Status and clinical and radiological predictive factors of presurgical anterior pituitary function in pituitary adenomas. Study of 232 patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the status of preoperative anterior pituitary function in patients undergoing pituitary adenoma (PA) resection and to identify factors associated with preoperative anterior pituitary dysfunction (APD).

METHODS

Patients with functioning and nonfunctioning PAs who underwent pituitary adenoma resection for first time, from January 2009 to December 2019 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Total sample included 232 patients; 123 (53.2%) females, mean age at diagnosis was 53.3 years. Sixty-three percent presented as nonfunctioning PAs and 37.1% as functioning PAs. Eighty-eight percent were macroadenomas and 34.9% had cavernous sinus invasion. APD was demonstrated in 36.2% (n = 84) of the patients. The FSH/LH deficit was the most frequent anterior pituitary deficit (31.9%); followed by ACTH (18.1%); TSH (16.4%) and GH (13.8%). We identified as independent risk factors of APD, male sex (OR = 6.1, 95% CI = 3.3-11.0); age (OR = 1.03 for each year, 95% CI = 1.01-1.04), diabetes mellitus (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.63-7.69), pituitary apoplexy presentation (OR = 4.3, 95% CI = 1.3-14.5) and tumor size (OR = 1.06 for each mm, 95% CI = 1.04-1.09). Nonfunctioning PAs (NFPA) had higher risk of APD than functioning PAs (FPA) (OR = 2.8 (95% CI = 1.5-5.0), but these differences disappeared after adjusted by tumor size (OR adjusted by tumor size = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.9-3.3). The tumor size with the highest diagnostic accuracy to predict hypopituitarism was 22 mm (sensitivity of 61.9% and specificity of 70.1%).

CONCLUSION

More than one third of PAs candidates for surgery had APD. The male sex, diabetes, an older age, pituitary apoplexy, and larger PAs were risk factors of APD. Hence, in these patients, the hormonal study should be prioritized and the need for dynamic tests must be carefully assessed.

Treatment of primary hyperaldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism is associated with higher cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality than essential hypertension in age- and sex-matched patients with the same degree of blood pressure elevation. Therefore, it is essential to establish a specific treatment to avoid the deleterious effects of aldosterone excess. Although adrenalectomy is generally considered the treatment of choice in cases of primary aldosteronism due to unilateral disease, several aspects and circumstances should be taken into account that may make medical treatment more appropriate. Among them, in this review we mention the limited experience and efficacy, and the potential risks of adrenal vein sampling; the risks and low efficacy of adrenalectomy; the high safety and efficacy of medical treatment and some special situations such as primary aldosteronism during pregnancy, in patients of advanced age or hereditary forms of primary aldosteronism, in which medical treatment is considered especially indicated as the first line therapy. The main studies comparing medical and surgical treatment in primary aldosteronism are also discussed.

Postoperative management of patients with pituitary tumors submitted to pituitary surgery. Experience of a Spanish Pituitary Tumor Center of Excellence

There is a lack of evidence on timing, frequency, and duration of postoperative endocrine, radiologic, and ophthalmologic assessments that should be performed after pituitary surgery (PS). However, it is known that careful optimization of treatment and follow-up strategies as well as a multidisciplinary approach may have a significant impact on long-term outcomes, improving surgical results, minimize complications and facilitate their correct treatment if occurring, and optimize the hormonal, ophthalmological, and radiological reassessment throughout the follow-up. Considering that there are no specific guidelines on the postoperative management of patients with pituitary tumors (PT), we present our protocol for the postoperative management of patients with PT. It has been elaborated by the multidisciplinary team of a Spanish Pituitary Tumor Center of Excellence (PTCE) that includes at least one neurosurgeon, ENT, neuroradiologist, neuro-ophthalmologist, endocrine pathologist and endocrinologist specialized in pituitary diseases. We elaborated this guideline with the aim of sharing our experience with other centers involved in the management of PT thereby facilitating the postoperative management of patients submitted to PS.

Pituitary tumors: epidemiology and clinical presentation spectrum

Pituitary tumors (PTs) are a heterogeneous group of lesions of the central nervous system that are usually benign. Most of them occur sporadically, but 5% can do so within family syndromes, usually at a young age. There are differences by sex, age, race, and genetic factors in the prevalence of different tumor cell types and clinical presentation. Functioning-PTs (FPTs) are usually diagnosed earlier than non-functioning PTs (NFPTs). However, this depends on the PT type. Headaches and visual disturbances are the most frequent mass-effect symptoms, but seizures or hydrocephalus may also occur. Pituitary apoplexy is another possible mode of presentation, and it requires special attention because of its potential severity. PTs in pregnancy, childhood, and old age present a series of clinical peculiarities that must be taken into account when evaluating these patients. Ectopic PTs (EPTs) are uncommon and share the same clinical-epidemiological data as eutopic PTs, but, depending on their location, other types of clinical manifestations may appear. Silent PTs are often detected as an incidentaloma or due to neurologic symptoms related to mass-effect. Aggressive PTs and pituitary carcinomas (PCs), which are very rare, are characterized by multiple local recurrences and metastases, respectively. This review addresses the epidemiology and clinical presentation of PTs, from the classical hormonal and mass-effect symptoms to the different rare presentations, such as pituitary apoplexy, hydrocephalus, or diabetes insipidus. Moreover, special situations of the presentation of PTs are discussed, namely, PTs in pregnancy, childhood, and the elderly, EPTs, silent and aggressive PTs, and PCs.

Cardiometabolic profile of non-functioning and autonomous cortisol-secreting adrenal incidentalomas. Is the cardiometabolic risk similar or are there differences?

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences in the cardiometabolic profile between patients with non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas (NFAI) and incidentalomas with autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS).

METHODS

A total of 149 patients with adrenal incidentalomas were retrospectively evaluated and followed-up for a mean time of 34.6 months at Departments of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases Units of four tertiary Spanish hospitals. Patients were grouped as NFAI or ACS adenomas based on two cutoffs in the dexamethasone suppression test (DST): 3.0 µg/dl (NFAI_DST3 or ACS_DST3) and 1.8 µg/dl (ACS_DST1.8 and NFAI_DST1.8).

RESULTS

The mean age of both groups was 62.0 (10.31) and was similar in ACS and NFAI. The prevalence of diabetes, high blood pressure, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease was higher in ACS than in NFAI, but differences only reached statistical significance for cerebrovascular disease using the 3.0 µg/dl cutoff (15.8% vs 2.3%, p = 0.01) and for diabetes using the 1.8 µg/dl cutoff (38.0% vs 22.0%, p = 0.04). No differences were found in the prevalence of dyslipidemia. The prevalence of obesity was lower in patients with ACS than in NFAI 26.3% vs 39.2%, p = 0.18 (NFAI_DST3 vs ACS_DST3) and 32.1% vs 40.6%, p = 0.56 (ACS_DST1.8 vs NFAI_DST1.8), but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Maximum adenoma diameter (R-squared = 0.15, p < 0.001) and cerebrovascular disease (OR = 1.59, p = 0.04) were the only parameters that could be predicted by the DST. The DST was an inadequate predictor of clinical (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index), hormonal (DHEAS, ACTH, UFC, and basal serum cortisol), biochemical (glucose, cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglycerides), and other radiological (laterality, lipid content) parameters. Throughout the follow-up, patients did not develop overt Cushing's Syndrome; three NFAI_DST3 developed ACS_DST3, eight NFAI_DST1.8 developed ACS_DST1.8, and one NFAI_DST1.8 progressed to ACS_DST3. In both groups (NFAI and ACS) the metabolic profile remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest higher prevalence of diabetes and cerebrovascular disease in ACS patients compared with NFAI. However, probably because of the small sample size, the differences only reached statistical significance using the cutoffs of 1.8 µg/dl for diabetes and 3.0 µg/dl for cerebrovascular disease. Patients with ACS and NFAI rarely progress to more aggressive forms of hypercortisolism, and the metabolic profile usually remains stable during the follow-up.

Autonomous cortisol secretion in adrenal incidentalomas

Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are one of the most frequent reasons for consultation in Endocrinology, as they are present in 3-10% of the general population. Up to 20% of them may have autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS), a term that refers to AI carriers with biochemical evidence of excess cortisol, but without the "specific" clinical signs of Cushing's syndrome. As ACS is associated with an increased risk of diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure (HBP), osteoporosis, cardiovascular events, and global mortality; its correct identification is of great importance. There are different laboratory assays to detect ACS, but all of them have some limitations. The dexamethasone suppression test is the most accepted for screening. However, there is no consensus on the cutoff point that should be used. Low levels of ACTH and DHEA-S and high urinary free cortisol are also associated with ACS, but in isolation they are of little value to establish the diagnosis. Considering its clinical implications and the lack of consensus in the diagnosis and in which is the most appropriate management of these patients, this review offers a quick reference guide of ACS, presenting an exhaustive review of the topic: its definition, epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical implications, treatment, and follow-up.