Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel ruxolitinib and baricitinib analogues for potential use against COVID-19

The coronavirus pandemic known as COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, threatens public health worldwide. Approval of COVID-19 vaccines and antiviral drugs have greatly reduced the severe cases and mortality rate. However, the continuous mutations of viruses are challenging the efficacies of vaccines and antiviral drugs. A drug repurposing campaign has identified two JAK1/2 inhibitors ruxolitinib and baricitinib as potential antiviral drugs. Ruxolitinib and baricitinib exert dual antiviral effect by modulation of inflammatory response via JAK1/2 and inhibition of viral entry via AAK1 and GAK. Inspired by this, in an effort to diversify chemical space, three analogues ((R)-8, (S)-8, and 9) of ruxolitinib and baricitinb were made using a scaffold hopping strategy. Compound 9 displayed potent and comparable potencies against AAK1, JAK1, and JAK2 compared to baricitinib. Notably, compound 9 showed better selectivity for AAK1, JAK1, and JAK2 over GAK. Besides, compound 9 displayed good druglikeness according to Lipinski's and Veber's rule. We thereby identified a potential lead compound 9, which might be used for the further development of anti-coronaviral therapy.

The use of Janus kinase inhibitors and narrowband ultraviolet B combination therapy in non-segmental vitiligo

Vitiligo is a depigmentation disorder of the skin that occurs secondary to the destruction of melanocytes by an immune-mediated process. Vitiligo clinically presents with depigmented macules and patches, most commonly on the face, acral sites, and genitalia. It can be characterized as generalized or localized based on distribution. The localized form can be further divided into segmental (linear, band-like, or Blaschkoid) and non-segmental vitiligo. The classical treatment of vitiligo includes topical steroids, pulsed oral steroids in unstable vitiligo, phototherapy, a combination of steroid therapy and phototherapy, surgical grafting, as well as intentional depigmentation therapy in severe cases. However, recent advances in understanding the immune mechanisms implicated in the pathogenesis of vitiligo have led to the use of an FDA-approved topical Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for vitiligo. Despite this novel therapy advancement, we recommend the addition of narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) to JAK inhibitors in patients with extensive and progressive lesions, or those not fully responsive to JAK inhibitor monotherapy.

Addition of ruxolitinib in Graft-versus-Host disease prophylaxis for pediatric β-Thalassemia major patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of addition of ruxolitinib in Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) prophylaxis on pediatric patients with β-thalassemia major after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT).

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 49 consecutive β-thalassemia major pediatric patients who underwent HSCT from unrelated or haploidentical donors from February 2018 to October 2022. All transplantation recipients received cyclosporine A (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term methotrexate (MTX) as GVHD prophylaxis; while 27 of them in the ruxolitinib group had added ruxolitinib oral to GVHD prophylaxis regimen at 2.5 mg twice daily once successful engraftment after January 2020.

RESULTS

The outcome showed that the ruxolitinib group had a lower cumulative incidence than the control group regardless of acute GVHD (22.2% vs.40.9%; p = .153) or chronic GVHD (18.5% vs.40.9%; p = .072); especially, the incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD was reported significantly less frequently in ruxolitinib group than that of the control group (0 vs. 27.3%, p = .005). No significant difference was detected between the two groups in EBV (Epstein-Barr virus)/CMV (cytomegalovirus) reactivation and BKV (BK virus) infection (p = .703, 1.000, and .436, respectively). Twenty-six patients (96.3%) in the ruxolitinib group were alive, while two patients (9.1%) in the control group died of intestinal acute GVHD. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) were both 96.296% in the ruxolitinib group, while both 90.909% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that ruxolitinib prophylaxis is a promising option to decrease the incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD in pediatric patients with β-thalassemia major.

Use of Janus kinase inhibitors in dermatomyositis: a systematic literature review

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy that commonly manifests with proximal muscle weakness and is associated with extramuscular pathology, including characteristic skin lesions such as Gottron's papules and heliotrope rash, as well as lung, gastrointestinal, joint, and cardiac involvement. Systemic corticosteroids are a cornerstone of therapy, and more recently intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; OCTAGAM®) has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with DM. Both steroids and IVIG represent nonspecific anti-inflammatory therapy, and more targeted approaches are lacking. Transcriptomics has identified upregulation of interferon (IFN)-regulated genes as key features of both adult DM and juvenile DM (JDM). Accordingly, blocking IFN signalling through inhibition of the Janus kinase (JAK) pathway represents a potential treatment option for DM. Placebo-controlled trial data assessing the use of JAK inhibitors for the treatment of DM are limited; as such, a systematic literature review was undertaken to assess the evidence of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of patients with DM. Terms related to DM and JAK inhibitors were searched using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions to identify peer-reviewed publications reporting patients with DM who were treated with a JAK inhibitor. Baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcome data were extracted. A total of 48 publications reporting 145 unique patients (adult DM, n=84; JDM, n=61) were identified. Among cases of adult DM, 61 of 84 (73%) had refractory skin disease at baseline, and all (61 of 61) reported improvement in cutaneous symptoms. Of patients with adult DM, 16 of 84 (19%) had refractory muscle disease at baseline, and all (16 of 16) reported improvement in muscle symptoms. In patients with adult DM complicated by interstitial lung disease (ILD; n=33), 31 (94%) patients improved with JAK inhibitor treatment. Among cases of JDM with refractory skin disease at baseline (60 of 61), most patients (57 of 60; 95%) showed improvements in skin symptoms after JAK inhibitor treatment. Of patients with JDM with refractory muscle disease at baseline (36 of 61), most (30 of 36; 83%) reported improvement in muscle symptoms. Four patients with JDM and ILD experienced improvement in lung disease activity following treatment with a JAK inhibitor. Among both DM and JDM cases, all patients (17 with DM and 16 with JDM) who had elevated serum IFN and/or IFN-stimulated gene expression at baseline showed reduction in IFN or IFN gene expression. Although the conclusions that can be drawn from this analysis are limited because of the differences in assessments used across publications, overall treatment of patients with DM or JDM with a JAK inhibitor was associated with significant improvement of a wide range of DM manifestations, including skin lesions, muscle weakness, and ILD. Our systematic literature review suggests that JAK inhibitors may be a viable treatment option for DM/JDM, and randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Although Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy for treating autoimmune disorders and myeloproliferative neoplasms, their efficacy in treating other types of cancer has not been clearly demonstrated. We evaluated oral ruxolitinib (15 mg twice daily) with oral methylprednisolone (40 mg every other day) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients with progressive disease who had received a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, glucocorticosteroids and three or more prior regimens. All of the planned 29 patients had been enrolled with follow-up until 28 April 2022. Median lines of prior therapy were 6 (range 3-12). Cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization were evaluable in 28 patients; 9 (32%) and 17 (70%) patients showed high-risk cytogenetics and/or 1q+, respectively. The overall response rate was 31%. The median duration of response was 13.1 (range 2.8-22.0) months. Median progression-free survival rate was 3.4 (range 0.5-24.6) months, Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The combination of ruxolitinib and methylprednisolone demonstrated significant clinical activity among previously heavily-treated MM patients, and responses were achieved among patients who had high-risk cytogenetics. This is the first clinical study to show activity of JAK inhibitors in combination with steroids for MM patients and expands the potential use of these drugs to those with cancers other than myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Early intervention in myelofibrosis and impact on outcomes: A pooled analysis of the COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II studies

BACKGROUND

In a pooled analysis of the phase 3 Controlled Myelofibrosis Study With Oral JAK Inhibitor Treatment I (COMFORT-I) and COMFORT-II clinical trials, adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis who received oral ruxolitinib at randomization or after crossover from placebo or best available therapy (BAT) had improved overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of pooled COMFORT data examined relevant disease outcomes based on the disease duration (≤12 or >12 months from diagnosis) before ruxolitinib initiation.

RESULTS

The analysis included 525 patients (ruxolitinib: ≤12 months, n = 84; >12 months, n = 216; placebo/BAT: ≤12 months, n = 66; >12 months, n = 159); the median age was 65.0-70.0 years. Fewer thrombocytopenia and anemia events were observed among patients who initiated ruxolitinib treatment earlier. At Weeks 24 and 48, the spleen volume response (SVR) was higher for patients who initiated ruxolitinib earlier (47.6% vs. 32.9% at Week 24, p = .0610; 44.0% vs. 26.9% at Week 48, p = .0149). In a multivariable analysis of factors associated with spleen volume reduction, a logistic regression model that controlled for confounding factors found that a significantly greater binary reduction was observed among patients with shorter versus longer disease duration (p = .022). At Week 240, OS was significantly improved among patients who initiated ruxolitinib earlier (63% [95% CI, 51%-73%] vs. 57% [95% CI, 49%-64%]; hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.01-2.31; p = .0430). Regardless of disease duration, a longer OS was observed for patients who received ruxolitinib versus those who received placebo/BAT.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that earlier ruxolitinib initiation for adult patients with intermediate-2 and high-risk myelofibrosis may improve clinical outcomes, including fewer cytopenia events, durable SVR, and prolonged OS.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Patients with myelofibrosis, a bone marrow cancer, often do not live as long as the general population. These patients may also have an enlarged spleen and difficult symptoms such as fatigue. Two large clinical trials showed that patients treated with the drug ruxolitinib lived longer and had improved symptoms compared to those treated with placebo or other standard treatments. Here it was examined whether starting treatment with ruxolitinib earlier (i.e., within a year of diagnosis) provided benefits versus delaying treatment. Patients who received ruxolitinib within a year of diagnosis lived longer and experienced fewer disease symptoms than those whose treatment was delayed.

Characterizing the Bone Marrow Environment in Advanced-Stage Myelofibrosis during Ruxolitinib Treatment Using PET/CT and MRI: A Pilot Study

Current diagnostic criteria for myelofibrosis are largely based on bone marrow (BM) biopsy results. However, these have several limitations, including sampling errors. Explorative studies have indicated that imaging might form an alternative for the evaluation of disease activity, but the heterogeneity in BM abnormalities complicates the choice for the optimal technique. In our prospective diagnostic pilot study, we aimed to visualize all BM abnormalities in myelofibrosis before and during ruxolitinib treatment using both PET/CT and MRI. A random sample of patients was scheduled for examinations at baseline and after 6 and 18 months of treatment, including clinical and laboratory examinations, BM biopsies, MRI (T1-weighted, Dixon, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)) and PET/CT ([¹⁵O]water, [¹⁸F]NaF)). At baseline, all patients showed low BM fat content (indicated by T1-weighted MRI and Dixon), increased BM blood flow (as measured by [¹⁵O]water PET/CT), and increased osteoblastic activity (reflected by increased skeletal [¹⁸F]NaF uptake). One patient died after the baseline evaluation. In the others, BM fat content increased to various degrees during treatment. Normalization of BM blood flow (as reflected by [¹⁵O]water PET/CT and DCE-MRI) occurred in one patient, who also showed the fastest clinical response. Vertebral [¹⁸F]NaF uptake remained stable in all patients. In evaluable cases, histopathological parameters were not accurately reflected by imaging results. A case of sampling error was suspected. We conclude that imaging results can provide information on functional processes and disease distribution throughout the BM. Differences in early treatment responses were especially reflected by T1-weighted MRI. Limitations in the gold standard hampered the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

Ruxolitinib-Loaded Imprinted Polymeric Drug Reservoir for the Local Management of Post-Surgical Residual Glioblastoma Cells

(1) Background: The current limitations of glioblastoma (GBM) chemotherapy were addressed by developing a molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP)-based drug reservoir designed for the localized and sustained release of ruxolitinib (RUX) within the tumor post-resection cavity, targeting residual infiltrative cancerous cells, with minimum toxic effects toward normal tissue. (2) Methods: MIP reservoirs were synthesized by precipitation polymerization using acrylamide, trifluoromethacrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and styrene as monomers. Drug release profiles were evaluated by real-time and accelerated release studies in phosphate-buffered solution as a release medium. The cytotoxicity of polymers and free monomers was evaluated in vitro on GBM C6 cells using the Alamar Blue assay, optical microscopy, and CCK8 cell viability assay. (3) Results: Among the four synthesized MIPs, trifluoromethacrylic acid-based polymer (MIP 2) was superior in terms of loading capacity (69.9 μg RUX/mg MIP), drug release, and efficacy on GBM cells. Accelerated drug release studies showed that, after 96 h, MIP 2 released 42% of the loaded drug at pH = 7.4, with its kinetics fitted to the Korsmeyer-Peppas model. The cell viability assay proved that all studied imprinted polymers provided high efficacy on GBM cells. (4) Conclusions: Four different drug-loaded MIPs were developed and characterized within this study, with the purpose of obtaining a drug delivery system (DDS) embedded in a fibrin-based hydrogel for the local, post-surgical administration of RUX in GBM in animal models. MIP 2 emerged as superior to the others, making it more suitable and promising for further in vivo testing.

Topical and systemic JAK inhibitors in hand eczema - a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Hand eczema is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by significant prevalence and impact on patients' Quality of Life (QoL). Because of its complex and diverse clinical picture, HE management requires patient-specific treatment which may constitute a challenge. First described in the 1990s, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK inhibitors) state a group of modern therapeuticals, which exhibit good bioavailability and are well tolerated by patients in both - topical and systemic - routes of administration. They are an immunomodulating small molecules, impacting JAKs' enzymatic activity.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a summary of available data concerning JAK inhibitors' use in HE patients, regarding also clinical trials for the HE treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent studies are introducing JAK inhibitors as an alternative for other topical and systemic therapies in HE patients. Treatment targeting specific immune pathways enables precise management and extends range of potential therapeutic options. Despite early promising results, future studies need to evaluate JAK inhibitors' safety, potential risks and benefits resulting from the treatment, as well as impact of the therapy on patients' QoL.

Trend of circulating CD34+ cells in patients with myelofibrosis: Association with spleen response during ruxolitinib treatment

We evaluated CD34⁺ cells in a single-centre series of 49 consecutive patients with myelofibrosis (MF) at baseline and during ruxolitinib therapy and examined any association with spleen response. The median (range) absolute number of circulating CD34⁺ cells was 0.0835 (0.001-1.528) × 10⁹ /L at diagnosis, and 0.123 (0.002-1.528) × 10⁹ /L at ruxolitinib start. With the exception of a transient increase after 3 months of ruxolitinib therapy, a progressive reduction in CD34⁺ cells count was documented, down to a minimum of 0.063 × 10⁹ /L after 36 months. We then assessed the association between spleen diameter expressed as the distance from the left costal margin (outcome) and log(CD34⁺ ) cells count using random-intercept and random slope multivariable regression models to take into account within subject correlation: after adjusting for time and ruxolitinib dosage, we estimated a 0.7 cm increase (95% confidence interval 0.2-1.2, p = 0.003) in spleen length for each unit increase in log(CD34⁺ ) cells count (× 10⁹ /L). Although our study has some limitations, mainly related to its retrospective design, our approach may introduce a reproducible and simple tool that could facilitate the assessment of spleen response more objectively in patients with MF treated with ruxolitinib.

Ruxolitinib Alleviates Inflammation, Apoptosis, and Intestinal Barrier Leakage in Ulcerative Colitis via STAT3

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disorder of the colonic mucosa with increasing prevalence and limited management. Ruxolitinib is a new anti- JAK/STAT3 biologic agent that has shown potential in protecting against colitis.

METHODS

We first constructed an in vivo UC model and an in vitro colonic epithelial cell inflammation model. Ruxolitinib was administered via gavage in mice. After treatment, colon tissues, cells, and cell lysates were collected and prepared for histological evaluation, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence staining, quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP nick end labeling staining, and cytokine analysis. STAT3 expression was silenced and overexpressed via small interfering RNA and overexpression plasmid transfection, respectively, and quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was used to examine the downstream effects.

RESULTS

Ruxolitinib administration significantly alleviated colitis both in vivo and in vitro, as manifested by reduced body weight loss, shortened colon lengths, relieved disease activity (measured by the disease activity index), and prolonged survival. A mechanistic study showed that ruxolitinib attenuated nuclear factor kappa B-induced inflammation, reduced apoptosis, and ameliorated epithelial barrier leakage, and thereby reduced colitis activity in vivo. STAT3 knockdown partially reversed the protective effect of ruxolitinib against colitis, while STAT3 overexpression exaggerated the reductions in proinflammatory cytokine levels upon ruxolitinib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that ruxolitinib alleviates colitis by inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B-related inflammation and apoptosis in addition to restoring epithelial barrier function via STAT3, providing a new strategy for UC treatment.

Assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis patients in a real-life setting: An Italian MYNERVA Project

BACKGROUND

Incorporating real-world data in the drug development process allows the improvement of health outcomes by providing better representation of actual patterns of drug safety and efficacy.

AIMS AND METHODS

Here, we present the results of a retroprospective, observational real-life study of 154 patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib in a real-life setting in seven Italian centers of the MYNERVA project.

RESULTS

Median drug exposure was 29 (range, 3-98) months. Discontinuation rate was 27% after a median time of 13 (range, 3-61). While hematological toxicities were in line with previous findings, infections occurred frequently, representing a not negligible cause of discontinuation and death. Anemia, symptoms, and spleen responses were obtained at any time in 23%, 91%, and 68% of patients, respectively; most patients achieved their responses by week 24. Larger splenomegaly and delayed treatment initiation correlated with lower spleen response at 24 weeks. Spleen response was associated with a superior overall survival, regardless of DIPSS. Of interest, both achievement and loss of spleen response had prognostic implications.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Overall, our findings provide insights on the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in a real-world, multicenter cohort of Italian MF patients.

Insights from a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm with coexisting BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, CALR, and TET2 mutations treated with nilotinib and ruxolitinib

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) with concurrent BCR-ABL1 fusion gene and CALR mutation are especially rare. We report a patient with coexisting BCR-ABL1 fusion gene, CALR, and TET2 mutations who was treated with the combination of the second-generation TKI nilotinib and JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib.

Leishmania Infection during Ruxolitinib Treatment: The Cytokines-Based Immune Response in the Setting of Immunocompromised Patients

Ruxolitinib is a JAK1/2 inhibitor that has revolutionized the approach to myelofibrosis. On the one side, this drug can rapidly improve the symptoms related to the hematological disease; on the other side, the inhibition of JAK1/2 can lead to immunosuppression which may increase the risk of infections, due to a change in the cytokine balance in favor of anti-inflammatory cytokines, to direct inhibition of immune cells, and to the suppression in the production of specific antibodies. In this patient setting, much is known about possible viral and bacterial infections, while little is reported in the literature concerning parasitic infections, specifically leishmaniasis. Leishmania is a parasitic infection that can cause serious problems in immunosuppressed patients. The parasite can invade the bloodstream and cause a wide range of symptoms, including fever, weight loss, and anemia. In severe cases, it can lead to multi-organ failure and, rapidly, death. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential especially for these patients, unable to respond adequately. In this case and the following review of the existing literature, the cytokine kinetics and the production of specific anti-Leishmania antibodies represent characteristic aspects capable of providing a more in-depth understanding of the mechanisms underlying these complex clinical cases in an immunocompromised patient.

Ruxolitinib does not completely abrogate the functional capabilities of TLR4/9 ligand-activated NK cells

Introduction

Natural killer (NK) cells are lymphocytes from the innate immune system part of the first defense barrier against infected and transformed cells, representing 5%-15% of peripheral blood lymphocytes. The cytotoxic capacity of NK cells is controlled by a balance between inhibitory and activating NK receptors expressed on their surface, which recognize and interact with the ligands on stressed cells. The cytokines involved in NK cell activation, proliferation, survival, and cytotoxicity are signaled mainly through the Janus kinase and signal transducer and activator of transcription proteins (JAK/STAT) pathway. NK cells are also activated in response to pathogens through Toll-like receptors (TLRs) expressed on their surface. Ruxolitinib is a specific JAK1/2 inhibitor approved for treating myelofibrosis and for steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-GvHD).

Methods

Purified NK cells from healthy donors were stimulated with two TOLL-like receptor ligands, LPS and CpG, in the presence of different concentrations of Ruxolitinib.

Results

This study showed the effects of ruxolitinib on TLR4 and TLR9 ligand-activated NK cells from healthy donors. Ruxolitinib did not completely inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation and had a moderate effect on NK cell cytokine activation via the TLR pathway. Only the highest doses of ruxolitinib led to a decrease in the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor α, interferon-γ, interleukin-6, and interleukin-1β. The cytotoxic capacity of stimulated NK cells versus K562, SEM, and MV-4-11 cell lines was reduced by increasing doses of ruxolitinib, but it was not completely abolished and we observed no major changes in degranulation capacity. Phenotypic changes were observed in activated NK cells in the presence of ruxolitinib. In a small cohort of pediatric patients treated with ruxolitinib for SR-GvHD, we observed no decrease in NK cell counts; however, further prospective studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm this finding.

Discussion

In summary, our results showed that the functional capabilities and phenotype of NK cells activated through TLR4/9 agonists were not completely abolished by the inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway by ruxolitinib.

A case of pachydermaperiostosis with myelofibrosis and treatment with ruxolitinib

Pachydermaperiostosis (PDP) is a rare condition of connective tissue presenting with abnormal skin and skeletal findings that usually occur as a complication of an underlying disease, especially malignancies. We described a case of a patient with severe transfusion-dependent anemia and both skin and joint findings, diagnosed as PDP. The haematological assessment revealed myelofibrosis as the underlying disease, and treatment with ruxolitinib as the first-line choice was given by skipping hydroxyurea due to pancytopenia. The patient got benefits in arthralgia and amelioration of pancytopenia and a reduced spleen volume was observed, despite the negative result for JAK2 gene mutation. This is the first case of ruxolitinib being used in PDP with myelofibrosis, and it highlights the importance of evaluating PDP as not just a skin and joint problem but a result of systemic disease and individual-based treatment.

Paradoxical activation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells by ruxolitinib in vitro and in vivo

Introduction

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by an aberrant cytokine network that can support tumor growth by triggering janus kinase (JAK)/STAT pathways. Targeting cytokine-signaling should then be a rational therapeutic strategy but the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib failed to control and seemingly accelerated the disease in clinical trials.

Methods

The effect of ruxolitinib on primary human CLL cells was studied in vitro and in vivo.

Results

Ruxolitinib increased phosphorylation of IRAK4, an important toll-like receptor (TLR)- signaling intermediate, in circulating CLL cells in vitro. It also enhanced p38 and NFKB1 phosphorylation while lowering STAT3 phosphorylation in CLL cells activated with TLR-7/8 agonists and IL-2. Among the cytokines made by activated CLL cells, high levels of IL-10 contributed strongly to STAT3 phosphorylation and inhibited TLR7 activity. Ruxolitinib limited TLR-mediated IL10 transcription and markedly reduced IL-10 production in vitro. It also decreased blood levels of IL-10 while increasing TNFα along with phospho-p38 expression and gene sets associated with TLR-activation in CLL cells in vivo. The bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib decreased IL-10 production in vitro but, in contrast to ruxolitinib, blocked initial IL10 transcription induced by TLR-signaling in vitro, decreased TNFα production, and deactivates CLL cells in vivo.

Discussion

These findings suggest the possible benefits of inhibiting growth factors with JAK inhibitors in CLL are outweighed by negative effects on potential tumor suppressors such as IL-10 that allow unrestrained activation of NFκB by drivers such as TLRs. Specific inhibition of growth-promoting cytokines with blocking antibodies or infusing suppressive cytokines like IL-10 might be better strategies to manipulate cytokines in CLL.

Randomized phase II clinical trial of ruxolitinib plus simvastatin in COVID19 clinical outcome and cytokine evolution

Background

Managing the inflammatory response to SARS-Cov-2 could prevent respiratory insufficiency. Cytokine profiles could identify cases at risk of severe disease.

Methods

We designed a randomized phase II clinical trial to determine whether the combination of ruxolitinib (5 mg twice a day for 7 days followed by 10 mg BID for 7 days) plus simvastatin (40 mg once a day for 14 days), could reduce the incidence of respiratory insufficiency in COVID-19. 48 cytokines were correlated with clinical outcome.

Participants

Patients admitted due to COVID-19 infection with mild disease.

Results

Up to 92 were included. Mean age was 64 ± 17, and 28 (30%) were female. 11 (22%) patients in the control arm and 6 (12%) in the experimental arm reached an OSCI grade of 5 or higher (p = 0.29). Unsupervised analysis of cytokines detected two clusters (CL-1 and CL-2). CL-1 presented a higher risk of clinical deterioration vs CL-2 (13 [33%] vs 2 [6%] cases, p = 0.009) and death (5 [11%] vs 0 cases, p = 0.059). Supervised Machine Learning (ML) analysis led to a model that predicted patient deterioration 48h before occurrence with a 85% accuracy.

Conclusions

Ruxolitinib plus simvastatin did not impact the outcome of COVID-19. Cytokine profiling identified patients at risk of severe COVID-19 and predicted clinical deterioration.

Trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04348695.

JAK inhibitors differentially modulate B cell activation, maturation and function: A comparative analysis of five JAK inhibitors in an in-vitro B cell differentiation model and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of several immune-mediated diseases (IMIDs) including rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis and are in clinical trials for numerous other IMIDs. However, detailed studies investigating the effects of different JAK inhibitors on B cells are missing. Within this study, we therefore aimed to characterize the effect of JAK inhibition on the B cell compartment.

Methods

To this end, we investigated the B cell compartment under JAK inhibition and compared the specific effects of the different JAK inhibitors tofacitinib (pan-JAK), baricitinib (JAK1/2), ruxolitinib (JAK1/2), upadacitinib (JAK1/2) as well as filgotinib (selective JAK1) on in-vitro B cell activation, proliferation, and class switch recombination and involved pathways.

Results

While B cell phenotyping of RA patients showed an increase in marginal zone (MZ) B cells under JAK inhibition, comparison with healthy donors revealed that the relative frequency of MZ B cells was still lower compared to healthy controls. In an in-vitro model of T-cell-independent B cell activation we observed that JAK1/2 and selective JAK1 inhibitor treatment led to a dose-dependent decrease of total B cell numbers. We detected an altered B cell differentiation with a significant increase in MZ-like B cells and an increase in plasmablast differentiation in the first days of culture, most pronounced with the pan-JAK inhibitor tofacitinib, although there was no increase in immunoglobulin secretion in-vitro. Notably, we further observed a profound reduction of switched memory B cell formation, especially with JAK1/2 inhibition. JAK inhibitor treatment led to a dose-dependent reduction of STAT3 expression and phosphorylation as well as STAT3 target gene expression and modulated the secretion of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by B cells.

Conclusion

JAK inhibition has a major effect on B cell activation and differentiation, with differential outcomes between JAK inhibitors hinting towards distinct and unique effects on B cell homeostasis.

Efficacy and safety of different JAK inhibitors in the treatment of alopecia areata: a network meta-analysis

Background

Alopecia areata (AA) is an immune disease characterized by non-scarring hair loss. With the widespread application of JAK inhibitors in immune-related diseases, attention is being given to their role in the treatment of AA. However, it is unclear which JAK inhibitors have a satisfactory or positive effect on AA. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different JAK inhibitors in the treatment of AA.

Methods

The network meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials as well as a small number of cohort studies. The differences in efficacy and safety between the treatment and control groups were compared.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials, two retrospective studies, and two prospective studies involving 1689 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. In terms of efficacy, oral baricitinib and ruxolitinib significantly improved the response rate of patients compared to placebo [MD = 8.44, 95% CI (3.63, 19.63)] and [MD = 6.94, 95% CI, (1.72, 28.05)],respectively. Oral baricitinib treatment significantly improved the response rate compared to non-oral JAK inhibitor treatment [MD=7.56, 95% CI (1.32,43.36)]. Oral baricitinib, tofacitinib, and ruxolitinib treatments significantly improved the complete response rate compared to placebo [MD = 12.21, 95% CI (3.41, 43.79)], [MD = 10.16, 95% CI (1.02, 101.54)], and [MD = 9.79, 95% CI, (1.29, 74.27)], respectively. In terms of safety, oral baricitinib, tofacitinib, and ruxolitinib treatments significantly reduced treatment-emergent adverse event rates compared with conventional steroid treatment [MD = 0.08, 95% CI (0.02, 0.42)], [MD = 0.14, 95% CI (0.04, 0.55)], and [MD = 0.35, 95% CI, (0.14, 0.88)], respectively.

Conclusion

Oral baricitinib and ruxolitinib are excellent options for the treatment of AA owing to their good efficacy and safety profiles. In contrast, non-oral JAK inhibitors do not appear to have satisfactory efficacy in treating AA. However, further studies are required to verify the optimal dose of JAK inhibitors for AA therapy.

Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Ph-neg chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: results from the EPICOVIDEHA registry

Background

Patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) typically incur high rates of infections and both drugs and comorbidities may modulate infection risk.

Objectives

The present study aims to assess the effect of immunosuppressive agents on clinical outcomes of MPN patients affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Design

This is an observational study.

Methods

We specifically searched and analyzed MPN patients collected by EPICOVIDEHA online registry, which includes individuals with hematological malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 since February 2020.

Results

Overall, 398 patients with MPN were observed for a median of 76 days [interquartile range (IQR): 19-197] after detection of SARS-CoV2 infection. Median age was 69 years (IQR: 58-77) and 183 individuals (46%) had myelofibrosis (MF). Overall, 121 patients (30%) of the whole cohort received immunosuppressive therapies including steroids, immunomodulatory drugs, or JAK inhibitors. Hospitalization and consecutive admission to intensive care unit was required in 216 (54%) and 53 patients (13%), respectively. Risk factors for hospital admission were identified by multivariable logistic regression and include exposure to immunosuppressive therapies [odds ratio (OR): 2.186; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.357-3.519], age ⩾70 years, and comorbidities. The fatality rate was 22% overall and the risk of death was independently increased by age ⩾70 years [hazard ratio (HR): 2.191; 95% CI: 1.363-3.521], previous comorbidities, and exposure to immunosuppressive therapies before the infection (HR: 2.143; 95% CI: 1.363-3.521).

Conclusion

COVID-19 infection led to a particularly dismal outcome in MPN patients receiving immunosuppressive agents or reporting multiple comorbidities. Therefore, specific preventive strategies need to be tailored for such individuals.

Plain language summary

EPICOVIDEHA registry reports inferior outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) incur high rates of infections during the course of their disease.The present study was aimed at assessing which patient characteristics predicted a worse outcome of SARS-COV-2 infection in individuals with MPN.To pursue this objective, the researchers analyzed the data collected by EPICOVIDEHA, an international online registry, which includes individuals with hematological malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 since February 2020.The database provided clinical data of 398 patients with MPN incurring COVID-19:Patients were mostly elderly (median age was 69 years);Forty-six percent of them were affected by myelofibrosis, which is the most severe MPN;Moreover, 32% were receiving immunosuppressive therapies (JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, steroids, or immunomodulatory IMID drugs, such as thalidomide) before COVID-19.Hospitalization was required in 54% of the patients, and the risk of being hospitalized for severe COVID-19 was independently predicted byOlder age;Comorbidities;Exposure to immunosuppressive therapies.Overall, 22% of MPN patients deceased soon after COVID-19 and the risk of death was independently increased over twofold byOlder age;Comorbidities;Exposure to immunosuppressive therapies before the infection.In conclusion, COVID-19 infection led to a particularly dismal outcome in MPN patients receiving immunosuppressive agents, including JAK inhibitors, or reporting multiple comorbidities. Therefore, specific preventive strategies need to be tailored for such individuals.

Case report: Ruxolitinib plus dexamethasone as first-line therapy in haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a cytokine-driven inflammatory syndrome caused by uncontrolled hypersecretion of inflammatory cytokines. Conventional first-line treatment for HLH included HLH-94 and HLH-2004 regimens. However, quite a few patients do not respond to treatment or cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. We reported two cases of HLH, one caused by natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma and another associated with missense variants in the perforin 1 gene. They both received the ruxolitinib plus dexamethasone protocol and had a rapid response to treatment without obvious adverse effects. Our report indicates that treatment with ruxolitinib plus dexamethasone might be a potential option for HLH, and clinical trials warrant further investigation. In addition, the detection of HLH-related genes is necessary for the identification of late-onset familial HLH in certain settings.