Asthma control during the year after bronchial thermoplasty

BACKGROUND

Bronchial thermoplasty is a bronchoscopic procedure to reduce the mass of airway smooth muscle and attenuate bronchoconstriction. We examined the effect of bronchial thermoplasty on the control of moderate or severe persistent asthma.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 112 subjects who had been treated with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (LABA) and in whom asthma control was impaired when the LABA were withdrawn to either bronchial thermoplasty or a control group. The primary outcome was the frequency of mild exacerbations, calculated during three scheduled 2-week periods of abstinence from LABA at 3, 6, and 12 months. Airflow, airway responsiveness, asthma symptoms, the number of symptom-free days, use of rescue medication, and scores on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) were also assessed.

RESULTS

The mean rate of mild exacerbations, as compared with baseline, was reduced in the bronchial-thermoplasty group but was unchanged in the control group (change in frequency per subject per week, -0.16+/-0.37 vs. 0.04+/-0.29; P=0.005). At 12 months, there were significantly greater improvements in the bronchial-thermoplasty group than in the control group in the morning peak expiratory flow (39.3+/-48.7 vs. 8.5+/-44.2 liters per minute), scores on the AQLQ (1.3+/-1.0 vs. 0.6+/-1.1) and ACQ (reduction, 1.2+/-1.0 vs. 0.5+/-1.0), the percentage of symptom-free days (40.6+/-39.7 vs. 17.0+/-37.9), and symptom scores (reduction, 1.9+/-2.1 vs. 0.7+/-2.5) while fewer puffs of rescue medication were required. Values for airway responsiveness and forced expiratory volume in 1 second did not differ significantly between the two groups. Adverse events immediately after treatment were more common in the bronchial-thermoplasty group than in the control group but were similar during the period from 6 weeks to 12 months after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchial thermoplasty in subjects with moderate or severe asthma results in an improvement in asthma control. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00214526 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Mucosal Tolerance to KLH Reduces BSA-Induced Arthritis in Rats—An Indication of Bystander Suppression

Mucosal tolerance has been shown to reduce disease severity in animal models mimicking human autoimmune diseases. The objective of this study was to examine whether mucosal tolerance against keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH) could be used to reduce bovine serum albumin (BSA)-induced arthritis in rats and whether anti-inflammatory drugs or passive cigarette smoke affected tolerance induction. Arthritis was induced by immunizing rats with BSA and then injecting BSA into one knee and saline into the other knee for comparison. Prior to BSA immunization, the rats were treated intranasally with KLH or saline and KLH then injected in the knee joints at the time of BSA injection, or the rats were treated with or without anti-inflammatory drugs or subjected to cigarette smoke prior to and during intranasal treatment with BSA. The rats that received intranasal treatment with KLH had a significantly less inflammation in their left knee joint compared to rats that received intranasal saline treatment. Beclamethasone increased the tolerance effect of BSA, whereas passive cigarette smoke abrogated the mucosal tolerance. This data suggests that bystander suppression can be used to treat arthritis and other autoimmune diseases, even when the autoantigen is not known.

Zileuton added to low-dose inhaled beclomethasone for the treatment of moderate to severe persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the therapeutic effects of oral zileuton tablets combined with low-dose beclomethasone compared to doubling the dose of beclomethasone, in improving lung function and reducing asthma symptoms.

METHODS

Randomized, active-control, double-blind, parallel, multi-center study of zileuton (400 or 600 mg QID)+200 microg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) BID versus placebo+BDP 400 microg BID in asthmatics with baseline FEV(1) percent predicted values between 40% and 80% following a single-blind ICS (BDP 200 microg BID) 2-week run-in. During the 3-month double-blind treatment period, assessments included safety, daytime and nighttime symptoms, acute asthma exacerbations, beta(2)-agonist use, AM and PM peak expiratory flow (PEF) and FEV(1).

RESULTS

The addition of a 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) inhibitor added to a low-dose of BDP showed no significant difference in FEV(1) compared to doubling the dose of BDP. FEV(1) improved in all 3 treatment groups, with mean increases of 10% with zileuton 600 mg QID+BDP 200 microg BID, 12% with zileuton 400mg QID+BDP 200 microg BID, and 11% with BDP 400 microg BID by study end. Within each treatment group, there were significant improvements in asthma symptoms and AM and PM PEF compared to baseline. No significant differences were observed between groups with regards to salbutamol use, acute asthma exacerbations, the requirement for oral/parenteral corticosteroids and adverse clinical events.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a 5-LO inhibitor added to low-dose beclomethasone may be an alternative to higher-doses of ICS in patients unable to achieve sufficient asthma control on low-dose ICS therapy.

The Predicting Response to Inhaled Corticosteroid Efficacy (PRICE) trial

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines recommend anti-inflammatory therapy for persistent asthma, recent studies suggest that 25% to 35% of patients with asthma may not improve lung function with inhaled corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate potential biomarkers of predicting short-term (6-week) response to inhaled corticosteroid with subsequent evaluation of responders and nonresponders to asthma control over a longer interval (16 additional weeks).

METHODS

Eighty-three subjects with asthma off steroid were enrolled in this multicenter study. Biomarkers and asthma characteristics were evaluated as predictors of inhaled corticosteroid response over a 6-week trial for changes in FEV(1) and methacholine PC(20). After this, an additional 4-month trial evaluated asthma control.

RESULTS

Although multiple baseline predictors had significant correlations with improvements for short-term inhaled steroid success, the only strong correlations (r >or= +/- 0.6) were albuterol reversibility (r = 0.83; P < .001), FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (r = -0.75; P < .001), and FEV(1) % predicted (r = -0.71; P < .001). Dividing the subjects in the short-term inhaled steroid trial into responders (>5% FEV(1) improvement) and nonresponders (<or=5%) determined the longer-term need for steroids. For the nonresponders, asthma control remained unchanged whether inhaled corticosteroids were continued or were substituted with a placebo (P = .99). The good short-term responders maintained asthma control longer-term only if maintained on inhaled steroids (P = .007).

CONCLUSION

The short-term response to inhaled corticosteroids with regard to FEV(1) improvement predicts long-term asthma control.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The decision to use long-term inhaled steroids could be based on a short-term trial. Different therapeutic strategies would need to be established for nonresponders.

Comparative efficacy of steroid nasal spray versus antihistamine nasal spray in allergic rhinitis

This prospective randomized case controlled study was conducted to determine the efficacy of antihistamine (azelastine) nasal spray and compare it to steroid (beclomethasone) nasal spray on the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Seventy five symptomatic patients of allergic rhinitis were included in this study. Diagnosis was made on the basis of history and physical examination. The patients were divided into three groups randomly. Group A was treated with Azelastine nasal spray, Group B was treated with Beclomethasone nasal spray and Group C was control group and only treated with steam inhalation. Efficacy of the treatment was assessed in the terms of Total Rhinitis Symptom Complex (TSC) scores and individual symptom score which was calculated on the basis of Okuda's grading system. Base line total symptom complex (TSC) scores were reduced in group A and group B by 84.0% after 4 week treatment whereas in group C it was reduced by only 38.0%. Decrease in mean score for sneezing was 95.0% in group A and group B whereas it was only 28.3% in group C. Similarly decrease in mean score for rhinorrhoea in azelastine group was 94.4% and in beclomethasone group was 95.3% in comparison to steam inhalation group where it was 25.0%. Only the beclomethasone reduced nasal stuffiness score significantly by 95.0%. No significant adverse effects of the drugs were observed. The present study establishes the relative efficacy and tolerability ofazelastine nasal spray as compared to beclomethasone nasal spray in symptomatic patients of allergic rhinitis.

Beclometasone oral--DOR BioPharma

orBec is an oral enteric-coated tablet formulation of the corticosteroid beclometasone, which has been developed by Enteron Pharmaceuticals, a subsidiary of Corporate Technology Development (now DOR BioPharma). orBec is being developed for the treatment of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and an NDA has been filed in the US. DOR BioPharma has also filed an MAA in Europe for the same indication.orBec is designed to reduce the need for systemic immunosuppressive drugs, thereby improving the outcome of bone marrow and stem cell transplantation.DOR BioPharma may seek a marketing partner in the US and elsewhere for orBec in GVHD and will seek a partner for other potential indications of the drug.In December 2001, Corporate Technology Development was acquired by Endorex Corporation (now DOR BioPharma). In October 1998, Enteron Pharmaceuticals (DOR BioPharma) entered into an exclusive, worldwide, royalty bearing license agreement with George B. McDonald, MD, including the right to grant sublicenses, for the rights to the intellectual property and know-how relating to orBec. In January 2007, DOR BioPharma received $US3 million under a non-binding letter of intent from Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals. The agreement grants Sigma-Tau an exclusive right to negotiate terms and conditions for a possible business transaction or strategic alliance regarding orBec and potentially other DOR pipeline compounds until 1 March 2007. Under the terms of the agreement, Sigma-Tau purchased $US1 million of DOR's common stock, with an additional $US2 million paid in cash. If no agreement is reached by 1 March 2007, DOR will return the $US2 million to Sigma-Tau within 60 days. DOR BioPharma received an unsolicited proposal from Cell Therapeutics, Inc. to acquire DOR BioPharma in January 2007. Because of the non-binding agreement already signed with Sigma-Tau, DOR BioPharma's board of directors cannot consider Cell Therapeutics' merger proposal at this time. orBec has been filed for approval in the US for the treatment of gastrointestinal GVHD. The US FDA accepted the NDA filing and has established a target date of 21 July 2007 for completion of review of the NDA. In November 2006, the EMEA determined that the MAA for orBec for the treatment of gastrointestinal GVHD is complete and that the review process has begun. The data provided in the MAA and NDA submissions demonstrate that orBec safely provides a lower risk of mortality compared with the current standard of care. Both filings are supported by data from two randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials. The first was a 129-patient pivotal phase III clinical trial for orBec conducted at 16 bone marrow/stem cell transplant centres in the US and France. The second trial was a 60-patient phase II clinical trial conducted at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre. In the primary endpoint of its pivotal trial, time to treatment failure through day 50, orBec failed to achieve statistical significance (p-value 0.1177). However, orBec did achieve statistical significance in the secondary endpoints of time to treatment failure through day 80, and a reduction in mortality compared with placebo. In this trial, patient survival at the prespecified endpoint of 200 days post-transplant showed a statistically significant 66% reduction in mortality among patients randomised to orBec. DOR BioPharma believes the primary endpoint was not achieved due to a higher than expected rate of treatment failures during the initial 10 days in both treatment groups. The mortality benefit in favour of orBec was confirmed in a retrospective analysis of the phase II study, in which there was a 55% reduction in mortality at 200 days post-transplant. At 1 year after randomisation, there were relatively consistent 51% and 45% reductions in the risk of mortality among patients randomised to orBec in both the phase III and phase II studies, respectively.DOR BioPharma is also conducting a phase II clinical trial to investigate orBec in the prevention of gastrointestinal GVHD. DOR BioPharma has executed an exclusive licence agreement with the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston for the use of oral luminally active anti-inflammatory drugs, such as orBec, for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome.

Prophylactic beclomethasone spray to the skin during postoperative radiotherapy of carcinoma breast: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Radiation induced wet desquamation of skin in carcinoma breast patients is a painful condition. In this study topical beclomethasone dipropionate spray was used as prophylaxis with the purpose of reducing risk of the wet desquamation of skin in irradiated field.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients of carcinoma breast were planned for postoperative loco regional radiotherapy (50 Gy in 25 fraction over five weeks) were prospectively randomized into two groups (1) steroid group-patients were advised to use beclomethasone dipropionate spray in irradiated axilla from day one of radiotherapy, (2) control group-patients were not allowed to use any topical agent in irradiated area. Radiation induced skin reaction was noted in terms of erythema, dry desquamation and wet desquamation weekly till end of prescribed 50 Gy dose of the radiation therapy.

STATISTICAL METHOD

Chi-square test was used to see the statistical significance of the difference in wet desquamation between two arms of the study. Chi-square value and P-value was calculated for the difference of wet desquamation in two study arms.

RESULT

In steroid group 4/30 (13.33%) patients developed wet desquamation of the axillary skin at the end of the radiotherapy. For the control group, this figure was 11/30 (36.66%). The difference in wet desquamation of the axillary skin in the two groups was statistically significant (P-value = 0.0369).

CONCLUSION

Topical steroid (beclomethasone dipropionate spray) for skin during radiotherapy significantly reduces the risk of wet desquamation of the skin.

Eosinophilic airway inflammation and exacerbations of COPD: a randomised controlled trial

Evidence suggests that eosinophilic airway inflammation is important in the pathogenesis of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. The present authors tested the hypothesis that a management strategy that aims to reduce sputum eosinophil counts is associated with a reduction in exacerbations of COPD. A total of 82 patients with COPD were randomised into two groups. One group was treated according to traditional guidelines (British Thoracic Society (BTS) group) and the other (sputum group) was treated with the additional aim of minimising eosinophilic airway inflammation, assessed using the induced sputum eosinophil count. The primary outcome was exacerbations, which were categorised as mild, moderate or severe. The frequency of severe exacerbations per patient per year was 0.5 and 0.2 in the BTS and sputum groups, respectively (mean reduction 62%). The majority of this benefit was confined to patients with eosinophilic airway inflammation. There was no difference in the frequency of mild and moderate exacerbations. The average daily dose of inhaled or oral corticosteroids during the trial did not differ between the groups. Out of 42 patients in the sputum group, 17 required regular oral corticosteroids to minimise eosinophilic airway inflammation. A management strategy that aims to minimise eosinophilic airway inflammation, as well as symptoms, is associated with a reduction in severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Formoterol and beclomethasone dipropionate interact positively in antagonising bronchoconstriction and inflammation in the lung

These studies were designed to assess the pharmacodynamic interaction between formoterol and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in controlling the bronchoconstriction and inflammatory response induced by various challenges in guinea-pigs and rats. In anaesthetised guinea-pigs, superfusion of the formoterol/BDP combination into the tracheal lumen had significantly more effect than the single components in antagonising the bronchoconstricting and inflammatory responses to acetylcholine or ovalbumin in a standard model of airway hyper-responsiveness. After ovalbumin challenge, the combination completely protected animals from death at doses lower than those effective when given separately. The combination, at doses ineffective individually, even counteracted the development of lung oedema induced by sephadex in the rat. Finally, in tracheal strips from ovalbumin-sensitised guinea-pigs pre-treatment with BDP (30 mg kg(-1) i.m.) completely reversed the rightward shift of the formoterol dose-response curve due to beta(2)-receptor desensitisation. In conclusion, these results indicate that formoterol and BDP together induce a favourable pharmacodynamic interaction which can be considered more than additive, at least in these experimental settings.

Beclometasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol versus fluticasone propionate in children with asthma

Beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) extrafine is a hydrofluoroalkane-based, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free inhalation aerosol. This study was conducted to determine whether BDP extrafine and CFC-fluticasone proprionate (FP) aerosols were equivalent in terms of efficacy and tolerability in children with symptomatic mild-to-moderate asthma. Male and female patients (aged 5-12 yr) with an asthma diagnosis for > or =3 months, peak expiratory flow (PEF) > or =60% of predicted normal and suboptimal asthma control were randomised to double-blind treatment with BDP extrafine 200 microg day(-1) (n=139) or CFC-FP 200 microg day(-1) (n=141) for up to 18 weeks. After 6 and 12 weeks, study medication was 'stepped down' to 100 and 50 microg day(-1), respectively, if patients had achieved good asthma control. Patients with poor asthma control discontinued from the study and those with intermediate control continued in the study but did not undergo a dose reduction. The estimated treatment difference in morning PEF% predicted at 6 weeks was -1.9% (90% CI -4.9, 1.0). There was a trend towards a greater increase in forced vital capacity (% predicted) in the BDP extrafine group (5.3 versus 0.4%; p=0.084). A 'step-down' in therapy to 100 microg day(-1) was possible in 36% and 42% of patients in the BDP extrafine and CFC-FP groups, respectively, at 6 weeks. Both drugs were well tolerated. BDP extrafine and CFC-FP aerosols were equally effective at improving asthma control in children with mild-to-moderate asthma at the same daily dose.

Applicability of an ultrasonic nebulization system for the airways delivery of beclomethasone dipropionate in a murine model of asthma

PURPOSE

We have assessed the use of an ultrasonic nebulization system (UNS), composed of ultrasonic nebulizer and diffusion dryer filled with charcoal, for the effective delivery of beclomethasone to the airways in a murine asthma model.

METHODS

Solution of beclomethasone in ethanol was aerosolized using an ultrasonic nebulizer. Passage of the aerosol through a drying column containing charcoal and deionizer produced dry beclomethasone particles. Particles were delivered to BALB/c mice placed in a whole-body exposition chamber 1 h before intranasal challenge with ovalbumine. Efficacy of beclomethasone delivery was evaluated by examining bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cytology.

RESULTS

Effect of three UNS system parameters on aerosol particle size was investigated. The critical parameter affecting the size of dry particles was beclomethasone concentration in aerosolized solution and solution flow rate while power level of ultrasonic nebulizer generator had no effect. Administration of beclomethasone at calculated dose of 150 microg/kg to mice significantly decreased total cell number and relative eosinophil number in BALF.

CONCLUSIONS

The UNS system produces a monodisperse aerosol that can be used for inhalative delivery of poorly water soluble substances to experimental animals. The UNS system minimizes formulation requirements and allows rapid and relatively simple efficacy and toxicity testing in animals.

Smoking affects response to inhaled corticosteroids or leukotriene receptor antagonists in asthma

RATIONALE

One-quarter to one-third of individuals with asthma smoke, which may affect response to therapy and contribute to poor asthma control.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the response to an inhaled corticosteroid or a leukotriene receptor antagonist is attenuated in individuals with asthma who smoke.

METHODS

In a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, 44 nonsmokers and 39 light smokers with mild asthma were assigned randomly to treatment twice daily with inhaled beclomethasone and once daily with oral montelukast.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Primary outcome was change in prebronchodilator FEV(1) in smokers versus nonsmokers. Secondary outcomes included peak flow, PC(20) methacholine, symptoms, quality of life, and markers of airway inflammation. Despite similar FEV(1), bronchodilator response, and sensitivity to methacholine at baseline, subjects with asthma who smoked had significantly more symptoms, worse quality of life, and lower daily peak flow than nonsmokers. Adherence to therapy did not differ significantly between smokers and nonsmokers, or between treatment arms. Beclomethasone significantly reduced sputum eosinophils and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in both smokers and nonsmokers, but increased FEV(1) (170 ml, p = 0.0003) only in nonsmokers. Montelukast significantly increased a.m. peak flow in smokers (12.6 L/min, p = 0.002), but not in nonsmokers.

CONCLUSIONS

In subjects with mild asthma who smoke, the response to inhaled corticosteroids is attenuated, suggesting that adjustments to standard therapy may be required to attain asthma control. The greater improvement seen in some outcomes in smokers treated with montelukast suggests that leukotrienes may be important in this setting. Larger prospective studies are required to determine whether leukotriene modifiers can be recommended for managing asthma in patients who smoke.

Air trapping in mild and moderate asthma: effect of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Air trapping reflects small airway obstruction in asthma and can be assessed quantitatively by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) is deposited across all sizes of airways, including the small ones. However, its long-term effect on air trapping remains unknown in uncontrolled asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effect of inhaled corticosteroids of different particle size - HFA-BDP and fluticasone propionate (FP) - on lung attenuation in mild-to-moderate uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

A randomized study was performed to analyze the effect of HFA-BDP (400 microg/d) or FP (500 microg/d) given over a period of 3 months to patients with uncontrolled mild-to-moderate asthma. HRCT was performed with spirometric gating, and lung attenuation was measured at residual volume and at pulmonary total capacity. The difference between inspiratory and expiratory attenuation was calculated as an air trapping index.

RESULTS

Twenty-five out of 58 patients had abnormal air trapping and could be included in the study. Lung attenuation significantly diminished in the posterior zones of the lung after a 3-month treatment with HFA-BDP or FP, but the difference between the groups was not significant. Adjusted mean variations of the air trapping index from baseline to treatment completion were 34.3 (11.2, 57.3) and 27.3 (6.4, 48.2) for the HFA-BDP and FP groups, respectively. However, the reduction of air trapping area was more pronounced in the group treated with HFA-BDP.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled corticosteroids decrease air trapping in uncontrolled asthma regardless of their particle size.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In mild-to-moderate asthma, air trapping assessed by HRCT may be a new outcome related to the control of the disease.

Effects on resource utilization of adding salmeterol in combination or separately to inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

The addition of a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) to an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma improves outcomes such as pulmonary function, reduces exacerbations requiring oral steroids, and reduces use of rescue beta-agonists.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the key resource utilization outcomes of adding salmeterol, a LABA, to fluticasone, an ICS, either as a fixed-combination inhaler (fluticasone-salmeterol [FSA] or as a separate inhaler used concomitantly with the ICS beclomethasone (BSA).

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational database study that extracted data from electronic medical and prescription records in which the prescription written was identical to the prescription dispensed. The sample included asthmatic patients aged 12 to 55 years who received a medium dose of an ICS (240-480 mcg of beclomethasone, 264-660 mcg of fluticasone, 600-1,200 mcg of budesonide, or 1,000-2,000 mcg of triamcinolone acetonide) between July 2001 and December 2002 and had salmeterol added to the regimen (index date). From this population of patients, the analytical cohort was derived to include 1,213 patients who received FSA and a matched cohort of 1,213 patients who received BSA. The primary endpoint was an asthma-related event (ARE), which was defined as (1) an emergency department (ED) visit or (2) hospital admission with a primary asthma diagnosis code (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] code 493.xx). The secondary endpoints were the (1) use of short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) equivalents, (2) percentage of patients who received 1 or more oral steroid prescriptions, (3) patterns of ICS use, and (4) refill rates of salmeterol. All data were collected for 6 months before and 6 months after the index date, defined as the first prescription dispensed to the patient that included salmeterol as an ingredient.

RESULTS

Outcomes were improved in both cohorts with no significant difference in the likelihood of an ARE, 60 patients (4.9%) for FSA and 90 patients (8.1%) for BSA (odds ratio [OR], 0.668; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.443-1.008); P=0.055). FSA was associated with a reduction in AREs of 55% (10.9%-4.9%; P <0.001), and BSA with a reduction in AREs of 39% (13.3%-8.1%; P <0.001). FSA compared with BSA was associated with a greater reduction in SABA use (-0.66 canister equivalents over 6 months, P <0.001) and a lower likelihood of filling an oral steroid prescription, 35.8% of FSA patients compared with 38.0% of BSA patients (OR, 0.801; 95% CI, 0.662-0.970; P=0.023). For the 132 FSA patients (10.9%) and 162 BSA patients (13.4%) who had an ARE in the preperiod, those who received FSA in the postperiod had a 47% lower likelihood of a subsequent ARE, 17.4% of 132 patients compared with 27.8% of 162 BSA patients (OR, 0.527; 95% CI, 0.291-0.954; P=0.034). No ARE differences in subgroup analyses were noted for patients without an ARE in the preperiod or for patients using more than 6 canisters of SABA. More patients in the FSA group took daily doses of 400 mcg or more of ICS than those in the BSA group (32.0% compared with 10.0%, P <0.001). The average refill rate for salmeterol was 2.71 prescriptions (SD=1.42) over 6 months for FSA compared with 2.38 (SD=1.49) for BSA (P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the addition of salmeterol as a fixed combination with fluticasone or with beclomethasone as separate inhalers was associated with a reduction in the ARE rate. Patients who received FSA were more likely to be exposed to a higher dose of ICS compared with those who received BSA. Differences in resource utilization may be attributed to how these drugs are prescribed and taken by patients in a real-practice (naturalistic) setting rather than to any inherent difference between the drugs (i.e., higher ICS dose rather than greater efficacy).

A new small volume holding chamber for asthmatic children: comparison with Babyhaler spacer

When a new holding chamber for administrating inhaled medication is to be marketed, it needs to be compared with existing chambers with two questions in mind: is this chamber well accepted by patients and is there an in vitro equivalence? We compared the new small volume non-electrostatic valved holding chamber, usable with all pressurized metered-dose inhalers and equipped with a funny facemask, Vortex (Pari GmbH, Germany), to the most frequently prescribed holding chamber in France, Babyhaler (GlaxoSmithKline Laboratories). Preferences were studied for 75 families with a child no more than 4 yr old, using standard questionnaires. An in vitro study assessed the delivered dose and the particle size distribution of two HFA beclomethasone dipropionate pressurized metered dose inhalers (Becotide 250 microg per dose and Nexxair 100 microg per dose) by dose uniformity sample apparatus and cascade impactor according to the European Pharmacopoeia. Vortex was preferred by 95% of the families because of its small size, its duck facemask, and its robust appearance. Among children able to give their opinion, 86% preferred Vortex to Babyhaler. In vitro, both holding chambers reduced the delivered dose of beclomethasone dipropionate and increased the quantity of particles smaller than 5 microm in diameter with both medications. A higher proportion of fine particles was obtained with Nexxair than with Becotide (p < 0.05) and with Vortex than with Babyhaler (p < 0.05). As expected, throat deposition is dramatically reduced for both drugs with both holding chambers. The in vitro difference in the particle size distribution of beclomethasone dipropionate with both holding chambers probably has no clinical influence.

Treatment and outcomes in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis in the United kingdom

BACKGROUND

Since allergic rhinitis in asthma patients is associated with worse asthma control, the treatment of the comorbid condition may improve outcomes.

METHODS

A 1-year retrospective study using the UK Mediplus database (2001-2004) included asthmatic patients aged 15-55 with allergic rhinitis. Patients starting therapy based on the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines, defined as an increase in inhaled corticosteroids (high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, hdICS), or the addition of montelukast (ICS+MON) or long-acting beta-agonists (ICS+LABA) to ICS, were studied. Univariable and multiple logistic regressions evaluated asthma-related outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 2,596 asthma and allergic rhinitis patients, 83.2% initiated ICS+LABA, 12.1% hdICS and 4.7% ICS+MON. The mean age was 34 years and 60% were female. ICS+MON patients had more moderate-severe asthma (p = 0.04). Approximately 84% of the ICS+LABA patients experienced an asthma control failure compared to 50% in the other groups (p < 0.0001). The proportions of patients requiring treatment change were 73.8, 22 and 27.3% in the ICS+LABA, hdICS and ICS+MON groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Asthma-related resource use was similar among all groups. The ICS+MON group received fewer mean prescriptions for oral corticosteroids (p = 0.024) than the other groups (p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

In asthma and allergic rhinitis, treatment with ICS+MON or hdICS was associated with lower rates of asthma control failure and fewer treatment changes than the ICS+LABA group. MON users also required fewer oral corticosteroids.

Peak expiratory flow monitoring in asthmatic children

OBJECTIVE

To correlate forced expiratory volume in 1 second (VEF(1)) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) with clinical parameters in children with moderate and severe asthma.

METHODS

This was a non-concurrent cohort study, carried out at a pediatric pneumology clinic, in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, between March and October 2002. The study enrolled children aged 5 to 16 years, with persistent asthma, being treated with a minimum of 500 mcg/day beclomethasone, and with symptoms under control for at least 3 months. Seventy-five patients (96.1%) were selected by simple randomization and monitored for 3 months, via a clinical severity scale and pulmonary function tests (PEF and VEF(1)). Results were analyzed using Pearson's coefficient.

RESULTS

Correlations between absolute and percentage PEF figures and clinical severity score were negative and very close to zero, signifying a weak correlation with no statistical significance. The same relationship was observed between VEF(1) and clinical severity score. The correlation between VEF(1) and PEF had a positive value with statistical significance (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Since the best parameter for evaluating airway obstruction is VEF(1), the finding that there is a positive correlation between this measure and absolute PEF reinforces the importance of its use and allows for the recommendation that PEF be measured as part of the management of asthmatic children, particularly in severe cases.

Usefulness of HFA-BDP for adult patients with bronchial asthma: randomized crossover study with fluticasone

In this randomized crossover study, 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe persistent bronchial asthma were assigned to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were administered fluticasone dry powder inhaler (DPI) for 8 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period, then hydrofluoroalkane-beclometasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) for 8 weeks. After a further 2-week washout, they were again administered fluticasone DPI for 8 weeks. Patients in group 2 were assigned HFA-BDP followed by fluticasone PII and finally HFA-BDP over the same time periods. In both groups, no significant difference was observed in use of beta2-agonists and symptom score between the treatment periods; however, markers of pulmonary function were significantly higher when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. Significant increases of morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (p < 0.01), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1.0) (p < 0.01), V50 (p < 0.05), and V25 (p < 0.01) were observed at 18 weeks in group 1, whereas there were significant decreases of V50 (p < 0.05) at 18 weeks in group 2. No significant difference was noted in circulating eosinophil count and serum ECP between the 2 treatments; however, ECP in induced sputum and nitric oxide in expired gas were significantly lower (p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively) when on HFA-BDP versus fluticasone DPI. HFA-BDP might be delivered to small airways more effectively than fluticasone DPI.

Topical glucocorticosteroids in rhinitis: clinical aspects

The introduction of nasal glucocorticosteroids, 30 years ago, has been the most important therapeutic progress in rhinitis management since the introduction of the first generation of antihistamines. Our knowledge of the mode of action of glucocorticosteroids in the nose has improved as the airway mucous membrane of the nose is easily accessible for investigation. However, the exact mechanism behind the marked clinical effect remains unclear. Topical glucocorticosteroids are highly effective in diseases characterized by eosinophil-dominated inflammation (allergic rhinitis, nasal polyposis), but not in diseases characterized by neutrophil-dominated inflammation (common cold, infectious rhinosinusitis). Experience for 30 years and a long series of controlled studies have shown that the treatment is highly effective and that the side effects are few and benign. Intranasal glucocorticosteroids can therefore be considered as first-line treatment for allergic and non-allergic, non-infectious rhinitis and nasal polyps.

Effects of hydrofluoroalkane and dry powder-formulated corticosteroids on sputum inflammatory markers in asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are powerful drugs that can suppress airway inflammation in asthmatic patients. Deposition of most of the inhaled corticosteroid occurs mainly in the central airways. However, a new hydrofluoroalkane formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) is preferentially deposited in the distal airways. Inflammatory characteristics of induced sputum have been shown to differ in samples collected early after sputum induction compared with later.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of HFA-BDP and budesonide in a dry powder inhaler (DPI-BUD) on inflammatory cells and inflammatory cytokine expression in early and late induced sputa compared with placebo.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with mild, intermittent bronchial asthma were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: eight patients received HFA-BDP and nine patients received DPI-BUD. Each patient was treated with one of the active treatments and placebo (for four weeks), with a two-week washout interval in between. Inflammatory cells and expression of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 were measured in early and late induced sputa before and after active treatment, as well as before and after placebo treatment using immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, eosinophils were significantly reduced in both early and late induced sputa after HFA-BDP treatment (P<0.05), whereas DPI-BUD had a significant effect only on early induced sputum. Both HFA-BDP and DPI-BUD decreased IL-4 expression in early and late induced sputa, but the effect was more prominent with HFA-BDP. IL-5 expression was reduced in both early and late induced sputa after HFA-BDP treatment. DPI-BUD significantly decreased IL-5 expression in early but not in late induced sputum. The number of lymphocytes was not altered by either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

HFA-BDP reduced eosinophilic inflammation and T helper 2-type cytokine expression in both early and late induced sputa, whereas the effect of DPI-BUD on inflammation was predominantly demonstrated in early induced sputum.

Managing asthma in the 21st century: role of pharmacogenetics

As discussed above, pharmacogenetics offers the opportunity to ascertain associations between genetic variability and response (both salutary and adverse) to various asthma medications. Although there have been multiple asthma pharmacogenetic studies, the field of pharmacogenetics is still in its infancy. As this field advances, it is estimated that an increasing proportion of individual variation in responses to pharmacotherapy will be predictable based on associations with particular genetic polymorphisms or patterns of polymorphisms. These associations hold out the promise of being able to individualize pharmacotherapy by providing specific therapy to those most likely to respond, while avoiding therapy in those most likely to suffer adverse effects. Currently, only the pharmacogenetic effects of position 16 of the beta-adrenergic receptor appear to be of sufficient magnitude to affect asthma therapy, but further understanding of the mechanism of this association as well as prospective replication with long-acting beta-agonists is still required to bring pharmacogenetics into the clinical arena. Most other pharmacogenetic effects are likely to be of smaller magnitude or, as with 5-LO or CRHR1 polymorphisms, less common. Thus, ultimately, we most likely will use "panels" of polymorphisms to calculate the relative risk-benefit ratio of a particular therapeutic course for an individual patient. It is hoped that, within the next decade, pharmacogenetic information will allow us to treat those who can benefit most from particular asthma medications and to avoid toxicity by administering medications to those unlikely to experience toxicity. If pharmacogenetics fulfills its promise, then not only will we be able to administer corticosteroids and other therapies to pediatric patients with asthma who are most likely to respond or to those least likely to experience adverse effects but we also will be able to introduce or develop drugs for asthma that would otherwise have been held back due to potential toxicity in a subset of patients.