European practice database: results from Greece

The survey (EPD) took place during December 2002-January 2003 and presents renal care in Greece. A questionnaire, structured at European level and translated into Greek, was sent to all dialysis centres (114) by post. The questionnaire was returned from 74 centres (64.9%). Some important results were: low use of peritoneal dialysis (13.3%), half of PD patients over 65 years old, one ninth of patients on transplantation waiting list, isolation for HBV positive patients (less for HCV and HIV), high use of AV fistulae (71.2%), maintenance and repair of dialysis machines by company technicians, absence of renal dieticians and social workers (but availability from hospital employees) one nurse every 5.54 patients (3.72 if nurse assistants are included), disinfection between shifts carried out chemically (hot or cold) and puncturing of vascular access performed mainly by nurses and nurse assistants. Data can be used to pressurise government for more scientists in the multidisciplinary team to be hired in hospitals, develop further research topics and to develop continuous education programmes.

Nocturnal haemodialysis in Australia and New Zealand (Review Article)

Although early experience in Australia and New Zealand confirmed home haemodialysis to be well tolerated, effective and with lower morbidity and mortality compared with centre-based haemodialysis, the advent of ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and 'satellite' haemodialysis has led to a steadily declining home haemodialysis population. However, the emergence of nocturnal haemodialysis, as a safe and highly effective therapy, has added to the modality choices now available and offers a new, highly attractive home-based option with many advantages over centre-based dialysis. For the patient, nocturnal haemodialysis means fluid and dietary freedom, less antihypertensive medication, the abolition of phosphate binders, the return of daytime freedom and the capacity for full-time employment. Potential biochemical benefits include normalization of the blood urea, serum creatinine, albumin, beta(2) microglobulin, homocysteine and triglyceride levels and other nutritional markers. Improved quality of life and sleep patterns and a resolution of sleep apnoea have been shown. Left ventricular function has also shown marked improvement. For the provider, nocturnal home haemodialysis offers clear cost advantages by avoiding high-cost nursing and infrastructure expenditure. Although consumable and equipment costs are higher, the savings on wage and infrastructure far outweigh this added expenditure. These combined factors make nocturnal haemodialysis an irresistible addition to comprehensive dialysis services, both from a clinical outcome and fiscal perspective.

Dialysis choice in the context of an early referral policy: there is room for self care

BACKGROUND

Predialysis care is vital for the patient and is crucial for dialysis choice: empowered, early referred patients tend to prefer out-of-hospital and self-care treatment; despite these claims, early referral remains too often a program more than a reality. Aim of the study was to evaluate the pattern and reasons for RRT choice in patients treated in a long-standing outpatient network, presently following 850 chronic patients (about 80% diabetics), working with an early referral policy and offering a wide set of dialysis options (home hemo and PD; self care and limited care hemodialysis; hospital hemodialysis).

METHODS

Prospective historical study. All patients who started RRT in January 2001-December 2003 were considered. Correlations between demographical (sex, age, educational level) or clinical variables (pre-RRT follow-up, comorbidity, SGA and Karnofsky) and treatment choice have been tested by univariate (chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis) and multivariate models (logistic regression), both considering all choices and dichotomising choice into "hospital" versus "out of hospital dialysis".

RESULTS

Hospital dialysis was chosen by 32.6% of patients; out of hospital in 67.4% (PD 26.5%, limited-care 18.4%, home hemodialysis 4.1%, self-care 18.4%). Hospital dialysis and PD were chosen by elderly patients (median age: 67.5 and 70 years respectively) with multiple comorbidities (75% and 92.3%); no difference for age, comorbidity, Karnofsky, SGA and educational level. 6/13 PD patients needed the help of a partner. Self-care/home hemodialysis patients were younger (median age 52), had higher educational level (p = 0.014) and lower prevalence of comorbidity (63.6% vs 94.7% in the other dialysis patients, p = 0.006). In the context of a long follow-up period (3.9 years) a statistically significant difference was found comparing hospital dialysis (3.3 years) vs out of hospital dialysis (4.9 years) (p = 0.035). In a logistic regression model, only pre-RRT follow-up was correlated with dialysis "hospital vs "out of hospital" choice (p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Early nephrological follow-up may enhance self and home-based dialysis care.

Impact of nocturnal home hemodialysis on anemia management in patients with end-stage renal disease

AIM

Anemia is adversely associated with poor uremia control and is an established cardiovascular risk factor in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Nocturnal home hemodialysis (NHD) is a novel form of renal replacement therapy that offers superior clearance of uremic solutes and improvements in several cardiovascular outcome parameters. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to test the hypotheses that augmenting the dose and frequency of dialysis by NHD would improve hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations and decrease requirement of erythropoietin (EPO) in ESRD patients.

METHODS

In 63 patients (mean age: 46 +/- 2 years) receiving NHD (mean duration: 2.1 +/- 0.2 years), Hb, EPO dose, iron saturation, ferritin were determined before and at six monthly repeated intervals after conversion to NHD. For comparison, 32 ESRD patients (mean age: 57 +/- 3 years) who remained on self-care conventional hemodialysis (CHD) were also studied.

RESULTS

There were no differences in baseline Hb concentrations, iron saturation, ferritin, or EPO dose between the two cohorts. After transfer from CHD to NHD, there were significant improvements in Hb concentrations (from 115 +/- 2 to 122 +/- 3 (6 months) and 124 +/- 2 (12 months) g/l, p = 0.03) despite a fall in EPO requirement (from 10,400 +/- 1400 to 8500 +/- 1300 (6 months) and 7600 +/- 1100 (12 months) U/week, p = 0.03). In contrast, CHD cohort had no change in EPO requirement (from 8300 +/- 1100 to 8100 +/- 1300 (6 months) and 8600 +/- 1000 (12 months) U/week, p > 0.05) or Hb concentrations (from 110 +/- 2 to 115 +/- 3 (6 months) and 115 +/- 2 (12 months), p > 0.05). There was a higher percentage of ESRD patients who did not require EPO in the NHD cohort (24% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.01). Lower Hb concentrations were noted in the CHD cohort despite higher iron saturation (0.25 +/- 0.01 (NHD) vs. 0.33 +/- 0.02 (CHD), p = 0.02) at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Enhancing uremic clearance by NHD resulted in a rise in Hb and a fall in EPO requirement.

Quotidian dialysis – update 2005

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The interest in quotidian hemodialysis has increased further after the HEMO study reported that high-dose thrice-weekly hemodialysis failed to improve clinical outcomes. This, in combination with a significant volume of newly published data, made a review of the topic of quotidian hemodialysis timely.

RECENT FINDINGS

The published research has revealed further evidence of cardiovascular and quality-of-life improvements as well as financial benefits with quotidian hemodialysis. Accrued worldwide experience has confirmed the previously published benefits of quotidian hemodialysis. There has been a significant effort by industry to produce patient-friendly machines for home hemodialysis. Reports on the use of daily hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration in children have appeared. An international registry of patients on quotidian hemodialysis has been created. The need for modification of the funding mechanisms and the lack of prospective randomized controlled studies on quotidian hemodialysis led to the funding of such studies by the National Institutes of Health in collaboration with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services to be completed by 2008. The proper funding for daily home hemodialysis was secured in the province of British Columbia, Canada, and is under consideration elsewhere.

SUMMARY

There is increasing evidence confirming that quotidian hemodialysis improves clinical outcomes in a cost-efficient manner. Provided that the reimbursement issues are resolved these modalities may be utilized extensively at home as well as in the in-center facilities. The revitalization of home hemodialysis will compensate for the decline in utilization of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and the nursing shortage encountered in most countries.

DAILY HEMODIALYSIS-SELECTED TOPICS: The London, Ontario, Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study

The London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study, a prospective, comparative, nonrandomized study, directly compared outcomes of quotidian (daily) hemodialysis patients with conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis patients. Patients were assigned to either daily (short-hours) hemodialysis (n = 11) or nocturnal hemodialysis (n = 12) and followed up for 5-36 months; all data were directly compared with matched control patients receiving conventional hemodialysis (n = 22). Outcomes evaluated were adequacy (urea kinetics), nutrition, anemia management, blood pressure and volume control, calcium/phosphorus control, and patient quality of life. In addition, a detailed economic analysis was undertaken. The study showed that both quotidian hemodialysis regimens are more effective than conventional hemodialysis in improving weekly urea clearance. Significant clinical improvements were seen with quotidian therapy in the areas of nutrition (short-hours daily), blood pressure (both), volume control (short-hours daily), calcium/phosphorus control (nocturnal), and quality of life (both). A nonsignificant trend for improvement in anemia management was suggested. The economic analysis showed substantial savings in annualized cost per quality-adjusted life-year in changing from conventional hemodialysis (carried out in-center, in satellite units, or at home) to home quotidian hemodialysis. The substantial clinical benefits of home quotidian hemodialysis, combined with the economic advantage shown by this study, clearly justify its expansion. (The details of this study have recently been published in 11 articles in the American Journal of Kidney Diseases[2003;42(suppl 1)].

Review of clinical outcomes in nocturnal haemodialysis patients after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Nocturnal haemodialysis (NHD) is a novel form of haemodialysis therapy that is associated with improved blood pressure control when compared to conventional haemodialysis (CHD). Current studies suggest that NHD lowers blood pressure through a decrease in peripheral resistance. The graft and blood pressure outcomes of NHD patients who undergo renal transplantation are unknown.

METHODS

We reviewed the renal allograft and blood pressure outcomes of 15 NHD patients who underwent renal transplantation. An age and vintage matched cohort of 29 CHD patients was used as controls.

RESULTS

The rate of delayed graft function (DGF) tended to be higher in the NHD group compared to the CHD group (64 vs 41%, P = 0.15), however the 1-year graft function (53+/-6 vs 59+/-5 ml/min, P = 0.426) and graft survival (92 vs 95%, P = 0.751) were similar. Intra-operatively, NHD patients had lower minimum systolic (92+/-5 vs 109+/-4, P = 0.03) and diastolic (48+/-3 vs 64+/-2, P = 0.02) blood pressures in comparison to the CHD cohort. Pathologically, acute tubular necrosis accounted for 100% of DGF in the NHD group in contrast to 75% in the CHD population (P = 0.01). Pre-transplant mean systolic BP (sBP) was significantly lower in the NHD group compared to the CHD group (113+/-6 vs 145+/-10 mmHg, P<0.001). At 12 months post-transplant, mean sBP increased from baseline in the NHD group ( triangle up sBP 22+/-7 mmHg, P = 0.009) while in the CHD group mean sBP fell (Delta sBP -14+/-5 mmHg, P = 0.014). Mean arterial and diastolic BP exhibited similar changes. These trends persisted after 24 months of post-transplant follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

One-year graft outcomes and blood pressures are similar for NHD and CHD patients who undergo renal transplantation. Unlike CHD patients, NHD patients experienced a significant fall in their intra-operative blood pressures, which likely contributed towards the delayed graft function in this cohort of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to examine the underlying differences in haemodynamics and long-term graft survival between the two renal replacement modalities.

Home hemodialysis à la carte: a tailormade program (1998-2003)

BACKGROUND

There are good epidemiological (increased numbers of dialysis patients), economical (renal replacement therapy (RRT) costs) and clinical reasons (new highly efficient schedules) to reconsider the choice of home hemodialysis (HD).

STUDY AIM

Analysis of the results and costs of a flexible, tailormade home dialysis program (1998-2003).

SETTING

Home HD facility of the University of Turin-Italy.

METHODS

Results were analyzed in terms of feasibility (enrolment rate, logistical problems--the two usual caregivers performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical records; production costs, assessed with a logic bottom-up technique). Since the main program feature was the tailoring of dialysis to the patient, kinetic data were analyzed to control the efficiency of the chosen schedules.

RESULTS

In 1998-2003 (54 months), 31 patients joined the home HD program (six patients were already being treated), while another 12 patients were treated in the training area and trained for an ongoing self-care program; mean age was 47.1 +/- 12.8 yrs; 35/49 patients had clinical comorbidities. During the study, four patients died, 10 were grafted, and six patients dropped out or were transferred. In March 2003, 23 patients were at home/in training and six were being treated in the training area: 11 patients were on a conventional schedule, four on daily dialysis, 12 on other schedules (two patients non-resident in the Piedmont region were not considered). Dialysis efficiency reached the target (EKRc > 11 mL/min) in all but four patients (schedules with more frequent sessions were planned for these patients). Costs were comparable to limited care HD (daily: 96.5 euros/session at home, 98.76 euros/session in the center; conventional: 133.48 euros/session at home, 131.25 euros/session in the center).

CONCLUSION

A tailored, flexible policy can help to revive a home HD program.

Short-Term Blood Pressure, Noradrenergic, and Vascular Effects of Nocturnal Home Hemodialysis

Long-term nocturnal hemodialysis, which uses longer and more frequent sessions than conventional hemodialysis, lowers clinic blood pressure and left ventricular mass. We tested the hypotheses that short-term nocturnal hemodialysis would (1) reduce ambulatory blood pressure; (2) cause peripheral vasodilation; (3) lower plasma norepinephrine concentration; and (4) improve the arterial response to reactive hyperemia (a marker of endothelium-dependent vasodilation). We studied 18 consecutive patients (age, 41±2; [mean±SEM]) before and 1 and 2 months after conversion from conventional (three 4-hour sessions per week) to nocturnal (six 8-hour sessions per week) hemodialysis. As the dialysis dose per session (Kt/V) increased from 1.24±0.06 to 2.04±0.08 after 2 months ( P =0.02), symptomatic hypotension developed and most antihypertensive medications were withdrawn. Nocturnal hemodialysis nonetheless lowered 24-hour mean arterial pressure (from 102±3 to 90±2 mm Hg after 2 months; P =0.01), total peripheral resistance (from 1967±235 to 1499±191 dyne · s · cm −5 ; P <0.01) and plasma norepinephrine (from 2.66±0.4 to 1.96±0.2 nmol; P =0.04). Endothelium-dependent vasodilation could not be elicited during conventional hemodialysis (−2.7±1.8%) but was restored (+8.0±1.0%; P =0.001) after 2 months of nocturnal hemodialysis. The brachial artery response to nitroglycerin also improved (from 6.9±2.8 to 15.7±1.6%; P <0.05). Nocturnal hemodialysis had no effect on weight or on stroke volume. Rapid reversal of these markers of adverse cardiovascular events with more intense hemodialysis may translate into improved outcome in this high-risk group of patients.

Management of anemia with quotidian hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Most patients with end-stage renal disease have chronic anemia caused by inadequate erythropoietin (EPO) synthesis and require therapy with exogenous EPO to maintain recommended hematocrit and hemoglobin levels.

METHODS

The London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study compared anemia control among patients on either short daily, long nocturnal, or conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) therapy. Patients were administered iron, either orally (900 mg/d) or intravenously (50 to 125 mg every 1 to 4 weeks), to maintain serum ferritin levels at greater than 45 ng/mL (100 microg/L) or transferrin saturations greater than 20%. EPO was administered by subcutaneous injection at frequencies ranging from twice weekly to once every second week to maintain hemoglobin levels within the target range of 11 to 12 g/dL (110 to 120 g/L).

RESULTS

Both the daily HD and nocturnal HD study groups showed increased hemoglobin levels at later times compared with baseline levels, although only nocturnal HD patients had a statistically significant increase in hemoglobin levels at 18 months (11.94 g/dL [119.4 g/L] versus 10.95 g/dL [109.5 g/L] at baseline; P = 0.047). Both the daily HD and control groups showed a trend for decreased EPO dose requirements at later times compared with baseline, although these decreases were not statistically significant. The nocturnal HD group showed increased EPO dose requirements, although not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Quotidian HD is associated with an increased quantity of blood loss that can account for some of the increased requirements in EPO dose. Additional studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to fully elucidate the effects of quotidian HD on anemia.

Nursing issues related to patient selection, vascular access, and education in quotidian hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Increased interest in quotidian hemodialysis (HD) programs requires that nephrology nurses have a larger role in transitioning patients to more frequent HD. Nursing issues include the selection, training, and education of patients before they begin more frequent HD therapy.

METHODS

The London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study directly compared data from patients undergoing either short daily HD (n = 11) or long nocturnal HD (n = 12) with those undergoing conventional thrice-weekly HD (n = 22). Patient training, education, safety, and vascular access data were collected.

RESULTS

The patient training period varied from 10 to 25 days, with an average length of 16.64 days. Patients used 1 of 3 types of vascular access: native arteriovenous (AV) fistulae, grafts, or central catheters. No statistically significant differences in access flow rates between the study and control groups were noted or when comparing different types of access. A significant decrease in catheter infection rate was seen when patients switched to daily HD therapy. Patient cannulation surveys showed that patients with AV fistulae or grafts showed improvements with ease and comfort as the study progressed, and patients widely preferred the buttonhole technique to the rotating-needle method for cannulation.

CONCLUSION

With growing interest in the development of quotidian HD programs, HD nursing personnel face the exciting challenge of improving on existing training programs and treatment modalities.

Patient quality of life on quotidian hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown improved quality of life for hemodialysis (HD) patients after changing from conventional thrice-weekly HD treatment to more frequent HD.

METHODS

In the London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study, 23 patients (11 patients, short daily HD; 12 patients, long nocturnal HD) were compared with 22 conventional thrice-weekly HD patients serving as controls. All patients completed 3 sets of quality-of-life assessment tools: (1) a locally developed renal disease-specific questionnaire that assessed dialysis symptoms, uremic symptoms, psychosocial stress, and social-leisure activity; (2) the generic Medical Outcomes Survey 36-Item Short Form (SF-36); and (3) the global Health Utilities Index (HUI). As a supplement to the HUI, a subset of patients was asked to complete the Time Trade-Off assessment.

RESULTS

Overall, the reduction in symptoms shows better fluid management because quotidian HD patients reported experiencing fewer and less severe cramping during dialysis, fewer headaches, less hypotension, fewer episodes of dizziness, decreased fluid restrictions, fewer blood pressure problems, decreased interdialytic weight gains, fewer episodes of shortness of breath, and a reduction in the sensation of easily feeling cold. HUI results showed that quotidian HD patients maintained functionality throughout the study period, whereas control patients showed a significant loss. Given the choice, all patients chose to remain on quotidian HD therapy after switching from conventional HD therapy. The Time Trade-Off analysis indicated that study patients were willing to trade far less time on quotidian HD therapy and much more time on conventional HD therapy in exchange for "perfect" health.

CONCLUSION

As more studies focus on improved patient outcomes and appropriate funding mechanisms are established, more frequent home HD treatment should become a standard treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease.

Patient monitoring in the London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study

BACKGROUND

Patient monitoring involves real-time surveillance of patients while they dialyze at home by a staff member ("monitor") at a centralized location. Monitoring is designed to ensure patient safety, patient compliance with treatment, and automatic collection of treatment data.

METHODS

In the London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study, 14 nocturnal hemodialysis (HD) patients were monitored from 13 to 602 sessions for a total of 4,096 patient-nights. Alarm data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The number of alarms per night ranged from 0 to 54, with an average of 1.31 +/- 2.81, resulting in a total of 5,351 registered alarms. Three hundred twenty-two calls because of nonresponse or slow response to alarms were made to patients' homes, but no calls to designated contact persons or emergency medical services were required. Arterial and venous pressure alarms were the most common type of alarm and were caused primarily by the patient obstructing blood tubing. The average number of alarms per night decreased significantly over time as patients gained experience with nocturnal HD, from a maximum of 1.98 +/- 3.31 alarms/night during the first month at home to a low of 0.74 +/- 1.63 alarms/night by the final month of follow-up. Each progressive decrease from month 3 through month 18 was statistically significantly lower than the value at month 1.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring is essential for the initial 3 months of nocturnal HD therapy until the HD team is convinced the patient is stable and compliant. Thereafter, monitoring is necessary only if medically indicated.

Calcium and phosphate balance with quotidian hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Conventional hemodialysis (HD) is associated with profound disturbances in calcium and phosphate metabolism and abnormal parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Effects of more frequent HD on calcium and phosphate balance have not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

The London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study examined effects of quotidian HD, either daily HD (n = 11) or nocturnal HD (n = 12), on calcium and phosphate metabolism, bone alkaline phosphatase levels, and intact PTH (iPTH) levels.

RESULTS

Daily HD patients showed a slight decrease in predialysis serum phosphate levels, no changes in phosphate-binder requirements or serum calcium levels, and slight increases in serum bone alkaline phosphatase and iPTH levels. Nocturnal HD patients showed a trend for decreased predialysis phosphate levels, with significantly lower values than daily HD and matched control patients on conventional HD therapy at several times. Phosphate-binder use by nocturnal HD patients was significantly reduced. Both quotidian HD groups showed decreases in calcium x phosphate product, with significantly lower values for nocturnal HD patients (38.11 mg(2)/dL(2)) compared with daily HD and control patients (53.99 and 52.51 mg(2)/dL(2), respectively) at 18 months. Bone alkaline phosphatase levels increased slightly and attained statistical significance compared with baseline values for both quotidian HD groups. A trend for increases in serum iPTH levels, coupled with increasing levels of bone alkaline phosphatase in nocturnal HD patients, led to the decision to increase the dialysate calcium concentration from 5.0 to 7.0 mg/dL. This 1-time adjustment resulted in a reversal of the trend and a return to baseline values.

CONCLUSION

This study shows the superior control of serum phosphate levels in nocturnal HD patients compared with daily HD or conventional HD patients and the benefits of dialysate with a greater calcium concentration in slow nocturnal HD.

Adequacy of quotidian hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Several methods exist to quantitate small-solute clearance by daily hemodialysis (HD) regimens, but these have not been empirically applied or compared.

METHODS

In the London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study, dosing and adequacy of quotidian HD regimens, both short daily HD (n = 11) and long nocturnal HD (n = 12), were compared with conventional thrice-weekly HD (n = 22) using several models. Urea clearance was computed by percentage of reduction in urea, kinetic modeling (single-pool Kt/V [spKt/V]), Daugirdas rate equation (equilibrated Kt/V [eKt/V]), and Gotch standardized Kt/V (stdKt/V).

RESULTS

Nocturnal HD patients maintained a mean single-session spKt/V of 1.64 throughout the study, similar to that of conventional HD patients (1.73), whereas daily HD patients showed a significant decrease in mean single-session spKt/V (0.93) compared with baseline (t(0)) values. Mean weekly spKt/V values increased from t(0) for both quotidian HD groups (9.08 for nocturnal HD, 5.55 for daily HD) and were higher in both quotidian HD groups compared with conventional HD patients. Weekly eKt/V, stdKt/V, and normalized protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance values showed similar trends. Comparison of the 3 different adequacy models showed an increase in weekly HD doses for both quotidian HD regimens compared with conventional HD; however, percentages of increases from t(0) to follow-up differed according to the model used. The calculated efficiency of dose delivery at the 10-month follow-up comparing daily HD with conventional HD was 257 +/- 26 minutes versus 306 +/- 17 stdKt/V unit delivered, respectively, amounting to almost 1 dialysis-hour saved per stdKt/V unit delivered for daily HD.

CONCLUSION

These results show that both quotidian HD regimens are more effective than conventional HD in improving weekly urea clearance measured by spKt/V, stdKt/V, and eKt/V.

Equipment and water treatment considerations for the provision of quotidian home hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Whereas clinical benefits of more frequent hemodialysis (HD) treatment are well documented, little information is available about technical aspects involved in setting up a patient's home for home HD. Technical considerations include the home infrastructure, as well as required plumbing modifications and electrical hook-ups.

METHODS

Twenty home HD installations were supported for the London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study. The Fresenius 2008H (Fresenius Medical Care, North America, Lexington, MA) HD machine was used for all home HD installations in conjunction with a Service Deionization Tank (SDI) water treatment system composed of pretreatment, purification, and posttreatment components. To ensure that SDI systems provided high-quality water and dialysate, standard bacteriological testing was performed throughout the study, and patient serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were tracked as an indicator of nonspecific inflammation.

RESULTS

The annual number of hours of work required for each home HD installation and service/maintenance was approximately 75 and 58 hours, respectively. Water quality proved high because there were only 4 occurrences of failed endotoxin and bacterial tests; all were subsequently retested and provided satisfactory results. Serum CRP levels showed no significant difference comparing home HD patients with conventional in-center HD control patients.

CONCLUSION

Although support of 20 home HD installations was economically feasible within the constraints of the London Health Sciences Centre Department of Biomedical Engineering, resources were strained by the final year of the study. This suggests that any sustained growth beyond the current study design may require a review of staffing, resources, and model of service delivery needs.