Everolimus: a new hope for patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer cells can develop resistance to standard hormonal treatment and chemotherapy with the activation of the mTOR pathway; this is supported by results of preclinical and clinical studies. In clinical trials, the addition of everolimus to hormonal treatment or anti-HER2 treatment improved the outcomes of breast cancer patients. The aim of this review is to discuss the efficacy and safety data of everolimus in all categories of breast cancer in recent published studies.

SCOPE

Everolimus showed positive results in clinical studies. A literature search was made from PubMed, ASCO and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Meeting abstracts by using the following search key words: 'everolimus', 'RAD001', 'mTOR inhibitor', 'breast cancer' 'endocrine therapy resistance' and 'HER-2 targeted therapies'. The last search was on June 10, 2013. The most important limitation of our review is that most of the data on everolimus rely on phase I and II trials.

FINDINGS

Preclinical studies showed that mTOR activation can be the responsible mechanism in all subgroups of breast cancer. Results of both the TAMRAD and BOLERO-2 studies have showed that mTOR inhibition in combination with endocrine therapy can be a new treatment strategy for MBC patients who are resistant to aromatase inhibitors. In the BOLERO-2 study, time to deterioration in health-related quality of life was also significantly higher in the everolimus and exemestane arm compared to the exemestane plus placebo arm. The recently completed BOLERO-3 study showed that mTOR inhibition in combination with trastuzumab plus vinorelbine treatment significantly improved PFS compared to trastuzumab plus vinorelbine alone in trastuzumab-resistant MBC patients.

CONCLUSION

Recent trials have shown that everolimus has produced promising anti-tumor activity in combination with trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and in combination with exemestane in patients with hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer who had recurrence or progression while receiving a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor. Results of ongoing studies with everolimus show evidence that using everolimus in earlier stages of the disease, namely in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, could be benefical.

Emerging functions of autophagy in kidney transplantation

In response to ischemic, toxic or immunological insults, the more frequent injuries encountered by the kidney, cells must adapt to maintain vital metabolic functions and avoid cell death. Among the adaptive responses activated, autophagy emerges as an important integrator of various extracellular and intracellular triggers (often related to nutrients availability or immunological stimuli), which, as a consequence,may regulate cell viability, and also immune functions,both innate or adaptive. The aim of this review is to make the synthesis of the recent literature on the implications of autophagy in the kidney transplantation field and to discuss the future directions for research.

[Combination of exemestane and everolimus may produce toxic side effects: a new treatment option for metastatic hormone-sensitive breast cancer]

The combination of exemestane and everolimus is a new treatment option for metastatic hormone-sensitive breast cancer. This treatment is used after progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. The treatment is generally well tolerated, but sometimes leads to minor or even serious side effects. It is important to be aware of these side effects and to treat them. We describe two patients who had to cope with various forms of toxicity: a 73-year-old woman with aphthous mouth lesions and a 49-year-old woman with pneumonitis. We then discuss the efficacy of the combination exemestane and everolimus and its positioning in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Finally, some common and some potentially serious side effects will be discussed, along with recommendations for their management and indications for distinguishing side effects from disease progression.

[Determination of blood levels for oral anticancer drugs]

Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are indicated in several types of cancer. They are usually administered at a fixed dose. In recent years, observational studies have reported on the wide variability in exposure to these new drugs, and the relationship between clinical response (efficacy and toxicity) and target plasma concentrations. Additionally, we are gaining insight into different food and drug interactions with these new drugs. On the basis of current drug monitoring, advice can be given on individual dosing of pazopanib in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC), sunitinib in mRCC and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and imatinib in GIST.

[Hyperglycaemia during treatment with everolimus]

BACKGROUND

Everolimus is an orally administered anti-cancer drug that inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction route. Use of everolimus may be associated with insulin resistance, manifesting in impaired glucose tolerance or hyperglycaemia.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 74-year-old female patient with a locally recurrent breast cancer developed hyperglycaemia, which started 2 weeks after the initiation of treatment with everolimus 10 mg once daily. Metformin and insulin were administered to restore normoglycaemia.

CONCLUSION

At the initiation of treatment with an mTOR inhibitor such as everolimus the treating physician should be aware of the occurrence of hyperglycaemia. Metformin is then the medicine of first choice.

Hematologic toxicities associated with mTOR inhibitors temsirolimus and everolimus in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, temsirolimus and everolimus, are currently approved for the treatment of several malignancies. Hematological toxicities have been reported with these drugs, but overall incidence and relative risk remains undefined. We perform an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the incidence and risk of hematologic toxicities associated with mTOR inhibitors.

METHODS

Several databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Eligible studies included prospective phase II and III trials of temsirolimus and everolimus with adequate safety data profile reporting anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by using either random effects or fixed effects models according to the heterogeneity of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 5436 patients with a variety of solid tumors from 26 clinical trials were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidences of mTOR inhibitor associated all-grade and high-grade hematologic toxicities were, respectively: anemia--38.8% and 7.5%; leucopenia--19.6% and 1.8%; neutropenia--14.9% and 5.6%; thrombocytopenia--33.1% and 3.6%. Compared to placebo/control arms, mTOR inhibitors were associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade (RR 2.05, 95% CI: 1.52-2.77; p < 0.001) and high-grade anemia (RR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.20-2.05; p = 0.001), all-grade (RR 6.03, 95% CI: 2.76-13.14; p < 0.001) and high-grade thrombocytopenia (RR 2.73, 95% CI: 1.87-3.99; p < 0.001). Additionally, a non-significantly increased risk of all-grade leucopenia (RR 1.46, 95% CI: 0.66-3.23; p = 0.34) and neutropenia (RR 1.77, 95% CI: 0.80-3.93; p = 0.16) was observed in the mTOR inhibitor group, while the risk of high-grade leucopenia (RR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31-0.90, p = 0.019) and neutropenia (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.62-1.51; p = 0.87) did not increase. Similar results were also observed in sub-group analysis according to mTOR inhibitor based regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of mTOR inhibitors is associated with a significant increase in the risk of developing all-grade and high-grade anemia and thrombocytopenia compared with placebo/control arms.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection after therapy with temsirolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

We describe the case of a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who developed a nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM)-related pulmonary nodule during therapy with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus. After discontinuation of temsirolimus treatment, a small pulmonary nodule with increased glucose uptake was detected on a positron emission tomography (PET) scan. A lung resection carried out to confirm and treat the suspected solitary metastasis of RCC yielded the surprising finding of a caseating granuloma containing NTM. A single PET-positive nodule presents a significant differential diagnostic dilemma in the setting of mRCC treated with mTOR inhibitors. Although the treatment of mRCC with temsirolimus can lead to immunosuppression and opportunistic infections, there is no report to our knowledge on the occurrence of NTM infections in mRCC patients treated with mTOR inhibitors. These infections should be included in the differential diagnosis of lung nodules. Interestingly, there is strong preclinical evidence pointing to direct and indirect antimycobacterial activity of mTOR inhibitors. We therefore hypothesize that while the seeding of NTM can occur during temsirolimus therapy due to T-lymphocyte suppression, the infection may only become active after the discontinuation of mTOR inhibitor treatment.

Severe hypersensitivity pneumonitis associated with everolimus therapy for neuroendocrine tumour: a case report

BACKGROUND

Novel therapeutic agents are currently being investigated for neuroendocrine tumour treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report here on the case of a patient presenting with hypersensitivity pneumonitis while being treated with everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

Side effects of everolimus should be familiar to clinicians, including nonspecialists, and be monitored carefully to allow for prompt management.

Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis

Backgrounds

Drug-eluting stents (DES) with biodegradable polymers have been developed to address the risk of thrombosis associated with first-generation DES. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BES) versus durable polymer DES.

Methods

Systematic database searches of MEDLINE (1950 to June 2013), EMBASE (1966 to June 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 6 of 12, June 2013), and a review of related literature were conducted. All randomized controlled trials comparing biodegradable polymer BES versus durable polymer DES were included.

Results

Eight randomized controlled trials investigating 11,015 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of major adverse cardiac events did not differ significantly between the patients treated with the biodegradable polymer BES and the durable polymer DES (Relative risk [RR], 0.970; 95% CI, 0.848–1.111; p = 0.662). However, biodegradable polymer BES was associated with reduced risk of very late ST compared with the durable polymer DES, while the risk of early or late ST was similar (RR for early or late ST, 1.167; 95% CI 0.755–1.802; p = 0.487; RR 0.273; 95% CI 0.115–0.652; p = 0.003; p for interaction = 0.003).

Conclusions

In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, treatments with biodegradable polymer BES did not significantly reduce the risk of major adverse cardiac events, but demonstrated a significantly lower risk of very late ST when compared to durable polymer DES. This conclusion requires confirmation by further studies with long-term follow-up.

PROSPERO register number

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42013004364#.UnM2lfmsj6J

Phase I study evaluating the combination of lapatinib (a Her2/Neu and EGFR inhibitor) and everolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) in patients with advanced cancers: South West Oncology Group (SWOG) Study S0528

PURPOSE

Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, can augment the efficacy of HER inhibitors in preclinical studies. This study was conducted to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of the combination of lapatinib, a Her1 and 2 inhibitor, and everolimus and to describe its anti-tumor activity in the Phase I setting.

METHODS

In Part I, dose escalation to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was performed. In Part II, PK of both drugs were analyzed to assess drug-drug interaction.

RESULTS

Twenty-three evaluable patients with advanced cancers were treated on six different dose levels in Part I of the study. The dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea, rash, mucositis, and fatigue. The MTD of the combination was 1,250 mg of lapatinib and 5 mg of everolimus once daily. In Part II of the study, 54 patients were treated with the combination at the MTD. The mean everolimus time to maximum concentration was increased by 44 %, and mean clearance was decreased by 25 % when co-administered with lapatinib, though these differences were not statistically significant. There was no significant influence on the PK of lapatinib by everolimus. Two patients achieved a partial response [thymic cancer (45+ months) and breast cancer (unconfirmed PR; 7 months)]; 11 patients attained stable disease of at least 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Lapatinib and everolimus are well tolerated at doses of 1,250 and 5 mg po daily, respectively. Stable disease ≥4 months/PR was achieved in 13 of 78 patients (17 %).

Everolimus in advanced or metastatic breast cancer

In one trial, combination therapy with everolimus and exemestane prolonged progression-free survival a few months (on the basis of radiological studies) compared with exemestane alone, which is not the standard treatment. However, the addition of everolimus greatly increased the incidence of serious adverse effects. As of mid-2013, the effect on overall survival is uncertain.

Health-related quality of life and disease symptoms in postmenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced breast cancer treated with everolimus plus exemestane versus exemestane monotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Everolimus (EVE)+exemestane (EXE; n = 485) more than doubled median progression-free survival versus placebo (PBO) + EXE (n = 239), with a manageable safety profile and no deterioration in health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) in patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)) advanced breast cancer (ABC) who recurred or progressed on/after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy. To further evaluate EVE + EXE impact on disease burden, we conducted additional post-hoc analyses of patient-reported HRQOL.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

HRQOL was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires at baseline and every 6 weeks thereafter until treatment discontinuation because of disease progression, toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Endpoints included the QLQ-C30 Global Health Status (QL2) scale, the QLQ-BR23 breast symptom (BRBS), and arm symptom (BRAS) scales. Between-group differences in change from baseline were assessed using linear mixed models with selected covariates. Sensitivity analysis using pattern-mixture models determined the effect of study discontinuation on/before week 24. Treatment arms were compared using differences of least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at each timepoint and overall.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00863655.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Progression-free survival, survival, response rate, safety, and HRQOL.

RESULTS

Linear mixed models (primary model) demonstrated no statistically significant overall difference between EVE + EXE and PBO + EXE for QL2 (LSM difference = -1.91; 95% CI = -4.61, 0.78), BRBS (LSM difference = -0.18; 95% CI = -1.98, 1.62), or BRAS (LSM difference = -0.42; 95% CI = -2.94, 2.10). Based on pattern-mixture models, patients who dropped out early had worse QL2 decline on both treatments. In the expanded pattern-mixture model, EVE + EXE-treated patients who did not drop out early had stable BRBS and BRAS relative to PBO + EXE.

KEY LIMITATIONS

HRQOL data were not collected after disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses confirm that EVE + EXE provides clinical benefit without adversely impacting HRQOL in patients with HR(+) ABC who recurred/progressed on prior NSAIs versus endocrine therapy alone.

Unusual radiological presentation of sirolimus-associated pneumonitis

Sirolimus-associated pneumonitis, a rare but serious drug-induced lung injury, has become a great concern clinically, because of the increasing use of sirolimus (rapamycin) in patients who have been subjected to solid organ transplantation. We report sirolimus-associated pneumonitis in two women who underwent renal transplantation. At variance with previous reports, the radiological findings shown on chest radiographs and computed tomography scans of the chest in these two cases were consolidation lesions mainly with minimal interstitial abnormalities. Our reported cases highlight that awareness of various radiological findings of sirolimus-associated pneumonitis is pivotal for physicians to make early diagnosis of the disorder in patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation.

A phase II study evaluating the toxicity and efficacy of single-agent temsirolimus in chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is deregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC.

METHODS

In this phase II open label study, eligible patients received IV temsirolimus at 25 mg weekly until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or investigator's discretion. Toxicity was assessed every 4 weeks and responses every 8 weeks. Primary end point was calculating the overall response (OR) rate as well as measuring stable disease (SD) to assess the overall clinical benefit calculated as OR+SD. Secondary end points included prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) changes and time to progression biochemically and radiographically. Correlative studies included prospective assessment of quality of life (QoL) using two previously validated scales.

RESULTS

Although the sponsor halted the study early, 21 patients were enrolled of which, 15 were evaluable for efficacy and OR. Median age was 74 (range: 57-89), median PSA was 237.5 ng ml(-1) (range: 8.2-2360), visceral disease present in 11 patients (52%), and 17 patients (81%) patients had Gleason score (7-10). Two patients had a partial response (PR) and eight had SD. The OR was 13% (2/15) and the overall clinical benefit (OR+SD) was 67% (10/15). Median time to radiographic disease progression was 2 months (range 2-10 months). Biochemical response assessment was available for 14/15 patients. Any PSA decline was observed in four patients (28.5%; 4/14) with one patient (7%) having >50% PSA decline. Median time to progression by PSA was 2 months (range 1-10 months). With a median follow-up of 32 months, median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range: 2-37) and three patients remain alive at the data cutoff (5/2013) for an OS of 14% at 4 years on an intent-to-treat analysis. Major non-haematologic toxicities included fatigue (19%) and pneumonia (14%). Main laboratory toxicities included hyperglycaemia (24%) and hypophosphatemia (14%). Also, 52% of enrolled patients had serious adverse events. Other toxicities were consistent with previously reported adverse events with temsirolimus. Despite these observed adverse events, temsirolimus did not adversely impact QoL.

CONCLUSION

Temsirolimus monotherapy has minimal activity in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC.

Assessment of efficacy, safety and quality of life of 55 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with temsirolimus: a single-center experience in Japan

BACKGROUND

To evaluate experience of the use of temsirolimus for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in a single center in Japan.

METHODS

This study included 55 consecutive patients with mRCC who received temsirolimus in a routine clinical setting, and retrospectively reviewed the comprehensive outcomes of these patients.

RESULTS

Of the 55 patients, 20 had a Karnofsky performance status of ≤80, and 5, 41 and 9 were classified into favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center model. Initially, 25 mg of temsirolimus was applied weekly; however, dose modification was required in 19 patients, resulting in a relative dose intensity of 90.5 % throughout this series. As the best responses to temsirolimus, 4, 44 and 7 were judged to have a partial response, stable disease and progressive disease, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients following the introduction of temsirolimus was 7.0 and 25.0 months, respectively. Of several factors examined, only the pretreatment C-reactive protein level was shown to be independently associated with both PFS and OS. The common adverse events related to temsirolimus corresponding to ≥grade 3 were anemia in 4, thrombocytopenia in 3, stomatitis in 3 and hyperglycemia in 3. Quality of life analysis using 36-Item Short Form showed that there were no significant differences in any scale scores between surveys performed before and 3 months after the introduction of temsirolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

Temsirolimus was well tolerated and facilitated comparatively favorable cancer control in Japanese patients with mRCC.

A phase I study of decitabine and rapamycin in relapsed/refractory AML

A phase I study utilizing decitabine (DAC) followed by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, rapamycin, in patients with relapsed/refractory adult AML was undertaken to assess safety and feasibility. Patients received DAC 20mg/m(2) intravenously daily for 5 days followed by rapamycin from day 6 to day 25 at doses of 2 mg, 4 mg, and 6 mg/day in a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Twelve patients completed treatment for safety evaluation. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached, and except for grade 3 mucositis in 4 patients, no other significant unexpected non-hematologic toxicities have occurred indicating safety of this regimen. This trial is registered at clinical trials.gov as NCT00861874.

A phase Ib combination study of RO4929097, a gamma-secretase inhibitor, and temsirolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background To determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics of RO4929097in combination with temsirolimus. Methods Escalating doses of RO4929097 and temsirolimus were administered at three dose levels. Patients received once daily oral RO4929097 on a 3 days on/4 days off schedule every week, and weekly intravenous temsirolimus. Blood samples were collected for PK analysis. Archival tissue specimens were collected for Notch pathway biomarker analysis and genotyping of frequent oncogenic mutations. Results Seventeen patients with refractory advanced solid tumors were enrolled in three dose levels (DLs): DL1 (RO4929097 10 mg; Temsirolimus 25 mg), DL2 (RO4929097 20 mg; Temsirolimus 25 mg), and DL3 (RO4929097 20 mg; Temsirolimus 37.5 mg). The most common toxicities related to the study drug combination included: fatigue (82 %; grade 3 6 %), mucositis, (71 %; grade 3 6 %), neutropenia (59 %; grade 3 12 %), anemia (59 %; grade 3 0 %), and hypertriglyceridemia (59 %; grade 3 0 %). Two dose-limiting toxicities, grade 3 rash and grade 3 mucositis, were observed in the same patient in the first dose level prompting dose expansion. Eleven patients (73 %) had stable disease as their best response. Co-administration of RO4929097 was associated with increased clearance and reduced exposure to temsirolimus, suggestive of drug-drug interaction via CYP3A4 induction. No correlation between the expression of Notch pathway biomarkers or genotype and time to progression was noted. Conclusions RO4929097 can be safely combined with temsirolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors. The RP2D was established at 20 mg of RO4929097 combined with 37.5 mg of temsirolimus.

Conversion to sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center study

INTRODUCTION

As an immunosuppressive treatment, cyclosporine carries a significant risk of nephrotoxicity. In this study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of sirolimus conversion in our kidney transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sirolimus conversion in 99 kidney transplant recipients was evaluated. Serum level of creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and the occurrence of adverse effects of sirolimus were evaluated at conversion time and 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after conversion.

RESULTS

The major causes of conversion were chronic allograft nephropathy and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. The median time to conversion and follow-up were 54.7 months and 24 months, respectively. Three patients died during the study period. The acute rejection rate was 4%. In 16.6% of the patients, sirolimus was discontinued because of refractory adverse effects. No significant changes in estimated GFR and incidence of adverse effects were observed between patients with baseline estimated GFR lower or higher than 40 mL/min. Patients with early sirolimus conversion (less than 6 months after transplant) had improvement of their GFR (59.9 +/- 22.3 mL/min to 68.0 +/- 15.5 mL/min, P = .02), while kidney recipients with late conversion did not show such an improvement. The difference between GFRs in these two groups reached significant level at 12 months and stayed significant until the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes that conversion of cyclosporine to sirolimus could be associated with stable kidney allograft function. However, cyclosporine discontinuation should be considered early when it is indicated.

New-generation drug-eluting stent experience in the percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the NEST registry

OBJECTIVES

To explore the 2-year clinical outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease treated with overall new drug-eluting stent (DES) options.

BACKGROUND

Recent available data have shown the feasibility and the safety of new DESs, mainly evaluating the everolimus-eluting stents in the setting of ULMCA disease.

METHODS

Patients with ULMCA disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-, zotarolimus-, and biolimus A9-eluting stents were prospectively evaluated. The study objective was the composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), consisting of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2-year clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients were analyzed. The mean EuroSCORE and SYNTAX scores were 4.7 ± 2.6 and 27.5 ± 8.3, respectively. Distal location was present in 126 patients (81.8%) and 96 lesions (76.3%) were true Medina bifurcations. The 2-stent technique was used in 73 cases (57.9%). Everolimus-, zotarolimus-, and biolimus A9-eluting stents were implanted in 68 patients (44.2%), 46 patients (29.9%), and 40 patients (25.9%), respectively. At a median clinical follow-up of 551.5 days (interquartile range, 360.8-1045.5 days), MACEs occurred in 29 patients (18.8%). Ten patients (6.5%) died, and 2 deaths (1.3%) were adjudicated as cardiac. No patient had myocardial infarction or definite stent thrombosis (ST). One probable and 1 possible ST were adjudicated. TVR was required in 19 patients (12.3%) and target lesion revascularization was required in only 7 patients (4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, despite the presence of complex distal left main lesions, new DESs in ULMCA disease appear to be promising in terms of safety and efficacy at 2-year clinical follow-up.

Management of adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated with everolimus: observations from a phase III clinical trial

Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex, renal angiomyolipoma and tuberous sclerosis complex, and, in combination with exemestane, for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after failure of treatment with letrozole or anastrozole. Results from the phase III BOLERO-2 trial demonstrated that everolimus in combination with exemestane provided significant clinical benefit to patients with advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Although everolimus is generally well tolerated, as with most therapies administered in an advanced cancer setting, drug-related adverse events (AEs) inevitably occur. Most common AEs observed in the everolimus studies include stomatitis, rash, infection, noninfectious pneumonitis, and hyperglycemia. Clinical awareness and early identification of such AEs by oncology nurses are essential to dosing (interruptions, reduction, and treatment discontinuation); quality of life; and, ultimately, patient outcomes. Because everolimus has already been shown to significantly improve clinical efficacy in patients with advanced breast cancer, a proactive approach to the practical management of AEs associated with this mTOR inhibitor as well as other most common AEs observed in this patient population has been reviewed and outlined here.

Everolimus as second- or third-line treatment of advanced endometrial cancer: ENDORAD, a phase II trial of GINECO

BACKGROUND

Patients with recurrent/metastatic endometrial cancer that progresses after chemotherapy have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Preclinical data suggest the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus may provide clinical benefit in these patients.

METHODS

In this multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer refractory to one or two previous chemotherapy regimens received everolimus 10 mg per day until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the non-progressive disease rate at 3 months. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free, and overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were enrolled (median age, 65 years); 66% received one previous chemotherapy regimen. The 3-month non-progressive disease rate was 36% (95% confidence interval 22-52%), including two patients (5%) with partial response (PR). At 6 months, two additional patients experienced PR. Median duration of response was 3.1 months. Median progression-free and OS were 2.8 months and 8.1 months, respectively. The most common adverse events were anaemia (100%), fatigue (93%), hypercholesterolaemia (81%), and lymphopenia (81%).

CONCLUSION

Everolimus demonstrated efficacy and acceptable tolerability in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic endometrial cancer. These results support the further development of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-targeted therapies in endometrial cancer.

High incidence of rejection episodes and poor tolerance of sirolimus in a protocol with early steroid withdrawal and calcineurin inhibitor-free maintenance therapy in renal transplantation: experiences of a randomized prospective single-center study

Immunosuppressive maintenance therapy after kidney transplantation leads to various undesired side effects such as calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-associated nephrotoxicity or elevated cardiovascular risk due to posttransplantation diabetes and hypertension. These effects show negative impacts on long-term allograft function as well as patient morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we used an immunosuppressive regimen with early corticosteroid withdrawal (ESW), maintenance therapy containing tacrolimus, sirolimus (SRL), and mycophenolate sodium for 3 months followed by a prospective randomized trial comparing a CNI free versus a low-dose CNI therapy. The primary endpoint was 6-month graft function. Among 75 patients, ESW was performed after 4 days in 65 patients. Over the following 3 months before randomization to CNI-free maintenance therapy, we experienced a high number (25%) of SRL discontinuations due to adverse events, including leukopenia, anemia, arthritis, and pneumonitis. In addition there were significantly more allograft rejection episodes in the CNI-free group (P = .017) during the study period leading to a switch from SRL to a CNI. Despite the higher rate of rejection episodes in the CNI-free groups, glomerular filtration rates (GFR) at 6 months were comparable between the study groups (P = .25). After 1 year only 9.2% (6/65) of all patients treated with SRL remained on this drug. Conclusion, there was an unacceptably high rate of SRL intolerance using an ESW and CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen combined with a significantly higher rate of rejection episodes.

A phase II study of temsirolimus and erlotinib in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic, platinum-refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a validated target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC, resistance to anti-EGFR therapy inevitably occurs. Downstream activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is an established resistance mechanism. Concurrent mTOR blockade may improve efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Erlotinib 150 mg daily and temsirolimus 15 mg weekly were administered to patients with platinum-refractory R/M HNSCC and ECOG performance status 0-2. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Correlative studies determined PIK3CA and HRAS mutation status; p16, EGFR, pS6K, pAkt and PTEN expression; and pre- and post-treatment plasma levels of 20 immunomodulatory cytokines.

RESULTS

Twelve patients enrolled; six withdrew within 6 weeks due to toxicity or death, prompting early closure of the trial. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, gastrostomy tube infection, peritonitis, pneumonia, dyspnea, and HN edema. Median PFS was 1.9 months. Median overall survival was 4.0 months. Six/12 tumors were p16(+), 9/11 lacked measurable PTEN expression, and 1/12 harbored a PIK3CA mutation. On exploratory analysis, high baseline plasma VEGF and interferon-gamma levels marginally associated with tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of erlotinib and temsirolimus was poorly tolerated. Low prevalence of PTEN expression and 8% incidence of PIK3CA mutations indicate biological relevance of this pathway in R/M disease. Investigation of more tolerable combinations of EGFR and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway inhibitors in selected HNSCC patients is warranted.

The efficacy of tacrolimus and sirolimus in heavily pre-treated unresectable thymic malignancies

BACKGROUND

Thymomas and thymic carcinomas, although uncommon, constitute a significant proportion of anterior mediastinal tumours. Systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for inoperable or recurrent disease, but immunosuppressive therapy may provide an alternative treatment strategy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present a series of 18 patients diagnosed with unresectable thymic tumours, of which eight received immunosuppressive therapy following relapse after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Eight individuals were treated with primary immunotherapy after a median of 3.5 lines of chemotherapy (range 2-6 lines), of which 3 had confirmed myasthenia gravis (MG). After 3 months, 2 patients achieved a radiological partial response and 4 had stable disease. The median time to progression measured 6.8 months (CI 1.4-19.3 months). Two of the 4 patients who progressed on tacrolimus and prednisolone received sirolimus. One of these patients has stable disease (SD) at 21 months, and the other has SD at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although previous case reports have related tacrolimus therapy with tumour shrinkage in patients with MG-associated invasive thymomas, these data are the first to demonstrate the efficacy of such immunosuppressive agents in a larger cohort of heavily pre-treated patients with thymic tumours. Our experience adds to the limited anecdotal evidence in the literature, and suggests that immunosuppressive agents represent a valuable additional treatment for thymic tumours.

A phase I trial of the IGF-1R antibody Cixutumumab in combination with temsirolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) plays a critical role in promoting tumor cell growth and is frequently activated in breast cancer. In preclinical studies, the antitumor activity of mTOR inhibitors is attenuated by feedback up-regulation of AKT mediated in part by Insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-1R). We designed a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacodynamic effects of the IGF-1R antibody Cixutumumab in combination with temsirolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to standard therapies. A 3 + 3 Phase I design was chosen. Temsirolimus and Cixutumumab were administered intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. Of the 26 patients enrolled, four did not complete cycle 1 because of disease progression (n = 3) or comorbid condition (n = 1) and were replaced. The MTD was determined from the remaining 22 patients, aged 34-72 (median 48) years. Most patients (86 %) had estrogen receptor positive cancer. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease was 3. The MTD was determined to be Cixutumumab 4 mg/kg and temsirolimus 15 mg weekly. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included mucositis, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Other adverse events included grade 1/2 fatigue, anemia, and hyperglycemia. No objective responses were observed, but four patients experienced stable disease that lasted for at least 4 months. Compared with baseline, there was a significant increase in the serum levels of IGF-1 (p < 0.001) and IGFBP-3 (p = 0.019) on day 2. Compared with day 2, there were significant increases in the serum levels of IGF-1 (p < 0.001), IGF-2 (p = 0.001), and IGFBP-3 (p = 0.019) on day 8. A phase II study in women with metastatic breast cancer is ongoing.

Multicenter phase II study of tivozanib (AV-951) and everolimus (RAD001) for patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Treatments that target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway have efficacy in colorectal cancer. We evaluated tolerability and efficacy of tivozanib (an oral VEGF receptor-1, -2, -3 inhibitor) plus everolimus (an oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor).

METHODS

The phase Ib study followed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with three dose levels. The primary objective in the follow-on phase II study was improvement in 2-month progression-free survival (PFS) from 30% (historical benchmark) to 50% in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicities in the phase Ib study were grade 3 fatigue and dehydration. Oral tivozanib (1 mg daily for 3 of 4 weeks) and oral everolimus (10 mg daily continuously) were advanced to a 40-patient phase II study. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia and hypophosphatemia. The 2-month PFS rate was 50%, with 20 of 40 patients having stable disease (SD). Seven (18%) patients were treated for ≥6 months. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 3.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-3.6 months) and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4-10.6 months), respectively. Patients who developed grade 1+ hypertension had increased SD rates (65.2% vs. 29.4%) and longer OS times (10.6 vs. 3.7 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The oral combination of tivozanib and everolimus was well tolerated, with stable disease achieved in 50% of patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer.

Second line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The Institut Gustave Roussy experience with targeted therapies in 251 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Sequential treatment is currently the standard of care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, very little is known on how many patients (pts) can receive second line or further, and on how to predict those pts. The goal of this study was to evaluate these questions in a large series of pts treated in our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from all mRCC patients treated at the IGR from 2005 to 2009 with first line targeted therapy (sunitinib (SU), sorafenib (SO), bevacizumab (B), temsirolimus or everolimus (pooled together as mammalian target of rapamycin - mTOR)) were analysed. Only patients with subsequent follow-up have been included in this analysis. Patients were defined as 'non-eligible' for second treatment if: they were (i) still on first line treatment, (ii) not showing progressive (durable stable disease or partial response or complete response) or (iii) if they refused a second line treatment.

RESULTS

251 patients, median age 60 years, median follow-up 20.2 months were treated with targeted therapy with a median overall survival (OS) of 25.8 months. Median OS with SU (127), SO (60) or B (61) were 26.3, 16.4 and 32.5 months respectively. Only three patients received an mTOR inhibitor as first line. According to the eligibility criteria, the percentage of patients who received a second line was 59% (n=61/103), 52% (n=30/58) and 79% (n=38/48) for Su, So and B, respectively. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC) classification (P=0.02) and first line agent (P=0.001) were significant predictive factor for receiving a second line of treatment. Overall, patients receiving B were in better general condition, with 77% of performance status score (PS)=0 compared to SO (53%) and SU (48%) (P=0.005). Among the 131 patients who received a second line, the median OS from the start of second line treatment was 20.8 months for a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (n=98; 75%) and 16.6 months for an mTOR (n=32; 42%) (P=0.12). Furthermore, the percentage of patients who received a third line was 56% (27/48), 28% (7/25) and 65% (13/20) for SU, SO and B, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The median OS in patients treated with targeted therapies for mRCC in The Institut Gustave Roussy exceeds 2 years. The use of second line varies from 52% to 79%. Further studies are needed to validate the MSKCC groups and first line therapy as predictive factor for second line treatment.

Efficacy and safety of FIREHAWK® abluminal groove filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of long coronary lesions: nine-month angiographic and one-year clinical results from TARGET I trial long cohort

BACKGROUND

Previous studies indicated that long coronary lesions are one of the key predictors of drug-eluting stent (DES) failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of the long length FIREHAWK(®) stent in long coronary artery disease.

METHODS

The long cohort of TARGET I was a prospective, multicenter, single arm trial. It was planned to enroll 50 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for the treatment of de novo long lesions in a native coronary artery. The major inclusion criteria of the trial was that patients were intended to undergo the treatment of a long target lesion(s) with diameter stenosis ≥ 70% and reference vessel diameter 2.5 mm to 4.0 mm by visual estimate, that needed to be covered by at least one 33 mm or 38 mm stent or multiple long stents overlapped. The angiographic follow-up was planned at 9-month and the clinical follow-up will be up to 5 years. The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss at 9-month.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (mean age (57.6 ± 10.2) years) with 59 de novo long lesions (reference vessel diameter (2.85 ± 0.44) mm, lesion length (35.2 ± 9.4) mm, and stent length (41.8 ± 11.3) mm) were enrolled. The angiographic follow-up rate was 92% at 9-month. The in-stent late loss was (0.16 ± 0.16) mm. Proximal edge, distal edge and in-segment late loss (mm) were 0.21 ± 0.35, 0.03 ± 0.33, and 0.07 ± 0.26, respectively. No in-segment binary restenosis was observed. At 1-year no death, Q wave myocardial infarction (MI), or stent thrombosis occurred. Non-Q-wave MI occurred in two patients (4%) due to procedural complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of long coronary lesions with the FIREHAWK(®) stent is able to produce similar results as observed in the FIREHAWK(®) FIM clinical trial. Based on this result, we are confident in the treatment prospect of the FIREHAWK(®) for long coronary lesions.

Effects of stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on endothelial function after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been shown to enhance endothelial healing after spontaneous or iatrogenic arterial disruption. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment might attenuate endothelial dysfunction after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation that may be associated with adverse cardiac events during follow-up. This prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated whether G-CSF improved endothelial dysfunction after SES implantation.

METHODS

One hundred patients who underwent SES implantation were randomly assigned to the G-CSF (n = 50) or the placebo group (n = 50). They received daily subcutaneous injection of 300 μg G-CSF or saline for 5 days. Endothelial function was estimated by measuring the coronary vasoreactivity in the segments 15 mm proximal and distal to SES in response to intracoronary infusion of acetylcholine (10(-8) and 10(-7) mol/L) at 9-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Follow-up angiography was performed in 41 G-CSF patients (82%) and 46 placebo patients (92%) (P = .14). Changes in coronary diameter in response to acetylcholine infusion in the proximal segment were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, vasoconstriction in the distal segment in response to 10(-8) mol/L (-3.9% ± 6.4% vs -7.0% ± 8.1%, P < .05) and 10(-7) mol/L (-8.8% ± 11.0% vs -15.2% ± 7.6%, P < .01) acetylcholine infusion was attenuated in the G-CSF group. Endothelium-independent vasodilatation after nitrate infusion did not differ between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor attenuates endothelial dysfunction after SES implantation.

Efficacy and safety of everolimus for subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (EXIST-1): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Tuberous sclerosis complex is a genetic disorder leading to constitutive activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and growth of benign tumours in several organs. In the brain, growth of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas can cause life-threatening symptoms--eg, hydrocephalus, requiring surgery. In an open-label, phase 1/2 study, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus substantially and significantly reduced the volume of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas. We assessed the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients (aged 0-65 years) in 24 centres in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, the UK, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, and the USA were randomly assigned, with an interactive internet-response system, in a 2:1 ratio to oral everolimus 4·5 mg/m(2) per day (titrated to achieve blood trough concentrations of 5-15 ng/mL) or placebo. Eligible patients had a definite diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex and at least one lesion with a diameter of 1 cm or greater, and either serial growth of a subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, a new lesion of 1 cm or greater, or new or worsening hydrocephalus. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with confirmed response--ie, reduction in target volume of 50% or greater relative to baseline in subependymal giant cell astrocytomas. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00789828.

FINDINGS

117 patients were randomly assigned to everolimus (n=78) or placebo (n=39). 27 (35%) patients in the everolimus group had at least 50% reduction in the volume of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas versus none in the placebo group (difference 35%, 95% CI 15-52; one-sided exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, p<0·0001). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2; no patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were mouth ulceration (25 [32%] in the everolimus group vs two [5%] in the placebo group), stomatitis (24 [31%] vs eight [21%]), convulsion (18 [23%] vs ten [26%]), and pyrexia (17 [22%] vs six [15%]).

INTERPRETATION

These results support the use of everolimus for subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis. Additionally, everolimus might represent a disease-modifying treatment for other aspects of tuberous sclerosis.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

MicroRNA-21 mediates the rapamycin-induced suppression of endothelial proliferation and migration

Rapamycin suppresses endothelial proliferation and migration, which leads to delayed re-endothelialization in the rapamycin-eluted stents that are used in coronary heart disease patients. Because microRNAs (miRs) play important roles in endothelial angiogenesis, we tested the hypothesis that rapamycin induces endothelial suppression, partly through pathways that involve miRs. Rapamycin treatment increased the expression of miR-21 in HUVECs. The downregulation of miR-21 by inhibitors abolished the negative effects of rapamycin on endothelial cell growth and mobility. RhoB was confirmed as a direct target gene of miR-21. Knockdown of Raptor by siRNA mimicked the effects of rapamycin on miR-21 expression. Our study provides a new explanation of the mechanism of rapamycin-mediated inhibition of endothelial proliferation and migration.

Profiling sirolimus-induced inflammatory syndrome: a prospective tricentric observational study

Background

The use of the immunosuppressant sirolimus in kidney transplantation has been made problematic by the frequent occurrence of various side effects, including paradoxical inflammatory manifestations, the pathophysiology of which has remained elusive.

Methods

30 kidney transplant recipients that required a switch from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus-based immunosuppression, were prospectively followed for 3 months. Inflammatory symptoms were quantified by the patients using visual analogue scales and serum samples were collected before, 15, 30, and 90 days after the switch.

Results

66% of patients reported at least 1 inflammatory symptom, cutaneo-mucosal manifestations being the most frequent. Inflammatory symptoms were characterized by their lability and stochastic nature, each patient exhibiting a unique clinical presentation. The biochemical profile was more uniform with a drop of hemoglobin and a concomitant rise of inflammatory acute phase proteins, which peaked in the serum 1 month after the switch. Analyzing the impact of sirolimus introduction on cytokine microenvironment, we observed an increase of IL6 and TNFα without compensation of the negative feedback loops dependent on IL10 and soluble TNF receptors. IL6 and TNFα changes correlated with the intensity of biochemical and clinical inflammatory manifestations in a linear regression model.

Conclusions

Sirolimus triggers a destabilization of the inflammatory cytokine balance in transplanted patients that promotes a paradoxical inflammatory response with mild stochastic clinical symptoms in the weeks following drug introduction. This pathophysiologic mechanism unifies the various individual inflammatory side effects recurrently reported with sirolimus suggesting that they should be considered as a single syndromic entity.

Consideration of dual anti-platelet therapy duration after drug-eluting stent implantation in a Japanese population: a five-year follow-up after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risks and benefits of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT: thienopyridine plus aspirin) following placement of drug-eluting stents (DES). The optimal duration of DAPT is not well established.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospective registry of 2,050 patients with sirolimus-eluting stents during a 5-year follow-up. We divided 1,691 patients into two groups according to DAPT duration (DAPT ≤12 months (n=749) and DAPT >12 months (n=942)) and compared the clinical outcomes using a landmark analysis.

RESULTS

The frequencies of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: 15.6% vs. 18.2%), death (10.0% vs. 11.5%), myocardial infarction (2.3% vs. 2.1%), target lesion revascularization (4.5% vs. 6.3%) and stent thrombosis (0.8% vs. 0.8%) were similar between the two groups. However, the frequency of bleeding was higher in the DAPT >12 months group (1.1% vs. 2.6%, p=0.030). The adjusted 12-month landmark analysis showed no differences in the incidence of MACE (hazard ratio (HR) 0.892; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.689-1.155; p=0.385) or a composite of target vessel revascularization, cardiac death and myocardial infarction (target vessel failure: HR 0.922; 95% CI 0.678-1.255; p=0.606). There were no differences in the frequency of stent thrombosis between the two groups during years 2 to 5 after stenting; however, with regard to bleeding, an increase in the frequency of hemorrhage events was observed after four years from the index procedures in the DAPT >12 months group.

CONCLUSION

DAPT performed beyond 12 months is associated with increased an frequency of bleeding complications and does not prevent the incidence of MACE, including stent thrombosis, during five years of follow-up after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Conducting larger, randomized studies will therefore be needed to confirm this finding.

Granuloma-forming interstitial pneumonia occurring one year after the start of everolimus therapy

We experienced a case of interstitial lung disease (ILD) that occurred one year after the start of everolimus therapy for renal cell carcinoma. The pathological features included interstitial pneumonia with granuloma formation. Everolimus is known to cause ILD; however, its pathology is unclear. Granuloma-forming interstitial pneumonia associated with everolimus is uncommon, although it may be one of the pathological patterns associated with everolimus-induced ILD. This is a slow-onset case of everolimus-induced ILD in a patient with renal cell carcinoma. Physicians should thus be aware of the potential for the development of ILD at any time during the administration of everolimus therapy.

A feasibility and efficacy study of rapamycin and erlotinib for recurrent pediatric low-grade glioma (LGG)

BACKGROUND

To determine the toxicity and efficacy of rapamycin and erlotinib for the treatment of recurrent pediatric low-grade gliomas (LGGs).

METHODS

Patients <21 years of age with recurrent LGGs who had failed conventional treatment were eligible, including those with NF1. The treatment consisted of two phases, a feasibility portion which assessed the toxicity of erlotinib at 65 mg/m(2) /day once daily and rapamycin at 0.8 mg/m(2) /dose twice daily for 28 consecutive days.

RESULTS

Nineteen (19) patients, median age of 8 years, with recurrent LGGs received the two-drug regimen. Eight (8) of the patients had NF1. The combination of erlotinib and rapamycin was well tolerated and no patient was removed from study due to toxicity. All 19 patients were evaluable for response and one child, with NF1, had a partial response to treatment. Six (6) patients received the planned 12 courses of treatment. The reasons for stoppage of therapy before 1 year of treatment were poor compliance (1), parental desire for withdrawal (1), persistent vomiting which pre-dated initiation of therapy (1), and radiographic progression (10). In those patients with stabilization of disease for 12 months or greater, 3 stayed on therapy and ultimately developed progressive disease, and one patient stopped therapy at 12 months and progressed. Two (2) patients, both with NF1, have had >1 year disease control.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of rapamycin and erlotinib is well tolerated in children with LGGs. Objective responses were infrequent, although there was prolonged disease stabilization in some patients with LGGs, especially in two children with NF1.

Safety and efficacy of second-generation everolimus-eluting Xience V stents versus zotarolimus-eluting resolute stents in real-world practice: patient-related and stent-related outcomes from the multicenter prospective EXCELLENT and RESOLUTE-Korea registries

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the Xience V/Promus everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Abbott Vascular, Temecula, California) with the Endeavor Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES-R) (Medtronic Cardiovascular, Santa Rosa, California) in "all-comer" cohorts.

BACKGROUND

Only 2 randomized controlled trials have compared these stents.

METHODS

The EXCELLENT (Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher to Reduce Late Loss After Stenting) and RESOLUTE-Korea registries prospectively enrolled 3,056 patients treated with the EES and 1,998 patients treated with the ZES-R, respectively, without exclusions. Stent-related composite outcomes (target lesion failure [TLF]) and patient-related composite outcomes were compared in crude and propensity score-matched analyses.

RESULTS

Of 5,054 patients, 3,830 (75.8%) had off-label indication (2,217 treated with EES and 1,613 treated with ZES-R). The stent-related outcome (82 [2.7%] vs. 58 [2.9%], p = 0.662) and the patient-related outcome (225 [7.4%] vs. 153 [7.7%], p = 0.702) did not differ between EES and ZES-R, respectively, at 1 year, which was corroborated by similar results from the propensity score-matched cohort. The rate of definite or probable stent thrombosis (18 [0.6%] vs. 7 [0.4%], p = 0.306) also was similar. In multivariate analysis, off-label indication was the strongest predictor of TLF (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.882; 95% confidence interval: 1.226 to 6.779; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

In this robust real-world registry with unrestricted use of EES and ZES-R, both stents showed comparable safety and efficacy at 1-year follow-up. Overall incidences of TLF and definite stent thrombosis were low, even in the patients with off-label indication, suggesting excellent safety and efficacy of both types of second-generation drug-eluting stents.

Everolimus plus octreotide long-acting repeatable in patients with colorectal neuroendocrine tumors: a subgroup analysis of the phase III RADIANT-2 study

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is increasing, and patients with this disease have particularly poor prognoses. Treatment options are limited, and survival times have not improved in the past decade.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of the efficacy and tolerability of everolimus plus octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR) was conducted in patients with colorectal NETs enrolled in the phase III RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Second Trial (RADIANT-2) study. The primary endpoint (progression-free survival [PFS]), secondary endpoints (including objective response rate), and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients with colorectal NETs receiving everolimus plus octreotide LAR had a significantly longer median PFS (29.9 months; n = 19) than did those receiving placebo plus octreotide LAR (6.6 months; n = 20). Everolimus plus octreotide LAR treatment also significantly reduced the risk for disease progression (hazard ratio: 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.89; p = .011). Although no objective responses were observed, tumor shrinkage was more frequently noted in the everolimus plus octreotide LAR arm than in the placebo plus octreotide LAR arm (67% vs. 37%, respectively). The combination of everolimus plus octreotide LAR was generally well tolerated by patients with colorectal NETs; rash and stomatitis were the most commonly reported adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus plus octreotide LAR treatment had significant benefits and improved outcomes for patients with advanced colorectal NETs compared with placebo plus octreotide LAR treatment. Results of this exploratory analysis are consistent with those reported from the RADIANT-2 primary analysis. These findings support additional investigations of everolimus plus octreotide LAR in patients with colorectal NETs.

A Phase 1 dose-finding and pharmacodynamic study of rapamycin in combination with bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Preclinical studies have demonstrated the additive effect of rapamycin with bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. We conducted a Phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of the combination in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Adult participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma received intravenous bevacizumab (5mg/kg every 14 days) and oral rapamycin (1-6 mg/day; 3+3 dose escalation design). Computed tomography assessed tumour response and treatment safety. Pharmacokinetics assessment established rapamycin blood concentrations pre- and post-dose. Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography analysed the tumour region for blood flow, permeability surface area product, fractional intravascular blood volume and extracellular-extravascular volume.

RESULTS

Twenty-four participants were treated. There were two dose limiting toxicities with rapamycin 5mg: grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 mucositis. The maximally tolerated dose of rapamycin was 4 mg. Adverse events (grade 1-2) included hyperglycaemia (83%), thrombocytopenia (75%), fatigue (46%), mucositis (46%), anorexia (42%), diarrhoea (33%) and proteinuria (12.5%). Of 20 evaluable participants, one reached complete response that lasted 4.5 months, two reached partial response, 14 reached stable disease and three had progressive disease. Median overall survival was 9.4 months; progression-free survival was 5.5 months. Dose level and steady state area under the concentration time curve for hour zero to infinity of rapamycin correlated inversely with blood flow rate and change in permeability-surface area. After 22 days of treatment, there were significant reductions from baseline in blood flow rate, permeability-surface area and fractional intracellular blood volume.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended Phase 2 dose of rapamycin is 4 mg in combination with bevacizumab. Evidence of anti-vascular activity was observed together with promising clinical activity.

Prenatal rapamycin results in early and late behavioral abnormalities in wildtype C57BL/6 mice

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling has been shown to be deregulated in a number of genetic, neurodevelopmental disorders including Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, Neurofibromatosis, Fragile X, and Rett syndromes. As a result, mTOR inhibitors, such as rapamycin and its analogs, offer potential therapeutic avenues for these disorders. Some of these disorders-such as Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-can be diagnosed prenatally. Thus, prenatal administration of these inhibitors could potentially prevent the development of the devastating symptoms associated with these disorders. To assess the possible detrimental effects of prenatal rapamycin treatment, we evaluated both early and late behavioral effects of a single rapamycin treatment at embryonic day 16.5 in wildtype C57Bl/6 mice. This treatment adversely impacted early developmental milestones as well as motor function in adult animals. Rapamycin also resulted in anxiety-like behaviors during both early development and adulthood but did not affect adult social behaviors. Together, these results indicate that a single, prenatal rapamycin treatment not only adversely affects early postnatal development but also results in long lasting negative effects, persisting into adulthood. These findings are of importance in considering prenatal administration of rapamycin and related drugs in the treatment of patients with neurogenetic, neurodevelopmental disorders.

Phase I/II study of sorafenib in combination with temsirolimus for recurrent glioblastoma or gliosarcoma: North American Brain Tumor Consortium study 05-02

The activity of single-agent targeted molecular therapies in glioblastoma has been limited to date. The North American Brain Tumor Consortium examined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of combination therapy with sorafenib, a small molecule inhibitor of Raf, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β, and temsirolimus (CCI-779), an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin. This was a phase I/II study. The phase I component used a standard 3 × 3 dose escalation scheme to determine the safety and tolerability of this combination therapy. The phase II component used a 2-stage design; the primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6) rate. Thirteen patients enrolled in the phase I component. The maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) for combination therapy was sorafenib 800 mg daily and temsirolimus 25 mg once weekly. At the MTD, grade 3 thrombocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Eighteen patients were treated in the phase II component. At interim analysis, the study was terminated and did not proceed to the second stage. No patients remained progression free at 6 months. Median PFS was 8 weeks. The toxicity of this combination therapy resulted in a maximum tolerated dose of temsirolimus that was only one-tenth of the single-agent dose. Minimal activity in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme was seen at the MTD of the 2 combined agents.

mTOR inhibitor RAD001 promotes metastasis in a rat model of pancreatic neuroendocrine cancer

Inhibition of mTOR is commonly considered a valid target in cancer treatment, but this assertion does not address effects on the immune microenvironment that may be detrimental to cancer treatment. Here we show how administration of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) results in the occurrence of distant metastasis in a rat model of pancreatic cancer. RAD001 was administered twice weekly for 4.5 weeks as a single treatment or combined with [(177)Lu-DOTA,Tyr3]octreotate ((177)Lu-DOTATATE), where the latter targets the somatostatin receptor-2. The hypothesized synergistic therapeutic effect of RAD001 combined with (177)Lu-DOTATATE was, however, not observed in our experiments. The combination was shown to be less effective than (177)Lu-DOTATATE alone. Unexpectedly, tumor metastasis was observed in 77% of the subjects treated with RAD001, either alone or as part of the combination treatment. This was a striking effect, because metastasis did not occur in control or (177)Lu-DOTATATE-treated animals, including those where the primary tumor was surgically removed. These findings may be important clinically among noncompliant patients or patients that discontinue RAD001 therapy because of adverse effects.

[Management of side effects of everolimus treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma]

Treatment with everolimus is known to prolong progression-free survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma resistant against tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy. The side effects must be known for more effective use of this drug. Information of side effects was collected from a randomized controlled study, the early post-marketing phase vigilance and from our own experience. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was a potentially severe side effect. Incidence of ILD was relatively large compared with that of other target therapy agents. Infections, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis and others were experienced as other side effects. However, there were few uncontrollable side effects. Management of side effects of everolimus can be improved by obtaining sufficient knowledge.

Safety and efficacy of overlapping homogenous drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of 4 homogenous overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. We selected 1,349 consecutive patients (62.1 ± 14.9 yr, 69.4% male) who received homogenous overlapping DESs in diffuse de novo coronary lesions from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from April 2006 through September 2010. They were divided into 4 groups based on type of DES implanted - Paclitaxel (PES), Sirolimus (SES), Zotarolimus (ZES) and Everolimus (EES)-eluting stents. Primary endpoint was 12-month MACE. We also studied EES versus other DESs (PES + SES + ZES). Mean stent length was 26.2 ± 7.5 mm and mean stent diameter was 3.1 ± 0.4 mm. Average number of stents used per vessel was 2.2 ± 0.5. Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in PES, SES, ZES, and EES groups were 9.5%, 9.2%, 7.5%, and 3.8%, respectively (P = 0.013). In EES group, overall MACE and repeat revascularization were lowest, and no incidence of stent thrombosis was observed. Non-fatal MI was highest in PES, almost similar in SES and EES with no incidence in ZES group (P = 0.044). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed no differences in the incidence of primary endpoint (P = 0.409). This study shows no significant differences in 12-month MACE among 4 groups.

[Adverse events associated with temsirolimus for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma]

Temsirolimus is an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, with proven efficacy against advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), particularly poor risk and/or non-clear cell RCC, in a randomized first-line phase III trial. In this trial, adverse events (AEs)≥grade 3 occurred in 47.6% of patients treated with temsirolimus alone (n＝208), and the common AEs included asthenia, anemia and hyperglycemia. During the observation period of this trial, drug-related pneumonitis was detected ; 4 patients developed temsirolimus-related pneumonitis, including 2 with ≥grade 3. To date, there have not been any reports analyzing data from a large number of Japanese RCC patients treated with temsirolimus. However, judging from our experience, the severity as well as the frequency of AEs associated with temsirolimus in Japanese patients seem to be similar to those in the Western population. In this study, we summarize our clinical experience with the use of temsirolimus focusing on its AEs and try to clarify the characteristics of temsirolimus-related AEs in Japanese patients, and then present our data relevant to this point from our clinical studies in order to discuss the significance of the management of AEs encountered during treatment with temsirolimus.

Low-dose oral sirolimus and the risk of menstrual-cycle disturbances and ovarian cysts: analysis of the randomized controlled SUISSE ADPKD trial

Sirolimus has been approved for clinical use in non proliferative and proliferative disorders. It inhibits the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway which is also known to regulate ovarian morphology and function. Preliminary observational data suggest the potential for ovarian toxicity but this issue has not been studied in randomized controlled trials. We reviewed the self-reported occurrence of menstrual cycle disturbances and the appearance of ovarian cysts post hoc in an open label randomized controlled phase II trial conducted at the University Hospital Zürich between March 2006 and March 2010. Adult females with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, an inherited kidney disease not known to affect ovarian morphology and function, were treated with 1.3 to 1.5 mg sirolimus per day for a median of 19 months (N = 21) or standard care (N = 18). Sirolimus increased the risk of both oligoamenorrhea (hazard ratio [HR] 4.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 29) and ovarian cysts (HR 4.4, CI 1.1 to 26); one patient was cystectomized five months after starting treatment with sirolimus. We also studied mechanisms of sirolimus-associated ovarian toxicity in rats. Sirolimus amplified signaling in rat ovarian follicles through the pro-proliferative phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Low dose oral sirolimus increases the risk of menstrual cycle disturbances and ovarian cysts and monitoring of sirolimus-associated ovarian toxicity is warranted and might guide clinical practice with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00346918.

Comparison of twelve-month outcomes after percutanous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents from the PROENCY (PROmus ENdeavor CYpher) registry

OBJECTIVES

We compared safety and efficacy outcomes of 3 limus-based drug-eluting stents in the 'all-comers' PROENCY (PROmus/ENdeavor/CYpher) registry.

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on head-to-head comparisons of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) or the sirolimus- eluting stent (SES) in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

PROENCY was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational study including consecutive patients undergoing planned treatment with EES, ZES, or SES. Seventeen centers were designated to place an EES or SES, 14 other centers were designated to place EES or ZES. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 12 months. Unadjusted and propensity-adjusted outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1921 patients were enrolled in the study from February to December 2008, of which 1704 patients received only study stents and were analyzed. At 12 months, the unadjusted major adverse event rate was significantly lower in the EES group versus the ZES group (3.1% vs 8.7%; P=.001) and the SES group (5.2% vs 9.6%; P=.01). This was mainly driven by lower TVR rates [2.6% with EES vs 8.2% with ZES [P<.001] and 4.1% with EES vs 7.0% with SES [P=.05]. Stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable. Adjusted analyses confirmed the unadjusted results.

CONCLUSION

There were no differences in safety outcomes of EES, ZES, and SES at 12 months in PROENCY. However, differences in efficacy were observed between the 3 "limus"-based stents in a real-world patient population.