Balanced analgesia with intravenous ketorolac and patient-controlled morphine following lower abdominal surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy, opioid-sparing effects and any reduction in adverse events of a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion of ketorolac following lower abdominal surgery.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

SETTING

Inpatient elective gynecologic surgical patients.

PATIENTS

60 ASA physical status I or II patients aged 18 to 70 years scheduled for elective abdominal hysterectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Following standardized preparation and anesthesia, continuous i.v. infusions of either ketorolac or placebo were administered for 24 hours postoperatively with a patients' standardized postoperative protocol. Supplementary analgesia was administered by an i.v. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A significantly lower proportion of the patients in the ketorolac group (6%) rated their pain at 24 hours as moderate or severe compared with patients in the placebo group (34%) (p = 0.04). Mean 24-hour morphine consumption was significantly lower in the ketorolac group (43 mg; SEM 5 mg) compared with the placebo group (55 mg SEM 5 mg) (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia between the groups with respect to mean times per hour spent with oxygen saturation (SPO2) less than 85%, more than 85% but less than 90%, or more than 90% but less than 94%, mean hourly SPO2, or the incidence and duration of severe hypoxemic episodes. Nausea and vomiting were the only significant adverse events, and they occurred in 30% of patients in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous infusion of ketorolac combined with morphine delivered via a PCA device would appear to be a valuable method of providing balanced analgesia following lower abdominal surgery.

Intramuscular Toradol, gastrointestinal bleeding, and peptic ulcer perforation: a case report

Peptic ulcers, perforations, and serious gastrointestinal bleeding have not been reported with intramuscular ketoralac tromethamine, the first parenteral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug available for analgesic use. This article presents the case of a 39-year-old black female who underwent surgical repair of a perforated gastric ulcer after receiving multiple dosages of intramuscular ketoralac tromethamine in the emergency room over a period of 21/2 months for the treatment of pain due to chronic pancreatitis.

A double-blind evaluation of ketorolac tromethamine versus acetaminophen in pediatric tonsillectomy: analgesia and bleeding

The study was designed to compare intravenous ketorolac to rectal acetaminophen for analgesia and bleeding in pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy. We studied 50 patients, aged 2-15 yr undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy. In a randomized, prospective double-blind fashion, patients were assigned to receive either ketorolac (1 mg/kg) or rectal acetaminophen (35 mg/kg). Bleeding was evaluated by measuring intraoperative blood loss and noting extra measures required to obtain hemostasis. Bleeding times were also measured before and during surgery. Pain was evaluated using a standard objective pain score for the first 3 h. Persistent pain was treated with morphine, acetaminophen, and codeine and recorded for 24 h. Blood for determination of acetaminophen levels was drawn at 20 and 40 min after the administration of study drugs. Pain scores were not significantly different between the ketorolac and acetaminophen groups. The majority of patients in both groups required additional opioid in the postoperative period. Acetaminophen levels were all less than the therapeutic range. Intraoperative bleeding times were normal in all patients, but blood loss was significantly higher in the ketorolac group (2.67 mL/kg) compared to the acetaminophen group (1.44 mL/kg), P = 0.025. Significantly more measures to achieve hemostasis were required in the ketorolac group (P = 0.012). We conclude that ketorolac is no more effective than high-dose rectal acetaminophen for analgesia in the patient undergoing tonsillectomy. Hemostasis during tonsillectomy was significantly more difficult to achieve in patients receiving ketorolac.

Gastroduodenal toxicity of different nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs

Although the etiologic relation between nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) use and gastrointestinal lesions is well documented, newly introduced NSAIDs deserve a fresh examination for their risk/benefit ratio. To estimate the association between consumption of ketorolac and the occurrence of gastroduodenal lesions, we conducted a case-control study. The study population comprised 600 outpatients with a confirmed endoscopic diagnosis of ulcer and erosion in 1991 and 1992 and 6,000 community controls matched by age and sex. We retrieved the prescription history through a computerized prescription monitoring system. We defined exposure to each study drug as "current" (month of endoscopy and preceding month), "recent" (second or third month preceding endoscopy). and "past" (fourth to sixth month preceding endoscopy). Current users of NSAIDs showed a 30% increase in the incidence of gastroduodenal lesions [odds ratio (OR) = 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.98 - 1.8] after adjustment for recent or past use of any NSAID, recent or past gastrotoxic therapy, recent or past use of gastroprotective drugs, and recent or past use of any other drug. Among NSAIDs, ketorolac was the only one showing a distinctly elevated risk of gastroduodenal lesions (OR = 4.2; 95% CI = 1.9-9.4). Current use of any NSAID was associated with almost a doubling of risk for ulcer alone (OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.3-3.0); no elevation in risk was found for erosions. The adjusted relative risk for ulcer associated with current use of ketorolac was 9.8 (95% CI = 3.4-28.10. Recent and past use of NSAIDs does not increase the risk of ulcer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Is there a clinical interaction between low molecular weight heparin and non-steroidal analgesics after total hip replacement?

The benefits of parenteral non-steroidal analgesic drugs and low molecular weight heparin anticoagulants have been shown before, but there is concern that the use of these agents in combination may potentiate haemorrhagic side-effects because of simultaneous inhibition of the clotting cascade and platelet mechanisms of haemostasis. In a prospective controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing total hip replacement were randomised into two groups. Those in one group received intramuscular ketorolac and those in the other group opioid analgesia. All patients received enoxaparin subcutaneously, once daily. There were 34 patients in the NSAID group and 26 in the opiate group. There were no significant differences between the two groups for intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, transfusion requirements, bruising, wound oozing and leg swelling. From this study it would appear that there is a low risk of significant haemostatic potentiation associated with concurrent use of low molecular weight heparin and a modest dose of ketorolac tromethamine.

Comparison of morphine and ketorolac for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in postoperative cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of intravenous patient-controlled (i.v.-PCA) ketorolac to i.v.-PCA morphine in the treatment of postoperative pain in cancer patients.

DESIGN

In a double-blind, prospective, randomized trial, patients received either morphine in 1 mg/ml concentration or ketorolac 5 mg/ml for postoperative pain control. On arrival to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the patients received 2 ml of medication every 5 min, until satisfactory analgesia was achieved. If pain persisted after 20 ml of study drug had been administered, 0.1 mg/kg morphine was given i.m. On discharge from the PACU, the patients were placed on an i.v.-PCA pump. All patients received a basal infusion of 1 ml/h with a 1-ml on-demand bolus and a lockout interval of 10 min. Patients were offered 0.1 mg/kg morphine IM every 6 h, which they could refuse.

SETTING

University Cancer Center.

PATIENTS

Seventy patients scheduled for abdominal or truncal cancer operations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual analog pain scores (VAPS) and Visual analog sedation scores (VASS) were used to measure the quality of pain control achieved either with ketorolac or morphine. The incidence of side effects was documented.

RESULTS

The VAPS were comparable between the groups. Patients in the ketorolac group requested more supplemental i.m. morphine. However, the total morphine dose and incidence of side effects was significantly higher in patients receiving i.v.-PCA morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that ketorolac supplemented with small doses of morphine is associated with a lower incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus compared to morphine alone. This combination should be considered where immunosuppression from operation and administration of morphine is undesirable.

Combination of intramuscular Ketorolac and low dose epidural morphine for the relief of post-caesarean pain

Epidural morphine produces profound analgesia but also causes many adverse effects in a dose-dependent manner. This double-blind, randomized, prospective study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of low dose (2 mg) epidural morphine in combination with 30 mg intramuscular (IM) Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with potent analgesic activity, in patients suffering pain after caesarean surgery. Ninety parturients who received epidural anaesthesia in the postoperative period were divided into 3 equal groups: group A received epidural morphine 2 mg plus IM placebo; group B received epidural morphine 2 mg plus IM Ketorolac 30 mg; and group C received epidural saline placebo plus IM Ketorolac 30 mg. All patients were observed for pain relief, vital signs and adverse effects for 24 hours post drug administration. Results showed that group B had statistically significant superior pain relief to that of the other 2 groups. The incidence of adverse effects was similar between those of group A and B. We concluded that the addition of Ketorolac by IM administration enhanced the analgesic effect of low dose (2 mg) epidural morphine in the relief of post-caesarean pain without potentiating its adverse effects.

Ketorolac vs meperidine for the management of pain in the emergency department

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pain relief, sedation, and common side effect profiles of ketorolac tromethamine and meperidine for the management of acute pain in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted over a 12-month period using consecutive adult patients presenting to a university teaching hospital ED (annual census: 32,000), who required IM analgesia for acute pain. Adult patients with acute pain of various etiologies were randomly assigned to receive a single fixed IM dose of ketorolac (60 mg) or meperidine (100 mg).

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were enrolled in the study; 46 were randomized to meperidine and 47 to ketorolac. Using a visual analog scale, there was no difference in pain relief between the ketorolac and meperidine groups even after adjusting for baseline pain level. Ketorolac caused significantly (p < 0.005) less sedation than did meperidine at one hour. Rescue analgesia was required for seven of the 46 (15.2%) patients receiving meperidine and five of the 47 (10.6%) patients receiving ketorolac (p = NS). Seventeen of 45 (38%) patients receiving meperidine experienced side effects compared with eight of the 47 (17%) patients receiving ketorolac (p = 0.0452).

CONCLUSIONS

When used to treat patients who had acute pain states, 60 mg of IM ketorolac produced analgesia similar to that produced by 100 mg of IM meperidine; however, the ketorolac produced fewer subjective side effects and less sedation than did the meperidine.

Single-blind comparative analgesic and safety study of single doses of intramuscularly administered ketorolac tromethamine and pethidine hydrochloride in patients with pain following orthopaedic surgery

Ketorolac tromethamine, a potent non-narcotic prostaglandin synthetase inhibiting analgesic was compared with pethidine for relief of moderate to severe postoperative pain. Forty-eight patients received Ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg and 52 received pethidine 1.25 mg/kg. The degree of pain prior to the administration of the drug and pain relief that followed were quantified using a vertical visual analogue scale (VAS) and monitored at hourly intervals. The safety profile was also studied by recording all adverse events noted. The mean pain (VAS) score at medication for Ketorolac was 7.04 and for pethidine 7.09. The pain relief obtained in the first four hours following administration of the drugs was similar for pethidine and Ketorolac. Although Ketorolac showed a longer sustained pain relief, time to peak analgesia after administration of this drug was slower than that after pethidine. It took 30 to 50 min for pethidine compared to 75 to 150 min for Ketorolac to achieve peak analgesia. The latter is therefore inappropriate if rapid pain relief is required. The incidence of side effects was significantly greater with pethidine (40.4%) as compared to Ketorolac (10.4%). The similar analgesic efficacy to pethidine makes Ketorolac an appropriate drug for the relief of postoperative pain especially in day surgery settings where observation following administration of the drug as in the case of pethidine can be dispensed with and patients sent home earlier because of the minimal side effects associated with its use. Caution must be exercised with the use of large doses of Ketorolac especially if the drug is used for more than 5 days to avoid serious complications like renal failure and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Ketorolac-induced acute renal failure and hyperkalemia: report of three cases

Ketorolac tromethamine (Toradol, Syntex Laboratories Inc, Palo Alto, CA) is a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug widely used in emergency departments and during the postoperative period because of its potent analgesic effects and lack of central nervous system activities. We present three new cases of acute renal failure and hyperkalemia secondary to ketorolac. All patients had at least one risk factor making them prone to the development of acute renal failure secondary to the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In all patients, acute renal failure developed after a moderate dose of ketorolac was administered for the management of postsurgical pain. Acute renal failure and hyperkalemia were transient, and improved after discontinuation of ketorolac treatment.

Influencing prescribing practices and associated outcomes utilizing the drug use evaluation process

Influencing prescribing practices and the implementation of pharmaceutical care utilizing the drug use evaluation (DUE) process at a 891-bed teaching hospital are described. The DUE program has been structured to provide for significant pharmacy involvement while maintaining medical staff responsibility as outlined by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. A multidisciplinary approach is used to identify problems and develop prescribing criteria and educational initiatives. Pharmacists provide drug therapy monitoring and engage in clinical interventions and documentation of outcomes on a daily basis. DUE program pharmacists help target possible interventions, assure monitoring and outcome documentation, and compile results of all initiatives for reporting purposes to the medical staff and quality assessment program. Specific performance compliance and problems are identified and incorporated into the credentialing process. Corrective measures are determined by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics (P&T) Subcommittee with subsequent actions carried out by peer physicians. The net result is a positive influence on prescribing practices that improves the appropriate and effective use of drugs and improves patient outcomes.

Clinical experience with ketorolac in children

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of parenteral ketorolac in a large population of children, focusing on dosing patterns, efficacy, and safety.

DESIGN

Observational, prospective study conducted over a four-month period.

SETTING

A 122-bed children's medical center located within an academic medical center hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Children receiving ketorolac during their hospitalization.

MAIN OUTCOME PARAMETERS

Indications for treatment, dose, dosing interval, use of a loading dose, length of therapy, efficacy (subjective response and use of concomitant therapy), and adverse effects (bleeding, gastrointestinal ulceration or vomiting, and renal dysfunction).

RESULTS

Of 112 children evaluated, 110 received ketorolac for analgesia, and 2 were given ketorolac as an antipyretic. The children ranged in age from 6 months to 19 years. Doses of 0.5 mg/kg q6h were used for most children (range 0.17-1.0). The average length of therapy was 3.4 days (range 1-12). The most frequent reason for discontinuing ketorolac therapy was a change to oral therapy. Therapy was discontinued because of a lack of efficacy in only 2 children. Adverse reactions were unusual, with only 2 patients having bleeding potentially associated with ketorolac use.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketorolac appears to be a safe and effective therapy for children when given in appropriate doses for a limited duration.

Subcapsular hematoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, associated with ketorolac administration

Ketorolac is the first injectable nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug used as an analgesic in the perioperative period. Its adverse effect profile is different from that of the opioid analgesics; in particular, in its lack of respiratory depressive actions. However, ketorolac has risks associated with its perioperative administration, including episodes of substantial gastrointestinal bleeding. A patient undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy developed a subcapsular hepatic hematoma shortly after receiving a dose of injectable ketorolac. No evidence of parenchymal injury was found on laparoscopy, which argues against iatrogenic trauma. Clinicians should be aware that ketorolac may cause or aggravate bleeding, and it should be used with caution in perioperative patients.

A single dose of morphine sulfate increases the incidence of vomiting after outpatient inguinal surgery in children

BACKGROUND

In children, opioids are valuable both for their analgesic properties and for their salutary effect on emergence delirium. Although intraoperative administration of opioids is often cited as the cause of postoperative emesis, few data quantitating the magnitude of this effect exist.

METHODS

Patients undergoing inguinal surgery as outpatients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group received a single intravenous dose of morphine 0.1 mg/kg (morphine group), and the other (control) group had the identical anesthetic but instead received saline. Intravenous ketorolac was administered in response to verbal complaints of pain or a Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Score greater than 9 on two successive evaluations performed at 5-min intervals. The authors compared the incidence of postoperative emesis and emergence, behavior, and pain scores between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients in the morphine group (n = 48) were 5.6 +/- 2.8 yr old and weighed 20.8 +/- 7.8 kg, and those in the control group (n = 49) were 4.5 +/- 2.9 yr old and weighed 18.9 +/- 9.2 kg. More patients in the morphine group were cooperative and deeply asleep both on arrival and through the first 30 min of their stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (P < 0.05). Sixty-three percent of the children in the control group received ketorolac in the PACU compared with 20% of the morphine group (P < 0.01). The incidence of emesis for the 24 h after arrival in the PACU was 56% for those who received morphine compared with 25% in the control group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For children undergoing inguinal surgery, the administration of a single dose of intravenous morphine after the induction of anesthesia smooths emergence from anesthesia as assessed by improved cooperation and sedation in the PACU, decreases the need for postoperative analgesics, but increases the incidence of vomiting in the first 24 h after surgery.

Tolerability, central effects and pharmacokinetics of intravenous ketorolac tromethamine in volunteers

The central effects, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of multiple intravenous doses of the analgesic ketorolac tromethamine (30 mg 4 times daily for 5 days) were studied in male volunteers. In this double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, 13 subjects received ketorolac tromethamine and 7 subjects received placebo (vehicle). To determine the effects of withdrawal all subjects were then given further dosing with placebo (4 times daily) for 2 days while maintaining the double-blind nature of the previous drug assignment. Physical examinations and laboratory tests were obtained prior to the drug administration and after completion of the study. Scales for assessment of anxiety, depression, sleep and opiate withdrawal were presented to the subjects on day 2, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the study. After 5 days of multiple intravenous doses ketorolac showed overall good systemic tolerance and safety in comparison with placebo. Myalgia and taste perversion were more frequently reported in the ketorolac group. The frequency of injection site complaints, mostly transient pain, was about 80% for both ketorolac and placebo, indicating these were likely caused by the vehicle. There were no significant changes in the scales assessing anxiety, depression, sleep and opiate withdrawal during treatment with ketorolac and after its withdrawal, suggesting that the drug has neither any major central effects nor any clear addiction potential in this dose schedule. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from plasma samples collected after the first and last active doses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Recovery from outpatient laparoscopic tubal ligation is not improved by preoperative administration of ketorolac or ibuprofen

The analgesic efficacy of a single dose of ketorolac or ibuprofen given preoperatively was assessed in healthy outpatients undergoing general anesthesia for laparoscopic tubal ligation. Fifty patients were randomized to receive either ketorolac 60 mg intravenously (i.v.), ibuprofen 800 mg orally, or placebo in a double-blind manner. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg, thiopental 5 mg/kg, and either vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg or succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg i.v. and was maintained with nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen and isoflurane. Patients were assessed at 15-min intervals in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and treated for pain with i.v. morphine by protocol. Patients were evaluated for pain, analgesic requirements, side effects, and recovery times. After discharge, patients completed questionnaires to assess pain, analgesic use, and side effects 6 and 24 h postoperatively. Parenteral morphine was required in 80% of patients in the control group, and 73% of patients in both treatment groups, and the difference was not statistically significant. The dose of parenteral morphine required in the PACU was not different between the control (7 +/- 1.2 mg), ibuprofen (5.7 +/- 1.4 mg), and ketorolac (6.1 +/- 1.4 mg) groups. There was no difference between groups in terms of pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores, fatigue VAS scores, recovery times, or the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The preoperative administration of either parenteral ketorolac or oral ibuprofen did not decrease postoperative pain or side effects when compared to placebo in this outpatient population.

A multiple-dose, double-blind comparison of intramuscularly and orally administered ketorolac tromethamine and Ketogan in patients with pain following orthopaedic surgery

In this multiple-dose, double-blind study 100 patients with moderate, severe or very severe pain following orthopaedic surgery were randomly assigned to receive ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with potent analgesic properties (10 mg), or the standard regimen of Ketogan (a combination product containing the narcotic analgesic, ketobemidone, plus a spasmolytic agent) by intramuscular injection every 1-6 h as needed for pain. When patients were able to tolerate an oral diet and were expected to respond to oral analgesic medication, based on overall pain sensitivity, they were switched to oral doses of the same medication every 4-6 h as needed. A maximum of four daily doses of medication was allowed for up to 10 days. The severity of pain was scored on a five-point scale and was recorded before the first intramuscular dose, at fixed time points thereafter for up to 6 h and at the end of each day. Both treatments were effective immediately after the first dose and during the subsequent multiple-dose phase. There were no statistically significant differences between ketorolac and Ketogan. The results show that 10-mg doses of ketorolac in intramuscular injections followed by 10-mg doses of oral ketorolac are as effective as Ketogan for the treatment of pain following orthopaedic surgery. Ketorolac appears to be better tolerated than Ketogan since significantly fewer patients reported adverse events (P = 0.004) when taking ketorolac.

Ketorolac (Toradol) induced lithium toxicity

A case of lithium neurotoxicity in a patient with cluster headache, resulting from coadministration of ketorolac is reported. While lithium interaction with many other NSAIDs is well-known, ketorolac has not been incriminated.