A comparative analysis of different automated von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib-binding activity assays in well typed von Willebrand disease patients

Essentials Von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) is not a completely reliable assay. Three automated VWF activity assays were compared within a von Willebrand disease (VWD) cohort. Raw values for all three assays were virtually the same. An overall problem within type 2A/IIE VWD using VWF:GPIb-binding activity/VWF:Ag was observed.

SUMMARY

Background von Willebrand disease (VWD) is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by quantitative (type 1 and 3) or qualitative (type 2) von Willebrand factor (VWF) defect. VWD diagnosis and classification require numerous laboratory tests. VWF: glycoprotein Ib (GPIb)-binding activity assays are used to distinguish type 1 from type 2 VWD. Objectives Three different automated VWF:GPIb-binding activity assays were compared. Patients and methods BC-VWF:RCo (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics), HemosIL® VWF:RCo (Instrumentation Laboratory) and INNOVANCE® VWF:Ac (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) were performed in a well typed VWD cohort (n = 142). Results Based on the three most used VWD parameters (FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIb-binding activity) and using a cut-off of <0.70 for type 2 VWD revealed sensitivity and specificity of, respectively, 92% and 72.4% for VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag, 84% and 89.7% for VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag, and 92% and 85.1% for VWF:GPIbM/VWF:Ag, whereas a lowered cut-off of < 0.60 resulted in reduced sensitivity with increased specificity for all assays. Conclusion VWD classification based on FVIII:C, VWF:Ag and VWF:GPIb-binding activity revealed an overall problem with normal VWF:GPIb-binding activity/VWF:Ag within type 2, especially type 2A/IIE. Although all assays were practically identical, BC-VWF:RCo had higher %CV compared with both new assays but comparable lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) ~4 IU dL-1 . No clear improved distinction between type 1 and 2 VWD with new assays was seen.

BC-VWF

RCo and HemosIL® are ristocetin dependent, whereas INNOVANCE® does not rely upon ristocetin and is not influenced by VWF polymorphisms increasing VWF:GPIb-binding activity levels. INNOVANCE® seems to be the best choice as a first-line VWF:GPIb-binding activity assay, providing the best balance between sensitivity and specificity for type 2 VWD.

Role of multimeric analysis of von Willebrand factor (VWF) in von Willebrand disease (VWD) diagnosis: Lessons from the PCM-EVW-ES Spanish project

The multimeric analysis (MA) of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) evaluates structural integrity and helps in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD). This assay is a matter of controversy, being considered by some investigators cumbersome and only slightly informative. The centralised study ‘Molecular and Clinical Profile of von Willebrand Disease in Spain (PCM-EVW-ES)’ has been carried out by including the phenotypic assessment and the genetic analysis by next generation sequencing (NGS) of the VWF gene (VWF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of MA to the diagnosis of these patients and their potential discrepancies. Two hundred and seventy out of 480 patients centrally diagnosed with VWD had normal multimers, 168 had abnormal multimers and 42 a total absence of multimers. VWF MA was of great significance in the diagnosis of 83 patients (17.3%), it was also of help in the diagnosis achieved in 365 additional patients (76%) and was not informative in 32 cases (6.7%). With regard to discrepancies, 110 out of 480 (23%) patients centrally diagnosed with VWD presented some kind of discordance between VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag and/or VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratios, multimeric study and/or genetic results. The VWF MA was key in the presence of novel mutations as well as in cases with phenotypic discrepancies. A comparison between the contribution of MA and VWF:CB showed a clearly higher contribution of the former in the diagnostic process. These data seem to reinforce the relevance of the VWF MA in VWD diagnosis, despite all its limitations.

Patterns of von Willebrand Disease Screening in Girls and Adolescents With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the frequency of von Willebrand disease screening and factors that affect screening frequency in a national sample of girls and adolescents with heavy menstrual bleeding.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we used a national claims database for privately and publicly insured patients between 2011 and 2013 for girls aged 10-17 years. Diagnostic criteria of heavy menstrual bleeding were the presence of one inpatient or two outpatient International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes for heavy menstrual bleeding. We defined severe heavy menstrual bleeding as heavy menstrual bleeding plus an inpatient stay for menstrual bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, or blood transfusion. To assess whether patient- or facility-level characteristics affected screening, we performed logistic regression analysis including patient age, health care provider type seen at first visit for menorrhagia, patient residence in a metropolitan statistical area (proxy for urban vs rural inhabitance), and approximate travel time to the nearest hemophilia treatment center.

RESULTS

We identified 23,888 postpubertal girls and adolescents with heavy menstrual bleeding (986 with severe heavy menstrual bleeding). Von Willebrand disease screening was performed in 8% of females with heavy menstrual bleeding and 16% with severe heavy menstrual bleeding. Younger age at diagnosis, commercial insurance, and living within a metropolitan statistical area were associated with higher screening rates. Patients who underwent testing for iron deficiency anemia had the highest likelihood of undergoing screening (odds ratio 7.08, 95% CI 6.32-7.93). Among patients living in a metropolitan statistical area, those 60 minutes or more from a hemophilia treatment center were less likely to undergo screening.

CONCLUSION

Despite recommendations by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists for more than 15 years, fewer than 20% of postpubertal girls and adolescents with heavy menstrual bleeding underwent screening for von Willebrand disease in this cohort. Increased clinician awareness and adherence to recommended screening recommendations may increase diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.

Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome due to Aortic Valve Stenosis in a Case with Antiphospholipid Antibody

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a bleeding disorder caused by an acquired deficiency of von Willebrand factor (vWF). Some patients with AVWS show a low bleeding tendency and are diagnosed by the presence of a mild prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) preoperatively. Another cause of APTT prolongation is the presence of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL). We experienced a case of AVWS due to aortic valve stenosis in a patient with aPL in whom aortic valve replacement surgery was successful with vWF replacement. In patients with AVWS-associated disorders who are identified based on APTT prolongation at the preoperative examination, both vWF and aPL screening tests must be performed.

Plasma glycocalicin as a source of GPIbα in the von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor ELISA

We have previously demonstrated that the von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo),used in the diagnosis of vonWillebrand disease (VWD),can be accurately determined via ELISA by measuring the ristocetin-induced binding ofVWF to a captured recombinant fragment of GPIb α (rfGPIb α ,AA 1–289) (Vanhoorelbeke et al., Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 107-13). This ELISA is more reliable than the currently used platelet agglutination test. Normal plasma contains relatively high concentrations of glycocalicin, a proteolytic fragment of GPIb α . We therefore studied whether non-purified plasma glycocalicin can replace rfGPIbα in our ELISA. Of 42 anti-GPIbα monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) capable of binding plasma glycocalicin, only one MAb captured glycocalicin in a spatial orientation exposing theVWF-binding site in glycocalicin,allowing a specific and dosedependent ristocetin-mediated VWF-binding. Intra- and interassay variability were comparable with those for the rfGPIbα basedVWF:RCo ELISA.TheVWF:RCo activity of plasma from 33 normal individuals, 19 type 1, 16 type 2A, 9 type 2B, 8 type 2M and 7 type 3VWD patients was determined with this ELISA and allowed a clear identification ofVWD patients.Furthermore,determination of the VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio resulted in the discrimination between type 1 and type 2 VWD patients. Results for the glycocalicin based and the rfGPIb α basedVWF:RCo ELISAs were in good agreement (r = 0.943).There was also a good correlation between the glycocalicin based ELISA and the standard platelet agglutination test (r = 0.963).In conclusion,to diagnose VWD, a VWF:RCo ELISA based on antibody immobilized plasma glycocalicin can be performed reliably.

Molecular and clinical profile of von Willebrand disease in Spain (PCM-EVW-ES): comprehensive genetic analysis by next-generation sequencing of 480 patients

Molecular diagnosis of patients with von Willebrand disease is pending in most populations due to the complexity and high cost of conventional molecular analyses. The need for molecular and clinical characterization of von Willebrand disease in Spain prompted the creation of a multicenter project (PCM-EVW-ES) that resulted in the largest prospective cohort study of patients with all types of von Willebrand disease. Molecular analysis of relevant regions of the VWF, including intronic and promoter regions, was achieved in the 556 individuals recruited via the development of a simple, innovative, relatively low-cost protocol based on microfluidic technology and next-generation sequencing. A total of 704 variants (237 different) were identified along VWF, 155 of which had not been previously recorded in the international mutation database. The potential pathogenic effect of these variants was assessed by in silico analysis. Furthermore, four short tandem repeats were analyzed in order to evaluate the ancestral origin of recurrent mutations. The outcome of genetic analysis allowed for the reclassification of 110 patients, identification of 37 asymptomatic carriers (important for genetic counseling) and re-inclusion of 43 patients previously excluded by phenotyping results. In total, 480 patients were definitively diagnosed. Candidate mutations were identified in all patients except 13 type 1 von Willebrand disease, yielding a high genotype-phenotype correlation. Our data reinforce the capital importance and usefulness of genetics in von Willebrand disease diagnostics. The progressive implementation of molecular study as the first-line test for routine diagnosis of this condition will lead to increasingly more personalized and effective care for this patient population.

Type 2N von Willebrand disease due to compound heterozygosity for R854Q and a novel R763G mutation at the cleavage site of von Willebrand factor propeptide

Type 2N von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by a markedly decreased affinity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) for factorVIII (FVIII) and is caused by mutations in the D’ or D3 domain of mature VWF. We now report a French patient with an atypical 2N VWD phenotype associating FVIII deficiency with plasmaVWF unable to bind FVIII (undetectableVWF:FVIIIB) but with an abnormal multimeric profile. This patient is heterozygous for both the frequent R854Q type 2NVWD mutation and a novel R763G mutation at the cleavage site betweenVWF propeptide and mature VWF. Four children of the patient displayed moderately decreased VWF:FVIIIB of plasma VWF and were heterozygous for either the R763G or the R854Q mutation. Children with the R763G mutation displayed the same abnormal multimeric profile as their father. Recombinant VWF (rVWF) expression studies performed in COS-7 cells showed that the R763G mutation subtly affects its multimeric profile and dramatically impairs its FVIII binding function. Furthermore, the characteristics of hybrid G763/Q854 rVWF resulting from cotransfection experiments were in agreement with the type 2N VWD diagnosis of the patient. We conclude that R763G is a new type 2N VWD mutation located in the VWF propeptide which alters the proteolytic processing of VWF and consequently its binding to FVIII.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in respiratory extracorporeal life support: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) are increasingly used in the management of severe respiratory failure. With bleeding complications being one of the major risks of these techniques, our aim in this systematic review was to assess the available literature on acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AvWS) and extracorporeal support. AvWS has previously been associated with bleeding and shear stress.

DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES

A systematic review, using Medline via PubMed, was performed to identify eligible studies up to January 2017.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The prevalence of AvWF among patients on VV ECMO or ECCO2R is high, but only a limited number of studies are reported in the literature. AvWS testing should be performed, including vWF multimer analysis, vWF activity and vWF antigen concentration. The extent to which vWF contributes to bleeding during ECMO, or how much changes in ECMO management can influence high molecular weight vWF multimer levels, cannot be answered from the currently available evidence and there remains a need for future studies.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome in cardiogenic shock patients on mechanical circulatory microaxial pump support

Early use of mechanical circulatory support, e.g. veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or left ventricular unloading by microaxial pump in refractory cardiogenic shock is recommended in current guidelines. Development of acquired von Willebrand Syndrome (AVWS) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and ECMO has been reported. There is an increasing number of patients treated with the Impella^® CP microaxial pump for left ventricular unloading. However, the prevalence of AVWS in these high risk patients is unknown and needs to be determined. We therefore screened 21 patients (68 ± 11years) treated with Impella^® (17 for cardiogenic shock, 4 for protected PCI) for the presence of AVWS by determining von Willebrand factor multimers, VWF collagen binding capacity and VWF antigen. During the time course of Impella^® support, 20/21 patients (95%) developed AVWS (mean duration of support: 135 ± 114 hours, mean time from device implantation to first diagnosis of AVWS: 10.6 ± 10.8 hours). Our data indicate that AVWS is a common phenomenon during left ventricular unloading via microaxial pump support. Thus, AVWS has to be considered as contributing factor for potential bleeding complications in this high risk patient population, especially in the context of dual antiplatelet therapy.

Application of a strain rate gradient microfluidic device to von Willebrand's disease screening

Von Willebrand's disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder caused by either quantitative or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Current tests for VWD require relatively large blood volumes, have low throughput, are time-consuming, and do not incorporate the physiologically relevant effects of haemodynamic forces. We developed a microfluidic device incorporating micro-contractions that harnesses well-defined haemodynamic strain gradients to initiate platelet aggregation in citrated whole blood. The microchannel architecture has been specifically designed to allow for continuous real-time imaging of platelet aggregation dynamics. Subjects aged ≥18 years with previously diagnosed VWD or who presented for evaluation of a bleeding disorder, where the possible diagnosis included VWD, were tested. Samples were obtained for device characterization as well as for pathology-based testing. Platelet aggregation in the microfluidic device is independent of platelet amplification loops but dependent on low-level platelet activation, GPIb/IX/V and integrin α_IIbβ₃ engagement. Microfluidic output directly correlates with VWF antigen levels and is able to sensitively detect aggregation defects associated with VWD subtypes. Testing demonstrated a strong correlation with standard clinical laboratory-based tests. Head-to-head comparison with PFA100® demonstrated equivalent, if not improved, sensitivity for screening aggregation defects associated with VWD. This strain rate gradient microfluidic prototype has the potential to be a clinically useful, rapid and high throughput-screening tool for VWD as well as other strain-dependent platelet disorders. In addition, the microfluidic device represents a novel approach to examine the effects of high magnitude/short duration (ms) strain rate gradients on platelet function.

Diagnosis or Exclusion of von Willebrand Disease Using Laboratory Testing

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder diagnosed based on clinical features and following laboratory testing. VWD is due to deficiencies or defects in the plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF), a large adhesive protein with multiple activities. Laboratory testing therefore centers on assessment of VWF protein level using VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), as well as assays that measure VWF activity, most notably platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ib and collagen binding (VWF:CB) activities. Decreases in VWF:Ag and VWF activities, as well as the pattern of such changes, help define VWD and its type. Classically, the most often used assay for measuring GPIb binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo), which historically measured agglutination of fixed human platelets by VWF in the presence of ristocetin. This assay is now often replaced or supplemented with other assays based on binding of VWF to recombinant GPIb, generally without the use of platelets, and with or without ristocetin. This chapter briefly reviews laboratory tests for VWD, as well as recommended approaches to use of such assays to help diagnose or exclude VWD in patients showing clinical features.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Ristocetin Cofactor (VWF:RCo)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder and can also arise as an acquired syndrome (AVWS). These disorders develop due to defects and/or deficiency of the plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). Laboratory testing for these VWF-related disorders requires assessment of both VWF level and VWF activity, the latter requiring multiple assays because of the many functions carried out by VWF to help prevent bleeding. The current paper describes several protocols for assessment of VWF activity by means of VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo). These assays identify VWF activity by quantitative assessment of VWF protein adhesion to platelets or other particles and subsequent detection of the adhered VWF as facilitated by inclusion of ristocetin. The most commonly performed assays for VWF:RCo comprise platelet agglutination assays, latex agglutination assays, and chemiluminescent assay (CLIA), with three of these described in this chapter.

Ristocetin-Induced Platelet Aggregation (RIPA) and RIPA Mixing Studies

Ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) is used as an in vitro test to determine the presence and integrity of the platelet glycoprotein (GP) Ibα-V-IX complex and von Willebrand factor (VWF) interaction and is usually performed using platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Impairment in the response of VWF/GPIbα-V-IX is measured with reference to several established concentrations of ristocetin and may indicate defects in VWF or in GPIbα-V-IX function. RIPA-based mixing studies comprise an additional approach to testing this interaction to help define whether defects identified by RIPA lie in VWF or in GPIbα-V-IX. For example, the correction of an abnormal RIPA trace after mixing PRP with normal plasma and rechallenging with ristocetin at 1.0 mg/mL suggests VWF function/quantity defect. RIPA mixing studies at lower doses of ristocetin (0.5 mg/mL) are recommended for discrimination of von Willebrand disease type 2B (VWD2B) from the rarer platelet-type (PT) VWD and for the phenotypic laboratory diagnosis of VWD2B. The demonstration of a plasma factor capable of inducing platelet aggregation at such low doses of ristocetin represents the hallmark for the phenotypic laboratory diagnosis of VWD2B. Moreover, since both VWD2B and PT-VWD may present with thrombocytopenia, RIPA-based mixing studies are also useful in thrombocytopenic patients in whom RIPA testing is difficult to assess.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Antigen (VWF:Ag)

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder and can also arise as an acquired syndrome (AVWS). These disorders arise due to defects and/or deficiency of the plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). Laboratory testing for the VWF-related disorders requires assessment of both VWF level and VWF activity, the latter requiring multiple assays because of the many functions carried out by VWF to help prevent bleeding. The current paper describes protocols for assessment of VWF level by means of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag). These assays identify VWF levels by quantitative assessment of VWF protein by means of immunological assays. The most commonly performed assays for VWF:Ag comprise enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and latex-enhanced immunoassays (LIA), as described in this chapter.

Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma with Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome Diagnosed via Splenic Bleeding

An 85-year-old woman underwent emergent splenectomy due to left abdominal pain and active bleeding in a massively enlarged spleen. The histological diagnosis was splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL). A prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was noted, and additional tests led to the diagnosis of type 2A-like acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS). An APTT cross mixing test ruled out the presence of inhibitors. She received eight courses of rituximab monotherapy. The coagulation data showed no improvement, possibly because the lymphoma showed a poor response to the treatment. AVWS rarely causes bleeding in solid organs. This is the first case of SMZL with AVWS diagnosed via splenic bleeding.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Collagen Binding (VWF:CB)

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder and can also arise as an acquired syndrome (AVWS). These disorders develop due to defects and/or deficiency of the plasma protein von Willebrand factor (VWF). Laboratory testing for the VWF-related disorders requires assessment of both VWF level and VWF activity, the latter requiring multiple assays because of the many functions carried out by VWF to help prevent bleeding. This chapter describes several protocols for assessment of VWF activity by means of VWF collagen binding (VWF:CB). These assays identify VWF activity by quantitative assessment of VWF protein adhesion to collagen or collagen peptides and subsequent immunological detection of the adhered VWF. The most commonly performed assays for VWF:CB comprise enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and chemiluminescent assay (CLIA), as described in this chapter.

What have we learned from large population studies of von Willebrand disease?

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical regulator of hemostatic processes, including collagen binding, platelet adhesion, and platelet aggregation. It also serves as a carrier protein to normalize plasma factor VIII synthesis, release, and survival. While VWF protein measurements by immunoassay are reasonably comparable between institutions, the measurement of VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) has significant variability. Other tests of VWF function, including collagen binding or platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa binding, are not universally available, yet these functional defects may cause major bleeding even with normal VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF:RCo assays. This results in both the overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of VWD. Newer assays of VWF function (using recombinant glycoprotein Ib rather than whole platelets) have been developed that may improve interlaboratory variability. Some of these tests are not uniformly available and may not be licensed in the United States. Large longitudinal studies of VWF in von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients are not available. Patients are sometimes diagnosed with a single diagnostic VWF panel. Plasma VWF levels increase with age, but it is not clear if this results in less bleeding or whether different normal ranges should be used to identify age-related decreases in VWF. In order to quantitatively compare bleeding symptoms in VWD patients and normal individuals, recent studies in the European Union, Canada, United Kingdom, Holland, and the United States have used semiquantitative bleeding assessment tools (BATs). Even with careful centralized testing, including functional assays of VWF, addition of a BAT does not solve all of the problems with VWD diagnosis. No matter where the line is drawn for diagnosis of VWD, VWF is still a continuous variable. Thus, VWD can be a severe hemorrhagic disease requiring frequent treatment or a mild condition that may not be clinically relevant. As will be discussed by Dr. Goodeve in her presentation, genetics has helped us to diagnose type 2 functional variants of VWD but has not been helpful for the many patients who are at the interface of normal and low VWF and carry the possible diagnosis of type 1 VWD. The hematologist's management of patients with reduced levels of VWF still requires both the art and science of clinical medicine.

A diagnostic approach to mild bleeding disorders

Mild inherited bleeding disorders are relatively common in the general population. Despite recent advances in diagnostic approaches, mild inherited bleeding disorders still pose a significant diagnostic challenge. Hemorrhagic diathesis can be caused by disorders in primary hemostasis (von Willebrand disease, inherited platelet function disorders), secondary hemostasis (hemophilia A and B, other (rare) coagulant factor deficiencies) and fibrinolysis, and in connective tissue or vascular formation. This review summarizes the currently available diagnostic methods for mild bleeding disorders and their pitfalls, from structured patient history to highly specialized laboratory diagnosis. A comprehensive framework for a diagnostic approach to mild inherited bleeding disorders is proposed.

Determination of von Willebrand Factor Activity: Evaluation of the HaemosIL™ Assay in Comparison With Established Procedures

Determination of von Willebrand factor activity is required for diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease. In addition, von Willebrand factor activity can be of prognostic relevance in several clinical entities including thromboembolic and cardiovascular disorders in which elevated activity correlates with a poor prognosis. The HaemosIL™ assay (Instrumentation Laboratory GmbH, Munich, Germany) provides a new fully automated procedure for determination of von Willebrand factor activity. This assay measures binding of the von Willebrand factor to GP Ibα of the platelet glycoprotein complex Ib-V-IX. In our study, we analyzed 300 samples including those of patients with hereditary von Willebrand disease. The results obtained with the HaemosIL™ assay were compared to von Willebrand factor activities determined by established procedures. Activities determined with HaemosIL™ correlated with those activities determined as ristocetin cofactor (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001), collagen-binding (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001), and GP Ib-binding (r = 0.91, p < 0.0001). The comparability of results obtained by HaemosIL™ and the GP Ib-binding ELISA were excellent ([HaemosIL™] = 0.96 ∞ activity [GP Ib-binding ELISA] + 10.7), whereas activities determined by ristocetin cofactor or collagen-binding revealed more variance. Like the other assays, the HaemosIL™ failed to indicate a loss of high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor multimers. The HaemosIL™ assay can replace the GP Ib-binding ELISA for the determination of von Willebrand factor activity. Advantages of this assay include accuracy of results, full automation, and, thus, broad availability. Since the assay does not predict the absence of high-molecular-weight multimers, multimeric analysis remains the procedure of choice for the differentiation of functional defects.

Developments in the diagnostic procedures for von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder but its diagnosis can be challenging due to the heterogeneity of the disease. VWD is mainly associated with mild mucocutaneous bleeding, although there are more severe phenotypes with bleeding from the gastrointestinal tract or even the joints. Also, surgical interventions and trauma may lead to critical bleeding events. These bleeding episodes are all related to quantitative or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF), a multimeric glycoprotein produced by endothelial cells and megakaryocytes, which mediates platelet adhesion and aggregation and binds factor VIII (FVIII) in the circulation. This review describes the diagnostic procedures required for correct diagnosis. Accurate diagnosis and classification is required for proper treatment and counseling. Assessment of bleeding starts with the medical history. After a positive bleeding or family history, subsequent laboratory investigations will start with a panel of standard screening tests for hemostatic defects. Patients suspected of having VWD will be tested for plasma VWF antigen levels, the ability of VWF to bind platelets and FVIII activity. When VWD is confirmed, a set of subtyping tests can classify the patients as VWD types 1, 2 (A, B, M or N) or 3. The performance of some additional assays and analyses, such as VWF propeptide measurement or genetic analysis, may help in identifying the pathological mechanism behind certain defects or can guide in the choice of treatment.