Association of cancer treatment with excess heart age among young breast cancer survivors

12081

Background: Young women with breast cancer may be at increased risk for premature development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in part due to their cancer treatment. Limited data are available on CVD risk among young breast cancer survivors. Methods: Women aged 30-40 years at diagnosis with stage 0-III breast cancer enrolled in a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤40 were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Data were obtained from serial surveys and electronic medical records at breast cancer diagnosis and 5-year follow-up. We calculated “excess heart age,” which incorporates a CVD risk-based score (calculated using age, systolic blood pressure, blood pressure medication, diabetes, smoking, body mass index) to estimate the difference in years between an individual’s chronological age and their CVD-risk adjusted age. Multivariable logistic regression models (adjusting for age at diagnosis, stage, and race) were fitted to evaluate associations between treatment (radiation, endocrine therapy, anthracyclines, and trastuzumab) and having a change in excess heart age ≥2 years from baseline to 5 years. Results: Among 372 young breast cancer survivors, mean age at diagnosis was 36.6 (SD 2.89), 93% were white, and 79% were diagnosed with stage I or II breast cancer. Mean excess heart age was.32 (SD: 6.16) years at baseline, which declined to -.07 (SD 6.64) at 5-year follow-up (p=.17). At 5 years, 31% (n=114) of women experienced an increase of at least 2 years in their excess heart age since diagnosis, and their mean excess heart age was 4.34 years (range -9 to 30). In multivariable analyses, receipt of trastuzumab was associated with higher odds (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02-2.77) of experiencing an increase of ≥2 years in excess heart age between diagnosis and 5 years of follow-up. Endocrine therapy, anthracyclines, and radiation were not significantly associated with a change in excess heart age of ≥2 years at 5 years post-diagnosis. Conclusions: At 5 years post-diagnosis, approximately 1/3 of young breast cancer survivors experienced a change from baseline in their excess heart age of ≥2 years. Further research is warranted to confirm findings regarding trastuzumab and excess heart age, and potential effects on longer-term cardiac outcomes in this population. Extended follow-up of this cohort may further quantify CVD risk over time.[Table: see text]

Disparities in surveillance imaging after breast conserving surgery for primary DCIS

6516

Background: Due to the elevated risk of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) after diagnosis with primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), professional guidelines recommend surveillance screening within 6-12 months (mo) after completion of initial local treatment and annually thereafter. To characterize adherence to these guidelines, we explored longitudinal patterns of utilization and factors associated with the use of surveillance imaging (mammography, MRI, ultrasound) for women with primary DCIS treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) ± radiotherapy (RT) within 6 mo of diagnosis. Methods: A treatment-stratified random sample of patients diagnosed with screen-detected and biopsy-confirmed DCIS in 2008-15 was selected from 1,330 Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities (up to 20/site) in the US. All imaging exams coded as asymptomatic were collected from 6 mo up to 10 years (yr) post-diagnosis. Time was defined according to 12-mo long surveillance periods. To be included in a given surveillance period, women had to be alive and free of a new breast cancer diagnosis through the end of the period. Women were classified as “consistent” screeners if they had at least one surveillance screen during each period, for the first 5 yr post-treatment or until censoring, whichever occurred first. Repeated measures multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to model receipt of surveillance breast imaging over time. The model included clinical and socioeconomic features. Results: The final analytic cohort contained 12,559 women; 8,989 (71.6%) received RT after BCS. Median age was 60 yr (interquartile range: 52-69) and median follow-up was 5.6 yr (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-5.7). Among women who received BCS (instead of BCS+RT), 62.5% (79.7%) underwent surveillance imaging within 6-18 mo after diagnosis. 38.7% (54.0%) were categorized as “consistent” screeners. Compared to white women, Black women were less likely to receive surveillance screening after treatment for primary DCIS (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94). Hispanic ethnicity had a similar association (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99) compared to non-Hispanic ethnicity. Women with private insurance, compared to government insurance, were more likely to receive screening (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.30). Prognostic tumor features indicative of a higher risk of subsequent iIBC, including higher grade, presence of comedonecrosis, and hormone receptor-negative DCIS, were not associated with screening uptake. Conclusions: Despite guidelines recommending annual surveillance imaging, many women with primary DCIS do not undergo regular imaging after BCS. The findings from this US-based study suggest that disparities in screening uptake are associated with race/ethnicity and insurance status rather than prognostic tumor features.

Satisfaction with care and attention to salient concerns by race in a diverse national sample of young women with breast cancer

e18561

Background: Young women with breast cancer (BC) have unique issues, including fertility, genetic, and emotional health concerns; these may sometimes be inadequately addressed by providers. Given documented disparities in BC care and outcomes, we sought to explore whether provider attention to these issues differs by race, as well as to examine racial differences in satisfaction with care among young patients with BC. Methods: The Young & Strong Study was a cluster randomized trial of an educational and supportive care intervention at 14 academic + 40 community oncology practices across the US enrolling women with newly diagnosed BC at age ≤45 and their providers. Patients completed surveys at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment. Race was self-reported at baseline. Provider attention to fertility, genetics, and emotional health was evaluated by medical record review. The proportions of patients with attention to these concerns by 3 months was compared by race (white, Black, Asian, multi-racial/other/unknown) using Fisher’s exact tests. Satisfaction with care was assessed with the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18 (PSQ-18) at 3 months. Median scores for each of 7 PSQ-18 subscales (1-5 scale, higher scores=more satisfaction) were compared by race with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: 465/467 (99.6%) of enrolled patients had evaluable data. 77% were white, 12% Black, 4% Asian, and 7% multiracial/other/unk. Median age at diagnosis was 40 (range: 22-45) years. Provider attention to genetics (≥85%) and emotional health (≥90%) was high across groups, and there were no differences by race in attention to fertility, genetics, or emotional health (Table). Among 359/465 women (77%) who completed the PSQ-18, median subscale scores ranged from 3.5-4.5, indicating high levels of satisfaction with care. For the PSQ-18 technical quality domain, median scores were lower (p=.03), indicating less satisfaction, in Black and Asian women (4.0) and higher in white women (4.5). Median scores for other PSQ-18 domains (general satisfaction, interpersonal manner, communication, financial, time spent with doctor, accessibility) did not differ by race. Conclusions: Satisfaction with care was high and issues related to fertility, genetics and emotional health were addressed by providers in the majority of young women in our study, with minimal differences by race. These patients were all enrolled in a clinical trial and had access to high-quality care, limiting the generalizability of our findings. Larger, population-based studies in more diverse settings are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01647607.

Attention to psychosocial concerns by race.

[Table: see text]

Testing for clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential in breast cancer survivors

e24108

Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes including increased risk of hematologic malignancies and heart disease. Limited data suggest an increased prevalence of CHIP in patients treated for solid tumors, particularly after exposure to radiation and chemotherapy. CHIP testing may inform risk-reduction strategies for cancer survivors. Little is known about patient knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding CHIP testing. Methods: We surveyed survivors without history of recurrence participating in an ongoing prospective cohort study of young women with breast cancer (BC). The survey was sent by email and included an introduction to CHIP including risk factors and clinical associations. Respondents then reviewed a vignette and were asked about CHIP testing preferences (definitely/probably test vs. definitely/probably not test) considering sequentially: 1) population-based 10-year risk of BC recurrence, hematological malignancy and heart disease; 2) estimated increase in these risks with CHIP; 3) current CHIP management; 4) a dedicated CHIP clinic; and 5) a theoretical CHIP treatment. Changes in preferences from the prior scenario were evaluated with the McNemar's test using a type I error rate of 5%. Results: 528/642 (82.2%) eligible women responded to the survey, at a median age of 46 (range: 31-54) years (median time from diagnosis: 108 months (range: 60-168)), and 88% were white. Most had stage 1/2 BC (78.8%) and had received chemotherapy (73.1%) and/or radiation (61.9%). 93.6% had never heard of CHIP prior to survey. After initial patient vignette presentation, most women (87.1%,) recommended CHIP testing if offered. Preferences for testing decreased (p<0.05) when considering population-based risks, with 11.1% shifting their preference from CHIP testing to not testing. After considering increased risks associated with CHIP, interest in testing increased (p<0.05), with 10.1% shifting their preference to testing. Interest significantly (p<0.05) increased with the possibility of managing CHIP through a clinic or a hypothetical CHIP treatment, with 7.2% and 14.1% switching their preferences towards testing, respectively. Finally, 75.8% responded that they themselves, after learning about CHIP and reviewing the vignette, would want to have CHIP testing; 28.2% reported that learning about CHIP and the associated risks caused them at least moderate anxiety. Conclusion: Few young BC survivors were aware of CHIP yet most indicated an interest in testing after learning about it. Testing preferences were influenced by risks presented and potential management strategies. Findings highlight the importance of effective risk communication and the need for adequate psychosocial support when considering testing for CHIP and other potential clinical biomarkers predictive of cancer and other medical risks in cancer survivors.

Impact of fertility concerns on endocrine therapy decisions in young breast cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can have profound effects on a young woman's family planning and fertility, particularly among women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

METHODS

The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study was a multicenter cohort of women aged 40 years or younger and newly diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2016. Surveys included assessments of fertility concerns, endocrine therapy (ET) preferences, and use. Characteristics were compared between women who reported that fertility concerns affected ET decisions and those who did not. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with having an ET decision affected by fertility concerns.

RESULTS

Of 643 eligible women with hormone receptor-positive, stage I to III breast cancer, one-third (213 of 643) indicated that fertility concerns affected ET decisions. In a multivariable analysis, only parity at diagnosis was significantly associated with fertility concerns affecting ET decisions (odds ratio for nulliparous vs ≥2 children, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 4.09-11.83; odds ratio for 1 vs ≥2 children, 5.30; 95% confidence interval, 3.03-9.87). Noninitiation/nonpersistence was higher among women with fertility concerns versus those without fertility concerns (40% vs 20%; P < .0001). Among women with fertility-related ET concerns, 7% (15 of 213) did not initiate ET, and 33% (70 of 213) were nonpersistent over 5 years of follow-up. Of these women, 66% (56 of 85) reported 1 or more pregnancies or pregnancy attempts; 27% (15 of 56) had resumed ET at the last available follow-up through 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Concern about fertility is a contributor to adjuvant ET decisions among a substantial proportion of young breast cancer survivors. Ensuring family planning is addressed in the setting of ET recommendations should be a priority throughout the cancer care continuum.

Arm Morbidity After Local Therapy for Young Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The impact of patient demographics and local therapy choice on arm morbidity in young breast cancer patients is understudied despite its importance given the long survivorship period. This study assessed patient-reported arm morbidity in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (YWS), a prospective cohort study.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2016, 1302 women with breast cancer diagnosed at the age of 40 years or younger enrolled in the YWS. The participants regularly complete surveys. The response rates are higher than 86%. Using the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Checklist, this study examined the prevalence of patient-reported postoperative arm swelling and decreased range of motion (ROM) 1 year after diagnosis, stratified by local therapy strategy, in patients who had surgery for stages 1 to 3 disease. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for arm morbidity.

RESULTS

Among 888 eligible participants (median age, 37 years), 14% reported arm swelling and 34% reported decreased ROM at 1 year. Arm swelling was reported by 23.6% of the patients who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and 24.6% of the patients who received ALND and post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). In the multivariable analysis, the patients who reported being financially uncomfortable or who had ALND were at higher risk of arm swelling at 1 year. Being overweight, receiving ALND after sentinel lymph node biopsy, and receiving PMRT were associated with decreased ROM at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

High rates of self-reported arm morbidity in young breast cancer survivors were reported, particularly in patients receiving ALND and PMRT. Attention to the risks and benefits of differing local therapy strategies for ALND and PMRT patients is warranted.

Evidence-based approaches for the management of side-effects of adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with breast cancer

The growing availability of more effective therapies has contributed to an increased survival of patients with breast cancer. In hormone receptor-positive early disease, increased survival is strongly correlated with the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy, but this therapy can cause side-effects that have major consequences in terms of treatment adherence and patients' quality of life. In premenopausal breast cancer survivors, these side-effects might be even more prominent due to the abrupt suppression of oestrogen associated with the most intense endocrine therapies. An important ambition of cancer care in the 21st century is to recover pre-cancer quality of life and emotional and social functions, which is only possible through the mitigation of the side-effects of anticancer treatments. This Review presents a comprehensive summary of the efficacy and safety data of the available interventions (hormonal and non-hormonal pharmacological strategies, non-pharmacological approaches, and complementary and alternative medicine) to control selected side-effects associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy (hot flashes, sexual dysfunction, weight gain, musculoskeletal symptoms, and fatigue), providing updated, evidence-based approaches for their management.

Impact of Cancer History on Outcomes Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19

Background

Early reports suggested increased mortality from COVID‐19 in patients with cancer but lacked rigorous comparisons to patients without cancer. We investigated whether a current cancer diagnosis or cancer history is an independent risk factor for death in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.

Patients and Methods

We identified patients with a history of cancer admitted to two large hospitals between March 13, 2020, and May 10, 2020, with laboratory‐confirmed COVID‐19 and matched them 1:2 to patients without a history of cancer.

Results

Men made up 56.2% of the population, with a median age of 69 years (range, 30–96). The median time since cancer diagnosis was 35.6 months (range, 0.39–435); 80% had a solid tumor, and 20% had a hematologic malignancy. Among patients with cancer, 27.8% died or entered hospice versus 25.6% among patients without cancer. In multivariable analyses, the odds of death/hospice were similar (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–1.82). The odds of intubation (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28–0.78), shock (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32–0.91), and intensive care unit admission (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32–0.81) were lower for patients with a history of cancer versus controls. Patients with active cancer or who had received cancer‐directed therapy in the past 6 months had similar odds of death/hospice compared with cancer survivors (univariable OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.66–2.60; multivariable OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.69–3.16).

Conclusion

Patients with a history of cancer hospitalized for COVID‐19 had similar mortality to matched hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 without cancer, and a lower risk of complications. In this population, patients with active cancer or recent cancer treatment had a similar risk for adverse outcomes compared with survivors of cancer.

Implications for Practice

This study investigated whether a current cancer diagnosis or cancer history is an independent risk factor for death or hospice admission in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19. Active cancer, systemic cancer therapy, and a cancer history are not independent risk factors for death from COVID‐19 among hospitalized patients, and hospitalized patients without cancer are more likely to have severe COVID‐19. These findings provide reassurance to survivors of cancer and patients with cancer as to their relative risk of severe COVID‐19, may encourage oncologists to provide standard anticancer therapy in patients at risk of COVID‐19, and guide triage in future waves of infection.

This article focuses on whether a current cancer diagnosis or cancer history is an independent risk factor for death or hospice admission in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19.

Serial Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

We examined the prognostic significance of circulating tumor cell (CTC) dynamics during treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

Serial CTC data from 469 patients (2202 samples) were used to build a novel latent mixture model to identify groups with similar CTC trajectory (tCTC) patterns during the course of treatment. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in groups based on baseline CTCs, combined CTC status at baseline to the end of cycle 1, and tCTC. Akaike information criterion was used to select the model that best predicted PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Latent mixture modeling revealed 4 distinct tCTC patterns: undetectable CTCs (56.9% ), low (23.7%), intermediate (14.5%), or high (4.9%). Patients with low, intermediate, and high tCTC patterns had statistically significant inferior PFS and OS compared with those with undetectable CTCs (P < .001). Akaike Information Criterion indicated that the tCTC model best predicted PFS and OS compared with baseline CTCs and combined CTC status at baseline to the end of cycle 1 models. Validation studies in an independent cohort of 1856 MBC patients confirmed these findings. Further validation using only a single pretreatment CTC measurement confirmed prognostic performance of the tCTC model.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 4 novel prognostic groups in MBC based on similarities in tCTC patterns during chemotherapy. Prognostic groups included patients with very poor outcome (intermediate + high CTCs, 19.4%) who could benefit from more effective treatment. Our novel prognostic classification approach may be used for fine-tuning of CTC-based risk stratification strategies to guide future prospective clinical trials in MBC.

Factors Associated with Nodal Pathologic Complete Response Among Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results of CALGB 40601 (HER2+) and 40603 (Triple-Negative) (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

De-escalation of axillary surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) requires careful patient selection. We seek to determine predictors of nodal pathologic complete response (ypN0) among patients treated on CALGB 40601 or 40603, which tested NAC regimens in HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), respectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 760 patients with stage II-III HER2+ or TNBC were analyzed. Those who had axillary surgery before NAC (N = 122), or who had missing pretreatment clinical nodal status (cN) (N = 58) or ypN status (N = 41) were excluded. The proportion of patients with ypN0 disease was estimated for those with and without breast pathologic complete response (pCR) according to pretreatment nodal status.

RESULTS

In 539 patients, the overall ypN0 rate was 76.3% (411/539) to 93.2% (245/263) in patients with breast pCR and 60.1% (166/276) with residual breast disease (RD) (P < 0.0001). For patients who were cN0 pretreatment, the ypN0 rate was 88.8% (214/241), 96.3% (104/108) with breast pCR, and 82.7% (110/133) with RD. For patients who were cN1, 66.2% (157/237) converted to ypN0, 91.7% (111/121) with breast pCR and 39.7% (46/116) with RD. For patients who were cN2/3, 65.6% (40/61) converted to ypN0, 88.2% (30/34) with breast pCR and 37.0% (10/27) with RD. On multivariable analysis, only pretreatment clinical nodal status and breast pCR/RD were associated with ypN0 status (both P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast pCR and pretreatment nodal status are predictive of ypN0 axillary nodal involvement, with < 5% residual nodal disease among cN0 patients who experience breast pCR. These findings support the incorporation of axillary surgery de-escalation strategies into NAC trials.

Comparison of Equations To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate and Their Impact on Frequency of Cisplatin-associated Acute Kidney Injury

Background

Accurate estimation of kidney function is essential for patient selection and drug dosing in patients with cancer. eGFR equations are necessary for decision making and monitoring. Our aim was to identify which of these equations-estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) by Cockcroft-Gault (CG), eGFR by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFRMDRD), CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (eGFRCKD-EPI) or the recently proposed Janowitz-Williams equation (eGFRJ-W)-would be most suitable for GFR estimation among patients with cancer receiving cisplatin.

Methods

We assembled a cohort of 5274 patients with cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy at two large cancer centers. We ascertained the frequency of cisplatin-associated AKI (C-AKI) defined as a ≥0.3 mg/dl rise in serum creatinine over baseline. We compared baseline eGFR and eCrCl using Bland-Altman (B-A) plots, coefficients of variation (CV), and concordance correlation coefficients. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (PPV), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Patients were predominantly middle aged (median 58 years, IQR 49-66 years), overweight (median BMI 26.2, IQR 23.1-29.8 kg/m2), and White (88%), with a median baseline creatinine of 0.8 mg/dl and median cisplatin dose of 99 mg. C-AKI developed in 12% of the cohort. eGFRCKD-EPI had the highest PPV and AUC. eGFRCKD-EPI and eGFRMDRD, along with their BSA-modified counterparts, had the closest agreement with the lowest CV (7.2, 95% CI, 7.0 to 7.3) and the highest concordance. C-AKI was lowest when using eGFRCKD-EPI to define eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2.

Conclusions

On the basis of its superior diagnostic performance, eGFRCKD-EPI should be used to estimate GFR in patients being considered for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Abstract PS9-08: The psychosocial impact of caregiving on partners of young women with breast cancer in treatment

BackgroundCancer diagnosis and early treatment may have wide-ranging consequences for a woman’spartner (ie. spouse or significant other). In general, younger caregivers have been found to havegreater unmet needs and higher levels of distress compared to those who are older. To date,there is little known about the unmet needs and experiences of partners who care for youngwomen with breast cancer during active treatment.Trial Design: Cross-sectional survey of partners of young women with breast cancer.Eligibility Criteria: The current analysis focuses on a subset of respondent partners of womenwith breast cancer participating in the Young Womens Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246)who met the following criteria: diagnosed at age &lt; 40 years; time since diagnosis &lt;12 months;and/or Stage IV disease (at diagnosis or in metastatic setting); and/or local recurrent disease&lt; 12 months.Specific Aims: To explore the experience of partners of women in active treatment or havingvery recently completed treatment for breast cancer.Statistical Methods: We employed descriptive statistics to present sample characteristics,including means or medians for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables.We assessed partners’ responses re: sociodemographics, perceived social support (MOS-Social Support Survey, Cancer Perceived Agents of Social Support), quality of life (QOL)(Caregiver QOL Index-Cancer), coping (Brief COPE), perceived financial security, perceivedparenting concerns (Parenting Concerns Questionnaire), anxiety and depression symptoms(Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), sexual satisfaction (Global Measure of SexualSatisfaction), posttraumatic growth (Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-Short Form), and an open-ended question to explore their experiences and needs.Accrual: 25 participants were included.Results: All partners were male (25/25; 100%), and most were white (n=23/25; 92%), workingfull-time (n=21/25; 91%); and college educated (n=19/25; 86%). Eighteen partners (n=18/25;72%) were parenting children &lt;18 years old and 40% (n=10/25) were partnered with womenwith Stage 4 breast cancer. At the time of the survey, the median age of partners was 44 years(range, 28-69) and of patients was 38 years (range, 25-40). Many partners (57%) reportedsymptoms of anxiety (&gt;8 on the HADS anxiety subscale), fewer (22%) were categorized ashaving symptoms of depression (&gt;8 on the HADS depression subscale). Additionally, 39%reported not being sexually active; 41% reported maladaptive coping; 30% reported financialstrain;30% reported relationship strain. Reported caregiver QOL ranged from 22-116, with amean score of 52.5 (SD, 23.9), similar to population norms, with higher scores indicating lowerquality of life. Parenting concerns scores were generally low indicating less concern, with arange of 12-35, and mean of 20.5 (SD, 7.6). Post-traumatic growth ranged from 4-33, with amean score of 20.7 (SD, 7.4), with higher scores indicating greater personal growthexperienced. 44% (11/25) responded to the open-ended experiences and needs question.Common responses included feeling a lack of support, need for tailored and titrated information,and desire to connect with other men who faced similar experiences. Partners also reportedtheir struggles with uncertainty about the future.

Discussion: A subset of partners of young women in active treatment for breast cancerexpressed concerns related to relationship strain, sexuality, need for support, and finances.Future work designed to meet the needs of partners of breast cancer patients includinginformational and psychosocial supports may benefit them and the patients as they manage theprocess of ongoing treatment and challenges about the future.

Citation Format: Tamryn F Gray, Nancy Borstelmann, Shoshana Rosenberg, Shari Gelber, Meghan E Meyer, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Lidia Schapira, Steven Come, Virginia Borges, Tamara Cadet, Peter Maramaldi, Ann H. Partridge. The psychosocial impact of caregiving on partners of young women with breast cancer in treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS9-08.

Abstract GS4-05: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) response in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) resistant to endocrine therapy (ET) in the ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106)

Background: Ki67 values &gt;10% 2-4 weeks (wks) after starting neoadjuvant ET (NET) indicates persistent cell proliferation, resistance to ET, and is associated with increased risk of recurrence. The ACOSOG Z1031 trial suggested that these tumors are also relatively chemotherapy (chemo) resistant with a low pathologic complete response (pCR) rate to NCT. The ALTERNATE trial (NCT01953588) is a randomized study of neoadjuvant anastrozole (ANA), fulvestrant (FUL), or ANA + FUL in postmenopausal patients (pt) with newly diagnosed clinical stage II or III ER+ (Allred score 6-8)/HER2- BC. Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12 after starting NET triggered triage to NCT of physician choice or weekly paclitaxel. Pts who refused protocol-directed therapy, were not candidates for NCT, or decided to undergo immediate surgery are being followed per protocol. Here we report the rates of pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB) following NCT for pts triaged to NCT due to Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12. Results: Of the 1,299 eligible pts randomized to receive ANA, FUL, or ANA + FUL, 286 (22%) had Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12. 168 of these 286 pts (58.7%) chose to switch to NCT, 32 went to surgery (11.2%), and 86 discontinued further protocol-directed therapy (30.1%). Among the 168 pts who underwent NCT, the presenting clinical T stages were cT2 (n=113; 67.26%), cT3 (n=47; 27.98%) and cT4 (n=8; 4.76%) and N stages were cN0 (n=82; 48.8%), cN1 (n=75; 44.6%), cN2/3 (n=9; 5.4%) and cNx (n=2; 1.2%). Central ER testing was performed on pre-treatment biopsies and confirmed ER Allred score 6-8 in 155 of 168 (92.2%) pts, with the rest being ER Allred score 4-5 (n=5; 3%), ER- (Allred score 0) (n=2; 1.2%), or not tested (n=6; 3.6%). Most (n=139; 82.7%) were ER+/PR+, while 17.3% (n=29) were ER+/PR-, and tumor grades were G1 (n=10; 6%), G2 (n=99; 58.9%), G3 (n=54; 32.1%), not reported (n=5; 3%). Baseline Ki67 levels prior to NET were &gt;10% in 94% (n=158), ≤10% in 3% (n=5), and not done in 3% (n=5). NCT regimens administered included doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) (n=60; 35.71%); weekly paclitaxel (n=56; 33.33%), docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) (n=33; 19.65%), other doxorubicin and/or taxane containing regimen (n=17; 10.12%), and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF) (n=2; 1.19%). 35 (20.8%) pts did not complete planned course of NCT due to toxicity (n=27) or refusal (n=8). 154 NCT pts underwent surgery (mastectomy in 40.3%, and breast conserving surgery in 59.7%). The path ypT stages were Tis/0 (n=10; 6.5%), T1 (n=62; 40.3%), T2 (n=61; 39.6%), and T3/4 (n=21; 13.6%), and the ypN stages were N0 (n=66; 42.9%), N1 (n=57; 37%), N2/3 (n=30; 19.5%), and Nx (n=1; 0.6%). Among the 168 pts who started on NCT (intent to treat population), there were 8 pCRs (no invasive disease in the breast or lymph nodes) (4.8%; 95% CI: 2.1% to 9.2%). Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) categories include RCB 0 (n=8; 4.8%), RCB 1 (n=15; 8.9%), RCB 2 (n=82; 48.8%), RCB 3 (n=42; 25.0%), and not determined (n=21; 12.5%). Correlations of baseline pt and tumor characteristics with pathology response to NCT will also be presented. Conclusion: In pts with NET-resistant ER+/HER2- BC, salvage NCT is not likely to induce a complete or near complete response. More effective treatments are needed for this high-risk ER+/HER2- pt population. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG); NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588

Citation Format: Cynthia X Ma, Vera Suman, A. Marilyn Leitch, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Gary W Unzeitig, Jeremy Hoog, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Horacio Maluf, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, Travis Dockter, Jo Anne Zujewski, Anna Weiss, Kelly Hunt, Clifford Hudis, Eric P Winer, Matthew J Ellis, Lisa A Carey, Ann H Partridge. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) response in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) resistant to endocrine therapy (ET) in the ALTERNATE trial (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-05.

Abstract GS2-10: Targeting depressive symptoms in younger breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation and survivorship education

Purpose Breast cancer before age 50 comprises 25% of incident breast cancer cases in women. Younger breast cancer survivors (YBCS) are at increased risk for the negative effects of cancer diagnosis and treatment, including elevated levels of depression and related symptoms (i.e., anxiety, stress, fatigue, sleep disturbance, vasomotor symptoms), leading to significantly diminished quality of life. Patients and Methods This Phase III, randomized, multi-institution trial was designed to examine the efficacy of two brief interventions- mindfulness meditation and survivorship education - for YBCS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03025139). We recruited women diagnosed at age 50 or younger with early-stage breast cancer who had completed cancer treatment between 6 months and 5 years earlier and endorsed at least mild depressive symptoms. Participants were randomly assigned to Mindful Awareness Practices (MAPs), Survivorship Education (SE), or wait-list control (WL). Both intervention programs were tailored for YBCS and included 6 weeks of structured content delivered in a group format. Assessments were conducted at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3- and 6- month post-intervention follow-ups. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale; CESD) at post-intervention; secondary outcomes included anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), fatigue severity (Fatigue Symptom Inventory), sleep disturbance (Insomnia Severity Index), and hot flashes (BCPT symptom checklist). Results We enrolled and randomized 247 women (85 MAPS, 81 SE, 81 WL). On average, participants were 45.4 years old at study entry and had been diagnosed 2.6 years earlier. Linear mixed models were conducted to compare each intervention group to WL on primary and secondary outcomes, controlling for baseline differences across groups in study site, race, and marital status. MAPs led to significant reductions in depressive symptoms at post-intervention and at 3- and 6-month follow-up relative to WL (Ps &lt; .01); see Table 1. SE also led to significant reductions in the CESD at post-intervention and 3-month follow-up (Ps &lt; .01). Both MAPs and SE produced reductions in anxiety at post-intervention relative to WL (Ps &lt; .05), though effects did not persist over follow-up. MAPs also had beneficial effects on other secondary outcomes, yielding significant decreases in fatigue severity, sleep disturbance, and hot flashes that persisted over the 6-month follow-up (Ps &lt; .05). In contrast, there was minimal evidence that SE impacted these outcomes. Conclusion Two brief behavioral intervention programs specially designed for YBCS were effective in reducing depressive symptoms and, in the case of mindfulness, improving related symptoms (fatigue, sleep disturbance) that pose serious threats to younger women’s health and well-being after cancer. These interventions are standardized, manualized, and have the potential for wide dissemination over virtual platforms. Table 1 Adjusted means and standard error (SE) for CESD depressive symptoms by group and time, controlling for study site, race, marital status. A CESD score of 16 or greater indicates moderately severe depressive symptoms. P-values are for differences between intervention and waitlist control groups in change over time between Baseline and Post-Intervention (1-2), Baseline to 3-month Follow-up (1-3), and Baseline to 6-month Follow-up (P 1-4).

BaselinePost-intvP (1-2)3 mo FUP (1-3)6 mo FUP (1-4)GroupCESDCESDCESDPCESDMindful Awareness Practices (MAPs)18.4 (1.0)13.6 (1.1).00113.4 (1.1)&lt;.00112.9 (1.1).013Survivorship Education (SE)17.4 (1.1)13.3 (1.1).00713.6 (1.2).00312.7 (1.2).063Waitlist (WL)16.5 (1.1)16.3 (1.1)17.3 (1.2)14.6 (1.1)

Citation Format: Patty Ganz, Julienne E Bower, Ann H Partridge, Antonio C Wolff, Elissa D Thorner, Hadine Joffe, Michael R Irwin, Laura Petersen, Laura Petersen, Catherine M Crespi. Targeting depressive symptoms in younger breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial of mindfulness meditation and survivorship education [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-10.

Abstract PD2-10: Validation of a predictive model for potential response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC): An ALTERNATE trial analysis (Alliance A011106)

Background: NET is offered to postmenopausal patients (pts) with clinical stage 2/3 ER+/HER2- BC to promote breast-conserving surgery. Also limited surgical accessibility during the COVID19 pandemic has increased NET utility. Inability to identify ET-resistant disease at diagnosis risks disease progression (PD) and delays more effective treatments. Dowsett et al. recently demonstrated that baseline levels of ER, progesterone receptor (PR), Ki67 (&gt;15% vs ≤15%), and Ki67 (&gt;10% vs ≤10%) 2-4 weeks (wks) after starting NET may improve appropriate patient (pt) selection for NET (PMC7280290). The ER, PR and Ki67-based prediction model divides pts with primary ER+/HER2- BC into 3 groups for appropriateness for NET: (Group 1) NET is likely to be inappropriate (Allred ER &lt;6 or ER 6 and PgR &lt;6), (Group 2) NET may be appropriate and a biopsy for on-treatment Ki67 analysis may be considered after 2-4 wks of NET (2A: ER 7 or 8 and PgR &lt;6 and 2B: ER 6 or 7 and PgR ≥6) given that on-treatment Ki67 &gt;10% has been associated with worse outcome (PMC5455353), or (Group 3) NET is appropriate (ER 8 and PgR ≥6). The ALTERNATE trial (NCT01953588) randomized postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III, ER+ (Allred score 6-8)/HER2- BC to receive anastrozole (ANA), fulvestrant (FUL), or ANA + FUL for 6 months, unless Ki67 was &gt;10% on wk 4 or 12 biopsy, in which case pts were triaged to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) or surgery. As previously reported, the ET-sensitive disease (mPEPI 0 plus pCR) rates were similar across the treatment arms and overall 22% (286 of 1,299) pts had Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4 or 12. The ALTERNATE trial therefore provides a large independent data set to evaluate the NET appropriateness model.

Results: Among 1,299 eligible pts randomized to receive 6 months of NET, 214 were excluded due to absent HR Allred score (n=41) or absence of pre-treatment and wk 4 Ki67 determinations (n=173). The proportions of the remaining 1,085 pts in Group 1, 2 and 3 were 1% (n=10), 43% (n= 468), and 56% (n=607), respectively. On-study Ki67 &gt;10% prompting conversion from NET to NCT/Surgery occurred in: Group 1 90% (9 of 10), Group 2 30% (141 of 468), and Group 3 17% (104 of 607) (Table 1). Among the 1,075 pts in Groups 2 and 3, 260 (24%) pts had Ki67 ≤15% at baseline (BL), among whom only 14 (5.4%) had Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4, compared to 231 of the 815 (28.3%) who had BL Ki67 &gt;15% and subsequent Ki67 &gt;10% at wk 4. 2% of pts who remained on NET due to on-treatment Ki67 &lt;10% had PD. Response and PEPI-0 rates by group will be reported.

Conclusion: ALTERNATE trial data support a model whereby levels of ER, PR and Ki67 at diagnosis can be used for the identification of postmenopausal pts with primary ER+/HER2- BC who are appropriate for NET. When baseline ER Allred scores are &gt;6 and Ki67 ≤15%, there is a low likelihood of ET-resistant disease. When BL Ki67 is &gt;15%, ET sensitivity is variable, and on-treatment biopsy for Ki67 may assist in triaging regarding NET appropriateness, particularly given the extremely low local PD rates seen in ALTERNATE when on-treatment Ki67 was &lt;10%. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, UG1CA189856, U10CA180868 (NRG); NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01953588

Table 1 Baseline levels of ER, PR, and Ki67 in Relation to Wk 4 Ki67 (N=1,085)BaselineWeek 4GroupNERAllred ScorePRAllred ScoreKi67Ki67 ≤10%N (%)Ki67 &gt;10%N (%)1N=26&lt;6≤15%0 (0%)2 (100%)9 (90)N=86&lt;6&gt;15%1 (12.5%)7 (87.5%)2AN=647 or 8&lt;6≤15%61 (95.3%)3 (4.7%)90 (30.1)N=2357 or 8&lt;6&gt;15%148 (63%)87 (37%)2BN=466 or 7≥6≤15%42 (91.3%)4 (8.7%)51 (30.2)N=1236 or 7≥6&gt;15%76 (61.8%)47 (38.2%)3N=1508≥6≤15%143 (95.3%)7 (4.7%)104 (17.1)N=4578≥6&gt;15%360 (78.8%)97 (21.2%)

Citation Format: Matthew J Ellis, Vera Suman, A. Marilyn Leitch, Souzan Sanati, Kiran Vij, Gary W Unzeitig, Jeremy Hoog, Mark Watson, Olwen Hahn, Joseph Guenther, Abigail Caudle, Erika Crouch, Horacio Maluf, Mitch Dowsett, Amy Tiersten, Monica Mita, Wajeeha Razaq, Tina J Hieken, Yang Wang, Travis Dockter, Jo Anne Zujewski, Anna Weiss, Clifford Hudis, Eric P Winer, Kelly Hunt, Ann H Partridge, Cynthia X Ma, Lisa A Carey. Validation of a predictive model for potential response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in postmenopausal women with clinical stage II or III estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC): An ALTERNATE trial analysis (Alliance A011106) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-10.

Abstract PD10-06: Clinical behavior and outcomes of BRCA-mutated breast cancer in young patients according to type of BRCA mutation and hormone receptor status: Results from an international cohort study

Background: Young breast cancer patients (pts) carrying a germline BRCA mutation (mBRCA) have similar outcomes as non-carriers. However, there is currently lack of evidence regarding the impact of mBRCA type and hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of mBRCA breast cancer. We aim to address these questions in the largest dataset to date of young mBRCA breast cancer pts.

Methods: This was an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study. Women harboring deleterious germline mBRCA1 or mBRCA2 that received a diagnosis of stage I-III invasive early breast cancer at age ≤40 years between January 2000 and December 2012 were included. Baseline pts, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pattern and risk over time of disease-free survival (DFS) events, and survival outcomes (DFS, distant recurrence-free interval [DRFI] and overall survival [OS]) were compared between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts overall and by hormone receptor status. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare hazard rates (HRs).

Results: 1,236 young mBRCA breast cancer pts were included. Among 808 and 428 pts with mBRCA1 or mBRCA2, respectively, 191 (23.6%) and 356 (83.2%) had hormone receptor-positive tumors while 617 (76.4%) and 72 (16.8%) hormone receptor-negative disease (p&lt;0.001). Compared to mBRCA2 breast cancer pts, those with mBRCA1 were younger, more likely to have reported Jewish ancestry, had more grade 3 tumors, less nodal involvement, lobular histology and HER2 positivity, and received more frequently chemotherapy (all p&lt;0.001). More mBRCA1 pts with hormone receptor-positive tumors did not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy (14.7% vs. 4.2%, p&lt;0.001). No difference between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts was observed in risk-reducing mastectomy (43.9% vs. 46.0%; p=0.371) or salpingo-oophorectomy (48.3% vs. 48.8%; p=1.0). Median follow-up was 7.9 years (range 5.6-10.6 years). Second primary breast cancers (17.0% vs. 12.2%, p=0.025) and non-breast primary malignancies (4.3% vs. 1.9%, p=0.033) were more frequent among mBRCA1 pts compared to mBRCA2 pts, while distant recurrences were less frequent (10.4% vs. 15.4%, p=0.013). 8-year DFS was 62.8% and 65.9% for mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts, respectively (adjusted HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.96). The worse DFS in mBRCA1 was observed regardless of hormone receptor status (pinteraction=0.848): hormone receptor-positive (adjusted HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.58-1.03) and hormone receptor-negative (adjusted HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.48-1.13). No differences in DRFI and OS were observed between mBRCA1 and mBRCA2 pts. Compared to pts with hormone receptor-negative disease, those with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer had higher chances of developing distant (± loco-regional) recurrences (16.1% vs. 9.0%; p&lt;0.001) and less frequent second primary malignancies (BC: 12.1% vs. 17.9%, p=0.005; non-BC: 2.8% vs. 4.0%, p=0.216). No differences in DFS and OS were observed between pts with hormone receptor-positive or negative breast cancer. However, there was a trend towards worse DRFI in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer as compared to those with hormone receptor-negative disease (8-year DRFI: 83.4% vs. 90.1%; adjusted HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.94-2.05).

Conclusions: In this large unique dataset, young mBRCA1 breast cancer pts had worse DFS than those with mBRCA2 mostly due to higher rates of second primary malignancies. Hormone receptor positivity had no positive prognostic value in young mBRCA breast cancer pts with a trend towards worse DRFI in those with hormone receptor-negative disease. These results provide important information for counseling young mBRCA breast cancer pts regarding treatment, prevention and follow-up care strategies.

Citation Format: Matteo Lambertini, Marcello Ceppi, Anne-Sophie Hamy, Olivier Caron, Philip D. Poorvu, Estela Carrasco, Albert Grinshpun, Kevin Punie, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Alberta Ferrari, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Angela Toss, Claire Senechal, Fabio Puglisi, Katarzyna Pogoda, Jose Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo, Laura De Marchis, Riccardo Ponzone, Luca Livraghi, Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Maria Vittoria Dieci, Florian Clatot, Francois P. Duhoux, Rossella Graffeo, Luis Teixeira, Octavi Córdoba, Amir Sonnenblick, Arlindo R. Ferreira, Ann H. Partridge, Antonio Di Meglio, Claire Saule, Fedro A. Peccatori, Marco Bruzzone, Lucia Del Mastro, Lieveke Ameye, Judith Balmaña, Hatem A. Azim, Jr. Clinical behavior and outcomes of BRCA-mutated breast cancer in young patients according to type of BRCA mutation and hormone receptor status: Results from an international cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-06.

Abstract PD12-08: Young, empowered & strong (YES): A web-based education and supportive care intervention for young women with breast cancer across the care continuum

Background: Young women diagnosed with breast cancer have unique physical and psycho-social needs that are often unaddressed. Patient-centered models of care, including eHealth strategies, can help empower young women to self-manage symptoms and psychosocial concerns, as well as support informational needs throughout the cancer care trajectory. Methods: YES (Young, Empowered and Strong) is an interactive web-based portal designed with patient-reported outcome questionnaires (PROs) that trigger delivery of young breast cancer patient-specific education and symptom management materials. Personal journal and messaging components are also available. We piloted the YES portal among young women (&lt;45 years) with newly diagnosed early breast cancer (EBC), breast cancer survivors (BC-S) and women living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), for whom PROs were deployed weekly (EBC, MBC) or every 4 weeks (BC-S) over 12-weeks. At study completion, the use, feasibility and acceptability of the YES portal was assessed via a survey and a structured interview. Results: Thirty women were enrolled between April and June 2019: 10 EBC, 10 BC-S and 10 MBC. Mean age at diagnosis and enrollment was 36 (range 25-44) and 39 (range 31-44) years respectively and 13% (4/30) were non-white. Nearly all participants were receiving treatment (96%, 27/28) including 54% (15/28), endocrine therapy and 43% (12/28), chemotherapy. Overall, 61% (180/296) of PROs deployed were completed, with completion rates highest for EBC patients (EBC: 70%, BC-S: 63%, MBC: 52%). Of 37 PROs domains, the most frequently triggered were sexual health (EBC: 90%, BC-S: 90%, MBC: 90%), anxiety (EBC: 80%, BC-S: 90%, MBC: 90%) and fatigue (EBC: 90%, BC-S: 80%, MBC: 90%). Physical domains and young breast cancer specific domains commonly addressed in clinic (i.e., fertility, genetic testing) were less frequently triggered. The post-pilot survey was answered by 15 participants: 8/15 reported the information shared through YES was helpful, 6/14 felt the portal helped monitor side effects and 8/14 felt the portal helped manage side-effects. Nineteen women completed post-pilot interviews: most women with EBC and MBC said the portal increased symptom awareness and complemented information communicated by providers; the BC-S group more frequently commented that features of the YES portal focusing on symptom monitoring/management would have been more useful when they were earlier in their care (newly diagnosed or undergoing more active treatment). Conclusions: YES, a novel eHealth intervention designed to support young women with breast cancer, is feasible and acceptable to young women across the breast cancer care continuum. The nearly universal triggering of information and support for sexual and mental health suggests sub-optimal management of these issues in the clinical setting and the potential role for self-management through an eHealth platform for this population. Future efforts will aim to evaluate whether provision of information through the YES portal reduces symptom burden and unaddressed needs and concerns in young women with breast cancer.

Citation Format: Tal Sella, Craig Snow, Hannah Freeman, Phillip D Poorvu, Shoshana M Rosenberg, Ann H Partridge. Young, empowered & strong (YES): A web-based education and supportive care intervention for young women with breast cancer across the care continuum [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD12-08.

Abstract SS2-05: Emerging from COVID-19 pandemic: Provider perspective on use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer

IntroductionDuring the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in USA, NET use has been recommended to allow safe deferral of surgical treatment in early stage, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer (ER+BC). In such circumstances, after NET use there is limited guidance on locoregional treatment, especially with management of the axilla. We aimed to evaluate patterns of care in early stage ER+BC during the first several months of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodA cross-sectional, 30-item survey was developed using a standardized survey development framework. The survey was administered May 8 - June 12, 2020 to a convenience sample of medical oncologists (MO), radiation oncologists (RO), and surgeons (SO) - breast committee members of two national cooperative groups (Alliance and SWOG) with additional participation through chain referrals. Providers were presented with general questions on NET use before and during the pandemic. They were asked their propensity for omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after NET if 1 micrometastatic node is found on sentinel lymph node biopsy, based on duration of NET.Results114 providers from 29 US states completed the survey - 42 (37%) MO, 14 (12%) RO, and 58 (51%) SO, the majority (N=73/96, 76%) with practices dedicated ≥ 75% to BC, at NCI designated comprehensive cancer centers 52% (N=48/94) and in large cities (N=49/94, 52%). Prior to COVID-19, most rarely (N=49/107, 46%) or sometimes (N=36, 33%) used NET for early stage ER+BC. Nearly half were willing to delay surgery up to 2 months (46%) and 3 months (21%) without use of NET (Table 1, †p&lt;0.05). Most providers would perform a genomic assay on the biopsy specimen on all or select patients prior to NET initiation, more frequently by MO compared to RO and SO (90% vs. 75% and 60%, p&lt;0.05). The most preferred regimen was tamoxifen (without ovarian suppression) for premenopausal patients and aromatase inhibitor for postmenopausal patients. Most planned to use NET for as little time as possible until surgery could proceed. When stratified by specialty, more MO stated they would vary the duration of therapy based on patient’s risk of cancer progression. Most providers recommended omitting ALND after 1, 2, or 3 months of NET (1 month N=56/93, 60%; 2 months N=54/92, 59%; 3 months N=48/90, 53%). With longer duration of therapy, the propensity for omitting ALND decreased (definitely omit after 6 months N=25/91, 27%; probably omit after 6 months N=38/91, 42%; definitely omit after 1 year N=26/92, 28%; probably omit after 1 year N=29/92, 32%). Omitting ALND was not associated with provider’s years in practice, percent of practice dedicated to BC, practice type or setting, participation in multidisciplinary tumor board, or number of COVID-19 cases in the provider’s practicing state.ConclusionMost providers changed their management of early stage ER+BC during the COVID-19 pandemic by utilizing NET until surgery could proceed. As the duration of NET extended, more providers favored ALND in low volume axillary metastatic disease in early stage ER+BC. Additional data to inform the care on post-NET locoregional management is needed.

Table 1. Management of early stage, node negative, ER+BC during COVID-19 pandemicTotal (N, %)Med OncRad OncSurgeonHow long are you willing to delay surgery (without use of endocrine therapy)?Up to 1 month25 (23%)10 (24%)015 (26%)Up to 2 months51 (46%)17 (40%)7 (64%)27 (47%)Up to 3 months23 (21%)9 (21%)2 (18%)12 (21%)Up to 4 months3 (3%)2 (5%)1 (9%)0Up to 6 months8 (7%)4 (10%)1 (9%)3 (5%)Have you changed your practice during the current pandemic?Yes - institution mandated change to delay surgery8 (25%)4 (36%)04 (29%)Yes - based on multidisciplinary team discussion (no explicit institutional mandate to delay cancer surgery)21 (66%)6 (55%)7 (100%)8 (57%)No - was not allowed by institution to change0000No - was not necessary3 (9%)1 (9%)02 (14%)If using endocrine therapy before surgery, which regimen are you using?†Tamoxifen for all patients0000Tamoxifen for premenopausal patients; aromatase inhibitor for postmenopausal patients77 (81%)26 (63%)051 (94%)Ovarian suppression with aromatase inhibitor for premenopausal patients; aromatase inhibitor for postmenopausal patients18 (19%)15 (37%)03 (6%)How are you staging the axilla prior to starting endocrine therapy?Exam only28 (26%)8 (19%)2 (17%)18 (33%)Exam + US77 (71%)30 (71%)10 (83%)37 (67%)Exam + US + cross sectional image (CT scan)4 (4%)4 (10%)0 (0%)0 (0%)SLNB0000If using endocrine therapy first (before surgery), are you†Sending genomic assay on biopsy specimen on all patients28 (26%)18 (44%)1 (8%)9 (16%)Sending genomic assay on biopsy specimen on only select patients (ie. high grade, size on imaging/exam, high Ki-67)51 (48%)19 (46%)8 (67%)24 (44%)Not sending genomic assay. Using PEPI score instead.4 (4%)1 (2%)1 (8%)2 (4%)Not sending genomic assay. Using Magee Equations for Estimating Oncotype DX Recurrence Score instead.2 (2%)002 (4%)None of above21 (20%)3 (7%)2 (17%)18 (33%)If using endocrine therapy first, what duration do you plan to use it for the average patient?†Minimum 1 year for all patients0000Minimum 6 months for all patients7 (6%)4 (10%)0 (0%)3 (5%)Minimum 3 months for all patients19 (18%)7 (17%)1 (8%)11 (20%)As short as possible (less than 3 months), until it is safe to proceed with surgery in light of COVID-19 situation57 (53%)14 (34%)9 (75%)34 (62%)Duration of therapy depends on patient''s risk of cancer progression (ie. tumor grade, percent hormone positivity)25 (23%)16 (39%)2 (17%)7 (13%)If using endocrine therapy before surgery, do you plan to re-image the breast prior to surgery?†Yes, re-image all patients27 (25%)14 (34%)1 (8%)12 (22%)No8 (7%)0 (0%)2 (17%)6 (11%)Case by case basis72 (67%)27 (66%)9 (75%)36 (67%)

Citation Format: Ko Un Park, Megan E Gregory, Maryam B Lustberg, Jose G Bazan, Chengli Shen, Shoshana M Rosenberg, Victoria S Blinder, Priyanka Sharma, Lajos Pusztai, Ann H Partridge, Alastair Thompson. Emerging from COVID-19 pandemic: Provider perspective on use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr SS2-05.

Abstract PS12-17: Baseline characteristics of women enrolled in the POSITIVE trial (pregnancy outcome and safety of interrupting therapy for women with endocrine responsIVE breast cancer)

Background: Pregnancy is a major concern for young breast cancer (BC) survivors. Conception after BC in women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) disease is affected by the standard 5-10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) during which pregnancy is contraindicated and fertility may be waning. The POSITIVE Trial (IBCSG 48-14/BIG 8-13/Alliance A221405/NCT02308085) investigates the impact of temporary ET interruption to allow pregnancy.

Methods: POSITIVE enrolled premenopausal women with stage I-III HR+ early BC, ≤42 years of age, who had received adjuvant ET (SERM alone, ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus SERM or AI) for 18 to 30 months, and wished to interrupt ET to attempt pregnancy. An interruption of ET for up to 2 years was foreseen to allow pregnancy (after a 3-month ET washout period), delivery, and breastfeeding if desired/feasible. Resumption of ET to complete 5-10 years of treatment was planned as soon as pregnancy/breastfeeding was completed or after it was ensured conception was not possible. We report baseline characteristics of participants enrolled in POSITIVE by region of enrollment.

Results: From 12/2014 to 12/2019, 518 participants were enrolled at 116 centers in 20 countries across 4 continents. The table shows the baseline characteristics of the enrolled women.

Several differences were seen across regions: A higher proportion of participants &lt;35 yrs (43%) enrolled in North America than in Europe (33%) or Asia (26%). Eighty-one percent of Asian women had no children at enrollment compared to 75% and 68% of European and North American women, respectively. Consistently, a greater percent of women in Asia (56%) had used fertility preservation measures, compared to Europe (53%) and North America (43%). Stage distribution was also different across continents: a greater percent of Asian participants had stage I, grade 1 and node-negative disease (51%, 29% and 76 %, respectively) compared to European (46%, 14% and 67%) and North American (43%, 16% and 55%) women. Only 19% of Asian women had either 1-3 positive nodes and grade 3 tumors, the proportion increased to 28% and 35% in Europe and to 41% and 38% in North America, respectively. North American women were more likely to have had mastectomy (60% vs. Asian (44%) and European (41%)); European women were more likely to have had chemotherapy (69% vs. North American (56%) and Asian (42%)). ET administration prior to enrollment differed substantially by region: Most North American women had SERM (T) alone (58%), and when OFS was added to oral ET, it was combined with AI in 19% and with T in 8% of participants, respectively. In Asia most women received T + OFS (55%), followed by T alone (36%), and AI + OFS (6%). In Europe, T + OFS was the most frequent treatment (40%), followed by T alone (37%) and AI + OFS (17%). Median duration of ET before enrollment was similar across regions (22-24 months).

Conclusion: Regional variation of baseline characteristics of women enrolled in the POSITIVE trial may provide important insights into different medical and sociocultural attributes and attitudes of the study participants and investigators from those regions.

Affiliation: POSITIVE Investigators, International Breast Cancer Study Group, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Breast International Group, North American Breast Cancer Group

CharacteristicRegion: Europe / North America / Asia-Pacific61% / 23% / 16%Median age at enrollment, yrs (IQR)37 (33-39)Caucasian race77%No children prior to enrollment74%Prior fertility preservation measures taken51%Stage I / II46% / 45%0 / 1 positive nodes65% / 21%Grade 2 / 348% / 33%HER2-negative74%Mastectomy46%Chemotherapy61%ET: SERM alone / SERM+OFS / AI+OFS41% / 35% / 16%Median duration of prior ET, mos (IQR)23 (20-27)

Citation Format: Ann H Partridge, Samuel M Niman, Monica Ruggeri, Fedro A Peccatori, Hatem A Azim, Jr, Marco Colleoni, Cristina Saura, Chikako Shimizu, Anna Barbro Sætersdal, Judith Kroep, Ellen Warner, Virginia F Borges, Andrea Gombos, Akemi Kataoka, Christine Rousset-Jablonski, Simona Borstnar, Hideko Yamauchi, Jeong Eon Lee, Janice M Walshe, Manuel Ruíz Borrego, Halle CF Moore, Christobel Saunders, Fatima Cardoso, Snezana Susnjar, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Karen L Smith, Martine Piccart, Larissa A Korde, Aron Goldhirsch, Richard D Gelber, Olivia Pagani. Baseline characteristics of women enrolled in the POSITIVE trial (pregnancy outcome and safety of interrupting therapy for women with endocrine responsIVE breast cancer) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS12-17.

Phase I study of JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib with weekly paclitaxel for the treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies support the JAK2-STAT3 signaling pathway as a key driver in CD44+ CD24- "stem-cell-like" breast cancer cells. Ruxolitinib is an orally bioavailable JAK1/2 inhibitor. We aimed to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ruxolitinib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

METHODS

Eligible patients had HER2-negative MBC and had received ≤ 3 chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease. Patients received oral ruxolitinib (10-25 mg bid) in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design in combination with weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m² in a 3-week cycle. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the RP2D.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients received protocol therapy (mean age 52 years). Eight (42%) had triple-negative breast cancer and 11 (58%) had hormone receptor-positive disease; 12 (63%) had visceral disease. Ten (53%) patients had not received prior treatment for advanced disease. Patients received a median number of 5 cycles of combination therapy (range 1-12) and five patients continued single-agent ruxolitinib. The MTD of ruxolitinib was 25 mg bid when combined with paclitaxel, and the RP2D for the combination was 15 mg bid. Thirteen (68%) patients required dose reductions or holds. Most frequent toxicities reported of any grade were neutropenia (50%) and anemia (33%). There were no grade 4/5 toxicities attributed to study drug. Four (21%) patients had PR, 12 (63%) had SD and three (16%) had PD as their best response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of ruxolitinib and weekly paclitaxel was well tolerated with evidence of clinical activity. Further analysis of this combination is ongoing (NCT02041429).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02041429. Date of registration: January 22, 2014.

Clinical behavior and outcomes of breast cancer in young women with germline BRCA pathogenic variants

Young breast cancer (BC) patients carrying a germline BRCA pathogenic variant (mBRCA) have similar outcomes as non-carriers. However, the impact of the type of gene (BRCA1 vs. BRCA2) and hormone receptor status (positive [HR+] vs. negative [HR-]) on clinical behavior and outcomes of mBRCA BC remains largely unknown. This is an international, multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study that included mBRCA patients diagnosed, between January 2000 and December 2012, with stage I-III invasive early BC at age ≤40 years. From 30 centers worldwide, 1236 young mBRCA BC patients were included. Among 808 and 428 patients with mBRCA1 or mBRCA2, 191 (23.6%) and 356 (83.2%) had HR+tumors, respectively (P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 7.9 years. Second primary BC (P = 0.009) and non-BC malignancies (P = 0.02) were more frequent among mBRCA1 patients while distant recurrences were less frequent (P = 0.02). Irrespective of hormone receptor status, mBRCA1 patients had worse disease-free survival (DFS; adjusted HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60-0.96), with no difference in distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and overall survival (OS). Patients with HR+ disease had more frequent distant recurrences (P < 0.001) and less frequent second primary malignancies (BC: P = 0.005; non-BC: P = 0.18). No differences in DFS and OS were observed according to hormone receptor status, with a tendency for worse DRFI (adjusted HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 0.94-2.05) in patients with HR+ BC. Type of mBRCA gene and hormone receptor status strongly impact BC clinical behavior and outcomes in mBRCA young patients. These results provide important information for patients' counseling on treatment, prevention, and surveillance strategies.

Screening for Depression in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors: Outcomes From Use of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire

Background

Major cancer organizations recommend depression screening in patients and survivors. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is often suggested, with limited information about its use.

Methods

Enrollment data collected from younger breast cancer survivors participating in a behavioral intervention trial were used to examine the relationship between PHQ-9 scores (range = 0-27), patient characteristics, and responses to standardized psychosocial assessment tools. Major depressive disorder criterion was met if responses to the first 2 PHQ-9 items (range = 0-6) were 3 or greater. The sample was categorized by total PHQ-9 scores: less than 5 (minimal depressive symptoms), 5-9 (mild to moderate depressive symptoms), and 10 or greater (moderate to severe depression). PHQ-9 category associations with medical, demographic, psychosocial, and behavioral characteristics were examined using analysis of variance for continuous variables and χ² tests for categorical variables.

Results

A total of 231 women met the study prescreening eligibility criterion of mild depressive symptoms and enrolled in the study. On average, they were 45.2 years old and 2.6 years since diagnosis. At enrollment, 22.1% met the screening criterion for possible major depressive disorder; among those with PHQ-9 scores of 10 or greater, 58.3% met this criterion. Anxiety, fatigue, insomnia, and intrusive thoughts about cancer were frequent and were associated with depressive symptom severity (all P < .001). In contrast, neither demographic nor cancer treatment characteristics were associated with depressive symptoms.

Conclusions

Depressive symptoms in this selected sample of younger breast cancer survivors were independent of demographic characteristics or cancer treatment history, suggesting that depression screening is necessary to detect uncontrolled depressive symptoms.

Association of Breast Cancer Surgery With Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-being in Young Breast Cancer Survivors

Importance

Young women with breast cancer are increasingly choosing bilateral mastectomy (BM), yet little is known about short-term and long-term physical and psychosocial well-being following surgery in this population.

Objective

To evaluate the differential associations of surgery with quality of life (QOL) and psychosocial outcomes from 1 to 5 years following diagnosis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cohort study.

Setting

Multicenter, including academic and community hospitals in North America.

Participants

Women age ≤40 when diagnosed with Stage 0-3 with unilateral breast cancer between 2006 and 2016 who had surgery and completed QOL and psychosocial assessments.

Exposures (for observational studies)

Primary breast surgery including breast-conserving surgery (BCS), unilateral mastectomy (UM), and BM.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Physical functioning, body image, sexual health, anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed in follow-up.

Results

Of 826 women, mean age at diagnosis was 36.1 years; most women were White non-Hispanic (86.7%). Regarding surgery, 45% had BM, 31% BCS, and 24% UM. Of women who had BM/UM, 84% had reconstruction. While physical functioning, sexuality, and body image improved over time, sexuality and body image were consistently worse (higher adjusted mean scores) among women who had BM vs BCS (body image: year 1, 1.32 vs 0.64; P < .001; year 5, 1.19 vs 0.48; P < .001; sexuality: year 1, 1.66 vs 1.20, P < .001; year 5, 1.43 vs 0.96; P < .001) or UM (body image: year 1, 1.32 vs 1.15; P = .06; year 5, 1.19 vs 0.96; P = .02; sexuality: year 1, 1.66 vs 1.41; P = .02; year 5, 1.43 vs 1.09; P = .002). Anxiety improved across groups, but adjusted mean scores remained higher among women who had BM vs BCS/UM at 1 year (BM, 7.75 vs BCS, 6.94; P = .005; BM, 7.75 vs UM, 6.58; P = .005), 2 years (BM, 7.47 vs BCS, 6.18; P < .001; BM, 7.47 vs UM, 6.07; P < .001) and 5 years (BM, 6.67 vs BCS, 5.91; P = .05; BM, 6.67 vs UM, 5.79; P = .05). There were minimal between-group differences in depression levels in follow-up.

Conclusions and Relevance

While QOL improves over time, young breast cancer survivors who undergo more extensive surgery have worse body image, sexual health, and anxiety compared with women undergoing less extensive surgery. Ensuring young women are aware of the short-term and long-term effects of surgery and receive support when making surgical decisions is warranted.