Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare subtype of Hodgkin lymphoma with distinct clinicopathologic features. It is typified by the presence of lymphocyte predominant (LP) cells, which are CD20(+) but CD15(-) and CD30(-) and are found scattered amongst small B lymphocytes arranged in a nodular pattern. Despite frequent and often late or multiple relapses, the prognosis of NLPHL is very favorable. There is an inherent risk of secondary aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and studies support that risk is highest in those with splenic involvement at presentation. Given disease rarity, the optimal management is unclear and opinions differ as to whether treatment paradigms should be similar to or differ from those for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL). This review provides an overview of the existing literature describing pathological subtypes, outcome and treatment approaches for NLPHL.

Molecular etiology of an indolent lymphoproliferative disorder determined by whole-genome sequencing

In an attempt to assess potential treatment options, whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing were performed on a patient with an unclassifiable small lymphoproliferative disorder. Variants from genome sequencing were prioritized using a combination of comparative variant distributions in a spectrum of lymphomas, and meta-analyses of gene expression profiling. In this patient, the molecular variants that we believe to be most relevant to the disease presentation most strongly resemble a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), whereas the gene expression data are most consistent with a low-grade chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The variant of greatest interest was a predicted NOTCH2-truncating mutation, which has been recently reported in various lymphomas.

The value of routine bone marrow biopsy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma staged with PET/CT: a Danish-Canadian study

BACKGROUND

The added diagnostic and prognostic value of routine bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) staging is controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who underwent both staging PET/CT and BMB were retrospectively identified in British Columbia, Aalborg, and Copenhagen. Original written PET/CT and pathology reports were retrospectively reviewed to determine Ann Arbor stage and outcomes, with and without the contribution of BMB.

RESULTS

A total of 530 patients were identified: 146 (28%) had focal bone marrow (BM) lesions on PET/CT and 87 (16%) had positive BMB. Fifty-two of 146 patients (36%) with positive PET/CT had a positive BMB [39 DLBCL, 13 indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL)], while 35 of 384 patients (9%) with negative PET/CT had positive BMB (12 DLBCL, 23 iNHL). BMB upstaged 12/209 (6%) of stage I/II patients to stage IV, although this was the case for only 3 (1%) patients with DLBCL in the BMB. PET/CT identified BM involvement by BMB with sensitivity 60%, specificity 79%, positive predictive value 36%, and negative predictive value 91%. Concordant histological involvement of the BM by DLBCL was associated with worse overall survival and progression-free survival than discordant or no involvement in univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with DLBCL, staging PET/CT can miss BM involvement with concordant DLBCL (less common) or discordant iNHL (more common). Routine BMB does not add relevant diagnostic or prognostic value over PET/CT alone in the majority of patients with DLBCL.

A phase II study of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine and prednisone (CEOP) Alternating with Pralatrexate (P) as front line therapy for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL): final results from the T- cell consortium trial

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) have suboptimal outcomes using conventional CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy. The anti-folate pralatrexate, the first drug approved for patients with relapsed/refractory PTCL, provided a rationale to incorporate it into the front-line setting. This phase 2 study evaluated a novel front-line combination whereby cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine and prednisone (CEOP) alternated with pralatrexate (CEOP-P) in PTCL. Patients achieving a complete or partial remission (CR/PR) were eligible for consolidative stem cell transplantation (SCT) after 4 cycles. Thirty-three stage II-IV PTCL patients were treated: 21 PTCL-not otherwise specified (64%), 8 angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (24%) and 4 anaplastic large cell lymphoma (12%). The majority (61%) had stage IV disease and 46% were International Prognostic Index high/intermediate or high risk. Grade 3-4 toxicities included anaemia (27%), thrombocytopenia (12%), febrile neutropenia (18%), mucositis (18%), sepsis (15%), increased creatinine (12%) and liver transaminases (12%). Seventeen patients (52%) achieved a CR. The 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival, were 39% (95% confidence interval 21-57) and 60% (95% confidence interval 39-76), respectively. Fifteen patients (45%) (12 CR) received SCT and all remained in CR at a median follow-up of 21·5 months. CEOP-P did not improve outcomes compared to historical data using CHOP. Defining optimal front line therapy in PTCL continues to be a challenge and an unmet need.

Rituximab with high-dose methotrexate in primary central nervous system lymphoma

The addition of rituximab (R) to chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with systemic B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but the impact in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) receiving high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is unknown. Patients diagnosed with PCNSL at the British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) between 2000 and 2013 were treated with ≥1 cycle of HDMTX 8 g/m(2) every 2 weeks, to best response or 10 cycles. After 2006, rituximab 375 mg/m(2) was given every 2 weeks with HDMTX for a total of 4 doses. 49 (66%) patients received HDMTX alone and 25 (34%) HDMTX+R, with a median of 5 (range 1-10) HDMTX cycles, and no difference between groups. The median follow-up was 5 years: 8.8 years (range 3.15-13.5 years) HDMTX and 1.9 years (range 0.5-7 years) HDMTX+R. The 5-year PFS was 17%, with no difference between groups (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.41-1.35; P = 0.33). The 5-year OS was 38%, with no difference between the groups OS (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35-1.52; P = 0.39). In this retrospective study comparing two subgroups of patients treated in different eras, the addition of R to HDMTX did not appear to improve outcomes in PCNSL, possibly consistent with its known poor CNS penetration. It is possible that with a larger sample size, longer follow-up, or different rituximab dosing/schedule, the addition of rituximab may lead to a statistically significant improvement in outcomes. Prospective randomized trials currently in progress will more definitively estimate the impact of the addition of rituximab to HDMTX-based chemotherapy for PCNSL.

Outcome prediction by extranodal involvement, IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI in the PET/CT and rituximab era: A Danish-Canadian study of 443 patients with diffuse-large B-cell lymphoma

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (PET/CT) is the current state-of-the-art in the staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and has a high sensitivity for extranodal involvement. Therefore, reassessment of extranodal involvement and the current prognostic indices in the PET/CT era is warranted. We screened patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL seen at the academic centers of Aalborg, Copenhagen, and British Columbia for eligibility. Patients that had been staged with PET/CT and treated with R-CHOP(-like) 1(st) line treatment were retrospectively included. In total 443 patients met the inclusion criteria. With a median follow-up of 2.4 years, the 3-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 73% and 69%, respectively. The Ann Arbor classification had no prognostic impact in itself with the exception of stage IV disease (HR 2.14 for PFS, P<0.01). Extranodal involvement was associated with a worse outcome in general, and in particular for patients with involvement of >2 extranodal sites, including HR 7.81 (P < 0.001) for PFS for >3 sites. Bone/bone marrow involvement was the most commonly involved extranodal site identified by PET/CT (29%) and was associated with an inferior PFS and OS. The IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI were predictive of PFS and OS, and the two latter could identify a very good prognostic subgroup with 3-year PFS and OS of 100%. PET/CT-ascertained extranodal involvement in DLBCL is common and involvement of >2 extranodal sites is associated with a dismal outcome. The IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI predict outcome with high accuracy.

Outcome of patients with primary refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma after R-CHOP treatment

Primary refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) following R-CHOP chemotherapy is a major concern. We identified 1126 patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP from 2000 to 2009, of whom 166 (15 %) had primary refractory disease. Of the 75/166 (45 %) who were age <70 years and had been planned for stage-directed curative therapy, 43 (57 %) were primary nonresponders and 32 (43 %) relapsed within 3 months of completing R-CHOP. Thirty of 75 (40 %) patients had serious comorbidity and organ dysfunction precluding intensive treatment and had palliative treatment only. Twelve of 45 (27 %) patients responded to second-line treatment and underwent ASCT. The median overall survival for the 75 patients was 10 months with only seven patients alive without evidence of disease at follow-up ranging from 14 to 106 months. Primary refractory DLBCL after R-CHOP has a very poor outcome with only anecdotal survivors independent of the intended treatment approach.

Prognostic Significance of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Cell of Origin Determined by Digital Gene Expression in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Biopsies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic impact of cell-of-origin (COO) subgroups, assigned using the recently described gene expression-based Lymph2Cx assay in comparison with International Prognostic Index (IPI) score and MYC/BCL2 coexpression status (dual expressers).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Reproducibility of COO assignment using the Lymph2Cx assay was tested employing repeated sampling within tumor biopsies and changes in reagent lots. The assay was then applied to pretreatment formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) biopsies from 344 patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) uniformly treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) at the British Columbia Cancer Agency. MYC and BCL2 protein expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays.

RESULTS

The Lymph2Cx assay provided concordant COO calls in 96% of 49 repeatedly sampled tumor biopsies and in 100% of 83 FFPET biopsies tested across reagent lots. Critically, no frank misclassification (activated B-cell-like DLBCL to germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL or vice versa) was observed. Patients with activated B-cell-like DLBCL had significantly inferior outcomes compared with patients with germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL (log-rank P < .001 for time to progression, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival). In pairwise multivariable analyses, COO was associated with outcomes independent of IPI score and MYC/BCL2 immunohistochemistry. The prognostic significance of COO was particularly evident in patients with intermediate IPI scores and the non-MYC-positive/BCL2-positive subgroup (log-rank P < .001 for time to progression).

CONCLUSION

Assignment of DLBCL COO by the Lymph2Cx assay using FFPET biopsies identifies patient groups with significantly different outcomes after R-CHOP, independent of IPI score and MYC/BCL2 dual expression.

Abstract 5303: Correlative results from PRELUDE, a phase III study of enzastaurin (ENZA) vs placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) following a response to R-CHOP therapy

Background: Protein kinase Cβ (PKCβ) is critical for B-cell signaling and survival and overexpression of PKCβ in DLBCL is associated with inferior survival. ENZA, an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, targets PKCβ. Here we report immunohistochemical (IHC) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) correlative analyses.

Methods: PRELUDE (NCT00332202) was a phase III, double-blind maintenance study of 758 pts with DLBCL who were randomized 2:1 to ENZA 500 mg daily (1125-mg loading dose) (n = 504) or PBO (n = 254), respectively, following CR to induction therapy with R-CHOP. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Overall survival (OS) and assessment of biomarkers specific to ENZA and DLBCL were secondary endpoints. Pre-treatment formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples were assessed via IHC staining in a blinded manner (Eric Hsi) for cell of origin (COO) using Hans’ algorithm. In addition, IHC was performed for c-MYC, BCL2, BCL6, FOXP1, and MUM1 (10% increments/% tumor cells stained), markers relevant to ENZA, including PKCβ2. FISH was performed to identify translocations involving c-MYC, BCL2, and BCL6. Cox regression was used to determine statistical associations between efficacy outcomes and dichotomized markers, adjusting for treatment and additional baseline covariates. All tests of association were conducted at a 2-sided α = 0.05.

Results: There was no difference in 4-year DFS (70% vs 71%) or OS (81% vs 82%) between ENZA and PBO arms, respectively. A total of 243 (32%) pts had ≥1 evaluable sample available for IHC and FISH. There was no difference in outcome for pts based on COO (GCB vs non-GCB). Independent of treatment, significant associations were observed for BCL2 (pre-specified cutpoint 20%) and MUM1 (cutpoint 30%) with OS, and FOXP1 (cutpoint 80%) by IHC with DFS (HR [95% CI]: 2.19 [1.01-4.73]), p = 0.031; 1.97 [1.04-3.71], p = 0.032; 1.74 [1.04-2.90], p = 0.032, respectively). Associations were not significant for other IHC markers, including c-MYC and BCL6. Low PKCβ2 (&lt;50% expression) had numerically better (but not significant) DFS/OS vs high PKCβ2. Dual translocation lymphoma by FISH was identified in two pts (1.2%) each for c-MYC/BCL2 and c-MYC/BCL6, and one pt (0.6%) had a triple hit involving c-MYC/BCL2/BCL6.

Conclusions: No difference in outcomes between treatment arms was observed for the trial. Independent of treatment, COO was not prognostic of outcomes. Pts with low PKCβ2 expression had numerically better DFS/OS compared with high PKCβ2 expression. Significant treatment-independent associations were observed for BCL2 and MUM1 with OS and for FOXP1 with DFS (low IHC expression corresponded to better outcomes). The small number of double hit and triple hit lymphomas seen in the study may reflect the enrollment of CR patients with more favorable biology.

Citation Format: Eric D. Hsi, Kerry J. Savage, Sonali M. Smith, Fritz Offner, Scott P. Myrand, Thomas M. Habermann, Donald E. Thornton, Boris K. Lin, Tuan S. Nguyen, Oday Hamid, Michael Crump. Correlative results from PRELUDE, a phase III study of enzastaurin (ENZA) vs placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) following a response to R-CHOP therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 5303. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-5303

Impact of time from diagnosis to initiation of curative chemotherapy on survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Although it is generally regarded appropriate to start chemotherapy promptly after a diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the optimal time from diagnosis to treatment (TDT) is unknown. A total of 689 patients diagnosed with DLBCL and treated with ≥ 1 cycle of CHOP-R with curative intent during 2003-2008 in British Columbia were identified: 347 (50%) TDT ≤ 4 weeks, 277 (40%) TDT 5-8 weeks, 65 (10%) TDT > 8 weeks. For the respective TDT groups, 5-year OS estimates were 61%, 74%, 63% (p = 0.006); 5-year PFS 57%, 70%, 61% (p = 0.006); and 5-year DSS 64%, 80%, 77% (p <0.001). In multivariate analysis, TDT >8 weeks was associated with worse OS (HR 1.20 (95% CI 1.03, 1.41), p = 0.020), PFS (HR 1.33 (95% CI 1.15, 1.54), p < 0.001), and DSS (HR 1.40 (95% CI 1.10, 1.78), p = 0.006). Clinicians should endeavor to initiate curative chemotherapy as soon as possible after a diagnosis of DLBCL is established.

Outcomes in splenic marginal zone lymphoma: analysis of 107 patients treated in British Columbia

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) accounts for less than 2% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. We identified 107 cases diagnosed with SMZL between 1985 and 2012 from the British Columbia Cancer Agency Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and Lymphoma Pathology Databases. Patient characteristics were: median age 67 years (range 30-88), male 40%, stage IV 98%, splenomegaly 93%, bone marrow involvement 96%, peripheral blood involvement 87%. As initial treatment, 52 underwent splenectomy (10 with chemotherapy), 38 chemotherapy alone (21 chemoimmunotherapy containing rituximab, 1 rituximab alone), two antivirals for hepatitis C, and 15 were only observed. The 10-year overall survival for first-line splenectomy versus chemotherapy was 61% and 42%, respectively [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0·48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·26-0·88, P = 0·017]. The 10-year failure-free survival (FFS) after first-line splenectomy vs chemotherapy was 39% and 14%, respectively (HR 0·48, 95% CI 0·28-0·80, P = 0·004). Among the 38 patients who received first-line chemotherapy, FFS was similar between those receiving rituximab (n = 22) and those who did not (n = 16) (HR 0·64, 95% CI 0·31-1·34, P = 0·238). Fifteen patients transformed to aggressive lymphoma with median time to transformation of 3·5 years (range 6 months to 12 years) and the 10-year transformation rate was 18%. In conclusion, splenectomy remains a reasonable treatment for patients with SMZL.

Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab was associated with higher rates of objective response than chemotherapy in a phase 3 study involving patients with ipilimumab-refractory metastatic melanoma. The use of nivolumab in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma has not been tested in a phase 3 controlled study.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 418 previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks and dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks and nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival.

RESULTS

At 1 year, the overall rate of survival was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 78.9) in the nivolumab group, as compared with 42.1% (95% CI, 33.0 to 50.9) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.42; 99.79% CI, 0.25 to 0.73; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the nivolumab group versus 2.2 months in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death or progression of disease, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 40.0% (95% CI, 33.3 to 47.0) in the nivolumab group versus 13.9% (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.4) in the dacarbazine group (odds ratio, 4.06; P<0.001). The survival benefit with nivolumab versus dacarbazine was observed across prespecified subgroups, including subgroups defined by status regarding the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Common adverse events associated with nivolumab included fatigue, pruritus, and nausea. Drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 11.7% of the patients treated with nivolumab and 17.6% of those treated with dacarbazine.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, as compared with dacarbazine, among previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 066 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01721772.).

Effect of place of residence and treatment on survival outcomes in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in British Columbia

BACKGROUND

We examined the relationship between location of residence at the time of diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and health outcomes in a geographically large Canadian province with publicly funded, universally available medical care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The British Columbia Cancer Registry was used to identify all patients 18-80 years of age diagnosed with DLBCL between January 2003 and December 2008. Home and treatment center postal codes were used to determine urban versus rural status and driving distance to access treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 1,357 patients. The median age was 64 years (range: 18-80 years), 59% were male, 50% were stage III/IV, 84% received chemotherapy with curative intent, and 32% received radiotherapy. There were 186 (14%) who resided in rural areas, 141 (10%) in small urban areas, 183 (14%) in medium urban areas, and 847 (62%) in large urban areas. Patient and treatment characteristics were similar regardless of location. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 62% for patients in rural areas, 44% in small urban areas, 53% in medium urban areas, and 60% in large urban areas (p = .018). In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in OS between rural and large urban area patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-1.4), although patients in small urban areas (HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0-2.0) and medium urban areas (HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0-1.9) had worse OS than those in large urban areas.

CONCLUSION

Place of residence at diagnosis is associated with survival of patients with DLBCL in British Columbia, Canada. Rural patients have similar survival to those in large urban areas, whereas patients living in small and medium urban areas experience worse outcomes.

Impact of time from diagnosis to initiation of curative chemotherapy on survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)

8552

Background: DLBCL is potentially curable with combination chemotherapy such as CHOP-R. Although it is generally regarded appropriate to start chemotherapy promptly after diagnosis, the impact of the time from diagnosis to treatment initiation on treatment outcome is unknown. Methods: Patients diagnosed with DLBCL and treated with at least one cycle of CHOP-R with curative intent during 2003 – 2008 in British Columbia were identified in the Lymphoid Cancer Database. Additional demographic data were obtained from the BC Cancer Registry. The BC Cancer Agency provincial pharmacy database was used to obtain dates of chemotherapy administration. The impact of the time interval from the date of pathologic diagnosis to treatment on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated. Results: A total of 793 patients were identified: 199 (25%) received CHOP-R <2 weeks after diagnosis, 244 (31%) at 2-4 weeks, 293 (37%) at 5-8 weeks, and 57 (7%) at >8 weeks. High international prognostic index, primary mediastinal DLBCL, and hospitalization at the time of CHOP-R start were associated with earlier initiation of chemotherapy (p<0.001 for all factors). Distance to chemotherapy from home (p=0.237), rural vs. urban location (p=0.952), geographic region (p=0.458), and median household income (p=0.127) were not associated to treatment start. Five-year PFS and OS respectively were 54% (SD 4%) and 61% (SD 4%) for treatment <2 weeks, 63% (SD 3%) and 66% (SD 3%) for 2-4 weeks, 70% (SD 3%) and 74% (SD 3%) for 5-8 weeks, and 60% (SD 7%) and for 61% (SD 8%) >8 weeks, p=0.006 (PFS) and p=0.024 (OS). A multivariate analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: In a publicly funded healthcare system, earlier initiation of chemotherapy was strongly associated with poor prognostic factors, as well as inferior PFS and OS. The timing of chemotherapy initiation appears to be related to clinical factors instead of system or socioeconomic barriers. Notwithstanding the lack of detrimental outcomes in those commencing CHOP-R after 8 weeks, clinicians should endeavor to initiate curative chemotherapy as soon as possible after a diagnosis of DLBCL is established.