Biomarkers Associated with Aortic Stenosis and Structural Bioprosthesis Dysfunction

Prediction of patients at risk of aortic valve stenosis (AS), AS progression rate, and aortic bioprosthesis dysfunction are of major importance for clinical management and/or prevention. Many imaging modalities may be used; however, they may not be conclusive or available for all patients. Circulating biomarkers are easily available and may be related to a disease or process such as aortic valve calcification or associated with a risk factor of the disease. This article reviews current blood biomarkers associated with aortic valve stenosis/calcification and bioprosthesis dysfunction.

The MIDA Mortality Risk Score: development and external validation of a prognostic model for early and late death in degenerative mitral regurgitation

Aims

In degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), lack of mortality scores predicting death favours misperception of individual patients' risk and inappropriate decision-making.

Methods and results

The Mitral Regurgitation International Database (MIDA) registries include 3666 patients (age 66 ± 14 years; 70% males; follow-up 7.8 ± 5.0 years) with pure, isolated, DMR consecutively diagnosed by echocardiography at tertiary (European/North/South-American) centres. The MIDA Score was derived from the MIDA-Flail-Registry (2472 patients with DMR and flail leaflet-Derivation Cohort) by weighting all guideline-provided prognostic markers, and externally validated in the MIDA-BNP-Registry (1194 patients with DMR and flail leaflet/prolapse-Validation Cohort). The MIDA Score ranged from 0 to 12 depending on accumulating risk factors. In predicting total mortality post-diagnosis, the MIDA Score showed excellent concordance both in Derivation Cohort (c = 0.78) and Validation Cohort (c = 0.81). In the whole MIDA population (n = 3666 patients), 1-year mortality with Scores 0, 7-8, and 11-12 was 0.4, 17, and 48% under medical management and 1, 7, and 14% after surgery, respectively (P < 0.001). Five-year survival with Scores 0, 7-8, and 11-12 was 98 ± 1, 57 ± 4, and 21 ± 10% under medical management and 99 ± 1, 82 ± 2, and 57 ± 9% after surgery (P < 0.001). In models including all guideline-provided prognostic markers and the EuroScoreII, the MIDA Score provided incremental prognostic information (P ≤ 0.002).

Conclusion

The MIDA Score may represent an innovative tool for DMR management, being able to position a given patient within a continuous spectrum of short- and long-term mortality risk, either under medical or surgical management. This innovative prognostic indicator may provide a specific framework for future clinical trials aiming to compare new technologies for DMR treatment in homogeneous risk categories of patients.

Genetic Association Analyses Highlight IL6, ALPL, and NAV1 As 3 New Susceptibility Genes Underlying Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) is a frequent and life-threatening cardiovascular disease for which there is currently no medical treatment available. To date, only 2 genes, LPA and PALMD, have been identified as causal for CAVS. We aimed to identify additional susceptibility genes for CAVS.

METHODS

A GWAS (genome-wide association study) meta-analysis of 4 cohorts, totaling 5115 cases and 354 072 controls of European descent, was performed. A TWAS (transcriptome-wide association study) was completed to integrate transcriptomic data from 233 human aortic valves. A series of post-GWAS analyses were performed, including fine-mapping, colocalization, phenome-wide association studies, pathway, and tissue enrichment as well as genetic correlation with cardiovascular traits.

RESULTS

In the GWAS meta-analysis, 4 loci achieved genome-wide significance, including 2 new loci: IL6 (interleukin 6) on 7p15.3 and ALPL (alkaline phosphatase) on 1p36.12. A TWAS integrating gene expression from 233 human aortic valves identified NAV1 (neuron navigator 1) on 1q32.1 as a new candidate causal gene. The CAVS risk alleles were associated with higher mRNA expression of NAV1 in valve tissues. Fine-mapping identified rs1800795 as the most likely causal variant in the IL6 locus. The signal identified colocalizes with the expression of the IL6 RNA antisense in various tissues. Phenome-wide association analyses in the UK Biobank showed colocalized associations between the risk allele at the IL6 lead variant and higher eosinophil count, pulse pressure, systolic blood pressure, and carotid artery procedures, implicating modulation of the IL6 pathways. The risk allele at the NAV1 lead variant colocalized with higher pulse pressure and higher prevalence of carotid artery stenosis. Association results at the genome-wide scale indicated genetic correlation between CAVS, coronary artery disease, and cardiovascular risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study implicates 3 new genetic loci in CAVS pathogenesis, which constitute novel targets for the development of therapeutic agents.

Outcomes of Patients With Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Followed Up in Heart Valve Clinics

Importance

The natural history and the management of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) have not been fully examined in the current era.

Objective

To determine the clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic AS using data from the Heart Valve Clinic International Database.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This registry was assembled by merging data from prospectively gathered institutional databases from 10 heart valve clinics in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Asymptomatic patients with an aortic valve area of 1.5 cm2 or less and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 50% at entry were considered for the present analysis. Data were collected from January 2001 to December 2014, and data were analyzed from January 2017 to July 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Natural history, need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), and survival of asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe AS at entry followed up in a heart valve clinic. Indications for AVR were based on current guideline recommendations.

Results

Of the 1375 patients included in this analysis, 834 (60.7%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 71 (13) years. A total of 861 patients (62.6%) had severe AS (aortic valve area less than 1.0 cm2). The mean (SD) overall survival during medical management (mean [SD] follow up, 27 [24] months) was 93% (1%), 86% (2%), and 75% (4%) at 2, 4, and 8 years, respectively. A total of 104 patients (7.6%) died under observation, including 57 patients (54.8%) from cardiovascular causes. The crude rate of sudden death was 0.65% over the duration of the study. A total of 542 patients (39.4%) underwent AVR, including 388 patients (71.6%) with severe AS at study entry and 154 (28.4%) with moderate AS at entry who progressed to severe AS. Those with severe AS at entry who underwent AVR did so at a mean (SD) of 14.4 (16.6) months and a median of 8.7 months. The mean (SD) 2-year and 4-year AVR-free survival rates for asymptomatic patients with severe AS at baseline were 54% (2%) and 32% (3%), respectively. In those undergoing AVR, the 30-day postprocedural mortality was 0.9%. In patients with severe AS at entry, peak aortic jet velocity (greater than 5 m/s) and LVEF (less than 60%) were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality without AVR; these factors were also associated with postprocedural mortality in those patients with severe AS at baseline who underwent AVR (surgical AVR in 310 patients; transcatheter AVR in 78 patients).

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients with asymptomatic AS followed up in heart valve centers, the risk of sudden death is low, and rates of overall survival are similar to those reported from previous series. Patients with severe AS at baseline and peak aortic jet velocity of 5.0 m/s or greater or LVEF less than 60% have increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality even after AVR. The potential benefit of early intervention should be considered in these high-risk patients.

Association of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Natural Course and Prognostic Value

Importance

The optimal timing to operate in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains controversial. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) may help to identify patients who might benefit from undergoing earlier aortic valve replacement.

Objective

To investigate the prevalence of impaired LV GLS, the natural course of LV GLS, and its prognostic implications in patients with asymptomatic severe AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This registry-based study included the institutional registries of 3 large tertiary referral centers and 220 patients with asymptomatic severe AS and preserved LVEF (>50%) who were matched for age and sex with 220 controls without structural heart disease. The echocardiograms of patients and controls were performed between 1998 and 2017.

Exposures

Both clinical and echocardiographic data were assessed retrospectively. Severe AS was defined by an indexed aortic valve area less than 0.6 cm2/m2. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain was evaluated on transthoracic echocardiography using speckle tracking imaging.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prevalence of impaired LV GLS, the natural course of LV GLS, and the association of impaired LV GLS with symptom onset and the need for aortic valve intervention.

Results

Two hundred twenty patients (mean [SD] age, 68 [13] years; 126 men [57%]) were included. Despite comparable LVEF, LV GLS was significantly impaired in patients with asymptomatic severe AS compared with age- and sex-matched controls without AS (mean [SD] LV GLS, -17.9% [2.5%] vs -19.6% [2.1%]; P < .001). After a median follow-up of 12 (interquartile range, 7-23) months, mean (SD) LV GLS significantly deteriorated (-18.0% [2.6%] to -16.3% [2.8%]; P < .001) while LVEF remained unchanged. Patients with impaired LV GLS at baseline (>-18.2%) showed a higher risk for developing symptoms (P = .02) and needing aortic valve intervention (P = .03) at follow-up compared with patients with more preserved LV GLS (≤-18.2%).

Conclusions and Relevance

Subclinical myocardial dysfunction that is characterized by impaired LV GLS is often present in patients with asymptomatic severe AS with preserved LVEF. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain further deteriorates over time and impaired LV GLS at baseline is associated with an increased risk for progression to the symptomatic stage and the need for aortic valve intervention.

P914Balloon aortic valve valvuloplasty as palliative therapy in severe aortic valve stenosis: 10 years experience in a single centre

Background

Improved technology together with greater operator experience has led to refinement of balloon aortic valve valvuloplasty (BAV) in recent years. It may provide a palliative treatment option in high-risk patients, highly symptomatic, for whom no other invasive therapy is available. However, there has not been universal adoption of BAV as a standalone therapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of ten years of practice of BAV as palliative strategy in patient with symptomatic aortic stenosis between March 2008 and June 2018 was performed. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and follow-up data on all patients were collected.

Results

A total of 152 patients (95 women, 63%) with a mean age of 85±6 years underwent BAV. All patients had severe aortic stenosis, were considered not suitable to aortic valve replacement nor Trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for appreciable comorbidity (STS score 9±5) and had severe symptoms mainly of heart failure which required medical attention. A statistically significant decrease in trans-valvular gradient was observed (peak to peak gradient before BAV 52±22 mmHg, after BAV 29±16 mmHg, delta gradient 24±14 mmHg; p<0.0001). Only one patient, who undergone BAV because of cardiogenic shock, died during the procedure. Considering the high-risk population, intra-hospital mortality was low (7 patients died, 4%). Mortality at 1-year follow-up was 43% and survival free from new hospitalization for heart failure was 63% at 1-year follow-up and 53% at 2 years follow-up. 19 patients (13%) required repeated BAV during follow-up.

Conclusion

BAV as a palliative procedure in high-risk patients who are highly symptomatic, has a low operative mortality in our experience. BAV is associated with a significant reduction in aortic valve gradient and is valuable since half of the patients were alive without re-hospitalizations for heart failure at 2 years follow-up.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

6097Aminoterminal proB-type natriuretic peptide: a key parameter to optimise therapeutic management of low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis

Background

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and aminoterminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP) are well established surrogates of LV function impairment. However, data are scarce regarding their prognostic value to risk-stratify patients with classical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS, with low left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction).

Methods

The TOPAS study is a prospective observational cohort of 240 patients with aortic valve area <0.6 cm2/m2, mean gradient<40 mmHg and LVEF<50%. True severe AS was adjudicated using flow independent grading schemes.

Results

BNP significantly predicted one-year (area under the receiver operating-characteristic curve [AUC]) 0.62±0.04, p=0.026) but not three-year mortality. After adjustment for the severity of AS, initial treatment (aortic valve replacement [AVR] vs. conservative management [ConsRx]), age, sex and the EuroSCORE (Model#1), BNP-ratio>550 pg/ml had a trend to predict time to death (HR=2.14 [1.00–4.58], p=0.05). In contrast, NT-proBNP ratio significantly predicted both one and three-year mortality (AUC=0.67±0.04 and 0.66±0.05, both p=0.001), and independently predicted time to death (HR=1.39 per 1 unit of Log transformed NT-proBNP [1.11–1.74], p=0.004). In a head-to-head comparison (108 patients with both biomarkers), the AUCs to predict one and thre-year mortality were significantly higher with NT-proBNP versus BNP (p<0.009). NT-proBNP but not BNP independently predicted mortality and significantly improved Model#1 (Likelihood ratio test Chi2=15.95, p<0.001). The category-free net reclassification index of NT-proBNP was 0.71 (p=0.008) versus 0.38 (p=0.15) for BNP. Furthermore, there was a marked survival benefit associated with AVR in patients with NT-proBNP ≥1700 pg/ml (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) associated to AVR vs conservative management=0.52 [0.31–0.85], p=0.009), while those<1700 pg/ml had excellent one-year survival under ConsRx (only one death [4.5±4.4%] at one year as compared to 23 [37±6.2%] for ConsRx-NTproBNP>1700, aHR=0.11 [0.01–0.83], p=0.033). The survival benefit associated with AVR interacted with NT-proBNP (p<0.001) but not with true or pseudosevere AS (p=0.53 for interaction), suggesting that NT-proBNP might identify moderate AS patients but sufficiently severe valvulo-ventricular disease to justify AVR.

Survival according to NT-proBNP and AVR

Conclusion

NT-proBNP appears to be an excellent biomarker for the clinical purpose of risk-stratifying classical LFLG-AS. A threshold of 1700 pg/ml i.e. close to the diagnostic threshold for heart failure in acute dyspnea, was a strong independent determinant of the survival benefit associated with aortic valve replacement. Our findings suggest that NT-proBNP should be preferred over BNP.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research

6099Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcomes of patients with low-flow, low-gradient moderate aortic stenosis

Background

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) and true-severe aortic stenosis (TSAS). However, there is very few data on the potential benefit of AVR in patients with LFLG pseudo-severe (i.e. moderate) AS (PSAS).

Methods

Consecutive patients with aortic valve area ≤0.6 cm2/m2, mean gradient <40 mmHg were prospectively recruited in a multicenter observational cohort study. The patients were categorized in TSAS vs. PSAS using previously reported thresholds of flow-independent parameters of AS severity (projected valve area at normal flow rate ≤1.0 cm2 and/or aortic valve calcium score by CT >1200 AU in women and >2000 AU in men). To account for between-treatment-group differences, inverse probability-of-treatment weighting was combined to Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Among the 430 patients included in this study, 297 (69%) were classified as TSAS and 274 (57%) underwent AVR. Of note, 21% of the patients treated by AVR were classified as PSAS. In patients managed conservatively (ConsRx), 52% had PSAS and 48% TSAS. During a median follow-up of 28 months [8–60], 198 patients died. The adjusted weighted hazard ratio (awHR) of death associated with AVR as compared to ConsRx was 0.42 [0.24–0.73] (p<0.0001, Figure1-Panel-A). This survival benefit associated with AVR was observed not only in patients with TSAS but also in those with PSAS (awHR: 0.29 [0.12–0.70]; p=0.006, Figure1-Panel-B).

Figure 1

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that AVR is associated with a survival benefit not only in LFLG patients with TSAS but also in those with PSAS. Randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefit of AVR in patients with moderate AS and depressed LV systolic function.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research

1337Myocardial extracellular volume in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve intervention - A multicentre T1 mapping study

Background

The development of myocardial fibrosis is a key mechanism in the transition from compensated hypertrophy to heart failure in aortic stenosis (AS). Focal and diffuse fibrosis can be quantified using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) and T1 mapping techniques.

Purpose

To assess T1 mapping measures of fibrosis in patients with severe AS referred for aortic valve intervention, and determine their associations with clinical characteristics, disease severity and long-term clinical outcome.

Methods

In this international prospective cohort study, patients with severe AS underwent contrast enhanced CMR with T1 mapping and LGE prior to aortic valve intervention. Image analysis was performed by a single core laboratory and the extracellular volume fraction [ECV%] calculated from T1 mapping images. The presence of LGE was determined visually and quantified using the full-width-at-half-maximum technique.

Results

Four-hundred and forty patients (70±10 years, 59% male) from ten international centres were enrolled. Aortic valve intervention was performed 15 [4 to 58] days following CMR. Within a follow-up of 3.8 [2.8 to 4.6] years, 52 patients died.

ECV% (mean 27.7±3.6%) correlated with increasing age, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, known coronary artery disease, lower peak aortic-jet velocity, larger left ventricular (LV) mass, lower LV ejection fraction, and presence of LGE (P<0.05 for all). Following adjustment for all demographic and clinical variables, ECV% remained associated with age (P=0.028), LV ejection fraction (P<0.001) and presence of LGE (P=0.035).

Univariable predictors of all-cause mortality included age, male sex, impaired LV ejection fraction and presence of LGE (all P<0.05). A progressive increase in all-cause mortality was seen across tertiles of ECV% (17.3, 31.6 and 52.7 deaths per 1000 patient-years; log-rank test, P=0.009). ECV% was independently associated with all-cause mortality following adjustment for age, sex, impaired LV ejection fraction and presence of LGE (HR per unit increase in ECV: 1.10, 95%, (1.02–1.19), P=0.013).

ECV440 abstract iamge

Conclusion

In patients with severe aortic stenosis scheduled for aortic valve intervention, extracellular volume-based T1 mapping correlates with LV decompensation. ECV% is a strong independent predictor of late all-cause mortality and is a potential therapeutic target.

Shortening of airway smooth muscle is modulated by prolonging the time without simulated deep inspirations in ovine tracheal strips

The shortening of airway smooth muscle (ASM) is greatly affected by time. This is because stimuli affecting ASM shortening, such as bronchoactive molecules or the strain inflicted by breathing maneuvers, not only alter quick biochemical processes regulating contraction but also slower processes that allow ASM to adapt to an ever-changing length. Little attention has been given to the effect of time on ASM shortening. The present study investigates the effect of changing the time interval between simulated deep inspirations (DIs) on ASM shortening and its responsiveness to simulated DIs. Excised tracheal strips from sheep were mounted in organ baths and either activated with methacholine or relaxed with isoproterenol. They were then subjected to simulated DIs by imposing swings in distending stress, emulating a transmural pressure from 5 to 30 cmH₂O. The simulated DIs were intercalated by 2, 5, 10, or 30 min. In between simulated DIs, the distending stress was either fixed or oscillating to simulate tidal breathing. The results show that although shortening was increased by prolonging the interval between simulated DIs, the bronchodilator effect of simulated DIs (i.e., the elongation of the strip post- vs. pre-DI) was not affected, and the rate of re-shortening post-simulated DIs was decreased. As the frequency with which DIs are taken increases upon bronchoconstriction, our results may be relevant to typical alterations observed in asthma, such as an increased rate of re-narrowing post-DI.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The frequency with which patients with asthma take deep inspirations (DIs) increases during bronchoconstriction. This in vitro study investigated the effect of changing the time interval between simulated DIs on airway smooth muscle shortening. The results demonstrated that decreasing the interval between simulated DIs not only decreases shortening, which may be protective against excessive airway narrowing, but also increases the rate of re-shortening post-simulated DIs, which may contribute to the increased rate of re-narrowing post-DI observed in asthma.

Progression of Hypertrophy and Myocardial Fibrosis in Aortic Stenosis: A Multicenter Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

Aortic stenosis is accompanied by progressive left ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis. We investigated the natural history of these processes in asymptomatic patients and their potential reversal post-aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Methods:

Asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis underwent repeat echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Changes in peak aortic-jet velocity, left ventricular mass index, diffuse fibrosis (indexed extracellular volume), and replacement fibrosis (late gadolinium enhancement [LGE]) were quantified.

Results:

In 61 asymptomatic patients (43% mild, 34% moderate, and 23% severe aortic stenosis), significant increases in peak aortic-jet velocity, left ventricular mass index, indexed extracellular volume, and LGE mass were observed after 2.1±0.7 years, with the most rapid progression observed in patients with most severe stenosis. Patients with baseline midwall LGE (n=16 [26%]; LGE mass, 2.5 g [0.8–4.8 g]) demonstrated particularly rapid increases in scar burden (78% [50%–158%] increase in LGE mass per year). In 38 symptomatic patients (age, 66±8 years; 76% men) who underwent AVR, there was a 19% (11%–25%) reduction in left ventricular mass index (P<0.0001) and an 11% (4%–16%) reduction in indexed extracellular volume (P=0.003) 0.9±0.3 years after surgery. By contrast midwall LGE (n=10 [26%]; mass, 3.3 g [2.6–8.0 g]) did not change post-AVR (n=10; 3.5 g [2.1–8.0 g]; P=0.23), with no evidence of regression even out to 2 years.

Conclusions:

In patients with aortic stenosis, cellular hypertrophy and diffuse fibrosis progress in a rapid and balanced manner but are reversible after AVR. Once established, midwall LGE also accumulates rapidly but is irreversible post valve replacement. Given its adverse long-term prognosis, prompt AVR when midwall LGE is first identified may improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical Trial Registration:

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01755936 and NCT01679431.

Genetic Variation in LPA, Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery, and Familial Risk of Aortic Valve Microcalcification

Importance

Genetic variants at the LPA locus are associated with both calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) and coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether these variants are associated with CAVS in patients with CAD vs those without CAD is unknown.

Objective

To study the associations of LPA variants with CAVS in a cohort of patients undergoing heart surgery and LPA with CAVS in patients with CAD vs those without CAD and to determine whether first-degree relatives of patients with CAVS and high lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels showed evidence of aortic valve microcalcification.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This genetic association study included patients undergoing cardiac surgery from the Genome-Wide Association Study on Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis in Quebec (QUEBEC-CAVS) study and patients with CAD, patients without CAD, and control participants from 6 genetic association studies: the UK Biobank, the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk, and Genetic Epidemiology Research on Aging (GERA) studies and 3 French cohorts. In addition, a family study included first-degree relatives of patients with CAVS. Data were collected from January 1993 to September 2018, and analysis was completed from September 2017 to September 2018.

Exposures

Case-control studies.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Presence of CAVS according to a weighted genetic risk score based on 3 common Lp(a)-raising variants and aortic valve microcalcification, defined as the mean tissue to background ratio of 1.25 or more, measured by fluorine 18-labeled sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Results

This study included 1009 individuals undergoing cardiac surgery and 1017 control participants in the QUEBEC-CAVS cohort; 3258 individuals with CAVS and CAD, 41 100 controls with CAD, 2069 individuals with CAVS without CAD, and 380 075 control participants without CAD in the UK Biobank, EPIC-Norfolk, and GERA studies and 3 French cohorts combined; and 33 first-degree relatives of 17 patients with CAVS and high Lp(a) levels (≥60 mg/dL) and 23 control participants with normal Lp(a) levels (<60 mg/dL). In the QUEBEC-CAVS study, each SD increase of the genetic risk score was associated with a higher risk of CAVS (odds ratio [OR], 1.35 [95% CI, 1.10-1.66]; P = .003). Each SD increase of the genetic risk score was associated with a higher risk of CAVS in patients with CAD (OR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.20-1.42]; P < .001) and without CAD (OR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.14-1.55]; P < .001). The percentage of individuals with a tissue to background ratio of 1.25 or more or CAVS was higher in first-degree relatives of patients with CAVS and high Lp(a) (16 of 33 [49%]) than control participants (3 of 23 [13%]; P = .006).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, a genetically elevated Lp(a) level was associated with CAVS independently of the presence of CAD. These findings support further research on the potential usefulness of Lp(a) cascade screening in CAVS.

Lipoprotein(a), Oxidized Phospholipids, and Aortic Valve Microcalcification Assessed by 18F-Sodium Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography

Background

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is the preferential lipoprotein carrier of oxidized phospholipids (OxPLs) and a well-established genetic risk factor for calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Whether Lp(a) predicts aortic valve microcalcification in individuals without CAVS is unknown. Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) and OxPL levels in patients with CAVS and to determine if individuals with elevated Lp(a) but without CAVS have higher aortic valve microcalcification.

Methods

We recruited 214 patients with CAVS from Montreal and 174 patients with CAVS and 108 controls from Québec City, Canada. In a second group of individuals with high (≥75 nmol/L, n = 27) or low (<75 nmol/L, n = 28) Lp(a) levels, 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed to determine the difference in mean tissue-to-background ratio (TBR) of the aortic valve.

Results

Patients with CAVS had 62.0% higher Lp(a) (median = 28.7, interquartile range [8.2-116.6] vs 10.9 [3.6-28.8] nmol/L, P < 0.0001), 50% higher OxPL-apolipoprotein-B (2.2 [1.3-6.0] vs 1.1 [0.7-2.6] nmol/L, P < 0.0001), and 69.9% higher OxPL-apolipoprotein(a) (7.3 [1.8-28.4] vs 2.2 [0.8-8.4] nmol/L, P < 0.0001) levels compared with individuals without CAVS (all P < 0.0001). Individuals without CAVS but elevated Lp(a) had 40% higher mean TBR compared with individuals with low Lp(a) levels (mean TBR = 1.25 ± 0.23 vs 1.15 ± 0.11, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Elevated Lp(a) and OxPL levels are associated with prevalent CAVS in patients studied in an echocardiography laboratory setting. In individuals with elevated Lp(a), evidence of aortic valve microcalcification by 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography is present before the development of clinically manifested CAVS.

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Negatively Affects Outcomes after Mitral Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of 10,239 Patients

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on the risk of perioperative and long-term mortality after mitral valve replacement.

METHODS

Databases were researched for studies published until December 2018. Main outcomes of interest were perioperative and 10-year mortality and echocardiographic parameters.

RESULTS

The research yielded 2,985 studies for inclusion. Of these, 16 articles were analyzed, and their data extracted. The total number of patients included was 10,239, who underwent mitral valve replacement. The incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement was 53.7% (5,499 with prosthesis-patient mismatch and 4,740 without prosthesis-patient mismatch). Perioperative (OR 1.519; 95%CI 1.194-1.931, P<0.001) and 10-year (OR 1.515; 95%CI 1.280-1.795, P<0.001) mortality was increased in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch. Patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement had higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure and transprosthethic gradient and lower indexed effective orifice area and left ventricle ejection fraction.

CONCLUSION

Prosthesis-patient mismatch increases perioperative and long-term mortality. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is also associated with pulmonary hypertension and depressed left ventricle systolic function. The findings of this study support the implementation of surgical strategies to prevent prosthesis-patient mismatch in order to decrease mortality rates.