A coordinated strategy to develop and distribute infographics addressing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and misinformation

Background

Visual communication strategies are becoming increasingly prevalent for conveying information to health professionals as well as to the general public. The potential of social media for rapid knowledge dissemination using infographics was recognized early in the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic by health professionals.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to describe a coalition of health professionals’ approach to developing infographics about COVID-19 vaccines and the reach and engagement of those infographics when shared through social media.

Methods

Infographics were created by a core team within the coalition following a stepwise approach. Each underwent a multistep review process, readability evaluation, and translation into Spanish. Infographics were then shared through multiple social media platforms. They were grouped into 1 of 3 categories for this analysis: COVID-19 vaccine series, myth debunkers, or other.

Results

All infographics had greater outreach, impressions, and engagement on Twitter than they did on other platforms. When comparing the 3 groups, no 1 infographic type was consistently performing higher than the others.

Conclusion

Each infographic reached thousands to tens of thousands of people. We do not know whether those who viewed these infographics changed their perspective on vaccination, so we are unable to draw a conclusion about their impact on vaccine hesitancy based on this study alone.

Multicentric Hospital-Based Surveillance of Pertussis Amongst Infants Admitted in Tertiary Care Facilities in India

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the disease and economic burden of pertussis amongst hospitalised infants in India.

DESIGN

Multicentric hospital-based surveillance study.

PARTICIPANTS

Hospitalised infants with clinical suspicion of pertussis based on predefined criteria.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of infants with laboratory-confirmed pertussis, economic burden of pertussis amongst hospitalised infants.

RESULTS

693 clinically suspected infants were recruited of which 32 (4.62%) infants had laboratory-confirmed pertussis. Progressive cough with post-tussive emesis (50%) and pneumonia (34%) were the common clinical presentations; apnea in young infants was significantly associated with pertussis. Infants with pertussis were more likely to be younger (median age 102.5 days vs.157 days) and born preterm (42.9% vs 24.5%). Almost 30% infants with pertussis had not received vaccine for pertussis with 50% of these infants aged less than 2 months. Pertussis was associated with higher costs of hospitalisation, pharmacy and loss of working days by caregivers as compared to non-pertussis cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger infants, those born preterm and those inadequately immunised against pertussis are at higher risk of pertussis infection. Timely childhood immunisation and introduction of maternal immunisation for pertussis can help in reducing the disease burden.

Patient Expectations From Consultation and Treatment of Spine Pain in a Private Spine Rehabilitation Clinic in Urban India

Despite high prevalence of spine pain among the Indian population, patient expectations regarding consultation and its treatment are unknown. We aimed to determine consultation and treatment expectations among patients visiting a spine rehabilitation clinic in urban India. We included 194 consecutive patients who completed a consultation expectation (CE) and treatment outcome expectation (OE) questionnaires and the Patient-Centered Outcome Questionnaire (PCOQ). To learn about the most suitable treatment for their problem (98%), and to know what kind of activities they could do and should avoid (96%) were the most important CEs, and to achieve complete relief of symptoms (96%), and prevent recurrence of pain (95%) were the most important OEs. For successful treatment, patients expected PCOQ pain levels of 2.0 (96.5% reduction) and interference levels of 1.5 (96% reduction). Patients expected to know the most suitable treatment, activities they could do and avoid after consultation, and to achieve complete relief of symptoms and prevent recurrence after treatment. Incorporating and addressing these expectations may help improve outcomes and satisfaction with the consultation and treatment of spine pain.

AB0276 HOW FAST CAN METHOTREXATE BE ESCALATED IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS? A MULTICENTRE, PARALLEL-GROUP RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (MEIRA)

Background:

Literature regarding the optimal dose escalation strategy of methotrexate (MTX) in RA is scant and ambiguous (1). Concerns regarding the safety of rapid escalation may lead to delayed attainment of the optimal dose and treatment target.

Objectives:

To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fast versus usual dose escalation of oral MTX in RA.

Methods:

This multicenter, open-label (assessor blinded) RCT included patients with active RA (SJC≥2 and TJC≥4) aged 18-55 years, not on DMARDs (except HCQ and/or low-dose prednisolone) and with disease duration <5 years. Patients were randomized 1:1 into two groups with the same starting dose of oral MTX (15 mg/week), but escalated either by 5 mg every 2 weeks (fast escalation group) or 5 mg every 4 weeks (usual escalation group), till a maximum of 25 mg/wk. Primary outcome was proportion of EULAR good responders at 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes were change in DAS28-3 and EULAR responders (good or moderate) at 8 and 16 weeks, change in Indian HAQ at 16 weeks, and symptomatic (questionnaire based) and laboratory adverse effects over 16 weeks. RBC MTX polyglutamate-3 levels were measured using HPLC in both groups. There was an open-label extension phase till 24 weeks (use of other DMARDs was permitted beyond 16 weeks if target was not met), and DAS28-3 at 24 weeks was compared.

Trial Reg: CTRI/2018/12/016549

Results:

178 patients (mean age 39.8 (8.6) years, 84% females) with mean disease duration of 1.9 (1.4) years were randomized (89 in each group). Mean DAS28ESR-3 and DAS28CRP-3 at enrollment were 6.3 (0.9) and 5.4 (1.1). At 16 weeks, there was no significant difference in good EULAR response by DAS28ESR-3 (5.6, 7.9%, p=0.9) or DAS28CRP-3 (28.1, 22.5%, p=0.8) between the two groups (Figure 1). The change in DAS28-ESR-3 at 8, 16 and 24 weeks (or by DASCRP-3, not shown) and improvement in HAQ at 16 weeks were also not significantly different (Table 1). Notably, there was no significant difference in symptomatic GI or CNS adverse effects, incidence of cytopenia, transaminitis or rates of drug discontinuation. RBC MTX polyglutamate-3 levels at 8 and 16 weeks were also similar (Table 1).

Table 1.

Key secondary efficacy and safety outcomes

ParameterUsualFastp-valueEfficacyDelta DAS28-ESR-3 (Mean±SD) -8 wk  -ITT (n=178)-0.9 ± 1.0-0.8 ± 0.90.5  -PP (n=139)-1.2 ± 1.0-1.1 ± 1.00.5 -16 wk  -ITT-1.3 ± 1.1-1.3 ± 1.00.9  -PP-1.6 ± 1.1-1.6 ± 0.91 -24 wk  -ITT-1.6 ± 1.3-1.5 ± 1.10.3  -PP-2.1 ± 1.2-1.8 ± 1.10.14Delta Indian HAQ (16 wk)-0.7 ± 0.6-0.8 ± 0.60.2Adverse effectsSerious AE00-Death00-Symptomatic AE ever* n (%)Vomiting7 (8)7 (8)1Nausea22 (26)26 (30)0.5Stomach ache16 (19)17 (20)0.9Loss of appetite/bad taste21 (25)27 (31)0.3Lethargy20 (24)21 (25)1Dizziness19 (23)16 (19)0.5Irritability/anxiety14 (16)14 (16)1Laboratory AE ever* [n/N times done (%)]Transaminitis episodes (>40IU/L)52/224 (23)52/219 (24)0.9  -Significant (>80 IU/L)5/224 (2)8/219 (4)0.4Thrombocytopenia episodes (<150000/uL)10/224 (5)13/218 (6)0.5 -Significant (<100000/uL)2/224 (1)2/218 (1)1Leucopenia episodes (<4000/uL)2/224 (1)3/220 (1.5)0.8 -Significant (<3500/uL)1/224 (0.5)2/220 (1)0.8Methotrexate levelsMTX-polyglutamate-3 (nmol/L)-8 wk25.8 ± 10.526.9 ± 13.60.6-16 wk40.7 ± 20.940.1 ± 23.40.9

*Ever=any time during the study

ITT= intention-to-treat, PP=per-protocol, AE=adverse effect

Figure 1.

EULAR response and change in DAS28ESR-3 over time

Conclusion:

A faster escalation of MTX (5 mg every 2 weeks) reaching 25 mg/week by 4 weeks did not have a significantly higher rate of adverse effects (symptomatic or laboratory) compared to an escalation by 5 mg every 4 weeks. Although not more efficacious, it may shorten the time to recognize MTX failure, and optimize treat-to-target.

References:

[1]Visser K, Katchamart W, Loza E, et al. Multinational evidence-based recommendations for the use of methotrexate in rheumatic disorders with a focus on RA: integrating systematic literature research and expert opinion of a broad international panel of rheumatologists in the 3E Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(7):1086–93

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

COVID-19 Threatens Progress Toward Gender Equity Within Academic Medicine

Women remain underrepresented within academic medicine despite past and present efforts to promote gender equity. The authors discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic could stymie progress toward gender parity within the biomedical workforce and limit the retention and advancement of women in science and medicine. Women faculty face distinct challenges as they navigate the impact of shelter-in-place and social distancing on work and home life. An unequal division of household labor and family care between men and women means women faculty are vulnerable to inequities that may develop in the workplace as they strive to maintain academic productivity and professional development without adequate assistance with domestic tasks and family care. Emerging data suggest that gender differences in academic productivity may be forthcoming as a direct result of the pandemic. Existing gender inequities in professional visibility, networking, and collaboration may be exacerbated as activities transition from in-person to virtual environments and create new barriers to advancement. Meanwhile, initiatives designed to promote gender equity within academic medicine may lose key funding due to the economic impact of COVID-19 on higher education. To ensure that the gender gap within academic medicine does not widen, the authors call upon academic leaders and the broader biomedical community to support women faculty through deliberate actions that promote gender equity, diversity, and inclusion. The authors provide several recommendations, including faculty needs assessments; review of gender bias within tenure-clock-extension offers; more opportunities for mentorship, sponsorship, and professional recognition; and financial commitments to support equity initiatives. Leadership for these efforts should be at the institutional and departmental levels, and leaders should ensure a gender balance on task forces and committees to avoid overburdening women faculty with additional service work. Together, these strategies will contribute to the development of a more equitable workforce capable of transformative medical discovery and care.

POS0679 A NEW QUESTIONNAIRE AND SCORE (MISA) FOR ASSESSING METHOTREXATE INTOLERANCE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Methotrexate (MTX) intolerance refers to unpleasant symptoms that accompany use of MTX and may lead to its discontinuation. However, it lacks a validated score in RA patients; with the only option being to use the MISS score which was validated for use in children and not adults.

Objectives:

To develop and validate a questionnaire and score (s) for measuring MTX intolerance and its severity in rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods:

A 10-item questionnaire called ‘Methotrexate Intolerance and Severity assessment in Adults’ (MISA) was validated in 105 RA patients. A score was calculated by adding the scores of first 7 questions (0 to 3 based on severity on symptoms), to last 3 questions (0 or 1); it ranged from 0 to 24 (MISA score) and was assessed for correctly classifying MTX intolerance (compared to an interview) by ROC analysis. Its area-under-curve (AUC) was compared with ‘Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score’ (MISS), developed for children. Subsequently, it was administered to 414 RA patients to assess the prevalence and associations of MTX intolerance. In addition, the MISA cross-products score, that was calculated by adding the cross-products (severity (1 to 3) x duration per week (0.5 to 7 days)) of symptoms, was compared to MISA and MISS for assessing severity of intolerance.

Results:

In the initial phase, 105 RA patients on MTX≥6 months were included, a majority were female (87%), mean age was 51 (13.4) years and methotrexate dose was 18.8±6 mg/week. Thirty-five (33%) were found to be intolerant to MTX based on interview. MISA score had a good predictive ability (AUC of 0.904), to correctly classify MTX intolerance, and was better than MISS score (AUC of 0.823) (Figure 1A). The optimal cut-off for MISA was ≥1, with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.4% and 84.3%. Using the MISA score (≥1), 38.4% of 414 RA patients were found to have MTX intolerance: with nausea, lethargy and irritability being common symptoms. (Figure 1B, C) On multivariable analysis, age (OR 0.972) and BMI (OR 1.061) were significant predictors of MTX intolerance. (Table 1) On assessing for severity of intolerance, MISA cross product score performed the best, with an area-under-curve of 0.899 (95% CI 0.831-0.966), being higher than AUC for MISS and MISA score which were 0.847 (95% CI 0.768-0.927) and 0.837 (95% CI 0.754-0.920).

Conclusion:

MISA is the first validated questionnaire for assessing methotrexate intolerance in rheumatoid arthritis, with the MISA score having a good accuracy (at cut-off ≥1), to detect MTX intolerance. Methotrexate intolerance was present in more than one-third of RA patients, with nausea, lethargy and irritability being most common.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of 414 RA patients.

VariableAll(n=414)Tolerant(n=255)Intolerant(n=159)p-valuetol. vs ntol.P-valuemultivariablemodelFemales, n (%)370 (89)231 (91)139 (87)0.31Age, yrs, mean (SD)50 (12.5)51.2 (12.6)48.2 (12.2)0.016*0.008**Duration of RA, yrs, mean (SD)10.0 (7.0)10.8 (7.4)9.6 (6.3)0.168BMI, Kg/m2a, mean (SD)24.0 (4.9)23.6 (4.9)24.6 (4.7)0.1070.03*RF positiveb, n (%)300 (73)191 (82)109 (78)0.29CDAI, mean (±SD)14.0 (11.8)14 (12.1)14.1 (11.4)0.69Dose of MTX, mg/wk, mean (SD)18.6 (5.6)18.6 (5.5)18.7 (5.8)0.83Injectable MTX, n (%)47 (11)25 (10)22 (14)0.21Use of FA, n (%)395 (95)241 (95)154 (97)0.27Use of other DMARD, n (%)272 (66)160 (62)112 (70)0.11HCQ n (%)209 (51)123 (48)86 (54)0.25Prednisolone n (%)156 (38)87 (34)69 (43)0.0580.21Using antiemetics, n (%)12 (3)1 (0.5)11 (7)<0.001

a Available for 262 patients bAvailable for 372 patients

Figure 1.

Figure showing the ROC curve for MISA and MISS questionnaires for MTX intolerance (A), Bar diagram showing the prevalence of various symptoms of intolerance in 414 RA patients (B), and Box-and-whiskers plot showing the duration of unpleasant symptoms (C).

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Trends in cancer screening volumes at an urban health center during the COVID-19 pandemic

10551

Background: The Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted cancer screening for reasons including healthcare resource preservation, infection control efforts, and patient factors. There is limited literature quantifying this interruption of care, particularly in vulnerable and racial/ethnic minorities. Methods: We compared the volume of cancer screening at the University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using data obtained from the electronic medical record. Modalities included mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI for breast; Pap test for cervical; colonoscopy, CT colonography, and flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal; low-dose CT for lung; and prostate-specific antigen test for prostate. Of note, screening and diagnostic tests could not be distinguished for colorectal cancer. We examined percent changes in cancer screening counts for each month from February 2020-August 2020, using January 2020 as a reference. Results were stratified by gender, race, and ethnicity. Results: Screening volume declined rapidly after January 2020, with the nadir for each cancer site occurring in April 2020: breast ( n = 0, -100%), cervical ( n = 169, -84%), colorectal ( n = 35, -89%), lung ( n = 0, -100%), and prostate ( n = 108, -72%). Values recovered by August 2020 for most cancer sites except cervical cancer, which remained decreased (-23%). There were no differences in screening trends by gender. With respect to race, breast screening volume in Black patients decreased earlier and exhibited slower recovery compared to White patients. White patients had poorer cervical screening recovery than Black patients by August 2020 (-60% vs. -23%). Hispanics had poorer recovery of breast screening compared to non-Hispanics by August 2020 (-23% vs. 6%). Conclusions: We observed widely decreased cancer screening attributable to COVID-19. Breast cancer screening data specifically showed persistent disparities affecting Black and Hispanic patients. Despite the reassuring recovery of multiple screening methods by August 2020, an increase above baseline is needed to compensate for initial declines. Further studies will likely reveal long-term consequences of this unprecedented situation.[Table: see text]

Validation of a clinical score (CS) for patients (pts) with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NETs) under consideration for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lu 177 dotatate

4109

Background: Questions remain regarding when to sequence PRRT and how to categorize pts being considered for the treatment (tx). We previously developed a CS (comprised of 5 categories: available non-PRRT tx for tumor type, prior systemic tx, pt symptoms, tumor burden in critical organs and peritoneal carcinomatosis presence) at Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (VICC) for pts being considered for PRRT to help answer these questions and demonstrated the score to be associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in pts receiving PRRT. Herein, we present the performance of the CS in a validation cohort (VC) and combined cohort (CC). Methods: Our original cohort (OC) included pts with progressive WD NETs (N = 122) under consideration for PRRT between 3/1/2016-3/17/2020 at VICC while our VC included pts under consideration for PRRT (N = 126) between 1/25/2017-11/18/2019 at Ochsner Medical Center (OMC) (N = 51), Markey Cancer Center (MCC) (N = 51) and Rush Medical Center (RMC) (N = 24). All pts in the OC were prospectively scored while pts in the VC were scored retrospectively, with the CS-assigning investigator blinded to patient outcomes. The primary outcome PFS, was estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier method; a Cox proportional‐hazards model adjusting for primary tumor site, tumor grade and number of PRRT doses administered (0, 1-2 or 3-4) was used to analyze effect of CS. Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary outcome. Results: In our VC, on multivariable (MV) analysis, for each 2-point increase in CS, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 2.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-4.11). On MV analysis, for each 2-point increase in CS, the HR for OS was 3.89 (95% CI 1.8-4.83). We combined the OC and VC for this analysis in order to increase the predictive power of our originally developed Cox proportional-hazards models. In our CC, of the 248 total pts, median pt age, CS and number of prior tx were 63.3 years, 4 (range 0-8) and 1 (range 0-7), respectively. The most represented primary tumor sites were small intestinal (N = 136), pancreatic (N = 58), unknown primary (N = 26) and lung (N = 14). A total of 140, 82 and 26 pts received 3-4, 0 or 1-2 doses of PRRT, respectively. On MV analysis, for each 2-point increase in CS, the HR for PFS was 2.52 (95% CI 1.90-3.35). On MV analysis, for each 2-point increase in CS, the HR for OS was 3.48 (95% CI 2.33-5.18). No interaction between PRRT doses administered and CS was observed. Conclusions: Increases in CS were strongly associated with worsening PFS and OS in our VC and CC, validating findings from our OC. Although we cannot determine whether the CS specifically predicts PRRT response or is prognostic based upon these data, it is the first presented clinical metric which can categorize pts with WD NETs under consideration for PRRT and estimate anticipated benefit from PRRT for pts.

Gender Differences in Physician Use of Social Media for Professional Advancement

This survey study examines gender difference in physician use of social media for professional advancement.

Mental health impact of covid on athletes

Introduction

The coronavirus pandemic continues to impact all aspects of the daily life of the public worldwide. With decreased economic activity, the sports industry faces significant challenges of maintaining athletes’ mental health while seeking the best strategies for eventual return to sports competition.

Objectives

We aim to evaluate COVID-19 related factors impacting on the mental health of athletes and provide appropriate management steps.

Methods

We examined MeSH terms “Athletes,” “Sports,” “COVID-19,” in the context of “Mental Health,” “Mental Disorders,” “Behavioral Medicine,” “Risk Factors.” We identified seven studies for the qualitative synthesis per the PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline, PubMed, PubMed Central, and PsychInfo databases until July 2020.

Results

The pandemic has negatively impacted athletes’ mental wellbeing due to decreased physical activities, limited resources, fears, and delays or cancellations of the sporting event. The negative psychological impact on athletes is due to self-isolation measures leading to worries of less preparedness for the lockdown, reduced physical activity, loss of competitive advantages, fear of being infected, social isolation, and loneliness. During this period, athletes struggled to maintain baseline routine and engaged in excessive calorie intake, eating low-quality food, substance use, and sleep disruption. It has caused anxiety, depression, PTSD, and mood disorder at varying degrees of severity in athletes.

Conclusions

Limited resources during a pandemic have caused adverse mental impact on athletes. We recommend improving physical activity through confined or virtual training programs with colleagues. A collaborative approach is required by clinicians, psychologists, coaches, sports organizations, government bodies to limit the pandemic’s mental health impact.

Prevalence of Personal Attacks and Sexual Harassment of Physicians on Social Media

This survey study examines the self-reports of personal attacks and sexual harassment of physicians through social media outlets.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Dual-Physician Couples: A Disproportionate Burden on Women Physicians

Background: Currently, physicians face an unprecedented crisis with the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The impact of the pandemic on dual-physician households remains unknown. In this survey study, we examined the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dual-physician families and described gendered differences related to the impact of the pandemic. Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey distributed via e-mail and social media, with results collected from April 30, 2020 until May 26, 2020. Respondents were members of a dual-physician couple. Respondents provided information on demographic characteristics and the impact of the pandemic on their professional lives, personal lives, and well-being. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared or Fisher's exact test. Ordinal variables were compared between genders using Cochran-Armitage trend test. Feeling emotionally and physically drained compared to pre-pandemic was analyzed as a binary outcome in a multivariable logistic model. Results: Of the 1799 physicians who completed the survey, 52% were between 30 and 39 years old, 81% self-identified as women, and 62% were white. Women were more likely to report increased worry about their job security, finances, personal health, partner's health, and children's health (p = 0.02, p = 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Seventy-eight percent of respondents reported feeling more drained during the pandemic. Multivariable analysis revealed that female gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-3.3, p < 0.001), and having children younger than 5 years of age (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05-1.95, p = 0.02) were associated with an increased risk of feeling more drained. Conclusions: Women were more likely to report increased worry about job security, finances, and health and had an increased risk of feeling more drained during the pandemic. While the COVID-19 pandemic is a significant stress for all physicians, women in dual-physician families were disproportionately affected, demonstrating the need for increased support from hospital administrations.

The effect of Cu additions in FePt-BN-SiO2 heat-assisted magnetic recording media

Structural and chemical order impact magnetic properties of solids, which are governed by spin-orbit coupling and exchange interaction. The ordered L1₀ phase of FePt is a key material to heat-assisted magnetic recording; to enable high storage density, a solid understanding is needed of structural and chemical disorder at small length scales, as well as associated modifications of the electronic band structure. Here, we investigate the effect of boron and copper additions (≲6 mol% Cu) on structural and magnetic properties of L1₀ FePt granular media. Two copper-driven mechanisms, although competing, can lead to improvements in both structural and magnetic properties. In particular, the Cu substitution on the Fe-site leads to a degradation of magnetic properties due to the delocalized electron orbitals originating from a larger Cu d-orbital occupancy. At the same time, Cu substitution leads to an enhanced crystallographic order and consequently magneto-crystalline anisotropy, which offsets the former effect to a large extent. Our study is based on magnetometry, x-ray absorption spectroscopy, ab-initio calculations and a phenomenological theory of disordered FePt granular media. We do not observe a sizable modification to Fe moments and electronic configuration; Cu reveals two different resonances associated with the presence and absence of Cu-B bonds that vary with total Cu concentration.

A clinical score for neuroendocrine tumor patients under consideration for Lu-177-DOTATATE therapy

We developed a clinical score (CS) at Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (VICC) that we hoped would predict outcomes for patients with progressive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) receiving therapy with Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-DOTATATE. Patients under consideration for 177Lu-DOTATATE between March 1, 2016 and March 17, 2020 at VICC were assigned a CS prospectively. The CS included 5 categories: available treatments for tumor type outside of 177Lu-DOTATATE, prior systemic treatments, patient symptoms, tumor burden in critical organs and presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The primary outcome of the analysis was progression-free survival (PFS). To evaluate the effect of the CS on PFS, a multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed adjusting for tumor grade, primary tumor location, and the interaction between 177Lu-DOTATATE doses received (zero, 1-2, 3-4) and CS. A total of 91 patients and 31 patients received 3-4 doses and zero doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE, respectively. On multivariable analysis, in patients treated with 3-4 doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE, for each 1-point increase in CS, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 2.0 (95% CI 1.61-2.48). On multivariable analysis, in patients who received zero doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE, for each 1-point increase in CS, the estimated HR for PFS was 1.22 (95% CI 0.91-1.65). Among patients treated with 3-4 doses of 177Lu-DOTATATE, those with lower CS experienced improved PFS with the treatment compared to patients with higher CS. This PFS difference, based upon CS, was not observed in patients who did not receive 177Lu-DOTATATE, suggesting the predictive utility of the score.

Internet of medical things (IoMT)-integrated biosensors for point-of-care testing of infectious diseases

On global scale, the current situation of pandemic is symptomatic of increased incidences of contagious diseases caused by pathogens. The faster spread of these diseases, in a moderately short timeframe, is threatening the overall population wellbeing and conceivably the economy. The inadequacy of conventional diagnostic tools in terms of time consuming and complex laboratory-based diagnosis process is a major challenge to medical care. In present era, the development of point-of-care testing (POCT) is in demand for fast detection of infectious diseases along with “on-site” results that are helpful in timely and early action for better treatment. In addition, POCT devices also play a crucial role in preventing the transmission of infectious diseases by offering real-time testing and lab quality microbial diagnosis within minutes. Timely diagnosis and further treatment optimization facilitate the containment of outbreaks of infectious diseases. Presently, efforts are being made to support such POCT by the technological development in the field of internet of medical things (IoMT). The IoMT offers wireless-based operation and connectivity of POCT devices with health expert and medical centre. In this review, the recently developed POC diagnostics integrated or future possibilities of integration with IoMT are discussed with focus on emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases like malaria, dengue fever, influenza A (H1N1), human papilloma virus (HPV), Ebola virus disease (EVD), Zika virus (ZIKV), and coronavirus (COVID-19). The IoMT-assisted POCT systems are capable enough to fill the gap between bioinformatics generation, big rapid analytics, and clinical validation. An optimized IoMT-assisted POCT will be useful in understanding the diseases progression, treatment decision, and evaluation of efficacy of prescribed therapy.

A clinical score (CS) for patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WD NETs) under consideration for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with Lu 177-dotatate

363

Background: Despite the benefit of PRRT for patients with WD NETs, questions remain regarding sequencing and optimal patient selection for the treatment. We developed a CS at Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (VICC) that we hoped would predict outcomes for patients with WD NETs receiving PRRT. Methods: Patients with progressive WD NETs (N = 146) under consideration for PRRT with Lu 177-dotatate between 3/1/2016-3/17/2020 at VICC (N = 122) and Rush Medical Center (RMC) (N = 24) were scored. The CS included 5 categories: available non-PRRT treatments for tumor type, prior systemic treatments, patient symptoms, tumor burden in critical organs and peritoneal carcinomatosis presence. All categories were scored from 0-2 except the peritoneal carcinomatosis category which was scored from 0-1; scoring criteria were determined by the VICC NET tumor board. All patients at VICC were prospectively scored, while patients from RMC were scored retrospectively with the investigator blinded to patient outcomes. The primary outcome, progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by the Kaplan‐Meier method; a Cox proportional‐hazards model adjusting primary tumor site, tumor grade and number of PRRT doses administered (none, 1-2 doses or 3-4 doses) was used to analyze effect of CS. Results: Median patient age was 62.7 while median CS was 5 (range 1-8); the most common primary tumor sites were small intestinal (N = 81) and pancreatic (N = 37). A total of 101 patients and 31 patients received 3-4 doses and no doses of PRRT, respectively. On multivariable analysis, in patients treated with 3-4 doses of PRRT, for each 2-point increase in CS, the estimated hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 3.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.05-5.19). On multivariable analysis, in patients who received no doses of PRRT, for each 2-point increase in CS, the estimated HR for PFS was 1.37 (95% CI .78-2.41). Conclusions: Among patients treated with 3-4 doses PRRT, those with lower CS had better PFS with the treatment compared to patients with higher CS. This PFS difference, based upon CS, was not observed in patients who did not receive PRRT, suggesting the predictive utility of the CS for patients with WD NETs receiving PRRT with Lu 177-dotatate. Though the CS needs to be validated, it is the first of its kind reported.