[Distribution of the anterior corneal astigmatism in over 140 000 patients with age-related cataract]

Objective: To analyze the distribution characteristics of the anterior corneal astigmatism in 140 000 cataract patients from 18 hospitals in China. Methods: Retrospective study. A total of 143 889 patients (143 889 right eyes) over the age of 40 years with age-related catarac were admitted to 18 Aier eye hospitals in China from July 2015 to October 2018. The average values of the three measurements of the magnitude of anterior corneal astigmatism, the meridian of corneal astigmatism, anterior chamber depth, corneal refractive power, and axial length measured by IOLMaster 500 were obtained. The data acquisition method of each sub-center was to collect and analyze the electronic case data in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and to provide them for the sponsor Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital. Non-normal distribution data are presented as M (P₂₅, P₇₅). Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test were used to analyze the distribution differences of the magnitude of corneal astigmatism and the meridian of corneal astigmatism in gender, age, anterior chamber depth, corneal refractive power and axial length. Results: Among the 143 889 patients, 84 319 were females and 59 570 were males, the median age was 72 (65, 78) years old, the median corneal astigmatism was 0.84 (0.51, 1.33) D; the corneal astigmatism was ≥0.75 D in 80 895 patients (56.22%) and was ≥1.00 D in 57 304 patients (39.83%). The median corneal astigmatism was 0.87 (0.53, 1.37) D in women and 0.82 (0.50, 1.29) D in men; with statistical difference (U=-14.891; P<0.05). The proportion of with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism was 33.26% (28 046/84 319) for women and 34.26% (20 408/59 570) for men; The proportion of against-the-rule (ATR) astigmatism was 49.08% (41 385/84 319) for women and 46.91% (27 945/59 570) for men, with statistical difference (χ²=70.913; P<0.05). With the increase of age, the magnitude of corneal astigmatism first decreased from 0.94 (0.57, 1.48) D to 0.75 (0.46, 1.18) D, and then increased to 1.19 (0.74, 1.79) D, with statistical difference (H=1 263.438; P<0.05), and the change was at 61 to 70 years old. With the increase of age, the proportion of WTR astigmatism decreased from 77.50% (396/511) to 12.50% (3/24), the proportion of ATR astigmatism increased from 11.15% (57/511) to 79.07% (34/43), and the proportion of oblique astigmatism changed little from 17.02% (16/94) to 19.92% (245/1 230), the distribution difference was significant (χ²=10 174.496; P<0.05). As the anterior chamber became shallow, the magnitude of corneal astigmatism significantly increased from 0.82 (0.51, 1.31) D to 1.05 (0.61, 1.56) D, and the proportion of ATR astigmatism increased from 47.32% (60 207/127 227) to 51.69% (184/356) (H=409.961, χ²=120.995, both P<0.05). With the corneal refractive power rising, the magnitude of corneal astigmatism increased from 0.80 (0.49, 1.33) D to 0.95 (0.58, 1.53) D, the proportion of ATR astigmatism decreased from 52.84% (4 963/9 392) to 39.97% (9 023/22 577); the difference was significant (H=808.562, χ²=752.147, both P<0.05). When the axial length was>25.00 mm, the magnitude of corneal astigmatism was highest [1.04 (0.62, 1.65) D], and the proportion of ATR astigmatism was also highest [49.00% (10 964/22 376)]; the difference was significant (H=2 071.198, χ²=131.130, all P<0.05). Conclusions: The meridian of corneal astigmatism in middle-aged and elderly cataract patients is mainly ATR astigmatism. With the increasing of age, the magnitude of corneal astigmatism decreases first and then increases. The turning point from the proportion of WTR astigmatism to the proportion of ATR astigmatism is 65 years old. The shallower the anterior chamber is, the more the magnitude of corneal astigmatism and the proportion of ATR astigmatism increase. When the axial length is>25.00 mm, both the magnitude of corneal astigmatism and the proportion of ATR astigmatism reach the peak. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2021, 57: 56-62).

Two-year outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy combined with small-incision lenticule extraction for high astigmatism

Background

To evaluate clinical outcomes after full-thickness astigmatic keratotomy (FTAK) combined with small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in eyes with high astigmatism.

Methods

This study comprised 75 eyes of 43 patients with over 4.0 diopters (D) of astigmatism who were treated with SMILE after FTAK. Visual acuities and refractive measurements were evaluated at 1 month after FTAK, and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after SMILE. Vector analysis of the astigmatic changes was performed using the Alpins method.

Results

Twenty-four months after the combined procedure, the average spherical equivalent was reduced from − 6.56 ± 2.38 D to − 0.36 ± 0.42 D (p < 0.001). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved from 1.54 ± 5.53 to − 0.02 ± 0.09 and from − 0.03 ± 0.07 D to − 0.07 ± 0.08 D (both p < 0.001), respectively. The preoperative mean astigmatism was − 5.48 ± 1.17 D, which was reduced to − 2.27 ± 0.97 D and − 0.34 ± 0.26 D at 1 month after FTAK and 24 months after SMILE, respectively (p < 0.001). The surgically-induced astigmatism after FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 3.38 ± 1.18 D, 2.22 ± 0.84 D, and 5.39 ± 1.20 D, respectively. Furthermore, the correction index of FTAK, SMILE, and FTAK and SMILE combined was 0.63 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.40, and 0.98 ± 0.06, respectively. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Our surgical procedure combining FTAK and SMILE showed good and stable clinical outcomes during two-year follow-up for the treatment of high astigmatism.

The prevalence of lower eyelid epiblepharon and its association with refractive errors in Chinese preschool children: a cross-sectional study

Background

To assess the prevalence and demographics of lower eyelid epiblepharon in Chinese preschool children and to evaluate its association with refractive errors.

Methods

In this population-based, cross-sectional study, a total of 3170 children aged 3 to 6 years from Beijing, China underwent examinations including weight, height, cycloplegic autorefraction and slit-lamp examination of external eyes. The prevalence of lower eyelid epiblepharon in preschool children was evaluated and its association with age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and refractive errors was analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

Results

The prevalence of lower eyelid epiblepharon was 26.2%, which decreased with age, with prevalence in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds of 30.6, 28.0, 15.0, and 14.3%, respectively. Boys had a higher risk of having epiblepharon than girls (OR = 1.41; 95%CI, (1.20–1.66)) and no significant correlation was detected between BMI and epiblepharon after adjusting for age and sex (p = 0.062). Epiblepharon was significantly associated with a higher risk of refractive errors, including astigmatism (OR = 3.41; 95% CI, (2.68–4.33)), myopia (OR = 3.55; 95% CI, (1.86–6.76)), and hyperopia (OR = 1.53; 95% CI, (1.18–1.99)).

Conclusions

There is a high prevalence of lower eyelid epiblepharon in Chinese preschool children, particularly among boys and younger children. Preschoolers with lower eyelid epiblepharon are subject to a higher risk of developing astigmatism, myopia, and hyperopia, than those without. Increased attention should be paid to this eyelid abnormality in the preschool population.

Open versus closed view autorefraction in young adults

PURPOSE

While there are numerous studies comparing open-view autorefractors to subjective refraction or other open-view autorefractors, most studies between closed and open-view autorefraction tend to focus on children rather than young adults. The aim of this study was to determine the concordance in non-cycloplegic refractive error between two modern objective autorefractors: the closed-view monocular Topcon TRK-2P and the binocular open-view Grand Seiko WR-5500.

METHODS

Fifty young adults aged 20-29 years (mean age 22 ± 1.6 years) underwent non-cycloplegic autorefraction using the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 (open view) and Topcon TRK-2P (closed-view) autorefractors on both eyes. Findings were expressed as the isolated spherical component and were also converted from clinical to vector notation: Mean Spherical Error (MSE) and the astigmatic components J0 and J45.

RESULTS

Mean MSE ± SD was -1.00 ± 2.40D for the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 compared to -1.23 ± 2.29D for the Topcon TRK-2P. Up to seventy-six percent of the cohort had mean spherical errors from the Topcon TRK-2P which fell within ±0.50D of the Grand Seiko reading and 58% fell within ±0.25D. Mean differences between the two instruments were statistically significant for all components (J0, spherical, and MSE) (p < 0.01), except J45 (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in non-cycloplegic MSE between these two instruments are small, but statistically significant. From a clinical perspective the Topcon TRK-2P may serve as a useful starting point for subjective refraction, but additional work is needed to help further minimise differences between the instruments.

Polar value analysis of astigmatic change and rotational stability after implantation of V4c toric implantable collamer lens

Background

To evaluate the clinical results and rotational stability of V4c toric implantable collamer lens (TICL, STAAR Surgical Company, Monrovia, CA, USA) in patients with moderate to high myopic astigmatism. Retrospective, interventional case series was performed at Shenzhen Eye Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Methods

This study enrolled 43 patients (72 eyes) who received TICL implantation to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism. The patients underwent visual and refractive examinations before and 1 month after surgery. Astigmatic changes were estimated using polar value analysis. The difference between the achieved axis and the intended axis at the last follow-up was taken as the rotation of the V4c TICL.

Results

At 1 month postoperatively, the mean safety and efficacy indices were 1.17 and 1.13, respectively. A significant reduction of 8.92±2.58 D was observed in the spherical equivalent refraction (SER), which decreased from −9.29±2.41 D preoperatively to −0.37±0.55 D postoperatively. The astigmatic error of treatment in cylinder format was calculated to 0.50±0.41 @ 15.08° relative to the preoperative stronger meridian at 1 month, postoperatively. At 1 month postoperatively, the mean absolute rotation was 8.30±10.00 degrees (median =5.46 degrees; range, 0.00–58.88 degrees).

Conclusions

TICL could achieve good astigmatic outcomes for correcting moderate to high myopic astigmatism. After TICL implantation, corneal astigmatism remained unchanged. To optimize postoperative astigmatic outcomes in TICL, polar value analysis can be used to build a nomogram.

The profile of astigmatism in 6-12-year-old children in Iran

PURPOSE

To determine the prevalence of astigmatism and its determinants in schoolchildren aged 6-12 years.

METHODS

The students selected by stratified cluster random sampling in Shahroud, north of Iran. Optometric examination included uncorrected visual acuity, refraction with autorefractometer, manifest refraction with retinoscopy followed by subjective and cycloplegic refraction (after two drops of cyclopentolate 1% with 5min interval were instilled in each eye). A cylinder power ≥0.75diopter (D) in at least one eye was considered as astigmatism. The prevalence of astigmatism was reported based on a cylinder power higher than 0.50, 1.00, and 2.00D in cycloplegic refraction, followed by power vector analysis.

RESULTS

After applying the inclusion criteria, the data of 5528 children were analyzed. The prevalence of astigmatism was 16.7% (95% CI: 15.6-17.7) in total, 16.6% (95% CI: 15.2-18.0) in boys and 16.8% (95% CI: 15.2-18.3) in girls (p=0.920) and decreased from 21.5% in 6-year-old children to 13.7% in 10-year-olds, and then again increased to 18.3% in children aged 12 years. Moreover, 17.2% (95% CI: 16.0-18.3) of urban and 12.1% (95% CI: 10.0-14.1) of rural children had astigmatism (p<0.001). The prevalence of with-the-rule, against-the-rule, and oblique astigmatism was 14.2%, 2.1%, and 0.33%, respectively. The mean cylinder power was -1.31, -0.46, and -0.44D in children with spherical myopia, emmetropia, and hyperopia, respectively (p<0.001). Urban students had a higher J₀ and boys had a higher J₄₅.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of astigmatism in this study was lower than previous studies. Astigmatism prevalence was markedly higher in urban children.

Excimer laser programming of refractive astigmatism vs. anterior corneal astigmatism in the case of ocular residual astigmatism (ORA)

PURPOSE

To determine whether manifest refractive astigmatism (RA) or anterior corneal astigmatism (CA) is the best value for excimer laser programming in cases of ocular residual astigmatism (ORA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had undergone LASIK surgery with a disagreement between manifest refractive and corneal cylinder (ocular residual astigmatism ORA)>0.75 D were included retrospectively in this study. We calculated target induced astigmatism vector (TIA), surgically induced astigmatism vector (SIA), difference vector between the astigmatism correction programmed in the excimer laser and refractive astigmatism (DVRA), difference vector between the astigmatism correction programmed in the excimer laser and corneal astigmatism (DVCA) and difference vector between TIA and SIA (DV), by the Alpins method. Vectorial differences between DV and DVRA, and between DV and DVCA, were then calculated to determine whether RA or CA was closest to the ideal cylinder for laser programming.

RESULTS

Of a total of 104 eyes undergoing LASIK, 22 eyes of 12 patients (21.1%) had an ORA>0.75 D and were included. Mean ORA was 0.9±0.2 D and mean postoperative subjective cylinder was 0.45 D. The DV-DVRA difference vector was 0.57±0.2 D, and the DV-DVCA difference vector was 0.86±0.4 D (P=0.02). RA was closer than CA to the ideal astigmatism correction.

CONCLUSION

In cases of discrepancy between manifest astigmatism and corneal astigmatism, correction of manifest refractive astigmatism seems to give a better refractive result.

Transepithelial or intrastromal femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy to manage corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the results of intrastromal arcuate incisions (AIs) and transepithelial AIs to treat corneal astigmatism during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 20 patients with corneal astigmatism between 0.70 and 2.00 diopters (D) who underwent FLACS with concurrent intrastromal AIs in one eye and transepithelial AIs in the fellow eye. The main outcomes measures at 2-3months of follow-up were the difference between preoperative and postoperative keratometric corneal cylinder (Kcyl), the correction index (CI) and the percentage of overcorrection.

RESULTS

The mean difference between preoperative and postoperative Kcyl revealed a mean value of 0.36±0.37D in the transepithelial group and 0.53±0.42D in the intrastromal group (P<.001). The mean CI was 0.83±0.71 in the transepithelial group and 0.68±0.29 in intrastromal group (P=.17). Five eyes (25%) had an astigmatism overcorrection in the transepithelial group and 1eye (5%) in the intrastromal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both intrastromal and transepithelial AIs showed potential for mild to moderate astigmatism correction and appeared to be a safe procedure. Despite transepithelial AIs presented a higher CI, the intrastromal AIs results were more predictable.

The prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

PURPOSE:

To determine the prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was conducted targeting healthy Saudi adults (20–40 years old) at two major gatherings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia from December 2018 to January 2019. Refractive errors were measured, and data pertaining to age, sex, region of origin, and spectacle use was collected. Clinically significant myopia was defined as SE ≥ -0.50 D, hyperopia as SE ≥ 0.50D, and astigmatism as cylindrical error ≥ 0.50D. Refractive error measurements were assessed using Topcon's Auto-Kerato-Refractometer, KR-800.

RESULTS:

A total of 660 adult individuals (1,319 eyes) were included in this study, of which 321 participants (48.7%) were found to be myopes, 167 subjects (25.2%) were hyperopes, and 438 individuals (66.3%) had astigmatism. With regards to correlations, myopia was highly correlated with being male (P-value = 0.036), belonging to age group 20–25 years (P-value = 0.033), originating from the northern regions of Saudi Arabia (P-value <0.001). Similarly, hyperopia was significantly correlated with being male (P-value = 0.048), age groups 20–25 years (P-value = 0.04), and 31–35 years (P-value = 0.011) and was higher in people from northern region (P-value = 0.011). In contrast, astigmatism was only found to be correlated with age group 36–40 years (P-value = 0.002). Additionally, 71.7% of myopic participants and 76.1% of astigmatic individuals opted not to wear spectacles (P-value <0.001).

CONCLUSION:

In this study, the refractive error with the highest prevalence among Saudis was astigmatism, followed by myopia and hyperopia. Gender, region of origin, and spectacle wear were all observed to be highly correlated with higher rates of refractive error.

Assessment of posture-induced cyclotorsion during cataract surgery using the Verion image-guided system

Background

The purpose of this prospective observational study is to analyse posture-induced cyclotorsion in eyes undergoing conventional phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and femtolaser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) using the Verion image-guided system.

Methods

Cyclotorsion was assessed in patients who underwent conventional phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation and FLACS between June 2017 and November 2017 with registration of iris architecture, limbal and bulbar conjunctival blood vessels acquired preoperatively using the Verion Reference Unit (the patient in sitting position) and intraoperatively under the microscope using the digital marker of the Verion image-guided system with the patient in supine position.

Results

Forty-four eyes of 30 patients (21 men and 9 women) were included with the mean age of 56.5 ± 17.1 (range, 19-89; median, 62) years. The mean cyclotorsion induced by change in posture from sitting to supine position was 5.84 ± 3.25° (range, 1-17; median, 5). Overall, clockwise (CW) rotation (59.1%) was noted to be more common than counter clockwise (CCW) rotation (40.9%). Furthermore, CW rotation was more common in men than in women, and CCW rotation was significantly more common in women. Patients who underwent bilateral sequential cataract surgery show similar cyclorotation (CW or CCW) in both eyes more often than mixed rotation (85.7% vs 14.3%).

Conclusion

Significant cyclotorsion can occur in supine position during cataract surgery. Accurate assessment of the amount and direction of cyclotorsion aids in appropriate alignment of the toric IOL for optimal visual outcomes.

Biometry data and prevalence of corneal astigmatism in caucasian spanish candidates for cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To describe ocular biometric parameters and the prevalence of corneal astigmatism as well as age and gender correlations in a population of cataract surgery candidates and to estimate the number of eyes that would be candidates for a toric intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

In consecutive patients requiring cataract surgery over a one-year period (June 2016 to June 2017), the following optical biometry measurements were performed on an IOLMaster 700 or Lenstar 900: axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean keratometry (K), flat keratometry (K1), steep keratometry (K2), corneal astigmatism (Cyl) and white-to-white diameter (WTW). Descriptive statistics for the demographic and biometric data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study sample included 6111 eyes of 3332 patients (59.3% women), with a mean age of 74.78±9.7years. The means of the compiled data are as follows: AL 23.58±1.55mm, ACD 3.08±0.41mm, LT 4.55±0.52mm,K 44.15±1.54 diopters (D), K1 43.64±1.57 D, K2 44.69±1.61 D, Cyl 1.0±0.81. D and WTW 11.88±0.46mm. The male patients had significantly larger eyes (higher AL, ACD and WTW) and flatter corneas (lower flat and steep K). Older patients had significantly lower AL, ACD and WTW, while their LT values were higher. Corneas became significantly steeper with age. 60.5% of eyes had less than 1 D of corneal astigmatism, while 3.1% had ≥3.0 D.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 1 D of corneal astigmatism was present in the majority of cataract surgery candidates. 3.1% of eyes were candidates for a toric IOL. This study provides useful information on inventory requirements for planning hospital resources.

[Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) for correction of myopic astigmatism]

PURPOSE

To study the efficacy, stability, safety and predictability of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) at 1 day and 3 months postoperatively for moderate and high myopic astigmatism. To describe a simple and convenient method for detection and manual compensation of cyclotorsion during the procedure.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 164 eyes from 114 patients over 20 years of age with at least 1.5 diopters (D) of myopic astigmatism were treated by SMILE. Any cyclotorsion was manually compensated by gently rotating the cone to align the horizontal marks on the cornea to the 0° to 180° axis of the reticule after activating the suction.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -5.3±2.01 D, and the mean cylinder was -2.01±0.67 D. Three months after surgery, a total of 87% of eyes were within±0.50 D of attempted post-operative SE, and 98% of eyes were within±1.00 D. Overall, the predictability of cylinder correction was excellent, with 96.3% of eyes within±1.00 D of attempted post-operative cylinder. The mean postoperative cylinder at three months was -0.3±0.39 D. We noted a slight undercorrection with treatment of high cylinder. However, 82% of eyes achieved postoperative refractive astigmatism less than 0.5 D. 91% of eyes achieved uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) equal to or better than 8/10. 22% of eyes gained one line of visual acuity.

CONCLUSION

SMILE is a predictable and safe technique for the surgical correction of astigmatism. Manual compensation may be an effective approach to improve astigmatic outcomes of SMILE, especially in moderate and high astigmatism.

Characterising the orientation-specific pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in children with bilateral refractive amblyopia and non-amblyopic controls

PURPOSE

An orientation-specific visual evoked potential (osVEP) protocol was developed to probe meridional anisotropies in children with refractive amblyopia. The aim was to characterise the osVEP response in children with bilateral refractive amblyopia, evaluate the intra-session repeatability of the main osVEP components (C1, C2 and C3), coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of the response to gratings in different meridians and determine if refractive amblyopes have poorer repeatability as compared with non-amblyopic controls.

METHODS

Children aged 4-7 years with newly diagnosed and untreated bilateral refractive amblyopia and non-amblyopic controls were recruited. Orientation-specific pattern-onset VEPs were recorded in response to an achromatic sinewave grating stimulus of 4 cycles per degree under monocular and binocular stimulation. The grating lines used for monocular stimulation were parallel with the subjects' most positive and negative astigmatic meridians when considered in sphero-minus cylinder form (Meridians 1 and 2, respectively). In subjects without astigmatism, meridians 1 and 2 were designated horizontal and vertical gratings, respectively. Binocular stimuli were presented with grating lines parallel to meridians 45, 90, 135 and 180°. The repeatability of latencies of the main osVEP components (C1, C2 and C3) were investigated using two successive osVEPs recordings for each stimulus meridian and the CoR for each component's latencies were assessed.

RESULTS

Seven amblyopic children (Visual acuity (VA) ranging from 0.08 to 0.40 LogMAR in the less amblyopic eye and 0.26-0.52 LogMAR in the more amblyopic eye) and 7 non-amblyopic controls (VA ranging from 0.00 to 0.02 LogMAR in either eye), with a median age of 4.6 and 7.0 years, respectively, completed the study. C1 had the highest CoR for most conditions assessed. Ratio of CoRs C1:C2 was > 2 for all binocular meridians in controls and the 90 and 180 meridians in the amblyopes; C1:C3 was > 2 for the binocularly assessed 45, 90 and 135 meridians in the controls and the 90 and 180 meridians in the amblyopes; C2:C3 were all < 2 for all meridians assessed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The osVEP waveforms are reliable and useful for future investigations into the meridional anisotropies in children with refractive amblyopia, particularly the C3 component. Component C1 had the poorest repeatability, which consequentially affected C2 amplitude estimation. Only C3 amplitude and latency could be consistently estimated as C2 and C3 latencies were similarly repeatable. Coefficients of repeatability of osVEP latencies did not appear to systematically differ between non-amblyopic and amblyopic children.

[Association between ocular dominance and refraction in myopic subjects]

Objective: To determine the association between ocular dominance and myopic-astigmatic characteristics in myopic subjects. Methods: Cross-sectional study. A total of 1 503 myopic subjects visiting from the myopiac clinic from December 2011 to December 2012 were included. The spheres and cylinders were recorded. The ocular dominance was determined by the hole-in-the-card test. The average spherical equivalent (SE) and the cylinder between the dominant eyes and the non-dominant eyes were compared with the paired t test. The associations between ocular dominance laterality and refractive characters were analyzed with the crosstab Chi-square test. Results: There were 527 males and 976 females in this study. The median (min, max) of age was 24 (17, 49) years old. Among the subjects, 66.00% (992/1 503) of subjects were right-eye dominant, while 34.00% (511/1 503) of subjects were left-eye dominant. The dominant eyes had significantly lower average sphere powers ［(-5.01±1.91) D vs. (-5.10±1.99) D］ and lower average cylinder powers ［(-0.70±0.68) D vs. (-0.76±0.73) D］ than the non-dominant eyes (t=2.976, 4.319; both P<0.01). In the subgroups of |ΔSE|≤0.50 D, 0.50 D<|ΔSE|≤1.00 D, 1.00 D<|ΔSE|≤2.00 D and |ΔSE|>2.00 D, respectively, the dominant eyes were lower myopic in 49.37% (355/719), 51.10% (163/319), 58.48% (100/171) and 65.56% (59/90) of the subjects. The inter-group difference was statistically significant (χ²=11.588, P=0.009). In the subgroups of |ΔCyl|≤0.25 D, 0.25 D<|ΔCyl|≤0.50 D and |ΔCyl|>0.50 D, the dominant eyes had lower astigmatism in 53.94% (89/165), 65.66% (65/99) and 69.70% (46/66) of the subjects, respectively. The inter-group difference was statistically significant (χ²=6.414, P=0.040). Conclusion: The ocular dominance laterality is significantly associated with lower myopia and lower astigmatism in the myopic subjects. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2020, 56: 693-698).

Comparison between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (AF t-PRK) in patients with low to moderate myopic astigmatism, including visual acuity, refractive outcomes, astigmatic vector analysis and corneal aberrometric changes.

METHOD

This retrospective comparative case series study involved 110 right eyes of 110 patients who underwent either SMILE (55 eyes) or AF t-PRK (55 eyes). Visual acuity, manifest refractive error and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were measured and analyzed at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after operation. The safety and efficacy indices, and vector parameters were also compared.

RESULT

1 month postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and spherical equivalent refraction (SE) were better after SMILE than AF t-PRK (logMAR UDVA,  - 0.03 ± 0.07 and  - 0.006 ± 0.07, P = 0.050; logMAR CDVA,  - 0.06 ± 0.07 and  - 0.03 ± 0.07, P = 0.043; SE,  - 0.04 ± 0.25 and 0.15 ± 0.26, P < 0.001). However, these parameters were comparable between the groups at 3 months after surgery. Residual astigmatism ≤ 0.25 diopters was observed in 74.5% and 90.9% (P = 0.023) of the eyes at one month and in 87.3% and 85.5% (P = 0.781) of the eyes at 3 months after SMILE and AF t-PRK, respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups in any of the vector parameters at 1 month or 3 months after surgery. Coma and total HOAs after SMILE were significantly higher than AF t-PRK (1 month coma, 0.49 ± 0.23 and 0.29 ± 0.15, P < 0.001; 1 month total RMS HOAs, 0.65 ± 0.20 and 0.54 ± 0.14, P = 0.001; 3 months coma, 0.50 ± 0.22 and 0.30 ± 0.17, P < 0.001; 3 months total RMS HOAs, 0.68 ± 0.20 and 0.55 ± 0.17, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, both SMILE and AF t-PRK were effective and comparable for correction of low to moderate myopic astigmatism. AF t-PRK group induced less coma and total HOAs than SMILE.

Automated digital analysis of intraoperative keratoscopy and its correlation with postoperative astigmatism after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between postoperative corneal astigmatism (PCA) and values of intraoperative keratoscopy analyzed with a newly developed automated technique in patients undergoing big-bubble (BB) deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).

METHODS

Photographs of keratoscope rings taken at the end of BB-DALK were analyzed using ImageJ for the calculation of "roundness" (R): values = 1 indicate a perfect circle. Pearson's correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between R and PCA that measured 1 week (V1), 3 months (V2), and 18 months (V3), postoperatively. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of R for identifying patients with PCA < 3 diopters (D). The point on the ROC curve nearest to the coordinate (0,100) was used as a cutoff to determine sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Data from 121 patients were included. The mean value of R*was 0.93 ± 0.04 (range 0.76-0.99). R showed a significant correlation with PA at V3 (R = - 0.42, P < 0.01). The ROC curve had an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.59-0.79). A cutoff value of R = 0.93 had a sensitivity of 70.3% and specificity of 61.0% for identifying patients with PA < 3D at V3.

CONCLUSIONS

This new digital analysis of keratoscope rings allows to identify with reasonably good diagnostic accuracy patients with low values of post-DALK astigmatism correctable with spectacles.

[Significant Increase in Astigmatism after Cycloplegia in Two Children]

Two cases with high corneal astigmatism and mixed astigmatism were reported. Both cases showed significantly increased astigmatism after cycloplegia. Combined with the patients' refractive error, corneal topography and wavefront aberration changes, the possible causes were analyzed. Aberration changes caused by pupil dilation, corneal astigmatism differences in different diameter ranges, and changes in lens astigmatism before and after cycloplegia may lead to increased astigmatism after cycloplegia. It was found that cycloplegic refraction may not accurately reflect the refractive status in daily life for children with high corneal astigmatism, especially mixed astigmatism. Because children need refractive correction in the state of natural pupil, it is recommended that the cycloplegic refraction result could not be directly used as prescription for such children. The final prescription should be based on the topography and the refraction result under natural pupil.

Clinical outcomes after aphakic versus aphakic/pseudophakic intraoperative aberrometry in cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation

PURPOSE

To determine if there was a clinically significant difference in clinical outcomes after toric IOL implantation based on intraoperative aberrometry (IA), where eyes were measured either in the aphakic state only or both the aphakic and pseudophakic states.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study was performed at one site in Poughkeepsie, NY, USA. Subjects included patients presenting for uncomplicated bilateral cataract surgery eligible for toric lens implantation with regular corneal astigmatism in both eyes whose toric IOL implantation was based on IA. One eye was measured when aphakic and the other when both aphakic and pseudophakic. The primary outcome measure was the magnitude of residual refractive astigmatism. Secondary measures included the percentage of eyes with 0.50D or less of residual refractive astigmatism, the spherical equivalent refraction and the time for IA measurement.

RESULTS

Mean residual refractive astigmatism was not statistically significantly different between groups (0.32D ± 0.46D IA_1 vs. 0.23D ± 0.35D IA_2, p = 0.25), nor was the percentage of eyes with a residual refractive cylinder of 0.50D or less (94% in both groups, p = 1.0). The average time to measure the pseudophakic eye was 3 min, 46 s. Aphakic IA measurements appeared to produce better spherical equivalent refractive results relative to preoperative calculations.

CONCLUSION

Pseudophakic IA measurements took nearly 4 min per case. Residual refractive astigmatism was not appreciably lower when pseudophakic IA measurements were made after aphakic IA measurements, which suggests aphakic IA measurements alone provide good clinical results with toric IOLs.

Clinical outcomes of Ankoris toric intraocular lens implantation using a computer-assisted marker system

PURPOSE

To report the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of Ankoris monofocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) (PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium) using the Zeiss Callisto Eye (Carl Zeiss AG, Dublin, CA).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case series of patients who underwent routine cataract extraction and implantation of Ankoris toric IOL using the Zeiss Callisto eye between January 2018 and December 2018 by four senior surgeons. Patients' medical records were reviewed, and clinical outcomes including postoperative refraction, visual acuity outcomes, IOL position and deviation from planned axis were collected.

RESULTS

Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients were included, 48% were female, and the mean age was 70 ± 8 years. Patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome, glaucoma or keratoconus were excluded from the study. Pre-operative mean corneal astigmatism was 2.38 ± 0.78 diopters (D), and mean implanted IOL cylindrical power was 3.06 ± 1.07 D. IOL rotation 30 days postoperatively was within 5° in 82% of eyes and between 6° and 10° in 10.8% of eyes. Mean postoperative refractive astigmatism 30 days postoperatively was 0.22 ± 0.36 D; in 84% of eyes the postoperative refractive astigmatism was ≤ 0.50 D. IOL rotation significantly increased between day 1 to day 7 postoperatively (1.91 ± 3.15° to 3.18 ± 3.3°, P = 0.001). However, no significant rotation had occurred between day 7 and day 30 postoperatively (P = 0.093).

CONCLUSION

Cataract surgery with implantation of Ankoris monofocal toric IOL using the Zeiss Callisto Eye marking system is predictable and effective in reducing refractive astigmatism.

Comparison of Toric Intraocular Lens Alignment Using Image-Guided System and Manual Marking Technique

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of an image-guided system (Callisto eye; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with the manual marking technique in the positioning of a toric intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

A total of 80 eyes of 80 patients who underwent cataract surgery with a monofocal, single-piece, hydrophobic, biconvex, toric, aspheric IOL (Acrysof IQ SN6AT, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA) implantation were included. Before surgery, all of the patients underwent a complete eye examination that included evaluation of uncorrected (UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE), astigmatic refraction (AR), keratometry, biometry, as well as meridian registration with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, and dilated retinal examination. The diopter of the toric IOL was calculated with an online calculator (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA). At 3 months post surgery, the UCVA, CDVA, SE, and residual astigmatism were recorded, and the pupils of all of the patients were fully dilated to determine the toric IOL marker positions.

RESULTS

Group 1, the Callisto eye system group, comprised 45 eyes, and Group 2, the manual marking technique group, was composed of 35 eyes. The preoperative values of both groups were statistically similar in terms of the SE, corneal cylinder, axial length, logMAR UDVA, and logMAR CDVA. At postoperative 3 months, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the logMAR UDVA, logMAR CDVA, degree of misalignment of toric IOL, or mean deviation from target-induced astigmatism values. The mean deviation degree from the intended axis was 2.04±1.84 in the Callisto eye system group (Group 1) and 3.24±2.64 in the manual marking technique group (Group 2). However, this difference did not have any effect on the logMAR UDVA.

CONCLUSION

The image-guided markerless system was found to be as effective as manual marking in the positioning of toric IOLs.

Mutual comparative analysis: a new topography-guided custom ablation protocol referencing subjective refraction to modify corneal topographic data

Background

Several planning algorithms have been developed for topography-guided custom ablation treatment (T-CAT), but each has its own deficiencies. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the potential of a novel mutual comparative analysis (MCA) informed by manifest refraction and corneal topographic data and the patient’s subjective perception in correcting ametropia.

Methods

This retrospective review included patients with significant preoperative differences in the power or axis of astigmatism according to the manifest refraction and corneal topographic data (power > 0.75 D and/or axis > 10°). T-CAT planning was designed using MCA. Follow-ups were conducted for at least 6 months.

Results

Seventy-nine patients (121 eyes) were included. The mean preoperative deviation in the astigmatic power and axis were 0.72 ± 0.43 D and 20.18 ± 23.68°, respectively. The average oculus residual astigmatism (ORA) was 0.81 ± 0.32 D (range: 0.08–1.66 D). Six months postoperatively, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.04 ± 0.42 D, and the mean cylinder was − 0.27 ± 0.24 D. The mean efficacy and safety indices were 1.10 and 1.15, respectively. The uncorrected distance visual acuity in 92% of the eyes was the same or better than the corrected distance visual acuity. The angle of error was ±5° in 61% of eyes and ± 15° in 84% of eyes. Residual astigmatism was ≤0.5 D in 91% of eyes. Optical quality and photopic contrast sensitivity did not change significantly (p > 0.05), and the scotopic contrast sensitivity decreased at 3, 6, and 12 cpd (p < 0.05). The vertical coma and horizontal coma of the anterior corneal surface significantly decreased postoperatively but increased during follow-up.

Conclusions

The MCA demonstrated safety, efficacy, accuracy, predictability, and stability and can be used as a complementary and feasible method for T-CAT.

Rotational slit-beam marking: an advanced manual corneal astigmatic marking method for toric intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of an advanced manual corneal astigmatic marking method for toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

METHODS

From 52 patients, 52 eyes with cataracts and corneal astigmatism were included. The target axis of the toric IOL was marked with the new manual marking method preoperatively and with the Zeiss CALLISTO Eye image-guided system intraoperatively. For the manual method, a slit-lamp with a minimum rotation angle of 5 degrees was used and rotated to the meridian of the toric IOL and incision axes. The relative rotational and vertical deviation of the IOL and incision axes were measured using the digital marker as a reference.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the manually marked IOL axis (100.9° ± 65.62°) and the digital mark (100.8° ± 65.76°; P = 0.771). The absolute values of the relative rotational and vertical deviations of the manually marked IOL axis were small, at 2.03° ± 1.44° and 0.46 ± 0.43 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the manually marked corneal incision and the digital meridian (P = 0.179). Then, patients were classified into three groups based on the type of astigmatism they had. There was no significant difference in mean absolute deviation among the groups (P = 0.112). The manual incision mark had a relative rotational deviation of 1.65° ± 1.44°. The vertical misalignment of the manually marked incision axis was 0.27 ± 0.30 mm.

CONCLUSION

Rotational slit-beam marking could be an effective and convenient marking method for toric IOL implantation. This method could be a potential alternative in underdeveloped areas where digital image-guided systems are not available.

"Harmonization" of donor and recipient tomography in corneal transplantation

The applicability of donor and recipient tissue matching in corneal transplantation ("harmonization") to reduce residual astigmatism after keratoplasty was simulated using Matlab software. The height profile of the donor and recipient corneas was measured using the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) Casia 2. After best fit of the donor button in the recipient bed the mean height difference as the mismatch, which had to be minimized, was derived from the height profile of the donor and recipient corneal front and back surfaces. The donor button was rotated in the recipient bed to extract the best fit situation where the mean height difference was minimized. After successful simulation, the procedure will be transferred to real measurement data.

Clinical application of bicylindric intraocular lens power calculation method

Purpose:

To analyze the reliability of the refractive results prediction obtained in intraocular lens (IOL) calculation using bicylindric power calculation method, with the use of steep and flat keratometry readings compared with the classical mean keratometry calculation method.

Methods:

Fifty-seven eyes of 57 subjects who underwent cataract surgery were included in this prospective study. Optical biometry was performed with IOLMaster 700 and IOL power calculation was performed using both keratometry readings and the surgically induced astigmatism. Four weeks after surgery, subjective refraction was done. Finally, results obtained with both IOL calculation methods were compared.

Results:

Mean spherical equivalent using bicylindric IOL power calculation method was - 0.082 ± 0.296D, and achieved mean spherical equivalent using classical IOL power method with Haigis formula was - 0.088 ± 0.405D. Achieved mean spherical equivalent obtained in subjective refraction after surgery was - 0.101 ± 0.265D. Linear correlation between bicylindric method spherical equivalent calculation and achieved spherical equivalent was statistically significant (r = 0.761, P < 0.001), also correlation between Haigis spherical equivalent calculation and achieved spherical equivalent was statistically significant (r = 0.339, P = 0.010). Emmetropia was achieved in 49 of 57 (85.86%) subjects and bicylindric method calculated that 49 of 57 (85.86%) of subjects would get emmetropia (P = 1.000). Classical IOL power calculation estimated that 38/57 subjects would get emmetropia (66.67%) (P = 0.026).

Conclusion:

The IOL power calculation including both keratometry readings and surgically induced astigmatism seems to be more accurate and provides more precision in refractive prediction than classical calculation method.

Early-stage clinical outcomes and rotational stability of TECNIS toric intraocular lens implantation in cataract cases with long axial length

Background

A major focus of toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is the rotational stability, especially in the patients with long axial length (AL). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after implantation of TECNIS toric IOL in eyes with long AL and identify factors influencing their early-stage stability with preoperative corneal astigmatism.

Methods

The study population consisted of 64 eyes from 52 cataract patients, and these patients had preoperative corneal astigmatism between 1.0 and 3.7 diopters (D) and underwent phacoemulsification and TECNIS toric IOL implantation. Ophthalmic biological measurements were carried out preoperatively, including AL, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), vitreous length (VL), anterior chamber volume (ACV), sulcus-to-sulcus (STS) and keratometric value (K). Clinical examinations, including visual acuity, manifest refraction, keratometry, digital anterior segment photographs with pupillary dilation, were performed at 1 and 3 months after surgery.

Results

The mean best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) was improved from 0.93 ± 0.35 logarithms of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) preoperatively to 0.07 ± 0.10 logMAR postoperatively at 3 months after surgery. The mean residual astigmatism (RAS) was 0.91 ± 0.74D at 3 months, which was significantly decreased compared with the preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.71 ± 0.55 D. The mean absolute rotation of TECNIS toric IOL at 1 and 3 months was 7.42 ± 11.32 degree (°) (0–79°) and 7.48 ± 11.19°(0–79°), respectively. The mean area of capsulorhexis and the overlapped area between capsulorhexis and IOL optic intraoperatively was 21.04 ± 3.30 mm² and 7.40 ± 2.87 mm².A positive correlation was found between IOL rotation and the area of capsulorhexis (p = 0.017) at 3 months after surgery. No correlation was found between IOL rotation and AL (p = 0.876), ACD (p = 0.387), LT (p = 0.523), VL (p = 0.546), ACV (p = 0.480), STS (p = 0.884), K1 (p = 0.429), K2 (p = 0.644), average of K1 and K2 (p = 0.520), intraoperative IOL axial direction (p = 0.396), preoperative corneal astigmatism (p = 0.269) or the overlapped area between capsulorhexis and IOL optic intraoperatively (p = 0.131) .

Conclusions

The large CCC was a risk factor for toric IOL rotation. An appropriately smaller sized CCC was conducive to increase the rotational stability of TECNIS toric IOL implantation in cataract cases with long AL.