Medical management of patients with difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease

Initial standard medical treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes a 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) compound (oral, local or combined) and corticosteroids (oral, local or combined). In both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease 5-ASA has proved effective in the acute phase of the disease. As maintenance treatment, it is effective in ulcerative colitis and in some instances also in Crohn's disease. Steroids can be used in active IBD, but their effectiveness as maintenance treatment has never been proven, although in practice low-dose steroids are used for chronic treatment. When the above-mentioned preparations are unsuccessful, other medications could be tried. Flagyl could be used when the colon is involved in Crohn's disease or when anal fistulation develops, but it often fails to maintain its effect after only a few weeks. For refractory IBD more potent immunomodulators are needed. 6-Mercaptopurine and azathioprine have been shown to be effective in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease with a response rate between 60 and 70%. Their optimal effect is only reached after 3-4 months. These drugs are therefore not of value for treatment in the acute phase of the disease. 6-Mercaptopurine or azathioprine can be used best in combination with steroids in situations where dose reduction of the latter drug repeatedly leads to relapse. They have therefore a steroid-sparing effect and initiate cessation of the long-term severe side-effects of steroids. Another possibility is the use of methotrexate in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease.

Oral 4-aminosalicylic acid versus 5-aminosalicylic acid slow release tablets. Double blind, controlled pilot study in the maintenance treatment of Crohn's ileocolitis

4-Aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) has been suggested as an effective treatment for both active and quiescent ulcerative colitis. 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is well accepted for the maintenance treatment of inactive ulcerative colitis. Moreover, recent studies suggest that 5-ASA may also be effective in maintaining remission in Crohn's colitis. As treatment with 4-ASA may result in less side effects, the efficacy of a one year's maintenance treatment with oral 4-ASA (1.5 g/d, slow release tablets, n = 19) and oral 5-ASA (1.5 g/d, slow release tablets, n = 21) was compared in a double blind, randomised trial in patients with quiescent Crohn's ileocolitis. Patients with ileocolonic or colonic involvement were enrolled if in stable remission for more than two months but less than one year. Baseline demography and clinical severity were similar in both groups. Total colonoscopy and ileoscopy were performed at enrollment and at the end of the study. After one year seven of 19 patients receiving 4-ASA (36%) and 8 of 21 receiving 5-ASA (38%) had developed a clinical relapse, as defined by a rise in the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) of more than 100 points to values higher than 150. The relapse rates between the 4-ASA and the 5-ASA groups were not statistically different although no comparison with the spontaneous relapse rate in a placebo group could be made. Clinical relapse was accompanied by a statistically significant rise in serum concentrations of soluble interleukin 2 receptor and by an increased percentage of activated peripheral blood T cells. There were no statistical differences between the 4-ASA and the 5-ASA groups regarding the height of rise in CDAI or of soluble interleukin 2 receptor concentrations during relapse, thus showing a similar severity relapsed disease activity. In conclusion, 4-ASA maybe as effective as 5-ASA in the maintenance treatment of quiescent Crohn's disease and there were no differences in the severity of relapse between both treatment groups.

Comparative bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid from a controlled release preparation and an azo-bond preparation

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the bioavailability of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, mesalazine) from the different 5-ASA-containing drugs is important for rational therapy of inflammatory bowel diseases.

METHODS

The local and systemic bioavailability of 5-ASA from a controlled release 5-ASA preparation (Pentasa--2, 4 or 6 g/day) was investigated and compared with the azo-bond 5-ASA preparation olsalazine (Dipentum--2 g/day) in 13 healthy volunteers during steady state conditions.

RESULTS

The therapeutically relevant parameter of 5-ASA at the rectal level, expressed as the mean concentration in faecal water, showed a significant trend towards higher concentrations with increasing Pentasa dose: 9.2 mmol/L, 19.0 mmol/L and 24.4 mmol/L, respectively. The concentration of olsalazine 2 g/day was 16.0 mmol/L. The concentration of the metabolite N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid (Ac-5-ASA) did not rise with increasing Pentasa dose, indicating saturable presystemic acetylating capacity of 5-ASA. Total urinary excretion of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA, as a percentage of the daily ingested 5-ASA dose, remained constant on the three Pentasa doses, but there was a significant increase in the 5-ASA fraction. Mean steady state plasma concentrations of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA were significantly higher on Pentasa 4 g/day and 6 g/day than on 2 g/day. Values on Pentasa 2 g/day were comparable with those on olsalazine 2 g/day.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed that 5-ASA is released from Pentasa in a predictable manner, the amount released increasing with dose. Olsalazine is an excellent generator of 5-ASA in the colon.

A placebo-controlled trial of cyclosporine enemas for mildly to moderately active left-sided ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Uncontrolled studies suggest that cyclosporine administered as an enema may be of benefit for left-sided ulcerative colitis and safer than intravenous or oral administration. The efficacy and safety of cyclosporine enemas for left-sided ulcerative colitis in a placebo-controlled trial was assessed.

METHODS

Steroid and mesalamine enemas were withdrawn before the study. Forty patients were assigned to 1 of 4 strata: no concomitant therapy, oral steroids, oral salicylates, or oral steroids and salicylates. After stratification, patients were randomized to nightly treatment with 350 mg cyclosporine (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) enemas. Clinical response was determined at baseline and 4 weeks by endoscopy, physician assessment, and a patient diary of daily symptoms. Trough blood cyclosporine levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

At 4 weeks, 8 of 20 patients (40%) who received cyclosporine showed clinical improvement compared with 9 of 20 patients (45%) who received placebo. One patient receiving cyclosporine had reversible neutropenia attributable to sulfasalazine, and another patient receiving cyclosporine was unable to tolerate the enema vehicle. No other toxicity was noted during the trial. Blood cyclosporine levels were detectable in only two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclosporine enemas administered in a dosage of 350 mg/day for 4 weeks are not efficacious in mildly to moderately active left-sided ulcerative colitis.

A mesalazine enema for ulcerative colitis

Given by mouth, drugs based on 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) are often effective in inducing or maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis. All of them depend on delaying the release of 5-ASA, so minimising its absorption in the small intestine and maximising delivery to the colon. With sulphasalazine (a chemical combination of 5-ASA and sulphapyridine) and olsalazine (a combination of two molecules of 5-ASA) cleavage of the azo bond by bacteria releases free 5-ASA in the colon. Oral formulations of mesalazine (the approved name for 5-ASA when given alone as a drug) use various physical mechanisms to release the 5-ASA gradually during transit through the gastrointestinal tract. Mesalazine can now be administered directly to the colon as an enema (Pentasa-Yamanouchi Pharma). How effective is this method of administering mesalazine and does it have a specific place in therapy?

5-ASA enema versus oral sulphasalazine in maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis

This prospective trial in patients with left-sided ulcerative colitis evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of biweekly high-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas (4g/100ml) in maintaining a remission recently induced using daily 5-ASA enemas. Thirty-one patients were randomly assigned, 16 to 5-ASA and 15 to oral sulphasalazine (2g/day), and examined monthly. Sigmoidoscopy was performed "blind" at six months or at clinical relapse. Twelve patients on 5-ASA (75%) and nine on sulphasalazine (60%) remained in clinical and endoscopic remission throughout the study (NS), and the survival curve for 5-ASA was better at all points (NS). No patient stopped therapy due to side effects, and all those on 5-ASA chose to continue rectal maintenance therapy after the study. It was concluded that biweekly 5-ASA enemas is at least as effective as oral sulphasalazine in maintaining remission in unselected patients whose remission has been achieve using local therapy.

5-Aminosalicylic acid in pregnancy: clinical report

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a disease condition which typically affects young people; pregnancy is therefore frequent in women with this disease. 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is known to be efficacious in maintaining remission of UC, but its safety in pregnancy has not yet been established. In the present study, the safety of 5-ASA was assessed in 16 women with UC (mean age: 31 years, range 25-35) who had a total of 19 pregnancies over the period from 1988 to 1992. All the patients were in clinical remission of UC at the beginning of pregnancy and were receiving a regular maintenance therapy with 5-ASA (ASACOL tablets, 1.2 g/day). During pregnancy, 4 women had a clinical relapse requiring treatment with higher doses of 5-ASA and, in some cases, with steroids. Our observations confirm that the treatment with 5-ASA does not affect the course of pregnancy nor does it damage the fetus, but it can protect from recurrences of UC.

Mesalamine capsules enhance the quality of life for patients with ulcerative colitis

Patients with ulcerative colitis tend to be young, potentially at peak lifetime productivity levels, and the disease can be devastating in its effects on the quality of life in these individuals. No treatment for ulcerative colitis can be comprehensively evaluated without careful attention to its impact on such psychosocial issues. The quality of life was evaluated in 374 ulcerative colitis patients using mesalamine capsules at 1 g, 2 g, and 4 g daily versus placebo in an 8-week, randomized, dose-response, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial. Function-related quality of life parameters were assessed in this study, including five pertinent clinical symptoms and seven general life capabilities. These parameters have been previously shown to be valid, reliable, and responsive to the disease activity of ulcerative colitis. All of the parameters were recorded using a 10-cm visual analogue scale, except trips to the toilet which were recorded in patients' diaries. The mean change was calculated from baseline and endpoint data. Mesalamine at 2 g and 4 g daily was significantly superior to placebo in improving each of the 12 quality of life parameters (P < 0.05). These results indicate that controlled-release mesalamine significantly enhances the quality of life for patients with either left-sided ulcerative colitis or pancolitis.

Oral mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid; Asacol) for the prevention of post-operative recurrence of Crohn's disease. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio del Colon e del Retto (GISC)

METHODS

A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of oral mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) for the prevention of post-operative recurrence in 110 patients operated on for Crohn's disease by first intestinal resection. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 2.4 g/day of mesalazine, or no treatment at all. The protocol included colonoscopy with ileoscopy at 6 months and yearly thereafter. Recurrence was defined on the basis of endoscopic criteria and classified as mild or severe.

RESULTS

The demographic and pre-trial characteristics were very similar in the two groups of patients. The cumulative proportion of recurrence at 6, 12 and 24 months was significantly lower in the mesalazine group than in untreated group (P = 0.002). At 24 months the cumulative proportions of endoscopic recurrence were 0.52 +/- 0.12 (+/- S.E.M.) and 0.85 (+/- 0.07), respectively. At the same time the cumulative proportions of symptomatic recurrence were 0.18 +/- 0.09 and 0.41 +/- 0.09 (P = 0.006). The cumulative proportions of the severe recurrence was also significantly lower in the mesalazine group (0.17 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.38 +/- 0.09; P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results of this study show that administration of oral mesalazine soon after surgery is effective in preventing post-operative endoscopic recurrence in Crohn's disease over a 2-year period. It is estimated that this treatment prevents 39% of all recurrences and 55% of the severe recurrences.

Medical therapy for ulcerative colitis in childhood

Corticosteroids remain the primary therapeutic agent to induce remission in moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease because of their rapidity of action in comparison to other agents. Mild UC and/or Crohn's disease of the colon and terminal small bowel may be treated with azulfidine first. However, if patients are intolerant of these medications, dipentum or asacol may be used. Occasionally, patients with Crohn's colitis but not UC may respond to metronidazole. Immunosuppressive agents such as 6-mercaptopurine are very useful for steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease, as a substitute for long-term corticosteroids. Cyclosporine, although it has been proposed as an alternative to other antimetabolite or immunosuppressive therapy, is of benefit in fewer than 25% of cases of UC or Crohn's disease. Rowasa enemas are useful for left-sided disease in UC or Crohn's disease of the colon; however, use in children may be difficult in view of psychosocial issues that must be considered.

Intermittent therapy with high-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas maintains remission in ulcerative proctitis and proctosigmoiditis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intermittent therapy with mesalazine enemas and continuous oral mesalazine to maintain remission of distal ulcerative colitis or proctitis.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with distal ulcerative colitis (n = 17) or ulcerative proctitis (n = 21) in clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission were randomly assigned to receive either oral mesalazine (0.5 g three times/day, Eudragit L coating, n = 19) or intermittent therapy with mesalazine enemas (4 g of 5-aminosalicylic acid enema every third night, n = 19). Both groups were comparable in regard to sex, age, age at disease onset, extent and duration of disease, number and mode of treatment of previous attacks, and time in remission. Patients were reviewed at the beginning of the study and, subsequently, at two-month intervals for 24 months or until a relapse occurred. At each visit, diaries were reviewed and clinical and laboratory assessments were performed. Sigmoidoscopy was carried out and biopsies were obtained by a blinded observer. Histology was assessed without knowledge of the patient's clinical state or treatment category.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, 6 of 19 patients on oral mesalazine (32 percent) and 14 of 19 patients on mesalazine enemas (74 percent) were still in full remission (log rank test: 15.28, P < 0.001). Differences in relapse rates between groups were significant even when data were stratified by extent of disease (P < 0.01). In the oral group, six and seven patients relapsed at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In the enema group, three and two relapses occurred in the first and second year of the study, respectively. All patients complied with the treatment satisfactorily and there were no dropouts.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that intermittent therapy with mesalazine enemas is more effective than continuous oral mesalazine in maintaining remission in patients with distal ulcerative colitis and proctitis.

Biopharmaceutical evaluation of salicylazosulfanilic acid as a novel colon-targeted prodrug of 5-aminosalicylic acid

A prodrug of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), salicylazosulfanilic acid (SASA), which consists of sulfanilic acid linked to 5-ASA through an azo-linkage was newly synthesized. Biopharmaceutical properties of SASA were evaluated in comparison with those of salicylazosulfapyridine (SASP) in rats. Since SASA is much more hydrophilic than SASP, the absorption of SASA from the small intestine was less in comparison with SASP. When SASA and SASP were incubated with the rat intestinal contents under anaerobic conditions, both compounds were stable in the small-intestinal contents, but were rapidly degraded to 5-ASA in the cecal and the colonic contents. The degradation to 5-ASA by the large-intestinal contents was suppressed by the pretreatment with kanamycin sulfate, suggesting that the bioconversion of SASA is mediated by the intestinal microflora similarly to that of SASP and that SASA is also a prodrug of 5-ASA. After the oral administration, 5-ASA was found neither in the stomach nor in the small intestine in case of both prodrugs. Most of the prodrugs were transferred to the lower intestine where they were degraded to 5-ASA. The recovery of SASA including the metabolites from the gastrointestinal tract at four hours after the oral administration was significantly greater than that of SASP. Accordingly, SASA is free from the liberation of sulfapyridine, the adverse effect moiety of SASP, and less absorbable in the small intestine. Thus, the beneficial characteristics of SASA as an excellent colon-targeted prodrug of 5-ASA were clarified.

Steady state disposition of 5-aminosalicyclic acid following oral dosing

In 18 healthy volunteers the steady state disposition of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA, mesalazine, CAS 89-57-6; 500 mg tid) was evaluated following the last oral dose in form of slow release tablets (Salofalk) either containing 500 mg or 250 mg 5-ASA. In none of the pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-ASA characterizing bioavailability (e.g. AUC approximately 6 ug/ml x h; Cmax approximately 1.7 micrograms/ml; tmax approximately 5 h; Cminss approximately 0.5 micrograms/ml; Cavss approximately 0.75 microgram/ml) differences between both forms were observed and the calculated 90% confidence intervals and point estimates indicated bioequivalence. Following the delayed absorption 5-ASA was rapidly eliminated (t1/2 = 1.4 +/- 0.5 h).

[Psychodiagnostic follow-up of patients with Crohn disease during intensive internal medicine treatment]

The present study includes 40 patients with Crohn's disease who underwent an internal and psychodiagnostic examination over a period of 5 to 8 weeks. On the average, there were only minor psychic symptoms were recorded in the psychodiagnostic instruments. The fewest symptoms were seen in the recurrence-free interval, a moderate number at the beginning of intermittent inpatient treatment and the largest number of symptoms in patients transferred to a psychosomatic department. While decreasing significantly from high levels under internal intensive care and at the beginning of inpatient depth-analysis-based psychotherapy, symptoms of depression and anxiety dropped only slightly from initially low levels in outpatients. In addition, there were first changes in the patients personality profile during psychotherapy. The findings are discussed under diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.

[Maintenance treatment of Crohn's disease using orally administered mesalazine (Pentasa). A controlled multicenter study. The Study Groups on the Treatment of Inflammatory Digestive Disorders]

BACKGROUND

Mesalamine provides a new therapeutic approach in treating Crohn's disease.

METHODS

To assess the efficacy and safety of slow-release mesalamine (Pentasa) in maintaining remission in Crohn's disease, 161 patients with inactive disease were randomized to receive either Pentasa (2 g/day) or placebo in a 2-year double-blind, multicenter trial. Two strata were defined according to the duration of their remission: < 3 months (n = 64) or 3-24 months (n = 97), presumed to be high and low relapse risk strata, respectively.

RESULTS

The probability of relapse was higher in the short-remission placebo group than in the three other groups (p < 0.003), showing there was a significant benefit from Pentasa in the high relapse risk stratum. In this stratum, the 2-year on-going remission rate was of 29% +/- 9% and 45% +/- 11% (mean +/- SD) in the placebo and Pentasa groups, respectively. The incidences of side effects were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Pentasa (2 g/day for 2 years) is a safe and effective maintenance treatment for Crohn's disease when given within 3 months of achieving remission.

Experience with Eudragit-S-coated mesalamine (Asacol) in inflammatory bowel disease. An open study

We reviewed the courses of 63 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated in a private gastroenterology practice. All were allergic, unresponsive, or in some way intolerant of sulfasalazine and therefore were treated with Eudragit-S-coated mesalamine (Asacol). Thirty-eight patients had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 25 had Crohn's disease. In 22 and 14, respectively, mesalamine was used to treat active disease; in 16 and 11, respectively, it was introduced to maintain remission. In some patients, mesalamine was used along with other medications. Symptomatic and endoscopic response was seen in seven of nine (77%) with active UC treated with measalamine alone; remission was maintained in seven of eight (94%) when mesalamine was used alone. Therapeutic success was noted in eight of 10 (80%) with active Crohn's disease, and remission was maintained in seven of nine (78%) when mesalamine was used alone. Adverse reactions of varying severity occurred in 21 of 63 (33%), but the drug had to be terminated in only 9 of 63 (14%). Eudragit-S-coated mesalamine appears to be effective in the treatment and maintenance of remission of UC in 82% of those patients allergic or intolerant to the parent drug, sulfasalazine. Furthermore, contrary to what was expected, we found it effective in a much larger percentage of patients with Crohn's disease (79%) than the parent drug.

Better quality of therapy with 5-ASA colonic foam in active ulcerative colitis. A multicenter comparative trial with 5-ASA enema

We evaluated the efficacy, tolerance, and acceptance of a new 5-ASA colonic foam versus 5-ASA liquid enema in the short-term treatment of active ulcerative colitis in a three-week prospective, randomized, investigator-blind study, enrolling 233 patients from 12 outpatient clinics in Italy. In arm 1 of the study, 117 patients with mild attacks received 2 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. In arm 2, 116 patients with moderate attacks were given 4 g of 5-ASA as foam or enema at bedtime. End points were defined as complete relief of symptoms, and endoscopic and histological evidence of remission or improvement. In patients with mild relapse, 34 of 63 (54%) treated with foam were in clinical remission after only 10 days compared with 17 of 51 (31%) treated with enemas (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between foam (83%) and enema (74%) after three weeks. In patients with moderate relapse, a higher proportion of patients achieved complete clinical remission in the foam group (63%) compared with enema group (52%) after three weeks (difference 11%, 95% CI -7 to 29). No significant differences were observed in endoscopic and histological evaluation of colonic mucosa between treatment groups in either arm. 5-ASA foam was well tolerated. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Patient evaluation of therapy showed that foam was much better accepted than enema because foam was more comfortable, more practical, easier to retain, and interfered less with daily living.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy on rectal mucosal biopsy morphology in chronic ulcerative colitis

Classic teaching emphasizes that chronic ulcerative colitis is characterized morphologically by the presence of fixed architectural and cellular mucosal changes that categorize the process as chronic. To examine the effect of topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas on the presence of six histological features of chronicity in established chronic ulcerative colitis, 123 mucosal biopsies were taken prospectively at 1-month intervals, all from the same anatomic location (10 cm), from 14 patients treated with either 5-ASA or placebo enemas. The biopsies were evaluated for the presence of mixed inflammation in the lamina propria, crypt architectural abnormalities, basally located lymphoid aggregates, basal plasmacytosis, villiform surface epithelial configuration, and Paneth cell metaplasia. Overall, 29% of biopsies from 64% of patients were histologically normal (no chronic features, no active disease). Compared with patients treated with placebo enemas, patients treated with 5-ASA enemas showed a significantly higher percentage of normal biopsies (36% ASA group vs. 12% placebo group; p = 0.005) and a lower percentage occurrence of each individual histological feature of chronicity. In addition, patients treated with 5-ASA had a higher average number of normal biopsies per patient (3.0) than those treated with placebo enemas (1.3). Therefore, histologically normal-appearing mucosal biopsies do occur in established cases of chronic ulcerative colitis, and this finding is enhanced by treatment with 5-ASA enemas. Awareness of these results should prevent the presence of normal rectal mucosal biopsy findings in chronic ulcerative colitis patients from being misinterpreted as either evidence against this diagnosis or as representing focal skip areas characteristic of Crohn's disease.