Simplifying protease inhibitor therapy with once-daily dosing of saquinavir soft-gelatin capsules/ritonavir (1600/100 mg): HIVNAT 001.3 study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility of switching therapy for HIV-1-infected patients with plasma viral loads of <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL who are receiving twice-daily saquinavir soft-gelatin capsules (SQV-SGC) plus dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) to a regimen containing once-daily SQV-SGC/ritonavir (RTV).

DESIGN

Therapy for patients with plasma viral loads of <50 copies/mL after 2 years of treatment with twice-daily SQV-SGC (1400 mg) plus zidovudine/lamivudine or didanosine/stavudine was switched to once-daily SQV-SGC/RTV (1600/100 mg) with continuing NRTI treatment.

METHODS

Safety and efficacy (determined by plasma viral load and CD4 cell count) were evaluated (week 24). For 12 patients, steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of SQV was determined (week 4).

RESULTS

Once-daily SQV-SGC/RTV was well tolerated. No patient changed regimens. After 24 weeks, 64 (93%) of 69 patients had plasma viral loads of <50 copies/mL (the remaining 5 patients had plasma viral loads of <300 copies/mL). The median CD4 cell count increased from 534/mL at the start of once-daily SQV-SGCs/RTV to 695/mL after 24 weeks (p <.001). Compared with the preceding 24 weeks of treatment with twice-daily SQV-SGC, the CD4 cell count improved significantly during once-daily SQV-SGC/RTV therapy (p <.001). All patients maintained SQV trough concentrations (C(24h)) of >0.05 mg/L. Median values for the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24h)), maximal concentration (C(max)), and C(24h) for SQV were 48.1 (h.mg)/L, 6.98 mg/L, and 0.17 mg/L, respectively. Body weight was inversely correlated with SQV AUC(24h) and C(24h) (p <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and pharmacokinetic data support once-daily SQV-SGC/RTV (1600/100 mg) with two NRTIs as a convenient and safe therapeutic regimen to maintain viral suppression and immune function in HIV-1-infected patients with plasma viral loads of <50 copies/mL.

[Acute coronary syndromes in patients treated with HIV protease inhibitors]

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular complications occurring in patients infected by the human immunodeficient virus (HIV) have considerably changed since the appearance, in April 1996, of highly active antiretroviral tri-therapy (HAART), associating reverse transcriptase and protease HIV-1 inhibitors. The spectacular efficacy of anti-proteases has led to the almost complete disappearance of these opportunistic complications. However, in May 1998, acute coronary accidents were reported in the literature, thus questioning the possible responsibility of antiprotease treatment in the occurrence of accelerated atheroma.

METHOD

We report a series of 8 seropositive patients in whom an acute coronary event had occurred between February 1997 and February 1999.

RESULTS

The patients were young and all exhibited cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, dyslipidemia) and were treated with HIV-1 protease inhibitors. Six patients presented myocardial infarction, one patient unstable angina and one patient effort angina.

COMMENTS

A rise in triglycerides was observed principally on ingestion of ritonavir and a rise in cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol with all the antiprotease agents. Glucose intolerance was observed with indinavir. The occurrence of acute coronary events appeared to be related to antiprotease treatment (at the origin of metabolic disorders, endothelial dysfunction...), although it was impossible to say whether the antiprotease agents were responsible for the early atheroma or whether they simply contributed to the event. The coronary lesions were characterized by their number (single artery) and their topography (proximal or median). Nelfinavir may carry less cardiovascular risks than the other antiproteases. Mean term prognosis was relatively good, after therapeutic adjustment (change in antiprotease, strategic measures against cardiovascular risk factors, introduction of anti-anginal treatment...).

CONCLUSION

Larger and longer studies would help to specify the role of antiproteases in the occurrence of early coronary events. Rigorous monitoring (lipid and glucose measurements, tests to search for myocardial infarction,..) together with the development of new antiretroviral molecules would reduce the number of coronary events in this type of patient.

HIV protease inhibitors are potent anti-angiogenic molecules and promote regression of Kaposi sarcoma

Treatment with HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PI) is associated with a reduced incidence or regression of Kaposi sarcoma (KS). Here we show that systemic administration of the PIs indinavir or saquinavir to nude mice blocks the development and induces regression of angioproliferative KS-like lesions promoted by primary human KS cells, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), or bFGF and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) combined. These PIs also block bFGF or VEGF-induced angiogenesis in the chorioallantoic membrane assay with a potency similar to paclitaxel (Taxol). These effects are mediated by the inhibition of endothelial- and KS-cell invasion and of matrix metalloproteinase-2 proteolytic activation by PIs at concentrations present in plasma of treated individuals. As PIs also inhibit the in vivo growth and invasion of an angiogenic tumor-cell line, these data indicate that PIs are potent anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor molecules that might be used in treating non-HIV KS and in other HIV-associated tumors.

Hepatic and intestinal contributions to pharmacokinetic interaction of indinavir with amprenavir, nelfinavir and saquinavir in rats

To elucidate the aspects of pharmacokinetic interactions among HIV protease inhibitors (PIs), we investigated the effects of indinavir (IDV) on the hepatic and intestinal first-pass metabolism of other HIV PIs, amprenavir (APV), saquinavir (SQV) and nelfinavir (NFV), in rats. After oral co-administration with IDV, the area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) of APV, SQV and NFV increased significantly by 1.6-, 9.5- and 2.3-fold, respectively, compared with mono-administration. After intravenous administration, the AUC of APV, SQV and NFV also increased in the presence of IDV by 1.4-, 1.2- and 1.5-fold, respectively. Mean concentrations of APV, SQV and NFV in the liver extracellular fluid, measured using a liver microdialysis method, were very low compared with their Michaelis constants regardless of co-administration of IDV, suggesting that APV, SQV and NFV metabolism follows linear kinetics in the liver. This finding also indicates that metabolism of PIs depended on the metabolic clearance rate in the liver microsomes. The oral bioavailability of SQV in the presence of IDV increased markedly by 8.5-fold, and that of APV and NFV also increased by 1.2- and 1.5-fold, respectively. On the basis of the well-stirred model, the hepatic availabilities of APV, SQV and NFV in the presence of IDV increased by 1.1-, 1.4- and 1.5-fold, and the intestinal availabilities increased by 1.1-, 6.2- and 1.1-fold, respectively. These results suggest that both hepatic and intestinal metabolism were essentially involved in the interactions between IDV and other HIV PIs, and the degree of those contributions varied with each combination of HIV PIs.

Pharmacokinetic study of human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors used in combination with amprenavir

In an open-label, randomized, multicenter, multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study, we determined the steady-state pharmacokinetics of amprenavir with and without coadministration of indinavir, nelfinavir, or saquinavir soft gel formulation in 31 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects. The results indicated that amprenavir plasma concentrations were decreased by saquinavir soft gel capsule (by 32% for area under the concentration-time curve at steady state [AUC(ss)] and 37% for peak plasma concentration at steady state [C(max,ss)]) and increased by indinavir (33% for AUC(ss)). Nelfinavir significantly increased amprenavir minimum drug concentration at steady state (by 189%) but did not affect amprenavir AUC(ss) or C(max,ss). Nelfinavir and saquinavir steady-state pharmacokinetics were unchanged by coadministration with amprenavir compared with the historical monotherapy data. Concentrations of indinavir, coadministered with amprenavir, in plasma decreased in both single-dose and steady-state evaluations. The changes in amprenavir steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters, relative to those for amprenavir alone, were not consistent among protease inhibitors, nor were the changes consistent with potential interactions in CYP3A4 metabolism or P-glycoprotein transport. No dose adjustment of either protease inhibitor in any of the combinations studied is needed.

Ritonavir/saquinavir plus one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) versus indinavir plus two NRTIs in protease inhibitor-naive HIV-1-infected adults (IRIS study)

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy, tolerability and safety of a ritonavir 400 mg/saquinavir hard gel fomulation 400 mg twice daily versus an indinavir 800 mg once every 8 h containing first-line protease inhibitor (PI) treatment regimen.

METHODS

Open, randomized, multicentre clinical trial. PI-naive patients received either ritonavir/saquinavir and one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) or indinavir and two NRTIs. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and on-treatment (OT) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of the study participants were similar in both arms, 67 patients (37%) were naive to antiretroviral treatment. The proportion of patients who achieved a plasma viral load below the level of detection of 400 copies/ml at week 48 was 43% (39/90) in the ritonavir/saquinavir arm and 63% (57/90) in the indinavir arm (P=0.005, I

Anti-human immunodeficiency virus drugs are ineffective against Pneumocystis carinii in vitro and in vivo

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs) recently have been reported to be active against Pneumocystis carinii in cell culture. Twelve anti-HIV drugs were analyzed for their effects against rat P. carinii by an ATP cytotoxicity assay. Indinavir and saquinavir exhibited slight anti-P. carinii activity at concentrations above those that can be clinically achieved in serum; other PIs and nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors were inactive against the organism. Anti-HIV drugs, alone or in combination, did not materially reduce the organism count in the treatment of P. carinii pneumonia in immunosuppressed mice. Thus, anti-HIV drugs have little or no activity against P. carinii in these in vitro and in vivo systems. Caution should be used when interpreting reports of the susceptibility of P. carinii to anti-HIV drugs on the basis of in vitro testing only.

[Value of saquinavir in antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV-1 infection in 2001]

Saquinavir is an HIV protease inhibitor (PI) which, formulated as a hard-gel capsule (HCG), was the first drug of its class to become available for the treatment of patients with HIV infection. The limited bioavailability of this drug was responsible for a reduced number of prescriptions when new PI were available. Since 1997, combination therapy with ritonavir has improved the pharmacokinetics parameters resulting in a better clinical benefit. Saquinavir (HGC) monotherapy is not yet recommended. Soft gel capsule (SGC) has improved biodisponibility. Efficacy of SQV has been shown in clinical studies in first and second line of treatment with PI. Resistance profile is favorable considering the low level of cross resistance with other PI. Better knowledge of saquinavir could help giving back a place to this drug in the anti HIV arsenal.

Limited patient adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection in an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for human immunodeficiency syndrome type 1 (HIV-1) infection is essential to sustain viral suppression and prevent drug resistance. We investigated adherence to HAART among patients in a clinical cohort study.

METHODS

Patients receiving HAART had their plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors or nevirapine measured and completed a questionnaire on adherence. We determined the percentage of patients who reported taking all antiretroviral medication on time and according to dietary instructions in the past week. Drug exposure was compared between patients reporting deviation from their regimen and fully adherent patients. Among patients who received HAART for at least 24 weeks, we assessed the association between adherence and virologic outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 224 of 261 eligible patients completed a questionnaire. Forty-seven percent reported taking all antiretroviral medication on time and according to dietary instructions. Patients who reported deviation from their regimen showed lower drug exposure compared with fully adherent patients (median concentration ratio, 0.81 vs 1.07; P =.001). Among those receiving HAART for at least 24 weeks, patients reporting deviation from their regimen were less likely to have plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below 500 copies/mL (adjusted odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-11.6) compared with fully adherent patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Only half of the patients took all antiretroviral medication in accordance with time and dietary instructions in the preceding week. Deviation from the antiretroviral regimen was associated with decreased drug exposure and a decreased likelihood of having suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA loads. Patient adherence should remain a prime concern in the management of HIV-1 infection.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of twice-daily dosing of saquinavir plus ritonavir in HIV-1-infected individuals

OBJECTIVE

To compare the steady state plasma pharmacokinetics of 1000 mg of saquinavir (SQV) in a soft-gel capsule (SGC) formulation in combination with 100 mg of ritonavir (RTV) (capsules) in a twice-daily dosing regimen in HIV-1-infected individuals with historical controls who used 400 mg of SQV in a hard-gel capsule (HGC) formulation in combination with 400 mg of RTV and to investigate the plasma pharmacokinetics of the 1000 mg/100 mg regimen after normal and high-fat breakfasts.

DESIGN

Open-label, crossover, steady-state pharmacokinetic study.

METHODS

Six HIV-1-infected individuals who used either 1200 mg of SQV (SGC or HGC) three times daily or 400 mg twice daily in combination with 400 mg of RTV twice daily were included. Each patient was switched to 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily. After 14 days, the patients came to the hospital for assessment of a pharmacokinetic profile during 12 hours. Patients were randomized to receive a high-fat (+/-45 g of fat) or normal (+/-20 g of fat) breakfast. After 7 days, a second pharmacokinetic profile was assessed after ingestion of the drugs with the alternate breakfast. A noncompartmental pharmacokinetic method was used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC0-12h), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the plasma trough concentration (C12h), and the elimination half-life in plasma (t1/2). The obtained pharmacokinetic parameters were compared with those of 12 patients using SQV HGC (400 mg twice daily) in combination with RTV (400 mg twice daily).

RESULTS

The median values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for SQV SGC (1000 mg twice daily, normal breakfast) were: AUC0-12h, 18.84 h*mg/L; Cmax, 3.66 mg/L; C12h, 0.40 mg/L; and t1/2, 3.0 hours. The median values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for SQV HGC (400 mg twice daily, normal breakfast) were: AUC0-12h, 6.99 h*mg/L; Cmax, 1.28 mg/L; C12h, 0.23 mg/L; and t1/2, 3.9 hours. The exposure to SQV in the dosing regimen of 1000 mg twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily was significantly higher than the exposure to SQV in a dosing regimen of 400 mg twice daily in combination with 400 mg of RTV twice daily. The pharmacokinetic parameters of SQV SGC in the dosing regimen of 1000 mg twice daily in combination with 100 mg of RTV twice daily were not significantly different after ingestion of a high-fat or normal breakfast (p >.35).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily and 100 mg of RTV twice daily resulted in a higher exposure to SQV compared with the exposure to SQV obtained when SQV is used in the 400 mg/400 mg twice-daily combination with RTV. In this small number of patients, no significant differences in exposure were seen after ingestion of either a normal or high-fat breakfast. From a pharmacokinetic perspective, the combination of 1000 mg of SQV SGC twice daily and 100 mg of RTV twice daily seems to be a good option for further clinical evaluation.

A pharmacokinetic study of intermittent rifabutin dosing with a combination of ritonavir and saquinavir in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus

AIM

Our primary aim was to evaluate the plasma exposures and safety of rifabutin and its active 25-O-desacetyl metabolite during concomitant therapy of intermittent rifabutin dosing regimens with a combination of ritonavir and saquinavir.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients without mycobacterial infection who were human immunodeficiency virus seropositive and who were receiving 400 mg each of ritonavir and saquinavir twice daily participated in a 3-period, 2-group longitudinal pharmacokinetic study. Patients were equally randomized to receive 300 mg of rifabutin every 7 days (group 1) or 150 mg of rifabutin every 3 days (group 2) for 8 weeks. Blood samples were collected over the dosing intervals of the protease inhibitors at baseline (period 1) and of the 3 drugs after 4 weeks (period 2) and 8 weeks (period 3) for HPLC measurement of plasma concentrations of the 3 drugs and 25-O-desacetylrifabutin.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (group 1, n = 10; group 2, n = 9) completed the study. Five individuals withdrew from the study; 3 of them experienced side effects, and 2 were lost to follow-up. For combined groups, mean saquinavir and ritonavir overall (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) and peak (C(max)) plasma exposures averaged over periods 2 and 3 did not change significantly (8% to 19%; P > .05) compared with those in period 1 (90% confidence intervals, -7% to 26% for ritonavir and -2% to 38% for saquinavir). Rifabutin and metabolite AUC and C(max) exposures were stable over the 8 weeks, with intraindividual coefficients of variation of 12% to 19%. Oral clearance of rifabutin was similar in both groups (321 mL/min in group 2 versus 372 mL/min in group 1; P = .34). Rifabutin C(max) values were significantly lower in group 2 (310 ng/mL versus 496 ng/mL in group 1; P = .004). Rifabutin and metabolite predose levels were significantly higher in group 2 (rifabutin: 54 ng/mL versus 17 ng/mL; desacetyl rifabutin: 55 ng/mL versus 28 ng/mL; P < .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Rifabutin exposures were similar at 4 and 8 weeks and had minimal effect on ritonavir and saquinavir exposures. Intermittent rifabutin dosing over 8 weeks provided a safe and manageable regimen for concurrent therapy with a combination of ritonavir and saquinavir.

Combination therapy with saquinavir soft gelatin capsules in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerance, safety and antiviral activity of the HIV protease inhibitor, saquinavir, formulated as soft gelatin capsules (SQV-SGC), given in combination with nucleoside antiretroviral agents (NRTIs) with or without nelfinavir in HIV-infected children.

METHODS

This was an open label study of HIV-infected children ages 3 to 16 years, conducted in two parts. In Part 1 of the study 14 children were treated orally with SQV-SGC (initially given in three 33-mg/kg doses daily; dosage adjusted to 50 mg/kg three times daily based on initial pharmacokinetics) and two NRTIs. Addition of nelfinavir was permitted for children who did not achieve a predetermined steady state target plasma saquinavir exposure. In Part 2 a new group of 13 children received SQV-SGC (33 mg/kg three times daily) in combination with nelfinavir and one or two NRTIs. Pharmacokinetics were assessed after the first dose and 4 weeks into treatment (steady state). Patients were treated for 72 and 48 weeks in Parts 1 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

Most adverse events were mild; the most commonly reported were diarrhea, abdominal discomfort and headache. Two children were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events (one each of nausea and dysphagia) related to the study treatment. There were no deaths or serious adverse events attributed to the study medication. Steady state saquinavir area under the plasma concentration vs. time curves (AUC24) were 6,210 and 11,010 ng/h/ml for Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Compared with baseline measurements median changes in plasma HIV RNA concentrations were -2.12 log10 copies/ml [5 of 14 (36%) with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml) (Week 72)] and -2.58 log10 copies/ml [8 of 13 (62%) <50 copies/ml) (Week 48)] in Parts 1 and 2, respectively. The median changes in CD4+ lymphocyte count were +292 and +154 cells/microl for Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Genotypic resistance assays revealed a low frequency of saquinavir-associated resistance mutations after 48 weeks of therapy, with only 2 of 27 children having substitutions at positions 48V and/or 90M.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with SQV-SGC was well-tolerated and safe in HIV-infected children, and antiviral activity was observed. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were lower than expected, particularly for Part 1 (SQV-SGC plus NRTIs), but addition of nelfinavir increased saquinavir exposures.

The effect of fluconazole on ritonavir and saquinavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-1-infected individuals

AIMS

To study the effect of fluconazole on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of the protease inhibitors ritonavir and saquinavir in HIV-1-infected patients.

METHODS

Five subjects treated with saquinavir and three with ritonavir received the protease inhibitor alone (saquinavir 1200 mg three times daily, ritonavir 600 mg twice daily) on day 1, and the same protease inhibitor in combination with fluconazole (400 mg on day 2 and 200 mg on days 3 to 8). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined on days 1 and 8.

RESULTS

In the saquinavir group, the median increase in the area under the plasma concentration vs time curve was 50% from 1800 microg l(-1) h to 2700 microg l(-1) h (P = 0.04, median increase: 900 microg l(-1) h; 2.5 and 97.5 percentile: 500-1300), and 56% for the peak concentration in plasma (from 550 to 870 microg l(-1), P = 0.04; median increase: 320 microg l(-1) h, 2.5 and 97.5 percentile: 60-450 microg l(-1)). In the ritonavir group, there were no detectable changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters on addition of fluconazole.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the favourable safety profile of saquinavir, dose adjustments are probably not necessary with concomitant use of fluconazole, as is the case for ritonavir.

Adherence over 48 weeks in an antiretroviral clinical trial: variable within patients, affected by toxicities and independently predictive of virological response

OBJECTIVES

To investigate adherence to antiretroviral therapy over 48 weeks, to investigate the association between adherence and treatment-related symptoms and to investigate the impact of adherence on virological response over 48 weeks among established predictors of treatment success.

METHODS

One-hundred-and-sixty HIV-1 infected protease inhibitor- and stavudine-naive patients participating in a trial of ritonavir/saquinavir versus ritonavir/saquinavir/ stavudine completed an adherence questionnaire and a symptom checklist at weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48. We calculated odds ratios between experienced symptoms and non-adherence. Regression models were used to determine predictors of HIV-1 RNA below 400 copies/ml at week 48, and of the area about the change from baseline over 48weeks (ACFB) in serum HIV-1 RNA.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients reporting missing medication, deviation from time schedule, and dietary prescriptions at separate time-points ranged from 12 to 15%, 32 to 35% and 17 to 22%, respectively. The percentage that changed their level of adherence during 48 weeks ranged from 29% for skipping medication to 48% for deviation from time-schedule. Experienced side-effects were associated with an increased likelihood of non-adherence. Not skipping medication was an independent predictor of both having a serum HIV-1 RNA below 400 copies/ml at week 48 and the ACFB over 48weeks in serum HIV-1 RNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence was an independent predictor of virological response over 48 weeks. The level of adherence is variable within patients over time. This suggests the need for continued adherence monitoring in all patients as part of standard medical practice.

Effect of ritonavir/saquinavir on stereoselective pharmacokinetics of methadone: results of AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 401

The effect of ritonavir 400 mg/saquinavir 400 mg twice daily on the stereoselective pharmacokinetics of methadone was examined in 12 HIV-infected, methadone-using study subjects.

DESIGN

A 24-hour methadone pharmacokinetic study was performed before antiretroviral therapy was begun and after 15 days of therapy. Methadone concentration was measured by a chiral plasma assay because the drug is administered as a racemic mixture of R- and S-methadone, but only the R-isomer is active. Both changes in plasma protein binding and changes in objective and subjective opioid effect were monitored.

RESULTS

Ritonavir/saquinavir administration was associated with 40% decrease in total S-methadone AUC0-24hr and 32% decrease in R-methadone area under the curve (AUC)0-24hr, and both changes were statistically significant (p =.001 for both). When AUC was corrected for the changes in protein binding induced by ritonavir/saquinavir, R-methadone free AUC0-24hr decreased 19.6% whereas the S-methadone decreased 24.6%, neither of these changes was statistically significant (p =.129 and p =.0537, respectively). This change in methadone exposure was not associated with any evidence of withdrawal from narcotics and no modification of methadone dose was required.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that ritonavir/saquinavir administration is associated with induction of metabolism of methadone but this is greater for the inactive S-methadone. However, approximately 37% of the decrease in the total R-methadone exposure can be explained by protein binding displacement. Ritonavir/saquinavir can be used in HIV-infected people taking methadone without routine dose adjustments.

Clinical outcome among HIV-infected patients starting saquinavir hard gel compared to ritonavir or indinavir

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical response among patients who initiate protease inhibitor therapies with different virological potency.

DESIGN

We analysed patients who started indinavir, ritonavir or saquinavir hard gel capsule (hgc) as part of at least triple therapy during prospective follow-up within the EuroSIDA study.

METHODS

Changes in plasma viral load (pVL) and CD4 cell count from baseline were compared between treatment groups. Time to new AIDS-defining events and death were compared in Kaplan--Meier models, and Cox models were established to further assess differences in clinical progression (new AIDS/death). Adjustment was made for differences in baseline parameters, in particular pVL, CD4 cell count, and region of Europe.

RESULTS

A total of 2708 patients (median follow-up: 30 months) were included, of which 556 started ritonavir (21%), 1342 indinavir (50%), and 810 saquinavir hgc (30%). The three groups were fairly evenly balanced at baseline regarding CD4 count, previous diagnosis of AIDS and pVL, After 12 months, the median changes in CD4 cell count were 90, 96 and 74 x 10(6) cells/l, respectively;P < 0.001, the proportions of patients with pVL < 500 copies/ml were 47, 54 and 41%; P < 0.001, and the proportions with clinical progression were 11.9, 9.2 and 11.9%, respectively; P = 0.20 (log-rank test). In multivariate models the relative risk of clinical progression for indinavir compared with saquinavir hgc was: 0.77 (0.60--0.99); P = 0.043, and for ritonavir 0.83 (0.62--1.11); P = 0.20.

CONCLUSIONS

Saquinavir hgc was associated with an inferior long-term clinical response relative to indinavir, which was consistent with the observed differences in virological and immunological responses.