Evaluation of VIDAS® Listeria species Xpress (LSX) Immunoassay Method for the Detection of Listeria species in Foods: Collaborative Study

In a multilaboratory study, the effectiveness of an alternative method for rapid screening of Listeria species compared to traditional reference methods was demonstrated in a variety of food products. A collaborative study was conducted to compare the VIDAS® Listeria species Xpress (LSX) method and the standard cultural methods for the detection of Listeria species in foods. Six food types were tested: vanilla ice cream, cheddar cheese, raw ground beef, frozen green beans, deli turkey, and cooked shrimp. Each food, inoculated with a different Listeria strain at two levels and uninoculated test portions, was analyzed by each method. A total of 15 laboratories representing government and industry participated. In this study 1134 tests were analyzed in the statistical analysis. There were 490 positives by the VIDAS LSX method using the sample boiling step, 483 positives by the VIDAS LSX method using the Heat and Go system, and 439 positives by the standard culture methods. Overall, the Chi-square result for the VIDAS LSX method with boiling for all foods was 7.25, indicating a significant statistical difference between the VIDAS method and the standard methods at the 5% confidence. For the VIDAS LSX method with the Heat and Go system, the Chi-square result for all foods was 5.37, indicating a significant statistical difference between the VIDAS LSX assay with the Heat and Go system and the standard methods at the 5% level of significance. In both cases, the VIDAS method was more sensitive than the standard methods. The LSX method detects Listeria species in foods with negative or presumptive positive results in a minimum of 30 h compared to at least 5 days for the cultural methods. Based on the results of this collaborative study, it is recommended that the VIDAS LSX method be adopted as an AOAC Official MethodSM for the detection of Listeria species in dairy products, vegetables, seafood, raw meats and poultry, and processed meats and poultry.

P678Pericardiocentesis in thrombocytopenic cancer patients

Background

Pericardial effusion is a known complication in cancer patients, resulting in chest pain, cardiac tamponade, and cardiogenic shock. Although technological advances allow for early detection, treatment options are limited for those also suffering from thrombocytopenia.

Purpose

Our study aims to evaluate survivorship of thrombocytopenic cancer patients who underwent pericardiocentesis.

Methods

From 2008 to 2019, we assessed overall mortality and follow-up post-pericardiocentesis in cancer patients with concurrent thrombocytopenia (<150,000 cells/microliter) at our cancer center. Thrombocytopenia grading was determined on the procedure day via serology platelet cell count with the following thresholds: Grade 1 (<50x103 cells/mL), Grade 2 (51–100x103 cells/mL), and Grade 3 (101–149x103 cells/mL).

Results

In 137 patients, we identified 65 (47%) patients with Grade 1, 30 (22%) with Grade 2, and 42 (31%) with Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. The calculated platelet count average was 66x103 cells/mL, median was 59x103 cells/mL, and range was 6 to 147x103 cells/mL. Of note, 7 (5%) patients had platelets <10x103 cells/mL. One patient developed a hematoma at the percutaneous site of pericardial drain, no other complications were noted. Kaplan Meier survival analysis by log-rank (mantel-cox) showed statistical significance (p=0.025). Comparatively, the cumulative survival of patients at 30 days was 63% in Grade 1, 67% in Grade 2, and 83% in Grade 3 patients. At one year, it was 26% in Grade 1, 37% in Grade 2, and 48% in Grade 3 patients.

Conclusion

Pericardiocentesis offers rapid symptomatic relief and can be life-saving in cardiac tamponade. In cancer patients, the development of pericardial effusions and thrombocytopenia increases due to the underlying malignancy and cancer therapeutics. Although thrombocytopenia is thought to increase peri-procedural risks, in this cohort there was only one minor complication and this occurred in Grade 2 thrombocytopenia. For thrombocytopenic cancer patients suffering from large pericardial effusions, high pre-operative risk scores often exclude them from receiving surgical pericardial windows. Although mortality was higher in severe thrombocytopenia, this is likely due to the competing risk of more severe cancer; there were no complications with Grade 1 thrombocytopenia. Especially noteworthy, no complications in those with platelets <10,000 cells/uL. Our study shows that in this population of patients, pericardiocentesis is a feasible intervention with low complication rate to help improve quality of life and potentially life-saving treatment.

P3629Invasive versus medical management of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in cancer patients: knowledge is bliss

Background

Cancer patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) frequently present with comorbidities (e.g., anaemia, thrombocytopenia) that discourage invasive treatment.

Purpose

To compare outcomes of cancer patients with NSTEMI treated with optimal medical therapy (OMT) + percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus OMT alone and to identify variables associated with overall survival (OS).

Methods

All cancer patients diagnosed with NSTEMI between March 2016 and December 2018 at our institution were included. Patients were classified based on treatment of NSTEMI into 2 groups: invasive strategy or OMT alone. The invasive group was further classified into early (PCI≤72 hours since presentation) or delayed strategy (PCI>72 hours). Clinical and laboratory data, oncologic history, major adverse cardiovascular events, and survival were collected. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to identify variables associated with OS.

Results

We included 201 patients with a mean age of 68±11 years, 136 (68%) of which were women. Median OS was 13 months. Factors influencing OS are presented in Table I. Patients receiving PCI had better OS compared to patients treated with OMT only (Figure 1, p<0.0001). Procedure-related complications were non-fatal and present in 2 (1.85%) cases.

Table I Covariate Hazard Ratio (95% confidence interval) p-value Early invasive treatment (≤72 hours) 0.327 (0.207–0.516) <0.0001 Delayed invasive treatment (>72 hours) 0.496 (0.252–0.977) 0.0426 Presenting symptom: chest pain 0.406 (0.254–0.649) 0.0002 Presenting symptom: others 1.869 (1.223–2.855) 0.0039 Single agent antiplatelet therapy 0.434 (0.263–0.716) 0.0011 Dual agent antiplatelet therapy 0.294 (0.174–0.496) <0.0001 Statins 0.440 (0.276–0.703) 0.0006 Active cancer 4.487 (1.646–12.234) 0.0033 Prior chemotherapy 2.312 (1.328–4.023) 0.0030 Prior chest radiation 1.752 (1.065–2.884) 0.0272 Active chemotherapy 1.931 (1.271–2.934) 0.0021

Figure 1

Conclusions

An invasive management of NSTEMI in cancer patients, especially within 72 hours, appears to be associated with improved OS. Patients presenting with symptoms other than chest pain were less likely to undergo PCI and had worse outcomes. Active cancer, a history of chest radiation, and active or prior chemotherapy were also associated with decreased OS.

Acknowledgement/Funding

None

The oral Janus kinase/spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor ASN002 demonstrates efficacy and improves associated systemic inflammation in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

ASN002 is an oral dual inhibitor of Janus kinase and spleen tyrosine kinase, which are involved in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) through their regulatory role on T helper (Th)1, Th2 and Th17/Th22 pathways.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and effects on systemic biomarkers of ASN002 in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods A total of 36 patients with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized (3 : 1) to ASN002 or placebo in the phase Ib study. Three dosage cohorts were studied over a 28-day period (20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg once daily).

RESULTS

ASN002 was superior to placebo for the proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 50 (20 mg 20%, P = 0·93; 40 mg 100%, P = 0·003; 80 mg 83%, P = 0·03; placebo 22%), EASI 75 (20 mg 0%, P = 0·27; 40 mg 71%, P = 0·06; 80 mg 33%, P = 0·65; placebo 22%) and in change from baseline in pruritus (20 mg -1·3 ± 2·1, P = 0·81; 40 mg -3·1 ± 2·7, P = 0·27; 80 mg -4·7 ± 2·1, P = 0·01; placebo -1·6 ± 1·8). Adverse events were generally mild and similar across all groups. ASN002 showed dose-dependent plasma exposure with low interpatient variability, significantly downregulated several serum biomarkers involved in Th1, Th2 and Th17/Th22 immunity, and decreased the atherosclerosis-associated biomarker E selectin/SELE.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with moderate-to-severe AD, ASN002 showed strong efficacy with rapid onset of action and associated improvements in systemic inflammation.