[Key aspects of drug therapy in vascular surgery]

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is one of the most common manifestations of systemic atherosclerosis. PAD affects millions of people worldwide, thus greatly contributing to the structure of mortality and disability of the population of developed countries. Along with surgical revascularization, pharmacotherapy is becoming increasingly important in improving the prognosis in such patients. Modern clinical guidelines define optimal therapy for patients with PAD as simultaneous prescription of several classes of drugs (hypolipidemic, antithrombotic, antihypertensive and, probably, vasodilators), thus making it necessary for the surgeon to take into consideration possible drug interactions. This literature review presents the evolution of evidence-based approaches to drug therapy and an algorithm of choosing drugs, depending on initial risk for ischaemic events in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Primary and Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke and Cerebral Hemorrhage: JACC Focus Seminar

Stroke is a leading cause of permanent disability. Therefore, primary prevention of first stroke and secondary prevention of recurrent stroke are a high priority. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke includes lifestyle modification and diet, treatment of risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus and lipid disorders, antiplatelet therapy for high vascular risk patients, and anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Secondary prevention of ischemic stroke includes additional carotid surgery or stenting in selected symptomatic patients, closure of patent foramen ovale after cryptogenic stroke, treatment of insulin resistance, and best medical treatment of intracranial stenosis. The most important preventive strategies in the primary and secondary prevention of cerebral hemorrhage include the treatment of hypertension, reduction in alcohol intake, and occlusion of the left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation and permanent contraindications for oral anticoagulation.

COVID-19 associated thromboinflammation of renal capillary: potential mechanisms and treatment

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a global pandemic disease with high morbidity and mortality. Inflammatory and thrombosis are its main manifestations. As an important organ of hemofiltration metabolism, the kidney is prone to blockage and destruction when filter high inflammatory and high viscous blood of COVID-19, resulting in the loss of a large amount of protein, aggravating blood concentration, and then worsening COVID-19 hypercoagulability, which may explain the phenomenon of erythrocytes aggregation blocking the capillary lumen and the main reason why the kidney has become the second largest involvement organs. Therefore, this review discusses the effects of pathophysiological mechanisms such as inflammatory storm, endothelial injury, phosphatidylserine expression, extracellular traps release on renal capillary thrombosis caused by COVID-19 infection. Meanwhile, in view of the above mechanisms, we put forward the potential targets of antithrombotic therapy, and graded management of patients, reasonable use of drugs according to the severity of the disease and the choice of time. And we support the view of prevention of thrombus before admission, continuous anticoagulation and drug choice after discharge. It is suggested that the symptomatic and supportive treatment of renal disease in critically ill patients should be combined with the concept of antithrombotic therapy. The ultimate goal is to reduce the occurrence and development of kidney disease, provide direction for the current management of COVID-19 with kidney disease, and reduce the mortality of COVID-19.

Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis is feasible for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy

OBJECTIVES

Patients with acute cholecystitis receiving antithrombotic therapy (ATT) have an increased risk of bleeding complications during surgery and percutaneous drainage. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD) is recommended for such cases; however, evidence is limited. To investigate this issue further, we performed a retrospective multicenter study.

METHODS

One hundred thirty patients with acute cholecystitis who underwent ETGBD were enrolled. They were divided into an ATT group (continuation of ATT on the day of the procedure and/or heparin substitution) and a Non-ATT group (discontinuation or no use of ATT). The primary outcome was bleeding complication rate, and the secondary outcomes were technical success rate, clinical success rate and total complication rate.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were enrolled in the ATT group, and 47 were enrolled in the Non-ATT group. In the ATT group, 42.2% continued multi-agent ATT. No bleeding complications occurred in either group. There were no significant differences between the ATT and Non-ATT groups in the technical success rate (84.3% vs 89.4%, P = 0.426 respectively) or the clinical success rate (97.1% vs 100%, P = 0.259, respectively). The overall early complication rate was 3.1% (4/130): mild pancreatitis (n = 3) and cholangitis (n = 1). Stent dysfunction was found in 10.9% of patients (at 196 days on average), and the 12-month stent patency rate was 69.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in the bleeding complication rate between ETGBD with and without ATT. ETGBD may be an ideal drainage method for patients with acute cholecystitis receiving ATT.

Dual-Pathway Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center, Single-Operator, Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: There is limited data evaluating the prescription practices for antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Objective: This single-center, single-operator, retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate trends of antithrombotic treatment strategies in patients with AF undergoing elective PCI.

Methods: Patients with AF who electively underwent PCI performed by a single interventionalist between April 2013 and May 2018 were identified. The primary outcome was the antithrombotic therapy at discharge assessed by chart review: triple (TAT, triple antithrombotic therapy) or dual (DAT, dual antithrombotic therapy) antithrombotic therapy and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC), respectively.

Results: Of 6,135 screened patients, 259 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 133 (51%) patients received NOAC- and 126 (49%) VKA-therapy. Compared with patients on NOAC therapy, patients treated with VKA had higher bleeding risk (mean HAS-BLED-Score; 2.3 vs. 2.0; p = 0.02) and more co-morbidities (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min, 11 vs. 4%; p = 0.04; diabetes mellitus, 33 vs. 20%; p = 0.03; history of previous PCI, 37 vs. 21%; p < 0.01). TAT was prescribed more frequently if the prescription included VKA compared with NOAC (61 vs. 41%; p < 0.01). Prescription of TAT and VKA decreased throughout the observed period (2013: 100% vs. 2018: 6%; p < 0.01 and 2013: 91% vs. 2018: 28%; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: These observational data from a single center registry show a decrease of TAT- and VKA- prescription in favor of DAT with NOAC. Whether these observations are consistent with national or global trends should to be evaluated in further studies.

[Current concepts of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients with vascular pathology]

The routine practice of a vascular surgeon is invariably associated with decreasing the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients presenting with either arterial or venous pathology. Antithrombotic therapy is one of the key approaches used to achieve this purpose. However, a wide variety of modern drugs inhibiting platelet aggregation and agents blocking the coagulation cascade, as well as their combinations makes the selection of the most appropriate treatment for a particular patient quite a difficult task. The choice should carefully be made taking into consideration the nosology, aetiology, accompanying diseases and therapy thereof, as well as the balance of the risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic complications. Therefore, availability of modern antithrombotic drugs favourably contributing to a more personified approach to treatment is of utmost importance. Thus, for example, rivaroxaban, an anticoagulant belonging to the class of direct-acting oral factor Xa inhibitors, provides a possibility to select an optimal dosage and regimen for a particular patient with arterial or vascular pathology in practice of a cardiovascular surgeon.

Optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Depending on the timing of AF detection, it is usually categorized as pre-existing AF or new-onset AF. Antiplatelet therapy, rather than a vitamin K antagonist, may be considered as the primary treatment for patients without an indication for oral anticoagulants who undergo TAVR. However, the optimal postprocedural antithrombotic regimen for patients with AF undergoing TAVR remains unknown. In this review, we briefly introduce the management strategies of antithrombotic therapy and list the evidence from related studies to elucidate the optimal antithrombotic management for patients with AF undergoing TAVR.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation at Very High Bleeding Risk Without Postimplantation Antithrombotic Therapy

OBJECTIVES

We assess the proportion, baseline characteristics, and outcomes of a cohort of very high bleeding risk (HBR) patients discharged with no antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

BACKGROUND

The optimal antithrombotic therapy after LAAC remains controversial. However, a substantial proportion of patients have HBR and are contraindicated to any antithrombotic therapy. Data regarding the feasibility and safety of such a strategy are scarce.

METHODS

All patients who underwent LAAC at our institution between October 2013 and December 2018 were included. Clinical, procedural, and imaging data were collected prospectively, and patients receiving no antithrombotic therapy were compared with those receiving at least 1 agent.

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients were included. At discharge, 72 (47.3%) received single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), 57 (37.5%) received dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), and 22 (14.5%) received no antithrombotic therapy (NATT). One patient received a combination of aspirin and vitamin K antagonist. There were no differences regarding baseline characteristics between NATT patients and the others. At a median follow-up of 16 months, 25 patients died. There were no differences between NATT patients and others regarding all-cause mortality (9.1% vs 18.8%, respectively; P=.07) or ischemic stroke (0.0% vs 4.2%, respectively; P=.20). There were 4 episodes of major bleeding, but none occurred in the NATT group, and no device-related thrombosis was seen on computed tomography scan performed within 12 weeks after LAAC.

CONCLUSIONS

In highly selected patients at very HBR, discontinuation of any antithrombotic therapy after LAAC appears safe and feasible.

EP-7041, a Factor XIa Inhibitor as a Potential Antithrombotic Strategy in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Brief Report

Objectives:

Current approaches to systemic antithrombotic therapy in support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are limited and are hampered by both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. An alternative approach is needed.

Design:

Inhibition of coagulation factor XI/activated factor XI is an appealing pathway for antithrombotic support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Selective inhibition of the contact pathway of coagulation could reduce bleeding risk, and because factor XI is linked with the inflammatory and complement systems, it can also be viewed as a biologically plausible target for the prevention of abnormal thrombosis during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Conclusions:

We introduce initial information on EP-7041, a parenteral, potent, and selective, small-molecule activated factor XIa inhibitor with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics that appear well suited for use in a critical care environment.

Coronavirus Disease 2019: Hematological Anomalies and Antithrombotic Therapy

After the first cases of COVID-19 appeared in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019, the disease quickly become a pandemic that has seriously affected the economic and health systems in more than 200 countries and territories around the world. Although most patients have mild symptoms or are even asymptomatic, there are patients who can develop serious complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome or venous thromboembolism requiring mechanical ventilation and intensive care. Hence, it is important to identify patients with a higher risk of complications in a timely manner. Thus, the objective of this paper is to review the hematological laboratory parameters that consistently are altered in COVID-19 and to identify their relationship with the severity of the disease. According to 11 selected reports, the frequency of patients aged > 65 years is higher among subjects severely affected or deceased; likewise, males predominantly suffer from comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes or obesity. Retrospective studies have identified alterations in various hematological and inflammatory parameters as part of the host's response to infection and a secondary increased risk of different thrombotic events. Among these altered parameters, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 have been tested as prognostic biomarkers due to their close relationship with the severity of the disease. Actually, they can reliably indicate the use of antithrombotic therapy at prophylactic or therapeutic doses (mainly D-dimer), as has already been established in those patients who, after an individualized assessment, appear to be at high risk for thrombotic events.

Optimal Antithrombotic Treatment of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Early after an Acute Coronary Syndrome-Triple Therapy, Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with an Anticoagulant… Or, Rather, Temporary Dual Antiplatelet Therapy?

The combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a complex situation in which a three-dimensional risk-cardioembolic, coronary, and hemorrhagic-has to be carefully managed. Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) is burdened with a high risk of serious bleeding, while dual antithrombotic therapy with an anticoagulant (DAT) likely provides only suboptimal coronary protection early after stent implantation. Moreover, TAT precludes the advantages provided by the use of the latest and more potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in ACS patients. Here, we aimed to simulate and compare the expected coronary, cardioembolic, and hemorrhagic outcomes offered by DAT, TAT, or modern dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus one of the latest P2Y₁₂ inhibitors in AF patients early after an ACS. The comparison of numbers needed to treat to prevent major adverse events with the various antithrombotic regimens suggests that AF-ACS patients at high ischemic and hemorrhagic risk and at moderately low embolic risk (CHA₂DS₂VASc score 2-4) might safely withhold anticoagulation after revascularization for one month taking advantage of a modern DAPT, with a favorable risk-to-benefit ratio. In conclusion, this strategy, not sufficiently addressed in recent European and North American guidelines or consensus documents, adds to the spectrum of treatment options in these difficult patients; it might be the best choice in a substantial number of patients; and should be prospectively tested in a randomized controlled trial.

Safety and Efficacy of Double Antithrombotic Therapy With Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The optimal antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention is a topic of debate. We aimed at defining the efficacy and safety of double antithrombotic therapy with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) plus a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) against triple antithrombotic therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) added to a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), illustrating the pooled cumulative distribution of events, the ranking of different NOACs tested in NOAC+SAPT combination strategies, and the state of the current evidence in the field. Methods and Results Randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of trial-defined major adverse cardiac events. The primary safety end point was clinically significant bleeding. Secondary end points were the components of primary end points. Trial-level pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses, reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analyses, and trial sequential analysis were performed. Four randomized controlled trials (10 969 patients) were included. No differences were found in terms of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94-1.22), and the NOAC+SAPT strategy showed a lower rate of clinically significant bleeding compared with VKA + DAPT (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.80). These results were consistent in reconstructed Kaplan-Meier analyses. In the Bayesian network meta-analysis, different NOACs displayed diverse risk-benefit profiles. Trial sequential analyses suggest that the evidence for the similarity in major adverse cardiac events compared with VKA + DAPT and the bleeding risk reduction observed with NOAC+SAPT is likely to be conclusive. Conclusions NOAC+SAPT does not increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events and reduces the risk of bleeding compared with VKA + DAPT in AF patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Various NOACs may have different risk-benefit profiles in combination strategies. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42020151089.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of institutional dental professionals regarding management of patients taking oral antithrombotic medications

OBJECTIVES

Nowadays, there is an increasing number of patients prescribed regular antithrombotics. With these long-term medications, complications like postoperative bleeding are extremely important. Despite available guidelines on this issue, disparities in approach have been noticed. The current study aimed to explore the knowledge, attitude, and practice of dental professionals associated with a dental school in Saudi Arabia regarding the management of patients with oral antithrombotic medications.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on institutional-based dental professionals in Saudi Arabia. Fifty-six subjects, including 12 interns, 20 demonstrators, and 24 faculty members were included in the study. A modified semistructured questionnaire comprising 20 questions was used to gather respondents' knowledge, attitude, and practice related to oral antithrombotic medications. The chi-square test was applied for computing inferential statistics. Spearman correlation coefficient was performed for significant variables.

RESULTS

The faculty members had comparable knowledge (P = .010) as well as practice (P = .001) levels, and significantly outscored the other two groups. The interns displayed a significantly higher knowledge score over the demonstrators, whereas the reverse scenario was seen for practice scores. Interestingly, participants were frequently found to be significantly overestimating the bleeding risk for procedures falling into the "no risk" category. A significantly positive correlation regarding the professional level could be shown in all domains.

CONCLUSION

Professionals need to regularly update about novel anticoagulants, and should strictly comply with the established practice guidelines, thus improving the quality, safety, and value of dental health care.

Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Stroke remains one of the major public health problems in Japan. The number of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been steadily increasing with the aging of the Japanese population. Appropriate oral antithrombotic therapy is necessary to prevent AF-related stroke and bleeding complications.

AREAS COVERED

The authors summarize the Japanese guidelines for antithrombotic therapy, as well as the current status of antithrombotic therapy, and future perspectives for antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF in Japan.

EXPERT OPINION

Further improvement in adherence to guideline-recommended warfarin therapy may be difficult to achieve. After the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) into clinical practice, the proportion of patients with AF receiving oral anticoagulant therapy has increased in Japan. However, the proportion of patients treated with inappropriately reduced doses of DOACs has also been increasing. Inappropriate dose reduction of DOACs simply because of advanced age should be avoided to reduce stroke events in patients with AF. Among patients with AF receiving anticoagulant therapy who have coronary artery disease, inappropriately prolonged triple therapy or dual therapy should be avoided to reduce major bleeding complications. Shortening the duration of triple therapy or dual therapy may be promoted by simplified recommendations in the 2020-updated guidelines supported by solid evidence.

Evidence-Based Practical Guidance for the Antithrombotic Management in Patients With Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in 2020

This practical guidance, endorsed by the Brazilian Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis and The Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, the International Union of Angiology and the European Venous Forum, aims to provide physicians with clear guidance, based on current best evidence-based data, on clinical strategies to manage antithrombotic strategies in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Stroke prevention and guideline adherent antithrombotic treatment in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A real-world experience

Patients aged ≥75 years with the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) are at a higher risk of stroke and, according to recent recommendations, should receive oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. This study aimed to assess the recommended prophylactic antithrombotic therapy among patients with AF aged ≥ 75 years and its compliance with current guidelines. We also aimed to identify predisposing factors associated with the administration of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in elderly patients with AF.This was a retrospective, single-center observational study. Patients with AF aged ≥75 years hospitalized at a reference cardiology center from 2014 to 2017 were included in the analysis.Among the 1236 eligible patients (43.4% male; mean age, 82 years), OACs were recommended in 90.1% of cases. Of these, 59.8% of patients used NOACs and 40.2% used vitamin K antagonists. Additionally, 3.3% of patients received antiplatelet (AP) therapy and 2.5% were administered low molecular weight heparin. Only 4.5% of patients did not receive any anticoagulant treatment. The majority (89.9%) of patients received relevant prophylactic antithrombotic therapy according to current guidelines; only 1.4% were overtreated and 8.7% were undertreated. The significant predictors of NOAC therapy among patients treated with anticoagulants were non-permanent AF (odds ratio [OR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-2.18, P = .0001), age-by 5 years (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.16-1.52, P = .0001), and glomerular filtration rate-by 5 units (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.10, P = .0066).A high percentage of AF patients aged ≥75 years receive OACs, mainly NOACs. Most patients are treated according to the current guidelines; under treatment is primarily observed in patients receiving AP therapy. Non-permanent AF, age, and preservation of renal function are significant predictors of NOAC use.

Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Antithrombotic Therapy Following Revascularization Procedures in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify and summarize the clinical efficacy and safety of available antithrombotic therapies after peripheral endovascular or surgical revascularization in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Five databases were searched using free-text and Emtree/Mesh terms for PAD, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and antithrombotic therapies of interest (ie, single antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, and vitamin K antagonists). Randomized controlled trials were eligible for inclusion if they assessed the risk of thrombotic events (ie, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, limb ischemia, or limb amputation) or safety profile (ie, minor, moderate, major, or fatal bleeding events) after revascularization. In total, 16 RCTs were identified. Only a few studies reported on treatment effects of the investigated therapies. Myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, and amputation were reported in up to 2.3%, 2.3%, 5.6%, and 7.3% of patients, respectively. Bleeding events were observed in up to 8.4% (major) and 1.5% (fatal) of patients. Despite available treatments, patients with PAD undergoing revascularization remain at risk of thrombotic events. There is a need for new treatments that will help to optimize care for patients with symptomatic PAD undergoing revascularization.

Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis patients receiving antithrombotic therapy

Background

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) as a treatment for patients with acute cholecystitis has been shown to obtain high technical and clinical success rates and a low recurrence rate. However, the safety of EUS-GBD for patients receiving antithrombotic therapy (ATT) has not been proven. The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-GBD in patients receiving ATT.

Methods

Twelve patients with acute cholecystitis associated with gallstones who were receiving antithrombotic therapy and underwent EUS-GBD were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients with grade II or III cholecystitis who had failed endoscopic transpapillary GBD (ETGBD) or developed recurrence after multiple ETGBD procedures underwent urgent drainage by EUS-GBD. The primary outcome was the rate of bleeding complications after the procedure and the secondary outcomes were the technical and clinical success rates, complications, and recurrence.

Results

Eleven (91.6%) patients underwent EUS-GBD with continuation of ATT (at least 1 agent). Five of 12 patients (41.7%) were receiving more than 1 agent for ATT. The rate of bleeding complications was 0% and the technical success rate was 100%, even though some patients had high-grade (severe) cholecystitis and/or several underlying diseases. Early complications were found in 2 (16.7%) patients. The clinical success rate was 91.7% (11/12). There were no recurrences of cholecystitis during the follow-up period (mean 261 [range 5-650] days).

Conclusions

EUS-GBD yielded high technical and clinical success rates and a low recurrence rate. No patients receiving ATT developed bleeding complications. EUS-GBD might be a good option for patients on ATT.

The impact of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis - A single center experience

AIM

The risk of developing hemorrhagic complications during or after surgery in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy remains uncertain. Moreover, the impact of antithrombotic therapy under an acute inflammatory status is unclear. We investigated the impact of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

This record-based retrospective study included patients who underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between September 2015 and January 2019. Patients who received elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy, or gallbladder drainage before surgery were excluded. We evaluated the diseases for which antithrombotic therapy was administered, background characteristics, laboratory parameters and perioperative outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis. The primary outcomes were intraoperative bleeding, blood transfusion requirement, conversion to an open procedure, and postoperative complications, including bleeding.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-one patients (non-antithrombotic therapy, n = 92; antithrombotic therapy, n = 29) were analyzed. There were differences in age and American Association of Anesthesiologists class (P < .05), but not in the grade of acute cholecystitis (P = .19). There were no differences in the operation time (non-antithrombotic vs antithrombotic therapy: 142 [58-313] vs 146 minutes [65-373], P = .85), bleeding (17.5 mL [1-1400] vs 25 mL [1-1337], P = .58), blood transfusion requirement (n = 3 [3.2%] vs n = 2 [6.9%], P = .59) and the number of cases converted to open surgery (n = 8 [9%] vs n = 2 [7%], P = 1). The rates of postoperative complications, including bleeding, did not differ between the two groups and there was no mortality in either group.

CONCLUSION

Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be planned for patients receiving single antithrombotic therapy, similar to patients who were not receiving antithrombotic therapy.

[New possibilities of antithrombotic therapy improving prognosis in patients with stenosing atherosclerosis of carotid arteries]

The purpose of the COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial was to evaluate a regimen of a two-way impact on thrombus formation in patients presenting with ischaemic heart disease and peripheral artery diseases. The study included a total of 1,919 patients with stenosis of carotid arteries and 1,032 patients with a history of stroke. Many patients with disease of peripheral arteries (including carotid arteries) enrolled into the COMPASS trial appeared to have additional risk factors for stroke such as, for instance, current or former smoking, diabetes mellitus, or ischaemic heart disease. An additionally carried out analysis for strokes revealed that supplementing rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily to acetylsalicylic acid decreased the risk for the development of ischaemic stroke by 49% (p<0.001), without increasing the risk for haemorrhagic transformation on the background of combined therapy (HR=0.35; 95% CI: 0.13-0.99; p=0.04), whereas the risk for haemorrhagic strokes remained at a low level and did not differ between the groups (HR=1.49; 95% CI: 0.67-3.31; p=0.33). The composite risk for major ischaemic and haemorrhagic events was significantly lower in the group of combined therapy. Adding rivaroxaban to acetylsalicylic acid appeared to result in a decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with ischaemic heart disease and peripheral artery disease by 18%. Thus, the addition of rivaroxaban at a dose of 2.5 mg twice daily to acetylsalicylic acid made it possible to decrease the risks of both primary and secondary strokes, and hence may be considered in patients with significant stenoses of carotid arteries for primary prevention, whereas in patients with endured ischaemic stroke - for secondary prevention, as well as after open endovascular reconstructive operations on carotid arteries.

Profiling the eicosanoid networks that underlie the anti- and pro-thrombotic effects of aspirin

Aspirin prevents thrombosis by inhibiting platelet cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 activity and the production of thromboxane (Tx)A₂, a pro-thrombotic eicosanoid. However, the non-platelet actions of aspirin limit its antithrombotic effects. Here, we used platelet-COX-1-ko mice to define the platelet and non-platelet eicosanoids affected by aspirin. Mass-spectrometry analysis demonstrated blood from platelet-COX-1-ko and global-COX-1-ko mice produced similar eicosanoid profiles in vitro: for example, formation of TxA₂, prostaglandin (PG) F_2α, 11-hydroxyeicosatraenoic acid (HETE), and 15-HETE was absent in both platelet- and global-COX-1-ko mice. Conversely, in vivo, platelet-COX-1-ko mice had a distinctly different profile from global-COX-1-ko or aspirin-treated control mice, notably significantly higher levels of PGI₂ metabolite. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) predicted that platelet-COX-1-ko mice would be protected from thrombosis, forming less pro-thrombotic TxA₂ and PGE₂. Conversely, aspirin or lack of systemic COX-1 activity decreased the synthesis of anti-aggregatory PGI₂ and PGD₂ at non-platelet sites leading to predicted thrombosis increase. In vitro and in vivo thrombosis studies proved these predictions. Overall, we have established the eicosanoid profiles linked to inhibition of COX-1 in platelets and in the remainder of the cardiovascular system and linked them to anti- and pro-thrombotic effects of aspirin. These results explain why increasing aspirin dosage or aspirin addition to other drugs may lessen antithrombotic protection.

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome

Acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation are both common and can occur in the same patient. Combination therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation increases risk of bleeding. Where the two conditions coexist, careful consideration is needed to determine the optimal antithrombotic treatment to reduce the risks of future ischaemic events associated with both conditions. Choices can be made in intraprocedural anticoagulation, type and dosing of oral anticoagulant, duration of combination therapy, and selection of P2Y12 inhibitor including genetic testing. This review article provides an overview of the available evidence to support clinicians in finding the delicate balance between antithrombotic efficacy and bleeding risk in patients with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation.

Complications in skin grafts when continuing antithrombotic therapy prior to cutaneous surgery requiring skin grafting: an observational study

Use of anticoagulants is common and practice regarding continuation or discontinuation of the medication peri-operatively for cutaneous surgery lacks evidence-based consensus. Therefore, we aimed to do a prospective observational study with patients who were referred to cutaneous surgery and needed full thickness or split skin grafting and using antitrombotic or non-antitrombotic therapies. Data on patients characteristics, diagnosis, location of surgery and surgery performed, antithrombotic medication and complications in skin grafts were collected. Skin grafts were traced on a transparent film and areas of unhealed skin graft were marked. All patients were routinely followed-up on days 5-7 postoperative. Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare patients taking antitrombotic medication with patients receiving no antitrombotic therapy. In addition, associations were calculated for treatment with the different antithrombotic therapies. No severe bleeding requiring blood transfusion or re-operation was observed in this study. The results showed no statistically significant difference between patients who continued treatment with antithrombotic therapy compared with patients having no antithrombotic treatment regarding sub graft hematomas or graft take. Continuing antithrombotic monotheraphy with acetylsalicylic, clopidogrel, warfarin or fish oil in relations to cutaneous surgery do not seem to increase risk of haematoma or graft lost.