Patient-controlled intranasal analgesia: effective alternative to intravenous PCA for postoperative pain relief

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the nasal route for fentanyl administration in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) provides as effective postoperative analgesia as intravenous PCA.

METHODS

Patient-controlled intranasal or intravenous analgesia with fentanyl was investigated in 48 patients (ASA I-III) on the day of surgery (orthopedic, abdominal or thyroid) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study. Fentanyl was given in a bolus of 25 microg for intranasal and 17.5 microg for i.v. PCA, lockout interval six minutes. The first requested dose was doubled in both groups. Pain intensity (101-point numerical rating scale) and vital parameters were observed at 11 measurement points during the 240 min study. Patients were asked for side effects at every measurement point and for their satisfaction at the end of the study by the same investigator (J.M.).

RESULTS

Onset of analgesia, the first reduction in pain intensity on the numerical rating scale, was 21 +/- 11 min (range 15-45 min) in intranasal and 22 +/- 16 min (range 15-90 min) in i.v. PCA. Pain intensity was reduced from 55 +/- 11 to 11 +/- 10 in the intranasal group and from 53 +/- 8 to 11 +/- 6 in the i.v. PCA group. Vital parameters remained stable and side effects were comparable in both groups. The judgement "excellent" or "good" was given by 21 of 23 patients treated intranasally and 24 of 25 patients treated intravenously.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal PCA with fentanyl was an effective alternative to i.v. PCA in postoperative patients.

New developments in cancer pain therapy

This review will summarize some of the potentially useful new drugs and therapies, which have already been applied in clinical practice or will potentially become available for cancer pain management in the near future. Included will be an introduction to drugs, which effectively relieve the breakthrough pain, a group of new sustained release long-acting opioids, Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs), alpha-2 agonists, ion channel blockers, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, and new delivery systems.

Lack of secondary hyperalgesia and central sensitization in an acute sheep model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to determine the following in an experimental acute pain model in sheep: (1) whether multimodal analgesia with intravenous fentanyl and ketorolac was more effective than fentanyl alone; (2) whether secondary hyperalgesia (central sensitization) occurred in adjacent (foreleg) dermatomes after thoracic surgery; (3) whether ketorolac used preemptively influenced the development of secondary hyperalgesia after surgery.

METHODS

Changes in primary nociception were measured by increases to tolerated pressure, applied to the foreleg by a blunt pin, before foreleg withdrawal occurred. Changes to breath-to-breath interval and estimated end-tidal CO2 were used as indices of respiratory effects. Study 1 (n = 6) compared the paired responses to acute nociception after ketorolac (90 mg) or saline (control) pretreatment, followed by fentanyl (graded, 0 mg to 1.5 mg). Study 2 (n = 6) used a cross-over of ketorolac (90 mg) or saline (control) 24 hours and 1 hour, respectively, before a standardized thoracotomy incision, followed by antinociceptive testing with ketorolac (90 mg) and fentanyl (0.6 mg) daily over 4 days.

RESULTS

In study 1, fentanyl produced naloxone-antagonizable antinociception and respiratory depression. Ketorolac did not affect fentanyl antinociception, except for prolonging antinociception at the highest dose; it did not affect the respiratory effects. In study 2, preemptive ketorolac had no effect on the postoperative antinociceptive or respiratory effects of fentanyl. The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl were unaltered by ketorolac.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in this acute pain model found no significant evidence of a fentanyl-ketorolac interaction, of central sensitization as shown by secondary hyperalgesia, or of a preemptive analgesic effect.

[Intravenous sedation with target-controlled infusion (TCI) in patients with difficult airways]

Tracheal intubation was facilitated with an intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) in two patients with difficult airways. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol and fentanyl was used for sedation during placement of an ILM. An ILM was inserted smoothly. Spontaneous ventilation and oxygenation were well maintained throughout the induction. Both patients were satisfied with intravenous sedation using TCI for awake instrumentation of their airways.

Awareness during laryngoscopy and intubation: quantitating incidence following induction of balanced anesthesia with etomidate and cisatracurium as detected with the isolated forearm technique

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To measure the incidence of awareness during induction of anesthesia with etomidate and fentanyl, and to model its frequency as a function of dose of etomidate.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Anesthesia department of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

30 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing elective general surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned to one of three groups of etomidate (0.2 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, 0.4 mg/kg) and received fentanyl (2 microg/kg) and 2 x ED(95) of cisatracurium (0.1 mg/kg). Neuromuscular block was monitored with a peripheral nerve stimulator. Intubation was performed after maximum T(1)-depression. To identify awareness, the isolated forearm technique (IFT) was used. The IFT was performed by prompting the patient every 20 seconds. Only a verified response was considered a positive IFT response. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen/air and fentanyl.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Maximum neuromuscular block occurred after 352 +/- 96 seconds and intubation was performed 424 +/- 86 seconds after loss of consciousness (LOC). Awareness was dose dependent: 80% of patients receiving 0.2 mg/kg etomidate, 70% of patients receiving 0.3 mg/kg etomidate, and 20% of patients receiving 0.4 mg/kg etomidate had a positive IFT response. Awareness occurred in one patient 3 minutes after LOC, in 65% during laryngoscopy, and in 30% within the following 120 seconds. One patient had explicit recall without finding awareness unpleasant. Hemodynamic parameters did not differ between patients with a positive or a negative IFT response.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of awareness during bolus induction can be modeled as dose dependent. However, when combining a short-acting induction drug and a delayed-onset neuromuscular blocker, the continuous infusion of the hypnotic drug may prevent awareness during induction.

Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread use, little is known about the comparative pharmacokinetics of intrathecally administered opioids. The present study was designed to characterize the rate and extent of opioid distribution within cerebrospinal fluid, spinal cord, epidural space, and systemic circulation after intrathecal injection.

METHODS

Equal doses of morphine and alfentanil, fentanyl, or sufentanil were administered intrathecally (L3) to anesthetized pigs. Microdialysis probes were used to sample cerebrospinal fluid at L2, T11, T7, T3, and the epidural space at L2 every 5-10 min for 4 h. At the end of the experiment, spinal cord and epidural fat tissue were sampled, and each probe's recovery was determined in vitro. Using SAAM II pharmacokinetic modeling software (SAAM Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA), the data were fit to a 16-compartment model that was divided into four spinal levels, each of which consisted of a caternary arrangement of four compartments representing the spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid, epidural space, and epidural fat.

RESULTS

Model simulations revealed that the integral exposure (area under the curve divided by dose) of the spinal cord (i.e., effect compartment) to the opioids was highest for morphine because of its low spinal cord distribution volume and slow clearance into plasma The integral exposure of the spinal cord to the other opioids was relatively low, but for different reasons: alfentanil has a high clearance from spinal cord into plasma, fentanyl distributes rapidly into the epidural space and fat, and sufentanil has a high spinal cord volume of distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

The four opioids studied demonstrate markedly different pharmacokinetic behavior, which correlates well with their pharmacodynamic behavior.

Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia

PURPOSE

To compare the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique with the epidural technique with regard to time to initiate and manage, motor block, onset of analgesia and satisfaction during labour.

METHODS

Upon requesting analgesia, 50 healthy term parturients were randomized in a prospective, double-blind fashion to receive either CSE analgesia or lumbar epidural analgesia in the labour floor of a university hospital at an academic medical centre. The epidural group (n = 24) received bupivacaine 0.0625%-fentanyl 0.0002% with 0.05 ml in 10 ml local anesthetic sodium bicarbonate 8.4% and epinephrine 1:200,000. The CSE group (n = 26) received intrathecal 25 microg fentanyl and 2.5 mg bupivacaine. Additional analgesia was provided upon maternal request.

RESULTS

There were no differences (P>0.05) in time to perform either technique, motor blockade, or parturient satisfaction or in the number of times that the anesthesiologist was called to perform any intervention. Although the first sign of analgesia was not different between the two groups, the onset of complete analgesia was more rapid with the CSE technique (Visual Analogue Pain Score (VAPS) at five minutes < three: 26/26 vs. 17/24, P+/-0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although epidural analgesia with a low concentration of local anesthetic and opioid mixture takes longer to produce complete analgesia, it is a satisfactory alternative to CSE.

The role of 5-HT(1A)-receptors in fentanyl-induced bulbospinal inhibition of a spinal withdrawal reflex in the rabbit

The sural to gastrocnemius withdrawal reflex is inhibited after injection of the OP(3) (micro)-receptor-selective opioid fentanyl into the fourth ventricle of decerebrated rabbits. This effect is abolished by complete section of the spinal cord but not by the selective alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist RX 821002 (Clarke RW, Parry-Baggott C, Houghton AK, Ogilvie J. The involvement of bulbo-spinal pathways in fentanyl-induced inhibition of spinal withdrawal reflexes in the decerebrated rabbit. Pain 1998;78:197-207). We have now investigated the role of 5-HT(1A) receptors in mediating the descending inhibition activated by intraventricular fentanyl. In the control state, intraventricular fentanyl (3-30 microgram/kg) inhibited gastrocnemius reflex responses to a median of 34% of pre-drug levels. After intrathecal administration of the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (100 microgram), fentanyl reduced reflex responses to 83% of pre-fentanyl values, significantly less inhibition than in the control state. In a separate group of experiments, intravenous fentanyl (0.3-30 microgram/kg) depressed the sural-gastrocnemius reflex to 17% of pre-drug controls. This inhibition was not affected by intrathecal WAY-100635 (100 microgram), but combined administration of the 5-HT(1A) antagonist with RX 821002 (100 microgram) significantly reduced the effectiveness of i.v. fentanyl. After the highest dose reflexes were 37% of pre-fentanyl levels. These data show that the bulbospinal inhibition activated by fentanyl is mediated, at least in part, by activation of spinal 5-HT(1A) receptors. That blockade of these receptors failed to influence the inhibition induced by i.v. fentanyl might be taken to mean that the brain-stem action of fentanyl does not contribute significantly to the systemic actions of this opioid. A more probable explanation is that, in the preparation used in the present study, the bulbospinal and direct spinal actions of fentanyl occlude each other to produce an overall inhibition that is less than the sum of the two effects.

[Serotonin syndrome during fluoxetine poisoning in a patient taking moclobemide]

PURPOSE

To present a case of delayed serotonin syndome (SS), a less well-known adverse effect of fluoxetine intoxication.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 21-yr-old woman was admitted following voluntary intoxication with fluoxetine and benzodiazepines. At the time of admission, she was slightly drowsy and hypotonic but, eight hours later, she developed severe hypertonic coma despite blood concentrations of fluoxetine within the therapeutic range. Repeated toxicological analyses revealed the presence of moclobemide at non-measurable concentrations, suggesting earlier ingestion of this monoamine oxydase inhibitor. Having excluded all other likely causes of the neurological syndrome observed, a SS was postulated. Treatment was symptomatic with mechanical ventilation, sedation with thiopental and fentanyl, and neuromuscular block with pancuronium bromide. The patient recovered spontaneously 20 hr later.

CONCLUSION

Physicians managing patients presenting with fluoxetine intoxication must be aware of the potential risk of SS. Treatment is symptomatic, but SS may be severe and require vital support in the intensive care environment. Review of published reports does not allow the authors to recommend a specific anesthetic management.

Fentanyl self-administration in juvenile rats that were tolerant and dependent to fentanyl as infants

Human neonates and infants can become tolerant and dependent during continuous fentanyl or morphine administration. The long-term consequences in these individuals as juveniles and adults are unknown. This study compared fentanyl self-administration behavior in juvenile rats that were opioid naive or were exposed chronically to fentanyl as infants. Postnatal day 14 infant rats remained naive or were implanted with saline- or fentanyl-filled Alzet minipumps. After 72 h, fentanyl's antinociceptive potency was 3.0-fold lower in the fentanyl-infused rats. Naloxone precipitated withdrawal occurred only in the fentanyl-infused animals. Other similarly treated infant rats were allowed to mature into P42 juvenile rats before enrolling them in an oral fentanyl self-administration study. Rats from each group consumed significantly more fentanyl than quinine. However, those rats, tolerant and dependent to fentanyl as infants, did not self-administer more fentanyl than their opiate-naive littermates. The issue of whether fentanyl was consumed for its reinforcing properties was demonstrated when noncontingent administration of opiate antagonists significantly reduced fentanyl intake in another group of juvenile rats. These data indicate that fentanyl is consumed for its reinforcing properties, but that infant fentanyl tolerance and dependence did not predispose them to self-administer more fentanyl than opiate-naive animals.

Transdermal fentanyl in opioid-naive cancer pain patients: an open trial using transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of chronic cancer pain in opioid-naive patients and a group using codeine

To treat cancer pain, physicians often decide to jump directly from step 1 of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder to step 3. The use of transdermal fentanyl in patients with cancer pain who had either used no opioid before, or only codeine, is evaluated in the present trial. Both opioid-naive (N = 14) and codeine-using (N = 14) patients started with transdermal fentanyl in the lowest available delivery rate (25 microg/hr). Immediate-release oral morphine was present as "rescue" medication. Transdermal fentanyl provided good to excellent pain relief in the majority (68%) of these patients. During the study, 5 patients continued with 25 microg/hr, and the others used a higher dose. Clinically relevant respiratory depression was not observed. The common side effects of opioids were found; constipation was mentioned by 3 patients (11%). Transdermal fentanyl appeared a safe analgesic in these opioid-naive cancer pain patients. In this study, WHO step 2 could be skipped without untoward complications.

A comparison of epidural analgesia with 0.125% ropivacaine with fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor

We previously found that the extent of an epidural motor block produced by 0.125% ropivacaine was clinically indistinguishable from 0.125% bupivacaine in laboring patients. By adding fentanyl to the 0. 125% ropivacaine and bupivacaine solutions in an attempt to reduce hourly local anesthetic requirements, we hypothesized that differences in motor block produced by the two drugs may become apparent. Fifty laboring women were randomized to receive either 0. 125% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 microg/mL or an equivalent concentration of bupivacaine/fentanyl using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with settings of: 6-mL/hr basal rate, 5-mL bolus, 10-min lockout, 30-mL/h dose limit. Analgesia, local anesthetic use, motor block, patient satisfaction, and side effects were assessed until the time of delivery. No differences in verbal pain scores, local anesthetic use, patient satisfaction, or side effects between groups were observed; however, patients administered ropivacaine/fentanyl developed significantly less motor block than patients administered bupivacaine/fentanyl. Ropivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 microg/mL produces similar labor analgesia with significantly less motor block than an equivalent concentration of bupivacaine/fentanyl. Whether this statistical reduction in motor block improves clinical outcome or is applicable to anesthesia practices which do not use the PCEA technique remains to be determined.

IMPLICATIONS

By using a patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique, ropivacaine 0.125% with fentanyl 2 microg/mL produces similar analgesia with significantly less motor block than a similar concentration of bupivacaine with fentanyl during labor. Whether this statistical reduction in motor block improves clinical outcome or is applicable to anesthesia practices which do not use the patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique remains to be determined.

Trained nurses can provide safe and effective sedation for MRI in pediatric patients

PURPOSE

To determine the success rate, safety and complications using a standard protocol and trained nurses to provide sedation for MRI under the supervision of a radiologist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nurses were trained to provide sedation via a standard protocol for pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic MRI. Oral chloral hydrate (80-100 mg x kg(-1)) was used for children less than 18 mo of age. Older children received either 1-6 mg x kg(-1) pentobarbital i.v., with or without 1-2 microg x kg x hr(-1) fentanyl, or 25 mg x kg(-1) thiopental pr. Sedation was defined as successful if it allowed completion of the MRI without image distorting patient movement. The records of 572 MRIs performed on 488 pediatric patients (mean age 5+/-4 yr; age 2 mo-14 yr) from 1991 to July 1995 were reviewed to determine the success rate and complications using the sedation program.

RESULTS

Most, 91.8% (525/572), of the MRIs were successfully completed in 445 patients. The reasons for failure were inadequate sedation (45, 95.7%) and coughing (2, 4.2%). The failure rate was much higher before 1994 (38/272, 14%) than after (9/300, 3%; P<0.0001). Failure was more common if rectal thiopental was used (23/172, 14%) than intravenous pentobarbital (19/256, 7.4%; P<0.05). The failure rate was also high in patients with a history of a behavioural disorder (10/59, 17%). There were no deaths or unexpected admissions as a result of the sedation program.

CONCLUSION

A high success rate can be achieved as experience is gained using a standard protocol and trained nurses to sedate children for MRI.

Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a solid form of fentanyl that delivers the drug through the oral mucosa. The clinical utility of multiple doses of OTFC in the treatment of "breakthrough" cancer pain is under evaluation. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the pharmacokinetics of OTFC do not change with multiple dosing.

METHODS

Twelve healthy adult volunteers received intravenous fentanyl (15 microg/kg) or OTFC (three consecutive doses of 800 microg) on separate study sessions. Arterial blood samples were collected for determination of fentanyl plasma concentration by radioimmunoassay. The descriptive pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum concentration, minimum concentration, and time to maximum concentration) were identified from the raw data and subjected to a nonparametric analysis of variance. Population pharmacokinetic models for all subjects and separate models for each subject were developed to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters of fentanyl after multiple OTFC doses.

RESULTS

The shapes of the profiles of plasma concentration versus time for each dose of OTFC were grossly similar. No change was noted for maximum concentration or time to maximum concentration over the three doses, while minimum concentration did show a significantly increasing trend. Terminal half-lives for intravenous fentanyl and OTFC were similar. A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model adequately represented the central tendency of the data from all subjects. Individual subject data were best described by either two- or three-compartment pharmacokinetic models. These models demonstrated rapid and substantial absorption of OTFC that did not change systematically with time and multiple dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of OTFC were similar among subjects and did not change with multiple dosing. Multiple OTFC dosing regimens within the dosage schedule examined in this study can thus be formulated without concern about nonlinear accumulation.

Local anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a double-blind, prospective, randomized study

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of local anesthesia in decreasing intravenous analgesic requirements during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy with a second-generation lithotriptor was studied.

METHODS

Subcutaneous infiltration was performed before the procedure. Sixty-nine patients (ASA I-II) were randomly allocated into four groups. Lidocaine 1% plus epinephrine (5 microg/ml) were infiltrated subcutaneously in a group of patients with ureteral stones (group UL), and a group with renal stones (group RL). The same amount of saline was administered to a group of patients with ureteral stones (group UC), and a group with renal stones (group RC).

RESULTS

Patients with ureteral stones needed higher doses of intravenous analgesic. Neither patients with renal stones nor patients with ureteral stones administered local anesthetic required less intravenous analgesic than patients given placebo.

CONCLUSION

Local anesthesia did not decrease the requirement of intravenous doses of analgesics in patients treated with a second-generation lithotriptor (Dornier MPL 9000).

Constipation and the use of laxatives: a comparison between transdermal fentanyl and oral morphine

Constipation and the use of laxatives were investigated in patients with chronic cancer pain treated with oral morphine and transdermal fentanyl in an open sequential trial. Forty-six patients were treated with slow-release morphine 30-1000 mg/day for 6 days and 39 of these patients were switched to transdermal fentanyl 0.6-9.6 mg/day with a conversion ratio of 100:1. Median fentanyl doses increased from 1.2 to 3.0 mg/day throughout the 30-day transdermal treatment period. Twenty-three patients completed the study. Two patients died from the basic disease while treated with transdermal fentanyl, 12 patients were excluded for various reasons, and not enough data for evaluation were available for two patients. Mean pain intensity decreased slightly after conversion although the number of patients with breakthrough pain or requiring immediate-release morphine as a rescue medication was higher with transdermal fentanyl. The number of patients with bowel movements did not change after the opioid switch but the number of patients taking laxatives was reduced significantly from 78-87% of the patients per treatment day (morphine) to 22-48% (fentanyl). Lactulose was used mainly and was reduced most drastically, but other laxatives were also used less frequently. In this study transdermal fentanyl was associated with a significantly lower use of laxatives compared to oral morphine. The difference in the degree of constipation between the two analgesic regimens should be confirmed in a randomized double-blind study that takes into account both constipation and use of laxatives.

A comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia following gynaecological surgery with and without a background infusion

We conducted a randomised, controlled study to investigate the effect of adding a background infusion to patient-controlled epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief. Forty-two patients scheduled for elective lower abdominal gynaecological surgery received patient-controlled epidural analgesia postoperatively using a mixture of 0.2% ropivacaine and 2.0 microg x ml-1 fentanyl. Patients in group B (n = 20) were given a background infusion of 5 ml x h-1, whereas those in group N (n = 21) were not. There was no difference in pain scores or patient satisfaction scores between the two groups. Patients in group B had a higher total drug consumption (156.8 +/- 34.8 ml vs. 89.5 +/- 41.0 ml; p < 0.0001) and incidence of side-effects (71.4% vs. 30.0%; p = 0.007). Motor blockade during the 24-h study period was also greater in group B (median [range] area under the curve 7.5 [0.0-39.0] h vs. 3.0 [0.0-36.0] h; p = 0.035). We conclude that the addition of a background infusion to patient-controlled epidural anaesthesia is not recommended as it confers no additional benefits.

A direct search procedure to optimize combinations of epidural bupivacaine, fentanyl, and clonidine for postoperative analgesia

BACKGROUND

The authors applied an optimization model (direct search) to find the optimal combination of bupivacaine dose, fentanyl dose, clonidine dose, and infusion rate for continuous postoperative epidural analgesia.

METHODS

One hundred ninety patients undergoing 48-h thoracic epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery were studied. Combinations of the variables of bupivacaine dose, fentanyl dose, clonidine dose, and infusion rate were investigated to optimize the analgesic effect (monitored by verbal descriptor pain score) under restrictions dictated by the incidence and severity of side effects. Six combinations were empirically chosen and investigated. Then a stepwise optimization model was applied to determine subsequent combinations until no decrease in the pain score after three consecutive steps was obtained.

RESULTS

Twenty combinations were analyzed. The optimization procedure led to a reduction in the incidence of side effects and in the mean pain scores. The three best combinations of bupivacaine dose (mg/h), fentanyl dose (microg/h), clonidine dose (microg/h), and infusion rate (ml/h) were: 9-21-5-7, 8-30-0-9, and 13-25-0-9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the variables investigated, the aforementioned combinations may be the optimal ones to provide postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery. Using the direct search method, the enormous number of possible combinations of a therapeutic strategy can be reduced to a small number of potentially useful ones. This is accomplished using a scientific rather than an arbitrary procedure.

Cost comparison between three different general anaesthetic techniques for elective arthroscopy of the knee

INTRODUCTION

We compared three anaesthetic techniques for elective knee arthroscopy with special reference to cost-effectiveness.

METHOD

Seventy-five ASA I-II patients having elective arthroscopy of the knee joint were randomised to receive an anaesthetic technique based on propofol, fentanyl for induction followed by sevoflurane in oxygen:nitrous oxide (1:2 l/min) for maintenance of one of two intravenous techniques: propofol alfentanil or propofol-remifentanil infusions in combination with oxygen in air.

RESULTS

All patients had an uncomplicated course. No differences were seen with regard to emergence, postoperative pain or emesis or time to discharge. The anaesthetic technique based on sevoflurane was associated with the lowest cost US$ 14.7 as compared to US$ 18 for the propfol/alfentanil and US$ 19.9 for the propofol/remifentanil technique, including both cost for wastage as well as premedication and other fixed drug costs. Looking only at the anaesthetic drugs consumed, the cost per minute was US$ 0.56 for sevoflurane/nitrous oxide as compared to US$ 0.68 and 0.63 per minute for the propofol/alfentanil and proprofol/remifentanil, respectively. When the cost for wastage was taken into account, the difference in mean anaesthetic drug cost was more pronounced: the sevoflurane anaesthetic technique US$ 0.58, the propofol/alfentanil US$ 0.74 and the propofol/remifentanil US$ 0.84 per minute respectively.

CONCLUSION

From a cost-minimisation point of view, anaesthesia based on sevoflurane in oxygen:nitrous oxide is the technique of choice.

Preemptive analgesia with tramadol and fentanyl in pediatric neurosurgery

Preemptive analgesia is based on administration of an analgesic before a painful stimulus generates, so as to prevent the subsequent rebound mechanism. Tissue injury results in disruption of the processing mechanisms of noxious stimuli afferent to the CNS (central nervous system) by way of an increase of inputs in the spinal cord. These reactions may be reduced by the administration of opioids. Few studies on preemptive analgesia with opioids in children are available, and none of them is concerned with pediatric neurosurgery. Tramadol and fentanyl are synthetic opioids which are relatively new and act through the activation of pain-inhibitory mechanisms. We conducted a randomized, prospective trial on the preemptive effects in children of these two analgesic drugs, administered according to three different protocols: tramadol as a bolus (1 mg/kg); tramadol by continuous infusion (150 microg/kg per h); fentanyl by continuous infusion (2 microg/kg per h). In all, 42 children undergoing major neurosurgical operations were enrolled in the study, 14 in each treatment group. Each treatment was started at the induction of general anesthesia and continued throughout the entire duration of the operation. The postoperative pain evaluation was conducted in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit at the end of the surgical operations and involved comparison of any changes in behavioral (AFS scale and CHEOPS score) and hemodynamic (heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, oxygen saturation, O(2) and CO(2) partial pressure) parameters. Only 2 children, both in group A, needed further drug administration postoperatively. No significant side effects were noticed in any of the three groups, except that in group A there was a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting. Tramadol efficacy seems to be better when it is administered in continuous infusion; this treatment modality also leads to fewer adverse effects. Fentanyl, in contrast, proved to be superior to tramadol in the treatment of postoperative pain. In conclusion, preemptive analgesia is a valid technique for the treatment of acute pain in children undergoing major neurosurgical operations.

Local administration of mu or kappa opioid agonists attenuates capsaicin-induced thermal hyperalgesia via peripheral opioid receptors in rats

RATIONALE

By acting on peripheral opioid receptors, opioid agonists can attenuate nociceptive responses induced by a variety of agents.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to characterize capsaicin-induced thermal hyperalgesia in rats and to evaluate the hypothesis that local administration of either mu or kappa opioid agonists (fentanyl and U50,488, respectively) can attenuate capsaicin-induced nociception.

METHODS

Capsaicin was administered s. c. in the tail of rats to evoke a nociceptive response, which was measured by the warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure. Either fentanyl or U50,488 was co-administered with capsaicin in the tail to evaluate local antinociceptive effects. In addition, the local antagonism study was performed to confirm the site of action of both opioid agonists.

RESULTS

Capsaicin (0.3-10 microg) dose dependently produced thermal hyperalgesia manifested as reduced tail-withdrawal latencies in 45 degrees C water. Co-administration of either fentanyl (0.32-3.2 microg) or U50,488 (10-100 microg) with capsaicin (3 microg) attenuated capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, this local antinociception was antagonized by small doses (10-100 microg) of an opioid antagonist, quadazocine, applied s.c. in the tail. However, the locally effective doses of quadazocine, when applied s.c. in the back (i.e., around the scapular region), did not antagonize either fentanyl or U50,488.

CONCLUSIONS

In this experimental pain model, activation of peripheral mu or kappa opioid receptors can attenuate capsaicin-induced thermal hyperalgesia in rats. It supports the notion that peripheral antinociception can be achieved by local administration of analgesics into the injured tissue without producing central side effects.

Remifentanil-based anesthesia versus a propofol technique for otologic surgical procedures

Otologic procedures require a still surgical field and are associated with a 50% incidence of emetic symptoms. Propofol reduces nausea and vomiting but not intraoperative movement. This study compares a remifentanil/propofol anesthetic to a propofol/fentanyl combination to determine which provides the best perioperative conditions for otologic microsurgery. Eighty healthy patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the anesthetic combinations. Demographic data, hemodynamic variables, movement, and bispectral index monitoring values in addition to anesthetic emergence, nausea, vomiting, pain, and other recovery variables were compared between groups with appropriate statistical methods. Both groups were similar. Times to eye opening (7.7 +/- 0.7 vs 12.4 +/- 1.2 minutes) and extubation (9.8 +/- 0.9 vs 12.4 +/- 1.0 minutes) were shorter with remifentanil. This group also had lower hemodynamic variables and movement (23% vs 65%) under anesthesia. Postoperative pain was mild in both groups, but remifentanil patients had more than the propofol group. All other postoperative parameters were similar. Remifentanil-based anesthesia produces better hemodynamic stability, less movement, and faster emergence after otologic surgery, with propofol's antiemetic effect, for the same cost.