Identifying Parameters Associated with Delayed Diagnosis in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Data from the European Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis

Objective

To identify the parameters associated with self-reported diagnostic delay (DD) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients across Europe.

Methods

Data from 2652 patients from 13 countries who participated in the European Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (EMAS) were collected through an online survey (2017–2018). DD was calculated as the difference between age at diagnosis and age at symptom onset reported by participants. Associations between DD and sociodemographic characteristics, as well as disease-related factors were explored through univariable and multivariable linear regression analysis.

Results

Average DD was 7.4  (8.4) years with a variation between countries. The variables associated with longer DD in the final multivariable regression model were: younger age at symptom onset (b = −0.26; 95% CI: −0.28, −0.23), female gender (b = 1.34; 95% CI: 0.73, 1.96) and higher number of health-care professionals (HCPs) seen before diagnosis (b = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.43). There was a significant interaction between the female gender and the number of HCPs seen before diagnosis. A substantial variation of the DD across European countries was observed.

Conclusion

In this sample of axSpA patients, average DD was greater than 7 years. Younger age at symptom onset, female gender, higher number of HCPs seen before diagnosis, and being diagnosed by rheumatologist were the parameters associated with a longer DD in axSpA. These findings indicate a need for continuing efforts dedicated to recognition of patients with a high probability of axSpA on the level of non-rheumatology specialists and facilitating referral to a rheumatologist for timely diagnosis.

P190 Secukinumab improves back pain, morning stiffness, fatigue and physical function in tumour necrosis factor inhibitor-naive patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: results from a randomised controlled Phase 3 study

Background/Aims 

Patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) suffer from comparable disease burden to patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS)/radiographic axSpA, including inflammatory back pain, morning stiffness, fatigue and reduced spinal mobility. Secukinumab 150 mg has demonstrated sustained improvement in signs and symptoms in patients with AS over 4 years. This post-hoc analysis evaluates the effect of secukinumab on back pain, morning stiffness, fatigue and physical function in tumour necrosis factor inhibitor-naive (TNFi-naive) patients with nr-axSpA from the PREVENT study (NCT02696031).

Methods 

Patients with nr-axSpA receiving either subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg with loading dose (LD), without loading dose (NL) or placebo (PBO) were included. Patients with inadequate response to treatment could switch to open-label secukinumab 150 mg or standard of care (TNFi) after Week 20 based on clinical judgement of disease activity. Nocturnal back pain scores (VAS [0-100]; ASAS outcome component), morning stiffness (overall level; VAS [0-10] ASAS outcome component), FACIT-Fatigue and SF-36 PCS scores were assessed. Continuous values were imputed as mixed-effects model repeated measures for mean change from baseline through Week 16 and as observed at Week 52. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed using non-responder imputation through Week 16 and as observed at Week 52.

Results 

Overall, 501 TNFi-naive patients were included (LD, N = 164; NL, N = 166; PBO, N = 171). Up to 64% of PBO and approximately of 50% secukinumab-treated patients switched to open-label secukinumab 150 mg between Week 20 and Week 52. Secukinumab-treated patients vs PBO (P < 0.05) demonstrated a higher mean reduction from baseline in nocturnal back pain and morning stiffness at Weeks 4 and 16, which was sustained at Week 52 (Table 1). Improvements in secukinumab-treated patients vs PBO (P < 0.05) were reported in FACIT-Fatigue and SF-36 PCS scores from baseline at Weeks 16 and 52 (Table 1). At Week 16, a higher proportion of secukinumab-treated patients met the MCID criteria vs PBO (P < 0.05) across efficacy assessments, which was sustained at Week 52.

Conclusion 

Secukinumab provided clinically meaningful improvement in back pain, morning stiffness, fatigue and physical function in TNFi-naive patients with nr-axSpA over 52 weeks.

Disclosure 

H. Marzo-Ortega: Consultancies; H.M-O. is a consultant for AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; H.M-O. is a member of speakers' buraeu for AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda and UCB. Grants/research support; H.M-O. has received research support from Janssen and Novartis. A. Deodhar: Consultancies; A.D. is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Grants/research support; A.D. has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. R. Alonso Blanco: Consultancies; R.A.B. has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD. Member of speakers’ bureau; R.A.B. is a member of the speakers' bureau for AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, UCB Pharma, MSD and Lilly. Grants/research support; R.A.B. has received grant/research support from AbbVie, MSD and Roche. H. Kameda: Consultancies; H.K. is a consultant for AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi and UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; H.K. has received speakers' bureau fees from: AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, BMS, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis and Pfizer. Grants/research support; H.K. has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Novartis. A. Kivitz: Consultancies; A.K. has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron, Sun Pharma Advanced Research and Gilead Sciences. Shareholder/stock ownership; A.K. is a shareholder of Pfizer, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences and Novartis. Member of speakers’ bureau; A.K. is a member of the speakers' bureau for Celgene, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Genzyme, Flexion and AbbVie. D. Poddubnyy: Consultancies; D.P. has received consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Roche. Honoraria; D.P. has received speaker fees from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB and Roche. Grants/research support; D.P. has received research grants from AbbVie, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. M. Magrey: Consultancies; M.M. is a consultant for Eli Lily and Novartis. Grants/research support; M.M. has received grant/research support from AbbVie, UCB and Amgen. J. Wang: Corporate appointments; J.W. is an employee of Novartis. S. Haemmerle: Corporate appointments; S.H. is an employee of Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; S.H. has ownership of Novartis stock. A. Shete: Corporate appointments; A.S. is an employee of Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; A.S. is a shareholder of Novartis. J. Braun: Consultancies; J.B. is a consultant for AbbVie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB pharma and Eli Lilly. Member of speakers’ bureau; J.B. has received speakers' bureau fees from AbbVie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, EBEWE Pharma, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB and Eli Lilly. Grants/research support; J.B. has received research support from AbbVie (Abbott), Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Centocor, Chugai, Medac, MSD (Schering-Plough), Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer (Wyeth), Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB and Eli Lilly. P190 Table 1:Mean change from baseline up to Week 52 in the TNFi-naive populationEndpointsWeekSecukinumab LD (N = 164)Secukinumab NL (N = 166)PBO(N = 171)Nocturnal back painaBLd70.81 (17.86)70.86 (16.03)70.29 (14.67)4e-24.35 (2.00)§-23.07 (1.99)‡-16.67 (1.96)16e-30.93 (2.23)†-31.91 (2.22)†-20.27 (2.19)52f-40.9 (31.03)-43.3 (29.93)-Overall level of morning stiffnessaBLd7.59 (1.66)7.31 (1.95)7.11 (1.60)4e-2.62 (0.20)§-2.49 (0.20)§-1.73 (0.20)16e-3.30 (0.22)†-3.34 (0.22)†-2.20 (0.22)52f-4.55 (3.00)-4.52 (2.74)-FACIT-Fatigueb,cBLd21.79 (9.28)24.85 (10.60)23.96 (9.87)16e9.10 (0.74)†8.61 (0.74)§5.25 (0.73)52f11.97 (11.70)11.05 (10.95-SF-36 PCSb,cBLd32.88 (7.72)33.83 (7.06)33.68 (6.69)16e7.17 (0.61)†6.66 (0.61)§4.26 (0.60)52f10.04 (10.78)9.06 (9.60)-†P<0.001,§P < 0.01 and‡P < 0.05 vs PBO.aAt Week 52, number of evaluable patients was 139 for LD and 146 for NL groups; number of patients switched to open-label secukinumab 150 mg was 67 for LD and 68 for NL groups for both pain and morning stiffness;bAt Week 52, number of evaluable patients was 146 for LD and 154 for NL groups; number of patients switched to open-label secukinumab 150 mg were 69 for LD and 71 for NL groups for fatigue and physical function;cFACIT-Fatigue and SF-36 PCS was assessed at baseline and Weeks 16 and 52;dMean (SD) presented at BL (as observed);eMean change from BL (SE) using MMRM at Weeks 4 and 16. For continuous variables, MMRM analysis was only conducted until Week 20.fMean change from BL (SD) as observed at Week 52. BL, baseline; FACIT, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; LD, with loading dose; MMRM, mixed-effects model repeated measures; N, number of randomised patients; n, number of evaluable patients; NA, not available; NL, without loading dose; PBO, placebo; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error; SF36 PCS, Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary; TNFi, tumour necrosis factor inhibitor.

P188 Secukinumab provides significant improvement of spinal pain and lowers disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: 24-week results from a randomised controlled Phase 3b trial

Background/Aims 

SKIPPAIN (NCT03136861) is the first randomised controlled study involving a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, with a primary endpoint of spinal pain at Week 8 in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA; ankylosing spondylitis [AS] and non-radiographic [nr]-axSpA). We present the 24-week results of secukinumab in reducing spinal pain and disease activity following step-up dosing.

Methods 

This double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3b study enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with active disease (BASDAI ≥4; average spinal pain numerical rating scale [NRS] score >4 at baseline; inadequate response to ≥ 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ≥4 weeks). Patients were randomised (3:1) to subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg or placebo weekly followed by every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 4. At Week 8, placebo patients were re-randomised to secukinumab 150 or 300 mg Q4W. Patients originally randomised to secukinumab 150 mg were classified as responders or non-responders (spinal pain NRS score <4 or ≥ 4, respectively) at Week 8. Responders were re-assigned to continue doubleblind secukinumab 150 mg Q4W (Arm A1). Non-responders were re-randomised to double-blind secukinumab 150 mg (Arm A2) or a step-up dose of 300 mg (Arm A3) Q4W. Treatment was up to Week 24. Primary endpoint: proportion of patients achieving an average spinal pain score <4 on a 0-10 NRS with secukinumab vs placebo at Week 8.

Results 

380 axSpA patients (269/380 [70.8%] AS; 111/380 [29.2%] nr-axSpA) were randomised to secukinumab 150 mg (N = 285) or placebo (N = 95). The primary endpoint was met (proportion of spinal pain NRS [average] score responders: 32% vs 20%; odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.9 [1.1-3.3] favouring secukinumab vs placebo; P < 0.05). Further reductions in spinal pain occurred at Week 24, especially in those initially randomised to placebo and switched to active drug. Pronounced improvements were observed in other disease activity measurements (Table 1). Numerically, more patients achieved ASDAS low disease activity at Week 24 post-secukinumab dose escalation (Arm A3) vs those remaining on the same dose (Arm A2).

Conclusion 

Secukinumab provided rapid, significant improvement in spinal pain and led to low disease activity in axSpA patients. Secukinumab dose escalation might be beneficial for patients not responding fully to the starting dose. P188 Table 1:Spinal pain and ASDAS-CRP scores at Weeks 8 and 24Week 8SEC 150 mg (N = 285)PBO (N = 95)Change from baseline in spinal pain NRS score (total), mean (SD) [n]-2.6 (2.5) [279]-1.5 (2.2) [92]Change from baseline in ASDAS-CRP score, mean (SD) [n]-1.2 (1.0) [271]-0.5 (0.8) [89]Week 24Active treatment group (SEC treatment starting at baseline)PBO switchers group (SEC treatment starting at Week 8)Arm A1 (SEC 150 R-150) N = 90Arm A2 (SEC 150 NR-150) N = 94Arm A3 (SEC 150 NR-300) N = 94Arm B1 (PBO-SEC 150) N = 45Arm B2 (PBO-SEC 300) N = 44Change from Week 8 in spinal pain NRS score (total), mean (SD) [n]-0.4 (1.5) [88]-2.1 (2.2) [93]-1.9 (2.2) [91]-2.5 (2.6) [45]-2.9 (2.6) [43]Change from baseline in ASDAS-CRP score, mean (SD) [n]-2.2 (1.0) [86]-1.2 (1.0) [93]-1.5 (1.0) [92]-1.5 (1.1) [44]-1.8 (0.9) [43]Arm A1=SEC responder to SEC 150 mg at Week 8 (SEC 150 R-150); Arm A2=SEC non-responder to SEC 150 mg at Week 8 (SEC 150 NR-150); Arm A3=SEC non-responder to SEC 300 mg at Week 8 (SEC 150 NR-300); Arm B1=Placebo patients to SEC 150 mg (PBO-SEC 150); Arm B2=Placebo patients to SEC 300 mg (PBO-SEC 300). ASDAS-CRP, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein; N, total number of patients randomised; n, number of evaluable patients; NR, non-responders; NRS, numerical rating scale; PBO, placebo; R, responders; SD, standard deviation; SEC, secukinumab.

Disclosure 

H. Marzo-Ortega: Consultancies; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB. Grants/research support; Janssen, Novartis. C. Perella: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis Stock. D. Poddubnyy: Consultancies; Consultant/speaker for: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer. E. Pournara: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis Stock. A. Zielińska: Consultancies; Novartis, Pfizer. A. Baranauskaite: Consultancies; AbbVie. Member of speakers’ bureau; Novartis, AbbVie, Amgen, Roche, KRKA. S. Sadhu: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. B. Schulz: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. M. Rissler: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis Stock.

Assessment of radiographic sacroiliitis in anteroposterior lumbar vs conventional pelvic radiographs in axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate the reliability and validity of radiographic sacroiliitis assessment in anteroposterior (AP) lumbar radiographs compared with conventional pelvic radiographs in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Patients from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort were selected based on the availability of pelvic and AP lumbar radiographs with visible SI joints at baseline and year 2. Two readers scored the images independently in a random order according to the modified New York criteria. The sacroiliitis sum score was calculated as the mean of both readers. Patients were classified as radiographic (r-)axSpA if radiographic sacroiliitis of grade ≥2 bilaterally or grade ≥3 unilaterally was present in the opinion of both readers and as non-radiographic (nr-)axSpA otherwise. The reliability and validity of sacroiliitis assessment in AP lumbar radiographs was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), absolute agreement and κ statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 226 sets of radiographs were scored from 113 patients included in the study. The ICC for the sacroiliitis sum score was 0.91 at both baseline and year 2. A total of 62 (54.9%) and 55 (48.7%) patients were classified as r-axSpA at baseline and 65 (57.5%) and 60 (53.1%) patients at year 2 based on evaluation of pelvic and AP lumbar radiographs, respectively. The absolute agreement between the methods on the classification was 84.9 and 85.0% at baseline and year 2, respectively, with the κ of 0.70 at both time points.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic sacroiliitis can be assessed in AP lumbar radiographs with a similar reliability to conventional pelvic radiographs.

The risk of malignancy in patients with secukinumab-treated psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: analysis of clinical trial and postmarketing surveillance data with up to five years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Data on the use of biologic therapy and malignancy risk are inconsistent due to limited long-term robust studies.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the malignancy risk in patients with secukinumab-treated psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

This integrated safety analysis from both the secukinumab clinical trial programme and postmarketing safety surveillance data included any patient receiving at least one approved dose of secukinumab with a maximum of 5 years of follow-up. Safety analyses evaluated the rate of malignancy using exposure-adjusted incidence rates [EAIR; incidence rates per 100 patient treatment-years (PTY)]. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were reported using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database as a reference population. Crude incidence of malignancy was also reported using postmarketing surveillance data.

RESULTS

Safety data from 49 clinical trials with secukinumab-treated patients were included: 10 685 patients with psoriasis, 2523 with PsA and 1311 with AS. Across indications over a 5-year period, the EAIR of malignancy was 0·85 per 100 PTY [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·74-0·98] in secukinumab-treated patients, corresponding to 204 patients per 23 908 PTY. Overall, the observed vs. expected number of malignancies from secukinumab clinical trial data were comparable, as indicated by an SIR of 0·99 (95% CI 0·82-1·19) across indications. The estimated crude cumulative incidence reporting rate per 100 PTY for malignancy was 0·27 in the postmarketing surveillance data across indications with a cumulative exposure of 285 811 PTY.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large safety analysis, the risk of malignancy was low for up to 5 years of secukinumab treatment. These data support the long-term use of secukinumab in these indications.

Deep learning for detection of radiographic sacroiliitis: achieving expert-level performance

BACKGROUND

Radiographs of the sacroiliac joints are commonly used for the diagnosis and classification of axial spondyloarthritis. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an artificial neural network for the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis as a manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Conventional radiographs of the sacroiliac joints obtained in two independent studies of patients with axSpA were used. The first cohort comprised 1553 radiographs and was split into training (n = 1324) and validation (n = 229) sets. The second cohort comprised 458 radiographs and was used as an independent test dataset. All radiographs were assessed in a central reading session, and the final decision on the presence or absence of definite radiographic sacroiliitis was used as a reference. The performance of the neural network was evaluated by calculating areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) as well as sensitivity and specificity. Cohen's kappa and the absolute agreement were used to assess the agreement between the neural network and the human readers.

RESULTS

The neural network achieved an excellent performance in the detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis with an AUC of 0.97 and 0.94 for the validation and test datasets, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for the cut-off weighting both measurements equally were 88% and 95% for the validation and 92% and 81% for the test set. The Cohen's kappa between the neural network and the reference judgements were 0.79 and 0.72 for the validation and test sets with an absolute agreement of 90% and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Deep artificial neural networks enable the accurate detection of definite radiographic sacroiliitis relevant for the diagnosis and classification of axSpA.

Joint anatomy in axial spondyloarthritis: strong associations between sacroiliac joint form variation and symptomatic disease

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this investigation was to determine the prevalence of variant sacroiliac joint forms in symptomatic patients with mechanical joint disease (MJD) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) compared with control patients.

METHOD

A total of 973 patients were included in this cross-sectional study (95 axSpA; 61 MJD; 817 controls); clinical diagnosis, age and gender were noted. An established scoring system was used to classify joint forms on computed tomography scans of the pelvis. Frequencies of joint forms were compared between groups (axial spondyloarthritis; mechanical joint disease; controls).

RESULTS

Patients with MJD exhibited the highest proportion of atypical joints (80.3% in MJD vs 44.1% in axSpA and 37.5% in controls; p< 0.001). Overall, females had a significantly higher proportion of atypical joints than men (65.0% vs 17.8%; p< 0.001); proportions of atypical joints were significantly higher in males with symptomatic joint disease than in male controls: 32.2% in axSpA, 55.0% in MJD, 13.9% in controls; p≤ 0.001. Two specific joint forms were significantly more prevalent in symptomatic patients than in controls: the iliosacral complex (16.2% vs 4.2%; p< 0.001) and the crescent-shaped ilium (9.1% vs 2.8%; p< 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate a strong association between atypical joint forms and symptomatic joint disease.

Differential diagnostic value of rheumatic symptoms in patients with Whipple's disease

Most patients with Whipple’s disease have rheumatic symptoms. The aim of our prospective, questionnaire-based, non-interventional clinical study was to assess whether these symptoms are useful in guiding the differential diagnosis to the rheumatic disorders. Forty patients with Whipple’s disease, followed by 20 patients for validation and 30 patients with rheumatoid-, 21 with psoriatic-, 15 with palindromic- and 25 with axial spondyloarthritis were recruited for the present investigation. Patients with Whipple’s disease and patients with rheumatic disorders were asked to record rheumatic symptoms on pseudonymized questionnaires. The data obtained were subjected to multiple logistic regression analysis. Episodic pain with rapid onset, springing from joint to joint was most common in patients with palindromic arthritis and second most common and somewhat less conspicuous in Whipple’s disease. Continuous pain in the same joints predominated in patients with rheumatoid-, psoriatic-, and axial spondyloarthritis. Multiple logistic equations resulted in a predicted probability for the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease of 43.4 ± 0.19% (M ± SD) versus a significantly lower probability of 23.8 ± 0.19% (M ± SD) in the aggregate of patients with rheumatic disorders. Mean area under the curve (AUC) ± SD was 0.781 ± 0.044, 95% CI 0.695–0.867, asymptotic significance p < 0.001. The logistic equations predicted probability for the diagnosis of Whipple’s disease in the initial series of 40 patients of 43.4 ± 0.19% was not significantly different in the subsequent 20 patients of 38.2 ± 0.28% (M ± SD) (p = 0.376). The data may be useful in a predictive algorithm for diagnosing Whipple’s disease. The project is registered as clinical study DRK S0001566.

Impact of age, sex, and joint form on degenerative lesions of the sacroiliac joints on CT in the normal population

Degeneration of the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) is a common finding, while its underlying cause and development remain incompletely understood. The aim of this investigation was to describe the spatial distribution of degenerative SIJ changes across age groups and to investigate for the first time their relationship to anatomical form and sex. For this IRB-approved investigation, demographic data of 818 patients without SIJ disease were retrieved from electronic patient records. High-resolution computed tomography (CT) datasets of all patients were analysed retrospectively for seven predefined age groups (ten-year increments, from < 25 to ≥ 75). A structured scoring system was applied to assess sclerosis, osteophytes, joint space alterations, and anatomical form. Chi-square tests were used to compare frequencies of degenerative lesions, and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between demographic data, anatomical form, and the presence of structural lesions. Sclerosis and osteophytes were common findings, with an overall prevalence of 45.7% and 46.8%, respectively. Female sex had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.27) for the presence of ventral osteophytes and of 4.42 (95% CI: 2.77-7.04) for dorsal osteophytes. Atypical joint forms were significantly more prevalent in women with 62.1% vs. 14.1% in men (p < 0.001). Accessory joints increased the likelihood of dorsal sclerosis (OR 2.735; 95% CI 1.376-5.436) while a typical joint form decreased its likelihood (OR 0.174; 95% CI 0.104-0.293). Sex and anatomical joint form have a major impact on the development of degenerative lesions of the SIJs and their spatial distribution.

Diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis: estimation of the disease probability in patients with a priori different likelihoods of the diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of spondyloarthritis (SpA) parameters and their combination for the diagnosis of axial SpA in patients with an a priori different probability of the diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 361 patients with chronic back pain and suspicion of axial SpA (181 referred by primary care physicians or orthopaedists, 180 recruited via an online screening tool) received a structured rheumatologic examination, which resulted into a diagnosis or exclusion of axial SpA. The prevalence of axial SpA indicating the pre-test probability was 40% in the physician-referred subgroup and 20% in the online screening subgroup. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios for SpA features were determined in both subgroups and the respective post-test probabilities of axial SpA were calculated.

RESULTS

The relative diagnostic value of single SpA features varied substantially between the groups with different referral pathways. For instance, HLA-B27 positivity increased the probability of the presence of axial SpA by 35% to 55% in online-screened patients and by 22% to 62% in physician-referred patients. The absence of HLA-B27 resulted in a sharp decrease in the probability of the presence of axial SpA in physician-referred patients (from 40% to 6%). This decrease was less sharp in the online screening group (from 20% to 10%). These differences were especially relevant in patients with a small number (1-2) of positive SpA features.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic value of SpA features varies in different patient populations, which should be considered in the diagnostic approach.

Updates on Axial Psoriatic Arthritis From the 2020 GRAPPA Annual Meeting

This article summarizes sessions that dealt with axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA) at the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) 2020 virtual meeting. The summary includes the symposium, which comprised a plenary presentation by Dr. Dafna Gladman from Toronto, Canada, as well as a panel discussion with Dr. Philip Helliwell, Dr. Denis Poddubnyy, and Dr. Gladman, moderated by Dr. Philip Mease. In addition, the paper also summarizes Dr. Mease's "Meet the Expert" session, which focused on axPsA.

Asymptomatic secondary hyperparathyroidism can mimic sacroiliitis on computed tomography

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) as a result of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common health problem and has been reported to manifest at the sacroiliac joints (SIJ). The aim of this investigation was to systematically assess sacroiliac joint changes in asymptomatic sHPT as detected by high-resolution CT. Included in this IRB-approved retrospective case-control study were 56 patients with asymptomatic sHPT as well as 259 matched controls without SIJ disease. Demographic data were retrieved from electronic patient records. High-resolution computed tomography datasets of all patients were subjected to a structured scoring, including erosions, sclerosis, osteophytes, joint space alterations and intraarticular calcifications. Chi² tests were used to compare frequencies of lesions. Erosions were significantly more prevalent in patients with sHPT, and were found mainly in the ventral (28.6% vs. 13.9%; p = 0.016) and middle (17.9% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.040) iliac portions of the SIJ. Partial ankylosis was rare in both cohorts (3.6% vs. 5.0%; p > 0.999); complete ankylosis was not observed. Neither extent not prevalence of sclerosis or calcifications differed significantly between groups. Joint lesions reminiscent of sacroiliitis can be found in a substantial portion of asymptomatic patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Further investigations into the clinical significance of these findings are warranted.

Data-driven definitions for active and structural MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joint in spondyloarthritis and their predictive utility

Objectives

To determine quantitative SI joint MRI lesion cut-offs that optimally define a positive MRI for inflammatory and structural lesions typical of axial SpA (axSpA) and that predict clinical diagnosis.

Methods

The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) MRI group assessed MRIs from the ASAS Classification Cohort in two reading exercises where (A) 169 cases and 7 central readers; (B) 107 cases and 8 central readers. We calculated sensitivity/specificity for the number of SI joint quadrants or slices with bone marrow oedema (BME), erosion, fat lesion, where a majority of central readers had high confidence there was a definite active or structural lesion. Cut-offs with ≥95% specificity were analysed for their predictive utility for follow-up rheumatologist diagnosis of axSpA by calculating positive/negative predictive values (PPVs/NPVs) and selecting cut-offs with PPV ≥ 95%.

Results

Active or structural lesions typical of axSpA on MRI had PPVs ≥ 95% for clinical diagnosis of axSpA. Cut-offs that best reflected a definite active lesion typical of axSpA were either ≥4 SI joint quadrants with BME at any location or at the same location in ≥3 consecutive slices. For definite structural lesion, the optimal cut-offs were any one of ≥3 SI joint quadrants with erosion or ≥5 with fat lesions, erosion at the same location for ≥2 consecutive slices, fat lesions at the same location for ≥3 consecutive slices, or presence of a deep (i.e. &gt;1 cm depth) fat lesion.

Conclusion

We propose cut-offs for definite active and structural lesions typical of axSpA that have high PPVs for a long-term clinical diagnosis of axSpA for application in disease classification and clinical research.

[Axial spondyloarthritis - Update 2021]

New data for the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis on the specificity of active inflammatory changes in sacroiliac joints were generated recently and are reviewed here. A new magnetic resonance imaging sequence to improve the detection of erosions is discussed. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and Interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors are now approved as therapy for both radiographic and non-radiographic forms of axial spondyloarthritis. Janus kinase inhibitors delivered promising results in Phase II/III studies. For the inhibition of structural progression new data are discussed on slowing structural progression in the spine under TNF and IL-17 inhibitors.

Sustained clinical response and safety of etanercept in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis: 10-year results of the ESTHER trial

Aims:

Long-term data on TNFi treatment in patients with axSpA is scarce. The objective of this analysis was to assess long-term clinical efficacy of etanercept in early axSpA [including both non-radiographic and radiographic axSpA forms], who participated in the long-term (until year 10) extension of the ESTHER-trial.

Methods:

In the previously reported ESTHER-trial, patients with early active axSpA were randomized to treatment with etanercept (n = 40) or sulfasalazine (n = 36) during the first year. Patients in remission discontinued their therapy and were followed up until the end of year 2; in case of remission-loss, etanercept was (re)-introduced and continued until the end of year 10. If remission was not achieved at year 1, patients continued receiving (or were switched to) etanercept for up to 10 years.

Results:

A total of 19 patients (12 with r-axSpA and 7 with nr-axSpA at baseline) out of the initial 76 patients (= 25%) completed year 10 of the study. In the entire group, a sustained clinical response was seen over 10 years of follow up in the as-observed analysis. Completers were significantly more often male and showed lower values of patient and physician global assessments of disease activity, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), and Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life questionnaire (ASQoL) scores at baseline as compared with non-completers. When analyzing clinical data of the completers, mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) values were constantly below 2 and mean ASDAS below 2.1 during follow up with no statistically significant differences between the r-axSpA and nr-axSpA subgroups. A total of 39 serious adverse events were documented over the 10 years, while six of them were seen as possibly associated with the etanercept treatment, which led in five patients to treatment discontinuation.

Conclusion:

A sustained clinical response was observed over the 10 years of the study with comparable response and drop-out rates between r-axSpA and nr-axSpA. Etanercept was well tolerated across the entire treatment period and showed a good safety profile with no new safety signals.

Clinical and imaging characteristics of osteitis condensans ilii as compared with axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES

Osteitis condensans ilii (OCI) has become an important differential diagnosis for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The objective of this matched case-control study was to investigate demographic, clinical, laboratory and MRI characteristics of OCI as compared with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

A total of 60 patients diagnosed with OCI were included in the final analysis. From 27 of these patients, MRIs of the sacroiliac joints were available. OCI patients were matched with a 1:1 ratio by back pain duration to patients with definite axSpA in order to compare clinical, laboratory and MRI characteristics.

RESULTS

The OCI patients were nearly all females (96.7 vs 46.7%), had a significantly lower prevalence of inflammatory back pain (39.5 vs 88.9%), a significantly lower percentage of HLA-B27 positives (35.2 vs 80.0%) and a lower prevalence of the majority of other SpA features as compared with axSpA patients. Interestingly, there was no difference in the prevalence of osteitis in the sacroiliac joints (92.6 vs 85.2% in OCI and axSpA, respectively, P = 0.44), but there was a difference in the prevalence of erosions (7.4 vs 66.7%, respectively, P = 0.0001). In addition, in OCI nearly all lesions were localized in the anterior part of the sacroiliac joints while in axSpA lesions were localized predominantly in the middle part of the joint (for osteitis: 96 vs 4% in OCI and 28.6 vs 71.4% in axSpA; P = 0.0002 for the inter-group difference).

CONCLUSION

Clinical and imaging features of OCI compared with axSpA are described that should help in differential diagnosis.

Classification vs diagnostic criteria: the challenge of diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis

In recent years, significant progress has been made in improving the early diagnosis of spondyloarthritides (SpA), including axial SpA. Nonetheless, there are still issues related to the application of classification criteria for making the primary diagnosis of SpA in the daily practice. There are substantial conceptional and operational differences between the diagnostic vs classification approach. Although it is not possible to develop true diagnostic criteria for natural reasons as discussed in this review, the main principles of the diagnostic approach can be clearly defined: consider the pre-test probability of the disease, evaluate positive and negative results of the diagnostic test, exclude other entities, and estimate the probability of the disease at the end. Classification criteria should only be applied to patients with an established diagnosis and aimed at the identification of a rather homogeneous group of patients for the conduction of clinical research.

Gender differences in patient journey to diagnosis and disease outcomes: results from the European Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (EMAS)

Introduction/objectives

To evaluate the journey to diagnosis, disease characteristics and burden of disease in male and female patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) across Europe.

Method

Data from 2846 unselected patients participating in the European Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (EMAS) study through an online survey (2017–2018) across 13 countries were analysed. Sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle, diagnosis, disease characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) [disease activity –BASDAI (0–10), spinal stiffness (3–12), functional limitations (0–54) and psychological distress (GHQ-12)] were compared between males and females using chi-square (for categorical variables) and student t (for continuous variables) tests.

Results

In total, 1100 (38.7%) males and 1746 (61.3%) females participated in the EMAS. Compared with males, females reported considerable longer diagnostic delay (6.1 ± 7.4 vs 8.2 ± 8.9 years; p < 0.001), higher number of visits to physiotherapists (34.5% vs 49.5%; p < 0.001) and to osteopaths (13.3% vs 24.4%; p < 0.001) before being diagnosed and lower frequency of HLA-B27 carriership (80.2% vs 66.7%; p < 0.001). In addition, females reported higher degree of disease activity in all BASDAI aspects and greater psychological distress through GHQ-12 (4.4 ± 4.2 vs 5.3 ± 4.1; p < 0.001), as well as a greater use of alternative therapies.

Conclusion

The patient journey to diagnosis of axSpA is much longer and arduous in females, which may be related to physician bias and lower frequency of HLA-B27 carriership. Regarding PROs, females experience higher disease activity and poorer psychological health compared with males. These results reflect specific unmet needs in females with axSpA needing particular attention.

Key Points • Healthcare professionals’ perception of axSpA as a predominantly male disease may introduce some bias during the diagnosis and management of the disease. However, evidence about male-female differences in axSpA is scarce. • EMAS results highlight how female axSpA patients report longer diagnostic delay and higher burden of the disease in a large sample of 2846 participants of 13 European countries. • Results reflect unmet needs of European female patients. Healthcare professionals should pay close attention in order to accurately diagnose and efficiently manage axSpA cases while further research should be developed on the cause of reported gender differences.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10067-020-05558-7.

Skin manifestations in spondyloarthritis

Spondyloarthritides (SpA) like psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis/ankylosing spondylitis, reactive arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated SpA can present with characteristic skin manifestations. These SpA-associated skin disorders may precede joint involvement, reflect a loss of efficacy of a current systemic treatment or can even be treatment associated. Cutaneous manifestations in SpA not only add additional morbidity with physical impact but also impose a psychosocial burden on affected patients. Psoriasis (PsO) - the main skin disease in SpA - has a variety of clinical presentations, including plaque-type PsO, inverse PsO, guttate PsO, erythrodermic PsO, nail PsO and pustular types. SpA associated with IBD presents with neutrophilic and granulomatous skin disorders, including pyoderma gangrenosum, hidradenitis suppurativa and cutaneous Crohn's disease. Reactive arthritides has a favourable prognosis and may feature keratoderma blenorrhagicum or balanitis circinatum as typical skin manifestations. Immunologically, SpA-associated skin diseases share interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 dysregulation but show distinctive genetic and immunological profiles. Therefore, they vary in their treatment responses to targeted therapies with biologicals or small molecules. In this review, we highlight the clinical presentation of skin manifestations in SpA and discuss therapeutic approaches in this interdisciplinary field.

Improvement of Signs and Symptoms of Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in Patients Treated With Secukinumab: Primary Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study

Objective

To report the primary (1‐year) results from PREVENT, the first phase III study evaluating secukinumab in patients with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).

Methods

A total of 555 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg with a loading dose (loading dose [LD] group), secukinumab 150 mg without a loading dose (non–loading dose [NL] group), or placebo weekly and then every 4 weeks starting at week 4. The NL group received placebo at weeks 1, 2, and 3 to maintain blinding. Switch to open‐label secukinumab or standard of care was permitted after week 20. The study had 2 independent analysis plans, per European Union and non‐US (plan A; week 16) and US (plan B; week 52) regulatory requirements. The primary end point was 40% improvement in disease activity according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS40) criteria at week 16 (in the LD group) and at week 52 (in the NL group) in tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)–naive patients. Safety analyses included all patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.

Results

Overall, 481 patients completed 52 weeks of treatment, including 84.3% (156 of 185) in the LD group, 89.7% (165 of 184) in the NL group, and 86.0% (160 of 186) in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who switched to open‐label or standard of care between weeks 20 and 48 was 50.8% in the LD group, 47.3% in the NL group, and 64.0% in the placebo group. Both primary and all secondary end points were met at week 16. The proportion of TNFi‐naive patients who met ASAS40 was significantly higher for LD at week 16 (41.5%) and NL at week 52 (39.8%) versus placebo (29.2% at week 16 and 19.9% at week 52; both P < 0.05). No new safety findings were reported.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that secukinumab 150 mg provides significant and sustained improvement in signs and symptoms of nonradiographic axial SpA through 52 weeks. Safety was consistent with previous reports.

Secukinumab Provides Sustained Reduction in Fatigue in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Long-term Results of Two Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the longer-term effects of secukinumab 150 mg on fatigue in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in MEASURE 1 (up to 3 years) and MEASURE 2 (up to 2 years).

METHODS

Patients with active AS were randomized to secukinumab or placebo in MEASURE 1 (10 mg/kg intravenous [IV] followed by 150 mg subcutaneous [SC]) and MEASURE 2 (150 mg SC). Patients were naive to or had an inadequate response/intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF-naive/ anti-TNF-IR). Fatigue was measured using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale. Relationships between fatigue response and baseline characteristics and clinical/laboratory variables were explored.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in FACIT-F scores from baseline were observed with secukinumab across both studies versus placebo at week 16 (P < 0.05). Improvements were sustained through week 156 (MEASURE 1)/week 104 (MEASURE 2). Significantly more patients reported fatigue responses (FACIT-F increase ≥4; observed data) with secukinumab 150 mg than placebo at week 16 in both MEASURE 1 (P < 0.05) and MEASURE 2 (P < 0.01). Fatigue responses were achieved by 75.6% of patients receiving secukinumab at week 156 (MEASURE 1) and 81.4% at week 104 (MEASURE 2); these results were consistent in both anti-TNF-naive (74.3% and 84.6%) and anti-TNF-IR (81.3% and 75.0%) patients. Baseline characteristics did not predict improvement in fatigue consistently. Fatigue responses were moderately to strongly correlated with responses in several clinical measures, including Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS)20/40, ASAS5/6 responses, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and Short-form (SF)-36 scores.

CONCLUSION

Secukinumab provided rapid and sustained improvements in fatigue for up to 3 years, regardless of prior anti-TNF exposure.

The impact of extra-musculoskeletal manifestations on disease activity, functional status, and treatment patterns in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from a nationwide population-based study

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) with disease activity, functional status, and treatment patterns in a large population-based cohort of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods

A stratified random sample of patients with axSpA, drawn from health insurance data, received a survey on disease-related characteristics including history (ever presence) of the following EMMs: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), psoriasis (PSO), and anterior uveitis (AU). Survey data were linked to health insurance data, gathering additional information on current occurrence (within one year) of EMMs and drug prescriptions. Separate multivariable linear regression models were calculated to determine the association of EMMs with disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), and functional status (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index) after adjustment for relevant parameters, including treatment.

Results

A total of 1729 patients with axSpA were included in the analyses (response: 47%; mean age: 56 years; 46% female) of whom 6% (9%) had current (ever) IBD, 10% (15%) had current (ever) PSO, and 9% (27%) had current (ever) AU. Ever presence of IBD and history of PSO were significantly associated with higher level of disease activity. Ever presence of PSO was also associated with higher level of functional impairment, whereas current AU was significantly associated with lower disease activity. Patients with current IBD or PSO received more frequently biological and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs as well as systemic steroids. AU was associated with a higher use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs only.

Conclusion

Disease activity is higher in patients with axSpA with history of IBD or history of PSO. Functional impairment is also higher in patients with axSpA with history of PSO. The presence of different EMMs was associated with different treatment patterns in axSpA.

IgA antibodies against CD74 are associated with structural damage in the axial skeleton in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES

To study the association between the presence of antibodies against CD74 and structural damage in the sacroiliac joints and spine in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

Antibodies against CD74 were measured in the sera of patients with axSpA from 2 cohorts: 1. An observational cohort from Damp in Northern Germany and 2. from a clinical trial (ENRADAS), in which the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) had been evaluated by two readers blinded to the time point at baseline and two years later. The presence of antibodies against CD74 was correlated with the presence and grade of radiographic sacroiliitis in the observational cohort, and with baseline mSASSS in the ENRADAS cohort.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of IgA anti-CD74 antibodies for axSpA was 50% in the Damp cohort and 42% in ENRADAS. The presence of IgA antibodies against CD74 was associated with a higher grade of sacroiliitis (observational cohort) and a higher baseline mSASSS in the ENRADAS cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

IgA antibodies against CD74 are not only markers of AS, but are associated with structural damage development in the sacroiliac joints and in the spine.

Treat-to-target strategy with secukinumab as a first-line biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug compared to standard-of-care treatment in patients with active axial spondyloarthritis: protocol for a randomised open-label phase III study, AScalate

INTRODUCTION

In patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are recommended to those with inadequate response or contraindications to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In case of failure of the first bDMARD, a switch within the class or to other bDMARD is recommended. Despite these treatment options, there is no optimal treat-to-target (T2T) strategy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a T2T strategy in patients with axSpA, with secukinumab as a first-line bDMARD, compared with standard-of-care (SOC) treatment.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

This is a randomised, parallel-group, open-label, multicentre ongoing study in patients with axSpA who are naïve to bDMARD and who have had an inadequate response to NSAIDs. The study will include an 8-week screening period, a 36-week treatment period and a 20-week safety follow-up period. At baseline, patients will be randomised (1:1) to T2T or SOC group. In the T2T group, patients will be treated with secukinumab 150 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) weekly until week 4 and then at week 8. For non-responders (patients without Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS] clinically important improvement; change from baseline ≥1.1) at week 12, dose will be escalated to 300 mg s.c. every 4 weeks until week 24. Non-responders at week 24 will be switched to adalimumab biosimilar 40 mg s.c. every 2 weeks until week 34. In the SOC group, patients will receive treatment at the discretion of the physician. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving an Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% (ASAS40) response at week 24.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is being conducted as per the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and after approval from independent ethics committees/institutional review boards. The first results are expected to be published in early 2022.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03906136.