Risk factors, outcome, and treatment in subtypes of ischemic stroke: the German stroke data bank

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Data on risk factors for etiologic subtypes of ischemic stroke are still scant. The aim of this study was to characterize stroke subtypes regarding risk factor profile, outcome, and current treatment strategies.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 5017 patients with acute ischemic stroke (42.4% women, aged 65.9+/-14.1 years) who were enrolled in a large multicenter hospital-based stroke data bank. Standardized data assessment and stroke subtype classification were used by all centers.

RESULTS

Sex and age distribution, major risk factors and comorbidities, recurrent stroke, treatment strategies, and outcome were all unevenly distributed among stroke subtypes (P<0.001, respectively). Cardioembolism, the most frequent etiology of stroke (25.6%), was particularly common in the elderly (those aged >70 years) and associated with an adverse outcome, a low rate of early stroke recurrence, and frequent use of thrombolytic therapy and intravenous anticoagulation. Large-artery atherosclerosis (20.9%), the most common cause of stroke in middle-aged patients (those aged 45 to 70 years), showed the highest male preponderance, highest rate of early stroke recurrence, and highest prevalence of previous transient ischemic attack, current smoking, and daily alcohol consumption among all subtypes. The highest prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and obesity was found in small-vessel disease (20.5%), which, in turn, was associated with the lowest stroke severity and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results foster the concept of ischemic stroke as a polyetiologic disease with marked differences between subtypes regarding risk factors and outcome. Therefore, studies involving risk factors of ischemic stroke should differentiate between etiologic stroke subtypes.

Comparison of rizatriptan and other triptans on stringent measures of efficacy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of oral rizatriptan 10 mg with oral doses of sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measures.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data from five randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked clinical trials in which oral rizatriptan was directly compared with oral sumatriptan 100 mg (n = 772), 50 mg (n = 1116), 25 mg (n = 1183), naratriptan 2.5 mg (n = 413), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (n = 580) for the acute treatment of a moderate or severe migraine attack.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of patients pain-free at 2 hours, symptom-free at 2 hours (no pain, nausea, photophobia, phonophobia, vomiting, or functional disability), 24-hour sustained pain-free (no headache at 2 hours, no recurrence, and no additional antimigraine medications for 24 hours).

RESULTS

More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were pain-free at 2 hours than were patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (40% vs 33%, p = 0.019), sumatriptan 50 mg (40% vs 35%, p = 0.009), sumatriptan 25 mg (38% vs 27%, p < 0.001), naratriptan 2.5 mg (45% vs 21%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (43% vs 36%, p = 0.041). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg were symptom-free at 2 hours than were patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (31% vs 22%, p = 0.002), sumatriptan 50 mg (33% vs 28%, p = 0.003), sumatriptan 25 mg (33% vs 24%, p < 0.001), naratriptan 2.5 mg (30% vs 11%, p < 0.001), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (31% vs 24%, p = 0.042). More patients taking rizatriptan 10 mg had a 24-hour sustained pain-free response than did patients taking sumatriptan 100 mg (27% vs 23%, p = 0.112), sumatriptan 50 mg (30% vs 26%, p = 0.015), sumatriptan 25 mg (27% vs 20%, p = 0.005), naratriptan 2.5 mg (29% vs 17%, p = 0.004), and zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (32% vs 24%, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Oral rizatriptan 10 mg was more effective than oral sumatriptan, naratriptan, and zolmitriptan on stringent outcome measures of pain-free response at 2 hours, symptom-free response at 2 hours, and 24-hour sustained pain-free response.

Advances in pharmacological treatment of migraine

Migraine is a paroxysmal disorder with attacks of headache, nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia and malaise. This review summarises new treatment options both for the therapy of the acute attack as well as for migraine prophylaxis. Analgesics like aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in treating migraine attacks. Few controlled trials were performed for the use of ergotamine or dihydroergotamine. These trials indicate inferior efficacy compared with serotonin (5-HT(1B/D)) agonists (triptans). The triptans (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan), are highly effective. They improve headache as well as nausea, photo- and phonophobia. The different triptans show only minor differences in efficacy, headache recurrence and adverse effects. The knowledge of their different pharmacological profile allows a more specific treatment of the individual migraine characteristics. Migraine prophylaxis is recommended, when more than three attacks occur per month, if attacks do not respond to acute treatment or if side effects of acute treatment are severe. Substances with proven efficacy include the beta-blockers metoprolol and propranolol, the calcium channel blocker flunarizine, several 5-HT antagonists and amitriptyline. Recently anti-epileptic drugs (valproic acid, gabapentin, topiramate) were evaluated for the prophylaxis of migraine. The use of botulinum toxin is under investigation.

Seizure-associated headache in epilepsy

PURPOSE

Headache is often ignored as a symptom of epileptic seizures. The purpose of this prospective study was to analyze frequency, classification, and characteristics of seizure-associated headache (SH) according to the criteria of the International Headache Society.

METHODS

Over a period of 15 months, 341 patients with epilepsy, consecutively evaluated at our outpatient clinic for SH, completed a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 341 epilepsy patients, 115 (34%) experienced SH with a pain intensity of 6.1 +/- 1.6 (SD) on the visual analogue scale and a duration of 12.8 +/- 15.7 (SD) h. Seizures were always accompanied by headache in 69 (60%) of these 115 patients. SH occurred in four (3%) of 115 patients only preictally, in 31 (27%) of 115 patients periictally, and in 80 (70%) of 115 patients only postictally. In the majority of the 115 patients (55.7%), SH could be classified as migraine headache, whereas in 36.5%, as tension-type headache. The type of SH was not correlated with sex, an epilepsy syndrome, or a seizure type. Migraine-like SH was significantly associated with a history of migraine (p < 0.001). In 20 (77%) of the 26 patients experiencing migraine-like SH with a history of migraine, the phenomenology of migraine-like SH and migraine attacks was identical.

CONCLUSIONS

SH is a frequent, long-lasting, and severe symptom of epileptic seizures, causing major impairment of daily living. A history of migraine significantly increases the risk for developing migraine-like SH.

Drug-induced headache: long-term follow-up of withdrawal therapy and persistence of drug misuse

Patients suffering from migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), or combined headache (CH) are at risk of developing drug-induced headache (DIH) due to regular use of analgesics, ergot alkaloids, and triptans. The aim of our study was to determine (1) the clinical features of DIH, (2) the outcome of withdrawal therapy using high methodological standards, and (3) predictors which could explain the high relapse rate (more than 40%) after a previously successful withdrawal therapy. We retrospectively reviewed 103 patients with migraine or TTH who underwent withdrawal therapy between 1994 and 1998. The long-term follow-up (2-4 years after therapy) was conducted by phone and by specially trained psychologists using a structured interview which enclosed characteristics of headache and medication behavior as well as patients global assessment of success. Complete sets of data were available from 83 patients (38 migraine, 26 TTH, 19 CH). The most frequently abused drugs were caffeine-combined analgesics (24%), followed by caffeine-combined ergotamines (19%), pure ergot alkaloids (17%), and monoanalgesics (17%). 48.5% of the patients suffered an abuse relapse within 4 years and developed the complete features of DIH again. Analgesic and ergot alkaloid combinations with caffeine lead significantly more often to a relapse. A long-term successful therapy is connected with a significant reduction of the frequency of headache attacks. Under relapse conditions, the patients reached their former headache frequency level. The data show a higher relapse rate than previously assumed and that certain substance groups bear a higher relapse risk.

The efficacy and safety of sc alniditan vs. sc sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase-III trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a single subcutaneous injection of placebo, 2 doses of alniditan (1.4 mg and 1.8 mg) and 6 mg of sumatriptan in subjects with acute migraine. A total of 114 investigators from 13 different countries screened 2021 subjects. In total 924 patients were treated with placebo (157), alniditan 1.4 mg (309), alniditan 1.8 mg (141) and sumatriptan 6 mg (317). The lower number of subjects in the alniditan 1.8 mg group is due to the termination of this trial arm after the incidence of a serious adverse event and a subsequent protocol amendment. The number of subjects who were pain free at 2 h (primary endpoint) was: 22 (14.1%) with placebo, 174 (56.3%) with alniditan 1.4 mg, 87 (61.7%) with alnditan 1.8 mg and 209 (65.9%) with sumatriptan 6 mg. Alniditan 1.4 mg was significantly better (P < 0.001) than placebo and sumatriptan was significantly better (P = 0.015) than alniditan 1.4 mg. The number of responders (reduction of headache severity from moderate or severe headache before treatment to mild or absent at 2 h), was 59 (37.8%) on placebo, 250 (80.9%) on alniditan 1.4 mg, 120 (85.1%) on alniditan 1.8 mg, and 276 (87.1%) on sumatriptan. Response was significantly higher (P < 0.001) with alniditan 1.4 mg than with placebo, and significantly lower (P = 0.036) with alniditan 1.4 mg than with sumatriptan. Recurrence rates were: 22 (37.3%) with placebo, 87 (34.8%) with alniditan 1.4 mg, 35 (29.2%) with alniditan 1.8 mg and 108 (39.1%) with sumatriptan. Adverse events occurred in 577/924 (62.4%) subjects, i.e. in 62/157 (39.5%) with placebo, 214/309 (69.3%) with alniditan 1.4 mg, 91/141 (64.5%) with alniditan 1.8 mg and 210/317 (66.2%) with sumatriptan 6 mg. Sumatriptan was significantly better than alniditan 1.4 mg for pain free at 2 h. The difference, however, was small and clinically not important. For alniditan, a dose-dependent adverse event relationship was seen. The safety profile of alniditan 1.4 mg was similar to that of sumatriptan.

Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke

Twenty-one patients with hemianopia received 4 weeks of compensatory visual field training. Detection of and reaction time to visual stimuli were measured with eyes fixating (condition A) and with use of exploratory eye movements (condition B) before and after training. Twenty-three healthy individuals served as control subjects for measurements of parameters during both conditions. Patients with hemianopia to either side showed a marked improvement of detection and reaction time during condition B, but minimum or no change during condition A. Improvements were maintained 8 months after training. Activity of daily living skills also improved in all patients. The size of scotoma on computerized perimetry, in contrast, remained unchanged. Training improved detection of and reaction to visual stimuli without restitution of the visual field defect.

Arm Training Induced Brain Plasticity in Stroke Studied with Serial Positron Emission Tomography

We used serial positron emission tomography (PET) to study training-induced brain plasticity after severe hemiparetic stroke. Ten patients were randomized to either task-oriented arm training or to a control group and scanned before and after 22.6 +/- 1.6 days of treatment using passive movements as an activation paradigm. Increases of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were assessed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM99). Before treatment, all stroke patients revealed bilateral activation of the inferior parietal cortex (IPC). After task-oriented arm training, activation was found bilaterally in IPC and premotor cortex, but also in the contralateral sensorimotor cortex (SMC). The control group only showed weak activation of the ipsilateral IPC. After treatment, the training group revealed relatively more activation bilaterally in IPC, premotor areas, and in the contralateral SMC. Five normal subjects showed no statistical significant differences between two separate PET studies. In this group of patients, task-oriented arm training induced functional brain reorganization in bilateral sensory and motor systems.

An in vivo rat model to study calcitonin gene related peptide release following activation of the trigeminal vascular system

Calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) released from the C-fibers projecting from the trigeminal ganglion to the meninges has been suggested to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of headache, particularly migraine. In humans it has been shown that CGRP is released during migraine-attacks, and this is attenuated by the administration of typical anti-migraine drugs such as dihydroergotamine or sumatriptan. We describe a new rat model which allows the study of CGRP release from the meninges into venous blood following activation of the trigeminal vascular system. The effects of classical and new anti-migraine drugs such as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), sumatriptan and the new high efficacy 5-HT1B/1D agonist donitriptan (4-[4-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-1H-indol-5-yloxyl]acetyl]piperazinyl-1-yl]benzonitrile) were evaluated in comparison with the established model of neurogenic inflammation in the meninges. Sumatriptan and donitriptan inhibited CGRP release as well as neurogenic inflammation. ASA, however, attenuated neurogenic inflammation, but not CGRP release, confirming the concept of prejunctional inhibition of CGRP release by 5-HT1B/1D receptors. This new model allows the further study of prejunctional pharmacology and mechanisms of neuropeptide release in the trigeminal vascular system, which might be crucial for the further development of potent, more effective anti-migraine drugs.

[Does early high dosage dipyridamole in prevention of secondary stroke induce cardiac events?]

In a post hoc analysis of the European Stroke Prevention Study 2 (ESPS2), we investigated whether dipyridamole given as antiplatelet drug in patients with TIA or stroke increases the risk of cardiac events. ESPS2 was a secondary prevention trial including 6602 patients with TIA or stroke. Patients were randomized into one of four treatment arms: 2 x 25 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), 2 x 200 mg slow release dipyridamole (DP), the combination of DP and ASA and placebo. DP did not result in a higher number of cardiac events, e.g., angina pectoris, myocardial infarction or death. The combination of ASA plus DP was superior to either drug alone in the prevention of strokes.

Glycine antagonist (GV150526) in acute stroke: a multicentre, double-blind placebo-controlled phase II trial

GV150526 is a novel glycine antagonist at the NMDA receptor complex. It is a potent neuroprotective agent in animal models of acute stroke including permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. GV150526 was very well tolerated in early human studies. The purpose of this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial was to assess the safety and population pharmacokinetics of GV150526 in patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke. Exploratory assessment of efficacy, quality of life and resource utilisation was also undertaken. Upon clinical diagnosis of acute stroke within 12 h of onset of symptoms, patients were treated with a loading dose of 800 mg GV150526 (or placebo), followed by 5 maintenance doses of 400 mg GV150526 (or placebo) given every 12 h over 3 days. Following observation of asymptomatic hyperbilirubinaemia, the maintenance dose was reduced mid-study to 200 mg. CT/MRI scanning was not mandatory prior to treatment. The study treated 128 patients (38 with GV 800 mg/400 mg, 48 with GV 800 mg/200 mg and 42 with placebo). Fewer patients with mild stroke (NIH scores < or =5) were enrolled in the GV150526-treated groups than in the placebo group (placebo 38%, GV 800 mg/400 mg 18%, GV 800 mg/200 mg 15%). There was also an imbalance in the proportion of patients with haemorrhagic strokes (placebo 5%, GV 800 mg/400 mg 3%, GV 800 mg/200 mg 15%). Mortality at 1 month was unbalanced between treatment groups, being 10, 18 and 17% in the placebo, GV 800 mg/400 mg and GV 800 mg/200 mg groups, respectively (no significant difference). Similarly, adverse events, though consistent with an acute stroke population, appeared more often in the GV 800 mg/200 mg group. Functional outcomes at 1 month also showed imbalances, the percentage of patients with a Barthel Index score of > or =95 at 1 month being 52, 39 and 27% in the placebo, GV 800 mg/400 mg and GV 800 mg/200 mg groups, respectively. These results probably reflect a prognostically significant baseline difference between the groups rather than the effect of GV150526. GV150526 was generally well tolerated in patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute stroke and formal efficacy studies were considered justified.

Cardiac safety in the European Stroke Prevention Study 2 (ESPS2)

The second European Stroke Prevention Study investigated the prevention of stroke and/or death in 6602 patients with transient ischaemic attack or stroke with aspirin (25 mg b.d.), dipyridamole (400 mg b.d.), the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole or placebo. This post hoc analysis investigated cardiac events in patients with coronary heart disease or myocardial infarction (MI) at entry. Dipyridamole did not result in a higher number of cardiac events, e.g. angina pectoris, MI, or death from all causes. The combination of aspirin plus dipyridamole was superior to either drug alone in the prevention of stroke.

Treatment of migraine attacks with intranasal alniditan: an open study

In this open phase-II clinical tolerability trial 17 neurologists enrolled a total of 112 patients and instructed them to administer a maximum of two doses of intranasal alniditan, a 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist, for the treatment of three consecutive migraine attacks of moderate to severe intensity. A second dose of the trial medication was allowed within 1-24 h after the first administration. At 1 h after intranasal administration, 70/103 (68%) patients had responded to treatment (reduction from severe or moderate headache before treatment to mild or no headache) after their first migraine attack, 65/94 (69%) after their second and 52/75 (71%) after their third. In 187/270 (69%) of all attacks, patients were considered responders at 1 h. The median time to onset of effect was 30 min. The migraine headache recurred in 44% (attack 1), 55% (attack 2) and 44% (attack 3) after 4-5 h. Sixty-eight per cent of the patients reported nasal irritation, 19% taste disturbance and 44% throat irritation. Alniditan 2 mg, administered via the intranasal route, was effective in relieving migraine headaches in over two-thirds of the patients at 1 h.

A comparative study of oral acetylsalicyclic acid and metoprolol for the prophylactic treatment of migraine. A randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel group phase III study

This study was a multinational, multicentre, double-blind, active controlled phase III trial designed to investigate efficacy and safety of 300 mg acetylsalicyclic acid (ASA) (n = 135) vs. 200 mg metoprolol (n = 135) in the prophylaxis of migraine. In total 270 (51 male and 219 female) patients, aged 18-65 years, suffering between two and six migraine attacks per month were recruited. The main objective was to show equivalence with respect to efficacy, defined as a 50% reduction in the rate of migraine attacks. A run-in phase was carried out with placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 16-week drug phase. In both treatment groups the median frequency of migraine attacks improved during the study period, from three to two in the ASA group and from three to one in the metoprolol group; 45.2% of all metoprolol patients were responders compared with 29.6% with ASA. Medication-related adverse events were less frequent in the ASA group (37) than in the metoprolol group (73). The findings from this trial show that metoprolol is superior to ASA for migraine prophylaxis but has more side-effects. Acetylsalicylic acid is better tolerated than metoprolol. Using a strict responder criterion ASA showed a responder rate comparable with the placebo rate in the literature.

Imaging in cerebrovascular disease

Various functional imaging modalities can be applied in acute ischaemic stroke to identify functionally impaired, but morphologically preserved tissue (i.e. the penumbra), and to distinguish it from irreversibly damaged tissue. Flow thresholds for irreversible tissue destruction resulting in functional impairment, as determined by positron emission tomography, perfusion and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon computed tomography and xenon computed tomography, were comparable and ranged between 5 and 12 ml/100 g per min for the lower and 14 and 22 ml/100 g per min for the upper limit of penumbra. These imaging modalities help to select patients for thrombolytic therapy and provide evidence for the effect of this treatment on critically perfused tissue. They can also serve as surrogate markers in the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. Further progress in interventional neuroradiology has been achieved with intra-arterial thrombolysis, which has become a treatment option beyond the 3-h therapeutic window in acute ischaemic stroke. Angioplasty and stenting of stenosis of arteries that supply the brain with blood have reached a point in their development at which a randomized trial to compare these treatments with vascular surgery is warranted.

Cyclandelate in the prophylaxis of migraine: a placebo-controlled study

The prophylactic action of cyclandelate was investigated in a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. A 4-week baseline period was followed by a 4-week placebo phase and a 16-week treatment period with either 1600 mg cyclandelate or placebo. Patients (n = 251) with two to six migraine attacks/month were randomized. Neither the primary study endpoint (reduction of migraine days from baseline to the last 28 days) nor most of the secondary endpoints (reduction in the number of migraine attacks, severity or duration of attacks, frequency of autonomic disturbances, medication for treatment of attacks) showed a difference between cyclandelate and placebo. Cyclandelate, however, was superior to placebo in a global impression of efficacy rated by the patients and the treating physicians. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, cyclandelate was not superior to placebo in the prophylaxis of migraine with regard to parameters usually used in migraine prophylaxis trials.

Treatment of acute ischemic stroke with the low-molecular-weight heparin certoparin: results of the TOPAS trial. Therapy of Patients With Acute Stroke (TOPAS) Investigators

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To study the safety and efficacy of the low-molecular-weight heparin certoparin, we performed a randomized, double-blind, dose-finding multicenter trial in patients with acute ischemic stroke (Therapy of Patients With Acute Stroke [TOPAS]).

METHODS

We randomized 404 patients to 4 treatment groups within 12 hours of stroke onset: 3000 U anti-factor Xa (aXa) certoparin once daily (treatment group 1); 3000 U aXa twice daily (group 2); 5000 U aXa twice daily (group 3); and 8000 U aXa twice daily (group 4). The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients reaching a favorable functional outcome (Barthel Index >/=90 points) at 3 months. CT was performed at trial entry, after 7 days, and on clinical deterioration.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with Barthel Index >/=90 was not different between treatment arms (61.5%, 60.8%, 63.3%, and 56.3% in the 4 groups, respectively; intent-to-treat population). European Stroke Scale scores improved in all treatment groups within the first 14 days to a similar extent. During the follow-up of 6 months, percentages of patients with recurrent stroke/transient ischemic attack were 11.0%, 5.9%, 9.7%, and 13.0% in the 4 groups, respectively. Overall mortality was only 7.4%. Two parenchymal cerebral hematomas and 1 extracranial bleeding episode occurred in treatment group 1 versus 1 and 0 in group 2, 2 and 0 in group 3, and 4 and 5 in group 4, respectively. During certoparin treatment, 1 deep vein thrombosis but no pulmonary embolism was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose increase of certoparin up to 8000 U aXa twice daily did not improve the functional outcome of patients with ischemic stroke. Severe bleeding tended to be more frequent in the highest dose group only.

Medication overuse headache

The frequent use (>15 times/month) of medication for the treatment of acute migraine attacks may cause medication overuse headache. This kind of headache can be caused by the intake of a combination of analgesics, opioids, ergot alkaloids and triptans. The delay between first intake and these attacks is shortest for triptans (1-2 years), longer for ergots (3-5 years) and longest for analgesics (5-10 years). Treatment includes drug withdrawal followed by structured acute therapy and initiation of migraine prophylactic treatment.

Analgesics

Analgesics such as acetaminophen (paracetamol), acetylsalicyclic acid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective in the treatment of migraine attacks. Comparative studies indicate that their efficacy is similar or slightly inferior to sumattriptan, a specific antimigraine drug. Few data on the efficacy of opioid drugs in the treatment of migraine are available. They seem to be effective but carry the risk of dependency and may cause drug-induced headache.