The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme

AIM

Based on three randomised controlled trials performed more than a decade ago, several national guidelines recommend prolonged venous thromboprophylaxis for 28 days following elective surgery for colon cancer. None of these studies were conducted within enhanced recovery after surgery setting. Newer studies indicate that prolonged prophylaxis might not be necessary with enhanced recovery after surgery. We aimed to provide further evidence to this unresolved discussion.

METHOD

Retrospective study of patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer stage I-III with enhanced recovery after surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2014 to 2017. Patients were excluded if discharged on postoperative day 28 or later, dying before discharge, undergoing concomitant rectum resection, or discharged with vitamin K antagonists, direct-oral anticoagulants, or low molecular weight heparin treatment. All patients received only low-dose low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis during their admission. The primary endpoint was symptomatic lower limb deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism diagnosed within 60 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Out of the included population of 1806 patients, only three experienced a symptomatic venous thromboembolic event; none was fatal. Two had pulmonary embolism associated with pneumonia, while one patient was diagnosed with lower limb deep venous thrombosis at postoperative day 15 after an uncomplicated course with first discharge at postoperative day 2.

CONCLUSION

The risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective surgery for colon cancer with enhanced recovery after surgery seems negligible even without prolonged prophylaxis. The current guidelines need to be reconsidered.

Acute pulmonary embolism in cancer patients admitted to intensive care unit: Impact of anticoagulant treatment on 90-day mortality and risk factors, results of a multicentre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening situation in cancer patients. In this situation, anticoagulant therapy is complex to administer due to the risk of bleeding. Only few studies have been conducted when these patients are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was to assess the association between anticoagulation strategies as well as other factors with 90-day mortality in patients with cancer and PE admitted to ICU. Major bleeding was also evaluated according to the type of anticoagulation.

METHODS

Retrospective study carried out in 4 ICUs in France over a 12-year period (2009-2021). All patients with cancer and PE were included. An overlap propensity score weighting analysis was performed in the subgroup of patients treated with either unfractionated heparins (UFH) alone or low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) alone on 90-day mortality and major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 218 consecutive cancer patients admitted to ICU and presenting PE were included. The 90-day mortality rate was 42 % for the global cohort. After propensity score analysis in the subgroup of patients treated with either "UFH alone" (n = 80) or "LMWH alone" (n = 71), the 90-day mortality was similar in patients treated with UFH alone (42.6 %) vs LMWH alone (39.9 %): OR = 1.124, CI 95 % [0.571-2.214], p = 0.750. There was a significant increased toward major bleeding rates in the "UFH alone" group (25.5 %) as compared to "LMWH alone" group (11.5 %), p = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

In 218 patients admitted to ICU and presenting PE, the 90-day mortality rate was 42 %. Treatment with UFH alone was associated with a mortality comparable to treatment with LMWH alone but it appeared to be more prone to major bleeding.

Impact of perioperative low-molecular-weight heparin therapy on clinical events of elderly patients with prior coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the safety and efficacy of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy via LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted for > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. This randomized trial was designed to compare the clinical benefits and risks of antiplatelet drug discontinuation via LMWH bridging therapy.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous injections of either dalteparin sodium or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiac or cerebrovascular events. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding.

RESULTS

Among 2476 randomized patients, the variables (sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities, medications, and procedural characteristics) and percutaneous coronary intervention information were not significantly different between the bridging and non-bridging groups. During the follow-up period, the rate of the combined endpoint in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (5.79% vs. 8.42%, p = 0.012). The incidence of myocardial injury in the bridging group was significantly lower than in the non-bridging group (3.14% vs. 5.19%, p = 0.011). Deep vein thrombosis occurred more frequently in the non-bridging group (1.21% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.024), and there was a trend toward a higher rate of pulmonary embolism (0.32% vs. 0.08%, p = 0.177). There was no significant difference between the groups in the rates of acute myocardial infarction (0.81% vs. 1.38%), cardiac death (0.24% vs. 0.41%), stroke (0.16% vs. 0.24%), or major bleeding (1.22% vs. 1.45%). Multivariable analysis showed that LMWH bridging, creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, preoperative hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of ischemic events. LMWH bridging and a preoperative platelet count of < 70 × 109/L were independent predictors of minor bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the safety and efficacy of perioperative LMWH bridging therapy in elderly patients with coronary stents implanted > 12 months undergoing non-cardiac surgery. An alternative approach might be the use of bridging therapy with half-dose LMWH.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN65203415.

Intra-abdominal hematomas and identifiable risk factors in patients receiving subcutaneous enoxaparin

BACKGROUND

Low molecular weight heparin has proven to be safe and effective but is not without potential risks such as spontaneous bleeding in the abdominal cavity. There is limited evidence evaluating the true incidence of this potential risk and the available literature is primarily via case reports.

CASE SUMMARY

The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors associated with enoxaparin use (prophylaxis or treatment) abdominal hematomas in a 350-bed community hospital during an 8-month time period. A total of 44 patients were identified as clinically significant bleeds receiving enoxaparin treatment or prophylactic therapy. Ultimately, 25 patients were excluded from the analysis due to an external cause of the abdominal hematoma or a temporal mismatch in enoxaparin administration and hematoma formation. After exclusion, there were a total of 19 patients that were assessed for the risk factors such as age, gender, renal function, and weight. After evaluation of risks, over half of the patients developing a clinically significant bleed were considered elderly (>65 years of age) and impaired renal function with a creatinine clearance of 60ml/min or less.

CONCLUSION

Patients at risk for an enoxaparin associated hematoma include female patients with a CrCl <60ml/min and/or BMI >30 kg/m2 receiving enoxaparin treatment dosing.

Effect of Aspirin Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Thromboprophylaxis on Medication Satisfaction and Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after orthopaedic trauma. However, recent evidence suggests that aspirin is similar in efficacy and safety. To understand patients' experiences with these medications, we compared patients' satisfaction and out-of-pocket costs after thromboprophylaxis with aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin.

METHODS

This study was a secondary analysis of the PREVENTion of CLots in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREVENT CLOT) trial, conducted at 21 trauma centers in the U.S. and Canada. We included adult patients with an operatively treated extremity fracture or a pelvic or acetabular fracture. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) twice daily or 81 mg of aspirin twice daily for thromboprophylaxis. The duration of the thromboprophylaxis, including post-discharge prescription, was based on hospital protocols. The study outcomes included patient satisfaction with and out-of-pocket costs for their thromboprophylactic medication measured on ordinal scales.

RESULTS

The trial enrolled 12,211 patients (mean age and standard deviation [SD], 45 ± 18 years; 62% male), 9725 of whom completed the question regarding their satisfaction with the medication and 6723 of whom reported their out-of-pocket costs. The odds of greater satisfaction were 2.6 times higher for patients assigned to aspirin than those assigned to low-molecular-weight heparin (odds ratio [OR]: 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.39 to 2.80; p < 0.001). Overall, the odds of incurring any out-of-pocket costs for thromboprophylaxis medication were 51% higher for patients assigned to aspirin compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.37 to 1.66; p < 0.001). However, patients assigned to aspirin had substantially lower odds of out-of-pocket costs of at least $25 (OR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.18; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of aspirin substantially improved patients' satisfaction with their medication after orthopaedic trauma. While aspirin use increased the odds of incurring any out-of-pocket costs, it protected against costs of ≥$25, potentially improving health equity for thromboprophylaxis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban for anticoagulation therapy in COVID-19: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library electronic databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to identify all relevant randomized controlled trial studies from December 2019 to July 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 6 randomized controlled trials, which included a total of 3323 patients, were considered for evaluation. Overall, short-term all-cause mortality and hospitalization rates were not significantly different between the rivaroxaban and control groups. Thrombotic events were significantly reduced in the rivaroxaban prophylaxis group compared to the placebo control group. However, the reduction in thrombotic events was not significantly different between rivaroxaban therapy and heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Rivaroxaban prophylaxis and the therapeutic dose may be associated with a higher rate of overall bleeding rate, but major bleeding rates did not differ substantially.

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban may reduce thrombotic events in COVID-19 patients, but it does not appear to have an advantage over heparin or LMWH, and it may increase the risk of bleeding.INPLASY Reg. No.: INPLASY 202370097.

Effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction in a tertiary referral hospital: A 7-year retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction (FGR).

METHODS

A cohort of 570 pregnant women diagnosed with placenta-mediated FGR were enrolled from January 1, 2015 through to December 31, 2021. A birth database, including demographic data, antenatal complications, and detailed delivery and newborn data, was created to collect variables from the Hospital Information System (HIS) Database. The unique personal registration number, assigned to each patient on first registration with HIS in the West China Second University Hospital, was used to link these patients. LMWH use was defined as at least 1-week prescription from diagnosis of placenta-mediated FGR. Pregnant women received LMWH (Enoxaparin 4000 IU/day) by self-administered subcutaneous injection only when they agreed and signed informed consent. Primary outcome was intrauterine fetal death after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth (PB), Apgar score less than 7 at 1 min, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and birth weight. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to compute adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes.

RESULTS

After controlling for confounders, LMWH use was associated with a decreased risk of intrauterine fetal death (aOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.35-4.57, P = 0.003), PB before 37 weeks of pregnancy (aOR 3.35, 95% CI 2.14-5.23, P < 0.001), PB before 34 weeks of pregnancy (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.36-3.74, P = 0.002), Apgar score less than 7 at 1 min (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.36-3.74, P = 0.002), NICU admission (aOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.48-3.55, P < 0.001). Using LMWH increased the mean birth weight in PB before 32 weeks of pregnancy (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 1126.4 ± 520.0 g, P = 0.020), PB before 37 weeks of pregnancy (mean ± SD 1563.9 ± 502.7 g, P = 0.019), early-onset FGR (mean ± SD 2125.2 ± 665.7 g, P < 0.001), late-onset FGR (mean ± SD 2343.4 ± 507.9, P < 0.001), and non-severe FGR (mean ± SD 2231.1 ± 607.2 g, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Use of LMWH can significantly improve the fetal and neonatal outcomes among pregnant women with placenta-mediated FGR, particularly reducing the risk of intrauterine fetal death.

Thrombosis prophylaxis following trauma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the persistent occurrence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in major trauma patients despite standard thrombosis prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH). It investigates the inadequacies of standard pharmacologic prophylaxis and proposes alternative approaches not covered in current trauma guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies highlight the effectiveness of monitoring and adjusting subcutaneous LMWH doses based on anti-Xa levels for the purpose of reducing VTE in trauma patients. The need for dose adaptation arises due to factors like fluctuating organ function, varying antithrombin levels, interaction with plasma proteins, and altered bioavailability influenced by oedema or vasopressor use. Additionally, promising alternatives such as intravenous LMWH, UFH, and argatroban have shown success in intensive care settings.

SUMMARY

The standard dosing of subcutaneous LMWH is often insufficient for effective thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma patients. A more personalised approach, adjusting doses based on specific effect levels like anti-Xa or choosing an alternative mode of anticoagulation, could reduce the risk of insufficient prophylaxis and subsequent VTE.

Anti-factor Xa as the preferred assay to monitor heparin for the treatment of pulmonary embolism

INTRODUCTION

The mainstay of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment is anticoagulation. Timely anticoagulation correlates with decreased PE-associated mortality, but the ability to achieve a therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) with unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains limited. Although some institutions have switched to a more accurate and reproducible test to assess for heparin's effectiveness, the anti-factor Xa (antiXa) assay, data correlating a timely therapeutic antiXa to PE-associated clinical outcomes remains scarce. We evaluated time to a therapeutic antiXa using intravenous heparin after PE response team (PERT) activation and assessed clinical outcomes including bleeding and recurrent thromboembolic events.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study at NYU Langone Health. All adult patients ≥18 years with a confirmed PE started on IV UFH with >2 antiXa levels were included. Patients were excluded if they received thrombolysis or alternative anticoagulation. The primary endpoint was the time to a therapeutic antiXa level of 0.3-0.7 units/mL. Secondary outcomes included recurrent thromboembolism, bleeding and PE-associated mortality within 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients with a PERT consult were identified with 192 patients included. The majority of PEs were classified as sub massive (64.6%) with 87% of patients receiving a bolus of 80 units/kg of UFH prior to starting an infusion at 18 units/kg/hour. The median time to the first therapeutic antiXa was 9.13 hours with 93% of the cohort sustaining therapeutic anticoagulation at 48 hours. Recurrent thromboembolism, bleeding and mortality occurred in 1%, 5% and 6.2%, respectively. Upon univariate analysis, a first antiXa <0.3 units/ml was associated with an increased risk of mortality [27.78% (5/18) vs 8.05% (14/174), p = 0.021].

CONCLUSION

We observed a low incidence of recurrent thromboembolism or PE-associated mortality utilizing an antiXa titrated UFH protocol. The use of an antiXa based heparin assay to guide heparin dosing and monitoring allows for timely and sustained therapeutic anticoagulation for treatment of PE.

Real-world comparative effectiveness of dalteparin and enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients world-wide. In Australia, the low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) enoxaparin or dalteparin are usually used as first-line prophylaxis for VTE, though there is uncertainty whether dalteparin has the same effectiveness as enoxaparin in real-world settings. This is relevant because dalteparin is less renally cleared and may be more cost effective than enoxaparin. The aim of this study was to explore VTE event incidence in a general cohort of hospitalized adult inpatients who were prescribed enoxaparin or dalteparin for VTE prophylaxis. A retrospective observational study was conducted at a quaternary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, of patients who had experienced a hospital-acquired VTE from 1 September 2021 to 1 March 2023. Patients were identified from routinely collected data following an in-hospital VTE event, and further data was retrieved retrospectively from the integrated electronic Medical Record (ieMR). Incidence and type of VTE events, LMWH-prescribing patterns, and risk factors were assessed. The incidence of VTE events were similar across the dalteparin and enoxaparin cohorts (42.1 events/10 000 patients vs. 34.4 events/10 000 patients, respectively), although patients prescribed enoxaparin had a higher number of risk factors, particularly obesity and active cancer. Our research indicates comparable incidence of VTE in patients prescribed dalteparin compared with enoxaparin in an Australian hospital general cohort of adult inpatients. Dalteparin may be as effective as enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in a real-world cohort of patients, and as such dalteparin may be considered a suitable alternative to enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis. Further research including large randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these results.

A systematic review of therapeutic enoxaparin dosing in obesity

Enoxaparin is a hydrophilic drug with obesity having little effect on its apparent volume of distribution, therefore patients with obesity receiving standard 1 mg/kg dosing may be at a higher risk of supratherapeutic dosing. Conversely, dose reducing patients with obesity could place already at risk patients at higher risk of a thrombotic event. Data and recommendations are variable for the most appropriate weight-based dose of therapeutic enoxaparin in obese patients, particularly those a weight > 100 kg or a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2. The purpose of this systematic review was to globally evaluate these data to surmise optimal dosing recommendations for patients with obesity. A systematic review of English language studies was conducted and identified articles via Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) searches. Studies were included if they reported therapeutic enoxaparin use in adult patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or body weight > 100 kg and the percentage of patients achieving a therapeutic anti-Xa based on a weight-based dose or the weight-based dose required to produce a therapeutic anti-Xa level. Therapeutic attainment of anti-Xa levels were assessed across enoxaparin weight-based dosing categories including a very low dose group: < 0.75 mg/kg, low dose group: 0.75-0.85 mg/kg, and standard dose group: ≥ 0.95 mg/kg. Rates of bleeding and thrombosis were also evaluated. A total of eight studies were included. For anti-Xa level assessment, 682 patients were included. A total of 62% of anti-Xa levels were therapeutic in the very low dose group, 66% in the low dose group, and 42% in the standard dose group. Overall rates of total bleeding and thrombosis were assessed in 798 patients. A total of 29 bleedings (3.6%) occurred, and 27 reported a relationship to dose. Most bleedings, 85.2% (n = 23/27), occurred with doses in the standard dose group (≥ 0.95 mg/kg). Thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (0.6%). Utilization of a reduced weight-based dosing strategy for therapeutic enoxaparin in obese patients may increase the percentage of patients with a therapeutic anti-Xa level.

Caltrop-like Small-Molecule Antidotes That Neutralize Unfractionated Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin In Vivo

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are widely applied for surgical procedures and extracorporeal therapies, which, however, suffer bleeding risk. Protamine, the only clinically approved antidote, can completely neutralize UFH, but only partially neutralizes LMWHs, and also has a number of safety drawbacks. Here, we show that caltrop-like multicationic small molecules can completely neutralize both UFH and LMWHs. In vitro and ex vivo assays with plasma and whole blood and in vivo assays with mice and rats support that the lead compound is not only superior to protamine by displaying higher neutralization activity and broader therapeutic windows but also biocompatible. The effective neutralization dose and the maximum tolerated dose of the lead compound are determined to be 0.4 and 25 mg/kg in mice, respectively, suggesting good promise for further preclinical studies.

Is early bilateral compression ultrasonography and D-dimer monitoring appropriately for prophylaxis and diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis after cesarean section women: a single-center observation study of Chinese Han population

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is most prevalent among parturients following a cesarean section (CS). The objective of this study was to assess the practical utility of bilateral compression ultrasonography (CUS) of the lower limbs, coupled with D-dimer monitoring, in the early diagnosis of VTE within the Han Chinese population.

METHODS

Our prospective observational study included 742 women who underwent CUS and D-dimer testing on the first day post-CS. Subsequently, telephone or outpatient follow-ups were conducted until 42 days postpartum. States of hypercoagulation and thrombosis, as indicated by CUS, were classified as CUS abnormal. A D-dimer level ≥ 3 mg/l was considered the D-dimer warning value. Early ambulation and mechanical prophylaxis were universally recommended for all parturients post-CS. A sequential diagnostic strategy, based on the 2015 RCOG VTE risk-assessment tool, was employed. Therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) were administered for the treatment of thromboembolic disease. Prophylactic doses of LMWH were given for VTE prophylaxis in parturients with hypercoagulative status accompanied by D-dimer levels ≥ 3 mg/l. All high-risk women (RCOG score ≥ 4 points) were additionally treated with preventive LMWH. Statistical analyses were conducted using the R statistical software, with a two-sided P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Fifteen cases of VTE and 727 instances without VTE were observed. The overall VTE rate post-CS was 2.02% (15/742), with 66.7% (10/15) being asymptomatic. Eleven patients received a VTE diagnosis on the first postpartum day. Among the 41 parturients exhibiting hypercoagulation ultrasound findings and D-dimer levels ≥ 3 mg/l, despite receiving pharmacological VTE prophylaxis with LMWH, 4.88% (2/41) in the high-risk group were eventually diagnosed with VTE. A total of 30.86% (229/742) exhibited normal ultrasound findings and D-dimer levels < 3 mg/l on the first day post-CS, with no VTE occurrences in the postpartum follow-up. According to RCOG's recommendation, 78.03% (579/742) of cesarean delivery women should receive prophylactic anticoagulation, while only 20.62% (153/742) met our criterion for prophylactic anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

The strategy of timely routine bilateral CUS and D-dimer monitoring is conducive to the early diagnosis and treatment of VTE, significantly reducing the use of LMWH in the Chinese Han population.

Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk pediatric retinal detachment; randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (PRRDs) are complex, rare occurrences and are often related to trauma or congenital abnormalities. Children often do not recognize or report symptoms of retinal detachment. Thus at presentation, PRRD is typically advanced often with macular involvement, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), chronic duration, and poor visual acuity. Because 5-FU and LMWH are effective in different aspects in the PVR process, it was believed that a syngergistic approach to the prevention of PVR would be advantageous.

METHODS

After informed consent, children under 14 years of age with high-risk PRRD underwent pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil injection with scleral buckle divided into 2 groups in prospective randomized trial. Group A received intraoperative infusion of 5-FU (200 µg/ml) and LMWH (5 IU/ml), group B received infusion of normal saline. Primary outcome was occurrence of recurrent PRRD within 12 weeks, secondary outcomes were occurrence of PVR, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number and timing of secondary procedures within 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The study included 42 eyes of 41 patients, 21 in group A and 21 in group B, the duration of PRRD ranged from 0.5 to 7 months in group A and 0.25-5 months in group B.The rate of recurrent PRRD was higher in group B 33% compared to 19% in group A (p = 0.292). The mean timing of occurrence of recurrent PRRD was 9.5 ± 5 weeks in group A compared to 2.86 ± 2.41 weeks in group B (p = 0.042), more patients in group B ended up with more advanced PVR (p = 0.038), BCVA was hand movement (HM) only in all cases preoperatively and improved to HM-0.3 Snellen in group A compared to light perception (PL)-0.1Snellen in group B (p = 0.035), there was no difference in any of secondary procedures but with later timing in group A 9.71 ± 3.73 weeks than in group B 4.0 ± 2.83 weeks (p = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that the use of the 5-FU and LMWH combination in high risk PRRD resulted in lower rate of postoperative PVR, later recurrence of PRRD and better final BCVA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Registry: clinicaltrials.gov PRS NCT06166914 date of initial release 4/12/2023. Unique Protocol ID: 9,163,209 date 21/10/2021. Retrospectively registered.

Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis following major abdominopelvic surgery - For everyone or selected cases only?

Major abdominopelvic surgery is an important risk factor for postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is the leading cause of 30-day postoperative mortality in patients with cancer undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery. Randomized controlled trials have shown that extended duration thromboprophylaxis using a low molecular weight heparin or a direct oral anticoagulant significantly decreases the risk of overall VTE (symptomatic events and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis). Hence, several clinical practice guidelines suggest the use of extended duration thromboprophylaxis for all high-risk patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery. Despite these recommendations by clinical practice guidelines, adoption of extended duration thromboprophylaxis in clinical practice remains low and clinical equipoise seems to persist. In this narrative review, we aim is to highlight and summarize the reasons that may explain discrepancy between clinical guideline recommendations and current practice regarding extended duration thromboprophylaxis in this patient population. We also aim to review different personalized approaches based on patients' individualized risk of VTE that may foster shared decision making and improve patient outcomes by reducing decisional conflict, increasing patient knowledge, and increasing risk perception accuracy.

Venous Thromboembolism Chemical Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy

» Venous thromboembolism (VTE) after shoulder arthroscopy is rare (0.01%-0.38%) but impacts a significant number of patients because of the high procedure volume.» Studies found no significant benefit in reducing VTE risk with aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparins.» Current guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in shoulder arthroscopy lack consensus and need patient-specific considerations.» Further research is required to develop evidence-based thromboprophylaxis guidelines for shoulder arthroscopy.

Clinical study of tirofiban compared to low molecular weight heparin in the antithrombotic treatment of progressive pontine infarction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of tirofiban and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of patients undergoing acute progressive pontine infarction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with acute progressive pontine infarction who were hospitalized in the Neurology Department from June 2021 to June 2023 were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups, namely the experimental group (tirofiban group) and the control group (LMWH group). All patients in both groups were required to receive conventional comprehensive treatment and dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin + clopidogrel at the beginning of admission. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and Barthel Index (BI) were used to evaluate the neurological deficits on the first day of admission, the next day with stroke progression, and at discharge after treatment with tirofiban and LMWH, respectively in the two groups. The modified Rankin Scale was employed to assess prognosis on the 90th day after treatment. Clinical adverse events were followed up for 90 days, comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of the two treatment methods.

RESULTS

There was no statistical significance in NIHSS score and Barthel Index between the tirofiban group and the LMWH group on the first day of admission and the next day with stroke progression (p > 0.05). After stroke progression, tirofiban and LMWH were separately used for treatment in the two groups. We found that the NIHSS score of the tirofiban group was lower than that of the LMWH group, and the Barthel Index score was higher than that of the LMWH group at discharge (p < 0.05). After three months of follow-up, the mRS score of the tirofiban group was dramatically higher than that of the LMWH group (p < 0.05). No significant harmful or adverse reactions, such as bleeding events, were found in the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tirofiban may be more effective and safer than LMWH in controlling the progression of acute pontine infarction, but further and large-sample studies are still needed to confirm this finding.

Venous thromboembolism management in people with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are increasing in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Providers treating VTE in PwCF have reported low confidence concerning anticoagulant drug selection, dose, duration, and drug-drug interactions. As there are currently no published reports regarding management of VTE in PwCF, our objective was to describe the management of VTE in PwCF.

METHODS

PwCF and VTE at the University of Utah Health were identified through electronic medical record searches. Patients were categorized into one of three treatment groups: warfarin, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). The primary outcome was episodes of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding.

RESULTS

Nine PwCF with a total of 12 unique VTE episodes were included in the study, with all but one episode associated with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Of the 12 VTE cases, 25% were treated with warfarin, 50% with a DOAC, and 25% with LMWH. There were no episodes of major bleeding and only one episode of CRNM bleeding (Hemoptysis) in the LMWH group. All anticoagulant doses and durations generally followed guidelines for persons without CF. DOACs were the most common VTE treatment, at doses and duration consistent with guidelines for persons without CF, with no major or CRNM bleeding.

CONCLUSION

VTE treatment in PwCF is generally consistent with guidelines for persons without CF with low rates of bleeding. DOACs are a potential option for treatment of VTE in PwCF, but more research is needed.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for extended thromboprophylaxis following major abdominal/pelvic cancer-related surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for extended thromboprophylaxis of abdominal/pelvic cancer-related postoperative thromboembolism (VTE) is unclear. We aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. LMWH in these patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of science through May 19th, 2023 for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared the outcomes with DOACs vs. LMWH for extended thromboprophylaxis among patients undergoing abdominal/pelvic cancer surgery. Primary efficacy outcome was clinical VTE, and safety outcome was clinically relevant bleeding complications reported within the 30-day postoperative period. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023413175).

RESULTS

We identified 5078 articles and selected 29 full-text articles for eligibility. A total of 9 studies (2 RCTs and 7 observational studies) encompassing 2651 patients were included for systematic review and 7 for meta-analysis. When compared with LMWH extended thromboprophylaxis, DOACs had a similar incidence of VTE (RR: 0.65 [95% CI: 0.32-1.33], I2 = 0%), major bleeding (RR: 1.68 [95% CI: 0.36-7.9], I2 = 26%), and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR: 0.68 [95% CI: 0.39-1.19], I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis suggested no difference according to the study type (RCTs versus observational studies) regarding clinical VTE or major bleeding (Pinteraction = 0.43 and Pinteraction = 0.71, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that DOACs for extended thromboprophylaxis were an effective and safe alternative to LMWH after major abdominal/pelvic cancer-related surgery.

Monitoring anti-Xa Levels to Optimize Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients: A Stratified Meta-Analysis

It is uncertain whether monitoring or targeting anti-Xa levels is necessary when using low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). This stratified meta-analysis assessed whether monitoring trough or peak anti-Xa levels with LMWH dosing would reduce risk of VTE. Twelve non-randomized studies involving 3604 hospitalized patients met the inclusion criteria and were subject to meta-analysis. Eight studies assessed the association between VTE and peak anti-Xa levels (between .2 and .5 IU/ml) and four studies assessed the benefits of targeting the trough anti-Xa levels (>.1 IU/ml). Achieving an adequate peak or trough anti-Xa level was associated with a reduced risk of VTE (random-effects model odds ratio [OR] .52, 95% confidence interval [CI] .34-.77; P = .001, I2 = 30% and P-value for heterogeneity = .171) compared with using a fixed standard dose of LMWH. Targeting the trough level (OR .40, 95%CI 0.22-.75, P = .004) appeared to be more effective than targeting the peak level (OR .62, 95%CI 0.37-1.03, P = .066), although a formal interaction analysis did not confirm they were statistically different (ratio of ORs = 1.52, 95%CI 0.68-3.40; z score = 1.03, P = .306). Targeting a higher anti-Xa level did not appear to increase the risk of bleeding or transfusion (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.46-3.17, P = .707).

[Venous thromboembolism - was is new in the revised AWMF guideline?]

For the diagnosis of a lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT), venous duplex ultrasound is the method of first choice. If a qualified ultrasonography is not timely available, D-dimer testing, and limited ultrasound protocols (point-of-care ultrasound, POCUS) can contribute to therapeutic decision-making when clinical probability is low. A DOAC-based treatment regimen is preferable to a vitamin K antagonist for both acute therapy and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Treatment with DOACs is unproblematic up to a body weight (BW) of 120 kg or a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m². Weight restrictions are no longer recommended for apixaban and rivaroxaban, but determination of DOAC trough and peak levels is recommended in the extremely obese and patients after bariatric surgery. In cancer-associated VTE, the direct factor Xa inhibitors are a good and safe alternative to low-molecular weight heparins (LMWH) for many patients; the adherence to oral therapy is also higher. Meaningful initial documentation and structured follow-up after LEDVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) are important in order to make an individualized risk-benefit assessment at the end of the therapy phase with regard to continued pharmacological secondary prophylaxis and to reassess patients' symptoms indicating post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

Distinct mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of low-molecular-weight heparin and chondroitin sulfate on Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder influenced by various factors, including age, genetics, and the environment. Current treatments provide symptomatic relief without impeding disease progression. Previous studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of exogenous heparin and chondroitin sulfate in PD. However, their therapeutic mechanisms and structure-activity relationships remain poorly understood. In this study, low-molecular-weight heparin (L-HP) and chondroitin sulfate (L-CS) exhibited favorable therapeutic effects in a mouse model of PD. Proteomics revealed that L-HP attenuated mitochondrial dysfunction through its antioxidant properties, whereas L-CS suppressed neuroinflammation by inhibiting platelet activation. Two glycosaminoglycan (GAG)-binding proteins, manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD2) and fibrinogen beta chain (FGB), were identified as potential targets of L-HP and L-CS, and we investigated their structure-activity relationships. The IdoA2S-GlcNS6S/GlcNAc6S unit in HP bound to SOD2, whereas the GlcA-GalNAc4S and GlcA-GalNAc4S6S units in CS preferred FGB. Furthermore, N-S and 2-O-S in L-HP, and 4-O-S, 6-O-S, and -COOH in L-CS contributed significantly to the binding process. These findings provide new insights and evidence for the development and use of glycosaminoglycan-based therapeutics for PD.

Anticoagulant prescribing patterns in patients with primary central nervous system malignancies and secondary metastases

To evaluate the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and secondary metastases. All adult patients with CNS malignancies and secondary metastases who were treated with a DOAC or LMWH for any indication from 2018 to 2022 were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after anticoagulation initiation. Secondary outcomes included non-ICH bleeding events and thromboembolic events. Tolerability was assessed by any changes in anticoagulant therapy during study period. 153 patients were included; 48 patients received enoxaparin and 105 received DOACs, of which apixaban was used most commonly. The population was predominantly White (74%) and male (59%) with a median age of 65. Data was censored for immortal time bias for outcomes evaluated beyond 3 months. ICH occurred in 7.7% of the population, more frequently in the enoxaparin group (DOACs 4, 4% vs. enoxaparin 7, 16%, p = 0.037). Non-ICH bleeds were predominantly minor and more common in the DOAC group (DOACs 13, 13% vs. enoxaparin 1, 2%, p = 0.037). Thromboembolic events were not different between groups (DOACs 9. 9% vs, enoxaparin 2, 4%, p = 0.503). Anticoagulant switches occurred more in the enoxaparin group (DOACs 12, 12.4% vs. enoxaparin, 37.8%, p < 0.001), primarily due to patient or provider preference. Our data supports DOACs to be preferred over LMWH for the treatment of VTE or for stroke prevention with AF to prevent ICH in patients with brain tumors or metastases.

Should intermittent pneumatic compression devices be standard therapy for the prevention of venous thromboembolic events in major surgery? Protocol for a randomised clinical trial (IMPOSTERS)

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognised postsurgical risk. Current prevention methods involve low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), graduated compression stockings (GCS), and intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCDs). Australian guidelines, commonly adopted by surgeons, recommend LMWH with GCS and/or IPCDs. IPCDs pose clinical risks, increase care burden, are poorly tolerated, and are costly single-use plastic items. Utilising only LMWH and GCS, without IPCDs, could be more practical, patient-friendly, and cost-effective, with added environmental benefits.

METHODS

This is a multicentre, prospective, two-arm randomised controlled non-inferiority trial at five New South Wales (NSW) hospitals, in Australia. We propose to randomise 4130 participants in a 1:1 ratio between arm A: LMWH+GCS+IPCDs (n=2065) or arm B: LMWH+GCS (n=2065). The primary outcome of interest is symptomatic VTE (deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism) identified at the day 30 phone follow-up (FU), confirmed by ultrasound or imaging. Radiologists interpreting the lower-extremity ultrasonography will be blinded to intervention allocation. Secondary outcomes are quality of life at baseline, days 30 and 90 FU using the 5-level European Quality of Life Score, compliance and adverse events with IPCDs, GCS, and LMWH, as well as healthcare costs (from the perspective of the patient and the hospital), and all-cause mortality. The trial has 90% power to detect a 2% non-inferiority margin to detect a reduction rate of VTE from 4% to 2%.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (2022/ETH02276) protocol V.10, 13 July 2023. Study findings will be presented at local and national conferences and in scientific research journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ANZCTR12622001527752.

[Evaluation of anticoagulant effect and predicted dose of low molecular weight heparin in hemodialysis by anti-Ⅹa factor activity]

The purpose of this study was to explore the reasonable dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in hemodialysis (HD) and the strategy of preventing extracorporeal circuit coagulation (ECC). A retrospective case-control study included patients who used LMWH for anticoagulation during maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) in the Hemodialysis Center of Beijing Hospital from December 2020 to January 2021. Basic data such as weight, height, basic kidney disease, dialysis age and anti-Ⅹa factor activity before, during and after dialysis were collected. A total of 46 patients were enrolled in this study, including 5 patients in coagulation group (10.9%) and 41 patients in non-coagulation group (89.1%). The anti-Ⅹa factor activity reached its peak at 0.5 h after the start of HD. The level of anti-Ⅹa factor was incorporated into the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve). The results showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.802 (95% confidence interval: 0.651-0.54, P=0.029), and the cutoff was 0.31 IU/ml (sensitivity 1, specificity 0.683). It is suggested that the body surface area should be used as the basis to estimate the anticoagulant dose of LMWH in HD, and the activity of HD 4 h anti-Ⅹa factor ≤0.31 IU/ml, which is of diagnostic value for ECC. In addition, the results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that dialysis age was an independent risk factor for ECC (OR value 1.319, 95%CI 1.052-1.654, P=0.017). In summary, this study reveals that dialysis age may be a risk factor for ECC and that the activity of HD 4 h anti-Ⅹa factor ≤0.31 IU/ml can be used as a potential diagnostic cut-off point for ECC in HD patients, which provides a scientific basis for monitoring strategies to prevent blood coagulation in HD filters.

Management of venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health burden in patients with cancer, causing morbidity, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and death. Treatment is challenging, as it is necessary to balance the risk of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding associated with anticoagulants. Treatment paradigms are shifting from low-molecular-weight heparin monotherapy. Multiple recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in this setting. Current studies are evaluating factor XI inhibitors as potential treatments for cancer-associated VTE.

Cancer-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis: Clinical implications and management considerations

Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), a thrombosis which involves the portal, mesenteric, and splenic veins, and the Budd-Chiari syndrome, represents an uncommon type of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Like with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and pulmonary embolism, ample evidence suggests a significant association between SVT and cancer, particularly intra-abdominal solid malignancies (e.g. hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancers) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Clinical symptoms of SVT in cancer patients can be ambiguous, and frequently attributed to the primary cancer itself. Alternatively, SVT may be asymptomatic and detected incidentally during cancer staging or follow-up evaluations. SVT can also precede the diagnosis of cancer and has been associated with poorer outcomes in patients with liver or pancreatic cancers. Therefore, an unprovoked SVT warrants a thorough evaluation for an underlying malignancy or MPN. Cancer-associated SVT carries a high risk of VTE extension, recurrence and bleeding. Extended anticoagulant treatment is often required in the absence of a high bleeding risk. Guidelines suggest treatment with either low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), although available data on the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in these patients is limited. This comprehensive review outlines the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, and diagnosis of cancer-associated SVT and underscores the importance of comprehensive patient evaluation and evidence-based management.

Venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in geriatric trauma patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE

Low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) has been shown to be associated with a decreased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and mortality compared to unfractionated heparin (UH) in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this study was to see if this association persists among a subset of patients, namely elderly patients with isolated TBI.

METHODS

This Trauma Quality Improvement Project (TQIP) database study included patients ≥ 65 years old with severe TBI (Abbreviated injury score [AIS] ≥ 3) that received either LMWH or UH for VTE prophylaxis. Patients with associated severe injuries (extracranial AIS ≥ 3), transferals, deaths < 72-h, hospitalization < 2 days, VTE chemoprophylaxis other than UH or LMWH, or with a history of bleeding diathesis were excluded. The association between VTE, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE) with VTE chemoprophylaxis was analyzed with multivariable analysis, subset analyses of different grades of AIS-head injury, and a 1:1 matched LWMH:UH cohort of patients.

RESULTS

Out of 14,926 patients, 11,036 (73.9%) received LMWH. Multivariate analysis showed that patients receiving LMWH had a decreased risk of mortality (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, p < 0.001) but a similar risk of VTE (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.63-1.08). Analysis according to head-AIS showed that LMWH was associated with a decreased risk of PE in patients AIS-3 but not in AIS 4 or 5. In a 1:1 matched cohort of LMWH:UH patients, the risk of PE, DVT and VTE were all similar but LMWH continued to be associated with a decreased risk of mortality (OR 0.81, CI 0.67-0.97, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

LMWH was associated with a decreased risk of overall mortality and reduced risk of PE compared to UH among geriatric patients with a severe head injury.

Risk factors for thromboembolic complications in isolated severe head injury

PURPOSE

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of the present study is to identify factors independently associated with VTE events. Specifically, we hypothesized that the mechanism of penetrating head trauma might be an independent factor associated with increased VTE events when compared with blunt head trauma.

METHODS

The ACS-TQIP database (2013-2019) was queried for all patients with isolated severe head injuries (AIS 3-5) who received VTE prophylaxis with either unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin. Transfers, patients who died within 72 h and those with a hospital length of stay < 48 h were excluded. Multivariable analysis was used as the primary analysis to identify independent risk factors for VTE in isolated severe TBI.

RESULTS

A total of 75,570 patients were included in the study, 71,593 (94.7%) with blunt and 3977 (5.3%) with penetrating isolated TBI. Penetrating trauma mechanism (OR 1.49, CI 95% 1.26-1.77), increasing age (age 16-45: reference; age > 45-65: OR 1.65, CI 95% 1.48-1.85; age > 65-75: OR 1.71, CI 95% 1.45-2.02; age > 75: OR 1.73, CI 95% 1.44-2.07), male gender (OR 1.53, CI 95% 1.36-1.72), obesity (OR 1.35, CI 95% 1.22-1.51), tachycardia (OR 1.31, CI 95% 1.13-1.51), increasing head AIS (AIS 3: reference; AIS 4: OR 1.52, CI 95% 1.35-1.72; AIS 5: OR 1.76, CI 95% 1.54-2.01), associated moderate injuries (AIS = 2) of the abdomen (OR 1.31, CI 95% 1.04-1.66), spine (OR 1.35, CI 95% 1.19-1.53), upper extremity (OR 1.16, CI 95% 1.02-1.31), lower extremity (OR 1.46, CI 95% 1.26-1.68), craniectomy/craniotomy or ICP monitoring (OR 2.96, CI 95% 2.65-3.31) and pre-existing hypertension (OR 1.18, CI 95% 1.05-1.32) were identified as independent risk factors for VTE complications in isolated severe head injury. Increasing GCS (OR 0.93, CI 95% 0.92-0.94), early VTE prophylaxis (OR 0.48, CI 95% 0.39-0.60) and LMWH compared to heparin (OR 0.74, CI 95% 0.68-0.82) were identified as protective factors for VTE complications.

CONCLUSION

The identified factors independently associated with VTE events in isolated severe TBI need to be considered in VTE prevention measures. In penetrating TBI, an even more aggressive VTE prophylaxis management may be justified as compared to that in blunt.

Factors limiting women's adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after cesarean section in the Gaza Strip: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

We evaluate the rates and limitations of women's adherence to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after cesarean section (CS) in the Gaza Strip.

METHODS

Women who underwent CS were recruited consecutively. Communication offered to women, adherence to Venous thromboembolism (VTE), and its limiting factors were surveyed.

RESULTS

281 women participated (mean age 27.9 years). 51.95% fully adhered to VTE prophylaxis. Causes of suboptimal adherence were: 51.1% did not feel VTE prophylaxis was important, 37.8% due to high drug cost, and 11.1% didn't receive a prescription for LMWH at discharge. Poor communication was evident as 48.8% of the sample did not receive any instructions about the technical method of LMWH injection, 45.6% did not receive any information about the clinical significance of heparin, and 74.7% were unaware of LMWH side effects.

CONCLUSION

There is inadequate adherence to VTE prophylaxis after CS among Gaza women, mostly due to a lack of appropriate communication but also due to drug costs.

Low molecular weight heparin decreases pro-coagulant activity in clinical MSC products

BACKGROUND AIMS

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent adult cells that can be isolated from tissues including bone marrow [MSC(BM)], adipose [MSC(AT)] and umbilical cord [MSC(CT)]. Previous studies have linked expression of tissue factor (TF) on MSC surfaces to a procoagulant effect. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), immediate blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) and microvascular thrombosis remain a risk with intravascular MSC therapy. We examined the effect of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on clinical-grade MSCs using calibrated automated thrombography (CAT).

METHODS

Clinical grade MSC(BM)s, MSC(AT)s and MSC(CT)s harvested at passage 4 were added to normal pooled plasma (NPP) to a final concentration of either 400 000 or 50 000 cells/mL. LMWH was added to plasma in increments of 0.1 U/mL. Thrombin generation (TG) was measured using CAT. Flow cytometry was conducted on the cells to measure MSC phenotype and TF load.

RESULTS

Presence of MSCs decreased lag time and increased peak TG. All cell lines demonstrated a dose response to LMWH, with MSC(AT) demonstrating the least thrombogenicity and most sensitivity to LMWH. TG was significantly reduced in all cell lines at doses of 0.2 U/mL LMWH and higher.

DISCUSSION

All MSC types and concentrations had a decrease in peak thrombin and TG with increasing amounts of LMWH. While this in vitro study cannot determine optimal dosing, it suggests that LMWH can be effectively used to lower the risk of VTE associated with intravascular administration of MSCs. Future in vivo work can be done to determine optimal dosing and effect on IBMIR and VTE.

Infrequent transition to direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are challenging aspects of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy in patients with cancer. We evaluated the prevalence of potential DOAC/antineoplastic agent DDIs and the one-year cumulative incidence of switching from low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to a DOAC in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Patients with cancer and an indication of LMWH were included from Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark, in the 2014-2019 period. Follow-up was initiated when the first dose of LMWH was dispensed. Data were obtained from electronic medical records. One-year cumulative incidence of switching from LMWH to DOAC was estimated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. Potential DDIs were evaluated using a report from the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and a review by Hellfritzsch et al. RESULTS. A total of 161 patients were included with a median age of 70.8 (interquartile range: 64.2-76.1) years. The one-year cumulative incidence of switching from LMWH to DOAC was 32% (95% confidence intervals: 21-43%) in patients eligible for DOACs. Using the EHRA report, a total of 24% of antineoplastic agents were not identified. This percentage decreased to 8% using data from Hellfritzsch et al. CONCLUSIONS. In patients with cancer, the one-year cumulative incidence of switching from LMWH to DOAC was less-t 35% in patients eligible for DOAC, revealing a potential for improved anticoagulant treatment. Furthermore, contemporary data elaborated on potential DDIs between DOACs/antineoplastic agents.

FUNDING

"Helsefonden" (21-B-0350) and the "Karen Elise Jensens Fonden" (29-4-2021) funded the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not relevant.

Low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies without thrombophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically evaluate the efficacy of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent preeclampsia in high risk pregnant women without thrombophilia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library were searched for articles published before 1st August 2022 using the combination keywords "preeclampsia", "Low Molecular Weight Heparin", "LMWH", "Heparin, Low Molecular Weight", "Dalteparin", "Nadroparin", and "Tinzaparin".

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of LMWH in pregnant women at high risk of preeclampsia without thrombophilia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis (1758 patients in total). Outcomes were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

LMWH reduced the incidence of PE (RR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.50-0.90; P = 0.009) in high risk pregnant women without thrombophilia. Subgroup analysis found that the prophylactic effect of LMWH was only significant in studies using low-dose aspirin (LDA) as the primary intervention. The combination of LMWH and LDA was also effective for the prevention of preterm birth and fetal growth restriction, but had no effect on the incidence of placenta abruption.

CONCLUSION

For women at high risk of developing preeclampsia without thrombophilia, the combination of LMWH and low-dose aspirin is effective for the prevention of preeclampsia, preterm birth and fetal growth restriction and is superior to LDA alone.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome, recurrent thromboembolism, and bleeding after upper extremity vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Data on complications after upper extremity vein thrombosis (UEVT) are limited and heterogeneous.

METHODS

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pooled proportions of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, bleeding, and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with UEVT. A systematic literature review was conducted of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to April 2023 in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. All studies included patients with UEVT and were published in English. Meta-analyses of VTE recurrence, bleeding, and of PTS after UEVT were performed to compute pooled estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses of cancer-associated UEVT and catheter-associated venous thrombosis were conducted. Patients with Paget-Schroetter syndrome or effort thrombosis were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 55 studies with 15,694 patients were included. The pooled proportions for VTE recurrence, major bleeding, and PTS were 4.8% (95% CI, 3.8%-6.2%), 3.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-4.0%), and 23.8% (95% CI, 17.0%-32.3%), respectively. The pooled proportion of VTE recurrence was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.6%) for patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), 1.7% (95% CI, 0.8%-3.7%) for patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and 4.4% (95% CI, 1.5%-11.8%) for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; P = .36). The pooled proportion was 6.3% (95% CI, 4.3%-9.1%) for cancer patients compared with 3.1% (95% CI, 2.1%-4.6%) for patients without cancer (P = .01). The pooled proportion of major bleeding for patients treated with DOACs, LMWH, and VKAs, was 2.1% (95% CI, 0.9%-5.1%), 3.2% (95% CI, 1.4%-7.2%), and 3.4% (95% CI, 1.4%-8.4%), respectively (P = .72). The pooled proportion of PTS for patients treated with DOACs, LMWH, and VKAs was 11.8% (95% CI, 6.5%-20.6%), 27.9% (95% CI, 20.9%-36.2%), and 24.5% (95% CI, 17.6%-33.1%), respectively (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study suggest that UEVT is associated with significant rates of PTS and VTE recurrence. Treatment with DOACs might be associated with lower PTS rates than treatment with other anticoagulants.

Achieving durable compliance with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in bariatric surgery: 3-year data from a major academic medical center

BACKGROUND

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) venous thromboembolism (VTE) prescribing practices vary widely. Our institutional VTE prophylaxis protocol has historically been unstandardized.

OBJECTIVES

To create a standardized MBS VTE prophylaxis protocol, track protocol compliance, and identify barriers to protocol compliance and address them with Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles.

SETTING

Single Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program-accredited academic hospital.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study for all patients undergoing MBS (January 2019 to September 2022). A multidisciplinary group of bariatric clinicians reviewed literature and developed the following standardized VTE prophylaxis protocol: 5000 units preoperative subcutaneous (SC) heparin within 60 minutes of anesthesia induction and postoperative 40 mg SC low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 24 hours of surgery. This protocol was distributed to relevant clinical stakeholders. We assessed monthly compliance rates through chart review. Goal compliance was ≥90%. We identified sources of noncompliance and addressed them with PDSA methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 796 patients were included. Preoperative heparin administration increased from a mean of 47% (107/228) preintervention to 96% (545/568) postintervention (P < .0001), and postoperative LMWH administration increased from 71% (47/66) to 96% (573/597, P = .0002). These compliance rates were sustained for 3 years. Barriers to protocol noncompliance included order set timing errors (n = 45), surgeon error (n = 44), surgeon discretion (n = 40), and nursing error (n = 20). No change in bleeding or VTE rates was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Developing a standardized VTE prophylaxis protocol, monitoring process measures, and engaging relevant stakeholders in PDSA cycles resulted in drastic and durable improvement in VTE prophylaxis compliance rates.

Availability of medical and endovascular therapies for venous thromboembolism: a global survey for World Thrombosis Day

BACKGROUND

Data on availability, affordability, and accessibility is key for the planning of global strategies to reduce the burden of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

OBJECTIVES

A survey was conducted for the 10th anniversary of World Thrombosis Day to assess the availability of VTE therapies worldwide and challenges in uniform implementation.

METHODS

We gathered information on the approval status, availability, utilization, occurrence of shortages, and spread of medical and interventional therapies for VTE. Furthermore, we collected information by accessing or contacting national or continental medicines agencies, manufacturers or distributors, and online drug repositories.

RESULTS

We obtained data from a total of 69 countries: 33 countries in Europe, 19 in Asia, 7 in the Americas, 9 in Africa, and 1 in Oceania. Unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and vitamin K antagonists were available in almost all countries, but shortages were recorded in 13%, 19%, and 15% of them, respectively. Direct oral anticoagulants were available in approximately three-quarters of the surveyed countries. At least one parenteral medication for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was available in 57% of countries and a shortage was reported in 9% of these. Shortage of thrombolytics was recorded in 50% of countries. Overall, at least one type of catheter-directed therapy system was approved for use in 77% of countries and available in 23% of surveyed institutions. Our findings revealed notable geographic disparities in the worldwide availability of VTE therapies, the access to which appeared to be limited by economic and geopolitical factors.

CONCLUSION

We anticipate that this comprehensive information will play a pivotal role in highlighting the shortcomings of VTE therapies and the lack of homogeneous availability globally.

Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment-related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least six months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond six months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first six months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

Safety of fixed-dose heparin titration boluses in underweight patients

INTRODUCTION

At UNC, venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients are treated with a heparin nomogram including fixed-dose titration boluses to correct subtherapeutic heparin correlation values (HCVs). The bolus dose often exceeds the recommended loading dose in underweight patients, therefore raising concern for an increased bleeding risk. This evaluation aims to assess the safety of these titration boluses for underweight patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients receiving intravenous heparin for VTE treatment and requiring at least one titration bolus were included. The underweight patients had a body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2 while the patients in the control group had a BMI of 18.5-29.9 kg/m2. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with a supratherapeutic HCV after the first titration bolus. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients with a supratherapeutic HCV requiring holding of the infusion, time to stable HCV, and clinically significant bleeding.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria, with similar baseline characteristics between groups. There were 13.9 % of patients in both groups who had a supratherapeutic HCV after the first titration bolus. More underweight patients required holding of heparin. All patients took over 48 h to reach a stable HCV. There was no difference in clinically significant bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite finding no significant difference, there remains clinical concern for increased bleeding risk in underweight patients as this population required heparin to be held due to supratherapeutic HCVs more often. More evidence is needed to evaluate the safety of fixed-dose heparin titration boluses in underweight patients due to the limited scope of this study.

Central venous catheter associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients: Diagnosis and therapeutic management

Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a relatively frequent and potentially fatal complication arising in patients with cancer who require a central catheter placement for intravenous treatment. In everyday practice, CRT remains a challenge for management; despite its frequency and its negative clinical impact, few data are available concerning diagnosis and treatment of CRT. In particular, no diagnostic studies or clinical trials have been published that included exclusively patients with cancer and a central venous catheter (CVC). For this reason, many questions regarding optimal management of CRT remain unanswered. Due to the paucity of high-grade evidence regarding CRT in cancer patients, guidelines are derived from upper extremity DVT studies for diagnosis, and from those for lower limb DVT for treatment. This article addresses the issues of diagnosis and management of CRT through a review of the available literature and makes a number of proposals based on the available evidence. In symptomatic patients, venous ultrasound is the most appropriate choice for first-line diagnostic imaging of CRT because it is noninvasive, and its diagnostic performance is high (which is not the case in asymptomatic patients). In the absence of direct comparative clinical trials, we suggest treating patients with CRT with a therapeutic dose of either a LMWH or a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor, with or without a loading dose. These anticoagulants should be given for a total of at least three months, including at least one month after catheter removal following initiation of therapy.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Worldwide Survey

Current recommendations on thromboprophylaxis for foot and ankle (FA) surgery are often inconsistent and generally based on weak evidence. The aim of this survey study was to evaluate the current practice among orthopedic surgeons regarding venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following FA surgery. From February 2019 to March 2020, an online questionnaire was sent by e-mail to orthopedic societies across the world. The questionnaire was hosted by the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostais RedCAP platform. Topics of interest were VTE rates following FA surgery, duration and type of thromboprophylaxis, bleeding complications, VTE risk factors for prophylaxis and use of risk assessment. A total of 693 FA orthopedic surgeons from all continents completed the survey of whom 392 (57%) performed more than 200 FA procedures per year. A total of 669/693 (97%) respondents stated that thromboprophylaxis is necessary in FA surgeries. When thromboprophylaxis was prescribed, half of surgeons prescribed it for the duration of immobilization. Acetylsalicylic acid, low molecular weight heparin and direct-oral anticoagulants were, in this order, the preferred choice. Acetylsalicylic acid and low molecular weight heparin were predominantly prescribed in North America and Europe, respectively. Previous deep vein thrombosis, immobility, obesity and inherited thrombophilia were considered the main risk factors indicative of thromboprophylaxis use. In this survey, most surgeons agree that thromboprophylaxis is indicated for FA surgery, but the prescription, type and duration of prophylaxis differs greatly with a large intercontinental discrepancy. These survey results could be a foundation for developing uniform guidelines to optimize thromboprophylactic strategies in FA procedures around the world.

A Good Prognosis of Patients with Acute Pancreatitis Combined with Pulmonary Embolism: Early Identification and Intervention

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a relatively rare vascular complication of acute pancreatitis (AP), and its mortality rate is high. To our knowledge, relevant literature reports still need to be summarized. In this study, we analyzed the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of five patients with AP complicated by PE and summarized and reviewed the relevant literature.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients with AP complicated by PE treated in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province between January 2017 and September 2022 were retrospectively collected. Combined with the relevant literature, the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognoses of patients with AP combined with PE were analyzed and summarized.

RESULTS

Five patients were eventually enrolled in this study. Among the five patients with AP complicated by PE, all (100%) had symptoms of malaise, primarily chest tightness, shortness of breath, and dyspnea. All patients (100%) had varied degrees of elevated D-dimer levels and a significant decrease in the pressure of partial oxygen (PO2) and pressure of arterial oxygen to fractional inspired oxygen concentration ratio (PaO2/FiO2). Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or pulmonary ventilation/perfusion imaging revealed a pulmonary artery filling defect in these patients. One patient (20%) had left calf muscular venous thrombosis before the occurrence of PE. Four patients (80%) were treated with lowmolecular- weight heparin (LMWH), and one patient (20%) was treated with rivaroxaban during hospitalization; all continued oral anticoagulant therapy after discharge. All patients (100%) were cured and discharged. No patients showed recurrence of AP or PE.

CONCLUSION

PE is a rare but life-threatening complication of AP. However, once diagnosed, early treatment with anticoagulation or radiological interventional procedures is effective, and the prognosis is good. Core Tips: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a rare but life-threatening complication of acute pancreatitis (AP). Its early diagnosis and timely anticoagulation or radiological intervention can reduce mortality. However, only nine cases have been reported in the English literature thus far, and they are all case reports. Our study is the first systematic analysis of patients with AP combined with PE with a review of the relevant literature. Our patients and those reported in the literature were discharged with good prognoses under treatment such as anticoagulation and vascular intervention. These cases remind clinicians that, in patients with AP, especially those with risk factors for venous thrombosis, it is necessary to monitor the D-dimer level dynamically. Clinicians should pay attention to AP patients' symptoms and related examinations to reduce the chance of a missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of PE.

Management of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with malignant brain tumours

This article addresses the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant brain tumours, including both primary and secondary (metastatic) tumours. The available data on patients on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding risks in patients with brain tumours is limited, since these patients have been excluded from most randomised, interventional, head-to-head, clinical trials comparing low molecular weight heparins to vitamin K antagonists or to direct oral Factor Xa inhibitors. More information is available from retrospective observational studies, which however were generally small, and carried a high risk of confounding. Their findings suggest that direct Factor Xa inhibitor use is associated with lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage compared with low molecular weight heparins. Overall, the safety profile of direct oral Factor Xa inhibitors when used to prevent venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with either primary or secondary brain tumours appears to be favourable. The available data are in favour of using an anticoagulant at a full therapeutic dose in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours experiencing a venous thromboembolism, although they are not yet sufficiently robust to permit recommending a direct Factor Xa inhibitor over low-molecular weight heparin.

COVID-19 thromboprophylaxis. New evidence

Recent publications have questioned the efficacy of using therapeutic or intermediate doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in COVID-19 patients, especially in the most severe patients. In order to update these recommendations, a non-systematic review has been carried out in the main medical databases. A total of 14 randomized clinical trials, 14 meta-analyses and the recommendations of 12 scientific societies were selected, stratified according to the type of patient (outpatient, hospitalized, admitted to critical care or post-discharge). The efficacy of LMWH and other therapeutic approaches (rivaroxaban, apixaban, sulodexide, acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y12 inhibitors) has been analyzed. The findings recommend using standard doses of LMWH as thromboprophylaxis in critically hospitalized COVID-19 patients and therapeutic doses in non-critically hospitalized patients if the risk of bleeding is low. In outpatients and those discharged from the hospital, LMWH could be used at a prophylactic dose if there are thrombotic risk factors, and the bleeding risk is low. It is not recommended to associate antiplatelet agents with LMWH unless previously indicated.

Prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin in women with thrombophilia undergoing in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To verify whether low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) could increase pregnancy rates and/or decrease abortion rates in women with thrombophilia undergoing assisted reproduction cycles.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study with patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) (N = 104). Women without thrombophilia (control group, n = 20), women with thrombophilia who did not receive LMWH (untreated group, n = 30), and women with thrombophilia, treated with daily enoxaparin from the day of embryo transfer until week 36 of gestation (treated group, n = 54). All women underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. IVF was performed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryos were transferred on day 3. Pregnancy was detected by β-human chorionic gonadotropin (biochemical pregnancy) and fetal heartbeat at week 5 to 6. Ongoing pregnancy was determined by ultrasound on week 12.

RESULTS

Patients in the untreated thrombophilia group presented with significantly lower ongoing pregnancy rates and live birth rates and significantly higher early pregnancy loss and abortion rates when compared with the control and the treated thrombophilia groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with diagnosed coagulation disorders, use of LMWH is important to avoid miscarriages.

Perioperative anticoagulation in head and neck free flap reconstructions: Experience of an anticoagulative scheme and its modification

OBJECTIVES

Microvascular anastomoses in microvascular reconstructions induce rheological changes in the anastomosed vessels and are usually counteracted by anticoagulative medication. There is no regimen commonly agreed on. This study provides an easy to use anticoagulative regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive cases of either anticoagulative regimen between 2013 and 2018 that underwent microvascular reconstruction in the head and neck area were included in this retrospective study, resulting in 400 cases in total. Two different anticoagulative regimens were applied to 200 patients in each group: (a) intraoperatively administered unfractionated 5000 I.U. high molecular weight heparin (HMWH) and postoperatively low molecular weight heparin (LMWH, Enoxaparin) 1 mg/kg/body weight postoperatively and (b) intraoperatively LMWH 0.5 mg/kg/body weight as well as 12 h later and 1 mg/kg/body weight postoperatively.

RESULTS

The LMWH cohort showed fewer overall thromboembolic (8.5% vs. 11%; p = .40) and peripheral thrombotic events (1% vs. 3.5%; p = .18) and lung embolisms (3% vs. 4%; p = .59). The number of thromboses at the site of the anastomosis was equally distributed. In regard to flap-specific complications, LMWH was associated with a positive effect, in particular with respect to total flap losses (5% vs. 7%; p = .40) and wound-healing disorders (14.5% vs. 20%; p = .145).

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate that intra- and postoperatively administered LMWH as the only anticoagulative medication seems reliable in our clinical routine of head and neck free flap reconstructions.

A child with intravascular fasciitis mimicking deep vein thrombosis: a case report

BACKGROUND

Intravascular fasciitis (IF) is a benign, reactive, myofibroblastic proliferation that originates from the superficial or deep fascia of small / medium-sized arteries and veins.

CASE REPORT

An 8-year-old male patient was admitted to a health center with the complaint of swelling in the inguinal region. Lower extremity venous Doppler ultrasonography showed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the femoral vein and anticoagulation with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was initiated. The patient was referred to our center for follow-up. The D-dimer level was detected within normal limits. Doppler ultrasonography was repeated and showed an intraluminal expanding mass lesion with increasing vascularity, without distinct borders and LMWH was discontinued. This lesion at the sapheno-femoral junction was excised surgically and the histopathological examination revealed intravascular fasciitis.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware that the clinical findings of IF may mimic sarcoma and thrombosis.

Low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with lower venous thromboembolism events than factor Xa inhibitors in patients with severe blunt trauma: a cohort study from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common complication of major trauma. Pharmacological VTE prophylactics are widely used, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended. Factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being used for VTE prophylaxis in both medical and surgical patients. Evidence comparing LMWH and factor Xa inhibitors as VTE prophylactics for severe blunt trauma is lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and LMHW in VTE prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with severe blunt trauma who received LMWH or a factor Xa inhibitor for VTE prophylaxis in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017 and 2019 were included. The comparison was performed after using propensity score matching. The outcomes included mortality and incidence of DVT, PE, post-prophylactics haemorrhage control procedures and length of stay.

RESULTS

After 2:1 propensity score matching, 1128 patients ( n =752, LMHW group; n =376, factor Xa inhibitor group) were included in the analysis. Patients in the LMWH group had fewer VTE events than those in the factor Xa inhibitor group (DVT, 3.7% vs. 7.2%, P =0.013; PE, 0.4% vs. 3.2%, P <0.001). VTE risk was higher in the factor Xa group (DVT: odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.12-3.44; P =0.018 and PE: odds ratio, 9.65; 95% CI, 2.91-44.12; P =0.001). The mortality rate was higher in the LMWH group; however, there was no significant difference (4.0% vs. 1.9%; P =0.075). The difference in the risk of undergoing haemorrhage control surgery after VTE prophylaxis between both groups was insignificant (0.3% vs. 0.0%; P =0.333).

CONCLUSIONS

LMWH was associated with a lower risk of VTE than factor Xa inhibitors in patients with severe blunt trauma. The mortality rate was higher in the LMWH group; however, there was no statistically significant difference observed.