Factors predicting survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy with arterial resection

Pancreatectomy with arterial resection is a treatment option in selected patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to identify factors predicting cancer-specific survival in this patient population. A single-Institution prospective database was used. Pre-operative prognostic factors were identified and used to develop a prognostic score. Matching with pathologic parameters was used for internal validation. In a patient population with a median Ca 19.9 level of 19.8 U/mL(IQR: 7.1–77), cancer-specific survival was predicted by: metabolic deterioration of diabetes (OR = 0.22, p = 0.0012), platelet count (OR = 1.00; p = 0.0013), serum level of Ca 15.3 (OR = 1.01, p = 0.0018) and Ca 125 (OR = 1.02, p = 0.00000137), neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (OR = 1.16; p = 0.00015), lymphocytes-to-monocytes ratio (OR = 0.88; p = 0.00233), platelets-to-lymphocytes ratio (OR = 0.99; p = 0.00118), and FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 0.57; p = 0.00144). A prognostic score was developed and three risk groups were identified. Harrell’s C-Index was 0.74. Median cancer-specific survival was 16.0 months (IQR: 12.3–28.2) for the high-risk group, 24.7 months (IQR: 17.6–33.4) for the intermediate-risk group, and 39.0 months (IQR: 22.7–NA) for the low-risk group (p = 0.0003). Matching the three risk groups against pathology parameters, N2 rate was 61.9, 42.1, and 23.8% (p = 0.04), median value of lymph-node ratio was 0.07 (IQR: 0.05–0.14), 0.04 (IQR:0.02–0.07), and 0.03 (IQR: 0.01–0.04) (p = 0.008), and mean value of logarithm odds of positive nodes was − 1.07 ± 0.5, − 1.3 ± 0.4, and − 1.4 ± 0.4 (p = 0.03), in the high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk groups, respectively. An online calculator is available at www.survivalcalculator-lapdac-arterialresection.org. The prognostic factors identified in this study predict cancer-specific survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer and low Ca 19.9 levels undergoing pancreatectomy with arterial resection.

Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with poor overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effect of preoperative body composition on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

Between October 2005 and August 2018, 116 patients (68 men, 48 women, mean age 66.2 ± 11.9 years) diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma following PD were retrospectively enrolled. The preoperative CT on vertebral level L3 was assessed for total abdominal muscle area (TAMA), visceral adipose tissue area (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue area (SAT), and mean skeletal muscle attenuation (SMD). The clinical data and pathological findings of tumors were collected. The impact of these factors on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The 3-year DFS and OS rates were 8% and 25%, respectively. Of 116 patients, 20 (17.2%), 3 (2.6%), and 46 (39.7%) patients were classified as having sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and myosteatosis, respectively. The VAT-TAMA ratio (1.2 ± 0.7 vs 0.9 ± 0.5, p = 0.01) and the visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (1.3 ± 0.7 vs 0.9 ± 0.5, p = 0.04) were higher in sarcopenic patients than in the nonsarcopenic group. Preoperative sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity were associated with shorter OS (p = 0.012 and p = 0.041, respectively), but not shorter DFS. Myosteatosis was neither associated with DFS nor OS. On multivariable analysis, sarcopenia was the only significant prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative sarcopenia assessed by CT is a poor prognostic factor for OS in pancreatic cancer patients after PD.

KEY POINTS

• Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity can be evaluated by abdominal CT on L3 level. • Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) had lower sex-standardized subcutaneous adipose tissue area index and skeletal muscle density and higher visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio than did those without DM. • Preoperative sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, and new-onset diabetes mellitus may predict poor overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Pancreatic insufficiency following pancreatectomy: Does underlying tumor syndrome confer a greater risk?

BACKGROUND

The risk of postoperative pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PPEI) is unknown in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I (MEN1) and von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) who require resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent resection of PNETs at the National Institutes of Health from 2007 to 2019 was performed.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 82 patients (VHL n = 25, MEN1 n = 20, sporadic n = 37), 6 of whom developed PPEI. While VHL compared to all non-VHL patients (p = 0.046), non-functional PNETs (p = 0.050), and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (p=<0.001) were associated with higher rates of PPEI on univariate analysis, only PD was found to be an independent predictor of PPEI on multivariate analysis (OR 14.43, 95% CI 1.43-145.8, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of PPEI in patients with hereditary tumor syndromes was similar to that of sporadic PNETs. PD was independently associated with PPEI, and this increased risk should be included in preoperative counseling.

International consensus guidelines on interventional endoscopy in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This paper is part of the international consensus guidelines on chronic pancreatitis, presenting for interventional endoscopy.

METHODS

An international working group with experts on interventional endoscopy evaluated 26 statements generated from evidence on 9 clinically relevant questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the level of evidence. To determine the level of agreement, a nine-point Likert scale was used for voting on the statements.

RESULTS

Strong consensus was obtained for 15 statements relating to nine questions including the recommendation that endoscopic intervention should be offered to patients with persistent severe pain but not to those without pain. Endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct could be used for immediate pain relief, and then offered surgery if this fails or needs repeated endoscopy. Endoscopic drainage is preferred for portal-splenic vein thrombosis and pancreatic fistula. A plastic stent should be placed and replaced 2-3 months later after insertion. Endoscopic extraction is indicated for stone fragments remaining after ESWL. Interventional treatment should be performed for symptomatic/complicated pancreatic pseudocysts. Endoscopic treatment is recommended for bile duct obstruction and afterwards surgery if this fails or needs repeated endoscopy. Surgery may be offered if there is significant calcification and/or mass of the pancreatic head. Percutaneous endovascular treatment is preferred for hemosuccus pancreaticus. Surgical treatment is recommended for duodenal stenosis due to chronic pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

This international expert consensus guideline provides evidenced-based statements concerning indications and key aspects for interventional endoscopy in the management of patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Efficacy and safety of islet autotransplantation after total pancreatectomy in chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis including 17 studies

AIMS

Islet autotransplantation (IAT), in conjunction with total pancreatectomy (TP), is used to relieve pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), while reducing the incidence of brittle diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IAT after TP (TPIAT) in this setting.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since 1977. Data were extracted from published papers. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression models were built to assess the outcomes and effect of different factors. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the between-study heterogeneity, which was assessed using Cochrane's Q and I² statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies, including 1024 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The median cohort size was 21 patients (range: 5-409). The pooled incidence rates of insulin independence, narcotic independence and mortality at last follow-up were 11.47 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 6.79-21.60, I²=91.0%), 18.11 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 5.29-62.04, I²=98.8%) and 2.88 per 100 patient-years (95% CI: 1.75-4.74, I²=46.8%), respectively. However, the heterogeneity level of our results was high, which was due to differences in research methods and definitions of outcomes between studies. Therefore, our results should be interpreted with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

TPIAT can effectively relieve pain and reduce the risk of surgical diabetes with no increase in mortality or morbidity. Prospective, randomized, clinical trials are required to further evaluate selection of patients and the timing of TPIAT.

Application of suction-type cigarette drain in leak-prone hepatopancreatobiliary surgery

Backgrounds/Aims

Penrose drain and Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain have benefits and drawbacks in terms of functional reliability of prolonged duration and easiness of bedside management. We have developed a suction-type cigarette drain (SCD) to compensate for the drawbacks.

Methods

We have used SCDs in leak-prone or contaminated hepatopancreatobiliary surgeries since 2020. Herein, we describe key elements of our 20-year experience with the management of SCDs.

Results

The SCD is available as two-piece and three-piece types. The two-piece SCD is a cigarette drain consisted of a silastic Penrose drain and Jackson-Pratt (JP) drain bearing multiple side holes. The three-piece SCD is a cigarette drain consisted of a silastic Penrose drain, internally located Nelaton catheter with multiple side-holes, and a connecting JP drain tube and bulb. These SCDs were inserted into the abdominal wall with a hemostat clamps and sealed with air-tight ties. Three sets of SCDs were usually inserted in more than 100 cases of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, and none of them underwent repeat surgery for postoperative pancreatic fistula. In more than 30 patients with extensive abdominal contamination, a single SCD was usually inserted into the high-risk point of fluid collection and none of them underwent repeat surgery to manage collection of abnormal fluid or abscess formation.

Conclusions

Our experience suggests that SCD is highly reliable and acceptably convenient for clinical application in abdominal drainage.

CT-determined resectability of borderline resectable and unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma following FOLFIRINOX therapy

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the ability of CT-determined resectability, as defined by a recent version of NCCN criteria, and associated CT findings to predict margin-negative (R0) resection in patients with PDAC after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients (36 men and 28 women; mean age, 58.8 years) with borderline resectable or unresectable PDAC who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were evaluated retrospectively. CT findings were independently assessed by two abdominal radiologists according to NCCN criteria (version 3. 2019). Tumor resectability was classified as resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable, and change in resectability was classified as regression, stability, or progression. The associations of R0 resection rate with CT-determined resectability and change in resectability categories were evaluated, as were the sensitivity and specificity of NCCN criteria for R0 resection. Factors associated with R0 resection were identified by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

R0 resection rate did not differ significantly among the resectable, borderline resectable, or unresectable PDAC (67-73%, p = 0.95) or among PDAC with regression, stability, or progression (56-77%, p = 0.39). The sensitivity and specificity for R0 resection were 67% and 37%, respectively, for resectability (resectable/borderline vs. unresectable) and 80% and 21%, respectively, for changes in resectability (regression/stable vs. progression). Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery (≤ 46.4 HU) was independently associated with R0 resection (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

CT-determined resectability after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy was relatively insensitive and non-specific for predicting R0 resection. Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery may increase the ability of CT to predict R0 resection.

KEY POINTS

• Margin-negative resection rate of pancreatic cancer following FOLFIRINOX therapy did not differ among each resectability (67-73%, p = 0.95) based on NCCN criteria or changes in resectability categories (56-77%, p = 0.39). • The sensitivity and specificity for margin-negative resection were 67% and 37% for resectability (resectable/borderline vs. unresectable) and 80% and 21% for changes in resectability (regression/stable vs. progression). • Low-contrast enhancement of soft tissue contacting artery (≤ 46.4 HU) was independently associated with margin-negative resection (p = 0.01).

[Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with conventional distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail]

Objective: To compare the short-term outcomes and long-term survivals of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy(RAMPS) and conventional distal pancreatectomy(CDP). Methods: A total of consecutive 304 patients including 176 male patients and 128 female patients who underwent RAMPS or CDP at Pancreas Center, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University from May 2013 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The median age was 64.1 years old (range:39 to 85 years old). There were 101 patients underwent RAMPS and 203 patients underwent CDP. Measurement data with skewed distribution were presented as (M(Q(R))) and comparison between groups was evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Count data were analyzed using the χ(2) test or Fisher exact probability. Survival analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method after a one to one propensity score matching(PSM) conducted to balance several variables. Results: An eighty-one to eighty-one patients were enrolled after PSM. The overall morbidity was 32.1%(26/81)and there were no in-hospital mortalities in RAMPS. The median operative time was 225(95)minutes in RAMPS, not significantly longer as compared with CDP(210(130)minutes, P=0.916). The median greatest tumor diameter in RAMPS was 4.0(2.3)cm, not significantly larger as compared with CDP(4.5(2.2)cm, P=0.520).There were 34.6%(28/81)patients who presented with T4 tumors by 8(th) AJCC TNM staging system in RAMPS, which was not significantly different as compared with CDP(39.5%, χ(2)=0.574, P=0.902). The median number of examined lymph nodes was 9(9), not significantly greater in RAMPS as compared with CDP(10(11), P=0.992). The rate of negative posterior margins using 1 mm rule in RAMPS was 70.3%(52/74), significantly higher as compared with CDP(53.6%(30/56), χ(2)=3.817, P=0.044). The overall R0 resection rate was 44.6% (33/74) in RAMPS and 37.5% (21/56) in CDP, which was not significantly different(χ(2)=0.663, P=0.474). The median overall survival was 16.5 months for RAMPS, 25.2 months for CDP, and there was no statistical difference between two groups(P=0.981). The median overall survival was 16.0 months for patients with preoperative CA19-9≥300 U/ml who underwent RAMPS, 10.1 months for patients who underwent CDP, without significant difference(P=0.082). Conclusions: RAMPS can improve the rate of negative posterior margins by 1 mm rule and probably increase R0 resection rate and the harvest of lymph nodes. RAMPS may be beneficial to some patients with preoperative CA19-9≥300 U/ml.

Emergent pancreatectomy for neoplastic disease: outcomes analysis of 534 ACS-NSQIP patients

BACKGROUND

While emergent pancreatic resection for trauma has been previously described, no large contemporary investigations into the frequency, indications, and outcomes of emergent pancreatectomy (EP) secondary to complications of neoplastic disease exist. Modern perioperative outcomes data are currently unknown.

METHODS

ACS-NSQIP was reviewed for all non-traumatic pancreatic resections (DP - distal pancreatectomy, PD - pancreaticoduodenectomy, or TP- total pancreatectomy) in patients with pancreatico-biliary or duodenal-ampullary neoplasms from 2005 to 2013. Patients treated for complications of pancreatitis were specifically excluded. Emergent operation was defined as NSQIP criteria for emergent case and one of the following: ASA Class 5, preoperative ventilator dependency, preoperative SIRS, sepsis, or septic shock, or requirement of > 4 units RBCs in 72 h prior to resection. Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare postoperative outcomes between emergent and elective cases as well as between pancreatectomy types.

RESULTS

Of 21,452 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for neoplastic indications, we identified 534 (2.5%) patients who underwent emergent resection. Preoperative systemic sepsis (66.3%) and bleeding (17.9%) were most common indications for emergent operation. PD was performed in 409 (77%) patients, DP in 115 (21%), and TP in 10 (2%) patients. Overall major morbidity was significantly higher (46.1% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.001) for emergent vs. elective operations. Emergent operations resulted in increased transfusion rates (47.6% vs. 23.4%, p < 0.001), return to OR (14.0% vs. 5.6%, p < 0.001), organ-space infection (14.6 vs. 10.5, p = 0.002), unplanned intubation (9.% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001), pneumonia (9.6% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001), length of stay (14 days vs. 8 days, p < 0.001), and discharge to skilled facility (31.1% vs. 13.9%). These differences persisted when stratified by pancreatic resection type. The 30-day operative mortality was higher in the emergent group (9.4%vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001) and highest for emergent TP (20%).

CONCLUSION

Emergent pancreatic resection is markedly uncommon in the setting of neoplastic disease. Although these operations result in increased morbidity and mortality compared to elective resections, they can be life-saving in specific circumstances. The results of this large series of modern era national data may assist surgeons as well as patients and their families in making critical decisions in select cases of acutely complicated neoplastic disease.

Incidence, predictors and clinical outcome of pancreatic fistula in patients receiving splenectomy for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer: a large multicentric experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence, predictors and clinical outcome of pancreatic fistulas in patients receiving splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Data of women who underwent splenectomy during cytoreduction for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer from December 2012 to May 2018 were retrospectively retrieved from the oncological databases of five institutions. Surgical, post-operative and follow-up data were analysed.

RESULTS

Overall, 260 patients were included in the study. Pancreatic resection was performed in 45 (17.6%) women, 23 of whom received capsule resection alone, while 22 required tail resection. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was administered in 28 (10.8%) patients. In the overall population, a pancreatic fistula was detected in 32 (12.3%) patients, and pancreatic resection (p-value = 0.033) and HIPEC administration (p-value = 0.039) were associated with fistula development. In multivariate analysis, HIPEC (OR = 2.573; p-value = 0.058) was confirmed as a risk factor for fistula development in women receiving splenectomy alone, while concomitant cholecystectomy (OR = 2.680; p-value = 0.012) was identified as the only independent predictor of the occurrence of pancreatic fistulas in those receiving additional distal pancreatectomy. Although the median length of hospital stay was higher in women with pancreatic leakage (p-value = 0.008), the median time from surgery to adjuvant treatment was not significantly increased.

CONCLUSION

HIPEC was identified as a risk factor for pancreatic fistulas in patients who underwent splenectomy alone, while concomitant cholecystectomy was the only independent predictor of fistula in those receiving additional pancreatectomy. The development of pancreatic leakage was not associated with increased post-operative mortality or delay in the initiation of chemotherapy.

[Manual suture or stapler closure: management of pancreatic stump during distal pancreatectomy]

Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the most common complication after distal pancreatectomy.With the update of the domestic and international guidelines or consensuses, the definition of pancreatic fistula has become more standardized.And the classification of pancreatic fistula is able to represent the severity of clinical outcomes more accurately.Currently, the determination of risk factors of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, the establishment of prediction model, and the surgical closure mode of pancreatic stump still remain the major topics.With the rapid development of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in pancreatectomy, there are more and more selectionsin transection and managing the pancreatic stump after distal pancreatectomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula.However, there has not been a uniform fashion in terms of manual suture or stapler use to close the pancreatic stump.Herein the current status and development of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy are reviewed.The strategy of managing the pancreatic stump after distal pancreatectomy should be adopted individually according to the texture and thickness of pancreatic parenchyma.

National Trends in Readmission and Resource Utilization After Pancreatectomy in the United States

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatectomy is a complex operation that has been associated with excess morbidity and mortality. Although acute index outcomes have been characterized, there are limited data available on nonelective readmission after pancreatic surgery. We sought to identify factors associated with 30-day and 30- to 90-day readmission after pancreatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We utilized the National Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2016 to identify adults who underwent a pancreatectomy. The primary outcomes were 30-day (30DR) and 30- to 90-day (90DR) readmission. Secondary outcomes included nonelective readmission trends, diagnosis, length of stay, charges, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 130,267 subjects undergoing pancreatectomy, 97% survived index hospitalization. Eighteen percent of patients had nonelective 30DR while 5.6% experienced 90DR. Readmission at the two time points remained stable during the study period. After adjusting for institution, pancreatectomy volume, mortality (2.0% versus 4.9%, P < 0.001), 30DR length of stay (7.3 d versus 7.8 d, P < 0.001), and 90DR rates (6.9% versus 8.1%, P = 0.003) were significantly decreased at high-volume pancreatectomy centers compared to low-volume hospitals. Discharge to a skilled nursing facility (AOR: 1.52) or with home health care (AOR: 1.2) was associated with 30DR (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing total pancreatectomy (AOR: 1.3) or those with a substance use disorder (AOR: 1.4) among others were associated with 90DR (P ≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Readmissions are common and costly after pancreatectomy. Approximately 20% of patients experience readmission within 30 d. 30DR and 90DR rates remained stable during the study. Pancreatectomy at a high-volume center was associated with decreased mortality and 90DR. The present analysis confirms associations between pancreatectomy volume, postsurgical complications, comorbidities, and readmission.

Predictive factors for utilization of a low-volume center in pancreatic surgery: A nationwide study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

It has been demonstrated that mortality following pancreatectomy is correlated with surgical volume. However, up until now, no French study has focused on predictive factors to undergo pancreatectomy in low-volume centers. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical characteristics, socio-economic status and medical density according to surgical volume and to analyze predictive factors for undergoing pancreatectomy in low-volume centers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent pancreatectomy in France from 2012 to 2015 were identified fromthe PMSI database. Hopsitals were classified as low, intermediate and high volume (<10, 11-19, ≥20 resections/year, respectively). Clinical and socioeconomic data, travel distance and rurality were assesed to identify factors associated with undergoing pancreatectomy at low-volume hospitals.

RESULTS

In overall, 12,333 patients were included. Those who underwent pancreatectomy in low-volume centers were more likely older, had high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), had low socioeconomic status, and resided in rural locations.distance traveled by patients operated on in low-volume centers was significantly shorter (23 vs. 61km, P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, older age (P=0.04), CCI≥4 (P=0.008), short travel distance (P<0.001), low socio-economic status (P<0.001) and rurality (P<0.001) were associated withundergoing pancreatectomy in low-volume centers.

CONCLUSION

Patients continue to undergo pancreatectomy at low-volume hospitals is due not only to clinical parameters, but also to socioeconomic and environmental factors. These factors should be taken into account in process of pancreatic surgery centralization.

Metabolically phenotyped pancreatectomized patients as living donors for the study of islets in health and diabetes

Background

The availability of human pancreatic islets with characteristics closely resembling those present in vivo is instrumental for ex vivo studies in diabetes research.

Scope of review

In this review we propose metabolically phenotyped surgical patients as a novel source of pancreatic tissue for islet research. Laser Capture Microdissection from snap frozen surgical specimens is a relatively simple, reproducible and scalable method to isolate islets of highest purity for many types of “omics” analyses. Fresh pancreatic tissue slices enable the functional characterization of living islet cells in situ through dynamic experiments. Access to complete medical history and laboratory values for each donor offers the opportunity of direct correlations with different “omics” data and detailed metabolic profiling prior to pancreas surgery. Peripheral blood samples complete the picture of each patient and represent a platform for pursuit of biomarkers with uniquely comprehensive background information in regard to the donor's islet cells.

Major conclusions

Living donors provide the scientific community with a steady and abundant supply of excellent material to study islets closest to their in situ environment, thus advancing our understanding of their physiology in health and diseases.

Meeting Report: Updates in Diagnosis and Management of Hyperinsulinism and Neonatal Hypoglycemia: Highlights from the Fourth International Hyperinsulinism Symposium

Hypoglycemia remains a significant cause of morbidity in infants and children. Up to 50% of children with hypoglycemic disorders suffer from neurodevelopmental deficits, as a consequence of delays in the diagnosis and inadequate treatment. Recent advances in the field have resulted in new therapies and improved outcomes. To review these advances and have a dialogue regarding controversies in the field, the Fourth International Hyperinsulinism Symposium, sponsored by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on September 5-6, 2019. The symposium faculty, leaders in the field of hyperinsulinism and hypoglycemia, presented 25 plenary lectures on all aspects of these disorders. Additionally, a mini-symposium on neonatal hypoglycemia closed out the conference. Objectives of the symposium were to: 1. Describe the clinical manifestations, genetics and natural history of congenital hyperinsulinism 2. Review recent advances in the medical and surgical management of hyperinsulinism 3. Discuss current controversies and management options of neonatal hypoglycemia.

The role of total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis: A report from the International Consensus Guidelines in chronic pancreatitis

BACKGROUND

Advances in our understanding of total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) have been made. We aimed to define indications and outcomes of TPIAT.

METHODS

Expert physician-scientists from North America, Asia, and Europe reviewed the literature to address six questions selected by the writing group as high priority topics. A consensus was reached by voting on statements generated from the review.

RESULTS

Consensus statements were voted upon with strong agreement reached that (Q1) TPIAT may improve quality of life, reduce pain and opioid use, and potentially reduce medical utilization; that (Q3) TPIAT offers glycemic benefit over TP alone; that (Q4) the main indication for TPIAT is disabling pain, in the absence of certain medical and psychological contraindications; and that (Q6) islet mass transplanted and other disease features may impact diabetes mellitus outcomes. Conditional agreement was reached that (Q2) the role of TPIAT for all forms of CP is not yet identified and that head-to-head comparative studies are lacking, and that (Q5) early surgery is likely to improve outcomes as compared to late surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement on TPIAT indications and outcomes has been reached through this working group. Further studies are needed to answer the long-term outcomes and maximize efforts to optimize patient selection.

Outcome after pancreatectomy for neuroendocrine neoplams according to the WHO 2017 grading system: A retrospective multicentric analysis of 138 consecutive patients

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the new World Health Organization (WHO) 2017 grading system and the others clinicopathological factors in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (panNET) operated patients.

METHODS

Histological staging was based on the WHO 2017 grading system. Outcome after surgery and predictors of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients underwent surgical resection with a severe morbidity and mortality rates of 14.5% and 0.7% respectively. Five years OS differed according to WHO 2017: 95% among 58 patients with NETG1, 82% in 68 patients with NETG2, 35% in 7 patients with NETG3 and 0% in 5 patients with NECG3 (P<0.0001). Independent predictors of worse OS were age>60 y.o (P=0.014), synchronous metastasis (P=0.005) and WHO 2017 with significant differences between NETG1 versus NETG2 (P=0.005), NETG3 (P<0.001) and NECG3 (P<0.001). Independent predictors of worse DFS were symptomatic NET (P=0.038), pN+ status (P=0.027) and WHO 2017 with significant differences between NETG1 versus NETG3 (P=0.014) and NECG3 (P=0.009).

CONCLUSION

The WHO 2017 grading system is a useful tool for patient prognosis after panNET resection and the tailoring of therapeutic strategy. Surgery could provide good results in NETG3 patients.

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation in diabetic and pre-diabetic patients with intractable chronic pancreatitis

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is an effective treatment option for non-diabetic patients with intractable chronic pancreatitis. The outcome and potential benefits for pre-diabetic and diabetic patients are less well established. Thirty-four patients underwent TPIAT were retrospectively divided into 3 groups according to pre-operative glycemic control: diabetes mellitus (DM) (n=5, 15%), pre-DM (n=11, 32%) and non-DM (n=18, 54%). Pre-operative fasting c-peptide was detectable and similar in all 3 groups. Islet yield in the DM group was comparable to pre-DM and non-DM groups (median islet equivalents [IEQ] was 191,800, 111,800, and 232,000IEQ, respectively). Patients received islet mass of over the target level of 2000IEQ/kg in pre-DM and DM at lower but clinically meaningful rates compared to the non-DM group: 45% (5/11) and 60% (3/5) for a combined 50% (8/16) rate, respectively, compared to 83% (15/18) for the non-DM group. At 1 year, fasting c-peptide and HbA1c did not differ between DM and pre-DM groups but c-peptide was significantly higher in non-DM. Islet transplantation failed (negative c-peptide) only in 1 patient. Pre-operatively, all patients experienced pancreatic pain with daily opioid dependence in 60% to 70%. Pancreatic-type pain gradually subsided completely in all groups with no differences in other painful somatic symptoms. Diabetic patients with measurable pre-operative c-peptide can achieve similar benefit from TPIAT, with comparable outcomes to pre-diabetic and non-diabetic patients including pain relief and the metabolic benefit of transplanted islets. Not surprisingly, endocrine outcomes for diabetic and pre-diabetics patients are substantially worse than in those with normal pre-operative glucose control.

Surgical treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism

A multidisciplinary approach to patients with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) can distinguish focal from diffuse HI, localize focal lesions, and permit partial pancreatectomy with cure in almost all focal patients. Surgery does not cure diffuse disease but can help prevent severe hypoglycemia and brain damage. Surgery can be curative for insulinoma and for some cases of atypical HI.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: quantitative CT features are correlated with fibrous stromal fraction and help predict outcome after resection

OBJECTIVES

To identify quantitative imaging features of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) that may be prognostically favorable after resection of smaller (≤ 30 mm) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) located at head.

METHODS

This retrospective study included two independent cohorts (discovery cohort, n = 212; test cohort, n = 100) of patients who underwent resection of head PDACs ≤ 30 mm and preoperative CE-CT. We examined tumor and surrounding parenchymal attenuation differences (deltas), and tumor attenuation changes across phases (ratios). Semantic features of PDACs were evaluated by two radiologists. Clinicopathologic and imaging features for predicting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via multivariate Lasso-penalized Cox proportional-hazards models. Survival rates were derived by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Imaging features achieved C-indices of 0.766 (discovery cohort) and 0.739 (test cohort) for DFS, and 0.790 (discovery cohort) and 0.772 (test cohort) for OS estimates through incorporation of clinicopathologic features. The most decisive imaging feature was delta 3, denoting attenuation differences between tumor and surrounding pancreas at pancreatic phase (DFS: HR = 2.122; OS: HR = 2.375; both p < 0.001). Compared with inconspicuous (low-delta-3, < 28 HU) tumors, conspicuous (high-delta-3) tumors correlated significantly with more aggressive histologic grades (p = 0.014) and less extensive tumor fibrous stromal fractions (p < 0.001). Patients with low-delta-3 tumors ≤ 20 mm experienced the most favorable outcomes (DFS, 36 months; OS, 42 months), whereas those with high-delta-3 tumors fared poorly, regardless of tumor size (DFS, 12 months; OS, 19 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantifiable CT imaging features reflect heterogeneous fibrous stromal fractions and histologic grades of PDAC at head locations that help stratify patients with disparate clinical outcomes.

KEY POINTS

• Quantitative and semantic imaging features achieved promising results for the prognosis of resected PDAC (≤ 30 mm) at head location, through incorporation of clinicopathologic features. • Attenuation difference at tumor-parenchyma interface (delta 3) emerged as the most decisive imaging feature, enabling further stratification of patients into distinct prognostic subtypes by tumor size. • High delta 3 signifies sharper contrast between tumor and surrounding pancreas, correlating with more aggressive histologic grades and less extensive tumor fibrous stromal fractions.

Gastric volvulus with perforation 1 year after total pancreatectomy: a case report

Background

Because of its rare indication and relatively simple reconstruction procedure (only choledochojejunostomy and gastrojejunostomy) compared to those for pancreatoduodenectomy, the technical tips and pitfalls of total pancreatectomy are rarely discussed. Herein, we discuss a rare case of gastric volvulus 1 year after total pancreatectomy and provide advice to prevent such cases.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old woman underwent total pancreatectomy with splenectomy for mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. Choledochojejunostomy (retro-colic route) and gastrojejunostomy (ante-colic route, Billroth II method) were performed for reconstruction. The final diagnosis was mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous adenoma of the pancreas without malignant neoplasm. She had no clinical symptoms, such as abdominal pain and fever, during postoperative follow-up. However, at 1 year postoperatively, she complained of abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography showed volvulus and perforation of the stomach. Emergent surgery was performed. The stomach fornix was located on the right side and was partly perforated. We resected the perforation site with a linear cutter® (New Type Linear Cutter, Ethicon, USA) and released the gastric volvulus. Moreover, we fixed the stomach to the left abdominal wall using non-absorbable thread. The cause of the perforation was clinically and pathologically unclear. Her serum albumin and cholinesterase levels temporarily decreased postoperatively, but gradually increased. A recurrence of volvulus-related symptoms has not been observed.

Conclusions

After total pancreatectomy with splenectomy, although the stomach is connected with the jejunum, it is typically fixed only by the pedicle of the left gastric artery and vein. In the present case, this anatomical change may have been a cause of the gastric volvulus. Thus, it might be better to fix the remnant stomach in total pancreatectomy with splenectomy.

Pancreas Solid Tumors

Solid tumors of the pancreas encompass a variety of diagnoses with treatments ranging from observation to major abdominal surgery. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the most common and most lethal of these differential of diagnoses and requires a multimodality approach through a multidisciplinary team of specialists. This article reviews the classification, clinical presentation, and workup in differentiating solid tumors of the pancreas and serves as an additional tool for general surgeons faced with such a clinical finding, from a surgical oncology perspective.

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center propensity score matching study

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic diseases has been increasingly utilized. However, the use of LDP for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains controversial and has not been widely accepted. In this study, the outcomes of LDP versus conventional open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for left-sided PDAC were examined. A retrospective review of patients who underwent LDP or ODP for left-sided PDAC between January 2010 and January 2019 was conducted. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection biases by balancing factors including age, sex, ASA grade, tumor size, and combined resection. Demographic data, their pathological and short-term clinical parameters, and long-term oncological outcomes were compared between the LDP and ODP groups. A total of 197 patients with PDAC were enrolled. There were 115 (58.4%) patients in the LDP group and 82 (41.6%) patients in the ODP group. After 1:1 PSM, 66 well-matched patients in each group were evaluated. The LDP group had lesser blood loss (195 vs. 210 mL, p < 0.01), shorter operative time (193.6 vs. 217.5 min; p = 0.02), and shorter hospital stay (12 vs. 15 days, p < 0.01), whereas the overall complication rates were comparable between groups (10.6% vs.16.7%, p = 0.31). There were no significant differences between the LDP and ODP groups regarding 3-year recurrence-free or overall survival rate (p = 0.89 and p = 0.33, respectively). LDP in the treatment of left-sided PDAC is a technically safe, feasible and favorable approach in short-term surgical outcomes. Moreover, patients undergoing LDP than ODP for PDAC had comparable oncological metrics and similar middle-term survival rate.

Effects of Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy on Body Weight and Nutritional Assessments After Pancreatoduodenectomy in a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We studied the effects of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) on body weight, nutritional status, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind trial of 304 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy at 7 tertiary referral hospitals in South Korea. Patients with fecal levels of elastase of 200 μg/g or less, before and after surgery, were assigned randomly to groups that received PERT (a single capsule of 40,000 IU pancreatin, Norzyme (40,000 IU, Pankreatan; Nordmark Arzneimittel GmbH & Co, Uetersen, Germany), 3 times each day during meals for 3 months; n = 151) or placebo (n = 153). Protocol completion was defined as taking more than two thirds of the total dose without taking other digestive enzymes; the protocol was completed by 71 patients in the PERT group and 93 patients in the placebo group. Patients underwent a physical examination, oral glucose tolerance tests, and blood tests at baseline and at month 3 of the study period. The primary end point was change in body weight. Secondary end points were changes in bowel habits, nutritional parameters, and QoL.

RESULTS

In the per-protocol analysis, 3 months after the study began, patients in the PERT group gained a mean of 1.09 kg in weight and patients in the placebo group lost a mean of 2.28 kg (difference between groups, 3.37 kg; P < .001). However, no difference in body weight was observed between groups in the intent-to-treat analysis. Three months after the study began, the mean serum levels of prealbumin increased by 10.9 mg/dL in the PERT group and increased by 7.8 mg/dL in the placebo group (P = .002). Poor compliance to PERT was a significant risk factor for weight loss (P < .001). There was no significant difference in QoL scores between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the intent-to-treat analysis of data from a randomized trial, we found no significant effect of PERT on mean body weights of patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreatoduodenectomy. However, with active education and monitoring, PERT could increase body weight and nutritional parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02127021.

Local Referral of High-Risk Pancreatectomy Patients to Improve Surgical Outcomes and Minimize Travel Burden

BACKGROUND

Referring patients to high-quality hospitals for complex procedures may improve outcomes. This is most feasible within small geographic areas. However, access to specialized surgical procedures may be an implementation barrier. We sought to determine the availability of high-quality hospitals performing pancreatectomy and the potential benefit and travel burden of referral within small geographic areas.

METHODS

We identified elderly Medicare beneficiaries undergoing pancreatectomy between 2012 and 2014. Hospitals were stratified into quintiles of quality based on postoperative complication rates. Patient risk was assessed by modeling the predicted risk of developing a postoperative complication. The geographic unit of analysis was Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA). Hospitals were categorized into MSA by zip code. Travel distance was calculated using patient and hospital zip code.

RESULTS

Among high-risk patients, 40.7% received care at the lowest-quality hospitals even though 80% had a high-quality hospital in the same MSA. Shifting these patients from low- to high-quality hospitals would decrease serious complications from 46.6 to 21.9% (P < 0.001) and mortality from 10.9 to 8.9% (P = 0.047). Three quarters of high-risk patients treated at low-quality hospitals could reach a high-quality hospital by extending their travel < 5 miles, and nearly 60% traveled farther to a low-quality hospital than was necessary to reach a high-quality hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk pancreatectomy patients often receive care at low-quality hospitals despite the availability of high-quality hospitals in the area or within an acceptable distance. Referral of high-risk patients to high-quality hospitals within small geographic areas may be an effective strategy to improve outcomes following pancreatic surgery.