Extravertebral low back pain: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for consultation in general practice. Currently, LBP is categorised into specific and non-specific causes. However, extravertebral causes, such as abdominal aortic aneurysm or pancreatitis, are not being considered.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed across MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library, complemented by a handsearch. Studies conducted between 1 January 2001 and 31 December 2020, where LBP was the main symptom, were included.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 6040 studies, from which duplicates were removed, leaving 4105 studies for title and abstract screening. Subsequently, 265 publications were selected for inclusion, with an additional 197 publications identified through the handsearch. The majority of the studies were case reports and case series, predominantly originating from specialised care settings. A clear distinction between vertebral or rare causes of LBP was not always possible. A range of diseases were identified as potential extravertebral causes of LBP, encompassing gynaecological, urological, vascular, systemic, and gastrointestinal diseases. Notably, guidelines exhibited inconsistencies in addressing extravertebral causes.

DISCUSSION

Prior to this review, there has been no systematic investigation into extravertebral causes of LBP. Although these causes are rare, the absence of robust and reliable epidemiological data hinders a comprehensive understanding, as well as the lack of standardised protocols, which contributes to a lack of accurate description of indicative symptoms. While there are certain disease-specific characteristics, such as non-mechanical or cyclical LBP, and atypical accompanying symptoms like fever, abdominal pain, or leg swelling, that may suggest extravertebral causes, it is important to recognise that these features are not universally present in every patient.

CONCLUSION

The differential diagnosis of extravertebral LBP is extensive with relatively low prevalence rates dependent on the clinical setting. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for extravertebral aetiologies, especially in patients presenting with atypical accompanying symptoms.

Acute Aortic Syndromes from Diagnosis to Treatment-A Comprehensive Review

This work aims to provide a comprehensive description of the characteristics of a group of acute aortic diseases that are all potentially life-threatening and are collectively referred to as acute aortic syndromes (AASs). There have been recent developments in the care and diagnostic plan for AAS. A substantial clinical index of suspicion is required to identify AASs before irreversible fatal consequences arise because of their indefinite symptoms and physical indicators. A methodical approach to the diagnosis of AAS is addressed. Timely and suitable therapy should be started immediately after diagnosis. Improving clinical outcomes requires centralising patients with AAS in high-volume centres with high-volume surgeons. Consequently, the management of these patients benefits from the increased use of aortic centres, multidisciplinary teams and an "aorta code". Each acute aortic entity requires a different patient treatment strategy; these are outlined below. Finally, numerous preventive strategies for AAS are discussed. The keys to good results are early diagnosis, understanding the natural history of these disorders and, where necessary, prompt surgical intervention. It is important to keep in mind that chest pain does not necessarily correspond with coronary heart disease and to be alert to the possible existence of aortic diseases because once antiplatelet drugs are administered, a blocked coagulation system can complicate aortic surgery and affect prognosis. The management of AAS in "aortic centres" improves long-term outcomes and decreases mortality rates.

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Dissection, Penetrating Aortic Ulcer, and Intramural Hematoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute aortic syndromes, including aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating aortic ulcer, are a group of highly morbid, related pathologies that are defined by compromised aortic wall integrity. The purpose of this review is to summarize current management strategies for acute aortic syndromes.

RECENT FINDINGS

All acute aortic syndromes have potential for high morbidity and mortality and must be quickly identified and managed with the appropriate algorithm to prevent suboptimal outcomes. Recent trials suggest that TEVAR is increasingly useful in stabilizing pathology of the descending thoracic aorta but when possible should be applied in a delayed fashion and with limited coverage to minimize neurologic complications. Treatment for acute aortic syndrome is frequently dictated by the anatomic location and extent of the wall compromise as well as patient comorbidities. Therapy is often individualized and often includes some combination of medical, procedural, and surgical intervention.

The Epiaortic Ultrasound Diagnosis of Iatrogenic Subadventitial Hematoma

Iatrogenic aortic injury is a rare but potentially lethal complication of cardiac surgery. While sometimes resulting in aortic dissection or intramural hematoma, injury more frequently results in subadventitial hematoma, a more benign pathology. Here, we describe a case where intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) identified such a hematoma but was unable to rule out dissection. Epiaortic ultrasound was subsequently performed, which definitively demonstrated the absence of a dissection flap or extraluminal flow. Per our review, this is the first report documenting the successful use of epiaortic imaging to identify subadventitial hematoma in the setting of inconclusive TEE findings.

Outcomes of uncomplicated Type B intramural hematoma patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to summarize the clinical presentations, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes of Type B intramural hematoma (IMHB) patients with and without Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

Patients with uncomplicated IMHBs were included between January 2016 and January 2018 and divided into two groups according to whether or not they had DM. We also assessed the potential diagnostic value of serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) level and the association of it with the disease progression of uncomplicated IMHB patients with and without DM.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients were included (DM group [n = 60] and non-DM group [n = 89]). Patients in the non-DM group underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair treatment more frequently (12% vs 2%, p = .028) and had a higher reintervention rate during the follow-up (9 in 81 patients, 11% vs. 2%, p = .043). There were significant differences between the two groups regarding the aorta-related mortality rate during the acute phase (9% vs. 0%, p = .042) and the all-cause mortality rate (22% vs. 7%, p = .011). Ulcer-like projection (ULP) development (during the acute phase; hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.79, p = .005), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.91-3.91, p = .003), and MMP-9 levels (HR, 15.77; 95% CI, 6.48-21.62, p < .001) were associated with an elevated risk for aorta-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

IMHBs with DM have a considerably better prognosis and serum MMP-9 level appear to be a potential biomarker to predict the disease progression. ULP development (during the acute phase) and CRP levels are also associated with an elevated risk for aorta-related mortality.

The evolution of treatments for uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma patients

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate whether uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma (IMHB) patients with known evolution predictors could benefit from more aggressive therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was performed in uncomplicated IMHB patients with evolution predictors between January 2001 and August 2018. Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to identify the specific factors associated with aorta-related mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 226 uncomplicated acute IMHB patients with evolution predictors were included. The conventional therapy group included 187 patients, and the other 39 patients received the more aggressive therapy. Aorta-related mortality in the first year was higher in the conventional therapy group than in the more aggressive therapy group (15% vs 2.5%, P = .035), and more patients died after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (13 of 27 patients, 48.1% vs 2.5%, P < .001). The more aggressive therapy group had a higher rate of hematoma resolution than the conventional therapy group (81.6% vs 62.2%, P = .024), a lower possibility of hematoma worsening (2.6% vs 17.0%, P = .021), and a lower reintervention rate (0% vs 11.9%, P = .028). Cox regression analysis revealed that a higher rate of focal intimal disruption (FID) development (hazard ratio [HR], 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-11.46, P = .010), and a higher C-reactive protein (CRP) level (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.40, P < .001) were associated with increased aorta-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

More aggressive therapy for uncomplicated IMHB patients with evolution predictors during the acute phase may result in better clinical outcomes. A higher rate of FID development and a higher CRP level are associated with increased aorta-related mortality.

Symptomatic Type B Intramural Aortic Hematoma as a Complication of Retrograde Right Common Iliac Artery Dissection

PURPOSE

To report the endovascular treatment of a spontaneous iliac artery dissection (IAD) involving iliac bifurcation, complicated by a type B intramural aortic hematoma (IMH).

CASE REPORT

A 38-year-old female patient came to our institution referring an acute ascending back pain. The angio computed tomography scan showed the presence of a retrograde right IAD with entry tear at the iliac bifurcation and a concomitant aortic IMH. After hypogastric embolization with a vascular plug, self-expanding stent graft was placed to cover the iliac entry tear. At 12 months, the patient was asymptomatic and the angio computed tomography scan showed the patency of the iliac graft without IMH.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of spontaneous IAD is a safe and effective option in symptomatic patient complicated with type B IMH.

Aortic intramural hemorrhage: A distinct disease entity with mystery

Aortic intramural hemorrhage (IMH) is one of the disease processes that comprise the spectrum of acute aortic syndrome (AAS) with clinical manifestations and a mortality rate similar to those of classic aortic dissection (AD). However, IMH should be considered as a distinct disease entity rather than a precursor to classic dissection because of differences in their pathology, etiology, natural history, and imaging findings. Multidetector computed tomography (CT) is recommended as the first-line diagnostic imaging modality for IMH, but transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are also helpful. There is still debate over the appropriate treatment of IMH. Medical treatment of type B IMH appears effective and safe, while surgical treatment is recommended for type A IMH. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a promising treatment for selected patients, and more clinical evidence needs to be assembled.

Endovascular stent-graft management of aortic intramural hematomas

PURPOSE

To report initial experience with endovascular stent-grafting in aortic intramural hematoma (IMH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2000 to 2006, 15 patients (mean age, 67 years; range, 54-83 y) underwent endovascular treatment of aortic IMH. Thirteen patients were admitted for acute aortic syndrome and two for traumatic aortic injury. An endovascular procedure was performed as primary treatment for four patients (type A IMH, n = 3; type B IMH, n = 1) and as a second-line therapy in 11 patients because of unfavorable evolution (type A IMH, n = 1; type B IMH, n = 10). All stent-grafts were placed in the descending aorta, even for type A IMH. The mean follow-up was 21 months (range, 6-72 months).

RESULTS

The primary success rate was 93%, with complete exclusion of the lesion (n = 14). Exclusion was partial for one patient with a type I endoleak (7%). The 30-day mortality rate was zero. IMH evolution was favorable in all cases, with decreased aortic wall thickening (n = 8) or complete regression (n = 7). Complications associated with endovascular repair were mainly related to aneurysm formation (20%). The late death rate was 7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular stent-graft treatment can be performed in the management of complicated IMH, even in some cases of type A IMH, when an intimal lesion is located in the isthmus or descending aorta with contraindications to surgery. This procedure offers low morbidity and mortality rates, representing a feasible therapeutic option especially for elderly patients with comorbidities. Further studies are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.

Intramural Hematoma of the Thoracic Aorta as a Form of Aortic Dissection

Intramural hematoma (IMH) of the thoracic aorta is a complication with unknown etiology and a poorly predictable prognosis. There is also considerable controversy about the management and prognosis of IMH as well as the treatment. We present two cases of endovascular treatment of IMH with stent-graft placement. On the basis of references, we discuss risks of progression of the given pathology and possible complications. Despite the lack of uniform opinion about the management of this disorder, we present our observations of and experiences with endovascular treatment of IMH of the thoracic aorta.