1
|
Kong D, Wang Z, Wang H, Yang R, Zhang W, Cao L, Nian Y, Ren J, Lu J, Chen T, Duan J, Song Z, Liu T, Hou W, Yoshida S, Shen Z, Bromberg JS, Zheng H. Capecitabine mitigates cardiac allograft rejection via inhibition of TYMS-Mediated Th1 differentiation in mice. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 141:112955. [PMID: 39163685 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Previous studies elucidated that capecitabine (CAP) works as an anti-tumor agent with putative immunosuppressive effects. However, the intricate mechanisms underpinning these effects remain to be elucidated. In this study, we aimed to unravel the molecular pathways by which CAP exerts its immunosuppressive effects to reduce allograft rejection. METHODS Hearts were transplanted from male BALB/c donors to male C57BL/6 recipients and treated with CAP for seven days. The rejection of these heart transplants was assessed using a range of techniques, including H&E staining, immunohistochemistry, RNA sequencing, LS-MS/MS, and flow cytometry. In vitro, naïve CD4+ T cells were isolated and cultured under Th1 condition medium with varying treatments, flow cytometry, LS-MS/MS were employed to delineate the role of thymidine synthase (TYMS) during Th1 differentiation. RESULTS CAP treatment significantly mitigated acute allograft rejection and enhanced graft survival by reducing graft damage, T cell infiltration, and levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, it curtailed CD4+ T cell proliferation and the presence of Th1 cells in the spleen. RNA-seq showed that TYMS, the target of CAP, was robustly increased post-transplantation in splenocytes. In vitro, TYMS and its metabolic product dTMP were differentially expressed in Th0 and Th1, and were required after activation of CD4+ T cell and Th1 differentiation. TYMS-specific inhibitor, raltitrexed, and the metabolite of capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, could inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of Th1. Finally, the combined use of CAP and the commonly used immunosuppressant rapamycin can induce long-term survival of allograft. CONCLUSION CAP undergoes metabolism conversion to interfere pyrimidine metabolism, which targets TYMS-mediated differentiation of Th1, thereby playing a significant role in mitigating acute cardiac allograft rejection in murine models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dejun Kong
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
| | - Zhenglu Wang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China; Institute of Transplantation Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Transplant Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Tianjin, China; Biological Sample Resource Sharing Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China.
| | - Hao Wang
- Tianjin Medical University First Central Clinical College, Tianjin, China.
| | - Ruining Yang
- Tianjin Medical University First Central Clinical College, Tianjin, China.
| | - Weiqi Zhang
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China.
| | - Lei Cao
- Biological Sample Resource Sharing Center, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China.
| | - Yeqi Nian
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Institute of Transplantation Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Jiashu Ren
- Tianjin Medical University First Central Clinical College, Tianjin, China.
| | - Jianing Lu
- Tianjin Medical University First Central Clinical College, Tianjin, China.
| | - Tao Chen
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China.
| | - Jinliang Duan
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China.
| | - Zhuolun Song
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China.
| | - Tao Liu
- National Health Commission's Key Laboratory for Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| | - Wen Hou
- Institute of Transplantation Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Sei Yoshida
- Institute of Transplantation Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
| | - Zhongyang Shen
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China; Institute of Transplantation Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Transplant Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Tianjin, China; National Health Commission's Key Laboratory for Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| | - Jonathan S Bromberg
- Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
| | - Hong Zheng
- Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Department of Organ Transplantation, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Nankai University School of Medicine, Tianjin, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory for Organ Transplantation, Tianjin, China; Institute of Transplantation Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China; Key Laboratory of Transplant Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Tianjin, China; National Health Commission's Key Laboratory for Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Himmelsbach V, Jeschke M, Lange CM, Scheiner B, Pinter M, Sinner F, Venerito M, Queck A, Trojan J, Waidmann O, Finkelmeier F. Systemic Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: A Multicenter Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2442. [PMID: 39001504 PMCID: PMC11240676 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) sorafenib and lenvatinib represent the first-line systemic therapy of choice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Under sorafenib and lenvatinib, HCC patients have shown increasingly improved overall survival in clinical studies over the years. In contrast, data on overall survival for patients with HCC recurrence after LT under TKIs are scarce and limited to small retrospective series. In this retrospective, multicenter study, we investigated the efficacy of TKI therapy and the influence of immunosuppression in patients with HCC recurrence after LT. METHODS Retrospective data were collected from four transplant centers from Germany and Austria. We included patients with HCC recurrence after LT between 2007 and 2020 who were treated with a TKI. RESULTS In total, we analyzed data from 46 patients with HCC recurrence after LT. The most common underlying liver disease was hepatitis C, accounting for 52.2%. The median time to relapse was 11.8 months (range 0-117.7 months). The liver graft was affected in 21 patients (45.7%), and 36 patients (78.3%) had extrahepatic metastases at initial diagnosis of recurrence, with the lung being the most commonly affected (n = 25, 54.3%). Of the total, 54.3% (n = 25) of the patients were initially treated locally; 39 (85.8%) and 7 (15.2%) patients received sorafenib and lenvatinib, respectively, as first-line systemic therapy. Median overall survival of the whole cohort was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6.9-14.9 months) and median progression free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI 2.0-9.4 months) from treatment initiation. CONCLUSION Since history of liver transplantation is considered a contraindication for immunotherapy, prognosis of patients with HCC recurrence after LT remains poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Himmelsbach
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Matthias Jeschke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christian M. Lange
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian University, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Scheiner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Pinter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Friedrich Sinner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-Von Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Marino Venerito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-Von Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Queck
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jörg Trojan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Oliver Waidmann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
- Center of Hematology and Oncology Bethanien, 60389 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Fabian Finkelmeier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lindemann J, Doyle MBM. Expanding the Boundaries for Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:129-143. [PMID: 37953032 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, which was the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide in 2020. Transplantation remains the preferred treatment for cure in otherwise unresectable HCC. There are several areas of active research that have led to expansion of eligibility criteria for transplantation including local-regional therapy for downstaging patients presenting outside of the Milan criteria and identification of tumor biomarkers aiding in the early diagnosis, determining prognosis and likelihood of recurrence after transplantation for HCC. New neoadjuvant therapies and post-transplant immunosuppression regimens may also result in expansion of transplant eligibility criteria for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Lindemann
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Maria Bernadette Majella Doyle
- Section of Abdominal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu H, Sethi V, Li X, Xiao Y, Humar A. Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review and A Glimpse into The Future. Semin Liver Dis 2024; 44:79-98. [PMID: 38211621 DOI: 10.1055/a-2242-7543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this review, we explored the development of LT selection criteria and organ allocation policies, comparing original data to underscore their historical progression into the intricate task of quantitatively estimating pre- and post-LT survivals. We emphasized the role of biomarkers such as serum alpha-fetoprotein, Des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin, circulating tumor cells, and circulating tumor DNA in predicting patient outcomes. Additionally, we examined the transplant-associated survival benefits and the difficulties in accurately calculating these benefits. We also reviewed recent advancements in targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors for advanced, inoperable HCC and projected their integration into LT for HCC. We further discussed the growing use of living donor liver transplants in the United States and compared its outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplants. Furthermore, we examined the progress in machine perfusion techniques, which have shown potential in improving patient outcomes and enlarging the donor pool. These advancements present opportunities to enhance LT patient survivals, refine selection criteria, establish new priority metrics, develop innovative bridging and downstaging strategies, and formulate redesigned LT strategies for HCC treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vrishketan Sethi
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Xingjie Li
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Yao Xiao
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang N, Zhou K, Liang Z, Sun R, Tang H, Yang Z, Zhao W, Peng Y, Song P, Zheng S, Xie H. RapaLink-1 outperforms rapamycin in alleviating allogeneic graft rejection by inhibiting the mTORC1-4E-BP1 pathway in mice. Int Immunopharmacol 2023; 125:111172. [PMID: 37951193 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/13/2023]
Abstract
Inhibition of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), which is a component of both mTORC1 and mTORC2, leads to clinical benefits for organ transplant recipients. Pathways to inhibit mTOR include strengthening the association of FKBP12-mTOR or competing with ATP at the active site of mTOR, which have been applied to the design of first- and second-generation mTOR inhibitors, respectively. However, the clinical efficacy of these mTOR inhibitors may be limited by side effects, compensatory activation of kinases and attenuation of feedback inhibition of receptor expression. A new generation of mTOR inhibitors possess a core structure similar to rapamycin and covalently link to mTOR kinase inhibitors, resulting in moderate selectivity and potent inhibition of mTORC1. Since the immunosuppressive potential of this class of compounds remains unknown, our goal is to examine the therapeutic efficacy of a third-generation mTOR inhibitor in organ transplantation. In this study, RapaLink-1 outperformed rapamycin in inhibiting T-cell proliferation and significantly prolonged graft survival time. Mechanistically, the ameliorated rejection induced by RapaLink-1 is associated with a reduction in p-4E-BP1 in T cells, resulting in an elevation in Treg cells alongside a decline in Th1 and Th17 cells. For the first time, these studies demonstrate the effectiveness of third-generation mTOR inhibitors in inhibiting allograft rejection, highlighting the potential of this novel class of mTOR inhibitors for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Wang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Ke Zhou
- Division of Lung Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Zhi Liang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Ruiqi Sun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hong Tang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Zhentao Yang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Wentao Zhao
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Yiyang Peng
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, 310058 Hangzhou, China
| | - Penghong Song
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou 310003, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, State Key Laboratory for The Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310003, China.
| | - Haiyang Xie
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou 310003, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, State Key Laboratory for The Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Paul C, Besch C, Artzner T, Michard B, Cusumano C, Addeo P, Bachellier P, Faitot F. Additional value of interleukin-6 level to predict histopathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. Cytokine 2023; 169:156286. [PMID: 37385083 DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2023.156286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Inflammatory biomarkers are increasingly used as outcome predictors in the field of oncology and liver transplantation for HCC, but no study has shown the prognostic value of IL6 after LT. The goal of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of IL-6 on histopathological features of HCC on explant, its predictive value on recurrence risk and its additional value to other scores and inflammatory markers at the time of transplantation. METHODS From 2009 to 2019, all adults transplanted with a first liver graft and diagnosed with HCC on the explant analysis were retrospectively included (n = 229). Only patients who had a pre-LT IL6 level determination were analysed in this study (n = 204). RESULTS High IL-6 level at transplantation was associated with a significantly higher risk of vascular invasion (15% vs 6%; p = 0.023), microsatellitosis (11% vs 3%; p = 0.013), lower rate of histological response both in terms of complete response (2% vs 14%, p = 0.004) and of necrosis (p = 0.010). Patients with pre-LT IL-6 level > 15 ng/ml had a lower overall and cancer-specific survival (p = 0.013). Recurrence-free survival was lower in patients with IL-6 > 15 ng/ml with a 3-year recurrence-free survival of 88% versus 78% (p = 0.034). IL6 levels were significantly higher in patients with early recurrence compared to patients without (p = 0.002) or with late recurrence (p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS IL6 level at transplantation is an independent predictor of pejorative histological features of HCC and is associated to the risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Paul
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Pancréatique, Chirurgie Générale et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; University of Strasbourg, 4 Rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - Camille Besch
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Pancréatique, Chirurgie Générale et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Thierry Artzner
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Pancréatique, Chirurgie Générale et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Baptiste Michard
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Pancréatique, Chirurgie Générale et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Caterina Cusumano
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Pancréatique, Chirurgie Générale et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France
| | - Pietro Addeo
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Pancréatique, Chirurgie Générale et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; ICube Laboratory, University of Strasbourg, 300 Bd Sébastien Brant, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Pancréatique, Chirurgie Générale et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; University of Strasbourg, 4 Rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France
| | - François Faitot
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatique et Pancréatique, Chirurgie Générale et Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1 avenue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France; University of Strasbourg, 4 Rue Kirschleger, 67000 Strasbourg, France; ICube Laboratory, University of Strasbourg, 300 Bd Sébastien Brant, 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Durkin C, Schaubel DE, Xu Y, Mahmud N, Kaplan DE, Abt PL, Bittermann T. Induction Immunosuppression Does Not Worsen Tumor Recurrence After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Transplantation 2023; 107:1524-1534. [PMID: 36695564 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies are inconsistent regarding the impact of antibody induction therapy on outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Adults transplanted with HCC exception priority were identified from February 27, 2002, to March 31, 2019, using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Time-to-event analyses evaluated the association of antibody induction therapy (none, nondepleting induction [NDI], depleting induction [DI]) with overall post-LT patient survival and HCC recurrence. Separate multivariable models adjusted for tumor characteristics on either last exception or on explant. The interaction of induction and maintenance regimen at LT discharge was investigated. RESULTS Among 22 535 LTs for HCC, 17 688 (78.48%) received no antibody induction, 2984 (13.24%) NDI, and 1863 (8.27%) DI. Minimal differences in patient and tumor characteristics were noted between induction groups, and there was significant center variability in practices. NDI was associated with improved survival, particularly when combined with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and antimetabolite (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 versus no induction plus 3-drug therapy in the last exception model [ P < 0.001]; HR 0.64 in the explant model [ P = 0.011]). The combination of DI with CNI alone was also protective (HR 0.43; P = 0.003). Neither NDI nor DI was associated with tumor recurrence (all P > 0.1). However, increased HCC recurrence was observed with no induction plus CNI monotherapy (HR 1.47, P = 0.019; versus no induction plus 3-drug therapy). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, induction immunosuppression was not associated with worse post-LT outcomes in patients transplanted with HCC exception priority. An improvement in survival was possibly observed with NDI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Durkin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Douglas E Schaubel
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Yuwen Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nadim Mahmud
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - David E Kaplan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter L Abt
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Therese Bittermann
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang Z, Xie H, Wan J, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhou K, Tang H, Zhao W, Wang H, Song P, Zheng S. A nanotherapeutic strategy that engages cytotoxic and immunosuppressive activities for the treatment of cancer recurrence following organ transplantation. EBioMedicine 2023; 92:104594. [PMID: 37167784 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term treatment with immunosuppressants is necessary to attenuate allograft rejection following organ transplantation (OT). Consequently, the overall survival of OT recipients with malignancies has been substantially compromised by tumour recurrence. Rapamycin (RAPA) is a clinically approved immunosuppressive agent with antitumour activity that is considered beneficial in preventing posttransplant tumour recurrence. However, the clinical outcome of RAPA is impeded by acquired drug resistance and its poor oral bioavailability. METHODS A nanotherapeutic strategy was developed by supramolecular assembly of RAPA into a polymer cytotoxic 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN38) prodrug nanoparticle (termed SRNP) for simultaneous codelivery of cytotoxic/immunosuppressive agents. Cell-based experiments were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of SRNPs against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The therapeutic efficacy of SRNPs was evaluated in multiple preclinical models including an orthotopic HCC mouse model, an orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) rat model and a clinically relevant cancer-transplant model to examine its antitumour and immunosuppressive activity. FINDINGS The combination of SN38 with RAPA resulted in synergetic effects against HCC cells and alleviated RAPA resistance by abrogating Akt/mTOR signalling activation. SRNPs exhibited potent antitumour efficiency in the orthotopic HCC model while substantially prolonging the survival of allografts in the OLT model. In the cancer-transplant model that simultaneously bears tumour xenografts and skin allografts, SRNPs not only effectively inhibited tumour growth but also attenuated allograft damage. INTERPRETATION The nanotherapy presented here had enhanced efficacy against tumours and maintained satisfactory immunosuppressive activity and thus has great potential to improve the survival outcomes of patients with a high risk of tumour recurrence following OT. FUNDING This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171368 and 31671019), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ21H180001), the Zhejiang Province Preeminence Youth Fund (LR19H160002), and the Jinan Provincial Laboratory Research Project of Microecological Biomedicine (JNL-2022039c).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhentao Yang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Haiyang Xie
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Jianqin Wan
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Yuchen Wang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Ke Zhou
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hong Tang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Wentao Zhao
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Hangxiang Wang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Penghong Song
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou 310003, China; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China; State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fung J, DiSabato D, Liao CY, Ahmed O, Pillai A. Perspective: Advances in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma - A prototype for transplant oncology. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:4-6. [PMID: 36163102 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- John Fung
- Liver Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago 60637, IL, USA.
| | - Diego DiSabato
- Liver Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago 60637, IL, USA
| | - Chih-Yi Liao
- Liver Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago 60637, IL, USA
| | - Osmanuddin Ahmed
- Liver Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago 60637, IL, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Liver Tumor Center, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago 60637, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A mixed blessing for liver transplantation patients - Rapamycin. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:14-21. [PMID: 36328894 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment option for end-stage liver disease. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, such as rapamycin, are widely used post LT. DATA SOURCES In this review, we focused on the anti-cancer activities and metabolic side effects of rapamycin after LT. The literature available on PubMed for the period of January 1999-September 2022 was reviewed. The key words were rapamycin, sirolimus, liver transplantation, hepatocellular carcinoma, diabetes, and lipid metabolism disorder. RESULTS Rapamycin has shown excellent effects and is safer than other immunosuppressive regimens. It has exhibited excellent anti-cancer activity and has the potential in preventing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence post LT. Rapamycin is closely related to two long-term complications after LT, diabetes and lipid metabolism disorders. CONCLUSIONS Rapamycin prevents HCC recurrence post LT in some patients, but it also induces metabolic disorders. Reasonable use of rapamycin benefits the liver recipients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Panackel C, Mathew JF, Fawas N M, Jacob M. Immunosuppressive Drugs in Liver Transplant: An Insight. J Clin Exp Hepatol 2022; 12:1557-1571. [PMID: 36340316 PMCID: PMC9630030 DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard of care for end-stage liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Over the years, immunosuppression regimens have improved, resulting in enhanced graft and patient survival. At present, the side effects of immunosuppressive agents are a significant threat to post-LT quality of life and long-term outcome. The role of personalized immunosuppression is to reach a delicate balance between optimal immunosuppression and minimal side effects. Today, immunosuppression in LT is more of an art than a science. There are no validated markers for overimmunosuppression and underimmunosuppression, only a few drugs have therapeutic drug monitoring and immunosuppression regimens vary from center to center. The immunosuppressive agents are broadly classified into biological agents and pharmacological agents. Most regimens use multiple agents with different modes of action to reduce the dosage and minimize the toxicities. The calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related toxicities are reduced by antibody induction or using mTOR inhibitor/antimetabolites as CNI sparing or CNI minimization strategies. Post-liver transplant immunosuppression has an intensive phase in the first three months when alloreactivity is high, followed by a maintenance phase when immunosuppression minimization protocols are implemented. Over time some patients achieve "tolerance," defined as the successful stopping of immunosuppression with good graft function and no indication of rejection. Cell-based therapy using immune cells with tolerogenic potential is the future and may permit complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive agents.
Collapse
Key Words
- AMR, Antibody-mediated rejection
- APCs, Antigen-presenting cells
- ATG, Anti-thymocyte globulin
- CNI, Calcineurin inhibitors
- CsA, Cyclosporine A
- EVR, Everolimus
- IL-2R, Interleukin 2 Receptor
- LT, Liver transplantation
- MMF, Mycophenolate mofetil
- MPA, Mycophenolic acid
- SRL, Sirolimus
- TAC, Tacrolimus
- TCMR, T-cell-mediated rejection
- antimetabolites
- basiliximab
- calcineurin inhibitors
- cyclosporine
- everolimus
- immunosuppression
- liver transplantation
- mTORi, mammalian targets of rapamycin inhibitor
- mycophenolate mofetil
- tacrolimus
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Panackel
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Kochi, Kerala, 682027, India
| | - Joe F Mathew
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Kochi, Kerala, 682027, India
| | - Mohamed Fawas N
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Kochi, Kerala, 682027, India
| | - Mathew Jacob
- Aster Integrated Liver Care, Aster Medcity, Kochi, Kerala, 682027, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dennis C, Prince DS, Moayed-Alaei L, Remash D, Carr-Boyd E, Bowen DG, Strasser SI, Crawford M, Pulitano C, Kench J, McCaughan GW, McKenzie C, Liu K. Association between vessels that encapsulate tumour clusters vascular pattern and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence following liver transplantation. Front Oncol 2022; 12:997093. [PMID: 36387254 PMCID: PMC9643778 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.997093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC) is a novel vascular pattern seen on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) histology which has been shown to independently predict tumor recurrence and survival after liver resection. Its prognostic value in HCC patients receiving liver transplantation (LT) is unclear. METHODS We retrospectively studied consecutive adults who underwent deceased-donor LT with active HCC found on explant between 2010-2019. Tumor tissue was stained for CD34 and quantified for VETC. Primary and secondary endpoints were time to recurrence (TTR) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS During the study period, 158 patients received LT where HCC was present on explant. VETC pattern was seen in 76.5% of explants. Patients with VETC-positive tumors spent longer on the waitlist (6.4 vs. 4.1 months, P=0.048), had higher median tumor numbers (2 vs. 1, P=0.001) and larger tumor sizes (20mm vs. 13mm, P<0.001) on explant pathology compared to those with VETC-negative tumors. Correspondingly, VETC-positive patients were more likely to be outside of accepted LT criteria for HCC. After 56.4 months median follow-up, 8.2% of patients developed HCC recurrence post-LT. On multivariable Cox regression, presence of VETC pattern did not predict TTR or RFS. However, the number of VETC-positive tumors on explant was an independent predictor of TTR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.411, P=0.001) and RFS (HR 1.267, P=0.014) after adjusting for other significant variables. CONCLUSION VETC pattern is commonly observed in HCC patients undergoing LT. The number of VETC-positive tumors, but not its presence, is an independent risk factor for TTR and RFS post-LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claude Dennis
- Australian National Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David S. Prince
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Liver Injury and Cancer Program, Centenary Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leila Moayed-Alaei
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Devika Remash
- Australian National Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emily Carr-Boyd
- Department of Histopathology, Auckland District Health Board LabPlus, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - David G. Bowen
- Australian National Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Simone I. Strasser
- Australian National Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Crawford
- Australian National Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carlo Pulitano
- Australian National Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James Kench
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Geoffrey W. McCaughan
- Australian National Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Liver Injury and Cancer Program, Centenary Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Catriona McKenzie
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ken Liu
- Australian National Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Liver Injury and Cancer Program, Centenary Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lim SW, Shin YJ, Cui S, Ko EJ, Yoo SH, Chung BH, Yang CW. Therapeutic effect of multiple functional minicircle vector encoding anti-CD25/IL-10/CXCR3 in allograft rejection model. Korean J Intern Med 2022; 37:1031-1049. [PMID: 35725307 PMCID: PMC9449213 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2021.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS We previously proposed minicircle vector technology as the potential platform for the development and production of new biologics. In this study, we have designed a novel target molecule for the treatment of allograft rejection and evaluated its feasibility as the therapeutic agent in this disease using the minicircle vector system. METHODS We engineered vectors to carry cassette sequences for anti-CD25, interleukin-10 (IL-10), and C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) fusion protein, and then isolated minicircle vectors from the parent vectors. We verified the substantial production of anti-CD25/IL-10/CXCR3 fusion protein from minicircles and their duration in HEK293T cells and mice models. We also evaluated whether minicircle-derived anti-CD25/IL-10/CXCR3 has therapeutic effects in a skin allograft in mice model. RESULTS We confirmed the production of anti-CD25/IL-10/CXCR3 from minicircle by its significant availability in cells transfected with the minicircle and in its conditioned media. After a single injection of minicircle by hydrodynamic injection via mouse tail vein, luminescence or red fluorescence was maintained until 40 days in the liver tissue, suggesting the production of anti-CD25/IL-10/CXCR3 protein from minicircles via protein synthesis machinery in the liver. Mice treated with the minicircle encoding anti-CD25/IL-10/CXCR3 showed prolonged skin allograft survival times accompanied by improved immunologic regulation e.g., reduction of the lymphocyte population of Th1, Th2, and Th17 and an induction of regulatory T cells. CONCLUSION These findings implied that self-generated anti-CD25/IL-10/CXCR3 protein drug by minicircle technology is functionally active and relevant for reducing allograft rejection. The minicircle vector system may be useful for developing new biological drugs, avoiding manufacturing or practical problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Woo Lim
- Transplant Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Convergent Research Consortium for Immunologic Disease, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Yoo Jin Shin
- Transplant Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Convergent Research Consortium for Immunologic Disease, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Sheng Cui
- Transplant Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Convergent Research Consortium for Immunologic Disease, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Eun Jeong Ko
- Transplant Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Convergent Research Consortium for Immunologic Disease, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | | | - Byung Ha Chung
- Transplant Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Convergent Research Consortium for Immunologic Disease, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Chul Woo Yang
- Transplant Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Convergent Research Consortium for Immunologic Disease, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Parente A, Flores Carvalho M, Eden J, Dutkowski P, Schlegel A. Mitochondria and Cancer Recurrence after Liver Transplantation—What Is the Benefit of Machine Perfusion? Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23179747. [PMID: 36077144 PMCID: PMC9456431 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor recurrence after liver transplantation has been linked to multiple factors, including the recipient’s tumor burden, donor factors, and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). The increasing number of livers accepted from extended criteria donors has forced the transplant community to push the development of dynamic perfusion strategies. The reason behind this progress is the urgent need to reduce the clinical consequences of IRI. Two concepts appear most beneficial and include either the avoidance of ischemia, e.g., the replacement of cold storage by machine perfusion, or secondly, an endischemic organ improvement through perfusion in the recipient center prior to implantation. While several concepts, including normothermic perfusion, were found to reduce recipient transaminase levels and early allograft dysfunction, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion also reduced IRI-associated post-transplant complications and costs. With the impact on mitochondrial injury and subsequent less IRI-inflammation, this endischemic perfusion was also found to reduce the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Firstly, this article highlights the contributing factors to tumor recurrence, including the surgical and medical tissue trauma and underlying mechanisms of IRI-associated inflammation. Secondly, it focuses on the role of mitochondria and associated interventions to reduce cancer recurrence. Finally, the role of machine perfusion technology as a delivery tool and as an individual treatment is discussed together with the currently available clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Parente
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Mauricio Flores Carvalho
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Centre of Preclinical Research, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Janina Eden
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Centre of Preclinical Research, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Centre, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cisneros-Garza L, González-Huezo M, Moctezuma-Velázquez C, Ladrón de Guevara-Cetina L, Vilatobá M, García-Juárez I, Alvarado-Reyes R, Álvarez-Treviño G, Allende-Pérez S, Bornstein-Quevedo L, Calderillo-Ruiz G, Carrillo-Martínez M, Castillo-Barradas M, Cerda-Reyes E, Félix-Leyva J, Gabutti-Thomas J, Guerrero-Ixtlahuac J, Higuera-de la Tijera F, Huitzil-Melendez D, Kimura-Hayama E, López-Hernández P, Malé-Velázquez R, Méndez-Sánchez N, Morales-Ruiz M, Ruíz-García E, Sánchez-Ávila J, Torrecillas-Torres L. The second Mexican consensus on hepatocellular carcinoma. Part II: Treatment. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO (ENGLISH EDITION) 2022; 87:362-379. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
16
|
The Role of Immunosuppression for Recurrent Cholangiocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122890. [PMID: 35740555 PMCID: PMC9221145 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), or biliary tract cancer (BTC), remains controversial regarding high recurrence rates and poor prognosis. Oncological follow-up may benefit from tumor-inhibiting properties of mTOR inhibitors (mTORI), shown with improved survival for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after LT. The aim of this study was to investigate the recurrence and survival in relation to tumor type and type of immunosuppression (IS). LT patients with CCA or mixed HCC/CCA (mHCC/CCA) (n = 67) were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints were the time from LT to recurrence (n = 44) and survival after recurrence. Statistically significant impairment in survival for recurrent CCA (rCCA) was shown in patients not eligible for surgical resection (HR 2.46 (CI: 1.2−5.1; p = 0.02). Histological proven grading >1 and N1 status at initial transplantation were associated with impaired survival (HR 0.13 (CI: 0.03−0.58); p < 0.01 and HR 3.4 (CI: 1.0−11.65); p = 0.05). Reduced IS after tumor recurrence improved survival (HR 4.2/CI: 1.3−13.6; p = 0.02). MTORI initiation before recurrence or after had no significant impact on survival. Our data thereby indicate, similar to findings in recurrent HCC after LT, that patients with rCCA after LT benefit from a reduction in IS upon recurrence.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abrahamsson J, Sternby Eilard M, Rizell M, Bennett W, Åberg F. Reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure with antibody induction and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:325-332. [PMID: 34871120 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.2010799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common indication for liver transplantation (LT), but post-LT tumor recurrence remains a concern. Early post-LT immunosuppression is suggested to affect recurrence risk. We evaluated the impact on HCC recurrence of an immunosuppression protocol introduced in 2010 with interleukin-2 receptor antibody (IL-2RA) induction and delayed-introduction of reduced-dose tacrolimus with mycophenolate. METHODS We included consecutive HCC patients transplanted 2000-2017 in Gothenburg. The impact on HCC recurrence of IL-2RA induction and mean tacrolimus trough concentration during the first 20 post-LT days was analyzed by multivariable Cox regression and propensity score-adjusted analyses. RESULTS The study comprised 235 patients (mean age 57 yrs, men 80%, mean MELD 13, within Milan criteria 57%). The cumulative 5-yr HCC recurrence rate among patients transplanted before and after 2010 were 28.6% and 19.7%, respectively. IL-2RA induction had no independent effect on HCC recurrence. High tacrolimus exposure (mean 20-day tacrolimus concentration ≥8ng/mL) was associated with increased HCC recurrence risk on univariable analysis (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.23-4.01, p = .008), but was non-significant on multivariable analysis (p = .17). Outside Milan criteria, high tacrolimus exposure was significant for HCC recurrence (HR 3.68, 95% CI 1.34-10.11, p = .012) independently of tumor characteristics and AFP level. This was confirmed on multivariable propensity score-adjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS Reduced early tacrolimus exposure, facilitated by IL-2RA induction, was associated with reduced risk for HCC recurrence among patients outside Milan criteria. Prospective studies are needed to confirm if early tacrolimus-minimization strategies can help reduce HCC recurrence rates and help extend transplant criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Abrahamsson
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Magnus Rizell
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - William Bennett
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Åberg
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bonney GK, Chew CA, Lodge P, Hubbard J, Halazun KJ, Trunecka P, Muiesan P, Mirza DF, Isaac J, Laing RW, Iyer SG, Chee CE, Yong WP, Muthiah MD, Panaro F, Sanabria J, Grothey A, Moodley K, Chau I, Chan ACY, Wang CC, Menon K, Sapisochin G, Hagness M, Dueland S, Line PD, Adam R. Liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association consensus guidelines. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:933-946. [PMID: 34506756 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00219-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease worldwide, with more than 50% of patients developing metastases to the liver. Despite advances in improving resectability, most patients present with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases requiring palliative systemic therapy and locoregional disease control strategies. There is a growing interest in the use of liver transplantation to treat non-resectable colorectal liver metastases in well selected patients, leading to a surge in the number of studies and prospective trials worldwide, thereby fuelling the emerging field of transplant oncology. The interdisciplinary nature of this field requires domain-specific evidence and expertise to be drawn from multiple clinical specialities and the basic sciences. Importantly, the wider societal implication of liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases, such as the effect on the allocation of resources and national transplant waitlists, should be considered. To address the urgent need for a consensus approach, the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association commissioned the Liver Transplantation for Colorectal liver Metastases 2021 working group, consisting of international leaders in the areas of hepatobiliary surgery, colorectal oncology, liver transplantation, hepatology, and bioethics. The aim of this study was to standardise nomenclature and define management principles in five key domains: patient selection, evaluation of biological behaviour, graft selection, recipient considerations, and outcomes. An extensive literature review was done within the five domains identified. Between November, 2020, and January, 2021, a three-step modified Delphi consensus process was undertaken by the workgroup, who were further subgrouped into the Scientific Committee, Expert Panel, and Transplant Centre Representatives. A final consensus of 44 statements, standardised nomenclature, and a practical management algorithm is presented. Specific criteria for clinico-patho-radiological assessments with molecular profiling is crucial in this setting. After this, the careful evaluation of biological behaviour with bridging therapy to transplantation with an appropriate assessment of the response is required. The sequencing of treatment in synchronous metastatic disease requires special consideration and is highlighted here. Some ethical dilemmas within organ allocation for malignant indications are discussed and the role for extended criteria grafts, living donor transplantation, and machine perfusion technologies for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases are reviewed. Appropriate immunosuppressive regimens and strategies for the follow-up and treatment of recurrent disease are proposed. This consensus guideline provides a framework by which liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastases might be safely instituted and is a meaningful step towards future evidenced-based practice for better patient selection and organ allocation to improve the survival for patients with this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn K Bonney
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Claire Alexandra Chew
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Peter Lodge
- Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Joleen Hubbard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Karim J Halazun
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Pavel Trunecka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Richard W Laing
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Cheng Ean Chee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Wei Peng Yong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mark Dhinesh Muthiah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Saint Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital-School of Medicine, Montpellier, France
| | - Juan Sanabria
- Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Axel Grothey
- Department of Medical Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, TN, USA
| | - Keymanthri Moodley
- The Centre of Medical Ethics and Law, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Ian Chau
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Albert C Y Chan
- Division of Liver Transplantation, Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chih Chi Wang
- Department of Surgery, Liver Transplantation Centre, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Krishna Menon
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Abdominal Transplant and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Oncology, Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Morten Hagness
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Svein Dueland
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål-Dag Line
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - René Adam
- Hepato Biliary Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation Unit, AP-HP Paul Brousse Hospital, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
L R, T I, Mpaw C, H M, G S. THE MANAGEMENT OF POST-TRANSPLANTATION RECURRENCE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA. Clin Mol Hepatol 2021; 28:1-16. [PMID: 34610652 PMCID: PMC8755475 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The annual incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to rise. Over the last two decades, liver transplantation (LT) has become the preferable treatment of HCC, when feasible and strict selection criteria are met. With the rise in HCC-related LT, compounded by downstaging techniques and expansion of transplant selection criteria, a parallel increase in number of post-transplantation HCC recurrence is expected. Additionally, in the context of an immunosuppressed transplant host, recurrences may behave aggressively and more challenging to manage, resulting in poor prognosis. Despite this, no consensus or best practice guidelines for post-transplantation cancer surveillance and recurrence management for HCC currently exist. Studies with adequate population sizes and high-level evidence are lacking, and the role of systemic and locoregional therapies for graft and extrahepatic recurrences remains under debate. This review seeks to summarize the existing literature on post-transplant HCC surveillance and recurrence management. It highlights the value of early tumour detection, re-evaluating the immunosuppression regimen, and staging to differentiate disseminated recurrence from intrahepatic or extrahepatic oligo-recurrence. This ultimately guides decision-making and maximizes treatment effect. Treatment recommendations specific to recurrence type are provided based on currently available locoregional and systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajendran L
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ivanics T
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Claasen Mpaw
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Muaddi H
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sapisochin G
- Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kang I, Lee JG, Choi SH, Kim HJ, Han DH, Choi GH, Kim MS, Choi JS, Kim SI, Joo DJ. Impact of everolimus on survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2021; 27:589-602. [PMID: 34293849 PMCID: PMC8524068 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS This study aimed to investigate whether everolimus (EVR) affects long-term survival after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS The data from 303 consecutive patients with HCC who had undergone LT from January 2012 to July 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 1) patients treated with EVR in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (EVR group; n=114) and 2) patients treated with CNI-based therapy without EVR (non-EVR group; n=189). Time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) after propensity score (PS) matching were compared between the groups, and prognostic factors for TTR and OS were evaluated. RESULTS The EVR group exhibited more aggressive tumor biology than the non-EVR group, such as a higher number of tumors (P=0.003), a higher prevalence of microscopic vascular invasion (P=0.017) and exceeding Milan criteria (P=0.029). Compared with the PS-matched non-EVR group, the PS-matched EVR group had significantly better TTR (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, EVR was identified as an independent prognostic factor for TTR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.248; P=0.001) and OS (HR, 0.145; P<0.001). CONCLUSION Combined with CNIs, EVR has the potential to prolong long-term survival in patients undergoing LT for HCC. These findings warrant further investigation in a well-designed prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Incheon Kang
- Department of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jae Geun Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hyun Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myoung Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sub Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soon Il Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Jin Joo
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pelizzaro F, Gambato M, Gringeri E, Vitale A, Cillo U, Farinati F, Burra P, Russo FP. Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194882. [PMID: 34638365 PMCID: PMC8508053 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an increasingly important indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. However, LT in the setting of liver cancer is burdened by the risk of tumor recurrence. The prognosis of patients with post-LT HCC recurrence is still very poor and several areas of uncertainty remain in the management of these patients. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of available evidence regarding the management of HCC recurrence after LT, starting from the pre- and post-transplant stratification criteria and encompassing post-LT surveillance, preventive strategies and treatment. Much work has been done in the last several years but further effort is still needed in order to improve the outcome of these patients. Abstract Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT), occurring in 10–15% of cases, is a major concern. A lot of work has been done in order to refine the selection of LT candidates with HCC and to improve the outcome of patients with recurrence. Despite this, the prognosis of these patients remains poor, partly due to the several areas of uncertainty in their management. Even if surveillance for HCC recurrence is crucial for early detection, there is currently no evidence to support a specific and cost-effective post-LT surveillance strategy. Concerning preventive measures, consensus on the best immunosuppressive drugs has not been reached and not enough data to support adjuvant therapy are present. Several therapeutic approaches (surgical, locoregional and systemic treatments) are available in case of recurrence, but there are still few data in the post-LT setting. Moreover, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is controversial in transplant recipients considered the risk of rejection. In this paper, the available evidence on the management of HCC recurrence after LT is comprehensively reviewed, considering pre- and post-transplant risk stratification, post-transplant surveillance, preventive strategies and treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Pelizzaro
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (F.P.); (M.G.); (F.F.); (P.B.)
| | - Martina Gambato
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (F.P.); (M.G.); (F.F.); (P.B.)
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Enrico Gringeri
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (E.G.); (A.V.); (U.C.)
| | - Alessandro Vitale
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (E.G.); (A.V.); (U.C.)
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (E.G.); (A.V.); (U.C.)
| | - Fabio Farinati
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (F.P.); (M.G.); (F.F.); (P.B.)
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (F.P.); (M.G.); (F.F.); (P.B.)
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Russo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (F.P.); (M.G.); (F.F.); (P.B.)
- Multivisceral Transplant Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhao Y, Liu Y, Zhou L, Du GS, He Q. Trends of rapamycin in survival benefits of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:953-966. [PMID: 34621472 PMCID: PMC8462078 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The proportion of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has kept on increasing over the past years and account for 20%-40% of all LT. Post-transplant HCC recurrence is considered the most important factor affecting the long-term survival of patients. The use of different types of immunosuppressive agents after LT is closely associated with an increased risk for HCC recurrence. The most commonly used conventional immunosuppressive drugs include the calcineurin inhibitors tacrolimus (FK506) and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor rapamycin (RAPA). Compared with tacrolimus, RAPA may carry an advantage in survival benefit because of its anti-tumor effects. However, no sufficient evidence to date has proven that RAPA could increase long-term recurrence-free survival and its anti-tumor mechanism of combined therapy remains incompletely clear. In this review, we will focus on recent advances in clinical application experience and basic research results of RAPA in patients undergoing LT for HCC to further guide the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Lin Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Guo-Sheng Du
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Qiang He
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim JM. Can hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence be prevented after liver transplantation? Clin Mol Hepatol 2021; 27:562-563. [PMID: 34551504 PMCID: PMC8524073 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Piñero F, Tanno M, Aballay Soteras G, Tisi Baña M, Dirchwolf M, Fassio E, Ruf A, Mengarelli S, Borzi S, Fernández N, Ridruejo E, Descalzi V, Anders M, Mazzolini G, Reggiardo V, Marciano S, Perazzo F, Spina JC, McCormack L, Maraschio M, Lagues C, Gadano A, Villamil F, Silva M, Cairo F, Ameigeiras B. Argentinian clinical practice guideline for surveillance, diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Hepatol 2021; 19:546-569. [PMID: 32593747 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Piñero
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Mario Tanno
- Hospital Centenario de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | | | - Matías Tisi Baña
- Internal Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Andrés Ruf
- Hospital Privado de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | | | - Silvia Borzi
- Instituto Rossi, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Ezequiel Ridruejo
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina; Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Guillermo Mazzolini
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cecilia Lagues
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Marcelo Silva
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
In liver transplant patients, solid tumors and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) have emerged as significant long-term mortality causes. Additionally, it is assumed that de novo malignancy (DNM) after liver transplantation (LT) is the second-leading cause of death after cardiovascular complications. Well-established risk factors for PTLD and solid tumors are calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), tacrolimus (TAC), and cyclosporine, the cornerstones of all immunosuppressive (IS) therapies used after LT. The loss of immunocompetence facilitated by the host immune system due to prolonged IS therapy leads to cancer development, including in LT patients. Hindering DNA repair mechanisms, promoting tumor cell invasiveness, and hampering apoptosis are critical events in tumorigenesis and tumor growth in LT patients resulting from IS administration. This paper aims to overview the refined mechanisms of IS-induced tumorigenesis after LT and the loss of immunocompetence facilitated by the host immune system due to prolonged IS therapy. In addition, we also discuss in detail the mechanisms of action in different types of IS regimen used after LT, and their putative effect on DNM.
Collapse
|
26
|
Nitta H, Younès A, El-Domiaty N, Karam V, Sobesky R, Vibert E, Coilly A, Maria Antonini T, De Martin E, Cherqui D, Baba H, Rosmorduc O, Adam R, Samuel D, Saliba F. High trough levels of everolimus combined to sorafenib improve patients survival after hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in liver transplant recipients. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1293-1305. [PMID: 33932239 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following liver transplantation (LT) occurs in 10%-20% of patients transplanted for HCC. The treatment of HCC recurrence after LT remains a challenge. Consecutive patients who underwent LT for HCC between 2005 and 2015 at our center were recruited. Characteristics of patients with recurrence, modalities of treatment and outcome were collected retrospectively. Patient survival was analyzed according to HCC recurrence therapeutic strategy. Among 306 transplanted patients, 43 patients (14.1%) developed recurrence with a median survival time after recurrence of 10.9 months (95%CI: 6.6-18.6). Survival of patients treated with Sorafenib (SOR) and everolimus (EVL) (n = 19) was significantly better than that of the group treated with other strategies (n = 24) (P = 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that SOR plus EVL therapy and absence of dissemination at diagnosis of recurrence were independent predictive factors of prolonged survival after recurrence. Among the patients who treated with EVL, survival of patients with controlled EVL blood trough levels ≥5 ng/ml was significantly better compared to those with EVL trough levels <5 ng/ml (P = 0.021). Combination therapy of sorafenib and everolimus was an independent predictor for better survival after HCC recurrence. Patients with controlled everolimus trough level ≥5 ng/ml might get the best survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidetoshi Nitta
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Aline Younès
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Nada El-Domiaty
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Tropical Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Vincent Karam
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Rodolphe Sobesky
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Eric Vibert
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Audrey Coilly
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Teresa Maria Antonini
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Eleonora De Martin
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Olivier Rosmorduc
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - René Adam
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Didier Samuel
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Faouzi Saliba
- AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Inserm UMR-S 1193, Université Paris- Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wei J, Ye L, Song L, Tang H, Zhang T, Fu B, Zhang Y, Yang Q, Yang Y, Yi S. TSC1/2 mutations-a unique type of mutation suitable for liver transplantation of Hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:1074-1085. [PMID: 34295558 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway-related genes-TSC1/2. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 46 patients who underwent liver transplantation for HCC and performed next generation sequencing to analyze the relationship between the efficacy of sirolimus after liver transplantation for HCC and mutations in mTOR pathway-related genes, especially tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) mutations. Results The average age of 46 patients with liver transplantation for HCC was 51±21 years. After surgery, 35 patients received an anti-rejection/anti-tumor regimen that included sirolimus, and 11 patients did not receive sirolimus. There was no significant difference in survival rate between the two groups (P=0.761). The gene sequencing results showed mTOR-related pathway mutations in 10 patients, of whom five (10.9%) had TSC1/2 mutations. Of the 35 patients using sirolimus, those with mTOR-related mutations had significantly better survival rates than patients without mTOR-related mutations (P=0.016). Conclusions According to genetic sequencing results, a personalized treatment plan for specific genetic mutations should be selected in patients undergoing liver transplantation for HCC. Patients with mTOR-related gene mutations, especially TSC mutations, can gain significant benefits from the use of mTOR inhibitors such as sirolimus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinming Wei
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, China
| | - Linsen Ye
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, China
| | - Laien Song
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Tang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tong Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Binsheng Fu
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingcai Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shuhong Yi
- Department of Hepatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhou J, Huang Z, Chen Z, Xu F, Tong R, Zheng S. Impact of donor age on liver transplant outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the SRTR database. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:195. [PMID: 33931011 PMCID: PMC8086097 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01786-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Donor age is an important predictor for liver transplant recipients. Studies have not fully explored its impact on transplant outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients as well as its involvement in tumor recurrence. Methods HCC patients who received liver transplants during 2010–2017 from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were included. The recipients were divided into four groups based on donor age: I (≤ 34 years), II (35–49 years), III (50–64 years), and IV (≥ 65 years). Transplant outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), tumor recurrence, and risks, were evaluated. Results A total of 13,276 HCC recipients were included in this study. Statistical significant differences were observed in OS among the four groups. The best 5-year survival was 76.0% in group I, followed by 73.5% in group II, 72.8% in group III, and 69.2% in group IV (P < 0.001). However, the liver-specific survival did not differ among these groups (P = 0.260). Donor age was found to be the independent predictor of OS after adjusting for other variables (P < 0.001, ref. group I; 1.087 (0.979–1.208) for group II, P = 0.119; 1.124 (1.015–1.246) for group III, P = 0.025; 1.395 (1.215–1.602) for group IV, P < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, OS was significantly different in recipients with hepatitis C virus (HCV), but there was no significant difference for recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV), alcoholic liver diseases and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The post-transplant cumulative tumor recurrence rates were similar among the four groups (P = 0.382). Conclusions Older donor age was associated with decreased OS but not liver-specific survival as well as post-transplant tumor recurrence in HCC recipients. Donor age also had different effects in patients with different underlying liver diseases. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-021-01786-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhou
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment For Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zhichao Huang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zheng Chen
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Fangshen Xu
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rongliang Tong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment For Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou, China.,Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China. .,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, China. .,Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Research Unit of Collaborative Diagnosis and Treatment For Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU019), Hangzhou, China. .,Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sirolimus-based immunosuppression improves the prognosis of liver Transplantation Recipients with low TSC1/2 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan Criteria. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2533-2542. [PMID: 33902956 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus (SRL) following liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. Sirolimus is a typical mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and tuberous sclerosis 1-tuberous sclerosis 2 complex (TSC1/TSC2) is an important negative effector in the mTOR pathway. In this study, we investigated the effect of SRL-based immunosuppression on the prognosis of LT recipients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria based on TSC1/2 expression and explored the effect of TSC1 on HCC in vitro and in vivo. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 120 HCC patients who underwent LT in our hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 30, 2018. All patients had HCC beyond the Milan criteria and were divided into the SRL group (n = 50) and non-SRL group (n = 70). TSC1/2 expression levels in paraffin-embedded tissues were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and then analyzed as subgroups. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. TSC1 expression was silenced in Huh-7 and Bel-7402 cell lines for further cell function experiments. RESULTS 88.3% of patients were HBV LT recipients. The SRL group exhibited better DFS and OS compared to the non-SRL group (P = 0.02, P = 0.003). Subgroup (TSC1-based or TSC2-based) analyses revealed that patients with low TSC1 or TSC2 expression benefited from sirolimus (DFS: P = 0.046, OS: P = 0.006 for TSC1; DFS: P = 0.05, OS: P = 0.003 for TSC2) compared with patients with high expression. TSC1 knockdown in Huh-7 and Bel-7402 HCC cell lines activated the mTORC1 pathway and enhanced cell proliferation, migration and sensitivity to SRL in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSION TSC1/2 expression could be used to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria who underwent SRL-based immunosuppression following LT. TSC1 knockdown promoted HCC malignancy and enhanced sensitivity to SRL.
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an increasingly common disease with liver transplant (LT) the best long-term therapy for early stage disease. We will review the data for assessing risk and managing recurrence for patients undergoing LT for HCC. AREAS COVERED In this review, we will provide an overview of methods of patient risk stratification in the post-transplant period, the data around surveillance for HCC recurrence, and the evidence for and against post-LT adjuvant treatment strategies. Finally, we will provide data regarding treatment options for patients with HCC recurrence after LT. Using an extensive search of original papers and society guidelines, this paper provides a comprehensive review of the data for assessing risk and managing recurrence for patients undergoing LT for HCC. EXPERT OPINION The development of multiple post-transplant prognostic scoring systems have allowed for improved assessment of recurrence risk and stratification of patients. However, the ability to translate this information into surveillance and therapeutic strategies that improve patient outcomes still have to be fully demonstrated. Post-LT immunosuppression strategies have been implemented in order to attempt to reduce this risk. Evidence-based strategies for managing recurrent HCC are evolving. We expect that with further understanding of individual patient characteristics will allow for optimal therapeutic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, University of California , San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California , San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Manzia T, Parente A, Angelico R, Gazia C, Tisone G. The Revolution in Indication for Liver Transplantation: Will Liver Metastatic Disease Overcome the End-Stage Liver Disease in the Next Future? TRANSPLANTOLOGY 2020; 1:111-122. [DOI: 10.3390/transplantology1020011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Indications for liver transplantation (LT) have constantly been evolving during the last few decades due to a better understanding of liver diseases and innovative therapies. Likewise, also the underlying causes of liver disease have changed. In the setting of transplant oncology, recent developments have pushed the boundaries of oncological indications for LT outside hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially for secondary liver tumors, such as neuroendocrine and colorectal cancer. In the next years, as more evidence emerges, LT could become the standard treatment for well-selected metastatic liver tumors. In this manuscript, we review and summarize the available evidence for LT in liver tumors beyond HCC with a focus on metastatic liver malignancies, highlighting the importance of these new concepts for future implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Manzia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 81, Viale Oxford, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 81, Viale Oxford, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Angelico
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 81, Viale Oxford, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Gazia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 81, Viale Oxford, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tisone
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata Hospital, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 81, Viale Oxford, 00133 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Li S, Saviano A, Erstad DJ, Hoshida Y, Fuchs BC, Baumert T, Tanabe KK. Risk Factors, Pathogenesis, and Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prevention: Emphasis on Secondary Prevention and Its Translational Challenges. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3817. [PMID: 33255794 PMCID: PMC7760293 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9123817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality globally. Given the limited therapeutic efficacy in advanced HCC, prevention of HCC carcinogenesis could serve as an effective strategy. Patients with chronic fibrosis due to viral or metabolic etiologies are at a high risk of developing HCC. Primary prevention seeks to eliminate cancer predisposing risk factors while tertiary prevention aims to prevent HCC recurrence. Secondary prevention targets patients with baseline chronic liver disease. Various epidemiological and experimental studies have identified candidates for secondary prevention-both etiology-specific and generic prevention strategies-including statins, aspirin, and anti-diabetic drugs. The introduction of multi-cell based omics analysis along with better characterization of the hepatic microenvironment will further facilitate the identification of targets for prevention. In this review, we will summarize HCC risk factors, pathogenesis, and discuss strategies of HCC prevention. We will focus on secondary prevention and also discuss current challenges in translating experimental work into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shen Li
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (S.L.); (D.J.E.); (B.C.F.)
| | - Antonio Saviano
- Inserm, U1110, Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies Virales et Hépatiques, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Derek J. Erstad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (S.L.); (D.J.E.); (B.C.F.)
| | - Yujin Hoshida
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Dallas, TX 75390, USA;
| | - Bryan C. Fuchs
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (S.L.); (D.J.E.); (B.C.F.)
| | - Thomas Baumert
- Inserm, U1110, Institut de Recherche sur les Maladies Virales et Hépatiques, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Kenneth K. Tanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (S.L.); (D.J.E.); (B.C.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Schnitzbauer AA, Filmann N, Adam R, Bachellier P, Bechstein WO, Becker T, Bhoori S, Bilbao I, Brockmann J, Burra P, Chazoullières O, Cillo U, Colledan M, Duvoux C, Ganten TM, Gugenheim J, Heise M, van Hoek B, Jamieson N, de Jong KP, Klein CG, Klempnauer J, Kneteman N, Lerut J, Mäkisalo H, Mazzaferro V, Mirza DF, Nadalin S, Neuhaus P, Pageaux GP, Pinna AD, Pirenne J, Pratschke J, Powel J, Rentsch M, Rizell M, Rossi G, Rostaing L, Roy A, Scholz T, Settmacher U, Soliman T, Strasser S, Söderdahl G, Troisi RI, Turrión VS, Schlitt HJ, Geissler EK. mTOR Inhibition Is Most Beneficial After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Active Tumors. Ann Surg 2020; 272:855-862. [PMID: 32889867 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival benefit of sirolimus in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (exploratory analysis of the SiLVER-trial). SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA Patients receiving LT) for HCC are at a high risk for tumor recurrence. Calcineurin inhibitors have shown evidence to promote cancer growth, whereas mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors like sirolimus have anticancer effects. In the SiLVER-trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00355862), the effect of sirolimus on the recurrence of HCC after LT was investigated in a prospective randomized trial. Although the primary endpoint of improved disease-free survival (DFS) with sirolimus was not met, outcomes were improved for patients in the sirolimus-treatment arm in the first 3 to 5 years. To learn more about the key variables, a multivariate analysis was performed on the SiLVER-trial data. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 508 patients of the intention-to-treat analysis were included in exploratory univariate and multivariate models for overall survival (OS), DFS and a competing risk analysis for HCC recurrence. RESULTS Sirolimus use for ≥3 months after LT for HCC independently reduced the hazard for death in the multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR): 0.7 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.52-0.96, P = 0.02). Most strikingly, patients with an alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥10 ng/mL and having used sirolimus for ≥3 months, benefited most with regard to OS, DFS, and HCC-recurrence (HR: 0.49-0.59, P = 0.0079-0.0245). CONCLUSIONS mTOR-inhibitor treatment with sirolimus for ≥3 months improves outcomes in LT for HCC, especially in patients with AFP-evidence of higher tumor activity, advocating particularly for mTOR inhibitor use in this subgroup of patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT: 2005-005362-36 CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:: NCT00355862.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Natalie Filmann
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Institut für Biostatistik und Mathematisches Modellierung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - René Adam
- Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hépato Biliaire, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Service de Chirurgie Générale, Hépatique, Endocrinienne, et Transplantation, Strasbourg, France
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Thomas Becker
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax, Transplantations- und Kinderchirurgie, Kiel, Germany
| | - Sherrie Bhoori
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, National Cancer Institute Milan, Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Cancer Unit, Milano, Italy
| | - Itxarone Bilbao
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Servicio de Cirugía General, Unidad de Trasplante Hepatico, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jens Brockmann
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Allgemein- und ViszeralchirurgieMünster, Germany
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Gastroenterologiche (DiSCOG), Padova, Italy
| | - Olivier Chazoullières
- Hôpital Saint Antoine, Federation d'Hepato-Gastro-Enterologie, Service d'Hepatologie, Paris, France
| | - Umberto Cillo
- Università di Padova, Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Chirurgia Epatobiliare e Trapianto Epatico, Padova, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- Azienda Ospedaliera Papa Giovanni XXIII, Chirurgia terza e Chirurgia Toracica, Bergamo (BG), Italy
| | - Christoph Duvoux
- Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor, Service d'Hepatologie et de Gastroenterologie, Unite d'Hepatologie et de Transplantation Hepatique, Paris, France
| | - Tom M Ganten
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Fürst Stirum Klinik Bruchsal, Bruchsal, Germany
| | - Jean Gugenheim
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital ARCHET 2, Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Centre de Transplantation Hépatique, Nice Cedex, France
| | - Michael Heise
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Bart van Hoek
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Neville Jamieson
- Cambridge University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Department of Surgery, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Koert P de Jong
- University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Department of Surgery, Div. of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Christian G Klein
- Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Essen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Klempnauer
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Hannover, Germany
| | - Norman Kneteman
- University of Alberta, Alberta Health Services Liver Transplant Program, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jan Lerut
- Institute for Experimental and Clinical Research (IREC), Université catholique Louvain(UCL), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Heikki Mäkisalo
- Helsinki University Central Hospital, Division of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, National Cancer Institute Milan, Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Cancer Unit, Milano, Italy
| | - Darius F Mirza
- University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Liver and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Unit, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Klinikum der Universität Tübingen, Klinik für Allgemeine, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Peter Neuhaus
- Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin, Germany
| | - George-Philippe Pageaux
- CHRU de Montpellier, APEMAD, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Service d'Hepato-Gastroentérologie et Transplantation Hepatique, Cedex 5, France
| | - Antonio D Pinna
- Universita di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Chirurgia Generale e dei Trapianti, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jaques Pirenne
- UZ Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg, Abdominale Transplantatiechirurgie, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin
| | - James Powel
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Hepatic-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgical Services and Edinburgh Transplant Unit, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Markus Rentsch
- Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München-Großhadern, current affiliation: Klinikum Ingolstadt, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Ingolstadt, Germany
| | - Magnus Rizell
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Giorgio Rossi
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS di Milano, Centro Trapianti Fegato, Pad Zonda I piano, Milano, Italy
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Department of Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Transplantation, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital Center, Avenue du Maquis du Grésivaudan, La Tronche, France
| | - André Roy
- Hopital St Luc, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Montréal (CHUM), Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Principal Pavillion, 1058 Rue St Denis Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tim Scholz
- Uppsala University Hospital, Deptartment for Transplant Surgery, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Universitätsklinikum Jena, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefässchirurgie, Jena, Germany
| | - Thomas Soliman
- Medizinische Universität Wien, AKH- Wien, Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Abteilung für Transplantation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Strasser
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, AW Morrow Gastroenterology, and Liver Centre and Liver Transplant Unit, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia
| | - Gunnar Söderdahl
- Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Transplantation Surgery, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Hepato- Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Victor Sánchez Turrión
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Departamento de Cirugía, Unidad de Trasplante Hepático, Calle Manuel de Falla 1, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hans J Schlitt
- University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Surgery, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Edward K Geissler
- University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Surgery and Section of Experimental Surgery, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, Germany.,Division of Tumor Therapy, Fraunhofer Institute of Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Immunosuppressive regimens for adult liver transplant recipients in real-life practice: consensus recommendations from an Italian Working Group. Hepatol Int 2020; 14:930-943. [PMID: 33099753 PMCID: PMC7803715 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-020-10091-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
It is a well-recognized fact that implementing new guidelines in clinical practice may be difficult; therefore the Italian Society for Organ and Tissue Transplantation (SITO) set out to define practical immunosuppression tools for the management of liver transplantation patients. In 2017, an Italian Working Group of liver transplant experts and hepatologists issued a set of consensus statements along with evidence-based recommendations on the use of everolimus after liver transplantation. This article presents the evidence- and consensus-based algorithms developed within the Italian Working Group, which are aimed towards guiding clinicians in the selection of immunosuppressive regimens for the management of adult liver transplant recipients in real-life practice. The liver transplant recipient population, typically managed in clinical practice, was divided into the following categories: (1) standard patients; (2) critically ill patients; (3) patients with a specific etiology; (4) patients with hepatocellular carcinoma; (5) and patients with de novo malignancies. The algorithms are divided into two parts, according to the time from transplantation (0-3 months and > 3 months) and are discussed here along with relevant supporting literature, when available. Ultimately, it is hoped that the evidence- and consensus-based algorithms developed within the Italian Working Group, and presented here, contribute to simplify, personalize, and optimize immunosuppression of liver transplantation recipients in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
35
|
Posttransplant Management of Recipients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Working Group Report From the ILTS Transplant Oncology Consensus Conference. Transplantation 2020; 104:1143-1149. [PMID: 32217940 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment for patients with localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), recurrence occurs in 6%-18% of patients. Several factors, particularly morphological criteria combined with dynamic parameters, known before LT modify this risk and combined in prediction models may be used to stratify patients at need of variable surveillance strategies. Additional variables though likely explain differences in recurrence rates in patients with the same pre-LT HCC status. One of these variables is possibly immunosuppression (IS). Once recurrence takes place, management is highly heterogenous. Within the International Liver Transplantation Society Consensus Conference on Liver Transplant Oncology, working group 4 aim was to analyze the data regarding posttransplant management of recipients undergoing LT for HCC. Three areas of research were considered: (1) cancer prediction models and surveillance strategies; (2) tailored IS for cancer recipients; and (3) new adjuvant therapies for HCC recurrence. Following formulation of several questions, a literature search was undertaken with abstract review followed by article retrieval and full-data extraction. The grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system was used for evidence rating incorporating strength of recommendation and quality of evidence.
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation and can occur through three mechanisms: recurrence of a recipient's pre-transplant malignancy, donor-related transmission and de novo development. Currently, the decision to list a patient with a history of malignancy is an individual one. Screening guidelines for potential donors and for recipients after transplant are still widely based on general population guidelines, while the role of chronic immunosuppression remains controversial. These shortcomings mean that patients present at diagnosis with advanced stages of the disease, often precluding curative treatments. The present review summarizes current recommendations for the screening of recipients and donors for pre- and post-transplant malignancies, and current management of recipients who develop cancer after a liver transplant.
Collapse
|
37
|
Brandi G, Ricci AD, Rizzo A, Zanfi C, Tavolari S, Palloni A, De Lorenzo S, Ravaioli M, Cescon M. Is post-transplant chemotherapy feasible in liver transplantation for colorectal cancer liver metastases? Cancer Commun (Lond) 2020; 40:461-464. [PMID: 32762027 PMCID: PMC7494063 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Brandi
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Angela Dalia Ricci
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Chiara Zanfi
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, S. Orsola- Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Simona Tavolari
- Center of Applied Biomedical Research, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Andrea Palloni
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Stefania De Lorenzo
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Matteo Ravaioli
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, S. Orsola- Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, S. Orsola- Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pommergaard HC, Rostved AA, Adam R, Rasmussen A, Salizzoni M, Bravo MAG, Cherqui D, De Simone P, Houssel-Debry P, Mazzaferro V, Soubrane O, García-Valdecasas JC, Prous JF, Pinna AD, O'Grady J, Karam V, Duvoux C, Thygesen LC. Mortality after Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Study from the European Liver Transplant Registry. Liver Cancer 2020; 9:455-467. [PMID: 32999871 PMCID: PMC7506266 DOI: 10.1159/000507397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Prognosis after liver transplantation differs between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers and aetiology is poorly understood. The aim was to investigate differences in mortality after liver transplantation between these patients. METHODS We included patients from the European Liver Transplant Registry transplanted due to HCC from 1990 to November 2016 and compared cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients using propensity score (PS) calibration of Cox regression estimates to adjust for unmeasured confounding. RESULTS We included 22,787 patients, of whom 96.5% had cirrhosis. In the unadjusted analysis, non-cirrhotic patients had an increased risk of overall mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.52). However, the HR approached unity with increasing adjustment and was 1.11 (95% CI 0.99-1.25) when adjusted for unmeasured confounding. Unadjusted, non-cirrhotic patients had an increased risk of HCC-specific mortality (HR 2.62, 95% CI 2.21-3.12). After adjustment for unmeasured confounding, the risk remained significantly increased (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.31-2.00). CONCLUSIONS Using PS calibration, we showed that HCC in non-cirrhotic liver has similar overall mortality, but higher HCC-specific mortality. This may be a result of a more aggressive cancer form in the non-cirrhotic liver as higher mortality could not be explained by tumour characteristics or other prognostic variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans-Christian Pommergaard
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark,*Hans-Christian Pommergaard, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK–2100 Copenhagen (Denmark),
| | - Andreas Arendtsen Rostved
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - René Adam
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Cancer, and Transplantation, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Inserm U935, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Allan Rasmussen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Cancer, and Transplantation, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Inserm U935, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Mauro Salizzoni
- Liver Transplant Centre and General Surgery, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Cancer, and Transplantation, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Inserm U935, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Paolo De Simone
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Pisa Medical School Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pauline Houssel-Debry
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Université de Rennes 1, and INSERM, UMR991, Foie, Métabolisme et Cancer, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- University of Milan and Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, University Denis Diderot, Paris, France
| | | | - Joan Fabregat Prous
- Unitat de Cirurgia Hepato-bilio-pancreàtica, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio D. Pinna
- General Surgery and Transplant Division, S. Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - John O'Grady
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vincent Karam
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Cancer, and Transplantation, AP-HP, Hôpital Universitaire Paul Brousse, Inserm U935, Université Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| | - Christophe Duvoux
- Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Paris Est University, Créteil, France
| | - Lau Caspar Thygesen
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Au KP, Chok KSH. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors after post-transplant hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: Is it too late? World J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 12:149-158. [PMID: 32426094 PMCID: PMC7215969 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i4.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of tumour recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, their role in established post-transplant HCC recurrence is uncertain.
AIM To investigate whether mTOR inhibitor offers a survival benefit in post-transplant HCC recurrence.
METHODS A retrospective study of 143 patients who developed HCC recurrence after liver transplantation was performed. They were divided into 2 groups based on whether they had received mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppression. The primary endpoint was post-recurrence survival.
RESULTS Seventy-nine (55%) patients received an mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regime, while 64 (45%) patients did not. The mTOR inhibitor group had a lower number of recurrent tumours (2 vs 5, P = 0.02) and received more active treatments including radiotherapy (39 vs 22%, P = 0.03) and targeted therapy (59 vs 23%, P < 0.001). The median post-recurrence survival was 21.0 ± 4.1 mo in the mTOR inhibitor group and 11.2 ± 2.5 mo in the control group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that mTOR inhibitor therapy was independently associated with improved post-recurrence survival (P = 0.04, OR = 0.482, 95%CI: 0.241-0.966). The number of recurrent tumours and use of other treatment modalities did not affect survival. No survival difference was observed between mTOR inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy with calcineurin inhibitor.
CONCLUSION mTOR inhibitors prolonged survival after post-transplant HCC recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kin Pan Au
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong 999077, China
| | - Kenneth Siu Ho Chok
- Department of Surgery and State Key Laboratory for Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Liver transplantation for non-resectable colorectal liver metastasis: where we are and where we are going. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:255-264. [PMID: 32333096 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01883-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Almost 50% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop liver metastasis (LM). Although their only long-term curative treatment is surgery, less than half of these patients can be eventually resected. Therefore, palliative chemotherapy is offered as a definitive option, though with poor results. Recently, the University of Oslo group has published encouraging results in the treatment of these patients with liver transplantation (LT), whereby worldwide interest in this option has been renewed. METHODS A literature review of LT for patients with unresectable colorectal metastasis was performed. This included information regarding patient selection, complications, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), immunosuppression, chemotherapy, and description of the ongoing trials. RESULTS Improvements in OS and DFS have been observed in consecutive published prospective trials, as patient selection has been refined. Papers reporting OS of patients who randomly presented similar selection criteria also exhibited good results. CONCLUSION LT within the available therapeutic options in patients with CRC-LM seems to be a compelling alternative in carefully selected patients. The ongoing trials will provide valuable information regarding selection criteria, immunosuppressive therapy and different modalities of adjuvant chemotherapy, which are, to our knowledge, the vital platform of LT in CRC-LM. Although some of the developing techniques involve living donors, graft availability for these patients remains a matter of major concern.
Collapse
|
41
|
Zhou L, Pan LC, Zheng YG, Zhang XX, Liu ZJ, Meng X, Shi HD, Du GS, He Q. Reduction of FoxP3 + Tregs by an immunosuppressive protocol of rapamycin plus Thymalfasin and Huaier extract predicts positive survival benefits in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:472. [PMID: 32395516 PMCID: PMC7210174 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Investigate immunoregulation and anti-tumor immunity of FoxP3+Tregs after treatment with rapamycin (RAPA/SRL) plus thymalfasin (Zadaxin) and Huaier extract (PS-T) in a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) rat model simulating HCC relapse after liver transplant (LT). Methods We successfully established a rat model simulating HCC relapse after LT using an optimized chemical induction method with TACROLIMUS, methylprednisolone, and diethylnitrosamine as identified by visible liver nodules and hematoxylin-eosin staining. The model rats were then treated with RAPA, Zadaxin, and PS-T. Immune status changes were analyzed by flow cytometry, and protein expression of Akt and mTOR was determined by western blotting. Cytokines were measured by ELISAs. Results Combined therapy by RAPA plus Zadaxin and PS-T obviously alleviated hepatic pathological changes and significantly decreased the levels of FoxP3+Tregs in peripheral blood, the spleen, and the liver (P<0.05) and expression of mTOR protein (P<0.01) in the liver, obviously improved survival time (P=0.02). Moreover, the levels of CD8+T cells were increased significantly to almost normal levels (P<0.05) in comparison with no SRL monotherapy protocols. Inhibitory cytokines were also decreased in accordance with FoxP3+Tregs. Significant decreases of IL-10 and TGF-β were observed after SRL-based therapy (P<0.01) in comparison with the other groups. Serum alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels were also decreased significantly (P<0.05). FoxP3+Tregs showed a negative correlation with CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+T cells and a positive correlation with AFP, and VEGF (P<0.05). Conclusions SRL-based therapy reduces FoxP3+Tregs to decrease secreted inhibitory cytokines which may enhancement the viability and number of CD8+T cells to exert anti-tumor effects that are mainly mediated through the AKT-mTOR signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.,Department of (Second) Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 1 Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.,Departmentof Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 8 Medical center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100091, China
| | - Li-Chao Pan
- Department of (Second) Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 1 Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Yong-Gen Zheng
- Departmentof Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 8 Medical center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100091, China
| | - Xin-Xue Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| | - Zhi-Jia Liu
- Departmentof Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 8 Medical center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100091, China
| | - Xuan Meng
- Department of (Second) Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 1 Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Hai-Da Shi
- Department of (Second) Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 1 Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Guo-Sheng Du
- Departmentof Hepatobiliary Surgery, the 8 Medical center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100091, China
| | - Qiang He
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreaticosplenic Surgery, Beijing ChaoYang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vescovo T, Pagni B, Piacentini M, Fimia GM, Antonioli M. Regulation of Autophagy in Cells Infected With Oncogenic Human Viruses and Its Impact on Cancer Development. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020; 8:47. [PMID: 32181249 PMCID: PMC7059124 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
About 20% of total cancer cases are associated to infections. To date, seven human viruses have been directly linked to cancer development: high-risk human papillomaviruses (hrHPVs), Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), and human T-lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1). These viruses impact on several molecular mechanisms in the host cells, often resulting in chronic inflammation, uncontrolled proliferation, and cell death inhibition, and mechanisms, which favor viral life cycle but may indirectly promote tumorigenesis. Recently, the ability of oncogenic viruses to alter autophagy, a catabolic process activated during the innate immune response to infections, is emerging as a key event for the onset of human cancers. Here, we summarize the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which human oncogenic viruses regulate autophagy and how this negative regulation impacts on cancer development. Finally, we highlight novel autophagy-related candidates for the treatment of virus-related cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana Vescovo
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani" - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Pagni
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani" - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Piacentini
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani" - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Biology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Fimia
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani" - IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza," Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Antonioli
- National Institute for Infectious Diseases "Lazzaro Spallanzani" - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review is to discuss existing data on liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastasis, emerging controversies, and future directions. RECENT FINDINGS Contemporary experience with transplanting patients with liver metastasis from colon cancer is mainly derived from European centers, with a large proportion being from a single institution (SECA study), made possible in part by a relatively high donor pool. The initial results prove to be encouraging by demonstrating an overall survival advantage over unresectable patients with liver-limited disease managed with chemotherapy only. Recurrence patterns, however, suggest a need for better patient selection and treatment sequencing optimization. In North America, the main barriers in establishing similar protocols result from national liver graft shortage, which represents an issue of competing resources when indications have yet to be well defined. Evolving strategies in transplantation, such as the utilization of marginal liver grafts and living donor liver transplantation might constitute potential solutions. SUMMARY Evidence suggests a potential survival benefit of liver transplantation for a subset of patients with unresectable liver-limited CRLM. Further prospective trials are needed to clarify the role and feasibility of this treatment strategy in oncotransplantation.
Collapse
|
44
|
López Ortega S, González Grande R, Santaella Leiva I, De la Cruz Lombardo J, Jiménez Pérez M. Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib After Liver Transplantation: Experience in Our Center. Transplant Proc 2020; 52:540-542. [PMID: 32057495 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) is increasing, with a consequent impact on survival. Here we report our experience with sorafenib to treat HCC recurrence after LT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of LT patients with recurrent HCC. RESULTS: The study included 12 patients with recurrent HCC after LT between January 2008 and March 2019; 9 were men and 3 women, with a median age of 58 years. Adverse effects were manageable in most patients with symptomatic treatment or with sorafenib dose adjustment. Stable disease was the best response and was achieved. Eight patients (66.7%) died during the study period, 5 (62.5%) due to tumor progression and 3 (37.5%) because of sepsis. The median survival time was 7.5 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S López Ortega
- UGC Aparato Digestivo, Liver Unit, Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain.
| | - R González Grande
- UGC Aparato Digestivo, Liver Unit, Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain
| | - I Santaella Leiva
- UGC Aparato Digestivo, Liver Unit, Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain
| | | | - M Jiménez Pérez
- UGC Aparato Digestivo, Liver Unit, Regional University Hospital, Malaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ling S, Feng T, Zhan Q, Duan X, Jiang G, Shen T, Shan Q, Xu S, Ye Q, Liu P, Cen B, Zheng S, Xu X. Sirolimus-based immunosuppression improves outcomes in liver transplantation recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Hangzhou criteria. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:80. [PMID: 32175373 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background The administration of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) posttransplant has been implicated as an independent risk factor for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT). The new immunosuppressive agent sirolimus (SRL) acts as a primary immunosuppressant or antitumor agent. In this study we investigated the effect of sirolimus-based immunosuppression compared to CNIs (non-SRL) on the outcomes of LT candidates with HCC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 204 HCC patients who underwent LT in our hospital between January 2, 2014 and December 10, 2017. The median of the follow-up duration of patients was 24.5 months. The patients were divided into a sirolimus (SRL) group (76 patients) and a non-sirolimus (non-SRL) group (128 patients). Patients exceeding the LT criteria were analyzed as subgroups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after tumor recurrence were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to compare OS between the SRL and non-SRL groups. Results The SRL group achieved better OS compared to the non-SRL group, while there was no significant difference in DFS. Subgroup (Milan criteria-based or Hangzhou criteria-based) analyses revealed that patients exceeding, rather than meeting, the Milan or Hangzhou criteria benefited from SRL (exceeding the Milan criteria: P=0.002; exceeding the Hangzhou criteria: P<0.001). There was no significant difference in OS between the SRL group and the non-SRL group that met the Milan or Hangzhou criteria. Conclusions SRL can improve survival outcomes in LT patients with HCC exceeding the Hangzhou criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunbin Ling
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Tingting Feng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China.,Department of Abdominal Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
| | - Qifan Zhan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xin Duan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Guangjiang Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Tian Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Qiaonan Shan
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shengjun Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Qianwei Ye
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Peng Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China.,Center of Organ Transplantation, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
| | - Beini Cen
- NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xiao Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.,NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, CAMS, Hangzhou 310003, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Fukuhara S, Tahara H, Hirata Y, Ono K, Hamaoka M, Shimizu S, Hashimoto S, Kuroda S, Ohira M, Ide K, Kobayashi T, Ohdan H. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma successfully treated with living donor liver transplantation: A case report and literature review. Clin Case Rep 2020; 8:108-115. [PMID: 31998498 PMCID: PMC6982499 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.2558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare neoplasm with a variable malignant potential and a high risk of recurrence. No general treatment guidelines have been established. Fortunately, we were able to minimize immunosuppressant after liver transplantation because of a full HLA-matched case. There was no recurrence 1 year after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sotaro Fukuhara
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Tahara
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Yoshito Hirata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Kosuke Ono
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Michinori Hamaoka
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Seiichi Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Shinji Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Shintaro Kuroda
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Masahiro Ohira
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Kentaro Ide
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Tsuyoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant SurgeryGraduate School of Biomedical and Health SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Saliba F, Duvoux C, Dharancy S, Dumortier J, Calmus Y, Gugenheim J, Kamar N, Salamé E, Neau‐Cransac M, Vanlemmens C, Durand F, Pageaux G, Leroy V, Hardwigsen J, Gharbi H, Masson C, Tindel M, Conti F. Early Switch From Tacrolimus to Everolimus After Liver Transplantation: Outcomes at 2 Years. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:1822-1832. [PMID: 31631501 PMCID: PMC7383505 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The observational CERTITUDE study follows liver transplant patients who completed the SIMCER trial. SIMCER randomized patients at month 1 after transplant to everolimus (EVR) with stepwise tacrolimus (TAC) withdrawal or to standard TAC, both with basiliximab induction and mycophenolic acid ± steroids. After completing SIMCER at 6 months after transplant, 65 EVR-treated patients and 78 TAC-treated patients entered CERTITUDE. At month 24 after transplant, 34/65 (52.3%) EVR-treated patients remained calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) free. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly higher with EVR versus TAC during months 3-12. At month 24, eGFR values were 83.6 versus 75.3 mL/minute/1.73 m2 , respectively (P = 0.90) and adjusted mean change in eGFR from randomization was -8.0 versus -13.5 mL/minute/1.73 m2 (P = 0.15). At month 24, 45.9%, 31.1%, and 23.0% of EVR-treated patients had chronic kidney disease stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively, versus 25.7%, 45.7%, and 28.6% of TAC-treated patients (P = 0.05). Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection affected 4 EVR-treated patients and 2 TAC patients during months 6-24. Adverse events led to study discontinuation in 15.4% and 7.7% of EVR-treated and TAC-treated patients, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 hematological events were rare in both groups. A CNI-free EVR-based maintenance regimen appears feasible in approximately half of liver transplant patients. It preserves renal function effectively with good efficacy without compromising safety or hematological tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faouzi Saliba
- Centre Hépato‐BiliaireHôpital Paul Brousse, AP‐HPVillejuifFrance
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Suppression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Mycophenolic Acid in Experimental Models and in Patients. Transplantation 2019; 103:929-937. [PMID: 30747839 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor recurrence is a major complication following liver transplantation (LT) as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Immunosuppression is an important risk factor for HCC recurrence, but conceivably may depend on the type of immunosuppressive medication. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a currently widely used immunosuppressant. This study investigated the effects of MPA on HCC. METHODS Three human HCC cell lines and organoids from mouse primary liver tumor were used as experimental models. MTT, Alamar Blue assay, cell cycle analysis, colony formation, and [3H]-thymidine assays were performed. An LT database was used for retrospective analysis of the effect of mycophenolate mofetil, the prodrug of MPA, on HCC recurrence. RESULTS With clinically achievable concentrations, MPA effectively inhibited HCC cell proliferation and single-cell colony-forming unit. In short-term experiments, MPA effectively elicited S phase arrest in HCC cell lines. In addition, the initiation and growth of liver tumor organoids were effectively inhibited by MPA. Most importantly, the use of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with HCC-related LT was significantly associated with less tumor recurrence and improved patient survival. CONCLUSIONS MPA can specifically counteract HCC growth in vitro and tumor recurrence in LT patients. These results warrant prospective clinical trials into the role of MPA-mediated immunosuppression following LT of patients with HCC.
Collapse
|
49
|
Saparbay J, Tanaka Y, Tanimine N, Ohira M, Ohdan H. Everolimus enhances TRAIL‐mediated anti‐tumor activity of liver resident natural killer cells in mice. Transpl Int 2019; 33:229-243. [DOI: 10.1111/tri.13536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jamilya Saparbay
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery Applied Life Sciences Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences Hiroshima University Hiroshima Japan
| | - Yuka Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery Applied Life Sciences Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences Hiroshima University Hiroshima Japan
| | - Naoki Tanimine
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery Applied Life Sciences Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences Hiroshima University Hiroshima Japan
- Department of Surgery Center for Transplantation Sciences Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA
| | - Masahiro Ohira
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery Applied Life Sciences Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences Hiroshima University Hiroshima Japan
- Division of Regeneration and Medicine Medical Center for Translational and Clinical Research Hiroshima University Hospital Hiroshima Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery Applied Life Sciences Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences Hiroshima University Hiroshima Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
|