1
|
Spadaccio C, Nenna A, Pisani A, Laskawski G, Nappi F, Moon MR, Biancari F, Jassar AS, Greason KL, Shrestha ML, Bonaros N, Rose D. Sutureless Valves, a "Wireless" Option for Patients With Aortic Valve Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 84:382-407. [PMID: 39019533 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
Transcatheter technologies triggered the recent revision of the guidelines that progressively widened the indications for the treatment of aortic stenosis. On the surgical realm, a technology avoiding the need for sutures to anchor the prosthesis to the aortic annulus has been developed with the aim to reduce the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and simplify the process of valve implantation. In addition to a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-like stent that exerts a radial force, these so-called "rapid deployment valves" or "sutureless valves" for aortic valve replacement also have cuffs to improve sealing and reduce the risk of paravalvular leak. Despite promising, the actual advantage of sutureless valves over traditional surgical procedures (surgical aortic valve replacement) or TAVR is still debated. This review summarizes the current comparative evidence reporting outcomes of "sutureless valves" for aortic valve replacement to TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement in the treatment of aortic valve stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Spadaccio
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre/Blackpool Teaching Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom; Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Antonio Nenna
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Pisani
- Cardiac Surgery, Hôpital Bichat - Claude-Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Grzegorz Laskawski
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre/Blackpool Teaching Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco Nappi
- Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | - Marc R Moon
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine/Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Fausto Biancari
- Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital/University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arminder S Jassar
- Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin L Greason
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Malakh L Shrestha
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Bonaros
- Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - David Rose
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre/Blackpool Teaching Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fatehi Hassanabad M, Fatehi Hassanabad A, Ahsan MR. The Novel Use of a Rapid Deployment Valve in Type A Aortic Dissection. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2024; 19:213-214. [PMID: 38504088 PMCID: PMC11059079 DOI: 10.1177/15569845241237732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mortaza Fatehi Hassanabad
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ali Fatehi Hassanabad
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Muhammad Rauf Ahsan
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alaklabi AM, Abdul Rab S, Sabbah BN, Maklad AE, Dokollari A, Van den Eynde J, Pompeu Sa M, Arjomandi Rad A, Ahsan MR, Fatehi Hassanabad A. Innovations in Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comprehensive Overview of the Intuity Rapid Deployment Valve. Cardiol Rev 2024:00045415-990000000-00210. [PMID: 38334371 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Rapid deployment/sutureless (RDS) valves have recently emerged as an innovative surgical solution, providing an alternative to traditional methods of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) by eliminating the need for suture placement and tying. This innovation leads to a reduction in aortic crossclamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times, enhancing the efficiency of the procedure. Among the 2 available RDS valves, the Edwards Intuity valve in particular has been demonstrated to be a particularly promising substitute in the field of SAVR. The Intuity valve distinguishes itself from other RDS and conventional valves by yielding superior outcomes, such as a significant reduction in mortality, increase in the longevity of the valve, and a marked decrease in both mean and peak transvalvular pressure gradients. These benefits collectively contribute to its appeal as a favorable new solution. However, further investigation is needed to conclusively determine the long-term outcomes and safety of RDS valves. Nevertheless, the utilization of the Intuity valve presents an exciting solution to the existing limitations of conventional and minimally invasive SAVR, especially for patients afflicted with severe aortic stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saleha Abdul Rab
- From the College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Belal N Sabbah
- From the College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Aleksander Dokollari
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, St. Boniface Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Michel Pompeu Sa
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Muhammad Rauf Ahsan
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Ali Fatehi Hassanabad
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu Y, Wang H, Kim JB, Woo YJ. Redo aortic valve replacement for an incorrectly sized rapid deployment valve. JTCVS Tech 2024; 23:18-20. [PMID: 38352018 PMCID: PMC10859641 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanjia Zhu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Hanjay Wang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Joon Bum Kim
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Y. Joseph Woo
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Im S, Kim KH, Sohn SH, Kang Y, Kim JS, Choi JW. Comparable Outcomes of Bicuspid Aortic Valves for Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement. J Chest Surg 2023; 56:435-444. [PMID: 37915291 PMCID: PMC10625967 DOI: 10.5090/jcs.23.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Edwards Intuity is recognized as a relatively contraindicated bioprosthesis for bicuspid aortic valve disease. This study compared the early echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valves. Methods Of 278 patients who underwent rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement using Intuity at Seoul National University Hospital, 252 patients were enrolled after excluding those with pure aortic regurgitation, prosthetic valve failure, endocarditis, and quadricuspid valves. The bicuspid and tricuspid groups included 147 and 105 patients, respectively. Early outcomes and the incidence of paravalvular leak were compared between the groups. A subgroup analysis compared the outcomes for type 0 versus type 1 or 2 bicuspid valves. Results The bicuspid group had more male and younger patients. Comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease, were less prevalent in the bicuspid group. Early echocardiographic evaluations demonstrated that the incidence of ≥mild paravalvular leak did not differ significantly between the groups (5.5% vs. 1.0% in the bicuspid vs. tricuspid groups, p=0.09), and the early clinical outcomes were also comparable between the groups. In the subgroup analysis between type 0 and type 1 or 2 bicuspid valves, the incidence of mild or greater paravalvular leak (2.4% vs. 6.7% in type 0 vs. type 1 or 2, p=0.34) and clinical outcomes were comparable. Conclusion Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valves demonstrated comparable early echocardiographic and clinical outcomes to those for tricuspid aortic valves, and the outcomes were also satisfactory for type 0 bicuspid aortic valves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Somin Im
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk Ho Sohn
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoonjin Kang
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Seong Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Woong Choi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schlömicher M, Useini D, Haldenwang PL, Naraghi H, Moustafine V, Bechtel M, Strauch JT. Outcomes in Patients with Left Bundle Branch Block after Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71:528-534. [PMID: 35108737 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Increased rates of postoperative left bundle branch block (LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) frequently occur after implantation of rapid deployment valves. The impact of LBBB on follow-up outcomes remains controversial. So far, no data regarding long-term outcomes exist. AIM The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of LBBB on postoperative outcomes after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR). METHODS A total of 620 consecutive patients without preexisting LBBB or PPI who underwent rapid deployment AVR between March 2012 and September 2019 were included. New-onset LBBB was defined as any new LBBB that persisted at hospital discharge. The median follow-up time for clinical data was 1.7 years post-RDAVR. RESULTS At discharge, new-onset LBBB was seen in 109 patients (17.5%). There were no differences between the LBBB groups and no-LBBB groups regarding baseline characteristics. At a median follow-up of 1.7 years, no difference was found between LBBB groups and no-LBBB groups concerning all-cause mortality (12.8 vs. 11.7%; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-1.53; p = 0.54). Nevertheless, new-onset LBBB was associated with significant higher pacemaker implantation rates at follow-up (10.1 vs. 6.3%; HR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.89-6.81 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION After a median follow-up of 1.7 years, new-onset LBBB was not associated with increased mortality. Nevertheless, higher pacemaker implantation rates were observed in patients with new-onset LBBB after RDAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Schlömicher
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Dritan Useini
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Peter Lukas Haldenwang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Hamid Naraghi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Vadim Moustafine
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Matthias Bechtel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Justus Thomas Strauch
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yun T, Kim KH, Sohn SH, Kang Y, Kim JS, Choi JW. Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement in a Real-World All-Comers Population. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71:511-518. [PMID: 36216332 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was conducted to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (AVR) using Edwards Intuity. METHODS A total of 215 patients underwent rapid-deployment AVR using Edwards Intuity at our institution. The median follow-up duration was 22 months (interquartile range, 8-36). Primary outcomes were overall survival, cumulative incidence of cardiac death, and major adverse cardiac events. Secondary outcomes were early and 1-year hemodynamic performances of the bioprosthetic valve. RESULTS The mean age was 68.6 ± 10.5 years, and EuroSCORE II was 3.09 ± 4.5. The study population included 113 patients (52.6%) with bicuspid valves (24 patients with type 0 bicuspid valves), 20 patients (9.3%) with pure aortic regurgitation, and 3 patients (1.4%) with infective endocarditis. Isolated AVR was performed in 70 patients (32.4%) and concomitant procedures were performed in 146 patients (67.6%), including aorta surgery (42.3%) and mitral valve procedure (22.3%). Operative mortality was 2.8%. Complete atrioventricular block occurred in 12 patients, but most of them were transient and only 3 patients received permanent pacemaker implantation before discharge. Overall survival at 3 years was 92.3%. Early hemodynamic data showed mean pressure gradients of 15.5 ± 5.0 and 12.7 ± 4.2 mm Hg in the 19 and 21 mm valve, respectively. One-year hemodynamics were also excellent with mean pressure gradients of 14.7 ± 5.3 and 10.7 ± 3.6 mm Hg in the 19 and 21 mm valve, respectively. CONCLUSION Based on a real-world all-comers population, rapid-deployment AVR using Edwards Intuity could be performed for various indications, including bicuspid valve, pure aortic regurgitation, and infective endocarditis, and the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes were excellent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taeyoung Yun
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Ho Sohn
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoonjin Kang
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Seong Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Woong Choi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taghiyev ZT, Bechtel M, Schlömicher M, Useini D, Taghi HN, Moustafine V, Strauch JT. Early-Term Results of Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement versus Standard Bioprosthesis Implantation Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 71:519-527. [PMID: 35151232 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1742686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Aortic stenosis is highly prevalent among patients with concomitant coronary artery disease. Surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting is usually the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis and significant coronary disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and hemodynamic results of the implantation of rapid-deployment valves (Rapid-Deployment Edwards Intuity Valve System [RDAVR]) versus conventional sutured valves (CSAVR) in combined surgery. METHODS Between January 2012 and January 2017, 120 patients underwent replacement via RDAVR and 133 patients underwent replacement using CSAVR with concomitant coronary bypass grafting. Clinical and echocardiographic data were compared. RESULTS The mean age was 76 ± 7 for RDAVR patients and 74 ± 6 years for CSAVR patients (p = 0.054); 48% in the RDAVR group were female versus 17% in the CSAVR group (p <0.002). Other characteristics such as diabetes mellitus, body-mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nicotine consumption, and extracardiac arteriopathy were similar. Coronary three-vessel disease was more common in the RDAVR group (42.5 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.017). Both mean EuroSCORE II (6.6 ± 5.4 vs. 4.3 ± 3.0, p = 0.001) and STS score (5.4 ± 4.4 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4, p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the RDAVR group. Mean cross-clamp time (82 ± 25 vs. 100 ± 30 minutes, p < 0.001) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (119 ± 38 vs. 147 ± 53 minutes, p < 0.001) were shorter with RDAVR. The mean number of bypass grafts, length of hospital and ICU stays, and mechanical ventilation time were not statistically significant different. Hospital mortality was 2.5% for RDAVR and 9.7% for CSAVR (p = 0.019). There was a similar rate of stroke (5.8 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.990) and postoperative delirium (14.1 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.728). Mean gradients were 8.2 ± 4.1 mm Hg in the RDAVR group vs. 11.3 ± 4.6 mm Hg in the CSAVR group (p = 0.001) at discharge. CONCLUSION RDAVR combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be performed extremely safely. Cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times can be significantly reduced with rapid deployment aortic valve system in the scenario of combined CABG. RDAVR resulted in lower gradients than CSAVR in patients implanted with prostheses of the same size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zulfugar T Taghiyev
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryRuhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Adult and Pediatric Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany
| | - Matthias Bechtel
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryRuhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Markus Schlömicher
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryRuhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Dritan Useini
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryRuhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Hamid Naraghi Taghi
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryRuhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Vadim Moustafine
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryRuhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Justus T Strauch
- Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryRuhr-University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Laufer G. The 10 Commandments of Rapid Deployment Intuity Valve Implantation. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 18:316-319. [PMID: 37615164 DOI: 10.1177/15569845231191770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Günther Laufer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mogilansky C, Massoudy P, Czesla M, Balan R. Conduction Disorders after Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Prosthesis: Medium-Term Follow-Up. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12052083. [PMID: 36902870 PMCID: PMC10004204 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have previously reported that the incidence of postoperative conduction disorders, especially left bundle branch block (LBBB), after implantation of a rapid deployment Intuity™ Elite aortic valve prosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA), was significantly increased compared with conventional aortic valve replacement. We were now interested in how these disorders behaved at intermediate follow-up. METHODS All 87 patients who had undergone surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using the rapid deployment Intuity™ Elite prosthesis and were shown to have conduction disorders at the time of hospital discharge were followed up after surgery. These patients' ECGs were recorded at least 1 year after surgery, and the persistence of the new postoperative conduction disorders was assessed. RESULTS At hospital discharge, 48.1% of the patients had developed new postoperative conduction disorders, with LBBB being the predominant conduction disturbance (36.5%). At medium-term follow-up (526 days, standard deviation (SD) = 169.6, standard error (SE) = 19.3 days, respectively), 44% of the new LBBB and 50% of the new right bundle branch block (RBBB) had disappeared. There was no new atrio-ventricular block III (AVB III) that occurred. One new pacemaker (PM) was implanted during follow-up because of AVB II Mobitz type II. CONCLUSIONS At medium-term follow-up after the implantation of a rapid deployment Intuity™ Elite aortic valve prosthesis, the number of new postoperative conduction disorders, especially LBBB, has considerably decreased but remains high. The incidence of postoperative AV block III remained stable.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sakata T, De La Pena C, Ohira S. Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement: Patient Selection and Special Considerations. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2023; 19:169-180. [PMID: 37016696 PMCID: PMC10066891 DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s374410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Sutureless or rapid deployment valves in the setting of aortic valve replacement (AVR) is an emerging surgical technique using the transcatheter valve technology, which may lead to reduction in cross-clamp time and potentially better hemodynamics compared to a stented bioprosthetic valve. The absence of subannular pledgets results to excellent hemodynamic performance with reduced turbulent flow and larger effective orifice area. However, complications from both surgical and transcatheter AVR may still occur and impact survival. The incidence of paravalvular leakage and permanent pacemaker implantation are not low. Although technical modifications can improve these outcomes, there is a learning curve effect. Therefore, technical and anatomical considerations as well as better patient selection are paramount for better outcomes. In this review, we discuss the use of sutureless or rapid deployment valves in setting of (1) complex procedures, (2) minimally invasive AVR, and (3) small aortic annulus. The advantage of sutureless or rapid deployment valves in terms of mortality remains to be clarified; therefore, it is necessary to accumulate long-term outcomes in an appropriate patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoki Sakata
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Corazon De La Pena
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Suguru Ohira
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
- Correspondence: Suguru Ohira, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, 100 Woods Road, Macy Pavilion, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA, Tel +1 404 234 5433, Email
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Current status of adult cardiac surgery-Part 1. Curr Probl Surg 2022; 59:101246. [PMID: 36496252 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2022.101246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
13
|
Krasivskyi I, Djordjevic I, Ivanov B, Gerfer S, Suhr L, Avgeridou S, Sabashnikov A, Kuhn E, Rahmanian P, Mader N, Eghbalzadeh K, Wahlers T. High Incidence of Transient Permanent Pacemaker Rate After Rapid Deployment Valve Replacement: Insights of a 9-Year Single-Centre Experience. Heart Lung Circ 2022; 31:1658-1665. [PMID: 36155721 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) remains debated. Expertise in this field has significantly increased over the last decade. This study aimed to investigate the need for PPI following implantation of a rapid deployment (RD) valve. METHODS Analysis of n=372 patients who underwent Edwards INTUITY (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) (n=251) and Perceval (Sorin/LivaNova Group, Saluggia, Italy) (n=121) valve replacement at the current institution between May 2012 and August 2018 was performed. Coronary artery bypass graft procedures were additionally performed in patients with coronary artery disease. Baseline, preoperative and postoperative outcomes were examined regarding correctness and completeness of the procedure. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 23.0.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS A total of 372 patients (aged 75±6.3 yrs) with a high grade of aortic valve stenosis underwent either Edwards INTUITY (67%) or Perceval (33%) valve replacement. Seventy-six (76) patients (20%) presented with preoperative conduction disorders. Sixty (60) patients (16%) underwent PPI, which in most cases was performed during the first month after the initial operation. Follow-up was performed up to 9 years, presenting a persistent pacemaker dependency rate of 50% among all patients who underwent PPI. Twenty (20) (40%) PPI recipients showed no dependency on pacemaker, while 10 (10%) required temporary pacemaker support. Mean length of ICU stay was 4±5.1 days and in-hospital stay was 8.2±7.6 days. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of PPI after RD valve implantation still remains high compared with conventional aortic valve replacement. However, this study shows that this phenomenon appears to be transient in a significant proportion of the patients undergoing RD valve replacement. These findings might contribute to the scientific discussion and should be taken into consideration for the indication of RD valve replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ihor Krasivskyi
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Ilija Djordjevic
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Borko Ivanov
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephen Gerfer
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Laura Suhr
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Soi Avgeridou
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anton Sabashnikov
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Elmar Kuhn
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Parwis Rahmanian
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Navid Mader
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kaveh Eghbalzadeh
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thorsten Wahlers
- University Hospital Cologne, Heart Center Cologne, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dokollari A, Torregrossa G, Sicouri S, Veshti A, Margaryan R, Cameli M, Mandoli GE, Maccherini M, Montesi G, Cabrucci F, Coku L, Arora R, Li QR, Bonacchi M, Gelsomino S. Pearls, pitfalls, and surgical indications of the Intuity TM heart valve: A rapid deployment bioprosthesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Card Surg 2022; 37:5411-5417. [PMID: 36403259 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.17231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To highlight short- and long-term clinical outcomes of the Intuity TM rapid deployment prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement. METHODS We reviewed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, SciELO, LILACS, CCTR/CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for clinical trials, retrospective clinical studies, meta-analysis, and gray literature. RESULTS Fourty-five clinical studies with 12.714 patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-day mortality ranged from 3.8% for Intuity and 3.9% for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The incidence of paravalvular leak (PVL) (Intuity 0% and TAVR 2.17%), permanent pacemaker implantation (Intuity 11.11% and TAVR 12.5%), stroke (Intuity 2.2% and TAVR 2.6%), myocardial infarction (MI) (Intuity 0% and TAVR 1%), were all higher in the TAVR group. Compared to other sutured bioprosthesis (SB), mortality ranged from 0% to 3.9% for Intuity and 0%-6.9% for SB. Long-term cardiac mortality ranged from 0.9% to 1.55% for Intuity and 1.4%-3.3% for the Perceval valve. The incidence of PVL (Intuity 0.24%-0.7% and Perceval 0%-1%), endocarditis (Intuity 0.2%-0.7% and Perceval 1.6%-6.6%), stroke (Intuity 0.36%-1.4% and Perceval 0%-0.8%), MI (Intuity 0.07%-0.26%), and SVD (Intuity 0.12%-0.7% and Perceval 0%) were comparable. Compared to standard full sternotomy (SFS), minimally invasive surgery (MINV) mortality ranged from 0% to 4.3% for MINV and 0%-2.1% for SFS. Hospital costs outcomes ranged from $37,187-$44,368 for the Intuity, $69,389 for TAVR, and $13,543 for SB. Intuity short-term mortality ranged between 0.9% and 12.4% while long-term mortality ranged between 2.6% and 20%. CONCLUSIONS This manuscript provides a 360° overview of the current rapid deployments, sutureless, and TAVR prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander Dokollari
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Lankenau Heart Institute, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gianluca Torregrossa
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Lankenau Heart Institute, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Serge Sicouri
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Altin Veshti
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Mother Teresa Hospital, University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania
| | - Rafik Margaryan
- Department of Adult Cardiac Surgery, G. Pasquinucci Heart Hospital, Fondazione CNR-G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy
| | - Matteo Cameli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cardiac Surgery Unit, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Giulia Elena Mandoli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cardiac Surgery Unit, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Massimo Maccherini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cardiac Surgery Unit, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Montesi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Cardiac Surgery Unit, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Francesco Cabrucci
- Department of Cardiac Surgery/Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Lindita Coku
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Appalachian Regional Health, University of Kentucky, Hazard, Kentucky, USA
| | - Rakesh Arora
- Department of Surgery, Section of Cardiac Surgery, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Qiao Ri Li
- 2010 Vision Associates, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Massimo Bonacchi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery/Cardiology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Sandro Gelsomino
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, CARIM Maastricht Medical University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ono Y, Yajima S, Kainuma S, Kawamoto N, Tadokoro N, Kakuta T, Koga-Ikuta A, Fujita T, Fukushima S. Early Outcomes of Intuity Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Conventional Biological Valves in Japanese Patients. Circ J 2022; 86:1710-1718. [PMID: 35569971 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-21-0959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to elucidate the short-term surgical outcomes and hemodynamics of the Intuity valve compared to the standard bioprosthesis in Japanese patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Among the 307 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) between February 2019 and March 2021, the Intuity valve was implanted in 95 patients (Intuity group) and a conventional stented bioprosthesis was implanted in 193 patients (conventional group). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the Intuity (n=2, 3%) and conventional groups (n=0, P=0.490). Operation, cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross-clamping times were significantly shorter in the Intuity group. Although the effective orifice area index, trans-prosthetic mean pressure gradient, and peak velocity were similar between the 2 groups at 1 week postoperatively, the Intuity group showed a better mean pressure gradient and peak velocity at 1 year postoperatively. Complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation developed in 2 patients (3%) in the Intuity group and none in the conventional group (P=0.476). Mild or greater paravalvular leakage was present in 8 patients (13%) in the Intuity group and 2 patients (3%) in the conventional group (P=0.095). CONCLUSIONS AVR using the Intuity valve in Japanese patients is satisfactory, with a better valve performance and a low incidence of complete atrioventricular block at 1 year postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshikazu Ono
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Shin Yajima
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Satoshi Kainuma
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Naonori Kawamoto
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Naoki Tadokoro
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Takashi Kakuta
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Ayumi Koga-Ikuta
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Tomoyuki Fujita
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Satsuki Fukushima
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Karsan RB, Allen R, Powell A, Beattie GW. Minimally-invasive cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis of impact and force to identify key and facilitating advanced training. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022; 17:236. [PMID: 36114506 PMCID: PMC9479391 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01988-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The number of citations an article receives is a marker of its scientific influence within a particular specialty. This bibliometric analysis intended to recognise the top 100 cited articles in minimally-invasive cardiac surgery, to determine the fundamental subject areas that have borne considerable influence upon clinical practice and academic knowledge whilst also considering bibliometric scope. This is increasingly relevant in a continually advancing specialty and one where minimally-invasive cardiac procedures have the potential for huge benefits to patient outcomes.
Methods The Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) data citation index database was searched with the following terms: [Minimal* AND Invasive* AND Card* AND Surg*]. Results were limited to full text English language manuscripts and ranked by citation number. Further analysis of the top 100 cited articles was carried out according to subject, author, publication year, journal, institution and country of origin. Results A total of 4716 eligible manuscripts were retrieved. Of the top 100 papers, the median (range) citation number was 101 (51–414). The most cited paper by Lichtenstein et al. (Circulation 114(6):591–596, 2006) published in Circulation with 414 citations focused on transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a viable alternative to aortic valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass in selected patients with aortic stenosis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery published the most papers and received the most citations (n = 35; 3036 citations). The United States of America had the most publications and citations (n = 52; 5303 citations), followed by Germany (n = 27; 2598 citations). Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, published the most papers of all institutions. Minimally-invasive cardiac surgery pertaining to valve surgery (n = 42) and coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 30) were the two most frequent topics by a large margin. Conclusions This work establishes a comprehensive and informative analysis of the most influential publications in minimally-invasive cardiac surgery and outlines what constitutes a citable article. Undertaking a quantitative evaluation of the top 100 papers aids in recognising the contributions of key authors and institutions as well as guiding future efforts in this field to continually improve the quality of care offered to complex cardiac patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Implante de la prótesis Edwards Intuity Elite en cirugía plurivalvular y en cirugía de revascularización coronaria concomitante. CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.circv.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
18
|
Incidence of persistent left bundle branch block after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 115:1446-1454. [PMID: 35952857 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to evaluate the incidence, prognosis and predictive factors of new onset of persistent left bundle branch block(NOP-LBBB) after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement(RD-AVR). METHODS This study was an observational, retrospective, single-center study of 274 consecutive patients with no baseline ventricular conduction disorder and no previous permanent pacemaker implantation(PPI) who underwent RD-AVR with an INTUITY valve(n=55) and INTUITY Elite Valve(n=219). Twelve-lead electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography were performed preoperatively, upon discharge, at 1-month and 1-year intervals. The incidence, prognosis, and predictive factors of NOP-LBBB were evaluated. RESULTS NOP-LBBB occurred in 58 patients(21.2%) upon discharge. In multivariate analysis, age (p <0.01), Intuity valve diameter ≥ 23 mm (p = 0.02) and INTUITY ELITE implantation(p=0.01) were independent predictors of NOP-LBBB. By 1:1 propensity matching analysis between the NOP-LBBB group and the control group, there were no significant differences in one-year overall mortality(p=0.23), hospitalization for CHF(p=0.99) or PPI(p=0.99). NOP-LBBB exposed patients to a high rate of dysrhythmic events(12.1%vs.1.4%,p<0.01) and was associated with a significant decrease in LVEF (62±9.5% vs. 65.2±7.83%, p=0.02) without an impact on NYHA functional status(1.25±0.32 and 1.52±0.70,p=0.32). Seventeen patients(6.2%) had a PPI before discharge, including 14 NOP-LBBB patients. CONCLUSIONS NOP-LBBB after RD-AVR is prevalent in patients with no prior conduction disorders. INTUITY ELITE is associated with a significantly higher rate of NOP-LBBB. The persistence of NOP-LBBB predisposed patients to the occurrence of high-grade conduction disorders and might have led to PPI but did not increase mortality or hospitalization for CHF.
Collapse
|
19
|
Iacovelli F, Desario P, Cafaro A, Pignatelli A, Alemanni R, Montesanti R, Bortone AS, De Cillis E, De Palo M, Bardi L, Martinelli GL, Tesorio T, Cassese M, Contegiacomo G. The hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable aortic bioprostheses in the elderly: a comparison between rapid deployment and transcatheter implantation. Hellenic J Cardiol 2022; 68:9-16. [PMID: 35863727 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical aortic valve replacement with a rapid deployment valve (RDV) is a relatively recent treatment option. Aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable (BE)-RDVs and BE-transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in a high surgical risk and frail-elderly population. METHODS BE-THVs and BE-RDVs were respectively implanted in 138 and 47 patients, all older than 75 years and with a Canadian Study of Health and Aging category of 5 or above. Echocardiographic assessment was performed at discharge and at six months. RESULTS At discharge, transprosthetic pressure gradients and indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) were similar in both cohorts. At six-month follow-up, BE-RDV showed lower peak (14.69 vs 20.86 mmHg; p <0.001) and mean (7.82 vs 11.83 mmHg; p <0.001) gradients, as well as larger iEOA (1.05 vs 0.84 cm2/m2; p <0.001). Similar findings were also shown considering only small sized valves. Moderate-to-severe paravalvular leakage was more prevalent in BE-THVs at discharge (14.49 vs 0.00%; p=0.032) and, considering exclusively small prostheses, at six months too (57.69 vs 15.00%; p=0.014). Nevertheless, BE-THVs determined amelioration in left ventricular ejection fraction (53.79 vs 60.14%; p <0.001), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (35.81 vs 33.15 mmHg; p=0.042) and tricuspid regurgitation severity (40.58 vs 19.57%; p=0.031) from discharge to mid-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS BE-RDVs showed better hemodynamic performance, especially when implanted in small annulus. Despite their worse baseline conditions, transcatheter patients still exhibited a greater improvement of their echocardiographic profile at mid-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fortunato Iacovelli
- Division of University Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Department, Policlinico University Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy; Division of Cardiology, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Via Francesco Bruno 1, 74121 Taranto, Italy.
| | - Paolo Desario
- Division of University Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Department, Policlinico University Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Cafaro
- Division of Cardiology, "V. Fazzi" Hospital, Piazza Filippo Muratore, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
| | - Antonio Pignatelli
- Interventional Cardiology Service, "Anthea" Clinic, GVM Care & Research, Via Camillo Rosalba 35/37, 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Rossella Alemanni
- Division of Heart Surgery, Emergency and Critical Care Department, "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Research Hospital, Viale Cappuccini, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
| | - Rosamaria Montesanti
- Division of Heart Surgery, Emergency and Critical Care Department, "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Research Hospital, Viale Cappuccini, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Santo Bortone
- Division of University Heart Surgery, Cardiothoracic Department, Policlinico University Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Emanuela De Cillis
- Division of University Heart Surgery, Cardiothoracic Department, Policlinico University Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Micaela De Palo
- Division of University Heart Surgery, Cardiothoracic Department, Policlinico University Hospital, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Luca Bardi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
| | - Gian Luca Martinelli
- Division of Heart Surgery, Cardiovascular Department, "MultiMedica" Research Hospital, Via Milanese 300, 20099 Sesto San Giovanni, Italy.
| | - Tullio Tesorio
- Interventional Cardiology Service, "Montevergine" Clinic, Via Mario Malzoni, 83013 Mercogliano, Italy.
| | - Mauro Cassese
- Division of Heart Surgery, Emergency and Critical Care Department, "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Research Hospital, Viale Cappuccini, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
| | - Gaetano Contegiacomo
- Interventional Cardiology Service, "Anthea" Clinic, GVM Care & Research, Via Camillo Rosalba 35/37, 70124 Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nappi F, Avtaar Singh SS, Nappi P, Fiore A. Biomechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant. Bioengineering (Basel) 2022; 9:bioengineering9070299. [PMID: 35877350 PMCID: PMC9312295 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9070299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has grown exponentially within the cardiology and cardiac surgical spheres. It has now become a routine approach for treating aortic stenosis. Several concerns have been raised about TAVI in comparison to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The primary concerns regard the longevity of the valves. Several factors have been identified which may predict poor outcomes following TAVI. To this end, the lesser-used finite element analysis (FEA) was used to quantify the properties of calcifications which affect TAVI valves. This method can also be used in conjunction with other integrated software to ascertain the functionality of these valves. Other imaging modalities such as multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) are now widely available, which can accurately size aortic valve annuli. This may help reduce the incidence of paravalvular leaks and regurgitation which may necessitate further intervention. Structural valve degeneration (SVD) remains a key factor, with varying results from current studies. The true incidence of SVD in TAVI compared to SAVR remains unclear due to the lack of long-term data. It is now widely accepted that both are part of the armamentarium and are not mutually exclusive. Decision making in terms of appropriate interventions should be undertaken via shared decision making involving heart teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 93200 Saint-Denis, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-149334104; Fax: +33-149334119
| | | | - Pierluigi Nappi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
| | - Antonio Fiore
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 94000 Creteil, France;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Aortic Annulus Stabilization Technique Prevents Paravalvular Leaks after Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Implantation. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10245776. [PMID: 34945072 PMCID: PMC8703849 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical aortic valve replacement with rapid deployment bioprosthesis guarantees good hemodynamic results but carries the risk of paravalvular leaks. To address this issue, an annulus stabilization technique has been recently developed. METHODS Clinical and hemodynamic parameters from patients treated for aortic valve replacement with the rapid deployment bioprosthesis and a concomitant annulus stabilization technique were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Echocardiographic data at discharge and at 1-year follow-up were collected and analysed. RESULTS A total of 57 patients (mean age 74.3 ± 6.1 years) with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement with the rapid deployment bioprosthesis and concomitant annulus stabilization technique (mean valve size: 23.8 ± 1.9 mm). Combined procedures accounted for 56.1%. Hospital mortality was 1.8% and a new pacemaker for conduction abnormalities was implanted in 10 patients. The pre-discharge echocardiographic control showed absence of paravalvular leaks of any degree in all patients with mean valve gradient of 9.6 ± 4.0 mmHg. The 1-year echocardiographic control confirmed the good valve hemodynamic (mean gradient of 8.0 ± 2.8 mmHg) and absence of leaks. CONCLUSION In this preliminary clinical experience, the annulus stabilization technique prevents postoperative paravalvular leaks after rapid deployment aortic valve implantation, up to 1-year postoperatively. Studies on larger series are of paramount importance to confirm the long-term efficacy of this new surgical technique.
Collapse
|
22
|
Thuraisingam A, Newcomb AE. Rhythm disturbances following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. JTCVS Tech 2021; 10:219-226. [PMID: 34984381 PMCID: PMC8691943 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives There have been reports of postoperative conduction disturbances after rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. Our objective was to assess electrocardiogram changes in patients undergoing this procedure and review the literature on this topic. Methods In this retrospective case series, clinical data were extracted from patient records at St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne and the Australia New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database. Electrocardiogram data were obtained at baseline and postoperatively on day 5 and at week 6 and reviewed for rhythm disturbances and intracardiac conduction problems. Pacemaker status was also recorded. Results From 2013 to 2017, 100 consecutive patients underwent rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with 1 valve type at our institution. Three patients were excluded because of paced rhythm preoperatively, leaving 97 patients (mean age 74.7 ± 8.12 years; 56.7% male) for analysis. Some 18.6% of patients developed new left bundle branch block at 5 days postoperatively and only 4.1% of patients found with persistent left bundle branch block at 6-week follow-up compared with preoperatively. No significant changes were observed in the frequencies of atrial fibrillation, first-degree heart block, and right bundle branch block. However, there was evidence of increases in paced rhythm and subsequent need for a permanent pacemaker. A total of 14 patients (14.4%) had a permanent pacemaker implanted at an average of 11.1 ± 2.9 days postoperatively. Conclusions Rhythm disturbances and conduction abnormalities are noted with the rapid-deployment aortic valves used at our institution, but appear comparable to other rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement bioprostheses. These abnormalities may be related to the effect of the sub-annular stent frame of the valve system and implantation technique.
Collapse
|
23
|
Wiedemann D, Laufer G, Coti I, Mahr S, Scherzer S, Haberl T, Kocher A, Andreas M. Anterior Right Thoracotomy for Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 112:564-571. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2020] [Revised: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
24
|
Coti I, Maierhofer U, Rath C, Werner P, Loewe C, Kocher A, Laufer G, Andreas M. Effect of conventional and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement on the distance from the aortic annulus to coronary arteries. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2021; 32:196-203. [PMID: 33236042 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the effect of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) on coronary height in patients undergoing SAVR with rapid-deployment or SAVR with several standard sutured bioprostheses. This study may identify patients at higher risk of coronary obstruction during valve-in-valve procedures. METHODS We analysed 112 patients [mean age 71 (9 SD) years] who underwent SAVR with either a rapid-deployment aortic bioprosthesis (EDWARDS INTUITY Elite Valve) or other standard sutured biological valves. The coronary heights were assessed by computed tomography scan with the Philips 3D HeartNavigator system. RESULTS Two groups of patients were analysed: 51 (45.5%) patients implanted with an RD-AVR, which is a supra-annular valve that requires 3 anchoring sutures without the use of pledgets, and 61 (54.5%) patients implanted with a conventional supra-annular sutured bioprosthesis. The mean right and left coronary artery-to-annulus (RCAA and LCAA) heights at baseline were 16.9 (4.6 SD) and 14.2 (4.0 SD) mm in the standard sutured group and 16.3 (3.5 SD) and 12.8 (2.9 SD) mm in the RD-AVR group, respectively; a significantly shorter distance was observed for the left coronary artery in the rapid-deployment group (P = 0.420 for RCAA height and P = 0.044 for LCAA). Postoperatively, the mean RCAA and LCAA heights were significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline. A mean of 11.5 (4.8 SD) mm for the RCAA and 7.9 (4.3 SD) mm for the LCAA in the standard sutured group as well as 14.4 (3.9 SD) mm for the RCAA and 9.0 (3.1 SD) mm for the LCAA in the RD-AVR group were observed (P < 0.001 for RCAA and LCAA in both the sutured and rapid-deployment groups). Despite the significant difference in the mean distance from the left coronary artery to annulus between the groups at baseline, the postoperative mean distance of the LCAA to the sewing ring was still higher in the RD-AVR group. CONCLUSIONS A significantly shorter coronary artery-to-aortic annulus distance for both the right and left main coronary arteries was observed after AVR with different conventional sutured supra-annular bioprostheses compared to AVR with rapid-deployment valves. These findings might be relevant for bioprosthesis selection, especially for young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliana Coti
- Division of Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Udo Maierhofer
- Division of Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claus Rath
- Division of Anatomy, Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paul Werner
- Division of Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Loewe
- Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alfred Kocher
- Division of Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guenther Laufer
- Division of Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Andreas
- Division of Surgery, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Arribas-Leal JM, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Aranda-Domene R, Moreno-Moreno JA, Espinosa-Garcia D, Jimenez-Aceituna A, Perez-Andreu J, Taboada-Martin R, Saura-Espin DR, Canovas-Lopez SJ. Mid-term outcomes of rapid deployment aortic prostheses in patients with small aortic annulus. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2021; 33:695-701. [PMID: 34179967 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Edwards Intuity valve is a rapid deployment aortic prosthesis that favours less invasive approaches. However, evidence about the clinical behaviour of their smaller sizes is scarce. Herein, we studied haemodynamic behaviours and clinical outcomes of small Intuity prostheses (19-21 mm) in comparison to larger Intuity prostheses (>21 mm). METHODS This is an observational study including patients implanted with an Edwards Intuity rapid deployment aortic prosthesis. Patients with prosthesis sizes 19-21 and >21 mm were included. Baseline and perioperative variables, as well as adverse events during the follow-up were recorded and compared between groups. RESULTS A total of 122 patients (37% female, mean age 75 ± 4.5 years) were included, of whom 54 (45%) were implanted with a small prosthesis and 68 (55%) with a prosthesis >21 mm. There were no significant differences between patients with small Intuity prostheses and patients with larger prostheses regarding in-hospital mortality (2% vs 4%, P = 0.43) or mortality during the follow-up (3.41 vs 2.45 per 100 patients-years; P = 0.58). Survival in the small Intuity valve group was 95% at 1 year and 83% at 6 years, whereas in the larger Intuity valve group was 96% at 1 year and 78% at 6 years. The presence of a small prosthesis did not influence mid-term survival (log-rank P-value = 0.62). CONCLUSIONS This study showed good clinical performance of Intuity aortic prostheses with appropriate mid-term survival in patients with the small aortic annulus. Thus, the Edwards Intuity rapid deployment aortic prosthesis may be considered as a potential option in patients with the small aortic annulus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José M Arribas-Leal
- Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| | - José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca
- Department of Cardiology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, University of Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), CIBERCV, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ramón Aranda-Domene
- Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| | - José A Moreno-Moreno
- Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| | - Dolores Espinosa-Garcia
- Department of Cardiology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, University of Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), CIBERCV, Murcia, Spain
| | - Antonio Jimenez-Aceituna
- Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| | - Joaquín Perez-Andreu
- Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| | - Rubén Taboada-Martin
- Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| | - Daniel R Saura-Espin
- Department of Cardiology, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, University of Murcia, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), CIBERCV, Murcia, Spain
| | - Sergio J Canovas-Lopez
- Cardiovascular Surgery Service, Virgen de la Arrixaca University Hospital, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Taboada-Martín R, Arribas-Leal JM, Esteve-Pastor MA, Abellán Alemán J, Marín F, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Cánovas-Lopez SJ. Comparison of Aortic Gradient and Ventricular Mass after Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis with Rapid Deployment, Sutureless, and Conventional Bioprostheses. Cardiology 2021; 146:656-666. [PMID: 34120109 DOI: 10.1159/000516465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of rapid deployment and sutureless aortic prostheses is increasing. Previous reports have shown promising results on haemodynamic performance and mortality rates. However, the impact of these bioprostheses on left ventricular mass (LVM) regression remains unknown. We decided to study the changes in remodelling and LVM regression in isolated severe aortic stenosis treated with conventional or Perceval® or Intuity® valves. METHOD AND RESULTS From January 2011 to January 2016, 324 bioprostheses were implanted in our centre. The collected characteristics were divided into 3 groups: conventional valves, Perceval®, and Intuity®, and they were analysed after 12 months. There were 183 conventional valves (56%), 72 Perceval® (22%), and 69 Intuity® (21.2%). The statistical analysis showed significant differences in transprosthetic postoperative peak gradient (23 [18-29] mm Hg vs. 21 [16-29] mm Hg and 18 [14-24] mm Hg, p < 0.001), ventricular mass electrical criteria regression (Sokolow and Cornell products), and 1-year survival (90 vs. 93% and 97%, log rank p value = 0.04) in conventional, Perceval®, and Intuity® groups. CONCLUSIONS We observed differences in haemodynamic, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters related to the different types of prosthesis. Patients with the Intuity® prosthesis had the highest reduction in peak aortic gradient and the higher ventricular mass regression. Besides, patients with the Intuity® prosthesis had less risk of mortality during follow-up than the other two groups. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubén Taboada-Martín
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - José María Arribas-Leal
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - María Asunción Esteve-Pastor
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, University of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, CIBERCV, Murcia, Spain
| | | | - Francisco Marín
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, University of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, CIBERCV, Murcia, Spain
| | - José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, University of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca, CIBERCV, Murcia, Spain
| | - Sergio Juan Cánovas-Lopez
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hui DS. Commentary: Intuity - Not so Intuitive. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 34:465-466. [PMID: 34087374 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn S Hui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tanaka D, Nedadur R, Yanagawa B. Rapid deployment valves: Another tool in the toolbox. J Card Surg 2021; 36:2834-2835. [PMID: 34060136 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin Tanaka
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rashmi Nedadur
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bobby Yanagawa
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Percutaneous versus Surgical Intervention for Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Systematic Review. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:3973924. [PMID: 34136565 PMCID: PMC8175165 DOI: 10.1155/2021/3973924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Aortic stenosis is a disease that is increasing in prevalence and manifests as decreased cardiac output, which if left untreated can result in heart failure and ultimately death. It is primarily a disease of the elderly who often have multiple comorbidities. The advent of transcatheter aortic valve therapies has changed the way we treat these conditions. However, long-term results of these therapies remain uncertain. Recently, there has been an increasing number of studies examining the role of both surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. We therefore performed a systematic review using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Two investigators searched papers published between January 1, 2007, and to date using the following terms: "aortic valve stenosis," "aortic valve operation," and "transcatheter aortic valve therapy." Both strategies in aortic stenosis treatment highlighted specific indications alongside the pitfalls such as structural valve degeneration and valve thrombosis which have a bearing on clinical outcomes. We propose some recommendations to help clinicians in the decision-making process as technological improvements make both surgical and transcatheter therapies viable options for patients with aortic stenosis. Finally, we assess the role of finite element analysis in patient selection for aortic valve replacement. THVT and AVR-S are both useful tools in the armamentarium against aortic stenosis. The decision between the two treatment strategies should be best guided by a strong robust evidence base, ideally with a long-term follow-up. This is best performed by the heart team with the patient as the center of the discussion.
Collapse
|
30
|
Pelce E, Porto A, Gariboldi V, Ben Lagha A, Amanatiou C, Collart F, Theron A. Five-year outcomes of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Intuity valve. J Card Surg 2021; 36:2826-2833. [PMID: 34036633 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This report presents 5-year outcomes of the rapid-deployment Edwards Intuity valve in a prospective, single-center study. METHODS All patients who underwent an aortic valve replacement (AVR) with an Edwards Intuity bioprosthesis at La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France, from July 2012 to June 2015 were assessed over a 5-year follow-up period. The primary outcome was overall mortality at 5 years. Secondary outcomes were reoperation, overall mortality and stroke, cardiovascular mortality, composite endpoints defined by the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2), periprosthetic regurgitation, prosthesis-patient mismatch, and the need for new pacemaker implantation. RESULTS In total, 170 consecutive patients were assessed, of which 67.1% were males. The mean age was 76 years, mean EuroSCORE II was 3.5% and 5-year overall mortality was 12.4%. At 5 years, reoperation was 2.9%, overall mortality and stroke was 4.1% per patient-year, and cardiovascular mortality was 4.7%. VARC clinical efficacy and VARC time-related valve safety were achieved in 46.0% and 59.9% of patients, respectively. At one month VARC device success was 71.2% and VARC early safety was 87.1%. At one year, mild and moderate periprosthetic regurgitation were 2.4% and 0.6%, respectively, and moderate and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch were 18.8% and 4.8%, respectively. Conduction disturbances needing new PPI occurred in 3.5% patients. CONCLUSION The 5-year outcomes of AVR with the Edwards Intuity valve system demonstrate satisfactory midterm safety and excellent haemodynamic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Pelce
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - A Porto
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - V Gariboldi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - A Ben Lagha
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - C Amanatiou
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - F Collart
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - A Theron
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
D'Onofrio A, Tessari C, Cibin G, Lorenzoni G, Martinelli GL, Solinas M, Gerosa G, Gregori D, Alamanni F, Polvani G, Massetti M, Eusanio MD, Merlo M, Vendramin I, Mangino D, Mignosa C, Russo C, Rinaldi M, De Paulis R, Pacini D, Luzi G, Antona C, Salvador L, Musumeci F, Maselli D, Colli A, Portoghese M, Alfieri O, De Filippo CM. Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes of Rapid-Deployment Aortic Bioprostheses. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 34:453-461. [PMID: 33979664 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Aim of this retrospective, multicenter study was to evaluate early and mid-term clinical and hemodynamic results of patients who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with Intuity rapid-deployment bioprostheses (RDB) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). We analyzed data from the Italian Registry of Intuity Valve (INTU-ITA registry) that is a national, real-world and independent from the industry registry. Preoperative variables were defined according to EuroSCORE and postoperative outcomes according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC). Survival distribution was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. A Cox-Proportional Hazard Model was employed to assess the effect of the covariates on patients' survival. The registry included 1687 patients from 23 centers (June 2012-September 2019). Aortic cross clamp time for isolated SAVR was 55 minutes (IQR: 45-70 minute). Postoperative pace-maker rate was 6.3%. At discharge transaortic peak and mean gradients were: 18 mm Hg (IQR: 14-23 mm Hg) and 10 mmHg (IQR: 8-13 mm Hg), respectively. Indexed effective orifice area was 1.10 cm2/m2 (IQR: 0.91-1.31 cm2/m2) and the incidence of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch was 0.6%. Hemodynamic data for all valve sizes remained stable during follow-up. Thirty-day overall mortality was 1.8% (30 patients), and at follow-up it was 5.3% (89 patients). Kaplan-Meier overall survival was 95.5% (94.3-96.7%); 90.7% (88.3-93.1%); 86.4% (82.6-90.4%) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Serum creatinine (HR: 1.36; 95%CI: 1.04-1.81; p = 0.0397) and cross-clamp time (HR: 1.01; 95%CI: 1.002-1.017; p = 0.0077) were identified as independent predictors of mortality. According to our data from the INTU-ITA registry, SAVR with RDB provides good early clinical and hemodynamic results that are confirmed at follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chiara Tessari
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Giorgia Cibin
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Solinas
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale del Cuore "G. Pasquinucci", Massa
| | - Gino Gerosa
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Dario Gregori
- Division of Biostatistics, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Alamanni
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Polvani
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Massetti
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maurizio Merlo
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Igor Vendramin
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital - University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Domenico Mangino
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, L'Angelo Hospital, Mestre-Venezia, Italy
| | - Carmelo Mignosa
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, G.B. Morgagni Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Claudio Russo
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Rinaldi
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Davide Pacini
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Luzi
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy
| | - Carlo Antona
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Loris Salvador
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Maselli
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, S. Anna Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Andrea Colli
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Michele Portoghese
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Santissima Annunziata Hospital, Sassari, Italy
| | - Ottavio Alfieri
- Departments of Cardiac Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Deutsch O, Deisenhofer I, Koch-Buettner K, Lange R, Krane M. Need for permanent pacemaker implantation following implantation of the rapid deployment valve in combined procedures: a single centre cohort study. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:2128-2136. [PMID: 34012563 PMCID: PMC8107573 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-3120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Rapid deployment aortic valves may interfere with the cardiac conduction system. We investigated the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following the implantation of Edwards INTUITY valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Methods One hundred twenty patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the INTUITY valve in a combined procedure at the German Heart Centre Munich between April 2016 and December 2019. Twenty-four patients with prior PPI or concomitant ablation procedures (24/120, 20%) were excluded. Patient-specific, procedural and post-procedural outcomes were assessed in the remaining 96 cases. Results AVR was successful in all cases. Seventy-four percent of the study population were men. Mean age was 69.5±7.6 years. EuroSCORE II was 3.2±2.9. Forty-six patients (46/96, 47.9%) presented with pre-operative conduction disorders, right bundle branch block (RBBB) (17/96, 17.7%) and first-degree or second degree atrio-ventricular block (AVB) (18/96, 18.8%), in particular. In total, 9 patients (9/96, 9.4%) underwent PPI. PPI was required in 3 patients (3/50, 6.0%) who did not have a pre-existing conduction disorder due to new high degree AVB. 6 patients with pre-operative conduction disorders (6/46, 13%) needed PPI. Timing of PPI was 5.2±1.5 days (median 5). Independent predictors of PPI were preoperative RBBB [odds ratio (OR) =4.554, P=0.049] and large valve size (#27) (OR =5.527, P=0.031). Conclusions The analysis of the data collected enabled us to identify patient factors associated with higher risk for post-operative PPI following AVR with the INTUITY valve. Patient factors associated with post-operative PPI, were RBBB and large valve size. These patients should be closely monitored following the procedure, in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Deutsch
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,INSURE (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery), German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabell Deisenhofer
- Department of Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katharina Koch-Buettner
- Department of Cardiology, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Lange
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,INSURE (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery), German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research)-Partner Site Munich, Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Krane
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Centre Munich of the Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,INSURE (Institute for Translational Cardiac Surgery), German Heart Centre Munich, Munich, Germany.,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research)-Partner Site Munich, Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ferrara J, Deharo P, Resseguier N, Porto A, Jaussaud N, Morera P, Amanatiou C, Gariboldi V, Collart F, Cuisset T, Theron A. Rapid deployment versus trans-catheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: A propensity score analysis. J Card Surg 2021; 36:2004-2012. [PMID: 33686755 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are insufficient studies comparing rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (RDAVR) and trans-aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). AIMS We compared 2-year outcomes between RDAVR with INTUITY and TAVR with SAPIEN 3 in intermediate-risk patients with AS. METHODS Inclusion criteria were patients with severe AS at a EuroSCORE II ≥ 4%, who received RDAVR or TAVR implantation and clinical evaluation by the Heart Team. Regression adjustment for the propensity score was used to compare RDAVR and TAVR. Primary outcome was the composite criterion of death, disabling stroke, or rehospitalization. SECONDARY OUTCOMES major bleeding complications postoperation, paravalvular regurgitation ≥ 2, patient-prosthesis mismatch, and pacemaker implantation. RESULTS A total of 152 patients were included from 2012 to 2018: 48 in the RDAVR group and 104 in the TAVR group. The mean age was 82.7 ± 6.0,51.3% patients were female, the mean EuroSCORE II was 6.03 ± 1.6%, mean baseline LVEF was 56 ± 13%, mean indexed effective orifice area was 0.41 ± 0.1 cm/m2 , and the mean gradient was 51.7 ± 14.7 mmHg. RDAVR patients were younger (79.5 ± 6 years vs. 82.6 ± 6 years; p = .01), and at higher risk (EuroSCORE II, 6.61 ± 1.8% vs. 5.63 ± 1.5%; p = .005), Twenty-two patients (45.99%) in the RDAVR group and 32 (66.67%) in the TAVR group met the composite criterion. Through the 1:1 propensity score matching analysis, there was a significant difference between the groups, favoring RDAVR (HR = 0.58 [95% CI: 0.34-1.00]; p = .04). No differences were observed in terms of patient-prosthesis mismatch (0.83 [0.35-1.94]; p = .67), major bleeding events (1.33 [0.47-3.93]; p = .59), paravalvular regurgitation ≥ 2 (0.33[0-6.28]; p = .46), or pacemaker implantation (0.84 [0.25-2.84]; p = .77) CONCLUSION: RDAVR was associated with better 2-year outcomes than TAVR in intermediate-risk patients with severe symptomatic AS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérome Ferrara
- Department of Cardiology, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Pierre Deharo
- Department of Cardiology, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | | | - Alizée Porto
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Jaussaud
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Pierre Morera
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Cécile Amanatiou
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Vlad Gariboldi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Frederic Collart
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Thomas Cuisset
- Department of Cardiology, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Alexis Theron
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Choi JW, Kim HJ, Kim JB, Lee S, Lim C, Chang BC, Suh Y, Lee NR, Hwang HY. Early and Two-year Outcomes after Sutureless and Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: a Nationwide Population-based Study. J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36:e57. [PMID: 33686809 PMCID: PMC7940122 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared early and 2-year clinical outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with conventional aortic valve replacement (CAVR) in a nationwide study based on claims data. METHODS From December 2016 to November 2018, 3,173 patients underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. SAVR and CAVR were performed in 641 and 2,532 patients, respectively. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed in 640 patient pairs. RESULTS Operative mortality rate was 2.8% without significant differences between the SAVR (3.4%) and CAVR (2.3%) groups (P = 0.324). There were no significant differences in postoperative morbidities between the groups except for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. PPM implantation rate was significantly higher in the SAVR (3.8%) than in the CAVR group (0.9%) (P < 0.001). One- and two-year overall survival was 89.1% and 87.5%, respectively, without significant differences between the groups (SAVR group vs. CAVR grouP = 89.9% and 90.5% vs. 87.2% and 88.7%, respectively; P = 0.475). There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of cardiac death, stroke, aortic valve reoperation and infective endocarditis between the groups. Cumulative PPM implantation incidence at 6 months in the CAVR was 1.1%, and no patient required PPM implantation after 6 months. In the SAVR, the cumulative PPM implantation incidence at 0.5, one, and two years was 3.9%, 5.0% and 5.6%, respectively. The cumulative PPM implantation rate was higher in the SAVR group than in the CAVR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Early and 2-year clinical outcomes between SAVR and CAVR were not different except for a high rate of permanent pacemaker implantation in the SAVR group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Woong Choi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Jin Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon Bum Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sak Lee
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheong Lim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Byung Chul Chang
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Youshin Suh
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
| | - Na Rae Lee
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Ho Young Hwang
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Arribas JM, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Moreno JA, Aranda R, Masso J, Jiménez A, Pérez-Andreu J, Taboada R, Fernández M, Aguilar JM, García-Puente JJ, Lorenzo M, Gutiérrez F, de la Morena G, Jara R, Cánovas SJ. Experiencia de 7 años con la protesis aortica de rápido despliegue Edwards Intuity. CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.circv.2020.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
36
|
Abstract
Since their introduction, it has been demonstrated that minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) approaches are safe and effective for the treatment of aortic valve diseases. To date, the main advantage of these approaches is represented by the reduced surgical trauma, with a subsequent reduced complication rate and faster recovery. This makes such approaches an appealing choice also for frail patients [obese, aged, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)]. The standardization of the minimally invasive techniques, together with the implementation of preoperative workup and anesthesiological intra- and post-operative care, led to an amelioration of surgical results and reduction of surgical times. Moreover, the improvement of surgical technology and the introduction of new devices such as sutureless and rapid deployment (SURD) valves, has helped the achievement of comparable results to traditional surgery. However, transcatheter technologies are nowadays more and more important in the treatment of aortic valve disease, also in low risk patients. For this reason surgeons should put new efforts for further reducing the surgical trauma in the future, even taking inspiration from other disciplines. In this review, we aim to present a review of literature evidences regarding minimally invasive treatment of aortic diseases, also reflecting our personal experience with MIAVR techniques. This review could represent a tool for a well-structured patient assessment and preoperative planning, in order to safely carrying out an MIAVR procedure with satisfactory outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Di Bacco
- U.O. Cardiochirurgia Mininvasiva, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo San Donato, Milano, Italy
| | - Antonio Miceli
- U.O. Cardiochirurgia Mininvasiva, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo San Donato, Milano, Italy
| | - Mattia Glauber
- U.O. Cardiochirurgia Mininvasiva, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Gruppo San Donato, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Klop ID, van Putte BP, Kloppenburg GT, Sprangers MA, Nieuwkerk PT, Klein P. Comparing quality of life and postoperative pain after limited access and conventional aortic valve replacement: Design and rationale of the LImited access aortic valve replacement (LIAR) trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2021; 21:100700. [PMID: 33506139 PMCID: PMC7815656 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) via limited access approaches ('mini-AVR') have proven to be safe alternative for the surgical treatment of aortic valve disease. However, it remains unclear whether these less invasive approaches are associated with improved quality of life and/or reduced postoperative pain when compared to conventional SAVR via full median sternotomy (FMS). STUDY DESIGN The LImited access Aortic valve Replacement (LIAR) trial is a single-center, single blind randomized controlled clinical trial comparing 2 arms of 80 patients undergoing limited access SAVR via J-shaped upper hemi-sternotomy (UHS) or conventional SAVR through FMS. In all randomized patients, the diseased native aortic valve is planned to be replaced with a rapid deployment stented bioprosthesis. Patients unwilling or unable to participate in the randomized trial will be treated conventionally via SAVR via FMS and with implantation of a sutured valve prosthesis. These patients will participate in a prospective registry. STUDY METHODS Primary outcome is improvement in cardiac-specific quality of life, measured by two domains of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire up to one year after surgery. Secondary outcomes include, but are not limited to: generic quality of life measured with the Short Form-36, postoperative pain, perioperative (technical success rate, operating time) and postoperative outcomes (30-day and one-year mortality), complication rate and hospital length of stay. CONCLUSION The LIAR trial is designed to determine whether a limited access approach for SAVR ('mini-AVR') is associated with improved quality of life and/or reduced postoperative pain compared with conventional SAVR through FMS.The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04012060.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Idserd D.G. Klop
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Bart P. van Putte
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AMC Heart Centre, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mirjam A.G. Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pythia T. Nieuwkerk
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick Klein
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alnajar A, Chatterjee S, Chou BP, Khabsa M, Rippstein M, Lee VV, La Pietra A, Lamelas J. Current Surgical Risk Scores Overestimate Risk in Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2020; 16:43-51. [PMID: 33269957 DOI: 10.1177/1556984520971775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Risk-scoring systems for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) were largely derived from sternotomy cases. We evaluated the accuracy of current risk scores in predicting outcomes after minimally invasive AVR (mini-AVR). Because transcatheter AVR (TAVR) is being considered for use in low-risk patients with aortic stenosis, accurate mini-AVR risk assessment is necessary. METHODS We reviewed 1,018 consecutive isolated mini-AVR cases (2009 to 2015). After excluding patients with Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) scores ≥4, we calculated each patient's European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II, TAVR Risk Score (TAVR-RS), and age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score (ACEF). We compared all 4 scores' accuracy in predicting mini-AVR 30-day mortality by computing each score's observed-to-expected mortality ratio (O:E). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves tested discrimination, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tested calibration. RESULTS Among 941 patients (mean age, 72 ± 12 years), 6 deaths occurred within 30 days (actual mortality rate, 0.6%). All 4 scoring systems overpredicted expected mortality after mini-AVR: ACEF (1.4%), EuroSCORE II (1.9%), STS-PROM (2.0%), and TAVR-RS (2.1%). STS-PROM best estimated risk for patients with STS-PROM scores 0 to <1 (0.6 O:E), ACEF for patients with STS-PROM scores 2 to <3 (0.6 O:E), and TAVR-RS for patients with STS-PROM scores 3 to <4 (0.7 O:E). ROC curves showed only fair discrimination and calibration across all risk scores. CONCLUSIONS In low-risk patients who underwent mini-AVR, current surgical scoring systems overpredicted mortality 2-to-3-fold. Alternative dedicated scoring systems for mini-AVR are needed for more accurate outcomes assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Alnajar
- 158424 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami, FL, USA
| | - Subhasis Chatterjee
- 3989 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,14644 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brendan P Chou
- 3989 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mariam Khabsa
- 3989 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Madeline Rippstein
- 3989 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vei-Vei Lee
- 14644 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Angelo La Pietra
- 5258 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center and Heart Institute, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| | - Joseph Lamelas
- 158424 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami, FL, USA.,3989 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.,14644 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX, USA.,5258 Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center and Heart Institute, Miami Beach, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
D'Onofrio A, Tessari C, Bagozzi L, Migliore F, Filippini C, Cibin G, Pesce R, Francescato A, Gerosa G. Conduction disorders after aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprostheses: early occurrence and one-year evolution. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9:396-407. [PMID: 33102178 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Rapid-deployment bioprostheses represent one of the newest aortic valve substitutes introduced into clinical practice. The aim of this retrospective single-center study was to evaluate the occurrence of conduction disorders (CDs) after rapid-deployment aortic valve implantation at discharge and at 1-year follow-up, and to identify risk factors for CDs and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). Methods All patients who reached 1-year follow-up after isolated or combined aortic valve replacement (AVR) with rapid-deployment bioprostheses (Intuity Elite, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) at our institution were included in this study. Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded before the procedure (within 24 hours), after the procedure as soon as the patient was moved to the intensive care unit (ICU), every day during in-hospital stay and at 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative CDs at discharge and at 1-year follow up. Patients were divided in two groups: those who developed the primary endpoint (Group CD) and those who didn't (Group Non-CD). Results A total of 98 consecutive patients were included in the study. At discharge, the primary endpoint occurred in 40 patients (40.8%). In particular, new CDs and PPI occurred in 33 (33.7%) and in 7 (7.1%) patients, respectively. Valve size was the only independent predictor of primary endpoint at discharge. At 1-year, 30 patients (31.3%) presented with CDs or pacemaker-induced rhythm. In particular, in 25 patients of Group CD (64.1%), 1-year follow-up ECG revealed the persistence of the same CD as at discharge or pacemaker-induced rhythm, while 14 patients (35.9%) showed recovery of their CD. Age and prosthesis size were identified as independent predictors of CDs/pacemaker-induced rhythm at 1-year follow-up. Conclusions According to our data, nearly 40% of patients develop a new CD after rapid-deployment aortic valve implantation. Of these, one third recover after one year. Bioprosthesis size and age were identified as independent risk factors for occurrence of CD after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto D'Onofrio
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Chiara Tessari
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bagozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Federico Migliore
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Giorgia Cibin
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Rita Pesce
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Annalisa Francescato
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gino Gerosa
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Carrel T, Heinisch PP. History, development and clinical perspectives of sutureless and rapid deployment surgical aortic valve replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9:375-385. [PMID: 33102176 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Degenerative aortic stenosis is the most frequent valvular heart disease in industrialized countries. Conservative treatment may beneficially influence symptoms but is never successful. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was the only recognized treatment option to provide substantially prolonged survival until 2008. Operative mortality of isolated SAVR has been reported as low as 0.5% to 1% in experienced institutions, while long-term survival is close to that observed in a control healthy population of similar age. A multitude of studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of SAVR with regard to improvement in quality of life and physical performance in the majority of symptomatic patients. In the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an equal treatment modality, first in patients with high surgical risk and more recently in patients with intermediate and low surgical risk. Paravalvular regurgitation and the higher rate of pacemaker implantation remain points of consideration. Additionally, the long-term durability of TAVI devices and occurrence of stroke late after TAVI require additional analyses. Sutureless (SU-SAVR) and rapid deployment valve (R-SAVR) were designed to simplify and accelerate a conventional or less invasive surgical procedure while allowing complete excision of the calcified native valve. From 3 different implants tested more than 10 to 15 years ago, only two are available on the market today: the Perceval® valve from Liva Nova and the Intuity® sutureless prosthesis from Edwards Lifesciences. There has been extensive experience with these two devices in previous years and the results obtained are comparable to those observed following the use of conventional implants. The sutureless devices may be of particular interest for more complex and combined surgical procedures. This review summarizes the sutureless (SU-SAVR) and rapid deployment valve technologies and presents a clinical outlook for the patient population managed with these devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Carrel
- Department for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul Philipp Heinisch
- Department for Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
D'Onofrio A, Tessari C, Lorenzoni G, Cibin G, Martinelli G, Alamanni F, Polvani G, Solinas M, Massetti M, Merlo M, Vendramin I, Di Eusanio M, Mignosa C, Mangino D, Russo C, Rinaldi M, Pacini D, Salvador L, Antona C, Maselli D, De Paulis R, Luzi G, Alfieri O, De Filippo CM, Portoghese M, Musumeci F, Colli A, Gregori D, Gerosa G. Minimally Invasive vs Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 111:1916-1922. [PMID: 33039363 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare early and midterm clinical and hemodynamic results of aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprostheses performed through conventional full-sternotomy vs mini-sternotomy. METHODS Data from the Italian multicenter registry of aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprostheses (INTU-ITA registry) were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: full sternotomy (FS) and ministernotomy (MS). Primary endpoint was the comparison of early and midterm mortality. Secondary endpoints were: comparison of intraoperative variables, complications, and hemodynamic performance. A propensity score weighting approach was used for data analysis. RESULTS A total of 1057 patients were analyzed: 435 (41.2%) and 622 (58.8%) in group FS and MS, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.6% and 0.6% in FS and MS groups, respectively (P = .074). cardiopulmonary bypass time was 78.5 minutes and 83 minutes in FS and MS groups, respectively (P = .414). In the overall cohort, the incidence of intraoperative complications and of device success was 3.8% (40 patients) and 95.9% (1014 patients), respectively, with no significant differences between groups. Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 94.1%, 98.1%, 88.5% and 91.8%, 85.2%, and 84.8% in FS and MS groups, respectively (P = .412). The 2 groups showed similar postoperative gradients (median mean gradient, FS: 10.0 mm Hg, MS: 11.0 mm Hg; P = .170) and also similar incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (FS: 7%, MS: 6.4%, P = .647). CONCLUSIONS According to our data, rapid-deployment bioprostheses allow the performance of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with similar surgical times and similar clinical and hemodynamic outcomes to conventional surgery and should be considered the first choice in these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto D'Onofrio
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
| | - Chiara Tessari
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Lorenzoni
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Giorgia Cibin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Alamanni
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Polvani
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Solinas
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ospedale del Cuore "G. Pasquinucci", Massa, Italy
| | - Massimo Massetti
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Merlo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Igor Vendramin
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Carmelo Mignosa
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, G.B. Morgagni Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Domenico Mangino
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, L'Angelo Hospital, Mestre-Venezia, Italy
| | - Claudio Russo
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Rinaldi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Davide Pacini
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Loris Salvador
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Carlo Antona
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Maselli
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, S. Anna Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Giampaolo Luzi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy
| | - Ottavio Alfieri
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Michele Portoghese
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Santissima Annunziata Hospital, Sassari, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Colli
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Dario Gregori
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Gino Gerosa
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Andreas M, Coti I, Rosenhek R, Shabanian S, Mahr S, Uyanik-Uenal K, Wiedemann D, Binder T, Kocher A, Laufer G. Intermediate-term outcome of 500 consecutive rapid-deployment surgical aortic valve procedures†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 55:527-533. [PMID: 30137264 PMCID: PMC6381385 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Edwards INTUITY Valve System is a balloon-expandable bioprosthesis, inspired from the Edwards Magna valve and transcatheter technology, with a subvalvular stent frame to enable rapid deployment. We report a single-centre experience of aortic valve replacement with this novel bioprosthesis. METHODS Five hundred consecutive patients, of whom 45.6% were female with a mean age of 73.5 [standard deviation (SD) 7.9 years], with severe aortic stenosis who received a rapid deployment aortic valve between May 2010 and July 2017 were included in a prospective and ongoing database. The median follow-up time was 12 months, and the total accumulated follow-up time was 818 patient years. Preoperative characteristics, operative parameters, survival, valve-related adverse events and valve haemodynamics were assessed. RESULTS Thirty-day mortality was 0.8% (4/500), and overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 94%, 89% and 81%, respectively. A minimally invasive surgical approach was chosen in 236 patients (47%), of which 122 (24%) were operated on through an anterior right thoracotomy. Cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times for isolated aortic valve replacement were 53 (SD 17) and 89 (SD 29) min for full sternotomy as well as 75 (SD 23) and 110 (SD 31) min for minimally invasive surgery approaches (P < 0.001). Mean gradients at discharge, 1, 3 and 5 years were 13 (SD 5), 11 (SD 4), 12 (SD 5) and 11 (SD 3) mmHg, respectively. New pacemaker implantation was necessary in 8.6% of patients. A single case (0.2%) of structural degeneration was registered after 6 years. Valve explantation for non-structural dysfunction or endocarditis occurred in 9 patients (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS This rapid deployment aortic valve has shown excellent results concerning haemodynamic performance, durability and safety. Implantation requires specific training, and the rate of pacemaker implantation remains a matter of concern. This novel valve also facilitates minimally invasive approaches and may be beneficial in complex combined procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Andreas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Iuliana Coti
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Raphael Rosenhek
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shiva Shabanian
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephane Mahr
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Keziban Uyanik-Uenal
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dominik Wiedemann
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Binder
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alfred Kocher
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guenther Laufer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nappi F, Avtaar Singh SS, Timofeeva I. Learning From Controversy: Contemporary Surgical Management of Aortic Valve Endocarditis. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-CARDIOLOGY 2020; 14:1179546820960729. [PMID: 33088184 PMCID: PMC7545763 DOI: 10.1177/1179546820960729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Aortic valve replacement is the commonest cardiac surgical operation performed worldwide for infective endocarditis (IE). Long-term durability and avoidance of infection relapse are goals of the procedure. However, no detailed guidelines on prosthesis selection and surgical strategies guided by the comprehensive evaluation of the extension of the infection and its microbiological characteristics, clinical profile of the patient, and risk of infection recurrence are currently available. Conventional mechanical or stented xenografts are the preferred choice for localized aortic infection. However, in cases of complex IE with the involvement of the root or the aortomitral continuity, the use of homograft is suggested according to the surgeon and center experience. Homograft use should be counterbalanced against the risk of structural degeneration. Prosthetic bioroot or prosthetic valved conduit (mechanical and bioprosthetic) are also potentially suitable alternatives. Further development of preservation techniques enabling longer durability of allogenic substitutes is required. We evaluate the current evidence for the use of valve substitutes in aortic valve endocarditis and propose an evidence-based algorithm to guide the choice of therapy. We performed a systemic review to clarify the contemporary surgical management of aortic valve endocarditis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | - Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Irina Timofeeva
- Department of Imaging, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nappi F, Singh SSA, Spadaccio C, Acar C. Revisiting the guidelines and choice the ideal substitute for aortic valve endocarditis. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:952. [PMID: 32953752 PMCID: PMC7475423 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Aortic valve replacement is the most commonly performed cardiac surgical operation worldwide for infective endocarditis (IE). Long-term durability and avoidance of infection relapse are the treatment goals. However, no detailed guidelines on prosthesis selection and surgical strategy are available. Management should be guided by a comprehensive evaluation of infection extension and its microbiological characteristics, the clinical profile of the patient and the risk of infection recurrence. We conducted a literature search of the PubMed database, EMBASE and Cochrane Library (through November 2019) for studies reporting to the use of biological substitutes in aortic valve endocarditis (AVE). Studies comparing long-term outcomes in the use of allogenic and autologous with conventional prostheses were investigated. Conventional mechanical or stented xenografts are the preferred choice for localized aortic infection. In cases of complex IE with the involvement of the root or the aorto-mitral continuity, the use of homografts are recommended, according to surgeon's and center experience. Homograft use needs to be balanced against the risk of structural degeneration. Prosthetic bioroot or prosthetic valved conduit with a mechanical or bioprosthetic valve are acceptable alternatives. The choice of aortic valves substitute and surgical strategy in IE is multifaceted. Principles guiding the selection of prosthesis and surgical approach rely on the long-term durability and the avoidance of infection relapse. A decisional algorithm considering the extension of the infection and its microbiological characteristics, the clinical profile of the patient and the risk of infection recurrence is provided. A multidisciplinary effort is required to achieve consistent outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Nappi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, North Cardiological Center, Saint-Denis, Paris, France
| | - Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,University of Glasgow Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Cristiano Spadaccio
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,University of Glasgow Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christophe Acar
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Institute, la Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schlömicher M, Bechtel M, Useini D, Naraghi H, Haldenwang PL, Moustafine V, Strauch JT. Single-Center Outcomes with Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 69:405-411. [PMID: 32674180 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rapid-deployment valves can reduce procedural times and may facilitate minimally invasive surgery. In our institution, more than 500 patients underwent rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS A total of 510 patients underwent rapid deployment AVR between March 2012 and September 2017, of whom 270 patients underwent isolated AVR and 240 underwent AVR with concomitant procedures. The cumulative follow-up time was 1,444 patient-years, the median follow-up time 2.8 years, respectively RESULTS: An early all-cause mortality of 3.5% (n = 18) was seen with a cumulative survival of 91.9 ± 2.2% after 12 months. Mean cross-clamp times were 37 ± 19 minutes for isolated AVR and 93 ± 29 minutes for AVR with concomitant procedures. The rate of new pacemaker implantation was 7.8% (n = 40). No case of structural degeneration occurred in the follow-up. Three (0.6%) cases of endocarditis were registered. CONCLUSIONS Rapid deployment AVR can be performed safely with low complication rates and good hemodynamic results. Therefore, the relevance in aortic valve surgery can be stressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Schlömicher
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Matthias Bechtel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Dritan Useini
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Hamid Naraghi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Peter Lukas Haldenwang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Vadim Moustafine
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| | - Justus T Strauch
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ruhr University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Di Eusanio M, Berretta P. The sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement international registry: lessons learned from more than 4,500 patients. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9:289-297. [PMID: 32832410 PMCID: PMC7415696 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The treatment options for patients with aortic valve disease have considerably expanded over the last decade. The remarkable advances in catheter-based technology, the popularizing of minimally invasive (MI) surgery, and the introduction of new valve technologies, such as sutureless and rapid-deployment (SURD) valves have led to a paradigm shift in the management of aortic valve pathologies. Yet, given their recent introduction, the current evidence on sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (SURD-AVR) has been limited thus far. The Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry (SURD-IR) was established in 2015 by a consortium of 18 research centers to assess safety, efficacy, short- and long-term outcomes of SURD-AVR interventions. The present keynote lecture aims to assess and comment on the real-world evidence for SURD-AVR surgery generated from the SURD-IR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Di Eusanio
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Paolo Berretta
- Cardiac Surgery Unit, Lancisi Cardiovascular Center, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Coti I, Haberl T, Scherzer S, Werner P, Shabanian S, Kocher A, Laufer G, Andreas M. Outcome of rapid deployment aortic valves: long-term experience after 700 implants. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 9:314-321. [PMID: 32832413 DOI: 10.21037/acs.2020.04.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background The Edwards Intuity Valve System is a bioprosthesis with a balloon-expandable stent frame which enables rapid-deployment (RD). We aimed to analyze our single-center long-term experience with a follow-up until 9 years after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with this bioprosthesis. Methods Between May 2010 and May 2019, 700 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis or combined aortic valve disease, implanted with a RD valve at our institution, were included in a prospective database. Median follow-up was 19 months and the total accumulated follow-up was 2,140 patient-years. Pre-operative characteristics, operative parameters, survival rates, valve-related adverse events and valve hemodynamics were assessed. Results Mean age was 74±8 years, 45% female. Concomitant procedures were performed in 339 (48.4%) patients. In case of isolated AVR (361/700), a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach was conducted in 283 patients (78.4%). Cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times for isolated AVR were 107.7±28.2 and 73.8±21.3 minutes for MIS approaches and 92.8±28.8 and 57.5±20.6 minutes for full sternotomy (P<0.001), respectively. Mean gradients at discharge, 1, 3 and 5 years were 13±5, 11±4, 12±5 and 13±8 mmHg. New early pacemaker implantation was required in 8.9% of patients. Re-intervention or re-operation with valve explantation for structural degeneration, non-structural dysfunction or endocarditis, occurred in 21 cases (3%). Thirty-day mortality was 0.7% (5/700) and overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 98%, 91% and 76%. Conclusions We report excellent long-term results in this updated single center experience for RD aortic valves regarding durability, safety and hemodynamic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliana Coti
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Haberl
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabine Scherzer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paul Werner
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shiva Shabanian
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alfred Kocher
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guenther Laufer
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Andreas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Coti I, Haberl T, Scherzer S, Shabanian S, Binder T, Kocher A, Laufer G, Andreas M. Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valves for Patients With a Small Aortic Root: A Single-Center Experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2020; 110:1549-1556. [PMID: 32205113 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic root is a matter of concern in terms of prosthesis-patient mismatch. We evaluated the survival and hemodynamic performance after implantation of a small rapid-deployment aortic valve (EDWARDS INTUITY valve system sizes 19 and 21 mm). METHODS Between May 2010 and November 2018, 659 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who received a rapid-deployment valve were included in a prospective and ongoing database. A small aortic bioprosthesis (sizes 19 mm and 21 mm) was implanted in 217 (32.9%) patients (mean age 74.9 ± 7.9 years, 85.3% women). Preoperative characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. RESULTS Mean gradients at discharge and 1 year were 14.8 ± 5.6 mm Hg and 13.6 ± 4.9 mm Hg, respectively. Mean effective orifice area and the indexed effective orifice area at discharge were 1.55 ± 0.36 cm2 and 0.87 ± 0.22 cm2/m2, respectively, and prosthesis-patient mismatch occurred in 77 (35.5%) patients (25.8% moderate and 9.7% severe). Perioperative mortality was 1.8% (n = 4 of 217) and overall survival at 1 year and 5 years was 91% and 79%, respectively. The presence of any prosthesis-patient mismatch degree did not have a significant influence on overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.19; P = .638). At the last follow-up, mean New York Heart Association functional class was 1.5 ± 0.7 vs 2.8 ± 0.6 at baseline (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Surgical aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment valves has shown improved results concerning hemodynamic performance, with decreased rates of prosthesis-patient mismatch. We observed excellent early-term and midterm survival and a significant improvement in functional class in this subgroup of patients with a small annulus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliana Coti
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Haberl
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sabine Scherzer
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shiva Shabanian
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Binder
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alfred Kocher
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guenther Laufer
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Andreas
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lamelas J, Alnajar A. Recent advances in devices for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020; 17:201-208. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1732812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lamelas
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ahmed Alnajar
- Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Coti I, Schukro C, Drevinja F, Haberl T, Kaider A, Kocher A, Laufer G, Andreas M. Conduction disturbances following surgical aortic valve replacement with a rapid-deployment bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 162:803-811. [PMID: 32204909 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implantation of rapid-deployment aortic valves may interfere with the conduction system of the heart. This study evaluates the occurrence and predictive factors of conduction anomalies in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a rapid-deployment balloon-expandable bioprosthesis in a single-center, real-world experience. METHODS Between May 2010 and April 2019, 700 consecutive patients were included in a prospective, ongoing database with a longitudinal follow-up preoperatively, at discharge, and at 3 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years postoperatively. Thirty-seven patients (5.3%) had a permanent pacemaker at baseline and were excluded from further analysis, leaving 663 patients for analysis. Assessment of conduction anomalies was performed by electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring and repeated 12-lead ECG during the hospital stay and at postoperative follow-ups. RESULTS Preoperatively, 126 patients (19.0%) presented with different conduction disturbances. New permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) occurred in 61 patients during the first 14 days (cumulative incidence, 9.4%). The indication for PPI was complete atrioventricular block in 47 cases (77%). Preoperative conduction anomalies, such as right bundle branch block, as well as operative characteristics (concomitant procedures) were found to be independent predictors for new PPI. One-year survival was 98% in patients with new early PPI and 96% in those without new early PPI (P = .60). CONCLUSIONS The PPI rate was in the range of previous reports for rapid-deployment prostheses. PPI did not have a significant influence on short- to intermediate-term survival. Case selection with exclusion of patients presenting with baseline conduction disturbances may decrease the rate of new PPIs after SAVR with rapid-deployment balloon-expandable bioprostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliana Coti
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Schukro
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fitim Drevinja
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Haberl
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandra Kaider
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alfred Kocher
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guenther Laufer
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Martin Andreas
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|