1
|
Wang J, Bai Z, Chen B. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence Related to the Impact of Endovascular Repair Timing on Prognosis of Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 108:47-56. [PMID: 38960090 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.04.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to determine whether thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) timing is more beneficial in the acute phase (first 14 days) than in the subacute phase (14-90 days) for the administration of acute Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases (EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) until December 2023 to identify studies reporting the results of TEVAR used for patients with acute TBAD. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated utilizing either the random-effects model or the fixed-effects model. RESULTS A total of 25 studies involving 4,827 individuals with TBAD (including 1,609 with subacute TBAD) met our selection criteria. Early results revealed a lower incidence of Ia endoleaks (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.33; P = 0.04) and aortic ruptures (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 0.98-8.50; P = 0.05) in subacute TBAD. Apart from these findings, there was little difference in other incidents between the 2 groups. Regarding late outcomes, we observed significantly higher rates of retrograde dissection (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.04-4.34; P = 0.04), distal stent-induced new entry (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.61; P = 0.009), and reintervention (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.05-1.99; P = 0.02) in acute TBAD than in subacute TBAD, whereas no significant differences were found for other outcomes between the 2 groups. Also, TEVAR appeared to yield comparable results for false lumen thrombosis and true lumen regression in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Subacute TBAD repair with TEVAR demonstrates a more effective reduction in adverse event rates compared to immediate treatment in the acute phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University's Medical School, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Zhixuan Bai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University's Medical School, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Bing Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University's Medical School, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sá MP, Jacquemyn X, Brown JA, Ahmad D, Serna-Gallegos D, Arnaoutakis GJ, Singh MJ, Sultan I. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for hyperacute, acute, subacute and chronic type B aortic dissection: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2024; 34:479-485. [PMID: 38142754 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Since the optimal timing for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the context of type B aortic dissections (TBAD) remains an open question, we performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes of TEVAR according to the phases of TBAD - hyperacute, acute, subacute and chronic. We carried out a pooled meta-analysis of time-to-event data extracted from studies published by June 2023 for the following outcomes: all-cause mortality, aortic-related mortality, and late aortic reinterventions. Thirteen studies met our eligibility criteria, comprising 4,793 patients (10.3 % hyperacute, 51.9 % acute, 25.9 % subacute, 11.9 % chronic). Considering the overall population, we observed a statistically significant difference between the groups (Log-rank test, P < 0.0001) and the main differences were found in the following comparisons: hyperacute versus acute (HR 1.61; 95 %CI 1.21-2.13; P = 0.001); hyperacute versus chronic (HR 1.70; 95 %CI 1.17-2.46; P = 0.005); subacute versus acute (HR 0.78; 95 %CI 0.63-0.98; P = 0.032). Considering the population with uncomplicated TBAD, we also observed a statistically significant difference for all-cause death between the groups (Log-rank test, P < 0.0001) and the main differences were found in the comparisons for subacute versus acute (HR 0.72; 95 %CI 0.58-0.88; P = 0.002). Furthermore, we observed statistically significant differences between the groups for aortic-related death (Log-rank test, P < 0.0001) and late aortic reintervention (Log-rank test, P < 0.0001), all favoring mostly the subacute phase as the optimal timing for TEVAR. In conclusion, there seems to be a timing-specific difference in the outcomes of TEVAR for TBAD pointing to the subacute phase as the optimal timing to achieve better long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Pompeu Sá
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Xander Jacquemyn
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - James A Brown
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Danial Ahmad
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Derek Serna-Gallegos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - George J Arnaoutakis
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Michael J Singh
- UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahim Sultan
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yammine H, Clemons GA, Arko FR. Longer is better, discussing length of coverage and timing of intervention in type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech 2024; 10:101468. [PMID: 38591021 PMCID: PMC11000170 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Halim Yammine
- Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | | | - Frank R Arko
- Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang J, Hu X, Liu J, Liu J, Li T, Huang J, Yang Y, Fan R, Yang F, Luo S, Li J, Chen Z, Luo J. Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Secondary Aortic Intervention Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Dissection. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241255549. [PMID: 38804527 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241255549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary aortic intervention (SAI) following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is not uncommon. However, a satisfactory management system has not been established for these patients. We aimed to report our single-center experience with SAI after prior TEVAR for type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS From January 2010 to May 2017, 860 eligible patients with TBAD underwent TEVAR. One hundred seven (12.4%) patients required SAI, either endovascularly (n=76) or surgically (n=31). The main indications for SAI were entry flow (n=58 [54.2%]), aneurysm expansion of the proximal or remote aorta (n=26 [24.3%]), retrograde type A aortic dissection (n=11 [10.3%]), distal stent-graft-induced new entry tear (n=6 [5.6%]), and stent migration (n=4 [3.7%]). The Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine the degree of freedom from SAI and the prognosis. Cox proportional hazards were used to screen for risk factors for SAI and poor prognosis. RESULTS The overall 30-day mortality rate after SAI was 4.7% (n=5): endovascular (n=2 [2.6%]) vs open surgery (n=3 [9.7%]; p=0.145). The cumulative survival rates with or without SAI were 86.3%±3.6% vs 95.7%±0.8% at 3 years and 82.0%±4.2% vs 92.2%±1.1% at 5 years, respectively (log-rank p<0.001). Although no significant difference in survival was observed, the incidence of SAI was significantly greater in patients who underwent TEVAR during the chronic phase (acute [11.6%] vs subacute [9.6%] vs chronic [27.8]; p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that prior TEVAR in the chronic phase (hazard ratio [HR]=1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.03-2.90; p=0.039), maximum aortic diameter (HR=1.05, 95% CI=1.04-1.07; p<0.001), and arch involvement (HR=1.48, 95% CI=1.01-2.18; p=0.048) were predictors of the incidence of SAI. In addition, the maximum aortic diameter was demonstrated to be the only risk factor for prognosis after adjusting for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic TBAD patients should be reconsidered. Open surgery is preferable for those with proximal progression, whereas endovascular treatment is more suitable for distal lesions. Close surveillance and timely reintervention after TEVAR, whether via endovascular techniques or open surgery, are necessary to prevent devastating complications. CLINICAL IMPACT The management of patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is challenging. We summarized our single-center experience regarding secondary aortic intervention after TEVAR for TBAD. We found that TEVAR for chronic TBAD patients should be carefully evaulated, and open surgery is recommended for those with proximal progession, while endovascular treatment is more preferable for distal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jizhong Wang
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaolu Hu
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jitao Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing Huang
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruixin Fan
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Songyuan Luo
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhengbo Chen
- Department of Vascular and Plastic Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianfang Luo
- Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Naito N, Takagi H. Optimal Timing of Pre-emptive Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Network Meta-Analysis. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241245282. [PMID: 38590280 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241245282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This network meta-analysis compares outcomes of optimal medical therapy (OMT) and pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection at different phases of chronicity. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through November 2023. Pooled short-term outcomes (short-term mortality, perioperative complications) and long-term outcomes (all-cause mortality, aortic-related mortality, aortic re-intervention rates) were calculated. RESULTS Systematic review identified 17 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 3 propensity score matching, and 2 inverse probability weighting). Subacute-phase intervention had lower short-term mortality than the acute-phase (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval [CI]]=0.60 [0.38-0.94], p=0.027). No significant differences were observed in aortic rupture and paraplegia. Acute-phase TEVAR had a higher stroke incidence than subacute-phase intervention (HR [95% CI]=2.63 [1.36-5.09], p=0.042), chronic (HR [95% CI]=2.5 [1.03-6.2], p=0.043), and OMT (HR [95% CI]=1.57 [1.12-2.18], p=0.008). Acute-phase TEVAR had higher long-term all-cause mortality than subacute-phase intervention (HR [95% CI]=1.34 [1.03-1.74], p=0.03). Optimal medical therapy had elevated long-term all-cause mortality compared with subacute-phase TEVAR (HR [95% CI]=1.67 [1.25-2.33], p<0.001) and increased long-term aortic-related mortality vs acute-phase (HR [95% CI]=2.08 [1.31-3.31], p=0.002) and subacute-phase (HR [95% CI]=2.6 [1.62-4.18], p<0.01) interventions. No significant differences were observed in aortic re-intervention rates. CONCLUSIONS Pre-emptive TEVAR may offer lower all-cause mortality and aortic-related mortality than OMT. Considering lower short-term mortality, perioperative stroke rate, and long-term mortality, our findings support pre-emptive TEVAR during the subacute phase. CLINICAL IMPACT The optimal timing of pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection remains uncertain. This network meta-analysis suggests that the subacute phase (14-90 days from symptom onset) emerges as the optimal timing for pre-emptive TEVAR. This window is associated with lower rates of short-term complications and higher long-term survival rates compared with alternative strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noritsugu Naito
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Hisato Takagi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kang M, Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Meng Y, Zhang J, Tian H. Predicting adverse events after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with type B aortic dissection. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8057. [PMID: 38580650 PMCID: PMC10997599 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58106-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
The potential of adverse events (AEs) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) has been reported. To avoid the occurrence of AEs, it is important to recognize high-risk population for prevention in advance. The data of 261 patients with TBAD who received TEVAR between June 2017 and June 2021 at our medical center were retrospectively reviewed. After the implementation of exclusion criteria, 172 patients were finally included, and after 2.8 years (range from 1 day to 5.8 years) of follow up, they were divided into AEs (n = 41) and non-AEs (n = 131) groups. We identified the predictors of AEs, and a prediction model was constructed to calculate the specific risk of postoperative AEs at 1, 2, and 3 years, and to stratify patients into high-risk (n = 78) and low-risk (n = 94) group. The prediction model included seven predictors: Age > 75 years, Lower extremity malperfusion (LEM), NT-proBNP > 330 pg/ml, None distal tear, the ratio between the diameter of the ascending aorta and descending aorta (A/D ratio) > 1.2, the ratio of the area of the false lumen to the total aorta (FL ratio) > 64%, and acute TEVAR, which exhibited excellent predictive accuracy performance and discriminatory ability with C statistic of 82.3% (95% CI 77.3-89.2%). The prediction model was contributed to identify high-risk patients of postoperative AEs, which may serve to achievement of personalized treatment and follow-up plans for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengyang Kang
- Department of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - You Li
- Department of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yiman Zhang
- Department of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yang Zhao
- Department of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yan Meng
- Department of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China
| | - Junbo Zhang
- Department of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Hongyan Tian
- Department of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 277, Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lopes A, Gouveia E Melo R, Amorim P, Fernandes E Fernandes R, Mendes Pedro L. Current perspectives in acute type B aortic dissections: a literature review. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2024; 65:132-138. [PMID: 37255494 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.23.12636-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
In this new millennial, endovascular strategies have revolutionized the treatment of acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD). With reduced in-hospital mortality and good long-term outcomes TEVAR has become the gold standard for the treatment of complicated dissection and is gaining increasing support for its preventive applicability in some uncomplicated dissections. With this new paradigm came a shift of the treatment goal where just covering the entry tear is not enough and instead achieving long-term positive thoracoabdominal remodeling is needed. More extensive approaches with composite device designs (covered stent graft and bare metal stent) emerged to answer this aortic conundrum. At 5-year of follow-up, "Provisional ExTension To Induce COmplete Attachment technique" (PETTICOAT) and its evolution "Stent assisted balloon induced intimal disruption and relamination in aortic dissection repair" (STABILISE) seem to be safe techniques that can allow, when anatomically feasible, excellent aortic remodeling and, in some cases, even the healing of the dissection. Nevertheless, STABILISE results, although promising, are mostly based on small series and therefore need to be validated by analyzing medium-long-term results from the international registry. Given the plethora of new data and the disparity of expert opinions on the best treatment to adopt, in this review we aim to summarize the current knowledge on the results of these different strategies for acute TBAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Lopes
- Division of Heart and Vessels, Department of Vascular Surgery, Saint Mary's Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal -
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal -
- Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon (CCUL), Lisbon, Portugal -
| | - Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Division of Heart and Vessels, Department of Vascular Surgery, Saint Mary's Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon (CCUL), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pedro Amorim
- Division of Heart and Vessels, Department of Vascular Surgery, Saint Mary's Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
- Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon (CCUL), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ruy Fernandes E Fernandes
- Division of Heart and Vessels, Department of Vascular Surgery, Saint Mary's Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon (CCUL), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luís Mendes Pedro
- Division of Heart and Vessels, Department of Vascular Surgery, Saint Mary's Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
- Cardiovascular Center of the University of Lisbon (CCUL), Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen D, Fang K, Luo M, Shu C. Timing of Intervention and Long-Term Outcomes of Type B Aortic Intramural Hematoma with Intimal Disruption at Admission. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 101:29-40. [PMID: 38128692 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the 30-day and long-term outcomes between patients with concomitant type B intramural hematoma and intimal disruption upon admission who underwent endovascular repair in the acute or subacute phases. METHODS Data were extracted from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019. Logistic regression and Cox regression were performed to evaluate the impact of timing of intervention on 30-day and long-term outcomes, respectively. RESULTS The study included 241 patients, among which 159 were in the acute group. No significant difference was observed in 30-day mortality (0.6% vs. 0%, P = 1), 30-day complication rate (2.5% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.664), long-term all-cause mortality (10.7% vs. 7.3%, P = 0.540), and aortic reintervention rate (2.5% vs. 2.4%, P = 1) between the acute and subacute group. In multivariable analysis, the timing of intervention was not associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 0, 95% confidence interval CI: 0-Inf, P = 0.999), 30-day complication (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.02-3.77, P = 0.348), long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.20-1.61, P = 0.283), and aortic reintervention (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.15-6.08, P = 0.970). CONCLUSIONS For patients with concomitant type B intramural hematoma and intimal disruption upon admission, there is no significant difference in 30-day and long-term outcomes between those who undergo endovascular treatment in the acute or subacute phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Chen
- Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Fang
- Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Mingyao Luo
- Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chang Shu
- Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang B, Miao M, Shi Q, Xian H, Wang J, Cao Y. The Role of Endovascular Repair Timing in Uncomplicated Acute Type B Intramural Hematoma Management. Ann Vasc Surg 2024; 99:233-241. [PMID: 37802137 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With favorable results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with uncomplicated acute type B intramural hematoma (uTBIMH), TEVAR is increasingly utilized in the management of patients with uTBIMH. However, optimal timing for intervention has not been decided. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of acute and delayed TEVAR in patients with uTBIMH. METHODS We included patients with uTBIMH who underwent TEVAR between October 2014 and December 2021. The participants were divided into the acute TEVAR (aTEVAR) and delayed TEVAR (dTEVAR) groups. We analyzed the total aortic diameter (TAD)/true lumen diameter (TLD) ratio on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and aortic-related adverse events and all-cause mortality (AREM). RESULTS We included 34 individuals with uTBIMH, among which 20 underwent aTEVAR and 14 underwent dTEVAR. We observed no significant differences in baseline characteristics between both groups. However, compared with the aTEVAR group, better aortic remodeling was achieved in the dTEVAR group before discharge (1.32 ± 0.11 vs. 1.21 ± 0.09, P = 0.005) and at the 1-year follow-up (1.18 ± 0.09 vs. 1.10 ± 0.04, P = 0.034). Although the 30-day and 1-year follow-up outcomes of AREM were not significantly different, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that AREM incidence in the dTEVAR group was significantly lower than that in the aTEVAR group (85.7% for dTEVAR vs. 65.0% for aTEVAR, log-rank P = 0.20). Moreover, subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in the TAD/TLD ratio between the aTEVAR and dTEVAR groups in individuals without a focal intimal disruption (1.33 ± 0.11 vs. 1.17 ± 0.09, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS For individuals with uTBIMH, delaying TEVAR by >7 days improved aortic remodeling and lowered the incidence of early AREM. Additionally, the absence of focal intimal disruption on preoperative CTA supports delayed intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, China.
| | - Miao Miao
- Department of Endocrinology, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, China
| | - Qiulin Shi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, China
| | - Haiying Xian
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, China
| | - Jinxing Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, China
| | - Yuecheng Cao
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Harrison International Peace Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang Y, Zhao WX, Li YJ. Re: "Optimal Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:179-180. [PMID: 37567341 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Centre of Gerontology, Beijing, China; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Xin Zhao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Centre of Gerontology, Beijing, China; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Yong-Jun Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Centre of Gerontology, Beijing, China; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China; Peking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China; Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ogino H, Iida O, Akutsu K, Chiba Y, Hayashi H, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Kaji S, Kato M, Komori K, Matsuda H, Minatoya K, Morisaki H, Ohki T, Saiki Y, Shigematsu K, Shiiya N, Shimizu H, Azuma N, Higami H, Ichihashi S, Iwahashi T, Kamiya K, Katsumata T, Kawaharada N, Kinoshita Y, Matsumoto T, Miyamoto S, Morisaki T, Morota T, Nanto K, Nishibe T, Okada K, Orihashi K, Tazaki J, Toma M, Tsukube T, Uchida K, Ueda T, Usui A, Yamanaka K, Yamauchi H, Yoshioka K, Kimura T, Miyata T, Okita Y, Ono M, Ueda Y. JCS/JSCVS/JATS/JSVS 2020 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Dissection. Circ J 2023; 87:1410-1621. [PMID: 37661428 DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-22-0794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hitoshi Ogino
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University
| | - Osamu Iida
- Cardiovascular Center, Kansai Rosai Hospital
| | - Koichi Akutsu
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | - Yoshiro Chiba
- Department of Cardiology, Mito Saiseikai General Hospital
| | | | | | - Shuichiro Kaji
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kansai Electric Power Hospital
| | - Masaaki Kato
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Morinomiya Hospital
| | - Kimihiro Komori
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Hitoshi Matsuda
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Kenji Minatoya
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | | | - Takao Ohki
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine
| | - Yoshikatsu Saiki
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University
| | - Kunihiro Shigematsu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital
| | - Norihiko Shiiya
- First Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
| | | | - Nobuyoshi Azuma
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University
| | - Hirooki Higami
- Department of Cardiology, Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital
| | | | - Toru Iwahashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University
| | - Kentaro Kamiya
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University
| | - Takahiro Katsumata
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka Medical College
| | - Nobuyoshi Kawaharada
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
| | | | - Takuya Matsumoto
- Department of Vascular Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare
| | | | - Takayuki Morisaki
- Department of General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, the Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo
| | - Tetsuro Morota
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | | | - Toshiya Nishibe
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical University
| | - Kenji Okada
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
| | | | - Junichi Tazaki
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | - Masanao Toma
- Department of Cardiology, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
| | - Takuro Tsukube
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kobe Hospital
| | - Keiji Uchida
- Cardiovascular Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center
| | - Tatsuo Ueda
- Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School
| | - Akihiko Usui
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kazuo Yamanaka
- Cardiovascular Center, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center
| | - Haruo Yamauchi
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital
| | | | - Takeshi Kimura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University
| | | | - Yutaka Okita
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Minoru Ono
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhao W, Yang Y, Wu Z, Chen Z, Diao Y, Lan Y, Li Y. Endovascular repair of acute vs. subacute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1189750. [PMID: 37502183 PMCID: PMC10369003 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1189750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the optimal timing for endovascular repair of acute versus subacute uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. Method PubMed, EMBASE, web of science and Cochrane Library was interrogated to identify Electronic bibliographic studies updated to January 2023 to collect studies compared the clinical outcomes of endovascular repair for Acute Versus Subacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. Data were aggregated as pooled odds ratios (OR) using the fixed or random effects models according to the significance of heterogeneity, Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated by RevMan 5.3 and applied with fixed or random-effect models. Result A comprehensive literature search found 322 citations published and finally among them 6 studies containing 3,769 patients (acute group 2,642, subacute group 1,127) were included in review. There is an increased risk of 30-day complications (OR = 1.51,95%CI,1.26-1.81) 30-day mortality (OR = 2.39,95%CI, 1.55-3.67) and 1-year mortality (OR = 1.71,95%CI,1.27-2.30) for an acute uTBAD group compared to subacute ones. Similarly, reintervention was more likely in the acute group than in the subacute group (OR = 1.42,95%CI,1.05-1.91). However, no significant differences were found in long-term mortality. Conclusion This meta-analysis confirmed that there was no significant difference in the long-term prognosis between the acute and subacute phases in the timing of surgery. However, considering the high incidence of complications, high re-intervention rate and one-year mortality probably caused by high intima fragility in the acute phase, endovascular repair at subacute phase appears to favorably compare with acute strategy. But future studies with adequate patient numbers and longer-term follow-up are necessary to further verify the study conclusion. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021247609, identifier PROSPERO CRD42021247609.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- WenXin Zhao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - ZhiYuan Wu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - ZuoGuan Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - YongPeng Diao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Lan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - YongJun Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Saricilar EC, Patel K, Gatmaitan R, Puttaswamy V. Editor's Choice - Optimal Timing of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 65:851-860. [PMID: 36871923 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.02.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Type B aortic dissections (TBAD) have a high mortality rate and are challenging to both classify and manage. There is significant evidence supporting the use of early intervention in complicated TBAD with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Currently, there is equipoise regarding the optimal timing for TEVAR in TBAD. This systematic review answers whether early TEVAR in the hyperacute or acute phase of the disease has improved aorta related events in the one year follow up period with no change in mortality rate when compared with TEVAR in the subacute or chronic phase. DATA SOURCES A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search guidelines for MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Reviews until 12 April 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria targeting the review objective and high quality research were employed by separate authors. REVIEW METHODS These studies were then reviewed for suitability, risk of bias, and heterogeneity using the ROBINS-I tool. Results were extracted for the meta-analysis with RevMan using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals with I2 used to assess heterogeneity. RESULTS Twenty articles were included. A meta-analysis showed no significant difference between acute phase TEVAR (excluding the hyperacute phase) and subacute or chronic phase TEVAR for the all cause 30 day and one year mortality rates. Aorta related events in the 30 day post-operative period were unaffected by the timing of intervention but had significant improvement in aorta related events in the one year follow up favouring TEVAR in the acute phase compared with subacute or chronic phase. Risk of confounding was high but with low heterogeneity. CONCLUSION Without prospective randomised controlled studies, it is evident that there is improved aortic remodelling in long term follow up with intervention in the acute setting from three to 14 days after symptom onset. This suggests that TEVAR in the acute period of TBAD is both safe and beneficial, and can be considered for early stent grafting based on clinical, anatomical and patient factors.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Halloum N, Scali S, Kriege M, Abualia M, Stamenovic D, Bashar Izzat M, Bohan P, Kloeckner R, Oezkur M, Dorweiler B, Treede H, El Beyrouti H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with type B aortic dissection. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e32944. [PMID: 37058052 PMCID: PMC10101253 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000032944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) is a devastating complication of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) with low incidence but high mortality. The objective of this study is to report the incidence, mortality, potential risk factors, clinical manifestation and diagnostic modalities, and medical and surgical treatments. METHODS A systematic review and single-arm and two-arm meta-analyses evaluated all published reports of RTAD post-TEVAR through January 2021. All study types were included, except study protocols and animal studies, without time restrictions. Outcomes of interest were procedural data (implanted stent-grafts type, and proximal stent-graft oversizing), the incidence of RTAD, associated mortality rate, clinical manifestations, diagnostic workouts and therapeutic management. RESULTS RTAD occurred in 285 out of 10,600 patients: an estimated RTAD incidence of 2.3% (95% CI: 1.9-2.8); incidence of early RTAD was approximately 1.8 times higher than late. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing showed that the proportion of RTAD patients with acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD) was significantly higher than those with chronic TBAD (P = .008). Pooled meta-analysis showed that the incidence of RTAD with proximal bare stent TEVAR was 2.1-fold higher than with non-bare stents: risk ratio was 1.55 (95% CI: 0.87-2.75; P = .13). Single arm meta-analysis estimated a mortality rate of 42.2% (95% CI: 32.5-51.8), with an I2 heterogeneity of 70.11% (P < .001). CONCLUSION RTAD is rare after TEVAR but with high mortality, especially in the first month post-TEVAR with acute TBAD patients at greater risk as well as those treated with proximal bare stent endografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Nancy Halloum
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Salvatore Scali
- Division Vascular Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
| | - Marc Kriege
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mohannad Abualia
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Davor Stamenovic
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Academic Thoracic Center Mainz, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | | | - Roman Kloeckner
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mehmet Oezkur
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Bernhard Dorweiler
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany
| | - Hendrik Treede
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| | - Hazem El Beyrouti
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz), Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen B, Zhang R, Liu H, Chen Y, Wang Z, Wei M. Efficacy of endovascular repair in the treatment of retrograde ascending aortic intramural haematoma. J Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 18:130. [PMID: 37041651 PMCID: PMC10091647 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-023-02234-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current treatment for retrograde ascending aortic intramural hematoma (RAIMH) remains challenging. This study aims to summarize the short-term results of endovascular repair in the treatment of retrograde ascending aortic intramural hematoma. METHODS Between June 2019 and June 2021, 21 patients (16 males and 5 females) with a retrograde ascending aortic intramural hematoma, aged 53 ± 14years, received an endovascular repair in our hospital. All cases involved an ascending aortic or aortic arch intramural hematoma. 15 patients had an ulcer on the descending aorta combined with an intramural hematoma in the ascending aorta and 6 patients had typical dissection changes on the descending aorta combined with an intramural hematoma in the ascending aorta. All patients had a successful endovascular stent-graft repair, with 10 cases operated on in the acute phase (<14 days) and 11 cases in the chronic phase (14-35 days). RESULTS A single-branched aortic stent graft system was implanted in 10 cases, a straight stent in 2 cases, and a fenestrated stent in 9 cases. All surgeries were technically successful. One of the patients developed a new rupture 2 weeks after surgery and was converted to a total arch replacement. No perioperative stroke, paraplegia, stent fracture or displacement, limb or abdominal organ ischemia occurred. The intramural hematomas started being absorbed on CT angiography images before discharge. There was no incidence of postoperative 30-day mortality, and the intramural hematomas in the ascending aorta and aortic arch were fully or partly absorbed. CONCLUSION Endovascular repair of retrograde ascending aortic intramural hematoma was shown to be safe and effective, and correlated with favorable short-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bailang Chen
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Haibing Liu
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yao Chen
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Zanxin Wang
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| | - Minxin Wei
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Preemptive fenestrated endovascular repair aimed at perfusion of cervical branches in acute type B aortic dissection. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 71:339-346. [PMID: 36414798 DOI: 10.1007/s11748-022-01886-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Most of the entry tears of uncomplicated type B aortic dissection are located in the distal arch and extends in a retrograde manner to the level of the left subclavian artery. Our objective was to evaluate feasibility and effectiveness using fenestrated sent graft with complete neck vessel preservation to treat uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. SUBJECTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the record of patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection who underwent fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair in subacute phase (15-90 days) between August 2016 and April 2020. The Najuta fenestrated stent graft was placed proximally beyond he left subclavian artery (zone 0-2) in an attempt to seal the entry while preserving the neck vessels. RESULTS We evaluated 9 cases (male: 7, female: 2; median age 70 years). The median distance from the LSA to the proximal entry was 37 mm. The landing zones of the proximal end of the Najuta were zone 0: 3, zone 1: 2, and zone 2: 4 cases. Technical success was 100% with no 30-day death. None of the patients had a stroke, paraplegia or retrograde dissection, and no endoleak was observed. Complete aortic remodeling with false lumen resolution was obtained in all cases while each fenestrated vessels remained patent during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION Preemptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair aimed at perfusion of cervical branches using the Najuta fenestrated stent is safe and effective and may be considered as a reasonable treatment option for the treatment is a safe and an effective treatment.
Collapse
|
17
|
Vacirca A, Dias Neto M, Baghbani-Oskouei A, Huang Y, Tenorio ER, Estrera A, Oderich GS. Timing of Intervention for Aortic Intramural Hematoma. Ann Vasc Surg 2022:S0890-5096(22)00614-8. [PMID: 36309166 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.09.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Intramural hematoma (IMH) is one of the acute aortic syndromes along with acute aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer. The three conditions can occur alone or in combination with overlapping presentation. Medical, open surgical, and endovascular treatment is tailored depending on clinical presentation, timing, and location within the aorta. Among patients who present with acute IMH affecting the ascending aorta (Type A), urgent open surgical repair is considered the primary line of treatment in patients who are suitable candidates and unstable. The management of IMH in the descending aorta and aortic arch (Type B) is similar to that applied to treat acute dissections in the same segment. Medical treatment with sequential imaging is recommended in patients with uncomplicated course, and endovascular repair is indicated in patients with rupture, persistent pain, end-organ ischemia, or rapid aortic enlargement. This review discusses the ideal timing for treatment of IMH.
Collapse
|
18
|
Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Dissections Based Upon Chronicity. J Vasc Surg 2022; 76:1458-1465. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
19
|
Yang Y, Zhang XH, Chen ZG, Diao YP, Wu ZY, Li YJ. Acute or Subacute, the Optimal Timing for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:852628. [PMID: 35592122 PMCID: PMC9110682 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.852628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the optimal timing (acute or subacute) of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for uncomplicated B aortic dissection (uTBAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Method A comprehensive literature search was undertaken across three major databases (EMBASE/Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) and was assessed until November 2021 to identify studies reporting the outcomes of TEVAR utilized to treat patients with uTBAD. The continuous variables were compared between the two groups using t-test and the categorical variables were compared using the χ2-test. A meta-analysis was used to produce pooled odds ratios for early and follow-up outcomes. The random effects models were applied. A statistical analysis was performed using R software v.4.1. Result A comprehensive literature search found 490 citations published within the predetermined time span of the analysis. Three studies including 1,193 patients (acute group 718, subacute group 475) were finally included for downstream meta-analysis. An acute uTBAD group presented with higher rates both in 30-day complications (20.5 vs. 13.7%; p = 0.014) and mortality (4.6 vs. 1.3%; p = 0.004) than subacute group. The respiratory complications were significantly higher in the acute group than in the subacute group (10.8 vs. 5.0%; p = 0.015). The procedure success rate (90.8 vs. 93.6%; p = 0.329), the follow-up mortality (7.7 vs. 7.6%; p = 1) and dissection-related late mortality (3.9 vs. 5.3%; p = 0.603) showed no significant difference. Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggested that despite significantly higher 30-day complications and 30-day mortality in the acute uTBAD group, there was no significant difference in the follow-up mortality between the two groups. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021247609.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Yong-Jun Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
MacGillivray TE, Gleason TG, Patel HJ, Aldea GS, Bavaria JE, Beaver TM, Chen EP, Czerny M, Estrera AL, Firestone S, Fischbein MP, Hughes GC, Hui DS, Kissoon K, Lawton JS, Pacini D, Reece TB, Roselli EE, Stulak J. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of type B aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 163:1231-1249. [PMID: 35090765 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas G Gleason
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich
| | - Gabriel S Aldea
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash
| | - Joseph E Bavaria
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Thomas M Beaver
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla
| | - Edward P Chen
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Martin Czerny
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anthony L Estrera
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Tex
| | | | - Michael P Fischbein
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - G Chad Hughes
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Dawn S Hui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex
| | | | - Jennifer S Lawton
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md
| | - Davide Pacini
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - T Brett Reece
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Eric E Roselli
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John Stulak
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
MacGillivray TE, Gleason TG, Patel HJ, Aldea GS, Bavaria JE, Beaver TM, Chen EP, Czerny M, Estrera AL, Firestone S, Fischbein MP, Hughes GC, Hui DS, Kissoon K, Lawton JS, Pacini D, Reece TB, Roselli EE, Stulak J. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American Association for Thoracic Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Type B Aortic Dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2022; 113:1073-1092. [PMID: 35090687 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas G Gleason
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Gabriel S Aldea
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joseph E Bavaria
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas M Beaver
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Edward P Chen
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Martin Czerny
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anthony L Estrera
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Michael P Fischbein
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - G Chad Hughes
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Dawn S Hui
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Jennifer S Lawton
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Davide Pacini
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - T Brett Reece
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Eric E Roselli
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John Stulak
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lou X, Chen EP, Duwayri YM, Jordan WD, Keeling WB, Leshnower BG. Early results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the management of acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 35:289-297. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
23
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Br J Surg 2022; 109:810-811. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
24
|
Jubouri M, Bashir M, Tan SZCP, Bailey D, Anderson R, Nienaber CA, Coselli JS, Williams I. What is the optimal timing for thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection? J Card Surg 2021; 37:993-1001. [PMID: 34967980 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uncomplicated Stanford Type B aortic dissection (un-TBAD) is characterized by a tear in the aorta distal to the left subclavian artery without ascending aorta and arch involvement. Optimized cardiovascular control (blood pressure and heart rate) is the current gold standard treatment according to current international guidelines. However, emerging evidence indicates that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is both safe and effective in the treatment of un-TBAD with improved long-term survival outcomes in combination with optimal medical therapy (OMT) relative to OMT alone. However, the optimal timeframe for intervention is not entirely clarified. AIMS This review critically addresses current state-of-the-art comparing TEVAR with OMT and corresponding clinical outcomes for un-TBAD based on timing of intervention. METHODS We carried out a comprehensive literature search on multiple electronic databases including PUBMED and Scopus to collate all research evidence on timing of TEVAR in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection. RESULTS TEVAR has proven to be a safe and effective treatment for un-TBAD in combination with OMT through comparable survival outcomes, improved aortic remodeling, and relatively low periprocedural added risks. Though the timing of intervention remains controversial, it is becoming clear that performing TEVAR during the subacute phase of un-TBAD yields better outcomes compared to earlier and delayed (>90 days) intervention. CONCLUSIONS Further research is required into both short- and long-term outcomes of TEVAR in addition to its optimal therapeutic window for un-TBAD. With stronger evidence, TEVAR is likely to be adopted as the gold-standard intervention for un-TBAD with definitive timeframe guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Jubouri
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mohamad Bashir
- Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Velindre University NHS Trust, Health Education & Improvement Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Sven Z C P Tan
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Damian Bailey
- Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | - Richard Anderson
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | - Christoph A Nienaber
- Cardiology and Aortic Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph S Coselli
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.,CHI St Luke's-Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ian Williams
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Le Huu A, Preventza O. Endovascular repair of acute type B thoracic aortic dissection. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 10:793-800. [PMID: 34926184 DOI: 10.21037/acs-2021-taes-26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Approximately one-third of patients with acute Stanford type B or DeBakey type III aortic dissection (TBAD) will develop complications, including persistent symptoms, malperfusion, enlarging aneurysms and impending rupture. In these cases, TBAD becomes a surgical emergency that requires endovascular intervention to complement the medical therapy. The immediate goal of endovascular therapy is to reestablish flow to the true lumen, stabilize the aneurysm and prevent rupture. Long-term goals are the remodeling of the descending thoracic aorta and the prevention of further surgeries in the thoracoabdominal aorta. In this report, we describe our step-by-step endovascular approach to TBAD repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Le Huu
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ourania Preventza
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.,Section of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Xiang D, Wu F, Chen L, Liang H, Xiong B, Liang B, Yang F, Zheng C. Timing of endovascular repair impacts long-term outcomes of uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 2021; 75:851-860.e3. [PMID: 34592378 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the 5-year outcomes of acute versus subacute thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). METHODS Between March 2008 and September 2018, 238 consecutive patients with uncomplicated ATBAD underwent TEVAR in the acute or subacute phase and were analyzed retrospectively. The primary end points were all-cause death and aortic-related death. The secondary end point was a composite of the outcomes of death from any cause, rupture, new dissection, retrograde type A aortic dissection, endoleak, and late reintervention. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics. Weight-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimate with landmark analysis and weighted Cox model were performed to assess time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS In the inverse probability treatment weighting-adjusted population, the 30-day mortality was 1.5% in the acute TEVAR group and 0% in the subacute TEVAR group (P = .24). The incidence of 30-day adverse events occurred in 16.8% and 6.9% patients in the acute TEVAR and subacute TEVAR groups, respectively (P = .13). At 5 years, there was no statistically significant difference in all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-3.81; P = .39) and aortic-related death (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.34-3.60; P = .86) between the two groups. The composite outcomes occurred in 30 patients (23.0%) in the acute TEVAR group and 18 patients (22.3%) in the subacute TEVAR group, respectively (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.36-1.25; P = .20). However, a landmark analysis of the composite outcomes indicated that there was a significant interaction between treatment effect and time (Pinteraction = .01), with a significantly higher incidence of the composite outcomes in the acute TEVAR group compared with the subacute TEVAR group within 1 year (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.79; P = .02), and a comparable rate between 1 and 5 years (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.56-2.76; P = .59). CONCLUSIONS At the 5-year follow-up, no significant differences exist in the all-cause death and aortic-related death between acute and subacute TEVAR. However, acute TEVAR is associated with an increased rate of severe complications within 1 year, which suggests that performing TEVAR in the subacute phase of ATBAD may be the preferable option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongqiao Xiang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Feihong Wu
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Chen
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Huimin Liang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Bin Xiong
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Bin Liang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China.
| | - Chuansheng Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Makhija RR, Mukherjee D. Endovascular therapies for Type B Aortic Dissection. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets 2021; 21:167-178. [PMID: 34565325 DOI: 10.2174/1871529x21666210924141446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition resulting from a tear in the intimal layer of the aorta, requiring emergent diagnosis and prompt multi-disciplinary management strategy for best patient outcomes. While type A dissection involving ascending aorta is best managed surgically due to high early mortality, type B aortic dissection (TBAD) involving descending aorta generally has better outcomes with conservative management and medical therapy as primary strategy is favored. However, there has been a recent paradigm shift in management of TBAD due to late aneurysmal degeneration of TBAD increasing morbidity and mortality at longer-term. Late surgical intervention can be prevented by early endovascular intervention when combined with optimal medical therapy. In this narrative review, we explore available literature on different endovascular therapies for TBAD in different populations of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhee R Makhija
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University, El Paso. United States
| | - Debabrata Mukherjee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Texas Tech University, El Paso, United States. United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
IMPACT OF THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR TIMING ON AORTIC REMODELING IN ACUTE TYPE B AORTIC INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA. J Vasc Surg 2021; 75:464-472.e2. [PMID: 34506888 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is increasingly utilized in the management of acute type B aortic intramural hematoma (TBIMH). Optimal timing for intervention has not been described. The aim of this study was to evaluate TEVAR timing on post-operative aortic remodeling. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent TEVAR for TBIMH from January 2008 to September 2018. Imaging was reviewed pre- and postoperatively. Primary data points included true lumen diameter (TLD) and total aortic diameter (TAD) at the site of maximal pathology. Primary endpoint was aortic remodeling evidenced by a TAD/TLD ratio closest to 1.0. Secondary outcome was occurrence of aortic-related adverse events and mortality (AREM): aortic rupture, aortic-related death, progression to dissection or need for aortic re-intervention within 12 months. Patients undergoing emergent TEVAR (within 24 hours, 'eTEVAR') were compared to the remainder - delayed TEVAR ('dTEVAR'). RESULTS We analyzed 71 patients that underwent TEVAR FOR TBIMH; 25 underwent emergent TEVAR and 46 patients underwent dTEVAR (median: 5.5 days, range: 2-120 days). There were no differences in demographics and comorbidities and patients did not differ in presenting IMH thickness (12.6±3.1 mm vs. 11.3±4.1 mm, p=0.186) nor presenting TAD/TLD ratio (1.535±0.471 vs. 1.525±0.397, p=0.928) for eTEVAR and dTEVAR groups, respectively. eTEVAR patients had larger average presenting maximal descending aortic (DTA) diameter (45.8±14.3 mm vs. 38.2±7.5 mm, p=0.018) and higher incidence of penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) on presenting CT angiography (52.0% vs 21.7%, p=0.033). Thirty day mortality was 2/25 (8.0%) for eTEVAR and 2/45 (4.4%) for dTEVAR (p=0.602). Postoperative aortic remodeling was more complete in the dTEVAR group (1.23±0.12 vs. 1.33±0.15, p=0.004). Case-control matching (controlling for presenting DTA diameter and PAU) on 30 patients still showed better aortic remodeling in the dTEVAR group (1.125±0.100 vs 1.348±0.42, p<0.001). The incidence of AREM was higher in the eTEVAR - 6/25 (24.0%) - group compared to the dTEVAR group - 2/46 (4.3%). At 12 months, freedom from AREM was higher in the dTEVAR group (95.7% vs. 76.0%, p=0.011). Postoperative TAD/TLD ratio was the best predictor for late aortic-related adverse events (AUROC=0.825, p=0.003). CONCLUSION TEVAR for acute type B IMH within 24 hours of admission is associated with lower aortic remodeling and higher occurrence of late aortic related adverse events and mortality. Delaying TEVAR when clinically possible could improve aortic remodeling and aortic-related outcomes.
Collapse
|
29
|
Li J, Zhang X, Peng Y, Wang L, Wang T, Li X, He H, Li Q, Shu C. Endovascular repair for retrograde type A intramural hematoma with focal intimal disruption in descending aorta. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:4250-4259. [PMID: 34422353 PMCID: PMC8339735 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background This study aims to report the experience of a single center using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to treat retrograde type A intramural hematoma (IMH) with focal intimal disruption (FID) in descending aorta. Methods A total of 24 consecutive patients with retrograde type A IMH and complicated with FID in descending aorta underwent TEVAR in our center from 2015 to 2020. Their clinical data, imaging manifestation and follow-up results were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results The median age of patients was 57.9 years (range, 42–80 years) and 18 were men (75%). As the preoperative CT angiography showed, the 24 patients developed IMH complicated with different kinds of FIDs in descending aorta [5 had intramural blood pool (IBP), 15 had ulcer-like projection (ULP), 2 had penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU), and 5 had localized dissection]. Successful deployment of aortic stent graft was achieved in all patients. There was no endoleak, stent graft migration, spinal cord ischemia, stroke, or 30-day mortality observed after TEVAR. The median duration of follow-up was 30.0 months (range, 3–60 months). As the last follow-up CT angiography showed, most of the patients (23 in 24, 96%) had favorable aortic remodeling. The maximum hematoma thicknesses and maximum diameters of both ascending and descending aorta were significantly decreased. During follow-up, 1 patient developed retrograde type A aortic dissection (RAAD) and underwent open surgery 3 months after TEVAR. 1 patient died of lung cancer 2 years later. There was no aorta-related death observed. Conclusions TEVAR provides a safe and effective treatment strategy for selected patients with retrograde type A IMH, and FID developed in descending aorta could be the possible treatment target. However, RAAD remains one of the most serious postoperative complications of concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiehua Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaolong Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yuan Peng
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Lunchang Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Tun Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hao He
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Quanming Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chang Shu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Vascular Disease Institute, Central South University, Changsha, China.,Center of Vascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lin W, Que L, Lin G, Chen R, Lu Q, Zhicheng Du MD, Hui Liu MD, Yu Z, Huang M. Using Machine Learning to Predict Five-Year Reintervention Risk in Type B Aortic Dissection Patients After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS 2021. [DOI: 10.1166/jmihi.2021.3813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a high-risk disease, commonly treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). However, for the long-term follow-up, it is associated with a high 5-year reintervention rate for patients after TEVAR. There is no accurate definition
of prognostic risk factors for TBAD in medical guidelines, and there is no scientific judgment standard for patients’ quality of life or survival outcome in the next five years in clinical practice. A large amount of medical data features makes prognostic analysis difficult. However,
machine learning (ML) permits lots of objective data features to be considered for clinical risk stratification and patient management. We aimed to predict the 5-year prognosis in TBAD after TEVAR by Ml, based on baseline, stent characteristics and computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging
data, and provided a certain degree of scientific basis for prognostic risk score and stratification in medical guidelines. Materials and Methods: Dataset we recorded was obtained from 172 TBAD patients undergoing TEVAR. Totally 40 features were recorded, including 14 baseline, 5 stent
characteristics and 21 CTA imaging data. Information gain (IG) was used to select features highly associated with adverse outcome. Then, the Gradient Boost classifier was trained using grid search and stratified 5-fold cross-validation, and Its predictive performance was evaluated by the area
under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Results: Totally 60 patients underwent reintervention during follow-up. Combing 24 features selected by IG, ML model predicted prognosis well in TBAD after TEVAR, with an AUC of 0.816 and a 95% confidence interval
of 0.797 to 0.837. Reintervention rate of prediction was slightly higher than the actual (48.2% vs. 34.8%). Conclusion: Machine learning, which combined with baseline, stent characteristics and CTA imaging data for personalized risk computations, effectively predicted reintervention
risk in TBAD patients after TEVAR in 5-year follow-up. The model could be used to efficiently assist the clinical management of TBAD patients and prompt high-risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiyuan Lin
- College of Automation Science and Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China
| | - Lifeng Que
- Medical Imaging Center, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518110, China
| | - Guisen Lin
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Rui Chen
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Qiyang Lu
- College of Automation Science and Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China
| | - M. D. Zhicheng Du
- Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Health Information Research Center, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Medicine, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - M. D. Hui Liu
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| | - Zhuliang Yu
- College of Automation Science and Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510640, China
| | - Meiping Huang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Marlevi D, Sotelo JA, Grogan-Kaylor R, Ahmed Y, Uribe S, Patel HJ, Edelman ER, Nordsletten DA, Burris NS. False lumen pressure estimation in type B aortic dissection using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparisons with aortic growth. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2021; 23:51. [PMID: 33980249 PMCID: PMC8117268 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00741-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is associated with poor long-term outcome, and accurate risk stratification tools remain lacking. Pressurization of the false lumen (FL) has been recognized as central in promoting aortic growth. Several surrogate imaging-based metrics have been proposed to assess FL hemodynamics; however, their relationship to enlarging aortic dimensions remains unclear. We investigated the association between aortic growth and three cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived metrics of FL pressurization: false lumen ejection fraction (FLEF), maximum systolic deceleration rate (MSDR), and FL relative pressure (FL ΔPmax). METHODS CMR/CMR angiography was performed in 12 patients with chronic dissection of the descending thoracoabdominal aorta, including contrast-enhanced CMR angiography and time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast CMR (4D Flow CMR). Aortic growth rate was calculated as the change in maximal aortic diameter between baseline and follow-up imaging studies over the time interval, with patients categorized as having either 'stable' (< 3 mm/year) or 'enlarging' (≥ 3 mm/year) growth. Three metrics relating to FL pressurization were defined as: (1) FLEF: the ratio between retrograde and antegrade flow at the TBAD entry tear, (2) MSDR: the absolute difference between maximum and minimum systolic acceleration in the proximal FL, and (3) FL ΔPmax: the difference in absolute pressure between aortic root and distal FL. RESULTS FLEF was higher in enlarging TBAD (49.0 ± 17.9% vs. 10.0 ± 11.9%, p = 0.002), whereas FL ΔPmax was lower (32.2 ± 10.8 vs. 57.2 ± 12.5 mmHg/m, p = 0.017). MSDR and conventional anatomic variables did not differ significantly between groups. FLEF showed positive (r = 0.78, p = 0.003) correlation with aortic growth rate whereas FL ΔPmax showed negative correlation (r = - 0.64, p = 0.026). FLEF and FL ΔPmax remained as independent predictors of aortic growth rate after adjusting for baseline aortic diameter. CONCLUSION Comparative analysis of three 4D flow CMR metrics of TBAD FL pressurization demonstrated that those that focusing on retrograde flow (FLEF) and relative pressure (FL ΔPmax) independently correlated with growth and differentiated patients with enlarging and stable descending aortic dissections. These results emphasize the highly variable nature of aortic hemodynamics in TBAD patients, and suggest that 4D Flow CMR derived metrics of FL pressurization may be useful to separate patients at highest and lowest risk for progressive aortic growth and complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Marlevi
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Julio A Sotelo
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
- Biomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- ANID-Millennium Science Initiative Program-Millennium Nucleus in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ross Grogan-Kaylor
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Yunus Ahmed
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sergio Uribe
- Biomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- ANID-Millennium Science Initiative Program-Millennium Nucleus in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Radiology, Schools of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Elazer R Edelman
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - David A Nordsletten
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas S Burris
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Cardiovascular Center 5588, SPC-5030, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hong JC, Le Huu A, Preventza O. Medical or endovascular management of acute type B aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 164:1058-1065. [PMID: 34024613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan C Hong
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Alice Le Huu
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex
| | - Ourania Preventza
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Tex.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Augoustides JG. Commentary: Acute type B aortic dissection: Navigating new horizons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 164:1066-1067. [PMID: 33985801 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John G Augoustides
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Xie E, Yang F, Liu Y, Xue L, Fan R, Xie N, Chen L, Liu J, Luo J. Timing and Outcome of Endovascular Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2021; 61:788-797. [PMID: 33846073 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the effect of intervention timing, from symptom onset to thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), on early and late outcomes in high risk patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD). METHODS The study retrospectively evaluated 267 uTBAD patients with high risk radiographic features who underwent pre-emptive TEVAR during the acute and subacute periods. Demographics, comorbidities, pre-operative imaging features, peri-procedural details, and follow up outcomes were analysed. RESULTS Among the 267 pre-emptive TEVARs for high risk uTBAD, 130 were performed in the acute phase (1-14 days); and 137 in the subacute phase (15-90 days), from initial presentation. The mean age was 55.9 ± 11.0 years and 222 (83.1%) were men. The 30 day mortality rate in the acute group was five times higher than that in the subacute group (3.8% vs. 0.7%), although without statistically significant difference (p = .11). No statistically significant difference in 30 day outcomes (aortic rupture, retrograde type A dissection [RTAD], immediate type Ia endoleak, stroke, spinal cord ischaemia, and re-intervention) was noted (p > .05 for each). Of note, aortic rupture, RTAD, and disabling stroke were observed only in the acute group. Multivariable logistic analyses showed that intervention timing was not associated with 30 day outcomes. The median clinical follow up was 48.2 ± 25.9 months (range 1 - 106 months). There were no significant differences in all cause mortality, dissection related death, late intervention, or aortic related late events among timing cohorts (p > .05 for each). Furthermore, aortic remodelling, by analysing the flow status of the false lumen and evaluation of aortic diameters, either at the thoracic aorta level or the abdominal aorta level, was similar between the two groups. Multivariable Cox analyses showed that intervention timing was not associated with late outcomes. CONCLUSION The present study indicates that TEVAR for high risk uTBAD in the acute phase was associated with a trend toward higher rates of early complications, while the long term outcomes were comparable with those of the subacute phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enmin Xie
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling Xue
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruixin Fan
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Nianjin Xie
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Lyufan Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jitao Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jianfang Luo
- Department of Cardiology, Vascular Centre, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China; The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zaidan L, Qannita A, Abbarah S, Koussayer B, Koussayer S. TEVAR Stent to the False Lumen of a Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection With Aneurysmal Dilatation, When no Other Options Are Left. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 74:523.e19-523.e25. [PMID: 33831528 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.01.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
We report a case of a 72 years-old male referred to us with a 2-year history of an enlarging aortic aneurysm secondary to a chronic Type B aortic dissection and a complete occlusion of the true lumen in the thoracic and abdominal aorta except at the level of visceral arteries origins. Several attempts to recanalize the true lumen was not successful. Because of the patient's high risk for an open repair and the normal size of his thoracic aorta proximal to the celiac artery, we deployed the TEVAR stent to the false lumen to prevent aneurysmal enlargement and rupture. The operation was successful, and the patient recovered without complications and with complete exclusion of the aneurysm on two years follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louai Zaidan
- Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Vascular Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Qannita
- Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Vascular Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shaher Abbarah
- Vascular Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Bilal Koussayer
- Vascular Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Samer Koussayer
- Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Vascular Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Section Head, Vascular Surgery Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hoshina K, Kato M, Ishimaru S, Michihata N, Yasunaga H, Komori K. Effect of the urgency and landing zone on rates of in-hospital death, stroke, and paraplegia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in Japan. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74:556-568.e2. [PMID: 33548443 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.12.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study used data from the Japanese Committee for Stentgraft Management's national registry, which contains unique surgical data, including surgical timing, anatomic factors, and pathologic factors, to determine the generalized community experience with thoracic endovascular abdominal aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS The medical background and short-term outcomes were reviewed for patients who had undergone TEVAR for a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA; 14,235 cases) or aortic dissection (AD; 990 type A and 4259 type B) from 2008 to 2015. TEVAR for AD was separated from that for TAAs; only the background and short-term outcomes were evaluated. The technical outcomes of TEVAR for TAA were also evaluated. All the cases were categorized as follows: elective, urgent (within 24 hours after admission), or emergent (immediately after admission). The outcomes included in-hospital mortality and persistent stroke and paraplegia diagnosed at discharge. The number of debranching bypasses, proximal landing zone (0, 1, 2, ≥3), and zone length were included in the logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The mortality, stroke, and paraplegia rates in the TAA and AD groups were 4.4%, 4.6%, and 3.7% and 4.0%, 2.9%, and 2.8%, respectively. After analyzing the TAA cohort, we found that urgent and emergent cases were associated with all adverse outcomes. The rate of paraplegia increased drastically in the patients with stent graft coverage that extended for six or more zones. Massive atheroma was associated with stroke and paraplegia. The cumulative survival rate of the TAA group was stratified by the urgency (ie, elective, urgent, emergent; P < .001). We found that the more proximal (0, 1, and 2) the landing zone, the greater the risk of stroke. Likewise, the longer (six or more zones) the coverage, the greater the risk of paraplegia. CONCLUSIONS Urgency was strongly associated with mortality, stroke, and paraplegia, and the classification of urgent and emergent, according to the surgical timing after admission, successfully stratified the population in the long-term overall survival analysis. A proximal landing zone involving the aortic arch and debranching bypasses were associated with the occurrence of stroke, and the length of stent graft coverage for six or more zones was associated with paraplegia. Identifying these risk factors will help operators of TEVAR develop appropriate operative strategies to mitigate patient risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuyuki Hoshina
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaaki Kato
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Morinomiya Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shin Ishimaru
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toda Chuo General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Michihata
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kimiiro Komori
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dohle DS, Laverne T, Bavaria J, Savino D, Vallabhajosyula P, Szeto WY, Siki M, Wang G, Jackson B, Desai N. Aortic remodelling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in acute and chronic type B aortic dissections. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 58:730-737. [PMID: 32572444 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Type B aortic dissections are routinely treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The timing for TEVAR remains controversial and might have an impact on the remodelling capacity of the aorta. This study analyses and compares aortic remodelling in acute (ABD) and chronic (CBD) type B aortic dissections after TEVAR. METHODS This retrospective study analysed the preoperative, postoperative and at least 1-year follow-up computed tomography of 53 TEVAR patients (36 ABD, 17 CBD) at a single institution between May 2005 and May 2016. The volumes of aortic lumen (AL), true lumen, false lumen (FL) and perfused FL were measured at the stent graft level (A), from the stent graft to the coeliac trunk (B) and from the coeliac trunk to the bifurcation (C). The absolute volumes, normalized volume changes and FL thrombosis rate of ABD and CBD patients were compared. RESULTS Absolute AL and FL of segment A were significantly larger in CBD patients compared to ABD patients preoperatively (AL: 354 ± 68 vs 255 ± 51 ml, P = 0.023, FL: 253 ± 56 vs 183 ± 35 ml, P = 0.028) until last follow-up (AL: 462 ± 52 vs 246 ± 52 ml, P = 0.003, FL: 268 ± 202 vs 91 ± 31 ml, P = 0.004). The true lumen in segment A increased more in ABD than in CBD patients preoperatively to postoperatively (112% vs 36% P < 0.001) and within the first year postoperatively (171% vs 80% P < 0.001). FL in segment A decreased more in ABD compared to CBD patients within the first year (-42% vs -13% P < 0.001) and thereafter (-50% vs +6% P = 0.002). In segments B and C, the FL thrombosis rate was higher in ABD than in CBD patients at all time points and significantly higher in segment A after the first year (91% vs 98% P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS Aortic remodelling after TEVAR is significantly different in acute and chronic dissection patients. TEVAR promotes aortic remodelling in both acute and chronic dissections in terms of true lumen increase at stent graft level. Nevertheless, significant AL reduction by FL shrinkage is primarily found in ABD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel-Sebastian Dohle
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Travis Laverne
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Joseph Bavaria
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Danielle Savino
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Prashant Vallabhajosyula
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Wilson Y Szeto
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Mary Siki
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Grace Wang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Benjamin Jackson
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Nimesh Desai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Munshi B, Ritter JC, Doyle BJ, Norman PE. Management of acute type B aortic dissection. ANZ J Surg 2020; 90:2425-2433. [PMID: 32893461 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The best management of acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection is currently a controversial area. Recent advances in endovascular intervention have begun to establish pre-emptive thoracic endovascular aortic repair as a potential strategy. A review about the management for type B aortic dissection has been conducted. METHODS A narrative review consisting of 157 original articles, meta-analyses and guidelines was conducted. The findings were synthesized and summarized using 70 articles. RESULTS There are clear guidelines directing surgical management of acute complicated type B aortic dissection. However, the best management of acute uncomplicated disease is more ambiguous, which is especially concerning in a condition which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Medical management alone is generally favoured. Endovascular intervention is now being considered by some surgeons, but it can be technically difficult, while exposing the patient to potential surgical risks. CONCLUSIONS Clinical and anatomical risk factors have been identified to help vascular surgeons make decisions about treatment in acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. New endovascular strategies are being developed to reduce surgical risk and address technical challenges. Registry data should be used to support future best management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bijit Munshi
- Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Vascular Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jens C Ritter
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Barry J Doyle
- Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Paul E Norman
- Vascular Engineering Laboratory, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Vascular Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hellgren T, Kuzniar M, Wanhainen A, Steuer J, Mani K. Clinical and Morphologic Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Subacute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection. Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 72:390-399. [PMID: 32889157 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of the study was to assess long-term remodeling, survival, and reintervention outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for subacute and chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS All patients who underwent TEVAR for subacute or chronic TBAD at a tertiary referral center between 1999 and 2015 were included in this cohort study. The primary outcome was aortic remodeling, and secondary outcomes included survival, rate of major complications, and reinterventions. RESULTS Fifty patients were included, with mean age of 62.4 years, 10 (20%) DeBakey type IIIA and 40 (80%) DeBakey type IIIB dissection; 45 standard TEVAR, 2 branched TEVAR, 3 TEVAR combined with fenestrated or branched EVAR. Indication for TEVAR was intact (n = 40) or ruptured (n = 1) postdissection aneurysm, hypoperfusion (n = 4), treatment-refractory pain (n = 2), or a combination (n = 3). Mean clinical follow-up was 76 months, and median radiological follow-up was 46 months. Thirty-day survival was 96%, stroke 4%, renal failure 0%, paraplegia 0%. Three- and five-year survival was 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) [79; 97]) and 77% (95% CI [61; 87]), respectively. Of 19 late deaths, 6 were confirmed aorta related. Five-year freedom from reintervention was 69% (95% CI [53-80]). Distal stent graft extension due to aortic dilatation composed most reinterventions. Mean maximal aortic diameter was 58.7 mm preoperatively and 51.9 mm on last follow-up (P = 0.003). On thoracic level, true lumen expanded (+10.0 mm, 95% CI [6.4; 13.6]) (P < 0.001) and false lumen decreased (-11.9 mm, 95% CI [-15.2; -8.5]) (P < 0.001) from baseline to the last computed tomography. In the abdominal aorta, true lumen diameter change was +3.1 mm (95% CI [1.4; 4.8]) (P = 0.001); false lumen diameter change was +1.0 mm (95% CI [-1.8; 3.8]) (P = 0.464). CONCLUSIONS TEVAR for subacute and chronic TBAD results in favorable remodeling of the thoracic but not the abdominal aorta. Five-year survival is almost 80%, but late aortic deaths still occur. Aortic dilatation distal to the treated segment requiring reintervention is common, emphasizing the importance of follow-up.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging
- Aortic Dissection/mortality
- Aortic Dissection/physiopathology
- Aortic Dissection/surgery
- Aorta, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging
- Aorta, Abdominal/physiopathology
- Aorta, Abdominal/surgery
- Aorta, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging
- Aorta, Thoracic/physiopathology
- Aorta, Thoracic/surgery
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/physiopathology
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality
- Chronic Disease
- Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects
- Endovascular Procedures/mortality
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Postoperative Complications/mortality
- Postoperative Complications/surgery
- Reoperation
- Retrospective Studies
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
- Vascular Remodeling
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Hellgren
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Marek Kuzniar
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johnny Steuer
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brown JA, Arnaoutakis GJ, Kilic A, Gleason TG, Aranda‐Michel E, Sultan I. Medical and surgical management of acute type B aortic intramural hematoma. J Card Surg 2020; 35:2324-2330. [DOI: 10.1111/jocs.14823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James A. Brown
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| | - George J. Arnaoutakis
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryUniversity of Florida Gainesville Florida
| | - Arman Kilic
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
- Heart and Vascular InstituteUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas G. Gleason
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
- Heart and Vascular InstituteUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| | - Edgar Aranda‐Michel
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| | - Ibrahim Sultan
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic SurgeryUniversity of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
- Heart and Vascular InstituteUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Torrent DJ, McFarland GE, Wang G, Malas M, Pearce BJ, Aucoin V, Neal D, Spangler EL, Novak Z, Scali ST, Beck AW. Timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection and the association with complications. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:826-835. [PMID: 32623110 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous publications have clearly established a correlation between timing of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and complications after treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection (ATBAD). However, the temporal association of TEVAR with morbidity after uncomplicated presentations is poorly understood and has not previously been examined using real-world national data. Therefore, the objective of this analysis was to determine whether TEVAR timing of uncomplicated ATBAD (UATBAD) is associated with postoperative complications. METHODS The Vascular Quality Initiative TEVAR and complex endovascular aneurysm repair registry was analyzed from 2010 to 2019. Procedures performed for non-dissection-related disease as well as for ATBAD with malperfusion or rupture were excluded. Because of inherent differences between timing cohorts, propensity score matching was performed to ensure like comparisons. Univariate and multivariable analysis after matching was used to determine differences between timing groups (symptom onset to TEVAR: acute, 1-14 days; subacute, 15-90 days) for postoperative mortality, in-hospital complications, and reintervention. RESULTS A total of 688 cases meeting inclusion criteria were identified. After matching 187 patients in each of the 1- to 14-day and 15- to 90-day treatment groups, there were no statistically significant differences between groups. On univariate analysis, the 1- to 14-day treatment group had a higher proportion of cases requiring reintervention within 30 days (15.3%) compared with UATBAD patients undergoing TEVAR within 15 to 90 days (5.2%; P = .02). There was also a difference (P = .007) at 1 year, with 33.8% of the 1- to 14-day UATBAD patients undergoing reintervention compared with 14.5% for the 15- to 90-day group. There were no statistically significant differences on multivariable analysis for long-term survival, complications, or long-term reintervention. There was a trend toward significance (P = .08) with the 1- to 14-day group having 2.3 times the odds of requiring an in-hospital reintervention compared with the 15- to 90-day group. CONCLUSIONS Timing of TEVAR for UATBAD does not appear to predict mortality or postoperative complications. However, there is a strong association between repair within 1 to 14 days and higher risk of reintervention. This may in part be related to the 1- to 14-day group's representing an inherently higher anatomic or physiologic risk population that cannot be entirely accounted for with propensity analysis. The role of optimal timing to intervention should be incorporated into future study design of TEVAR trials for UATBAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Torrent
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Graeme E McFarland
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Grace Wang
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Mahmoud Malas
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, Calif
| | - Benjamin J Pearce
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Victoria Aucoin
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Dan Neal
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla
| | - Emily L Spangler
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Zdenek Novak
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Salvatore T Scali
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Fla
| | - Adam W Beck
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hysa L, Khor S, Starnes BW, Chow WB, Sweet MP, Nguyen J, Shalhub S. Cause-specific mortality of type B aortic dissection and assessment of competing risks of mortality. J Vasc Surg 2020; 73:48-60.e1. [PMID: 32437949 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Natural history studies of type B aortic dissection (TBAD) commonly report all-cause mortality. Our aim was to determine cause-specific mortality in TBAD and to evaluate the clinical characteristics associated with aorta-related and nonaorta-related mortality. METHODS Clinical and administrative records were reviewed for patients with acute TBAD between 1995 and 2017. Demographics, comorbidities, presentation, and initial imaging findings were abstracted. Cause of death was ascertained through a multimodality approach using electronic health records, obituaries, social media, Social Security Death Index, and state mortality records. Causes of death were classified as aorta related, nonaorta related, or unknown. A Fine-Gray multivariate competing risk regression model for subdistribution hazard ratio was employed to analyze the association of clinical characteristics with aorta-related and nonaorta-related mortality. RESULTS A total of 275 individuals met inclusion criteria (61.1 ± 13.7 years, 70.9% male, 68% white). Mean survival after discharge was 6.3 ± 4.7 years. Completeness of follow-up Clark C index was 0.87. All-cause mortality was 50.2% (n = 138; mean age, 70.1 ± 14.6 years) including an in-hospital mortality of 8.4%. Cause-specific mortality was aorta related, nonaorta related, and unknown in 51%, 43%, and 6%, respectively. Compared with patients with nonaorta-related mortality, patients with aorta-related mortality were younger at acute TBAD (69.5 ± 11.2 years vs 61.6 ± 15.5 years; P = .001), underwent more descending thoracic aortic repairs (19.4% vs 45.8%; P = .002), and had a shorter survival duration (5.7 ± 3.9 vs 3.4 ± 4.5 years; P = .002). There was clear variation in cause of death by each decade of life, with higher aorta-related mortality among those younger than 50 years and older than 70 years and a stepwise increase in nonaorta-related mortality with each increasing decade (P < .001). All-cause mortality at 1 year, 3 years, and 10 years was 15%, 24%, and 57%, respectively. After accounting for competing risks, the cumulative incidence of aorta-related mortality at 1 year, 3 years, and 10 years was 8.9%, 16.5%, and 27.2%, respectively, and that of nonaorta-related mortality was 2.7%, 7.2%, and 29%, respectively. A maximum descending thoracic aortic diameter >4 cm was associated with an increase in hazard of aorta-related mortality by 84% (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.28) on multivariate competing risk regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS TBAD is associated with high 10-year mortality. Those at risk for aorta-related mortality have a clinical phenotype different from that of individuals at risk for nonaorta-related mortality. This information is important for building risk prediction models that account for competing mortality risks and to direct optimal and individualized surgical and medical management of TBAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Hysa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
| | - Sara Khor
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
| | - Benjamin W Starnes
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
| | - Warren B Chow
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
| | - Matthew P Sweet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
| | - Jimmy Nguyen
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash
| | - Sherene Shalhub
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Milligan JM, Dayama A, El Sayed HF, Panneton JM. Current technology for endovascular repair of the aortic arch. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4777.20.01451-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
44
|
Shah A, Gupta N, Gewertz BL, Azizzadeh A. TEVAR for high risk patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a paradigm shift. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY 2020. [DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4777.20.01450-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
45
|
Mougin J, Charbonneau P, Guihaire J, Schwein A, Tyrrell MR, Maurel B, Fabre D, Haulon S. Endovascular management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2020; 61:402-415. [PMID: 32337939 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.20.11395-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews endovascular management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch. Therapeutic strategies intended for this complex aortic condition are evolving rapidly to allow the treatment of various hostile aortic anatomy and frail patients. Principles, technical considerations, devices and outcomes of each technique are reviewed and summarized. Hybrid repair offer similar early mortality and stroke rates compared to open conventional surgery. Arch chimney and other parallel graft techniques present poor long term outcome, and should be limited to emergency situations where no other option is available. Fenestrated stent-grafting is subjected to many technical challenges in aortic arch due to difficulties in stent-graft orientation and fenestration positioning. In situ fenestration is an off-label technique that should only be used as an emergency bailout maneuver, considering that temporary coverage of supra aortic trunk vessel and its long-term durability raise concern. Finally, in experienced hands and appropriate anatomic conditions, arch branched graft technology has shown itself to be a safe and effective alternative to open conventional surgery. No randomized controlled trials have yet compared total endovascular aortic arch repair with hybrid techniques and open arch repair. The management of chronic post-dissection aneurysms of the aortic arch is challenging, decision-making and interventions should continue to be performed in high-volume centers with a dedicated aortic team with an expertise in both open and endovascular repairs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Mougin
- Aortic Center, INSERM UMR_S 999, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Le Plessis Robinson, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Charbonneau
- Aortic Center, INSERM UMR_S 999, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Le Plessis Robinson, Paris, France
| | - Julien Guihaire
- Aortic Center, INSERM UMR_S 999, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Le Plessis Robinson, Paris, France
| | - Adeline Schwein
- Aortic Center, INSERM UMR_S 999, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Le Plessis Robinson, Paris, France
| | | | - Blandine Maurel
- Service of Vascular Surgery, Thorax Institute, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Dominique Fabre
- Aortic Center, INSERM UMR_S 999, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Le Plessis Robinson, Paris, France
| | - Stéphan Haulon
- Aortic Center, INSERM UMR_S 999, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris Saclay University, Le Plessis Robinson, Paris, France -
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Otsuka R, Morikage N, Mizoguchi T, Nagase T, Samura M, Harada T, Suehiro K, Hamano K. Endovascular Aneurysm Repair With Re-entry Closure in a Patient With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Concomitant With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection. EJVES Vasc Forum 2020; 47:18-21. [PMID: 33078147 PMCID: PMC7287399 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2020.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) concomitant with acute aortic dissection is rare. Case report An acute type B aortic dissection involving AAA in a 58 year old woman is described. Computed tomography angiography demonstrated that the false lumen of the abdominal aorta including the aneurysm remained patent, secondary to entry sites in the abdominal aorta, bilateral external iliac arteries, and a membrane tear of the left renal artery (LRA). The aneurysm was isolated by endovascular aneurysm repair and LRA stenting; all entry sites were occluded by endovascular treatment that included covered stenting of the LRA. Imaging performed three months after the procedure confirmed complete thrombosis of the false lumen and AAA sac shrinkage. Discussion Endovascular treatment with covered stents is reported as an alternative strategy for treatment of AAA concomitant with acute aortic dissection involving a visceral artery. A 58 year old woman developed acute type B aortic dissection involving an AAA. AAA concomitant with acute aortic dissection is rare. Endovascular treatment using a covered stent of the visceral artery can be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Noriyasu Morikage
- Corresponding author. Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery and Clinical Science, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube 755-8505, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Early and mid-term mortality and morbidity of contemporary international endovascular treatment for type B aortic dissection - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2020; 301:56-61. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
48
|
Miura S, Kurimoto Y, Maruyama R, Wada T, Konno M, Iba Y, Hatta E, Yamada A. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair on Zone 2 Landing for Type B Aortic Dissection. Ann Vasc Surg 2019; 60:120-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 02/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
49
|
Wang GJ, Cambria RP, Lombardi JV, Azizzadeh A, White RA, Abel DB, Cronenwett JL, Beck AW. Thirty-day outcomes from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection project. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69:680-691. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
50
|
Zhou W, Yu W, Wang Y, Li Y, Sheng W, Wang Q, Xu W. Assessing Aortic Remodeling after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) in DeBakey IIIb Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Study. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 25:46-55. [PMID: 30305479 PMCID: PMC6388301 DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.18-00167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study analyzed the different levels of aortic remodeling in patients with DeBakey IIIb aortic dissection (AD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) at a single center. METHODS In all, 66 patients with DeBakey IIIb AD who underwent TEVAR in the acute (Group A) or subacute phase (Group SA) from January 2012 to October 2016 were included in the study. The change in aortic lumen (A), true lumen (TL), false lumen (FL), and true lumen index (TLi) at different levels were analyzed. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical information and morphologic imaging findings in Groups A and SA. At proximal levels (levels A-C), there was no difference in aortic remodeling parameters, that is, increased TL, decreased FL, and increased TLi at levels B and C and stable A at levels A-C, in both groups. Moreover, the above parameters were illustrated using a box-and-whisker plot, which revealed the unstable acute phase by the larger distribution interval and the median and abnormal values of the right skew distribution in Group A. CONCLUSION Postoperative surveillance is important for patients of both acute and subacute AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.,Department of Radiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Wanjiang Yu
- Department of Radiology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Yunying Wang
- Department of Medical Genetics, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Wei Sheng
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Qingjiang Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| | - Wenjian Xu
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|