A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in EGFR-Mutant, PD-L1+, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC

Efficacy analysis of immunotherapy‑based combinations for patients with EGFR‑mutant advanced non‑small cell lung cancer after TKI failure

Treatment options for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure are limited, and platinum-based chemotherapy remains the main treatment. The development of effective immunotherapy for this disease has been challenging. In the present study, 37 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC who were treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor-based combinations after TKI failure were reviewed. The total cohort had a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.077-6.323 months) and a median overall survival (mOS) of 18.3 months (95% CI, 12.932-23.668 months). Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status (ECOG-PS) scores of 0 or 1 had longer mPFS than those with ECOG-PS scores of 2 (5.4 vs. 2.4 months; P=0.006). In addition, a PFS benefit was observed in patients with EGFR T790M-negative compared with EGFR T790M-positive tumors (mPFS 6.2 vs. 4.4 months; P=0.041). Patients treated with immunotherapy-based combinations as a front-line therapy had a longer mPFS than those in which the combinations were used as a late-line therapy (6.2 vs. 2.4 months; P<0.001). PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab did not show a clear advantage over PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy alone (mPFS, 6.2 vs. 4.4 months; P=0.681), although it resulted in an improved overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate. Notably, the 7 patients with a programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of ≥50% had an ORR of 100% and an mPFS of 8.3 months. Therefore, it is suggested that PD-1 inhibitor-based combinations should be a priority treatment option in selective populations, such as those with low ECOG-PS scores, T790M-negative status or high PD-L1 expression in EGFR-mutant NSCLC after TKI failure. The use of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in combination with antiangiogenic agents appears to be a promising combination therapy for such patients.

Obesity-dependent selection of driver mutations in cancer

Obesity is a risk factor for cancer, but whether obesity is linked to specific genomic subtypes of cancer is unknown. We examined the relationship between obesity and tumor genotype in two clinicogenomic corpora. Obesity was associated with specific driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma, endometrial carcinoma and cancers of unknown primaries, independent of clinical covariates, demographic factors and genetic ancestry. Obesity is therefore a driver of etiological heterogeneity in some cancers.

Therapeutic potential of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with poor outcomes even for those diagnosed at early stages. Current standard-of-care for most non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients involves an array of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and surgical resection depending on the stage and location of the cancer. While patient outcomes have certainly improved, advances in highly personalized care remain limited. However, there is growing excitement around harnessing the power of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) through the use of adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapy. These TILs are naturally occurring, may already recognize tumor-specific antigens, and can have direct anti-cancer effect. In this review, we highlight comparisons of various ACTs, including a brief TIL history, show current advances and successes of TIL therapy in NSCLC, discuss the potential roles for epigenetics in T cell expansion, and highlight challenges and future directions of the field to combat NSCLC in a personalized manner.

Combination of radiotherapy and PD-L1 blockade induces abscopal responses in EGFR-mutated lung cancer through activating CD8+ T cells

Patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) respond poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). It has been reported that the number of CD8+T cells is reduced in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, the extent of heterogeneity and effector function of distinct populations of CD8+T cells has not been investigated intensively. In addition, studies investigating whether a combination of radiotherapy and ICIs can improve the efficacy of ICIs in EGFR-mutated lung cancer are lacking. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was used to investigate the heterogeneity of CD8+T cell populations in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The STING pathway was explored after hypofractionated radiation of EGFR-mutated and wild-type cells. Mice bearing LLC-19del and LLC-EGFR tumors were treated with radiotherapy plus anti-PD-L1. The scRNA-seq data showed the percentage of progenitor exhausted CD8+T cells was lower in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. In addition, CD8+T cells in EGFR-mutated NSCLC were enriched in oxidative phosphorylation. In EGFR-mutated and wild-type cells, 8 Gy × 3 increased the expression of chemokines that recruit T cells and activate the cGAS-STING pathway. In the LLC-19del and LLC-EGFR mouse model, the combination of radiation and anti-PD-L1 significantly inhibited the growth of abscopal tumors. The enhanced abscopal effect was associated with systemic CD8+T cell infiltration. This study provided an intensive understanding of the heterogeneity and effector functions of CD8+T cells in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. We showed that the combination of hypofractionated radiation and anti-PD-L1 significantly enhanced the abscopal responses in both EGFR-mutated and wild-type lung cancer by activating CD8+T cells in mice.

The risk of treatment-related toxicities with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with lung cancer

The risk of treatment-related toxicities with programmed cell death 1 and its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in patients with lung cancer is unclear and inconclusive. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched without language restrictions from inception to May 31, 2024 to identify Phase 3 randomized controlled trials of lung cancer comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus placebo/best supportive care (alone or in combination with nontargeted chemotherapy) that had available data regarding treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) or incidence and sample size. Random-effect models were employed to study the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Finally, 36 trials, involving 19,693 participants, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly augmented the likelihood of developing all-grade (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04, p < .01) and grade ≥3 TRAEs (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.23, p < .01). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors substantially augmented the odds of developing treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.27-1.71, p < .01) and fatal adverse events (FAEs) (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11-1.82, p < .01). Subgroup analyses indicated that the RR of SAEs and FAEs were generally consistent, regardless of treatment type, tumor type, treatment setting, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors type and study design. The most common causes of FAEs were respiratory failure/insufficiency (33.3%), cardiac events (16.1%), and hematological disorders (10.1%). We demonstrated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were significantly correlated with higher possibility of developing treatment-related toxicities, especially SAEs and FAEs, compared with placebo/best supportive care controls.

Impact of next-generation sequencing vs polymerase chain reaction testing on payer costs and clinical outcomes throughout the treatment journeys of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

For patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), next-generation sequencing (NGS) biomarker testing has been associated with a faster time to appropriate targeted therapy and more comprehensive testing relative to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. However, the impact on payer costs and clinical outcomes during patients' treatment journeys has not been fully characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the costs and clinical outcomes of NGS vs PCR biomarker testing among patients with newly diagnosed de novo mNSCLC from a US payers' perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model assessed costs and clinical outcomes of NGS vs PCR testing from the start of testing up to 3 years after. Patients entered the model after receiving biomarker test results and then initiated first-line (1L) targeted or nontargeted therapy (immunotherapy and/or chemotherapy) depending on actionable mutation detection. A few patients with an actionable mutation were not detected by PCR and inappropriately initiated 1L nontargeted therapy. At each 1-month cycle, patients could remain on treatment with 1L, progress to second line or later (2L+), or die. Literature-based inputs included the rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), targeted and nontargeted therapy costs, total costs of testing, and medical costs of 1L, 2L+, and death. Per patient average PFS and OS as well as cumulative costs were reported for NGS and PCR testing.

RESULTS

In a modeled population of 100 patients (75% commercial and 25% Medicare), 45.9% of NGS and 40.0% of PCR patients tested positive for an actionable mutation. Relative to PCR, NGS was associated with $7,386 in savings per patient (NGS = $326,154; PCR = $333,540) at 1 year, driven by lower costs of testing, including estimated costs of delayed care and nontargeted therapy initiation before receiving test results (NGS = $8,866; PCR = $16,373). Treatment costs were similar (NGS = $305,644; PCR = $305,283). In the PCR cohort, the per patient costs of inappropriate 1L nontargeted therapy owing to undetected mutations were $6,455, $6,566, and $6,569 over the first 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Relative to PCR testing, NGS was associated with $4,060 in savings at 2 years and $1,092 at 3 years. Patients who initiated 1L targeted therapy had an additional 5.4, 8.8, and 10.4 months of PFS and an additional 1.4, 3.6, and 5.3 months of OS over the first 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, relative to those who inappropriately initiated 1L nontargeted therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Markov model, as early as year 1, and over 3 years following biomarker testing, patients with newly diagnosed de novo mNSCLC undergoing NGS testing are projected to have cost savings and longer PFS and OS relative to those tested with PCR.

Top advances of the year: Perioperative therapy for lung cancer

Emerging data supporting the rise of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as a standard of care in the treatment of early stage, surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) dominated the NSCLC news in 2023. Adjuvant pembrolizumab became the second adjuvant ICI to receive US Food and Drug Administration approval in early 2023 after the 2021 approval of adjuvant atezolizumab and the 2022 approval of neoadjuvant nivolumab with chemotherapy. Subsequently in 2023, multiple phase 3 trials examining perioperative ICIs were positive and demonstrated clinically meaningful outcomes by prolonging event-free survival, improving pathologic complete response rates, and trending toward improved overall survival in most. Perioperative pembrolizumab became the first ICI to attain US Food and Drug Administration approval in this setting through the KEYNOTE-671 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03425643), which also demonstrated a definitive overall survival benefit in the entire study population. However, questions remain regarding patient selection for either approach and how we can optimize biomarkers to determine who needs adjuvant therapy after surgery.

Mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor-targeted therapy and overcoming strategies

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-targeted therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by selectively blocking specific signaling pathways crucial for tumor growth, offering improved outcomes with fewer side effects compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, despite their initial effectiveness, resistance to TKIs remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. Understanding the mechanisms underlying TKI resistance is paramount for improving patient outcomes and developing more effective treatment strategies. In this review, we explored various mechanisms contributing to TKI resistance, including on-target mechanisms and off-target mechanisms, as well as changes in the tumor histology and tumor microenvironment (intrinsic mechanisms). Additionally, we summarized current therapeutic approaches aiming at circumventing TKI resistance, including the development of next-generation TKIs and combination therapies. We also discussed emerging strategies such as the use of dual-targeted antibodies and PROteolysis Targeting Chimeras. Furthermore, we explored future directions in TKI-targeted therapy, including the methods for detecting and monitoring drug resistance during treatment, identification of novel targets, exploration of dual-acting kinase inhibitors, application of nanotechnologies in targeted therapy, and so on. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities in TKI-targeted therapy, aiming to advance our understanding of resistance mechanisms and guide the development of more effective therapeutic approaches in cancer treatment.

Management of Non-Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Driver Gene Alterations: An Evolving Scenario

The ever-growing knowledge regarding NSCLC molecular biology has brought innovative therapies into clinical practice; however, the treatment situation in the non-metastatic setting is rapidly evolving. Indeed, immunotherapy-based perioperative treatments are currently considered the standard of care for patients with resectable NSCLC in the absence of EGFR mutations or ALK gene rearrangements. Recently, data have been presented on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the adjuvant and locally advanced setting for patients with NSCLC harboring such driver gene alterations. The aim of the current work is to review the available evidence on the use of targeted treatments in the non-metastatic setting, together with a summary of the ongoing trials designed for actionable gene alterations other than EGFR and ALK. To date, 3-year adjuvant osimertinib treatment has been demonstrated to improve DFS and OS and to reduce CNS recurrence in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC in stage IB-IIIA (TNM 7th edition). The use of osimertinib after chemo-radiation in stage III unresectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC showed the relevant PFS improvement. In the ALK-positive setting, 2-year alectinib treatment was shown to clearly improve DFS compared to adjuvant standard chemotherapy in resected NSCLC with stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA (TNM 7th edition). Several trials are ongoing to establish the optimal adjuvant TKI treatment duration, as well as neoadjuvant TKI strategies in EGFR- and ALK-positive disease, and (neo)adjuvant targeted treatments in patients with actionable gene alterations other than EGFR or ALK. In conclusion, our review depicts how the current treatment scenario is expected to rapidly change in the context of non-metastatic NSCLC with actionable gene alterations, hence appropriate molecular testing from the early stages has become crucial to establish the most adequate approaches both in the perioperative and the locally advanced disease.

Prognostic Factors in Japanese EGFR Mutation-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer has improved significantly since the advent of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). We aimed to investigate the relationship between patient characteristics, EGFR genotype, therapeutic agents, and the prognosis of the patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 198 Japanese patients with unresectable EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer who were treated with EGFR-TKIs at Toho University Sakura Medical Center from April 2006 to December 2021. Factors associated with overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Patients who received osimertinib had a significantly longer OS than did those not receiving it (median OS, 36.2 versus 20.7 months; p < 0.001).There were significant differences in OS between patients with EGFR mutation who received osimertinib as first-line treatment, T790M-positive patients who received osimertinib as second- or later-line treatment, and those who did not receive it (median OS, 28.2 versus 40.2 versus 20.7 months; p = 0.003). However, in T790M-negative patients, no significant difference in OS was noted between those who did and did not receive osimertinib as post-treatment (median OS, 28.0 versus 40.0 months; p = 0.619). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that osimertinib treatment was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.480; 95% confidence interval, 0.326-0.707; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The patients who were T790M-positive in the first-line treatment with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and were given osimertinib as the second or later line treatment had a better prognosis than the patients who were T790M-negative in the first-line treatment with first or second-generation EGFR-TKIs and could not receive osimertinib.

Overcoming Resistance to Checkpoint Inhibitors with Combination Strategies in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer continues to contribute to the highest percentage of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Advancements in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer like immune checkpoint inhibitors have dramatically improved survival and long-term disease response, even in curative and perioperative settings. Unfortunately, resistance develops either as an initial response to treatment or more commonly as a progression after the initial response. Several modalities have been utilized to combat this. This review will focus on the various combination treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors including the addition of chemotherapy, various immunotherapies, radiation, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, neoantigen vaccines, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. We discuss the status of these agents when used in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors with an emphasis on lung cancer. The early toxicity signals, tolerability, and feasibility of implementation are also reviewed. We conclude with a discussion of the next steps in treatment.

A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of PD-1/L1 inhibitor and platinum-containing dual-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer resistant to EGFR-TKIs

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of combining Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitors with platinum-containing chemotherapy for treating late-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients who have developed resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted at Baoji Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital involving 133 patients with advanced NSCLC who had shown resistance to EGFR-TKIs and were treated from October 2018 to May 2021. The cohort was categorized into two groups: one treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy and antiangiogenic agents (ICIs+BCP group), and the other treated with ICIs alone (ICIs group). Baseline data collected included demographic factors, smoking status, PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS), EGFR mutation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and routine blood markers prior to second-line therapy. Computed Tomography (CT) scans were performed every two treatment courses to evaluate the treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

The ICIs+BCP group exhibited a statistically significant improvement in Overall Survival (OS) compared to the ICIs group (P=0.001). Cox survival analysis uncovered age (P=0.012), PD-L1 TPS expression (P<0.001), treatment regimen (P=0.006), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) (P=0.024), and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) (P=0.005) as independent factors influencing OS in patients with advanced NSCLC resistant to primary-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The nomogram model, based on these prognostic factors, exhibited Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.823 and 0.769, indicating its predictive accuracy for 1-year and 2-year survival, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Combining ICIs with BCP prolongs OS in patients with NSCLC resistant to EGFR-TKIs. This study underscores the importance of personalized treatment plans and biomarker evaluations to improve outcomes in drug-resistant cases.

From Rarity to Reality: Osimertinib's Promising Horizon in Treating Uncommon EGFR Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In the realm of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), addressing optimal treatment for uncommon EGFR mutations like G719X in exon 18, S768I in exon 20, and L861Q in exon 21 remains a pivotal yet challenging frontier. Contrary to the well-established efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in common EGFR mutations, these uncommon alterations pose unmet medical needs due to a lack of comprehensive evidence. While afatinib, a second-generation EGFR-TKI, has received FDA approval for patients with these uncommon EGFR mutations, the approval was based on a post-hoc analysis of randomized clinical trials. Recent developments include multiple clinical trials investigating the efficacy of both second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations. A noteworthy example is a prospective phase II trial of osimertinib including the landmark UNICORN study, which has shown promising results in treating uncommon EGFR mutations. Despite various reports on the efficacy of afatinib and osimertinib in treating uncommon EGFR mutations, the appropriate use of these TKIs remains unclear. This review aims to consolidate the findings from the latest clinical trials focused on uncommon EGFR mutations, outlining variations in the therapeutic efficacy of these TKIs based on the specific genetic mutation. By synthesizing these findings, we aim to guide oncologists toward more informed decisions in employing TKIs for NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations other than exon 20 insertion. Additionally, we explore potential treatment strategies tailored to these patient populations to address the challenges posed by these mutations.

Neoadjuvant targeted therapy versus targeted combined with chemotherapy for resectable EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective controlled real-world study

Background

This study aimed to assess the role and effect of neoadjuvant targeted therapy (TT) versus targeted combined with chemotherapy (TC) for resectable EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Between March 2021 and June 2023, 20 patients with stage IA3-IIIB NSCLC were enrolled in the study. Eleven patients received EGFR-TKIs in the TT group, while nine patients received EGFR-TKIs and two cycles of cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy (TC group). We compare the differences between the two groups through the following variables, including age, sex, surgical approach, postoperative complications, neoadjuvant therapy adverse events, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), objective response rate (ORR), major pathologic response (MPR), and pathologic complete response (pCR).

Results

Patients were predominantly female (75%) and never-smokers (95%). The average age was 59.2 years (range 46-79 years). Fifty-five percent harbored an exon 19 EGFR mutation and 45% an exon 21 mutation. The average targeted drug dosing time was 2.91 ± 1.7 (range 1-6) months in the TT group and 3.56 ± 3.54 (range 1-12) months in the TC group (P=0.598). The most common side effects were rash and diarrhea. No grade 5 events with neoadjuvant therapy were observed. The rate of R0 resection was 100% in all patients. Among the 11 patients in the TT group, 6 achieved a PR and 5 had SD, resulting in an ORR of 54.5%. Among the 9 patients in the TC group, 6 had PR and the remaining 3 had SD, resulting in an ORR of 66.6%. one patient (11.1%) in the TC group achieved pCR, while no patients in the TT group achieved pCR (P = 0.142). Two patients (18.2%) in the TT group reached MPR, and 2 patients (22.2%) in the TC group reached MPR (P = 0.257). The overall clinical downstage rate is 60%. Only 9 (45%) cases of yield clinical TNM (ycTNM) were consistent with yield pathologic TNM (ypTNM).

Conclusion

Results from this retrospective controlled research indicate that the neoadjuvant TT group is likely to be more effective outcomes and has safer profile in patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC than the neoadjuvant TC group. However, our results need to be validated in a multicenter, large sample prospective study.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: Phase 2 trial interim results (NEOTIDE/CTONG2104)

The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy remains elusive in localized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report interim results of a Simon's two-stage design, phase 2 trial using neoadjuvant sintilimab with carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel in resectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC. All 18 patients undergo radical surgery, with one patient experiencing surgery delay. Fourteen patients exhibit confirmed radiological response, with 44% achieving major pathological response (MPR) and no pathological complete response (pCR). Similar genomic alterations are observed before and after treatment without influencing the efficacy of subsequent EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in vitro. Infiltration and T cell receptor (TCR) clonal expansion of CCR8+ regulatory T (Treg)hi/CXCL13+ exhausted T (Tex)lo cells define a subtype of EGFR-mutant NSCLC highly resistant to immunotherapy, with the phenotype potentially serving as a promising signature to predict immunotherapy efficacy. Informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection in EGFR-mutant NSCLC could help identify patients nonresponsive to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. These findings provide supportive data for the utilization of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and insight into immune resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

EGFR mutations induce the suppression of CD8+ T cell and anti-PD-1 resistance via ERK1/2-p90RSK-TGF-β axis in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations exhibit an unfavorable response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, and their tumor microenvironment (TME) is usually immunosuppressed. TGF-β plays an important role in immunosuppression; however, the effects of TGF-β on the TME and the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy against EGFR-mutated tumors remain unclear.

METHODS

Corresponding in vitro studies used the TCGA database, clinical specimens, and self-constructed mouse cell lines with EGFR mutations. We utilized C57BL/6N and humanized M-NSG mouse models bearing EGFR-mutated NSCLC to investigate the effects of TGF-β on the TME and the combined efficacy of TGF-β blockade and anti-PD-1 therapy. The changes in immune cells were monitored by flow cytometry. The correlation between TGF-β and immunotherapy outcomes of EGFR-mutated NSCLC was verified by clinical samples.

RESULTS

We identified that TGF-β was upregulated in EGFR-mutated NSCLC by EGFR activation and subsequent ERK1/2-p90RSK phosphorylation. TGF-β directly inhibited CD8+ T cell infiltration, proliferation, and cytotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo, but blocking TGF-β did not suppress the growth of EGFR-mutated tumors in vivo. Anti-TGF-β antibody combined with anti-PD-1 antibody significantly inhibited the proliferation of recombinant EGFR-mutated tumors in C57BL/6N mice, which was superior to their monotherapy. Mechanistically, the combination of anti-TGF-β and anti-PD-1 antibodies significantly increased the infiltration of CD8+ T cells and enhanced the anti-tumor function of CD8+ T cells. Moreover, we found that the expression of TGF-β1 in EGFR-TKI resistant cell lines was significantly higher than that in parental cell lines. The combination of anti-TGF-β and nivolumab significantly inhibited the proliferation of EGFR-TKI resistant tumors in humanized M-NSG mice and prolonged their survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal that TGF-β expression is upregulated in NSCLC with EGFR mutations through the EGFR-ERK1/2-p90RSK signaling pathway. High TGF-β expression inhibits the infiltration and anti-tumor function of CD8+ T cells, contributing to the "cold" TME of EGFR-mutated tumors. Blocking TGF-β can reshape the TME and enhance the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1 in EGFR-mutated tumors, which provides a potential combination immunotherapy strategy for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Brain Metastasis from EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secretion of IL11 from Astrocytes Up-Regulates PDL1 and Promotes Immune Escape

Patients who have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are more prone to brain metastasis (BM) and poor prognosis. Previous studies showed that the tumor microenvironment of BM in these patients is immunosuppressed, as indicated by reduced T-cell abundance and activity, although the mechanism of this immunosuppression requires further study. This study shows that reactive astrocytes play a critical role in promoting the immune escape of BM from EGFR-mutated NSCLC by increasing the apoptosis of CD8+ T lymphocytes. The increased secretion of interleukin 11(IL11) by astrocytes promotes the expression of PDL1 in BM, and this is responsible for the increased apoptosis of T lymphocytes. IL11 functions as a ligand of EGFR, and this binding activates EGFR and downstream signaling to increase the expression of PDL1, culminating in the immune escape of tumor cells. IL11 also promotes immune escape by binding to its intrinsic receptor (IL11Rα/glycoprotein 130 [gp130]). Additional in vivo studies show that the targeted inhibition of gp130 and EGFR suppresses the growth of BM and prolongs the survival time of mice. These results suggest a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Integrated management of stage III in nonsmall cell lung cancer: where do perioperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy fit?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 30% of the total NSCLC, being the stage III a heterogeneous disease that represents a challenge in the management of these patients. Multidisciplinary approach is essential for an adequate treatment strategy, with surgery being the only curative treatment. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for a long period, with modest results.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has revolutionized the neoadjuvant setting of resectable NSCLC, improving pathologic complete responses and survival outcomes in this scenario. Furthermore, perioperative treatment with immunotherapy has also recently shown promising results in several phase III trials.

SUMMARY

The landscape of early-stage resectable NSCLC has evolved in recent years, with an improvement in the survival of these patients since the incorporation of immunotherapy in this scenario.

Evolving Precision First-Line Systemic Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

First-line systemic therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has rapidly evolved over the past two decades. First, molecularly targeted therapy for a growing number of gain-of-function molecular targets has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with favorable toxicity profiles compared to platinum-containing chemotherapy and can be given as first-line systemic therapy in ~25% of patients with NSCLC. Actionable genetic alterations include EGFR, BRAF V600E, and MET exon 14 splicing site-sensitizing mutations, as well as ALK-, ROS1-, RET-, and NTRK-gene fusions. Secondly, inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 or its ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) such as pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or cemiplimab monotherapy have become a standard of care for ~25% of patients with NSCLC whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression (total proportion score (TPS) ≥50%) and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations. Lastly, for the remaining ~50% of patients who are fit and whose tumors have no or low PD-L1 expression (TPS of 0-49%) and no sensitizing EGFR/ALK aberrations, platinum-containing chemotherapy with the addition of a PD-1/L1 inhibitor alone or in combination of a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor improves PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone. The objectives of this review are to summarize the current data and perspectives on first-line systemic treatment in patients with unresectable NSCLC and propose a practical algorithm for implementing precision biomarker testing at diagnosis.

The genomic landscape of the immune system in lung cancer: present insights and continuing investigations

Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, contributing to over a million cancer-related deaths annually. Despite extensive research investigating the genetic factors associated with lung cancer susceptibility and prognosis, few studies have explored genetic predispositions regarding the immune system. This review discusses the most recent genomic findings related to the susceptibility to or protection against lung cancer, patient survival, and therapeutic responses. The results demonstrated the effect of immunogenetic variations in immune system-related genes associated with innate and adaptive immune responses, cytokine, and chemokine secretions, and signaling pathways. These genetic diversities may affect the crosstalk between tumor and immune cells within the tumor microenvironment, influencing cancer progression, invasion, and prognosis. Given the considerable variability in the individual immunegenomics profiles, future studies should prioritize large-scale analyses to identify potential genetic variations associated with lung cancer using highthroughput technologies across different populations. This approach will provide further information for predicting response to targeted therapy and promotes the development of new measures for individualized cancer treatment.

Top 20 EGFR+ NSCLC Clinical and Translational Science Papers That Shaped the 20 Years Since the Discovery of Activating EGFR Mutations in NSCLC. An Editor-in-Chief Expert Panel Consensus Survey

The year 2024 is the 20th anniversary of the discovery of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since then, tremendous advances have been made in the treatment of NSCLC based on this discovery. Some of these studies have led to seismic changes in the concept of oncology research and spurred treatment advances beyond NSCLC, leading to a current true era of precision oncology for all solid tumors. We now routinely molecularly profile all tumor types and even plasma samples of patients with NSCLC for multiple actionable driver mutations, independent of patient clinical characteristics nor is profiling limited to the advanced incurable stage. We are increasingly monitoring treatment responses and detecting resistance to targeted therapy by using plasma genotyping. Furthermore, we are now profiling early-stage NSCLC for appropriate adjuvant targeted treatment leading to an eventual potential "cure" in early-stage EGFR+ NSCLC which have societal implication on implementing lung cancer screening in never-smokers as most EGFR+ NSCLC patients are never-smokers. All these advances were unfathomable in 2004 when the five papers that described "discoveries" of activating EGFR mutations (del19, L858R, exon 20 insertions, and "uncommon" mutations) were published. To commemorate this 20th anniversary, we assembled a global panel of thoracic medical oncology experts to select the top 20 papers (publications or congress presentation) from the 20 years since this seminal discovery with December 31, 2023 as the cutoff date for inclusion of papers to be voted on. Papers ranked 21 to 30 were considered "honorable mention" and also annotated. Our objective is that these 30 papers with their annotations about their impact and even all the ranked papers will serve as "syllabus" for the education of future thoracic oncology trainees. Finally, we mentioned potential practice-changing clinical trials to be reported. One of them, LAURA was published online on June 2, 2024 was not included in the list of papers to be voted on but will surely be highly ranked if this consensus survery is performed again on the 25th anniversay of the discovery EGFR mutations (i.e. top 25 papers on the 25 years since the discovery of activating EGFR mutations).

EGFR-mutant NSCLC may remodel TME from non-inflamed to inflamed through acquiring resistance to EGFR-TKI treatment

BACKGROUND

EGFR-TKI represent the standard first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. However, resistance to EGFR-TKI inevitably develops in nearly all patients. Previous clinical study have demonstrated that, some patients that failed EGFR-TKI therapy show a benefit outcome from immunotherapy. Our objective is to explore the immune microenviroment remodeling induced by EGFR-TKI treatment in EGFR mutant lung cancer patients and to investigate the immune cell types and potential molecular signatures involved.

METHODS

A cohort of 37 EGFR mutant advanced-stage NSCLC patients, who are resistant to at least one type of TKI treatment, was retrospectively established. Both pre-treatment and TKI resistance tumor FFPE samples of each pairs were collected. Transcriptional profiling and bioinformatics analysis were employed to evaluate the change of immune associated hallmarks before and after EGFR-TKI therapy.

RESULTS

Tumor samples after EGFR-TKI treatment displayed enrichment of proinflammatory signaling like interferon-γ, allograft rejection and inflammatory response. Of note, cytotoxic factor granzyme A as well as PD-L1 were found to be more expressed in EGFR-TKI resistance samples. Approximately 33.3 % (11/33) of EGFR-TKI treated samples were classified as "hot" tumor, especially for EGFR L858R mutated NSCLC patients (46.7 %,7/15). Effector cells were significantly overexpressed in 'hot' tumors feature following TKI resistance. In addition, we found that four effector genes (CD8A, CDB8, GZMB, GZMK) showed higher expression in 'hot' tumors post-TKI resistance, and its 4-gene effector cell signature was found to have a good correlation with survival benefit in external immunotherapy database.

CONCLUSIONS

TKI treatment may initiate immune activation in EGFR mutant NSCLC, leading to changes in immune cell infiltration following TKI resistance. We mechanistically explored that this might be due to an increased immune response caused by the rise in effector cells post-TKI resistance.

ATTLAS, IMpower151 and ORIENT-31: Dusting off IMpower150 for Post-Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC?

Treatment strategies for post-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an ongoing challenge. Previously, the IMPRESS trial comparing platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without EGFR-TKI did not demonstrate any progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. The retrospective subgroup analysis of IMpower150 indicated that the quad regimen (carboplatin, paclitaxel, bevacizumab, atezolizumab) improved PFS and overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who progressed on first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Given the retrospective nature of the analysis, the IMpower150 regimen is not approved in the US for post-EGFR-TKI treatment. Currently, osimertinib or other third-generation (3G) EGFR-TKIs is the first-line standard of care for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. MARIPOSA-2 provided the first randomized trial post-osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with another quad regimen (platinum, pemetrexed, lazertinib, amivantamab). The IMpower150 and MARIPOSA-2 quad regimens differ in the principle of whether to continue or even "double-down" on EGFR inhibition. Recently, three prospective randomized trials conducted in Asia offered promising results, showing that a quad regimen of doublet platinum chemotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis agent and ICI may be as efficacious as MARIPOSA-2 with a lower rate of toxicities and accounting for the PFS difference if 1L chemotherapy plus osimertinib instead of osimertinib monotherapy. In particular, the median PFS achieved by the quad regimens of ATTLAS and IMpower151 is 8.5 months. However, only 8.2% and 17.9% of the EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who received the quad regimens progressed on 3G EGFR-TKI, respectively. Here, we discuss how the results of IMpower151 and ATTLAS may rejuvenate interest in a non-EGFR containing quad regimen as a potential post-osimertinib monotherapy treatment. Randomized trials comparing the results of these studies, including the quad regimen of MARIPOSA-2 versus the quad regimen of IMpower151/Impower150/ATTLAS in post-osimertinib (or other 3G EGFR-TKI) progression, are urgently needed.

Immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring oncogenic driver alterations other than EGFR: a multicenter real-world analysis

Background

The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic driver alterations other than epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) aroused a heated discussion. We thus aimed to evaluate ICI treatment in these patients in real-world routine clinical practice.

Methods

A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted for NSCLC patients with at least one gene alteration (KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, RET, ALK, ROS1) receiving ICI monotherapy or combination treatment. The data regarding clinicopathologic characteristics, clinical efficacy, and safety were investigated.

Results

A total of 216 patients were included, the median age was 60 years, 72.7% of patients were male, and 46.8% had a smoking history. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n=95), HER2 (n=42), BRAF (n=22), MET (n=21), RET (n=14), ALK (n=14), and ROS1 (n=8); 56.5% of patients received immunotherapy in the first-line, and the rest 43.5% were treated as a second-line and above. For the entire cohort who received immunotherapy-based regimens in the first-line, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months. For the entire cohort who received immunotherapy-based regimens in the second-line and above, the median PFS was 4.7 months and median OS was 17.1 months. KRAS mutated NSCLC treated with immunotherapy-based regimens in the first-line setting had a median PFS and OS were 7.8 and 26.1 months, respectively. Moreover, the median PFS and OS of immunotherapy-based regimens for KRAS-mutant NSCLC that progressed after chemotherapy were 5.9 and 17.1 months. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level was not consistently associated with response to immunotherapy across different gene alteration subsets. In the KRAS group, PD-L1 positivity [tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1%] was associated with better PFS and OS according to the multivariate Cox analysis. No statistically significant association was found for smoking status, age, or gender with clinical efficacy in any gene group analyses.

Conclusions

KRAS-mutant NSCLC could obtain clinical benefits from ICIs either for treatment-naive patients or those who have experienced progression after chemotherapy, and PD-L1 positive expression (TPS >1%) may be a potential positive predictor. For NSCLC with ALK, RET and ROS1 rearrangement, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, or BRAF V600E mutation, effectiveness of single or combined ICI therapy remains limited, therefore, targeted therapies should be considered prior to immunotherapy regimens. Future studies should address the investigation of better predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response in oncogene-driven NSCLC.

Clinical factors and major pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in potentially resectable lung squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

Major pathological response (MPR) helps evaluate the prognosis of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). However, the clinical factors that affect the achievement of MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIO) in patients with LUSC remain unclear. This study aimed to explore the clinical factors affecting the MPR after NCIO in patients with potentially resectable LUSC.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with stage IIB-IIIC LUSC who underwent surgical resection after receiving NCIO at a center between March 2020 and November 2022. In addition to the postoperative pathological remission rate, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, TNM stage, hematological and imaging test results, and other indicators were examined before NCIO. According to the pathological response rate of the surgically removed tumor tissue, the patients were split into MPR and non-MPR groups.

Results

In total, 91 LUSC patients who met the study's eligibility criteria were enrolled: 32 (35%) patients in the non-MPR group and 59 (65%) in the MPR group, which included 43 cases of pathological complete remission (pCR). Pre-treatment lymphocyte level (LY) (odds ratio [OR] =5.997), tumor burden (OR=0.958), N classification (OR=15.915), radiographic response (OR=11.590), pulmonary atelectasis (OR=5.413), and PD-L1 expression (OR=1.028) were independently associated with MPR (all P < 0.05). Based on these six independent predictors, we developed a nomogram model of prediction having an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.914 that is simple to apply clinically to predict the MPR. The MPR group showed greater disease-free survival (DFS) than the non-MPR group, according to the survival analysis (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The MPR rate of NCIO for potentially resectable LUSC was 65%. LY, tumor burden, N classification, radiographic response, pulmonary atelectasis, and PD-L1 expression in patients with LUSC before NCIO were the independent and ideal predictors of MPR. The developed nomogram demonstrated a good degree of accuracy and resilience in predicting the MPR following NCIO, indicating that it is a useful tool for assuring customized therapy for patients with possibly resectable LUSC.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with driver alterations.

METHODS

This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Eight new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients based on targetable driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

Correlation of distribution characteristics and dynamic changes of gut microbiota with the efficacy of immunotherapy in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The effects of gut microbiota and metabolites on the responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been studied. However, their effects on EGFR-mutated (EGFR +) NSCLC remain unknown.

METHODS

We prospectively recorded the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with advanced EGFR + NSCLC and assessed potential associations between the use of antibiotics or probiotics and immunotherapy efficacy. Fecal samples were collected at baseline, early on-treatment, response and progression status and were subjected to metagenomic next-generation sequencing and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses to assess the effects of gut microbiota and metabolites on immunotherapy efficacy.

RESULTS

The clinical data of 74 advanced EGFR + NSCLC patients were complete and 18 patients' fecal samples were dynamically collected. Patients that used antibiotics had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (mPFS, 4.8 vs. 6.7 months; P = 0.037); probiotics had no impact on PFS. Two dynamic types of gut microbiota during immunotherapy were identified: one type showed the lowest relative abundance at the response time point, whereas the other type showed the highest abundance at the response time point. Metabolomics revealed significant differences in metabolites distribution between responders and non-responders. Deoxycholic acid, glycerol, and quinolinic acid were enriched in responders, whereas L-citrulline was enriched in non-responders. There was a significant correlation between gut microbiota and metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of antibiotics weakens immunotherapy efficacy in patients with advanced EGFR + NSCLC. The distribution characteristics and dynamic changes of gut microbiota and metabolites may indicate the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced EGFR + NSCLC.

The study of primary and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib to improve the outcome of EGFR-mutated advanced Non-small cell lung cancer patients: the challenge is open for new therapeutic strategies

The development of targeted therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has radically changed their clinical perspectives. Current first-line standard treatment for advanced disease is commonly considered third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), osimertinib. The study of primary and acquired resistance to front-line osimertinib is one of the main burning issues to further improve patients' outcome. Great heterogeneity has been depicted in terms of duration of clinical benefit and pattern of progression and this might be related to molecular factors including subtypes of EGFR mutations and concomitant genetic alterations. Acquired resistance can be categorized into two main classes: EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent mechanisms and specific pattern of progression to first-line osimertinib have been demonstrated. The purpose of the manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature about molecular resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib, from a clinical perspective and therefore in relationship to emerging therapeutic approaches.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with stage III NSCLC in Korea: The KINDLE study

OBJECTIVE

KINDLE-Korea is part of a real-world KINDLE study that aimed to characterize the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The KINDLE was an international real-world study that explores patient and disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes. The KINDLE-Korea included stage III NSCLC patients diagnosed between January 2013 and December 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 461 patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years (range: 24-87). Most patients were men (75.7%) with a history of smoking (74.0%), stage IIIA NSCLC (69.2%), and unresectable disease (52.9%). A total of 24.3% had activating EGFR mutation and 62.2% were positive for PDL1 expression. Broadly categorized, 44.6% of the patients received chemoradiation (CRT)-based therapy, 35.1% underwent surgery, and 20.3% received palliative therapies as initial treatment. The most commonly adopted approaches for patients with stage IIIA and IIIB disease were surgery and CRT, respectively. The median PFS was 15.2 months and OS was 66.7 months. Age >65 years, adenocarcinoma histology, and surgery as the initial treatment were significantly associated with longer OS.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the heterogeneity of treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III NSCLC before durvalumab consolidation came into clinical practice. There is an unmet need for patients who are not eligible for surgery as an initial therapy. Novel therapeutic approaches are highly warranted to improve clinical outcomes.

The lack of head-to-head randomised trials and the consequences for patients and national health service: The case of non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

To introduce a drug to the market, it's not mandatory for it to be more effective and safer than the current treatment for the same condition. Consequently, head-to-head studies between the two best treatments for the same condition are not required, and this could result in a lack of information for patients, clinicians, and decision-makers. This study aims to evaluate the presence of head-to-head studies among the drugs used for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Taking into account the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines updated to 2022, which list all available treatments for each NSCLC subtype, the search engine Pubmed and the platform clinicaltrials.gov were consulted to find all completed and ongoing head-to-head studies among various treatments for NSCLC.

RESULTS

Among the anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) drugs, 7 studies were found, with 6 completed and 5 registrational for drug commercialisation. No completed study to date has compared osimertinib and afatinib. For anti-ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) drugs, 7 studies were found, with 5 completed. Alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib have no completed comparison studies, but all were compared with crizotinib. Among various immunotherapy-based regimens, 5 studies were found, with only 1 completed. Therapeutic regimens based on pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or the combination of nivolumab/ipilimumab have not been compared in studies published to date.

CONCLUSION

There are few head-to-head studies comparing treatments for NSCLC; there are no such studies between the latest generation of drugs. Consequently, ambiguous areas exist due to the lack of comparative studies among the available evidence, preventing the clinician's choice of the most effective treatment and risking the patient receiving suboptimal therapy. Simultaneously, the price of the drug cannot be determined correctly, relying only on indirect evaluations from different trials. To dispel this uncertainty, it would be desirable to initiate a process that brings together the demands derived from clinical practice and clinical research to provide clinicians and patients with the best possible evidence.

Intracranial Efficacy of Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Real-World Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and EGFR or ALK Alterations

Contrary to Pemetrexed-containing chemo-immunotherapy studies, Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel (ABCP) treatment has consistently shown clinical benefit in prospective studies in patients with lung cancer and actionable mutations, where intracranial metastases are common. Here, we aimed to describe the real-life population of patients fit to receive ABCP after targeted therapy and quantify its clinical effect in patients with brain metastases. Patients treated in Cheshire and Merseyside between 2019 and 2022 were identified. Data were collected retrospectively. A total of 34 patients with actionable EGFR or ALK alterations had treatment with a median age of 59 years (range 32-77). The disease control rate was 100% in patients with PDL1 ≥ 1% (n = 10). In total, 19 patients (56%) had brain metastases before starting ABCP, 17 (50%) had untreated CNS disease, and 4 (22%) had PDL1 ≥ 1%. The median time to symptom improvement was 12.5 days (range 4-21 days), with 74% intracranial disease control rates and 89.5% synchronous intracranial (IC) and extracranial (EC) responses. IC median Progression Free Survival (mPFS) was 6.48 months, EC mPFS was 10.75 months, and median Overall Survival 11.47 months. ABCP in real-life patients with brain metastases (treated or untreated) was feasible and showed similar efficacy to that described in patients without actionable mutations treated with upfront chemo-immunotherapy.

The state of the art of EGFR exon 20 insertions in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and future perspectives

Insertions in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 (Ex20Ins) are the third most incident mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The hypervariable nature of these driver mutations hinders their identification by traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, requiring a comprehensive sequencing approach to detect all possible insertions. The prognosis of patients with EGFR Ex20Ins is similar to those with wild-type NSCLC, since no targeted drugs are approved in the first-line setting, and platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the front-line treatment. However, the new generation of drugs currently being tested in first and post-platinum settings will likely change the management of this entity. Here, we summarize the latest data on EGFR Ex20Ins molecular characteristics, patient profile, identification challenges, and emerging therapies to help lung clinicians face a growing treatment landscape.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immunotherapy is an emerging antitumor therapy that can improve the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only about 20% of NSCLC patients can benefit from this treatment. At present, whether patients with driving gene-positive NSCLC can benefit from immunotherapy is one of the hot issues. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC and concluded the efficacy of altered subtypes.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC.

Results

In all, 86 studies involving 4524 patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORRs in clinical trials treated with monoimmunotherapy of EGFR, ALK, and KRAS alteration were 6%, 0%, and 23%, respectively. In retrospective studies, the pooled ORRs of EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, MET, HER2, RET, and ROS1 alteration were 8%, 3%, 28%, 24%, 23%, 14%, 7%, and 8%, respectively. Among them, the pooled ORRs of KRAS non-G12C mutation, KRAS G12C mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, BRAF non-V600E mutation, MET-exon 14 skipping, and MET-amplification were 33% 40%, 20%, 34%, 17%, and 60%, respectively. In addition, the pooled mPFS rates of EGFR, KRAS, MET, HER2, and RET alteration were 2.77, 3.24, 2.48, 2.31, and 2.68 months, while the pooled mOS rates of EGFR and KRAS alteration were 9.98 and 12.29 months, respectively. In prospective data concerning EGFR mutation, the pooled ORR and mPFS treated with chemo-immunotherapy (IC) reached 38% and 6.20 months, while 58% and 8.48 months with chemo-immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy (ICA). Moreover, the pooled mPFS and mOS of monoimmunotherapy was 2.33 months and 12.43 months.

Conclusions

EGFR-, ALK-, HER2-, RET-, and ROS1-altered NSCLC patients have poor reactivity to monoimmunotherapy but the efficacy of immune-based combined therapy is significantly improved. KRAS G12C mutation, BRAF non-V600E mutation, and MET amplification have better responses to immunotherapy, and more prospective studies are needed for further research.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio may predict efficacy of anti-PD-1 inhibitors in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to investigate the associations between the clinical characteristics and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 inhibitors in patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations, aiming to identify the potential subgroup of patients who might benefit from anti-PD-1 inhibitor treatment. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-sensitive mutations who received subsequent anti-PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy/antiangiogenic agents or alone after progression to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were screened. Clinical characteristics, including hematological parameters, were investigated for potential correlations with clinical outcomes. Subgroup and multivariate analyses were used for further confirmation of the relationship. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox survival regression models using the log-rank test were used for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) assessments between the groups. Multiple regression analysis was performed using the standard regression coefficient values. The Wilcoxon test was used for the analysis of the variation in NLR. P ≤ 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. This study was a retrospective study. Twenty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The median PFS was 3.05 months (95% CI, 2.9-10.2 months). The median OS was 7.30 months (95% CI, 5.2-18.1 months). PFS in low neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR ≤ 4) was significantly longer than high NLR (NLR > 4, 5.7 months versus 2.0 months, HR, 0.35, 95% CI, 0.08-0.63, P = 0.0083). The OS in the low NLR group was also significantly better than that in the high NLR group (OS, 21.3 months versus 5.0 months, HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09-0.74; P = 0.0163). In the multivariate analysis, NLR was the only significant factor for OS benefits (β = 3.535, 95% CI, 1.175-10.636, P = 0.025). Further investigation revealed that front-line TKIs exposure may contribute to the elevation or decrease of NLR, and finally lead to different efficacy outcomes by anti-PD-1 inhibitors. The findings suggest that a portion of advanced NSCLC patients with low NLR characteristics (NLR ≤ 4), even those harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations, could benefit from anti-PD-1 inhibitors as further line treatment after progression to EGFR-TKIs.

Response to immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in metastatic RET-mutated lung cancer from real-world retrospective data

BACKGROUND

The impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) based treatments on non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with RET fusions remains poorly understood.

METHODS

We screened patients with RET fusions at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and included those who were treated with ICIs based regimens for further analysis. We evaluated clinical indicators including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients with RET fusions were included in the study. Of these, 129 patients had their programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) expression levels tested, with 22 patients (17.8%) having a PDL1 level greater than or equal to 50%. Additionally, tumor mutational burden (TMB) status was evaluated in 35 patients, with the majority (30/35, 85.8%) having a TMB of less than 10 mutations per megabase. Out of the 38 patients treated with ICI based regimens, the median PFS was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4-7.6 months) and the median OS was 19 months (95% CI: 9.7-28.3 months) at the time of data analysis. Stratification based on treatment lines did not show any significant differences in OS (18 vs. 19 months, p = 0.63) and PFS (6 vs. 5 months, p = 0.86). The ORR for patients treated with ICIs was 26.3%. Furthermore, no significant differences were found for PFS (p = 0.27) and OS (p = 0.75) between patients with positive and negative PDL1 expression. Additionally, there was no significant difference in PD-L1 levels (p = 0.10) between patients who achieved objective response and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RET fusion positive NSCLCs may not benefit from ICI based regimens and therefore should not be treated with ICIs in clinical practice.

Perioperative Treatment Strategies in EGFR-Mutant Early-Stage NSCLC: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

Treatment with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib is considered a new standard in patients with completely resected stage I to IIIA NSCLC harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation. This therapeutic approach significantly prolonged the disease-free survival and the overall survival versus placebo and revealed a significant role in preventing the occurrence of brain metastases. However, many unanswered questions remain, including the optimal duration of this therapy, whether all patients benefit from adjuvant osimertinib, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this population. Indeed, there is a renewed interest in neoadjuvant strategies with targeted therapies in resectable NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers. In light of these considerations, we discuss the past and current treatment options, and the clinical challenges that should be addressed to optimize the treatment outcomes in this patient population.

The association of genomic alterations with PD-L1 expression in Chinese patients with EGFR/ALK wild-type lung adenocarcinoma and potential predictive value of Hippo pathway mutations to immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

The study focuses on PD-L1 expression as an essential biomarker for gauging the response of EGFR/ALK wild-type NSCLC patients to FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). It aims to explore clinical, molecular, and immune microenvironment characteristics associated with PD-L1 expression in EGFR/ALK wild-type lung adenocarcinoma patients eligible for ICI therapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, tumor samples from 359 Chinese EGFR/ALK wild-type lung adenocarcinoma patients underwent comprehensive evaluations for PD-L1 expression and NGS-targeted sequencing. The investigation encompassed the analysis and comparison of clinical traits, gene mutations, pathways, and immune signatures between two groups categorized by PD-L1 status: negative (TPS < 1%) and positive (TPS ≥ 1%). Additionally, the study explored the link between genomic changes and outcomes following immunotherapy.

RESULTS

High tumor mutational burden correlated significantly with PD-L1 positivity in patients with EGFR/ALK wild-type lung adenocarcinoma. Gene alterations, including TP53, KRAS, and others, were more pronounced in the PD-L1 positive group. Pathway analysis highlighted higher frequencies of alterations in pathways like RTK/RAS, p53, and Hippo in PD-L1-positive patients. The Hippo pathway's relevance was confirmed in separate immunotherapy cohorts, associated with better outcomes. In terms of immune cell infiltration, Hippo mutants exhibited higher levels of CD68+ PD-L1+ macrophages, CD8+ T cells, and CD8+ PD-1- T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers insights into genomic features of Chinese EGFR/ALK wild-type lung adenocarcinoma patients based on PD-L1 expression. Notably, Hippo pathway alterations were linked to improved immunotherapy outcomes. These findings suggest connections between the Hippo pathway and PD-L1 expression, warranting further clinical and functional investigations. The research advances our understanding of PD-L1 expression's genomic context and immunotherapy response in EGFR/ALK wild-type lung adenocarcinoma.

The efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in resectable stage II-IV non-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary study

Background

Lung cancer is currently the world's leading malignancy in terms of morbidity and mortality. Neoadjuvant therapy is widely used in clinic to improve R0 resection rates and long-term survival after surgery, and patients with locally resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods

Data from 78 patients with stage II to IV NSCLC who had received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy from January 2019 to May 2022 were collected. The patients were categorized into groups based on their eligibility for posttreatment surgery, the level of pathological remission, and receipt of adjuvant therapy. The progression-free survival (PFS) and survival rates of patients in each group were compared. Efforts were made to identify the factors that influence patients' prognoses.

Results

The incidence of adverse events in patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy was 19%. The proportion of patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy undergoing surgery was 83.33%, and the rate of R0 resection was 64.10%. The pathological complete response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) rates were 26.25% and 21.87%, respectively. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were less likely to experience recurrent metastases than were those who did not receive adjuvant therapy (χ2=7.183; P=0.007<0.05).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has a low incidence of adverse events in resectable stage II-IV NSCLC, does not significantly increase the difficulty of surgery, and provides greater benefit in terms of PFS for patients who receive operation and adjuvant therapy.

Efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in metastatic BRAF-mutated lung cancer: a single-center retrospective data

Background

The effectiveness of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with BRAF mutations has not been sufficiently explored.

Methods

We compiled data from 306 NSCLC patients with identified BRAF mutations. We looked at efficacy by assessing the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), as well as survival through measuring progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Out of the patient pool, 44 were treated with a regimen of immune-chemotherapy. Patients undergoing ICI in combination with chemotherapy had a median PFS of 4 months, and the median OS was recorded at 29 months. There was a notable increase in OS in patients receiving first-line treatment versus subsequent lines (29 vs 9.75 months, p=0.01); however, this was not the case with PFS (9 vs 4 months, p=0.46). The ORR for patients on ICIs was 36.3%. PFS and OS rates did not significantly differ between patients with the BRAF-V600E mutation and those with non-V600E mutations (p=0.75 and p=0.97, respectively). Additionally, we found a significant variation in PD-L1 expression between those who responded to treatment and those who didn't (p=0.04).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that chemo-immunotherapy as an initial treatment may lead to improved OS in patients with BRAF-mutated NSCLC when compared to its use in subsequent lines of therapy. Further studies are needed to validate these results and to delve deeper into how specific types of BRAF mutations and PD-L1 expression levels might predict a patient's response to treatments in NSCLC.

Is Immunotherapy Beneficial in Patients with Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers? A Narrative Review

Over the past 20 years, there has been a paradigm shift in the care of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who now have a range of systemic treatment options including targeted therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy (ICI), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). A proportion of these cancers have single identifiable alterations in oncogenes that drive their proliferation and cancer progression, known as "oncogene-addiction". These "driver alterations" are identified in approximately two thirds of patients with lung adenocarcinomas, via next generation sequencing or other orthogonal tests. It was noted in the early clinical development of ICIs that patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC may have differential responses to ICI. The toxicity signal for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC when treated with ICIs also seemed to differ depending on the alteration present and the specific targeted agent used. Developing a greater understanding of the underlying reasons for these clinical observations has become an important area of research in NSCLC. In this review, we analyze the efficacy and safety of ICI according to specific mutations, and consider possible future directions to mitigate safety concerns and improve the outcomes for patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

The Nail in the Coffin?: Examining the KEYNOTE-789 Clinical Trial's Impact

Targeted therapies, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have revolutionized the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the emergence of resistance to EGFR TKIs especially the third generation TKIs such as osimertinib remains a major clinical challenge. As a broader strategy for combating resistance, several clinical trials have explored the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)+chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Until now, the ORIENT-31 and IMpower150 trials suggested that ICIs+ chemotherapy may be more effective than chemotherapy alone after failure of EGFR-TKIs (although ORIENT-31 was negative for overall survival [OS] and IMpower150 was a subset analysis, so the study was not powered to detect a difference); however, the CheckMate-722 trial yielded disappointing results. Thus, the results of this global trial KEYNOTE-789 were highly anticipated.

Obesity shapes selection for driver mutations in cancer

Obesity is a leading risk factor for cancer, but whether obesity is linked to specific genomic subtypes of cancer is unknown. Here, we examined the relationship between obesity and tumor genotype in two large clinicogenomic corpora. Obesity was associated with specific driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, and cancers of unknown primary, independent of clinical covariates and genetic ancestry. Obesity is therefore a putative driver of etiologic heterogeneity across cancers.

[Progress of Immunotherapy in EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are currently the first-line standard of care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that harbor EGFR mutations. Nevertheless, resistance to EGFR-TKIs is inevitable. In recent years, although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly shifted the treatment paradigm in advanced NSCLC without driver mutation, clinical benefits of these agents are limited in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Compared with wild-type tumors, tumors with EGFR mutations show more heterogeneity in the expression level of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics. Whether ICIs are suitable for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations is still worth exploring. In this review, we summarized the clinical data with regard to the efficacy of ICIs in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and deciphered the unique TME in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
.

Pan-Tumor Analytical Validation and Osimertinib Clinical Validation in EGFR Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, Supporting the First Next-Generation Sequencing Liquid Biopsy in Vitro Diagnostic

Comprehensive genotyping is necessary to identify therapy options for patients with advanced cancer; however, many cancers are not tested, partly because of tissue limitations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) liquid biopsies overcome some limitations, but clinical validity is not established and adoption is limited. Herein, clinical bridging studies used pretreatment plasma samples and data from FLAURA (NCT02296125; n = 441) and AURA3 (NCT02151981; n = 450) pivotal studies to demonstrate clinical validity of Guardant360 CDx (NGS LBx) to identify patients with advanced EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer who may benefit from osimertinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with EGFR mutation as identified by NGS LBx had significant PFS benefit with first-line osimertinib over standard of care (15.2 versus 9.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.41; P < 0.0001) and with later-line osimertinib over chemotherapy (8.3 versus 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.34; P < 0.0001). PFS benefits were similar to the original trial cohorts selected by tissue-based EGFR testing. Analytical validation included accuracy, precision, limit of detection, and specificity. Analytical validity was established for EGFR mutation detection and pan-tumor profiling. Panel-wide limit of detection was 0.1% to 0.5%, with 98% to 100% per-sample specificity. Patients with EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer by NGS LBx had improved PFS with osimertinib, confirming clinical validity. Analytical validity was established for guideline-recommended therapeutic targets across solid tumors. The resulting US Food and Drug Administration approval of NGS LBx demonstrated safety and effectiveness for its intended use and is expected to improve adherence to guideline-recommended targeted therapy use.

Molecular pathology of non-small cell carcinoma

Currently, lung cancer is treated by the highest number of therapeutic options and the benefits are based on multiple large-scale sequencing studies, translational research and new drug development, which has promoted our understanding of the molecular pathology of lung cancer. According to the driver alterations, different characteristics have been revealed, such as differences in ethnic prevalence, median age and alteration patterns. Consequently, beyond traditional chemoradiotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy and treatment with immune check-point inhibitors (ICI) also became available major therapeutic options. Interestingly, clinical results suggest that the recently established therapies target distinct lung cancer proportions, particularly between the EGFR/ALK and PD-1/PD-L1-positive subsets, e.g. the kinase inhibitors target driver mutation-positive tumours, whereas driver mutation-negative tumours respond to ICI treatment. These therapeutic efficacy-related differences might be explained by the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. Addictive driver mutations promote tumour formation with powerful transformation performance, resulting in a low tumour mutation burden, reduced immune surveillance, and subsequent poor response to ICIs. In contrast, regular tobacco smoke exposure repeatedly injures the proximal airway epithelium, leading to accumulated genetic alterations. In the latter pathway, overgrowth due to alteration and immunological exclusion against neoantigens is initially balanced. However, tumours could be generated from certain clones that outcompete immunological exclusion and outgrow the others. Consequently, this cancer type responds to immune check-point treatment. These pathogenic differences are explained well by the two-compartment model, focusing upon the anatomical and functional composition of distinct cellular components between the terminal respiratory unit and the air-conducting system.

Compromised Outcomes in Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Actionable Mutations Initially Treated Without Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data

PURPOSE

Identification and targeting of actionable oncogenic drivers (AODs) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically improved outcomes. However, genomic testing uptake is variable and hampered by factors including slow turnaround time, frequently resulting in initial non-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. We investigate how this behavior affects outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of real-world, deidentified data from the Integra Connect Database included adults with stage IV NSCLC newly diagnosed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, with mutations of EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET, ERBB2, or NTRK. Outcomes were reported as time to next treatment or death (TTNT) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Five hundred ten patients harboring AODs were identified and grouped as follows: group A (n = 379) were treated after the AOD was reported and served as the comparator. One hundred thirty-one patients treated before their AOD report were divided into group B (n = 47) who were initially started on chemotherapy and/or checkpoint inhibitor but switched to appropriate TKI within 35 days and group C (n = 84) who were also started empirically on non-TKI and did not switch within 35 days. Survival (OS) was significantly superior in group A compared with group C; TTNT was significantly superior in group A compared with groups B and C.

CONCLUSION

For patients harboring AODs in advanced NSCLC, initial treatment before receipt of genomic test results yields significantly inferior outcomes and should be avoided. Molecular profiling panels with rapid turnaround times are essential to optimize patient outcomes and should be standard of care.

Cost of genetic testing, delayed care, and suboptimal treatment associated with polymerase chain reaction versus next-generation sequencing biomarker testing for genomic alterations in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

AIMS

To assess US payers' per-patient cost of testing associated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) versus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) biomarker testing strategies among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), including costs of testing, delayed care, and suboptimal treatment initiation.

METHODS

A decision tree model considered biomarker testing for genomic alterations using either NGS, sequential PCR testing, or hotspot panel PCR testing. Literature-based model inputs included time-to-test results, costs for testing/medical care, costs of delaying care, costs of immunotherapy [IO]/chemotherapy [CTX] initiation prior to receiving test results, and costs of suboptimal treatment initiation after test results (i.e. costs of first-line IO/CTX in patients with actionable mutations that were undetected by PCR that would have been identified with NGS). The proportion of patients testing positive for a targetable alteration, time to appropriate therapy initiation, and per-patient costs were estimated for NGS and PCR strategies combined.

RESULTS

In a modeled cohort of 1,000,000 members (25% Medicare, 75% commercial), an estimated 1,119 had mNSCLC and received testing. The proportion of patients testing positive for a targetable alteration was 45.9% for NGS and 40.0% for PCR testing. Mean per-patient costs were lowest for NGS ($8,866) compared to PCR ($18,246), with lower delayed care costs of $1,301 for NGS compared to $3,228 for PCR, and lower costs of IO/CTX initiation prior to receiving test results (NGS: $2,298; PCR:$5,991). Cost savings, reaching $10,496,220 at the 1,000,000-member plan level, were driven by more rapid treatment with appropriate therapy for patients tested with NGS (2.1 weeks) compared to PCR strategies (5.2 weeks).

LIMITATIONS

Model inputs/assumptions were based on published literature or expert opinion.

CONCLUSIONS

NGS testing was associated with greater cost savings versus PCR, driven by more rapid results, shorter time to appropriate therapy initiation, and minimized use of inappropriate therapies while awaiting and after test results.