1
|
Jin C, Chen H, Xie L, Zhou Y, Liu LL, Wu J. GPCRs involved in metabolic diseases: pharmacotherapeutic development updates. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2024; 45:1321-1336. [PMID: 38326623 PMCID: PMC11192902 DOI: 10.1038/s41401-023-01215-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are expressed in a variety of cell types and tissues, and activation of GPCRs is involved in enormous metabolic pathways, including nutrient synthesis, transportation, storage or insulin sensitivity, etc. This review intends to summarize the regulation of metabolic homeostasis and mechanisms by a series of GPCRs, such as GPR91, GPR55, GPR119, GPR109a, GPR142, GPR40, GPR41, GPR43 and GPR120. With deep understanding of GPCR's structure and signaling pathways, it is attempting to uncover the role of GPCRs in major metabolic diseases, including metabolic syndrome, diabetes, dyslipidemia and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, for which the global prevalence has risen during last two decades. An extensive list of agonists and antagonists with their chemical structures in a nature of small molecular compounds for above-mentioned GPCRs is provided as pharmacologic candidates, and their preliminary data of preclinical studies are discussed. Moreover, their beneficial effects in correcting abnormalities of metabolic syndrome, diabetes and dyslipidemia are summarized when clinical trials have been undertaken. Thus, accumulating data suggest that these agonists or antagonists might become as new pharmacotherapeutic candidates for the treatment of metabolic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Jin
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, MOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, 200032, China
- College of Clinical Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Hui Chen
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, MOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Li Xie
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, MOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yuan Zhou
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, MOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Li-Li Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Liver Diseases, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Jian Wu
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, MOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Virology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Liver Diseases, Fudan University Shanghai Medical College, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ackmann J, Brüge A, Gotina L, Lim S, Jahreis K, Vollbrecht AL, Kim YK, Pae AN, Labus J, Ponimaskin E. Structural determinants for activation of the Tau kinase CDK5 by the serotonin receptor 5-HT7R. Cell Commun Signal 2024; 22:233. [PMID: 38641599 PMCID: PMC11031989 DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01612-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple neurodegenerative diseases are induced by the formation and deposition of protein aggregates. In particular, the microtubule-associated protein Tau leads to the development of so-called tauopathies characterized by the aggregation of hyperphosphorylated Tau within neurons. We recently showed that the constitutive activity of the serotonin receptor 7 (5-HT7R) is required for Tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation through activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (CDK5). We also demonstrated physical interaction between 5-HT7R and CDK5 at the plasma membrane suggesting that the 5-HT7R/CDK5 complex is an integral part of the signaling network involved in Tau-mediated pathology. METHODS Using biochemical, microscopic, molecular biological, computational and AI-based approaches, we investigated structural requirements for the formation of 5-HT7R/CDK5 complex. RESULTS We demonstrated that 5-HT7R domains responsible for coupling to Gs proteins are not involved in receptor interaction with CDK5. We also created a structural model of the 5-HT7R/CDK5 complex and refined the interaction interface. The model predicted two conserved phenylalanine residues, F278 and F281, within the third intracellular loop of 5-HT7R to be potentially important for complex formation. While site-directed mutagenesis of these residues did not influence Gs protein-mediated receptor signaling, replacement of both phenylalanines by alanine residues significantly reduced 5-HT7R/CDK5 interaction and receptor-mediated CDK5 activation, leading to reduced Tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation. Molecular dynamics simulations of 5-HT7R/CDK5 complex for wild-type and receptor mutants confirmed binding interface stability of the initial model. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide a structural basis for the development of novel drugs targeting the 5-HT7R/CDK5 interaction interface for the selective treatment of Tau-related disorders, including frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Ackmann
- Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alina Brüge
- Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lizaveta Gotina
- Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Bio-Medical Science & Technology, KIST School, Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sungsu Lim
- Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kathrin Jahreis
- Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Anna-Lena Vollbrecht
- Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Yun Kyung Kim
- Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Bio-Medical Science & Technology, KIST School, Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ae Nim Pae
- Brain Science Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Bio-Medical Science & Technology, KIST School, Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Josephine Labus
- Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Evgeni Ponimaskin
- Department of Cellular Neurophysiology, Institute for Neurophysiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heng J, Hu Y, Pérez-Hernández G, Inoue A, Zhao J, Ma X, Sun X, Kawakami K, Ikuta T, Ding J, Yang Y, Zhang L, Peng S, Niu X, Li H, Guixà-González R, Jin C, Hildebrand PW, Chen C, Kobilka BK. Function and dynamics of the intrinsically disordered carboxyl terminus of β2 adrenergic receptor. Nat Commun 2023; 14:2005. [PMID: 37037825 PMCID: PMC10085991 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37233-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in structural biology have provided important mechanistic insights into signaling by the transmembrane core of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs); however, much less is known about intrinsically disordered regions such as the carboxyl terminus (CT), which is highly flexible and not visible in GPCR structures. The β2 adrenergic receptor's (β2AR) 71 amino acid CT is a substrate for GPCR kinases and binds β-arrestins to regulate signaling. Here we show that the β2AR CT directly inhibits basal and agonist-stimulated signaling in cell lines lacking β-arrestins. Combining single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations, we reveal that the negatively charged β2AR-CT serves as an autoinhibitory factor via interacting with the positively charged cytoplasmic surface of the receptor to limit access to G-proteins. The stability of this interaction is influenced by agonists and allosteric modulators, emphasizing that the CT plays important role in allosterically regulating GPCR activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Heng
- School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
- Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Yunfei Hu
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
- Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Science, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Guillermo Pérez-Hernández
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Asuka Inoue
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8578, Japan
| | - Jiawei Zhao
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Xiuyan Ma
- School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Xiaoou Sun
- School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Kouki Kawakami
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8578, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ikuta
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8578, Japan
| | - Jienv Ding
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
- College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Yujie Yang
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Lujia Zhang
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Sijia Peng
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
| | - Xiaogang Niu
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Hongwei Li
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Ramon Guixà-González
- Condensed Matter Theory Group, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232, Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
| | - Changwen Jin
- Beijing Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Center, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
| | - Peter W Hildebrand
- Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University Leipzig, 04107, Leipzig, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chunlai Chen
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
- Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
- Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
- School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
| | - Brian K Kobilka
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sadler F, Ma N, Ritt M, Sharma Y, Vaidehi N, Sivaramakrishnan S. Autoregulation of GPCR signalling through the third intracellular loop. Nature 2023; 615:734-741. [PMID: 36890236 PMCID: PMC10033409 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05789-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
The third intracellular loop (ICL3) of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) fold is important for the signal transduction process downstream of receptor activation1-3. Despite this, the lack of a defined structure of ICL3, combined with its high sequence divergence among GPCRs, complicates characterization of its involvement in receptor signalling4. Previous studies focusing on the β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) suggest that ICL3 is involved in the structural process of receptor activation and signalling5-7. Here we derive mechanistic insights into the role of ICL3 in β2AR signalling, observing that ICL3 autoregulates receptor activity through a dynamic conformational equilibrium between states that block or expose the receptor's G protein-binding site. We demonstrate the importance of this equilibrium for receptor pharmacology, showing that G protein-mimetic effectors bias the exposed states of ICL3 to allosterically activate the receptor. Our findings additionally reveal that ICL3 tunes signalling specificity by inhibiting receptor coupling to G protein subtypes that weakly couple to the receptor. Despite the sequence diversity of ICL3, we demonstrate that this negative G protein-selection mechanism through ICL3 extends to GPCRs across the superfamily, expanding the range of known mechanisms by which receptors mediate G protein subtype selective signalling. Furthermore, our collective findings suggest ICL3 as an allosteric site for receptor- and signalling pathway-specific ligands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Sadler
- Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics Graduate Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ning Ma
- Irell and Manella Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Michael Ritt
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Yatharth Sharma
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nagarajan Vaidehi
- Irell and Manella Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan
- Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics Graduate Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
How phosphorylation impacts intrinsically disordered proteins and their function. Essays Biochem 2022; 66:901-913. [PMID: 36350035 PMCID: PMC9760426 DOI: 10.1042/ebc20220060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Phosphorylation is the most common post-translational modification (PTM) in eukaryotes, occurring particularly frequently in intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). These proteins are highly flexible and dynamic by nature. Thus, it is intriguing that the addition of a single phosphoryl group to a disordered chain can impact its function so dramatically. Furthermore, as many IDPs carry multiple phosphorylation sites, the number of possible states increases, enabling larger complexities and novel mechanisms. Although a chemically simple and well-understood process, the impact of phosphorylation on the conformational ensemble and molecular function of IDPs, not to mention biological output, is highly complex and diverse. Since the discovery of the first phosphorylation site in proteins 75 years ago, we have come to a much better understanding of how this PTM works, but with the diversity of IDPs and their capacity for carrying multiple phosphoryl groups, the complexity grows. In this Essay, we highlight some of the basic effects of IDP phosphorylation, allowing it to serve as starting point when embarking on studies into this topic. We further describe how recent complex cases of multisite phosphorylation of IDPs have been instrumental in widening our view on the effect of protein phosphorylation. Finally, we put forward perspectives on the phosphorylation of IDPs, both in relation to disease and in context of other PTMs; areas where deep insight remains to be uncovered.
Collapse
|
6
|
Shaw TI, Zhao B, Li Y, Wang H, Wang L, Manley B, Stewart PA, Karolak A. Multi-omics approach to identifying isoform variants as therapeutic targets in cancer patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1051487. [PMID: 36505834 PMCID: PMC9730332 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1051487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer-specific alternatively spliced events (ASE) play a role in cancer pathogenesis and can be targeted by immunotherapy, oligonucleotide therapy, and small molecule inhibition. However, identifying actionable ASE targets remains challenging due to the uncertainty of its protein product, structure impact, and proteoform (protein isoform) function. Here we argue that an integrated multi-omics profiling strategy can overcome these challenges, allowing us to mine this untapped source of targets for therapeutic development. In this review, we will provide an overview of current multi-omics strategies in characterizing ASEs by utilizing the transcriptome, proteome, and state-of-art algorithms for protein structure prediction. We will discuss limitations and knowledge gaps associated with each technology and informatics analytics. Finally, we will discuss future directions that will enable the full integration of multi-omics data for ASE target discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy I. Shaw
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States,*Correspondence: Timothy I. Shaw,
| | - Bi Zhao
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Yuxin Li
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Hong Wang
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Brandon Manley
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Paul A. Stewart
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Aleksandra Karolak
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tahsin A, Ahmed R, Bhattacharjee P, Adiba M, Al Saba A, Yasmin T, Chakraborty S, Hasan AM, Nabi AN. Most frequently harboured missense variants of hACE2 across different populations exhibit varying patterns of binding interaction with spike glycoproteins of emerging SARS-CoV-2 of different lineages. Comput Biol Med 2022; 148:105903. [PMID: 35932731 PMCID: PMC9296255 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 at Wuhan in the Hubei province of China in 2019, the virus has accumulated various mutations, giving rise to many variants. According to the combinations of mutations acquired, these variants are classified into lineages and greatly differ in infectivity and transmissibility. In 2021 alone, a variant of interest (VoI) Mu (B.1.621), as well as, variants of concern (VoC) Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (BA.1, BA.2) and later in 2022, BA.4, BA.5, and BA.2.12.1 have emerged. Since then, the world has seen prominent surges in the rate of infection during short periods of time. However, not all populations have suffered equally, which suggests a possible role of host genetic factors. Here, we investigated the strength of binding of the spike glycoprotein receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 variants: Mu, Delta, Delta Plus (AY.1), Omicron sub-variants BA.1, BA.2, BA.4, BA.5, and BA.2.12.1 with the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) missense variants prevalent in major populations. In this purpose, molecular docking analysis, as well as, molecular dynamics simulation was performed of the above-mentioned SARS-CoV-2 RBD variants with the hACE2 containing the single amino acid substitutions prevalent in African (E37K), Latin American (F40L), non-Finnish European (D355 N), and South Asian (P84T) populations, in order to predict the effects of the lineage-defining mutations of the viral variants on receptor binding. The effects of these mutations on protein stability were also explored. The protein-protein docking and molecular dynamics simulation analyses have revealed variable strength of attachment and exhibited altered interactions in the case of different hACE2-RBD complexes. In vitro studies are warranted to confirm these findings which may enable early prediction regarding the risk of transmissibility of newly emerging variants across different populations in the future.
Collapse
|
8
|
Intrinsically disordered proteins and proteins with intrinsically disordered regions in neurodegenerative diseases. Biophys Rev 2022; 14:679-707. [DOI: 10.1007/s12551-022-00968-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
9
|
Yeast-based directed-evolution for high-throughput structural stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Sci Rep 2022; 12:8657. [PMID: 35606532 PMCID: PMC9126886 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12731-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The immense potential of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) as targets for drug discovery is not fully realized due to the enormous difficulties associated with structure elucidation of these profoundly unstable membrane proteins. The existing methods of GPCR stability-engineering are cumbersome and low-throughput; in addition, the scope of GPCRs that could benefit from these techniques is limited. Here, we present a yeast-based screening platform for a single-step isolation of GRCR variants stable in the presence of short-chain detergents, a feature essential for their successful crystallization using vapor diffusion method. The yeast detergent-resistant cell wall presents a unique opportunity for compartmentalization, to physically link the receptor's phenotype to its encoding DNA, and thus enable discovery of stable GPCR variants with unprecedent efficiency. The scope of mutations identified by the method reveals a surprising amenability of the GPCR scaffold to stabilization, and suggests an intriguing possibility of amending the stability properties of GPCR by varying the structural status of the C-terminus.
Collapse
|
10
|
Structural Insights into the Intrinsically Disordered GPCR C-Terminal Region, Major Actor in Arrestin-GPCR Interaction. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12050617. [PMID: 35625550 PMCID: PMC9138321 DOI: 10.3390/biom12050617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Arrestin-dependent pathways are a central component of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCRs) signaling. However, the molecular processes regulating arrestin binding are to be further illuminated, in particular with regard to the structural impact of GPCR C-terminal disordered regions. Here, we used an integrated biophysical strategy to describe the basal conformations of the C-terminal domains of three class A GPCRs, the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R), the growth hormone secretagogue or ghrelin receptor type 1a (GHSR) and the β2-adernergic receptor (β2AR). By doing so, we revealed the presence of transient secondary structures in these regions that are potentially involved in the interaction with arrestin. These secondary structure elements differ from those described in the literature in interaction with arrestin. This suggests a mechanism where the secondary structure conformational preferences in the C-terminal regions of GPCRs could be a central feature for optimizing arrestins recognition.
Collapse
|
11
|
Madhu MK, Debroy A, Murarka RK. Molecular Insights into Phosphorylation-Induced Allosteric Conformational Changes in a β 2-Adrenergic Receptor. J Phys Chem B 2022; 126:1917-1932. [PMID: 35196859 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c08610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The large conformational flexibility of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been a puzzle in structural and pharmacological studies for the past few decades. Apart from structural rearrangements induced by ligands, enzymatic phosphorylations by GPCR kinases (GRKs) at the carboxy-terminal tail (C-tail) of a GPCR also make conformational alterations to the transmembrane helices and facilitates the binding of one of its transducer proteins named β-arrestin. The phosphorylation-induced conformational transition of the receptor that causes specific binding to β-arrestin but prevents the association of other transducers such as G proteins lacks atomistic understanding and is elusive to experimental studies. Using microseconds of all-atom conventional and Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) simulations, we investigate the allosteric mechanism of phosphorylation induced-conformational changes in β2-adrenergic receptor, a well-characterized GPCR model system. Free energy profiles reveal that the phosphorylated receptor samples a new conformational state in addition to the canonical active state corroborating with recent nuclear magnetic resonance experimental findings. The new state has a smaller intracellular cavity that is likely to accommodate β-arrestin better than G protein. Using contact map and inter-residue interaction energy calculations, we found the phosphorylated C-tail adheres to the cytosolic surface of the transmembrane domain of the receptor. Transfer entropy calculations show that the C-tail residues drive the correlated motions of TM residues, and the allosteric signal is relayed via several residues at the cytosolic surface. Our results also illustrate how the redistribution of inter-residue nonbonding interaction couples with the allosteric communication from the phosphorylated C-tail to the transmembrane. Atomistic insight into phosphorylation-induced β-arrestin specific conformation is therapeutically important to design drugs with higher efficacy and fewer side effects. Our results, therefore, open novel opportunities to fine-tune β-arrestin bias in GPCR signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Midhun K Madhu
- Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhopal 462066, MP, India
| | - Annesha Debroy
- Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhopal 462066, MP, India
| | - Rajesh K Murarka
- Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal, Bhopal Bypass Road, Bhopal 462066, MP, India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nicoli A, Dunkel A, Giorgino T, de Graaf C, Di Pizio A. Classification Model for the Second Extracellular Loop of Class A GPCRs. J Chem Inf Model 2022; 62:511-522. [PMID: 35113559 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) is the longest and the most diverse loop among class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). It connects the transmembrane (TM) helices 4 and 5 and contains a highly conserved cysteine through which it is bridged with TM3. In this paper, experimental ECL2 structures were analyzed based on their sequences, shapes, and intramolecular contacts. To take into account the flexibility, we incorporated into our analyses information from the molecular dynamics trajectories available on the GPCRmd website. Despite the high sequence variability, shapes of the analyzed structures, defined by the backbone volume overlaps, can be clustered into seven main groups. Conformational differences within the clusters can be then identified by intramolecular interactions with other GPCR structural domains. Overall, our work provides a reorganization of the structural information of the ECL2 of class A GPCR subfamilies, highlighting differences and similarities on sequence and conformation levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Nicoli
- Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany
| | - Andreas Dunkel
- Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany
| | - Toni Giorgino
- Biophysics Institute, National Research Council (CNR-IBF), 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Chris de Graaf
- Sosei Heptares, Steinmetz Building, Granta Park, Great Abington, Cambridge CB21 6DG, U.K
| | - Antonella Di Pizio
- Leibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, 85354 Freising, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Harini K, Jayashree S, Tiwari V, Vishwanath S, Sowdhamini R. Ligand Docking Methods to Recognize Allosteric Inhibitors for G-Protein-Coupled Receptors. Bioinform Biol Insights 2021; 15:11779322211037769. [PMID: 34733103 PMCID: PMC8558589 DOI: 10.1177/11779322211037769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane proteins which play an important role in many cellular processes and are excellent drug targets. Despite the existence of several US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved GPCR-targeting drugs, there is a continuing challenge of side effects owing to the nonspecific nature of drug binding. We have investigated the diversity of the ligand binding site for this class of proteins against their cognate ligands using computational docking, even if their structures are known already in the ligand-complexed form. The cognate ligand of some of these receptors dock at allosteric binding site with better score than the binding at the conservative site. Interestingly, amino acid residues at such allosteric binding site are not conserved across GPCR subfamilies. Such a computational approach can assist in the prediction of specific allosteric binders for GPCRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Harini
- Department of Bioinformatics, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India
| | - S Jayashree
- Department of Biotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.,Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Vikas Tiwari
- Department of Bioinformatics, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India
| | - Sneha Vishwanath
- Department of Biophysics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.,Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ramanathan Sowdhamini
- Department of Bioinformatics, National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Turku A, Schihada H, Kozielewicz P, Bowin CF, Schulte G. Residue 6.43 defines receptor function in class F GPCRs. Nat Commun 2021; 12:3919. [PMID: 34168128 PMCID: PMC8225760 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24004-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The class Frizzled of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), consisting of ten Frizzled (FZD1-10) subtypes and Smoothened (SMO), remains one of the most enigmatic GPCR families. While SMO relies on cholesterol binding to the 7TM core of the receptor to activate downstream signaling, underlying details of receptor activation remain obscure for FZDs. Here, we aimed to investigate the activation mechanisms of class F receptors utilizing a computational biology approach and mutational analysis of receptor function in combination with ligand binding and downstream signaling assays in living cells. Our results indicate that FZDs differ substantially from SMO in receptor activation-associated conformational changes. SMO manifests a preference for a straight TM6 in both ligand binding and functional readouts. Similar to the majority of GPCRs, FZDs present with a kinked TM6 upon activation owing to the presence of residue P6.43. Functional comparison of FZD and FZD P6.43F mutants in different assay formats monitoring ligand binding, G protein activation, DVL2 recruitment and TOPflash activity, however, underlines further the functional diversity among FZDs and not only between FZDs and SMO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainoleena Turku
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Sec. Receptor Biology & Signaling, Biomedicum 6D, Stockholm, Sweden
- Orion Pharma R&D, Espoo, Finland
| | - Hannes Schihada
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Sec. Receptor Biology & Signaling, Biomedicum 6D, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pawel Kozielewicz
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Sec. Receptor Biology & Signaling, Biomedicum 6D, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Carl-Fredrik Bowin
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Sec. Receptor Biology & Signaling, Biomedicum 6D, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Schulte
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Sec. Receptor Biology & Signaling, Biomedicum 6D, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matthees ESF, Haider RS, Hoffmann C, Drube J. Differential Regulation of GPCRs-Are GRK Expression Levels the Key? Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:687489. [PMID: 34109182 PMCID: PMC8182058 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.687489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest family of transmembrane receptors and their signal transduction is tightly regulated by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins. In this review, we discuss novel aspects of the regulatory GRK/β-arrestin system. Therefore, we briefly revise the origin of the "barcode" hypothesis for GPCR/β-arrestin interactions, which states that β-arrestins recognize different receptor phosphorylation states to induce specific functions. We emphasize two important parameters which may influence resulting GPCR phosphorylation patterns: (A) direct GPCR-GRK interactions and (B) tissue-specific expression and availability of GRKs and β-arrestins. In most studies that focus on the molecular mechanisms of GPCR regulation, these expression profiles are underappreciated. Hence we analyzed expression data for GRKs and β-arrestins in 61 tissues annotated in the Human Protein Atlas. We present our analysis in the context of pathophysiological dysregulation of the GPCR/GRK/β-arrestin system. This tissue-specific point of view might be the key to unraveling the individual impact of different GRK isoforms on GPCR regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carsten Hoffmann
- Institut für Molekulare Zellbiologie, CMB – Center for Molecular Biomedicine, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kharche S, Joshi M, Chattopadhyay A, Sengupta D. Conformational plasticity and dynamic interactions of the N-terminal domain of the chemokine receptor CXCR1. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1008593. [PMID: 34014914 PMCID: PMC8172051 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The dynamic interactions between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their cognate protein partners are central to several cell signaling pathways. For example, the association of CXC chemokine receptor 1 (CXCR1) with its cognate chemokine, interleukin-8 (IL8 or CXCL8) initiates pathways leading to neutrophil-mediated immune responses. The N-terminal domain of chemokine receptors confers ligand selectivity, but unfortunately the conformational dynamics of this intrinsically disordered region remains unresolved. In this work, we have explored the interaction of CXCR1 with IL8 by microsecond time scale coarse-grain simulations, complemented by atomistic models and NMR chemical shift predictions. We show that the conformational plasticity of the apo-receptor N-terminal domain is restricted upon ligand binding, driving it to an open C-shaped conformation. Importantly, we corroborated the dynamic complex sampled in our simulations against chemical shift perturbations reported by previous NMR studies and show that the trends are similar. Our results indicate that chemical shift perturbation is often not a reporter of residue contacts in such dynamic associations. We believe our results represent a step forward in devising a strategy to understand intrinsically disordered regions in GPCRs and how they acquire functionally important conformational ensembles in dynamic protein-protein interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalmali Kharche
- CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
| | - Manali Joshi
- Bioinformatics Centre, S. P. Pune University, Pune, India
| | | | - Durba Sengupta
- CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India
- Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ocampo Daza D, Bergqvist CA, Larhammar D. The Evolution of Oxytocin and Vasotocin Receptor Genes in Jawed Vertebrates: A Clear Case for Gene Duplications Through Ancestral Whole-Genome Duplications. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:792644. [PMID: 35185783 PMCID: PMC8851675 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.792644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The neuronal and neuroendocrine peptides oxytocin (OT) and vasotocin (VT), including vasopressins, have six cognate receptors encoded by six receptor subtype genes in jawed vertebrates. The peptides elicit a broad range of responses that are specifically mediated by the receptor subtypes including neuronal functions regulating behavior and hormonal actions on reproduction and water/electrolyte balance. Previously, we have demonstrated that these six receptor subtype genes, which we designated VTR1A, VTR1B, OTR, VTR2A, VTR2B and VTR2C, arose from a syntenic ancestral gene pair, one VTR1/OTR ancestor and one VTR2 ancestor, through the early vertebrate whole-genome duplications (WGD) called 1R and 2R. This was supported by both phylogenetic and chromosomal conserved synteny data. More recently, other studies have focused on confounding factors, such as the OTR/VTR orthologs in cyclostomes, to question this scenario for the origin of the OTR/VTR gene family; proposing instead less parsimonious interpretations involving only one WGD followed by complex series of chromosomal or segmental duplications. Here, we have updated the phylogeny of the OTR/VTR gene family, including a larger number of vertebrate species, and revisited seven representative neighboring gene families from our previous conserved synteny analyses, adding chromosomal information from newer high-coverage genome assemblies from species that occupy key phylogenetic positions: the polypteriform fish reedfish (Erpetoichthys calabaricus), the cartilaginous fish thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) and a more recent high-quality assembly of the Western clawed frog (Xenopus tropicalis) genome. Our analyses once again add strong support for four-fold symmetry, i.e., chromosome quadruplication in the same time window as the WGD events early in vertebrate evolution, prior to the jawed vertebrate radiation. Thus, the evolution of the OTR/VTR gene family can be most parsimoniously explained by two WGD events giving rise to the six ancestral genes, followed by differential gene losses of VTR2 genes in different lineages. We also argue for more coherence and clarity in the nomenclature of OT/VT receptors, based on the most parsimonious scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ocampo Daza
- Subdepartment of Evolution and Development, Department of Organismal Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, United States
| | - Christina A. Bergqvist
- Department of Neuroscience, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Dan Larhammar
- Department of Neuroscience, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Dan Larhammar,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sepuru KM, Nair V, Prakash P, Gorfe AA, Rajarathnam K. Long-Range Coupled Motions Underlie Ligand Recognition by a Chemokine Receptor. iScience 2020; 23:101858. [PMID: 33344917 PMCID: PMC7736917 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemokines are unusual class-A G protein-coupled receptor agonists because of their large size (∼10 kDa) and binding at two distinct receptor sites: N-terminal domain (Site-I, unique to chemokines) and a groove defined by extracellular loop/transmembrane helices (Site-II, shared with all small molecule class-A ligands). Structures and sequence analysis reveal that the receptor N-terminal domains (N-domains) are flexible and contain intrinsic disorder. Using a hybrid NMR-MD approach, we characterized the role of Site-I interactions for the CXCL8-CXCR1 pair. NMR data indicate that the CXCR1 N-domain becomes structured on binding and that the binding interface is extensive with 30% CXCL8 residues participating in this initial interaction. MD simulations indicate that CXCL8 bound at Site-I undergoes extensive reorganization on engaging Site-II with several residues initially engaged at Site-I also engaging at Site-II. We conclude that structural plasticity of Site-I interactions plays an active role in driving ligand recognition by a chemokine receptor. Structural plasticity governs chemokine-receptor interactions Receptor N-terminal domain captures the chemokine by a fly-casting mechanism Crosstalk between two distinct binding sites determines recognition and function A hybrid NMR-MD approach provides crucial insights into receptor binding mechanism
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishna Mohan Sepuru
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.,Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
| | - Vinay Nair
- Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Priyanka Prakash
- Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Alemayehu A Gorfe
- Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Krishna Rajarathnam
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.,Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Marti-Solano M, Crilly SE, Malinverni D, Munk C, Harris M, Pearce A, Quon T, Mackenzie AE, Wang X, Peng J, Tobin AB, Ladds G, Milligan G, Gloriam DE, Puthenveedu MA, Babu MM. Combinatorial expression of GPCR isoforms affects signalling and drug responses. Nature 2020; 587:650-656. [PMID: 33149304 PMCID: PMC7611127 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2888-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane proteins that modulate physiology across human tissues in response to extracellular signals. GPCR-mediated signalling can differ because of changes in the sequence1,2 or expression3 of the receptors, leading to signalling bias when comparing diverse physiological systems4. An underexplored source of such bias is the generation of functionally diverse GPCR isoforms with different patterns of expression across different tissues. Here we integrate data from human tissue-level transcriptomes, GPCR sequences and structures, proteomics, single-cell transcriptomics, population-wide genetic association studies and pharmacological experiments. We show how a single GPCR gene can diversify into several isoforms with distinct signalling properties, and how unique isoform combinations expressed in different tissues can generate distinct signalling states. Depending on their structural changes and expression patterns, some of the detected isoforms may influence cellular responses to drugs and represent new targets for developing drugs with improved tissue selectivity. Our findings highlight the need to move from a canonical to a context-specific view of GPCR signalling that considers how combinatorial expression of isoforms in a particular cell type, tissue or organism collectively influences receptor signalling and drug responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie E Crilly
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Duccio Malinverni
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Structural Biology and Center for Data Driven Discovery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Christian Munk
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Matthew Harris
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Abigail Pearce
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tezz Quon
- Centre for Translational Pharmacology, Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Amanda E Mackenzie
- Centre for Translational Pharmacology, Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Xusheng Wang
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Biology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| | - Junmin Peng
- Center for Proteomics and Metabolomics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Departments of Structural Biology and Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Andrew B Tobin
- Centre for Translational Pharmacology, Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Graham Ladds
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Graeme Milligan
- Centre for Translational Pharmacology, Institute of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - David E Gloriam
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manojkumar A Puthenveedu
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - M Madan Babu
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Structural Biology and Center for Data Driven Discovery, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Capturing Peptide-GPCR Interactions and Their Dynamics. Molecules 2020; 25:molecules25204724. [PMID: 33076289 PMCID: PMC7587574 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25204724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Many biological functions of peptides are mediated through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Upon ligand binding, GPCRs undergo conformational changes that facilitate the binding and activation of multiple effectors. GPCRs regulate nearly all physiological processes and are a favorite pharmacological target. In particular, drugs are sought after that elicit the recruitment of selected effectors only (biased ligands). Understanding how ligands bind to GPCRs and which conformational changes they induce is a fundamental step toward the development of more efficient and specific drugs. Moreover, it is emerging that the dynamic of the ligand–receptor interaction contributes to the specificity of both ligand recognition and effector recruitment, an aspect that is missing in structural snapshots from crystallography. We describe here biochemical and biophysical techniques to address ligand–receptor interactions in their structural and dynamic aspects, which include mutagenesis, crosslinking, spectroscopic techniques, and mass-spectrometry profiling. With a main focus on peptide receptors, we present methods to unveil the ligand–receptor contact interface and methods that address conformational changes both in the ligand and the GPCR. The presented studies highlight a wide structural heterogeneity among peptide receptors, reveal distinct structural changes occurring during ligand binding and a surprisingly high dynamics of the ligand–GPCR complexes.
Collapse
|
21
|
Wedemeyer MJ, Mueller BK, Bender BJ, Meiler J, Volkman BF. Comparative modeling and docking of chemokine-receptor interactions with Rosetta. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020; 528:389-397. [PMID: 31924303 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.12.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Chemokine receptors are a subset of G protein-coupled receptors defined by the distinct property of binding small protein ligands in the chemokine family. Chemokine receptors recognize their ligands by a mechanism that is distinct from other class A GPCRs that bind peptides or small molecules. For this reason, structural information on other ligand-GPCR interactions are only indirectly relevant to understanding the chemokine receptor interface. Additionally, the experimentally determined structures of chemokine-GPCR complexes represent less than 3% of the known interactions of this complex, multi-ligand/multi-receptor network. To enable predictive modeling of the remaining 97% of interactions, a general in silico protocol was designed to utilize existing chemokine receptor crystal structures, co-crystal structures, and NMR ensembles of chemokines bound to receptor fragments. This protocol was benchmarked on the ability to predict each of the three published co-crystal structures, while being blinded to the target structure. Averaging ensembles selected from the top-ranking models reproduced up to 84% of the intermolecular contacts found in the crystal structure, with the lowest Cα-RMSD of the complex at 3.3 Å. The chemokine receptor N-terminus, unresolved in crystal structures, was included in the modeling and recapitulates contacts with known sulfotyrosine binding pockets seen in structures derived from experimental NMR data. This benchmarking experiment suggests that realistic homology models of chemokine-GPCR complexes can be generated by leveraging current structural data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Wedemeyer
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Benjamin K Mueller
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Brian J Bender
- Department of Pharmacology and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Jens Meiler
- Department of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States; Institute for Drug Discovery, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Brian F Volkman
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guillien M, le Maire A, Mouhand A, Bernadó P, Bourguet W, Banères JL, Sibille N. IDPs and their complexes in GPCR and nuclear receptor signaling. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2020; 174:105-155. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
23
|
Fonin AV, Darling AL, Kuznetsova IM, Turoverov KK, Uversky VN. Multi-functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure-function continuum with intrinsic disorder-based proteoforms. Cell Mol Life Sci 2019; 76:4461-4492. [PMID: 31428838 PMCID: PMC11105632 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
GPCR-G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signaling cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand-GPCR and GPCR-G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defines an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR-G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure-function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of differently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fine-tuned by various post-translational modifications and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specific partners. In other words, GPCRs and G proteins exist as sets of conformational/basic, inducible/modified, and functioning proteoforms characterized by a broad spectrum of structural features and possessing various functional potentials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander V Fonin
- Laboratory of structural Dynamics, Stability and Folding of Proteins, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russian Federation
| | - April L Darling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Irina M Kuznetsova
- Laboratory of structural Dynamics, Stability and Folding of Proteins, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russian Federation
| | - Konstantin K Turoverov
- Laboratory of structural Dynamics, Stability and Folding of Proteins, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, 194064, Russian Federation
- Department of Biophysics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya av. 29, St. Petersburg, 195251, Russian Federation
| | - Vladimir N Uversky
- Department of Molecular Medicine and USF Health Byrd Alzheimer's Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
- Institute for Biological Instrumentation, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Moscow, Russian Federation.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pal S, Chattopadhyay A. Extramembranous Regions in G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Cinderella in Receptor Biology? J Membr Biol 2019; 252:483-497. [DOI: 10.1007/s00232-019-00092-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
25
|
Pandey A, LeBlanc DM, Parmar HB, Phạm TTT, Sarker M, Xu L, Duncan R, Liu XQ, Rainey JK. Structure, amphipathy, and topology of the membrane-proximal helix 8 influence apelin receptor plasma membrane localization. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES 2019; 1861:183036. [PMID: 31394100 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically have an amphipathic helix ("helix 8") immediately C-terminal to the transmembrane helical bundle. To date, a number of functional roles have been associated with GPCR helix 8 segments, but structure-function analysis for this region remains limited. Here, we examine helix 8 of the apelin receptor (AR or APJ), a class A GPCR with wide physiological and pathophysiological relevance. The 71 residue C-terminal tail of the AR is primarily intrinsically disordered, with a detergent micelle-induced increase in helical character. This helicity was localized to the helix 8 region, in good agreement with the recent AR crystal structure. A series of helix 8 mutants were made to reduce helicity, remove amphipathy, or flip the hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces. Each mutant AR was tested both biophysically, in the isolated C-terminal tail, and functionally in HEK 293 T cells, for full-length AR. In all instances, micelle interactions were maintained, and steady-state AR expression was efficient. However, removal of amphipathy or helical character led to a significant decrease in cell surface localization. Flipping of helix 8 amphipathic topology restored cell surface localization to some degree, but still was significantly reduced relative to wild-type. Structural integrity, amphipathy to drive membrane association, and correct topology of helix 8 membrane association all thus appear important for cell surface localization of the AR. This behavior correlates well to GPCR C-terminal tail sequence motifs, implying that these serve to specify key topological features of helix 8 and its proximity to the transmembrane domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Pandey
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Danielle M LeBlanc
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Hirendrasinh B Parmar
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Trần Thanh Tâm Phạm
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Muzaddid Sarker
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Lingling Xu
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Roy Duncan
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Xiang-Qin Liu
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Jan K Rainey
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada; Department of Chemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tsai CJ, Marino J, Adaixo R, Pamula F, Muehle J, Maeda S, Flock T, Taylor NMI, Mohammed I, Matile H, Dawson RJP, Deupi X, Stahlberg H, Schertler G. Cryo-EM structure of the rhodopsin-Gαi-βγ complex reveals binding of the rhodopsin C-terminal tail to the gβ subunit. eLife 2019; 8:e46041. [PMID: 31251171 PMCID: PMC6629373 DOI: 10.7554/elife.46041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the largest membrane protein families in eukaryotes are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs modulate cell physiology by activating diverse intracellular transducers, prominently heterotrimeric G proteins. The recent surge in structural data has expanded our understanding of GPCR-mediated signal transduction. However, many aspects, including the existence of transient interactions, remain elusive. We present the cryo-EM structure of the light-sensitive GPCR rhodopsin in complex with heterotrimeric Gi. Our density map reveals the receptor C-terminal tail bound to the Gβ subunit of the G protein, providing a structural foundation for the role of the C-terminal tail in GPCR signaling, and of Gβ as scaffold for recruiting Gα subunits and G protein-receptor kinases. By comparing available complexes, we found a small set of common anchoring points that are G protein-subtype specific. Taken together, our structure and analysis provide new structural basis for the molecular events of the GPCR signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Ju Tsai
- Division of Biology and Chemistry / Laboratory of Biomolecular ResearchPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Jacopo Marino
- Division of Biology and Chemistry / Laboratory of Biomolecular ResearchPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Ricardo Adaixo
- Center for Cellular Imaging and NanAnalytics (C-CINA), BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Filip Pamula
- Division of Biology and Chemistry / Laboratory of Biomolecular ResearchPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Jonas Muehle
- Division of Biology and Chemistry / Laboratory of Biomolecular ResearchPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Shoji Maeda
- Division of Biology and Chemistry / Laboratory of Biomolecular ResearchPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Tilman Flock
- Division of Biology and Chemistry / Laboratory of Biomolecular ResearchPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
- Department of BiologyETH ZurichZürichSwitzerland
| | - Nicholas MI Taylor
- Center for Cellular Imaging and NanAnalytics (C-CINA), BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Inayatulla Mohammed
- Center for Cellular Imaging and NanAnalytics (C-CINA), BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Hugues Matile
- Pharma Research and Early Development, Therapeutic modalities, Roche Innovation Center BaselHoffmann-La Roche LtdBaselSwitzerland
| | - Roger JP Dawson
- Pharma Research and Early Development, Therapeutic modalities, Roche Innovation Center BaselHoffmann-La Roche LtdBaselSwitzerland
| | - Xavier Deupi
- Division of Biology and Chemistry / Laboratory of Biomolecular ResearchPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
- Condensed Matter Theory GroupPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
| | - Henning Stahlberg
- Center for Cellular Imaging and NanAnalytics (C-CINA), BiozentrumUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland
| | - Gebhard Schertler
- Division of Biology and Chemistry / Laboratory of Biomolecular ResearchPaul Scherrer InstituteVilligenSwitzerland
- Department of BiologyETH ZurichZürichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Aguayo-Ortiz R, Dominguez L. APH-1A Component of γ-Secretase Forms an Internal Water and Ion-Containing Cavity. ACS Chem Neurosci 2019; 10:2931-2938. [PMID: 30979338 DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Anterior pharynx-defective 1A (APH-1A) is a seven transmembrane component of γ-secretase (GS), an aspartyl protease enzyme involved in the production of toxic amyloid-β peptides in Alzheimer's disease patients. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the enzyme complex revealed a central cavity in its APH-1A component, similar to water-containing cavities in G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). In this work, we performed molecular dynamics and umbrella sampling simulations to understand the role of the APH-1A cavity in the GS complex. Our results suggest that APH-1A is able to store water molecules in its inner cavity and transport some of them between cell spaces. Additionally, APH-1A allows the influx of extracellular cations into a central hydrophilic cavity but cannot transport them into the intracellular space. Overall, this study seeks to describe an alternative APH-1A function in GS besides its complex stabilization role and provide novel approaches to understand the functioning of the GS enzyme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Aguayo-Ortiz
- Facultad de Química, Departamento de Fisicoquímica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
| | - Laura Dominguez
- Facultad de Química, Departamento de Fisicoquímica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Inoue A, Raimondi F, Kadji FMN, Singh G, Kishi T, Uwamizu A, Ono Y, Shinjo Y, Ishida S, Arang N, Kawakami K, Gutkind JS, Aoki J, Russell RB. Illuminating G-Protein-Coupling Selectivity of GPCRs. Cell 2019; 177:1933-1947.e25. [PMID: 31160049 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 325] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Heterotrimetic G proteins consist of four subfamilies (Gs, Gi/o, Gq/11, and G12/13) that mediate signaling via G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), principally by receptors binding Gα C termini. G-protein-coupling profiles govern GPCR-induced cellular responses, yet receptor sequence selectivity determinants remain elusive. Here, we systematically quantified ligand-induced interactions between 148 GPCRs and all 11 unique Gα subunit C termini. For each receptor, we probed chimeric Gα subunit activation via a transforming growth factor-α (TGF-α) shedding response in HEK293 cells lacking endogenous Gq/11 and G12/13 proteins, and complemented G-protein-coupling profiles through a NanoBiT-G-protein dissociation assay. Interrogation of the dataset identified sequence-based coupling specificity features, inside and outside the transmembrane domain, which we used to develop a coupling predictor that outperforms previous methods. We used the predictor to engineer designer GPCRs selectively coupled to G12. This dataset of fine-tuned signaling mechanisms for diverse GPCRs is a valuable resource for research in GPCR signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asuka Inoue
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan; Advanced Research & Development Programs for Medical Innovation (PRIME), Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0004, Japan; Advanced Research & Development Programs for Medical Innovation (LEAP), AMED, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0004, Japan.
| | - Francesco Raimondi
- CellNetworks, Bioquant, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Biochemie Zentrum Heidelberg (BZH), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | - Gurdeep Singh
- CellNetworks, Bioquant, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Biochemie Zentrum Heidelberg (BZH), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Takayuki Kishi
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - Akiharu Uwamizu
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - Yuki Ono
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - Yuji Shinjo
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - Satoru Ishida
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - Nadia Arang
- Department of Pharmacology and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Kouki Kawakami
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - J Silvio Gutkind
- Department of Pharmacology and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Junken Aoki
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan; Advanced Research & Development Programs for Medical Innovation (LEAP), AMED, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0004, Japan
| | - Robert B Russell
- CellNetworks, Bioquant, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Biochemie Zentrum Heidelberg (BZH), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Liu H, Wang D, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Mamonova T, Wang L, Zhang C, Li S, Friedman PA, Xiao K. Parallel Post-Translational Modification Scanning Enhancing Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange-Mass Spectrometry Coverage of Key Structural Regions. Anal Chem 2019; 91:6976-6980. [PMID: 31082219 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry (HDXMS) is a powerful technology to characterize conformations and conformational dynamics of proteins and protein complexes. HDXMS has been widely used in the field of therapeutics for the development of protein drugs. Although sufficient sequence coverage is critical to the success of HDXMS, it is sometimes difficult to achieve. In this study, we developed a HDXMS data analysis strategy that includes parallel post-translational modification (PTM) scanning in HDXMS analysis. Using a membrane-delimited G protein-coupled receptor (vasopressin type 2 receptor; V2R) and a cytosolic protein (Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor-1; NHERF1) as examples, we demonstrate that this strategy substantially improves protein sequence coverage, especially in key structural regions likely including PTMs themselves that play important roles in protein conformational dynamics and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sheng Li
- Department of Medicine , University of California San Diego , La Jolla , California 92093 , United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Arimont M, van der Woude M, Leurs R, Vischer HF, de Graaf C, Nijmeijer S. Identification of Key Structural Motifs Involved in 7 Transmembrane Signaling of Adhesion GPCRs. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.8b00051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Arimont
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Melanie van der Woude
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob Leurs
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henry F. Vischer
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris de Graaf
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Nijmeijer
- Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Amsterdam Institute of Molecules, Medicines and Systems (AIMMS), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1108, 1081 HZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
New Binding Sites, New Opportunities for GPCR Drug Discovery. Trends Biochem Sci 2019; 44:312-330. [PMID: 30612897 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2018] [Revised: 08/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Many central biological events rely on protein-ligand interactions. The identification and characterization of protein-binding sites for ligands are crucial for the understanding of functions of both endogenous ligands and synthetic drug molecules. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically detect extracellular signal molecules on the cell surface and transfer these chemical signals across the membrane, inducing downstream cellular responses via G proteins or β-arrestin. GPCRs mediate many central physiological processes, making them important targets for modern drug discovery. Here, we focus on the most recent breakthroughs in finding new binding sites and binding modes of GPCRs and their potentials for the development of new medicines.
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
GPCR drug discovery: integrating solution NMR data with crystal and cryo-EM structures. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2018; 18:59-82. [PMID: 30410121 DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2018.180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The 826 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the human proteome regulate key physiological processes and thus have long been attractive drug targets. With the crystal structures of more than 50 different human GPCRs determined over the past decade, an initial platform for structure-based rational design has been established for drugs that target GPCRs, which is currently being augmented with cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of higher-order GPCR complexes. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in solution is one of the key approaches for expanding this platform with dynamic features, which can be accessed at physiological temperature and with minimal modification of the wild-type GPCR covalent structures. Here, we review strategies for the use of advanced biochemistry and NMR techniques with GPCRs, survey projects in which crystal or cryo-EM structures have been complemented with NMR investigations and discuss the impact of this integrative approach on GPCR biology and drug discovery.
Collapse
|
34
|
Synergy between intrinsically disordered domains and structured proteins amplifies membrane curvature sensing. Nat Commun 2018; 9:4152. [PMID: 30297718 PMCID: PMC6175956 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-06532-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability of proteins to sense membrane curvature is essential to cellular function. All known sensing mechanisms rely on protein domains with specific structural features such as wedge-like amphipathic helices and crescent-shaped BAR domains. Yet many proteins that contain these domains also contain large intrinsically disordered regions. Here we report that disordered domains are themselves potent sensors of membrane curvature. Comparison of Monte Carlo simulations with in vitro and live-cell measurements demonstrates that the polymer-like behavior of disordered domains found in endocytic proteins drives them to partition preferentially to convex membrane surfaces, which place fewer geometric constraints on their conformational entropy. Further, proteins containing both structured curvature sensors and disordered regions are more than twice as curvature sensitive as their respective structured domains alone. These findings demonstrate an entropic mechanism of curvature sensing that is independent of protein structure and illustrate how structured and disordered domains can synergistically enhance curvature sensitivity. Many proteins which sense membrane curvature contain intrinsically disordered domains. Here the authors use Monte Carlo simulations combined with experimental approaches and report that disordered domains are potent sensors of membrane curvature.
Collapse
|
35
|
Mechanisms of signalling and biased agonism in G protein-coupled receptors. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018; 19:638-653. [DOI: 10.1038/s41580-018-0049-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 323] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
36
|
Zhou J, Zhao S, Dunker AK. Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Link Alternative Splicing and Post-translational Modifications to Complex Cell Signaling and Regulation. J Mol Biol 2018; 430:2342-2359. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2018.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 03/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
37
|
Bugge A, Jansen PG, Maria LD, Sanni SJ, Clausen TR. Cloning and characterization of the porcine gastrin/cholecystokinin type 2 receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 2018; 833:357-363. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 06/15/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
38
|
Constrained dynamics of the sole tryptophan in the third intracellular loop of the serotonin 1A receptor. Biophys Chem 2018; 240:34-41. [PMID: 29885563 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2018.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are major signaling proteins in eukaryotic cells and are important drug targets. In spite of their role in GPCR function, the extramembranous regions of GPCRs are relatively less appreciated. The third intracellular loop (ICL3), which connects transmembrane helices V and VI, is important in this context since its crucial role in signaling has been documented for a number of GPCRs. Unfortunately, the structure of this loop is generally not visualized in x-ray crystallographic studies since this flexible loop is either stabilized using a monoclonal antibody or replaced with lysozyme. In this work, we expressed and purified the ICL3 region of the serotonin1A receptor and monitored its motional restriction and organization utilizing red edge excitation shift (REES) of its sole tryptophan and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. Our results show that the tryptophan in ICL3 exhibits REES of 4 nm, implying that it is localized in a restricted microenvironment. These results are further supported by wavelength-selective changes in fluorescence anisotropy and lifetime. This constrained dynamics was relaxed upon denaturation of the peptide, thereby suggesting the involvement of the peptide secondary structure in the observed motional restriction, as evident from CD spectroscopy and apparent rotational correlation time. To the best of our knowledge, these results constitute one of the first measurements of motional constraint in the ICL3 region of GPCRs. Our results are relevant in the context of the reported intrinsically disordered nature of ICL3 and its role in providing functional diversity to GPCRs due to conformational plasticity.
Collapse
|
39
|
Xue AY, Di Pizio A, Levit A, Yarnitzky T, Penn O, Pupko T, Niv MY. Independent Evolution of Strychnine Recognition by Bitter Taste Receptor Subtypes. Front Mol Biosci 2018; 5:9. [PMID: 29552563 PMCID: PMC5840161 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2018.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The 25 human bitter taste receptors (hT2Rs) recognize thousands of structurally and chemically diverse bitter substances. The binding modes of human bitter taste receptors hT2R10 and hT2R46, which are responsible for strychnine recognition, were previously established using site-directed mutagenesis, functional assays, and molecular modeling. Here we construct a phylogenetic tree and reconstruct ancestral sequences of the T2R10 and T2R46 clades. We next analyze the binding sites in view of experimental data to predict their ability to recognize strychnine. This analysis suggests that the common ancestor of hT2R10 and hT2R46 is unlikely to bind strychnine in the same mode as either of its two descendants. Estimation of relative divergence times shows that hT2R10 evolved earlier than hT2R46. Strychnine recognition was likely acquired first by the earliest common ancestor of the T2R10 clade before the separation of primates from other mammals, and was highly conserved within the clade. It was probably independently acquired by the common ancestor of T2R43-47 before the homo-ape speciation, lost in most T2Rs within this clade, but enhanced in the hT2R46 after humans diverged from the rest of primates. Our findings suggest hypothetical strychnine T2R receptors in several species, and serve as an experimental guide for further study. Improved understanding of how bitter taste receptors acquire the ability to be activated by particular ligands is valuable for the development of sensors for bitterness and for potential toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Yuan Xue
- Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
- The Fritz Haber Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Antonella Di Pizio
- Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
- The Fritz Haber Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Anat Levit
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Tali Yarnitzky
- Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
- Tali Yarnitzky Scientific Consulting, Maccabim-Reut, Israel
| | - Osnat Penn
- Modeling, Analysis and Theory Group, Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Tal Pupko
- The Department of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Masha Y. Niv
- Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
- The Fritz Haber Center for Molecular Dynamics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Guidolin D, Marcoli M, Tortorella C, Maura G, Agnati LF. G protein-coupled receptor-receptor interactions give integrative dynamics to intercellular communication. Rev Neurosci 2018; 29:703-726. [DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2017-0087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
The proposal of receptor-receptor interactions (RRIs) in the early 1980s broadened the view on the role of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) in the dynamics of the intercellular communication. RRIs, indeed, allow GPCR to operate not only as monomers but also as receptor complexes, in which the integration of the incoming signals depends on the number, spatial arrangement, and order of activation of the protomers forming the complex. The main biochemical mechanisms controlling the functional interplay of GPCR in the receptor complexes are direct allosteric interactions between protomer domains. The formation of these macromolecular assemblies has several physiologic implications in terms of the modulation of the signaling pathways and interaction with other membrane proteins. It also impacts on the emerging field of connectomics, as it contributes to set and tune the synaptic strength. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that the transfer of GPCR and GPCR complexes between cells via the exosome pathway could enable the target cells to recognize/decode transmitters and/or modulators for which they did not express the pertinent receptors. Thus, this process may also open the possibility of a new type of redeployment of neural circuits. The fundamental aspects of GPCR complex formation and function are the focus of the present review article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Guidolin
- Department of Neuroscience , University of Padova, via Gabelli 65 , I-35121 Padova , Italy
| | - Manuela Marcoli
- Department of Pharmacy and Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research , University of Genova , I-16126 Genova , Italy
| | - Cinzia Tortorella
- Department of Neuroscience , University of Padova, via Gabelli 65 , I-35121 Padova , Italy
| | - Guido Maura
- Department of Pharmacy and Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research , University of Genova , I-16126 Genova , Italy
| | - Luigi F. Agnati
- Department of Biomedical Sciences , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia , I-41121 Modena , Italy
- Department of Neuroscience , Karolinska Institutet , S-17177 Stockholm , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Wang Y, Bugge K, Kragelund BB, Lindorff-Larsen K. Role of protein dynamics in transmembrane receptor signalling. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2018; 48:74-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2017.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
42
|
Phosphorylation-induced conformation of β 2-adrenoceptor related to arrestin recruitment revealed by NMR. Nat Commun 2018; 9:194. [PMID: 29335412 PMCID: PMC5768704 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02632-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The C-terminal region of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), stimulated by agonist binding, is phosphorylated by GPCR kinases, and the phosphorylated GPCRs bind to arrestin, leading to the cellular responses. To understand the mechanism underlying the formation of the phosphorylated GPCR-arrestin complex, we performed NMR analyses of the phosphorylated β2-adrenoceptor (β2AR) and the phosphorylated β2AR–β-arrestin 1 complex, in the lipid bilayers of nanodisc. Here we show that the phosphorylated C-terminal region adheres to either the intracellular side of the transmembrane region or lipids, and that the phosphorylation of the C-terminal region allosterically alters the conformation around M2155.54 and M2796.41, located on transemembrane helices 5 and 6, respectively. In addition, we found that the conformation induced by the phosphorylation is similar to that corresponding to the β-arrestin-bound state. The phosphorylation-induced structures revealed in this study propose a conserved structural motif of GPCRs that enables β-arrestin to recognize dozens of GPCRs. Upon stimulation by agonist binding, the C-terminal regions of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) become phosphorylated by GPCR kinases, and phosphorylated GPCRs bind arrestin. Here the authors give structural insights into the phosphorylation induced conformational changes in GPCRs by performing NMR studies with the β2-adrenoceptor.
Collapse
|
43
|
Detection and Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic GPCRs Interactions Using Flow Cytometry-Based FRET. RECEPTOR-RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8576-0_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
44
|
Hauser AS, Chavali S, Masuho I, Jahn LJ, Martemyanov KA, Gloriam DE, Babu MM. Pharmacogenomics of GPCR Drug Targets. Cell 2017; 172:41-54.e19. [PMID: 29249361 PMCID: PMC5766829 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 383] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Natural genetic variation in the human genome is a cause of individual differences in responses to medications and is an underappreciated burden on public health. Although 108 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the targets of 475 (∼34%) Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and account for a global sales volume of over 180 billion US dollars annually, the prevalence of genetic variation among GPCRs targeted by drugs is unknown. By analyzing data from 68,496 individuals, we find that GPCRs targeted by drugs show genetic variation within functional regions such as drug- and effector-binding sites in the human population. We experimentally show that certain variants of μ-opioid and Cholecystokinin-A receptors could lead to altered or adverse drug response. By analyzing UK National Health Service drug prescription and sales data, we suggest that characterizing GPCR variants could increase prescription precision, improving patients’ quality of life, and relieve the economic and societal burden due to variable drug responsiveness. Video Abstract
GPCRs targeted by FDA-approved drugs show genetic variation in the human population Genetic variation occurs in functional sites and may result in altered drug response We present an online resource of GPCR genetic variants for pharmacogenomics research Understanding variation in drug targets may help alleviate economic healthcare burden
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander S Hauser
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK; Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Sreenivas Chavali
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Ikuo Masuho
- Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute Florida, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA
| | - Leonie J Jahn
- The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University Denmark, Kemitorvet 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Kirill A Martemyanov
- Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute Florida, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA
| | - David E Gloriam
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Madan Babu
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Prosser RS, Ye L, Pandey A, Orazietti A. Activation processes in ligand-activated G protein-coupled receptors: A case study of the adenosine A 2A receptor. Bioessays 2017; 39. [PMID: 28787091 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201700072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Here we review concepts related to an ensemble description of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The ensemble is characterized by both inactive and active states, whose equilibrium populations and exchange rates depend sensitively on ligand, environment, and allosteric factors. This review focuses on the adenosine A2 receptor (A2A R), a prototypical class A GPCR. 19 F Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) studies show that apo A2A R is characterized by a broad ensemble of conformers, spanning inactive to active states, and resembling states defined earlier for rhodopsin. In keeping with ideas associated with a conformational selection mechanism, addition of agonist serves to allosterically restrict the overall degrees of freedom at the G protein binding interface and bias both states and functional dynamics to facilitate G protein binding and subsequent activation. While the ligand does not necessarily "induce" activation, it does bias sampling of states, increase the cooperativity of the activation process and thus, the lifetimes of functional activation intermediates, while restricting conformational dynamics to that needed for activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Scott Prosser
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, UTM, Mississauga, ON, Canada.,Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Libin Ye
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, UTM, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Aditya Pandey
- Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, UTM, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
The contribution of intrinsically disordered regions to protein function, cellular complexity, and human disease. Biochem Soc Trans 2017; 44:1185-1200. [PMID: 27911701 PMCID: PMC5095923 DOI: 10.1042/bst20160172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Revised: 07/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
In the 1960s, Christian Anfinsen postulated that the unique three-dimensional structure of a protein is determined by its amino acid sequence. This work laid the foundation for the sequence–structure–function paradigm, which states that the sequence of a protein determines its structure, and structure determines function. However, a class of polypeptide segments called intrinsically disordered regions does not conform to this postulate. In this review, I will first describe established and emerging ideas about how disordered regions contribute to protein function. I will then discuss molecular principles by which regulatory mechanisms, such as alternative splicing and asymmetric localization of transcripts that encode disordered regions, can increase the functional versatility of proteins. Finally, I will discuss how disordered regions contribute to human disease and the emergence of cellular complexity during organismal evolution.
Collapse
|
47
|
Identification of two novel chicken GPR133 variants and their expression in different tissues. Funct Integr Genomics 2017; 17:687-696. [DOI: 10.1007/s10142-017-0564-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2016] [Revised: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
48
|
Sojka AC, Brennan KM, Maizels ET, Young CD. The Science Behind G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) and Their Accurate Visual Representation in Scientific Research. THE JOURNAL OF BIOCOMMUNICATION 2017; 41:e6. [PMID: 36405408 PMCID: PMC9140105 DOI: 10.5210/jbc.v41i1.7309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane (TM) proteins that span the cell membrane seven times, and contain intracellular and extracellular domains, comprised of connecting loops, as well as terminal extension sequences. GPCRs bind ligands within their transmembrane and/or extracellular domains. Ligand binding elicits conformational changes that initiate downstream intracellular signaling events through arrestins and G proteins. GPCRs play central roles in many physiological processes, from sensory to neurological, cardiovascular, endocrine, and reproductive functions. This paper strives to provide an entry point to current GPCR science, and to identify visual approaches to communicate select aspects of GPCR structure and function with clarity and accuracy. The overall GPCR structure, primary sequence and the implications of sequence for membrane topology, ligand binding and helical rearrangements accompanying activation are considered and discussed in the context of visualization strategies, including two-dimensional topological diagrams, three-dimensional representations, and common errors that arise from these representations.
Collapse
|
49
|
Farran B. An update on the physiological and therapeutic relevance of GPCR oligomers. Pharmacol Res 2017; 117:303-327. [PMID: 28087443 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Revised: 01/06/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The traditional view on GPCRs held that they function as single monomeric units composed of identical subunits. This notion was overturned by the discovery that GPCRs can form homo- and hetero-oligomers, some of which are obligatory, and can further assemble into receptor mosaics consisting of three or more protomers. Oligomerisation exerts significant impacts on receptor function and physiology, offering a platform for the diversification of receptor signalling, pharmacology, regulation, crosstalk, internalization and trafficking. Given their involvement in the modulation of crucial physiological processes, heteromers could constitute important therapeutic targets for a wide range of diseases, including schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, substance abuse or obesity. This review aims at depicting the current developments in GPCR oligomerisation research, documenting various class A, B and C GPCR heteromers detected in vitro and in vivo using biochemical and biophysical approaches, as well as recently identified higher-order oligomeric complexes. It explores the current understanding of dimerization dynamics and the possible interaction interfaces that drive oligomerisation. Most importantly, it provides an inventory of the wide range of physiological processes and pathophysiological conditions to which GPCR oligomers contribute, surveying some of the oligomers that constitute potential drug targets. Finally, it delineates the efforts to develop novel classes of ligands that specifically target and tether to receptor oligomers instead of a single monomeric entity, thus ameliorating their ability to modulate GPCR function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Batoul Farran
- Department of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi R. Latorraca
- Department of Computer Science, ‡Biophysics Program, §Department of Molecular
and Cellular
Physiology, and ∥Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - A. J. Venkatakrishnan
- Department of Computer Science, ‡Biophysics Program, §Department of Molecular
and Cellular
Physiology, and ∥Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Ron O. Dror
- Department of Computer Science, ‡Biophysics Program, §Department of Molecular
and Cellular
Physiology, and ∥Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| |
Collapse
|