Long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and lamivudine in combination compared to lamivudine monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. An Italian multicenter, randomized trial

Histological response to combination therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogs and peginterferon alpha in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients

Although nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) monotherapy is effective in hepatitis B virus suppression and fibrosis regression, serological response rates are not satisfactory. Studies assessing the benefits of combination therapy with NAs and peginterferon alpha (PegIFNα) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have produced conflicting results and mainly focused on serological outcomes. Histological changes in response to combination therapy have not been evaluated in real-world practice. This study aimed to evaluate the histological changes in response to NA-PegIFNα combination therapy in CHB patients and to comprehensively compare the efficacy of NA-PegIFNα combination therapy and NA monotherapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 40 CHB patients who underwent either NA-PegIFNα combination therapy or NA monotherapy. Changes in histology at 48 weeks after treatment initiation were evaluated. Serological characteristics were also analysed and compared between the NA-PegIFNα combination therapy and NA monotherapy groups and between histological responders and nonresponders. Compared to baseline biopsies, both fibrosis staging and necroinflammatory grading scores were significantly lower in the second biopsies examined post-treatment in both groups. Nearly all patients experienced a reduction in inflammation (87.5% in both groups), but there was a subgroup of patients who exhibited either no significant improvement or fibrosis progression (33.3% and 31.2% in the NA monotherapy and NA-PegIFNα combination therapy groups, respectively). Nearly, all patients achieved ALT normalization and sustained virological response (SVR) after 48 weeks of antiviral treatment. Approximately one-third of individuals (36.8% and 30% in the two groups, respectively) achieved HBeAg loss at 48 weeks after treatment initiation. Although there were no significant differences in overall rates of histological, biochemical, virological and serological responses between the two groups, an earlier virological response and a higher cumulative SVR rate over time were observed during long-term follow-up in patients treated with NA-PegIFNα combination therapy (P = 0.0129). Trends of more rapid HBeAg loss and a higher cumulative HBeAg loss rate throughout long-term follow-up were also observed but were not statistically significant. The ALT normalization rates at 24 and 48 weeks after treatment initiation were associated with the histological response. Significant regression of fibrosis and resolution of necroinflammation were induced with either NA-PegIFNα combination therapy or NA monotherapy. Significant biochemical, virological and serological responses were observed in both groups, and the response rates at 48 weeks were similar in the two groups. Over time during long-term follow-up, the virological and serological responses were faster and superior following the combination regimen.

Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B: Current Updates and Perspectives

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) and interferon have been used for several decades to treat chronic hepatitis B; however, the therapeutic response remains unsatisfactory. Although NUC therapy exhibits potent on-treatment viral suppression, frequent off-therapy virological relapses suggest an indefinite treatment course. Interferon modulates the innate and adaptive antiviral immune responses and thus increases the chance of viral eradication. Interferon therapy has the advantage of a finite duration, absence of drug resistance, and durable posttreatment responses. Therefore, the combination of NUCs and interferon can theoretically facilitate a synergistic therapeutic effect. This paper summarizes the current strategies of various combination therapies into three categories: the simultaneous “dual” strategy, sequential combination “add-on” strategy, and “switch” strategy. Generally, dual therapy exhibits greater on-treatment and off-therapy viral suppression and lower drug resistance compared with NUC monotherapy. Compared with interferon monotherapy, dual therapy has greater on-treatment viral suppression but shows no difference in off-therapy sustained virological responses. Specific add-on or switch strategies provide promising on-treatment efficacy in select patients. Pretreatment or on-treatment quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen and e antigen are predictive for the treatment efficacy of combination therapy. The optimal schedule of combination regimens and individualized therapy remain to be comprehensively evaluated.

Unconventional T cells in chronic hepatitis B patients on long-term suppressive therapy with tenofovir followed by a Peg-IFN add-on strategy: A randomized study

HBV eradication in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) subjects is rarely achieved with either nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) or pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN), which both have a limited effect in restoring immune responses. Thirty CHB subjects on long-term treatment with tenofovir (TDF) and HBV suppression were enrolled and randomized 1:2 to either receive Peg-IFN-α-2a add-on therapy or continue TDF alone. We studied γδ T and iNKT frequency and function (by flow cytometry) at baseline, at 12 weeks and 12 weeks after the end of treatment. A higher reduction in qHBsAg occurred in the add-on group compared with the NA group at W12 (P = .016) and at W24 (P = .012). A decline of qHBsAg ≥0.5 log₁₀ at week 24 occurred in 4 of 10 patients in the add-on arm and 1 of 20 in the NA arm, respectively (P = .03). HBsAg loss was seen in 20% of subjects in the add-on group and in none of the NA group. Compared to HBV negative, CHB on TDF showed lower frequency of iNKT (P = .03) and γδ T cells (P = .03) as well as fewer γδ T cells expressing Vδ2 T-cell receptors (P = .005). No changes in unconventional T-cell frequency and function were shown in both add-on and NA patients nor were differences detected between the two treatment groups. We report persistent impairment of unconventional T cells in CHB. Despite a greater qHBsAg decline of add-on patients, our data failed to detect any effect of Peg-IFN treatment on unconventional T cells.

Treatment of Hepatitis B related Polyarteritis Nodosa presenting with mononeuritis multiplex

We describe the case of a male patient who presented with mononeuritis multiplex due to polyarteritis nodosa following recent hepatitis B infection. Despite immunomodulatory treatment, the condition progressed with renal and small bowel involvement and the patient died. This case illustrates the difficulty in treating this multisystem disorder and we review the literature on its pathogenesis and treatment.

A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Interferon Monotherapy or Combined with Different Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B

Background: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of interferon (IFN) with or without different nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). Methods: The PubMed, Wan Fang and CNKI databases were searched to identify relevant trials up to May 2015. Meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0. The stability and reliability were evaluated by publication bias tests. Results: Fifty-six studies fulfilled the criteria for the meta-analysis. Compared with IFN monotherapy, combination therapy were superior in HBV DNA undetectable rate (Risk Ratio (RR) = 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.44–1.66, p < 0.00001), HBeAg and HBsAg loss rate (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22–1.56, p < 0.00001; RR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.03–2.78, p = 0.04, respectively) at the end of week 48 treatment. Sub-analysis showed the RRs of virological response for entecavir (ETV), adefovir (ADV), and lamivudine (LAM) were 1.64, 1.61 and 1.52, respectively; RRs of HBeAg loss rate were 1.34, 1.71 and 1.34, respectively. However, at the end of follow-up, IFN plus NAs therapy was better than IFN monotherapy only in terms of HBV DNA undetectable rate (p = 0.0007). Conclusions: Combination therapy was better than IFN monotherapy in virological and serological responses at the end of treatment. After follow-up, only HBV DNA undetectable rate was superior for combination therapy.

Combination therapy of interferon and nucleotide/nucleoside analogues for chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B is one of the leading causes of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma globally. At present, seven drugs, including two interferons and five oral nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Interferon works by immunomodulation, but is successful in less than a third of treated patients and is a relatively weak antiviral. NAs directly suppress the hepatitis B virus but have limited durability. Based on current data, combination of NA and interferon results in greater viral suppression but does not translate to off-treatment sustained response. Concomitant or sequential treatment also does not make a difference. Combining telbivudine and interferon also runs the risk of severe peripheral neuropathy. On the other hand, interferon switch or additional therapy in patients well controlled with NAs appears to improve the durability of off-treatment response. This article reviews current data on interferon and NA combination and discusses potential future developments.

Treatment options for chronic hepatitis B and C infection in children

There has been a dramatic increase in treatment options for both chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection in adults over the past 5-10 years, resulting in standardized regimes for initial treatment, relapsers and even infection in the setting of recurrence post-liver transplantation. These regimes have resulted in the halting of the disease progression, reduction in the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and removal of these infections as a contraindication for liver transplantation. However, treatment in children must be considered carefully in the context of the natural history of these infections and host factors, particularly the immunological mileu, which may affect response to therapy. The as yet unknown long-term effects of medications must also be balanced with the probability of significant life-long morbidity or mortality from chronic hepatitis and its complications. Furthermore, the development of drug resistance, particularly in the case of CHB, has significant implications for the pediatric patient who may exhaust effective therapeutic options at a relatively young age. For these reasons, initiation of therapy must be based on sound criteria. Based on the current data, we recommend that therapy should be offered to children with CHB who have an elevation in alanine aminotransferase (>2-3 x upper limit of normal) for more than 6 months. Therapy with interferon-alpha should be offered in the majority of cases with the aim of immune clearance as measured by early antigen seroconversion. By contrast, treatment indication for CHC in children remains controversial. If used, combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is likely to produce the highest rates of sustained viral response.

Adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera, Gilead Sciences) is a prodrug of adefovir, with potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus. Adefovir dipivoxil therapy, 10 mg daily for 48 weeks, is effective in hepatitis B e antigen-positive and -negative chronic hepatitis B. In hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B, adefovir dipivoxil was recently found to maintain its efficacy even after 3 years of therapy. Adefovir dipivoxil is effective in patients with compensated or decompensated chronic viral B liver disease, and in pre- and post-transplant hepatitis B virus patients who develop resistance to lamivudine (Epivir, GlaxoSmithKline). It is well-tolerated and safe even after the third year of long-term therapy, and is associated with low rates of viral resistance. All these characteristics make adefovir dipivoxil an important drug for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection and an excellent candidate for long-term maintenance therapy in chronic viral B liver disease.

Combination therapy with a nucleos(t)ide analogue and interferon for chronic hepatitis B: simultaneous or sequential

Currently available antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus infection can be divided into two classes of therapeutic agents: nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and interferon (IFN). The major advantages of NAs are good tolerance and potent antiviral activity associated with high rates of on-treatment response to therapy; the advantages of IFN include a finite course of treatment, absence of drug resistance, and an opportunity to obtain a post-treatment durable response to therapy. The use of these two antiviral agents with different mechanisms of action in combination is theoretically an attractive approach for treatment. Here, we have reviewed previous reports of either simultaneous or sequential combination therapy with NA and IFN for chronic hepatitis B patients. In previous studies comparing the lamivudine/IFN combination and lamivudine monotherapy in a finite course, combination therapy was associated with higher rates of sustained post-treatment response and lower rates of drug resistance than lamivudine monotherapy. However, NAs such as lamivudine are generally administered indefinitely because of high rates of post-treatment relapse. In addition, concern for drug resistance has decreased significantly with newer, high-potency NAs even when administered alone. In previous studies comparing the lamivudine/IFN combination and IFN monotherapy, the combination therapy showed greater on-treatment viral suppression, but no difference was observed in the post-treatment sustained response. Thus, whether combination therapy confers an additional benefit compared to monotherapy for treating chronic hepatitis B remains unclear. The efficacy of IFN in combination with a more potent NA, such as entecavir or tenofovir, remains to be comprehensively evaluated.

Economic evaluation of treatments for chronic hepatitis B

The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-utility study of adefovir, entecavir, interferon alpha, pegylated interferon alpha, lamivudine and tenofovir for chronic hepatitis B in the context of Brazilian Public Health Care System. A systematic review was carried out for efficacy and safety. Another review was performed to collect utility data and transition probabilities between health states. A Markov model was developed in a time horizon of 40 years with annual cycles for three groups of: HBeAg positive, HBeAg negative, and all patients. These strategies were compared to a fourth group that received no treatment. Discount rates of 5% were applied and sensitivity analyses were performed. Tenofovir offered the best cost-utility ratio for the three evaluated models: U$397, U$385 and U$384 (per QALY, respectively, for HBeAg positive, negative, and all patients). All other strategies were completely dominated because they showed higher costs and lower effectiveness than tenofovir. The sequence of cost-utility in the three models was: tenofovir, entecavir, lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, pegylated interferon alpha, and interferon alpha. In the sensitivity analysis, adefovir showed lower cost-utility than telbivudine in some situations. The study has some limitations, primarily related to the creation of scenarios and modeling. In this study, tenofovir presented the best cost-utility ratio. The results obtained in this study will be valuable in decision-making and in the review of the clinical protocol, mainly involving the allocation of available resources for health care.

Systematic review of the literature on comparative effectiveness of antiviral treatments for chronic hepatitis B infection

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of antiviral drugs in adults with chronic hepatitis B monoinfection for evidence-based decision-making.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) published in English. Results after interferon and nucleos(t)ides analog therapies were synthesized with random-effects meta-analyses and number needed to treat (NNT).

RESULTS

Despite sustained improvements in selected biomarkers, no one drug regimen improved all intermediate outcomes. In 16 underpowered RCTs, drug treatments did not reduce mortality, liver cancer, or cirrhosis. Sustained HBV DNA clearance was achieved in one patient when two were treated with adefovir (NNT from 1 RCT=2 95%CI 1;2) or interferon alpha-2b (NNT from 2 RCTs=2 95%CI 2;4), 13 with lamivudine (NNT from 1 RCT=13 95%CI 7;1000), and 11 with peginterferon alpha-2a vs. lamivudine (NNT from 1 RCT=11 95%CI 7;25). Sustained HBeAg seroconversion was achieved in one patient when eight were treated with interferon alpha-2b (NNT from 2 RCTs=8 95%CI 5;33) or 10--with peginterferon alpha-2b vs. interferon alpha-2b (NNT from 1 RCT=10 95%CI 5;1000). Greater benefits and safety after entecavir vs. lamivudine or pegylated interferon alpha-2b vs. interferon alpha-2b require future investigation of clinical outcomes. Adverse events were common and more frequent after interferon. Treatment utilization for adverse effects is unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual clinical decisions should rely on comparative effectiveness and absolute rates of intermediate outcomes and adverse events. Future research should clarify the relationship of intermediate and clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of drugs for evidence-based policy and clinical decisions.

Effect of nucleoside analog-interferon sequential therapy on patients with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B

AIM

Nucleoside analog (NA)-interferon (IFN) sequential therapy may enable the long-term control of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and the withdrawal of the nucleoside analog. We evaluated the efficacy of NA-IFN sequential therapy for acute exacerbation of CHB.

METHODS

A total of 12 patients with acute exacerbation of CHB, nine of whom were positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), were enrolled in this study. All the patients were treated with lamivudine 100 mg/day alone for 20 weeks, then with both IFN-alpha 6 megaunits three times per week and lamivudine for 4 weeks, and lastly, with IFN-alpha alone for 20 weeks. Patients whose serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level was normalized, whose serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level decreased to less than 5 log copies/mL, and HBeAg level was absent 24 weeks after the end of treatment were defined as having sustained virological response (SVR). The other patients were defined as having no response (NR).

RESULTS

Four out of nine (44.4%) HBeAg-positive and all three HBeAg-negative patients achieved SVR. The levels of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), HBV DNA and HBV core-related antigen were similar between SVR and NR patients at baseline. Three of four patients (75.0%) whose serum HBeAg became negative at the end of treatment achieved SVR, while one of five (20.0%) whose serum HBeAg remained positive achieved SVR.

CONCLUSION

NA-IFN sequential therapy for patients with acute exacerbation of CHB enables the withdrawal of treatment and is particularly effective for patients whose serum HBeAg has become undetectable by the end of the IFN treatment.

End points of therapy in chronic hepatitis B

This review assesses the relevance of the clinical, histological, biochemical and virological end points in the course and outcome of chronic hepatitis B. The pathway and the impact of the variation in these end points are presented, as well as their definitions. The treatment goals are discussed in terms of quality of life and survival. Prevention of the progression of the disease to cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma seems to be the best approach to improve survival. As these criteria are long-term end points, easier to use end points assessed in clinical trials as efficacy objectives were also analyzed to determine whether they can be used as accurate surrogate criteria. Results of therapy were then analyzed according to the approved end points and in terms of management of chronic hepatitis B. Finally, an attempt to define new clinical end points is discussed in view of the development of more potent antiviral strategies.

Revisão sistemática da eficácia do interferon alfa (convencional, peguilado) e lamivudina para o tratamento da hepatite crônica B

A hepatite crônica B constitui um grave problema de saúde pública e vem demonstrando crescentes gastos com financiamento de medicamentos de dispensação em caráter excepcional e de alto custo no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). O objetivo do estudo foi comparar a eficácia do interferon (convencional; peguilado - PEG2a) e lamivudina (LAM) para o tratamento da hepatite crônica B, pelo método de revisão sistemática selecionando ensaios clínicos randomizados e controlados identificados nas bases PubMed e LILACS. As medidas de resultado consideradas foram resposta virológica, soroconversão, resposta bioquímica, resposta histológica e efeitos adversos. Foram selecionados 35 artigos. A presença ou ausência do HBeAg e os níveis de alanina amino transferase (ALT) no pré-tratamento demonstraram papel fundamental na indicação terapêutica inicial. O tratamento com interferons convencionais permite a inativação da doença por longos períodos de tempo, podendo resultar em soroconversão HBsAg. O PEG 2a demonstrou eficácia superior ao interferon e LAM e efeitos colaterais semelhantes ao interferon. A LAM apresenta vantagem de ser sensível para os pacientes HBeAg negativo e apresenta como maior desvantagem o desenvolvimento de resistência.

Chronic hepatitis B: who to treat and which choice of treatment?

The goal of antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B is to prevent, through persistent suppression of HBV replication, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, seven drugs are available: IFN-alpha, pegylated interferon, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir. The choice of the drugs should always take into consideration the clinical features of patients, the antiviral efficacy of each drug, the risk of developing resistance, the long-term safety profile, the method of administration and the cost of therapy. Ideal candidates for treatment are hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients with a prolonged phase of immune clearance and hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients with elevated levels of serum HBV DNA, abnormal alanine aminotransferase and histologic evidence of moderate or severe liver necroinflammation and/or fibrosis. Patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis should be treated, even if alanine aminotransferase levels are normal and/or serum HBV DNA levels are low, in order to prevent disease flare and to improve liver function.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: are we ready for combination therapy?

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection currently involves the use of immunomodulators such as interferon and nucleoside or nucleotide analogues. Treatment aims to suppress levels of HBV DNA and induce clearance of the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) or surface antigen (HBsAg) and seroconversion. At present, no single treatment has been shown to reliably suppress HBV DNA and induce durable HBsAg loss. Nucleoside or nucleotide analogues induce the production of HBV-resistant mutations that may lead to virologic and clinical breakthrough. Combination therapy, using either immunomodulators in combination or with nucleoside or nucleotide analogues, represents an emerging strategy for treating chronic HBV infection. The theoretical benefits of combining agents with varying mechanisms of action include more efficacious viral suppression and potentially durable HBsAg loss. Although combination therapy has proven successful in chronic hepatotropic viral infections and in chronic, noninfectious medical conditions, its benefits must be weighed against risks such as increased toxicity, resistance, and cost.

Interferons and their use in persistent viral infections

In 2007, the world celebrated the 50th anniversary of the discovery of interferon (IFN) by Isaacs and Lindenmann. Subsequently, the IFN-alpha gene was cloned, fully sequenced and IFN-alpha was produced in recombinant form. Recombinant IFN-alpha is now used as the basis for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection and can also be used to treat certain forms of chronic hepatitis B virus infections. IFNs have also been used in other viral infections, although with less success. The antiviral mechanisms of IFNs are reviewed in this chapter as well as the utility of IFNs in the treatment of persistent viral infections.

Pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety of lamivudine in hepatitis B virus infection

Lamivudine was the first nucleoside analog for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). It is well-tolerated and induces a decrease in serum HBV DNA levels associated with normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels. However, a sustained response with hepatitis B 'e' antigen to anti-hepatitis B e seroconversion is obtained in a smaller proportion of patients and hepatitis B surface antigen loss is exceptional. The response is maintained during therapy, and needs to be continued indefinitely in the majority of patients since withdrawal of treatment is generally followed by a rapid reappearance of the virus. However, mutations can be induced in long-term treatment.

Systematic review: combination therapies for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

There is a renewed interest in use of combination therapies in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) because of limitations of monotherapies.

AIM

To discuss the current status of combination therapies in treatment-naïve CHB.

METHODS

PubMed search was done using 'combination', 'sequential' and 'chronic hepatitis B' as the search terms.

RESULTS

The two most popular combination therapies include 'combination of nucleos(t)ide analogues' and 'combination of interferons and nucleos(t)ide analogues'. Combination therapies using two nucleos(t)ide analogues do not lead to higher long-term efficacy. However, addition of a nucleos(t)ide analogue with a good resistance profile to a nucleos(t)ide analogue with a lower genetic barrier to resistance decreases the risk of emergent resistance to the latter. Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates are observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional interferon, but pegylated-interferon monotherapy is equally effective as combination with lamivudine. Again, resistance to lamivudine is lower with its combination with interferons.

CONCLUSIONS

The answer to the question whether hepatitis B can be treated better with combination or monotherapy remains largely unknown. Additional trials are warranted of combination therapies of peginterferon and potent nucleos(t)ide analogues or therapies with the combined use of nucleos(t)ide analogues or immunomodulators.

Lamivudine compared with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We aimed to evaluate nucleoside/nucleotide combination therapy in treatment-naïve HBeAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

One hundred and fifteen HBeAg-positive patients received lamivudine 100 mg daily plus placebo (monotherapy) or lamivudine 100 mg plus adefovir dipoxil 10 mg daily (combination therapy) for 104 weeks in a randomized double-blind study.

RESULTS

Time-weighted average change in serum HBV DNA from baseline up to week 16 was -4.20 log(10)copies/mL for both groups (p=0.936). At week 104, median serum HBV DNA change from baseline (log(10)copies/mL) for monotherapy and combination therapy was -3.41 versus -5.22, respectively. HBV DNA breakthrough was detected in 44% of monotherapy and 19% of combination therapy patients. The M204V/I mutation was detected in 43% (15/35) and 15% (6/41) of each group, respectively. ALT normalization at week 100 and 104 was 34% (19/56) in the monotherapy group and 45% (23/51) in the combination therapy group (p=0.018). By week 104, HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 20% of monotherapy and 13% of combination therapy patients. Both regimens were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower rates of resistance to lamivudine, lower serum HBV DNA levels and higher rates of ALT normalization were seen in the combination therapy group after two years. However, serological outcomes were similar.

Interferon and lamivudine vs. interferon for hepatitis B e antigen-positive hepatitis B treatment: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

To compare interferon monotherapy with its combination with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive hepatitis B treatment.

METHODS

Two independent researchers identified pertinent randomized controlled trials. The trials were evaluated for methodological quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virological and biochemical responses, and HBeAg clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative meta-analyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall.

RESULTS

Greater sustained virological, biochemical and seroconversion rates were observed with addition of lamivudine to conventional [odds ratio (OR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.7-5.5), P<0.0001, OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.2-2.7), P=0.007 and OR=1.8, 95% CI (1.1-2.8), P=0.01 respectively], although not pegylated [OR=1.1, 95% CI (0.5-2.3), P=0.8, OR=1.0, 95% CI (0.7-1.3), P=0.94, and OR=0.9, 95% CI (0.6-1.2), P=0.34 respectively] interferon-alpha, with no significant affect on HBeAg clearance rates [OR=1.6, 95% CI (0.9-2.7), P=0.09, and OR=0.8, 95% CI (0.6-1.1), P=0.26 respectively]. Excluding virological response (P<0.001), pegylated interferon monotherapy and conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy were similarly efficacious (P>0.05), with the former studied in harder to treat patients, as evidenced by the superior virological response observed with conventional as compared with pegylated interferon monotherapy (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In comparable populations, pegylated interferon monotherapy is likely to be equally or more efficacious than conventional interferon and lamivudine combination therapy, thus constituting the treatment of choice, with no added benefit with lamivudine addition. However, when conventional interferon is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered.

[Interferon in the treatment of viral hepatitis. The interferon was discovered 50 years ago]

The interferons are heterogenic glycoproteins which are produced on the effect of virus infection, as immune answer, by the living cells. They were discovered half a century ago. They have antineoplastic, antiviral and immunomodulator effect. The names of interferons used in the therapy are nominated with Greek letters. This nomination shows their origins: the interferon-alpha originates from leucocytes, the interferon-beta does from fibroblasts and the interferon-gamma is produced as immune interferon by lymphocytes. In human medicine both natural and recombinant interferons are applied. The connection of polyethyleneglycol to interferons ensures their sustained effect. Nowadays they are applied in the therapy of chronic hepatitis B or C as well as in oncology to inhibit the neoplasm progression.

Cross-study analysis of the relative efficacies of oral antiviral therapies for chronic hepatitis B infection in nucleoside-naive patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lamivudine and adefovir were approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection based on placebo-controlled trials, and entecavir was recently approved on the basis of its superiority over lamivudine in phase II/III trials; however, to date, these three therapies have not been compared head to head.

METHODS

To evaluate the relative efficacy of these therapies, we applied a predefined protocol of established statistical techniques to compare data from phase III entecavir trials with published clinical trial results with lamivudine, adefovir and placebo in nucleoside-naive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative populations.

RESULTS

A comprehensive literature search identified 612 publications/data sources, of which 28 satisfied predefined inclusion criteria. Independent reviewers extracted week 48-52 histological, virological, biochemical and serological endpoints from these sources, which were analysed with a fixed-effects model. For each of the three histological endpoints in HBeAg-positive patients (Histological Improvement, Ranked Assessment of Necroinflammation [RA-N] and Ranked Assessment of Fibrosis [RA-F]), entecavir was superior to adefovir. Entecavir was superior to lamivudine for Histological Improvement and comparable to lamivudine for RA-N and RA-F. With respect to reducing HBV DNA levels, entecavir (-6.98 log(10) copies/mL) was more effective than lamivudine (-5.46 log(10) copies/mL, p < 0.0001) and adefovir (-3.60 log(10) copies/mL, p < 0.0001), and lamivudine was more effective than adefovir (p < 0.0001). The parallel goals of HBV DNA reduction below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) [by polymerase chain reaction] and ALT normalisation were achieved more often with entecavir (69% and 67% of patients, respectively) than with lamivudine (38% and 59%, respectively; p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively) or adefovir (21% and 48%, respectively; both p < 0.0001), and more often with lamivudine than with adefovir (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). HBeAg seroconversion rates were higher with entecavir (21% of patients) and lamivudine (18%) than with adefovir (12%, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). For each of the three histological endpoints in the HBeAg-negative population, entecavir was comparable to adefovir. Entecavir was superior to lamivudine for Histological Improvement, and comparable to lamivudine for RA-N and RA-F, and all three antivirals were superior to placebo. Entecavir proved superior to lamivudine and adefovir in lowering HBV DNA levels (-5.20 vs -4.66 vs -3.91 log(10) copies/mL, respectively; p < 0.0005 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and in suppressing HBV DNA below the LOQ (91% vs 73% vs 51% of patients, respectively; both p < 0.0001); in the latter respect, lamivudine was in turn superior to adefovir (p < 0.0001). Entecavir was also superior to lamivudine in normalising ALT (76% vs 69% patients, respectively; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Over a 12-month treatment period, this analysis predicts that the antiviral efficacy of entecavir would be superior to that of lamivudine, which in turn would be superior to that of adefovir, in nucleoside-naive patients with chronic HBV infection.

Virological Response to Different Combination Regimes of Peginterferon α-2b and Lamivudine in Hepatitis B e Antigen Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

Objective

To investigate whether simultaneous commencement of peginterferon α-2b and lamivudine treatment has more potent hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA suppression than staggered regimes.

Methods

Thirty HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to 32-week peginterferon started simultaneously with lamivudine (group 1), eight weeks before lamivudine (group 2) or eight weeks after commencement of lamivudine (group 3). All patients received lamivudine until week 104.

Results

At week 52, the log HBV DNA reduction in group 1 (6.38) was more profound than that in group 2 (3.43, P=0.022) and tended to be superior to that in group 3 (4.44, P=0.060). HBeAg seroconversion developed in six (67%) patients in group 1, three (33%) patients in group 2 ( P=0.35 versus group 1) and one (10%) patient in group 3 ( P=0.037 versus group 1). At week 104, the log HBV DNA reduction in group 1 (6.13) versus that in group 2 (5.24) and group 3 (5.15) was insignificantly different. Lamivudine resistance was found in four (14%) patients at week 104. There was 1.22 and 2.52 median log reduction in covalently closed circular DNA and total intrahepatic HBV DNA, respectively, at week 104, but there was no difference among the three groups. At 24 weeks post-treatment, sustained HBeAg seroconversion was observed in five (56%), three (33%) and four (40%) of the patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively ( P>0.05).

Conclusions

Simultaneous commencement of peginterferon and lamivudine tend to provide more profound viral suppression than staggered regimes in the early phase of treatment.

Lamivudine and interferon versus lamivudine monotherapy for HBeAg-positive hepatitis B treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

The suboptimal outcomes of current chronic hepatitis B treatments have prompted the notion of combination therapy as a means of augmenting the therapeutic response. In this study, investigators compared lamivudine monotherapy versus its combination with conventional or pegylated interferon-alpha, pooling data from all pertinent randomized controlled studies into the meta-analysis. The studies were evaluated for methodologic quality and heterogeneity. Rates of sustained virologic and biochemical responses and of hepatitis B e antigen clearance and seroconversion were used as primary efficacy measures. Quantitative metaanalyses were conducted to assess differences between groups for conventional and pegylated interferon, and overall. Analysis yielded greater sustained virologic, biochemical, and seroconversion rates with the addition of conventional (odds ratio [OR]=4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.2-9.4, P<.001; OR=2.1, 95% CI=1.3-3.2, P=.002; and OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.4-4.8, P=.001, respectively) and pegylated (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.1-3.6, P=.02; OR=1.8, 95% CI=1.3-2.6, P<.001; and OR=1.6, 95% CI=1.1-2.3, P=.03, respectively) interferon-alpha to lamivudine, with the former also yielding greater hepatitis B e antigen clearance rates (OR=2.6, 95% CI=1.3-5.2, P=.008). As previous studies suggested that pegylated interferon monotherapy and its combination with lamivudine were comparable, the use of this combination is not justified. In contrast, when conventional interferon-a is used, its combination with lamivudine should be considered.

Future prospectives for the management of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection affects about 400 million people around the globe and causes approximately one million deaths a year. Since the discovery of interferon-α as a therapeutic option the treatment of hepatitis B has evolved fast and management has become increasingly complicated. The amount of viral replication reflected in the viral load (HBV-DNA) plays an important role in the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The current treatment modalities for chronic hepatitis B are immunomodulatory (interferons) and antiviral suppressants (nucleoside and nucleotide analogues) all with their own advantages and limitations. An overview of the treatment efficacy for both immunomodulatory as antiviral compounds is provided in order to provide the clinician insight into the factors influencing treatment outcome. With nucleoside or nucleotide analogues suppression of viral replication by 5-7 log₁₀ is feasible, but not all patients respond to therapy. Known factors influencing treatment outcome are viral load, ALT levels and compliance. Many other factors which might influence treatment are scarcely investigated. Identifying the factors associated with response might result in stopping rules, so treatment could be adapted in an early stage to provide adequate treatment and avoid the development of resistance. The efficacy of compounds for the treatment of mutant virus and the cross-resistance is largely unknown. However, genotypic and phenotypic testing as well as small clinical trials provided some data on efficacy in this population. Discontinuation of nucleoside or nucleotide analogues frequently results in viral relapse; however, some patients have a sustained response. Data on the risk factors for relapse are necessary in order to determine when treatment can be discontinued safely. In conclusion: chronic hepatitis B has become a treatable disease; however, much research is needed to tailor therapy to an individual patient, to predict the sustainability of response and determine the best treatment for those failing treatment.

[Sequential combination therapy with prednisone, lamivudine and interferon alfa-2b for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B]

INTRODUCTION

Despite the development of potent, new antiviral drugs, the percentage of HBeAg seroconversion is approximately 35%. Immunosuppression before antiviral administration has recently been investigated with contradictory results. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of lamivudine and interferon alfa-2b with prior immunosuppression with prednisone in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

A randomized controlled study was conducted in a sample of 44 patients with HBeAg-positive CHB and persistently elevated alanine transferase (ALT) levels. The patients were distributed into two groups: 22 patients received prednisone 40 mg daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment, and lamivudine 150 mg daily for 4 weeks; lamivudine plus interferon alfa 2b (10 MIU every other day) was then administered for 24 weeks followed by continuous lamivudine 150 mg daily to complete 58 weeks. A further 22 patients received the same treatment regimen and duration, but without prednisone.

RESULTS

Virologic response defined as HBeAg seroconversion plus a decrease of serum HBV DNA < 105 copies/ml 24 weeks after concluding the treatment was observed in 68% of the patients receiving previous immunosuppression compared with 54% of the control group (p = 0.26). Forty-five percent of patients with prednisone priming showed histologic improvement compared with 23% of the control group (p = 0.10). A significant proportion of patient with previous immunosuppression showed improvement in necroinflammatory activity (45% vs 23%) and fibrosis (50 vs 23%) compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Virologic response was clinically, but not statistically, superior in the group with prednisone priming. Histologic improvement was notable in the group with previous immunosuppression.

Natural course, therapeutic options and economic evaluation of therapies for chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection afflicts 400 million people worldwide and untreated will progress to cirrhosis in 15-40% of individuals, with an associated increased risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The 'inactive carrier state' carries a benign prognosis with a very low risk of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis state is an active disease state with increased risk for progressing to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The HBeAg-negative mutant variety of chronic hepatitis B has been associated with a higher incidence of cirrhosis at initial presentation and more frequent progression to hepatocellular carcinoma compared with the wild-type hepatitis B. Five medications are currently approved by the US FDA for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: interferon-alpha, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir and peginterferon-alpha-2a. Interferon-alpha therapy has been shown to increase the rate of HBeAg and hepatitis B DNA loss with a small chance of hepatitis B surface antigen loss, but has significant adverse effects and is ineffective against the HBeAg-negative mutant. Lamivudine is a safely used, orally administered drug with good efficacy, but is associated with the development of a lamivudine-resistant (Lam-R) mutant in a large proportion of patients after long-term therapy. High relapse rates after lamivudine therapy make this medication less effective in the HBeAg-negative mutant also. Adefovir dipivoxil is a safely used, orally administered drug, which is effective against the Lam-R mutant. Adefovir dipivoxil is effective against the wild-type and HBeAg-negative hepatitis B and has a very low incidence of resistance development. Entecavir is a highly potent and selective new oral drug against hepatitis B. It has demonstrated no resistance development in treatment-naive patients, but a low incidence of resistance in patients infected with prior Lam-R mutants. Peginterferon-alpha-2a is administered once weekly and has improved efficacy compared with standard interferon-alpha and lamivudine. However, it has a similar adverse-effect profile to standard interferon-alpha. Pharmacoeconomic studies have demonstrated a cost benefit in treating chronic hepatitis B patients compared with no therapy. However, results have been conflicting, with earlier studies showing a cost advantage of lamivudine over interferon-alpha and a more recent, comprehensive study favouring interferon-alpha monotherapy in HBeAg-negative patients and adefovir dipivoxil 'salvage' after lamivudine resistance development in HBeAg-positive patients.

Effect of lowering HBV DNA levels by initial antiviral therapy before adding immunomodulator on treatment of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Lower hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) levels are associated with better responses in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). It is unclear whether an initial phase of antiviral treatment to lower HBV DNA levels before adding immunomodulator therapy is more effective than the strategy of using immunomodulators from the beginning.

AIM

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of lamivudine followed by pegylated-interferon (peg-IFN) therapy with placebo followed by peg-IFN therapy in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-three treatment-naive HBeAg-positive patients with histologically proven CHB and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) received placebo for 4 wk followed by peg-IFN 1.0 mug/kg/wk for next 24 wk (group A, N = 27; age 32 +/- 11 yr; M:F = 25:2) or lamivudine 100 mg per day for 4 wk followed by peg-IFN 1.0 mug/kg/wk for next 24 wk (group B, N = 36; age 32.5 +/- 10.5 yr; M:F = 31:5). Patients were followed for next 24 wk after completion of treatment. Biochemical and virologic responses were assessed at weeks 4, 28, and 52 and analysis was done on intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

At wk 4, mean +/- SD of log change in DNA from baseline was 0.2594 +/- 1.7873 in group A and 1.2186 +/- 1.6347 in group B, respectively (P = 0.032). At week 28, undetectable HBV DNA was seen in eight (29.6%) and 16 (44.4%) patients in groups A and B, respectively (P= 0.298). At week 28, HBeAg loss occurred in eight (29.6%) in group A and 15 (41.7%) in group B (P = 0.43). Six months posttherapy, at week 52, undetectable HBV DNA was seen in four (14.8%) and 18 (50%) in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.028) and HBeAg loss was maintained in four (14.8%) and 14 (38.9%) (P = 0.05) patients. Normal ALT was seen in five (18.5%) and 10 (27.8%) at week 28 (P = 0.552) and five (18.5%) and 13 (36.1%) at week 52 (P = 0.159) in groups A and B, respectively. There was a significant correlation among achievement of HBeAg loss, anti-HBe appearance, and undetectable HBV DNA levels at week 28 (P = 0.008) and 52 (P < 0.001) and HBV DNA levels at week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The strategy of using an antiviral initially to decrease HBV DNA levels before adding an immunomodulatory agent leads to improved sustained virological response as compared with using immunomodulator from the start.

Treatment options in HBV

The available evidence on interferon-alpha (IFN) treatment for chronic hepatitis B is sufficient to conclude that in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis, standard IFN therapy significantly improves clearance of HBeAg (number needed to treat [NNT] = 4), loss of HBV-DNA (NNT = 4) and clearance of HBsAg (NNT = 18). HBeAg positive patients with normal or slightly raised ALT should be treated only if there is histological evidence of progressive disease. In patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis, less than 20% of subjects who have achieved an end-of-treatment virological response after a course of standard IFN maintain a sustained virological response in the long-term. IFN treatment could help to delay or prevent disease decompensation and liver-related deaths but further large studies are needed. Lamivudine is effective at reducing, and sometimes clearing, HBV replication in heavily immunosuppressed patients and can be safely administered to patients with advanced liver disease. Lamivudine should be continued over an undefined extended period of time, with a switch from lamivudine to adefovir if there is an HBV-DNA breakthrough under therapy. Adefovir, excluding cost, is preferable to lamivudine as a first-choice because there is less chance of inducing resistance. The long-term benefit of lamivudine and adefovir and the role of combinations is under investigation.

Application of real-time PCR to quantify hepatitis B virus DNA in chronic carriers in The Gambia

BACKGROUND/AIM

The study aimed at developing a real-time quantitative PCR assay to monitor HBV serum virus load of chronic carriers enrolled in therapeutic trials.

METHOD

Quantitative real-time PCR assay was carried out using SYBR-Green signal detection and primers specific to the S gene. Thermal cycling was performed in an ABi 5700 sequence detection system. The assay was calibrated against an international HBV DNA standard and inter- and intra-assay reproducibility determined. Levels of viral load were monitored for 1-year in lamivudine treated carriers. Correlation between HBV DNA levels and HBeAg sero-status was determined in untreated carriers.

RESULTS

The qPCR assay showed good intra- and inter-assay reproducibility over a wide dynamic range (1.5 x 103 to 1.5 x 108 copies/mL) and correlated well with those from a commercial assay (r = 0.91, (p < 0.001). Viral load levels dropped dramatically but temporarily during and after a short course of lamivudine therapy. HBV DNA was a more reliable indicator of the presence of virus than HBe antigen and was detected in 77.0% (161/209) of HBeAg negative and in all HBeAg positive carriers.

CONCLUSION

This method is reliable, accurate, and reproducible. HBV DNA Quantification by qPCR can be used to monitor the efficacy of HBV therapy and useful in understanding the natural history of HBV in an endemic area.

The effect of pegylated interferon-alpha on the treatment of lamivudine resistant chronic HBeAg positive hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To determine the response to pegylated interferon-alpha treatment of HBeAg-positive hepatitis B patients with proven lamivudine resistance.

METHODS

Sixteen HBeAg-positive HBV patients with YMDD mutations were treated with pegylated interferon. Median treatment duration was 52 weeks (range 20-53), with a 26-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Two of 16 (12.5%) patients seroconverted to HBeAg negative and achieved sustained virological (HBV-DNA levels below 10log 5 copies/ml) together with biochemical (normalization of serum ALT levels) responses. Compared with the strong signal in all other patients, only these two patients had a faint signal in the lamivudine resistance assay. For all patients, the median viral load decreased from 10log 9.4 to 7.9 copies/ml (P = 0.001) during treatment but rebounded to a median of 10log 8.7 copies/ml after treatment cessation. Similarly, elevated median ALT levels at baseline decreased with treatment but rebounded after the end of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest cohort study to date, pegylated interferon-alpha therapy showed marginal efficacy in the presence of lamivudine resistance but such therapy may be beneficial in patients with only small amounts of mutant virus. In our opinion, an analysis of the patient subgroup harbouring an YMDD-mutation should be included in all future studies of pegylated interferon-alpha in chronic hepatitis B.

Early reduction of infected hepatocytes by activated immunity at the time of interferon withdrawal hepatitis followed by lamivudine administration resulted in higher seroconversion in hepatitis Be antigen-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

It has been found that the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) therapy can be improved by preceding administration with a short course of corticosteroid that induces a flare of the disease upon its withdrawal. Because of the side effects of corticosteroid, we tested the effect of a short course of interferon (IFN) as the primer instead of prednisolone, which was followed by LAM when the hepatitis flare occurred. The incidence of LAM resistance mutations and the effect of core promoter and precore mutations on the durability of the responses were also studied.

METHODS

Patients treated with interferon (IFN)-LAM therapy (n=73) were compared to those treated with IFN alone (n=117). The IFN-LAM group received IFN-alpha MU/day, t.i.w. for a 3-month period. LAM (10mg/day during 1 year) was started when IFN withdrawal hepatitis occurred during 2-10 months after stopping IFN. The LAM-resistant, core promoter, and precore mutations were examined by sequencing.

RESULTS

(1) The IFN-LAM group developed exacerbated hepatitis following IFN withdrawal in 63 patients before starting LAM therapy. The seroconversion (SC) rate was significantly higher in the IFN-LAM group than in the IFN-alone group (61% vs 26%, P=0.0001). (2) The LAM resistance mutation rate was 31% at 1 year after initiating LAM therapy. (3) In a stepwise discriminant-function analysis, decreased level of HBeAg determined at 4 weeks after LAM administration and increased level of HBeAb before the start of LAM administration contributed significantly on seroconversion to anti-HBe (P = 0.0073 and 0.004, respectively). (4) The reappearance rate of HBeAg within 6 months after the therapy (relapse) was 33% in the IFN-LAM group and 10% in the IFN-alone group. The prevalence of core promoter and precore mutations did not change before and after the therapy, nor did these mutations correlate with the relapse after stopping IFN-LAM therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Our findings suggest that early reduction of infected hepatocytes expressed by HBeAg by LAM may contribute to a high SC rate of IFN-LAM therapy. (2) The emergence of LAM-resistant mutations was similar to the previously reported rate, and neither core promoter nor precore mutations correlated with relapse of seroconverters after IFN-LAM withdrawal.

Comparison of Two Different Regimens of Combined Interferon-α2A and Lamivudine Therapy in Children with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy of two regimens of combined interferon-α2a (IFN-α2a) and lamivudine (3TC) therapy in childhood chronic hepatitis B.

Methods

A total of 177 patients received IFN-α2a, 9 million units (MU)/m2 for 6 months. In group I (112 patients, 8.7±3.5 years), 3TC (4 mg/kg/day, max 100 mg) was started simultaneously with IFN-α2a, in group II (65 patients, 9.6±3.8 years) 3TC was started 2 months prior to IFN-α2a. 3TC was continued for 6 months after antiHBe seroconversion or stopped at 24 months in non-responders.

Results

Baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was 134.2 ±34.1 and 147.0 ±45.3; histological activity index (HAI) was 7.4 ±2.7 and 7.1 ±2.3; and HBV DNA levels were above 2,000 pg/ml in 76% and 66% of patients in groups I and II, respectively ( P>0.005). Complete response was 55.3% and 27.6% in groups I and II, respectively ( P<0.01). AntiHBe seroconversion was higher and earlier, and HBV DNA clearance was earlier in group I ( P<0.05). HBsAg clearance was 12.5% and 4.6% and antiHBs seroconversion was 9.8% and 6.2% in groups I and II, respectively ( P>0.05). Breakthrough occurred in 17.9% and 24.6%; breakthrough times were 15.9 ±4.6 and 14.1 ±5.1 months; and relapse rates were 6.8% and none in groups I and II, respectively ( P>0.05, P>0.05, P>0.05). Responders had higher HAI (HAI>6) and higher pre-treatment ALT than non-responders.

Conclusion

Simultaneous 3TC+IFN-α2a yields a higher response and earlier antiHBe seroconversion and viral clearance than consecutive combined therapy. Relapse rate is low. Predictors of response are high basal ALT and high HAI scores. 3TC can be administered for 24 months without any side effect and breakthrough rate is comparable with previous studies.

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Thymosin-α1 and Lymphoblastoid Interferon for Hbeag-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

Combination therapy between two immunomodulators used for treatment of chronic hepatitis B was explored based on reported therapeutic efficacy of interferon-α, and thymosin-α1 as monotherapeutic agents to determine if combination therapy was superior to interferon alone. This double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial compares the addition of thymosin-α1, 1.6 μg taken three times per week (combination therapy) or thymosin placebo (monotherapy) to lymphoblastoid interferon (Wellferon®), 5 million international units (MIU) taken three times per week, for 24 weeks. Entry criteria included positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg); alanine aminotransferease (ALT) ≥1.5x upper normal limit, but ≤10xupper normal limit; positive HBV DNA; absence of cirrhosis; treatment naivety and no co-morbid factors. A total of 98 HBeAg-positive patients were recruited, of which 48 were randomized to combination therapy and 50 to monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the loss of HBeAg at 72 weeks. The secondary endpoints were HBeAg seroconversion, normalization of ALT, loss of HBV DNA and improvement in histology. The HBeAg loss was 45.8% and 28.0% for combination therapy and monotherapy, respectively (difference, 17.8%; 95% CI -1.2%-35.3%, P=0.067). There was a trend towards HBeAg loss when using combination therapy. There were also no statistically significant differences between the different therapies with respect to the secondary endpoints of HBeAg seroconversion, changes in histology, normalization of ALT or loss of HBV DNA. In conclusion, this trial showed a 17.8% improvement in HBeAg loss rates using combination therapy over interferon monotherapy. This could clinically indicate a potential important difference that would need confirmation in subsequent trials.

Established and emerging therapies for the treatment of viral hepatitis

Patients who are chronically infected with either hepatitis B or C viruses run the risk of developing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in later life. Antiviral treatment offers the only means of interrupting this progression. To date, recombinant interferon alpha and the nucleos(t)ide analogues lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil are the only licensed drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, whilst recombinant or pegylated interferons in combination with ribavirin are the ones used for chronic hepatitis C virus infections. The efficacy of these treatments, reasons for treatment failure, drug resistance and future options are discussed in the present review.

A partially overlapping treatment course with lamivudine and interferon in hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHBe-) with interferon or lamivudine alone is inefficient and reports of combination treatment with both drugs, equivocal so far.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of a lamivudine-interferon combination therapy in 36 patients HBeAg-negative CHBe-.

METHODS

Lamivudine was administered from 1 to 12 months and interferon-alpha2b from 7 to 18 months. A historical control group of 36 CHBe- patients, matched for age and sex and treated with the same dosage of interferon-alpha2b was used. All patients were followed up for > or =12-month post-treatment.

RESULTS

The biochemical response rate at the end of treatment was 78% in lamivudine-interferon and 52.8% in interferon-control group (P = 0.026) and at 12-month post-treatment 38.9% and 22.2%, respectively (P = 0.125). Alanine aminotransferase normalization and serum HBV-DNA levels < or =30 000 cp/mL were observed in 50.0% of lamivudine-interferon-treated and 30.6% of interferon-treated patients at the end of treatment (P =0.093) and in 22.2% and 13.9% of patients, respectively, at 12-month post-treatment (P = 0.358). Moreover, alanine aminotransferase normalization and undetectable serum HBV-DNA (<400 cp/mL) was observed in 30.6% of lamivudine-interferon-treated and 8.3% of interferon-treated patients at the end of treatment (P = 0.017) and in 8.3% and 0% of patients, respectively, at 12-month post-treatment (P = 0.076).

CONCLUSIONS

In CHBe-, 12 months after ending a lamivudine-interferon partially overlapping 18-month combination course, 22% of patients still maintain normal alanine aminotransferase and HBV-DNA levels < or =30 000 cp/mL. However, a 12-month interferon monotherapy course may achieve similar responses.

Higher efficacy of sequential therapy with interferon-alpha and lamivudine combination compared to lamivudine monotherapy in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND

Monotherapy with interferon (IFN) or lamivudine is effective in a limited proportion of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. A sequential combination may have better therapeutic effects by sustained viral suppression combined with immunomodulation.

AIM

To compare the efficacy of sequential lamivudine and IFN therapy versus lamivudine monotherapy in HBeAg positive CHB patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-five treatment naïve HBeAg positive patients with histologically proven CHB and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 x ULN received lamivudine 100 mg per day for 52 wks with IFN 5 MIU per day added for 16 wks after the first 8 wks (group A, n = 38; age 30 +/- 12 yr; M:F = 35:3) or lamivudine 100 mg per day for 52 wks (group B, n = 37; age 30 +/- 16 yr; M:F = 31:6). Biochemical and virologic responses were assessed at weeks 52 and 76 and analysis was done on intention-to-treat. Serial samples were studied for the emergence of lamivudine-resistant YM552I/VDD mutations by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

At week 52, HBeAg loss occurred in 15 (39.5%) in group A and 14 (37.8%) in group B (p= 1.00). HBeAg loss, anti-HBe appearance, and undetectable DNA levels were seen in 26.3% and 13.5% (p= 0.249), respectively. Nine of 10 (90%) patients in group A and 1 of 5 (20%) in group B maintained the response through week 76 (p= 0.017). At week 76, 5 additional patients in group A and 3 in group B further achieved the primary end point and the overall HBeAg loss was observed in 44.7% and 18.9% (p= 0.025) and HBeAg loss, anti-HBe appearance, and undetectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels in 36.8% and 10.8% in group A and group B, respectively (p= 0.026). At week 76, undetectable HBV DNA was seen in 39.5% and 16.2% in groups A and B, respectively (p= 0.039). Normal ALT was seen in 47.7% and 40.5% at week 52 (p= 0.489) and ALT was normal in 39.5% and 13.5% at week 76 (p= 0.018) in groups A and B, respectively. YM552I/VDD-resistant mutants emerged in 6 of 38 (15.5%) patients in group A, and 3 of 37 (8.1%) in group B (p= ns). The rate of histological improvement was comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that sequential therapy is superior to lamivudine monotherapy in achieving sustained seroconversion, ALT normalization, and HBV DNA loss. Compared to 80% with sequential therapy, only 20% Indian patients with CHB did not relapse after stopping lamivudine monotherapy.

Interferon-α plus lamivudine vs lamivudine reduces breakthroughs, but does not affect sustained response in HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of combination treatment of IFN-α and lamivudine compared to lamivudine monotherapy, after 24 mo of administration in HBeAg-negative hepatitis B patients.

METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients were randomly assigned to receive IFN-α-2b (5 MU thrice per week, n = 24) plus lamivudine (100 mg daily) or lamivudine only (n = 26) for 24 mo. Patients were followed up for further 6 mo. The primary outcome was the proportion with sustained virological response (undetectable serum HBV DNA concentrations) and or sustained biochemical response (transaminase levels within normal range) at 30 mo (6 mo after the end of therapy). Secondary end-points were timed from initial virological (biochemical) response to VBR (BBR, respectively) and the emergence of YMDD mutants across the two arms.

RESULTS: Five of twenty-four (21%) patients in the combination arm vs 3/26 (12%) in the lamivudine arm had sustained response (i.e., normal serum transaminase levels and undetectable HBV DNA by PCR assay) 6 mo after treatment discontinuation. A reduction in the emergence of YMDD mutants and in the development of virological breakthroughs was observed in patients receiving combination treatment (10% vs 46%, P = 0.01 and 14% vs 46%, P = 0.03, respectively). Time from initial virologic response to virologic breakthrough (VBR) was greater among initial responders receiving combination treatment compared to those receiving lamivudine (22.9 mo vs 15.9 mo, respectively; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that IFN-α plus lamivudine combination therapy does not increase the sustained response, compared to lamivudine. However, combination therapy reduces the likelihood of VBR due to YMDD mutants and prolongs the time period until the breakthrough development.

Hepatitis B in children: complexities in management

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection by definition is persistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in the serum for > or =6 months. The risk of developing chronic HBV infection ranges from 90% in neonates to <5% in immunocompetent adults. HBV acquired by perinatal infection has a prolonged immune-tolerant phase, characterized by the presence of hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg), high HBV-DNA and normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Efficient and multi-specific helper and cytotoxic T-cell response is essential for controlling HBV infection. Chronic HBV infection is characterized by a state of HBV-specific T-cell hyporesponsiveness. The goal of therapy in chronic HBV infection is to eliminate or significantly suppress HBV replication and prevent the progression of liver disease to cirrhosis with the potential development of liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In adults, drugs currently licensed for treatment of HBV infection: are interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), lamivudine (LMV) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), the first two are also licensed to use in children. IFN-alpha has the advantage of having a more durable response, fixed duration of treatment and lack of resistant mutants. The disadvantages of IFN-alpha include need for thrice-weekly injections, higher cost and more side-effects compared with the nucleoside analogues. Nucleoside analogues can be given orally and used in decompensated cirrhosis and transplant recipients. ADV and newer drugs like tenefovir can successfully treat mutants produced after prolonged LMV therapy. Current protocols exclude children with immunotolerant HBV. Periodic screening with liver ultrasound scan and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in all children with chronic HBV infection is recommended. The severe shortage of cadaveric donor organs has led to the use of marginal (including anti-HBc-positive) cadaveric donor livers in selected transplant candidates with high medical urgency; 5-10% of all liver transplants are because of HBV. Using hepatitis B immunoglobulin and nucleoside analogues has made the outcome following liver transplantation for hepatitis B, comparable with, if not slightly better, than that in patients with other diagnoses. Future treatments should be based on the restoration of HBV-specific T-cell responses to levels similar to that seen in subjects controlling HBV.

N/A

N/A

Peginterferon Alfa-2a, lamivudine, and the combination for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Current treatments for chronic hepatitis B are suboptimal. In the search for improved therapies, we compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa plus lamivudine, pegylated interferon alfa without lamivudine, and lamivudine alone for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 814 patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B received either peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg once weekly) plus oral placebo, peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (100 mg daily), or lamivudine alone. The majority of patients in the study were Asian (87 percent). Most patients were infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype B or C. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks of follow-up, significantly more patients who received peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine than those who received lamivudine monotherapy had HBeAg seroconversion (32 percent vs. 19 percent [P<0.001] and 27 percent vs. 19 percent [P=0.02], respectively) or HBV DNA levels below 100,000 copies per milliliter (32 percent vs. 22 percent [P=0.01] and 34 percent vs. 22 percent [P=0.003], respectively). Sixteen patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a (alone or in combination) had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion, as compared with 0 in the group receiving lamivudine alone (P=0.001). The most common adverse events were those known to occur with therapies based on interferon alfa. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 percent, 6 percent, and 2 percent of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, combination therapy, and lamivudine monotherapy, respectively. Two patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy had irreversible liver failure after the cessation of treatment--one underwent liver transplantation, and the other died.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, peginterferon alfa-2a offers superior efficacy over lamivudine, on the basis of HBeAg seroconversion, HBV DNA suppression, and HBsAg seroconversion.

Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2005 update

BACKGROUND/AIMS

A large amount of new data on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B has become available such that the 2003 consensus statement requires revision and update.

METHODS

New data were presented, discussed and debated in an expert pre-meeting to draft a revision. The revised contents were finalized after discussion in a general meeting of APASL.

RESULTS

Conceptual background, including the efficacy and safety profile of currently available and emerging drugs, was reviewed. Nineteen recommendations were formed and unresolved issues and areas for further study were suggested.

CONCLUSION

The current therapy of chronic hepatitis B is modestly effective but not satisfactory. The development of new drugs and new strategies is required to further improve the outcomes of treatment.

Lamivudine vs lamivudine and interferon combination treatment of HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B

To determine whether combination treatment of HBeAg(-) chronic hepatitis B is beneficial we studied 78 patients with HBeAg(-), HBV DNA-positive chronic hepatitis B who were randomized to lamivudine, 100 mg, qd, for 12 months or lamivudine-interferon (9 MU, t.i.w.) in combination. In the combination arm, 2 months of lamivudine treatment preceded 10 months of combination treatment. Biochemical, virologic and histologic responses were assessed at the end of treatment, after six and a median 27 months of drug-free follow-up (short- and long-term follow-up, respectively). Virologic response was defined as undetectable HBV DNA with a hybridization assay and biochemical response as normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Change in HBV DNA was also assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Presence of YMDD mutants at the end of treatment was investigated with a line probe assay. Both treatment regimes led to a median 2 log decline in HBV DNA levels. Virologic end of treatment responses were 90 and 92% with mono- and combination treatment, respectively. Corresponding virologic responses at short- and long-term follow-up were 59 and 54%, and 27 and 25%, respectively. Patients having a baseline HBV DNA value > or =200 pg/mL were more likely to relapse within 6 months off therapy than those patients with a baseline HBV DNA level <200 pg/mL (P = 0.041). YMDD mutants were observed in 53% of patients receiving lamivudine compared with 24% of patients receiving the combination regime (P = 0.017). In conclusion, efficacy of combination treatment is similar to lamivudine monotherapy. However, combination treatment decreases the development of YMDD mutant strains compared with lamivudine monotherapy.

Emerging treatments in chronic hepatitis B

Although the management of chronic hepatitis B has improved over the last decade, none of the available therapeutic agents, IFN-alpha, lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, can achieve sustained off-therapy responses in most cases. Therefore, several newer, mainly antiviral and immunomodulatory agents, are being evaluated. Pegylated IFN-alpha(2a) has been shown to be more effective than lamivudine or standard IFN-alpha monotherapy in achieving post-therapy biochemical and virological responses, and is expected to be licensed soon for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Newer antiviral agents, such as entecavir and telbivudine, appear to be quite effective initially, but their sustained off-therapy response rates remain unknown. The preliminary data of monotherapies with immunomodulatory agents, or of combination therapies, have been rather disappointing. Long-term maintenance treatment with antiviral agent(s) with good safety and tolerability profiles and low resistance rates appears to be the most realistic future therapeutic option for most chronic hepatitis B patients.