1
|
Overbeek KA, Cahen DL, Bruno MJ. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the detection of pancreatic lesions in high-risk individuals. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:279-293. [PMID: 38573399 PMCID: PMC11255057 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00380-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Individuals at high risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are eligible for surveillance within research programs. These programs employ periodic imaging in the form of magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound for the detection of early cancer or high-grade precursor lesions. This narrative review discusses the role of endoscopic ultrasound within these surveillance programs. It details its overall strengths and limitations, yield, burden on patients, and how it compares to magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, recommendations are given when and how to incorporate endoscopic ultrasound in the surveillance of high-risk individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper A Overbeek
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Djuna L Cahen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bogdanski AM, van Hooft JE, Boekestijn B, Bonsing BA, Wasser MNJM, Klatte DCF, van Leerdam ME. Aspects and outcomes of surveillance for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:323-339. [PMID: 38619782 PMCID: PMC11255004 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00368-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths and is associated with a poor prognosis. The majority of these cancers are detected at a late stage, contributing to the bad prognosis. This underscores the need for novel, enhanced early detection strategies to improve the outcomes. While population-based screening is not recommended due to the relatively low incidence of PDAC, surveillance is recommended for individuals at high risk for PDAC due to their increased incidence of the disease. However, the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surveillance in high-risk individuals are not sorted out yet. In this review, we will address the identification of individuals at high risk for PDAC, discuss the objectives and targets of surveillance, outline how surveillance programs are organized, summarize the outcomes of high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer surveillance, and conclude with a future perspective on pancreatic cancer surveillance and novel developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander M Bogdanski
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Boekestijn
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martin N J M Wasser
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Derk C F Klatte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maurer E, Lehman B, Matthäi E, Denzer U, Figiel J, Jesinghaus M, Slater EP, Stefenelli U, Gress TM, Bartsch DK. Pancreatic cancer screening is effective in individuals at risk with predisposing germline gene variants, but not in gene variant-negative familial pancreatic cancer families. United European Gastroenterol J 2024. [PMID: 39031472 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic yield of pancreatic cancer screening in individuals at risk (IAR) from familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families with respect to the presence or absence of pathogenic germline variants predisposing to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). DESIGN In a 20 years period, IAR from FPC families were enrolled in a prospective screening program of the national case collection for FPC of Germany, including magnet resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The diagnostic yield was analyzed regarding significant pancreatic lesions such as PDAC, high-grade pancreatic-intraepithelial-neoplasia (PanIN3) and intraductal-papillary-mucinous-neoplasia (IPMN) with high-grade dysplasia. Screening results were compared between carriers of pathogenic variants and variant-negative IAR. RESULTS 337 IAR, including 74 (22%) variant-carriers and 263 IAR of variant-negative FPC families (mean age 49; standard deviation [SD] + 8.9) were followed 64 (SD + 55) months. IAR underwent 5.1 (SD + 3.9) screening visits with 1733 MRI (5.1,SD + 3.9 per IAR) and 728 EUS (2.2,SD + 1.7 per IAR). In 12 (4%) cases, significant pancreatic lesions were detected, including 4 PDAC, 3 PanIN3 and 5 high-grade IPMN. Three of 4 IAR with PDAC died after a mean of 27 months postoperatively, and one IAR is alive without evidence of disease after 31 months. The diagnostic yield for significant lesions was 13.5% (10/74) for variant carriers compared to 0.8% (2/263) for IAR of variant-negative FPC families (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a negative variant status was almost always accompanied by the absence of a significant lesion over time with a negative predictive value of 99.2% (95% CI 97.3%-99.9%). CONCLUSION The diagnostic yield seems to justify PDAC screening in IAR of FPC-families with pathogenic germline variants in PDAC predisposing genes, not in IAR of variant-negative families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Maurer
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Bettina Lehman
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Elvira Matthäi
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Denzer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Infectiology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jens Figiel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Emily P Slater
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Thomas M Gress
- Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Infectiology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rogers HK, Shah SL. Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis and Management. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1156. [PMID: 38893682 PMCID: PMC11171704 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The emergence of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has significantly impacted the diagnosis and management of pancreatic cancer and its associated sequelae. While the definitive role of EUS for pancreatic cancer remains incompletely characterized by currently available guidelines, EUS undoubtedly offers high diagnostic accuracy, the precise staging of pancreatic neoplasms, and the ability to perform therapeutic and palliative interventions. However, current challenges to EUS include limited specialized expertise and variability in operator proficiency. As the technology and techniques continue to evolve and become more refined, EUS is poised to play an increasingly integral role in shaping pancreatic cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley K. Rogers
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Shawn L. Shah
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Dallas VA Medical Center, VA North Texas Healthcare System, Dallas, TX 75216, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peters MLB, Eckel A, Seguin CL, Davidi B, Howard DH, Knudsen AB, Pandharipande PV. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Pancreatic Cancer Among High-Risk Populations. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:278-290. [PMID: 38086003 PMCID: PMC10911581 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among populations at high risk for the disease. METHODS We used a microsimulation model of the natural history of PDAC to estimate the lifetime health benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of PDAC screening among populations with specific genetic risk factors for PDAC, including BRCA1 and BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, Lynch syndrome, TP53, CDKN2A, and STK11. For each high-risk population, we simulated 29 screening strategies, defined by starting age and frequency. Screening included MRI with follow-up EUS in a subset of patients. Costs of tests were based on Medicare reimbursement for MRI, EUS, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and pancreatectomy. Cancer-related cost by stage of disease and phase of treatment was based on the literature. For each high-risk population, we performed an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, assuming a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 US dollars (USD) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS For men with relative risk (RR) 12.33 (CDKN2A) and RR 28 (STK11), annual screening was cost-effective, starting at age 55 and 40 years, respectively. For women, screening was only cost-effective for those with RR 28 (STK11), with annual screening starting at age 45 years. CONCLUSION Combined MRI/EUS screening may be a cost-effective approach for the highest-risk populations (among mutations considered, those with RR >12). However, for those with moderate risk (RR, 5-12), screening would only be cost-effective at higher WTP thresholds (eg, $200K USD/QALY) or with once-only screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Linton B. Peters
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Claudia L. Seguin
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| | - Barak Davidi
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David H. Howard
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Amy B. Knudsen
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Pari V. Pandharipande
- Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laish I, Schechter M, Dancour A, Lieberman S, Levi Z, Goldberg Y, Kedar I, Hasnis E, Half E, Levi GR, Katz L, Vainer ED, Genzel D, Aharoni M, Chen-Shtoyerman R, Abu-Freha N, Raitses-Gurevich M, Golan T, Bernstein-Molho R, Ben Yehoyada M, Gluck N, Rosner G. The benefit of pancreatic cancer surveillance in carriers of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Cancer 2024; 130:256-266. [PMID: 37861363 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surveillance of high-risk individuals for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is recommended. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and outcomes of PDAC and its precursor lesions in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) carriers undergoing pancreatic surveillance. METHODS A retrospective multicenter cohort study of pancreatic surveillance outcomes in Israeli BRCA1/2 carriers preferably with a family history of PDAC. RESULTS A total of 180 asymptomatic carriers participated in the screening programs, including 57 (31.7%) with BRCA1 PVs, 121 (67.2%) with BRCA2 PVs, and 12 (6.6%) with PVs in BRCA1/2 and other genes, for a median follow-up period of 4 years. Ninety-one individuals (50.5%) fulfilled the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) criteria for surveillance whereas 116 (64.4%) fulfilled the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) criteria. There were four cases of adenocarcinoma and four cases of grade 1-neuroendocrine tumor (G1-NET). All were BRCA2 carriers, and two had no family history of PDAC. Three cancer patients were at resectable stages (IA, IIA, IIB) whereas one had a stage IIIB tumor. Of the G1-NET cases, one had surgery and the others were only followed. Success rate for detection of confined pancreatic carcinoma was thus 1.6% (three of 180) in the whole cohort, 1.6% (two of 116) among individuals who fulfilled ACG criteria and 2.2% (two of 91) in those fulfilling CAPS criteria for surveillance. CONCLUSIONS Despite the low detection rate of PDAC and its' high-risk neoplastic precursor lesions among BRCA1/2 carriers undergoing pancreatic surveillance, 75% of cancer cases were detected at a resectable stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Laish
- Gastroenterology Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Menachem Schechter
- Gastroenterology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Alain Dancour
- Gastroenterology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Sari Lieberman
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Zohar Levi
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Gastroenterology Institute, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Yael Goldberg
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Inbal Kedar
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Raphael Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - Erez Hasnis
- Gastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Elizabeth Half
- Gastroenterology Institute, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Lior Katz
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Elez D Vainer
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dor Genzel
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Maya Aharoni
- Gastroenterology Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman
- The Genetic Institute, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
- The Adelson School of Medicine and the Molecular Biology Department, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Naim Abu-Freha
- The Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Maria Raitses-Gurevich
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Talia Golan
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Rinat Bernstein-Molho
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- The Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Merav Ben Yehoyada
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nathan Gluck
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Guy Rosner
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koltai T. Earlier Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: Is It Possible? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4430. [PMID: 37760400 PMCID: PMC10526520 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a very high mortality rate which has been only minimally improved in the last 30 years. This high mortality is closely related to late diagnosis, which is usually made when the tumor is large and has extensively infiltrated neighboring tissues or distant metastases are already present. This is a paradoxical situation for a tumor that requires nearly 15 years to develop since the first founding mutation. Response to chemotherapy under such late circumstances is poor, resistance is frequent, and prolongation of survival is almost negligible. Early surgery has been, and still is, the only approach with a slightly better outcome. Unfortunately, the relapse percentage after surgery is still very high. In fact, early surgery clearly requires early diagnosis. Despite all the advances in diagnostic methods, the available tools for improving these results are scarce. Serum tumor markers permit a late diagnosis, but their contribution to an improved therapeutic result is very limited. On the other hand, effective screening methods for high-risk populations have not been fully developed as yet. This paper discusses the difficulties of early diagnosis, evaluates whether the available diagnostic tools are adequate, and proposes some simple and not-so-simple measures to improve it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Koltai
- Hospital del Centro Gallego de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1094, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah I, Silva-Santisteban A, Germansky KA, Trindade A, Raphael KL, Kushnir V, Pawa R, Mishra G, Anastasiou J, Inamdar S, Tharian B, Bilal M, Sawhney MS. Pancreatic Cancer Screening for At-Risk Individuals (Pancreas Scan Study): Yield, Harms, and Outcomes From a Prospective Multicenter Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:1664-1670. [PMID: 37141538 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Guidelines endorse pancreatic cancer screening in genetically susceptible individuals. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study to determine yield, harms, and outcomes of pancreatic cancer screening. METHODS All high-risk individuals undergoing pancreatic cancer screening at 5 centers from 2020 to 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Pancreas findings were designated as low-risk (fatty or chronic pancreatitis-like changes), intermediate-risk (neuroendocrine tumor [NET] <2 cm or branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm [IPMN]), or high-risk lesions (high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia/dysplasia, main-duct IPMN, NET >2 cm, or pancreatic cancer). Harms from screening included adverse events during screening or undergoing low-yield pancreatic surgery. Annual screening was performed using endoscopic ultrasound and or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Annual screening for new-onset diabetes using fasting blood sugar was also performed ( ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT05006131). RESULTS During the study period, 252 patients underwent pancreatic cancer screening. Mean age was 59.9 years, 69% were female, and 79.4% were White. Common indications were BRCA 1/2 (36.9%), familial pancreatic cancer syndrome kindred (31.7%), ataxia telangiectasia mutated (3.5%), Lynch syndrome (6.7%), Peutz-Jeghers (4.3%), and familial atypical multiple mole melanoma (3.5%). Low-risk lesions were noted in 23.4% and intermediate-risk lesions in 31.7%, almost all of which were branch-duct IPMN without worrisome features. High-risk lesions were noted in 2 patients (0.8%), who were diagnosed with pancreas cancer at stages T2N1M0 and T2N1M1. Prediabetes was noted in 18.2% and new-onset diabetes in 1.7%. Abnormal fasting blood sugar was not associated with pancreatic lesions. There were no adverse events from screening tests, and no patient underwent low-yield pancreatic surgery. DISCUSSION Pancreatic cancer screening detected high-risk lesions with lower frequency than previously reported. No harms from screening were noted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishani Shah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andy Silva-Santisteban
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katharine A Germansky
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Arvind Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long-Island Jewish Hospital, Great Neck, New York, USA
| | - Kara L Raphael
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long-Island Jewish Hospital, Great Neck, New York, USA
| | - Vladimir Kushnir
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rishi Pawa
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Girish Mishra
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jiannis Anastasiou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Benjamin Tharian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arkansas Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Mohammad Bilal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mandeep S Sawhney
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haimi I, Dettwyler S, Everett J, Simeone DM. Are All Cysts Created Equal?: Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms in Patients with Familial or Genetic Risk Factors for Pancreatic Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:547-557. [PMID: 37245935 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have become more prevalent over time, particularly in asymptomatic individuals. Current screening guidelines for incidental PCLs offer a unified approach to surveillance and management, predicated on "worrisome features." Although PCLs are common in the general population, their prevalence may be higher in high-risk individuals (HRI, unaffected patients with specific familial and/or genetic risk factors). As more PCLs are diagnosed and more HRI identified, it is important to promote research that bridges data gaps and introduces nuance to risk assessment tools, ensuring tailoring of guidelines to the needs of HRI with varying pancreatic cancer risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Haimi
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Shenin Dettwyler
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Jessica Everett
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Diane M Simeone
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA; Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA; Pancreatic Cancer Center, 240 East 38th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Harindranath S, Sundaram S. Approach to Pancreatic Head Mass in the Background of Chronic Pancreatitis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13101797. [PMID: 37238280 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13101797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer. CP may present with an inflammatory mass, and differentiation from pancreatic cancer is often difficult. Clinical suspicion of malignancy dictates a need for further evaluation for underlying pancreatic cancer. Imaging modalities remain the mainstay of evaluation for a mass in background CP; however, they have their shortcomings. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become the go-to investigation. Adjunct modalities such as contrast-harmonic EUS and EUS elastography, as well as EUS-guided sampling using newer-generation needles are useful in differentiating inflammatory from malignant masses in the pancreas. Paraduodenal pancreatitis and autoimmune pancreatitis often masquerade as pancreatic cancer. In this narrative review, we discuss the various modalities used to differentiate inflammatory from malignant masses of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sidharth Harindranath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, India
| | - Sridhar Sundaram
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ben-Aharon I, van Laarhoven HWM, Fontana E, Obermannova R, Nilsson M, Lordick F. Early-Onset Cancer in the Gastrointestinal Tract Is on the Rise-Evidence and Implications. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:538-551. [PMID: 36757194 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-1038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Epidemiologic data indicate a significant increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer in younger populations in the past three decades. Moreover, recent evidence also demonstrates a similar trend in gastric, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers. A majority of these early-onset cases are sporadic and lack hereditary or familial background, implying a potential key role for behavioral, lifestyle, nutritional, microbial, and environmental factors. This review explores the current data on early-onset gastrointestinal cancer, exploring the etiology, unique treatment considerations for this population, future challenges, as well as implications for research and practice. SIGNIFICANCE The worrisome trend of an increasing incidence of early-onset gastrointestinal cancers appears to be correlated with nonhereditary etiologies in which behavioral, lifestyle, nutritional, microbial, and environmental factors, as well as host mechanisms, may play a key role. Further epidemiologic and pathogenetic research is urgently needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and to develop preventive strategies and tailored early detection. Young patients with gastrointestinal cancer face unique challenges and unmet needs. These must be addressed in the future management of the disease to minimize treatment-related somatic morbidity and prevent psychosocial sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irit Ben-Aharon
- Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elisa Fontana
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Radka Obermannova
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Florian Lordick
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL) and 2nd Medical Department (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pneumology and Infectiology), University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bagias G, Kanavidis P, Vailas M, Despotidis M, Sotiropoulou M, Katsaros I, Maroulis I, Filippou D, Schizas D. Surgical management of familial pancreatic cancer: a systematic review of the literature. ANZ J Surg 2022; 92:2816-2821. [PMID: 35758214 DOI: 10.1111/ans.17834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality. The fact that the vast majority of patients with PDAC are diagnosed at an advanced stage highlights the need of early diagnosis. As hereditary factors are associated with approximately 5% of all PDAC cases, a screening programme to these high-risk individuals (HRI) has been proposed. The aim of screening methods is to identify selected group of patients with morphological abnormalities at an early stage, in order to be treated promptly. In this study, we evaluate the surgical outcomes and the appropriateness of pancreatic resection in HRIs who were selected for screening. METHODS A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed. The clinicopathological features were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS Six studies were selected for data collection. A total number of 77 patients were identified. Twenty-one patients had a germline mutation, with CDKN2A being the most prominent one (15.6%). Distal pancreatectomy was the most common surgical procedure (42.8%), followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy (33.8%). The mean disease-free survival was 23.6 months and tumour recurrence occurred in 9 patients (11.7%). Disease-specific mortality was 17.8%, while overall mortality was 19.5%. The most frequently reported postoperative diagnosis was PDAC (28 cases, 38.9%), followed by IPMN (23 cases, 31.9%), whereas high-grade PanIN lesions were found in 13 patients (18.1%). CONCLUSION High-risk individuals for pancreatic cancer, who are eventually operated may have a relatively uneventful postoperative course, however the oncological outcomes are comparable to the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Bagias
- Third Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Prodromos Kanavidis
- First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Michail Vailas
- First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Markos Despotidis
- First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Sotiropoulou
- First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Katsaros
- First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Maroulis
- Department of Surgery, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Filippou
- Department of Anatomy and Surgical Anatomy, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Schizas
- First Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Peters MLB, Eckel A, Lietz A, Seguin C, Mueller P, Hur C, Pandharipande PV. Genetic testing to guide screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a microsimulation model. Pancreatology 2022; 22:760-769. [PMID: 35752568 PMCID: PMC9474673 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have elevated PDAC risk, partially due to germline genetic variants. We evaluated the potential effectiveness of genetic testing to target MRI-based screening among FDRs. METHODS We used a microsimulation model of PDAC, calibrated to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, to estimate the potential life expectancy (LE) gain of screening for each of the following groups of FDRs: individuals who test positive for each of eight variants associated with elevated PDAC risk (e.g., BRCA2, CDKN2A); individuals who test negative; and individuals who do not test. Screening was assumed to take place if LE gains were achievable. We simulated multiple screening approaches, defined by starting age and frequency. Sensitivity analysis evaluated changes in results given varying model assumptions. RESULTS For women, 92% of mutation carriers had projected LE gains from screening for PDAC, if screening strategies (start age, frequency) were optimized. Among carriers, LE gains ranged from 0.1 days (ATM+ women screened once at age 70) to 510 days (STK11+ women screened annually from age 40). For men, LE gains were projected for all mutation carriers, ranging from 0.2 days (BRCA1+ men screened once at age 70) to 620 days (STK11+ men screened annually from age 40). For men and women who did not undergo genetic testing, or for whom testing showed no variant, screening yielded small LE benefit (0-2.1 days). CONCLUSIONS Genetic testing of FDRs can inform targeted PDAC screening by identifying which FDRs may benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Linton B Peters
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, USA.
| | - Andrew Eckel
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Anna Lietz
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Claudia Seguin
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Peter Mueller
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Chin Hur
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Current Affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, USA
| | - Pari V Pandharipande
- Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vanek P, Urban O, Zoundjiekpon V, Falt P. Current Screening Strategies for Pancreatic Cancer. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10092056. [PMID: 36140157 PMCID: PMC9495594 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a dreaded malignancy with a dismal 5-year survival rate despite maximal efforts on optimizing treatment strategies. Radical surgery is the only potential curative procedure. Unfortunately, the majority of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease, which renders them ineligible for curative resection. Early detection of PDAC is thus considered to be the most effective way to improve survival. In this regard, pancreatic screening has been proposed to improve results by detecting asymptomatic stages of PDAC and its precursors. There is now evidence of benefits of systematic surveillance in high-risk individuals, and the current guidelines emphasize the potential of screening to affect overall survival in individuals with genetic susceptibility syndromes or familial occurrence of PDAC. Here we aim to summarize the current knowledge about screening strategies for PDAC, including the latest epidemiological data, risk factors, associated hereditary syndromes, available screening modalities, benefits, limitations, as well as management implications.
Collapse
|
15
|
Ardeshna DR, Rangwani S, Cao T, Pawlik TM, Stanich PP, Krishna SG. Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms in Hereditary Cancer Syndromes. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10071475. [PMID: 35884779 PMCID: PMC9313108 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary pancreatic cancer, which includes patients with familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) and hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes, accounts for about 10% of all pancreatic cancer diagnoses. The early detection of pre-cancerous pancreatic cysts has increasingly become a focus of interest in recent years as a potential avenue to lower pancreatic cancer incidence and mortality. Intraductal papillary mucinous cystic neoplasms (IPMNs) are recognized precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer. IPMNs have high prevalence in patients with hereditary pancreatic cancer and their relatives. While various somatic mutations have been identified in IPMNs, certain germline mutations associated with hereditary cancer syndromes have also been identified in IPMNs, suggesting a role in their formation. While the significance for the higher prevalence of IPMNs or similar germline mutations in these high-risk patients remain unclear, IPMNs do represent pre-malignant lesions that need close surveillance. This review summarizes the available literature on the incidence and prevalence of IPMNs in inherited genetic predisposition syndromes and FPC and speculates if IPMN and pancreatic cancer surveillance in these high-risk individuals needs to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devarshi R. Ardeshna
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (D.R.A.); (S.R.)
| | - Shiva Rangwani
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (D.R.A.); (S.R.)
| | - Troy Cao
- College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Peter P. Stanich
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Somashekar G. Krishna
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wang Y, Cuggia A, Chen YI, Parent J, Stanek A, Denroche RE, Zhang A, Grant RC, Domecq C, Golesworthy B, Shwaartz C, Borgida A, Holter S, Wilson JM, Chong G, O'Kane GM, Knox JJ, Fischer SE, Gallinger S, Gao ZH, Foulkes WD, Waschke KA, Zogopoulos G. Is Biannual Surveillance for Pancreatic Cancer Sufficient in Individuals With Genetic Syndromes or Familial Pancreatic Cancer? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:663-673.e12. [PMID: 35714671 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Individuals with a family history of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) or with a germline mutation in a PC susceptibility gene are at increased risk of developing PC. These high-risk individuals (HRIs) may benefit from PC surveillance. METHODS A PC surveillance program was developed to evaluate the detection of premalignant lesions and early-stage PCs using biannual imaging and to determine whether locally advanced or metastatic PCs develop despite biannual surveillance. From January 2013 to April 2020, asymptomatic HRIs were enrolled and followed with alternating MRI and endoscopic ultrasound every 6 months. RESULTS Of 75 HRIs, 43 (57.3%) had a germline mutation in a PC susceptibility gene and 32 (42.7%) had a familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) pedigree. Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) were identified in 26 individuals (34.7%), but only 2 developed progressive lesions. One patient with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) developed locally advanced PC arising from a BD-IPMN. Whole-genome sequencing of this patient's PC and of a second patient with PJS-associated PC from the same kindred revealed biallelic inactivation of STK11 in a KRAS-independent manner. A review of 3,853 patients from 2 PC registries identified an additional patient with PJS-associated PC. All 3 patients with PJS developed advanced PC consistent with the malignant transformation of an underlying BD-IPMN in <6 months. The other surveillance patient with a progressive lesion had FPC and underwent resection of a mixed-type IPMN that harbored polyclonal KRAS mutations. CONCLUSIONS PC surveillance identifies a high prevalence of BD-IPMNs in HRIs. Patients with PJS with BD-IPMNs may be at risk for accelerated malignant transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifan Wang
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| | - Adeline Cuggia
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| | - Yen-I Chen
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and
| | - Josée Parent
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, and
| | - Agatha Stanek
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
| | | | - Amy Zhang
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Robert C Grant
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Céline Domecq
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| | - Bryn Golesworthy
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| | - Chaya Shwaartz
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Ayelet Borgida
- Ontario Pancreas Cancer Study, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Spring Holter
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | - George Chong
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec
| | - Grainne M O'Kane
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Jennifer J Knox
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | - Steven Gallinger
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario
- Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario
- Ontario Pancreas Cancer Study, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
| | | | - William D Foulkes
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Department of Human Genetics, and
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - George Zogopoulos
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec
- Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Calderwood AH, Sawhney MS, Thosani NC, Rebbeck TR, Wani S, Canto MI, Fishman DS, Golan T, Hidalgo M, Kwon RS, Riegert-Johnson DL, Sahani DV, Stoffel EM, Vollmer CM, Al-Haddad MA, Amateau SK, Buxbaum JL, DiMaio CJ, Fujii-Lau LL, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Pawa S, Storm AC, Qumseya BJ. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on screening for pancreatic cancer in individuals with genetic susceptibility: methodology and review of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:827-854.e3. [PMID: 35183359 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey H Calderwood
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Mandeep S Sawhney
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nirav C Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marcia I Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Douglas S Fishman
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Talia Golan
- Cancer Center, Sheba Medical Center, Yehuda, Israel
| | - Manuel Hidalgo
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Douglas L Riegert-Johnson
- Department of Clinical Genomics and Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elena M Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohammad A Al-Haddad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stuart K Amateau
- Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - James L Buxbaum
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christopher J DiMaio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Larissa L Fujii-Lau
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Laith H Jamil
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, and Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| | - Terry L Jue
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joanna K Law
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Mariam Naveed
- Advent Health Medical Group, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Advent Health Hospital Altamonte Springs, Altamonte Springs, Florida, USA
| | - Swati Pawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew C Storm
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bashar J Qumseya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sawhney MS, Calderwood AH, Thosani NC, Rebbeck TR, Wani S, Canto MI, Fishman DS, Golan T, Hidalgo M, Kwon RS, Riegert-Johnson DL, Sahani DV, Stoffel EM, Vollmer CM, Qumseya BJ. ASGE guideline on screening for pancreatic cancer in individuals with genetic susceptibility: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:817-826. [PMID: 35183358 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mandeep S Sawhney
- Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Nirav C Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UT Health, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marcia I Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Douglas S Fishman
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Talia Golan
- Oncology Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Manuel Hidalgo
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard S Kwon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Douglas L Riegert-Johnson
- Department of Clinical Genomics and Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Dushyant V Sahani
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Elena M Stoffel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bashar J Qumseya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kasuga A, Okamoto T, Udagawa S, Mori C, Mie T, Furukawa T, Yamada Y, Takeda T, Matsuyama M, Sasaki T, Ozaka M, Ueki A, Sasahira N. Molecular Features and Clinical Management of Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer Syndromes and Familial Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:1205. [PMID: 35163129 PMCID: PMC8835700 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Revised: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary pancreatic cancers are caused by several inherited genes. Familial pancreatic cancer is defined as pancreatic cancer arising in a patient with at least two first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer in the absence of an identified genetic cause. Hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and familial pancreatic cancers account for about 10% of pancreatic cancer cases. Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, CDKN2A, STK11, and TP53 and mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM) are among the well-known inherited susceptibility genes. Currently available targeted medications include poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARP) for cases with mutant BRCA and immune checkpoint inhibitors for cases with mismatch repair deficiency. Loss of heterozygosity of hereditary pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA1/2 plays a key role in carcinogenesis and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. Signature 3 identified by whole genome sequencing is also associated with homologous recombination deficiency and sensitivity to targeted therapies. In this review, we summarize molecular features and treatments of hereditary pancreatic cancer syndromes and surveillance procedures for unaffected high-risk cases. We also review transgenic murine models to gain a better understanding of carcinogenesis in hereditary pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiyoshi Kasuga
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Takeshi Okamoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Shohei Udagawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan;
| | - Chinatsu Mori
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Takafumi Mie
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Takaaki Furukawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Yuto Yamada
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Tsuyoshi Takeda
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Masato Matsuyama
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Takashi Sasaki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Masato Ozaka
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| | - Arisa Ueki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan;
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan; (T.O.); (C.M.); (T.M.); (T.F.); (Y.Y.); (T.T.); (M.M.); (T.S.); (M.O.); (N.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tanţău A, Leucuţa DC, Tanţău M, Boţan E, Zaharie R, Mândruţiu A, Tomuleasa IC. Inflammation, Tumoral Markers and Interleukin-17, -10, and -6 Profiles in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Chronic Pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:3427-3438. [PMID: 33184795 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06700-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interleukin profiles can be used as biochemical markers regarding the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. AIMS To assess CRP, CA 19-9, CEA levels, and interleukin-6, -10, and -17 profiles in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, chronic pancreatitis was compared with a control group, and the correlation with pancreatic cancer survival. METHODS A total of 87 patients were prospective divided in pancreatic cancer (n = 53), chronic pancreatitis (n = 22) ,and control group (n = 12). The diagnosis of PDAC was made histologically. The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was based on medical history, imaging methods, and endoscopic ultrasound. Systemic concentrations of interleukins were measured using ELISA kits. The patients were followed at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS CRP, CA 19-9, and CEA were higher in the pancreatic cancer group (p < 0.001). Interleukin-10 was significantly higher in the pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis groups (p < 0.001). Interleukin-17 was statistically higher in the pancreatic cancer group (p < 0.0001). The cut-off of interleukin-17 of 0.273 had a sensitivity of 90.9 and a specificity of 80.9 with a curve under ROC of 0.80 in order to differentiate between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The serum levels of interleukins are not correlated with the stage of the disease. CRP, CA 19-9, CEA, and interleukin-6, -10, and -17 were lower in patients with survival more than 6 months. CONCLUSIONS We detected high levels of interleukin-6, -10, and -17 in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Serum interleukin-17 levels can discriminate between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. The prognostic role of interleukins needs to be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Tanţău
- The 4th Medical Clinic, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400015, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Medical Center, 400132, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
| | - Daniel-Corneliu Leucuţa
- Medical Informatics and Biostatistics Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania.
| | - Marcel Tanţău
- The 3rd Medical Clinic, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, "Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor" Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400158, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
| | - Emil Boţan
- Anatomopathology Department, "Regina Maria" Medical Center, 400117, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
| | - Roxana Zaharie
- The 3rd Medical Clinic, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, "Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor" Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400158, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
| | - Alina Mândruţiu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Medical Center, 400132, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
| | - Ionuţ-Ciprian Tomuleasa
- Hematology Department, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă" Institute of Oncology Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Cluj-Napoca City, Cluj, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kimura H, Klein AP, Hruban RH, Roberts NJ. The Role of Inherited Pathogenic CDKN2A Variants in Susceptibility to Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 2021; 50:1123-1130. [PMID: 34714275 PMCID: PMC8562885 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT CDKN2A is cell cycle negative regulator, and the role of CDKN2A in the development of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, which continues to be a lethal cancer, is well-established. Somatic loss of CDKN2A is considered one of the major drivers of pancreatic tumorigenesis. CDKN2A gene is one of the pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene; in addition to melanoma, pathogenic germline CDKN2A variants have been identified in up to 3.3% patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma depending on family history of disease. Carriers of a known pathogenic germline CDKN2A variant have up to a 12.3-fold increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Recently, several studies have demonstrated the benefit of clinical surveillance in patients with pathogenic germline CDKN2A variants. Therefore, identification of patients with a pathogenic germline CDKN2A variant is important for screening of at-risk relatives for pancreatic cancer. It has the potential to lead to the detection of early, potentially curable pancreatic cancer and precursor neoplasms, and reduce mortality. Furthermore, patients with a germline pathogenic CDKN2A variant and somatic loss of CDKN2A may benefit in the future from treatment with targeted therapies, such as a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirokazu Kimura
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alison P. Klein
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nicholas J. Roberts
- The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Department of Pathology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Oncology, the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kumar S, Saumoy M, Oh A, Schneider Y, Brand RE, Chak A, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML, Canto MI, Goggins MG, Hur C, Kastrinos F, Katona BW, Rustgi AK. Threshold Analysis of the Cost-effectiveness of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Patients at High Risk for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 2021; 50:807-814. [PMID: 34149034 PMCID: PMC8577312 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Data from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium studies have demonstrated that screening for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma can be effective and that surveillance improves survival in high-risk individuals. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and cross-sectional imaging are both used, although there is some suggestion that EUS is superior. Demonstration of the cost-effectiveness of screening is important to implement screening in high-risk groups. METHODS Results from centers with EUS-predominant screening were pooled to evaluate efficacy of index EUS in screening. A decision analysis model simulated the outcome of high-risk patients who undergo screening and evaluated the parameters that would make screening cost-effective at a US $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year willingness to pay. RESULTS One-time index EUS has a sensitivity of 71.25% and specificity of 99.82% to detection to detect high-risk lesions. Screening with index EUS was cost-effective, particularly at lifetime pancreatic cancer probabilities of greater than 10.8%, or at lower probabilities if life expectancy after resection of a lesion that was at least 16 years, and if missed, lesion rates on index EUS are 5% or less. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic cancer screening can be cost-effective through index EUS, particularly for those individuals at high-lifetime risk of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shria Kumar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Monica Saumoy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Aaron Oh
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Yecheskel Schneider
- Division of Gastroenterology, St. Luke’s University Health Network, Allentown, PA
| | - Randall E. Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Gregory G. Ginsberg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael L. Kochman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Marcia Irene Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Gilbert Goggins
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Chin Hur
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Fay Kastrinos
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Bryson W. Katona
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anil K. Rustgi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Song CY, Shen Y, Lu YQ. Role of routine check-up in the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer: A puzzling phenomenon. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2021; 20:67-73. [PMID: 32631760 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The high coverage of annual routine health check-up in China is a unique phenomenon throughout the world. However, its clinical value is controversial. In this cohort study, we chose pancreatic cancer as a disease model to explore the role of routine check-up in the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS Data from 157 patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between January 2010 and April 2014 were collected. Patients were divided into two groups depending on how their disease was detected. Group A (n = 85): Patients were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in clinic visits. Group B (n = 72): Patients were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in routine check-ups. We compared their prognosis. RESULTS The tumor stage in group B was earlier than that in group A. The 1-year survival rate in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (74.6% vs. 42.4%, P < 0.001), while the 3- and 5-year survival rates of the two groups showed no significant difference (P > 0.05). The difference of overall survival time between the two groups was not significant (22.0 vs. 9.0 months, P = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS The stage of pancreatic cancer diagnosed in routine check-ups was earlier and therefore, the intervention was earlier which improved short-term survival rate. However, early intervention did not improve overall survival in the long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong-Ying Song
- Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Department of Geriatric Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Aging and Physic-chemical Injury Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Yan Shen
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Yuan-Qiang Lu
- Department of Emergency Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Department of Geriatric Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Aging and Physic-chemical Injury Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kogekar N, Diaz KE, Weinberg AD, Lucas AL. Surveillance of high-risk individuals for pancreatic cancer with EUS and MRI: A meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2020; 20:1739-1746. [PMID: 33077384 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Consensus guidelines recommend surveillance of high-risk individuals (HRIs) for pancreatic cancer (PC) using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This study aims to assess the yield of PC surveillance programs of HRIs and compare the detection of high-grade dysplasia or T1N0M0 adenocarcinoma by EUS and MRI. METHODS The MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid) databases were searched for prospective studies published up to April 11, 2019 using EUS and/or MRI to screen HRIs for PC. Baseline detection of focal pancreatic abnormalities, cystic lesions, solid lesions, high-grade dysplasia or T1N0M0 adenocarcinoma, and all pancreatic adenocarcinoma were recorded. Weighted pooled proportions of outcomes detected were compared between EUS and MRI using random effects modeling. RESULTS A total of 1097 studies were reviewed and 24 were included, representing 2112 HRIs who underwent imaging. The weighted pooled proportion of focal pancreatic abnormalities detected by baseline EUS (0.34, 95% CI 0.30-0.37) was significantly higher (p = 0.006) than by MRI (0.31, 95% CI 0.28-0.33). There were no significant differences between EUS and MRI in detection of other outcomes. The overall weighted pooled proportion of patients with high-grade dysplasia or T1N0M0 adenocarcinoma detected at baseline (regardless of imaging modality) was 0.0090 (95% CI 0.0022-0.016), corresponding to a number-needed-to-screen (NNS) of 111 patients to detect one high-grade dysplasia or T1N0M0 adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Surveillance programs are successful in detecting high-risk precursor lesions. No differences between EUS and MRI were noted in the detection of high-grade dysplasia or T1N0M0 adenocarcinoma, supporting the use of either imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Kogekar
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1060, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Kelly E Diaz
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1060, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Alan D Weinberg
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Aimee L Lucas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1060, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: The Key for Survival. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10110869. [PMID: 33114412 PMCID: PMC7694042 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10110869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Revised: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most aggressive forms of cancer. Negative prognosis is mainly due to the late diagnosis in advanced stages, when the disease is already therapeutically overcome. Studies in recent years have focused on identifying biomarkers that could play a role in early diagnosis, leading to the improvement of morbidity and mortality. Currently, the only biomarker widely used in the diagnosis of PC is carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19.9), which has, however, more of a prognostic role in the follow-up of postoperative recurrence than a diagnostic role. Other biomarkers, recently identified as the methylation status of ADAMTS1 (A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 1) and BNC1 (zinc finger protein basonuclin-1) in cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), may play a role in the early detection of PC. This review focuses on the diagnosis of PC in its early stages.
Collapse
|
26
|
Scholten L, Latenstein AE, Aalfs CM, Bruno MJ, Busch OR, Bonsing BA, Koerkamp BG, Molenaar IQ, Ubbink DT, van Hooft JE, Fockens P, Glas J, DeVries JH, Besselink MG. Prophylactic total pancreatectomy in individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PROPAN): systematic review and shared decision-making programme using decision tables. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:865-877. [PMID: 32703081 PMCID: PMC7707864 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620945534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals with a very high lifetime risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; for example, hereditary pancreatitis and main-duct or mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, may wish to discuss prophylactic total pancreatectomy but strategies to do so are lacking. Objective To develop a shared decision-making programme for prophylactic total pancreatectomy using decision tables. Methods Focus group meetings with patients were used to identify relevant questions. Systematic reviews were performed to answer these questions. Results The first tables included hereditary pancreatitis and main-duct or mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. No studies focused on prophylactic total pancreatectomy in these groups. In 52 studies (3570 patients), major morbidity after total pancreatectomy was 25% and 30-day mortality was 6%. After minimally invasive total pancreatectomy (seven studies, 35 patients) this was, respectively, 13% and 0%. Exocrine insufficiency-related symptoms occurred in 33%. Quality of life after total pancreatectomy was slightly lower compared with the general population. Conclusion The decision tables can be helpful for discussing prophylactic total pancreatectomy with individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Scholten
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jolanda Glas
- Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Patient Organisation, 'Living with Hope', Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Hans DeVries
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pereira SP, Oldfield L, Ney A, Hart PA, Keane MG, Pandol SJ, Li D, Greenhalf W, Jeon CY, Koay EJ, Almario CV, Halloran C, Lennon AM, Costello E. Early detection of pancreatic cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:698-710. [PMID: 32135127 PMCID: PMC7380506 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30416-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 231] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is most frequently detected at an advanced stage. Such late detection restricts treatment options and contributes to a dismal 5-year survival rate of 3-15%. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is relatively uncommon and screening of the asymptomatic adult population is not feasible or recommended with current modalities. However, screening of individuals in high-risk groups is recommended. Here, we review groups at high risk for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, including individuals with inherited predisposition and patients with pancreatic cystic lesions. We discuss studies aimed at finding ways of identifying pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in high-risk groups, such as among individuals with new-onset diabetes mellitus and people attending primary and secondary care practices with symptoms that suggest this cancer. We review early detection biomarkers, explore the potential of using social media for detection, appraise prediction models developed using electronic health records and research data, and examine the application of artificial intelligence to medical imaging for the purposes of early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen P Pereira
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lucy Oldfield
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Alexander Ney
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Phil A Hart
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Margaret G Keane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen J Pandol
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Debiao Li
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William Greenhalf
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Christie Y Jeon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher V Almario
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eithne Costello
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Canto MI, Kerdsirichairat T, Yeo CJ, Hruban RH, Shin EJ, Almario JA, Blackford A, Ford M, Klein AP, Javed AA, Lennon AM, Zaheer A, Kamel IR, Fishman EK, Burkhart R, He J, Makary M, Weiss MJ, Schulick RD, Goggins MG, Wolfgang CL. Surgical Outcomes After Pancreatic Resection of Screening-Detected Lesions in Individuals at High Risk for Developing Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24:1101-1110. [PMID: 31197699 PMCID: PMC6908777 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04230-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening high-risk individuals (HRI) can detect potentially curable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its precursors. We describe the outcomes of high-risk individuals (HRI) after pancreatic resection of screen-detected neoplasms. METHODS Asymptomatic HRI enrolled in the prospective Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) studies from 1998 to 2014 based on family history or germline mutations undergoing surveillance for at least 6 months were included. Pathologic diagnoses, hospital length of stay, incidence of diabetes mellitus, operative morbidity, need for repeat operation, and disease-specific mortality were determined. RESULTS Among 354 HRI, 48 (13.6%) had 57 operations (distal pancreatectomy (31), Whipple (20), and total pancreatectomy (6)) for suspected pancreatic neoplasms presenting as a solid mass (22), cystic lesion(s) (25), or duct stricture (1). The median length of stay was 7 days (IQR 5-11). Nine of the 42 HRI underwent completion pancreatectomy for a new lesion after a median of 3.8 years (IQR 2.5-7.6). Postoperative complications developed in 17 HRI (35%); there were no perioperative deaths. New-onset diabetes mellitus after partial resection developed in 20% of HRI. Fourteen PDACs were diagnosed, 11 were screen-detected, 10 were resectable, and 9 had an R0 resection. Metachronous PDAC developed in remnant pancreata of 2 HRI. PDAC-related mortality was 4/10 (40%), with 90% 1-year survival and 60% 5-year survival, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Screening HRI can detect PDAC with a high resectability rate. Surgical treatment is associated with a relatively short length of stay and low readmission rate, acceptable morbidity, zero 90-day mortality, and significant long-term survival. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT2000089.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Irene Canto
- Departments of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tossapol Kerdsirichairat
- Departments of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Charles J. Yeo
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Departments of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jose Alejandro Almario
- Departments of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amanda Blackford
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Madeline Ford
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Alison P. Klein
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ammar A. Javed
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Departments of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Atif Zaheer
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ihab R. Kamel
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard Burkhart
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Martin Makary
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew J. Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Michael G. Goggins
- Departments of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland,Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christopher L. Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Abnormalities of the main pancreatic duct may be an early indicator of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We develop and validate algorithms that predict the risk of PDAC using features identified on cross-sectional imaging and other clinical characteristics collected through electronic medical records. METHODS Adult patients with abdominal computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in January 2006 to June 2016 demonstrating dilatation of main pancreatic duct were identified. Pancreas-related morphologic features were extracted from radiology reports using natural language processing. The cumulative incidence of PDAC with death as a competing risk was estimated using multistate models. Model discrimination was assessed using c-index. The models were internally validated using bootstrapping. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 7819 patients (mean age, 71 years; 65% female). A total of 781 patients (10%) developed PDAC within 3 years after the first eligible imaging study. The final models achieved reasonable discrimination (c-index, 0.825-0.833). The 3-year average risk of PDAC in the top 5% of the total eligible patients was 56.0%, more than 20 times of the average risk among the bottom 50% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Prediction models combining imaging features and clinical measures can be used to further stratify the risk of pancreatic cancer among patients with pancreas ductal dilatation.
Collapse
|
30
|
Matsubayashi H, Takaori K, Morizane C, Kiyozumi Y. Familial Pancreatic Cancer and Surveillance of High-Risk Individuals. Gut Liver 2020; 13:498-505. [PMID: 30917631 PMCID: PMC6743804 DOI: 10.5009/gnl18449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Family history of pancreatic cancer (PC) is a risk factor for PC development, and the risk level correlates with the number of affected families. A case of PC with ≥1 PC cases in the first-degree relative is broadly defined as familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) and accounts for 5% to 10% of total PC cases. FPC possesses several epidemiological, genetic and clinicopathological aspects that are distinct from those of conventional PCs. In Western countries, FPC registries have been established since the 1990s, and high-risk individuals are screened to detect early PCs. For the pharmacotherapy of FPC, especially in cases with germline pathogenic BRCA mutations, regimens using platinum and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor have recently been studied for their effectiveness. To date, the concept of FPC has prevailed in Western countries, and it has begun to infiltrate into Eastern countries. As the genetic background and environmental conditions vary in association with ethnicity and living area, we need to establish our own FPC registries and accumulate data in Asian countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
- Divisions of Genetic Medicine Promotion, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.,Divisions of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kyoichi Takaori
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Chigusa Morizane
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshimi Kiyozumi
- Divisions of Genetic Medicine Promotion, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Goggins M, Overbeek KA, Brand R, Syngal S, Del Chiaro M, Bartsch DK, Bassi C, Carrato A, Farrell J, Fishman EK, Fockens P, Gress TM, van Hooft JE, Hruban RH, Kastrinos F, Klein A, Lennon AM, Lucas A, Park W, Rustgi A, Simeone D, Stoffel E, Vasen HFA, Cahen DL, Canto MI, Bruno M. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Gut 2020; 69:7-17. [PMID: 31672839 PMCID: PMC7295005 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 304] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Consortium met in 2018 to update its consensus recommendations for the management of individuals with increased risk of pancreatic cancer based on family history or germline mutation status (high-risk individuals). METHODS A modified Delphi approach was employed to reach consensus among a multidisciplinary group of experts who voted on consensus statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥75% agreed or disagreed. RESULTS Consensus was reached on 55 statements. The main goals of surveillance (to identify high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions and T1N0M0 pancreatic cancer) remained unchanged. Experts agreed that for those with familial risk, surveillance should start no earlier than age 50 or 10 years earlier than the youngest relative with pancreatic cancer, but were split on whether to start at age 50 or 55. Germline ATM mutation carriers with one affected first-degree relative are now considered eligible for surveillance. Experts agreed that preferred surveillance tests are endoscopic ultrasound and MRI/magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, but no consensus was reached on how to alternate these modalities. Annual surveillance is recommended in the absence of concerning lesions. Main areas of disagreement included if and how surveillance should be performed for hereditary pancreatitis, and the management of indeterminate lesions. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic surveillance is recommended for selected high-risk individuals to detect early pancreatic cancer and its high-grade precursors, but should be performed in a research setting by multidisciplinary teams in centres with appropriate expertise. Until more evidence supporting these recommendations is available, the benefits, risks and costs of surveillance of pancreatic surveillance need additional evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Goggins
- Pathology, Medicine Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Randall Brand
- Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sapna Syngal
- GI Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- Division of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of Surgey, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - James Farrell
- Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Elliot K Fishman
- The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M Gress
- Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Infectiology, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Fay Kastrinos
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA,Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Allison Klein
- Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Aimee Lucas
- Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Walter Park
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Anil Rustgi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Diane Simeone
- New York University Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | | | - Hans F A Vasen
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Djuna L Cahen
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marco Bruno
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Matsubayashi H, Kiyozumi Y, Ishiwatari H, Uesaka K, Kikuyama M, Ono H. Surveillance of Individuals with a Family History of Pancreatic Cancer and Inherited Cancer Syndromes: A Strategy for Detecting Early Pancreatic Cancers. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019; 9:E169. [PMID: 31683730 PMCID: PMC6963266 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics9040169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A family history of pancreatic cancer (PC) is a risk factor of PC, and risk levels increase as affected families grow in number and/or develop PC at younger ages. Familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) is defined as a client having at least two PC cases in a first degree relatives. In the narrow sense, FPC does not include some inherited cancer syndromes that are known to increase the risks of PC, such as Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS), hereditary pancreatitis (HP), hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), and so on. FPC accounts for 5%-10% of total PC diagnoses and is marked by several features in genetic, epidemiological, and clinicopathological findings that are similar to or distinct from conventional PC. Recent advances in genetic medicine have led to an increased ability to identify germline variants of cancer-associated genes. To date, high-risk individuals (HRIs) in many developed countries, including FPC kindreds and inherited cancer syndromes, are screened clinically to detect and treat early-stage PC. This article highlights the concept of FPC and the most recent data on its detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
- Division of Genetic Medicine Promotion, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
| | - Yoshimi Kiyozumi
- Division of Genetic Medicine Promotion, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
| | | | - Katsuhiko Uesaka
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
| | - Masataka Kikuyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo 113-0021, Japan.
| | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lorenzo D, Rebours V, Maire F, Palazzo M, Gonzalez JM, Vullierme MP, Aubert A, Hammel P, Lévy P, Mestier LD. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the screening and follow-up of high-risk individuals for familial pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:5082-5096. [PMID: 31558858 PMCID: PMC6747297 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i34.5082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Managing familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) is challenging for gastroenterologists, surgeons and oncologists. High-risk individuals (HRI) for pancreatic cancer (PC) (FPC or with germline mutations) are a heterogeneous group of subjects with a theoretical lifetime cumulative risk of PC over 5%. Screening is mainly based on annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The goal of screening is to identify early-stage operable cancers or high-risk precancerous lesions (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with high-grade dysplasia). In the literature, target lesions are identified in 2%-5% of HRI who undergo screening. EUS appears to provide better identification of small solid lesions (0%-46% of HRI) and chronic-pancreatitis-like parenchymal changes (14%-77% of HRI), while MRI is probably the best modality to identify small cystic lesions (13%-49% of HRI). There are no specific studies in HRI on the use of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS. EUS can also be used to obtain tissue samples. Nevertheless, there is still limited evidence on the accuracy of imaging procedures used for screening or agreement on which patients to treat. The cost-effectiveness of screening is also unclear. Certain new EUS-related techniques, such as searching for DNA abnormalities or protein markers in pancreatic fluid, appear to be promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Lorenzo
- Pancreatology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 75013, France
| | - Vinciane Rebours
- Pancreatology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 75013, France
- INSERM, UMR1149, Paris 92110, France
| | - Frédérique Maire
- Pancreatology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 75013, France
| | - Maxime Palazzo
- Pancreatology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 75013, France
| | - Jean-Michel Gonzalez
- Departement of Gastroenterology, Aix Marseille university - APHM - Hôpital Nord, Marseille 13000, France
| | - Marie-Pierre Vullierme
- Radiology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 92110, France
| | - Alain Aubert
- Pancreatology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 75013, France
| | - Pascal Hammel
- Oncology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 92110, France
| | - Philippe Lévy
- Pancreatology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 75013, France
| | - Louis de Mestier
- Pancreatology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, and Paris Diderot University, Paris 75013, France
- INSERM, UMR1149, Paris 92110, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Henrikson NB, Aiello Bowles EJ, Blasi PR, Morrison CC, Nguyen M, Pillarisetty VG, Lin JS. Screening for Pancreatic Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2019; 322:445-454. [PMID: 31386140 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.6190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the third most common cause of cancer death among men and women in the United States. OBJECTIVE To systematically review benefits and harms of screening for pancreatic adenocarcinoma to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials, from January 2002 through April 27, 2018; surveillance through March 22, 2019. STUDY SELECTION Studies of adults with or without risk factors for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (eg, family history of pancreatic cancer, personal history of new-onset diabetes) undergoing imaging-based screening; studies of treatment for adults with screen-detected or asymptomatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Included study designs were randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized controlled intervention studies, diagnostic accuracy studies with a reference standard, cohort studies, and case-control studies (for evaluation of harms only). Studies consisting entirely of populations with known genetic syndromes associated with pancreatic cancer were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and rated included studies for quality; data were quantitatively analyzed to calculate a pooled diagnostic yield and narratively synthesized. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mortality, morbidity, or quality of life; diagnostic accuracy of screening tests; any harm of screening or treatment. RESULTS Thirteen fair-quality prospective cohort screening studies (N = 1317) conducted predominantly in populations at high familial risk for pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included. No studies reported on the effect of screening on morbidity or mortality or on the effectiveness of treatment for screen-detected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Although no studies evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests, all 13 studies reported the diagnostic yield. Yields ranged from 0 to 75 cases per 1000 persons in studies using endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or computed tomography-based screening. In total, 18 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were detected in 1156 adults at increased familial risk and 0 cases were detected in 161 average-risk adults. In 8 studies (n = 675) assessing procedural harms of screening, no serious harms from initial screening were reported. Two studies (n = 271) found no evidence of psychosocial harms related to screening. Evidence of surgical harms was limited. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Imaging-based screening in groups at high familial risk can detect pancreatic adenocarcinoma with limited evidence of minimal harms. However, the effect of screening on morbidity and mortality in groups at high familial risk has not been studied, and no data are available in average-risk populations. There is limited evidence to assess benefits or harms of surgical intervention for screen-detected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Seattle
| | - Erin J Aiello Bowles
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Seattle
| | - Paula R Blasi
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Seattle
| | - Caitlin C Morrison
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Seattle
| | - Matt Nguyen
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Seattle
| | - Venu G Pillarisetty
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Jennifer S Lin
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Curry SJ, Doubeni CA, Epling JW, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Screening for Pancreatic Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019; 322:438-444. [PMID: 31386141 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.10232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pancreatic cancer is an uncommon cancer with an age-adjusted annual incidence of 12.9 cases per 100 000 person-years. However, the death rate is 11.0 deaths per 100 000 person-years because the prognosis of pancreatic cancer is poor. Although its incidence is low, pancreatic cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Because of the increasing incidence of pancreatic cancer, along with improvements in early detection and treatment of other types of cancer, it is estimated that pancreatic cancer may soon become the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. OBJECTIVE To update the 2004 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for pancreatic cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for pancreatic cancer, the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for pancreatic cancer, and the benefits and harms of treatment of screen-detected or asymptomatic pancreatic cancer. FINDINGS The USPSTF found no evidence that screening for pancreatic cancer or treatment of screen-detected pancreatic cancer improves disease-specific morbidity or mortality, or all-cause mortality. The USPSTF found adequate evidence that the magnitude of the benefits of screening for pancreatic cancer in asymptomatic adults can be bounded as no greater than small. The USPSTF found adequate evidence that the magnitude of the harms of screening for pancreatic cancer and treatment of screen-detected pancreatic cancer can be bounded as at least moderate. The USPSTF reaffirms its previous conclusion that the potential benefits of screening for pancreatic cancer in asymptomatic adults do not outweigh the potential harms. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends against screening for pancreatic cancer in asymptomatic adults. (D recommendation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Douglas K Owens
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
- Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Karina W Davidson
- Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| | - Alex H Krist
- Fairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lori Pbert
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
| | | | | | - Chien-Wen Tseng
- University of Hawaii, Honolulu
- Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - John B Wong
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Konings ICAW, Canto MI, Almario JA, Harinck F, Saxena P, Lucas AL, Kastrinos F, Whitcomb DC, Brand RE, Lachter J, Malleo G, Paiella S, Syngal S, Saltzman JR, Stoffel EM, van Hooft JE, Hruban RH, Poley JW, Fockens P, Goggins MG, Bruno MJ. Surveillance for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. BJS Open 2019; 3:656-665. [PMID: 31592073 PMCID: PMC6773633 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surveillance of individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and its precursors might lead to better outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and outcomes of PDAC and high-risk neoplastic precursor lesions among such patients participating in surveillance programmes. Methods A multicentre study was conducted through the International CAncer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium Registry to identify high-risk individuals who had undergone pancreatic resection or progressed to advanced PDAC while under surveillance. High-risk neoplastic precursor lesions were defined as: pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) 3, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) with high-grade dysplasia, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours at least 2 cm in diameter. Results Of 76 high-risk individuals identified in 11 surveillance programmes, 71 had undergone surgery and five had been diagnosed with inoperable PDAC. Of the 71 patients who underwent resection, 32 (45 per cent) had PDAC or a high-risk precursor (19 PDAC, 4 main-duct IPMN, 4 branch-duct IPMN, 5 PanIN-3); the other 39 patients had lesions thought to be associated with a lower risk of neoplastic progression. Age at least 65 years, female sex, carriage of a gene mutation and location of a lesion in the head/uncinate region were associated with high-risk precursor lesions or PDAC. The survival of high-risk individuals with low-risk neoplastic lesions did not differ from that in those with high-risk precursor lesions. Survival was worse among patients with PDAC. There was no surgery-related mortality. Conclusion A high proportion of high-risk individuals who had surgical resection for screening- or surveillance-detected pancreatic lesions had a high-risk neoplastic precursor lesion or PDAC at the time of surgery. Survival was better in high-risk individuals who had either low- or high-risk neoplastic precursor lesions compared with that in patients who developed PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I C A W Konings
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M I Canto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - J A Almario
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - F Harinck
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Saxena
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A L Lucas
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - F Kastrinos
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - D C Whitcomb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - R E Brand
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J Lachter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - G Malleo
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - S Paiella
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - S Syngal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Population Sciences Division, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - J R Saltzman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Population Sciences Division, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - E M Stoffel
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - J E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R H Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - J W Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Goggins
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - M J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Muhammad W, Hart GR, Nartowt B, Farrell JJ, Johung K, Liang Y, Deng J. Pancreatic Cancer Prediction Through an Artificial Neural Network. Front Artif Intell 2019; 2:2. [PMID: 33733091 PMCID: PMC7861334 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2019.00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Early detection of pancreatic cancer is challenging because cancer-specific symptoms occur only at an advanced stage, and a reliable screening tool to identify high-risk patients is lacking. To address this challenge, an artificial neural network (ANN) was developed, trained, and tested using the health data of 800,114 respondents captured in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and Pancreatic, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian cancer (PLCO) datasets, together containing 898 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Prediction of pancreatic cancer risk was assessed at an individual level by incorporating 18 features into the neural network. The established ANN model achieved a sensitivity of 87.3 and 80.7%, a specificity of 80.8 and 80.7%, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 and 0.85 for the training and testing cohorts, respectively. These results indicate that our ANN can be used to predict pancreatic cancer risk with high discriminatory power and may provide a novel approach to identify patients at higher risk for pancreatic cancer who may benefit from more tailored screening and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wazir Muhammad
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Gregory R. Hart
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Bradley Nartowt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - James J. Farrell
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kimberly Johung
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Ying Liang
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Jun Deng
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Thiruvengadam SS, Chuang J, Huang R, Girotra M, Park WG. Chronic pancreatitis changes in high-risk individuals for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:842-851.e1. [PMID: 30145314 PMCID: PMC6589432 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with chronic pancreatitis (CP) changes on EUS. The objective of this study was to determine whether CP changes were more common in high-risk individuals (HRIs) than in control subjects and whether these changes differed among higher-risk subsets of HRIs. METHODS HRIs and control subjects were identified from an endoscopy database. HRIs were defined as having predisposing mutations or a family history (FH) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. HRIs were classified as vHRIs who met Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) criteria for high risk and mHRIs who did not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders and CP risk factors. RESULTS Sixty-five HRIs (44 vHRIs, 21 mHRIs) and 118 control subjects were included. HRIs were included for FH (25), Lynch syndrome (5), Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (2), and mutations in BRCA1/2 (26), PALB2 (3), ATM (3), and CDKN2A (1). After adjustment for relevant variables, HRIs were 16 times more likely to exhibit 3 or more CP changes than control subjects (95% confidence interval, 2.6-97.0; P = .003). HRIs were also more likely to have hypoechoic foci (odds ratio, 8.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-32.9; P = .004). vHRIs and mHRIs did not differ in frequency of 3 or more CP changes on EUS. CONCLUSIONS HRIs were more likely to exhibit CP changes and hypoechoic foci on EUS compared with control subjects. HRIs with these findings may require closer surveillance. HRIs who did or did not meet CAPS criteria did not differ with regard to CP findings, supporting a more inclusive approach to screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Judith Chuang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Robert Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mohit Girotra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Miami Hospitals and Clinics, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Walter G. Park
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to perform an economic analysis to identify the clinical and cost determinants of pancreatic cancer (PC) surveillance in high-risk individuals (HRIs). METHODS A Markov model was created to compare the following 3 strategies: no screening, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening. Patients were considered HRIs according to the Cancer of the Pancreas Screening consortium recommendations. Risk for developing PC, survival, and costs data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases. Surveillance effectiveness was obtained from a recent meta-analysis. RESULTS Analysis of a cohort with fivefold relative risk of PC higher than the US population showed that MRI is the most cost-effective strategy. For those with the highest risk (>×20 relative risk), EUS became the dominant strategy. Our model was impacted by cost and imaging performance, but still cost-effective within the range reported in literature. Threshold analysis showed that if MRI increases greater than US $1600, EUS becomes more cost-effective. Once patients reached the age of 76 years, "no screening" was favored. Both surveillance strategies were cost-effective over a wide range of willingness to pay. CONCLUSIONS Abdominal imaging followed by pancreatectomy is cost-effective to prevent PC in HRIs, favoring MRI in moderate risk cases but EUS in those with highest risk.
Collapse
|
40
|
de Mestier L, Muller M, Cros J, Vullierme MP, Vernerey D, Maire F, Dokmak S, Rebours V, Sauvanet A, Lévy P, Hammel P. Appropriateness of pancreatic resection in high-risk individuals for familial pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a patient-level meta-analysis and proposition of the Beaujon score. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7:358-368. [PMID: 31019704 DOI: 10.1177/2050640618824910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background About 5% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas are inherited due to a deleterious germline mutation detected in 20% or fewer families. Pancreatic screening in high-risk individuals is proposed to allow early surgical treatment of (pre)malignant lesions. The outcomes of pancreatic surgery in high-risk individuals have never been correctly explored. Objectives To evaluate surgical appropriateness and search for associated factors in high-risk individuals. Methods A patient-level meta-analysis was performed including studies published since 1999. Individual classification distinguished the highest risk imaging abnormality into low-risk or high-risk abnormality, and the highest pathological degree of malignancy of lesions into no/low malignant potential or potentially/frankly malignant. Surgical appropriateness was considered when potentially/frankly malignant lesions were resected. Results Thirteen out of 24 studies were selected, which reported 90 high-risk individuals operated on. Low-risk/high-risk abnormalities were preoperatively detected in 46.7%/53.3% of operated high-risk individuals, respectively. Surgical appropriateness was consistent in 38 (42.2%) high-risk individuals, including 20 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (22.2%). Identification of high-risk abnormalities was strongly associated with surgical appropriateness at multivariate analysis (P = 0.001). We proposed a score and nomogram predictive of surgical appropriateness, including high-risk abnormalities, age and existence of deleterious germline mutation. Conclusion Overall, 42.2% of high-risk individuals underwent appropriate surgery. The proposed score might help selecting the best candidates among high-risk individuals for pancreatic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis de Mestier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Marie Muller
- Department of Digestive Oncology and Genetic Counselling, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Jérôme Cros
- Department of Pathology, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Marie-Pierre Vullierme
- Department of Radiology, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Dewi Vernerey
- Department of Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit, EA 3181, Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Frédérique Maire
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Vinciane Rebours
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Philippe Lévy
- Department of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| | - Pascal Hammel
- Department of Digestive Oncology and Genetic Counselling, Beaujon Hospital (AP-HP) and University Paris Diderot, Clichy, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Selective screening for pancreatic cancer (PC) has been proposed. We describe the establishment of a comprehensive multidisciplinary screening program using 3.0 T MRI. Criteria for screening included the presence of PC in: ≥ 2 first degree relatives (FDR), 1 FDR and 1 s degree relative (SDR), ≥ 3 any degree relatives (ADR), or any known hereditary cancer syndrome with increased PC risk. Imaging with 3.0 T MRI was performed routinely and endoscopic ultrasound was used selectively. Screening was completed in 75 patients (pts). Hereditary cancer syndromes were present in 42 (56%) of the 75 pts: BRCA2 (18), ATM (8), BRCA1 (6), CDKN2A (4), PALB2 (3), Lynch (2), and Peutz-Jeghers (1). A family history of PC was present in ≥ 2 FDR in 12 (16%) pts, 1 FDR and 1 SDR in 5 (7) pts, and ≥ 3 ADR in 16 (21%) pts. Of the 65 pts who received screening MRI, 28 (43%) pts had pancreatic cystic lesions identified, including 1 (1%) patient in whom a cholangiocarcinoma was diagnosed as well. No patient underwent surgical resection. Using a 3.0 T MRI to screen patients at high risk for developing PC identified radiographic abnormalities in 43% of patients, which were stable on subsequent surveillance. Specific guidelines for the frequency of surveillance and indications for surgery remain areas of active investigation as the global experience with high risk screening continues to mature.
Collapse
|
42
|
Cazacu IM, Luzuriaga Chavez AA, Saftoiu A, Bhutani MS. Psychological impact of pancreatic cancer screening by EUS or magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk individuals: A systematic review. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8:17-24. [PMID: 30246710 PMCID: PMC6400091 DOI: 10.4103/eus.eus_25_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There is an increasing global interest in screening programs aiming to detect pancreatic cancer (PC) in an early and potentially curable stage. Concerns still remain as to whether screening would confer any survival benefit. Another approach to evaluate the benefits of the pancreatic screening programs would be to consider its impact on the quality of life of the individuals who at risk of developing cancer. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the current knowledge regarding the psychological impact of participation in routine screening for PC. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out in January 2018 in three major databases which are as follows: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Cross-sectional and prospective studies evaluating the psychological aspects of screening in high-risk individuals were included in the study. For each study, the following data were recorded: name of first author, year of publication, study design, study population, aims, screening protocol, outcomes and instruments, main results, and summary of findings. Results: Six cohort studies and one cross-sectional study that addressed the psychological aspects of PC screening were included in the analysis. Overall, studies have shown that high-risk individuals have positive psychological outcomes from participating in PC screening programs. Conclusions: Although screening might not always be reassuring, it may improve individuals’ quality of life, and this should be an important aspect when considering PC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Mihaela Cazacu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | | | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Sheel ARG, Harrison S, Sarantitis I, Nicholson JA, Hanna T, Grocock C, Raraty M, Ramesh J, Farooq A, Costello E, Jackson R, Chapman M, Smith A, Carter R, Mckay C, Hamady Z, Aithal GP, Mountford R, Ghaneh P, Hammel P, Lerch MM, Halloran C, Pereira SP, Greenhalf W. Identification of Cystic Lesions by Secondary Screening of Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) Kindreds Is Not Associated with the Stratified Risk of Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114:155-164. [PMID: 30353057 DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0395-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are associated with risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is unclear if an IPMN in individuals at high risk of PDAC should be considered as a positive screening result or as an incidental finding. Stratified familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) populations were used to determine if IPMN risk is linked to familial risk of PDAC. METHODS This is a cohort study of 321 individuals from 258 kindreds suspected of being FPC and undergoing secondary screening for PDAC through the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer (EUROPAC). Computerised tomography, endoscopic ultrasound of the pancreas and magnetic resonance imaging were used. The risk of being a carrier of a dominant mutation predisposing to pancreatic cancer was stratified into three even categories (low, medium and high) based on: Mendelian probability, the number of PDAC cases and the number of people at risk in a kindred. RESULTS There was a median (interquartile range (IQR)) follow-up of 2 (0-5) years and a median (IQR) number of investigations per participant of 4 (2-6). One PDAC, two low-grade neuroendocrine tumours and 41 cystic lesions were identified, including 23 IPMN (22 branch-duct (BD)). The PDAC case occurred in the top 10% of risk, and the BD-IPMN cases were evenly distributed amongst risk categories: low (6/107), medium (10/107) and high (6/107) (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS The risk of finding BD-IPMN was independent of genetic predisposition and so they should be managed according to guidelines for incidental finding of IPMN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R G Sheel
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - S Harrison
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - I Sarantitis
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - J A Nicholson
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - T Hanna
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - C Grocock
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - M Raraty
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - J Ramesh
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Farooq
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Liverpool University Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Costello
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - R Jackson
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - M Chapman
- Institute for Liver & Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Smith
- Department of Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - R Carter
- West of Scotland Pancreatic unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - C Mckay
- West of Scotland Pancreatic unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Z Hamady
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - G P Aithal
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - R Mountford
- Mersey Regional Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - P Ghaneh
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - P Hammel
- Service de Gastroentérologie-Pancréatologie, Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Hôpital Beaujon, 92118, Clichy Cedex, France
| | - M M Lerch
- Department of Medicine A, University Medicine Greifswald, Sauerbruch-Strasse, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - C Halloran
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| | - S P Pereira
- Institute for Liver & Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - W Greenhalf
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chhoda A, Lu L, Clerkin BM, Risch H, Farrell JJ. Current Approaches to Pancreatic Cancer Screening. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2019; 189:22-35. [PMID: 30558719 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a 5-year survival rate of only 8% and is estimated to be the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2021. Prior convention held that screening for PDAC would not be beneficial; however, a deeper understanding of the carcinogenesis pathway supports a potential window of opportunity among the target population. Screening for PDAC is not a standard practice among the general population because of its low incidence. However, screening may be beneficial for individuals with familial history, chronic diseases with genetic predispositions, or inherited cancer syndromes, such as hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome, hereditary pancreatitis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial atypical multiple mole melanoma, Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer), ataxia telangiectasia, and Li-Fraumeni syndrome, all of which have been associated with an increased risk of developing PDAC. The screening strategies among these high-risk individuals are targeted to identify precursor lesions and PDAC at an early resectable stage. This review describes the risk factors for pancreatic cancer, especially the genetic risk factors in high-risk individuals and current screening strategies available for PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Chhoda
- Yale Waterbury Internal Medicine Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lingeng Lu
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Barbara M Clerkin
- Pancreatic Disease Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harvey Risch
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James J Farrell
- Yale Center for Pancreatic Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Yale Center for Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Corral JE, Mareth KF, Riegert-Johnson DL, Das A, Wallace MB. Diagnostic Yield From Screening Asymptomatic Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:41-53. [PMID: 29775792 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.04.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There have been few studies of abdominal imaging screening of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer (based on family history or genetic variants). We performed a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to determine the diagnostic yield and outcomes of abdominal imaging screening for asymptomatic individuals at high risk. METHODS Through a systematic review of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings through July 2017, we identified prospective cohort studies (>20 patients) of asymptomatic adults determined to be at high-risk of pancreatic cancer (lifetime risk >5%, including specific genetic-associated conditions) who were screened by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect pancreatic lesions. Our primary outcome was identification of high-risk pancreatic lesions (high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or adenocarcinoma) at initial screening, and overall incidence during follow up. Summary estimates were reported as incidence rates per 100 patient-years. RESULTS We identified 19 studies comprising 7085 individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer; of these, 1660 patients were evaluated by EUS and/or MRI. Fifty-nine high-risk lesions were identified (43 adenocarcinomas: 28 during the initial exam and 15 during follow-up surveillance) and 257 patients underwent pancreatic surgery. Based on our meta-analysis, the overall diagnostic yield screening for high-risk pancreatic lesions was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.33-1.14), with moderate heterogeneity among studies. The number needed to screen to identify 1 patient with a high-risk lesion was 135 (95% CI, 88-303). The diagnostic yield was similar for patients with different genetic features that increased risk, and whether patients were screened by EUS or MRI. CONCLUSIONS Based on meta-analysis, 135 patients at high-risk for pancreatic cancer must be screened to identify 1 patient with a high-risk pancreatic lesion. Further studies are needed to determine whether screening reduces mortality and is cost effectiveness for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan E Corral
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Karl F Mareth
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Ananya Das
- Center for Digestive Health, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Is magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging superior in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and does it have a prognostic value? THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
47
|
Franke FS, Matthäi E, Slater EP, Schicker C, Kruse J, Bartsch DK. German National Case Collection for familial pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa) - acceptance and psychological aspects of a pancreatic cancer screening program. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2018; 16:17. [PMID: 30519369 PMCID: PMC6267785 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-018-0100-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer screening is recommended to individuals at risk (IAR) of familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) families, but little is known about the acceptance of such screening programs. Thus, the acceptance and psychological aspects of a controlled FPC screening program was evaluated. Methods IAR of FPC families underwent comprehensive counseling by a geneticist and pancreatologist prior to the proposed screening. Participating IAR, IAR who discontinued screening and IAR who never participated in the screening program were invited to complete questionnaires to assess the motivation for participating in surveillance, cancer worries, structural distress and experiences with participation. Questionnaires were completed anonymously to receive most accurate answers. Results Of 286 IAR to whom pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) screening was recommended, 139 (48.6%) IAR regularly participated (group 1), 49 (17.1%) IAR (group 2) discontinued screening after median 1 (1–10) screening visits and 98 (34.2%) IAR (group 3) never underwent screening. The overall response rate of questionnaires was 67% (189/286) with rates of 100% (139 of 139 IAR), 49% (29 of 49 IAR) and 23.4% (23 of 98 IAR) for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At least 93% of IAR felt adequately informed about the screening program after initial counseling. However, only 38.8% received knowledge of or the recommendation for PDAC screening by physicians. The reported cancer-related distress and the fear of investigations were highest in group 1, but acceptably low in all three groups. The main reasons to discontinue or not to participate in screening were the time efforts and travel costs (groups 2 and 3 48,7%). Conclusion Less than 50% of IAR regularly participate in a proposed PDAC screening program, although the associated psychological burden is quite low. Physicians should be educated about high risk PDAC groups and screening recommendations. Time and travel efforts must be reduced to encourage more IAR to participate in a recommended screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederike S Franke
- 1Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, National Case Collection for Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa), Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Elvira Matthäi
- 1Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, National Case Collection for Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa), Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Emily P Slater
- 1Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, National Case Collection for Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa), Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schicker
- 1Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, National Case Collection for Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa), Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Kruse
- 2Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Detlef K Bartsch
- 1Department of Visceral-, Thoracic- and Vascular Surgery, National Case Collection for Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FaPaCa), Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
McGuigan A, Kelly P, Turkington RC, Jones C, Coleman HG, McCain RS. Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:4846-4861. [PMID: 30487695 PMCID: PMC6250924 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1054] [Impact Index Per Article: 175.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
This review aims to outline the most up-to-date knowledge of pancreatic adenocarcinoma risk, diagnostics, treatment and outcomes, while identifying gaps that aim to stimulate further research in this understudied malignancy. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a lethal condition with a rising incidence, predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer death in some regions. It often presents at an advanced stage, which contributes to poor five-year survival rates of 2%-9%, ranking firmly last amongst all cancer sites in terms of prognostic outcomes for patients. Better understanding of the risk factors and symptoms associated with this disease is essential to inform both health professionals and the general population of potential preventive and/or early detection measures. The identification of high-risk patients who could benefit from screening to detect pre-malignant conditions such as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms is urgently required, however an acceptable screening test has yet to be identified. The management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is evolving, with the introduction of new surgical techniques and medical therapies such as laparoscopic techniques and neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, however this has only led to modest improvements in outcomes. The identification of novel biomarkers is desirable to move towards a precision medicine era, where pancreatic cancer therapy can be tailored to the individual patient, while unnecessary treatments that have negative consequences on quality of life could be prevented for others. Research efforts must also focus on the development of new agents and delivery systems. Overall, considerable progress is required to reduce the burden associated with pancreatic cancer. Recent, renewed efforts to fund large consortia and research into pancreatic adenocarcinoma are welcomed, but further streams will be necessary to facilitate the momentum needed to bring breakthroughs seen for other cancer sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew McGuigan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Kelly
- Department of Pathology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast BT12 6BA, United Kingdom
| | - Richard C Turkington
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Jones
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mater Hospital, Belfast BT14 6AB, United Kingdom
| | - Helen G Coleman
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BJ, United Kingdom
| | - R Stephen McCain
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mater Hospital, Belfast BT14 6AB, United Kingdom
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BJ, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Canto MI, Almario JA, Schulick RD, Yeo CJ, Klein A, Blackford A, Shin EJ, Sanyal A, Yenokyan G, Lennon AM, Kamel IR, Fishman EK, Wolfgang C, Weiss M, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Risk of Neoplastic Progression in Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Long-term Surveillance. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:740-751.e2. [PMID: 29803839 PMCID: PMC6120797 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 261] [Impact Index Per Article: 43.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2017] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Screening of individuals who have a high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), because of genetic factors, frequently leads to identification of pancreatic lesions. We investigated the incidence of PDAC and risk factors for neoplastic progression in individuals at high risk for PDAC enrolled in a long-term screening study. METHODS We analyzed data from 354 individuals at high risk for PDAC (based on genetic factors of family history), enrolled in Cancer of the Pancreas Screening cohort studies at tertiary care academic centers from 1998 through 2014 (median follow-up time, 5.6 years). All subjects were evaluated at study entry (baseline) by endoscopic ultrasonography and underwent surveillance with endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or computed tomography. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of PDAC, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) after baseline. We performed multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS During the follow-up period, pancreatic lesions with worrisome features (solid mass, multiple cysts, cyst size > 3 cm, thickened/enhancing walls, mural nodule, dilated main pancreatic duct > 5 mm, or abrupt change in duct caliber) or rapid cyst growth (>4 mm/year) were detected in 68 patients (19%). Overall, 24 of 354 patients (7%) had neoplastic progression (14 PDACs and 10 HGDs) over a 16-year period; the rate of progression was 1.6%/year, and 93% had detectable lesions with worrisome features before diagnosis of the PDAC or HGD. Nine of the 10 PDACs detected during routine surveillance were resectable; a significantly higher proportion of patients with resectable PDACs survived 3 years (85%) compared with the 4 subjects with symptomatic, unresectable PDACs (25%), which developed outside surveillance (log rank P < .0001). Neoplastic progression occurred at a median age of 67 years; the median time from baseline screening until PDAC diagnosis was 4.8 years (interquartile range, 1.6-6.9 years). CONCLUSIONS In a long-term (16-year) follow-up study of individuals at high-risk for PDAC, we found most PDACs detected during surveillance (9/10) to be resectable, and 85% of these patients survived for 3 years. We identified radiologic features associated with neoplastic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Jose Alejandro Almario
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions,Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | | | | | - Alison Klein
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Amanda Blackford
- Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Abanti Sanyal
- The Johns Hopkins Biostatistics Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | - Gayane Yenokyan
- The Johns Hopkins Biostatistics Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Ihab R. Kamel
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Elliot K. Fishman
- Department of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Christopher Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Matthew Weiss
- Department of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Ralph H. Hruban
- Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions,Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yoshikawa T, Abe T, Amano H, Hanada K, Minami T, Kobayashi T, Yonehara S, Nakahara M, Ohdan H, Noriyuki T. Metachronous triple cancer associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome treated with curative surgery: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2018; 4:84. [PMID: 30069736 PMCID: PMC6070452 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-018-0492-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by mucocutaneous pigmentation and hamartomatous gastrointestinal polyposis. It is well known that individuals with PJS are at an increased risk of cancer in a variety of organs. Case presentation Here, we present a patient with PJS who achieved long-term survival by undergoing repeat curative surgery for metachronous triple cancer. Her medical history included hilar cholangiocarcinoma and cervical carcinoma; curative surgery was performed for both conditions. On annual follow-up, the level of carcinoembryonic antigen was elevated at 6.9 ng/ml. Enhanced computed tomography revealed a cystic tumor consisting of mural nodules at the pancreatic head; the maximal diameter was 15 mm. Magnetic resonance imaging clearly demonstrated the tumor with low intensity on T1-weighted images and high intensity on T2-weighted images. Endoscopic ultrasound sonography showed a high echoic tumor at the pancreatic head, which was confirmed as adenocarcinoma by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. The preoperative diagnosis was intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC; T1N0M0, stage IA). Subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed and the final diagnosis was IPMC, stage 0 (TisN0M0). Conclusions Aggressive surgery for metachronous triple cancer resulted in good long-term prognosis. Continuous and systematic follow-up would allow the detection of malignancy at an early stage and make treatment with curative surgery possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Yoshikawa
- Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, 1-10-23, Onomichi, Hiroshima, 722-8508, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Abe
- Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, 1-10-23, Onomichi, Hiroshima, 722-8508, Japan.
| | - Hironobu Amano
- Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, 1-10-23, Onomichi, Hiroshima, 722-8508, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keiji Hanada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Minami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Kobayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shuji Yonehara
- Department of Pathology, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masahiro Nakahara
- Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, 1-10-23, Onomichi, Hiroshima, 722-8508, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Toshio Noriyuki
- Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, 1-10-23, Onomichi, Hiroshima, 722-8508, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|