Clinical and biological significance of E-cadherin protein expression in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

E-cadherin staining in the diagnosis of lobular versus ductal neoplasms of the breast: the emperor has no clothes

Categorizing breast neoplasia as ductal or lobular is a daily exercise that relies on a combination of histologic and immunohistochemical tools. The historically robust link between loss of the E-cadherin molecule and lobular neoplasia has rendered staining for E-cadherin by immunohistochemistry a staple of this diagnostic process. Unfortunately, discordances between E-cadherin expression and histomorphology, and variations in E-cadherin staining patterns and intensities abound in clinical practice, but are often neglected in favour of a binary interpretation of the E-cadherin result. In this article, we highlight the complexities of E-cadherin expression through a review of the E-cadherin protein and its associated gene (CDH1), the mechanisms leading to aberrant/absent E-cadherin expression, and the implications of these factors on the reliability of the E-cadherin immunohistochemical stain in the classification of ductal versus lobular mammary neoplasia.

Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast; clinicopathologic profile and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy over a 15-year period

INTRODUCTION

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5-15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical ILCs. This study compared subtypes of ILC in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to biomarker profile.

METHODS

All patients with ILC treated in a single centre from January 2005 to December 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and outcome data was collected and analysed according to tumour biomarker profile.

RESULTS

A total of 582 patients with ILC were treated. Typical ILC was observed in 89.2% (n = 519) and atypical in 10.8% (n = 63). Atypical ILCs were of a higher grade (35% grade 3 vs 9.6% grade 3, p < 0.001). A larger proportion of atypical ILC received NACT (31.7% vs 6.9% p < 0.001). Atypical ILCs showed a greater response to NACT (mean RCB (Residual Cancer Burden Score) 2.46 vs mean RCB 3.41, p = 0.0365), and higher pathological complete response rates (15% vs 0% p = 0.017). Despite this, overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients with typical ILC (91% vs 83%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Atypical ILCs have distinct characteristics. They are more frequently of a higher grade and demonstrate a superior response to NACT. Despite the latter, atypical ILCs have a worse 5-year DFS which should be taken into consideration in terms of prognostication and may assist patient selection for NACT.

E-Cadherin Mutational Landscape and Outcomes in Breast Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) are characterized by the loss of E-cadherin expression and CDH1 gene inactivation. Diagnostic reproducibility for this tumor type is currently suboptimal and could be improved by a better understanding of its histomolecular and clinical heterogeneity. We have analyzed the relationship between the presence, type, or position of CDH1 mutations, E-cadherin expression, and clinicopathological features (including outcome) in a retrospective series of 251 primary ILC with a long follow-up (median: 9.5 years). The mutational status of E-cadherin gene (CDH1) was determined by RNA sequencing from frozen tumor samples. E-cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with antibodies directed against the intracellular domain (clone 4A2C7) and the extracellular domain (clone NCH38). IHC expression of p120 and β-catenin was also assessed in E-cadherin diffusely positive cases. Three major patterns of E-cadherin membrane expression were identified by IHC, with good agreement between the 2 clones (overall concordance: 83.8%, Kappa 0.67): null/focal expression (≤10%) (72.8% of cases for 4A2C7 and 83.8% for NCH38), heterogeneous expression (11%-89%) (19.2% of cases for 4A2C7 and 6.9% for NCH38), and diffuse expression (≥90%) (8% of cases for 4A2C7 and 9.3% for NCH38). E-cadherin membranous expression, when present, was abnormal (incomplete labeling and/or reduced intensity). ILC with diffuse E-cadherin expression showed abnormal β-catenin or p120-catenin staining in 21% of cases. Interestingly, these cases with diffusely expressed E-cadherin had a CDH1 mutation rate as high as the E-cadherin null/focal cases (∼70%) but were enriched in nontruncating mutations. Regarding CDH1 mutation location, intracytoplasmic domain mutations correlated with a divergent E-cadherin IHC phenotype between the 2 antibodies (4A2C7 ≤ 10%/NCH38 ≥ 10%). Clinico-pathological correlation analyses found that stromal amount (inversely correlated with tumor cellularity) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were less abundant in ILC with E-cadherin null/focal cases. In addition, CDH1 truncating mutations were associated with radiohistologic size discordance and were identified in multivariate survival analysis as an independent poor prognosis factor in terms of metastasis risk and breast cancer-related mortality. Overall, our study highlights the importance of the precise mutational status of CDH1 in the clinical, radiological, histologic, and phenotypic expression of lobular carcinomas. These findings should be taken into account in future attempts to improve diagnostic criteria or methods for ILC, as well as for clinicobiological studies dedicated to this tumor type.

Deciphering the Clinical Behaviour of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast Defines an Aggressive Subtype

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the most common special type of breast cancer (BC), has unique clinical behaviour and is different from invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type (IDC-NST). However, ILC further comprises a diverse group of tumours with distinct features. This study aims to examine the clinicopathological and prognostic features of different variants of ILC, with a particular focus on characterising aggressive subtypes.

METHODS

A large (n = 7140) well-characterised and histologically reviewed BC cohort with treatment and long-term follow-up data was investigated. The cohort was classified based on the WHO classification of tumours into main histological subtypes, including ILC and IDC-NST. ILCs were further classified into variants. Clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes in terms of BC-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

ILC constituted 11% of the cohort. The most common non-classic ILC variants were pleomorphic (pILC) and solid (sILC), constituting 19% of ILC. Compared to classic and related variants (alveolar, trabecular, papillary, and tubulolobular; cILC), pILC and sILC variants were associated with aggressive tumour characteristics. The histologic grade of ILC was an important prognostic variable. The survival patterns identified an aggressive ILC subtype encompassing pILC and high-grade sILC. These tumours, which comprised 14% of the cases, were associated with clinicopathological characteristics of poor prognosis and had high BC-specific death and recurrence rates compared not only to cILC (p < 0.001) but also to IDC-NST (p = 0.02) patients. Contrasting this, cILC patients had significantly longer BCSS and DFS than IDC-NST patients in the first 10 to 15 years of follow-up. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the outcome of patients with aggressive ILC subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

pILC and high-grade sILC variants comprise an aggressive ILC subtype associated with poor prognostic characteristics and a poor response to chemotherapy. These results warrant confirmation in randomised clinical trials.

Eleven years of disease free survival in a case of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) Rt Breast grade 3, stage 3, treated with add on Ayurveda treatment: A case report

Breast cancer shows high mortality, especially in women worldwide. This report discusses a case of female patient with a history of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC) Rt Breast, ER, PR negative, Grade 3 (Gr3) Stage 3 (St3) seen in our OPD treated with supporting herbo-mineral-metallic combination of Ayurveda medicines. Generally, breast cancers of such subtype and that too in Lower Outer Quadrant (LOQ) are always of a concern and can be more troublesome to the patient. When the patient came for the first time, her chief complaint was palpable lump in her right breast for previous three months. We advised her to undergo relevant investigations and, it was found to be malignant. She underwent surgery, Modified Radical Mastectomy,(MRM), followed by chemotherapy. During chemotherapy, which was Adriamycin + Cyclophosphamide (AC) protocol 4 cycles, followed by Docetaxel 4 cycles, every 21 days. After 2 cycles, she started complaints of pain in both calf regions, numbness in fingers of hand and foot, severe generalized skin rash with itching, hyperacidity and constipation. She visited our clinic again for the same, and Ayurveda treatment was started to her at this point. So, at the time of commencement of treatment, the diagnosis was "IDC Rt Breast, LOQ, Gr3 St3, ER, PR negative HER2Neu positive, post op, on chemo". After appropriate analysis based on Ayurvedic and modern parameters, she was diagnosed to have vitiation of Rakta and Pitta (Dushti avastha), due to cyto-toxic nature of (Visha exposure) chemotherapy and medication was planned accordingly, along with chemotherapy protocol. The Ayurveda treatment showed significant relief in the chemotoxicity symptoms, within one month and she could tolerate further chemotherapy cycles very conveniently. On completion of chemotherapy, she was diagnosed to have need of good immunity (Vyadhi-Kshamatva). Based on this diagnosis, Ayurveda treatment protocol was changed and this new regimen continued for almost 6 years afterwards. Laboratory and imaging investigations performed periodically showed marked improvement, and even currently not showing any abnormality. Till date, there is no recurrence and patient is living completely normally for last 11 years. As all the symptoms and investigations showed near complete improvement; it may be concluded that probably add on Ayurveda treatment (Integrative approach) proved effective in this patient of IDC. We have observed 11 years of disease-free survival and excellent quality of life in this patient and still ongoing.

Effect of histological breast cancer subtypes invasive lobular versus non-special type on survival in early intermediate-to-high-risk breast carcinoma: results from the SUCCESS trials

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular breast carcinomas (ILC) have different histological features compared to non-special type carcinomas (NST), but the effect of histological subtypes on survival is controversial. In this study, we compared clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes between ILC and NST based on a large pooled data set from three adjuvant breast cancer trials (SUCCESS A, B, and C) and investigated a potential differential effect of recurrence risk related to nodal stage on survival.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2017, the large randomized controlled SUCCESS A, B, and C trials enrolled 8190 patients with primary, intermediate-to-high-risk breast carcinoma. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and endocrine and/or HER2-targeted treatment was given where appropriate. Survival outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using log-rank tests as well as univariable and adjusted multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

In the SUCCESS trials, 6284 patients had NST and 952 had ILC. The median follow-up time was 64 months. ILC patients were older, more likely to receive mastectomy, and more likely to have larger tumor sizes, lymph node infiltration, hormone receptor-positive, HER2neu-negative, and luminal A-like tumors than NST patients. In the overall cohort, no significant differences between ILC and NST were detectable regarding the four survival endpoints, with hazard ratios obtained in adjusted multivariable cox regressions of 0.96 (95% CI 0.77-1.21, p = 0.743) for DFS, 1.13 (95% CI 0.85-1.50, p = 0.414) for OS, 1.21 (95% CI 0.89-1.66, p = 0.229) for BCSS, and 0.95 (95% CI 0.73-1.24, p = 0.689) for DDFS. However, a differential effect of nodal stage on survival was observed, with better survival for ILC patients with pN0/pN1 tumors and worse survival for ILC patients with pN2/pN3 tumors compared to NST patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that ILC was associated with worse survival compared to NST for patients at high risk of recurrence due to advanced lymph node infiltration. These findings should be taken into account for treatment decisions and monitoring.

Evaluation of the routine use of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry in the typing of breast carcinomas: results of a randomized diagnostic study

AIMS

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) has distinct morphology and association with loss of E-cadherin function. It has special clinical and imaging features, and its proper recognition is important. Following a recent proposal, we tested the value of the routine use of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC) in recognizing ILC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Five pathologists with experience in breast pathology from four Hungarian institutions histotyped 1001 breast cancers from diagnostic core biopsies or excision specimens randomly assigned to haematoxylin and eosin (HE) diagnosis first, followed by E-cadherin IHC; or to immediate HE and E-cadherin-based diagnosis. Of 524 cases with HE diagnosis, 73(14%) were deemed uncertain. E-cadherin made the initial histological type change in 14/524 cases (2.7%), including three with confident HE-based type allocation. Use of E-cadherin immunostaining was considered useful in 88/477 cases (18%) with immediate dual assessment, and typing uncertainty went down to 5% (25/477 cases), but was not zero. Collective assessment of 171 uncertain, difficult, nonclassical cases resulted in consensus diagnosis in most cases, but 15 cases were still doubtful as concerns their proper histological type. CDH1 gene sequencing was attempted and successful in 13; pathogenic genetic alterations were identified in seven cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of E-cadherin IHC decreases the uncertainty in typing and improves the typing accuracy at the cost of potentially redundant additional immunostains. Furthermore, this procedure does not exclude uncertainty due to E-cadherin-positive ILCs, which are occasionally difficult to confidently label as ILC, especially when the growth pattern is not classic.

Immunohistochemistry in the Diagnosis and Classification of Breast Tumors

CONTEXT.—

In the clinical practice of breast pathology, immunohistochemistry (IHC) of different markers is widely used for the diagnosis and classification of breast lesions.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide an overview of currently used and recently identified IHC stains that have been implemented in the field of diagnostic breast pathology.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were obtained from literature review and clinical experience of the authors as breast pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS.—

In the current review, we summarize the common uses of IHC stains for diagnosing different types of breast lesions, especially invasive and noninvasive breast lesions, and benign and malignant spindle cell lesions. In addition, the cutting-edge knowledge of diagnostic carcinoma markers will lead us to further understand the different types of breast carcinoma and differentiate breast carcinomas from other carcinomas of similar morphology. Knowing the strengths and limitations of these markers is essential to the clinical practice of breast pathology.

Quality Assessment of Proteins and RNA Following Storage in Archival Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Human Breast Cancer Tissue Microarray Sections

Although the immunogenicity of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections can decrease during storage and transport, the exact mechanism of antigenic loss and how to prevent it are not clear. Herein, we investigated changes in the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), E-cadherin, and Ki-67 in human breast tissue microarray (TMA) tissue sections stored for up to 3 months in dry and wet conditions. The positive rates of ER and PR expression were minimally changed after 3 months of storage, but the Allred scores of ER and PR stored in humid conditions decreased remarkably in comparison to fresh-cut tissue. The HER-2 antigenicity and RNA integrity of breast TMA sections stored in dry conditions diminished gradually with storage time, whereas the immunoreactivity and RNA quality of HER-2 in humid conditions decreased sharply as storage length increased. The area and intensity of E-cadherin staining in tissue sections stored in dry conditions did not change significantly and were minimally changed after 3 months, respectively. In contrast, the area and intensity of E-cadherin staining in tissue sections stored in humid conditions decreased significantly as storage length increased. Finally, the Ki-67 labeling index of tissue sections stored for 3 months in dry (9% decrease) and wet (31.9% decrease) conditions was decreased in comparison to fresh sections. In conclusion, these results indicate that water is a crucial factor for protein and RNA degradation in stored tissue sections, and detailed guidelines are required in the clinic.

Diagnostic Pitfalls in Breast Cancer Pathology With an Emphasis on Core Needle Biopsy Specimens

CONTEXT.—

Breast pathology has many mimics and diagnostic pitfalls. Evaluation of malignant breast lesions, particularly in the biopsy setting, can be especially challenging, with diagnostic errors having significant management implications.

OBJECTIVE.—

To discuss the pitfalls encountered when evaluating ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinomas, providing histologic clues and guidance for appropriate use and interpretation of immunohistochemistry to aid in the correct diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES.—

Data were obtained from review of pertinent literature of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast carcinomas and from the experience of the authors as practicing breast pathologists.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Awareness of the pitfalls in diagnosing breast cancers is important when creating a differential diagnosis for each breast lesion evaluated. This review will cover some of these scenarios to aid in the diagnostic process.

Clinicopathologic and genomic features of lobular like invasive mammary carcinoma: is it a distinct entity?

This study describes "lobular-like invasive mammary carcinomas" (LLIMCas), a group of low- to intermediate-grade invasive mammary carcinomas with discohesive, diffusely infiltrative cells showing retained circumferential membranous immunoreactivity for both E-cadherin and p120. We analyzed the clinical-pathologic features of 166 LLIMCas compared to 104 classical invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) and 100 grade 1 and 2 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs). Tumor size and pT stage of LLIMCas were intermediate between IDCs and ILCs, and yet often underestimated on imaging and showed frequent positive margins on the first resection. Despite histomorphologic similarities to classical ILC, the discohesion in LLIMCa was independent of E-cadherin/p120 immunophenotypic alteration. An exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis of the genomic features of 14 randomly selected LLIMCas and classical ILCs (7 from each category) was performed utilizing an FDA-authorized targeted capture sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT). None of the seven LLIMCas harbored CDH1 loss-of-function mutations, and none of the CDH1 alterations detected in two of the LLIMCas was pathogenic. In contrast, all seven ILCs harbored CDH1 loss-of-function mutations coupled with the loss of heterozygosity of the CDH1 wild-type allele. Four of the six evaluable LLIMCas were positive for CDH1 promoter methylation, which may partially explain the single-cell infiltrative morphology seen in LLIMCa. Further studies are warranted to better define the molecular basis of the discohesive cellular morphology in LLIMCa. Until more data becomes available, identifying LLIMCas and distinguishing them from typical IDCs and ILCs would be justified. In patients with LLIMCas, preoperative MRI should be entertained to guide surgical management.

Pitfalls in breast pathology

Accurate pathological diagnosis is the cornerstone of optimal clinical management for patients with breast disease. As non-operative diagnosis has now become the standard of care, histopathologists encounter the daily challenge of making definitive diagnoses on limited breast core needle biopsy (CNB) material. CNB samples are carefully evaluated using microscopic examination of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and supportive immunohistochemistry (IHC), providing the necessary information to inform the next steps in the patient care pathway. Some entities may be difficult to distinguish on small tissue samples, and if there is uncertainty a diagnostic excision biopsy should be recommended. This review discusses (1) benign breast lesions that may mimic malignancy, (2) malignant conditions that may be misinterpreted as benign, (3) malignant conditions that may be incorrectly diagnosed as primary breast carcinoma, and (4) some IHC pitfalls. The aim of the review is to raise awareness of potential pitfalls in the interpretation of breast lesions that may lead to underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, or incorrect classification of malignancy with potential adverse outcomes for individual patients.

The Importance of the Pathological Perspective in the Management of the Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

Background

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) account for 10–15% of all breast cancers and are the second most common histological form of breast cancer. They usually show a discohesive pattern of single cell infiltration, tend to be multifocal, and the tumor may not be accompanied by a stromal reaction. Because of these histological features, which are not common in other breast tumors, radiological detection of the tumor may be difficult, and its pathological evaluation in terms of size and spread is often problematic. The SSO-ASTRO guideline defines the negative surgical margin in breast-conserving surgeries as the absence of tumor detection on the ink. However, surgical margin assessment in invasive lobular carcinomas has not been much discussed from the pathological perspective.

Methods

The study included 79 cases diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma by a Tru-cut biopsy where operated in our center between 2014 and 2021. Clinicopathological characteristics of the cases, results of an intraoperative frozen evaluation in cases that underwent conservative surgery, the necessity of re-excision and complementary mastectomy, and consistency in radiological and pathological response evaluation in cases receiving neoadjuvant treatment were questioned.

Results

The tumor was multifocal in 37 (46.8%) cases and single tumor focus in 42 (53.2%) cases. When the entire patient population was evaluated, regardless of focality, mastectomy was performed in 27 patients (34.2%) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was performed in 52 patients (65.8%). Of the 52 patients who underwent BCS, 26 (50%) required an additional surgical procedure (cavity revision or completion mastectomy). There is a statistical relationship between tumor size and additional surgical intervention (p < 0.05). BCS was performed in 7 of 12 patients who were operated on after neoadjuvant treatment, but all of them were reoperated with the same or a second session and turned to mastectomy. Neoadjuvant treatment and the need for reoperation were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Additional surgical procedures were performed in 20 (44.4%) of 45 patients in BCS cases who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy.

Conclusions

Diagnostic difficulties in the intraoperative frozen evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma are due to the different histopathological patterns of the ILC. In our study, it was determined that large tumor size and neoadjuvant therapy increased the need for additional surgical procedures. It is thought that the pathological perspective is the determining factor in order to minimize the negative effects such as unsuccessful cosmesis, an additional surgical burden on the patient, and cost increase that may occur with additional surgical procedures; for this reason, new approaches should be discussed in the treatment planning of invasive lobular carcinoma cases.

Expression of N-Terminal-Deficient E-Cadherin Protein in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast is characterized by the discohesive growth of tumor cells, which is mainly associated with the complete loss of E-cadherin (E-cad) expression. However, some aberrant expression patterns of E-cad protein that are inconsistent with their morphologies have been reported in ILC. We report herein ILC cases expressing a new type of abnormal E-cad protein that lacks the N-terminal domain, but conserves the C-terminal domain on the cell membrane. Immunohistochemical staining of 299 ILC cases using specific antibodies against the N-terminal or C-terminal region of E-cad revealed that 227 (76%) cases showed loss of the membranous expression of both terminuses (N-/C-) and 72 (24%) cases showed expression of only the C-terminus (N-/C+). In all cases, the expression of p120-catenin and β-catenin coincided with the expression of the C-terminus of E-cad. Clinicopathologic analysis revealed that N-/C+ expression in ILC cells was significantly associated with the histologic subtype (especially mixed-type ILC with another histologic type) and immunohistochemical molecular subtype (especially the triple-negative subtype), but not with prognostic factors (pT or pN). In addition, 12 of 15 cases (80%) with aberrant cytoplasmic localization of the N-terminal of E-cad showed diffuse membranous expression of the C-terminal domain. Additional immunohistochemistry using an antibody recognizing the extracellular juxtamembrane region showed that 28 (39%) of the N-/C+ cases had lost membranous expression, suggesting diversity in the deletion pattern of the N-terminal region. Our findings provide a novel mechanism for the loss of E-cad function because of N-terminal-deficient E-cad protein in ILC.

Results of a worldwide survey on the currently used histopathological diagnostic criteria for invasive lobular breast cancer

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) represents the second most common subtype of breast cancer (BC), accounting for up to 15% of all invasive BC. Loss of cell adhesion due to functional inactivation of E-cadherin is the hallmark of ILC. Although the current world health organization (WHO) classification for diagnosing ILC requires the recognition of the dispersed or linear non-cohesive growth pattern, it is not mandatory to demonstrate E-cadherin loss by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Recent results of central pathology review of two large randomized clinical trials have demonstrated relative overdiagnosis of ILC, as only ~60% of the locally diagnosed ILCs were confirmed by central pathology. To understand the possible underlying reasons of this discrepancy, we undertook a worldwide survey on the current practice of diagnosing BC as ILC. A survey was drafted by a panel of pathologists and researchers from the European lobular breast cancer consortium (ELBCC) using the online tool SurveyMonkey®. Various parameters such as indications for IHC staining, IHC clones, and IHC staining procedures were questioned. Finally, systematic reporting of non-classical ILC variants were also interrogated. This survey was sent out to pathologists worldwide and circulated from December 14, 2020 until July, 1 2021. The results demonstrate that approximately half of the institutions use E-cadherin expression loss by IHC as an ancillary test to diagnose ILC and that there is a great variability in immunostaining protocols. This might cause different staining results and discordant interpretations. As ILC-specific therapeutic and diagnostic avenues are currently explored in the context of clinical trials, it is of importance to improve standardization of histopathologic diagnosis of ILC diagnosis.

Unusual Metastasis From Breast Cancer: Case Report

Metastatic breast cancer among young women represents a serious public health issue. The most frequent sites of dissemination are bone, liver, lung, lymph nodes and brain. Bladder location is extremely unusual. We present the case of a 33-year-old female who was receiving palliative chemotherapy for bilateral metastatic invasive lobular cancer. Following episodes of macroscopic hematuria, a CT scan was performed, which revealed a suspicious thickening of the bladder wall. After an endoscopic resection with immunohistological analysis, the diagnosis was confirmed. Voiding symptoms in a woman with a history of breast cancer should be evaluated to rule out a secondary urinary tract lesion. As soon as the diagnosis is determined, appropriate therapy should be initiated.

Lobular Breast Cancer: Histomorphology and Different Concepts of a Special Spectrum of Tumors

Simple Summary

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is a special type of breast cancer (BC) that was first described in 1941. The diagnosis of ILC is made by microscopy of tumor specimens, which reveals a distinct morphology. This review recapitulates the developments in the microscopic assessment of ILC from 1941 until today. We discuss different concepts of ILC, provide an overview on ILC variants, and highlight advances which have contributed to a better understanding of ILC as a special histologic spectrum of tumors.

Abstract

Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the most common special histological type of breast cancer (BC). This review recapitulates developments in the histomorphologic assessment of ILC from its beginnings with the seminal work of Foote and Stewart, which was published in 1941, until today. We discuss different concepts of ILC and their implications. These concepts include (i) BC arising from mammary lobules, (ii) BC growing in dissociated cells and single files, and (iii) BC defined as a morpho-molecular spectrum of tumors with distinct histological and molecular characteristics related to impaired cell adhesion. This review also provides a comprehensive overview of ILC variants, their histomorphology, and differential diagnosis. Furthermore, this review highlights recent advances which have contributed to a better understanding of the histomorphology of ILC, such as the role of the basal lamina component laminin, the molecular specificities of triple-negative ILC, and E-cadherin to P-cadherin expression switching as the molecular determinant of tubular elements in CDH1-deficient ILC. Last but not least, we provide a detailed account of the tumor microenvironment in ILC, including tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) levels, which are comparatively low in ILC compared to other BCs, but correlate with clinical outcome. The distinct histomorphology of ILC clearly reflects a special tumor biology. In the clinic, special treatment strategies have been established for triple-negative, HER2-positive, and ER-positive BC. Treatment specialization for patients diagnosed with ILC is just in its beginnings. Accordingly, ILC deserves greater attention as a special tumor entity in BC diagnostics, patient care, and cancer research.

Mixed ductal-lobular carcinoma: an analysis of CDH1 DNA copy number variation and mutation

BACKGROUND

Mixed ductal-lobular carcinoma (MDL) of the breast is poorly understood. Dysfunction of E-cadherin, a cell adhesion protein encoded by the CDH1 gene located on 16q22.1, causes loss of cell adhesion and cellular polarity in lobular carcinoma (LC). This study focuses the aberrations of CDH1 in LC, ductal carcinoma (DC), and MDL to investigate the pathogenesis of MDL.

METHODS

The CDH1 DNA value (ratio of CDH1 copy number to the reference gene, RNase P) was calculated by digital polymerase chain reaction analysis of a total of 113 breast carcinoma cases (51 LCs, 54 DCs, and 8 MDLs). CDH1 gene mutation assay was performed for 20/51 LCs, 8/54 DCs, and 8 MDLs cases.

RESULTS

The CDH1 DNA values were lower in LCs (average: 0.664) than in DCs (average: 1.296) (p < 0.000). In MDL, The CDH1 DNA values were significantly lower in LC areas (average: 0.58), compared to that of DC areas (average: 1.08) (p = 0.004), and there is no significant difference between the intermingled areas (average: 1.05) and DC areas (p = 0.775). Moreover, CDH1 mutations occurred more frequently in MDLs than in pure LCs and DCs. In one MDL case, the identical CDH1 mutation was found in LC and DC areas.

CONCLUSION

Our study presented that MDL had more frequent CDH1 mutations. There were two possible processes for cancer cells in LC areas: one process was via DC areas with a common ancestor, and another was an independent process from DC areas.

p-120 Catenin is a Useful Diagnostic Biomarker for Distinguishing Plasmacytoid and Sarcomatoid Variants From Conventional Urothelial Carcinoma

CONTEXT.—

Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma (PC-UC) is an aggressive variant of urothelial carcinoma (UC), characterized by loss of E-cadherin (E-Cad)-mediated intercellular adhesion. Loss of E-Cad by immunohistochemistry can help diagnose PC-UC; however, sensitivity is limited. Expression of other cadherin-catenin adhesion complex members, that is, p-120 catenin (p-120) and β-catenin (B-Cat), which are diagnostically useful for lobular breast carcinoma, remains unknown in UC.

OBJECTIVE.—

To determine the utility of p-120 and B-Cat in conventional and variant UC.

DESIGN.—

E-cadherin, B-Cat, and p-120 immunohistochemistry was performed in 25 conventional UCs and 33 variant UCs, including 22 PC-UCs, 6 sarcomatoid UCs (SUCs), and 5 micropapillary UCs. Membranous staining for all biomarkers was considered normal; however, any cytoplasmic staining or an absence of staining was considered diagnostically abnormal. Next-generation sequencing was performed on 8 PC-UC cases.

RESULTS.—

E-cadherin, B-Cat, and p-120 showed membranous staining in all conventional and micropapillary UCs. In contrast, most PC-UCs were negative for E-Cad (17 of 22; 77%) with an additional 2 of 22 cases (9%) showing cytoplasmic with partial membranous staining. p-120 catenin demonstrated cytoplasmic or negative staining in 21 of 22 cases (95%). Most SUCs showed an absence of E-Cad (5 of 6; 83%) and cytoplasmic or negative p-120 in 5 of 6 cases (83%). Staining for B-Cat was also abnormal in a subset of PC-UCs and SUCs. Five PC-UC cases that harbored CDH1 gene variants were p-120 cytoplasmic positive.

CONCLUSIONS.—

p-120 catenin is a useful adjunct biomarker to E-Cad in the clinically important distinction of PC-UC and SUC from conventional UC. In particular, the combination of cytoplasmic p-120 and loss of E-Cad is strongly supportive of PC-UC and SUC.

Asymptomatic solitary metastasis to the stomach from breast cancer: A case report

Distant metastases from breast cancer are frequently found in bones, lungs and the liver. Metastasis to the stomach is rare, and its clinical presentation remains unclear. The present report describes a case of isolated gastric metastasis from breast cancer identified by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). A 45-year-old female patient underwent right mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection after preoperative chemotherapy for right invasive lobular breast carcinoma T4bN2M0, stage IIIB. Postoperative radiotherapy and endocrine therapy with tamoxifen for 5 years were performed. CT for postoperative follow-up at 52 years old revealed thickening of the stomach wall. Although the patient was asymptomatic, erosive mucosa was observed on the gastric body during gastroscopy. The gastric lesion was immunohistochemically diagnosed as metastatic luminal disease from the breast cancer. Positron emission tomography/CT revealed no abnormal accumulation suggesting metastasis to other organs. Palbociclib and fulvestrant treatment were initiated for gastric metastasis. Invasive lobular breast carcinoma results in gastrointestinal metastasis, including the stomach, more frequently than invasive ductal breast carcinoma. However, most gastric metastases occur simultaneously with systemic metastases. Solitary metastasis to the stomach without symptoms as in this case has rarely been reported. The possibility of gastric metastasis should be considered among the differential diagnoses, even in the absence of symptoms, when gastrointestinal abnormalities are seen on CT in patients with a history of breast cancer.

E-cadherin immunohistochemical expression in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with morphology and CDH1 somatic alterations

E-cadherin (ECAD) immunohistochemical (IHC) expression is lost in ∼90% of invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) owing to genomic alterations of CDH1. We examined morphologic features and ECAD IHC expression in invasive breast carcinomas (BCs) with known CDH1 alterations. Between January 2014 and May 2018, 202 cases of BC with a CDH1 somatic alteration were identified. ECAD expression was lost in 77% (155/202) of cases and was retained in 23% (47/202) cases. Most (90%, 139/155) ECAD-negative cases were morphologically classified as ILC, while the remaining (10%, 16/155) were invasive mammary carcinoma with mixed ductal and lobular features (IMC). Of 47 cases with ECAD staining, 62% (29/47) were classified as ILC, 23% (11/47) were classified as IMC, and 15% (7/47) were classified as invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Of note, 51% (24/47) of ECAD-positive cases were initially diagnosed as IDC or IMC based on ECAD expression alone. For ECAD-negative BCs, 98% (152/155) of CDH1 alterations were truncating, and 2% (3/155) were variants of unknown significance (VUS). Truncating CDH1 alterations were identified in the majority of ECAD-positive BCs (72%, 34/47); however, VUS-type CDH1 alterations were more prevalent (28%, 13/47) in ECAD-positive BCs than in ECAD-negative BCs. Although 90% of ECAD-negative tumors were compatible with ILC in this study, 17% (29/168) of ILC cases were ECAD positive. In addition, CDH1 truncating alterations were seen in ECAD-positive ILC, supporting the notion of aberrant ECAD staining. Therefore, ECAD IHC expression must be interpreted in conjunction with morphology, and BC with classic histologic features of ILC should not be reclassified as IDC/IMC based solely on the status of ECAD IHC expression.

Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer as a Distinct Disease: Implications for Therapeutic Strategy

Invasive lobular carcinoma comprises 10-15% of all breast cancers and is increasingly recognised as a distinct and understudied disease compared with the predominant histological subtype, invasive ductal carcinoma. Hallmarks of invasive lobular carcinoma include E-cadherin loss, leading to discohesive morphology with cells proliferating in single-file strands and oestrogen receptor positivity, with favourable response to endocrine therapy. This review summarises the distinct histological and molecular features of invasive lobular carcinoma with focus on diagnostic challenges and the impact on surgical management and medical therapy. Emphasis is placed on recent advances in our understanding of the unique molecular biology of lobular breast cancer and how this is optimising our therapy approach in the clinic.

Adjuvant chemotherapy could not bring survival benefit to HR-positive, HER2-negative, pT1b-c/N0-1/M0 invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a propensity score matching study based on SEER database

BACKGROUND

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is still unclear. The objective of the current study was to elucidate the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, pT1b-c/N0-1/M0 ILC.

METHODS

Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) database, we identified original 12,334 HR-positive, HER2-negative, pT1b-c/N0-1/M0 ILC patients, who were then divided into adjuvant chemotherapy group and control group. End-points were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Aiming to minimize the selection bias of baseline characteristics, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) method was used.

RESULTS

In a total of 12,334 patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, pT1b-c/N0-1/M0 ILC, 1785 patients (14.5%) were allocated into adjuvant chemotherapy group and 10,549 (85.5%) into control group. Used PSM, the 1785 patients in adjuvant chemotherapy group matched to the 1785 patients in control group. By Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, we observed no beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS in both original samples (P = 0.639) and matched samples (P = 0.962), however, ineffective or even contrary results of adjuvant chemotherapy on BCSM both in original samples (P = 0.001) and in matched samples (P = 0.002). In both original and matched multivariate Cox models, we observed ineffectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy on OS (hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival = 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.62-1.09]; P = 0.172 and HR = 0.90, 95%CI [0.65-1.26]; P = 0.553, respectively), unexpectedly promoting effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on BCSM (HR = 2.33, 95%CI [1.47-3.67]; P = 0.001 and HR = 2.41, 95%CI [1.32-4.39]; P = 0.004, respectively). Standard surgery was beneficial to the survival of patients. Lymph node metastasis was detrimental to survival and radiotherapy brought survival benefit in original samples, but two issues had unobvious effect in matched samples.

CONCLUSION

In this study, adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve survival for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative pT1b-c/N0-1/M0 ILC.

American Registry of Pathology Expert Opinions: The Spectrum of Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: Diagnostic Features and Clinical Implications

This review reflects a collaboration between the American Registry of Pathology (the publisher of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Fascicles) and Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. It is part of a series of expert recommendations on topics encountered in daily practice. The authors, 4 pathologists with expertise in breast pathology and a breast surgeon with a clinical and research interest in lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), met by conference call in September 2019 to develop recommendations for evaluating and reporting LCIS. Herein, we summarize the diagnostic criteria of classic LCIS and LCIS subtypes according to the most recent WHO criteria, discuss how best to distinguish LCIS from ductal carcinoma in situ in problematic cases (including the uses and limitations of E-cadherin immunohistochemistry), and review outcome and management issues for patients with LCIS.

Truncated ASPP2 Drives Initiation and Progression of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma via Distinct Mechanisms

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 8%-14% of all breast cancer cases. The main hallmark of ILCs is the functional loss of the cell-cell adhesion protein E-cadherin. Nonetheless, loss of E-cadherin alone does not predispose mice to mammary tumor development, indicating that additional perturbations are required for ILC formation. Previously, we identified an N-terminal truncation variant of ASPP2 (t-ASPP2) as a driver of ILC in mice with mammary-specific loss of E-cadherin. Here we showed that expression of t-ASPP2 induced actomyosin relaxation, enabling adhesion and survival of E-cadherin-deficient murine mammary epithelial cells on stiff matrices like fibrillar collagen. The induction of actomyosin relaxation by t-ASPP2 was dependent on its interaction with protein phosphatase 1, but not on t-ASPP2-induced YAP activation. Truncated ASPP2 collaborated with both E-cadherin loss and PI3K pathway activation via PTEN loss in ILC development. t-ASPP2-induced actomyosin relaxation was required for ILC initiation, but not progression. Conversely, YAP activation induced by t-ASPP2 contributed to tumor growth and progression while being dispensable for tumor initiation. Together, these findings highlight two distinct mechanisms through which t-ASPP2 promotes ILC initiation and progression. SIGNIFICANCE: Truncated ASPP2 cooperates with E-cadherin and PTEN loss to drive breast cancer initiation and progression via two distinct mechanisms. ASPP2-induced actomyosin relaxation drives tumor initiation, while ASPP2-mediated YAP activation enhances tumor progression.

Impact of histotypes on preferential organ-specific metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer

Background

The distant metastasis was the most predictive characters of poor prognosis for triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC). We aimed to evaluate the correlation between patient characters and preferential distant metastatic sites (DMS) and its effects on prognosis.

Methods

Using the 2010‐2014 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) data, patients with TNBC were classified into eight histologic subtypes. Patient characters were compared using a chi‐squared test. Logistic regression was used for identification of predictive factors. The log‐rank testing was utilized with disease‐specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) as the primary outcomes.

Results

A total of 23 270 patients with TNBC were involved, including 1544 patients with distant metastatic cancer. Bone metastasis was diagnosed in 559 cases, brain metastasis in 124 cases, liver metastasis found in 369 cases and lung metastasis in 492 cases. Histologic subtypes including metaplastic breast carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma showed significant differences in preferential DMS compared with invasive ductal carcinoma. Furthermore, we found different histologic subtypes with specific DMS showed various prognosis. We also evaluated different DMS of specific histologic subtypes showed different prognosis.

Conclusion

Certain histologic subtypes of breast cancer are associated with preferential DMS and prognosis; this knowledge may help to further understand the mechanism of breast cancer metastasis and to monitor the prognosis of patients with TNBC.

Balancing STAT Activity as a Therapeutic Strategy

Driven by dysregulated IL-6 family member cytokine signaling in the tumor microenvironment (TME), aberrant signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT3) and (STAT5) activation have been identified as key contributors to tumorigenesis. Following transformation, persistent STAT3 activation drives the emergence of mesenchymal/cancer-stem cell (CSC) properties, important determinants of metastatic potential and therapy failure. Moreover, STAT3 signaling within tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils drives secretion of factors that facilitate metastasis and suppress immune cell function. Persistent STAT5 activation is responsible for cancer cell maintenance through suppression of apoptosis and tumor suppressor signaling. Furthermore, STAT5-mediated CD4+/CD25+ regulatory T cells (T_regs) have been implicated in suppression of immunosurveillance. We discuss these roles for STAT3 and STAT5, and weigh the attractiveness of different modes of targeting each cancer therapy. Moreover, we discuss how anti-tumorigenic STATs, including STAT1 and STAT2, may be leveraged to suppress the pro-tumorigenic functions of STAT3/STAT5 signaling.

E-cadherin clone 36 nuclear staining dictates adverse disease outcome in lobular breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and additional biomarkers for individually predicting patient outcomes are needed. Aberrant membrane E-cadherin immunoexpression has been demonstrated in lobular breast cancer. Also, E-cadherin nuclear staining has been reported, associating with prognosis in various tumors. Here, we explore whether membrane or nuclear staining of E-cadherin has the potential to dictate prognosis of patients with lobular breast cancer. We selected a cohort of 285 consecutively diagnosed lobular breast cancer patients and performed immunohistochemistry for E-cadherin (clones 36, EP700Y, and NCH38) and P-cadherin (clone 56C1) in representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks. All patients were female, HER2-negative and surgically treated in a single institution. Survival curves were computed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios and respective 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox regression models. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Nuclear staining for E-cadherin clone 36 was frequent (35%), contrarily to other antibodies tested. Negative correlation was found between nuclear and membrane E-cadherin clone 36 immunostaining (r_s = -0.30, p < 0.001), whereas positive correlation was found between membrane immunoexpression of E-cadherin clone 36 and P-cadherin (r_s = 0.31, p < 0.001). Patients with any evidence of E-cadherin clone 36 nuclear immunostaining disclosed significantly worse overall survival, disease-specific-survival and disease/progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 2.059, 95% confidence interval 1.313-3.230; hazard ratio = 1.980, 95% confidence interval 1.121-3.495; and hazard ratio = 2.341, 95% confidence interval 1.403-3.905, respectively). Differences in survival were more remarkable when considering nuclear E-cadherin immunoexpression in ≥50% tumor cells. Poorer survival was maintained in multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, menopausal and PR status, treatment course, vascular invasion, tumor grade and stage. Our results support the use of antibodies against the cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin, such as clone 36, which may reveal nuclear immunostaining and indicate more aggressive clinical course in patients with lobular breast cancer. We hypothesize that E-cadherin is cleaved and translocated to nucleus functioning as transcription factor.

Rabbit monoclonal E-cadherin antibody: A cost-effective alternative to mouse monoclonal antibody in distinguishing ductal carcinoma in situ from lobular carcinoma in situ

Rabbit monoclonal antibody (RabMAb) demonstrates higher sensitivity without sacrificing specificity than mouse monoclonal antibody (MMAb). MMAb against E-cadherin stain is heavily utilized in distinguishing ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) from lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). We aimed to compare the E-cadherin stain using RabMAb vs MMAb in distinguishing DCIS from LCIS. One hundred and seventeen in situ breast carcinomas (55 DCIS, 58 LCIS, and 4 DCIS and LCIS) were studied. Sections from a representative block of each were stained with RabMAb [EP700Y] and MMAb [36B5]. Scanned images of stained slides were compared in tandem. All DCIS cases (59/59) showed comparable staining by RabMAb and MMAb. Comparable staining was also observed in all but one case of LCIS (61/62; 98%). One case of pleomorphic LCIS showed mostly complete, weak to moderately intense membranous staining with RabMAb and fragmented, weak membranous staining with MMAb. Consistently better staining quality was observed in slides stained by RabMAb vs MMAb. RabMAb and MMAb against E-cadherin were diagnostically equivalent with the exception of one case where RabMAb may have led to diagnostic misinterpretation. However, the not insignificant cost savings and easier interpretation using RabMAb may justify the risk of misinterpretation of increased staining in rare cases, largely avertable with proper training.

Clinical spectrum and pleiotropic nature of CDH1 germline mutations

CDH1 encodes E-cadherin, a key protein in adherens junctions. Given that E-cadherin is involved in major cellular processes such as embryogenesis and maintenance of tissue architecture, it is no surprise that deleterious effects arise from its loss of function. E-cadherin is recognised as a tumour suppressor gene, and it is well established that CDH1 genetic alterations cause diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer—the foremost manifestations of the hereditary diffuse gastric cancer syndrome. However, in the last decade, evidence has emerged demonstrating that CDH1 mutations can be associated with lobular breast cancer and/or several congenital abnormalities, without any personal or family history of diffuse gastric cancer. To date, no genotype–phenotype correlations have been observed. Remarkably, there are reports of mutations affecting the same nucleotide but inducing distinct clinical outcomes. In this review, we bring together a comprehensive analysis of CDH1-associated disorders and germline alterations found in each trait, providing important insights into the biological mechanisms underlying E-cadherin’s pleiotropic effects. Ultimately, this knowledge will impact genetic counselling and will be relevant to the assessment of risk of cancer development or congenital malformations in CDH1 mutation carriers.

High Frequency of ERBB2 Activating Mutations in Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma with Pleomorphic Features

Background: Characterisation of molecular alterations of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC), an aggressive subtype of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), have not been yet completely accomplished. Methods: To investigate the molecular alterations of invasive lobular carcinoma with pleomorphic features, a total of 39 tumour samples (in situ and invasive lesions and lymph node metastases) from 27 patients with nuclear grade 3 invasive lobular carcinomas were subjected to morphological, immunohistochemical and massive parallel sequencing analyses. Results: Our observations indicated that invasive lobular carcinomas with pleomorphic features were morphologically and molecularly heterogeneous. All cases showed absence or aberrant expression of E-cadherin and abnormal expression of β-catenin and p120. CDH1 (89%), PIK3CA (33%) and ERRB2 (26%) were the most common mutated genes. ERBB2 mutations preferentially affected the tyrosine-kinase activity domain, being the most frequent the targetable mutation p.L755S (57%). We also observed higher frequency of mutations in ARID1B, KMT2C, MAP3K1, TP53 and ARID1A in PLC than previously reported in classic ILC. Alterations related to progression from in situ to invasive carcinoma and/or to lymph node metastases included TP53 mutation, amplification of PIK3CA and CCND1 and loss of ARID1A expression. Conclusions: The high frequency of ERBB2 mutations observed suggests that ERBB2 mutation testing should be considered in all invasive lobular carcinomas with nuclear grade 3.

Loss of E-cadherin Enhances IGF1-IGF1R Pathway Activation and Sensitizes Breast Cancers to Anti-IGF1R/InsR Inhibitors

Purpose: Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) signaling regulates breast cancer initiation and progression and associated cancer phenotypes. We previously identified E-cadherin (CDH1) as a repressor of IGF1 signaling and in this study examined how loss of E-cadherin affects IGF1R signaling and response to anti-IGF1R/insulin receptor (InsR) therapies in breast cancer.Experimental Design: Breast cancer cell lines were used to assess how altered E-cadherin levels regulate IGF1R signaling and response to two anti-IGF1R/InsR therapies. In situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) was used to define interaction between IGF1R and E-cadherin. TCGA RNA-seq and RPPA data were used to compare IGF1R/InsR activation in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) tumors. ER+ ILC cell lines and xenograft tumor explant cultures were used to evaluate efficacy to IGF1R pathway inhibition in combination with endocrine therapy.Results: Diminished functional E-cadherin increased both activation of IGF1R signaling and efficacy to anti-IGF1R/InsR therapies. PLA demonstrated a direct endogenous interaction between IGF1R and E-cadherin at points of cell-cell contact. Increased expression of IGF1 ligand and levels of IGF1R/InsR phosphorylation were observed in E-cadherin-deficient ER+ ILC compared with IDC tumors. IGF1R pathway inhibitors were effective in inhibiting growth in ER+ ILC cell lines and synergized with endocrine therapy and similarly IGF1R/InsR inhibition reduced proliferation in ILC tumor explant culture.Conclusions: We provide evidence that loss of E-cadherin hyperactivates the IGF1R pathway and increases sensitivity to IGF1R/InsR targeted therapy, thus identifying the IGF1R pathway as a potential novel target in E-cadherin-deficient breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res; 24(20); 5165-77. ©2018 AACR.

Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, observed traditionally by morphology and protein expression but, more recently with the advent of modern molecular technologies, at the genomic and transcriptomic level. This review describes the association between the different molecular subtypes with the histologic subtypes of breast cancer alongside some of their major genomic characteristics and illustrates how these subtypes may affect the appearance of tumors on imaging studies. The authors aim to show how molecular stratification can be used to augment traditional methods to improve our understanding of breast cancers and their clinical management.

E-cadherin breast tumor expression, risk factors and survival: Pooled analysis of 5,933 cases from 12 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

E-cadherin (CDH1) is a putative tumor suppressor gene implicated in breast carcinogenesis. Yet, whether risk factors or survival differ by E-cadherin tumor expression is unclear. We evaluated E-cadherin tumor immunohistochemistry expression using tissue microarrays of 5,933 female invasive breast cancers from 12 studies from the Breast Cancer Consortium. H-scores were calculated and case-case odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression. Survival analyses were performed using Cox regression models. All analyses were stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status and histologic subtype. E-cadherin low cases (N = 1191, 20%) were more frequently of lobular histology, low grade, >2 cm, and HER2-negative. Loss of E-cadherin expression (score < 100) was associated with menopausal hormone use among ER-positive tumors (ever compared to never users, OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.97-1.59), which was stronger when we evaluated complete loss of E-cadherin (i.e. H-score = 0), OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.06-2.33. Breast cancer specific mortality was unrelated to E-cadherin expression in multivariable models. E-cadherin low expression is associated with lobular histology, tumor characteristics and menopausal hormone use, with no evidence of an association with breast cancer specific survival. These data support loss of E-cadherin expression as an important marker of tumor subtypes.

Loss of E-Cadherin-Dependent Cell-Cell Adhesion and the Development and Progression of Cancer

Classical cadherins are the key molecules that control cell-cell adhesion. Notwithstanding this function, it is also clear that classical cadherins are more than just the "glue" that keeps the cells together. Cadherins are essential regulators of tissue homeostasis that govern multiple facets of cellular function and development, by transducing adhesive signals to a complex network of signaling effectors and transcriptional programs. In cancer, cadherins are often inactivated or functionally inhibited, resulting in disease development and/or progression. This review focuses on E-cadherin and its causal role in the development and progression of breast and gastric cancer. We provide a summary of the biochemical consequences and consider the conceptual impact of early (mutational) E-cadherin loss in cancer. We advocate that carcinomas driven by E-cadherin loss should be considered "actin-diseases," caused by the specific disruption of the E-cadherin-actin connection and a subsequent dependence on sustained actomyosin contraction for tumor progression. Based on the available data from mouse and human studies we discuss opportunities for targeted clinical intervention.

ERBB2 mutation is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with CDH1 altered invasive lobular cancer of the breast

E-cadherin (CDH1) is a glycoprotein that mediates adhesion between epithelial cells and also suppresses cancer invasion. Mutation or deletion of the CDH1 gene has been reported in 30-60% cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). However, little is known about genomic differences between ILC with and without a CDH1 alteration. Therefore, we analyzed whole genome sequencing data of 169 ILC cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to address this deficiency. Our study shows that CDH1 gene was altered in 59.2% (100/169) of ILC. No significant difference was identified between CDH1-altered and -unaltered ILC cases for any of the examined demographic, clinical or pathologic characteristics, including histologic grade, tumor stage, lymph node metastases, or ER/PR/HER2 states. Seven recurrent mutations (PTEN, MUC16, ERBB2, FAT4, PCDHGA2, HERC1 and FLNC) and four chromosomal changes with recurrent copy number variation (CNV) (11q13, 17q12-21, 8p11 and 8q11) were found in ILC, which correlated with a positive or negative CDH1 alteration status, respectively. The prevalence of the most common breast cancer driver abnormalities including TP53 and PIK3CA mutations and MYC and ERBB2 amplifications showed no difference between the two groups. However, CDH1-altered ILC with an ERBB2 mutation shows a significantly worse prognosis compared to its counterparts without such a mutation. Our study suggests that CDH1-altered ILC patients with ERBB2 mutations may represent an actionable group of patients who could benefit from targeted breast cancer therapy.

Break Breast Cancer Addiction by CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing

Breast cancer is the leading diagnosed cancer for women globally. Evolution of breast cancer in tumorigenesis, metastasis and treatment resistance appears to be driven by the aberrant gene expression and protein degradation encoded by the cancer genomes. The uncontrolled cancer growth relies on these cellular events, thus constituting the cancerous programs and rendering the addiction towards them. These programs are likely the potential anticancer biomarkers for Personalized Medicine of breast cancer. This review intends to delineate the impact of the CRSPR/Cas-mediated genome editing in identification and validation of these anticancer biomarkers. It reviews the progress in three aspects of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of the breast cancer genomes: Somatic genome editing, transcription and protein degradation addictions.

CDH1 promoter methylation in patients with cervical carcinoma: a systematic meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

AIM

This study was performed to evaluate the correlation between CDH1 promoter methylation and cervical cancer.

METHODS

Trial sequential analysis was conducted to evaluate the required information size.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies with 950 cervical cancers and 829 controls were identified. CDH1 promoter methylation was higher in cervical cancer than in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions and normal cervical tissues. Subgroup analysis of ethnicity showed that CDH1 promoter methylation correlated with cervical cancer in Caucasians, but not in Asians. CDH1 promoter methylation was higher in cervical cancer cytology samples than in normal cytology samples. It was higher in squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma, but was not correlated with tumor stage, grade and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

CDH1 promoter methylation may be correlated with cervical cancer carcinogenesis, especially for Caucasians. It was associated with histological subtypes. Trial sequential analysis showed that more studies are needed.

Insertional mutagenesis identifies drivers of a novel oncogenic pathway in invasive lobular breast carcinoma

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common breast cancer subtype and accounts for 8-14% of all cases. Although the majority of human ILCs are characterized by the functional loss of E-cadherin (encoded by CDH1), inactivation of Cdh1 does not predispose mice to develop mammary tumors, implying that mutations in additional genes are required for ILC formation in mice. To identify these genes, we performed an insertional mutagenesis screen using the Sleeping Beauty transposon system in mice with mammary-specific inactivation of Cdh1. These mice developed multiple independent mammary tumors of which the majority resembled human ILC in terms of morphology and gene expression. Recurrent and mutually exclusive transposon insertions were identified in Myh9, Ppp1r12a, Ppp1r12b and Trp53bp2, whose products have been implicated in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. Notably, MYH9, PPP1R12B and TP53BP2 were also frequently aberrated in human ILC, highlighting these genes as drivers of a novel oncogenic pathway underlying ILC development.

Modeling invasive lobular breast carcinoma by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic genome editing of the mammary gland

Annunziato et al. describe a novel strategy for in vivo validation of candidate tumor suppressors implicated in invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC). Whereas intraductal injection of Cas9-encoding lentiviruses induced Cas9-specific immune responses and development of tumors that did not resemble ILC, lentiviral delivery of a Pten targeting sgRNA in mice with mammary gland-specific loss of E-cadherin and expression of Cas9 efficiently induced ILC development.

Large-scale sequencing studies are rapidly identifying putative oncogenic mutations in human tumors. However, discrimination between passenger and driver events in tumorigenesis remains challenging and requires in vivo validation studies in reliable animal models of human cancer. In this study, we describe a novel strategy for in vivo validation of candidate tumor suppressors implicated in invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC), which is hallmarked by loss of the cell–cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. We describe an approach to model ILC by intraductal injection of lentiviral vectors encoding Cre recombinase, the CRISPR/Cas9 system, or both in female mice carrying conditional alleles of the Cdh1 gene, encoding for E-cadherin. Using this approach, we were able to target ILC-initiating cells and induce specific gene disruption of Pten by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic gene editing. Whereas intraductal injection of Cas9-encoding lentiviruses induced Cas9-specific immune responses and development of tumors that did not resemble ILC, lentiviral delivery of a Pten targeting single-guide RNA (sgRNA) in mice with mammary gland-specific loss of E-cadherin and expression of Cas9 efficiently induced ILC development. This versatile platform can be used for rapid in vivo testing of putative tumor suppressor genes implicated in ILC, providing new opportunities for modeling invasive lobular breast carcinoma in mice.

Molecular Classification of Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

The morphology of breast tumors is complicated and diagnosis can be difficult. We present here a novel diagnostic model which we validate on both array-based and RNA sequencing platforms which reliably distinguishes this tumor type across multiple cohorts. We also examine how this molecular classification predicts sensitivity to common chemotherapeutics in cell-line based assays. A total of 1845 invasive breast cancer cases in six cohorts were collected, split into discovery and validation cohorts, and a classifier was created and compared to pathological diagnosis, grade and survival. In the validation cohorts the concordance of predicted diagnosis with a pathological diagnosis was 92%, and 97% when inconclusively classified cases were excluded. Tumor-derived cell lines were classified with the model as having predominantly ductal or lobular-like molecular physiologies, and sensitivity of these lines to relevant compounds was analyzed. A diagnostic tool can be created that reliably distinguishes lobular from ductal carcinoma and allows the classification of cell lines on the basis of molecular profiles associated with these tumor types. This tool may assist in improved diagnosis and aid in explorations of the response of lobular type breast tumor models to different compounds.

Basal markers and prognosis in luminal breast cancer

PURPOSE

Basal marker expression in triple-negative breast cancers identifies basal-like tumours, and thus separates the TN group into two prognostic groups. However, the expression and prognostic significance of basal markers in luminal breast cancers are poorly described. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression and prognostic value of basal markers (CK5, CK14 and EGFR) in luminal breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1423 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tumours from a well-characterized cohort of Norwegian women, previously reclassified into molecular subtypes using IHC and ISH, were included in the study. For the present study, tumours expressing at least one of the basal markers CK5, CK14 or EGFR were defined as basal marker positive. Cumulative incidence of death from breast cancer and hazard ratio analyses were used to assess prognosis according to basal marker expression.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In total, 470 cases (33.0%) were basal marker positive. A higher proportion of the basal marker-positive tumours were of histopathological grade 3 compared to basal marker negative. For hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative cases, we found better prognosis for basal marker-positive breast cancer compared to basal marker negative. For all subtypes combined, poorer prognosis for basal marker-negative cases was found in histopathological grade 2 tumours but not among grade 1 and 3.

Strong Correlation of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 Expression with Basal-Like Phenotype and Increased Lymphocytic Infiltration in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) is an immunosuppressive enzyme involved in tumor immune escape. Blockade of the IDO1 pathway is an emerging modality of cancer immunotherapy. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks established therapeutic targets and may be a good candidate for this novel immunotherapeutic agent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of the IDO1-expressing TNBC subset. A tissue microarray was constructed from 200 patients with TNBC. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for IDO1 and TNBC molecular subtype-surrogate markers (AR, GCDFP-15, claudin-3, E-cadherin, CK5/6, and EGFR) was performed using this tissue microarray. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to confirm the IDO1 mRNA expression level in 16 fresh-frozen TNBC samples. Two hundred TNBCs were classified into four subtypes based on surrogate IHC results: 22 luminal androgen receptor type (11.0%), 23 claudin-low type (11.4%), 103 basal-like type (51.5%), and 52 mixed type (26.0%). IDO1 positivity (defined as expression of >10% tumor cells) was observed in 37% of all TNBCs. IDO1 IHC expression was well correlated with mRNA expression. IDO1 positivity was significantly associated with smaller tumor size, dense stromal lymphocytic infiltration, and basal-like phenotype; however, it did not affect the patients' prognosis. IDO1 expression in basal-like TNBCs is considered an immune inhibitory signal that counterbalances active immunity and may reflect the high mutational load of these tumors. Our results suggest which patients with TNBC would be more efficaciously treated with IDO1 blockade.

E-cadherin immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: uses and pitfalls

E-cadherin immunohistochemistry is used commonly in surgical pathology practice to help distinguish lobular carcinoma in situ from ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular carcinoma from invasive ductal carcinoma in histologically problematic or indeterminate cases. However, the interpretation of E-cadherin immunostains is not always straightforward. Failure to recognize the pitfalls and limitations of E-cadherin immunostains can lead to an erroneous diagnosis which may result in inappropriate patient management, particularly for patients with in-situ lesions. In this paper we review the uses and, particularly, the pitfalls in the interpretation of E-cadherin immunostains in distinguishing lobular from ductal lesions of the breast.

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: a comparison of cytopathological features with other lobular carcinoma variants

OBJECTIVE

Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (PLC) is a subtype of breast cancer with unique morphological features, but it remains controversial whether PLC should be considered an independent disease entity. The aim of this study was to illustrate cytopathological characteristics of PLC in comparison with other lobular carcinoma variants.

METHODS

We investigated clinicopathological features of PLC (n = 11) compared with those of other variants of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC, non-PLC) (n = 32). Histological variants of the non-PLC group consisted of classic (n = 25), solid (n = 2), alveolar (n = 1) and a tubulolobular type (n = 4). A review of cytological reports and fine needle aspiration (FNA) smear samples was performed for the PLC (n = 9) and non-PLC (n = 27) groups.

RESULTS

Patients with PLC were older, and had a higher nuclear grade and a higher incidence of axillary lymph node metastasis and triple negative phenotype than non-PLC patients (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, P = 0.02 and P < 0.001, respectively). Cytological findings in PLC included medium- to large-sized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, a moderate-to-severe degree of pleomorphism, apocrine change and background necrosis, none of which were evident in the smears of the non-PLC group (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.03, respectively). Despite these differences, patients with PLC and non-PLC showed similar clinical outcomes in our follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, a cytological diagnosis of PLC should be proposed if there are moderate- to large-sized nuclei, prominent nucleoli, a moderate-to severe degree of nuclear pleomorphism, apocrine change and necrosis in the background in FNA biopsy samples.

Intratumoral estrogen production and actions in luminal A type invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas

The great majority of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is estrogen-dependent luminal A type carcinoma but the details of estrogen actions and its intratumoral metabolism have not been well studied compared to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We first immunolocalized estrogen-related enzymes including estrogen sulfotransferase (EST), estrogen sulfatase (STS), 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD) 1/2, and aromatase. We then evaluated the tissue concentrations of estrogens in ILC and IDC and subsequently estrogen-responsive gene profiles in these tumors in order to explore the possible differences and/or similarity of intratumoral estrogen environment of these two breast cancer subtypes. The status of STS and 17βHSD1 was significantly lower in ILCs than IDCs (p = 0.022 and p < 0.0001), but that of EST and 17βHSD2 vice versa (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0106). In ILCs, tissue concentrations of estrone and estradiol were lower than those in IDCs (p = 0.0709 and 0.069). In addition, the great majority of estrogen response genes tended to be lower in ILCs. Among those genes above, FOXP1 was significantly higher in ILCs than in IDCs (p = 0.002). FOXP1 expression was reported to be significantly higher in relapse-free IDC patients treated with tamoxifen. Therefore, tamoxifen may be considered an option of endocrine therapy for luminal A type ILC patients. This is the first study to demonstrate the detailed and comprehensive status of intratumoral production and metabolism of estrogens and the status of estrogen response genes in luminal A-like ILC with comparison to those in luminal A-like IDCs.

Breast cancer subtypes: morphologic and biologic characterization

Advances in basic science, technology and translational research have created a revolution in breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. Researchers' discoveries of genes defining variability in response to therapy and heterogeneity in clinical presentations and tumor biology are the foundation of the path to personalized medicine. The success of personalized breast cancer care depends on access to pertinent clinical information and risk factors, optimal imaging findings, well-established morphologic features, and traditional and contemporary prognostic/predictive testing. The integration of these entities provides an opportunity to identify patients who can benefit from specific therapies, and demonstrates the link between breast cancer subtypes and their association with different tumor biology. It is critical to recognize specific types of breast cancer in individual patients and design optimal personalized therapy. This article will highlight the roles of morphologic features and established tumor biomarkers on patient outcome.