1
|
Hettiarachchi Senarath GM, Delir Haghighi P, Bai L, Shannon MM, Andrew NE, Srikanth V, Snowdon DA, O’Connor DA. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of electronic collection and use of patient-reported measures in routine care of older adults: a systematic review with qualitative evidence synthesis. JAMIA Open 2024; 7:ooae068. [PMID: 39100988 PMCID: PMC11296862 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The aims of this systematic review were to (1) synthesize the available qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators influencing implementation of the electronic collection and use of patient-reported measures (PRMs) in older adults' care from various stakeholder perspectives and (2) map these factors to the digital technology implementation framework Non-adoption, Abandonment, challenges to the Scale-up, Spread, Sustainability (NASSS) and behavior change framework Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B). Materials and Methods A search of MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science databases from 1 January 2001 to 27 October 2021 was conducted and included English language qualitative studies exploring stakeholder perspectives on the electronic collection and use of PRMs in older adults' care. Two authors independently screened studies, conducted data extraction, quality appraisal using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), data coding, assessed confidence in review findings using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE CERQual), and mapped the findings to NASSS and COM-B. An inductive approach was used to synthesize findings describing the stakeholder perspectives of barriers and facilitators. Results Twenty-two studies were included from the 3368 records identified. Studies explored older adult, caregiver, healthcare professional, and administrative staff perspectives. Twenty nine of 34 review findings (85%) were graded as having high or moderate confidence. Key factors salient to older adults related to clinical conditions and socio-cultural factors, digital literacy, access to digital technology, and user interface. Factors salient to healthcare professionals related to resource availability to collect and use PRMs, and value of PRMs collection and use. Conclusion Future efforts to implement electronic collection and use of PRMs in older adults' care should consider addressing the barriers, facilitators, and key theoretical domains identified in this review. Older adults are more likely to adopt electronic completion of PRMs when barriers associated with digital technology access, digital literacy, and user interface are addressed. Future research should explore the perspectives of other stakeholders, including those of organizational leaders, digital technology developers and implementation specialists, in various healthcare settings and explore factors influencing implementation of PREMs. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022295894.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pari Delir Haghighi
- Department of Human-Centred Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Lu Bai
- Department of Human-Centred Computing, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Michelle M Shannon
- Academic Unit, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - Nadine E Andrew
- Academic Unit, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- Academic Unit, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - David A Snowdon
- Academic Unit, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia
| | - Denise A O’Connor
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kraak JT, Verhoef K, Kramer SE, Merkus P. Barriers to and enablers of the use of the Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam in clinical practice-a qualitative post-implementation study. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:96. [PMID: 39141062 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00741-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Otology Questionnaire Amsterdam (OQUA) is developed to evaluate multiple ear complaints and their impact on patients' daily lives. The current clinical use of this questionnaire is below the potential utilization. AIM To identify the barriers and enablers of using the OQUA as perceived by ENT surgeons and patients and provide recommendations for an implementation strategy. METHODS Prospective and qualitative analysis was performed using focus groups and interviews with ENT professionals (n = 15) and patients (n = 25) with ear complaints of one tertiary referral hospital and two regional hospitals. Barriers and enablers were identified and classified by using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Suggestions for an implementation strategy will be made accordingly. RESULTS ENT professionals' barriers included lack of knowledge and skills to use the OQUA, inadequate technological support and perceived time constraints during consultation, uncertainty about the clinical relevance and lack of feedback on the outcomes of the OQUA. Enablers included beneficial consequences of the OQUA for the professional, organization and science. Patients' barriers included lack of knowledge about the objective and usefulness of the OQUA, perceived burden, difficulties in completing the questionnaire and insufficient feedback during consultation. Patient enablers included beliefs about beneficial consequences of the OQUA for the patient, health care and society. Suggested interventions involved education, training, environmental restructuring and incentivisation. CONCLUSION Based on the findings, we propose an implementation strategy should focus on education and training about the objective, outcomes and relevance of the OQUA, environmental restructuring regarding the optimal use of the OQUA, and incentivisation with feedback on the valuable outcomes of the OQUA for the patient, professional and healthcare. Future research is needed to determine the feasibility of the implementation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J T Kraak
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - K Verhoef
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S E Kramer
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Merkus
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ear and Hearing and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jolliffe L, Andrew NE, Srikanth V, Beare R, Noeske KE, Snowdon DA. Development of an implementation strategy for routine collection of generic patient reported outcome measures: a qualitative study in multidisciplinary community rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:3895-3904. [PMID: 37735798 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2258334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore staff perceptions of barriers and enablers towards implementing the EQ-5D-5L in community rehabilitation, and develop a theory-informed implementation approach for routine administration of generic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using implementation science frameworks. MATERIALS AND METHODS A qualitative study was conducted at three sites. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation staff completed individual semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and coded against the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). We identified and selected potentially effective behaviour change techniques using the Behavior Change Wheel. Hypothetical strategies were operationalised. RESULTS Twenty-one interviews were conducted, and four themes emerged: (1) The Impact of PROMs on patient centered-care; (2) Considerations for validity of PROMs; (3) Service-level impact of embedding PROMs; (4) Practical issues of embedding PROMs within the service. Barriers and enablers were mapped to seven of the TDF domains; relating most to clinicians' "belief about consequences", "reinforcement", and "environmental context and resources". Five hypothetical strategies were developed to overcome identified barriers and strengthen enablers. Key behaviour change techniques underpinning the strategies include: restructuring the physical environment, incentivisation, persuasion and education, enablement, and, social support. CONCLUSIONS Our implementation approach highlights the importance of automating processes, engaging site champions, routinely reporting, and using PROM data to inform service provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Jolliffe
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nadine E Andrew
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard Beare
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kate E Noeske
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David A Snowdon
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing (NCHA), Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dai Y, Daveson BA, Gan L, Ding J, Chen Y, Johnson CE. Implementation Strategies for Quality Improvement in Palliative Care: A Scoping Review. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14151. [PMID: 39056397 PMCID: PMC11273214 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality improvement (QI) programs based on person-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) play an important role in promoting optimal palliative care. However, routine use of PCOMs has been slow and difficult to implement, including within QI programs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify implementation strategies that support the implementation of PCOMs as routine practice in hospital-based palliative care, as well as the implementation theories, models and frameworks (TMFs) guiding the design of these implementation strategies. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review framework. Four databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and PubMed) were systematically searched for literature published between 1 January 1990 and 8 March 2024. RESULTS One hundred and fifteen unique implementation strategies, identified from 11 included studies, were mapped onto the 73 Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) discrete implementation strategies, covering 52% of the ERIC strategies. The most commonly used categories were train and educate stakeholders, and support clinicians, followed by develop stakeholder interrelationships and use evaluation and iterative strategies. Three key themes emerged: what to do; how to do it; and who to do it with. Only four studies employed TMFs to guide the design of the implementation strategies in this review. CONCLUSIONS To promote the implementation of PCOM-based QI programs, strategies should be developed based on identified/potential barriers and facilitators by using rigorous TMFs. The components of the implementation strategies must be reported transparently and consistently to enable replication and measurement in future research and practice. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This scoping review does not directly involve patients or the general public in its design or execution. However, it is part of an implementation study aimed at integrating the Palliative Care Outcome Collaboration (PCOC) model into routine clinical practice at a cancer hospital in China. Before the formal implementation, palliative care professionals from this hospital highlighted the need for a comprehensive analysis of existing evidence to support the effective adoption of the PCOC model in their specific clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunyun Dai
- Faculty of Science, Medicine and HealthUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
- School of NursingGuilin Medical UniversityGuilinGuangxiChina
| | - Barbara A. Daveson
- Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration, Faculty of Science, Medicine and HealthUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Luyu Gan
- School of NursingGuilin Medical UniversityGuilinGuangxiChina
| | - Jinfeng Ding
- Xiangya School of NursingCentral South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| | - Yongyi Chen
- Hunan Cancer HospitalThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South UniversityChangshaHunanChina
| | - Claire E. Johnson
- Palliative Aged Care Outcomes Program, Faculty of Science, Medicine and HealthUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ibrahim A, Clarke DE, Gibson D, Casanova B, Pagano A, Vocci FJ, Goldstein A, Patel S, Rahman N, Schwartz RP. Experience Starting an Addiction Medicine Practice-Based Research Network. J Addict Med 2024:01271255-990000000-00350. [PMID: 39078061 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This paper outlines the experience developing Addiction Medicine Practice-Based Research Network (AMNet), which promotes the adoption of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and measurement-based care in outpatient addiction treatment practices and creates a platform for quality improvement and research. METHODS From August 2019 to July 2023, the AMNet team selected patient-reported outcome measures for implementation in the American Psychiatric Association's clinical data registry (PsychPRO), recruited addiction medicine providers, and collected PROMs data. RESULTS AMNet selected 12 PROMs for implementation in PsychPRO. Through July 2023, 1565 providers expressed interest, of whom 216 of the 929 eligible providers (23%) attended an onboarding call/webinar. Two hundred six providers (95%) from 54 practices returned Participation Agreements. Subsequently, 65 providers (32%) from 39 practices withdrew, resulting in 141 (68%) providers from 15 practices. From November 2020 to July 2023, 38 providers submitted PROMs data using 1 of 3 PsychPRO patient portals. Sixteen of the 53 providers (30%) who signed up for the initial portal collected data from 468 patients. As of July 2023, 83 of the 141 providers (59%) opted to submit PROMs data from their own portal or electronic health record. CONCLUSIONS Next steps will include continued recruitment of providers, addressing barriers to data transfer and integrating data from providers' portals into the registry to create a platform for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adila Ibrahim
- From the Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD (AI, FJV, RPS); Division of Research, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC (DEC, DG, BC, SP, NR); Quality and Science Department, American Society for Addiction Medicine, Rockville, MD (AP); Division of Epidemiology, Services and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD (AG); and Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (DEC)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schwartz A, Guerrero Calle F, Barbour E, Persch A, Pfeiffer B, Davies DK, Mugele EJ, Kramer J. Interpretability and Clinical Utility of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Patient Reported Outcome (PEDI-PRO) Score Report. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2024:1-19. [PMID: 39039971 DOI: 10.1080/01942638.2024.2378064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Well-designed score reports can support therapists to accurately interpret assessments. We piloted a score report for the Pediatric Evaluation Disability Inventory-Patient Reported Outcome (PEDI-PRO) and evaluated: 1) To what extent can occupational and physical therapists (OT, PT) accurately interpret item-response theory (IRT)-based PEDI-PRO assessment results? 2) What is the perceived clinical utility of the pilot score report? METHODS Exploratory, sequential mixed methods design. Focus groups with OT and PTs (n = 20) informed the development of the final score report; revisions were made in response to feedback. Next, OTs and PTs (n = 33) reviewed score reports from two fictional clients and answered survey questions about the interpretation of the PEDI-PRO results. Additional questions evaluated clinical utility. RESULTS Focus groups: Visual cues supported score interpretation, but therapists requested additional explanations for advanced IRT measurement concepts. Survey: Therapists accurately interpreted foundational IRT concepts (e.g. identifying most/least difficult items, highest scores), but were less accurate when interpreting advanced concepts (e.g. fit, unexpected responses). Therapists anticipated sharing different components of the score report with family members, clinicians, and payers to support their clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS The pilot PEDI-PRO score report was highly endorsed by therapists, but therapists may need additional training to interpret advanced IRT concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Schwartz
- Institute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Barbour
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Andrew Persch
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Beth Pfeiffer
- Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel K Davies
- AbleLink Smart Living Technologies, LLC, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| | - Erik J Mugele
- AbleLink Smart Living Technologies, LLC, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| | - Jessica Kramer
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anderson M, van Kessel R, Wood E, Stokes A, Fistein J, Porter I, Mossialos E, Valderas JM. Understanding factors impacting patient-reported outcome measures integration in routine clinical practice: an umbrella review. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03728-7. [PMID: 39023733 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03728-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-report outcome measures (PROMs) have gained widespread support as a mechanism to improve healthcare quality. We aimed to map out key enablers and barriers influencing PROMs implementation strategies in routine clinical practice. METHODS An umbrella review was conducted to identify reviews exploring enablers and barriers related to the integration of PROMs in routine clinical practice from January 2000 to June 2023. Information on key enablers and barriers was extracted and summarised thematically according to the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS 34 reviews met our criteria for inclusion. Identified reviews highlighted barriers such as limited PROMs awareness among clinicians and patients, perceived low value by clinicians and patients, PROMs that were too complex or difficult for patients to complete, poor usability of PROMs systems, delayed feedback of PROMs data, clinician concerns related to use of PROMs as a performance management tool, patient concerns regarding privacy and security, and resource constraints. Enablers encompassed phased implementation, professional training, stakeholder engagement prior to implementation, clear strategies and goals, 'change champions' to support PROMs implementation, systems to respond to issues raised by PROMs, and integration into patient pathways. No consensus favoured paper or electronic PROMs, yet offering both options to mitigate digital literacy bias and integrating PROMs into electronic health records emerged as important facilitators. CONCLUSIONS The sustainable implementation of PROMs is a complex process that requires multicomponent organisational strategies covering training and guidance, necessary time and resources, roles and responsibilities, and consultation with patients and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Anderson
- Health Organisation, Policy, Economics (HOPE), Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
| | - Robin van Kessel
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Eleanor Wood
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Adam Stokes
- Centre for Global Health, St Georges, University of London, London, UK
| | - Jon Fistein
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ian Porter
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Elias Mossialos
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jose M Valderas
- Health Services and Policy Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Centre for Research On Health Systems Performance, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McCabe E, Dyson M, McNeil D, Hindmarch W, Ortega I, Arnold PD, Dimitropoulos G, Clements R, Santana MJ, Zwicker JD. A protocol for the formative evaluation of the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services as part of a learning health system. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:85. [PMID: 39010106 PMCID: PMC11251393 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01174-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health conditions affect one in seven young people and research suggests that current mental health services are not meeting the needs of most children and youth. Learning health systems are an approach to enhancing services through rapid, routinized cycles of continuous learning and improvement. Patient-reported outcome measures provide a key data source for learning health systems. They have also been shown to improve outcomes for patients when integrated into routine clinical care. However, implementing these measures into health systems is a challenging process. This paper describes a protocol for a formative evaluation of the implementation of patient-reported measures in a newly operational child and adolescent mental health centre in Calgary, Canada. The purpose is to optimize the collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures. Our specific objectives are to assess the implementation progress, identify barriers and facilitators to implementation, and explore patient, caregivers and clinician experiences of using these measures in routine clinical care. METHODS This study is a mixed-methods, formative evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Participants include patients and caregivers who have used the centre's services, as well as leadership, clinical and support staff at the centre. Focus groups and semi-structured interviews will be conducted to assess barriers and facilitators to the implementation and sustainability of the use of patient-reported outcome measures, as well as individuals' experiences with using these measures within clinical care. The data generated by the patient-reported measures over the first five months of the centre's operation will be analyzed to understand implementation progress, as well as validity of the chosen measures for the centres' population. DISCUSSION The findings of this evaluation will help to identify and address the factors that are affecting the successful implementation of patient-reported measures at the centre. They will inform the co-design of strategies to improve implementation with key stakeholders, which include patients, clinical staff, and leadership at the centre. To our knowledge, this is the first study of the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services and our findings can be used to enhance future implementation efforts in similar settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin McCabe
- School of Public Policy and Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| | - Michele Dyson
- Provincial Addictions and Mental Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Deborah McNeil
- Maternal Newborn Child and Youth Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences and Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Iliana Ortega
- Department of Psychiatry and Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Paul D Arnold
- Department of Psychiatry and Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Ryan Clements
- Alberta Health Services Calgary Zone, Calgary, Canada
| | - Maria J Santana
- Department of Pediatrics and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Jennifer D Zwicker
- School of Public Policy and Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kendir C, van den Berg M, Bloemeke-Cammin J, Groene O, Guanais F, Rochfort A, Valderas JM, Klazinga N. Engaging primary care professionals in OECD's international PaRIS survey: a documentary analysis. Health Res Policy Syst 2024; 22:76. [PMID: 38965544 PMCID: PMC11223287 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01170-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Healthcare professionals have first-hand experience with patients in clinical practice and the dynamics in the healthcare system, which can be of great value in the design, implementation, data analysis and dissemination of research study results. Primary care professionals are particularly important as they provide first contact, accessible, coordinated, comprehensive and continuous people-focused care. However, in-depth examination of the engagement of health professionals in health system research and planning activities-how professionals are engaged and how this varies across national contexts- is limited, particularly in international initiatives. There is a need to identify gaps in the planning of engagement activities to inform the design and successful implementation of future international efforts to improve the responsiveness of health systems to the changing needs of patients and professionals. The aim of this study was to explore how primary care professionals were engaged in the design and implementation plans of an international health policy study led by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The OECD's international PaRIS survey measures and disseminates information on patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) of people living with chronic conditions who are managed in primary care. A documentary analysis of 17 written national implementation plans (country roadmaps) was conducted between January and June 2023. Two reviewers independently performed the screening and data abstraction and resolved disagreements by discussion. We reported the intended target primary care professionals, phase of the study, channel of engagement, level of engagement, and purpose of engagement. All 17 countries aimed to engage primary care professionals in the execution plans for the international PaRIS survey. While organisations of primary care professionals, particularly of family doctors, were the most commonly targeted group, variation was found in the timing of engagement activities during the different phases of the study and in the level of engagement, ranging from co-development (half of the countries co-developed the survey together with primary care professionals) to one-off consultations with whom. International guidance facilitated the participation of primary care professionals. Continuous collaborative efforts at the international and national levels can foster a culture of engagement with primary care organisations and individual professionals and enhance meaningful engagement of primary care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candan Kendir
- Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | - Michael van den Berg
- Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France
| | | | - Oliver Groene
- Research & Innovation, OptiMedis, Hamburg, Germany
- Faculty of Management, Economics and Society, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Frederico Guanais
- Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France
| | - Andree Rochfort
- Quality Improvement, Irish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of General Practice and Forensic & Legal Medicine, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jose M Valderas
- Department of Family Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Research in Health Systems Performance (CRiHSP), Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Niek Klazinga
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centres (UMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Majorowicz RR, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Practical Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus. J Ren Nutr 2024; 34:294-301. [PMID: 38286359 DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Regulatory and clinical stakeholders are increasingly advocating for the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures; however, the use of PROs is still not widespread. Patient reports are often the best ways to diagnose and monitor the effect of treatment on symptoms when the symptoms are subjective, as with pruritus. While many PRO tools are available to assess the severity of pruritus and its impact on quality of life (e.g., sleep), these are not used in a consistent manner and their results may not translate into clinical action. In this article, we present an introduction to PROs and their use in the assessment of chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus, as well as a practical guide to some of the PRO tools currently available, to empower all members of the nephrology patient care team to use these tools appropriately for the benefit of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael R Majorowicz
- Dialysis Dietitian, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
- Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Van Coillie S, Prévot J, Sánchez-Ramón S, Lowe DM, Borg M, Autran B, Segundo G, Pecoraro A, Garcelon N, Boersma C, Silva SL, Drabwell J, Quinti I, Meyts I, Ali A, Burns SO, van Hagen M, Pergent M, Mahlaoui N. Charting a course for global progress in PIDs by 2030 - proceedings from the IPOPI global multi-stakeholders' summit (September 2023). Front Immunol 2024; 15:1430678. [PMID: 39055704 PMCID: PMC11270239 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI) held its second Global Multi-Stakeholders' Summit, an annual stimulating and forward-thinking meeting uniting experts to anticipate pivotal upcoming challenges and opportunities in the field of primary immunodeficiency (PID). The 2023 summit focused on three key identified discussion points: (i) How can immunoglobulin (Ig) therapy meet future personalized patient needs? (ii) Pandemic preparedness: what's next for public health and potential challenges for the PID community? (iii) Diagnosing PIDs in 2030: what needs to happen to diagnose better and to diagnose more? Clinician-Scientists, patient representatives and other stakeholders explored avenues to improve Ig therapy through mechanistic insights and tailored Ig preparations/products according to patient-specific needs and local exposure to infectious agents, amongst others. Urgency for pandemic preparedness was discussed, as was the threat of shortage of antibiotics and increasing antimicrobial resistance, emphasizing the need for representation of PID patients and other vulnerable populations throughout crisis and care management. Discussion also covered the complexities of PID diagnosis, addressing issues such as global diagnostic disparities, the integration of patient-reported outcome measures, and the potential of artificial intelligence to increase PID diagnosis rates and to enhance diagnostic precision. These proceedings outline the outcomes and recommendations arising from the 2023 IPOPI Global Multi-Stakeholders' Summit, offering valuable insights to inform future strategies in PID management and care. Integral to this initiative is its role in fostering collaborative efforts among stakeholders to prepare for the multiple challenges facing the global PID community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samya Van Coillie
- International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Johan Prévot
- International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Silvia Sánchez-Ramón
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos/Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IML and IdISSC), Health Research Institute of the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - David M. Lowe
- Department of Immunology, Royal Free London National Heath System (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Borg
- Department of Infection Control & Sterile Services, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Brigitte Autran
- Sorbonne-Université, Cimi-Paris, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM) U1135, centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) ERL8255, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Centre de Recherche n°7 (UPMC CR7), Paris, France
| | - Gesmar Segundo
- Departamento de Pediatra, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
| | - Antonio Pecoraro
- Transfusion Medicine Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Territoriale, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Nicolas Garcelon
- Université de Paris, Imagine Institute, Data Science Platform, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale Unité Mixte de Recherche (INSERM UMR) 1163, Paris, France
| | - Cornelis Boersma
- Health-Ecore B.V., Zeist, Netherlands
- Unit of Global Health, Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Department of Management Sciences, Open University, Heerlen, Netherlands
| | - Susana L. Silva
- Serviço de Imunoalergologia, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jose Drabwell
- International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabella Quinti
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Isabelle Meyts
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Adli Ali
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Hospital Tunku Ampuan Besar Tuanku Aishah Rohani, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) Specialist Children’s Hospital, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Siobhan O. Burns
- Department of Immunology, Royal Free London National Heath System (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin van Hagen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martine Pergent
- International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nizar Mahlaoui
- Pediatric Hematology-Immunology and Rheumatology Unit, Necker-Enfants malades University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
- French National Reference Center for Primary Immune Deficiencies (CEREDIH), Necker-Enfants malades University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Di Basilio D, King L, Lloyd S, Michael P, Shardlow M. Asking questions that are "close to the bone": integrating thematic analysis and natural language processing to explore the experiences of people with traumatic brain injuries engaging with patient-reported outcome measures. Front Digit Health 2024; 6:1387139. [PMID: 38983792 PMCID: PMC11231399 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1387139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are valuable tools for assessing health-related quality of life and treatment effectiveness in individuals with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). Understanding the experiences of individuals with TBIs in completing PROMs is crucial for improving their utility and relevance in clinical practice. Methods Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of individuals with TBIs. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Thematic Analysis (TA) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to identify themes and emotional connotations related to the experiences of completing PROMs. Results The TA of the data revealed six key themes regarding the experiences of individuals with TBIs in completing PROMs. Participants expressed varying levels of understanding and engagement with PROMs, with factors such as cognitive impairments and communication difficulties influencing their experiences. Additionally, insightful suggestions emerged on the barriers to the completion of PROMs, the factors facilitating it, and the suggestions for improving their contents and delivery methods. The sentiment analyses performed using NLP techniques allowed for the retrieval of the general sentimental and emotional "tones" in the participants' narratives of their experiences with PROMs, which were mainly characterised by low positive sentiment connotations. Although mostly neutral, participants' narratives also revealed the presence of emotions such as fear and, to a lesser extent, anger. The combination of a semantic and sentiment analysis of the experiences of people with TBIs rendered valuable information on the views and emotional responses to different aspects of the PROMs. Discussion The findings highlighted the complexities involved in administering PROMs to individuals with TBIs and underscored the need for tailored approaches to accommodate their unique challenges. Integrating TA-based and NLP techniques can offer valuable insights into the experiences of individuals with TBIs and enhance the interpretation of qualitative data in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Di Basilio
- Division of Health Research, School of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine King
- Department of Neuropsychology, North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Lloyd
- Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Panayiotis Michael
- Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Shardlow
- Department of Computing and Mathematics, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Saunders S, Gomes-Osman J, Jannati A, Ciesla M, Banks R, Showalter J, Muniz-Terrera G, Luz S, Ritchie C, Pascual-Leone Á. Towards a lifelong personalized brain health program: empowering individuals to define, pursue, and monitor meaningful outcomes. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1387206. [PMID: 38899057 PMCID: PMC11186480 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1387206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Incorporating person-centered outcomes into clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases has been challenging due to a deficiency in quantitative measures. Meanwhile, the integration of personally meaningful treatment targets in clinical practice remains qualitative, failing to truly inform evaluations, therapeutic interventions and longitudinal monitoring and support. We discuss the current advances and future directions in capturing individualized brain health outcomes and present an approach to integrate person-centered outcome in a scalable manner. Our approach stems from the evidence-based electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) program which prompts an individual to define personally meaningful treatment priorities and report level of confidence in managing items that matter to the individual the most (e.g., "Do I feel confident in my ability to contribute to a conversation?"). Deployed either as a single version (person only) or a dyad version (person and care partner), our proposed tool could be used as an endpoint in clinical trials, offering proof of meaningful intervention benefits and in clinical practice, by establishing an anchor for the therapeutic objectives sought by the individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stina Saunders
- Linus Health Inc., Boston, MA, United States
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Joyce Gomes-Osman
- Linus Health Inc., Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Ali Jannati
- Linus Health Inc., Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Russell Banks
- Linus Health Inc., Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, College of Arts & Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | | | - Graciela Muniz-Terrera
- Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States
- Scottish Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Saturnino Luz
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Craig Ritchie
- Scottish Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Population and Behavioural Sciences Division, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom
| | - Álvaro Pascual-Leone
- Linus Health Inc., Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Wolk Center for Memory Health, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Drury A, Boland V, Dowling M. Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Advanced Nursing Practice: What Are Key Considerations for Implementation and Optimized Use? Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151632. [PMID: 38658204 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To discuss the opportunities and challenges of implementing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) within advanced practice nursing services in cancer care. METHODS This discussion paper has been informed by an environmental scan of evidence from systematic reviews and primary studies evaluating the use and implementation of PROMs and PREMs. Literature from the contexts of cancer and chronic disease, including nursing and multidisciplinary supportive care literature, has been included. RESULTS Advanced practice nurses are well-positioned to evaluate and respond to PROMs and PREMs data; several studies have highlighted improved patient outcomes concerning quality of life, symptom distress, and functional status within nurse-led services. Nevertheless, the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in cancer care and nurse-led services is variable. Previous studies have highlighted implementation challenges, which can hinder comparability and generalizability of PROMs and PREMs instruments. Advanced practice nurses should consider these challenges, including ways to use standardized PROM instruments. Electronic PROMs, while efficient, may exclude individuals at risk of inequity. Complex, lengthy, and frequent administration of PROMs may also overburden people living with or after cancer, with people affected by cancer expressing preference for flexible use in some studies. Therefore, the involvement of people affected by cancer in planning for PROMs/PREMs implementation may overcome this challenge. Finally, organizational considerations in implementation should address financial investments, including initial costs for technology and training and consideration of the operationalization of PROMs within existing infrastructure for the seamless utilization of PROMs data. CONCLUSION Despite the potential of advanced practice nursing services to enhance patient-reported outcomes and experiences, variability in the implementation of PROMs and PREMs poses challenges. Use of validated measures, electronic or paper-based instruments, and the preferences of people affected by cancer for the use of PROMs and PREMs must be carefully considered in consultation with end users for successful implementation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE In planning for the implementation of PROMs and PREMs within nurse-led services, implementation risks may be mitigated through establishing clear guidelines for their use, investment in the development of the required infrastructure, user education, and rigorous implementation processes, including patient involvement in PROMs/PREMs selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Drury
- Associate Professor in General Nursing, School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Vanessa Boland
- Assistant Professor in General Nursing, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maura Dowling
- Associate Professor, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Martínez-Moragón E, Antepara Ercoreca I, Muñoz García M, Casas Maldonado F, Calvín Lamas M, Chiner Vives E, Crespo Diz C, Díaz-Pérez D, Eguiluz Gracia I, García Gil S, González-Pérez R, Habernau Mena A, Hermida Valverde T, Jornet Montaña S, López-Carrasco V, Martínez López I, Merino-Bohórquez V, Moreno-Ancillo Á, Mínguez Cabeza AC, Monte-Boquet E, Revuelta-Herrero JL, Sánchez-Cuellar S. Patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: an expert consensus. J Asthma 2024; 61:619-631. [PMID: 38146964 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2023.2297372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study aimed to reach a consensus on the most relevant patient-reported outcomes (PROs), the corresponding measures (PROMs), and measurement frequency during severe asthma patient follow-up. METHODS Two Delphi rounds were conducted. The questionnaire was developed based on a systematic literature review, a focus group with patients, and a nominal group with experts. It assessed PROs' relevance and the appropriateness (A) and feasibility (F) of PROMs using a Likert scale (1=totally agree; 9=totally disagree). The consensus was established when ≥75% of participants agreed (1-3) or disagreed (7-9). RESULTS Sixty-three professionals (25 hospital pharmacists, 14 allergists, 13 pulmonologists, and 11 nurses) and 5 patients answered the Delphi questionnaire. A consensus was reached on all PROs regarding their relevance. Experts agreed on the use of ACT (A:95.24%; F:95.24%), mini AQLQ (A:93.65; F:79.37%), mMRC dyspnea scale (A:85.71%; F:85.71%), TAI (A:92.06%; F:85.71%), MMAS (A:75.40%; F:82%), and the dispensing register (A:96.83%; F:92.06%). Also considered suitable were: SNOT-22 (A:90.48%; F:73.80%), PSQI (A:82.54; F:63.90%), HADS (A:82.54; F:64%), WPAI (A:77.78%; F:49.20%), TSQM-9 (A:79.37; F:70.50%) and knowledge of asthma questionnaire (A:77%; F:68.80%); however, their use in clinical practice was considered unfeasible. Panelists also agreed on the appropriateness of EQ-5D, which was finally included despite being considered unfeasible (A: 84.13%; F:67.20%) in clinical practice. Agreement was reached on using ACT, TAI, mMRC, and a dispensing register every three months; mini-AQLQ and MMAS every six months; and EQ-5D every twelve months. CONCLUSION This consensus paves the way toward patient-centered care, promoting the development of strategies supporting routine assessment of PROs in severe asthma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - María Muñoz García
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Marta Calvín Lamas
- Servicio de Farmacia, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Eusebi Chiner Vives
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - Carlos Crespo Diz
- Servicio de Farmacia, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
| | - David Díaz-Pérez
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Ibon Eguiluz Gracia
- Servicio de Alergología, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Sara García Gil
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Icíar Martínez López
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Álvaro Moreno-Ancillo
- Servicio de Alergología, Hospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado, Talavera de la Reina, Spain
| | | | - Emilio Monte-Boquet
- Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bellino S, La Salvia A. The Importance of Patient Reported Outcomes in Oncology Clinical Trials and Clinical Practice to Inform Regulatory and Healthcare Decision-Making. Drugs R D 2024; 24:123-127. [PMID: 39023849 PMCID: PMC11315859 DOI: 10.1007/s40268-024-00478-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Bellino
- Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Anna La Salvia
- Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eng L, Chan RJ, Chan A, Charalambous A, Darling HS, Grech L, van den Hurk CJG, Kirk D, Mitchell SA, Poprawski D, Rammant E, Ramsey I, Fitch MI, Cheung YT. Perceived Barriers Toward Patient-Reported Outcome Implementation in Cancer Care: An International Scoping Survey. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:816-826. [PMID: 38457755 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collection is an important priority in cancer care. We examined perceived barriers toward implementing PRO collection between centers with and without PRO infrastructure and administrators and nonadministrators. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a multinational survey of oncology practitioners on their perceived barriers to PRO implementations. Multivariable regression models evaluated for differences in perceived barriers to PRO implementation between groups, adjusted for demographic and institutional variables. RESULTS Among 358 oncology practitioners representing six geographic regions, 31% worked at centers that did not have PRO infrastructure and 26% self-reported as administrators. Administrators were more likely to perceive concerns with liability issues (aOR, 2.00 [95% CI, 1.12 to 3.57]; P = .02) while having nonsignificant trend toward less likely perceiving concerns with disruption of workflow (aOR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.32 to 1.03]; P = .06) and nonadherence of PRO reporting (aOR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.26 to 1.08]; P = .08) as barriers. Respondents from centers without PRO infrastructure were more likely to perceive that not having access to a local PRO expert (aOR, 6.59 [95% CI, 3.81 to 11.42]; P < .001), being unsure how to apply PROs in clinical decisions (aOR, 4.20 [95% CI, 2.32 to 7.63]; P < .001), and being unsure about selecting PRO measures (aOR, 3.36 [95% CI, 2.00 to 5.66]; P < .001) as barriers. Heat map analyses identified the largest differences between participants from centers with and without PRO infrastructure in agreed-upon barriers were (1) not having a local PRO expert, (2) being unsure about selecting PRO measures, and (3) not recognizing the role of PROs at the institutional level. CONCLUSION Perceived barriers toward PRO implementation differ between administrators and nonadministrators and practitioners at centers with and without PRO infrastructure. PRO implementation teams should consider as part of a comprehensive strategy including frontline clinicians and administrators and members with PRO experience within teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawson Eng
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Alexandre Chan
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA
| | - Andreas Charalambous
- Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus
- Department of Nursing, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - H S Darling
- Department of Medical Oncology, Command Hospital Air Force, Bangalore, India
| | - Lisa Grech
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Medicine Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Deborah Kirk
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Bunbury, WA, Australia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Dagmara Poprawski
- Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Elke Rammant
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Imogen Ramsey
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Margaret I Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yin Ting Cheung
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Hub of Paediatric Excellence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Janssen A, Donnelly C, Shaw T. A Taxonomy for Health Information Systems. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e47682. [PMID: 38820575 PMCID: PMC11179026 DOI: 10.2196/47682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
The health sector is highly digitized, which is enabling the collection of vast quantities of electronic data about health and well-being. These data are collected by a diverse array of information and communication technologies, including systems used by health care organizations, consumer and community sources such as information collected on the web, and passively collected data from technologies such as wearables and devices. Understanding the breadth of IT that collect these data and how it can be actioned is a challenge for the significant portion of the digital health workforce that interact with health data as part of their duties but are not for informatics experts. This viewpoint aims to present a taxonomy categorizing common information and communication technologies that collect electronic data. An initial classification of key information systems collecting electronic health data was undertaken via a rapid review of the literature. Subsequently, a purposeful search of the scholarly and gray literature was undertaken to extract key information about the systems within each category to generate definitions of the systems and describe the strengths and limitations of these systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Janssen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Candice Donnelly
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tim Shaw
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Srinivasan R, Rodgers-Melnick SN, Rivard RL, Kaiser C, Vincent D, Adan F, Dusek JA. Implementing paper-based patient-reported outcome collection within outpatient integrative health and medicine. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303985. [PMID: 38809886 PMCID: PMC11135778 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of pre- and post-encounter patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure collection within an outpatient integrative health and medicine (IHM) clinic and to characterize factors associated with successful completion. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 27,464 outpatient IHM encounters including 9,520 chiropractic; 8,237 acupuncture; 5,847 massage; 2,345 IHM consultation; and 1,515 osteopathic manipulation treatment encounters at four clinics offering IHM over 18 months. Patients were asked to complete paper questionnaires rating pain, anxiety, and stress from 0-10 immediately pre- and post-encounter. Generalized linear mixed effect regression models were used to examine the relationship between demographic, clinical, and operational covariates and completing (1) pre-encounter and (2) paired (i.e., pre and post) PROs. RESULTS Patients (N = 5587, mean age 49 years, 74% white, 77% female) generally presented for musculoskeletal conditions (81.7%), with a chief complaint of pain (55.1%). 21,852 (79.6%) encounters were among patients who completed pre-encounter PROs; 11,709/21,852 (53.6%) completed subsequent post-encounter PROs. Odds of PRO completion were more impacted by provider, operational, and clinical-level factors than patient factors. Covariates associated with increased odds of pre-encounter PRO completion included being female, having additional IHM encounters, and having a pain or anxiety complaint. Covariates associated with increased odds of paired PRO completion included being aged 31-40 vs. 51-60 years and having additional IHM encounters. CONCLUSION Implementing a paper-based PRO collection system in outpatient IHM is feasible; however, collecting post-encounter PROs was challenging. Future endeavors should leverage the electronic health record and patient portals to optimize PRO collection and engage patients and clinical providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshini Srinivasan
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Samuel N. Rodgers-Melnick
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Rachael L. Rivard
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Center for Evaluation Survey and Research, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Christine Kaiser
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - David Vincent
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Francoise Adan
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
- Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Jeffery A. Dusek
- Susan Samueli Integrative Health Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ito N, Sato A, Takeuchi K, Shigeno T, Sasaki H, Aoyama M, Miyashita M. Development and validation of clinical implementation methods for patient-reported outcomes in Japanese multi-center palliative care units. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:49. [PMID: 38743180 PMCID: PMC11093964 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00730-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) are recommended for use in clinical oncology. However, they are not routinely used in professional palliative care practices in Japan. The reasons include both patient and healthcare provider factors and the implementation of PROs. This study aimed to develop and validate clinical implementation methods for PROs in Japanese palliative care units. METHODS The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was conducted with four palliative care units in Japan. The study was conducted in six steps: unit assessment, development and implementation of a PRO implementation plan, PRO post-implementation survey and analysis of its utilization, a review of the PRO implementation process, creation of a PRO implementation method in a palliative care unit, and use and verification of the implementation method. Steps 1-5 were the development phase, and step 6 was the verification phase. RESULTS Interviews were conducted with healthcare providers prior to PRO implementation. Intervention characteristics, patient needs in the palliative care unit, and factors related to the organization were identified as barriers. The implementation plan was developed, and the core members were selected. The implementation procedures were created in the above mentioned steps. PROs were used in the palliative care units. The same was true in the validation phase. CONCLUSIONS This study guided PROs in specialized palliative care unit in a clinical setting. The method was developed and validated for the implementation of PROs in the palliative care unit. In the PRO implementation process, it was important to assess the unit, address the barriers to implementation, and reduce the burden on healthcare providers. Furthermore, healthcare providers had to be supported by the champion, a person responsible for the implementation of PROs in the palliative care unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nao Ito
- Health Sciences, Department of Palliative Nursing, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
- Iwate Medical University School of Nursing, Iwate, Japan.
| | - Azusa Sato
- Department of Nursing, Hikarigaoka Spellman Hospital, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Kana Takeuchi
- Department of Nursing, Iwate Medelical University Hospital, Iwate, Japan
| | - Tomoko Shigeno
- Health Sciences, Department of Palliative Nursing, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
- Department of Nursing, Sanyudo Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Hiroko Sasaki
- Depart of Nursing, Omagari Kousei Medical Center, Akita, Japan
| | - Maho Aoyama
- Health Sciences, Department of Palliative Nursing, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Mitsunori Miyashita
- Health Sciences, Department of Palliative Nursing, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Snowdon DA, Collyer TA, Marsh L, Srikanth V, Beare R, Baber S, Naude K, Andrew NE. Healthcare consumer acceptability of routine use of the EQ-5D-5L in clinical care: a cross-sectional survey. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:1307-1321. [PMID: 38321194 PMCID: PMC11045645 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03598-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient reported outcome measures, such as the EQ-5D-5L, provide a measure of self-perceived health status or health-related quality of life. Understanding the consumer acceptability of a patient reported outcome measure can help to decide about its implementation across a healthcare organisation and possibly increase the likelihood of its use in clinical care. This study established the acceptability of the EQ-5D-5L from the perspective of clients receiving healthcare, and determined if acceptability varied by client sub-types. METHODS A cross-sectional survey explored clients' experience of the EQ-5D-5L. Eligible clients were aged ≥ 18 years and completed the EQ-5D-5L on admission and discharge to one of two multi-disciplinary community health services. Likert scale items explored acceptability, and open-ended questions determined if the EQ-5D-5L reflects experience of illness. Associations between acceptability and client characteristics were established using χ2 test. Open-ended questions were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS Most of the 304 clients (mean age 70 years, SD 16) agreed that the EQ-5D-5L: was easy to use/understand (n = 301, 99%) and useful (n = 289, 95%); improved communication with their therapist (n = 275, 90%); and made them feel more in control of their health (n = 276, 91%). Most clients also agreed that they wished to continue using the EQ-5D-5L (n = 285, 93%). Clients aged ≥ 60 years reported lower acceptability. Clients noted that the EQ-5D-5L did not capture experience of illness related to fatigue, balance/falls, cognition, and sleep. CONCLUSION The EQ-5D-5L is acceptable for use in care but does not capture all aspects of health relevant to clients, and acceptability varies by subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Snowdon
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Taya A Collyer
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lucy Marsh
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Beare
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephanie Baber
- Physiotherapy Department, Golf Links Road Rehabilitation Centre, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Kim Naude
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Nadine E Andrew
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mourits BMP, den Hartog SJ, de Graaf JA, Roozenbeek B, Post MWM, Visser-Meily JMA, Scholten EWM. Exploring patients' experience using PROMs within routine post-discharge follow-up assessment after stroke: a mixed methods approach. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:46. [PMID: 38668901 PMCID: PMC11052975 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00724-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) are being used increasingly to measure health problems in stroke clinical practice. However, the implementation of these PROMs in routine stroke care is still in its infancy. To understand the value of PROMs used in ischemic stroke care, we explored the patients' experience with PROMs and with the consultation at routine post-discharge follow-up after stroke. METHODS In this prospective mixed methods study, patients with ischemic stroke completed an evaluation questionnaire about the use of PROMs and about their consultation in two Dutch hospitals. Additionally, telephone interviews were held to gain in-depth information about their experience with PROMs. RESULTS In total, 63 patients completed the evaluation questionnaire of which 10 patients were also interviewed. Most patients (82.2-96.6%) found completing the PROMs to be feasible and relevant. Half the patients (49.2-51.6%) considered the PROMs useful for the consultation and most patients (87.3-96.8%) reported the consultation as a positive experience. Completing the PROMs provided 51.6% of the patients with insight into their stroke-related problems. Almost 75% of the patients found the PROMs useful in giving the healthcare provider greater insight, and 60% reported discussing the PROM results during the consultation. Interviewed patients reported the added value of PROMs, particularly when arranging further care, in gaining a broader insight into the problems, and in ensuring all important topics were discussed during the consultation. CONCLUSIONS Completing PROMs appears to be feasible for patients with stroke attending post-discharge consultation; the vast majority of patients experienced added value for themselves or the healthcare provider. We recommend that healthcare providers discuss the PROM results with their patients to improve the value of PROMs for the patient. This could also improve the willingness to complete PROMs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B M P Mourits
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - S J den Hartog
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J A de Graaf
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B Roozenbeek
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W M Post
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J M A Visser-Meily
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E W M Scholten
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Grove BE, de Thurah A, Ivarsen P, Kvisgaard AK, Hjollund NH, Grytnes R, Schougaard LMV. Remote Symptom Monitoring Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e48173. [PMID: 38656781 PMCID: PMC11079764 DOI: 10.2196/48173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Denmark, outpatient follow-up for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is changing from in-hospital visits toward more remote health care delivery. The nonuse of remote patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is a well-known challenge, and it can be difficult to explain which mechanisms of interventions influence the outcome. Process evaluation may, therefore, be used to answer important questions on how and why interventions work, aiming to enhance the implications for clinical practice. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to provide insight into the intervention process by evaluating (1) the representativity of the study population, (2) patient and physician use patterns, (3) patient adherence to the intervention, and (4) clinical engagement. METHODS A process evaluation determining the reach, dose, fidelity, and clinical engagement was carried out, alongside a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). We developed and implemented an intervention using PRO measures to monitor outpatients remotely. Data were collected for the PRO intervention arms in the RCT from 4 sources: (1) PRO data from the participants to determine personal factors, (2) the web-based PRO system to identify key usage intervention patterns, (3) medical records to identify clinical factors relating to the use of the intervention, and (4) semistructured interviews conducted with involved physicians. RESULTS Of the 320 patients invited, 152 (47.5%) accepted to participate. The study population reflected the target population. The mean adherence rate to the PRO intervention arms was 82% (95% CI 76-87). The questionnaire response rate was 539/544 (99.1%). A minority of 13 (12.9%) of 101 patients needed assistance to complete study procedures. Physicians assessed 477/539 (88.5%) of the questionnaires. Contact was established in 417/539 (77.4%) of the cases, and 122/539 (22.6%) of the patients did not have contact. Physicians initiated 288/417 (69.1%) and patients requested 129/417 (30.9%) of all the contacts. The primary causes of contact were clinical data (242/417, 58%), PRO data (92/417, 22.1%), and medication concerns and precautionary reasons (83/417, 19.9%). Physicians found the use of PRO measures in remote follow-up beneficial for assessing the patient's health. The inclusion of self-reported clinical data in the questionnaire motivated physicians to assess patient responses. However, some barriers were emphasized, such as loss of a personal relationship with the patient and the risk of missing important symptoms in the absence of a face-to-face assessment. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the importance and practical use of remote monitoring among patients with CKD. Overall, the intervention was implemented as intended. We observed high patient adherence rates, and the physicians managed most questionnaires. Some physicians worried that distance from the patients made it unfeasible to use their "clinical glance," posing a potential risk of overlooking crucial patients' symptoms. These findings underscore key considerations for the implementation of remote follow-up. Introducing a hybrid approach combining remote and face-to-face consultations may address these concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03847766; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03847766.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgith Engelst Grove
- AmbuFlex, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Annette de Thurah
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Per Ivarsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Niels Henrik Hjollund
- AmbuFlex, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Regine Grytnes
- AmbuFlex, Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bull C, Pole JD. Implementation remains the biggest challenge to the effective use of PROMs and PREMs, so what can we do about it? Int J Qual Health Care 2024; 36:mzae029. [PMID: 38619124 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Bull
- Princess Alexandra Hospital Southside Clinical Unit, Greater Brisbane Clinical School, Medical School, The University of Queensland, Ground floor, Building 33, 199 Ipswich Road Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
- The ALIVE National Centre for Mental Health Research Translation, The University of Queensland, Ground floor, Building 33, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
- Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The University of Queensland, Ground floor, Building 33, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
| | - Jason D Pole
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Level 6, 288 Herston Road Woolloongabba, Queensland 4102, Australia
- Queensland Digital Health Centre, The University of Queensland, Level 6, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, The University of Toronto, Level 6, 288 Herston Road, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kamran R, Jackman L, Goodwin C, Laws A, Stepney M, Harrison C, Jain A, Rodrigues J. Implementing strategies to improve uptake of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in gender-affirming care: a mixed-methods implementation study. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002777. [PMID: 38649199 PMCID: PMC11043758 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The Practical Guide to Implementing PROMs in Gender-Affirming Care (PG-PROM-GAC) is an evidence-based resource, which was developed in response to international calls for improved patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation in gender-affirming care. The PG-PROM-GAC has the potential to improve PROM implementation; however, its real-world effectiveness has not yet been investigated. OBJECTIVE Investigate effectiveness and fidelity of three implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC in a real-world gender clinic setting. DESIGN Interrupted time series mixed-methods study investigating response rates to a PROM deployed alongside implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC; and open-ended feedback on the fidelity and effectiveness of implementation strategies. SETTING Participants were recruited from a National Health Service (NHS) gender clinic. PARTICIPANTS Eligible participants were being seen at an NHS gender clinic for an appointment during the study period, and were invited to participate in this study via email. INTERVENTION Three implementation strategies from the PG-PROM-GAC deployed alongside a PROM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Response rates were calculated at 2-week intervals, in line with the deployment of each implementation strategy. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed by two researchers following guidance from implementation science and interpretation from Normalisation Process Theory. RESULTS A total of 28 participants were included in this study with a mean (SD) age of 39 (17) years. In general, participants rated education material for PROMs as the most important for PROM implementation, and accessibility options for PROMs as the second most important. Response rates to PROM completion dropped as the study progressed, as the burden of reviewing implementation strategies increased. Results were used to construct recommendations for future PROM implementation efforts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The PG-PROM-GAC and implementation strategy materials developed from this study (ie, educational video on PROMs co-developed with key stakeholders) can be used by clinicians, researchers and policymakers to lead PROM implementation efforts in gender-affirming care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhshan Kamran
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Liam Jackman
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlie Goodwin
- Northern Region Gender Dysphoria Service, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Anna Laws
- Northern Region Gender Dysphoria Service, Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Conrad Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Abhilash Jain
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy Rodrigues
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire NHS Trust, UK
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sim JA, Huang X, Horan MR, Baker JN, Huang IC. Using natural language processing to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes data derived from electronic health records for cancer populations: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:467-475. [PMID: 38383308 PMCID: PMC11001514 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2322664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-reported outcomes (PROs; symptoms, functional status, quality-of-life) expressed in the 'free-text' or 'unstructured' format within clinical notes from electronic health records (EHRs) offer valuable insights beyond biological and clinical data for medical decision-making. However, a comprehensive assessment of utilizing natural language processing (NLP) coupled with machine learning (ML) methods to analyze unstructured PROs and their clinical implementation for individuals affected by cancer remains lacking. AREAS COVERED This study aimed to systematically review published studies that used NLP techniques to extract and analyze PROs in clinical narratives from EHRs for cancer populations. We examined the types of NLP (with and without ML) techniques and platforms for data processing, analysis, and clinical applications. EXPERT OPINION Utilizing NLP methods offers a valuable approach for processing and analyzing unstructured PROs among cancer patients and survivors. These techniques encompass a broad range of applications, such as extracting or recognizing PROs, categorizing, characterizing, or grouping PROs, predicting or stratifying risk for unfavorable clinical results, and evaluating connections between PROs and adverse clinical outcomes. The employment of NLP techniques is advantageous in converting substantial volumes of unstructured PRO data within EHRs into practical clinical utilities for individuals with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-ah Sim
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of AI Convergence, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Xiaolei Huang
- Department of Computer Science, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
| | - Madeline R. Horan
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Justin N. Baker
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - I-Chan Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Fontaine G, Poitras ME, Sasseville M, Pomey MP, Ouellet J, Brahim LO, Wasserman S, Bergeron F, Lambert SD. Barriers and enablers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs): protocol for an umbrella review. Syst Rev 2024; 13:96. [PMID: 38532492 PMCID: PMC10964633 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02512-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs, respectively) are evidence-based, standardized questionnaires that can be used to capture patients' perspectives of their health and health care. While substantial investments have been made in the implementation of PROMs and PREMs, their use remains fragmented and limited in many settings. Analysis of multi-level barriers and enablers to the implementation of PROMs and PREMs has been hampered by the lack of use of state-of-the-art implementation science frameworks. This umbrella review aims to consolidate available evidence from existing quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods systematic and scoping reviews covering factors that influence the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in healthcare settings. METHODS An umbrella review of systematic and scoping reviews will be conducted following the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods reviews of studies focusing on the implementation of PROMs and/or PREMs in all healthcare settings will be considered for inclusion. Eight bibliographical databases will be searched. All review steps will be conducted by two reviewers independently. Included reviews will be appraised and data will be extracted in four steps: (1) assessing the methodological quality of reviews using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist; (2) extracting data from included reviews; (3) theory-based coding of barriers and enablers using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) 2.0; and (4) identifying the barriers and enablers best supported by reviews using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) approach. Findings will be presented in diagrammatic and tabular forms in a manner that aligns with the objective and scope of this umbrella review, along with a narrative summary. DISCUSSION This umbrella review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods systematic and scoping reviews will inform policymakers, researchers, managers, and clinicians regarding which factors hamper or enable the adoption and sustained use of PROMs and PREMs in healthcare settings, and the level of confidence in the evidence supporting these factors. Findings will orient the selection and adaptation of implementation strategies tailored to the factors identified. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023421845.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Fontaine
- Ingram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke O #1800, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada.
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, 3755 Chem. de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1E2, Canada.
| | - Marie-Eve Poitras
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12 Ave N Building X1, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean du Québec, 930 Rue Jacques-Cartier E, Chicoutimi, QC, G7H 7K9, Canada
| | - Maxime Sasseville
- Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, 1050 Av. de La Médecine, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
- Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable VITAM, CIUSSS de La Capitale-Nationale, 2480, Chemin de La Canardière, Quebec City, QC, G1J 2G1, Canada
| | - Marie-Pascale Pomey
- Faculty of Medicine & School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd, Montreal, QC, H3T 1J4, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de L, Université de Montréal (CR-CHUM), 900 Saint Denis St., Montreal, QC, H2X 0A9, Canada
| | - Jérôme Ouellet
- Direction of Nursing, CIUSSS de L'Ouest de L'Île-de-Montréal, 3830, Avenue Lacombe, Montreal, QC, H3T 1M5, Canada
| | - Lydia Ould Brahim
- Ingram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke O #1800, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada
| | - Sydney Wasserman
- Ingram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke O #1800, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada
| | - Frédéric Bergeron
- Université Laval Library, Pavillon Alexandre-Vachon 1045, Avenue de La Médecine, Québec, Québec), G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Sylvie D Lambert
- Ingram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 680 Rue Sherbrooke O #1800, Montréal, QC, H3A 2M7, Canada
- St. Mary's Research Centre, CIUSSS de L'Ouest de L'Île-de-Montréal, 3777 Jean Brillant St, Montreal, QC, H3T 0A2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Naude K, Andrew NE, Srikanth V, Parker E, Marsh L, Beare R, McNaney R, Snowdon DA. Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:619-636. [PMID: 38041742 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03552-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Limited examples exist of successful Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) implementation across an entire healthcare organisation. The aim of this study was to use a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a PROM collection system, which will inform implementation of routine collection of PROMs across an entire healthcare organisation. METHODS Co-design comprised semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 11) and workshops/surveys with consumers (n = 320). The interview guide with clinicians focused on their experience using PROMs, preferences for using PROMs, and facilitators/barriers to using PROMs. Co-design activities specific to consumers focused on: (1) how PROMs will be administered (mode), (2) when PROMs will be administered (timing), (3) who will assist with PROMs collection, and (4) how long a PROM will take to complete. Data were analysed using a manifest qualitative content analysis approach. RESULTS Core elements identified during the co-design process included: PROMs collection should be consumer-led and administered by someone other than a clinician; collection at discharge from the healthcare organisation and at 3-6 months post discharge would be most suitable for supporting comprehensive assessment; PROMs should be administered using a variety of modes to accommodate the diversity of consumer preferences, with electronic as the default; and the time taken to complete PROMs should be no longer than 5-10 min. CONCLUSION This study provides new information on the co-design of a healthcare organisation-wide PROM collection system. Implementing a clinician and patient informed strategy for PROMs collection, that meets their preferences across multiple domains, should address known barriers to routine collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Naude
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
| | - Nadine E Andrew
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Emily Parker
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Lucy Marsh
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Beare
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Developmental Imaging, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roisin McNaney
- Action Lab, Department of Human Centered Computing, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David A Snowdon
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, 2 Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Academic Unit, Peninsula Health, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lai-Kwon J, Rutherford C, Jefford M, Gore C, Best S. Using Implementation Science Frameworks to Guide the Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring in Routine Cancer Care. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:335-349. [PMID: 38206290 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are an evidence-based means of detecting symptoms earlier and improving patient outcomes. However, there are few examples of successful implementation in routine cancer care. We conducted a qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing ePRO symptom monitoring in routine cancer care using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). METHODS Participants were adult patients with cancer, their caregivers, or health care professionals involved in ePRO monitoring or processes. Focus groups or individual interviews were conducted using a semistructured approach informed by the CFIR. Data were analyzed deductively using the CFIR. Barriers were matched to theory-informed implementation strategies using the CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) matching tool. RESULTS Thirty participants were interviewed: 22 females (73%), aged 31-70 years (28, 94%), comprising patients (n = 8), caregivers (n = 2), medical oncologists (n = 4), nurses (n = 4), hospital leaders (n = 6), clinic administrators (n = 2), pharmacists (n = 2), and information technology specialists (n = 2). Barriers pertaining to four CFIR domains were identified and several were novel, including the challenge of adapting ePROs for different anticancer treatments. Facilitators pertaining to all CFIR domains were identified, such as leveraging acceptability of remote care post-COVID-19 to drive implementation. Conducting consensus discussions with stakeholders to tailor ePROs to the local setting, identifying/preparing individual and group-level champions, and assessing readiness for change (including leveraging technological advances and increased confidence in using remote monitoring post-COVID-19) were the most frequently recommended implementation strategies. CONCLUSION The CFIR facilitated identification of known and novel barriers and facilitators to implementing ePRO symptom monitoring in routine cancer care. Implementation strategies summarized in a conceptual framework will be used to codesign an ePRO symptom monitoring system for immunotherapy side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Cancer Care Research Unit (CCRU), Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claire Gore
- Department of Psychology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephanie Best
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Psychology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kansara B, Basta A, Mikhael M, Perkins R, Reisman P, Hallanger-Johnson J, Rollison DE, Nguyen OT, Powell S, Gilbert SM, Turner K. Suicide Risk Screening for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: An Implementation Study. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15:404-413. [PMID: 38777326 PMCID: PMC11111312 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is limited research on suicide risk screening (SRS) among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, a population at increased risk for suicide. To address this gap, this single-site mixed methods study assessed oncology professionals' perspectives about the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of an electronic SRS program that was implemented as a part of routine care for HNC patients. METHODS Staff who assisted with SRS implementation completed (e.g., nurses, medical assistants, advanced practice providers, physicians, social workers) a one-time survey (N = 29) and interview (N = 25). Quantitative outcomes were assessed using previously validated feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness measures. Additional qualitative data were collected to provide context for interpreting the scores. RESULTS Nurses and medical assistants, who were directly responsible for implementing SRS, reported low feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, compared with other team members (e.g., physicians, social workers, advanced practice providers). Team members identified potential improvements needed to optimize SRS, such as hiring additional staff, improving staff training, providing different modalities for screening completion among individuals with disabilities, and revising the patient-reported outcomes to improve suicide risk prediction. CONCLUSION Staff perspectives about implementing SRS as a part of routine cancer care for HNC patients varied widely. Before screening can be implemented on a larger scale for HNC and other cancer patients, additional implementation strategies may be needed that optimize workflow and reduce staff burden, such as staff training, multiple modalities for completion, and refined tools for identifying which patients are at greatest risk for suicide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhargav Kansara
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Ameer Basta
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Marian Mikhael
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Randa Perkins
- Department of Internal and Hospital Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
- Department of Clinical Informatics, Center for Digital Health, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Phillip Reisman
- Department of Clinical Informatics, Center for Digital Health, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Julie Hallanger-Johnson
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Dana E. Rollison
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Oliver T. Nguyen
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Sean Powell
- Department of Social Work, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Scott M. Gilbert
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
| | - Kea Turner
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Šafran V, Lin S, Nateqi J, Martin AG, Smrke U, Ariöz U, Plohl N, Rojc M, Bēma D, Chávez M, Horvat M, Mlakar I. Multilingual Framework for Risk Assessment and Symptom Tracking (MRAST). SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:1101. [PMID: 38400259 PMCID: PMC10892413 DOI: 10.3390/s24041101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
The importance and value of real-world data in healthcare cannot be overstated because it offers a valuable source of insights into patient experiences. Traditional patient-reported experience and outcomes measures (PREMs/PROMs) often fall short in addressing the complexities of these experiences due to subjectivity and their inability to precisely target the questions asked. In contrast, diary recordings offer a promising solution. They can provide a comprehensive picture of psychological well-being, encompassing both psychological and physiological symptoms. This study explores how using advanced digital technologies, i.e., automatic speech recognition and natural language processing, can efficiently capture patient insights in oncology settings. We introduce the MRAST framework, a simplified way to collect, structure, and understand patient data using questionnaires and diary recordings. The framework was validated in a prospective study with 81 colorectal and 85 breast cancer survivors, of whom 37 were male and 129 were female. Overall, the patients evaluated the solution as well made; they found it easy to use and integrate into their daily routine. The majority (75.3%) of the cancer survivors participating in the study were willing to engage in health monitoring activities using digital wearable devices daily for an extended period. Throughout the study, there was a noticeable increase in the number of participants who perceived the system as having excellent usability. Despite some negative feedback, 44.44% of patients still rated the app's usability as above satisfactory (i.e., 7.9 on 1-10 scale) and the experience with diary recording as above satisfactory (i.e., 7.0 on 1-10 scale). Overall, these findings also underscore the significance of user testing and continuous improvement in enhancing the usability and user acceptance of solutions like the MRAST framework. Overall, the automated extraction of information from diaries represents a pivotal step toward a more patient-centered approach, where healthcare decisions are based on real-world experiences and tailored to individual needs. The potential usefulness of such data is enormous, as it enables better measurement of everyday experiences and opens new avenues for patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentino Šafran
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (V.Š.); (U.S.); (U.A.); (M.R.)
| | - Simon Lin
- Science Department, Symptoma GmbH, 1030 Vienna, Austria (A.G.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jama Nateqi
- Science Department, Symptoma GmbH, 1030 Vienna, Austria (A.G.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Urška Smrke
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (V.Š.); (U.S.); (U.A.); (M.R.)
| | - Umut Ariöz
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (V.Š.); (U.S.); (U.A.); (M.R.)
| | - Nejc Plohl
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia;
| | - Matej Rojc
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (V.Š.); (U.S.); (U.A.); (M.R.)
| | - Dina Bēma
- Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia;
| | - Marcela Chávez
- Department of Information System Management, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium;
| | - Matej Horvat
- Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia;
| | - Izidor Mlakar
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia; (V.Š.); (U.S.); (U.A.); (M.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Alamrani S, Gardner A, Falla D, Russell E, Rushton AB, Heneghan NR. Outcome measures for young people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals' perceptions and practices. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0297339. [PMID: 38277344 PMCID: PMC10817127 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited knowledge exists on current use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and performance measures for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), as well as health care professionals' (HCPs) perceived barriers and facilitators towards their use. This study's objectives were: 1) to explore current practice of HCPs when assessing outcomes for AIS 2) to understand perceived barriers and facilitators of HCPs to use PROMs 3) to understand perceived barriers and facilitators of HCPs to use performance measures. METHODS A qualitative study recruited a purposive sample of HCPs from a tertiary hospital in the United Kingdom. Mean years of experience managing individuals with AIS was 11.8 years; and included surgeons, physiotherapists and nurses, educated at Bachelor, Masters and Doctoral level. Consent to participate and demographic information were collected in advance of the interviews. In-depth, virtual semi-structured interviews were informed by a topic guide based on current evidence. Interviews of approximately 45 minutes were audio and video recorded and transcribed verbatim alongside written field notes. Data were coded and analysed using inductive thematic analysis, involving researchers with topic and methodological expertise and input from a patient representative. RESULTS Two themes emerged regarding current practice of using PROMs routine practice and personal evaluations. Four themes emerged as barriers to using PROMs for individuals with AIS: priority and support (e.g., HCPs focus on providing care), practical challenges (e.g., inadequate PROMs), patient-related challenges (e.g., patient preferences) and knowledge, education, and perceived value. Two themes emerged as facilitators: quality existing measure (e.g., sufficient psychometric properties), and priority and support (e.g., research department/culture). Themes for barriers to use performance measures were practicality (e.g., need physical space) and perceived value and knowledge (e.g., PROMs are more important), while the one theme for facilitators was practical consideration (e.g., acceptability). CONCLUSIONS Although HCPs perceived the value of using outcome measures, current practice indicates limited use for individuals with AIS. The findings revealed different barriers and facilitators to implement PROMs in practice. Adopting performance measure are limited due to lack of knowledge and perceived value alongside the practicality, while considering practical factors can improve the use of these measures in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samia Alamrani
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Physical Therapy Department, College of Applied Medical Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Adrian Gardner
- Spine Unit, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Northfield, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Russell
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Alison B. Rushton
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicola R. Heneghan
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lopez CJ, Jones JM, Campbell KL, Bender JL, Strudwick G, Langelier DM, Reiman T, Greenland J, Neil-Sztramko SE. A pre-implementation examination of barriers and facilitators of an electronic prospective surveillance model for cancer rehabilitation: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:17. [PMID: 38178095 PMCID: PMC10768357 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10445-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An electronic Prospective Surveillance Model (ePSM) uses patient-reported outcomes to monitor symptoms along the cancer pathway for timely identification and treatment. Randomized controlled trials show that ePSMs can effectively manage treatment-related adverse effects. However, an understanding of optimal approaches for implementing these systems into routine cancer care is limited. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators prior to the implementation of an ePSM to inform the selection of implementation strategies. METHODS A qualitative study using virtual focus groups and individual interviews was conducted with cancer survivors, oncology healthcare providers, and clinic leadership across four cancer centres in Canada. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the interviews and analysis of barriers and facilitators based on five domains (intervention characteristics, individual characteristics, inner setting, outer setting, and process). RESULTS We conducted 13 focus groups and nine individual interviews with 13 patient participants and 56 clinic staff. Of the 39 CFIR constructs, 18 were identified as relevant determinants to the implementation. The adaptability, relative advantage, and complexity of an ePSM emerged as key intervention-level factors that could influence implementation. Knowledge of the system was important at the individual level. Within the inner setting, major determinants were the potential fit of an ePSM with clinical workflows (compatibility) and the resources that could be dedicated to the implementation effort (readiness for implementation). In the outer setting, meeting the needs of patients and the availability of rehabilitation supports were key determinants. Engaging various stakeholders was critical at the process level. CONCLUSIONS Improving the implementation of ePSMs in routine cancer care has the potential to facilitate early identification and management of treatment-related adverse effects, thereby improving quality of life. This study provides insight into important factors that may influence the implementation of an ePSM, which can be used to select appropriate implementation strategies to address these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian J Lopez
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada.
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Jennifer M Jones
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kristin L Campbell
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jackie L Bender
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Gillian Strudwick
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David M Langelier
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tony Reiman
- Department of Oncology, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Jonathan Greenland
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada
- Dr. H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre, Eastern Health, St. John's, Canada
| | - Sarah E Neil-Sztramko
- Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Westerink HJ, Bresser CC, Garvelink MM, van Uden-Kraan CF, Zouitni O, Bart HAJ, van der Wees PJ, van der Nat PB. The use of outcome data in patient consultations from the healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives: A mixed methods study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 118:108043. [PMID: 37925975 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To gain insight into healthcare professionals' (HCPs') perspectives on the use of outcome data in consultations and to understand which aggregated outcomes patients find important. METHODS This study had a mixed-methods design and consisted of two steps: RESULTS: HCPs indicated that aggregated outcome data are not routinely used in consultations. They pointed out various barriers to using outcome data, e.g., low response rates of PROMs, and suggested actions to address these barriers, including training of HCPs in outcome data usage. Patients rated the majority of aggregated outcomes as important, although preferences differed between the studied health conditions. CONCLUSION Both HCPs and patients underscored the importance of discussing outcome data in consultations. Nevertheless, HCPs encountered several barriers to using outcome data. Furthermore, patients with different health conditions have somewhat different information needs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The study identified several actionable steps to enhance the collection and application of outcome data in consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrike J Westerink
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Cato C Bresser
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam M Garvelink
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ouisam Zouitni
- Client Council, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Philip J van der Wees
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul B van der Nat
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dunlop E, Ferguson A, Mueller T, Baillie K, Laskey J, Clarke J, Kurdi A, Wales A, Connolly T, Bennie M. Involving Patients and Clinicians in the Design of Wireframes for Cancer Medicines Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Care: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Form Res 2023; 7:e48296. [PMID: 38127422 PMCID: PMC10767627 DOI: 10.2196/48296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer treatment is a key component of health care systems, and the increasing number of cancer medicines is expanding the treatment landscape. However, evidence of the impact on patients has been focused more on chemotherapy toxicity and symptom control and less on the effect of cancer medicines more broadly on patients' lives. Evolving electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) presents the opportunity to secure early engagement of patients and clinicians in shaping the collection of quality-of-life metrics and presenting these data to better support the patient-clinician decision-making process. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to obtain initial feedback from patients and clinicians on the wireframes of a digital solution (patient app and clinician dashboard) for the collection and use of cancer medicines ePROMs. METHODS We adopted a 2-stage, mixed methods approach. Stage 1 (March to June 2019) consisted of interviews and focus groups with cancer clinicians and patients with cancer to explore the face validity of the wireframes, informed by the technology acceptance model constructs (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intention to use). In stage 2 (October 2019 to February 2020), the revised wireframes were assessed through web-based, adapted technology acceptance model questionnaires. Qualitative data (stage 1) underwent a framework analysis, and descriptive statistics were performed on quantitative data (stage 2). Clinicians and patients with cancer were recruited from NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, the largest health board in Scotland. RESULTS A total of 14 clinicians and 19 patients participated in a combination of stage 1 interviews and focus groups. Clinicians and patients indicated that the wireframes of a patient app and clinician dashboard for the collection of cancer medicines ePROMs would be easy to use and could focus discussions, and they would be receptive to using such tools in the future. In stage 1, clinicians raised the potential impact on workload, and both groups identified the need for adequate IT skills to use each technology. Changes to the wireframes were made, and in stage 2, clinicians (n=8) and patients (n=16) indicated it was "quite likely" that the technologies would be easy to use and they would be "quite likely" to use them in the future. Notably, clinicians indicated that they would use the dashboard to enable treatment decisions "with around half" of their patients. CONCLUSIONS This study emphasizes the importance of consulting both patients and clinicians in the design of digital solutions. The wireframes were perceived positively by patients and clinicians who were willing to use such technologies if available in the future as part of routine care. However, challenges were raised, and some differences were identified between participant groups, which warrant further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Dunlop
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Aimee Ferguson
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Tanja Mueller
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Julie Clarke
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al-Kitab University, Kirkuk, Iraq
| | - Ann Wales
- NHS Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Marion Bennie
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Silveira Bianchim M, Crane E, Jones A, Neukirchinger B, Roberts G, Mclaughlin L, Noyes J. The implementation, use and impact of patient reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare programmes: A scoping review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290976. [PMID: 38055759 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) focuses on the value of patient outcomes and is achieved by ensuring resources already available are managed to realise the best possible individual and population health outcomes. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) measure the impact of illnesses from the patient perspective. We conducted a scoping review to understand how PROMs were implemented and used, and their impact in the context of VBHC. METHODS Arksey and O'Malley's overarching framework supplemented by principles from mixed-methods Framework Synthesis were used. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Google Scholar and reference lists were searched. An a priori data extraction framework was created using the review question and objectives as key domains against which to extract data. Mixed-methods data were organised, integrated and preserved in original format and reported for each domain. RESULTS Forty-three studies were included with 60,200 participants. Few studies reported a well-developed programme theory and we found little robust evidence of effect. PROMs were universally considered to have the potential to increase patient satisfaction with treatment and services, enhance patient awareness of symptoms and self-management, and improve health outcomes such as quality of life and global health status. Evidence is currently limited on how PROMs work and how best to optimally implement PROMs to achieve the target outcome. Implementation challenges commonly prevented the realisation of optimal outcomes and patients generally needed better and clearer communication about why PROMs were being given and how they could optimally be used to support their own self-management. CONCLUSION PROMSs have yet to demonstrate their full potential in a VBHC context. Optimal PROMs implementation is poorly understood by clinicians and patients. Future studies should explore different models of PROM implementation and use within VBHC programmes to understand what works best and why for each specific context, condition, and population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ellie Crane
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Anwen Jones
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | | | - Gareth Roberts
- Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, United Kingdom
| | - Leah Mclaughlin
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Noyes
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sherman V, Glista D, Cunningham BJ. Engaging clinical end users in the development of an outcome measurement protocol for paediatric communicative health systems. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 25:821-829. [PMID: 36444943 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2148741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a conceptual framework of the factors likely to influence clinicians' use of a new participation-focused outcome measurement protocol in a large paediatric speech-language pathology program. METHOD A convenience sample of 27 end users (clinicians, managers) were recruited from Ontario, Canada's Preschool Speech and Language Program. Participants engaged in one virtual concept mapping session in groups of five to six during which they learned about the new protocol, and generated statements in response to a prompt asking them to identify factors that would influence their use of the protocol. Following all sessions, participants asynchronously sorted and rated all statements, and data were analysed using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses. RESULT Six themes were identified: (1) response from families; (2) use of resources; (3) feasibility and clinical utility; (4) relevance and value-added for clinicians; (5) streamlining policies and guidelines; and (6) delivery, administration, and modification of tool. Response from families, feasibility and clinical utility, and use of resources received the highest importance ratings. CONCLUSION Concept mapping methodology was used to engage clinicians and managers to identify the barriers to a new implementation protocol for outcome measurement. Results will support future research and implementation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Sherman
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danielle Glista
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- The National Centre for Audiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barbara J Cunningham
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Migchels C, Zerrouk A, Crunelle CL, Matthys F, Gremeaux L, Fernandez K, Antoine J, van den Brink W, Vanderplasschen W. Patient Reported Outcome and Experience Measures (PROMs and PREMs) in substance use disorder treatment services: A scoping review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 253:111017. [PMID: 37995391 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substance use disorders (SUD) pose significant challenges for healthcare systems, and there is a need to monitor the provision of effective, individualized care to persons accessing treatment. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) are increasingly used in healthcare services to measure treatment outcomes and quality of care as perceived by patients, and to guide service improvement. OBJECTIVES This review aims to identify and characterize international developments regarding the use and systematic implementation of PROMs and PREMs in SUD treatment services. METHODS A scoping review was conducted searching multiple databases to identify studies on the use and routine implementation of PROMs and PREMs in SUD treatment services. RESULTS 23 articles were selected, all dating from 2016 onwards. There was large variation in the patient-reported measures that were used, how they were developed and how and when patient-reported data were collected. Treatment providers identified leadership support, the presence of an integrated electronic patient record, and regular feedback to be the most important facilitators of successful implementation of patient-reported measures into clinical practice, whilst treatment dropout and burden to staff and patients were the most important barriers to consider. CONCLUSIONS PROMs and PREMs are increasingly used in SUD treatment services, but guidance is needed to support researchers and clinicians in selecting and implementing valid, meaningful, and comparable measures if we want to understand the effects of PROM and PREM data collection and feedback on treatment quality and results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Migchels
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Department of Psychiatry, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Amine Zerrouk
- Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University (UGent), Ghent, Belgium
| | - Cleo L Crunelle
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Department of Psychiatry, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frieda Matthys
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Department of Psychiatry, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lies Gremeaux
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kim Fernandez
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jérôme Antoine
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wim van den Brink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Neo SHS, Tan JYT, Ng ESL, Yoon S. Facilitators and barriers to implementation of a patient and staff reported measure for screening of palliative concerns of patients with heart failure: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Palliat Care Soc Pract 2023; 17:26323524231214814. [PMID: 38044934 PMCID: PMC10693212 DOI: 10.1177/26323524231214814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Screening patients with patient-reported outcome measures allows identification of palliative care concerns. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) was developed in the United Kingdom for this purpose. Tools developed in another setting might not be readily usable locally. We previously evaluated the validity and reliability of the IPOS in our cardiology setting. However, it remains uncertain what factors would influence the subsequent implementation of IPOS for routine screening of patients with advanced heart failure in future practice. Objectives This study aimed to identify the factors that could affect the IPOS implementation for patients with advanced heart failure. Design This was a qualitative study conducted at the National Heart Centre Singapore. Methods Patients with advanced heart failure who participated in our previous IPOS validation study were purposively recruited for semi-structured interviews. Healthcare workers caring for these patients and involved in the testing of the IPOS tool were also invited for interviews. The interviews were analyzed thematically and mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results Our analysis identified six potential facilitators and six potential barriers to implementation across five major domains of the CFIR (intervention characteristics, inner setting, outer setting, individual characteristics, and process). Facilitators include: (i) perception of utility, (ii) perception of minimal complexity, (iii) perception of relatability, (iv) conducive culture, (v) dedicated resources, and (vi) advocates for implementation. Barriers include: (i) need for adaptation, (ii) mindsets/role strains, (iii) resource constraints, (iv) cultural concerns, (v) individual needs, and (vi) change process. Conclusion Institutions could focus on cultivating appropriate perceptions and conducive cultures, providing dedicated resources for implementation and introducing facilitators to advocate for implementation. Adaptation of IPOS to suit workflows and individual needs, consideration of change processes, and systemic changes to alleviate cultural, resource, and staff role strains would improve IPOS uptake during actual implementation in clinical services. Trial registration Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirlyn Hui-Shan Neo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Level 4, 11 Hospital Crescent, Singapore 169610, Singapore
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jasmine Yun-Ting Tan
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elaine Swee-Ling Ng
- Nursing Specialty Care Unit, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sungwon Yoon
- Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Levens B, Kim BS, Aksu N, Dorris CS, Svoboda S, Douoguih W, Dreese J. Young or Old Age and Non-White Race Are Associated With Poor Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Compliance After Orthopaedic Surgery. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2023; 5:100817. [PMID: 38023444 PMCID: PMC10661514 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate orthopaedic patient compliance with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and identify factors that improve response rates. Methods Our search strategy comprised a combination of key words and database-specific subject headings for the concepts of orthopaedic surgical procedures, compliance, and PROMs from several research databases from inception to October 11, 2022. Duplicates were removed. A total of 97 studies were included. A table was created for the remaining articles to be appraised and analyzed. The collected data included study characteristics, follow-up/compliance rate, factors that increase/decrease compliance, and type of PROM. Follow-up/compliance rate was determined to be any reported response rate. The range and average used for analysis was based on the highest or lowest number reported in the specific article. Results The range of compliance reported was 11.3% to 100%. The overall response rate was 68.6%. The average baseline (preoperative/previsit) response rate was 76.6%. Most studies (77%) had greater than 50% compliance. Intervention/reminder of any type (most commonly phone call or mail) resulted in improved compliance from 44.6% to 70.6%. Young and elderly non-White male patients had the lowest compliance rate. When directly compared, phone call (71.5%) resulted in a greater compliance rate than electronic-based (53.2%) or paper-based (57.6%) surveys. Conclusions The response rates for PROMs vary across the orthopaedic literature. Patient-specific factors, such as age (young or old) and race (non-White), may contribute to poor PROM response rate. Reminders and interventions significantly improve PROM response rates. Clinical Relevance PROMs are important tools in many aspects of medicine. The data generated from these tools not only provide information about individual patient outcomes but also make hypothesis-driven comparisons possible. Understanding the factors that affect patient compliance with PROMs is vital to our accurate understanding of patient outcomes and the overall advancement of medical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Steven Svoboda
- Medstar Health at Lafayette Centre, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - Wiemi Douoguih
- Medstar Health at Lafayette Centre, Washington, DC, U.S.A
| | - James Dreese
- Medstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sim JA, Huang X, Horan MR, Stewart CM, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Baker JN, Huang IC. Natural language processing with machine learning methods to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes derived from electronic health records: A systematic review. Artif Intell Med 2023; 146:102701. [PMID: 38042599 PMCID: PMC10693655 DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Natural language processing (NLP) combined with machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly used to process unstructured/free-text patient-reported outcome (PRO) data available in electronic health records (EHRs). This systematic review summarizes the literature reporting NLP/ML systems/toolkits for analyzing PROs in clinical narratives of EHRs and discusses the future directions for the application of this modality in clinical care. METHODS We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies written in English between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2020. Seventy-nine studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included. We abstracted and summarized information related to the study purpose, patient population, type/source/amount of unstructured PRO data, linguistic features, and NLP systems/toolkits for processing unstructured PROs in EHRs. RESULTS Most of the studies used NLP/ML techniques to extract PROs from clinical narratives (n = 74) and mapped the extracted PROs into specific PRO domains for phenotyping or clustering purposes (n = 26). Some studies used NLP/ML to process PROs for predicting disease progression or onset of adverse events (n = 22) or developing/validating NLP/ML pipelines for analyzing unstructured PROs (n = 19). Studies used different linguistic features, including lexical, syntactic, semantic, and contextual features, to process unstructured PROs. Among the 25 NLP systems/toolkits we identified, 15 used rule-based NLP, 6 used hybrid NLP, and 4 used non-neural ML algorithms embedded in NLP. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the potential utility of different NLP/ML techniques in processing unstructured PROs available in EHRs for clinical care. Though using annotation rules for NLP/ML to analyze unstructured PROs is dominant, deploying novel neural ML-based methods is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Ah Sim
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States; School of AI Convergence, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Xiaolei Huang
- Department of Computer Science, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Madeline R Horan
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Christopher M Stewart
- Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Leslie L Robison
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Melissa M Hudson
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States; Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
| | - Justin N Baker
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - I-Chan Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Agarwal N, Shah KK, Dansie K, Bennett PN, Greenham L, Brown C, Smyth B, McDonald S, Jesudason S, Viecelli AK, Morton RL. Feasibility of Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) for adults on hemodialysis: a registry-based cluster randomized pilot trial. BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:345. [PMID: 37993776 PMCID: PMC10666372 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03399-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with kidney failure on hemodialysis (HD) experience considerable symptom burden and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). There is limited use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in facility HD units to direct immediate care, with response rates in other studies between 36 to 70%. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate feasibility of electronic PROMs (e-PROMs) in HD participants, with feedback 3-monthly to the participants' treating team, for severe or worsening symptoms as identified by the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS-Renal), with linkage to the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry, compared with usual care. METHODS This is a registry-based cluster-randomized controlled pilot trial involving all adults receiving HD in 4 satellite units in Australia over a 6-month period. HD units were cluster randomized 1:1 to the control (HRQoL data collection only) or intervention arm (symptom monitoring with feedback to treating team every 3 months). Feasibility was assessed by participant response rate (percentage of eligible HD participants, including new incident participants, who completed the questionnaire at each time point); retention rate (percentage of participants who completed the baseline questionnaire and all subsequent measures); and completion time. HRQoL and symptom burden scores are described. RESULTS There were 226 unique participants who completed the e-PROMs (mean age 62 years, 69% males, 78% White-European, median dialysis vintage 1.62 years). At 6 months, response rate and retention rate for the intervention arm were 54% and 68%, respectively, and 89% and 97% in the control arm. Median time to complete IPOS-Renal was 6.6 min (5.3, 10.1) at 3 months, and when combined with the outcome measure (EQ-5D-5L), the median time was 9.4 min (6.9, 13.6) at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS Electronic symptom monitoring among HD participants with feedback to clinicians is feasible. Variations in response and retention rates could be potentially explained by the lengthier questionnaire, and higher frequency of data collection time points for participants in the intervention arm. A definitive national RCT is underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12618001976279 (07/12/2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeru Agarwal
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Level 6, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
| | - Karan K Shah
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Level 6, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Kathryn Dansie
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Paul N Bennett
- Medical and Clinical Affairs, Satellite Healthcare, San Jose, USA
- Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Lavern Greenham
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Chris Brown
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Level 6, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Brendan Smyth
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Level 6, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Australia
| | - Stephen McDonald
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Shilpanjali Jesudason
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Level 6, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Rd, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Minteer SA, Cheville A, Tesch N, Griffin JM, Austin JD, Mitchell S, Leppin AL, Ridgeway JL. Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:697. [PMID: 37962699 PMCID: PMC10645625 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08114-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Symptoms can negatively impact quality of life for patients with a history of cancer. Digital, electronic health record (EHR)-integrated approaches to routine symptom monitoring accompanied by evidence-based interventions for symptom management have been explored as a scalable way to improve symptom management, particularly between clinic visits. However, little research has evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementing these approaches in real-world settings, particularly during the pre-implementation phase. Pre-implementation assessment is critical for informing the selection and sequencing of implementation strategies and intervention adaptation. Thus, this study sought to understand pre-implementation perceptions of a remote cancer symptom monitoring and management intervention that uses electronic patient-reported outcome measures for symptom assessment. METHODS We interviewed 20 clinical and administrative stakeholders from 4 geographic regions within an academic medical center and its affiliated health system during the months prior to initiation of a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized pragmatic trial. Transcripts were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research [CFIR] 2.0. Two study team members reviewed coded transcripts to understand how determinants were relevant in the pre-implementation phase of the trial and prepared analytic memos to identify themes. RESULTS Findings are summarized in four themes: (1) ability of the intervention to meet patient needs [recipient characteristics], (2) designing with care team needs in mind [innovation design and adaptability], (3) fit of the intervention with existing practice workflows [compatibility], and (4) engaging care teams early [engaging deliverers]. CONCLUSION Attention to these aspects when planning intervention protocols can promote intervention compatibility with patients, providers, and practices thereby increasing implementation success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Minteer
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Andrea Cheville
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nathan Tesch
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joan M Griffin
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jessica D Austin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Sandra Mitchell
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Aaron L Leppin
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer L Ridgeway
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kamran R, Jackman L, Laws A, Stepney M, Harrison C, Jain A, Rodrigues J. Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on implementing patient-reported outcome measures in gender-affirming care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:e002507. [PMID: 37940336 PMCID: PMC10632877 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient and healthcare professional perspectives are needed to develop a gender-affirming care patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation plan. We aimed to identify top considerations relevant to gender-affirming care PROM implementation from patient and healthcare professional perspectives. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study conducted in the UK between January and April 2023 includes focus groups with a patient sample diverse in age and gender identity, and a healthcare professional sample diverse in age and role. Established methods in implementation science and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research were used to create interview guides, and analyse data. Focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed by two independent researchers. Patient and healthcare professional focus groups were conducted separately. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on PROM implementation were explored through focus groups and until data saturation. RESULTS A total of 7 virtual focus groups were conducted with 24 participants (14 patients, mean (SD) age, 43 (14.5); 10 healthcare professionals, mean (SD) age, 46 (11.3)). From patient perspectives, key barriers to PROM implementation were mistrust with PROMs, lack of accessibility, burden, and lack of communication on why PROMs are important and how they will help care. From healthcare professional perspectives, key barriers to PROM implementation were lack of accessibility, burden with PROM administration and scoring, costs of implementation (financial and time), and lack of communication on what PROMs are and how they benefit service provision. CONCLUSION Gender-affirming care PROM implementation must address: patient mistrust with PROMs, accessibility, communication on what PROMs are and how they can be used, reducing burden, and hybridised implementation. These factors may also be applicable to other clinical areas interested in implementing PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhshan Kamran
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Liam Jackman
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Laws
- Northern Region Gender Dysphoria Service, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Melissa Stepney
- The CHiMES Collaborative, Department of Psychiatry University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Conrad Harrison
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Abhilash Jain
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy Rodrigues
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, UK
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Healy BC, Liu Y, Winston-Khan S, Weiner HL, Chitnis T, Glanz BI. Association between PROMIS10, SF-36 and NeuroQoL in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 79:105003. [PMID: 37741027 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient reported outcome measures (PROs) are considered promising tools for use in clinical settings to measure the impact of disease on physical, mental and social well-being from the patient's perspective. The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Scale v1.1-Global Health (PROMIS-10) is a measure that is well-suited to clinical practice, but the relationships between this measure and longer PRO measures used in multiple sclerosis (MS) research are unknown. METHODS Subjects enrolled in SysteMS: A Systems Biology Study of Clinical, Radiological, and Molecular Markers in Subjects with MS at the Brigham and Women's Hospital were eligible to contribute to the study. 349 subjects completed three PRO measures at study entry: PROMIS-10, Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL™). All questions and global scores from PROMIS-10 were correlated with all domain and summary component scores for SF-36 and all domain scores for Neuro-QoL using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Further, the global scores from PROMIS-10 were correlated with the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and compared between disease categories (relapsing vs progressive MS). RESULTS Strong correlations were observed between PROMIS-10 questions and SF-36 domains aimed at measuring the same construct. Further, the PROMIS-10 Global Physical Health score was correlated with the Physical Component Score from the SF-36 (r = 0.798), and the PROMIS Global Mental Health score was correlated with the Mental Component Score from the SF-36 (r = 0.726). Strong correlations between PROMIS-10 questions and two Neuro-QoL domains (fatigue and lower extremity function) were observed, but other Neuro-QoL domains were not strongly correlated with PROMIS-10 questions. PROMIS-10 Global Physical Health had stronger relationship to EDSS and disease category compared to the Global Mental Health. CONCLUSIONS PROMIS-10 questions and global scores are highly correlated with the corresponding domains of SF-36 in PwMS. Neuro-QoL provides different information regarding HRQOL since different domains are being measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Healy
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Massachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, United States; Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Yanqing Liu
- Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sasha Winston-Khan
- Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Howard L Weiner
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Tanuja Chitnis
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bonnie I Glanz
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chiche L, Yang HK, Abbassi F, Robles-Campos R, Stain SC, Ko CY, Neumayer LA, Pawlik TM, Barkun JS, Clavien PA. Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery. Ann Surg 2023; 278:647-654. [PMID: 37555327 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This forum summarizes the proceedings of the joint European Surgical Association (ESA)/American Surgical Association (ASA) symposium on Quality and Outcome Assessment for Surgery that took place in Bordeaux, France, as part of the celebrations of the 30th anniversary of the ESA. Three presentations focused on a) the main messages from the Outcome4Medicine Consensus Conference, which took place in Zurich, Switzerland, in June 2022, b) the patient perspective, and c) benchmarking were hold by ESA members and discussed by ASA members in a symposium attended by members of both associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Han-Kwang Yang
- Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | - Clifford Y Ko
- University of California at Los Angeles and the American College of Surgeons, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Leigh A Neumayer
- University of Florida, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Jeffrey S Barkun
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pathak A, Abbott JH, Bajracharya N, Gurung G, Nepal GM, Sharma S. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of outcome measures among physiotherapists in Nepal: A mixed-methods study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 68:102859. [PMID: 37844424 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standardised outcome measures are essential to evidence-based practice but their implementation remains a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries. The barriers and enablers for implementation of outcome measures are likely different in these settings. OBJECTIVES We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to use of standardised outcome measures (e.g. patient-reported, performance-based, clinician-reported) in clinical practice among physiotherapists in Nepal. DESIGN Exploratory sequential mixed-method study. METHODS We conducted focus groups with physiotherapists in Nepal to understand factors contributing to standardised outcome measure use/non-use in depth and thematically analysed the data using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). To triangulate the findings, we used an online survey which was distributed to practicing physiotherapists in Nepal using social media. RESULTS We interviewed 26 physiotherapists for the qualitative phase and 125 physiotherapists responded to our online survey. The most endorsed facilitator was mandating outcome measure use through regulations at organisational or national level, for example, submission of patient-level outcome measures to an insurance system. Major barriers were lack of time, lack of outcome measures in local languages, inability to follow-up with patients and perceived inability of patients to understand outcome measures. Challenges that had not yet been identified in previous studies were inability to follow-up with patients and organisational culture (e.g., cultural hierarchy within an institution). CONCLUSION The findings of our study provide an understanding of the contextual needs, and potential way forward for implementation of outcome measures in developing countries like Nepal. Future studies should focus on establishing consensus on which measures to use, the cross-cultural adaptation of these measures, and developing pathways for regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anupa Pathak
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - J Haxby Abbott
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Nibha Bajracharya
- Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Gagan Gurung
- Department of General Practice and Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Govinda Mani Nepal
- Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal
| | - Saurab Sharma
- Department of Exercise Physiology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia (NeuRA), Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lehmann J, de Ligt KM, Tipelius S, Giesinger JM, Sztankay M, Voigt S, van de Poll-Franse LV, Rumpold G, Weger R, Willenbacher E, Willenbacher W, Holzner B. Adherence to Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring and Subsequent Clinical Interventions for Patients With Multiple Myeloma in Outpatient Care: Longitudinal Observational Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e46017. [PMID: 37606979 PMCID: PMC10481208 DOI: 10.2196/46017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of software to monitor patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can improve outcomes for patients with cancer receiving anticancer therapy; however, evidence from applications used in routine clinical practice is lacking. OBJECTIVE We aimed to investigate adherence to and patient perceptions of a weekly, web-based PROM symptom monitoring program in routine clinical practice for patients with Multiple Myeloma. Moreover, we aimed to capture how clinical alerts prompted by the system influenced clinical care. METHODS We conducted a single-center longitudinal observational study to evaluate patient adherence to and perceptions of the PROM monitoring software in routine practice. Patients with Multiple Myeloma remotely completed weekly treatment-specific PROMs to monitor key symptoms via a dedicated web-based platform. Alarming symptoms triggered clinical alerts in the application for the treatment team, which could initiate clinical interventions. The primary outcomes were the web-based assessment completion rate and patients' perceptions of the monitoring program, as assessed by an evaluation questionnaire. Moreover, clinical alerts prompted by the system and consequential clinical interventions were analyzed. RESULTS Between July 2021 and June 2022, a total of 55 patients were approached for participation; 39 patients participated (24, 61% male, mean age 63.2, SD 9.2 years). The median assessment completion rate out of all weekly scheduled assessments was 70.3% (IQR 41.2%-89.6%). Most patients (77%) felt that the health care team was better informed about their health status due to the web-based assessments. Clinical alerts were triggered for 1758 of 14,639 (12%) reported symptoms. For 548 of 1758 (31.2%) alerts, the symptom had been registered before and no further action was required; for 348 of 1758 (19.9%) alerts, telephone consultation and self-management advice sufficed. Higher-level interventions were seldom needed in response to alerts: referral to a doctor or specialist (88/1758, 5% alerts), medication changes (22/1758, 1.3%), scheduling additional diagnostics (9/1758, 0.5%), or unplanned emergency visits (7/1758, 0.4%). Most patients (55%) reported the calls in response to alerts gave them "quite a bit" or "very much" of an added feeling of security during therapy. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows that high adherence to regular and tailored PROM monitoring can be achieved in routine clinical care. The findings provide valuable insight into how the PROM monitoring program and the clinical alerts and resulting interventions shaped clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05036863; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05036863.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Lehmann
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Syndena GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Kelly M de Ligt
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes M Giesinger
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Monika Sztankay
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Sandra Voigt
- Syndena GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
- Internal Medicine V: Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychological and Somatic Disorders (CoRPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Gerhard Rumpold
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Evaluation Software Development GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Ella Willenbacher
- Internal Medicine V: Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Willenbacher
- Syndena GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
- Internal Medicine V: Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Evaluation Software Development GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Vaitkevičienė GE, Ažukaitis K, Jankauskienė A, Petrėnė J, Puronaitė R, Trinkūnas J, Jankauskienė D. Development and Integration of Patient-Reported Measures into E-Health System: Pilot Feasibility Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2290. [PMID: 37628488 PMCID: PMC10454584 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-centered care is recognized as a key element in recent healthcare management strategies. However, the integrated collection of patient feedback capturing the entire journey of patients with complex medical conditions remains understudied. Herein, we aimed to describe the development of an instrument prototype for the collection of PROMs and PREMs that would encompass a whole patient journey at a single time point. We further describe the process of its integration into a hospital's information system (HIS) and the results of a pilot feasibility study in adult patients with kidney and hematological diseases. We developed an instrument consisting of original PREM and generic EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. E-questionnaires were handled with REDCap software (version 12.5.14) and integrated into the HIS. Patients refusing to use e-questionnaires (48%) were offered paper administration and were older (64 vs. 50 years). The overall response rate for e-questionnaires was 57.1% with a median completion time of 2.0 and 3.7 min for PROM and PREM, respectively. Psychological and social services and primary care setting (diagnosis establishment and involvement in continuous care) were identified as most problematic. The majority of PREM dimensions encompassing different levels of care significantly correlated with PROM responses. Our data indicate the feasibility and potential relevance of the proposed approach, although wider-scale studies in diverse settings are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Goda Elizabeta Vaitkevičienė
- Center of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania; (K.A.); (A.J.); (R.P.)
| | - Karolis Ažukaitis
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania; (K.A.); (A.J.); (R.P.)
- Center of Pediatrics, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Augustina Jankauskienė
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania; (K.A.); (A.J.); (R.P.)
- Center of Pediatrics, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Justė Petrėnė
- Center of Hematology, Oncology and Transfusiology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania;
| | - Roma Puronaitė
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania; (K.A.); (A.J.); (R.P.)
- Center of Informatics and Development, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania;
| | - Justas Trinkūnas
- Center of Informatics and Development, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, 08406 Vilnius, Lithuania;
- Faculty of Fundamental Sciencies, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Consolo L, Colombo S, Basile I, Rusconi D, Campa T, Caraceni A, Lusignani M. Barriers and facilitators of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) for patients in home palliative cancer care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perceptions. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:111. [PMID: 37542264 PMCID: PMC10401773 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01234-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes in palliative care enable early monitoring and management of symptoms that most impact patients' daily lives; however, there are several barriers to adopting electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures (e-PROMs) in daily practice. This study explored the experiences of health care professionals (HCPs) regarding potential barriers and facilitators in implementing e-PROMs in palliative cancer care at home. METHODS This was a qualitative descriptive study. The data were collected from two focus groups structured according to the conceptual framework of Grol. HCPs involved in home palliative cancer care of Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan were enrolled. Data were analyzed using a reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS A total of 245 codes were generated, 171 for the first focus group and 74 for the second focus group. The results were subdivided into subthemes according to Grol's themes: Innovation, Individual professional, Patient, Social context, Organizational context, except Economic Political context. Nine HCPs attended the first focus group, and ten attended the second. According to these participants, e-PROMs could be integrated into clinical practice after adequate training and support of HCPs at all stages of implementation. They identified barriers, especially in the social and organizational contexts, due to the uniqueness of the oncological end-of-life setting and the intangible care interventions, as well as many facilitators for the innovation that these tools bring and for improved communication with the patient and the healthcare team. CONCLUSIONS e-PROMs are perceived by HCPs as adding value to patient care and their work; however, barriers remain especially related to the fragility of these patients, the adequacy of technological systems, lack of education, and the risk of low humanization of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letteria Consolo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
- Bachelor School of Nursing, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Stella Colombo
- Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Basile
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Rusconi
- Urology Unit, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Campa
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- High-Complexity Unit of Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation, IRCCS, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maura Lusignani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|