Primary Dystonia Is More Responsive than Secondary Dystonia to Pallidal Interventions: Outcome after Pallidotomy or Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation

Anterior capsulotomy combined with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for tardive dystonia

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been reported as a therapy option for the motor dysfunction of severe tardive dystonia (TD). The major psychiatric diseases, however, are contraindications to DBS treatment in TD patients.

METHODS

Six severe, medically refractory TD patients undergoing bilateral anterior capsulotomy combined with bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS treatment were studied retrospectively at two time points: pre-operation, and 1-3 years post-operation. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) was used to assess the dystonia and disability. Depressive, anxiety, psychiatric symptoms, and Quality of Life (QoL) were evaluated using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17), the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA-14), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), respectively.

RESULTS

After receiving the combination treatment for 25 ± 11.6 months (range, 12-41 months), significant clinical symptom improvements were reported in TD patients. BFMDRS motor and disability scores were ameliorated by 78.5 ± 32.0% (p = 0.031) and 76.5 ± 38.6% (p = 0.031), respectively. The HAMD-17 and HAMA-14 scores were reduced by 60.3 ± 27.9% (p = 0.007) and 60.0 ± 24.6% (p = 0.009), respectively. Furthermore, the PANSS scores of the comorbidity schizophrenia TD patients decreased by 58.1 ± 6.0% (p = 0.022), and the QoL improved by 59.7 ± 14.1% (SF-36, p = 0.0001). During the research, there were no notable adverse effects or problems.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral anterior capsulotomy combined with bilateral STN-DBS may be an effective and relatively safe treatment option for severe TD comorbid with major psychiatric disorders.

Intraventricular baclofen for palliative management of acquired generalized dystonia in pediatric patients: a case series and literature review

Dystonia represents a significant source of disability in children. Generalized dystonia, which involves multiple body regions, leads to impaired mobility and motor function, resulting in substantial challenges in daily activities. Surgical treatments are used when medical treatments fail. Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) or deep brain stimulations (DBS) are the most employed surgical therapies. When these options are not feasible or ineffective, some authors have explored the use of intraventricular baclofen (IVB). In this report, we present four cases of pediatric patients with generalized dystonia who underwent treatment with IVB, resulting in notable improvements. To further explore the potential of this treatment modality, we conducted a comprehensive literature review. The findings from our study provide a comprehensive overview that can guide palliative management in similar cases.

Diffusion tensor imaging in pediatric patients with dystonia

BACKGROUND

Childhood-onset dystonia is often progressive and severely impairs a child´s life. The pathophysiology is very heterogeneous and treatment responses vary in patients with dystonia. Factors influencing treatment effects remain to be elucidated. We hypothesize that differences in brain connectivity and fiber coherence contribute to the heterogeneity in treatment response among pediatric patients with inherited and acquired dystonia.

METHODS

Twenty patients with childhood-onset dystonia were retrospectively recruited including twelve patients with inherited or idiopathic, and eight patients with acquired dystonia (mean age 10 years; 8 female/12 male). Fiber density between the internal part of the globus pallidus and selective target regions, as well as the diffusion measures of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were analyzed and compared between different etiologies.

RESULTS

Patients with acquired dystonia presented higher fiber density to the premotor cortex and putamen and lower FA values in the thalamus compared to patients with inherited/idiopathic dystonia. MD in the premotor cortex was higher in patients with acquired dystonia, while it was lower in the thalamus.

CONCLUSION

Diffusion MRI reveals microstructural and network alterations in patients with dystonia of different etiologies.

Uncovering neuroanatomical correlates of impaired coordinated movement after pallidal deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND

The loss of the ability to swim following deep brain stimulation (DBS), although rare, poses a worrisome risk of drowning. It is unclear what anatomic substrate and neural circuitry underlie this phenomenon. We report a case of cervical dystonia with lost ability to swim and dance during active stimulation of globus pallidus internus. We investigated the anatomical underpinning of this phenomenon using unique functional and structural imaging analysis.

METHODS

Tesla (3T) functional MRI (fMRI) of the patient was used during active DBS and compared with a cohort of four matched patients without this side effect. Structural connectivity mapping was used to identify brain network engagement by stimulation.

RESULTS

fMRI during stimulation revealed significant (Pbonferroni<0.0001) stimulation-evoked responses (DBS ON

CONCLUSIONS

These stimulation-induced impairments are likely a manifestation of a broader deficit in interlimb coordination mediated by stimulation effects on the SMA. This neuroanatomical underpinning can help inform future patient-specific stimulation and targeting.

Collapse

Key Words

• DYSTONIA
• ELECTRICAL STIMULATION
• FUNCTIONAL IMAGING
• MRI
• NEUROSURGERY

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Globus Pallidus/diagnostic imaging
• Globus Pallidus/physiology
• Deep Brain Stimulation/adverse effects
• Deep Brain Stimulation/methods
• Treatment Outcome
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Brendan Santyr Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Aaron Loh Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Artur Vetkas Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Dave Gwun Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Wilson Kw Fung Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Shakeel Qazi Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Jurgen Germann Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Alexandre Boutet Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Can Sarica Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Andrew Yang Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Gavin Elias Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Suneil K Kalia Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Alfonso Fasano Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease and Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Andres M Lozano Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Krembil Brain Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Collapse

Outcomes of Unilateral Pallidotomy in Focal and Hemidystonia Cases: A Single-Blind Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The role of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of dystonia has been widely documented. However, there is limited literature on the outcome of lesioning surgery in unilateral dystonia.

OBJECTIVE

We restrospectively reviewed our cases of focal and hemidystonia undergoing unilateral Pallidotomy at our institute to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcome.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radiofrequency lesioning of GPi for unilateral dystonia between 1999 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were evaluated using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and Dystonia Disability Scale (DDS) preoperatively at the short term follow-up (<1 year) and at long-term follow-up (2-7.5 years). Video recordings performed at these time points were independently reviewed by a blinded movement disorders specialist.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were included for analysis. The preoperative, short-term, and long-term follow-up motor BFMDRS and DDS scores were 15.5 (IQR [interquartile range]: 10.5, 23.75) and 10.5 (IQR: 6.0, 14.5); 3.0 (IQR: 1.0, 6.0, P = 0.02) and 3.0 (IQR: 3.0, 8.0, P = 0.016); and 14.25 (IQR: 4.0, 20.0, P = 0.20) and 10.5 (IQR: 2.0, 15.0, P = 0.71) respectively. For observers B, the BFMDRS scores at the same time points were 19 (IQR: 12.5, 27.0), 7.5 (IQR: 6.0, 15.0, P = 0.002), and 21 (IQR: 7.0, 22.0, P = 0.65) respectively. The improvement was statistically significant for all observations at short-term follow-up but not at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Pallidotomy is effective for hemidystonia or focal dystonia in the short term. Continued benefit was seen in the longer term in some patients, whereas others worsened. Larger studies may be able to explain this in future.

Applicability of clinical genetic testing for deep brain stimulation treatment in monogenic Parkinson's disease and monogenic dystonia: a multidisciplinary team perspective

In this perspective article, we highlight the possible applicability of genetic testing in Parkinson's disease and dystonia patients treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS, a neuromodulatory technique employing electrical stimulation, has historically targeted motor symptoms in advanced PD and dystonia, yet its precise mechanisms remain elusive. Genetic insights have emerged as potential determinants of DBS efficacy. Known PD genes such as GBA, SNCA, LRRK2, and PRKN are most studied, even though further studies are required to make firm conclusions. Variable outcomes depending on genotype is present in genetic dystonia, as DYT-TOR1A, NBIA/DYTPANK2, DYT-SCGE and X-linked dystonia-parkinsonism have demonstrated promising outcomes following GPi-DBS, while varying outcomes have been documented in DYT-THAP1. We present two clinical vignettes that illustrate the applicability of genetics in clinical practice, with one PD patient with compound GBA mutations and one GNAL dystonia patient. Integrating genetic testing into clinical practice is pivotal, particularly with advancements in next-generation sequencing. However, there is a clear need for further research, especially in rarer monogenic forms. Our perspective is that applying genetics in PD and dystonia is possible today, and despite challenges, it has the potential to refine patient selection and enhance treatment outcomes.

Neurosurgical management of non-spastic movement disorders

BACKGROUND

Non-spastic movement disorders in children are common, although true epidemiologic data is difficult to ascertain. Children are more likely than adults to have hyperkinetic movement disorders defined as tics, dystonia, chorea/athetosis, or tremor. These conditions manifest from acquired or heredodegenerative etiologies and often severely limit function despite medical and surgical management paradigms. Neurosurgical management for these conditions is highlighted.

METHODS

We performed a focused review of the literature by searching PubMed on 16 May 2023 using key terms related to our review. No temporal filter was applied, but only English articles were considered. We searched for the terms (("Pallidotomy"[Mesh]) OR "Rhizotomy"[Mesh]) OR "Deep Brain Stimulation"[Mesh], dystonia, children, adolescent, pediatric, globus pallidus, in combination. All articles were reviewed for inclusion in the final reference list.

RESULTS

Our search terms returned 37 articles from 2004 to 2023. Articles covering deep brain stimulation were the most common (n = 34) followed by pallidotomy (n = 3); there were no articles on rhizotomy.

DISCUSSION

Non-spastic movement disorders are common in children and difficult to treat. Most of these patients are referred to neurosurgery for the management of dystonia, with modern neurosurgical management including pallidotomy, rhizotomy, and deep brain stimulation. Historically, pallidotomy has been effective and may still be preferred in subpopulations presenting either in status dystonicus or with high risk for hardware complications. Superiority of DBS over pallidotomy for secondary dystonia has not been determined. Rhizotomy is an underutilized surgical tool and more study characterizing efficacy and risk profile is indicated.

Deep brain stimulation for hemidystonia: A meta-analysis with individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now well established for the treatment of dystonic movement disorders. There is limited data, however, on the efficacy of DBS in hemidystonia. This meta-analysis aims to summarize the published reports on DBS for hemidystonia of different etiologies, to compare different stimulation targets, and to evaluate clinical outcome.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed on PubMed, Embase and Web of Science to identify appropriate reports. The primary outcome variables were the improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement (BFMDRS-M) and disability (BFMDRS-D) scores for dystonia.

RESULTS

Twenty-two reports (39 patients; 22 with pallidal stimulation, 4 with subthalamic stimulation, 3 with thalamic stimulation, and 10 with combined target stimulation) were included. Mean age at surgery was 26.8 years. Mean follow-up time was 31.72 months. An overall mean improvement of 40% in the BFMDRS-M score was achieved (range 0%-94%), which was paralleled by a mean improvement of 41% in the BFMDRS-D score. When considering a 20% cut-off for improvement, 23/39 patients (59%) would qualify as responders. Hemidystonia due to anoxia did not significantly improve with DBS. Several limitations of the results must be considered, most importantly the low level of evidence and the small number of reported cases.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of the current analysis, DBS can be considered as a treatment option for hemidystonia. The posteroventral lateral GPi is the target used most often. More research is needed to understand the variability in outcome and to identify prognostic factors.

Deep brain stimulation effect in genetic dyskinetic cerebral palsy: The case of ADCY5- related disease

BACKGROUND

Cerebral Palsy (CP) represents a frequent cause of disability in childhood. Early in life, genetic disorders may present with motor dysfunction and diagnosed as CP. Establishing the primary, genetic etiology allows more accurate prognosis, genetic counselling, and planning for symptomatic interventions in homogeneous etiological groups. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is recommended in refractory movement disorders, including isolated pediatric dystonias. For dystonia evolving in more complex associations in genetic CP, the effect of DBS is still understudied and currently only sporadically described.

OBJECTIVES

To report the effect of DBS applied to the globus pallidus pars interna (GPi) in children with complex movement disorders caused by pathogenic ADCY5 variants, diagnosed as dyskinetic CP previous to genetic diagnostic.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on evolution of treatment with DBS in ADCY5-related disease. A standardized proforma including the different type of movement disorders and associated neurological signs was completed at each follow-up time, based on video recordings, as well as functional assessments used in children with CP.

RESULTS

Four children (mean of age, 13 ± 2.9 years) received GPi-DBS. The same de novo pathogenic missense variant (c.1252C > T, p.R418W) was identified in three out of four and a splice site variant (c.2088 + 2G > T) in one subject. Developmental delay and overlapping features including axial hypotonia, chorea, dystonic attacks, myoclonus, and cranial dyskinesia were present. The median age at DBS was 9 years and follow-up with DBS, 2.6 years. We identified a pattern of clinical response with early suppression of dystonic attacks, followed by improvement of myoclonus and facial dyskinesia. Effect on chorea was delayed and more limited. Two patients gained notable functional benefit related to sitting, standing, gait, use of upper limbs and speech.

CONCLUSION

ADCY5-related disease may benefit from GPi-DBS. The most significant clinical response relates to the early and sustained benefit on dystonic attacks and a variable but still positive response on the other hyperkinetic features. Genetic etiology of CP will contribute to further elucidate genotype-phenotype correlations and to refine DBS indication as network-related symptomatic interventions.

Neuromodulation in Dystonia - Harnessing the Network

Adult-onset isolated focal dystonia (AOIFD) is a network disorder characterised by abnormalities of sensory processing and motor control. These network abnormalities give rise to both the phenomenology of dystonia and the epiphenomena of altered plasticity and loss of intracortical inhibition. Existing modalities of deep brain stimulation effectively modulate parts of this network but are limited both in terms of targets and invasiveness. Novel approaches using a variety of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques including transcranial stimulation and peripheral stimulation present an interesting alternative approach and may, in conjunction with rehabilitative strategies, have a role in tailored therapies targeting the underlying network abnormality behind AOIFD.

Evaluation of outcome of different neurosurgical modalities in management of cervical dystonia

Background

Cervical dystonia is the most common form of focal dystonia and is managed by multiple modalities including repeated botulinum toxin injections, in addition to medical treatment with anticholinergics, muscle relaxants, and physiotherapy. However, surgical interventions could be beneficial in otherwise refractory patients. This study aims to report our experience in the neurosurgical management of cervical dystonia and evaluate patient outcomes using reliable outcome scores for the assessment of patients with cervical dystonia and possible complications. This case series study was conducted on 19 patients with cervical dystonia of different etiologies who underwent surgical management [ten patients underwent selective peripheral denervation, five patients underwent pallidotomy, and four patients underwent bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS)] in the period between July 2018 and June 2021 at Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt. With the assessment of surgical outcomes using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and the Tsui scale 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Surgical management of patients with cervical dystonia of either primary or secondary etiology was associated with significant improvement in head and neck postures after 6 months without major complications associated with the different surgical procedures. The mean improvement in total TWSTRS and Tsui scores were 51.2% and 64.8%, respectively, compared with preoperative scores, while the mean improvement in the TWSTRS subscales (severity, disability, and pain) were 40.2%, 66.9%, and 58.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

Cervical dystonia patients in whom non-surgical options have failed to alleviate their symptoms can be managed surgically leading to significant improvements with minimal adverse effects. However, surgical treatment should be tailored according to several factors including but not limited to the etiology, pattern of dystonic activity, and comorbidities. Therefore, management should be tailored to achieve long-term improvement with minimal risk of complications.

Long-Term Outcomes of Idiopathic and Acquired Dystonia After Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Among dystonia patients receiving globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS), long-term outcomes remain to be established. To report the long-term outcomes of GPi DBS in a patient cohort with idiopathic and acquired dystonia.

METHODS

In this long-term follow-up cohort, there were 4 patients with idiopathic dystonia and 2 patients with acquired dystonia. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale was used to evaluate 6 consecutive patients preoperatively and at 6 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up. The relationship between etiology and clinical improvement was analyzed. Stimulation parameters were evaluated for similarities and differences among these patients.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of our cohort was 65.3 months (median 40.5 months). The average improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (mean ± SEM) were 56% ± 7.6, 67% ± 6.8 and 66% ± 9.7 at 6 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up, respectively. There was greater improvement during the long-term follow-up in the 4 patients with idiopathic dystonia than in the 2 patients with acquired dystonia. The 2 most ventral electrodes (contact 0 and 1) were activated in all 11 leads in this cohort. The average stimulation intensity, pulse width and frequency were 2.0 ± 0.24 mA, 252 ± 43 μs, and 99 ± 6.0 Hz, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated dystonia, either monogenic or idiopathic, usually responds better to GPi DBS than to acquired dystonia. Selection of patients by dystonia etiology, accurate placement of DBS leads in GPi targets, and proper stimulation programming are crucial to achieve better long-term outcomes.

Bilateral pallidotomy for acquired or heredodegenerative generalized dystonia in children

OBJECTIVE

Dystonias are relatively rare disorders characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal movements or postures. Generalized dystonia is a therapeutic challenge because medications are unable to control dystonia adequately in most patients. These patients may be candidates for surgical therapy. The commonly used surgical procedures in these patients are pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation. Limited studies are available on the role of pallidotomy in children with acquired/heredodegenerative generalized dystonia. The objective of this study was to describe the authors’ experience with bilateral pallidotomy in this group of patients.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed all pediatric patients (less than 18 years of age) with acquired/heredodegenerative generalized dystonia who underwent bilateral simultaneous pallidotomy at their center between January 2014 and January 2021. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores before and after surgery were recorded. Complications arising after the procedure were recorded as well.

RESULTS

Ten patients (8 male and 2 female) with a mean (range) age of 11.1 (5–17) years were included in this study. The mean duration between disease onset and surgical intervention was 3.9 years. Two patients presented in status dystonicus. The mean ± SD (range) preoperative BFMDRS score of the patients without status dystonicus (n = 8) was 80 ± 18.9 (59.5–108). The mean ± SD BFMDRS score at the time of discharge from the hospital after surgery was 58.8 ± 37.9. Three patients had more than 20% change in BFMDRS score at the time of discharge from the hospital. The mean improvement was 25.5% at the end of 1 year. Of 5 surviving patients in the non–status dystonicus group, 3 patients had more than 40% change in BFMDRS score while the other 2 patients developed recurrence at the last follow-up (4.5 years). Status dystonicus abated after bilateral pallidotomy in both patients. Permanent bulbar complications were seen in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral pallidotomy may result in clinically significant improvement in children with acquired/heredodegenerative generalized dystonia, although the benefits should be closely weighed against the risk of irreversible bulbar dysfunction. It is a viable option for children in resource-limited settings.

Rescue procedure for isolated dystonia after the secondary failure of globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation

Introduction

Globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is widely used in patients with dystonia. However, 10–20% of patients receive insufficient benefits. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS along with unilateral posteroventral pallidotomy (PVP) in patients with dystonia who experienced unsatisfactory GPi-DBS and to address the reported rescue procedures after suboptimal DBS or lesion surgery in dystonia patients.

Methods

Six patients with isolated dystonia who had previously undergone bilateral GPi-DBS with suboptimal improvement were included. Standardized assessments of dystonia using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and quality of life using SF-36 were evaluated before surgery and 1, 6 months, and last follow-up (LFU) after surgery. STN bilateral OFF (bi-OFF), unilateral ON (uni-ON), and bilateral ON (bi-ON) states were recorded at LFU. Specific items were used to find publications published before 10 April 2022 regarding rescue procedures after suboptimal DBS or lesion surgery in patients with dystonia for reference. Eleven original studies including case reports/series were identified for discussion.

Results

Substantial clinical benefits were achieved in all six patients. Significant amelioration was achieved during the 1-month (6.5 ± 7.45; p = 0.0049), 6-month (5.67 ± 6.3; p = 0.0056) follow-ups, and at LFU (4.67 ± 4.72; p = 0.0094) when compared with the baseline (LFU of GPi DBS with on status) (17.33 ± 11.79) assessed by BFMDRS. The percentage of improvement reached 70.6, 74.67, and 77.05%, respectively. At LFU, significant differences were found between the stimulation bi-OFF and uni-ON (11.08 ± 8.38 vs. 9 ± 8.52, p = 0.0191), and between the stimulation bi-OFF and bi-ON (11.08 ± 8.38 vs. 4.67 ± 4.72, p = 0.0164). Trends depicting a better improvement in stimulation bi-ON compared with uni-ON (4.67 ± 4.72 vs. 9 ± 8.52, p = 0.0538) were observed.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that bilateral STN-DBS plus unilateral PVP may be an effective rescue procedure for patients with isolated dystonia who experienced suboptimal movement improvement following GPi-DBS. However, given the heterogeneity of patients and the small sample size, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Deep brain stimulation in dystonia: factors contributing to variability in outcome in short and long term follow-up

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently the most effective treatment for medically refractory dystonia with globus pallidus internus (GPi) usually the preferred target. Despite the overall success of DBS in dystonia, there remains variability in treatment outcome in both short and long-term follow-up, due to various factors. Factors contributing to variability in outcome comprise 'Dystonia Related' including dystonia classification, semiology, duration, body distribution, orthopaedic deformity, aetiology and genetic cause. The majority of these factors are identifiable from clinical assessment, brain MRI and genetic testing, and therefore merit careful preoperative consideration. 'DBS related' factors include brain target, accuracy of lead placement, stimulation parameters, time allowed for response, neurostimulation technology employed and DBS induced side-effects. In this review, factors contributing to variability in short and long-term dystonia DBS outcome are reviewed and discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recognition of differential DBS benefit in monogenic dystonia, increasing experience with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS and in DBS for Meige syndrome, elucidation of DBS side effects and novel neurophysiological and imaging techniques to assist in predicting clinical outcome.

SUMMARY

Improved understanding of factors contributing to variability of DBS outcome in dystonia may assist in patient selection and predicting surgical outcomes.

DBSim and ELMA - Freeware for Simulations of Deep Brain Stimulation

Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations of the electric field is a useful tool to estimate the activated tissue around Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) electrodes. Based on our previous research, a two-part software package named DBSim and ELMA is presented. ELMA is used to classify brain tissue into grey matter, white matter, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid and assign electric conductivities accordingly. This data is then used in DBSim to generate patient-specific simulations of the electric field around currently implemented leads Medtronic 3387 and 3389, and Abbott 6180 and 6181. The software is available for free download at https://liu.se/en/article/ne-downloads Clinical Relevance- This is a tool meant for research and educational purposes for e.g. studies on optimal target areas for DBS.

Unilateral Campotomy of Forel for Acquired Hemidystonia: An Open-Label Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Hemidystonia (HD) is characterized by unilateral involuntary torsion movements and fixed postures of the limbs and face. It often develops after deleterious neuroplastic changes secondary to injuries to the brain. This condition usually responds poorly to medical treatment, and deep brain stimulation often yields unsatisfactory results. We propose this study based on encouraging results from case reports of patients with HD treated by ablative procedures in the subthalamic region.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of stereotactic-guided radiofrequency lesioning of the subthalamic area vs available medical treatment in patients suffering from acquired HD.

METHODS

This is an open-label study in patients with secondary HD allocated according to their treatment choice, either surgical or medical treatment; both groups were followed for one year. Patients assigned in the surgical group underwent unilateral campotomy of Forel. The efficacy was assessed using the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale, Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Scale, Arm Dystonia Disability Scale, and SF-36 questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

Patients in the surgical group experienced significant improvement in the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale, Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Scale, and Arm Dystonia Disability Scale (39%, 35%, and 15%, respectively) 1 year after the surgery, with positive reflex in quality-of-life measures, such as bodily pain and role-emotional process. Patients kept on medical treatment did not experience significant changes during the follow-up. No infections were recorded, and no neurological adverse events were associated with either intervention.

CONCLUSION

The unilateral stereotaxy-guided ablation of Forel H1 and H2 fields significantly improved in patients with HD compared with optimized clinical treatment.

Surgical Outcomes in Rare Movement Disorders: A Report of Seventeen Patients from India and Review of Literature

Background:

Rare movement disorders (RMDs) throw remarkable challenges to their appropriate management particularly when they are medically refractory. We studied the outcome of functional neurosurgery among patients with RMDs.

Methods:

Retrospective chart-review from 2006 to 2021 of patients with RMDs who underwent either Deep brain Stimulation (DBS) or lesional surgeries in the department of Neurology and Neurosurgery at a tertiary care centre.

Results:

Seventeen patients were included. Generalized dystonia (11 patients, 64.7%) and tremor (5 patients, 29.4%) were the most common indication for surgery whereas, Wilson’s disease (8 patients, 47.1%) and Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (5 patients, 29.4%) were the most common aetiology. Sixteen patients (94.1%) had objective clinical improvement. Significant improvement was noted in the dystonia motor scores both at 6-months and 12-months follow-up (n = 11, p-value of <0.01 and 0.01 respectively). Comparison between DBS and lesional surgery showed no significant difference in the outcomes (p = 0.95 at 6-months and p = 0.53 at 12-months), with slight worsening of scores in the DBS arm at 12-months. Among five patients of refractory tremor with Wilson’s disease, there was remarkable improvement in the tremor scores by 85.0 ± 7.8% at the last follow-up. Speech impairment was the main complication observed with most of the other adverse events either transient or reversible.

Discussion:

Surgical options should be contemplated among patients with disabling medically refractory RMDs irrespective of the aetiology. Key to success lies in appropriate patient selection. In situations when DBS is not feasible, lesional surgeries can offer an excellent alternative with comparable efficacy and safety.

Subcortical Cognition: The Fruit Below the Rind

Cognitive neuroscience has highlighted the cerebral cortex while often overlooking subcortical structures. This cortical proclivity is found in basic and translational research on many aspects of cognition, especially higher cognitive domains such as language, reading, music, and math. We suggest that, for both anatomical and evolutionary reasons, multiple subcortical structures play substantial roles across higher and lower cognition. We present a comprehensive review of existing evidence, which indeed reveals extensive subcortical contributions in multiple cognitive domains. We argue that the findings are overall both real and important. Next, we advance a theoretical framework to capture the nature of (sub)cortical contributions to cognition. Finally, we propose how new subcortical cognitive roles can be identified by leveraging anatomical and evolutionary principles, and we describe specific methods that can be used to reveal subcortical cognition. Altogether, this review aims to advance cognitive neuroscience by highlighting subcortical cognition and facilitating its future investigation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Neuroscience, Volume 45 is July 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Deep Brain Stimulation in childhood-onset dystonia due to brain pathology. A long-term study

BACKGROUND

Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment option for isolated, inherited or idiopathic dystonia, however data on its safety and efficacy in other forms of dystonia are more limited.

OBJECTIVES

Retrospective analysis of motor and non-motor outcomes in pediatric onset refractory dystonia due to static or progressive brain disorders in a cohort of patients with a DBS treatment duration ≥12 months.

METHODS

Multidisciplinary assessments including standardised scales/tests of motor function, pain, quality of life, cognition and language were carried out before implantation and longitudinally afterwards.

RESULTS

9 patients were included, 7 had cerebral palsy. Mean age at implantation was 209 months ± 156, mean treatment duration 84 ± 37 months. DBS was well tolerated and positively affected both motor and non-motor functions. In particular, statistically significant improvements were documented in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Scale scores (- 19.9% p 0.01031) at 12 months and in long-term quality of life (+28.6%, p 0.0292).

CONCLUSIONS

DBS may be a useful treatment option in generalized dystonia associated with brain pathology. Even when the motor benefits are limited, improvements in quality of life and non-motor functions, or the possible prevention of serious dystonia-related complications, may have a significant impact on overall clinical status.

Long-term effects of pallidal deep brain stimulation in tardive dystonia: a follow-up of 5-14 years

Introduction

Pallidal DBS is an established treatment for severe isolated dystonia. However, its use in disabling and treatment-refractory tardive syndromes (TS) including tardive dyskinesia and tardive dystonia (TD) is less well investigated and long-term data remain sparse. This observational study evaluates long-term effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) in patients with medically refractory TS.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of seven TD patients with bilateral GPi-DBS. Involuntary movements, dystonia and disability were rated at long-term follow-up (LT-FU) after a mean of 122 ± 33.2 SD months (range 63–171 months) and compared to baseline (BL), short-term (ST-FU; mean 6 ± 2.0 SD months) and 4-year follow-up (4y-FU; mean 45 ± 12.3 SD months) using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) and the Burke–Fahn–Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS), respectively. Quality of life and mood were evaluated using the SF36 and Beck Depression Index (BDI) questionnaires, respectively.

Results

At LT-FU patients had improved by 73% ± 14.2 SD in involuntary movements and 90% ± 1.0 SD in dystonia. Mood had improved significantly whereas quality of life remained unchanged compared to baseline. No serious long-lasting stimulation-related adverse events (AEs) were observed. Three patients of this cohort presented without active stimulation and ongoing symptom relief at long-term follow-up after 3–10 years of continuous DBS.

Conclusion

Pallidal DBS is a safe and effective long-term TD treatment. Even more interesting, three of our patients could stop stimulation after several years of DBS without serious relapse. Larger studies need to explore the phenomenon of ongoing symptom relief after DBS cessation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-10965-8.

Deep Brain Stimulation Treating Dystonia: A Systematic Review of Targets, Body Distributions and Etiology Classifications

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a typical intervention treating drug-refractory dystonia. Currently, the selection of the better target, the GPi or STN, is debatable. The outcomes of DBS treating dystonia classified by body distribution and etiology is also a popular question.

Objective: To comprehensively compare the efficacy, quality of life, mood, and adverse effects (AEs) of GPi-DBS vs. STN-DBS in dystonia as well as in specific types of dystonia classified by body distribution and etiology.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched to identify studies of GPi-DBS and STN-DBS in populations with dystonia. The efficacy, quality of life, mood, and adverse effects were quantitatively compared. Meta-regression analyses were also performed. This analysis has been registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42020146145.

Results: Thirty five studies were included in the main analysis, in which 319 patients underwent GPI-DBS and 113 patients underwent STN-DBS. The average follow-up duration was 12.48 months (range, 3–49 months). The GPI and STN groups were equivalent in terms of efficacy, quality of life, mood, and occurrence of AEs. The focal group demonstrated significantly better disability symptom improvement (P = 0.012) than the segmental and generalized groups but showed less SF-36 enhancement than the segmental group (P < 0.001). The primary groups exhibited significantly better movement and disability symptom improvements than the secondary non-hereditary group (P < 0.005), which demonstrated only disability symptom improvement compared with the secondary hereditary group (P < 0.005). The primary hereditary and idiopathic groups had a significantly lower frequency of AEs than the secondary non-hereditary group (P < 0.005). The correlation between disability symptom improvement and movement symptom improvement was also significant (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: GPi-DBS and STN-DBS were both safe and resulted in excellent improvement in efficacy and quality of life in patients with dystonia. Compared with patients with segmental dystonia, patients with focal dystonia demonstrated better improvement in dystonia symptoms but less enhancement of quality of life. Those with primary dystonia had a better response to DBS in terms of efficacy than those with secondary dystonia. Patients who exhibit a significant improvement in movement symptoms might also exhibit excellent improvement in disability symptoms.

Estimation of electric field impact in deep brain stimulation from axon diameter distribution in the human brain

Objective.Finite element method (FEM) simulations of the electric field magnitude (EF) are commonly used to estimate the affected tissue surrounding the active contact of deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads. Previous studies have found that DBS starts to noticeably activate axons at approximately 0.2 V mm^-1, corresponding to activation of 3.4μm axons in simulations of individual axon triggering. Most axons in the brain are considerably smaller however, and the effect of the electric field is thus expected to be stronger with increasing EF as more and more axons become activated. The objective of this study is to estimate the fraction of activated axons as a function of electric field magnitude.Approach. The EF thresholds required for axon stimulation of myelinated axon diameters between 1 and 5μm were obtained from a combined cable and Hodgkin-Huxley model in a FEM-simulated electric field from a Medtronic 3389 lead. These thresholds were compared with the average axon diameter distribution from literature from several structures in the human brain to obtain an estimate of the fraction of axons activated at EF levels between 0.1 and 1.8 V mm^-1.Main results. The effect of DBS is estimated to be 47·EF-8.8% starting at a threshold levelEF_t0 = 0.19 V mm^-1.Significance. The fraction of activated axons from DBS in a voxel is estimated to increase linearly with EF above the threshold level of 0.19 V mm^-1. This means linear regression between EF above 0.19 V mm^-1and clinical outcome is a suitable statistical method when doing improvement maps for DBS.

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Internus for Secondary Dystonia: Clinical Cases and Systematic Review of the Literature Regarding the Effectiveness of Globus Pallidus Internus versus Subthalamic Nucleus

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a frequently applied therapy in primary dystonia. For secondary dystonia, the effects can be less favorable. We share our long-term findings in 9 patients with severe secondary dystonia and discuss these findings in the light of the literature.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone globus pallidus internus (GPi)-DBS for secondary dystonia were included. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores, clinical improvement rates, follow-up periods, stimulation parameters and the need for internal pulse generator replacements were analyzed. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles describing GPi-DBS and subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS only for secondary dystonia cases. Keywords were "dystonia," "deep brain stimulation," "GPi," "dystonia," "deep brain stimulation," and "STN."

RESULTS

A total of 9 secondary dystonia patients (5 male, 4 female) had undergone GPi-DBS with microelectrode recording in our units. The mean follow-up period was 29 months. The average BFMDRS score was 58.2 before the surgery, whereas the mean value was 36.5 at the last follow-up of the patients (mean improvement, 39%; minimum, 9%; maximum, 63%). In the literature review, we identified 264 GPi-DBS cases (mean follow-up, 19 months) in 72 different articles about secondary dystonia. The mean BFMDRS improvement rate was 52%. In 146 secondary dystonia cases, reported in 19 articles, STN-DBS was performed. The average follow-up period was 20 months and the improvement in BFMDRS score was 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although GPi-DBS has favorable long-term efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with secondary dystonia, STN seems a promising target for stimulation in patients with secondary dystonia. Further studies including a large number of patients, longer follow-up periods, and more homogenous patients are necessary to establish the optimal target for DBS in the management of secondary dystonias.

Pallidotomy for Dystonia

Background

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently the preferred surgical treatment for various movement disorders. Pallidotomy is an effective procedure for patients with dystonia and Parkinson's disease and was the surgical treatment of choice before the advent of DBS. However, it can be the preferred modality in immunocompromised patients and those patients who cannot afford DBS due to financial constraints. Hypophonia, dysarthria and dysphagia are the most significant complications of bilateral pallidotomy.

Objective

The aim of this study was to present the surgical technique and nuances involved in bilateral simultaneous pallidotomy in a patient with generalized dystonia.

Procedure

A 30-year male with primary generalized dystonia presented to us with preoperative Burke-Fahn-Marsden (BFM) Dystonia Rating Scale of 24. After acquiring preoperative volumetric 3T MRI and stereotactic CT, bilateral pallidotomy was done under general anesthesia. There were no procedure related complications.

Results

At two months of follow-up, his BFM dystonia score improved from 24 to 4.5.

Conclusion

Appropriately acquired volumetric MRI, meticulous planning and meticulously performed surgical procedure can help in achieving good outcome and minimize the complications.

Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonic Opisthotonus in Adult-Onset Dystonia: A Personalized Approach

Introduction

Dystonic opisthotonus is defined as a backward arching of the neck and trunk, which ranges in severity from mild backward jerks to life-threatening prolonged severe muscular spasms. It can be associated with generalized dystonic syndromes or, rarely, present as a form of axial truncal dystonia. The etiologies vary from idiopathic, genetic, tardive, hereditary-degenerative, or associated with parkinsonism. We report clinical cases of dystonic opisthotonus associated with adult-onset dystonic syndromes, that benefitted from globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Methods

Clinical data from patients with dystonic syndromes who underwent comprehensive medical review, multidisciplinary assessment, and tailored medical and neurosurgical managements were prospectively analyzed. Quantification of dystonia severity pre- and postoperatively was performed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale and quantification of overall pain severity was performed using the Visual Analog Scale.

Results

Three male patients, with age of onset of the dystonic symptoms ranging from 32 to 51 years old, were included. Tardive dystonia, adult-onset dystonia-parkinsonism and adult-onset idiopathic axial dystonia were the etiologies identified. Clinical investigation and management were tailored according to the complexity of the individual presentations. Although they shared common clinical features of adult-onset dystonia, disabling dystonic opisthotonus, refractory to medical management, was the main indication for GPi-DBS in all patients presented. The severity of axial dystonia ranged from disturbance of daily function to life-threatening truncal distortion. All three patients underwent bilateral GPi DBS at a mean age of 52 years (range 48–55 years), after mean duration of symptoms prior to DBS of 10.7 years (range 4–16 years). All patients showed a rapid and sustained clinical improvement of their symptoms, notably of the dystonic opisthotonos, at postoperative follow-up ranging from 20 to 175 months. In some, the ability to resume activities of daily living and reintegration into the society was remarkable.

Conclusion

Adult-onset dystonic syndromes predominantly presenting with dystonic opisthotonus are relatively rare. The specific nature of dystonic opisthotonus remains a treatment challenge, and thorough investigation of this highly disabling condition with varying etiologies is often necessary. Although patients may be refractory to medical management and botulinum toxin injection, Globus pallidus stimulation timed and tailored provided symptomatic control in this cohort and may be considered in other carefully selected cases.

Correlates of deep brain stimulation consensus conference decision to treat primary dystonia

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for motor disturbance in people with primary dystonia (PWD). Numerous factors are considered by an interdisciplinary consensus conference before deciding candidacy for DBS surgery (e.g., demographic, medical, cognitive, and behavioral factors). However, little is known about which of these factors are associated with PWD DBS surgery consensus conference decisions.

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to examine whether pre-operative demographic, medical, and cognitive/behavioral variables are associated DBS consensus conference decisions in patients with dystonia.

METHODS

Thirty-two PWD completed comprehensive presurgery workup included neurological and neuropsychological exams, and neuroimaging in consideration for DBS surgery. An interdisciplinary conference committee either recommended or did not recommend DBS surgery based upon these data. Demographic and medical data (e.g., dystonia disease characteristics, medical comorbidities, medications) were also collected. We also examined impact from cardiovascular disease factors, using a Revised Cardiac Risk Index. PWD were grouped based on DBS conference decision (eligible: n = 21, ineligible: n = 11) and compared across demographic, medical, and cognitive/behavioral variables.

RESULTS

Across clinical variables, PWD who were deemed ineligible for DBS surgery had a higher Revised Cardiac Risk Index. PWD who were classified as ineligible displayed lower global cognitive functioning, working memory, phonemic fluency, memory retrieval, and cognitive flexibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus decision making regarding DBS surgery eligibility involves a multifactorial process. We found that deficits in executive functioning were associated with the DBS consensus committee decision. We also observed elevated cardiac risk among these individuals, likely reflecting the relation between vascular health and cognition. Implications, and clinical and scientific applications of these findings are discussed.

A Scientometric Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles on Pallidotomy

BACKGROUND

Pallidotomy is the oldest stereotactically performed neurosurgical procedure for movement disorders. Consequently, there is a wealth of literature available on the topic.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this analysis was to identify the top-cited articles on pallidotomy in order to discern the origins, spread, the current trends, and the future directions of this surgical procedure.

METHODS

We performed a search of the Web of Science database on 19 October 2020 using the keyword "pallidotomy." The top-100 cited articles found were arranged in descending order on the basis of citation count (CC) and citation per year (CY). Relevant conclusions were derived.

RESULTS

The 100 top-cited articles were published between 1961 and 2017, in 24 journals. The average CC and CY were 118.1 (range - 856-46) and 5.326 (range - 29.52-2.09), respectively. The 3 most prolific authors were Lang AE (Neurologist - Toronto), Lozano AM (Neurosurgeon - Toronto), and Vitek JL (Neurologist - Atlanta). The Journal of Neurosurgery published the highest number of top-cited articles [Neurology. 1960;10:61-9]. The maximum articles were from the USA. University of Toronto and Emory University were the most productive institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Pallidotomy has gone through several ebbs and flows. Unilateral pallidotomy is currently recommended for the treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease and dystonia. The need for further research and improved technology to make the technique safer and prove its efficacy is highlighted, especially keeping in mind a large number of populations to which the prohibitively expensive deep brain stimulation is unavailable.

Safety and efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pallidotomy for primary dystonia

Objective

Ablation of the globus pallidus internus (pallidotomy) is an effective surgical intervention for dystonia. However, the current literature on the efficacy and safety of pallidotomy for dystonia is derived only from single‐case reports and small cohort studies.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with primary dystonia who underwent pallidotomy at our institution between 2014 and 2019. Neurological conditions were evaluated using the Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS, range: 0–120). We evaluated the total BFMDRS score and each subitem score (nine body regions) in the patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral pallidotomy before surgery and at last available follow‐up. Moreover, postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

We found that 69 and 20 patients underwent unilateral and bilateral pallidotomy respectively. The mean age at dystonia onset was 40.4 ± 15.2 years. The mean clinical follow‐up period was 17.2 ± 11.6 months. Unilateral pallidotomy significantly improved the total BFMDRS score from 11.2 ± 14.7 preoperatively to 5.4 ± 7.6 at last available follow‐up (51.8% improvement, p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant and independent improvement in all midline BFMDRS subitems, including eyes, mouth, speech/swallow, and neck, after unilateral pallidotomy. Bilateral pallidotomy significantly improved the total BFMDRS score from 14.6 ± 10.2 preoperatively to 3.8 ± 8.2 at last available follow‐up (74.0% improvement, p < 0.001). However, bilateral pallidotomy induced medically refractory parkinsonism (postural instability and gait disturbance) in five patients, dysarthria in three patients, and dysphagia in one patient.

Interpretation

Unilateral radiofrequency pallidotomy remains a viable treatment option for patients with some forms of dystonia. Bilateral pallidotomy cannot be recommended due to unacceptably high complication rates.

Mapping efficacious deep brain stimulation for pediatric dystonia

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to report the authors' experience with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal globus pallidus (GPi) as a treatment for pediatric dystonia, and to elucidate substrates underlying clinical outcome using state-of-the-art neuroimaging techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in 11 pediatric patients (6 girls and 5 boys, mean age 12 ± 4 years) with medically refractory dystonia who underwent GPi-DBS implantation between June 2009 and September 2017. Using pre- and postoperative MRI, volumes of tissue activated were modeled and weighted by clinical outcome to identify brain regions associated with clinical outcome. Functional and structural networks associated with clinical benefits were also determined using large-scale normative data sets.

RESULTS

A total of 21 implanted leads were analyzed in 11 patients. The average follow-up duration was 19 ± 20 months (median 5 months). Using a 7-point clinical rating scale, 10 patients showed response to treatment, as defined by scores < 3. The mean improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale motor score was 40% ± 23%. The probabilistic map of efficacy showed that the voxel cluster most associated with clinical improvement was located at the posterior aspect of the GPi, comparatively posterior and superior to the coordinates of the classic GPi target. Strong functional and structural connectivity was evident between the probabilistic map and areas such as the precentral and postcentral gyri, parietooccipital cortex, and brainstem.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reported on a series of pediatric patients with dystonia in whom GPi-DBS resulted in variable clinical benefit and described a clinically favorable stimulation site for this cohort, as well as its structural and functional connectivity. This information could be valuable for improving surgical planning, simplifying programming, and further informing disease pathophysiology.

Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation for Monogenic Dystonia: The Effect of Gene on Outcome

Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi DBS) is the most effective intervention for medically refractory segmental and generalized dystonia in both children and adults. Predictive factors for the degree of improvement after GPi DBS include shorter disease duration and dystonia subtype with idiopathic isolated dystonia usually responding better than acquired combined dystonias. Other factors contributing to variability in outcome may include body distribution, pattern of dystonia and DBS related factors such as lead placement and stimulation parameters. The responsiveness to DBS appears to vary between different monogenic forms of dystonia, with some improving more than others. The first observation in this regard was reports of superior DBS outcomes in DYT-TOR1A (DYT1) dystonia, although other studies have found no difference. Recently a subgroup with young onset DYT-TOR1A, more rapid progression and secondary worsening after effective GPi DBS, has been described. Myoclonus dystonia due to DYT-SCGE (DYT11) usually responds well to GPi DBS. Good outcomes following GPi DBS have also been documented in X-linked dystonia Parkinsonism (DYT3). In contrast, poorer, more variable DBS outcomes have been reported in DYT-THAP1 (DYT6) including a recent larger series. The outcome of GPi DBS in other monogenic isolated and combined dystonias including DYT-GNAL (DYT25), DYT-KMT2B (DYT28), DYT-ATP1A3 (DYT12), and DYT-ANO3 (DYT24) have been reported with varying results in smaller numbers of patients. In this article the available evidence for long term GPi DBS outcome between different genetic dystonias is reviewed to reappraise popular perceptions of expected outcomes and revisit whether genetic diagnosis may assist in predicting DBS outcome.

Bilateral Pallidotomy for Dystonia: A Systematic Review

Stereotactic lesioning of the bilateral globus pallidus (GPi) was one of the first surgical treatments for medication‐refractory dystonia but has largely been abandoned in clinical practice after the introduction of deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, some patients with dystonia are not eligible for DBS. Therefore, we reviewed the efficacy, safety, and sustainability of bilateral pallidotomy by conducting a systematic review of individual patient data (IPD). Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses and IPD were followed. In May 2020, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on outcome of bilateral pallidotomy for dystonia. If available, IPD were collected. In this systematic review, 100 patients from 33 articles were evaluated. Adverse events were reported in 20 patients (20%), of which 8 were permanent (8%). Pre‐and postoperative Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden Dystonia Rating Movement Scale scores were available for 53 patients. A clinically relevant improvement (>20%) of this score was found in 42 of 53 patients (79%). Twenty‐five patients with status dystonicus (SD) were described. In all but 2 the SD resolved after bilateral pallidotomy. Seven patients experienced a relapse of SD. Median‐reported follow‐up was 12 months (n = 83; range: 2–180 months). Based on the current literature, bilateral pallidotomy is an effective and relatively safe procedure for certain types of dystonia, particularly in medication‐refractory SD. Although due to publication bias the underreporting of negative outcomes is very likely, bilateral pallidotomy is a reasonable alternative to DBS in selected dystonia patients. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Unilateral pallidotomy as a potential rescue therapy for cervical dystonia after unsatisfactory selective peripheral denervation

OBJECTIVE

Selective peripheral denervation (SPD) is a widely accepted surgery for medically refractory cervical dystonia (CD), but when SPD has failed, the available approaches are limited. The authors investigated the results from a cohort of CD patients treated with unilateral pallidotomy after unsatisfactory SPD.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed patients with primary CD who underwent unilateral pallidotomy after SPD between April 2007 and August 2019. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) was used to evaluate symptom severity before surgery, 7 days postsurgery, 3 months postsurgery, and at the last follow-up. TWSTRS subscores for disability and pain and the 24-item Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24) were used to assess quality of life.

RESULTS

At a mean final follow-up of 5 years, TWSTRS severity subscores and total scores were significantly improved (n = 12, mean improvement 57.3% and 62.3%, respectively, p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0022), and 8 of 12 patients (66.7%) were characterized as responders (improvement ≥ 25%). Patients with rotation symptoms before pallidotomy showed greater improvement in TWSTRS severity subscores than those who did not (p = 0.049). The most common adverse event was mild upper-limb weakness (n = 3). Patients' quality of life was also improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral pallidotomy seems to offer an effective and safe option for patients with CD who have otherwise experienced limited benefits from SPD.

Radiofrequency Ablation Through Previously Effective Deep Brain Stimulation Leads for Parkinson Disease: A Retrospective Series

BACKGROUND

Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the surgical method of choice to treat the canonical symptoms of Parkinson disease, occasionally surgical sites become infected or the hardware erodes, necessitating explantation. Usual practice is to remove and reimplant replacement leads after tissue healing, leaving patients without the clinical benefits of DBS for several months, and at risk for DBS withdrawal in some, and some patients are no longer good surgical candidates for reimplantation. Radiofrequency ablation through the DBS lead is an option for these patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation of the STN or GPi through indwelling DBS leads performed before hardware removal at our institution. We generated patient-specific anatomic models to determine lesion locations and volumes.

RESULTS

Six patients underwent radiofrequency ablation of the STN (n = 4) and GPi (n = 2) through indwelling DBS leads. All 6 of these patients initially showed comparable motor symptom relief to that experienced with DBS before lesioning, with 4 patients sustaining meaningful long-term (≥2 years) improvement. Better outcomes were achieved in those patients with a higher percentage of the planned target lesioned.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation through indwelling DBS leads before explantation could be considered a viable alternative to subsequent reimplantation or stereotactic lesion in patients with Parkinson disease in whom hardware explantation is necessary, if the patient achieved substantive symptom relief with DBS. This approach avoids symptom exacerbation while awaiting revision surgery.

Ablative brain surgery: an overview

Background: Ablative therapies have been used for the treatment of neurological disorders for many years. They have been used both for creating therapeutic lesions within dysfunctional brain circuits and to destroy intracranial tumors and space-occupying masses. Despite the introduction of new effective drugs and neuromodulative techniques, which became more popular and subsequently caused brain ablation techniques to fall out favor, recent technological advances have led to the resurgence of lesioning with an improved safety profile. Currently, the four main ablative techniques that are used for ablative brain surgery are radiofrequency thermoablation, stereotactic radiosurgery, laser interstitial thermal therapy and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thermal ablation. Object: To review the physical principles underlying brain ablative therapies and to describe their use for neurological disorders. Methods: The literature regarding the neurosurgical applications of brain ablative therapies has been reviewed. Results: Ablative treatments have been used for several neurological disorders, including movement disorders, psychiatric disorders, chronic pain, drug-resistant epilepsy and brain tumors. Conclusions: There are several ongoing efforts to use novel ablative therapies directed towards the brain. The recent development of techniques that allow for precise targeting, accurate delivery of thermal doses and real-time visualization of induced tissue damage during the procedure have resulted in novel techniques for cerebral ablation such as magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound or laser interstitial thermal therapy. However, older techniques such as radiofrequency thermal ablation or stereotactic radiosurgery still have a pivotal role in the management of a variety of neurological disorders.

Cerebellar Deep Brain Stimulation for Acquired Hemidystonia

Background

The cerebellum's role in dystonia is increasingly recognized. Dystonia can be a disabling and refractory condition; deep brain stimulation can help many patients, but it is traditionally less effective in acquired dystonia. New surgical targets would be instrumental in providing treatment options and understanding dystonia further.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the cerebellum in acquired dystonia.

Methods

We report our management of a 37-year-old woman with severe left arm and leg dystonia, a complication of an ischemic stroke in childhood. She had already had 2 thalamotomies with only transient benefit. These procedures, in addition to her initial stroke that had damaged the basal ganglia, left traditional deep brain stimulation targets unavailable.

Results

After implantation of bilateral deep cerebellar nuclei, dystonia improved with a 40% reduction in severity on scales and subjective reports of improved posturing, gait, and pain. This improvement has been maintained for almost 2 years after implantation.

Conclusion

Cerebellar stimulation has potential for therapeutic benefit in acquired dystonia and should be further explored.

Deep brain stimulation for cerebral palsy: where are we now?

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a complex disorder and children frequently have multiple impairments. Dystonia is a particularly frustrating impairment that interferes with rehabilitation and function and is difficult to treat. Of the available treatments, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as an option with the potential for large effect size in a subgroup of children. While brain stimulation has been used in CP for more than 40 years, modern devices and targeting methods are improving both the safety and efficacy of the procedure. Successful use of DBS depends on appropriate selection of patients, identification of effective neuroanatomical targets in each patient, careful neurosurgical procedure, and detailed follow-up evaluation and programming. The use of functional neurosurgery for neuromodulation in CP remains a technology in its infancy, but improving experience and knowledge are likely to make this one of the safest and most effective interventions for children with moderate-to-severe motor disorders. This review summarizes the current procedures for patient and target selection, and surgical implantation of DBS electrodes for CP. The history of DBS and future directions when used in secondary dystonia are also examined. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Selection of candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires understanding of dystonia in cerebral palsy . DBS could become a first-line treatment option in some children.

Clinical phenotypes associated with outcomes following deep brain stimulation for childhood dystonia

OBJECTIVE

Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an accepted treatment for childhood dystonia, there is significant heterogeneity in treatment response and few data are available to identify ideal surgical candidates.

METHODS

Data were derived from a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of DBS for dystonia in children that was previously published. Outcomes were assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale for movement (BFMDRS-M) and for disability (BFMDRS-D). The authors used partial least squares, bootstrapping, and permutation statistics to extract patterns of contributions of specific preoperative characteristics to relationship with distinct outcomes, in all patients and in patients with primary and secondary dystonia separately.

RESULTS

Of 301 children undergoing DBS for dystonia, 167 had primary dystonia, 125 secondary dystonia, and 9 myoclonus dystonia. Three dissociable preoperative phenotypes (latent variables) were identified and associated with the following: 1) BFMDRS-M at last follow-up; 2) relative change in BFMDRS-M score; and 3) relative change in BFMDRS-D score. The phenotype of patients with secondary dystonia, with a high BFMDRS-M score and truncal involvement, undergoing DBS at a younger age, was associated with a worse postoperative BFMDRS-M score. Children with primary dystonia involving the trunk had greater improvement in BFMDRS-M and -D scores. Those with primary dystonia of shorter duration and proportion of life with disease, undergoing globus pallidus DBS, had greater improvements in BFMDRS-D scores at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In a comprehensive, data-driven, multivariate analysis of DBS for childhood dystonia, the authors identified novel and dissociable patient phenotypes associated with distinct outcomes. The findings of this report may inform surgical candidacy for DBS.

Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Movement Disorders: Current Concepts and Evidence-Based Strategies

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the treatment of choice for advanced stages of Parkinson's disease, medically intractable essential tremor, and complicated segmental and generalized dystonia. In addition to accurate electrode placement in the target area, effective programming of DBS devices is considered the most important factor for the individual outcome after DBS. Programming of the implanted pulse generator (IPG) is the only modifiable factor once DBS leads have been implanted and it becomes even more relevant in cases in which the electrodes are located at the border of the intended target structure and when side effects become challenging. At present, adjusting stimulation parameters depends to a large extent on personal experience. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we here summarize previous studies that examined the significance of distinct stimulation strategies for ameliorating disease signs and symptoms. We assess the effect of adjusting the stimulus amplitude (A), frequency (f), and pulse width (pw) on clinical symptoms and examine more recent techniques for modulating neuronal elements by electrical stimulation, such as interleaving (Medtronic®) or directional current steering (Boston Scientific®, Abbott®). We thus provide an evidence-based strategy for achieving the best clinical effect with different disorders and avoiding adverse effects in DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the ventro-intermedius nucleus (VIM), and the globus pallidus internus (GPi).

Despite dystonia: natural history of delayed-onset pediatric secondary dystonia

Background: Dystonia is a movement disorder involving involuntary movements and/or postures of the limbs, trunk, neck or face. Secondary dystonia following brain injury is uncommon, with unfavorable long-term consequences. Given the limited evidence regarding pediatric secondary dystonia, this study's aim was to document the natural history of the condition and the effect of interventions on its symptomatology. Methods: We describe three cases of girls (age 8 to 11 y) who developed dystonia secondary to an acquired brain injury, received intensive rehabilitation treatments and were followed for 8-33 months post-injury. In all three cases, secondary dystonia appeared 1-3 months post-insult. Results: In none of the cases was there alleviation of dystonic symptoms over time despite physical and pharmacological interventions; in two cases the dystonic hand is now used as an assisting hand only, whereas in the third it is completely non-functional. However, despite their impairment, two girls achieved basic functional independence and one is partly independent in activities of daily living. Conclusions: Rehabilitation professionals who work with pediatric patients susceptible to developing secondary dystonia should be aware of its possible consequences and inform families and staff. Intensive task-specific training during rehabilitation may be key to regaining overall functional capabilities despite residual impairment.

Long-term Outcome of Globus Pallidus Internus Stimulation for Pisa Syndrome

Pisa syndrome, defined as dystonia leading to lateral flexion of the spine, is an increasingly recognized complicating factor in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Symptoms may persist despite medical therapy, or medical therapy may not be tolerated due to adverse effects. Here, we demonstrate the long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the globus pallidus internus (GPi) for the treatment of Pisa syndrome. One patient with Pisa syndrome and Parkinson disease underwent bilateral GPi DBS with computed tomography (CT)-and microelectrode-based guidance. Follow-up with neurosurgery and neurology was done over a four-year period. The patient’s axial deformity decreased from approximately 45 to 25 degrees, and he reported significant relief from back pain. Bilateral GPi DBS is a safe and effective option for Pisa syndrome in patients with PD.

Deep brain stimulation for pediatric dystonia: a meta-analysis with individual participant data

AIM

We performed a meta-analysis with individual participant data of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for dystonia in children and young people.

METHOD

Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) were queried from January 1999 to August 2017 with no language restrictions to identify case studies and cohort studies reporting on pediatric patients (age ≤21y) with dystonia. The primary outcomes were changes in Burke-Fahn-Marsden (BFM) or Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale scores. A mixed-effects regression was used to identify associations between clinical covariates and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 2509 citations reviewed, 72 articles (321 children) were eligible. At last follow-up (median 12mo, 25th centile=9.0; 75th centile=32.2), 277 (86.3%) patients showed improvement in dystonia, while 66.1 percent showed clinically significant (>20%) BFM Dystonia Rating Scale-motor improvement. On multivariable hierarchical regression, older age at dystonia onset, inherited dystonia without nervous system pathology and idiopathic dystonia (vs inherited with nervous system pathology or acquired dystonia), and truncal involvement indicated a better outcome (p<0.05).

INTERPRETATION

The data suggest that DBS is effective and should be considered in selected children with inherited or idiopathic dystonia.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Deep brain stimulation is effective in selected children with inherited or idiopathic dystonia.

Neurosurgical Management of Spastic Conditions of the Upper Extremity

Spasticity is a hypertonic segmental reflex pathway caused by a central nervous system injury. Spasticity of the upper extremity causes loss of function, joint contracture, pain, and poor cosmesis. Treatment aims to reduce or change the pathophysiology underlying the hyperactive reflex from dorsal sensory rootlets through the intrinsic machinery of the spinal cord to the neuromuscular junction. There are many treatments for upper extremity spasticity including oral medication, physiotherapy, intrathecal baclofen, and lesional or neuromodulatory surgical approaches. Goals of treatment must always be clearly defined, but neurosurgical management is most effective when paired with multidisciplinary therapies and caregiver participation.