Stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic brain tumors: a comprehensive review of complications

Contemporary strategies in glioblastoma therapy: Recent developments and innovations

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represents one of the most prevailing and aggressive primary brain tumors among adults. Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, the complex microenvironment of GBM poses significant challenges in its optimal therapy, which are attributed to immune evasion, tumor repopulation by stem cells, and limited drug penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising avenue for GBM treatment, offering biosafety, sustained drug release, enhanced solubility, and improved BBB penetrability. In this review, a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems for GBM therapy is emphasized. The conventional and novel treatment modalities for GBM and the potential of nanocarriers to overcome existing limitations are comprehensively covered. Furthermore, the updates in the clinical landscape of GBM therapeutics are presented in addition to the current status of drugs and patents in the same context. Through a critical evaluation of existing literature, the therapeutic prospect and limitations of nanocarrier-based drug delivery strategies are highlighted offering insights into future research directions and clinical translation.

Surgery of enlarging lesions after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with oncogenic driver mutations frequently reveals radiation necrosis: case series and review

In brain metastases, radiation necrosis (RN) is a complication that arises after single or multiple fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS/FSRS), which is challenging to distinguish from local recurrence (LR). Studies have shown increased RN incidence rates in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oncogenic driver mutations (ODMs) or receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study investigated enlarging brain lesions following SRS/FSRS, for which additional surgeries were performed to distinguish between RN and LR. We investigated seven NSCLC patients with ODMs undergoing SRS/FSRS for BM and undergoing surgery for suspicion of LR on MRI imaging. Descriptive statistics were performed. Among the seven patients, six were EGFR+, while one was ALK+. The median irradiation dose was 30 Gy (range, 20-35 Gy). The median time to develop RN after SRS/FSRS was 11.1 months (range: 6.3-31.2 months). Moreover, gradually enlarging lesions were found in all patients after 6 months post-SRS/FSR. Brain radiation necrosis was pathologically confirmed in all the patients. RN should be suspected in NSCLC patients when lesions keep enlarging after 6 months post-SRS/FSRS, especially for patients with ODMs and receiving TKIs. Further, this case series indicates that further dose reduction might be necessary to avoid RN for such patients.

High-precision stereotactic irradiation for focal drug-resistant epilepsy versus standard treatment: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial (the PRECISION trial)

INTRODUCTION

The standard treatment for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are not eligible for open brain surgery is the continuation of anti-seizure medication (ASM) and neuromodulation. This treatment does not cure epilepsy but only decreases severity. The PRECISION trial offers a non-invasive, possibly curative intervention for these patients, which consist of a single stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment. Previous studies have shown promising results of SRT in this patient population. Nevertheless, this intervention is not yet available and reimbursed in the Netherlands. We hypothesize that: SRT is a superior treatment option compared to palliative standard of care, for patients with focal DRE, not eligible for open surgery, resulting in a higher reduction of seizure frequency (with 50% of the patients reaching a 75% seizure frequency reduction at 2 years follow-up).

METHODS

In this waitlist-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive SRT as the intervention, while the standard treatments consist of ASM continuation and neuromodulation. After 2-year follow-up, patients randomized for the standard treatment (waitlist-control group) are offered SRT. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with focal DRE and a pretreatment defined epileptogenic zone (EZ) not eligible for open surgery will be included. The intervention is a LINAC-based single fraction (24 Gy) SRT treatment. The target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non) invasive examinations. The seizure frequency will be monitored on a daily basis using an electronic diary and an automatic seizure detection system during the night. Potential side effects are evaluated using advanced MRI, cognitive evaluation, Common Toxicity Criteria, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the SRT treatment will be evaluated.

DISCUSSION

This is the first randomized trial comparing SRT with standard of care in patients with DRE, non-eligible for open surgery. The primary objective is to determine whether SRT significantly reduces the seizure frequency 2 years after treatment. The results of this trial can influence the current clinical practice and medical cost reimbursement in the Netherlands for patients with focal DRE who are not eligible for open surgery, providing a non-invasive curative treatment option.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05182437. Registered on September 27, 2021.

Porcine-human glioma xenograft model. Immunosuppression and model reproducibility

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant and treatment-resistant human brain tumor. Rodent models have played an important role in understanding brain cancer biology and treatment. However, due to their small cranium and tumor volume mismatch, relative to human disease, they have been less useful for translational studies. Therefore, development of a consistent and simple large animal glioma xenograft model would have significant translational benefits.

METHODS

Immunosuppression was induced in twelve standard Yucatan minipigs. 3 pigs received cyclosporine only, while 9 pigs received a combined regimen including cyclosporine (55 mg/kg q12 h), prednisone (25 mg, q24 h) and mycophenolate (500 mg q24 h). U87 cells (2 × 106) were stereotactically implanted into the left frontal cortex. The implanted brains were imaged by MRI for monitoring. In a separate study, tumors were grown in 5 additional pigs using the combined regimen, and pigs underwent tumor resection with intra-operative image updating to determine if the xenograft model could accurately capture the spatial tumor resection challenges seen in humans.

RESULTS

Tumors were successfully implanted and grown in 11 pigs. One animal in cyclosporine only group failed to show clinical tumor growth. Clinical tumor growth, assessed by MRI, progressed slowly over the first 10 days, then rapidly over the next 10 days. The average tumor growth latency period was 20 days. Animals were monitored twice daily and detailed records were kept throughout the experimental period. Pigs were sacrificed humanely when the tumor reached 1 - 2 cm. Some pigs experienced decreased appetite and activity, however none required premature euthanasia. In the image updating study, all five pigs demonstrated brain shift after craniotomy, consistent with what is observed in humans. Intraoperative image updating was able to accurately capture and correct for this shift in all five pigs.

CONCLUSION

This report demonstrates the development and use of a human intracranial glioma model in an immunosuppressed, but nongenetically modified pig. While the immunosuppression of the model may limit its utility in certain studies, the model does overcome several limitations of small animal or genetically modified models. For instance, we demonstrate use of this model for guiding surgical resection with intraoperative image-updating technologies. We further report use of a surrogate extracranial tumor that indicates growth of the intracranial tumor, allowing for relative growth assessment without radiological imaging.

Early tumor-related hemorrhage after stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: Systematic review of reported cases

OBJECTIVE

Early (within 72 h) tumor-related hemorrhage (TRH) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) has been reported only occasionally. Systematic review of such cases was done.

METHODS

Literature search was performed through PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines using combination of the following medical subject headings: "hemorrhage," "stereotactic radiosurgery," and "brain metastasis."

RESULTS

In total, 7 case reports and 8 clinical series, which noted early TRH after SRS of BM were identified. Scarce and inconsistent data precluded their precise synthesis and statistical analysis. BM of renal cell carcinoma comprised around one-third of reported cases. In 4 patients with multiple BM, TRH after SRS was noted simultaneously in several irradiated tumors. Considering 17 reported cases overall, in 3 patients TRH occurred during SRS session itself, in 4 within several minutes upon completion of treatment, in 7 within several hours thereafter, and in 3 on the third posttreatment day. Out of 11 reported cases providing detailed outcome, 6 patients died shortly after the ictus, 2 others were severely disabled at discharge, and 3 demonstrated good-to-moderate recovery. Overall, among evaluated series the median rates of early TRH after SRS for BM were 0.8% per patient (range, 0.4 - 1.9%) and 0.3% per tumor (range, 0.05 - 0.8%).

CONCLUSION

Early TRH is very rare, but potentially life-threatening complication of SRS for BM; thus, its risk (while extremely low) and possible consequences should be discussed at the time of obtaining informed consent.

Evaluation of inverse treatment planning for gamma knife radiosurgery using fMRI brain activation maps as organs at risk

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be an effective primary or adjuvant treatment option for intracranial tumors. However, it carries risks of various radiation toxicities, which can lead to functional deficits for the patients. Current inverse planning algorithms for SRS provide an efficient way for sparing organs at risk (OARs) by setting maximum radiation dose constraints in the treatment planning process.

PURPOSE

We propose using activation maps from functional MRI (fMRI) to map the eloquent regions of the brain and define functional OARs (fOARs) for Gamma Knife SRS treatment planning.

METHODS

We implemented a pipeline for analyzing patient fMRI data, generating fOARs from the resulting activation maps, and loading them onto the GammaPlan treatment planning software. We used the Lightning inverse planner to generate multiple treatment plans from open MRI data of five subjects, and evaluated the effects of incorporating the proposed fOARs.

RESULTS

The Lightning optimizer designs treatment plans with high conformity to the specified parameters. Setting maximum dose constraints on fOARs successfully limits the radiation dose incident on them, but can have a negative impact on treatment plan quality metrics. By masking out fOAR voxels surrounding the tumor target it is possible to achieve high quality treatment plans while controlling the radiation dose on fOARs.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method can effectively reduce the radiation dose incident on the eloquent brain areas during Gamma Knife SRS of brain tumors.

Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, carries a low incidence of acute toxicities: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on acute toxicities after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and nature of toxicities immediately after SRT using a linear accelerator.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 315 patients with brain metastases treated with SRT at our institution between May 2019 and February 2022. In total, 439 SRT sessions were performed for 2161 brain metastases. The outcome of interest was immediate side effects (ISEs), defined as new or worsening symptoms occurring during SRT or within 14 days after the end of SRT.

RESULTS

Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 ISEs occurred in 16 (3.6%) and 7 (1.6%) cases, respectively. Among 63 treatments for 10 or more lesions (range: 10-40), 1 (1.6%) ISE occurred. Among 22 treatments for lesions with a maximum tumor volume of > 10 cc, 2 (9.1%) ISEs occurred. Grade ≥ 3 ISEs included 1, 4, 1, and 1 cases of grade 3 nausea, grade 3 new-onset partial and generalized seizures, grade 3 obstructive hydrocephalus, and grade 5 intracranial hemorrhage, respectively. ISEs were more common in patients with a larger maximum tumor volume, primary sites other than lung and breast cancer, and pre-treatment neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSION

SRT using a linear accelerator for brain metastases, including multiple and large lesions, is safe, with a low incidence of ISEs. Serious complications immediately after SRT are rare but possible; therefore, careful follow-up is necessary after treatment initiation.

Advances in Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases

Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone treatment of brain metastases. With new treatment advances, patients with brain metastases are living longer, and finding solutions for mitigating treatment-related neurotoxicity and improving quality of life is important. Historically, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was widely used but treatment options such as hippocampal sparing WBRT and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have emerged as promising alternatives. Herein, we discuss the recent advances in radiotherapy for brain metastases including the sparing of critical structures that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcomes (eg, hippocampus, fornix) that may improve long-term neurocognitive outcome, evidence supporting preoperative and fractionated-SRS, and treatment strategies for managing radiation necrosis.

Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: Factors Affecting Outcomes and Radiation Necrosis

Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is a proven effective treatment for brain metastases (BM); however, symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) is a late effect that may impact on patient’s quality of life. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate survival outcomes and characterize the occurrence of RN in a cohort of BM patients treated with ablative SRT at Federico II University Hospital. Clinical and dosimetric factors of 87 patients bearing a total of 220 BMs treated with SRT from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. Among them, 46 patients with 127 BMs having clinical and MRI follow-up (FUP) ≥ 6 months were selected for RN evaluation. Dosimetric parameters of the uninvolved brain (brain without GTV) were extracted. The crude local control was 91% with neither clinical factors nor prescription dose correlating with local failure (LF). At a median FUP of 9 (1–68) months, the estimated median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and brain progression-free survival (bPFS) were 16, 6, and 9 months, respectively. The estimated OS rates at 1 and 3 years were 59.8% and 18.3%, respectively; bPFS at 1 and 3 years was 29.9% and 13.5%, respectively; PFS at 1 and 3 years was 15.7% and 0%, respectively; and local failure-free survival (LFFS) at 1 and 3 years was 87.2% and 83.8%, respectively. Extracranial disease status was an independent factor related to OS. Fourteen (30%) patients manifested RN. At multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma histology, left location, and absence of chemotherapy were confirmed as independent risk factors for any-grade RN. Nine (20%) patients developed symptomatic (G2) RN, which improved or stabilized after 1–16 months of steroid therapy. With prompt recognition and, when necessary, medical therapy, RN radiological and clinical amelioration can be obtained.

Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery-Related Radiation Necrosis in Patients with Intracranial Metastasis from Melanoma

Background:

Radiation necrosis (RN) is a clinically relevant complication of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial metastasis (ICM) treatments. Radiation necrosis development is variable following SRS. It remains unclear if risk factors for and clinical outcomes following RN may be different for melanoma patients. We reviewed patients with ICM from metastatic melanoma to understand the potential impact of RN in this patient population.

Methods:

Patients who received SRS for ICM from melanoma at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, radiation parameters, prior surgical and systemic treatments, and patient outcomes. Radiation necrosis was diagnosed by clinical evaluation including brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, in some cases, tissue evaluation.

Results:

Radiation necrosis was diagnosed in 7 (27%) of 26 patients at 1.6 to 38 months following initial SRS. Almost 92% of all patients received systemic therapy and 35% had surgical resection prior to SRS. Patients with RN trended toward having larger ICM and a prior history of surgical resection, although statistical significance was not reached. Among patients with resection, those who developed RN had a longer period between surgery and SRS start (mean 44 vs 33 days). Clinical improvement following treatment for RN was noted in 2 (29%) patients.

Conclusions:

Radiation necrosis is relatively common following SRS for treatment of ICM from metastatic melanoma and clinical outcomes are poor. Further studies aimed at mitigating RN development and identifying novel approaches for treatment are warranted.

Management of brain tumour related epilepsy (BTRE): a narrative review and therapy recommendations

Brain Tumour Related Epilepsy (BTRE) has a significant impact on Quality of Life with implications for driving, employment, and social activities. Management of BTRE is complex due to the higher incidence of drug resistance and the potential for interaction between anti-cancer therapy and anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Neurologists, neurosurgeons, oncologists, palliative care physicians and clinical nurse specialists treating these patients would benefit from up-to-date clinical guidelines. We aim to review the current literature and to outline specific recommendations for the optimal treatment of BTRE, encompassing both Primary Brain Tumours (PBT) and Brain Metastases (BM). A comprehensive search of the literature since 1995 on BTRE was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMCARE. A broad search strategy was used, and the evidence evaluated and graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. Seizure frequency varies between 10 and 40% in patients with Brain Metastases (BM) and from 30% (high-grade gliomas) to 90% (low-grade gliomas) in patients with PBT. In patients with BM, risk factors include number of BM and melanoma histology. In patients with PBT, BTRE is more common in patients with lower grade histology, frontal and temporal tumours, presence of an IDH mutation and cortical infiltration. All patients with BTRE should be treated with ASMs. Non-enzyme inducing ASMs are recommended as first line treatment for BTRE, but up to 50% of patients with BTRE due to PBT remain resistant. There is no proven benefit for the use of prophylactic ASMs, although there are no randomised trials testing newer agents. Surgical and oncological treatments i.e. radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve BTRE. Vagus Nerve Stimulation has been used with partial success. The review highlights the relative dearth of high-quality evidence for the management of BTRE and provides a framework for further studies aiming to improve seizure control, quality of life, and indications for ASMs.KEY POINTSOffer levetiracetam or lamotrigine to all patients with primary or metastatic brain tumours who have seizure(s), irrespective of whether these are partial or generalised.ASM withdrawal for patients in remission is not recommended due to high rates of seizure recurrence.ASM prophylaxis is not generally recommended in the management of seizure-naïve patients.Both levetiracetam and lamotrigine are safe in pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Direct dosimetric comparison of linear accelerator vs. Gamma Knife fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain tumors

The purpose of this study was to directly compare the plan quality of Gamma Knife (GK) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden)- vs linear accelerator (LINAC)-based delivery techniques for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain metastases. Eighteen patients with clinical target volumes (CTVs) larger than 9.5 cc were selected to generate comparative plans for the prescription dose of 9 Gy × 3 fractions, utilizing the Eclipse (Varian, Palo Alto, US) vs Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) treatment planning systems (TPS). Each GK plan was first developed using LGP's automatic planning, followed by manual adjustments/refinements. The same MRI and structures, including CTVs and organs at risk, were then DICOM-transferred to the Eclipse TPS. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Dynamic Conformal Arc (DCA) plans for a Truebeam, with high-definition multi-leaf collimators (MLCs), were developed on these MR images and structures using a single isocenter and 3 non-coplanar arcs. No planning target volume (PTV) margins were added, and no heterogeneity correction was used for either TPS. GK plans were prescribed to the 50% isodose line, and Eclipse VMAT and DCA plans allowed a maximum dose up to 170% and ∼125%, respectively. Gradient index (GI), Paddick Conformity Index (PCI), V_20GyRind, and V_4GyRind of all 3 techniques were calculated and compared. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine the statistical significance of the differences of these planning indices for the 3 planning techniques. A total of eighteen treatment targets were analyzed. Median CTV volume was 14.4 cc (range 9.5 cc - 55.9 cc). Mean ± standard deviation of PCI were 0.85 ± 0.03, 0.90 ± 0.03, and 0.72 ± 0.11 for GK, VMAT and DCA plans, respectively. They were respectively 2.64 ± 0.17, 2.46 ± 0.18, and 2.83 ± 0.48 for GI; 15.33 ± 8.45 cc, 10.47 ± 4.32 cc and 23.51 ± 16 cc for V_20GyRind; and 316.28 ± 138.35 cc, 317.81 ± 108.21 cc, and 394.85 ± 142.16 cc for V_4GyRind. The differences were statistically significant with p < 0.01 for all indices, except for V_4GyRind (p > 0.129). In conclusion, a direct dosimetric comparison using the same MRI scan and contours was performed to evaluate the plan quality of various fSRT delivery techniques for CTV > 9.5 cc. LINAC VMAT plans provided the best dosimetric outcome in regard to PCI, GI, and V_20GyRind. GK outcomes were similar to LINAC VMAT plans while LINAC DCA outcomes were significantly worse. Even though GK has a smaller physical penumbra, LINAC VMAT outperformed GK in this study due to enhanced penumbra sharpening and better beam optimization.

Laser hyperthermia: Past, present, and future

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an ablative procedure using heat from a laser to provide cytoreduction in tissue. It is a minimally invasive procedure that has been used in intracranial pathologies such as high-grade gliomas, metastatic lesions, epilepsy, and other lesions. While LITT may offer a more acceptable complication profile compared to open surgery, the role of laser therapy for intracranial lesions in current treatment paradigms continues to evolve. This review will focus on the background and application of LITT, the current evidence for its use, and future directions for the technology.

Application of C-Terminal Clostridium Perfringens Enterotoxin in Treatment of Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer

Claudin-4 is part of the Claudin family of transmembrane tight junction (TJ) proteins found in almost all tissues and, together with adherens junctions and desmosomes, forms epithelial and endothelial junctional complexes. Although the distribution of Claudin-4 occurs in many cell types, the level of expression is cell-specific. Claudin proteins regulate cell proliferation and differentiation by binding cell-signaling ligands, and its expression is upregulated in several cancers. As a result, alterations in Claudin expression patterns or distribution are vital in the pathology of cancer. Profiling the genetic expression of Claudin-4 showed that Claudin-4 is also a receptor for the clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE) and that Claudin-4 has a high sequence similarity with CPE's high-affinity receptor. CPE is cytolytic due to its ability to form pores in cellular membranes, and CPE treatment in breast cancer cells have shown promising results due to the high expression of Claudin-4. The C-terminal fragment of CPE (c-CPE) provides a less toxic alternative for drug delivery into breast cancer cells, particularly metastatic tumors in the brain, especially as Claudin-4 expression in the central nervous system (CNS) is low. Therefore, c-CPE provides a unique avenue for the treatment of breast-brain metastatic tumors.

Recurrence benefit from supramarginal resection in brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma

Background

There is growing evidence that brain metastases (BM) have no well-defined boundaries and that conventional microsurgical circumferential dissection of BM is often inadequate to prevent local tumor recurrence. Previous studies have suggested that supramarginal resection can significantly improve local tumor control. We retrospectively analyzed the local tumor control in a series of patients with BM from lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with BM for lung adenocarcinoma in Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital from May 2015 to May 2020. 26 resected lesions were located in eloquent areas and underwent standard gross total resection (GTR group); 22 resected lesions were located in ineloquent areas, after standard gross total resection, the periphery was expanded and resected by 5 mm (MTR group). The postoperative tumor recurrence was compared between the two groups.

Results

During the follow-up period, the local recurrence rates in the GTR group and the MTR group were 61.5% and 27.3% (p = 0.022), respectively. Within 6 months after surgery, the local recurrence rates in the GTR group and the MTR group were 42.3% and 13.6% (p = 0.029), respectively. Within 12 months after surgery, the local recurrence rates in the GTR group and the MTR group were 57.7% and 22.7% (p = 0.014), respectively. The median progression-free survival time after surgery was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.0–10.0 months) in the GTR group and 14.0 months (95% CI 11.4–16.6 months) in the MTR group (Log-Rank p = 0.008). Compared with the MTR group, the HR of local recurrence in the GTR group was 3.74 (95% CI 1.38–10.39, p = 0.010). Cox multivariable analysis showed no other factors associated with local recurrence except for the surgical method (p = 0.012).

Conclusions

On the basis of conventional surgical total resection, expanded peripheral resection of 5 mm around the brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma can significantly reduce the local recurrence rate and prolongs the progression-free survival time.

Drug Delivery Systems in the Development of Novel Strategies for Glioblastoma Treatment

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a grade IV glioma considered the most fatal cancer of the central nervous system (CNS), with less than a 5% survival rate after five years. The tumor heterogeneity, the high infiltrative behavior of its cells, and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) that limits the access of therapeutic drugs to the brain are the main reasons hampering the current standard treatment efficiency. Following the tumor resection, the infiltrative remaining GBM cells, which are resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, can further invade the surrounding brain parenchyma. Consequently, the development of new strategies to treat parenchyma-infiltrating GBM cells, such as vaccines, nanotherapies, and tumor cells traps including drug delivery systems, is required. For example, the chemoattractant CXCL12, by binding to its CXCR4 receptor, activates signaling pathways that play a critical role in tumor progression and invasion, making it an interesting therapeutic target to properly control the direction of GBM cell migration for treatment proposes. Moreover, the interstitial fluid flow (IFF) is also implicated in increasing the GBM cell migration through the activation of the CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling pathway. However, due to its complex and variable nature, the influence of the IFF on the efficiency of drug delivery systems is not well understood yet. Therefore, this review discusses novel drug delivery strategies to overcome the GBM treatment limitations, focusing on chemokines such as CXCL12 as an innovative approach to reverse the migration of infiltrated GBM. Furthermore, recent developments regarding in vitro 3D culture systems aiming to mimic the dynamic peritumoral environment for the optimization of new drug delivery technologies are highlighted.

Preclinical cerebral cryoablation in non-tumor bearing pigs

Patients with brain metastases, the most common intracranial tumor, have an average survival ranging from a few months to 40 months, and new treatment initiatives are needed. Cryoablation is a minimally invasive, well-tolerated, and effective procedure commonly applied for treatment of renal tumors and certain other malignancies. We aimed to examine the clinical usefulness of this procedure in a step-by-step program starting with cerebral cryoablation in healthy pigs. In four terminal and four non-terminal non-tumor bearing pigs, we studied immediate and delayed effects of cerebral cryoablation. Safety was assessed by computed tomography (CT), and clinical observation of behavior, neurological deficits, and wellbeing. Effects were assessed by histological and immuno-histochemical analyses addressing structural and metabolic changes supported by additional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) in the non-terminal animals. Using CT-guidance, cryoablation probes were successfully inserted without complications, and ice formation could be monitored real-time with CT. No animal developed neurological deficits or signs of discomfort. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses, MRI, and PET revealed profound structural and biological damage within the lesion. MRI and PET revealed no long-term damage to healthy tissue outside the cryoablation zone. Cerebral cryoablation appears to be a feasible, safe, and controllable procedure that can be monitored successfully with CT. The net effect is a dead brain lesion without damage of either nearby or remote healthy structures. Immediate changes are local hemorrhage and edema; delayed effects are perfusion defects, immune system activation, and astrogliosis.

Technical note: A spiral fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging technique for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning for trigeminal neuralgia

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used in treatment planning for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of trigeminal neuralgia (TN). With current MRI techniques, the delineation of the trigeminal nerve root entry zone (REZ) may be degraded due to poor contrast and artifacts. The purpose of this work is to develop an MRI technique with better delineation of the trigeminal nerve REZ to improve SRS treatment planning for TN.

METHODS

A spiral fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI technique was developed to improve image quality by improving tissue contrast, fluid suppression, artifact reduction, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A concomitant-phase compensation method based on spiral gradient waveforms was implemented to minimize artifacts due to magnetic field change induced by the metal frame used in Gamma Knife treatment planning. The image quality of spiral FLAIR was assessed in four healthy volunteers. The geometric accuracy was quantitatively evaluated by registering spiral FLAIR to computed tomography (CT) images and comparing it with existing MRI techniques.

RESULTS

The spiral FLAIR technique demonstrated better delineation of the trigeminal nerve REZ, improved tissue contrast of the brain stem, and minimized flow artifacts, compared to steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRI. Spiral FLAIR also improved fluid suppression, SNR, and artifacts, which contributed to better delineation of the trigeminal nerve REZ compared to conventional Cartesian FLAIR. The measured mean (± standard deviation) distance between spiral FLAIR and CT images is 0.98 ± 0.56 mm, comparable to 0.40 ± 0.26 mm in 3T T1 spoiled gradient echo (T1-SPGR), 0.59 ± 0.25 mm in 3T SSFP, 0.66 ± 0.38 mm in 1.5T T1-SPGR, and 0.61 ± 0.25 mm in 1.5T Cartesian FLAIR.

CONCLUSION

A spiral FLAIR technique with improved image quality and good geometric accuracy provides a potential alternative for treatment planning in SRS for TN patients.

Second window ICG predicts gross-total resection and progression-free survival during brain metastasis surgery

OBJECTIVE

Metastases are the most common intracranial malignancies and complete resection can provide relief of neurological symptoms and reduce recurrence. The authors' prospective pilot study in 2017 demonstrated promising results for the application of high-dose, delayed imaging of indocyanine green (ICG), known as second window ICG (SWIG), in patients undergoing surgery for brain metastases. In this prospective cohort study, the authors evaluated intraoperative imaging and clinical outcomes of treatment using SWIG.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively enrolled in an approved study of high-dose, delayed ICG (SWIG) and received 5 mg/kg (2014-2018) or 2.5 mg/kg (2018-2019) ICG 24 hours preoperatively. Intraoperatively, near-infrared (NIR) imaging was performed using a dedicated NIR exoscope. NIR images were analyzed and the signal-to-background ratio (SBR) was calculated to quantify fluorescence. Residual fluorescence on the postresection NIR view was compared and correlated to the residual gadolinium enhancement on postoperative MRI. Patient survival and predictive factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 51 intracranial metastases were surgically treated in 47 patients in this cohort. All 51 metastatic tumors demonstrated strong NIR fluorescence (mean SBR 4.9). In tumors ≤ 10 mm from the cortical surface, SWIG with 5 mg/kg ICG produced enhanced transdural tumor visibility (91.3%) compared to 2.5 mg/kg (52.9%; p = 0.0047). Neoplastic margin detection using NIR fluorescence compared to white light improved sensitivity, albeit lowered specificity; however, increasing the SBR cutoff for positive fluorescence significantly improved specificity without sacrificing sensitivity, increasing the overall accuracy from 57.5% to 72.5%. A lack of residual NIR fluorescence after resection was closely correlated with a lack of residual enhancement on postoperative MRI (p = 0.007). Among the 16 patients in whom tumor recurred at the site of surgery, postoperative MRI successfully predicted 8 cases, whereas the postresection NIR view predicted 12 cases. Progression-free survival rate at 12 months was greater for patients without residual NIR fluorescence (38%) than for those without residual enhancement on postoperative MRI (29%).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates the clinical benefits of the SWIG technique in surgery for patients with brain metastases. Specifically, this technique allows for dose-dependent, transdural localization of neoplasms and improved sensitivity in neoplastic margin detection. Postresection residual fluorescence can be a powerful tool to evaluate extent of resection in conjunction with MRI, and it may guide decisions on brain metastasis management.

Single- and hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large (> 2 cm) brain metastases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Since frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) techniques have been recently introduced, hypofractionated SRS (HF-SRS) for large brain metastases (BMs) is gradually increasing. To verify the efficacy and safety of HF-SRS for large BMs, we aimed to perform a systematic review and compared them with SF-SRS.

METHODS

We systematically searched the studies regarding SF-SRS or HF-SRS for large (> 2 cm) BM from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on July 31, 2018. Biologically effective dose with the α/β ratio of 10 (BED₁₀), 1-year local control (LC), and radiation necrosis (RN) were compared between the two groups, with the studies being weighted by the sample size.

RESULTS

The 15 studies with 1049 BMs that described 1-year LC and RN were included. HF-SRS tended to be performed in larger tumors; however, higher mean BED₁₀ (50.1 Gy₁₀ versus 40.4 Gy₁₀, p < 0.0001) was delivered in the HF-SRS group, which led to significantly improved 1-year LC (81.6 versus 69.0%, p < 0.0001) and 1-year overall survival (55.1 versus 47.2%, p < 0.0001) in the HF-SRS group compared to the SF-SRS group. In contrast, the incidence of radiation toxicity was significantly decreased in the HF-SRS group compared to the SF-SRS group (8.0 versus 15.6%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

HF-SRS results in better LC of large BMs while simultaneously reducing RN compared to SF-SRS. Thus, HF-SRS should be considered a priority for SF-SRS in patients with large BMs who are not suitable to undergo surgical resection.

Evidence-Based Recommendations for Seizure Prophylaxis in Patients with Brain Metastases Undergoing Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Symptomatic epilepsy is frequently encountered in patients with brain metastases (BM), affecting up to 25% of them. However, it generally remains unknown whether the risk of seizures in such cases is affected by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), which involves highly conformal delivery of high-dose irradiation to the tumor with a minimal effect on adjacent brain tissue. Thus, the role of prophylactic administration of antiepileptic drugs (AED) after SRS remains controversial. A comprehensive review and analysis of the available literature reveals that according to prospective studies, the incidence of seizures after SRS for BM varies from 8% to 22%, and there is no evidence that SRS increases the incidence of symptomatic epilepsy. Therefore, routine prophylactic administration of AED prior to, during, or after SRS in the absence of a seizure history is not recommended. Nevertheless, short-course administration of an AED may be judiciously considered (on the basis of class III evidence) for selected high-risk individuals.

The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy in the Management of Large Brain Metastases

Simple Summary

Brain metastases are the most common cause of cancerous brain tumors in adults. Large brain metastases are an especially difficult clinical scenario as patients often have debilitating symptoms from these tumors, and large tumors are more difficult to control with traditional single treatment radiation regimens alone or after surgery. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is a novel way to deliver the higher doses of radiation to control large tumors either after surgery (most common), alone (common), or potentially before surgery (uncommon). Herein, we describe how delivering high doses over three or five treatments may improve tumor control and decrease complication rates compared to more traditional single treatment regimens for brain metastases larger than 2 cm in maximum dimension.

Abstract

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignant tumor in adults and are a cause of significant morbidity and mortality for cancer patients. Large brain metastases, defined as tumors with a maximum dimension >2 cm, present a unique clinical challenge for the delivery of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as patients often present with neurologic symptoms that require expeditious treatment that must also be balanced against the potential consequences of surgery and radiation therapy—namely, leptomeningeal disease (LMD) and radionecrosis (RN). Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and pre-operative SRS have emerged as novel treatment techniques to help improve local control rates and reduce rates of RN and LMD for this patient population commonly managed with post-operative SRS. Recent literature suggests that pre-operative SRS can potentially half the risk of LMD compared to post-operative SRS and that HSRT can improve risk of RN to less than 10% while improving local control when meeting the appropriate goals for biologically effective dose (BED) and dose-volume constraints. We recommend a 3- or 5-fraction regimen in lieu of SRS delivering 15 Gy or less for large metastases or resection cavities. We provide a table comparing the BED of commonly used SRS and HSRT regimens, and provide an algorithm to help guide the management of these challenging clinical scenarios.

Surgical Management of Brain Metastases in the Perirolandic Region

Brain metastases (BM) are the most frequent intracranial tumors, which may result in significant morbidity and mortality when the lesions involve the perirolandic region. Surgical intervention for BM in the perirolandic region is still under discussion even though prompt relief of mass effect and avoidance of necrosis together with brain edema may not be achieved by radiotherapy. More recently, several researchers attempt to evaluate the benefit of surgery for BM within this pivotal sensorimotor area. Nevertheless, data are sparse and optimal treatment paradigm is not yet widely described. Since the advance in intraoperative neuroimaging and neurophysiology, resection of BM in the perirolandic region has been proven to be safe and efficacious, sparing this eloquent area while retaining reasonably low morbidity rates. Although management of BM becomes much more tailored and multimodal, surgery remains the cornerstone and principles of resection as well as indications for surgery should be well defined. This is the first review concerning the characteristics of BM involving the perirolandic region and the current impact of surgical therapy for the lesions. Future perspectives of advanced neurosurgical techniques are also presented.

Antiepileptic Drugs in the Management of Cerebral Metastases

Seizures represent a common and debilitating complication of central nervous system metastases. The use of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the preoperative period remains controversial, but the preponderance of evidence suggests that it is not helpful in preventing seizure and instead poses a significant risk of adverse events. Studies of postoperative seizure prophylaxis have not shown substantial benefit, but this practice remains widespread. Careful analysis of the risk of seizure based on patient-specific factors, such as tumor location and primary tumor histology, should guide the physician's decision on the initiation and cessation of prophylactic AED therapy.

Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain

PURPOSE

As part of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy investigating normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) after hypofractionated radiation therapy, data from published reports (PubMed indexed 1995-2018) were pooled to identify dosimetric and clinical predictors of radiation-induced brain toxicity after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible studies provided NTCPs for the endpoints of radionecrosis, edema, or symptoms after cranial SRS/fSRS and quantitative dose-volume metrics. Studies of patients with only glioma, meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, or brainstem targets were excluded. The data summary and analyses focused on arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and brain metastases.

RESULTS

Data from 51 reports are summarized. There was wide variability in reported rates of radionecrosis. Available data for SRS/fSRS for brain metastases were more amenable to NTCP modeling than AVM data. In the setting of brain metastases, SRS/fSRS-associated radionecrosis can be difficult to differentiate from tumor progression. For single-fraction SRS to brain metastases, tissue volumes (including target volumes) receiving 12 Gy (V12) of 5 cm³, 10 cm³, or >15 cm³ were associated with risks of symptomatic radionecrosis of approximately 10%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. SRS for AVM was associated with modestly lower rates of symptomatic radionecrosis for equivalent V12. For brain metastases, brain plus target volume V20 (3-fractions) or V24 (5-fractions) <20 cm³ was associated with <10% risk of any necrosis or edema, and <4% risk of radionecrosis requiring resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of radionecrosis after SRS and fSRS can be modeled as a function of dose and volume treated. The use of fSRS appears to reduce risks of radionecrosis for larger treatment volumes relative to SRS. More standardized dosimetric and toxicity reporting is needed to facilitate future pooled analyses that can refine predictive models of brain toxicity risks.

Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Imaging Tools and Dosimetric Predictive Factors for Radionecrosis

Radionecrosis (RN) is the most important side effect after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases, with a reported incidence ranging from 3% to 24%. To date, there are no unanimously accepted criteria for iconographic diagnosis of RN, as well as no definitive dose-constraints correlated with the onset of this late effect. We reviewed the current literature and gave an overview report on imaging options for the diagnosis of RN and on dosimetric parameters correlated with the onset of RN. We performed a PubMed literature search according to the preferred reporting items and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, and identified articles published within the last ten years, up to 31 December 2019. When analyzing data on diagnostic tools, perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) seems to be very useful allowing evaluation of the blood flow in the lesion using the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and blood vessel integrity using relative peak weight (rPH). It is necessary to combine morphological with functional imaging in order to match information about lesion morphology, metabolism and blood-flow. Eventually, serial imaging follow-up is needed. Regarding dosimetric parameters, in radiosurgery (SRS) V12 < 8 cm³ and V10 < 10.5 cm³ of normal brain are the most reliable prognostic factors, whereas in hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) V18 and V21 are considered the main predictive independent risk factors of RN.

Efficacy of frameless stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of presumptive canine intracranial gliomas: A retrospective analysis (2014-2017)

The use of conventional multi-fractionated radiotherapy for the treatment of glial tumours is well documented in the literature. Recently, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has become more widely available allowing for hypo-fractionated protocols; however, its usefulness in the treatment of canine intracranial gliomas is largely undetermined. We conducted a retrospective analysis, including 21 dogs diagnosed with presumptive intracranial gliomas treated with one or more courses of three fractions of 8 to 10 Gy CyberKnife SRT. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and prognostic factors associated with the use of SRT for the treatment of canine intracranial gliomas. Overall MST for all dogs was 636 days (d). Dogs treated with one course of the described SRT protocol had a MST of 258 days while those treated with >1 course had a MST of 865 days (P = .0077 log rank, 0.0139 Wilcoxon). Dogs treated with one course of SRT who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a MST of >658 days and lived significantly longer than those who did not receive chemotherapy (MST, 230 days) (P = .0414 log rank, 0.0453 Wilcoxon). The most common adverse event included presumptive transient demyelination in 3/21 dogs, which was treated successfully with corticosteroids in all patients. This study provides evidence that SRT is effective in prolonging survival in dogs with intracranial gliomas, and may provide similar results to conventional fractionated protocols, while decreasing the number of hospital visits and anaesthetic episodes. Additionally, it appears that patients can be safely treated with multiple rounds of SRT resulting in improved survival times.

Integrating navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping in hypofractionated and single-dose gamma knife radiosurgery: A two-patient case series and a review of literature

Background:

The aim of the study was to demonstrate the feasibility of integrating navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) in preoperative gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) planning of motor eloquent brain tumors.

Case Description:

The first case was a 53-year-old female patient with metastatic breast cancer who developed focal epileptic seizures and weakness of the left hand. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan demonstrated a 30 mm metastasis neighboring the right precentral gyrus and central sulcus. The lesion was treated with adaptive hypofractionated GKRS following preoperative nTMS-based motor mapping. Subsequent follow-up imaging (up to 12 months) revealed next to complete tumor ablation without toxicity. The second case involved a previously healthy 73-year-old male who similarly developed new left-handed weakness. A subsequent MRI demonstrated a 26 mm metastatic lesion, located in the right postcentral gyrus and 5 mm from the hand motor area. The extracranial screening revealed a likely primary lung adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent preoperative nTMS motor mapping prior to treatment. Perilesional edema was noted 6 months postradiosurgery; nevertheless, long- term tumor control was demonstrated. Both patients experienced motor function normalization shortly after treatment, continuing to final follow-up.

Conclusion:

Integrating preoperative nTMS motor mapping in treatment planning allowed us to reduce dose distributions to perilesional motor fibers while achieving salvage of motor function, lasting seizure freedom, and tumor control. These initial data along with our review of the available literature suggest that nTMS can be of significant assistance in brain radiosurgery. Prospective studies including larger number of patients are still warranted.

Neratinib: the emergence of a new player in the management of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastasis

HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer has become an effectively treatable disease in the era of targeted therapies, and outcomes have improved such that prognosis of this subtype is demonstrated to be superior to HER2-negative disease. Despite these advances, durable responses in HER2+ metastatic disease are challenged by the increased risk for brain metastasis. Neratinib is an irreversible pan-HER kinase inhibitor that has emerged as an effective agent when combined with capecitabine for the management of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients with brain metastasis. The randomized, Phase III, NALA trial compares neratinib plus capecitabine to a currently prevailing regimen of lapatinib plus capecitabine and is provided herein. Analysis of NALA portends meaningful changes on the horizon for the management of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer.

The effect of brain metastasis location on clinical outcomes: A review of the literature

It is common clinical practice to consider the location of a brain metastasis when making decisions regarding local therapies and, in some scenarios, estimating clinical outcomes, such as local disease control and patient survival. However, the location of a brain metastasis is not included in any validated prognostic nomogram and it is unclear if this is due to a lack of a relationship or a lack of support from published data. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on studies that have investigated a relationship between brain metastasis location and clinical outcomes, including patient survival. The vast majority of reports anatomically categorized brain metastases as supratentorial or infratentorial whereas some reports also considered other subdivisions of the brain, including different lobes or with particular areas defined as eloquent cortex. Results were variable across studies, with some finding a relationship between metastasis location and survival, but the majority finding either no relationship or a weak correlation that was not significant in the context of multivariable analysis. Here, we highlight the key findings and limitations of many studies, including how neurosurgical resection might influence the relative importance of metastasis location and in what ways future analyses may improve anatomical categorization and resection status.

Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for locally recurrent brain metastases after failed stereotactic radiosurgery

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

There is scant data on the utility of repeated radiosurgery for management of locally recurrent brain metastases after upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Most studies have used single-fraction SRS for repeated radiosurgery, and the use of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (f-SRS) in this setting has been poorly addressed. In this study, we assessed the utility of f-SRS for the management of locally recurrent brain metastases after failed upfront single-fraction SRS and report our single-center experience.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

A total of 30 patients receiving f-SRS for locally recurrent brain metastases after upfront single-fraction SRS at our department between September 2011 and September 2017 were retrospectively evaluated for local control (LC), toxicity, and overall survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Median age and Karnofsky performance status were 57 (range: 38-78 years) and 80 (range: 70-100) at repeated radiosurgery (SRS2). The median time interval between the two radiosurgery applications was 13.5 months (range: 3.7-49 months). LC after SRS2 was 83.3%. Radionecrosis developed in 4 of the 30 lesions after SRS2, and total rate of radionecrosis was 13.3%. Statistical analysis revealed that the volume of planning target volume (PTV) at SRS2 was significantly associated with radionecrosis (P = 0.014). The volume of PTV was >13 cm³ at SRS2 in all patients with radionecrosis.

CONCLUSION

A repeated course of radiosurgery in the form of f-SRS may be a viable therapeutic option for the management of locally recurrent brain metastases after failed upfront SRS with high LC rates and an acceptable toxicity profile despite the need for further supporting evidence.

An overview of anti-epileptic therapy management of patients with malignant tumors of the brain undergoing radiation therapy

As our surgical, radiation, chemotherapeutic and supportive therapies for brain malignancies improve, and overall survival is prolonged, appropriate symptom management in this patient population becomes increasingly important. This review summarizes the published literature and current practice patterns regarding prophylactic and perioperative anti-epileptic drug use. As a wide range of anti-epileptic drugs is now available to providers, evidence guiding appropriate anticonvulsant choice is reviewed. A particular focus of this article is radiation therapy for brain malignancies. Toxicities and seizure risk associated with cranial irradiation will be discussed. Epilepsy management in patients undergoing radiation for gliomas, glioblastoma multiforme, and brain metastases will be addressed. An emerging but inconsistent body of evidence, reviewed here, indicates that anti-epileptic medications may increase radiosensitivity, and therefore improve clinical outcomes, specifically in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Clinical significance of conformity index and gradient index in patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery for a single metastatic tumor

OBJECTIVEAlthough the conformity index (CI) and the gradient index (GI), which were proposed by Paddick and colleagues, are both logically considered to correlate with good posttreatment results after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), this hypothesis has not been confirmed clinically. The authors' aim was to reappraise whether high CI values correlate with reduced tumor progression rates, and whether low GI values correlate with reduced complication incidences.METHODSThis was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study conducted using a prospectively accumulated database including 3271 patients who underwent Gamma Knife SRS for brain metastases (BMs) during the 1998-2016 period. Among the 3271 patients, 925 with a single BM at the time of SRS (335 women and 590 men, mean age 66 [range 24-93] years) were studied. The mean/median CIs were 0.62/0.66 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.53-0.74, range 0.08-0.88) and the mean/median GIs were 3.20/3.09 (IQR 2.83-3.39, range 2.27-11.4).RESULTSSRS-related complications occurred in 38 patients (4.1%), with a median post-SRS interval of 11.5 (IQR 6.0-25.8, maximum 118.0) months. Cumulative incidences of post-SRS complications determined by a competing risk analysis were 2.2%, 3.2%, 3.6%, 3.8%, and 3.9% at the 12th, 24th, 36th, 48th, and 60th post-SRS month, respectively. Multivariable analyses showed that only two clinical factors (i.e., peripheral doses and brain volume receiving ≥ 12 Gy) correlated with complication rates. However, neither CIs nor GIs impacted the incidences of complications. Among the 925 patients, post-SRS MRI was performed at least once in 716 of them, who were thus eligible for local progression evaluation. Among these 716 patients, local progression was confirmed in 96 (13.4%), with a median post-SRS interval of 10.8 (IQR 6.7-19.5, maximum 59.8) months. Cumulative incidences of local progression determined by a competing risk analysis were 7.7%, 12.6%, 14.2%, 14.8%, and 15.3% at the 12th, 24th, 36th, 48th, and 60th post-SRS month, respectively. Multivariable analyses showed neurological symptoms, extracerebral metastases, repeat SRS, and CIs to correlate with incidences of local progression, whereas GIs had no impact on local tumor progression. Particularly, cumulative incidences of local progression were significantly lower in patients with CIs < 0.65 than in those with CIs ≥ 0.65 (adjusted hazard ratio 1.870, 95% confidence interval 1.299-2.843; p = 0.0034).CONCLUSIONSTo the authors' knowledge, this is the first analysis to focus on the clinical significance of CI and GI based on a large series of patients with BM. Contrary to the majority opinion that dose planning with higher CI and lower GI results in good post-SRS outcomes (i.e., low local progression rates and minimal complications), this study clearly showed that the lower the CIs were, the lower the local progression rates were, and that the GI did not impact complication rates.

Single versus Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large Brain Metastases: An International Meta-analysis of 24 Trials

PURPOSE

Multifraction (MF) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) purportedly reduces radionecrosis risk over single-fraction (SF) SRS in the treatment of large brain metastases. The purpose of the current work is to compare local control (LC) and radionecrosis rates of SF-SRS and MF-SRS in the definitive (SF-SRS_D and MF-SRS_D) and postoperative (SF-SRS_P and MF-SRS_P) settings.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used to select articles in which patients had "large" brain metastases (Group A: 4-14 cm³, or about 2-3 cm in diameter; Group B: >14 cm³, or about >3 cm in diameter); 1-year LC and/or rates of radionecrosis were reported; radiosurgery was administered definitively or postoperatively. Random effects meta-analyses using fractionation scheme and size as covariates were conducted. Meta-regression and Wald-type tests were used to determine the effect of increasing tumor size and fractionation on the summary estimate, where the null hypothesis was rejected for P < .05.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies were included, published between 2008 and 2017, with 1887 brain metastases. LC random effects estimate at 1 year was 77.6% for Group A/SF-SRS_D and 92.9% for Group A/MF-SRS_D (P = .18). LC random effects estimate at 1 year was 77.1% for Group B/SF-SRS_D and 79.2% for Group B/MF-SRS_D (P = .76). LC random effects estimate at 1 year was 62.4% for Group B/SF-SRS_P and 85.7% for Group B/MF-SRS_P (P = .13). Radionecrosis incidence random effects estimate was 23.1% for Group A/SF-SRS_D and 7.3% for Group A/MF-SRS_D (P = .003). Radionecrosis incidence random effects estimate was 11.7% for Group B/SF-SRS_D and 6.5% for Group B/MF-SRS_D (P = .29). Radionecrosis incidence random effects estimate was 7.3% for Group B/SF-SRS_P and 7.5% for Group B/MF-SRS_P (P = .85). Metaregression assessing 1-year LC and radionecrosis as a continuous function of increasing tumor volume was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment for large brain metastases with MF-SRS regimens may offer a relative reduction of radionecrosis while maintaining or improving relative rates of 1-year LC compared with SF-SRS. These findings are hypothesis-generating and require validation by ongoing and planned prospective clinical trials.

Complications after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Incidences, correlating factors, treatments and outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Complications after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BMs) were analyzed in detail using our database including nearly 3000 BM patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study using our prospectively accumulated database including 3271 consecutive patients who underwent gamma knife SRS for BMs during the 1998-2016 period. Excluding four patients lost to follow-up, 112 with three-staged treatment and 189 with post-operative irradiation, 2966 who underwent a single-session of SRS only as radical irradiation were studied.

RESULTS

The overall median survival time after SRS was 7.8 (95% CI; 7.4-8.1) months. Post-SRS complications occurred in 86 patients (2.9%) 1.9-211.4 (median; 24.0, IQR; 12.0-64.6) months after treatment. RTOG neurotoxicity grades were 2, 3 and 4 in 58, 25 and 3 patients, respectively. Cumulative incidences determined with a competing risk analysis were 1.4%, 2.2%, 2.4%, 2.6% and 2.9% at the 12th, 24th, 36th, 48th and 60th post-SRS month, respectively. Among various pre-SRS clinical factors and radiosurgical parameters, multivariable analyses demonstrated solitary tumor (Adjusted HR; 0.584, 95% CI; 0.381-0.894, p = 0.0133), controlled primary cancer (Adjusted HR; 2.595, 95% CI; 1.646-4.091, p < 0.0001), no extra-cerebral metastases (Adjusted HR; 1.608, 95% CI; 1.028-2.514, p = 0.0374), KPS ≥80% (Adjusted HR; 2.715, 95% CI; 1.245-5.924, p = 0.0121) and largest tumor volume ≥3.3 cc (Adjusted HR; 0.516, 95% CI; 0.318-0.836, p = 0.0072) to be independently significant predictors of a higher incidence of complications.

CONCLUSION

The post-SRS complication incidence is acceptably low (2.9%). Meticulous long-term follow-up after SRS is crucial for all patients.

The Role of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Mapping in Adjuvant Radiotherapy Planning in Patients With Supratentorial Brain Metastases

Purpose: In radiotherapy (RT) of brain tumors, the primary motor cortex is not regularly considered in target volume delineation, although decline in motor function is possible due to radiation. Non-invasive identification of motor-eloquent brain areas is currently mostly restricted to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which has shown to lack precision for this purpose. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is a novel tool to identify motor-eloquent brain areas. This study aims to integrate nTMS motor maps in RT planning and evaluates the influence on dosage modulations in patients harboring brain metastases.

Materials and Methods: Preoperative nTMS motor maps of 30 patients diagnosed with motor-eloquent brain metastases were fused with conventional planning imaging and transferred to the RT planning software. RT plans of eleven patients were optimized by contouring nTMS motor maps as organs at risk (OARs). Dose modulation analyses were performed using dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters.

Results: By constraining the dose applied to the nTMS motor maps outside the planning target volume (PTV) to 15 Gy, the mean dose (Dmean) to the nTMS motor maps was significantly reduced by 18.1% from 23.0 Gy (16.9–30.4 Gy) to 18.9 Gy (13.5–28.8 Gy, p < 0.05). The Dmean of the PTV increased by 0.6 ± 0.3 Gy (1.7%).

Conclusion: Implementing nTMS motor maps in standard RT planning is feasible in patients suffering from intracranial metastases. A significant reduction of the dose applied to the nTMS motor maps can be achieved without impairing treatment doses to the PTV. Thus, nTMS might provide a valuable tool for safer application of RT in patients harboring motor-eloquent brain metastases.

Mechanisms and Therapy for Cancer Metastasis to the Brain

Advances in chemotherapy and targeted therapies have improved survival in cancer patients with an increase of the incidence of newly diagnosed brain metastases (BMs). Intracranial metastases are symptomatic in 60–70% of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium is more sensitive than computed tomography and advanced neuroimaging techniques have been increasingly used in the detection, treatment planning, and follow-up of BM. Apart from the morphological analysis, the most effective tool for characterizing BM is immunohistochemistry. Molecular alterations not always reflect those of the primary tumor. More sophisticated methods of tumor analysis detecting circulating biomarkers in fluids (liquid biopsy), including circulating DNA, circulating tumor cells, and extracellular vesicles, containing tumor DNA and macromolecules (microRNA), have shown promise regarding tumor treatment response and progression. The choice of therapeutic approaches is guided by prognostic scores (Recursive Partitioning Analysis and diagnostic-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment-DS-GPA). The survival benefit of surgical resection seems limited to the subgroup of patients with controlled systemic disease and good performance status. Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) can be a complication, especially in posterior fossa metastases undergoing a “piecemeal” resection. Radiosurgery of the resection cavity may offer comparable survival and local control as postoperative whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). WBRT alone is now the treatment of choice only for patients with single or multiple BMs not amenable to surgery or radiosurgery, or with poor prognostic factors. To reduce the neurocognitive sequelae of WBRT intensity modulated radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing, and pharmacological approaches (memantine and donepezil) have been investigated. In the last decade, a multitude of molecular abnormalities have been discovered. Approximately 33% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations develop BMs, which are targetable with different generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs: gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, icotinib, and osimertinib). Other “druggable” alterations seen in up to 5% of NSCLC patients are the rearrangements of the “anaplastic lymphoma kinase” gene TKI (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib). In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, breast cancer targeted therapies have been widely used (trastuzumab, trastuzumab-emtansine, lapatinib-capecitabine, and neratinib). Novel targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have also revolutionized the systemic management of melanoma (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and BRAF inhibitors dabrafenib and vemurafenib).

Radiotoxicity in robotic radiosurgery: proposing a new quality index for optimizing the treatment planning of brain metastases

BACKGROUND

As irradiated brain volume at 12 Gy (V12) is a predictor for radionecrosis, the purpose of the study was to develop a model for Cyberknife (CK) plans that is able to predict the lowest achievable V12 at a given tumor size and prescription dose (PD), and to suggest a new quality index regarding V12 for optimizing the treatment planning of brain metastases.

METHOD

In our model V12 was approximated as a spherical shell around the tumor volume. The radial distance between tumor surface and the 12 Gy isodose line was calculated using an approximation of the mean dose gradient in that area. Assuming a radially symmetrical irradiation from the upper half space, the dose distribution is given by the superposition of single fields. The dose profiles of a single field were derived by the measured off-center ratios (OCR) of the CK system. Using the calculated gradients of the sum dose profiles, minimal-V12 was estimated for different tumor sizes. The model calculation was tested using a phantom dataset and retrospectively applied on clinical cases.

RESULTS

Our model allows the prediction of a best-case scenario for V12 at a given tumor size and PD which was confirmed by the results of the isocentric phantom plans. The results of the non-isocentric phantom plans showed that an optimization of coverage caused an increase in V12. This was in accordance with the results of the retrospective analysis. V12 s of the clinical cases were on average twice that of the predicted model calculation. A good agreement was achieved for plans with an optimal conformity index (nCI). Re-planning of cases with high V12 showed that lower values could be reached by selecting smaller collimators and by allowing a larger number of total MU and more MU per beam.

CONCLUSIONS

V12 is a main parameter for assessing plan quality in terms of radiotoxicity. The index f12 defined as the ratio of V12 from the actual plan with the evaluated V12 from our model describes the conformity of an optimally possible V12 and thus can be used as a new quality index for optimizing treatment plans.

Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiotherapy: utility of intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion MRI and correlation with histopathology

Radiation necrosis is a serious potential adverse event of stereotactic radiosurgery that cannot be reliably differentiated from recurrent tumor using conventional imaging techniques. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based method that uses a diffusion-weighted sequence to estimate quantitative perfusion and diffusion parameters. This study evaluated the IVIM-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and perfusion fraction (f), and compared the results to the gold standard histopathological-defined outcomes of radiation necrosis or recurrent tumor. Nine patients with ten lesions were included in this study; all lesions exhibited radiographic progression after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases that subsequently underwent surgical resection due to uncertainty regarding the presence of radiation necrosis versus recurrent tumor. Pre-surgical IVIM was performed to obtain f and ADC values and the results were compared to histopathology. Five lesions exhibited pathological radiation necrosis and five had predominantly recurrent tumor. The IVIM perfusion fraction reliably differentiated tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis (f_mean = 10.1 ± 0.7 vs. 8.3 ± 1.2, p = 0.02; cutoff value of 9.0 yielding a sensitivity/specificity of 100%/80%) while the ADC did not distinguish between the two (ADC_mean = 1.1 ± 0.2 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4, p = 0.6). IVIM shows promise in differentiating recurrent tumor from radiation necrosis for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery, but needs to be validated in a larger cohort.

Anticonvulsant therapy in brain-tumor related epilepsy

Background. The lifetime risk of patients with brain tumors to have focal epileptic seizures is 10-100%; the risk depends on different histology. Specific guidelines for drug treatment of brain tumor-related seizures have not yet been established.

Aim. This review addresses the special aspects of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in brain tumor-related epilepsy.

Methods. We analyzed the literature up to December 2015.

Results. Based on current evidence the management of tumor-related seizures does not differ substantially from that applied to epilepsies from other etiologies. Therefore, the choice of an AED is based, above all, on tolerability and pharmacokinetic interactions with chemotherapeutic drugs. Levetiracetam is recommended by many authors as first-line therapy in brain tumor-related epilepsy. Due to the possibility of interactions, the combination of enzyme-inducing AEDs and chemotherapeutic drugs, is usually not recommended as a first choice. Currently there is no evidence that prophylactic prescription of long-term AEDs in brain tumor-patients who did not present with seizures is justified. Because of the high risk of recurrence, however, AED treatment should be strongly considered after a single brain tumor-related seizure. The decision to withdraw AEDs must carefully consider the risk of seizure recurrence.

Conclusion. At present levetiracetam is the preferred drug in brain tumor-related epilepsy, especially when drug interactions need to be avoided. In the future we hope to acquire more targeted drugs against this disorder by uncovering its pathogenesis.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases from lung cancer : Evaluation of indications and predictors of local control

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) for brain metastases (BMs) from lung cancer, and to explore prognostic factors associated with local control (LC) and indication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients who were treated with linac-based HSRT for BMs from lung cancer. Lesions treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the same patients during the same periods were analysed and compared with HSRT in terms of LC or toxicity. There were 53 patients with 214 lesions selected for this analysis (HSRT: 76 lesions, SRS: 138 lesions). For HSRT, the median prescribed dose was 35 Gy in 5 fractions.

RESULTS

The 1‑year LC rate was 83.6 % in HSRT; on multivariate analysis, a planning target volume (PTV) of <4 cm(3), biologically effective dose (BED10) of ≥51 Gy, and adenocarcinoma were significantly associated with better LC. Moreover, in PTVs ≥ 4 cm(3), there was a significant difference in LC between BED10 < 51 Gy and ≥ 51 Gy (p = 0.024). On the other hand, in PTVs < 4 cm(3), both HSRT and SRS had good LC with no significant difference (p = 0.195). Radiation necrosis emerged in 5 of 76 lesions (6.6 %) treated with HSRT and 21 of 138 (15.2 %) lesions treated with SRS (p = 0.064).

CONCLUSION

Linac-based HSRT was safe and effective for BMs from lung cancer, and hence might be particularly useful in or near an eloquent area. PTV, BED10, and pathological type were significant prognostic factors. Furthermore, in BMs ≥ 4 cm(3), a dose of BED ≥ 51 Gy should be considered.

Functional approach using intraoperative brain mapping and neurophysiological monitoring for the surgical treatment of brain metastases in the central region

OBJECTIVE Brain metastases are the most frequent intracranial malignant tumor in adults. Surgical intervention for metastases in eloquent areas remains controversial and challenging. Even when metastases are not infiltrating intra-parenchymal tumors, eloquent areas can be affected. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the role of a functional guided approach for the resection of brain metastases in the central region. METHODS Thirty-three patients (19 men and 14 women) with perirolandic metastases who were treated at the authors' institution were reviewed. All participants underwent resection using a functional guided approach, which consisted of using intraoperative brain mapping and/or neurophysiological monitoring to aid in the resection, depending on the functionality of the brain parenchyma surrounding each metastasis. Motor and sensory functions were monitored in all patients, and supplementary motor and language area functions were assessed in 5 and 4 patients, respectively. Clinical data were analyzed at presentation, discharge, and the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS The most frequent presenting symptom was seizure, followed by paresis. Gross-total removal of the metastasis was achieved in 31 patients (93.9%). There were 6 deaths during the follow-up period. After the removal of the metastasis, 6 patients (18.2%) presented with transient neurological worsening, of whom 4 had worsening of motor function impairment and 2 had acquired new sensory disturbances. Total recovery was achieved before the 3rd month of follow-up in all cases. Excluding those patients who died due to the progression of systemic illness, 88.9% of patients had a Karnofsky Performance Scale score greater than 80% at the 6-month follow-up. The mean survival time was 24.4 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of intraoperative electrical brain stimulation techniques in the resection of central region metastases may improve surgical planning and resection and may spare eloquent areas. This approach also facilitates maximal resection in these and other critical functional areas, thereby helping to avoid new postoperative neurological deficits. Avoiding permanent neurological deficits is critical for a good quality of life, especially in patients with a life expectancy of over a year.

Single-Fraction Versus Multifraction (3 × 9 Gy) Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large (>2 cm) Brain Metastases: A Comparative Analysis of Local Control and Risk of Radiation-Induced Brain Necrosis

PURPOSE

To investigate the local control and radiation-induced brain necrosis in patients with brain metastases >2 cm in size who received single-fraction or multifraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS); factors associated with clinical outcomes and the development of brain radionecrosis were assessed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred eighty-nine consecutive patients with brain metastases >2.0 cm who received SRS as primary treatment at Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy, were analyzed. Cumulative incidence analysis was used to compare local control and radiation-induced brain necrosis between groups from the time of SRS. To achieve a balanced distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups, a propensity score analysis was used.

RESULTS

The 1-year cumulative local control rates were 77% in the single-fraction SRS (SF-SRS) group and 91% in the multifraction SRS (MF-SRS) group (P=.01). Recurrences occurred in 25 and 11 patients who received SF-SRS or MF-SRS (P=.03), respectively. Thirty-one patients (20%) undergoing SF-SRS and 11 (8%) subjected to MF-SRS experienced brain radionecrosis (P=.004); the 1-year cumulative incidence rate of radionecrosis was 18% and 9% (P=.01), respectively. Significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of local control and risk of radionecrosis were maintained after propensity score adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Multifraction SRS at a dose of 27 Gy in 3 daily fractions seems to be an effective treatment modality for large brain metastases, associated with better local control and a reduced risk of radiation-induced radionecrosis as compared with SF-SRS.

[Surgery for metastases, anatomical and ethical limits. Special aspect: oligometastases]

The surgical resection of metastases is nowadays feasible in selected patients with multifocal metastatic disease due to the implementation of interdisciplinary multimodal therapeutic options. Anatomical limitations do not seem to represent obstacles which cannot be overcome because of the development of new surgical techniques. The cornerstone of the selection of patients is the correct staging diagnosis achieved through modern diagnostic tools; however, surgery alone does not always offer acceptable survival and recurrence-free rates. Furthermore, in every complex surgical procedure there is the risk of morbidity and mortality; therefore, parameters such as alternative therapeutic modalities, the individual situation of the patient and tumor biology have to be considered in order to make the correct selection of patients. This is one of the major future challenges and should never be driven by unfounded hopes and expectations of the patients. The same principle also applies for brain metastases, which represent the most common brain tumors. Approximately 70 % of patients with brain metastases have 1-3 lesions (oligometastases). Treatment is now individualized and the goal of therapy has shifted towards long-term survival (≥ 24 months) and improved quality of life. Under this aspect surgery is one of the important treatment options, particularly in patients with a single metastasis or oligometastases. Furthermore, approximately 20 % of patients who have recurrent brain metastases, successfully undergo a complete resection of tumors and with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score > 70 show a long-term survival of ≥ 24 months.

Steroid and anticonvulsant prophylaxis for stereotactic radiosurgery: Large variation in physician recommendations

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The risk of developing symptomatic edema or seizure following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is poorly defined, and many practitioners prescribe prophylactic corticosteroids and/or anticonvulsants. Because there are no clear guidelines regarding appropriate use, we sought to characterize prescribing practices and factors associated with these recommendations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a 1-time, internet-based survey among 500 randomly selected radiation oncologists self-described as specializing in central nervous system diseases who were registered in the American Society for Radiation Oncology directory. Physicians were contacted by e-mail and invited to complete the 22-question survey.

RESULTS

The response rate was 32% (n = 161). Sixty-six percent of respondents had been in practice for >10 years, and 45% of respondents practiced at an academic medical center. During/after SRS, 53% of respondents "always" or "usually" recommended corticosteroids, whereas 47% "never," "rarely," or "sometimes" recommended them. When prescribing corticosteroids, the recommended duration of use was <1 week, 1-2 weeks, or >2 weeks among 49%, 33%, and 18% of respondents, respectively. Respondents who worked in an academic medical center were less likely to prescribe corticosteroids, although this did not reach significance (P = .09). Seizure prophylaxis was less common overall, as 79% of respondents "rarely" or "never" prescribed anticonvulsants for SRS. Respondents who prescribed anticonvulsants more frequently had higher estimations of the risk of seizure within 2 weeks of SRS (P < .001), and their recommended duration of anticonvulsant use was <1 week, 1-2 weeks, and >2 weeks among 35%, 25%, and 41% of respondents, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is extreme variation in physician recommendations regarding prophylactic corticosteroid and anticonvulsant use for patients undergoing SRS. Further investigation of the risks and benefits of these medications for SRS is warranted, which may promote guideline development and more patient-centered, rational prescribing practices.