Evidence that the transition of HIV-1 gp41 into a six-helix bundle, not the bundle configuration, induces membrane fusion

Deletion of the cytoplasmic tail of the fusion protein of the paramyxovirus simian virus 5 affects fusion pore enlargement

The fusion (F) protein of the paramxyovirus simian parainfluenza virus 5 (SV5) promotes virus-cell and cell-cell membrane fusion. Previous work had indicated that removal of the SV5 F protein cytoplasmic tail (F Tail- or FDelta19) caused a block in fusion promotion at the hemifusion stage. Further examination has shown that although the F Tail- mutant is severely debilitated in promotion of fusion as measured by using two reporter gene assays and is debilitated in the formation of syncytia relative to the wild-type F protein, the F Tail- mutant is capable of promoting the transfer of small aqueous dyes. These data indicate that F Tail- is fully capable of promoting formation of small fusion pores. However, enlargement of fusion pores is debilitated, suggesting that either the cytoplasmic tail of the F protein plays a direct role in pore expansion or that it interacts with other components which control pore growth.

Evolution of intermediates of influenza virus hemagglutinin-mediated fusion revealed by kinetic measurements of pore formation

Cells expressing wild-type influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) or HA with a point mutation within the transmembrane domain (G520L) were bound to red blood cells and exposed to low pH for short times at suboptimal temperatures followed by reneutralization. This produced intermediate states of fusion. The ability of intermediate states to proceed on to fusion when temperature was raised was compared kinetically. In general, for wild-type HA, fusion occurred more quickly by directly lowering pH at 37 degrees C in the bound state than by raising temperature at the intermediate stage. When pH was lowered for 1-2 min, kinetics of fusion upon raising temperature of an intermediate slowed the longer the intermediate was maintained at neutral pH. But for a more sustained (10 min) acidification, kinetics was independent of the time the intermediate was held at neutral pH before triggering fusion by raising temperature. In contrast, generating intermediates in the same way with G520L yielded kinetics of fusion that did not depend on the time intermediates were maintained after reneutralization. For both HA and G520L, the extents of fusion did not depend on the temperature at which pH was lowered, but fusion from the intermediate was extremely sensitive to the temperature to which the cells were raised. The measured kinetics and temperature dependencies suggest that the rate-limiting step of fusion occurs subsequent to formation of any of the intermediates; the conformational change of HA into its final configuration may be the rate-limiting step.