Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin plus vindesine and mitomycin C in stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung carcinoma: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

To compare a regimen of vinorelbine and cisplatin (VC) to the combination of mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin (MVP) in patients with stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main endpoits were analysis of objective response rates, toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

247 eligible patients were randomized to receive (a) vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks, or (b) mitomycin c 8 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1, vindesine 3 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 8, 15 and 22, plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks. In subsequent cycles vindesine was given every other week. For both treatments a maximum of six cycles was planned. Patients with performance status 0-2 according to the ECOG scale were enrolled. Response and toxicity were evaluated according to the WHO criteria. Analysis of clinical efficacy was performed according to an intent-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in clinical efficacy were observed between the two chemotherapy regimens. The overall objective response rates were 39% (95% CL, 31-49%) in the VC arm and 42% (95% CL, 33-51%) in the MVP arm (P=0.13). Median time to progression was 4.2 and 4.5 months for the MVP arm and the VC arm, respectively. Median overall survival was 7 months in the VC arm and 8 months in the MVP one (log-rank test, P=0.898). These differences were not statistically significant. However, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly higher in the MVP arm than in the VC (P=0.0001; P=0.0002). Grade 3 alopecia was more frequent in the MVP arm than in the VC one (P<0.001), which was associated with higher rate of phlebitis (P=0.037).

CONCLUSION

Data achieved in this study suggest that the vinorelbine-cisplatin doublet is similar to the three-drug MVP regimen in term of overall response rate, time to progressive disease, and overall survival. However, hematological toxicity and alopecia are more frequent and severe in the MVP regimen which therefore appears to be less tolerable than the VC regimen. The combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin may be considered as a reference treatment for future studies on the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Is there a preferred combination chemotherapy regimen for metastastic non-small cell lung cancer?

Since over 70% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) disease, the majority of NSCLC patients might benefit from chemotherapy. During the past decade, a number of new agents (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, irinotecan, and topotecan) have been found to be effective against lung cancer. These agents have been combined with cisplatin, carboplatin, and nonplatinum drugs to treat NSCLC. They, in general, produce median survival times of 8-10 months and 1- and 2-year survival rates of 35%-40% and 10%-15%, respectively. Based on this review, there is not a preferred combination chemotherapy regimen to treat advanced NSCLC patients. However, there are a number of different regimens from which to choose.

The novel and effective nonplatinum, nontaxane combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: potential for decreased toxicity and combination with biological therapy

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are two of the most active third-generation agents for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The authors conducted a formal Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in both untreated and previously treated patients with Stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients were treated on the current Phase II trial of front-line or second/third-line therapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in NSCLC. Eligible patients manifested either untreated disease (n = 42) or had received at least one but not more than two prior chemotherapy regimens (n = 36). The median age was 57.5 years (range, 33-79) with 57 men (73%) and 21 women (27%). The median performance status was one (range, one to two). The initial eight patients (four untreated and four previously treated) were treated at a previously established maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15, with significant myelosuppression seen in five out of eight patients requiring dose omission in the first cycle. The next 70 patients received a reduced dose of vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) followed by gemcitabine (900 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15.

RESULTS

Seventy eight patients were treated. Fifteen (36%) of the 42 evaluable patients who received front-line therapy had objective responses and 14 (33%) had stable disease. In the patients with prior treatment, 6 (17%) of 36 patients had partial response and 18 patients (50%) had stable disease. Median survival time for the previously untreated patient group was 10.1 months, with a one year survival of 43% and a two year survival rate of 32%. For the previously treated patients, the median survival time was 8.5 months, with a one year survival rate of 30%. Toxic effects were notable for significant myelosuppression, with > or =Grade 3 granulocytopenia seen in 55% of the patients on the untreated arm and 67% of the patients on the previously treated arm. Additionally, 9.5% and 13.9% (untreated and previously treated), respectively, of these patients experienced Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia at some point in their treatment. A full dose delivery analysis showed that this myelosuppression resulted in Course 1, Day 15 skipped doses (even at the reduced dose level) in 42% of previously untreated patients and 47% of pretreated patients. Other side effects seen at Grades 3 and 4 in previously untreated and treated patients included anemia (9.5% and 2.8%), asthenia (4.8% and 5.5%), infection (14.3% and 5.6%), pain (9.5% and 19.4%), and pulmonary complications (4.8% and 13.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine/vinorelbine is an active, well-tolerated combination in both front-line and second/third-line therapy for Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The response rate, median survival rate, and one year survival rate compare favorably with platinum-based regimens. The toxicity profile of the gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination was quite favorable, with minimal Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects aside from granulocytopenia, which resulted in numerous Day 15 skipped doses but no significant febrile neutropenia or infection. The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine could be a useful regimen in standard clinical practice and has the potential for efficient combination with biologic/targeted therapy. Multiple randomized trials of this combination versus platinum combinations are now ongoing [corrected].

Unfavorable Therapeutic Index of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine/Vinorelbine in Advanced non—small-Cell Lung Cancer

In view of favorable reports with the 3-drug combination of PGV (cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine), this multicenter phase II study evaluated the therapeutic index of PGV in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-two patients with stage IV NSCLC and 1 with stage IIIB were studied. There were 23 men and 10 women, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38-80 years). Twelve patients had a performance status (PS) of 0, and 21 patients had a PS of 1. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 50 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 all given intravenously on days 1 and 8, in 21-day cycles. Fifteen patients (45%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 28%-64%) achieved a partial response. Median response duration was 3 months (range, 1-9 months). The median and 1-year survival rates were 9.4 months and 39% (95% CI, 23%-58%), respectively. The median number of cycles was 4. Only 3 patients (9%) completed treatment without regimen modifications. Median dose intensity (% planned) was cisplatin 24 mg/m2/week (72%), gemcitabine 483 mg/m2/week (72%), and vinorelbine 12 mg/m2/week (72%). Toxicities were predominantly hematologic, with grade 3/4 neutropenia (67%), febrile neutropenia (21%), and thrombocytopenia (67%). There were 3 (9%) treatment-related deaths due to neutropenic complications. This study confirms the substantial antineoplastic activity of PGV. We observed a high rate of severe hematologic toxicity, especially febrile neutropenia, despite a lower delivered dose intensity of PGV. Given these results, PGV appears to offer no therapeutic advantage to current doublet regimens.

Long-term follow-up of patients treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: sequential phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

PURPOSE

To provide long-term follow-up on the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin-based regimens in a multicenter, community-based setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 1995 and April 1998, 321 patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer were treated on sequential phase II trials with the following combination regimens: paclitaxel/carboplatin, paclitaxel/carboplatin/gemcitabine, and paclitaxel/carboplatin/vinorelbine. Details of these three regimens and patient populations have been previously reported. Responding and stable patients continued treatment until tumor progression or for a recommended six treatment courses.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 58 months (minimum follow-up, 40 months), the median survival for the entire group of patients was 8.6 months, with actual 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates of 40%, 19%, and 7%, respectively. The actuarial 4-year survival rate for the entire group was 4%. No statistically significant differences in survival were seen among the three regimens. Administration of all three regimens was feasible in a community-based setting; however, myelosuppression and hospitalizations for treatment of neutropenia/fever were more frequent with the three-drug regimens.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel/carboplatin-based regimens, in addition to prolonging median survival and improving 1-year survival, result in substantial improvements in the 2-year survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer when compared retrospectively with supportive care or traditional cisplatin-based regimens. In these sequential phase II trials, we did not demonstrate any advantages of three-drug regimens when compared with paclitaxel/carboplatin. Because few patients remain alive after 4 years with any of these chemotherapy regimens, future treatment improvements will require the introduction of novel agents.

Three-week versus four-week schedule of cisplatin and gemcitabine: results of a randomized phase II study

BACKGROUND

The cisplatin and gemcitabine (GC) regimen is usually administered as a 4- or 3-week schedule; however, the best schedule to use is still unclear. We therefore started a randomized phase II trial to compare toxicity and dose intensity (DI) between these two GC schedules.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety-six patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and an additional 11 patients with an advanced epithelial neoplasm [bladder (n = 5), head and neck (n = 3), cervix (n = 1), esophageal (n = 1) or unknown primary carcinoma (n = 1)] were randomized to receive cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 2 plus either gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Planned DI (PDI) for the 4-week schedule was 750 mg/m(2)/week for gemcitabine and 17.5 mg/m(2)/week for cisplatin; for the 3-week regimen PDI was 666 mg/m(2)/week and 23 mg/m(2)/week for gemcitabine and cisplatin, respectively.

RESULTS

From July 1998 to March 2000, 107 patients were randomized. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 27.8% of patients in the 3-week versus 22.5% in the 4-week arm (P = 0.69), while grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was higher in the 4-week arm (29.5% versus 5.5% of patients; P = 0.14). A total of 398 cycles of therapy were delivered. Overall, 51% of cycles were modified in dose, timing or both in the 4-week arm, and 19% in the 3-week arm. The 21-day schedule of GC leads to a similar received DI of gemcitabine and higher cisplatin DI. Both regimens had activity in NSCLC, with a response rate of 39% (38% for the 4-week arm, and 42% for the 3-week arm).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-week schedule has similar DI to the 4-week schedule. However the 3-week regimen has a better compliance profile and a comparable response rate in NSCLC, supporting the use of such a schedule.

Gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer

Gemcitabine is considered to be one of the most active drugs in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When used as a single agent, gemcitabine yielded response rates consistently > 20%, with a uniformly good tolerance profile. Preclinical data indicated synergism between gemcitabine and platinum compounds, such as cisplatin or carboplatin. The gemcitabine-cisplatin combination is considered one of the reference regimens for advanced NSCLC and the recommended schedule is gemcitabine 1000 - 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 - 8 and cisplatin 70 - 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 or 2. In order to avoid many of the non-haematological toxicities associated with cisplatin, several trials evaluated the gemcitabine-carboplatin combination. Previous trials using the 28-day schedule showed unacceptable haematological toxicity. Recent studies demonstrated the activity and feasibility of gemcitabine-carboplatin combination using a 21-day schedule, with carboplatin administered on day 1 and gemcitabine on days 1 and 8. Gemcitabine can be combined with one of the other new agents, such as the taxanes or vinorelbine, to create novel non-platinum-doublets. Although encouraging, the available data are still conflicting and non-platinum-based combinations are not indicated outside clinical trials. Three-drug combinations increased toxicity and failed to demonstrate any advantage over standard doublets in advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in elderly patients and represents a reasonable therapeutic option. Although no Phase III trials have been conducted to compare gemcitabine to the best supportive care or docetaxel in pretreated NSCLC, gemcitabine alone or in combination with vinorelbine or one of the taxanes can be considered a valid option for second-line treatment in patients who had a previous response or who achieved stable disease with a platinum-containing regimen. Gemcitabine is considered the most radiopotentiating agent available amongst the newer agents we have in terms of activity and toxicity, but the routine use of gemcitabine in combination with radical thoracic radiotherapy, although promising, is not yet recommended. Further testing of gemcitabine-based combinations with concurrent radiation is underway.

Present and future treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Platinum-based chemotherapy is considered the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several phase II trials using cisplatin in combination with new chemotherapeutic agents, such as gemcitabine, the taxanes, vinorelbine, and irinotecan, showed impressive response rates and suggested an improvement in overall survival. Large phase III trials comparing these second-generation cisplatin regimens indicated a substantial equivalence of new combinations, marginally improving the outcome of patients over the first-generation platinum-based regimens. Phase III trials have not yet shown dramatic advantages for either multiple-drug regimens, with nonoverlapping mechanisms of action and toxicity, or nonplatinum doublets, with efficacy and/or toxicity profiles superior to those of platinum-based chemotherapy. Chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer has reached a plateau, and it is clear that new approaches are required. These should include prevention, screening, and early detection, and the use of novel treatments based on our understanding of the biology and molecular biology of this disease.

Incorporation of pemetrexed (Alimta) into the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (thoracic tumors)

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and throughout the world. The overall 5-year survival rate for lung cancer is dismal: 14% in the United States and even lower in other parts of the world. Recent developments in the armamentarium of chemotherapeutic agents for lung cancer have shown that two-drug combinations improve survival, relieve symptoms, and improve quality of life; however, complete response rates are still approximately 1% in stage IV disease and less than 20% of advanced stage patients survive 2 years. Therefore, improved therapeutic agents that increase efficacy are sorely needed. Most lung cancers overexpress thymidylate synthase and a variety of genes involved in cell cycle regulation. Previous studies have shown that some inhibitors of DNA synthesis (eg, gemcitabine) can improve the survival of advanced lung cancer patients, especially when combined with other agents such as cisplatin. The multitargeted antifolate, pemetrexed (Alimta; Eli Lilly and Co, Indianapolis, IN) was developed because it inhibits multiple enzymes involved in DNA synthesis including thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase. The early studies of pemetrexed showed that the important dose-limiting toxicities were myelosuppression, mucositis, and diarrhea, all of which are common with any antimetabolite. Subsequent studies described in this article will show that these toxicities can be significantly reduced by the use of vitamin supplementation with folate and B12, and that pemetrexed has considerable activity in non-small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma.

Phase I Study of Dose-Dense Alternating Doublets in Advanced Non—Small-Cell Lung Cancer

We performed a study to determine the feasibility of a rapidly alternating administration of cisplatin/vinorelbine (CV) and docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG) in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-four patients with NSCLC (6% stage IIIB, 94% stage IV) were enrolled. The initial schema was to give CV on days 1 and 8 followed by DG on days 15 and 22, every 28 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used on days 9-14 and 23-28. Despite dose reductions, this sequence was not feasible. Therefore, the sequence was switched to give DG before CV, cycle duration was extended to 35 days, and G-CSF was given on days 2-7 and 23-28. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended doses for phase II studies are docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 1, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 15, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 15 and 22, every 35 days with G-CSF 5 microg/kg on days 2-7 and 23-28. However, treatment delays were required in subsequent cycles due to cumulative myelosuppression. A less intensive schedule is recommended for subsequent cycles for further testing. Overall response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14%-45%), and median survival for all patients was 11.8 months. One- and 2-year survival rates were 47% (95% CI, 30%-63%) and 14% (95% CI, 1.4%-40%), respectively. Although initial administration of this regimen was feasible, dose intensity could not be maintained in subsequent cycles due to cumulative myelosuppression. A sequential rather than alternating use of doublet regimens might be more readily feasible and may permit greater maintenance of dose intensity.

Phase I dose-escalating study of raltitrexed ('Tomudex') and cisplatin in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this Phase I, dose-escalation study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of a raltitrexed ('Tomudex') and cisplatin combination in patients with previously untreated, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received raltitrexed (15-min intravenous infusion), followed by cisplatin (1-h intravenous infusion), every 3 weeks at escalating dose levels.

RESULTS

In total, 21 patients entered the study. No DLT was observed up to dose level 4 (raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2)), or in the first 3 patients who received dose level 5 (raltitrexed 3.5 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2)). However, 1 patient, entered at dose level 6 (raltitrexed 4.0 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2)) experienced severe toxicity (including grade 3 diarrhea), and no further patients were recruited at this level. Of 4 additional patients who received raltitrexed 3.5 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), 3 also experienced DLTs. The most common adverse events included nausea/vomiting, asthenia, diarrhea, and hematologic toxicities. Of 19 patients evaluated for response, 3 achieved a partial response, 13 had stable disease, and 3 progressed.

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD is raltitrexed 3.5 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2), and the RD for future studies is raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2); DLTs were diarrhea and asthenia. The combination of raltitrexed and cisplatin shows clinical activity in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

The Value of Platinum Compounds in Non—Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The value of platinum compounds has come into question with the advent of newer chemotherapy agents in the management of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. These newer agents, which include the taxanes, topoisomerase I inhibitors, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine, appear to have higher single-agent response rates and more favorable toxicity profiles when compared to the platinum compounds. However, the toxicity of the platinum compounds is now minimized with the advent of more effective antiemetics. In addition, phase III clinical trials have demonstrated that the strategy of cisplatin dose intensity and prolonged duration of therapy with platinum compounds does not improve overall survival; therefore, moderate doses of cisplatin and a shorter duration of therapy can be given to further decrease toxicity. Furthermore, while phase II trials utilizing nonplatinum-based combination chemotherapy appear to demonstrate superior response rates and survival in comparison to platinum-based doublets, results of phase III trials have demonstrated no improvement in survival. Platinum combination chemotherapy remains the standard approach for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. More substantial advances will likely be made with novel molecular targeted therapy, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, which demonstrate synergy with the platinum compounds.

Activity of gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

This phase II trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle and carboplatin AUC 5 mg/ml/min on day 2 of each cycle. Fifty patients (Zubrod-ECOG-WHO performance status 0/1 in 70/30%, stage IV disease in 64%) entered the study and were evaluable for response and toxicity. There was 1 complete response and 24 partial responses among 50 evaluable patients, for a response rate of 50% (95% CI: 36.0-64.1%). The median survival time was 13 months (range: 6-22 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 54%. Hematologic toxicities included grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 24 and 8% of patients, respectively, and grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia in 48 and 8% of patients, respectively. These were without clinical sequelae. Seven (14%) patients had grade 3 nausea and vomiting. The combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin is highly active and well tolerated in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

The purpose of this phase II trial was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with NSCLC stage IIIB or IV disease received 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine and 25 mg/m(2) vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 2, every 3 weeks. From December 1998 to May 1999, 31 patients (21 stage IV and 10 stage IIIB disease), with a median age of 59 years (range 40-72 years) were enrolled. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 45% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27-64%) with 2 complete responders (CR) and 12 partial responders (PR), 7 patients had stable disease and 10 progressed. Median survival was 12.8 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.8+ months), median time to progression was 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-7.7 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 52.9% (95% CI: 36.7-76.2%). Patients with stage IIIB disease had a significantly longer overall survival than patients with stage IV disease (P=0.05). Transient World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV leucopenia, anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 3 (10%), 2 (6%) and 3 (10%) patients, respectively. The predominant non-haematological toxicities were alopecia and nausea/vomiting. 15 patients (48%) had WHO grade II and III alopecia and 14 patients (45%) nausea/vomiting. The combination of gemcitabine, vinorelbine and cisplatin has demonstrated major antitumour efficacy in advanced NSCLC with a manageable toxicity profile.

A 3-week schedule of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as induction chemotherapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to explore the activity and feasibility of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in patients with Stage IIIA N(2) and selected IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September 1997 to July 2000, 70 chemonaive patients with Stage III NSCLC, median age of 64 years, World Health Organization performance status 0, 1, or 2, and the ability to tolerate a pneumonectomy entered the study and received gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on day 2 every 3 weeks. After three cycles of induction chemotherapy, patients underwent resection or radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Responses were seen in 40 of the 69 assessable patients, for an intent-to treat overall response rate of 57.1% (95% confidence interval, 45-62%), with 4.2% complete response. Response rates were 68 and 35% in patients with Stage IIIA and IIIB disease, respectively. The overall pathological CR rate after induction chemotherapy was 3%, with an overall pathological downstaging rate of 20%. Median survival for all patients was 14.5 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 67% (95% CI, 54.3-79.5%). The estimated time to treatment failure was 12.6 months. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was the main hematologic toxicity, occurring in 26% of patients, but was not associated with life-threatening bleeding. Febrile neutropenia was rare and other severe non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-week schedule of gemcitabine plus cisplatin is highly active as induction chemotherapy in Stage IIIA N(2) unresectable NSCLC. This suggests a need for a multimodality approach upfront, such as concurrent chemoradiation therapy, particularly in patients with Stage IIIB disease.

Therapy for stage IIIB and stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

The treatment options for unresectable stage III NSCLC include definitive RT, chemotherapy, combined chemoradiotherapy, or supportive care. Compared with radiation alone or chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and standard RT confers a modest survival benefit at the cost of increased toxicity for patients with an excellent performance status. For metastatic disease, combination chemotherapy--in particular, platinum-based regimens--improves symptom control and survival. Newer chemotherapeutic agents with higher response rates and favorable toxicity profiles are improving outcome even for the elderly and debilitated patients and those refractory to first-line chemotherapy. Evolving understanding of the molecular events in tumorigenesis is uncovering a host of promising targets for mechanism-based therapy. Many of these novel target modulators likely will require combination with conventional chemotherapy for optimal results.

Targeted Therapy Using Novel Agents in the Treatment of Non—Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a poor prognosis and high mortality. The therapeutic improvement caused by the new generation of cytotoxic agents seems to have reached a plateau. The main categories of targeted therapeutics applicable for NSCLC include receptor-targeted therapy, signal transduction or cell-cycle inhibition, angiogenesis inhibitors, gene therapy, and vaccines. Several major classes of agents directed at specific cellular mechanisms exist for the treatment of NSCLC. The anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) group contains trastuzumab and IMC-C225, monoclonal antibodies against EGFRs that are overexpressed in many cancers. OSI-774 and ZD1839 are inhibitors of EGFR tyrosine kinase, a key enzyme of the signaling pathway. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors, such as SCH66336, and protein kinase C inhibitors, such as ISIS 3521, have also shown antitumor activity. Antiangiogenesis agents that have shown promise include TNP-470, recombinant endostatin, and angiostatin. Antibodies to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) also seem to control tumor progression and may prolong survival. LY317615, an inhibitor of protein kinase Cb, augmented the tumor growth delay produced by cytotoxic drugs. All of these agents are in different phases of clinical testing and have shown encouraging activity as single agents or in combination with chemotherapy drugs. These new agents are more target specific, less toxic, easier to administer, and may lead to enhanced safety and survival for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin administered as three consecutive weekly infusions for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Weekly administration of low-dose taxane reduces myelosuppression and increases dose intensity as compared with an every third week schedule. We conducted a phase II trial of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to evaluate safety and efficacy. Thirty-seven patients with chemonaïve stage IIIB (n=15), stage IV (n=16), or recurrence after operation (n=6) NSCLC received intravenous infusions of docetaxel at 35 mg/m(2) and cisplatin at 25 mg/m(2) for three consecutive weeks, followed by a week of rest. There were ten partial responses for an objective response rate of 30% (95% confidence interval (CI), 15-46%) in 33 evaluable patients and 27% (95% CI, 13-41%) in the intent-to-treatment population. The median survival was 12.8 months (range 2.5-17.1), and the 1-year survival was 54%. Hematologic toxicities, which were mild, included grade 4 neutropenia in 6%. There were none with febrile neutropenia or severe (grade 3-4) infections, and no septic deaths. The common nonhematologic toxicities included grade 2-3 nausea and vomiting (44%) and grade 2-3 diarrhea (14%). Consecutive weekly administrations of docetaxel and cisplatin for 3 weeks produces minimal myelosuppression and shows activity in the treatment of chemonaïve patients with advanced NSCLC. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to compare this 3 consecutive weeks protocol with administration of docetaxel and cisplatin every third week.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin in a multimodality treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The role of new cytotoxic agents like gemcitabine has not yet been proven in the neoadjuvant settings. We designed a phase II study to test the feasibility of using gemcitabine and cisplatin before local treatment for stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients. Patients received three cycles of induction chemotherapy of gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2), days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (90 mg m(-2), day 15) every 4 weeks before evaluation for operability. Operable patients underwent radical resection. Inoperable patients and patients who had incomplete resection received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with daily low dose cisplatin. All patients who did not progress after local treatment received three more cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Fifty-two patients received induction treatment. Two patients had complete response and 31 patients had partial response (response rate 63.5%) after induction chemotherapy. Thirty-six patients (69%) were operable. Eighteen patients (35%) had their tumours completely resected. Two patients had pathological complete response. Median overall survival was 19.1 months, projected 1-year survival was 66% and 2-year survival was 34%. Three cycles of gemcitabine and cisplatin is effective and can be used as induction treatment before surgery for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Novel approaches to the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC) remains poor, especially in advanced disease. The introduction of new cytotoxic agents in the past decade did only attain minor improvements in survival. It is rather clear that chemotherapy may have reached a plateau, and that it will be difficult to obtain better results in advanced NSCLC by chemotherapy alone. Novel treatment modalities are urgently needed in advanced NSCLC. Backed-up by advances in the understanding of tumor cell biology, a new generation of anticancer agents specifically directed at targets such as tyrosine kinases, farnesyl transferase, angiogenesis factors, matrixmetalloproteinases and oncogenes has been developed in recent years. In this review, we give a brief summary of the state-of-the-art treatment of NSCLC, highlighting its limitations. Novel systemic approaches are then discussed in detail with focus on their mechanistic rationale, stage of clinical development and possible drawbacks. Finally, perspectives of future applications and impact on the treatment of NSCLC are also discussed.

A phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: clinical outcomes and quality of life

The aim of the present phase II study was to assess the activity and safety of gemcitabine-cisplatin combination in advanced NSCLC, and to evaluate the impact of this regimen in terms of symptom benefit and quality of life (QOL). Eighty patients with pathologically confirmed advanced (stage IIIB and IV) NSCLC were enrolled into this study. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1, 8 and 15 at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2), and cisplatin was given on day 2 at a dose of 100 mg/m(2). The cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. The impact of treatment on QOL and on tumor-related symptoms was evaluated with the validated EORTC forms (QLQ-C30 and LC-13). The regimen was relatively well tolerated. Myelosuppresion was the principal toxicity. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred in 58, 65 and 30% of patients respectively. In 143 cycles (35%) the administration of gemcitabine on day 15 was omitted due to myelosuppresion. Non-hematological toxicities were generally mild. Among the 76 patients available for response evaluation, there were 5 complete responses (7%) and 26 partial responses (34%); an overall response rate of 41%. The median duration of response was 8.0 months. The median survival for all 80 patients was 11.0 months and the actuarial 1-year survival probability 45%. During therapy global QOL improved in 22% of patients and particular functional domains increased in 19-37% of patients. Dyspnea was released in 36% of patients, fatigue in 45%, chest pain in 38%, shoulder pain in 27%, cough in 44%, and hemoptysis in 75%. The mean intensity scores of the last three symptoms decreased significantly with therapy. Our study confirmed relatively high efficacy of the gemcitabine-cisplatin combination in patients with advanced NSCLC. Of particular importance was that treatment with gemcitabine-cisplatin combination in a large proportion of patients was also associated with remarkable symptomatic release and with improvement of QOL. However, the high frequency of myelotoxicity-related gemcitabine omissions on day 15 of the cycle indicates that modification of the schedule should be considered in standard care.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin, compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, shows similar efficacy while more cost-effective: a randomized phase II study of combination chemotherapy against inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel (Taxol) plus carboplatin (PC) has shown activity in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Non-platinum-containing combination chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PG), has also demonstrated reasonable efficacy. Our aim here was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of PC versus PG in chemo-naive. advanced NSCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ninety (68 male, 22 female) patients were enrolled from August 1999 to August 2000. The performance status was one in 29 patients and two in 16 patients of the PC group, and one in 24 patients and two in 21 patients of the PG group. Seventeen patients had stage IIIb disease and 28 patients stage IV disease in the PC group: 18 patients had stage IIIb disease and 27 patients stage IV disease in the PG group (New International Staging System). Treatment consisted of P 175 mg/m2 and C at AUC = 7 (predicted using measured clearances and the Calvert formula) intravenous infusion (i.v.) on day 1, or P 175 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and G 1000 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

In all, 175 cycles of PC and 184 cycles of PG were given in the PC and PG groups, respectively. The median treatment cycle was four cycles in both groups. All the patients were assessable for toxicity and response measurement. There were three complete responses and 15 partial responses (overall 40%) in the PC group, and no complete response, but 18 partial responses (overall 40%) in the PG group. WHO grades 3/4 leukopenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in six (13.3%), seven (15.5%) and five patients (11.1%) in the PC group; and in four (8.9%), six (13.3%) and 0 patients in the PG group, respectively. Two patients in each group suffered from grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Other non-hematological toxicities were mild and few. Median survival time was 14.1 months in the PC group and 12.6 months in the PG group. One-year survival was 50.7% in the PC group and 53.3% in the PG group. The PG group had a higher total expense and expended more days undergoing treatment than the PC group (P = 0.034 and 0.069, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PC and PG combination chemotherapy produce a similar efficacy in the treatment of NSCLC. However, PC is more cost-effective than PG.

A phase II trial of weekly intravenous gemcitabine and cisplatin with continuous infusion fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We reported previously that the combination of gemcitabine and continuous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) has activity in renal cell carcinoma. Based upon in vitro synergy of gemcitabine/cisplatin and 5-FU/cisplatin, we hypothesized that the addition of cisplatin could improve the objective response rate of gemcitabine and 5-FU with manageable toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status of 0 to 2 were enrolled. Ten had received prior systemic therapy. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Continuous infusion 5-FU was given from day 1 to day 21.

RESULTS

No complete responses and one partial response were observed for an objective response rate of 5% (95% confidence interval 0% to 24%). Two minor responses (25% to 50% regression) were also observed. The median overall survival was 10 months with 35% of patients surviving at 1 year. Grade 3-4 myelosuppression (mostly thrombocytopenia) occurred in nine (43%) patients. Nausea/vomiting and neuropathy were dose-limiting in an additional five patients. Only 51% of treatment cycles were delivered on time and without dose reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of cisplatin to gemcitabine and 5-FU did not improve the objective response rate of gemcitabine and 5-FU alone and added to the toxicity. Due to the cumulative toxicity, further trials with this cisplatin-containing regimen in RCC are not indicated.

Clinical and cost effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer remains a devastating disease with few effective treatment options. Recent developments in chemotherapy have led to cautious optimism. This paper reviews the evidence on the clinical and cost effectiveness of four of the new generation drugs for patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified from 11 electronic databases (including Medline, Cochrane library and Embase), reference lists and contact with experts and industry was performed to assess clinical effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine. Clinical effectiveness was assessed using the outcomes of patient survival, quality of life, and adverse effects. Cost effectiveness was assessed by development of a costing model and presented as incremental cost per life year saved (LYS) compared with best supportive care (BSC).

RESULTS

Of the 33 RCTs included, five were judged to be of good quality, 10 of adequate quality, and 18 of poor quality. Gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and vinorelbine as first line treatment and docetaxel as second line treatment appear to be more beneficial for non-small cell lung cancer than BSC and older chemotherapy agents, increasing patient survival by 2-4 months against BSC and some comparator regimes. These gains in survival do not appear to be at the expense of quality of life. Survival gains were delivered at reasonable levels of incremental cost effectiveness for vinorelbine, vinorelbine with cisplatin, gemcitabine, gemcitabine with cisplatin, and paclitaxel with cisplatin regimens compared with BSC.

CONCLUSION

Although the clinical benefits of the new drugs appear relatively small, their benefit to patients with lung cancer appears to be worthwhile and cost effective.

Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in good performance status has survival benefit, reduces tumour symptoms and can improve quality of life. Future challenges include defining the optimal chemotherapy and incorporating the newer agents to improve patients' outcome. In particular treatment of the elderly and patients with poorer performance status need to be developed with more attention being paid to relief of symptoms and minimising treatment toxicity.

A phase II study of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (P) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: interim analysis

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) combination is one of the most active and well tolerated regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to evaluate the activity and toxicity of the GP regimen as a 21-day schedule in patients (pts) with stage IIIAN2-IIIB NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From October 1997 to July 2000, 47 pts entered the study: 43 were eligible (40 men and three women); median age was 61 years (range 45-73); ECOG PS 0-1; histology was squamous (20 pts), adenocarcinoma (12 pts), large cell (five pts), and undifferentiated (six pts); stage was IIIAN2 (14 pts, 32.56%), and IIIB (29 pts, 67.44%). Malignant pleural effusion or superior vena cava syndrome was criteria of exclusion. Induction treatment consisted of three cycles of GP (G 1250 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8, and P 100 mg/m(2) on day 8 every 3 weeks). Responding and stable pts underwent surgery (S) and/or radiotherapy (RT).

RESULTS

Following a minimum of two cycles, 39 pts were evaluable for response and 42 for toxicity. Two pts had complete responses (CR; 5.2%), 24 had partial response (PR; 61.5%), eight had stable disease (SD; 20.5%), and five had progressive disease (PRO; 12.8%). WHO grades 3 and 4 anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in two, four and two pts, respectively; non-haematological toxicity was moderate. After induction, stable and responding pts received either RT (18 pts) or S+RT (13 pts). Among the 16 resected pts, a radical complete resection was possible in 13 cases (81.3%), whereas tumour down-staging was observed in nine pts (56.2%).

CONCLUSION

GP, as a 3-week neoadjuvant schedule, appears a safe and active regimen.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who fail prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based regimens

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with recurrent nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of older agents after platinum-based therapy. In the current Phase II study, the authors evaluated the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC (Stage IIIB-IV), a World Health Organization performance status (PS) < or = 2, prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy, and unimpaired hematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered as follows: gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was administered on Days 1 and 8 followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on Day 8, and this regimen was recycled every 21 days. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was administered on Days 10-14 or until the patient achieved a white blood cell count > or = 5000/microL.

RESULTS

Of 43 patients who were entered on the study, 41 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for toxicity. The median patient age was 63 years (range, 47-70 years), the median PS was 1 (range, 0-2), there were 38 male patients, and there were 5 female patients. Four patients had Stage IIIA disease, 17 patients had Stage IIIB disease, and 22 patients had Stage IV disease. Histologies included 19 patients with adenocarcinoma, 18 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and 3 patients with large cell carcinoma. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes in 28 patients, bone in 6 patients, liver in 5 patients, brain in 5 patients, lung nodules in 8 patients, adrenals in 7 patients, and other sites in 3 patients. All patients had received prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based treatment; 28 patients had received prior paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin. Objective responses were partial response (PR) in 14 of 43 patients [33%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 18.5-46.6%], stable disease (SD) in 16 of 43 patients (37%; 95% CI, 22.8-51.6%), and progressive disease (PD) in 13 of 43 patients (30%; 95% CI, 16.3-43.7%). The median time to disease progression was 6 months (range, 1.0-20.0+ months), and the median survival was 8.5 months (range, 1.5-20.0+ months). The 1-year survival rate was 28%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was experienced by 53% of patients (30% Grade 4), with 14% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was experienced by 7% of patients (no Grade 4), whereas other Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were never encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is active and is well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC who have failed prior taxane plus platinum chemotherapy. This regimen represents a tolerable and effective combination to apply in the palliative treatment of patients with recurrent NSCLC.

Paclitaxel-based combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Paclitaxel has proven to be a useful drug for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Paclitaxel-based combination chemotherapy, particularly with carboplatin, has become a very popular combination in the US. This article will review the conclusions of several studies regarding paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. The data provide evidence that this therapy produces good palliation and prolongation of survival for patients with NSCLC and is superior to older cisplatin-based chemotherapy. These results in patients with advanced disease have important implications for neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant approaches in patients with lower stages of disease, and several studies are ongoing.

Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

The necessity of improving the long-term survival of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) points out on the one hand the limit of surgery alone and, on the other hand, the need of combined modality therapy, in which the role of chemotherapy to control distant metastases is prominent. Recent experiences support the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Phase II studies show response rates of 50-80% and median survival longer than 2 years. Phase III studies suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival and objective responses, and induces higher percentages of complete resections compared with surgery alone or chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen has proved its efficacy in NSCLC advanced disease with response rate greater than 40% in phase II and III trials. Representing one of the regimens most used in Europe, its activity has been investigated also in the neoadjuvant setting. Phase II studies have reported an average response rate greater than 60%, complete surgical resections in 60-70% of the cases, and 1-year survival of about 60%. A modern tendency is to use neoadjuvant chemotherapy in very early stages of NSCLC. Gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen has been used as a randomised clinical trial (chemotherapy for early stages trial, CHEST) to compare the efficacy of surgery alone versus surgery plus preoperative chemotherapy in early-stage disease (T2-3N0, T1-2N1, T3N1), and to evaluate the progression free survival.

Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: standards

For non-small cell lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients in good clinical condition (PS 0-1), Platin-based combination chemotherapy is currently recommended to prolong survival, prevent or reduce tumor-related symptoms, and maintain the quality of life. Nonetheless, the clinical availability of newer cytotoxic drugs has considerably increased the chemotherapeutic options for Platin-based chemotherapy and, at the same time, increased the difficulties in choosing the most appropriate regimen. These difficulties became especially clear when oncologists were confronted with the disappointing results from ECOG 1594, a study which tested four popular Platin-based combinations. Since no survival advantages could be shown by any of the four combinations used in ECOG 1594, one of the pertinent question seems to be whether, and in what form, a Platin-free combination regimen with newer agents should replace the currently recommended Platin-based therapy? A strong indication that non-Platin-containing regimens are not inferior came from at least two randomized trials. However, first results from EORTC 08975 -trial, did not confirm these observations, since the trend seems to be towards better results for the patients on Platin-containing regimens. A number of trials have shown that patients with PS >1 do not benefit from combination regimens. For these and for elderly patients, single agent therapy with newer cytotoxic agents may be for various reasons an attractive chemotherapeutic alternative for palliation. Several cooperative studies have proven that single agent therapy is superior to best supportive care. Vinorelbine was the first new agent tested in randomized, controlled trials in the elderly population, and was found to give statistically significant survival advantages in comparison to best supportive care only. As chemotherapy gains wider acceptance for advanced and early stage NSCLC, the need for an effective second-line chemotherapy is also growing. On the basis of two randomized, phase III studies, Docetaxel has recently become the first cytotoxic agent to be registered for second-line therapy in NSCLC. Both studies demonstrated that Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks significantly prolongs survival, and offers clinically meaningful benefits to patients who have an acceptable performance status.

The role of chemotherapy in early non-small-cell lung cancer management

Great advances have been made in chemotherapy in advanced and metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and a major milestone was reached with the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIIA N2 disease. The systemic nature of lung cancer has been confirmed by many genetic analyses documenting micrometastases in negative lymph nodes and bone marrow, and mRNA gene overexpression as a surrogate of cancer cells has been identified in peripheral blood. Furthermore, serum or plasma cell-free tumor DNA has been observed even in tumors with a diameter of less than 2 cm. Pharmacogenetic screening can lead to tailored chemotherapy even in patients with early disease through the use of a genetic tool kit that will allow us to optimize the use of chemotherapy by using serial measurements of serum DNA that can help to detect residual disease and re-assess the chemosensitivity of sub-clinical micrometastatic disease. The ongoing (neo)adjuvant taxol/carboplatin hope (NATCH) trial is testing the value of three cycles of chemotherapy given pre- or post-operatively compared with surgery alone and will analyze genetic abnormalities in serum DNA at three different points during patient follow-up. Our major concern in this review is to analyze the pros and cons of chemotherapy in NSCLC. Although this review is not a formal meta-analysis, we have discussed the most relevant published studies in this field. We conclude that not only is there no evidence of detrimental effects of chemotherapy, in fact, there are many indications that chemotherapy induces response in up to 80% of patients and downgrades N2 disease in up to 50% of patients. This translates into significantly better survival when accompanied by complete resection. Since at least 50% of patients with stage IB disease develop distant metastases, it seems logical to explore the role of chemotherapy in early disease.

Outcome of patients with a performance status of 2 in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1594: a Phase II trial in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study E1594 compared paclitaxel and cisplatin with three newer chemotherapy doublets in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The accrual of patients with an ECOG performance status (PS) of 2 was discontinued due to a perceived rate of unacceptable toxicity.

METHODS

Patients were stratified by PS and randomized to one of the following treatments: 1) paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) over 24 hours with cisplatin (75 mg/m2) on a 21-day cycle; 2) cisplatin (100 mg/m2) with gemcitabine (1 g/m2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle; 3) cisplatin (75 mg/m2) with docetaxel (75 mg/m2) on a 21-day cycle; and 4) paclitaxel (225 mg/m2) over 3 hours with carboplatin (area under the curve, 6). All tests of statistical significance were two-sided.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients with an ECOG PS of 2 were enrolled, and 64 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. Fifty-six percent of 64 evaluable patients were male, and 81% had Stage IV disease. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities occurred in > 50% of the patients in each treatment group. Nonhematologic Grade 3-4 toxicities occurred significantly less often in the paclitaxel and carboplatin arm (P = 0.0032). The overall rate of toxicity did not differ significantly from the rate of toxicity in the PS-0 or PS-1 cohorts. There were 5 deaths (7.35%) among 68 patients with a PS of 2 during therapy; however, only 2 of those deaths were attributed to therapy. The overall response rate for the 64 evaluable patients was 14%. The overall median survival of all 68 patients with a PS of 2, as determined by an intent-to-treat analysis, was 4.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced NSCLC and a PS of 2 experienced a large number of adverse reactions and overall poor survival. A comparison with patients with a PS of 0-1 suggests that these events and the shorter survival were related to disease process rather than treatment. Alternative strategies need to be explored with therapy specifically tailored for this group of patients.

Weekly docetaxel with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: Phase II trials of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of weekly docetaxel when paired with either gemcitabine or vinorelbine as the second-line treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with progressive nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after one previous chemotherapeutic regimen, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and measurable lesions were eligible for treatment in these Phase II trials. Patients who had not received gemcitabine previously were treated with docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2), and gemcitabine, 800 mg/m(2), both of which were administered intravenously (i.v.) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. If the patients had received gemcitabine as part of first-line therapy, they were treated with docetaxel, 30 mg/m(2), and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m(2) i.v., on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were reevaluated after two courses of treatment, and responding patients continued treatment for six courses or until disease progression.

RESULTS

Forty patients were treated with a combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine, and 23 patients received docetaxel and vinorelbine. The docetaxel/gemcitabine combination was reasonably well tolerated, with moderate myelosuppression and a few nonhematologic toxicities reported. The objective response rate was 10%, with a 1-year survival rate of 20%. The docetaxel/vinorelbine combination was found to be poorly tolerated, with Grade 3/4 leukopenia reported in 71% of patients and neutropenic fever reported in 70% of patients despite frequent dose reductions and omission of the Day 15 doses. Enrollment onto this regimen was stopped prematurely due to toxicity, and after no major responses were observed in the first 20 evaluable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly docetaxel/gemcitabine appears to be feasible and relatively well tolerated as second-line treatment in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, whereas a weekly combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine did not appear to be tolerable at the doses and schedule used in the current study. Neither regimen showed a level of activity that suggested any advantage compared with the results obtained with single-agent docetaxel in this setting.

Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine in stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a multicentre phase II clinical trial

A phase II study in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was carried out to evaluate the clinical activity and toxicity of the chemotherapeutic combination of gemcitabine+vinorelbine (GEM/VNR). Forty-five patients (40 male, 5 female) with a median age of 67 years (range 37-73) and a median ECOG performance status of 1 (range 0-2) were enrolled into the trial. Twenty patients had stage IIIB (two positive supraclavicular nodes and 20 cytologically positive pleural effusion), and 25 had stage IV NSCLC. GEM 1000 mg/m(2) diluted in 250 cc(3) of normal saline was administered iv on days 1, 8, and 15, while VNR was given 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks. The median number of courses/patient was 4 (range 3-7). According to an intent-to-treat analysis 2 (4%) patients had a complete response and 16 (36%; 95% CL 22-52%) had a partial response for an overall response rate of 40% (95% CL 26-56%). Twelve (27%) patients had stable disease and 15 (33%) were considered as treatment failures. Median overall survival of the whole series was 8+ months with 33% of patients alive at 1 year. Toxicity was generally mild. WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia was recorded in 22% of cases, grade 1-3 liver toxicity in 6% of patients and neutropenia-unrelated fever in 9%. This multicentre phase II study suggests that the GEM/VNR combination regimen is an active and well tolerated regimen in patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Larger studies comparing cisplatin-based regimens to new schedules without cisplatin are warranted.

Recent advances in the use of radiosensitizing nucleosides

Chemotherapeutic drugs that perturb nucleotide metabolism have the potential to produce substantial sensitization of tumor cells to radiation treatment. The clinical effectiveness of fluoropyrimidines as radiosensitizers has been proven in multiple randomized trials. The development of oral fluoropyrimidine formulations may allow protracted exposure without the need for indwelling intravenous lines and infusion pumps. These agents may also provide more selective radiosensitization and are likely to be widely incorporated into chemoradiotherapy regimens for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Gemcitabine has been well studied in the laboratory, with respect to mechanisms of radiosensitization and strategies that may increase the therapeutic index. Clinical trials based on these studies are now defining the role of this radiosensitizing nucleoside. Issues regarding the use oral fluoropyrimidines and gemcitabine need to be viewed in the context of both local and distant disease control, given the potential systemic activity of these agents.

Indications for chemotherapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

Treatment of stage IV NSCLC has been a controversial issue during the last decade. However, there is now clear evidence that cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens lead to prolonged survival with an increase of the 1-year survival rates at about 10%. New drugs like gemcitabine, the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), and vinorelbine have shown very promising single-agent activity and have been included into modern combination chemotherapy regimens achieving response rates of 40 to 50% and 1-year survival rates of between 30 and 40%. In comparison to single-agent cisplatin or cisplatin/etoposide as 'standard treatment approaches', most of these modern combinations could demonstrate advantages in terms of response, survival and improved QOL. Patients with favourable prognostic factors are at the moment frequently treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy often including one of these newer active drugs. Patients with adverse prognostic factors such as elderly or stage IV patients with a reduced performance status are preferably treated with single agents such as gemcitabine, paclitaxel or vinorelbine.

Combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study with emphasis on scheduling

BACKGROUND

Many regimens of gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy have proven activity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal dose and schedule still have to be established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a phase II study with administration of cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 2, 9 and 15. This schedule was selected to optimise the synergism between the two drugs and reduce toxicity due to high dose cisplatin.

RESULTS

Thirty-six chemo-naive patients with stage IIIA, IIIB or IV NSCLC entered the study (26 men, 10 women; median age 58 years, range 29-74). Twenty patients achieved a partial response: 7 out of 10 stage IIIA patients, 7 out of 13 stage IIIB patients and 6 out of 13 stage IV patients. On intent-to-treat basis, the overall response rate (RR) was 58% (95% confidence interval, 42-74%). Ninety percent of stage IIIA patients and 46% of stage IIIB patients received adjuvant surgery or radiotherapy. Overall median duration of response was 28 weeks (range 6-147 weeks). For stage IIIA, IIIB and IV patients, these numbers were 91, 13 and 23 weeks, respectively. One-year survival was 49% with 90%, 23% and 42% for stage IIIA, IIIB and IV patients, respectively. The main toxicity was myelosuppression. WHO grades 3 and 4 leukopenia occurred in 67% of patients, whereas 61% experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Although hematological toxicity was clinically tolerable, it frequently led to omission of gemcitabine administration on day 15. The incidence of non-hematological toxicity was very low.

CONCLUSION

This regimen of cisplatin on days 1 and 8 and gemcitabine on days 2, 9 and 15 induced a high RR in patients with advanced NCSLC. Frequent omission of gemcitabine day 15 is a limitation of this schedule. This should be an important factor in a practical approach to decide on the most optimal schedule of the cisplatin plus gemcitabine combination.

Sequential combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: carboplatin and gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel

BACKGROUND

The objective of this Phase II study was to evaluate the concept of sequential chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) by the administration of carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by of paclitaxel.

METHODS

Patients with Stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC and a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performance status (PS) of 0--2 were eligible. Therapy consisted of three cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 5.5 mg/mL per minute) on Day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) every 21 days.

RESULTS

Of the 37 eligible patients, 81% had Stage IV disease, and 27% had a PS of 2; all were assessable for survival and toxicity; 32 patients were assessable for response. After treatment with carboplatin plus gemcitabine, there were no complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs) (response rate [RR], 25%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 11--43%). The best overall response was two CRs and eight PRs (RR, 31%; 95% CI, 16--50%). The median survival time was 9.5 months, the 1-year survival rate was 36% (95% CI, 26--44%), the 2-year survival rate was 11% (95% CI, 3--25%), and the median time to disease progression was 4.9 months. The median survivals were 11.2 months for patients with a PS of 0--1 and 6.4 months for patients with a PS of 2. Noncumulative, reversible thrombocytopenia was the principal toxicity with carboplatin/gemcitabine therapy. Paclitaxel therapy was well tolerated, and moderate (Grade 3) neutropenia was the primary toxic effect. One cardiac death occurred, possibly related to paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to evaluate planned sequential chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine followed by paclitaxel was well tolerated and resulted in promising survival in this patient population. This pilot experience forms the basis for an ongoing SWOG trial. Cancer 2001;92:146-52. Published 2001 American Cancer Society.

Treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of current randomized clinical trials and an examination of emerging therapies

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related deaths for Americans. As most patients present with nonsurgically curable disease, major efforts have been made in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with chemotherapy. Several new agents and new combinations of chemotherapy are available.

METHODS

The author reviews randomized clinical trials investigating chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC in chemotherapy-naive patients, in patients who present with relapsed or progressive disease, and in elderly patients. Therapies that incorporate new biological agents to target specific aberrations in lung cancer are discussed.

RESULTS

Several clinical trials demonstrate improvement in overall survival as well as quality of life with chemotherapy treatment of advanced NSCLC. Better options are available for patients who have relapsed after first-line chemotherapy, and treatment of elderly patients with chemotherapy has demonstrated benefit in survival and quality of life. New agents that target molecular pathways are being tested in patients with early-stage disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite progress with newer agents for the treatment of advanced NSCLC, only 14% of patients with the disease are alive at 5 years after initial diagnosis. New therapies are needed.

Management of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is one of the most lethal cancers, causing more deaths of men and women than any other cancer in the United States. Non-small-cell lung cancers account for most the newly diagnosed cases of lung cancer. Many patients with non-small-cell lung cancer present with advanced-stage disease and are not appropriate candidates for combined modality therapy. Although these patients have incurable disease, they have a chance of achieving improved 1-year survival rates and palliation of symptoms with chemotherapy. The performance status of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is the most important determinant of response to chemotherapy.

Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial

PURPOSE

This randomized trial was designed to determine whether paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) offered a survival advantage over vinorelbine plus cisplatin (VC) for patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer. Secondary objectives were to compare toxicity, tolerability, quality of life (QOL), and resource utilization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred two patients received VC (vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2)/wk and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2)/d, day 1 every 28 days) and 206 patients received PC (paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) over 3 hours with carboplatin area under the curve of 6, day 1 every 21 days). Patients completed QOL questionnaires at baseline, 13 weeks, and 25 weeks. Resource utilization forms were completed at five time points through 24 months.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar between the groups. The objective response rate was 28% in the VC arm and 25% in the PC arm. Median survival was 8 months in both arms, with 1-year survival rates of 36% and 38%, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia (P =.002) and neutropenia (P =.008) occurred more frequently on the VC arm. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were higher on the VC arm (P =.001, P =.007), and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy was higher on the PC arm (P <.001). More patients on the VC arm discontinued therapy because of toxicity (P =.001). No difference in QOL was observed. Overall costs on the PC arm were higher than on the VC arm because of drug costs.

CONCLUSION

PC is equally efficacious as VC for the treatment of advanced non--small-cell lung cancer. PC is less toxic and better tolerated but more expensive than VC. New treatment strategies should be pursued.

Emerging therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains the single most devastating cause of cancer-related death with approximately 1.5 million cases of lung cancer expected worldwide and more than 1.3 million cancer-related deaths in 2001. In the United States alone, of 164,100 news cases expected in the year 2000, about 70,000 will be metastatic disease (stage IV), and another 70,000 will be locally advanced (stages IIIA and IIIB). Therefore, the five-year survival rate for lung cancer has improved only incrementally from 5% in the late 1950s to 14% by 1994. While advances in combined modality therapy have led to significant progress against locally advanced disease, it was only a decade ago that few believed that the treatment of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer was justifiable. However, multiple randomized trials in the 1980s and 1990s have changed the role of chemotherapy in lung cancer, such that by the middle of the next decade, it may be that only patients with stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer are not considered as candidates for chemotherapy.