Gemcitabine plus carboplatin compared with carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: an intergroup trial of the AGO-OVAR, the NCIC CTG, and the EORTC GCG

Intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of current results

BACKGROUND

Advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer results in extensive spread of tumor on the peritoneal surfaces of the abdomen and pelvis. We collectively review studies in the literature that report the efficacy of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis.

METHODS

An electronic search of all relevant studies published in peer-reviewed journals before May 2009 was performed on three databases. The quality of each study was independently assessed and classified according to the time point of HIPEC use in various setting of ovarian cancer from the consensus statement of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group. Clinical efficacy was synthesized through a narrative review with full tabulation of the results of each included study.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies each of more than ten patients reporting treatment results of HIPEC of patients with both advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer were included and data were extracted. All studies were observational case series. The overall rate of severe perioperative morbidity ranged from 0 to 40% and mortality rate varied from 0 to 10%. The overall median survival following treatment with HIPEC ranged from 22 to 64 months with a median disease-free survival ranging from 10 to 57 months. In patients with optimal cytoreduction, a 5-year survival rate ranging from 12 to 66% could be achieved.

CONCLUSION

Despite the heterogeneity of the studies reviewed, current evidence suggest that complete CRS and HIPEC may be a feasible option with potential benefits that are comparable with the current standard of care. A randomized trial is required to establish the role of HIPEC in ovarian cancer.

Efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) plus carboplatin in ovarian cancer patients who recur within six to twelve months: a phase II study

OBJECTIVES

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is one of the preferred alternatives for ovarian cancer patients with early relapse (<6 months) and taxane/carboplatin for late relapse (>12 months), but the optimal therapy for the partially platinum-sensitive (6-12 months) population has not been defined. This single-arm phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)/carboplatin in ovarian cancer patients who relapse between 6 and 12 months after initial treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Ovarian cancer patients who previously completed a course of therapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin were administered PLD 30 mg/m(2) followed by carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL/minute every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the study and 54 were eligible for the efficacy analysis, of whom most (75%) received at least 6 cycles of PLD/carboplatin. The objective response rate was 46% (4% CR and 42% PR), with an additional 33% experiencing disease stabilization >6 months. For those patients with measurable CA-125, the response rate was 66% (28% CR and 38% PR), with an additional 18% experiencing disease stabilization >6 months. Median time-to-progression was 10 months (1.5-25). Median overall survival was 19.1 months (2.2-38.9). The most frequent adverse effects were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and constipation.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PLD/carboplatin is efficacious and well tolerated in women with partially platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer and represents a valuable alternative for patients who relapse within 6-12 months of completing paclitaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy.

Management of recurrent ovarian carcinoma: current status and future directions

The majority of patients who present with epithelial ovarian cancer respond well to the initial treatment, but will ultimately experience a recurrence of their disease. Chemotherapy can palliate symptoms of disease recurrence, and there is some evidence that it also can improve survival. Recurrent ovarian carcinoma is divided into two subsets of patients: those with platinum-sensitive disease and those with platinum-resistant disease. Management for these two groups has diverged in the last few years, as evidence accrues that the response to treatment and duration of treatment-free interval after completion of front-line therapy impacts the prognosis and the treatment choice for these patients. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for platinum combination re-treatment in patients with platinum-sensitive disease. Additionally, there are multiple single-agent trials evaluating novel agents for patients with platinum-resistant as well as platinum-sensitive disease. This review will discuss the role of chemotherapy in recurrent disease, describe the various agents used in this setting, and touch on the role of biologic agents in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Evaluation of new platinum-based treatment regimens in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup

PURPOSE

To determine if incorporation of an additional cytotoxic agent improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma who receive carboplatin and paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with stages III to IV disease were stratified by coordinating center, maximal diameter of residual tumor, and intent for interval cytoreduction and were then randomly assigned among five arms that incorporated gemcitabine, methoxypolyethylene glycosylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The primary end point was OS and was determined by pairwise comparison to the reference arm, with a 90% chance of detecting a true hazard ratio of 1.33 that limited type I error to 5% (two-tail) for the four comparisons.

RESULTS

Accrual exceeded 1,200 patients per year. An event-triggered interim analysis occurred after 272 events on the reference arm, and the study closed with 4,312 women enrolled. Arms were well balanced for demographic and prognostic factors, and 79% of patients completed eight cycles of therapy. There were no improvements in either PFS or OS associated with any experimental regimen. Survival analyses of groups defined by size of residual disease also failed to show experimental benefit in any subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard paclitaxel and carboplatin, addition of a third cytotoxic agent provided no benefit in PFS or OS after optimal or suboptimal cytoreduction. Dual-stage, multiarm, phase III trials can efficiently evaluate multiple experimental regimens against a single reference arm. The development of new interventions beyond surgery and conventional platinum-based chemotherapy is required to additionally improve outcomes for women with advanced EOC.

A phase II study of GM-CSF and rIFN-gamma1b plus carboplatin for the treatment of recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of carboplatin, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and recombinant interferon gamma 1b (rIFN-gamma1b) in women with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer.

METHODS

In this phase II study, patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer were treated with subcutaneous GM-CSF and rIFN-gamma1b before and after intravenous carboplatin until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients had measurable disease and a chemotherapy-free interval >6 months. Response was determined using RECIST criteria and CA 125 levels.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2007, 59 patients received a median of 6 cycles of therapy (range, 1 to 13 cycles). Median age at enrollment was 61 years (range, 35 to 79 years). Median time to progression prior to enrollment was 11 months (range, 6 to 58 months). Of 54 patients evaluable for response, 9 (17%) had a complete response, 21 (39%) had a partial response, and 24 (44%) had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 56% (95% CI: 41% to 69%). With a median follow-up of 6.4 months, median time to progression was 6 months. Myeloid derived cells and platelets increased on day 9 of each chemotherapy cycle. The most common adverse effects were bone marrow suppression, carboplatin hypersensitivity, and fatigue. Responders reported improved quality of life.

CONCLUSION

This pre and post-carboplatin cytokine regimen resulted in a reasonable response and a hematologic profile that could invite further evaluation of its components in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.

Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: role of peritoneal carcinomatosis: exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I Trial about risk factors, surgical implications, and prognostic value of peritoneal carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Almost all retrospective trials pointed out that a benefit of surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer may be limited to patients in whom a macroscopic complete resection could be achieved. Peritoneal carcinomatosis has been reported to be either a negative predictor for resectability or a negative prognostic factor, or both. The role of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a multicenter trial was investigated.

METHODS

Exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I trial (multicenter trial of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer, 2000 to 2003).

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients (50%) who underwent surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer had peritoneal carcinomatosis. Univariate analyses showed worse overall survival for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis compared with patients without carcinomatosis (P < .0001). Patients with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis had a complete resection rate of 26% and 74%, respectively (P < .0001). This corresponded with the observation that patients with complete resection had a better prognosis than those with minimal residual disease of 1 to 5 mm, which commonly reflects peritoneal carcinomatosis (P = .0002). However, patients who underwent complete resection, despite peritoneal carcinomatosis, had a 2-year survival rate of 77%, which was similar to the 2-year survival rate of patients with completely debulked disease who did not have peritoneal carcinomatosis (81%) (P = .96). Analysis of prognostic factors did not show any independent effect of peritoneal carcinomatosis on survival in patients who underwent complete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal carcinomatosis was a negative predictor for complete resection but had no effect on prognosis if complete resection could be achieved. Improving surgical skills might be one step to increase the proportion of patients who might benefit from surgery for recurrent disease.

Platinum neurotoxicity pharmacogenetics

Cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin anticancer drugs are commonly used to treat lung, colorectal, ovarian, breast, head and neck, and genitourinary cancers. However, the efficacy of platinum-based drugs is often compromised because of the substantial risk for severe toxicities, including neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicity can result in both acute and chronic debilitation. Moreover, colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin discontinue therapy more often because of peripheral neuropathy than tumor progression, potentially compromising patient benefit. Numerous methods to prevent neurotoxicity have thus far proven unsuccessful. To circumvent this life-altering side effect while taking advantage of the antitumor activities of the platinum agents, efforts to identify mechanism-based biomarkers are under way. In this review, we detail findings from the current literature for genetic markers associated with neurotoxicity induced by single-agent and combination platinum chemotherapy. These data have the potential for broad clinical implications if mechanistic associations lead to the development of toxicity modulators to minimize the noxious sequelae of platinum chemotherapy.

Phase II evaluation of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in platinum-sensitive patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer have limited therapeutic options. There are no reports of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive disease. We report efficacy and toxicity with nab-paclitaxel in this group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-seven patients enrolled (44 assessable patients). Main inclusion criteria were histologically or cytologically confirmed epithelial cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum (any stage, grade 2 to 3 if stage I) and measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or elevated CA-125 (> 70 U/mL) in patients without measurable disease. Patients received nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m(2) administered intravenously for 30 minutes on day 1 of a 21-day cycle for six cycles or until disease progression.

RESULTS

Median age was 65.5 years; 76% of patients had stage IIIC or IV disease, 81% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, and 94% had prior surgery. For assessable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 64% (15 complete responses [CR] and 13 partial responses [PR] among 44 assessable patients). In patients evaluated with RECIST only, the ORR was 45% (one CR and four PR of 11 patients). In patients with only elevated CA-125, ORR was 82% (seven CRs and two PRs of 11 patients). In patients meeting both RECIST and CA-125 criteria, the ORR was 64% (seven CRs and seven PRs of 22 patients). Median time to response was 1.3 months (range, 0.5 to 4.8 months). Estimated median progression-free survival was 8.5 months. The most frequent grade 3 to 4 treatment-related toxicities were neutropenia (24%) and neuropathy (9%).

CONCLUSION

Nab-paclitaxel is active in this group of patients with recurrent ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The ORR was 64%. Toxicities were manageable. Further studies of nab-paclitaxel in combination with platinum are warranted.

Phase II Study of Carboplatin and Pemetrexed for the Treatment of Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Purpose

More efficacious, less toxic combinations are needed to treat platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate with manageable toxicity and has been combined with carboplatin to treat other cancers.

Patients and Methods

This is a phase II study of carboplatin area under the curve 5 with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 administered intravenously on day 1 every 21 days for six cycles or for up to eight cycles if clinical benefit occurred. Eligible patients had platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC, peritoneal serous cancer, or fallopian tube cancer. The primary objective was to determine response rate defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; other end points included toxicities, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Forty-five patients were accrued; 44 patients received treatment. Overall response rate was 51.1%; there were no complete responses (0%), 23 confirmed partial responses (51.1%), two unconfirmed partial responses (4.4%), 14 patients with stable disease (31.1%), and two patients with progressive disease after two cycles (4.4%). Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (23%), and anemia (9%); there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 and 4 nonhematologic toxicities included fatigue (11%), nausea (5%), vomiting (5%), diarrhea (5%), syncope (5%), and pulmonary embolism (5%). Median PFS time was 7.57 months (95% CI, 6.44 to 10.18 months), mean OS time was 20.3 months, and median OS has not yet been reached with a mean follow-up time of 15.3 months.

Conclusion

Carboplatin/pemetrexed is a well-tolerated regimen with activity in platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC; further testing of this regimen in platinum-sensitive EOC patients is warranted.

Platinum compounds 30 years after the introduction of cisplatin: implications for the treatment of ovarian cancer

Cisplatin and carboplatin have dominated the drug therapy of ovarian cancer and other gynecologic malignancies during the past three decades. This review, based on a recent international conference on metal coordination compounds, highlights advances in our understanding of their mechanisms of action and resistance. Two emerging areas are of special importance: 1) the role of transporters and exporters (first identified in the regulation of copper) in imparting the special selectivity of platinum drugs (also including oxaliplatin) for specific tumors; and 2) the relevance of inactivated DNA repair pathways, and in particular those related to BRCA genes in determining sensitivity of tumors to platinum drugs. The status of DNA repair pathways may become relevant to response to platinums and to the treatment of ovarian cancer in general: repair inhibitors are under testing alone or in combination with cytotoxic drugs for cancer.

Cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative effect of multiple prognostic variables on overall post-recurrence survival time among cohorts of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

Forty cohorts of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (2019 patients) meeting study inclusion criteria were identified from the MEDLINE database (1983-2007). Simple and multiple linear regression analyses, with weighted correlation calculations, were used to assess the effect on median post-recurrence survival time of the following variables: year of publication, age, disease-free interval, localized disease, tumor grade and histology, the proportion of patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery, requirement for bowel resection, and the sequence of cytoreductive surgery and salvage chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The mean weighted median disease-free interval prior to cytoreductive surgery was 20.2 months, and the mean weighted median overall post-recurrence survival time was 30.3 months. The weighted mean proportion of patients in each cohort undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery was 52.2%. Median survival improved with increasing year of publication (p=0.009); however, the only statistically significant clinical variable independently associated with post-recurrence survival time was the proportion of patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery (p=0.019). After controlling for all other factors, each 10% increase in the proportion of patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery was associated with a 3.0 month increase in median cohort survival time.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing operative intervention for recurrent ovarian cancer, the proportion of patients undergoing complete cytoreductive surgery is independently associated with overall post-recurrence survival time. For this select group of patients, the surgical objective should be resection of all macroscopic disease.

An Example of Ovarian Cancer as a 'Chronic Disease Process' - 11-Year Survival with Multiple Treatments for Recurrent and Progressive Disease

The 11-year survival of a woman with recurrent progressive advanced epithelial ovarian cancer emphasizes the potential for the disease process to be quite 'chronic' in nature.

Phase II evaluation of topotecan and navelbine in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and toxicity profile in patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer treated with topotecan at 2.5 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 plus vinorelbine at 25 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligibility criteria included patients with recurrent primary peritoneal or epithelial ovarian cancer with either platinum-resistant or platinum-sensitive disease. Patients were required to have a performance status of <or=2 and normal hepatic and renal function. Response to therapy and toxicity were assessed using standard criteria. Chi square and Student's t-tests were used as appropriate. Survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

All 40 patients enrolled were assessable for response. The median age of the patients was 58 years (range 30-82). Median treatment-free interval was 4.0 months. A total of 216 cycles of chemotherapy were administered with a median of 5.0 cycles per patient. Overall median TTP with this treatment regimen was 19 weeks (range 2-136 weeks). The response rate was 30% overall, and the response for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients was 44% (95% CI:22-69%) and 18% (95% CI:5-40%) respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (range 1-9 months). Median overall survival was 16.4 months (range 1.5-51.7 months). Assessment of toxicity by patient showed 58% demonstrating grade 3/4 neutropenia with the vast majority being uncomplicated. No severe non-hematological toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Administration of topotecan and navelbine is feasible with demonstrable activity and tolerable toxicity. This regimen may be considered especially in platinum-sensitive patients if a non-platinum based doublet is desired.

Phase II trial of biweekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent platinum-refractory ovarian and peritoneal cancer

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is active in recurrent platinum-refractory ovarian and peritoneal cancer as demonstrated in a prospective-randomized trial. Dose-limiting toxicity in the US Food and Drug Administration-approved application schedule of PLD (50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks) was serious palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (PPE). This phase II trial was aimed at reduction of the frequency of serious PPE without loss of efficacy by modifying both the application schedule and the total dose of PLD administered as palliative single-agent chemotherapy. Fifty patients were enrolled into this phase II trial. PLD was given via 30-min intravenous infusion at a dose of 20 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint of the trial was the best response to chemotherapy. Secondary goals were progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Four complete responses and 16 partial responses were found resulting in an overall best response rate of 40.0%. The median progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat-population was 4.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-5.4 months], whereas the overall survival was 16.5 months (95% CI, 12.3-20.7 months). Although 17 (34.0%) patients developed some PPE, only one progressed to grade 3 (NCI-CTC version 2.0; 1998). No grade 4 toxicity occurred. PLD 20 mg/m2 biweekly is highly active in patients with recurrent platinum-refractory ovarian and peritoneal cancer. The frequency of grade 3 and grade 4 PPE was remarkably reduced in this trial, as compared with the frequency of serious PPE observed in patients who were administered the dose schedule of 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks.

Pharmaceutical management of ovarian cancer : current status

Over recent decades, truly impressive progress has been made in the outcome associated with the pharmacological antineoplastic management of women with advanced ovarian cancer. Following initial surgery, the large majority of patients with this malignancy will receive a chemotherapy regimen that includes a platinum drug (carboplatin or cisplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel). Currently, objective responses are observed in approximately 60-80% of patients treated in the front-line setting, with documented improvements in overall survival compared with prior non-platinum and taxane programmes. Unfortunately, despite the high response rate to initial chemotherapy, the majority of women with advanced disease will experience recurrence of the malignant process and be candidates for a variety of possible second-line therapeutic options. It is well recognized that ovarian cancer patients who are documented to experience an initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy but where the disease recurs approximately 6 or more months following the completion of primary therapy, may have another clinically meaningful response (both objective and subjective) to a second platinum-based strategy. However, an optimal management approach in this setting remains to be defined. Furthermore, the malignant cell populations in all ovarian cancer patients who experience an initial relapse of the disease process will eventually be resistant to the platinum agents. In this setting, multiple drugs have been shown to be biologically active. Again, an optimal strategy to be employed in the platinum-resistant setting has yet to be demonstrated through the conduct of evidence-based trials. Reasonable goals of therapy in women with recurrent or resistant ovarian cancer are to improve overall survival, reduce the severity (and delay the occurrence) of symptoms and optimize overall quality of life.

Activity of chemotherapy in mucinous ovarian cancer with a recurrence free interval of more than 6 months: results from the SOCRATES retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma have a poorer prognosis compared with other histological subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate, retrospectively, the activity of chemotherapy in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent mucinous ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The SOCRATES study retrospectively assessed the pattern of care of a cohort of patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer observed in the years 2000-2002 in 37 Italian centres. Data were collected between April and September 2005. Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer with > 6 months of platinum free interval were considered eligible.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with mucinous histotype and 388 patients with other histotypes were analyzed. At baseline, mucinous tumours differed from the others for an higher number of patients with lower tumor grading (p = 0.0056) and less advanced FIGO stage (p = 0.025). At time of recurrence, a statistically significant difference was found in performance status (worse in mucinous, p = 0.024). About 20% of patients underwent secondary cytoreduction in both groups, but a lower number of patients were optimally debulked in the mucinous group (p = 0.03). Patients with mucinous cancer received more frequently single agent platinum than platinum based-combination therapy or other non-platinum schedules as second line therapy (p = 0.026), with a response rate lower than in non-mucinous group (36.4% vs 62.6%, respectively, p = 0.04). Median time to progression and overall survival were worse for mucinous ovarian cancer. Finally, mucinous cancer received a lower number of chemotherapy lines (p = 0.0023).

CONCLUSION

This analysis shows that platinum sensitive mucinous ovarian cancer has a poor response to chemotherapy. Studies dedicated to this histological subgroup are needed.

Antineoplastic agents in the management of ovarian cancer: current status and emerging therapeutic strategies

The intent of this review is to critically examine the status of the current chemotherapeutic management of ovarian cancer and possible future directions. Standard systemic chemotherapy includes a platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel), a strategy that has not changed in more than a decade. Phase-III-trial data have revealed the superior efficacy of intraperitoneal cisplatin, compared with systemic platinum delivery, in small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer, but in general this approach is associated with greater toxicity. Several regimens have been shown to be active in recurrent and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, but an optimal management strategy has not been defined. Although 'targeted therapeutic approaches' are currently being explored in this disease, with the important exception of anti-angiogeneic agents, to date, limited biological and clinical activity have been demonstrated.

A phase I study of lapatinib in combination with carboplatin in women with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), spectrum of toxicities, clinical activity, and pharmacokinetics of carboplatin given in combination with lapatinib in women with a first recurrence of platinum sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients with measurable, platinum sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma were eligible. Cohorts of 3-6 patients were to receive up to 6 cycles of intravenous carboplatin AUC of 6 every 21 days in combination with escalating dosages of oral lapatinib (starting at a dose of 750 mg daily). Toxicity was assessed using NCI CTC for Adverse Events. Clinical response was monitored using RECIST criteria. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed for the second cohort of patients.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled. No dose limiting toxicity was noted. Two of 6 patients in the first cohort had unanticipated excessive delays in treatment due to non-dose limiting G3 neutropenia. Therefore, the study was modified to reduce the carboplatin dose in the second cohort. The median number of courses administered to the 11 evaluable patients in these two cohorts was 2.8 (range 1-6). Drug-related grade 3 or 4 toxicities included non-dose limiting G4 thrombocytopenia (n=1), and non-dose limiting G3 neutropenia (n=3). Of the 11 patients who received >or=1 course of therapy, 3 (27%) had a partial response, and 3 (27%) had stable disease. The pharmacokinetics of carboplatin were not significantly altered by concomitant administration of lapatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen of lapatinib and carboplatin was associated with unacceptable non-dose limiting toxicities, excessive treatment delays and limited clinical responses.

Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group

Purpose

The management of recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Single-agent topotecan is an established treatment option, and preliminary evidence suggests improved tumor control by combining topotecan with etoposide or gemcitabine.

Patients and Methods

Women with relapsed ovarian cancer after primary surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to topotecan monotherapy 1.25 mg/m2/d, topotecan 1.0 mg/m2plus oral etoposide 50 mg/d, or topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2on day 1 and 600 mg/m2on day 8 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified for platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive disease according to a recurrence-free interval of less or more than 12 months, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rates, toxicity, and quality of life (as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] 30-item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire).

Results

The trial enrolled 502 patients with a mean age of 60.5 years (± 10.2 years), 208 of whom were platinum resistant. Median overall survival was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.5 to 21.9 months) with topotecan, 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 20.0 months) with topotecan plus etoposide (log-rank P = .7647), and 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.9 months) with topotecan plus gemcitabine (log-rank P = .2344). Platinum-sensitive patients lived significantly longer than platinum-refractory patients (21.9 v 10.6 months). The median progression-free survival was 7.0, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Objective response rates were 27.8%, 36.1%, and 31.6%, respectively. Patients under combined treatment were at higher risk of severe thrombocytopenia.

Conclusion

Nonplatinum topotecan combinations do not provide a survival advantage over topotecan alone in women with relapsed ovarian cancer.

Treatment of recurrent or persistent platinum-refractory ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer with gemcitabine and topotecan: a phase II trial of the Puget Sound Oncology Consortium

OBJECTIVE

To determine the nature and degree of toxicity, response rate, quality of life (QOL), and progression-free interval in women with platinum-resistant refractory ovarian or peritoneal cancer receiving weekly topotecan and gemcitabine.

METHODS

A Phase II trial of gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) and topotecan 3.0 or 2.5 mg/m(2) administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle was conducted. Response was assessed by RECIST criteria. Quality of life was assessed with FACT-O.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study and all were evaluable. One patient was later found to be ineligible due to a concurrent endometrial malignancy, but remains part of the analysis. Sixteen patients (70%) had measurable disease at baseline and 7 (30%) had elevated CA125 only. The median number of prior regimens was 1, range 1-4 and median number of prior cycles was 8, range 3-39. The first 6 patients received topotecan at a dose of 3.0 mg/m(2), but because of dose delays and need for GCSF the dose of topotecan was lowered to 2.5 mg/m(2). There were 4 (17%) partial responses, but only two (9%) were confirmed prior to progression; and 8 (35%) had stable disease. Toxicity was acceptable with only 8 of the 107 cycles given requiring a dose reduction. Four patients (17%) were taken off the study for toxicity, two at the higher dose and two at the lower dose. Median time to recurrence was 3.0 months and median overall survival was 12.6 months. QOL did not differ with subsequent cycles as compared to baseline.

CONCLUSION

The combination of weekly topotecan and gemcitabine is well tolerated, but best response rate is 17%, and confirmed response is only 9%, which is not significantly better than single agent gemcitabine or topotecan. These results do not provide compelling evidence for the combination of weekly gemcitabine and topotecan as a promising therapy.

Anti-mesothelin immunotoxin SS1P in combination with gemcitabine results in increased activity against mesothelin-expressing tumor xenografts

PURPOSE

To determine the antitumor activity of the anti-mesothelin immunotoxin SS1P in combination with gemcitabine against mesothelin-expressing tumor xenografts.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The in vitro activity of SS1P in combination with gemcitabine against the mesothelin-expressing cell line A431/K5 was evaluated using cytotoxicity and apoptosis assays. The antitumor activity of this combination was evaluated in nude mice bearing A431/K5 tumor xenografts. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with different doses and schedules of gemcitabine alone, SS1P alone (0.2 mg/kg i.v. every other day x three doses), or with both agents together, and tumor volumes were measured over time.

RESULTS

In vitro studies failed to show the synergy of SS1P plus gemcitabine against the mesothelin-expressing A431/K5 cells. In contrast, in the in vivo setting, there was a marked synergy when SS1P was combined with gemcitabine for the treatment of mesothelin-expressing tumor xenografts. This synergy was present using different doses and schedules of gemcitabine administration. In mice treated with fractionated doses of gemcitabine in combination with SS1P, complete tumor regression was observed in all mice and was long-lasting in 60% of the animals. Also, this antitumor activity was specific to SS1P because HA22, an immunotoxin targeting CD22 not expressed on A431/K5 cells, did not increase the efficacy of gemcitabine.

CONCLUSIONS

SS1P in combination with gemcitabine results in marked antitumor activity against mesothelin-expressing tumors. This combination could be potentially useful for the treatment of human cancers that express mesothelin and are responsive to gemcitabine therapy.

Gemcitabine-induced reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome: a case report and review of the literature

Gemcitabine is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for a variety of tumor types. Although this nucleoside analogue antineoplastic agent is similar in structure to cytarabine, central nervous system toxicities have rarely been attributed to gemcitabine. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) is a rare but increasingly identifiable clinicoradiologic process in cancer patients associated with cytotoxic and immunosuppressive agents. The syndrome is characterized by acute to subacute onset of headache, nausea, vomiting, altered mental status, seizures, stupor, and visual disturbances. The pathophysiology of RPLS continues to remain controversial but likely involves loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation leading to arteriole leakage. Radiologically, posterior occipital white matter edema is noted, with characteristic findings on magnetic resonance imaging. Often the syndrome is reversible with treatment of concurrent hypertension or removal of the causative agent; however, failure to quickly recognize the syndrome and discontinue the offending agent may result in profound and permanent central nervous system dysfunction or death. This article describes a case of RPLS attributed to gemcitabine use for pancreatic cancer. Such a descriptive case serves as a platform for the discussion of the syndrome, proposed mechanisms of central nervous system damage, and review of the currently available literature on the topic. With increased awareness of RPLS by oncologists and other medical providers, cancer patient care may be improved and further insight into this complication of therapy through continued research may be gained.

Kinetic investigation of the inhibitory effect of gemcitabine on DNA polymerization catalyzed by human mitochondrial DNA polymerase

Gemcitabine, 2'-deoxy-2', 2'-difluorocytidine (dFdC), is a drug approved for use against various solid tumors. Clinically, this moderately toxic nucleoside analog causes peripheral neuropathy, hematological dysfunction, and pulmonary toxicity in cancer patients. Although these side effects closely mimic symptoms of mitochondrial dysfunction, there is no direct evidence to show gemcitabine interferes with mitochondrial DNA replication catalyzed by human DNA polymerase gamma. Here we employed presteady state kinetic methods to directly investigate the incorporation of the 5'-triphosphorylated form of gemcitabine (dFdCTP), the excision of the incorporated monophosphorylated form (dFdCMP), and the bypass of template base dFdC catalyzed by human DNA polymerase gamma. Opposite template base dG, dFdCTP was incorporated with a 432-fold lower efficiency than dCTP. Although dFdC is not a chain terminator, the incorporated dFdCMP decreased the incorporation efficiency of the next 2 correct nucleotides by 214- and 7-fold, respectively. Moreover, the primer 3'-dFdCMP was excised with a 50-fold slower rate than the matched 3'-dCMP. When dFdC was encountered as a template base, DNA polymerase gamma paused at the lesion and one downstream position but eventually elongated the primer to full-length product. These pauses were because of a 1,000-fold decrease in nucleotide incorporation efficiency. Interestingly, the polymerase fidelity at these pause sites decreased by 2 orders of magnitude. Thus, our pre-steady state kinetic studies provide direct evidence demonstrating the inhibitory effect of gemcitabine on the activity of human mitochondrial DNA polymerase.

Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Progressive or Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Purpose

We aimed at investigating the efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life (QOL) of gemcitabine (GEM) compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in the salvage treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Patients and Methods

A phase III randomized multicenter trial was planned to compare GEM (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) with PLD (40 mg/m2 every 28 days) in ovarian cancer patients who experienced treatment failure with only one platinum/paclitaxel regimen and who experienced recurrence or progression within 12 months after completion of primary treatment.

Results

One hundred fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to PLD (n = 76) or GEM (n = 77). Treatment arms were well balanced for clinicopathologic characteristics. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in GEM-treated patients versus PLD-treated patients (P = .007). Grade 3 or 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was documented in a higher proportion of PLD patients (6%) versus GEM patients (0%; P = .061). The overall response rate was 16% in the PLD arm compared with 29% in the GEM arm (P = .056). No statistically significant difference in time to progression (TTP) curves according to treatment allocation was documented (P = .411). However, a trend for more favorable overall survival was documented in the PLD arm compared with the GEM arm, although the P value was of borderline statistical significance (P = .048). Statistically significantly higher global QOL scores were found in PLD-treated patients at the first and second postbaseline QOL assessments.

Conclusion

GEM does not provide an advantage compared with PLD in terms of TTP in ovarian cancer patients who experience recurrence within 12 months after primary treatment but should be considered in the spectrum of drugs to be possibly used in the salvage setting.

Second-line randomized trials in epithelial ovarian cancer

Important issues in the treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) are 1) to delay the time to symptomatic disease, 2) to reduce symptoms in case of symptomatic disease, 3) to optimize quality of life, and 4) to prolong overall survival. However, response assessment and recording of treatment-induced side effects in general get most attention. The likelihood of response to chemotherapy is directly proportional to the length of time between the end of primary chemotherapy and the date of recurrence. Also, the aggressiveness of the recurrence seems related to the prior biological pace of disease progression. For these reasons different disease categories have been identified, ie, platinum/taxane-refractory disease (progressive during first-line stabilization as best response), persistent disease (partial response to first-line therapy), platinum/taxane-resistant disease (clinical complete response [CCR] or no evidence of disease [NED] to/after first line and relapse <6 months), and platinum/taxane-sensitive disease (CCR or NED to/after first line and relapse >6 months). Randomized trials in these different categories did not show a benefit of maintenance or consolidation therapies after first-line therapy but did show differences in tolerability and efficacy (in platinum/taxane-sensitive disease) of different single agents and indicated that in specific circumstances combination chemotherapy is superior to single-agent chemotherapy. However, in all circumstances other aspects such as toxicity (and earlier experienced toxicity), clinical condition, convenience of administration, costs, and patient preference should be considered in the final selection of treatment

[Evaluation of second-line chemotherapies most often used in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Second-line chemotherapies result in a progression-free interval of 2,3-42 months.

AIM

The authors evaluated the efficacy of second-line paclitaxel-carboplatin, topotecan, and cisplatin-epirubicin-etoposide combinations.

METHODS

Paclitaxel-carboplatin (175 mg/m2 and AUC 5) in 3-week intervals and topotecan (1.5 mg/m2/d1-3) in 3-week intervals was given to 13 and 16 patients. The triple combination of cisplatin-epirubicin-etoposide was applied in 48 patients in 4-week courses, with doses of 33 mg/m2/d1-3, 60 mg/m2/d1, and 100 mg/m2/d1-3., respectively. The progression-free interval was calculated by the product limit method of Kaplan-Meier.

RESULTS

A significantly better progression-free interval was observed in treatments with paclitaxel-carboplatin and cisplatin-epirubicin-etoposide compared to the topotecan chemotherapy (5 and 5.5 months vs. 4 months, respectively, p = 0.0324 and p = 0.0087). A better progression-free interval was found in the platinum-sensitive tumors compared to the platinum-resistant ones by the above mentioned combinations (6 and 3.5 months, 7 and 4 months, and 6.5 and 3.5 months, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The lower priced cisplatin-epirubicin-etoposide combination resulted in a slightly better efficacy compared to the 2 other treatments both in platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant tumors.

Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: pharmacotherapy and novel therapeutics

Epithelial ovarian cancer will strike between 1 - 2% of women in developed countries and, unfortunately, it largely remains a lethal disease due to late-stage at diagnosis and the eventual development of chemotherapy resistance. Ovarian cancer is initially treated with surgical resection and chemotherapy (primarily platinum/taxane combinations) and remission can be attained for the majority of patients. Despite this, most women will recur and require multiple further therapies. The purpose of this paper is to review the existing treatment options, including surgery, traditional chemotherapy as well as upcoming novel and targeted therapies that may one day improve outcomes in this disease.

International Perspective on Health-Related Quality-of-Life Research in Cancer Clinical Trials: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Experience

Over recent decades, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) research has been increasingly integrated into cancer clinical trials. The purpose of this review is to examine the overall approach taken towards clinical trial–based HRQOL investigations within the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). This article reports a literature review of clinical trial–based HRQOL investigations and provides selective examples of HRQOL studies in phase III clinical trials in various disease sites. The findings of this review highlight that, historically, assessing HRQOL was a challenge. However, as EORTC has become more experienced in the assessment of HRQOL and has developed a portfolio of appropriate tools, HRQOL has become a more accepted end point in large-scale trials. The trials reviewed in this article show that, in general, HRQOL data do provide information that can both inform clinicians about the effectiveness of the treatments and also serve as an invaluable source of information for patients to make informed decisions regarding the treatment choice.

Update in the management of ovarian and cervical carcinoma

Ovarian and cervical cancers are significant health problems. This article provides an update in selected management topics. Paclitaxel and platinum derivatives are the first-line treatment for patients with advanced disease. In selected patients, intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been associated with improved survival but the broad applicability of this strategy is limited by issues of toxicity and feasibility. Management of patients with recurrent disease is based on a number of factors and includes surgery in selected cases, platinum-based chemotherapy for patients with platinum-sensitive disease and other agents such as topotecan and pegylated liposomal formulation of doxorubicin for patients with platinum-resistant disease. In cervical cancer, the most significant issue/event is the demonstration of superior survival with topotecan and cisplatin compared to cisplatin alone. Finally, new agents such as epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents are being currently tested in these settings.

Gemcitabine and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin alternating with cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide in platinum refractory/resistant, paclitaxel-pretreated, ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This phase II study conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (LDOX) alternating with cisplatin (CDDP) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) in platinum-resistant/refractory, paclitaxel pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with CDDP-resistant/refractory and paclitaxel pretreated patients were treated with 8 cycles of GEM 800 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 and LDOX 30 mg/m2 day 1, alternating with CDDP 60 mg/m2 and CTX 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Objective responses were observed in 37.5% of patients (4 complete and 11 partial responses) with measurable disease (n=40). CA125 response occurred in 30 (71.4%) of patients with elevated CA125 (n=42). After a median follow-up of 23 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 5.2-8.5), while the median overall survival (OS) was 18.2 months (95% CI: 12.7-23.6). A progression-free interval (PFI) of 0-3 months was associated with lower objective responses (10% versus 46.6%, p=0.06). Chemotherapy was well tolerated. The most frequent toxicities were myelosuppression, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, nausea/vomiting, fatigue and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). Overall 31 (65%) patients received G-CSF and 13 (27%) antibiotics because of neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

This alternating combination chemotherapy is feasible for patients with platinum-resistant EOC and is associated with encouraging outcomes and a favorable toxicity profile.

Combination therapy with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin in gynecologic malignancies: a prospective phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe Ovarialkarzinom (AGO-OVAR) and Kommission Uterus (AGO-K-Ut)

OBJECTIVE

A multicenter non-randomized phase II study was initiated to evaluate tolerability and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in combination with carboplatin in gynecologic malignancies.

METHODS

One hundred forty women with recurrent or advanced endometrial (n=31), cervical or vaginal cancer (n=31), uterine sarcomas (n=11), or recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (n=67) received six courses of PLD 40 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC 6) every 28 days.

RESULTS

Hematological toxicities with NCI-CTC grade 3/4 were anemia in 8%, thrombocytopenia in 14%, neutropenia in 24%, and febrile neutropenia in 2% of 652 cycles. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities included fatigue (14% of patients), pain (10%), dyspnea (9%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (7%), and nausea/vomiting (7%). Dose intensity reached 87.2% for PLD and 88.2% for carboplatin. Seventy-four percent of all non-progressive patients received at least 5 cycles. Overall response rates were (116 patients evaluable for response): ovarian cancer (n=54) 68%, endometrial cancer (n=27) 44%, uterine sarcomas (n=9) 33%, and cervical/vaginal cancer (n=26) 12%. Median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95%CI 9.6-14.1) for ovarian cancer and 9.5 months (95%CI 6.6-12.6) for endometrial cancer. Median overall survival was 23.8 months (95%CI 19.0-30.2) and 21.4 months (95%CI 11.9-), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PLD and carboplatin was well tolerated and feasible in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Efficacy was low in cervical/vaginal cancer, but promising in patients with endometrial cancer. Efficacy was within the expected range in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer and is currently under further investigation in a prospective randomized phase III trial comparing PLD/carboplatin with paclitaxel/carboplatin (CALYPSO-trial; AGO-OVAR 2.9).

Management of asymptomatic patients on follow-up for ovarian cancer with rising CA-125 concentrations

In most women who have been treated for ovarian cancer, serum concentrations of the tumour marker cancer antigen (CA)-125 will serially rise on average 4 months before they develop symptoms or signs of relapse. Whether or not early reintroduction of treatment produces a survival advantage is unclear. Although a high chance exists that tumour response can be achieved with chemotherapy, complete cure of these patients is rarely possible. Potential advantages of early treatment of relapse include delaying cancer-related symptoms; psychological reassurance; and, possibly, improved survival. Potential disadvantages include loss of time without treatment and the associated toxic effects. Patients should be counselled on these advantages and disadvantages before deciding whether to have their CA-125 concentrations routinely measured during follow-up. In this review, we make suggestions, on the basis of the extent and duration of response to previous treatment, as to how to manage patients once their CA-125 concentrations start rising. Our suggestions range from close observation if scans are clear to various chemotherapy regimens, hormonal treatment, and surgery. Asymptomatic patients with rising CA-125 concentrations provide an ideal group in which to test new investigational agents that might have potential as maintenance treatment.