New insights into the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of statins

Clinically relevant differences between the statins: implications for therapeutic selection

Although the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins, share a common lipid-lowering effect, there are differences within this class of drugs. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-lowering efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, drug-food interactions, and cost can vary widely, thus influencing the selection of a particular statin as a treatment option. The statins that produce the greatest percentage change in LDL cholesterol levels are atorvastatin and simvastatin. Atorvastatin and fluvastatin are least affected by alterations in renal function. Fewer pharmacokinetic drug interactions are likely to occur with pravastatin and fluvastatin, because they are not metabolized through the cytochrome P450 (3A4) system. The most cost-effective statins, based on cost per percentage change in LDL cholesterol levels, are fluvastatin, cerivastatin, and atorvastatin. Awareness of these differences may assist in the selection or substitution of an appropriate statin for a particular patient.

Fluvastatin in combination with rad significantly reduces graft vascular disease in rat cardiac allografts

BACKGROUND

RAD is a potent immunosuppressive agent that has been shown to be effective in preventing acute and chronic allograft rejection in animal models. The HMGCoA reductase inhibitors have been found to reduce the incidence of graft vascular disease (GVD) in heart transplant patients and in animal models. This study was designed to investigate the effects of fluvastatin or pravastatin in a rodent model of GVD produced using low doses of RAD to prevent acute rejection.

METHODS

Hearts from Fisher 344 rats were heterotopically transplanted to Lewis rat recipients. RAD was administered orally at 0.5 mg/kg per day for days 0 to 14 and then 0.25 mg/kg per day for an additional 85 days to prevent acute rejection but allow for the development of GVD. Pravastatin (20 mg/kg per day) or fluvastatin (2 or 6 mg/kg per day) was added to the RAD treatment. At the end of a 100-day treatment period, the hearts were harvested for morphometric and histopathologic examinations.

RESULTS

Rats treated with fluvastatin, at either dose, had a significant (P< or =0.0239) decrease in coronary arterial intimal thickening (GVD) of approximately 43%. Rats treated with pravastatin had a 22% reduction in GVD that did not reach statistical significance. Treatment with fluvastatin, but not pravastatin, decreased the degree of endomyocardial mononuclear cell infiltration seen with RAD administered alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin significantly decreased GVD in a rat model produced using low-dose RAD immunosuppression. To a lesser extent, pravastatin also decreased GVD in this model. These data lend further support for the study of fluvastatin, pravastatin, and other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for the prevention of GVD in cardiac transplant patients.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin

Fluvastatin, the first fully synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce cholesterol in patients with hyperlipidaemia, to prevent subsequent coronary events in patients with established coronary heart disease, and to alter endothelial function and plaque stability in animal models. Fluvastatin is relatively hydrophilic, compared with the semisynthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, and, therefore, it is extensively absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract. After absorption, it is nearly completely extracted and metabolised in the liver to 2 hydroxylated metabolites and an N-desisopropyl metabolite, which are excreted in the bile. Approximately 95% of a dose is recovered in the faeces, with 60% of a dose recovered as the 3 metabolites. The 6-hydroxy and N-desisopropyl fluvastatin metabolites are exclusively generated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and do not accumulate in the blood. CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C8 and CYP2D6 form the 5-hydroxy fluvastatin metabolite. Because of its hydrophilic nature and extensive plasma protein binding, fluvastatin has a small volume of distribution with minimal concentrations in extrahepatic tissues. The pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin are not influenced by renal function, due to its extensive metabolism and biliary excretion; limited data in patients with cirrhosis suggest a 30% reduction in oral clearance. Age and gender do not appear to affect the disposition of fluvastatin. CYP3A4 inhibitors (erythromycin, ketoconazole and itraconazole) have no effect on fluvastatin pharmacokinetics, in contrast to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors which are primarily metabolised by CYP3A and are subject to potential drug interactions with CYP3A inhibitors. Coadministration of fluvastatin with gastrointestinal agents such as cholestyramine, and gastric acid regulating agents (H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors), significantly alters fluvastatin disposition by decreasing and increasing bioavailability, respectively. The nonspecific CYP inducer rifampicin (rifampin) significantly increases fluvastatin oral clearance. In addition to being a CYP2C9 substrate, fluvastatin demonstrates inhibitory effects on this isoenzyme in vitro and in vivo. In human liver microsomes, fluvastatin significantly inhibits the hydroxylation of 2 CYP2C9 substrates, tolbutamide and diclofenac. The oral clearances of the CYP2C9 substrates diclofenac, tolbutamide, glibenclamide (glyburide) and losartan are reduced by 15 to 25% when coadministered with fluvastatin. These alterations have not been shown to be clinically significant. There are inadequate data evaluating the potential interaction of fluvastatin with warfarin and phenytoin, 2 CYP2C9 substrates with a narrow therapeutic index, and caution is recommended when using fluvastatin with these agents. Fluvastatin does not appear to have a significant effect on other CYP isoenzymes or P-glycoprotein-mediated transport in vivo.

Sirolimus allows early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplantation resulting in improved renal function and lower blood pressure

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated whether cyclosporine (CsA) could be eliminated from a sirolimus (Rapamune, rapamycin, SRL)-CsA-steroid (ST) regimen at 3 months.

METHODS

This was an open-label study conducted in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Upon enrollment, 525 primary (90%) or secondary (10%) renal allograft recipients with cadaveric (89%) or living (11%) donors received 2 mg of sirolimus (troughs>5 ng/ml), CsA, and steroids. At 3 months+/-2 weeks, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to remain on SRL-CsA-ST or to have CsA withdrawn and therapy continued with SRL (troughs 20-30 ng/ml)-ST.

RESULTS

At 12 months, overall graft and patient survival were 89.1% and 94.9%, respectively. In the 430 (82%) randomized patients, there was no difference in graft survival (95.8% vs. 97.2%, SRL-CsA-ST vs. SRL-ST) or patient survival (97.2% vs. 98.1%, respectively). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed primary acute rejection was 13.1% during the prerandomization period. After randomization, the acute rejection rates were 4.2% and 9.8% for SRL-CsA-ST and SRL-ST, respectively (P=0.035). Renal function (calculated glomerular filtration rate, 57 vs. 63 ml/min, P<0.001) and blood pressure significantly improved when CsA was withdrawn. Hypertension, CsA nephrotoxicity, hyperuricemia, and Herpes zoster occurred statistically more frequently in patients remaining on CsA, whereas thrombocytopenia, abnormal liver function tests, and hypokalemia were reported more often for SRL-ST therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sirolimus, CsA, and steroids for 3 months posttransplant, followed by elimination of CsA, is a safe and effective alternative to continuous therapy with sirolimus, CsA, and steroids that can result in better renal function and lower blood pressure.

Induction of apoptosis and inhibition of migration of inflammatory and vascular wall cells by cerivastatin

Statins are thought to play a role in directly affecting immune and mesenchymal cells. Since cerivastatin's pleiotropic effects are poorly investigated, we were interested to find out whether this drug can modulate leukocyte and vessel wall cell functions. Leukocyte migration was tested in modified Boyden microchemotaxis chambers and oxygen radical production was measured fluorometrically. Transendothelial migration experiments were performed with human umbilical vein endothelial cells and neutrophils. Neutrophil, monocyte, and vascular smooth muscle cell caspase-3 activity and annexin-V binding were quantified by FIENA and FACS, respectively. Cerivastatin [10 pM to 100 microM] decreased leukocyte chemotaxis towards interleukin-8 or RANTES. Migration of cells was completely restored by addition of mevalonic acid. In neutrophils, cerivastatin [100 microM] reduced transendothelial migration, whereas treatment of endothelial cells failed to affect transmigration. Neutrophil respiratory burst activity was unaffected by cerivastatin. At concentrations of 10 nM or higher, cerivastatin increased the rate of apoptosis in phagocytes and smooth muscle cells. Results show that cerivastatin is able to inhibit leukocyte chemotaxis, and that cerivastatin induces neutrophil, monocyte, and smooth muscle cell apoptosis. The drug's impact on transendothelial migration is due to its effects on neutrophils. In addition to its lipid-lowering effects, pharmacological properties of cerivastatin may include modulatory actions in leukocytes and mesenchymal cells.

Cerivastatin and gemfibrozil-associated rhabdomyolysis

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of rhabdomyolysis resulting from concurrent use of cerivastatin and gemfibrozil. CASE SUMMARY An 82-year-old white man presented to the emergency department with severe muscle weakness and inability to walk approximately one month after starting cerivastatin. He had been taking gemfibrozil for several years without any known adverse effects. Both medications were discontinued and the patient recovered. He was discharged with a diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis secondary to his medications.

DISCUSSION

Four previous reports describing rhabdomyolysis in patients on concomitant cerivastatin and gemfibrozil have been cited. Although monotherapy with cerivastatin is well tolerated and has a low frequency of adverse events, the combination with nicotinic acid (i.e., niacin) or a fibric-acid derivative (i.e., gemfibrozil, fenofibrate) may result in severe skeletal muscle toxicity and rhabdomyolysis.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the Naranjo scale, a probable relationship exists between the concomitant use of gemfibrozil and cerivastatin with the resulting development of rhabdomyolysis. Concurrent use of gemfibrozil and cerivastatin is therefore contraindicated.

Rhabdomyolysis and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To review rhabdomyolysis and discuss the role of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) and their interactions with other agents in precipitating this condition, and to present case reports of statin-induced rhabdomyolysis.

DATA SOURCE

Relevant clinical literature was accessed using MEDLINE (January 1985-October 2000). The following search terms were used: rhabdomyolysis, adverse events, drug interactions, statins, and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

DISCUSSION

Rhabdomyolysis occurs when extensive muscle damage results in the release of cellular contents into systemic circulation. Major complications include acute renal failure, cardiac abnormalities, and compartment syndrome. Treatment of rhabdomyolysis is supportive, with the primary aim of preventing renal and cardiac complications. Statin monotherapy or combination therapy may result in myopathy, which rarely progresses to rhabdomyolysis. The mechanism for drug interactions with the statins involves their property of lipid or water solubility. This characteristic determines the degree of hepatoenteric or renal metabolism of the statins. All statins except pravastatin undergo metabolism via the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Other pharmacologic agents that are also metabolized via this pathway may interact with the statins and cause rhabdomyolysis. The risk of statin-induced rhabdomyolysis is increased significantly when statins are used concomitantly with such drugs as fibrates, cyclosporine, macrolide antibiotics, and azole antifungals.

CONCLUSIONS

Rhabdomyolysis is a rare but clinically important adverse event of statin monotherapy or combination therapy. Thorough understanding of this condition may help prevent or minimize adverse health outcomes in patents receiving statin therapy.

Apoptosis in atherosclerosis: pathological and pharmacological implications

Normal embryonic development, tissue differentiation and repair in the eukaryote requires a tightly regulated apoptosis, or programmed cell death. Apoptosis also plays an essential role in different pathological processes including atherosclerosis, in which it affects all cell types in the atherosclerotic lesion, including endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and macrophages. During atherosclerosis progression, pro- and anti-apoptotic signals abound in the evolving lesion. Apoptosis limits the number of a particular cell type that accumulates in the lesion and slows down the overall progression of the lesion. On the other hand, it contributes to the production of unstable plaques. Many pharmacological agents used to treat cardiovascular and lipid disorders have pro- or/and anti-apoptotic effects. Pharmaceuticals that modulate apoptosis in specific types of cell can potentially serve as anti-atherogenic agents. However, to develop agents for clinical use requires a thorough knowledge of the pathophysiology of apoptosis in atheromatous lesions, a highly cell-specific process. Here we review our current understanding of the process to provide a background for future pharmacological research in the area.

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibition prevents endothelial NO synthase downregulation by atherogenic levels of native LDLs: balance between transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation

Atherogenic levels of native low density lipoproteins (nLDLs) decrease the bioavailability of endothelium-derived NO and downregulate endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) expression in cultured human endothelial cells. Here, we show that simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, within the therapeutic range (0.01 to 1 micromol/L) prevented the downregulation of eNOS mRNA and protein promoted by nLDL (180 mg cholesterol/dL, 48 hours) in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. This effect of simvastatin was completely reversed by mevalonate, the product of the reaction, and to a lesser extent by farnesol and geranyl geraniol. Simvastatin significantly stabilized eNOS mRNA in cells treated with nLDL during 48 hours (eNOS mRNA half-life approximately 11 hours in controls versus >24 hours in nLDL per 0.1 micromol/L simvastatin-treated cells). The downregulation of eNOS by nLDL was abrogated by cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis, and by N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal, a protease inhibitor that reduces the catabolism of sterol regulatory element binding proteins. Sterol deprivation increased the downregulation produced by nLDL on eNOS and sterol regulatory element binding protein-2 expression levels. However, no differential modulation of the retardation bands corresponding to the putative sterol-responsive element present in the eNOS promoter was detected by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Our results suggest that nLDL promote eNOS downregulation operating at a transcriptional level, whereas simvastatin prevents such an effect through a posttranscriptional mechanism.

Atorvastatin

Atorvastatin (Lipitor, Pfizer) is a safe and effective 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin). It is the most potent currently available statin in terms of lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total cholesterol levels. It was the first statin shown to lower triglycerides in patients with isolated hypertriglyceridaemia. It has a good safety profile. In common with other statins, it has non-lipid-lowering effects including improving endothelial function, antiproliferative actions on smooth muscle and reducing platelet aggregation. It also has anti-inflammatory effects and may reduce plasma glucose levels. Clinical trial evidence with this statin is currently limited. It did slightly reduce events in the AVERT trial comparing patients receiving coronary angioplasty with those receiving high-dose atorvastatin therapy and in the MIRACL study reduced ischemia in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Other end point trials are in progress.

The significance of genetic polymorphisms in modulating the response to lipid-lowering drugs

The response to lipid-lowering drugs is modified by a number of factors like age, gender, concomitant disease and genetic determinants. Even within homogenous groups of patients, individual responses vary greatly. Until now, no clinical or biochemical parameter exists which predicts whether a subject will respond well to a particular lipid-lowering drug or, in the extreme case, will develop adverse, life-threatening effects (e.g., myositis or rhabdomyolysis). The recent advances in the human genome project promises to have a great impact on our understanding of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and of the individual response to lipid-lowering drugs. Monogenetic disorders of the lipid metabolism produce severe clinical phenotypes, such as Tangier disease, but have a minor role in the evaluation of cardiovascular risk in the general population. On the other hand, several polymorphisms in genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism (e.g., apolipoprotein E) are associated with the plasma levels of lipoproteins, explaining a substantial fraction of the variance of LDL or HDL concentrations. In combination, the knowledge of these polymorphisms, further variants yet to be discovered and variants within the genes involved in the metabolism of lipid-lowering drugs will in the future allow these drugs to be selected according to the patients needs and thus increase both efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lipid-lowering regimes.

NK-104, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, reduces osteopontin expression by rat aortic smooth muscle cells

1. It has been suggested that osteopontin promotes the development of atherosclerosis, especially under diabetic conditions. 2. In the present study, we found that NK-104, a new potent synthetic inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, reduced osteopontin expression both at protein and mRNA levels in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells. 3. The inhibitory effect of NK-104 was almost completely reversed by mevalonate, suggesting that mevalonate or its metabolites play important roles in the regulation of osteopontin expression. 4. Furthermore, oral administration of NK-104 (3 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 7 days) effectively suppressed abnormally upregulated expression of osteopontin mRNA in the aorta and kidney of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. 5. These data support a notion that NK-104 is a suitable drug for the treatment of diabetic patients with hypercholesterolaemia.

The effects of the statins lovastatin and cerivastatin on signalling by the prostanoid IP-receptor

The prostanoid-IP receptor may be unique among G protein coupled receptors in that it is isoprenylated. In this study, we investigated the effects of the statins lovastatin and cerivastatin on signalling by the mouse (m) IP and the human (h) IP receptors, over-expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells and by the hIP receptor, endogenously expressed in human erythroleukaemia cells. Both statins significantly reduced IP receptor-mediated cyclic AMP generation and intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](i)) mobilization in a time and concentration dependent manner but had no effect on signalling by the non-isoprenylated beta(2) adrenergic receptor or by the human prostanoid-TP receptor isoforms. Cerivastatin (IC(50), 50 - 90 nM) was significantly more potent than lovastatin (IC(50), 0.80 - 4.2 microM) in inhibiting IP receptor signalling. Whereas IC(50) values indicated that the hIP receptor was significantly more sensitive than the mIP receptor to the statins, the extent of inhibition of cyclic AMP generation by the mIP receptor was significantly greater than that of the hIP receptor to either statin, even at the highest concentrations used. Pretreatment with either statin significantly reduced IP receptor mediated desensitization of signalling by the h.TPalpha, but not by the h.TPbeta, receptor isoform. These data generated in whole cells point to the possibility that statin therapy may interfere with IP receptor signalling in vivo; such interference may be extenuated under conditions where circulating statin levels are elevated and may account, in part, for some of the pleiotropic affects of the statins not attributed solely to their lipid lowering properties.

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and P-glycoprotein modulation

1. Five 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins), (e.g. atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin), were investigated for their ability to reverse P-glycoprotein (P-gp) mediated rhodamine 123 (R123) transport in a murine monocytic leukaemia cell line that over-expresses the multi-drug resistance protein 1a/b (mdr1a/1b). 2. P-gp modulation was studied by a fluorimetric assay and confocal microscopy by means of R123 efflux and uptake experiments, respectively. 3. Atorvastatin acid, methyl ester and lactone, lovastatin lactone and simvastatin lactone inhibited R123 transport in a concentration-dependent manner. Lovastatin acid, simvastatin acid, fluvastatin and pravastatin did not show a significant inhibition of the R123 transport in our cell system. Atorvastatin methyl ester and lactone showed the highest affinities for P-gp and results were comparable for both methods. 4. In conclusion, monitoring of R123 transport in living cells by confocal microscopy in addition to fluorimetric assay is a sensitive tool to study P-gp affinity in drug screening that is especially useful for early phases of drug development.

Rhabdomyolysis secondary to a drug interaction between simvastatin and clarithromycin

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of rhabdomyolysis resulting from concomitant use of clarithromycin and simvastatin.

CASE SUMMARY

A 64-year-old African-American man was admitted to the hospital for worsening renal failure, elevated creatine phosphokinase, diffuse muscle pain, and severe muscle weakness. About three weeks prior to admission, the patient was started on clarithromycin for sinusitis. The patient had been receiving simvastatin for approximately six months. He was treated aggressively with intravenous hydration, sodium bicarbonate, and hemodialysis. A muscle biopsy revealed necrotizing myopathy secondary to a toxin. The patient continued to receive intermittent hemodialysis until his death from infectious complications that occurred three months after admission. There were several factors that could have increased his risk for developing rhabdomyolysis, including chronic renal failure.

DISCUSSION

Clarithromycin is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, the major enzyme responsible for simvastatin metabolism. The concomitant administration of macrolide antibiotics and other hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors have resulted in previous reports of rhabdomyolysis. Other factors may increase the risk of this drug interaction, including the administration of other medications that are associated with myopathy, underlying renal insufficiency, and administration of high doses of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Macrolide antibiotics inhibit the metabolism of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors that are metabolized by CYP3A4 (i.e., atorvastatin, cerivastatin, lovastatin, simvastatin). This interaction may result in myopathy and rhabdomyolysis, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency or those who are concurrently taking medications associated with myopathy.

Pravastatin down-regulates inflammatory mediators in human monocytes in vitro

There is experimental evidence that pravastatin, which is designed to inhibit the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, can affect cell metabolism and proliferation. We therefore studied the effects of pravastatin on the generation of inflammatory mediators in non-stimulated and stimulated primary human monocytes in vitro. In our experimental model, pravastatin induced a dose-dependent inhibition of monocyte cholesterol synthesis (up to 67%), up-regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor mRNA (by about 35%) and reduction in intracellular cholesterol accumulation. In parallel, exposure of non-stimulated monocytes to various doses of pravastatin resulted in inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 protein expression (up to 15-fold), reduction of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) levels (up to 2.4-fold) and a total loss of metalloproteinase-9 activity in stimulated cells. Pravastatin at concentrations of 5, 100 and 500 microM caused an inhibition of TNF-alpha-induced cellular oxygen consumption from 2. 4- to 5.5-fold. These data extend the findings of potential anti-inflammatory actions of statins and also suggest the possibility for pravastatin use in a broader spectrum of inflammatory situations.

Fluvastatin: effects beyond cholesterol lowering

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a major therapeutic challenge in the Western world, and strategies aimed at cholesterol lowering form the mainstay of treatment. Fluvastatin is an established 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor ("statin") for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Its efficacy and safety have been established in numerous clinical trials. Emerging evidence now indicates that treatment with fluvastatin slows the progression of atherosclerotic CHD and reduces the incidence of cardiovascular morbimortality in the secondary prevention setting. This effect of fluvastatin cannot be explained by cholesterol lowering alone; nonlipid-related mechanisms (so-called "pleiotropic effects") undoubtedly contribute to a certain extent, and are probably linked to modulation of the mevalonate pathway. This review discusses the experimental evidence regarding the antiatherosclerotic and antithrombotic effects of fluvastatin that may contribute to its beneficial action on disease progression and clinical events. Such effects include decreased expression of adhesion molecules in monocytes and leucocyte-endothelium adherence responses, immunomodulation, prevention of low-density lipoprotein oxidation, inhibition of cholesterol esterification and accumulation, along with effects on smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. Pleiotropic actions aimed at plaque stabilization (eg, decreased secretion of matrix metalloproteinases by macrophages), together with effects on platelet activity, tissue factor expression, and endothelial function, may contribute to an antithrombotic effect of fluvastatin. Taken together, the results of these studies indicate that the effects of fluvastatin, at therapeutic doses, may extend beyond cholesterol lowering.

Pharmacotherapy of hypercholesterolaemia: statins in clinical practice

The objective of this article is to evaluate the roles of the lipid-lowering class of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in reducing cardiovascular events and to review their mechanism of action based on in vitro and in vivo studies. The clinical outcome of 15 major clinical trials has been critically reviewed and summarised; all showed a high degree of efficacy and safety. Statins, either in active or prodrug forms, are potent inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase, have good absorption rate and their bioavailability depends on their lipophobicity and concomitant use with meals. Abdominal discomfort is the most commonly reported adverse effect. Although the incidence is low, myopathy with or without rhabdomyolysis may be considered a serious adverse effect of statins. A combination of a statin with gemfibrozil seems to increase the risk of this adverse event, particularly in patients with renal impairment. Combination therapy with several other agents, frequently administered to cardiovascular patients, has also been reviewed. Statin therapy is considered highly cost effective in secondary prevention, but it is less cost effective in primary prevention. This factor may underline the rationale for developing other safe and effective agents with an improved cost effectiveness profile. The pleiotropic non-lipid lowering effects of statins may include their anti-oxidant and antithrombotic potential as well as restoration of endothelial function. Statins may also be beneficial in the treatment of osteoporosis. Fewer studies have investigated statins' effects on the quality of lipoprotein particles, the activities of cholesteryl ester transfer protein and lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase as well as their possible synergistic effects with n-3 fatty acids, anti-oxidants and aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events.

Non-lipid-related effects of statins

The beneficial effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) on coronary events have generally been attributed to their hypocholesterolaemic properties. However, as mevalonate and other intermediates of cholesterol synthesis (isoprenoids) are necessary for cell proliferation and other important cell functions, effects other than cholesterol reduction may explain the pharmacological properties of statins. In the present review, we discuss the current knowledge on the nonlipid-related effects of statins, with a special emphasis on their potential benefits in different diseases, such as atherosclerosis and cancer. The mechanism(s) responsible for their favourable properties are also reviewed.

Do pleiotropic effects of statins beyond lipid alterations exist in vivo? What are they and how do they differ between statins?

The inhibition of cellular proliferation, the restoration of endothelial activity, the inhibition of platelet reactivity, and an antioxidant potential are only a few examples of pleiotropic effects of statins. This review analyzes the current knowledge on the pleiotropic properties of this class of drugs and examines the relevant data that support the presence of these effects in vivo. The favorable outcome of major trials of statins has indicated that pleiotropic factors indeed play a role in cardiovascular protection. In addition, recent data indicate that many pleiotropic effects influence mechanisms that belong to the extravascular compartment, as well. Perhaps, some of these properties may eventually justify additional indications for statins and improve the treatment of other diseases, including inflammation and cancer.