Clinical progression and virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 patients: a prospective cohort study. Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Virologic outcome and predictors of virologic failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy containing protease inhibitors

In this observational single-center cohort study outside the clinical trial setting, outcome and predictors of virologic failure of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) containing a protease inhibitor were evaluated in human immunodeficiency (HIV)-infected persons. The study population consisted of 807 protease inhibitor-naive HIV-seropositive patients who initiated antiretroviral therapy with reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors (indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir) between January 1997 and January 1999. Demographic variable, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, CD4+ T-cell count, adverse drug reactions, and adherence to HAART were assessed. Virologic treatment response was defined as a decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA load from baseline to below 500 copies per milliliter after 12 months of therapy. Levels of HIV-1 RNA were undetectable in 43% of patients at 12 months. Factors associated with failure to suppress viral load included age 40 years or younger, baseline CD4+ T cell count less than 200 x 10(6) per liter baseline viral load greater than 4.3 log(10) per milliliter, and non-adherence to HAART. After adjustment by logistic regression, non-adherence was the only statistically significant variable associated with virologic failure (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.67). Unselected patients in whom protease inhibitor is started in a usual clinical setting achieve viral suppression less frequently than do patients in controlled clinical trials. Failure to adherence to HAART was the strongest predictor of virologic failure.

The effects of an HIV-1 immunogen (Remune) on viral load, CD4 cell counts and HIV-specific immunity in a double-blind, randomized, adjuvant-controlled subset study in HIV infected subjects regardless of concomitant antiviral drugs

OBJECTIVE

We examined the activity of an HIV-1 immunogen (Remune) on viral load, CD4 cells and HIV-1 specific immunity.

METHODS

Plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained in a predefined random subset of subjects (n = 252) from a multicentre, double-blind, adjuvant-controlled phase III clinical endpoint study.

RESULTS

The subjects treated with the HIV-1 immunogen had a significantly greater decline in viral load at multiple time points (P < 0.05), a trend towards increased CD4+ T cell counts and significantly enhanced HIV-1 specific immune responses as measured by HIV-1 lymphocyte proliferation (P < 0.001) compared to the adjuvant control group. Furthermore, in the HIV-1 immunogen treated group, enhanced HIV-1 specific lymphocyte proliferative immune responses were associated with decreased HIV-1 plasma RNA.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that, in a predefined, random subset of subjects, a beneficial effect of the HIV-1 immunogen was observed on viral load, CD4+ T cells, and HIV-specific immunity. These differences were observed in a background of multiple drug therapies. Ongoing trials are evaluating the effect of the combination of this HIV-1 specific, immune-based therapy with potent antiviral drug therapy on virological outcomes.

A Rational Approach to the Selection and Sequencing of Nucleoside/Nucleotide Analogues: A New Paradigm

While the value of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is unquestionable, its use as a life-long therapy will require a more structured and strategic approach to the sequential use of antiretroviral agents than has previously been the case. A complex cocktail of factors influences the durability of a given regimen, but the durability of HAART requires a carefully planned approach to the selection of agents across multiple regimens from first-line onwards, based on considerations of drug cross-resistance and sequenceability at regimen failure. Despite considerable ongoing interest in sequencing protease inhibitors and even non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, there has been little study into the optimal sequence of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) drugs in consecutive regimens. Historical practice, clinical experience and force of habit have all emphasized the use of thymidine analogue-based first-line combinations and the frequent retention of a thymdine analogue at all subsequent stages until a salvage situation is reached. Emerging data clearly associates thymidine analogue-derived reverse transcriptase mutations with loss of drug susceptibility and clinical response to other members of the NRTI class, particularly when present alongside other NRTI-associated mutations. Any approach to strategic therapy across multiple treatment lines will require, as a basic tenet, that agents with the greatest potential for cross-resistance be used later in therapy rather than earlier. To this end, a move away from the universal use of the thymidine analogues in first-line therapy is likely as strategic thinking becomes more integrated into clinical management in HIV disease. However, more clinical investigation is required into both the performance of alternative first-line NRTI combinations and the individual sequenceability of NRTI drugs, in the absence of the class reductions in susceptibility conferred by accumulations of thymidine analogue mutations that are the corollary to most current definitions of ‘treatment-experienced’. Another basic tenet of strategic therapy is that while drugs with high potency in treatment-experienced individuals, and favourable cross-resistance profiles, are urgently required for the salvage of patients with limited options, constraining such agents to this niche merely cements the bad habits which led to an early salvage situation in the first place. Potent drugs with low cross-resistance should be investigated at all stages of therapy, including first-line, for their potential to provide not only individual regimen durability but also to extend the number of effective, successive treatment lines. Just as highly cross-resistant agents are best used later in therapy, poorly cross-resistant agents may provide an even greater strategic advantage in first- or second-line regimens than they do when used where little else is likely to work.

Timing of antiretroviral therapy. Use of Markov modeling and decision analysis to evaluate the long-term implications of therapy

BACKGROUND

The timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy is controversial. Current guidelines are heavily based on the principle of 'hit early, hit hard', although the long-term implications of this approach are unknown.

METHODS

Using Markov modeling and decision analysis we modeled the virologic outcomes over 10 years in a hypothetical population of 10 000 HIV-infected patients in which therapy (with the possibility of three sequential regimens before the development of multidrug-resistant virus) is started immediately versus starting progressively at rates of 5, 10, 15, 20 or 30% of the original population each year. The model used inputs from available clinical trial data: virologic success rate and durability of the response of the first and subsequent regimens. We performed one-way and two-way sensitivity analysis to evaluate changes in the input variables.

RESULTS

If therapy is started immediately in all patients, by 10 years 57% would be undetectable, but 38% would have detectable multidrug-resistant virus. In contrast, the population as a whole would have had better virologic outcomes if one waited before starting treatment at any progression rate; for example, initiating therapy in 10% of the subjects per year results in 64% of patients being undetectable and 24% with multidrug-resistant virus. Two-way sensitivity analysis demonstrates that immediate initiation should be at least 15 to 20% better than delayed antiretroviral therapy to justify immediate initiation of therapy over a wide range of success rates of the delayed start.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis, utilizing optimistic outcomes based on short-term clinical trials, provides a theoretical basis for questioning the current aggressive early use of therapy and should help prompt studies that look at when and how to start antiretroviral therapy.

Discontinuation of primary prophylaxis in HIV-infected patients at high risk of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia: prospective multicentre study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety of discontinuation of primary prophylaxis in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral combination therapy at high risk of developing Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.

DESIGN

Prospective multicentre study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The incidence of P. carinii pneumonia after discontinuation of primary prophylaxis was studied in 396 HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral combination therapy who experienced an increase in their CD4 cell count to at least 200 x 10(6)/l and 14% of total lymphocytes; the study population included 191 patients with a history of CD4 cell counts below 100 x 10(6)/l (245 person-years) and 144 patients with plasma HIV RNA above 200 copies/ml (215 person-years).

RESULTS

There was one case of Pneumocystis pneumonia, an incidence of 0.18 per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.005--1.0 per 100 person-years]. No case was diagnosed in groups with low nadir CD4 cell counts (95% CI, 0--1.2 per 100 person-years) or detectable plasma HIV RNA (95% CI, 0--1.4 per 100 person-years).

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of primary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis pneumonia is safe in patients who have responded with a sustained increase in their CD4 cell count to antiretroviral combination therapy, irrespective of the CD4 cell count nadir and the viral load at the time of stopping prophylaxis.

Membrane-anchored peptide inhibits human immunodeficiency virus entry

Peptides derived from the heptad repeats of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gp41 envelope glycoprotein, such as T20, can efficiently inhibit HIV type 1 (HIV-1) entry. In this study, replication of HIV-1 was inhibited more than 100-fold in a T-helper cell line transduced with a retrovirus vector expressing membrane-anchored T20 on the cell surface. Inhibition was independent of coreceptor usage.

International perspectives on antiretroviral resistance. Resistance to protease inhibitors

The availability of protease inhibitors (PIs) and their combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors marked the passage of antiretroviral therapy (ART) from potential for control to effective suppression and thus substantially reduced rates of morbidity and mortality related to HIV. Even so, what was first hoped to be an immutable HIV DNA treatment target has proved to be prone to resistance mutations, with substitutions identified at more than 20 amino acid sites, which reduces PI susceptibility and increases resistance to treatment. The mutation patterns associated with each PI have been defined, and have been observed to occur at one of two locations: at or near the active site, or in the substrate cleavage site. The natural history of PI resistance has been extensively studied, and the genetic and cellular pathways are described in detail in this article. In addition, cross-resistance among PIs is now recognized to be fairly extensive, although the degree of cross-resistance varies with the number of mutations and the variants selected by drug pressure. Thus, it is still possible to salvage a response with another PI after a first regimen with another PI has failed. The extensive basic science and clinical experience with PIs in the fight against HIV are reviewed in this article, which provides data on resistance-mutation profiles, cellular resistance mechanisms, viral fitness studies, and clinical outcome trials with various first-line and subsequent regimens that contain PIs. It is hoped that the information provided will guide physicians in best using PIs as part of a logical and successful ART strategy.

Variant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proteases and response to combination therapy including a protease inhibitor

The objective of this observational study was to assess the genetic variability in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease gene from HIV type 1 (HIV-1)-positive (clade B), protease inhibitor-naïve patients and to evaluate its association with the subsequent effectiveness of a protease inhibitor-containing triple-drug regimen. The protease gene was sequenced from plasma-derived virus from 116 protease inhibitor-naïve patients. The virological response to a triple-drug regimen containing indinavir, ritonavir, or saquinavir was evaluated every 3 months for as long as 2 years (n = 40). A total of 36 different amino acid substitutions compared to the reference sequence (HIV-1 HXB2) were detected. No substitutions at the active site similar to the primary resistance mutations were found. The most frequent substitutions (prevalence, >10%) at baseline were located at codons 15, 13, 12, 62, 36, 64, 41, 35, 3, 93, 77, 63, and 37 (in ascending order of frequency). The mean number of polymorphisms was 4.2. A relatively poorer response to therapy was associated with a high number of baseline polymorphisms and, to a lesser extent, with the presence of I93L at baseline in comparison with the wild-type virus. A71V/T was slightly associated with a poorer response to first-line ritonavir-based therapy. In summary, within clade B viruses, protease gene natural polymorphisms are common. There is evidence suggesting that treatment response is associated with this genetic background, but most of the specific contributors could not be firmly identified. I93L, occurring in about 30% of untreated patients, may play a role, as A71V/T possibly does in ritonavir-treated patients.

Virologic and immunologic consequences of discontinuing combination antiretroviral-drug therapy in HIV-infected patients with detectable viremia

BACKGROUND

In many patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, therapy with potent antiretroviral drugs does not result in complete suppression of HIV replication. The effect of cessation of therapy in these patients is unknown.

METHODS

Sixteen patients who had a plasma HIV RNA level of more than 2500 copies per milliliter during combination antiretroviral-drug therapy were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to discontinue or continue therapy. Plasma HIV RNA levels, CD4 cell counts, and drug susceptibility were measured weekly. Viral replicative capacity was measured at base line and at week 12.

RESULTS

Discontinuation of therapy for 12 weeks was associated with a median decrease in the CD4 cell count of 128 cells per cubic millimeter and an increase in the plasma HIV RNA level of 0.84 log copies per milliliter. Virus from all patients with detectable resistance at entry became susceptible to HIV-protease inhibitors within 16 weeks after the discontinuation of therapy. Drug susceptibility began to increase a median of six weeks after the discontinuation of therapy and was temporally associated with increases in plasma HIV RNA levels and decreases in CD4 cell counts. Viral replicative capacity, measured by means of a recombinant-virus assay, was low at entry into the study and increased after therapy was discontinued. Despite the loss of detectable resistance in plasma, resistant virus was cultured from peripheral-blood mononuclear cells in five of nine patients who could be evaluated. Plasma HIV RNA levels, CD4 cell counts, and drug susceptibility remained stable in the patients who continued therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the presence of reduced drug susceptibility, antiretroviral-drug therapy can provide immunologic and virologic benefit. This benefit reflects continued antiviral-drug activity and the maintenance of a viral population with a reduced replicative capacity.

Modeling changes in CD4-positive T-lymphocyte counts after the start of highly active antiretroviral therapy and the relation with risk of opportunistic infections: the Aquitaine Cohort, 1996-1997

After initiation of a treatment for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection containing a protease inhibitor, immune restoration associated with increases in CD4-positive (CD4+) T lymphocyte count may be delayed. In a sample of patients who had been prescribed protease inhibitors for the first time, the authors tested to see whether there was a minimal duration of CD4+ cell count increase before the increase had an impact on the occurrence of opportunistic infections. The evolution (difference between time t and baseline) of CD4+ cell count was modeled using a mixed effects linear model. Changes in CD4+ count estimated by this model were then included as time-dependent covariates in a proportional hazards model. Finally, the authors tested for the existence of a CD4+ change x time interaction. The authors used a sample of 553 French patients first prescribed protease inhibitors in 1996 and followed for a median of 16 months. During the first 120 days, there was no association between CD4+ change and the rate of opportunistic infections. After 120 days, each 50-cell/mm3 increase in CD4+ count was associated with a 60% (95% confidence interval: 45, 72) reduction in the incidence of opportunistic infections. These results, based on modeling of CD4+ cell response, at least indirectly reinforce the concept of a delayed but possible immune recovery with the use of protease inhibitors. The findings support the potential for interruption of certain types of prophylaxis against opportunistic infections under reasonable conditions of duration of antiretroviral therapy and sustained CD4+ cell response.

Antiretroviral Activity and Safety of Abacavir in Combination with Selected HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors in Therapy-Naive HIV-1-Infected Adults

Objective

To assess antiretroviral efficacy and safety of abacavir in combination with selected HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

Design

A 48-week, open-label study.

Materials and Methods

Eighty-two antiretroviral naive HIV-1-infected adults (CD4 cell count ≥100 cells/mm3, plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥5000 copies/ml) were randomly assigned to receive abacavir (300 mg twice daily) in combination with standard doses of one of five protease inhibitors: indinavir, saquinavir soft-gel, ritonavir, nelfinavir or amprenavir. Adults who met protocol-defined switch criteria at or after week 8 could modify their randomized therapy. Antiretroviral activity was assessed by the proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≤400 and ≤50 copies/ml, and by changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts. Safety was assessed by monitoring clinical adverse events and laboratory abnormalities.

Results

At week 48, the proportion of subjects in the indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir and amprenavir groups with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≤400 copies/ml was 53, 50, 50, 41 and 56%, respectively, and the proportion with HIV-1 RNA ≤50 copies/ml was 47, 56, 50, 47, and 44%, respectively (by intent-to-treat analysis). Median reductions from baseline in plasma HIV-1 RNA for each group ranged from 1.7 to 2.4 log10 copies/ml. The median CD4 cell count increase from baseline was 195, 131, 116, 136 and 259 cells/mm3 in the indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, and amprenavir groups, respectively. Overall, the most common adverse events attributed to study drugs were diarrhoea, nausea, malaise/fatigue, headache and perioral paresthesia. The frequency of treatment-limiting adverse events did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Abacavir is safe and effective when used in combination with a protease inhibitor.

Analysis of HIV-1 mutation patterns in patients failing antiretroviral therapy

The emergence of mutations encoding drug resistance is supposed to be a significant limitation to the clinical efficacy of inhibitor compounds directed against specific HIV-1 enzymatic targets. We have used a commercial test (Visible Genetics Inc., Paris, France) to study the prevalence of mutations occurred in HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes in 93 HIV-1 infected patients treated with at least one regimen containing a protease inhibitor (PI) and failing to the current therapeutic regimen. Protease mutations conferring resistance to at least one PI were detected in 46/93 (49.4%) of strains, 25 (26.8%) of which showed resistance to all PIs. Reverse transcriptase mutations conferring resistance to at least one RT inhibitor were detected in 57/93 (61.2%) of strains, 18 (19.3%) of which showed resistance to all RT inhibitors. The most frequent RT mutations were T215Y/F, M41L, and M184V (41.9, 40.8, and 40.8%, respectively), while L63P, L10R/V, and A71V/T (58, 41.9, and 34.4%, respectively) were the most represented protease substitutions. We have found no mutations encoding for multiple dideoxynucleoside resistance (Q151M or T69SS). Twelve of our patients (12.9%) had no mutation encoding drug resistance and were completely sensitive to all RT and protease inhibitors. Therefore, not all virological failures are caused by HIV-1 genomic resistance.

Immune restoration and CD4+ T-cell function with antiretroviral therapies

OBJECTIVES

To review the current understanding of the details and mechanisms of immune restoration that follows administration of suppressive antiretroviral therapies to persons with chronic HIV-1 infection.

SUMMARY

A first-phase cellular increase often includes increases in multiple circulating lymphocyte populations and is largely attributable to rapid redistribution of cells from lymphoid tissue. A second slower phase is largely comprised of naïve cell increases that may reflect cells newly produced in the thymus. Improvement in CD4+ cell function is demonstrable but functional restoration is incomplete. Immunization can enhance the restoration of CD4+ cell-dependent responses, and the magnitude of restoration is related in part to the degree to which HIV-1 replication and immune activation are controlled. Despite the incomplete nature of immune restoration seen after suppression of HIV-1 replication in chronic infection, clinical benefits of these responses are reflected in decreased HIV-1-related opportunistic infections and mortality. The effects of these therapies on the occurrence of non-Hodgkins lymphoma are less apparent.

CONCLUSIONS

Suppression of HIV-1 replication results in both laboratory and clinical evidence of immune restoration. Although incomplete, this immune restoration provides 'breathing room' to develop better-tolerated antiviral therapies and therapies designed to enhance immune function.

Adherence over 48 Weeks in An Antiretroviral Clinical Trial: Variable within Patients, Affected by Toxicities and Independently Predictive of Virological Response

Objectives

To investigate adherence to antiretroviral therapy over 48 weeks, to investigate the association between adherence and treatment-related symptoms and to investigate the impact of adherence on virological response over 48 weeks among established predictors of treatment success.

Methods

One-hundred-and-sixty HIV-1 infected protease inhibitor- and stavudine-naive patients participating in a trial of ritonavir/saquinavir versus ritonavir/saquinavir/ stavudine completed an adherence questionnaire and a symptom checklist at weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48. We calculated odds ratios between experienced symptoms and non-adherence. Regression models were used to determine predictors of HIV-1 RNA below 400 copies/ml at week 48, and of the area about the change from baseline over 48 weeks (ACFB) in serum HIV-1 RNA.

Results

The percentage of patients reporting missing medication, deviation from time schedule, and dietary prescriptions at separate time-points ranged from 12 to 15%, 32 to 35% and 17 to 22%, respectively. The percentage that changed their level of adherence during 48 weeks ranged from 29% for skipping medication to 48% for deviation from time-schedule. Experienced side-effects were associated with an increased likelihood of non-adherence. Not skipping medication was an independent predictor of both having a serum HIV-1 RNA below 400 copies/ml at week 48 and the ACFB over 48 weeks in serum HIV-1 RNA.

Conclusions

Adherence was an independent predictor of virological response over 48 weeks. The level of adherence is variable within patients over time. This suggests the need for continued adherence monitoring in all patients as part of standard medical practice.

Implications of antiretroviral resistance on viral fitness

Treatment of HIV infected patients with antiretroviral drugs often results in the emergence of virus variants with reduced sensitivity to these drugs. However, the viral load often remains partially suppressed below pretherapy levels, which might be explained by a reduced fitness of the drug resistant viral population. This review describes the effects of antiretroviral resistance development on the fitness of the viral population and its clinical implications.

Predictive role of the three-month CD4 cell count in the long-term clinical outcome of the first HAART regimen

The aim was to evaluate whether the three-month CD4 cell counts are a reliable predictor of the long-term clinical outcome of HAART-treated patients, by an observational study of 585 patients initiating HAART in a clinical setting. Clinical failure was defined as the occurrence of new or recurrent AIDS-defining events or death, and was analysed by means of intention-to-treat, univariate and multivariate analyses. An adjusted Cox regression model was used to evaluate the effect of three-month CD4+ counts on clinical outcome. Clinical failure occurred in 65 patients (11.1%) during a median follow-up of 31 months (1-65) as a result of new AIDS-defining events (ADEs) in 48 patients, ADE recurrence in six, and death in 11. The mean (median; range) CD4+ counts were 156/microL (155; 4--529) in patients with and 362/microL (326; 18--1162) in patients without clinical failure (P < .0001). Moreover, the proportion of patients with mean CD4+ counts < 200 microL was higher in those experiencing subsequent clinical failure (chi2: 41.11; P< .00001). Multivariate analysis showed that baseline CD4+ counts < 50 microL, HIV-RNA > 100,000 copies/mL and AIDS at baseline predicted failure; after adjusting for three-month CD4+ counts, this marker was the only one independently associated with clinical failure (HR 2.93; 95% Cl: 1.16--7.38). The three-month immunologic response is a reliable predictor of long-term clinical outcome.

Protease inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 from patients with preserved CD4 cell counts is cytopathic in activated CD4 T lymphocytes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate CD4 T-cell cytopathicity of protease inhibitor (PI)-resistant isolates from patients with preserved CD4 cell counts after long-term virologic failure.

METHODS

PI-resistant primary isolates from 14 patients with stable or increasing CD4 T-cell counts despite long-term virologic failure during continuous combination therapy were examined. Replication and cytopathicity were assessed in activated peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures in the presence and absence of PI using titered stocks of primary HIV-1 isolates and during initial viral isolation. Also studied were PI-sensitive isolates from four of these patients after therapy discontinuation and reversion to PI-sensitive virus and from seven antiretroviral drug-naive patients. Coreceptor use, syncytia-inducing (SI) phenotype and protease sequences were determined by standard methods.

RESULTS

All isolates obtained during continued therapy showed genetic markers of PI resistance and decreased phenotypic susceptibility. PI-resistant SI isolates were highly to moderately cytopathic whereas non-syncytia-inducing isolates were moderately to weakly cytopathic. PI-susceptible and PI-resistant isolates obtained after discontinuation of therapy were equally cytopathic at similar replication levels. The cytopathicity of PI-resistant isolates was not altered by PI and was similar to that of isolates from untreated subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary isolates from patients showing virologic rebound without net CD4 T-cell loss during continued therapy are as cytopathic as PI-sensitive isolates with equivalent input infectious titer. As with PI-sensitive isolates, cytopathicity of PI-resistant viruses was determined primarily by coreceptor preference. These results suggest that the sustained immunologic response observed after failure of PI-containing regimens is not due to the emergence of PI-resistant strains that are intrinsically less cytopathic for activated peripheral CD4 lymphocytes.

The use of and response to second-line protease inhibitor regimens: results from the EuroSIDA study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of second line protease-inhibitor (PI) regimens across Europe and to determine factors associated with virological and immunological response.

DESIGN

Analysis of data from 984 patients with a median follow-up of 21 months enrolled in EuroSIDA. Patients started their second PI-containing regimen at least 16 weeks after starting the first PI-containing regimen and with viral load > 1000 copies/ml.

METHODS

Virological response was defined as a viral load < 500 copies/ml and immunological response as an increase of 50 x 10(6)/l or more in CD4 lymphocyte count.

RESULTS

The median CD4 cell count at starting the second PI was 171 x 10(6) cells/l; viral load was 4.45 log copies/ml. As a second PI regimen, 45% were using a dual PI, while of those on one PI, indinavir (42%) and nelfinavir (34%) were most common. In multivariate Cox models, a higher viral load at starting the second PI [relative hazard (RH), 0.67 per 1 log higher; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.77; P < 0.0001) and a lower CD4 cell count (RH, 1.15 per 50% higher; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P = 0.0014) were associated with a reduced probability of virological response. Those who had achieved viral suppression on the first PI-regimen were more likely to respond to the second (RH, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.30-2.10; P < 0.0001) as were those who added one or two new nucleosides to their second PI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who initiate a second PI regimen at lower viral load, higher CD4 cell count or who added new nucleosides tended to be more likely to achieve a viral load < 500 copies/ml. The roles of cross-resistance and adherence in response to second-line regimens needs further investigation.

Reasons for modification and discontinuation of antiretrovirals: results from a single treatment centre

OBJECTIVE

To describe the reasons for, and factors associated with, modification and discontinuation of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens at a single clinic.

SUBJECTS

A total of 556 patients who started HAART at the Royal Free Hospital were included in analyses. Modification was defined as stopping or switching any antiretrovirals in the regimen, whereas discontinuation was defined as the simultaneous stopping of all antiretrovirals included in the initial regimen. Reasons were classified as immunological/virological failure (IVF) and toxicities and patient choice/poor compliance (TPC).

RESULTS

The median CD4 count at starting HAART was 171 x 10(6) cells/l and viral load 5.07 log copies/ml. During a median follow-up of 14.2 months, 247 patients (44.4%) modified their HAART regimen, 72 due to IVF (29.1%) and 159 due to TPC (64.4%) and a total of 148 patients (26.6%) discontinued HAART. Older patients were less likely to modify HAART [relative hazard (RH), 0.73 per 10 years; P = 0.0008], as were previously treatment-naive patients (RH, 0.65; P = 0.0050), those in a clinical trial (RH, 0.64; P = 0.027) and those who started nelfinavir (RH, 0.57; P = 0.035). Patients who started with four or more drugs (RH, 2.21, P < 0.0001), who included ritonavir in the initial regimen (RH, 1.41; P = 0.035) or who had higher viral loads during follow-up (RH per log increase, 1.51; P < 0.0001) were more likely to modify HAART.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high rate of modification and discontinuation of HAART regimens in the first 12 months, particularly due to toxicities, patient choice or poor compliance.

Discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV infection who have a response to antiretroviral therapy. Eight European Study Groups

BACKGROUND

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and a history of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia are at high risk for relapse if they are not given secondary prophylaxis. Whether secondary prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia can be safely discontinued in patients who have a response to highly active antiretroviral therapy is not known.

METHODS

We analyzed episodes of recurrent P. carinii pneumonia in 325 HIV-infected patients (275 men and 50 women) in eight prospective European cohorts. Between October 1996 and January 2000, these patients discontinued secondary prophylaxis during treatment with at least three anti-HIV drugs after they had at least one peripheral-blood CD4 cell count of more than 200 cells per cubic millimeter.

RESULTS

Secondary prophylaxis was discontinued at a median CD4 cell count of 350 per cubic millimeter; the median nadir CD4 cell count had been 50 per cubic millimeter. The median duration of the increase in the CD4 cell count to more than 200 per cubic millimeter after discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis was 11 months. The median follow-up period after discontinuation of secondary prophylaxis was 13 months, yielding a total of 374 person-years of follow-up; for 355 of these person-years, CD4 cell counts remained at or above 200 per cubic millimeter. No cases of recurrent P. carinii pneumonia were diagnosed during this period; the incidence was thus 0 per 100 patient-years (99 percent confidence interval, 0 to 1.2 per 100 patient-years, on the basis of the entire follow-up period, and 0 to 1.3 per 100 patient-years, on the basis of the follow-up period during which CD4 cell counts remained at or above 200 per cubic millimeter).

CONCLUSIONS

It is safe to discontinue secondary prophylaxis against P. carinii pneumonia in patients with HIV infection who have an immunologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy.

The virological response to highly active antiretroviral therapy over the first 24 weeks of therapy according to the pre-therapy viral load and the weeks 4-8 viral load

OBJECTIVES

To describe the viral response to HAART by weeks 4 and 8 in previously antiretroviral-naive patients. To assess whether the weeks 4 or 8 viral loads are useful predictors of viral suppression by week 24.

DESIGN

A large clinical database including 453 antiretroviral-naive patients whose plasma viral load was monitored every 4 weeks.

METHODS

Observed probabilities of achieving a viral load < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24 (days 84-168) from starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were calculated according to viral loads at weeks 4 and 8.

RESULTS

A total of 42.4% of patients (153/361) reached < or = 500 copies/ml viral load by week 4 and 70.4% (245/348) by week 8. Viral suppression below 500 copies/ml by 4-8 weeks was similar irrespective of the pre-HAART viral load. In patients with viral loads above 10000 copies/ml at week 4, 60.6% (20/33) achieved < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24. In patients with viral loads still above 10000 copies/ml at week 8, only 42.3% (11/26) achieved < or = 500 copies/ml by week 24, and only 33.3% (3/9) maintained viral suppression below 500 copies/ml to week 48.

CONCLUSION

Viral loads at weeks 4 and 8 should be monitored to detect early signs of low subsequent viral suppression. For previously antiretroviral-naive patients whose viral loads after 8 weeks of HAART are still above 10000, there is an urgent need to assess adherence to therapy, drug levels and resistance, so management can be modified accordingly to reduce the rate of week 24 virological failure.

Genotypic and phenotypic evidence of different drug-resistance mutation patterns between B and non-B subtype isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 found in Brazilian patients failing HAART

We have investigated the phenotypic and genotypic susceptibility of 14 HIV-1 strains isolated from individuals failing HAART therapy to protease inhibitors (PI). Proviral and plasma viral pol gene fragment were amplified, sequenced and subtyped. Nine samples clustered with protease subtype B reference strains and the remaining samples were classified as non-B subtype corresponding to subtype F (n = 4) and subtype A (n = 1). Although all patients were treated with similar P1 drug regimen, the non-B subtype isolates did not present the L90M and 184V mutations and used mainly G48V and V82A/F to achieve drug resistance. A strong cross-resistance phenotype among all four PI was associated with the mutation L90M in the subtype-B isolates, and with G48V and V82A/F in the non-B counterparts. This observation revealed that the non-B viruses tested had specific genotypic characteristics contrasting with the subtype-B isolates.

Low body weight and type of protease inhibitor predict discontinuation and treatment-limiting adverse drug reactions among HIV-infected patients starting a protease inhibitor regimen: consistent results from a randomized trial and an observational cohort

OBJECTIVES

To assess predictors for discontinuation and treatment-limiting adverse drug reactions (TLADR) among patients starting their first protease inhibitor (PI).

METHODS

Data on patients starting a PI regimen (indinavir, ritonavir, ritonavir/saquinavir and saquinavir hard gel) in a randomized trial (RAS, n = 318) and an observational cohort (OBC, n = 505) were used to document reasons for discontinuation and TLADR. Risk factors for discontinuation of the initial PI/developing TLADR were assessed in Cox models.

RESULTS

A total of 43 (RAS) and 48% (OBC) discontinued the initial PI therapy within less than 2 years. In both populations TLADR were the most common reason for discontinuation. The incidence of TLADR in RAS was: 8.5 (indinavir), 66.0 (ritonavir), 15.6 (saquinavir hard gel) per 100 person-years of follow-up (P < 0.001). Body weight and type of PI initiated were independent risk factors for treatment discontinuation and TLADR in both groups. In OBC, the risk of developing TLADR increased by 12% per 5 kg lower body weight when starting the PI regimen [the relative hazard (RH) was 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.19) per 5 kg lighter], and starting ritonavir was associated with a three- to sixfold higher risk of TLADR relative to other PI regimens. Very similar results were documented in RAS [RH for body weight was 1.18 (1.07-1.29)].

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of the patients stopped treatment with the initial PI, most commonly as a result of adverse drug reactions. Low body weight and initiation of ritonavir relative to other PIs were associated with an increased risk of TLADRs. Very consistent results were found in a randomized trial and an observational cohort.

The status of HIV/AIDS nursing in Australia: a specialty in decline?

Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), occasions of service for patients with HIV/AIDS have altered drastically. HIV/AIDS nurses perceived that this change in activity had caused an exodus from the specialty by experienced nurses, and those that remained were rapidly deskilling. A survey of nurses working in HIV/AIDS in Australia and New Zealand was conducted to assess the impact of HAART on nursing skills and retention. More than 72% of respondents reported that they had lost some or many clinical HIV/AIDS nursing skills. About 37% of nurses reported that they were losing confidence in their knowledge of the management of opportunistic infections and cancers. About 27% reported larger numbers of nurses leaving their specialty area than in previous years. To enable nurses to respond rapidly to a potential decline in the effectiveness of HAART, this loss in skills and knowledge must be addressed.

Combined therapy with saquinavir, ritonavir and stavudine in moderately to severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected protease inhibitor-naive patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the short-term and long-term effect of a combination of saquinavir, ritonavir and stavudine in moderately to severely immunosuppressed protease inhibitor-naive patients.

DESIGN

Prospective open-label multicentre study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 64 protease inhibitor-naive and stavudine-naive HIV-infected patients with a CD4 count of < 250 cells/microL and > 10 000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL received saquinavir hard-gelatin capsules, ritonavir and stavudine. Full (drop in viraemia of > 2 log10 and/or < 500 copies/mL) and partial responders (drop to between 500 and 5000 viraemia copies/mL) at week 9 (end of phase I) entered the second phase (additional 12-month period).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients completed phase I, 45 (70%) full responders and nine (14%) partial responders by intent-to-treat analysis. Thirty-nine patients completed phase II, 33 (52%) full responders and two (3%) partial responders. Six patients had < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 9, and 20 (31%) patients at month 12 of phase II. Mean CD4 cell counts increased significantly in the 56 patients from 89 to 184 cells/microL after 9 weeks and from 100 to 292 cells/microL in the 39 patients treated for another 12 months. Higher baseline viraemia and lower baseline CD4 cell counts were not associated with an unfavourable virological response at week 9 and month 12 of phase II. HIV DNA in peripheral blood monocytes decreased substantially (- 1.5 log10) but was detectable in all except one patient at the end of phase II.

CONCLUSION

In protease- and stavudine-naive HIV-infected patients with moderate to severe immunosuppression, saquinavir in combination with ritonavir and stavudine caused a substantial long-term decrease in plasma viral load in approximately half the participants and a substantial increase in CD4 cell counts.

[Current antiretroviral therapy]

INTRODUCTION

Advances in HIV/AIDS therapy have been rapid and profound.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

In developed countries the epidemic infection has stabilized and there are dramatic decreases in morbidity and mortality resulting from the use of intensive but expensive therapies. HIV patients who have detectable viral loads and/or evidence of immunologic dysfunction should be treated with a potent combination antiretroviral regimen. Currently, this consists of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with at least one protease inhibitor, or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, or another combination with adequate potency. Current therapies do have limitations, including side effects, cross-resistance, adherence challenges, and drug interactions.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Drug resistance is a major factor contributing to the failure of antiretroviral therapy: the ability to predict clinical response to therapy on the basis of genotype and/or phenotype depends on knowledge of appropriate data for defining drug resistance. Moreover, careful selection and monitoring of combination drug therapy along with individualized rather than standard dosage regimens may minimize the pharmacological problems and help ensure optimum antiviral activity. Further developments include new drugs, vaccine, cytokine-, and gene therapy-based treatment strategies.

The role of observational studies in assessing the impact of antiviral therapies

During the past year many observational studies have reported on the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy on their patient populations. Care should be taken when interpreting these findings because of possible biases due to reporting delay and loss to follow-up. The results are very encouraging, however, suggesting dramatic reductions in the incidence of AIDS and death, and resulting hospitalizations.

Long-term safety and antiretroviral activity of hydroxyurea and didanosine in HIV-infected patients

Long-term safety, immunologic effects, and antiretroviral activity of hydroxyurea and didanosine were evaluated in this retrospective study. Some 65 HIV-1-infected patients (39 of whom were antiretroviral naive) were studied (mean baseline CD4 count, 362 cells/mm3; mean plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load, 4.8 log10 copies/ml). The mean treatment duration was 20 months. Overall tolerance was good: 15 patients interrupted treatment because of clinical or biologic side effects. Four patients experienced a category B event. Patients had a mean increase of 27 CD4 cell counts after 12 months, of 112 after 24 months and of 59 after 36 months. They had a mean 1. 03 log10 fall in HIV-1 RNA after 12 months, 1.59 log10 after 24 months, and 1.27 log10 after 36 months. After 12 months, 35% developed an HIV-1 RNA viral load <200 copies/ml, 53% after 24 months, and 36% after 36 months. Those whose viral load became undetectable after 12 months have significantly lower baseline RNA values (p =.03). Fourteen patients had a viral load <3.4 log10 copies/ml after 24 months of the double therapy. A prolonged viral load suppression can be achieved using a simple combination of two drugs that are inexpensive and well tolerated.

Didanosine once daily: potential for expanded use

Factors affecting patient adherence to therapy, such as frequent daily dosing and complex dosing schedules, are widely understood to be key obstacles to the durability of effective anti-HIV therapy. Didanosine, a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) that is a core component of combination antiretroviral regimens, is currently indicated for twice-daily dosing. However, the active metabolite of didanosine (2',3'-dideoxyadenosine-5'-triphosphate) has a long intracellular half-life that supports the use of didanosine in a more patient-friendly, once-daily dosing schedule. Clinical studies in which didanosine was administered either once or twice daily, as monotherapy or in combination with another NRTI, have demonstrated the equivalence of both dosing schedules, with respect to safety and tolerability, virologic and immunologic endpoints, and short-term clinical effects (e.g., weight gain). Preliminary results from recent studies support the clinical efficacy and utility of once-daily didanosine in combination antiretroviral regimens that provide maximal drug exposure, while allowing for once- or twice-daily dosing of all component drugs.

Correlation between intracellular pharmacological activation of nucleoside analogues and HIV suppression in vitro

Following intracellular activation of HIV nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, their triphosphates (ddNTPs) compete with endogenous nucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) for incorporation into proviral DNA. In this study we have examined the effect of combinations of two thymidine analogues, stavudine (d4T) and zidovudine (ZDV), and two cytidine analogues, lamivudine (3TC) and zalcitabine (ddC) on intracellular drug activation and on the relevant competing dNTP in uninfected and persistently HIV-infected cells. Endogenous triphosphates of deoxycytidine (dCTP) and deoxythymidine (dTTP) were measured using a template primer assay and the ratio of ddNTP:dNTP was calculated. Antiviral activity of two-drug combinations was also assayed by p24 ELISA. A significant reduction in d4T triphosphate (d4TTP) [0.11+/-0.09 pmol/10(6) cells to undetectable (<0.01); P=0.039] in the presence of equimolar concentrations of ZDV and d4T, resulted in a decrease in the d4TTP/dTTP ratio of 90%. ZDVTP/dTTP was not significantly altered in the presence of d4T. 3TC (10 microM) reduced total ddC phosphates by 57% and ddCTP/dCTP by 27%. 3TC phosphorylation was comparatively unaffected by ddC, up to a concentration of 10 microM ddC (>100 times the plasma concentration achieved following standard dosing). 3TC plus ddC resulted in greater p24 inhibition than 3TC or ddC alone (P<0.001). Combining one thymidine analogue (ZDV or d4T) with one cytidine analogue (3TC or ddC) resulted in greater inhibition of p24 inhibition than with any single agent. From a pharmacological viewpoint, the combination of ZDV plus d4T should be avoided, but in vitro the combination of 3TC plus ddC confers modest benefit over either drug alone. This in vitro study illustrates that decreases in ddNTP/dNTP are consistent with a reduction in antiviral effect.

Limits to potent antiretroviral therapy

The availability of potent combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), also known as highly active antiretroviral therapy or HAART has changed the prognosis of HIV infection. However, the benefits have to be seen in the context of deficiencies of current therapy: failure to eradicate the virus, the slow and potentially incomplete recovery of the immune system, the high prevalence of resistance, and the potential for long-term toxicity. Treatment strategies need to take into account these limits to better target those HIV-infected patients who could benefit the most from antiretroviral therapy.

Adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy

Antiretroviral toxicity is an increasingly important issue in the management of HIV-infected patients. With the sustained major declines in opportunistic complications, HIV infection is a more chronic disease, and so more drugs are being used in more patients for longer periods. This review focuses on the pathogenesis, clinical features, and management of the principal toxicities of the 15 licensed antiretroviral drugs, including mitochondrial toxicity, hypersensitivity, and lipodystrophy, as well as more drug-specific adverse effects and special clinical settings.

Long-term outcome and treatment modifications in a prospective cohort of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients on triple-drug antiretroviral regimens. Triest Cohort Investigators

We designed a cohort in order to assess the long-term effects of triple-drug antiretroviral combinations in 608 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). We recruited patients who had been previously treated with nucleoside analogues as well as treatment-naive patients who were starting triple-drug antiretroviral combinations consisting of nucleoside analogues, either alone or in combination with a protease inhibitor. After a median follow-up time of 22 months, the incidence rates of acquired immune deficiency syndrome-defining events and death were, respectively, 6.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3-8.8) and 2.9 (95% CI, 1.9-4.2) per 100 person-years. Advanced clinical stage of disease (P=.004), a low CD4(+) cell count (P=.002), and a low quality-of-life score (P=.001) at baseline were independent predictors of clinical progression. The initial triple-drug combination was modified a total of 647 times in 321 patients. The only independent predictor of treatment modification was previous exposure to a nucleoside analogue in patients who did not receive a new nucleoside analogue at inclusion (P=.001). Plasma HIV RNA values below 500 copies/mL were obtained in 88% of the treatment-naive patients and in 57% of the previously treated patients (P<.001). Compared with previously treated patients who received > or = 1 new nucleoside analogue at enrollment, previously treated patients who did not receive a new nucleoside analogue at enrollment were twice as likely to have plasma HIV RNA values >500 copies/mL at the last visit (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.8), and the antiretroviral-naive patients were significantly less likely to have plasma HIV RNA values >500 copies/mL at the last visit (adjusted OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1-0.4).

Long-term hydroxyurea in combination with didanosine and stavudine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Swiss HIV Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

In 1998 we reported on a randomized comparison between stavudine plus didanosine plus placebo versus stavudine plus didanosine plus hydroxyurea (HU), in patients with a CD4 count of 200-500 x 10(6) cells/l. After 3 months, the HU group had a higher proportion of patients with viral load < 200 x 10 cells/l. At the end of the 3 months blinded period, patients in the placebo group had the option to add HU if their viral load remained > 200 x 10(6) cells/l. We report results after 24 months.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were randomized to the HU arm, and a further 30 elected to add HU after 12 weeks. Twenty-four months after the start of the trial, only 25% of the 72 patients originally randomized to HU, and 20% of the 30 who added HU after week 12, were still taking it. The reasons for stopping HU were: lack of efficacy (45%), adverse events (37%) and patient or physician preference (18%). Side effects were more frequent in the didanosine/stavudine/HU group than in the didanosine/stavudine group: neuropathy (35 versus 15%, P< 0.02), fatigue (22 versus 7%, P< 0.01), and nausea or vomiting (26 versus 9%, P< 0.01). Of those who had discontinued HU, 73% were taking three drugs including a protease inhibitor. Patients who had started HU were compared with similar patients who had started protease inhibitors in the Swiss cohort. The probability of stopping HU was higher than the probability of stopping nelfinavir or indinavir, and similar to the probability of stopping ritonavir.

CONCLUSION

HU increased the antiviral effect of stavudine plus didanosine. However, side effects were more frequent, and after 24 months the majority of patients had switched to protease inhibitor regimens.

Drug-resistant reverse transcriptase genotyping and phenotyping of B and non-B subtypes (F and A) of human immunodeficiency virus type I found in Brazilian patients failing HAART

Development of drug resistance is the inevitable consequence of incomplete suppression of virus plasma levels in HIV-1-infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. Resistance mutations previously characterized have been found in B subtype viruses of developed countries. Moreover, mutation profiles for non-B and more divergent B subtype viruses found in developing countries shall be analyzed together with their ex vivo phenotyping in order to establish an exact correlation between the genotyping data and the clinical management counseling for those uncommon virus subtypes. In the present study, we evaluated the mutation profile for individuals infected with B subtype and non-B subtype viruses. Viral DNA fragments corresponding to the RT gene were amplified, sequenced, and subtyped. Phenotyping analysis for reverse transcriptase nucleoside (NRTI) and nonnucleoside inhibitor susceptibility was performed using the recombinant virus assay technology. Brazilian non-B subtypes (subtype F, n = 4, and subtype A, n = 1) isolates showed essentially the same B subtype mutation profile, presenting an NRTI drug resistance with similar MIC50% and MIC90% values for all drugs analyzed regardless of their subtypes. A strong cross-resistance phenotype among AZT, 3TC, and abacavir could be seen in all isolates analyzed. A novel result was that some RT sequences not only revealed the presence of G333D/E mutations but also correlated to the presence of mutation T386I that could abrogate the M184V-surpassing effect of L210W or L210W plus G333D/E. These findings suggest that Brazilian non-B subtype HIV-1 strains use an identical RT drug resistance mutation pattern when compared to B isolates and will contribute to the validation of the genotypic and phenotypic tests in these predominant worldwide-spread viral variants.

Infections with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium among HIV-infected patients after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. EuroSIDA Study Group JD

The impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients on the incidences of mycobacterial infections has not been studied in detail. We assessed incidences of mycobacterial diseases among HIV- infected patients following the introduction of HAART, using data from the EuroSIDA study, a European, multicenter observational cohort of more than 7,000 patients. Overall incidences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) were 0.8 and 1.4 cases/100 person-years of follow-up (PYF), decreasing from 1.8 (TB) and 3.5 cases/100 PYF (MAC) before September 1995 to 0.3 and 0.2 cases/100 PYF after March 1997. After adjustment for changes in CD4 cell count and use of antiretroviral treatment in Cox proportional hazards models, the risk of MAC decreased with increasing calendar time (hazard ratio per calendar year; HR = 0.58 [95% confidence intervals: 0.45-0.74], whereas this was not the case for TB; 0.95 [0.74-1.22]). In conclusion, we documented marked decreases in the incidence of TB and to an even larger extent of MAC among HIV-infected patients from 1994 to 1999. The decrease in TB was associated with the introduction of HAART and changes in CD4 cell count. These factors could also explain some of the decrease in MAC over time, though there remained a significantly lower risk of MAC than expected.

Three-year effectiveness of highly active antiretroviral treatment in the Luxembourg HIV cohort

Clinical trials have shown that highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) is able to reduce HIV plasma viral loads to undetectable in 70% to 90% of patients and to increase CD4 cell counts. HAART in community settings (i.e., nonclinical trial situations) is reported to be much less effective.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study.

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART in the Luxembourg HIV cohort after 36 months of treatment in previously treated and untreated patients. The secondary aim was to identify surrogate markers associated with long-term virologic and immunologic outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Seventy-three PI-naive patients, who started on HAART, combining one PI and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs),with a follow-up of 3 years, were evaluated with plasma viral load and CD4 cell counts every 3 months and were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had been treated previously with NRTI (n = 48) were at a more advanced stage of disease.

RESULTS

Overall, there was a mean decrease in viral load compared to baseline of -1.89 log RNA copies/mL (SD = 1.40) that persisted at month 36. Sixty-two percent (62%) of patients reached an undetectable viral load (i.e., below 500 copies/mL): 82% and 53% of NRTI-naive and NRTI-experienced patients, respectively (p =.013). CD4 cell counts increased progressively in both groups with a sustained effect (mean increase of 146 cells/mL +/- 241) at month 36. NRTI-naive patients had a mean increase of 257 cells/mL (SD = 305), in contrast to experienced patients who had an increase of 108 cells/mL (SD = 206) at 3 years. Proportions of patients with a CD4 count under 200 cells/mL fell after 3 years for NRTI-naive (from 66% to 43%) and for experienced patients (from 32% to 13%). Predictors of short duration of viral load response were in decreasing order of importance: clinical AIDS, the use of saquinavir hard gel formulation as initial PI, and the number of NRTIs previously used. Viral load response was the only significant predictor of CD4 changes.

CONCLUSION

In a community setting, effectiveness of PI-based HAART at 3 years is still achieved for most patients. NRTI-experienced patients have a good long-term response rate even if it is lower than NRTI-naive patients. A poor treatment response is associated with a more advanced stage of disease before HAART is introduced.