Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy

Optimizing the management of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with capecitabine (Xeloda)

Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) require chemotherapy that improves outcomes without compromising quality of life. To achieve optimal outcomes with chemotherapy, treatment choices should be influenced by patient and disease characteristics, as well as patient preferences. Capecitabine (Xeloda; F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) combined with docetaxel achieves significantly superior response rates, time to progression, and overall survival compared with single-agent docetaxel. With a manageable safety profile, capecitabine/docetaxel is a particularly appropriate option for younger, fitter patients with rapidly progressing disease and/or visceral metastases. In addition, studies show that dosing flexibility with capecitabine/docetaxel allows management of side effects without compromising efficacy. However, for older patients and those with comorbidities or more indolent disease, single-agent capecitabine may be more appropriate. Studies show that front-line capecitabine is a highly effective and well-tolerated alternative to standard intravenous treatments. The activity of capecitabine in the first-line treatment of MBC is underpinned by its consistently high activity in MBC. As an oral agent that causes minimal alopecia and myelosuppression, capecitabine has the potential to significantly improve patient quality of life and convenience. In summary, the treatment of MBC will always need to be individualized, but a large body of evidence indicates that capecitabine, whether alone or in combination, can be offered to women early in the disease course.

Costs of treatment of colorectal cancer in different settings in Germany

The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost implications of different settings (inpatient, outpatient/day clinic, or office-based oncologists) for the administration of standard fluoropyrimidine therapies, i.e., Mayo Clinic and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)/Ardalan regimen, and to compare the results with the cost of oral capecitabine in Germany. In total, 89 quarterly fee-listings from 26 patients provided by 5 office-based oncologists were analyzed. Physician's services, drug costs, pharmacy costs, and costs for implantable venous port systems and single-use pumps were considered. Findings were transferred to the hospital setting. A third-party payer perspective was applied. Quarterly treatment costs for the Mayo Clinic regimen varied between <euro> 2,036 and <euro> 10,569, and between <euro> 1,294 and <euro> 10,179 for the AIO/Ardalan regimen depending on the treatment setting. Projected costs for capecitabine were <euro> 2,338. No hospitalization was considered to be necessary for capecitabine due to its oral administration route. The most expensive treatment options were the AIO/Ardalan protocol in the office-based setting and the Mayo Clinic protocol in the hospital setting. Capecitabine emerged as the cheapest option in the office-based setting. Overall, the cheapest option was the AIO/Ardalan protocol in municipal hospitals. However, municipal hospitals are unlikely to cover their costs in this situation. Substantial cost savings without incurring losses to providers may be realized if patients are transferred from the hospital setting to the office-based setting and treated with capecitabine.

Patient management issues in metastatic bone disease

The main goals of bisphosphonate therapy are to prevent and treat skeletal events, minimize disability, and relieve pain without increasing the overall burden that bone metastases (and their treatment) place on patients. The ease and convenience of treatment are important to patients, and there are data suggesting that patients prefer oral therapy over intravenous drugs to help them maintain a normal life. Intravenous therapy with zoledronic acid and pamidronate is currently time-consuming; preparation, renal monitoring, infusion, and follow-up use valuable health care resources. Intravenous ibandronate could help alleviate this burden because of its good renal safety profile. Although efficacious, oral clodronate has compliance problems because of multiple dosing, large tablet size, and gastrointestinal tolerability issues. Recent phase III trials of oral ibandronate have shown efficacy similar to that of intravenous ibandronate, with no compliance or tolerability concerns. Ibandronate appears to have several advantages over current therapies that could improve treatment acceptability and reduce the burden of disease on the health care system. Research continues into the efficacy, safety, and pharmacoeconomics of ibandronate.

The role of uracil-tegafur (UFT) in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) administered in several schedules since its introduction in 1957 continues to be an integral part of standard first-line therapy for colorectal cancer. Continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion appears to yield improved response rate and overall survival, with fewer adverse effects compared with i.v. bolus dosing. However, these protracted infusions require portable infusion pumps and central venous lines, which are associated with complications (i.e. increased risk of infection and clotting and/or dislodgement of the catheter, increased risk of venous thrombosis). Colorectal carcinoma is the second cause of death for tumour after lung cancer. About 70% of cases occur over 65 years and 50% or more affects people over 70. In clinical research age was a common exclusion criteria and little information is available about the efficacy, safety and toxicity of chemotherapy in elderly patients because few studies focused on the treatment of cancer in that part of population. The goal of this article is to review the literature concerning the treatment of elderly patients with UFT, an orally administered dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitory fluoropyrimidine.

Pharmacokinetics and neutrophil toxicity of paclitaxel orally administered in mice with recombinant interleukin-2

PURPOSE

Intrinsic P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression in the gut limits paclitaxel uptake and, thus, its bioavailability when administered orally. Interleukin-2 has been reported to be a P-gp modulator in vitro and in vivo in mice. In the work described here, the effects of interleukin-2 pretreatment on pharmacokinetics and toxicity of paclitaxel orally administered were investigated.

METHODS

For the pharmacokinetic study, 96 mice were allocated to two groups receiving either 10 mg/kg of paclitaxel by the oral route alone or 16.5 microg of human recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL2) by the intraperitoneal route twice daily for 3 days and then paclitaxel. Pharmacokinetic profiles were analysed first by the Bailer method, and then using a compartmental approach. For the toxicity study, 90 Swiss mice were allocated to three groups receiving paclitaxel (10 mg/kg orally), rIL2 alone (16.5 microg i.p. twice daily for 3 days, control group), or both treatments. Haematological parameters were measured and the three groups were compared using the Bailer method. A Bonferroni correction was applied to the test.

RESULTS

A complex absorption of paclitaxel was revealed. The Bailer method showed that the mean area under the curve (AUC) values over 0-24 h were not significantly different in the two groups, despite a trend to reduced AUC in the pretreated group. The AUC over 0-0.5 h was significantly higher in the group pretreated with rIL2, but represented only a fraction of total exposure. These results were confirmed by the compartmental analysis. The elimination rate constant remained the same across both groups. rIL2 thus increased paclitaxel absorption for the 15 min following oral intake of the drug but did not enhance the overall exposure.

CONCLUSION

We found that a 3-day pretreatment with rIL2 had some in vivo inhibitory effects on P-gp activity for a short period after oral dosing of paclitaxel. Those results encourage further investigation of the effect of rIL2 on the overall exposure of paclitaxel. On the other hand, it seems that the joint administration of the two drugs did not increase the risk of myelosuppression, which might be worth knowing to treat advanced cancers.

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Intravenous to Oral Administration

This article reviews the current status of the topoisomerase I (top I) inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. We focus on oral drug administration, the mode of administration that is generally preferred by patients with cancer. However, the great majority of the studies have been performed with intravenous (I.V.) administration. The most extensively investigated GI malignancy in phase I/II studies is colorectal cancer (CRC), for which I.V. irinotecan is currently approved in the United States and Europe. We discuss the activity and efficacy of irinotecan as a single agent in CRC and in combination regimens. Also, results obtained with monotherapy and in combination treatment in other GI malignancies such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer are discussed. Few phase I studies have been performed with oral irinotecan and its clinical activity has not yet been fully determined. Several top I inhibitors are discussed, including topotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, rubitecan, exatecan, and lurtotecan. None of these agents, given orally or intravenously, have shown activity in CRC similar to that of I.V. irinotecan. However, several agents show promising results in other GI malignancies, eg, rubitecan and exatecan in pancreatic cancer. A complicating factor in the oral administration of the top I inhibitors is the often encountered low and variable oral bioavailability. This can partly be explained by the high affinity for the drug efflux pumps BCRP (ABCG2) and P-glycoprotein, which are highly expressed in the epithelial apical membrane of the GI tract. A novel approach to improve the oral bioavailability of the top I inhibitors by temporary blockade of the drug transporter BCRP is described.

Oral bioavailability of docetaxel in combination with OC144-093 (ONT-093)

OBJECTIVE

Docetaxel given orally as monotherapy results in low bioavailability of <10%. Previous studies have indicated that the intestinal efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp) prevents uptake from the gut resulting in low systemic exposure to docetaxel. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of enhancement of the oral uptake of docetaxel on combination with orally administered OC144-093, a potent P-gp inhibitor. Furthermore, the safety of combined treatment was determined and whether known functional genetic polymorphisms of the MDR1 gene could be associated with variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics was also investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A proof of concept study was carried out in 12 patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were randomized to receive one course of 100 mg oral docetaxel combined with 500 mg OC144-093 followed 2 weeks later by a second i.v. course of docetaxel at a flat dose of 100 mg, without OC144-093, or vice versa. This was followed by standard i.v. docetaxel treatment if indicated.

RESULTS

The apparent relative oral bioavailability of docetaxel was 26+/-8%. Orally administered docetaxel combined with oral OC144-093 resulted in a Cmax of 415+/-255 ng ml(-1), an AUC0-infinity of 844+/-753 ng h ml(-1) and kel of 0.810+/-0.296 h(-1). These values differed significantly from those following i.v. administration of docetaxel, with a Cmax of 2124+/-1054 ng ml(-1), an AUC0-infinity of 2571+/-1598 ng h ml(-1) and a kel of 1.318+/-0.785 h(-1) (P=0.003, P=0.006, P=0.016). The study medication was well tolerated and most of the adverse events possibly or probably related to OC144-093 and docetaxel were of CTC grade 1 and 2. One patient had a homozygous 3435T/T mutation, which is associated with low intestinal P-gp expression, and two other patients had a homozygous mutation on exon 21.

CONCLUSION

The relative apparent bioavailability of 26% was most likely caused by a significant effect of OC144-093 on the oral uptake of docetaxel. Large intrapatient and interpatient (pharmacokinetic) variation was found after oral as well as after i.v. administration of docetaxel. Higher plasma levels were observed after 100 mg i.v. docetaxel than after 100 mg oral docetaxel plus 500 mg oral OC144-093. The safety of the oral combination was good. More patients should be evaluated to determine the effect of P-gp single nucleotide polymorphisms on oral pharmacokinetic values of docetaxel.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with tegafur in cancer of the pancreas: initial analysis of clinical tolerance and outcome

The early institutional experience in the neoadjuvant treatment of potentially resectable pancreatic carcinoma using oral Tegafur as radioenhancing agent is analyzed. Fifteen patients (10 male and 5 female, mean age of 61 years) were treated over a 30-month period. Tegafur dose was 1,200 mg/d along the external radiotherapy period (45-55 consecutive days). Preoperative radiotherapy achieved a total dose of 45 to 50 Gy (1.8 Gy/d). Intraoperative electron boost (10-15 Gy) was delivered at the time of surgery. Hematologic tolerance showed a significant decrease of neutrophil and platelet counts from the outset to the end of the neoadjuvant period (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). Five grade III vomiting episodes (33%) were also registered. In 9 patients (60%), surgical resection was performed after chemoradiation. Three complete pathologic responses (pT0 specimens) were identified; in seven cases, the resection achieved tumor-free surgical margins of the specimen. With a median follow-up of 21 months, median survival time was 17 months, with actuarial rates of 45% at 1 year and 24% at 3 years. Median survival for the resected patients was 23 months, and for the unresected patients median survival was 8 months (p = 0.02). The overall median survival in completely resected patients was 28 months, with a 71% survival rate at 1 and 3 years. It is concluded that the treatment scheme described is feasible and acceptably tolerated. The use of oral Tegafur seems to induce results similar to those of other therapeutic protocols using intravenous radioenhancing chemotherapy.

Capecitabine in malignant mesothelioma: a phase II trial by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (39807)

PURPOSE

The CALGB performed a phase II multicenter study to evaluate the activity of oral capecitabine in patients with malignant mesothelioma (CALGB 39807).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between November 15, 2000 and August 31, 2001, 27 patients with mesothelioma were enrolled in this study. Capecitabine was administered at 2500 mg/m(2) per day divided in two doses for 14 days followed by a seven-day break. Cycles were repeated every 21 days with restaging performed every two cycles and therapy continuing for up to six cycles. One patient withdrew from the study prior to receiving therapy and is removed from further analysis. Eligibility criteria included no prior treatment, PS 0-1 by CALGB criteria and histologically documented mesothelioma.

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS

gender; male 19 (73%), female seven; median age 70 (range 40-81); histology: epithelial 15 (58%), mixed eight (31%), unclassified three; site of origin pleura, 25 (96%); weight loss in previous six months of more than 10% in seven (27%), symptoms longer than six months in five (19%).

RESULTS

One patient (4%) had a confirmed PR while 10 (38%) achieved SD for 2-6 cycles. Ten patients (38%) had PD as their best response. There were three patients unevaluable for response and two early deaths. Median survival and failure free survival were 4.9 (95% CI 4-10.8) and 2.4 (95% CI 1.5-4.2) months respectively with a one-year survival of 23% (95% CI 11-49%). Grade three or greater toxicities encountered by at least 10% of patients included lymphopenia (12%), fatigue (12%), dehydration (12%) and diarrhea (15%). Three patients (12%) had grade three skin toxicity or hand-foot syndrome. One patient died of treatment related toxicity during cycle one.

CONCLUSION

The antitumor activity of capecitabine is insufficient to warrant further exploration in patients with malignant mesothelioma.

Phase II trial of Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin combination in epithelial ovarian carcinoma relapsing within 2 years of platinum-based therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Leucovorin (LV) combination in ovarian cancer relapsing within 2 years of prior platinum-based chemotherapy in a phase II trial.

METHODS

Eligible patients had at least one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, elevated CA-125 > or = 60 IU/l, radiological evidence of disease progression and adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Patients with raised CA-125 levels alone as marker of disease relapse were not eligible. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) was given on day 1, and 5-Fluorouracil (370 mg/m(2)) and Leucovorin (30 mg) was given on days 1 and 8 of a 14-day cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (range 42-74 years). The median platinum-free interval (PFI) was 5 months (range 0-17 months) with only 30% of patients being platinum sensitive (PFI > 6 months). Six patients (22%) had two prior regimens of chemotherapy. A total of 191 cycles were administered (median 7; range 2-12). All patients were evaluable for toxicity. The following grade 3/4 toxicities were noted: anemia 4%; neutropenia 15%; thrombocytopenia 11%; neurotoxicity 8%; lethargy 4%; diarrhea 4%; hypokalemia 11%; hypomagnesemia 11%. Among 27 enrolled patients, 20 patients were evaluable for response by WHO criteria and 25 patients were evaluable by Rustin's CA-125 criteria. The overall response rate (RR) by WHO criteria was 30% (95% CI: 15- 52) [three complete responses (CRs) and three partial responses (PRs)]. The CA-125 response rate was 56% (95% CI: 37-73). Significantly, a 25% (95% CI: 9-53) radiological and a 50% (95% CI: 28-72) CA-125 response rate were noted in platinum resistant patients (PFI < 6 months). The median response duration was 4 months (range 3-12) and the median overall survival was 10 months.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin combination has a good safety profile and is active in platinum-pretreated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Phase II study of oral S-1 for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The goal of the current study was to evaluate the objective response rate and toxicity associated with the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 (a combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2 twice daily for 28 days, followed by a 14-day rest period. Treatment was repeated every 6 weeks unless disease progression was observed.

RESULTS

A combined total of 173 courses of S-1 were administered to the 38 enrolled patients. The median number of courses administered to a given patient was 3.5 (range, 1-18). Although no patient exhibited a complete response to treatment, 15 had partial responses (response rate, 39.5%; 95% confidence interval, 24.0-56.6%). In addition, 5 patients had minor responses, and 14 had stable disease. Four patients were found to have progressive disease after two courses of treatment. The median survival time was 358 days (95% confidence interval, 305-490 days), and the 1-year survival rate was 47.4%. The most common adverse reactions included myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity; most cases involved Grade 1 or 2 toxicity, but Grade 3 toxicities (anemia [7.9% of patients], neutropenia [5.3% of patients], diarrhea [2.6% of patients], and abnormal bilirubin levels [7.9% of patients]) also were noted. Neither Grade 4 toxicity nor treatment-related death was observed during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Orally administered S-1 is active against metastatic colorectal carcinoma and has an acceptable toxicity profile. This promising agent has the potential to become a valuable chemotherapeutic option.

A Phase I Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Ro 31-7453 Given as a 7- or 14-Day Oral Twice Daily Schedule Every 4 Weeks in Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

This is a dose-finding Phase I study of oral Ro 31-7453, a new class of antimitotic drug with promising preclinical activity in several chemoresistant models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Two schedules of oral Ro 31-7453 (every 12 h) given for either 7 or 14 consecutive days repeated every 4 weeks were explored consecutively.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients with refractory cancer entered the study (14 on the 7-day schedule and 23 on the 14-day schedule). Median age was 63 years (range, 40-77 years), and median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (range, 60-100); the most frequent diagnosis was colorectal carcinoma (16 patients). Dose levels of 100, 200, 240, and 280 mg/m(2) twice daily (bid) for 7 days and 70, 100, 125, and 150 mg/m(2) bid for 14 days were explored. A total of 110 cycles were administered, the median number of cycles received was 3 (range, 1-7); six patients completed 6 or more cycles. Myelosuppression and mucositis were dose-limiting with both schedules. Fatigue and gastrointestinal toxicities other than mucositis were frequent but generally mild. The maximum tolerated doses were 200 mg/m(2) bid and 125 mg/m(2) bid for the 7- and 14-day schedules, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed rapid absorption and metabolism. The area under the concentration-time curve and trough concentrations of Ro 31-7453 and two active metabolites appeared dose proportional with a t(1/2) of approximately 9 h and a t(max) of approximately 4 h. One patient with pretreated lung cancer had a partial response.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Ro 31-7453 regimens were feasible, but the 14-day schedule at the recommended dose of 125 mg/m(2) bid was selected for further monotherapy Phase II evaluation because of its higher preclinical activity. This regimen is convenient, well tolerated, and has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile.

Information needs and decision-making processes in older cancer patients

The paper provides an overview of age-differences in patients' preferences for participation in cancer treatment decision-making and factors that relate to these age-differences. On average, older cancer patients prefer to receive less information about their illness and treatment and assume a less active role in making treatment decisions. They are also less likely to collect and analyze all relevant information in order to make an optimal decision. Observed age-differences are, in part, explained by age-associated cognitive decline. Age-differences are, on average, small to moderate, and most older patients prefer to be well-informed. Nonetheless, only a minority of them wishes to play an active role in decision-making. Given their lower preference for active participation in decision-making, older adults may show less positive psychological effects of active participation, but this question warrants research. Implications for working with older cancer patients are discussed.

Single-agent capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, is well documented in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients (overall response rate: 25%). However, its efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) has not been determined. This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and to identify the side-effects of capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer showing progression despite 5-FU/LV-based combination chemotherapy.

METHODS

Fifty-one metastatic colorectal cancer patients who showed progressive disease in 5-FU/LV-containing regimens (median: two regimes) were treated with capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily (days 1-14 repeated every 3 weeks).

RESULTS

Only one partial response was observed (response rate: 2%). Twenty-seven patients (53%) showed stable disease after two cycles. The median time to disease progression of either a partial response or stable disease was 3.4 months. Hand-foot syndrome was the main toxicity of capecitabine and occurred in 35% of cases (grade 3 or 4 in 6%). The median number of cycles administered was two and the relative dose intensity of capecitabine was 80%.

CONCLUSION

The response rate to capecitabine was low in metastatic colorectal cancers that were refractory to 5-FU/LV-containing chemotherapy. However, disease stabilization was seen in a significant number of patients.

Four Decades of Continuing Innovation With Fluorouracil: Current and Future Approaches to Fluorouracil Chemoradiation Therapy

Purpose

Chemoradiotherapy, the combination of external radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy, has been the basis for the oncologic management of many patients since its development in the 1960s. Fluorouracil (FU) chemoradiotherapy has demonstrated success in several organ sites with multiple dosing schedules that now guide the selection of oral analogs of FU to provide new chemoradiotherapy options.

Methods

This article reviews the metabolism and pharmacology of FU and the advantages of administration of FU by continuous infusion or bolus. The potential role and impact of the oral fluorouracil prodrugs UFT, S-1, BOF-A2, and capecitabine as replacements for intravenous administration are discussed. The results of recent chemoradiotherapy studies with FU from 2000 to 2003 are summarized in rectal, head and neck, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, biliary, anal, and cervical cancers.

Results

Chemoradiotherapy with FU has the potential to widen the therapeutic window by minimizing normal tissue toxicity while maintaining effective tumor toxicity. Overall, FU chemoradiotherapy maximizes local control and, for some tumor sites (such as head and neck, pancreatic, biliary, cervical, esophageal, and gastric cancers), improves survival rates. Moreover, FU chemoradiotherapy results in improved organ preservation with excellent functional outcome in several anatomic sites including head and neck cancer, anal, and rectal cancer, with improved sphincter preservation.

Conclusion

FU chemoradiotherapy continues to play an important role in the management of many cancer sites. During the last four decades, optimal dosing schedules have produced a therapeutic gain. The introduction of oral prodrug analogs will likely further improve the results of FU therapy in several organ systems, such as the rectum, head and neck, and esophagus.

Vinorelbine alternating oral and intravenous plus carboplatinin advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicentre phase II study

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine and carboplatin are both active agents in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Vinorelbine has recently been developed in an oral formulation, which is as active as the intravenous (i.v.) form.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two chemonaive patients with unresectable localised or metastatic NSCLC received i.v. vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin (AUC 5) on day 1 and oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) on day 8 (or day 15 if neutrophils <1500/mm(3)) every 3 weeks in an open-label, multicentre phase II study.

RESULTS

A total of 224 cycles were given, with the median number per patient of four (range one to eight). Eight responses out of 52 enrolled patients were documented and validated by an independent panel review, yielding a response rate of 18.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.8-29.6%] in the evaluable population. This response rate was balanced by a high rate of disease control (78.9% in the intention-to treat population and 90.9% in the evaluable population). The median progression-free and median survival were 5.1 months (95% CI 4.3-8.1) and 9.3 months (95% CI 6.8-11.4), respectively. Overall, the safety profile of the combination regimen alternating i.v. and oral vinorelbine appeared similar to that expected for each individual agent. Some lung cancer-specific items (pain, dyspnoea) improved or were stabilised by assessment using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of carboplatin with an alternating regimen of i.v./oral vinorelbine is a well tolerated regimen with a low level of toxicity and a low rate of serious adverse events. A high rate of disease control (partial response + no change) was achieved. Progression-free survival and overall survival fell within the expected range. This regimen is convenient and safe for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients.

Oral capecitabine as an alternative to i.v. 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: safety results of a randomized, phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Oral capecitabine achieves a superior response rate with an improved safety profile compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin (5-FU/LV) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We report here the results of a large phase III trial investigating adjuvant oral capecitabine compared with 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic regimen) in Dukes' C colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged 18-75 years with resected Dukes' C colon carcinoma were randomized to receive 24 weeks of treatment with either oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days (n = 993), or i.v. bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) with i.v. leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, repeated every 28 days (n = 974).

RESULTS

Patients receiving capecitabine experienced significantly (P <0.001) less diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, alopecia and neutropenia, but more hand-foot syndrome than those receiving 5-FU/LV. Fewer patients receiving capecitabine experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia/sepsis and stomatitis (P <0.001), although more experienced grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than those treated with 5-FU/LV (P <0.001). Capecitabine demonstrates a similar, favorable safety profile in patients aged <65 years or > or = 65 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on its improved safety profile, capecitabine has the potential to replace 5-FU/LV as standard adjuvant treatment for patients with colon cancer. Efficacy results are expected to be available in Keywords: Adjuvant treatment, capecitabine, chemotherapy, colorectal cancer

Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m⁻² twice daily, days 1−14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885–1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84–1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.

Impact of the new AJCC staging system and adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The combination of chemoradiation and fluorouracil based chemotherapy has been the standard adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment outcome of patients classified by the new AJCC staging system and to compare treatment outcome of oral doxifluridine and the standard Mayo Clinic regimen after chemoradiation in advanced rectal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred nine patients underwent curative surgical resection and chemoradiation followed by chemotherapy. 45 Gy pelvic irradiation was given to the entire pelvis and the boost radiation with 50.4 to 54 Gy, and simultaneously 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 375 mg/m(2)/day was given on day 1 approximately 3 and 26 approximately 28. After the completion of chemoradiation, patients were given either 6 cycles of the Mayo Clinic regimen (5-FU 425 mg/m(2) plus leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus infusion on day 1~5, every 4 weeks) or oral doxifluridine (600 mg/m(2)/day) for 1 year.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 30 months. Among 102 evaluable patients, 38 patients (37.3%) relapsed: the locoregional recurrence in 10 patients (9.8%) and systemic relapse in 28 patients (27.5%). The systemic relapse rate was 15.6% in the stage IIA, 25.0% in the stage IIIB , and 59.1% in the stage IIIC (p=0.048). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was significantly higher in the IIA and IIIA patients than the IIIB and IIIC patients (72% and 100% vs 48.1% and 11.2%, respectively. p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was also significantly different between in the IIA/IIIA patients and the IIIB/IIIC (67.3%/100% vs 48.4%/22.3%. p<0.001). However, the difference in DFS or OS between the oral doxifluridine group and the Mayo Clinic regimen group was not significant. Cox regression multivariate analyses showed that the new AJCC stage and tumor differentiation were significant independent prognostic factors in DFS and OS.

CONCLUSION

These results support that the new AJCC staging system is superior to Dukes' staging system in the prognostic stratification. Regarding DFS and OS, oral doxifluridine is comparable to the standard Mayo Clinic regimen in rectal cancer patients when combined with postoperative chemoradiation. Stage IIIC patients should be selected for aggressive therapy as they have a dismal prognosis.

Principles of transmucosal delivery of therapeutic agents

Recent advances in medicine have led to new treatment options for patients and physicians as a more developed understanding of the molecular basis of disease states is translated into new therapeutic agents. Many of these new agents are compounds that are not able to reach the bloodstream when administered by the oral route preventing the ability to enjoy the benefits this delivery route provides such as lower cost and increased quality of life. Our laboratory has focused on the use of hydrogel carriers to increase the bioavailability of orally administered therapeutic agents ranging from proteins such as insulin to chemotherapeutics like bleomycin. The foundations of this research as well as recent advances are reviewed along with a discussion of the challenges of oral administration and other emerging strategies for oral administration.

A phase II study of S-1 in patients with metastatic breast cancer — A Japanese trial by the S-1 cooperative study group, breast cancer working group

BACKGROUND

S-1 is a newly developed novel oral dihydrouracil dehydrogenase inhibiting fluoropyrimidine drug consisting of 1 M tegafur (FT), 0.4 M 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyrimidine (gimeracil), and 1 M potassium oxonate (oteracil), with efficient antitumor activity and low gastrointestinal toxicity which is widely used in Japan against advanced gastric, head and neck cancers. We investigated its clinical efficacy against metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

A non-blind phase II study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity in metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with measurable metastasis foci (n=111) were enrolled, and 108 patients were regarded as eligible. S-1 was administered orally at a standard dose of 80 mg/m2/day b.i.d. One course consisted of 28 consecutive days of administration followed by a 14-day rest, and courses were repeated up to six times.

RESULTS

Among the eligible patients, 10 had a complete response and 35 had a partial response, with an overall response rate (CR+PR) of 41.7% (95% confidence interval: CI, 32.3-51.5%). The incidences of toxicity (> or =grade 3) were neutropenia 9.1%, anemia 0.9%, anorexia 3.6%, stomatitis 1.8%, nausea/vomiting 1.8%, diarrhea 0.9%, and fatigue 2.7%, however no treatment-related deaths were observed. The median survival time was 872 days (95% CI, 572-1,110 days). There was no difference in response rate or toxicity between the under 65-year-old group and the older group.

CONCLUSION

S-1 was demonstrated to have high efficacy with low gastrointestinal toxicity even in older patients and will be a promising new chemotherapy drug for metastatic breast cancer.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the association of capecitabine-cisplatin in head and neck cancer patients

The combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered to be the standard treatment in induction chemotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Capecitabine (Xeloda) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is preferentially activated at the tumoral level, exploiting the higher thymidine phosphorylase activity in tumoral tissue. This phase I trial was conducted in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic head and neck carcinoma. The treatment plan included cisplatin on day 1 every 21 days, followed by capecitabine twice daily from day 2 to day 15, with a 1-week rest period. Pharmacokinetic investigations concerned plasma measurement of unchanged capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine, 5'-doxifluridine and 5-FU using an optimized high performance liquid chromatography method, and cisplatin measurement in plasma using a limited sampling procedure. Twenty-one patients were included (mean age 61 years, range 46-76 years). Dose (mg/m(2)) increments for cisplatin and capecitabine (b.i.d.), respectively, were as follows: level 1, 80 and 1000 (three patients); level 2, 100 and 1000 (12 patients); and level 3, 100 and 1125 (five patients). Dose-limiting toxicities occurring during the first cycle (grade >/= 3) were observed on level 2 (one patient with diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, hand-foot syndrome, one toxic death due to renal failure and neutropenia, one patient with neutropenia) and on level 3 (one patient with diarrhea, one patient with hand-foot syndrome and one patient with neutrothrombocytopenia). Due to delayed side-effects, 14 patients (67%) had repeated cycles every 28 days instead of 21 days as initially planned. Objective response was obtained in seven patients (three complete responses and four partial responses). There was no evidence of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships with the drugs and metabolites investigated. Combination of capecitabine and cisplatin is feasible, with a very promising response rate. The recommended doses for further phase II studies are those of level 2 with cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14, every 28 days.

Phase I/II study of S-1 combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

A dose-escalation study of cisplatin (CDDP) combined with S-1, a new oral dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine, was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and objective response rate (RR) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). S-1 was given orally at 40 mg m⁻² b.i.d. for 21 consecutive days following a 2-week rest. CDDP was planned to be given intravenously on day 8, at a dose of 60, 70, or 80 mg m⁻² depending on the DLT. Treatment was repeated every 5 weeks, unless disease progression was observed. In the phase I portion, the MTD of CDDP was presumed to be 70 mg m⁻², because 33.3% of patients (2/6) developed DLTs, mainly neutropenia. Therefore, the RD of CDDP was estimated as 60 mg m⁻². In the phase II portion, 19 patients including six patients of the RD phase I portion were evaluated. The median administered courses was four (range: 1–8). The incidences of severe (grades 3–4) haematological and nonhaematological toxicities were 15.8 and 26.3%, respectively, but all were manageable. The RR was 74% (14/19, 95% confidence interval: 54.9−90.6%), and the median survival day was 383. This regimen is considered to be active against AGC with acceptable toxicity.

Factors affecting pharmacokinetic variability of oral topotecan: a population analysis

The aim of this study was to characterise the pharmacokinetics of the anticancer agent topotecan, and explore the influence of patient covariates and interoccasion variability on drug disposition. Data were obtained from 190 patients who received the drug as a 30-min infusion (N=72) or orally (N=118). The population model was built with the use of NONMEM to identify candidate covariates, and obtain models for clearance (CL) and volume of distribution. The final models were based on first-order absorption with lag-time (oral data), and a two-compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment. The Cockcroft–Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl) and WHO performance status (PS) were the only significant covariates: CL=(12.8+2.1 × CrCl) × (1−0.12 × PS). For the volume of distribution, a correlation was found between body weight and the central volume (V1)=0.58 × body weight. Based on the structural models, a limited-sampling strategy was developed with minor bias and good precision that can be applied a posteriori using timed samples obtained at 1.5, and 6 h after the administration of topotecan. In conclusion, a population pharmacokinetic model for topotecan has been developed that incorporates measures of renal function and PS to predict CL. In combination with drug monitoring, the limited sampling strategy allows individualised treatment for patients receiving oral topotecan.

Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Treating patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC) represents a significant challenge to oncologists. The tumour-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, is the only treatment approved for these patients. Our study evaluated the efficacy, safety and impact on quality of life (QOL) of capecitabine in this setting. Patients (n=126) with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer received capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, days 1-14, followed by a 7-day rest period. Median time to progression was 4.9 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.0-6.4). Thirty-five patients (28%) achieved an objective response (95% CI: 20-36%), including five (4%) complete responses. Median overall survival was 15.2 months (95% CI: 13.5-19.6 months). Capecitabine demonstrated a favourable safety profile, with a low incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events. The most common adverse events were hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal effects. QOL assessment showed that capecitabine treatment was associated with an increase in mean Global Health Score. Capecitabine is active, well tolerated and improves the QOL of patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Based on the consistently high activity demonstrated in clinical trials, capecitabine has become the reference treatment in this setting.

Oral vinorelbine for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: a phase II trial of efficacy and toxicity

PURPOSE

Before now oral vinorelbine has not yet been tested in a cohort of elderly, advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients, even though the intravenous form of this drug provides a reasonable therapeutic option for this group. This trial was conducted to determine the tumor response rate and toxicity profile of oral vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients > or = 65 years of age.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Fifty-eight evaluable patients > or = 65 years of age with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were enrolled. Median age was 73 years (range: 65-87). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score was 0, 1, or 2 in 29, 59, and 12% of patients, respectively. All patients had adequate organ function. Oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 per week was prescribed weekly as first-line therapy.

RESULTS

Two patients manifested a confirmed tumor response, yielding a response rate of 3.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4, 11.9%). There were no complete responses. Median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.2, 5.4 months), and median overall survival was 7.5 months (95% CI: 5.0, 12 months). There were five deaths, one of which might have been treatment-related, and there were 10 grade 4 events.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral vinorelbine, as prescribed in this trial, provides minimal activity in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients > or = 65 years of age.

Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease

Background

The objective of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate a general measure of patients' satisfaction with medication, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM).

Methods

The content and format of 55 initial questions were based on a formal conceptual framework, an extensive literature review, and the input from three patient focus groups. Patient interviews were used to select the most relevant questions for further evaluation (n = 31). The psychometric performance of items and resulting TSQM scales were examined using eight diverse patient groups (arthritis, asthma, major depression, type I diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, migraine, and psoriasis) recruited from a national longitudinal panel study of chronic illness (n = 567). Participants were then randomized to complete the test items using one of two alternate scaling methods (Visual Analogue vs. Likert-type).

Results

A factor analysis (principal component extraction with varimax rotation) of specific items revealed three factors (Eigenvalues > 1.7) explaining 75.6% of the total variance; namely Side effects (4 items, 28.4%, Cronbach's Alpha = .87), Effectiveness (3 items, 24.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .85), and Convenience (3 items, 23.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .87). A second factor analysis of more generally worded items yielded a Global Satisfaction scale (3 items, Eigenvalue = 2.3, 79.1%, Cronbach's Alpha = .85). The final four scales possessed good psychometric properties, with the Likert-type scaling method performing better than the VAS approach. Significant differences were found on the TSQM by the route of medication administration (oral, injectable, topical, inhalable), level of illness severity, and length of time on medication. Regression analyses using the TSQM scales accounted for 40–60% of variation in patients' ratings of their likelihood to persist with their current medication.

Conclusion

The TSQM is a psychometrically sound and valid measure of the major dimensions of patients' satisfaction with medication. Preliminary evidence suggests that the TSQM may also be a good predictor of patients' medication adherence across different types of medication and patient populations.

Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: results of a randomized phase III study comparing temozolomide with dacarbazine

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a crucial endpoint in the evaluation of treatments that have limited survival benefits. The HRQL evaluations help ensure that patients are not sacrificing life quality for quantity. Current treatments for metastatic melanoma are primarily palliative, because cure is unattainable. The purpose of this article is to report detailed HRQL results of a phase III clinical trial comparing temozolomide to dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with metastatic melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive either oral temozolomide for 5 days every 4 weeks or intravenous DTIC for 5 days every 3 weeks. The HRQL was evaluated on day 1 cycle 1 and after each subsequent treatment cycle using the EORTC QLQ-C-30. The HRQL was compared between groups at weeks 12 and 24. Patients treated with temozolomide reported significantly better physical functioning and less fatigue and sleep disturbances than patients treated with DTIC at week 12. For all but two function and symptom subscales, EORTC QLQ-C30 subscale scores were numerically better for patients treated with temozolomide at week 12. All subscales except diarrhea were better for temozolomide at week 24. Analyses of change scores revealed that patients treated with temozolomide reported statistically significant improvements in emotional well-being and sleep disturbance. Patients also reported near significant change in cognitive functioning (3.9, p = 0.06). Patients treated with DTIC deteriorated on most function subscales and many symptom subscales at week 12. Deterioration in physical functioning approached significance (-6.8, p = 0.06). At week 24, patients treated with DTIC improved on the emotional functioning subscale and deteriorated on the physical, role, and global HRQL subscales, although many of the symptom scores improved. The results of this study suggest that treatment with temozolomide leads to important functional improvements and decreased symptoms compared to treatment with DTIC in patients being treated for metastatic melanoma.

Phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin with radiotherapy in patients with inextirpable non-rectal gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Chemoradiotherapy is increasingly used in the primary management of patients with loco-regionally advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Oral chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) may represent a convenient way of delivering protracted infusion of fluorouracil. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of UFT plus LV combined with radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and a recommended dose for further testing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inextirpable GI cancer received escalating doses of UFT (starting at 300 mg/m(2)/d with 50 mg/m(2)/d increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of LV (90 mg/d). UFT and LV were given 5 days per week concurrently with radiation to 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction).

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were treated, and 22 received the planned treatment. Three patients were withdrawn from treatment, two due to disease-progression and one due to toxicity. The MTD of UFT with radiation was 400 mg/m(2)/d with 90 mg/d of LV. Diarrhoea was the main dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Since some toxicity (3/12 DLTs) was seen in the expanded cohort at the level below, but none (0/9 DLT) at the starting level, the recommended dose chosen for further testing is 300-350 mg/m(2)/d depending upon the size of the target volume.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant chemoradiation with oral UFT plus LV is feasible and well tolerated and should be further investigated since tumour responses were frequently seen.

Pharmacological factors influencing anticancer drug selection in the elderly

Persons over the age of 65 years are the fastest growing segment of the US population. In the next 30 years this segment will represent more than 20% of the population. Fifty percent of all cancers occur in this age group and therefore the total cancer burden is expected to rise. Data are becoming available that will better guide the use of chemotherapy in the older patient population. Studies are presented discussing pharmacokinetic data on a number of chemotherapeutic agents with an emphasis on those that have entered clinical practice over the past few years. Many of these agents seem to have a beneficial therapeutic index, particularly in regard to older patients. Aging can affect the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapy in a number of ways. Absorption is only modified minimally by age. The greater concern with the use of oral drugs is patient compliance. Volume of distribution is affected by changes in body composition, anaemia and decreased plasma albumin concentration. There are many drugs in which renal excretion plays an important role. Decline in glomerular filtration is a consistent phenomenon with aging. Drug metabolism is primarily affected by changes in the P450 system and coadministration of drugs which also interact with this important enzyme system. The selection of chemotherapy in the elderly is frequently determined by degree of comorbidity and the patients' functional status. These factors are critical and can often determine response and toxicity. This article discusses the changes that occur with antimetabolites, camptothecins, anthracyclines, taxanes, platinum compounds, epipodophyllotoxins and vinca alkaloids. There has also been an increasing trend toward the use of oral chemotherapy. Factors that must be considered in selecting chemotherapeutic agents include limitations of saturability of absorption, patient compliance and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes that occur in older patients. Interpatient variability and age-related changes in drug metabolism are discussed. Careful attention to the physiological changes with age and dose adjustments necessary for end-organ dysfunction (renal, hepatic) are needed to ensure the safe administration of chemotherapy. In this article specific diseases are discussed (breast, colon, ovarian and non-small lung cancers) with recommendations for drug selection in adjuvant chemotherapy and the treatment of metastatic disease. Future studies will need to incorporate these various factors to properly evaluate chemotherapy in older patients. Research and educational initiatives targeted to this population will need to be a priority.

Development of and clinical experience with capecitabine (Xeloda®) in the treatment of solid tumours

The oral fluoropyrimidine capecitabine (Xeloda) delivers 5-FU to the tumour site, thereby limiting the side effects and other complications associated with intravenous (i.v.) 5-FU. As an oral drug, capecitabine is preferred to 5-FU by many patients as it can be conveniently taken at home. In first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC), capecitabine results in superior response rates and equivalent progression-free and overall survival compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV. There is also increasing evidence for replacing i.v. 5-FU with capecitabine in combination with other anticancer agents (e.g. oxaliplatin and irinotecan) in MCRC and in the adjuvant treatment of early stage colon cancer. In anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC), adding capecitabine to docetaxel improves survival, time to progression (TTP) and response rates beyond docetaxel. Single-agent capecitabine is also effective in pretreated MBC and is a promising first-line therapy. Capecitabine has a favourable safety profile, the most frequent adverse events being hand-foot syndrome, stomatitis and diarrhoea. Because capecitabine is orally administered, it is possible to intervene promptly with dose interruption/reduction to resolve adverse events without impacting on efficacy. The increasing availability of capecitabine in the home-based setting requires careful consideration of the role of the oncology nurse, who is the key link between the patient and clinician for effective and efficient management.

Pharmacokinetic Optimisation of Treatment with Oral Etoposide

Etoposide is a derivative of podophyllotoxin widely used in the treatment of several neoplasms, including small cell lung cancer, germ cell tumours and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Prolonged administration of etoposide aims for continuous inhibition of topoisomerase II, the intracellular target of etoposide, thus preventing tumour cells from repairing DNA breaks. However, the clinical advantages of extended schedules as compared with conventional short-term infusions remain unclear. Oral administration of etoposide represents the most feasible and economic strategy to maintain effective concentrations of drug for extended times. Nevertheless, the efficacy of oral etoposide therapy is contingent on circumventing pharmacokinetic limitations, mainly low and variable bioavailability. Inhibition of small bowel and hepatic metabolism of etoposide with specific cytochrome P450 inhibitors or inhibition of the intestinal P-glycoprotein efflux pump have been attempted to increase the bioavailability of oral etoposide, but the best results were obtained with daily oral administration of low etoposide doses (50-100 mg/day for 14-21 days). Saturable absorption of etoposide was reported for doses greater than 200 mg/day, whereas lower doses were associated with increased bioavailability, although they were characterised by high inter- and intrapatient variability. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as plasma trough concentration between two oral administrations (C(24,trough)), drug exposure time above a threshold value and area under the plasma concentration-time curve have been correlated with the pharmacodynamic effect of oral etoposide. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships indicate that severe toxicity is avoided when peak plasma concentrations do not exceed 3-5 mg/L and C(24,trough) is under the threshold limit of 0.3 mg/L. To maintain effective etoposide plasma concentrations during prolonged oral administration, pharmacokinetic variability must be monitored in each patient, taking account of factors from many pharmacokinetic studies of etoposide, including absorption, distribution, protein binding, metabolism and elimination. Dosage reduction is generally useful to avoid haematological toxicity in patients with renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance <50 mL/min). The need for dosage adjustment based on liver function in patients with liver dysfunction is not completely defined, but generally is not indicated in patients with minor liver dysfunction. Adaptive dosage adjustment based on individual pharmacokinetic parameters, estimated using limited sampling strategies and population pharmacokinetic models, is more appropriate. This approach has been used with success in different clinical trials to increase the etoposide dosage, without significantly increasing toxicity. Various pharmacodynamic models have been proposed to guide etoposide oral dosage. However, they lack precision and accuracy and need to be refined by considering other predictor variables in order to extend their application in current clinical practice.

Implications of capecitabine (Xeloda®) for cancer nursing practice

Home-based therapy with oral capecitabine (Xeloda) has a number of advantages over i.v. hospital-based chemotherapy regimens, including improvement in patients' quality of life, and medical resource/cost savings compared with 5-FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, the ability of capecitabine to extend survival beyond docetaxel in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer means that capecitabine plus docetaxel is a very cost-effective combination. Oncology nurses should prepare for the increased use of oral capecitabine as a single agent or in combination regimens in the outpatient setting. The use of this drug requires enhanced patient education skills, communication (e.g. telephone contact) and patient management on the part of the nurse. Oncology nurses will also need to accept a more significant and pivotal role in the clinical oncology team, not only as a point of contact between the patient and clinician, but also in documenting the benefits of capecitabine to ensure the effective management of patients receiving the drug.

Randomized multicenter Phase II trial of two different schedules of irinotecan combined with capecitabine as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current randomized Phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine combined with irinotecan as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC).

METHODS

A total of 140 patients received capecitabine at a dose of 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily on Days 2-15 and irinotecan at a dose of either 300 mg/m(2) on Day 1 (Arm A) or 150 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 (Arm B) every 3 weeks. During the course of the study, enrollment was continued using lower doses of capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2) twice daily) and irinotecan (Arm A: 240 mg/m(2); Arm B: 120 mg/m(2)) to improve the safety profile of the combinations.

RESULTS

Efficacy was evaluable in 134 patients (68 in Arm A, 66 in Arm B). Objective responses were observed in 46% of the patients (8% complete response [CR]), including 47% in Arm A (9% CR; 38% partial response [PR]) and 44% in Arm B (8% CR; 36% PR). The median progression-free survival was 8.3 months in Arm A and 7.6 months in Arm B. Among the first 52 patients treated with the higher doses, the most frequent Grade 3-4 adverse event was diarrhea (27%). The lower doses adopted in the subsequent 88 patients led to better diarrhea control, particularly in Arm A, and significant reductions in the incidence of all-grade hand-foot syndrome and abdominal pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The capecitabine and irinotecan combination was a highly active first-line therapy in metastatic CRC. An acceptable safety profile was observed after dose reduction, particularly when irinotecan was administered on 1 day.

Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: Influence of Age on Vinorelbine Oral Pharmacokinetics

The majority of cancer-related deaths are attributed to lung carcinoma. Age increases this incidence, which is also likely associated with physiologic modifications that affect drug pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Therefore, knowledge of pharmacokinetics in elderly patients is one of the major factors in deciding whether or not to reduce the dose to prevent toxicity. This phase II study was aimed at evaluating the influence of age on oral vinorelbine pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Inclusion criteria were > 70 years of age; histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC; inoperable stage IIIB, IV, or delayed relapse of any stage becoming unresectable; Karnofsky performance status > 80%; and normal hematology and biochemistry. Blood-limited sampling at intervals of 1.5, 3, and 24 hours after dosing was performed during the first administration of oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m2. Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated through previously published nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM), and compared with a reference population of 52 patients (age, 56 years 12) selected from vinorelbine pharmacokinetic database. There were 48 patients evaluable for pharmacokinetics out of the 52 elderly patients enrolled (age, 74 years 3). There was no difference between pharmacokinetic parameters, including the bioavailability factor evaluated by NONMEM, even without intravenous administration, and a similar interindividual variability (32%-33%) was observed between the 2 groups. Furthermore, no correlation between age (range, 31-82 years) and oral vinorelbine total clearance was observed in 100 patients pooled together. Therefore, no requirement for oral vinorelbine dose reduction was suggested from a pharmacokinetic standpoint.

Effects of Food on the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Anticancer Agents

Pharmacokinetic interactions between food and orally administered drugs involve changes mainly in the absorption and metabolism of a drug, and may have clinical implications. Such interactions, in particular, may be of major clinical significance for cancer chemotherapy since the majority of anticancer agents are toxic, have a low therapeutic index and are administered long term, most often in combination with other cytotoxic agents. The purpose of this review is to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of various anticancer drugs, including chemopreventive agents that have been examined previously in fasted and fed conditions, and to discuss the underlying basis/mechanisms of food effect in light of a drug's physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. Clinical pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, time to maximum concentration and half-life for each drug are compared in fasted and fed states, and specific dietary recommendations are summarised accordingly. In addition, the effects of food on the metabolite kinetics and pharmacodynamic responses, and the potential role of food effect in the modulation of oral biovariability and multidrug resistance have been extensively discussed. Overall, this comprehensive pharmacokinetic analysis indicates that a broad spectrum of food effects is seen among anticancer agents because of diverse factors regulating each drug's oral bioavailability and its interactions with food. The consideration of such effects is important, as it could lead to more rational pharmacological monitoring and possibly improve the oral chemotherapy of cancer in children, adults and the elderly.

Review article: chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a common, highly lethal disease that is rising in incidence. Chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to prolong survival in advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine improves major symptoms and survival outcomes compared with bolus 5-FU. Many novel small molecules are being widely and actively researched. These compounds are based on classical mechanisms of action as well as biological therapies targeting novel cellular survival pathways, and include fluoropyrimidines, nucleoside cytidine analogues, platinum analogues, topoisomerase-inhibitors, antimicrotubule agents, proteasome inhibitors, vitamin D analogues, arachidonic acid pathway inhibitors, histone deacytylator inhibitors, farnesyltransferase inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor therapies. Adjuvant chemotherapy has also demonstrated the best survival outcomes following resection compared to other adjuvant or neo-adjuvant strategies such as radiation-based treatments. These benefits are superimposed on the dramatic increase in resectability rates and reduction in post-operative mortality achieved by centralisation of treatment in high-volume speciality centres. Newer 'small-molecule' drugs as well as the latest 'large-molecule' biological agents hold considerable promise for the future. Real advances are anticipated over the next five years but are dependent on large randomised controlled trials for success.

A phase II trial of capecitabine (Xeloda) in recurrent ovarian cancer

Oral capecitabine is a highly active, well-tolerated and convenient treatment for breast and colorectal cancer. This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of single-agent capecitabine in patients with previously treated ovarian cancer. A total of 29 patients with platinum-pretreated relapsed ovarian cancer were enrolled in this prospective, open-label, single-centre, phase II study. Patients received oral capecitabine 1250 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Tumour response was evaluated using serum CA125. Out of 29 enrolled patients, 28 were evaluable, and a response was observed in eight patients (29%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 13-49%). Median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.7 (95% CI, 2.8-4.6) and 8.0 (95% CI, 4.1-11.8) months, respectively. After 6 months of treatment, 28% (95% CI, 13-48%) of patients remained progression-free and 62% (95% CI, 42-79%) were still alive. The most common clinical adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (HFS), nausea and diarrhoea. Grade 3 HFS occurred in 14% of patients, grade 3 vomiting in 10%. Efficacy and safety of capecitabine compare favourably with other monotherapies in platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer. The convenience and improved safety profile of capecitabine compared with intravenous. regimens make it an ideal agent for administration in the outpatient setting.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: integrating irinotecan into combination and sequential chemotherapy

The chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has undergone a succession of refinements. Through the biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (FA), the use of infusional rather than bolus regimens and the combination of 5-FU/FA with other active agents (notably irinotecan), first-line response rates (RRs) of 40% can be achieved, with patients surviving up to 17 months. Significant benefits on survival are also seen with second-line chemotherapy. The question of how best to sequence combination chemotherapy was addressed in a recent trial in which patients were randomized to receive either an irinotecan-based combination with 5-FU/FA (FOLFIRI) followed by an oxaliplatin-based combination (FOLFOX), or the two regimens in the reverse order. In both arms, RRs were greater than 50% and median survival exceeded 20 months. The primary end point was time to progression after two lines of treatment, and this was not significantly different. However, the sequence FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX appears preferable because of the better tolerability of FOLFIRI in first-line use. Use of the sequence FOLFIRI/FOLFOX is also supported by the greater chance of a second-line response with FOLFOX. Concern has been expressed about the safety of irinotecan combined with bolus 5-FU/FA. Infusional regimens have a better risk/benefit ratio than bolus regimens. However, the adverse event profile with both approaches is manageable, and irinotecan plus 5-FU/FA can be considered one standard of care in metastatic CRC.

Phase I Trial of Uracil–Ftorafur, Leucovorin, and Etoposide: An Active All-oral Regimen for Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated doses, toxicities, and therapeutic effect of an oral chemotherapy regimen consisting of uracil-ftorafur, etoposide, and leucovorin for metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The regimen consists of 28-day cycles of uracil-ftorafur, etoposide, and leucovorin administered orally on days 1-14. The dose of etoposide was fixed at 50 mg/m2/day, and uracil-ftorafur was escalated in 50 mg/m2/day increments from 200 to 350 mg/m2. Leucovorin, was used at a dose of 90 mg/day. Eligibility criteria required prior treatment with a taxane or anthracycline.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were enrolled. Twenty patients are assessable for toxicity and 16 patients are assessable for response. All non-hematologic toxicities were grade 1 or 2. Three hematologic dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Partial responses were seen in 6 of 16 (37.5%, 95% confidence interval 15%, 85%) of assessable patients with durations ranging from 4 to 20 months. Stable disease was observed in 4 of 16 (25%) of patients with durations from 4 to 12 months. Median time to progression was 10.5 months. An intent to treat analysis revealed a response of 26%.

CONCLUSION

The recommended dose and schedule of this combination is uracil-ftorafur 350 mg/m2, leucovorin 90 mg/day, and etoposide 50 mg/m2 for two consecutive weeks in a 4-week cycle. This all-oral regimen is well tolerated and demonstrates encouraging efficacy in a cohort of heavily pretreated patient with metastatic breast cancer.

Oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin: a novel active regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A phase II trial of alternating i.v. and oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin was designed to determine the response rate, safety profile, progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life (QoL) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six chemotherapy-naïve patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) and i.v. vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m(2) on days 8, 15 and 22, every 28 days.

RESULTS

After an independent review, the response rate was 33% [95% confidence interval (CI) 20% to 46%]. Median progression-free and overall survival were 5.5 months (95% CI 3.7-6.4) and 8.9 months (95% CI 8.8-11.7), respectively. The most frequent hematological toxicities were neutropenia (grade 3-4 in 73% of patients) and anemia (grade 3-4 in 11% of patients). Grade 3-4 infections and non-hematological toxicities occurred occasionally. QoL for lung cancer related symptoms was stable or improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of the alternating vinorelbine schedule (i.v. on day 1, oral on days 8, 15 and 22) in combination with cisplatin in advanced NSCLC are similar to those of the standard regimen using exclusively i.v. vinorelbine, whereas ease of administration and patient comfort may favor the novel approach.

Palliative treatment of patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients are left with palliative measures. The development seen using palliative chemotherapy is reviewed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic approach to the literature-based evidence was aimed at.

RESULTS

The continuous improvements during the past 13-15 years have been documented in several large conclusive trials. At the end of the 1980s, the evidence that chemotherapy should be used at all was very limited, whereas presently most patients can be offered two lines of chemotherapy based upon good scientific evidence. Median survival has gradually improved from below 6 months to above 18 months in some recent trials. Several important issues remain to be solved, such as the best sequence of treatments, what regimens to use in various situations, when to start and when to stop if a response is seen, and whether cure may be possible in a small subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Progress has been rapid in advanced colorectal cancer. This is likely a result of well-designed trials in collaboration between academy and industry, showing a great interest in the disease. Future collaborations may hopefully introduce new treatment concepts, further improving outcome.

Health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients

Accurate assessment of quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer is essential in order to inform clinical decisions by providing insights into patients' experiences of the disease and treatment. This review summarizes the clinical evidence of how treatments for colorectal cancer impact on short- and long-term quality of life. Surgery for colorectal cancer has a short-term detrimental impact on most aspects of quality of life. Chemotherapy in palliative settings often preserves quality of life. Some studies do not demonstrate changes in keeping with clinical expectations. This may be due to insensitive quality of life tools, low numbers of patients, insufficient compliance or patients' adaptation to changes. An international consensus involving clinicians and methodologists is needed to describe robust standards for quality of life measurement in oncology.

Multicenter dose-finding study of concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for operable rectal cancer

PURPOSE

5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) is the standard adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. A Phase I study was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of capecitabine combined with standard RT as adjuvant treatment in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with Stage II-III rectal cancer after surgery were eligible. RT included a total dose of 50.4 Gy in fractions of 1.8 Gy/d, 5 d/wk, for 5.5 weeks. Capecitabine was administered twice daily in escalating doses during the entire period of RT. Dose-limiting toxicity included Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity, or treatment delay because of unresolved toxicity for >1 week.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled at the following dose levels: 1000 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), 1150 mg/m(2)/d (4 patients) 1300 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients), 1400 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients), 1500 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), 1600 mg/m(2)/d (3 patients), and 1700 mg/m(2)/d (6 patients). Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 patients at 1300 mg/m(2)/d (Grade 3 diarrhea), and 2 patients at 1400 mg/m(2)/d (skin toxicity in 1 and abdominal pain with fever in 1, resulting in treatment delay), and 3 patients at 1700 mg/m(2)/d (2 patients had Grade 3 diarrhea and 1 had hand-foot syndrome). Four patients presented with chronic postradiation colitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximal tolerated dose of capecitabine given concurrently with RT was 1600 mg/m(2)/d in this study. This dose is recommended for additional use in Phase II-III studies.

New approaches to symptom improvements in lung cancer patients

The efficacy of chemotherapy in treating lung cancer continues to be assessed by the impact treatment has on disease progression and survival. Where differences between treatments are marginal and survival times cannot be realistically extended, symptom relief and improving health-related quality of life (QoL) become treatment priorities. Clinical trials in lung cancer often now include an assessment of symptom relief and QoL, and have confirmed the benefit of chemotherapy compared with best supportive care. Collection of symptom relief and QoL data is based on subjective reporting by patients, which can be influenced by extraneous and confounding factors. To ensure reproducibility and interpretability, standardized, validated instruments with known psychometric properties and culturally adapted language are required to capture QoL data from lung cancer patients in clinical trials. A number of available questionnaires, developed and validated for use in oncology studies, are reviewed in this paper. A selection of published lung cancer studies that have used these instruments are described and their outcomes summarized. These studies show that symptom assessment can be integrated in study protocols successfully, but there is a recognized need for improved and consistent measurement in future studies.