Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer

Phase I and pharmacological study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib (Zarnestra, R115777) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours

This phase I trial was designed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tipifarnib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumours. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of each of these agents was evaluated. Patients were treated with tipifarnib b.i.d. on days 1-7 of each 21-day cycle. In addition, gemcitabine was given as a 30-min i.v. infusion on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin as a 3-h i.v. infusion on day 1. An interpatient dose-escalation scheme was used. Pharmacokinetics was determined in plasma and white blood cells. In total, 31 patients were included at five dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) consisted of thrombocytopenia grade 4, neutropenia grade 4, febrile neutropenia grade 4, electrolyte imbalance grade 3, fatigue grade 3 and decreased hearing grade 2. The MTD was tipifarnib 200 mg b.i.d., gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2). Eight patients had a confirmed partial response and 12 patients stable disease. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Tipifarnib can be administered safely at 200 mg b.i.d. in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2). This combination showed evidence of antitumour activity and warrants further evaluation in a phase II setting.

Relations farnesyltransferase beta-subunit mRNA expression with clinicopathological features and H-ras mutation in gastric cancer tissues

AIM: To investigate the expression of farnesyltransferase(FTase) beta-subunit mRNA in gastric cancer tissues and its relations with the clinicopathological features and point mutation in codon 12 of H-ras gene.

METHODS: Specimens were collected from 43 cases of gastric cancer and their corresponding normal tissues. The expression of FTase beta-subunit mRNA was investigated by semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The point mutation in codon 12 of H-ras gene was detected by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test was used to analyze the difference of the matching data of FTase beta-subunit mRNA expression between gastric cancer and normal tissues. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to explore the relations of FTase activity with the clinicopathological features and H-ras mutation in gastric cancer.

RESULTS: The mean level of FTase beta-subunit mRNA expression were significantly higher in gastric cancer tissues than that in the corresponding normal ones(0.89 ± 0.48 vs 0.69 ± 0.40, Z = 2.469, P = 0.014). Of the 43 cases, the mutation of H-ras 12 codon was found in 1 case of cancer tissue(1/43, 2.3%), and no mutation appeared in the all the normal tissues. The expression of FTase beta-subunit mRNA was not related to the age, tumor location, histological differentiation, lymph node metastasis and H-ras 12 codon mutation. But the female patients with signetring cell carcinoma had higher expression of FTase beta-subunit mRNA.

CONCLUSION: The expression of FTase beta-subunit mRNA is up-regulated in gastric cancer. The point mutation in codon 12 of H-ras gene is not related to the expression of FTase beta-subunit mRNA.

Design Issues of Randomized Phase II Trials and a Proposal for Phase II Screening Trials

Future progress in improving cancer therapy can be expedited by better prioritization of new treatments for phase III evaluation. Historically, phase II trials have been key components in the prioritization process. There has been a long-standing interest in using phase II trials with randomization against a standard-treatment control arm or an additional experimental arm to provide greater assurance than afforded by comparison to historic controls that the new agent or regimen is promising and warrants further evaluation. Relevant trial designs that have been developed and utilized include phase II selection designs, randomized phase II designs that include a reference standard-treatment control arm, and phase II/III designs. We present our own explorations into the possibilities of developing “phase II screening trials,” in which preliminary and nondefinitive randomized comparisons of experimental regimens to standard treatments are made (preferably using an intermediate end point) by carefully adjusting the false-positive error rates (α or type I error) and false-negative error rates (β or type II error), so that the targeted treatment benefit may be appropriate while the sample size remains restricted. If the ability to conduct a definitive phase III trial can be protected, and if investigators feel that by judicious choice of false-positive probability and false-negative probability and magnitude of targeted treatment effect they can appropriately balance the conflicting demands of screening out useless regimens versus reliably detecting useful ones, the phase II screening trial design may be appropriate to apply.

New drugs in cancer therapy, National Tumor Institute, Naples, 17-18 June 2004

An international meeting on 'New Drugs in Cancer Therapy' was held at the National Tumor Institute of Naples, on 17-18 June 2004. The first session of the meeting focused on analogs of conventional anti-cancer drugs, such as taxanes, platinum compounds, anthracyclines and topoisomerase I inhibitors. The data of a phase II trial of BMS-247550, an epothilone B analog, in patients with renal cell carcinoma were reported. Data were also presented on BBR-3464, a trinucleate platinum analog which was developed on the grounds of greater potency, a more rapid rate of DNA binding and the ability to induce apoptosis regardless of the p53 status of the cell. Pegylated-coated liposomal formulation doxorubicin (Caelyx) has shown efficacy in metastatic breast cancer and in advanced ovarian cancer; sabarubicin is a third-generation anthracycline with equal or superior potency to doxorubicin or idarubicin in a variety of human tumor cell lines of different histotypes. The main mechanisms of resistance to topoisomerase I inhibitors were discussed; data on diflomotecan were reported, showing a narrow therapeutic index of the drug. The second session of the meeting focused on the ErbB family as a target for anti-cancer therapy. Recent evidence of a correlation between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations at exons 18-21 and clinical response of advanced non-small cell lung cancer to gefitinib therapy was commented on. The issue of the association between ErbB2 expression and gefitinib activity was addressed, while clinical data of a phase II study of gefitinib in advanced breast cancer were presented. Monoclonal antibodies targeting EGFR represent another worthwhile way to interfere with EGFR-driven signal transduction. Cetuximab is reaching market registration in advanced colorectal cancer; in particular, due to the results of the BOND study. The recently presented results of the Bonner study strongly support the activity of this drug in head and neck cancer. A step forward in the research on anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies may be represented by humanized monoclonal antibodies, such as EMD 72000 and ABX-EGF. Imatinib mesylate is probably the most outstanding example of an effective targeted therapy--its activity in gastrointestinal stromal tumors was so exciting that the drug reached the market without undergoing phase III evaluation. The third session of the meeting was on angiogenesis inhibitors. Drugs may interfere with the angiogenic process via different mechanisms and there is a sound rationale for combining anti-angiogenic agents with chemotherapy or multiple anti-angiogenic strategies. Clinical results obtained with direct anti-angiogenic agents have been negative up to now, but some exciting results have been seen with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). A few VEGF-tyrosine kinase inhibiting small molecules, such as ZD6474, AZD2171 and PTK/ZK, are undergoing clinical trials. The fourth session of the meeting was on interference with intracellular signal transduction. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors exert their action by interfering with either pro-Ras or RhoB farnesylation. Several clinical studies of different phases with compounds belonging to this class have been carried out, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy; unfortunately, all of them have turned out to be negative. Cell cycle inhibitors, such as CYC-202 and BMS-387032, represent a class of interesting compounds which are in the early phase of development and whose clinical results are eagerly awaited. Another strategy to achieve cell cycle inhibition is to target heat shock protein 90, a molecular chaperone required for protein folding. Clinical data on depsipeptide, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with activity in T cell lymphoma, were presented. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid is another small molecular weight inhibitor of HDAC activity. Phase I/II clinical trials have shown low toxicity and evidence of anti-tumor activity; on the other hand, this compound has potential for synergism with radiotherapy, chemotherapy and biologicals.

K-ras as a target for cancer therapy

The central role K-, H- and N-Ras play in regulating diverse cellular pathways important for cell growth, differentiation and survival is well established. Dysregulation of Ras proteins by activating mutations, overexpression or upstream activation is common in human tumors. Of the Ras proteins, K-ras is the most frequently mutated and is therefore an attractive target for cancer therapy. The complexity of K-ras signaling presents many opportunities for therapeutic targeting. A number of different approaches aimed at abrogating K-ras activity have been explored in clinical trials. Several of the therapeutic agents tested have demonstrated clinical activity, supporting ongoing development of K-ras targeted therapies. However, many of the agents currently being evaluated have multiple targets and their antitumor effects may not be due to K-Ras inhibition. To date, no selective, specific inhibitor of K-ras is available for routine clinical use. In this review, we will summarize the structure and function of K-ras with attention to its role in tumorigenesis and discuss the successes and failures of the various strategies designed to therapeutically target this important oncogene.

A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

This randomized phase III study compared the overall survival (OS) of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine (PG) versus standard gemcitabine (G) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer and no prior systemic therapy (including 5-fluorouracil as a radiosensitizer) were randomized to receive either 1,250 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) after gemcitabine on day 8 (PG arm) of each 21-day cycle, or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle (G arm).

RESULTS

Five hundred and sixty-five patients with well-balanced baseline characteristics were randomly assigned (283 PG, 282 G). OS was not improved on the PG arm (6.2 months) compared with the G arm (6.3 months) (P=0.8477). Progression-free survival (3.9 versus 3.3 months; P=0.1109) and time to treatment failure (3 versus 2.2 months; P=0.2680) results were similar. Tumor response rate (14.8% versus 7.1%; P=0.004) was significantly better on the PG arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (45.1% versus 12.8%), thrombocytopenia (17.9% versus 6.2%), anemia (13.9% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (9.9% versus 0.4%; all P <0.001) and fatigue (15% versus 6.6%; P=0.002) were significantly more common on the PG arm. Four treatment-related deaths occurred on the PG arm and none in the G arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed plus gemcitabine therapy did not improve OS. Single-agent gemcitabine remains the standard of care for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Current management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Almost 30% of patients with pancreatic cancer present with large, locally advanced tumors in the absence of distant metastases. Because surgical resection is frequently contraindicated by vascular invasion, locally advanced pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis with a 6-10-month median survival. Recent advances in the multimodality treatment of other gastrointestinal malignancies have not altered the management of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a clinical dilemma reflected by the number of nonrandomized trials and anecdotal reports addressing this difficult disease. Our review summarizes the current status of aggressive surgical resection and neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and suggests a treatment algorithm for patients with this disease based upon published clinical evidence.

Prostate stem cell antigen is a putative target for immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer

The prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) is a glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol (GPI)-linked cell surface antigen expressed in normal prostate and overexpressed in the majority of prostate cancers and correlates with tumor grade and disease stage. Because PSCA has been described to be up-regulated in pancreatic cancer, the purpose was to evaluate the expression of PSCA in human pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, the therapeutic efficacy of a monoclonal anti-PSCA antibody in an in vivo pancreatic cancer model was determined.

METHODS

The expression of PSCA in human pancreatic cancer tissues was determined and compared with chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreas by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Therapeutic efficacy of the monoclonal anti-PSCA antibody 1G8 was examined in Capan-1 pancreatic tumors grown as subcutaneous grafts in athymic nude mice.

RESULTS

PSCA was strongly up-regulated in human pancreatic cancer compared with chronic pancreatitis and normal pancreas. In addition, the PSCA protein was expressed on the cell surface of pancreatic cancer cells. Treatment with 1G8 significantly reduced tumor growth initiation in an in vivo pancreatic cancer xenograft model. In addition, antibody treatment of established tumors reduced tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show a potential therapeutic role for anti-PSCA antibodies in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, PSCA might serve as a novel marker in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Phase I/II trial of intraperitoneal 5-Fluorouracil with and without intravenous Vasopressin in non-resectable pancreas cancer

BACKGROUND

Systemic palliative treatment with chemotherapy against advanced pancreas cancer has low effectiveness despite considerable toxicity.

AIM

To investigate the safety, toxicity and tumour response of intraperitoneal 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) with intravenous Leucovorin and to monitor 5-FU pharmacokinetics in plasma during intraperitoneal instillation with and without vasopressin in patients with non-resectable pancreas cancer.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Between 1994 and 2003, 68 patients with non-resectable pancreas cancer TNM stage III and IV, were enrolled to receive intraperitoneal5-FU instillation 750-1500 mg/m2 and intravenous Leucovorin 100 mg/m2 for two days every third week. Tumour response, performance status and toxicity were recorded. Seventeen patients were also treated with intravenous vasopressin 0.1 IU/minute for 180 minutes, during intraperitoneal 5-FU instillation. Area under the curve (AUC) and peak concentration (Cmax) of 5-FU in plasma were analysed.

RESULTS

The treatment was well tolerated with minor toxicity. One complete response (54.1+ months) and 2 partial responses were observed. Time to progression was 4.4 months (0.8-54.1+), and median survival was 8.0 months (0.8-54.1+). There was a significant reduction of 5-FU Cmax in plasma the second day of treatment if vasopressin was used (3.4+/-2.5 and 6.1+/-5.4 mumol/l, respectively, p<0.05). 5-FU AUC in plasma was not significantly affected by vasopressin either day of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal 5-FU is a safe treatment with low toxicity to patients with non-resectable pancreas cancer. Tumour response was 4.4% and median survival time 8.0 months. Addition of vasopressin did not significantly decrease plasma 5-FU AUC but reduced Cmax on day 2 of treatment.

Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine (Gem) is the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Given the promising phase II results obtained with the Gem-oxaliplatin (GemOx) combination, we conducted a phase III study comparing GemOx with Gem alone in advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were stratified according to center, performance status, and type of disease (locally advanced v metastatic) and randomly assigned to either GemOx (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a 100-minute infusion on day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks) or Gem (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 as a weekly 30-minute infusion).

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled; 313 were eligible, and 157 and 156 were allocated to the GemOx and Gem arms, respectively. GemOx was superior to Gem in terms of response rate (26.8% v 17.3%, respectively; P = .04), progression-free survival (5.8 v 3.7 months, respectively; P = .04), and clinical benefit (38.2% v 26.9%, respectively; P = .03). Median overall survival (OS) for GemOx and Gem was 9.0 and 7.1 months, respectively (P = .13). GemOx was well tolerated overall, although a higher incidence of National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 toxicity per patient was observed for platelets (14.0% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), vomiting (8.9% for GemOx v 3.2% for Gem), and neurosensory symptoms (19.1% for GemOx v 0% for Gem).

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the efficacy and safety of GemOx, but this study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant advantage in terms of OS compared with Gem. Because GemOx is the first combined treatment to be superior to Gem alone in terms of clinical benefit, this promising regimen deserves further development.

Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma have a poor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival with standard treatment. We aimed to assess whether a four-drug regimen could improve 4 month progression-free survival compared with gemcitabine alone.

METHODS

In a randomised multicentre phase III trial, 52 patients were randomly assigned to 40 mg/m2 cisplatin and 40 mg/m2 epirubicin both given on day 1, 600 mg/m2 gemcitabine given intravenously over 1 h on days 1 and 8, and 200 mg/m2 fluorouracil a day given by continuous infusion on days 1-28 of a 4-week cycle (PEFG regimen), and 47 were assigned to 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine given intravenously over 30 min once a week for 7 of 8 consecutive weeks in cycle 1 and for 3 of 4 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was 4-month progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, objective response, safety, and quality of life. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

51 patients assigned PEFG and 46 assigned gemcitabine alone had disease progression. 49 patients in the PEFG group and 46 in the gemcitabine group died from progressive disease. More patients allocated PEFG than gemcitabine alone were alive without progressive disease at 4 months (60% [95% CI 46-72] vs 28% [17-42]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.46 [0.26-0.79]). 1-year overall survival in the PEFG group was 38.5% (25.3-51.7) and in the gemcitabine group was 21.3% (9.6-33.0; HR 0.68 [0.42-1.09]). More patients assigned PEFG showed disease response than did those assigned gemcitabine (38.5% [25.3-51.7] vs 8.5% [0.5-16.5]; odds ratio 6.60 [2.11-20.60], p=0.0008). More patients in the PEFG group had grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than in the gemcitabine group (p<0.0001).

INTERPRETATION

The PEFG regimen could be considered for treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: Past, present, and future

Advanced pancreatic cancer is a devastating illness characterized by significant morbidity and a brief median survival. Although standard chemotherapy with gemcitabine achieves only modest improvements in survival and quality of life, classic cytotoxic agents, such as 5-fluorouracil, pemetrexed, irinotecan, exatecan, cisplatin, or oxaliplatin, given alone or in combination with gemcitabine, have not proved superior. Thus, more recent trials have focused on targeting the biologic characteristics of pancreatic cancer. Although phase III trials of farnesyl transferase and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors have not improved survival, encouraging preliminary results have been observed in phase II studies of inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor and the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Carboplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a phase II multicenter study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

In the present phase II multicenter study, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin at an AUC of 4 on day 8 of a 3-week cycle, for a total of six cycles. Primary end points were response rate and clinical benefit; secondary end points were, survival, time to progression (TTP) and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study, 47 of whom were eligible for treatment. The median age was 63 years (range 34-76) and the median Karnofsky performance status (PS) was 80%. Patients received a median of six cycles (range 1-11). Among 35 patients evaluable for response, eight (17%) achieved partial response; 15 (32%) and 12 (25%) patients had stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median overall survival was 7.4 months; the median TTP was 4.4 months and the 1-year survival was 28%. The observed clinical benefit response was remarkable. After the second cycle of chemotherapy, 21 of 31 (68%) patients experienced pain improvement and reduced analgesic consumption. At the same time, 35% and 56% of our patients significantly improved their Karnofsky PS and weight, respectively. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematological, including 8% anemia, 6% neutropenia and 13% thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin is a moderately active treatment for patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile and provides a significant clinical benefit, and hence warrants further investigation.

Treatment for pancreatic cancer: current therapy and continued progress

In the last decade, continued efforts in pancreas cancer research have led to the development of new, more effective therapies. Additionally, progress in understanding the molecular processes underlying the development and progression of this disease provides hope for the development of more effective treatment strategies. Recent clinical trials have provided reason for hope that novel chemotherapy combinations and molecularly targeted agents will lead to improved clinical outcomes for patients with this disease. This article will summarize the data that has led to the current standards of therapy for patients with resectable and advanced pancreatic cancer and review new treatment strategies for this disease.

Predominant Bcl-XL knockdown disables antiapoptotic mechanisms: tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-based triple chemotherapy overcomes chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro

Pancreatic cancer is lethal because of its invasiveness, rapid progression, and profound resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. To identify the molecular mechanisms underlying this, we have examined the expression and potency of three major death receptors: tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNF-R), TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor (TRAIL-R), and Fas in mediating cytotoxicity in four invasive pancreatic cancer cell lines. We have analyzed the expression of major antiapoptotic factors, cell cycle regulators and death receptor decoys (DcR) in comparison with normal pancreas tissues and five other human malignant tumor cell lines. We have found that different pancreatic cancer cell lines coexpress high-level TRAIL-R, Fas, and TNF-R1 but are strongly resistant to apoptosis triggered by the death receptors. DcR2 and DcR3 overexpression may partly contribute to the resistance of pancreatic cancer cells to TRAIL-R- and Fas-mediated cytotoxicity. Bcl-XL and Bcl-2 are predominantly overexpressed in pancreatic cancer cell lines, respectively. Bcl-XL is also predominantly overexpressed in prostate, colorectal, and intestinal cancer cells. The knockdown of the predominant Bcl-XL overexpression significantly reduces the viability of pancreatic cancer cells to TNFalpha- and TRAIL-mediated apoptosis by sublethal-dose single and combined antitumor drugs, including geldanamycin, PS-341, Trichostatin A, and doxorubicine. Geldanamyin and PS-341 synergistically block NFkappaB activation, suppress Akt/PKB pathway, and down-regulate Bcl-XL, Bcl-2, cIAP-1, and cyclin D1 expression. This combined regimen dramatically enhances TRAIL cytotoxic effects and breaks through chemoresistance. Bcl-XL plays a vital role in pancreatic cancer chemoresistance. Geldanamycin, PS-341, and TRAIL triple combination may be a novel therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer.

Benzimidazolones and indoles as non-thiol farnesyltransferase inhibitors based on tipifarnib scaffold: synthesis and activity

A series of analogs of tipifarnib (1) has been synthesized as inhibitors of FTase by substituting the benzimidazolones and indoles for the 2-quinolone of tipifarnib. The novel benzimidazolones are potent and selective FTase inhibitors (FTIs) with IC(50) values of the best compounds close to that of tipifarnib. The current series demonstrate good cellular activity as measured in their inhibiting the Ras processing in NIH-3T3 cells, with compounds 2c and 2f displaying EC(50) values of 18 and 22nM, respectively.

Irinotecan plus oxaliplatin and leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer--a Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer study

PURPOSE

To evaluate response rate and toxicity of irinotecan and oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (Folfirinox) in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with histologically proven APA and bidimensionally measurable disease were treated with Folfirinox therapy every 2 weeks, which comprised oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) plus leucovorin 400 mg/m(2) followed by bolus FU 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, then FU 2,400 mg/m(2) as a 46-hour continuous infusion. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were entered, and 46 received treatment. Thirty-five patients (76%) had metastatic disease. A total of 356 cycles were delivered, with a median of eight cycles per patient (range, one to 24 cycles). All patients were assessable for safety. No toxic death occurred. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in 52% of patients, including two patients with febrile neutropenia. Other relevant toxicities included grade 3 to 4 nausea (20%), vomiting (17%), and diarrhea (17%) and grade 3 neuropathy (15%; Levi's scale). The confirmed response rate was 26% (95% CI, 13% to 39%), including 4% complete responses. Median time to progression was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 11.6 months), and median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 14.4 months). Between baseline and end of treatment, patients had improvement in all functional scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30, except cognitive functioning. Responders had major improvement in global QOL.

CONCLUSION

With a good safety profile, a promising response rate, and an improvement in QOL, Folfirinox will be further assessed in a phase III trial.

Développement des inhibiteurs de farnésyl transférase comme agents anticancéreux

Ras proteins belong to the monomeric GTPases familly. They control cell growth, differentiation, proliferation, and survival. Ras mutations are frequently found in human cancers and play a fundamental role in tumorigenesis. Ras requires localization to the plasma membrane to exert its oncogenic effects. This subcelllular localization is dependent of protein farnesylation which is a post translational modification catalysed by the farnesyl transferase enzyme. Farnesyl transferase Inhibitors (FTI) were then designed ten to twelve years ago to inhibit ras processing and consequently the growth of ras mutated tumor. Preclinical data show that FTIs inhibit cell proliferation and survival in vitro and in vivo of a wide range of cancer cell lines, many of which contain wild type ras suggesting that mutated Ras is not the only target of the FTIs effects. Four FTIs went then through clinical trials and three of then are still developed in the clinic. Phase I et II clinical trials confirmed a relevant antitumor activity and a low toxicity. Phase III clinical trials are currently undergoing for both solid and hematologic tumors. The expected results should allow to define the position of FTIs as anticancer drugs, particularly in combination with conventional chemotherapy, hormone therapy, radiotherapy or any other new targeted compound.

A phase II trial of R115777, an oral farnesyl transferase inhibitor, in patients with advanced urothelial tract transitional cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

R115777 is a potent farnesyl transferase inhibitor and has significant antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS

The objective of the current study was to determine the objective response proportion in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract who received treatment with R115777 at a dose of 300 mg orally given twice daily for 21 days followed by 7 days of rest for every 4-week cycle. Thirty-four patients with TCC were enrolled in this Phase II study. Patients were allowed to have received a maximum of one prior systemic chemotherapy regimen, not including chemoradiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and kidney function.

RESULTS

Twice daily administration of oral R115777 was tolerated well. R115777 was absorbed rapidly after oral administration. Grade 3-4 neutropenia (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) was observed in 5 patients (15%). Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity was rare, consisting of rash and diarrhea in 1 patient each. Two patients (6%) without prior chemotherapy demonstrated partial responses. Thirteen patients (38%) achieved disease stabilization according to World Health Organization criteria that lasted a median of 4 months. No complete responses were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The objective response rate of R115777 was not sufficient to warrant future investigation in TCC as a single agent. Preliminary evidence of the activity of R115777 in 2 chemotherapy-naive patients may warrant further investigation in combination with first-line chemotherapy.

New targets for therapy in breast cancer: farnesyltransferase inhibitors

Current systemic therapies for breast cancer are often limited by their nonspecific mechanism of action, unwanted toxicities on normal tissues, and short-term efficacy due to the emergence of drug resistance. However, identification of the molecular abnormalities in cancer, in particular the key proteins involved in abnormal cell growth, has resulted in development of various signal transduction inhibitor drugs as new treatment strategies against the disease. Protein farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) were originally designed to target the Ras signal transduction pathway, although it is now clear that several other intracellular proteins are dependent on post-translational farnesylation for their function. Preclinical data revealed that although FTIs inhibit the growth of ras-transformed cells, they are also potent inhibitors of a wide range of cancer cell lines that contain wild-type ras, including breast cancer cells. Additive or synergistic effects were observed when FTIs were combined with cytotoxic agents (in particular the taxanes) or endocrine therapies (tamoxifen). Phase I trials with FTIs have explored different schedules for prolonged administration, and dose-limiting toxicities included myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity and neuropathy. Clinical efficacy against breast cancer was seen for the FTI tipifarnib in a phase II study. Based on promising preclinical data that suggest synergy with taxanes or endocrine therapy, combination clinical studies are now in progress to determine whether FTIs can add further to the efficacy of conventional breast cancer therapies.

Pancreatic cancer: future outlook, promising trials, newer systemic agents, and strategies from the Gastrointestinal intergroup pancreatic cancer task force

This article summarizes the results of recent studies using newer agents, including farnesyl transferase inhibitors, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor pathway, antiangiogenic therapeutics by inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor, and some forms of immunotherapy. Although some results have been disappointing, others seem to be promising, serving as a basis for planned larger trials.

The Role of Pemetrexed in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancy

Although advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and Europe, chemotherapeutic options have only recently expanded with concomitant improvements in survival. Through the 1980s and early 1990s, research focused mainly on the major fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil, a thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor, and methods to enhance its activity through scheduling changes or by biochemical modulation. Pemetrexed is a novel antifolate that inhibits several folate-dependent enzymes in addition to TS. This agent has theoretical and preclinical advantages over fluoropyrimidines and more specific antifolates. Phase II studies have shown a broad spectrum of activity in solid tumors, including CRC and pancreatic cancer. Combinations of pemetrexed with gemcitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin have also proven feasible. Further studies of higher and biweekly doses with the use of vitamin supplementation are under way. In pancreatic cancer, the phase II studies of pemetrexed and gemcitabine were sufficiently promising to warrant a completed phase III comparison. Based on a recent abstract presentation, it appears that this combination did not improve survival compared with gemcitabine alone. Nonetheless, pemetrexed has important promise for new and improved regimens in the therapy of gastrointestinal cancer.