601
|
Stewart LM, Holman CDJ, Finn JC, Preen DB, Hart R. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk of borderline ovarian tumours. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 129:372-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2012] [Revised: 01/11/2013] [Accepted: 01/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
602
|
Pearce CL, Rossing MA, Lee AW, Ness RB, Webb PM, Chenevix-Trench G, Jordan SM, Stram DA, Chang-Claude J, Hein R, Nickels S, Lurie G, Thompson PJ, Carney ME, Goodman MT, Moysich K, Hogdall E, Jensen A, Goode EL, Fridley BL, Cunningham JM, Vierkant RA, Weber RP, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H, Gayther SA, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Ramus SJ, Brinton L, Wentzensen N, Lissowska J, Garcia-Closas M, Massuger LFAG, Kiemeney LALM, Van Altena AM, Aben KKH, Berchuck A, Doherty JA, Iversen E, McGuire V, Moorman PG, Pharoah P, Pike MC, Risch H, Sieh W, Stram DO, Terry KL, Whittemore A, Wu AH, Schildkraut JM, Kjaer SK. Combined and interactive effects of environmental and GWAS-identified risk factors in ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22:880-90. [PMID: 23462924 PMCID: PMC3963289 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1030-t] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are several well-established environmental risk factors for ovarian cancer, and recent genome-wide association studies have also identified six variants that influence disease risk. However, the interplay between such risk factors and susceptibility loci has not been studied. METHODS Data from 14 ovarian cancer case-control studies were pooled, and stratified analyses by each environmental risk factor with tests for heterogeneity were conducted to determine the presence of interactions for all histologic subtypes. A genetic "risk score" was created to consider the effects of all six variants simultaneously. A multivariate model was fit to examine the association between all environmental risk factors and genetic risk score on ovarian cancer risk. RESULTS Among 7,374 controls and 5,566 cases, there was no statistical evidence of interaction between the six SNPs or genetic risk score and the environmental risk factors on ovarian cancer risk. In a main effects model, women in the highest genetic risk score quartile had a 65% increased risk of ovarian cancer compared with women in the lowest [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-1.84]. Analyses by histologic subtype yielded risk differences across subtype for endometriosis (Phet < 0.001), parity (Phet < 0.01), and tubal ligation (Phet = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS The lack of interactions suggests that a multiplicative model is the best fit for these data. Under such a model, we provide a robust estimate of the effect of each risk factor that sets the stage for absolute risk prediction modeling that considers both environmental and genetic risk factors. Further research into the observed differences in risk across histologic subtype is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
603
|
Wang S, Qiu L, Lang JH, Shen K, Yang JX, Huang HF, Pan LY, Wu M. Clinical analysis of ovarian epithelial carcinoma with coexisting pelvic endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208:413.e1-5. [PMID: 23220508 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2012] [Revised: 10/28/2012] [Accepted: 12/03/2012] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the differences between women with endometriosis associated ovarian cancer and typical epithelial ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN The medical charts of total 226 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2011 and March 2012 were reviewed. Histology evaluation determined endometriosis associated ovarian cancer (n = 17) or non-endometriosis associated ovarian cancer (n = 209). RESULTS Compared with non-endometriosis associated ovarian cancer, patients with endometriosis associated ovarian cancer were proved: (1) to be younger and more likely to be premenopausal at diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (P = .03 and .005, respectively); (2) to have lower preoperative serum level of Ca125 (mean: 122.9 vs 1377.5 U/mL, P < .001) and more likely to display normal Ca125 level (P < .001); (3) to be identified at the earlier stage (stage I, P < .001); (4) to have completely different distribution of histological subtypes (significant overrepresentation of clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma). CONCLUSION As such, patients with endometriosis associated ovarian cancer differ from non-endomertiosis associated ovarian cancer in many of their critical clinical and biologic characteristics.
Collapse
|
604
|
Cicek MS, Koestler DC, Fridley BL, Kalli KR, Armasu SM, Larson MC, Wang C, Winham SJ, Vierkant RA, Rider DN, Block MS, Klotzle B, Konecny G, Winterhoff BJ, Hamidi H, Shridhar V, Fan JB, Visscher DW, Olson JE, Hartmann LC, Bibikova M, Chien J, Cunningham JM, Goode EL. Epigenome-wide ovarian cancer analysis identifies a methylation profile differentiating clear-cell histology with epigenetic silencing of the HERG K+ channel. Hum Mol Genet 2013; 22:3038-47. [PMID: 23571109 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddt160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains the leading cause of death in women with gynecologic malignancies, despite surgical advances and the development of more effective chemotherapeutics. As increasing evidence indicates that clear-cell ovarian cancer may have unique pathogenesis, further understanding of molecular features may enable us to begin to understand the underlying biology and histology-specific information for improved outcomes. To study epigenetics in clear-cell ovarian cancer, fresh frozen tumor DNA (n = 485) was assayed on Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips. We identified a clear-cell ovarian cancer tumor methylation profile (n = 163) which we validated in two independent replication sets (set 1, n = 163; set 2, n = 159), highlighting 22 CpG loci associated with nine genes (VWA1, FOXP1, FGFRL1, LINC00340, KCNH2, ANK1, ATXN2, NDRG21 and SLC16A11). Nearly all of the differentially methylated CpGs showed a propensity toward hypermethylation among clear-cell cases. Several loci methylation inversely correlated with tumor gene expression, most notably KCNH2 (HERG, a potassium channel) (P = 9.5 × 10(-7)), indicating epigenetic silencing. In addition, a predicted methylation class mainly represented by the clear-cell cases (20 clear cell out of 23 cases) had improved survival time. Although these analyses included only 30 clear-cell carcinomas, results suggest that loss of expression of KCNH2 (HERG) by methylation could be a good prognostic marker, given that overexpression of the potassium (K(+)) channel Eag family members promotes increased proliferation and results in poor prognosis. Validation in a bigger cohort of clear-cell tumors of the ovary is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mine S Cicek
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
605
|
Melin AS, Lundholm C, Malki N, Swahn ML, Sparèn P, Bergqvist A. Hormonal and surgical treatments for endometriosis and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92:546-54. [PMID: 23560387 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2012] [Accepted: 02/15/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Whether hormonal or surgical treatment of endometriosis is associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. DESIGN Nested case-control study. SETTING Sweden. POPULATION All women with a first-time discharge diagnosis of endometriosis in 1969-2007 were identified using the National Swedish Patient Register and constituted our study base. METHODS By linkage to the National Swedish Cancer Register we identified all women diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer at least one year after the endometriosis diagnosis (cases). Two controls per case with no ovarian cancer before the date of cancer diagnosis of the case were randomly selected from the study base and matched for year of birth. Two-hundred-and-twenty cases and 416 controls entered the study. Information on hormonal and surgical treatments and other reproductive factors was extracted from medical records according to pre-specified protocols. Conditional logistic regression was used for all calculations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all hormonal as well as surgical treatments. RESULTS There was a significant association between one-sided oophorectomy, as well as for radical extirpation of all visible endometriosis, and ovarian cancer risk in both univariate analyses (crude OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.62 and OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.55, respectively) and multivariate analyses (adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08-0.46 and OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.74, respectively). CONCLUSIONS One-sided oophorectomy as well as radical extirpation of all visible endometriosis is protective against later development of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Sofia Melin
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
606
|
Abstract
Ageing is a process characterized by a progressive decline in cellular function, organismal fitness and increased risk of age-related diseases and death. Several hundred theories have attempted to explain this phenomenon. One of the most popular is the 'oxidative stress theory', originally termed the 'free radical theory'. The endocrine system seems to have a role in the modulation of oxidative stress; however, much less is known about the role that oxidative stress might have in the ageing of the endocrine system and the induction of age-related endocrine diseases. This Review outlines the interactions between hormones and oxidative metabolism and the potential effects of oxidative stress on ageing of endocrine organs. Many different mechanisms that link oxidative stress and ageing are discussed, all of which converge on the induction or regulation of inflammation. All these mechanisms, including cell senescence, mitochondrial dysfunction and microRNA dysregulation, as well as inflammation itself, could be targets of future studies aimed at clarifying the effects of oxidative stress on ageing of endocrine glands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Vitale
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Via Zucchi 18, Cusano Milanino (MI) 20095, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
607
|
Sieh W, Salvador S, McGuire V, Weber RP, Terry KL, Rossing MA, Risch H, Wu AH, Webb PM, Moysich K, Doherty JA, Felberg A, Miller D, Jordan SJ, Goodman MT, Lurie G, Chang-Claude J, Rudolph A, Kjær SK, Jensen A, Høgdall E, Bandera EV, Olson SH, King MG, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Kiemeney LA, Marees T, Massuger LF, van Altena AM, Ness RB, Cramer DW, Pike MC, Pearce CL, Berchuck A, Schildkraut JM, Whittemore AS. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Int J Epidemiol 2013; 42:579-89. [PMID: 23569193 PMCID: PMC3619957 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tubal ligation is a protective factor for ovarian cancer, but it is unknown whether this protection extends to all invasive histological subtypes or borderline tumors. We undertook an international collaborative study to examine the association between tubal ligation and ovarian cancer subtypes. METHODS We pooled primary data from 13 population-based case-control studies, including 10,157 patients with ovarian cancer (7942 invasive; 2215 borderline) and 13,904 control women. Invasive cases were analysed by histological type, grade and stage, and borderline cases were analysed by histological type. Pooled odds ratios were estimated using conditional logistic regression to match on site, race/ethnicity and age categories, and to adjust for age, oral contraceptive use duration and number of full-term births. RESULTS Tubal ligation was associated with significantly reduced risks of invasive serous (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74-0.89; P < 0.001), endometrioid (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.59; P < 0.001), clear cell (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.67; P < 0.001) and mucinous (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.89; P = 0.005) cancers. The magnitude of risk reduction was significantly greater for invasive endometrioid (P < 0.0001) and clear cell (P = 0.0018) than for serous cancer. No significant associations were found with borderline serous or mucinous tumours. CONCLUSIONS We found that the protective effects of tubal ligation on ovarian cancer risk were subtype-specific. These findings provide insights into distinct aetiologies of ovarian cancer subtypes and mechanisms underlying the protective effects of tubal ligation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiva Sieh
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5405, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
608
|
Loss of ARID1A expression is an early molecular event in tumor progression from ovarian endometriotic cyst to clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2013; 22:1310-5. [PMID: 22976498 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0b013e31826b5dcc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES ARID1A is a recently identified tumor suppressor participating in chromatin remodeling. Somatic inactivating mutations of ARID1A and loss of its expression occur frequently in ovarian clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas and in uterine endometrioid carcinomas. Because endometriotic epithelium is thought to be the cell of origin of most ovarian clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas, we undertook an analysis of ARID1A expression of these tumors arising within an endometriotic cyst (endometrioma). MATERIALS AND METHODS Our immunohistochemical study set consisted of 47 endometriotic cysts containing clear cell carcinoma in 24 cases, well-differentiated ovarian endometrioid carcinoma in 20 cases, and mixed clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma in 3 cases. RESULTS ARID1A loss was observed in 31 (66%) of 47 carcinomas; and therefore, these cases were informative for determining the temporal sequence of loss of ARID1A expression in tumor progression. In 16 of the 47 cases, ARID1A immunoreactivity was retained in both the endometriotic cyst and the carcinoma; and thus, these cases were not informative. All of the 31 informative cases showed loss of ARID1A immunoreactivity in the carcinoma and in the endometriotic cyst epithelium in direct continuity with the carcinoma but not in the cyst epithelium that was not adjacent to the tumor. CONCLUSIONS Loss of ARID1A function as shown by loss of expression, presumably due to mutations, is an early molecular event in the development of most ovarian clear cell and endometrioid carcinomas arising in endometriomas.
Collapse
|
609
|
Schüler S, Ponnath M, Engel J, Ortmann O. Ovarian epithelial tumors and reproductive factors: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287:1187-204. [PMID: 23503972 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-2784-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/28/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current knowledge about the etiology and pathogenesis of borderline tumors ovarian cancer with special emphasis on the role of endocrine treatments and reproductive factors to establish a foundation for future studies. METHODS We performed a systematic review on the relation between ovarian epithelial tumors (OET) and reproductive factors using the keywords: ovarian cancer, ovarian tumor, ovarian borderline tumor, age at menarche, age at menopause, parity, infertility, PCO syndrome, oral contraception, menopausal hormone therapy, fertility treatment. Totally, 3,290 abstracts were scanned for their relevance in this publication and 127 were finally included. RESULTS The incidence of ovarian epithelial cancer and ovarian borderline tumors is influenced by certain reproductive factors. The strongest protective effects are conferred by parity and use of oral contraceptive pills. Recent molecular biologic and histopathologic studies prove that OET represent a diverse group of tumors, each histologic type with a different genetic background. This is at least partly reflected in epidemiologic and clinical studies showing different risk modulating effects of reproductive factors and endocrine therapies on OET. CONCLUSIONS The etiology and pathogenesis of ovarian cancer are still not fully understood. None of the so far proposed hypothesis on the development of OET can fully account for the epidemiologic and clinical findings in the context of reproductive factors and OET development. Further research approaches are warranted and need to put more weight on the clinical and genetical diversity of OET to yield a more detailed insight into their pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Schüler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Regensburg, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Landshuter Straße 65, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
610
|
Turner T, Secord AA, Lowery WJ, Sfakianos G, Lee PS. Metastatic adenocarcinoma after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with morcellation: A case report. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY CASE REPORTS 2013; 5:19-21. [PMID: 24371686 PMCID: PMC3862316 DOI: 10.1016/j.gynor.2013.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2012] [Accepted: 03/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Uterine morcellation is common in minimally invasive hysterectomy but should be performed with caution due to risk of unsuspected malignancy. Intraoperative techniques should be considered to minimize dissemination of endometrial tissue during morcellation. Strategies to ensure accurate pathologic evaluation of morcellated specimens and to improve preoperative risk stratification before morcellation procedures are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Turner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA
| | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA ; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA ; Duke Cancer Institute, USA
| | - William J Lowery
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA ; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA ; Duke Cancer Institute, USA
| | - Gregory Sfakianos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA ; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA ; Duke Cancer Institute, USA
| | - Paula S Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA ; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, USA ; Duke Cancer Institute, USA
| |
Collapse
|
611
|
Kotsopoulos J, Terry KL, Poole EM, Rosner B, Murphy MA, Hecht JL, Crum CP, Missmer SA, Cramer DW, Tworoger SS. Ovarian cancer risk factors by tumor dominance, a surrogate for cell of origin. Int J Cancer 2013; 133:730-9. [PMID: 23364849 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2012] [Revised: 12/22/2012] [Accepted: 01/14/2013] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Differentiating ovarian tumors based on developmental pathway may further enhance our understanding of the disease. Traditionally, ovarian cancers were thought to arise from the ovarian surface epithelium; however, recent evidence suggests that some tumors originate in the fallopian tube. We classified cases in a population-based case-control study (New England Case-Control [NECC] Study) and two cohort studies (Nurses' Health Study [NHS]/Nurses' Health Study II [NHSII]) by tumor dominance, a proxy for tissue of origin. Dominant tumors (likely ovarian origin) are restricted to one ovary or are at least twice as large on one ovary compared to the other. Ovarian cancer risk factors were evaluated in relation to dominant and nondominant tumors (likely tubal origin) using polytomous logistic regression (NECC) or competing risks Cox models (NHS/NHSII). Results were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Among 1,771 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases, we observed 1,089 tumors with a dominant mass and 682 with no dominant mass. Dominant tumors were more likely to be mucinous, endometrioid or clear cell, whereas nondominant tumors were more likely to be serous. Tubal ligation, two or more births, endometriosis and age were more strongly associated with dominant tumors (rate ratio [RR] = 0.60, 0.83, 1.58 and 1.37, respectively) than nondominant tumors (RR = 1.03, 0.93, 0.84 and 1.14, respectively; p-difference = 0.0001, 0.01, 0.0003 and 0.01, respectively). These data suggest that risk factors for tumors putatively arising from ovarian versus fallopian tube sites may differ; in particular, reproductive factors may be more important for ovarian-derived tumors. As this is the first study to evaluate ovarian cancer risk factors by tumor dominance, these results need to be validated by other studies.
Collapse
|
612
|
The oncofetal protein IMP3: a novel biomarker and triage tool for premalignant atypical endometriotic lesions. Fertil Steril 2013; 99:1974-9. [PMID: 23473990 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2012] [Revised: 01/24/2013] [Accepted: 02/04/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the oncofetal protein IMP3 is detectable in endometriomas with or without histological atypia and whether IMP3 staining can be used as a triage tool to identify foci of atypical endometriosis in doubtful cases. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING Academic department and referral center for endometriosis. PATIENT(S) A consecutive series of 516 women who underwent excision of 874 endometriomas. INTERVENTION(S) Histological review by three expert pathologists and immunohistochemical staining for IMP3. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Test performance of IMP3 immunohistochemistry versus first-round histology. RESULT(S) The prevalence of atypical endometriosis was 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9%-3.3%) based on the number of women and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.5%-1.9%) based on the number of cysts. Three cases of atypical endometriosis were identified at first-round histological examination. Immunohistochemistry detected seven of the eight cases diagnosed as preneoplastic atypia at second-round histology and one case diagnosed as reactive atypia at second-round histology. The sensitivity of first-round histology was 33.3%, compared with 88.9% of IMP3 immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION(S) Immunohistochemical staining for IMP3 expression is a simple, inexpensive, and sensitive test that can be used in routine clinical practice as a triage tool to discriminate between cytological/structural atypia and confounding benign conditions.
Collapse
|
613
|
Worley MJ, Welch WR, Berkowitz RS, Ng SW. Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: a review of pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14:5367-79. [PMID: 23466883 PMCID: PMC3634491 DOI: 10.3390/ijms14035367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 02/21/2013] [Accepted: 02/26/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis is classically defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside of the endometrial lining and uterine musculature. With an estimated frequency of 5%–10% among women of reproductive age, endometriosis is a common gynecologic disorder. While in itself a benign lesion, endometriosis shares several characteristics with invasive cancer, has been shown to undergo malignant transformation, and has been associated with an increased risk of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). Numerous epidemiologic studies have shown an increased risk of EOC among women with endometriosis. This is particularly true for women with endometrioid and clear cell ovarian carcinoma. However, the carcinogenic pathways by which endometriosis associated ovarian carcinoma (EAOC) develops remain poorly understood. Current molecular studies have sought to link endometriosis with EAOC through pathways related to oxidative stress, inflammation and hyperestrogenism. In addition, numerous studies have sought to identify an intermediary lesion between endometriosis and EAOC that may allow for the identification of endometriosis at greatest risk for malignant transformation or for the prevention of malignant transformation of this common gynecologic disorder. The objective of the current article is to review the current data regarding the molecular events associated with EAOC development from endometriosis, with a primary focus on malignancies of the endometrioid and clear cell histologic sub-types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Worley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; E-Mails: (M.J.W.J.); (R.S.B.)
| | - William R. Welch
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; E-Mail:
| | - Ross S. Berkowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; E-Mails: (M.J.W.J.); (R.S.B.)
| | - Shu-Wing Ng
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; E-Mails: (M.J.W.J.); (R.S.B.)
- Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: ; Tel.: +1-617-278-0072; Fax: +1-617-975-0856
| |
Collapse
|
614
|
Rogers PAW, D'Hooghe TM, Fazleabas A, Giudice LC, Montgomery GW, Petraglia F, Taylor RN. Defining future directions for endometriosis research: workshop report from the 2011 World Congress of Endometriosis In Montpellier, France. Reprod Sci 2013; 20:483-99. [PMID: 23427182 DOI: 10.1177/1933719113477495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis, defined as estrogen-dependent lesions containing endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterus, is a chronic and often painful gynecological condition that affects 6% to 10% of reproductive age women. Endometriosis has estimated annual costs of US $12 419 per woman (approximately €9579), comprising one-third of the direct health care costs with two-thirds attributed to loss of productivity. Decreased quality of life is the most important predictor of direct health care and total costs. It has been estimated that there is a mean delay of 6.7 years between onset of symptoms and a surgical diagnosis of endometriosis, and each affected woman loses on average 10.8 hours of work weekly, mainly owing to reduced effectiveness while working. To encourage and facilitate research into this debilitating disease, a consensus workshop to define future directions for endometriosis research was held as part of the 11th World Congress on Endometriosis in September 2011 in Montpellier, France. The objective of this workshop was to review and update the endometriosis research priorities consensus statement developed following the 10th World Congress on Endometriosis in 2008.(1) A total of 56 recommendations for research have been developed, grouped under 6 subheadings: (1) diagnosis, (2) classification and prognosis, (3) clinical trials, treatment, and outcomes, (4) epidemiology, (5) pathophysiology, and (6) research policy. By producing this consensus international research priorities statement, it is the hope of the workshop participants that researchers will be encouraged to develop new interdisciplinary research proposals that will attract increased funding support for work on endometriosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A W Rogers
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
615
|
Chen K, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Steentoft C, Marcos-Silva L, Mandel U, Jacobs I, Dawnay A, Menon U, Blixt O. Microarray Glycoprofiling of CA125 improves differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer. J Proteome Res 2013; 12:1408-18. [PMID: 23360124 DOI: 10.1021/pr3010474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The CA125 biomarker assay plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of primary invasive epithelial ovarian/tubal cancer (iEOC). However, a fundamental problem with CA125 is that it is not cancer-specific and may be elevated in benign gynecological conditions such as benign ovarian neoplasms and endometriosis. Aberrant O-glycosylation is an inherent and specific property of cancer cells and could potentially aid in differentiating cancer from these benign conditions, thereby improving specificity of the assay. We report on the development of a novel microarray-based platform for profiling specific aberrant glycoforms, such as Neu5Acα2,6GalNAc (STn) and GalNAc (Tn), present on CA125 (MUC16) and CA15-3 (MUC1). In a blinded cohort study of patients with an elevated CA125 levels (30-500 kU/L) and a pelvic mass from the UK Ovarian Cancer Population Study (UKOPS), we measured STn-CA125, ST-CA125 and STn-CA15-3. The combined glycoform profile was able to distinguish benign ovarian neoplasms from invasive epithelial ovarian/tubule cancer (iEOCs) with a specificity of 61.1% at 90% sensitivity. The findings suggest that microarray glycoprofiling could improve differential diagnosis and significantly reduce the number of patients elected for further testing. The approach warrants further investigation in other cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kowa Chen
- Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
616
|
Brinton LA, Trabert B, Shalev V, Lunenfeld E, Sella T, Chodick G. In vitro fertilization and risk of breast and gynecologic cancers: a retrospective cohort study within the Israeli Maccabi Healthcare Services. Fertil Steril 2013; 99:1189-96. [PMID: 23375197 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2012] [Revised: 11/29/2012] [Accepted: 12/18/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess long-term cancer risks associated with in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN Record-linkage study. SETTING Health maintenance organization in Israel. PATIENT(S) A total of 87,403 women evaluated and/or treated for infertility on or after September 25, 1994, who were followed for cancer development through June 22, 2011: 522 breast, 41 endometrial, 45 ovarian, 311 in situ cervical, and 32 invasive cervical cancers were identified. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Hazard ratios (HRs) for specific cancers. RESULT(S) We found no significant relationships of IVF exposures to the risks of breast, endometrial, or ovarian cancers. However, compared with women with no fertility treatment, the HR for ovarian cancer associated with IVF was 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-3.29), with higher risk among those receiving four or more cycles (HR 1.78, 95% CI 0.76-4.13). There was also a nonsignificantly elevated risk for endometrial cancer among women who received 1-3 IVF cycles (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.73-5.12), but additional cycles were associated with less risk. In contrast, the risk of in situ cervical cancer was significantly reduced and invasive cervical cancer nonsignificantly reduced among women receiving IVF as well as other fertility treatments. CONCLUSION(S) Our results regarding long-term effects were largely reassuring, but women receiving IVF should continue to be monitored given that the procedures involve potent ovulation stimulators and repeated ovarian punctures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise A Brinton
- Hormonal and Reproductive Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
617
|
Suryawanshi S, Vlad AM, Lin HM, Mantia-Smaldone G, Laskey R, Lee M, Lin Y, Donnellan N, Klein-Patel M, Lee T, Mansuria S, Elishaev E, Budiu R, Edwards RP, Huang X. Plasma microRNAs as novel biomarkers for endometriosis and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19:1213-24. [PMID: 23362326 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-2726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometriosis, a largely benign, chronic inflammatory disease, is an independent risk factor for endometrioid and clear cell epithelial ovarian tumors. We aimed to identify plasma miRNAs that can be used to differentiate patients with endometriosis and ovarian cancer from healthy individuals. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We conducted a two-stage exploratory study to investigate the use of plasma miRNA profiling to differentiate between patients with endometriosis, patients with endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (EAOC), and healthy individuals. In the first stage, using global profiling of more than 1,000 miRNAs via reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in a 20-patient initial screening cohort, we identified 23 candidate miRNAs, which are differentially expressed between healthy controls (n = 6), patients with endometriosis (n = 7), and patients with EAOC (n = 7) based on the fold changes. In the second stage, the 23 miRNAs were further tested in an expanded cohort (n = 88) of healthy individuals (n = 20), endometriosis (n = 33), EAOC (n = 14), and serous ovarian cancer cases (SOC; n = 21, included as controls). RESULTS We identified three distinct miRNA signatures with reliable differential expression between healthy individuals, patients with endometriosis, and patients with EAOC. When profiled against the control SOC category, our results revealed different miRNAs, suggesting that the identified signatures are reflective of disease-specific pathogenic mechanisms. This was further supported by the fact that the majority of miRNAs differentially expressed in human EAOCs were mirrored in a double transgenic mouse EAOC model. CONCLUSION Our study reports for the first time that distinct plasma miRNA expression patterns may serve as highly specific and sensitive diagnostic biomarkers to discriminate between healthy, endometriosis, and EAOC cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Suryawanshi
- Magee-Womens Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
618
|
Capobianco A, Rovere-Querini P. Endometriosis, a disease of the macrophage. Front Immunol 2013; 4:9. [PMID: 23372570 PMCID: PMC3556586 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2012] [Accepted: 01/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis, a common cause of pelvic pain and female infertility, depends on the growth of vascularized endometrial tissue at ectopic sites. Endometrial fragments reach the peritoneal cavity during the fertile years: local cues decide whether they yield endometriotic lesions. Macrophages are recruited at sites of hypoxia and tissue stress, where they clear cell debris and heme-iron and generate pro-life and pro-angiogenesis signals. Macrophages are abundant in endometriotic lesions, where are recruited and undergo alternative activation. In rodents macrophages are required for lesions to establish and to grow; bone marrow-derived Tie-2 expressing macrophages specifically contribute to lesions neovasculature, possibly because they concur to the recruitment of circulating endothelial progenitors, and sustain their survival and the integrity of the vessel wall. Macrophages sense cues (hypoxia, cell death, iron overload) in the lesions and react delivering signals to restore the local homeostasis: their action represents a necessary, non-redundant step in the natural history of the disease. Endometriosis may be due to a misperception of macrophages about ectopic endometrial tissue. They perceive it as a wound, they activate programs leading to ectopic cell survival and tissue vascularization. Clearing this misperception is a critical area for the development of novel medical treatments of endometriosis, an urgent and unmet medical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalisa Capobianco
- Division of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
619
|
Bhatti P, Cushing-Haugen KL, Wicklund KG, Doherty JA, Rossing MA. Nightshift work and risk of ovarian cancer. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70:231-7. [PMID: 23343856 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2012-101146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Animal evidence suggests that circadian disruption may be associated with ovarian cancer, though very little epidemiological work has been done to assess this potential association. We evaluated the association between self-reported nightshift work, a known circadian disruptor, and ovarian cancer in a population-based case-control study. METHODS The study included 1101 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, 389 women with borderline epithelial ovarian tumours and 1832 controls and was conducted in western Washington state. Shift work data were collected as part of inperson interviews. RESULTS Working the nightshift was associated with an increased risk of invasive (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.49) and borderline (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.90) tumours; however, we observed little evidence that risks increased with increasing cumulative duration of nightshift work, and risks were not elevated in the highest duration category (>7 nightshift work-years). Increased risks were restricted to women who were 50 years of age and older and to serous and mucinous histologies of invasive and borderline tumours. There was suggestive evidence of a decreased risk of ovarian cancer among women reporting a preference for activity during evenings rather than mornings. CONCLUSIONS We found evidence suggesting an association between shift work and ovarian cancer. This observation should be followed up in future studies incorporating detailed assessments of diurnal preference (ie, chronotype) in addition to detailed data on shift schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parveen Bhatti
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
620
|
Kelemen LE, Bandera EV, Terry KL, Rossing MA, Brinton LA, Doherty JA, Ness RB, Kjaer SK, Chang-Claude J, Köbel M, Lurie G, Thompson PJ, Carney ME, Moysich K, Edwards R, Bunker C, Jensen A, Høgdall E, Cramer DW, Vitonis AF, Olson SH, King M, Chandran U, Lissowska J, Garcia-Closas M, Yang H, Webb PM, Schildkraut JM, Goodman MT, Risch HA. Recent alcohol consumption and risk of incident ovarian carcinoma: a pooled analysis of 5,342 cases and 10,358 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:28. [PMID: 23339562 PMCID: PMC3568733 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2012] [Accepted: 01/17/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies evaluating the association between alcohol intake and ovarian carcinoma (OC) are inconsistent. Because OC and ovarian borderline tumor histologic types differ genetically, molecularly and clinically, large numbers are needed to estimate risk associations. METHODS We pooled data from 12 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium comprising 5,342 OC cases, 1,455 borderline tumors and 10,358 controls with quantitative information on recent alcohol intake to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) according to frequencies of average daily intakes of beer, wine, liquor and total alcohol. RESULTS Total alcohol intake was not associated with all OC: consumption of >3 drinks per day compared to none, OR=0.92, 95% CI=0.76-1.10, P trend=0.27. Among beverage types, a statistically non-significant decreased risk was observed among women who consumed >8 oz/d of wine compared to none (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.68-1.01, P trend=0.08). This association was more apparent among women with clear cell OC (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.83; P trend=0.02), although based on only 10 cases and not statistically different from the other histologic types (P value for statistical heterogeneity between histologic types = 0.09). Statistical heterogeneity of the alcohol- and wine-OC associations was seen among three European studies, but not among eight North American studies. No statistically significant associations were observed in separate analyses evaluating risk with borderline tumors of serous or mucinous histology. Smoking status did not significantly modify any of the associations. CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence that recent moderate alcohol drinking is associated with increased risk for overall OC, or that variation in risk is associated strongly with specific histologic types. Understanding modifiable causes of these elusive and deadly cancers remains a priority for the research community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, AB, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
621
|
Shoni M, Parra-Herran CE, May T, Wright AA, Feltmate CM. Multiple Synchronous Primary Gynecologic Malignancies in an MSH2 Mutation Carrier With Endometriosis. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:e33-6. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.43.4274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Melina Shoni
- Brigham and Women's Hospital; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Taymaa May
- Brigham and Women's Hospital; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Alexi A. Wright
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Colleen M. Feltmate
- Brigham and Women's Hospital; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
622
|
Merritt MA, De Pari M, Vitonis AF, Titus LJ, Cramer DW, Terry KL. Reproductive characteristics in relation to ovarian cancer risk by histologic pathways. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:1406-17. [PMID: 23315066 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do reproductive risk factor associations differ across subgroups of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) defined by the dualistic model (type I/II) or a histologic pathway-based classification? SUMMARY ANSWER Associations with parity, history of endometriosis, tubal ligation and hysterectomy were found to differ in the context of the type I/II and the histologic pathways classification of ovarian cancer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Shared molecular alterations and candidate precursor lesions suggest that tumor histology and grade may be used to classify ovarian tumors into likely etiologic pathways. DESIGN This case-control study included 1571 women diagnosed with invasive EOC and 2100 population-based controls that were enrolled from 1992 to 2008. Reproductive risk factors as well as other putative risk factors for ovarian cancer were assessed through in-person interviews. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Eligible cases were diagnosed with incident ovarian cancer, were aged 18 and above and resided in eastern Massachusetts or New Hampshire, USA. Controls were identified through random digit dialing, drivers' license and town resident lists and were frequency matched with the cases based on age and study center. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We used polytomous logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for type I/II EOC or using a pathway-based grouping of histologic subtypes. In multivariate analyses, we observed that having a history of endometriosis (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.36-2.71) increased the risk for a type I tumor. Factors that were strongly inversely associated with risk for a type I tumor included parity (≥ 3 versus 0 children, OR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11-0.21), having a previous tubal ligation (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.26-0.60) and more weakly hysterectomy (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.45-1.13). In analyses of histologic pathways, parity (≥ 3 versus 0 children, OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.10-0.18) and having a previous tubal ligation (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.28-0.60) or hysterectomy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.86) were inversely associated with risk of endometrioid/clear cell tumors. Having a history of endometriosis strongly increased the risk for endometrioid/clear cell tumors (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.78-3.26). We did not observe significant differences in the risk associations across these tumor classifications for age at menarche, menstrual cycle length or infertility. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION A potential limitation of this study is that dividing the cases into subgroups may limit the power of these analyses, particularly for the less common tumor types. Since cases were enrolled after their diagnosis, it is possible that the most aggressive cases were not included in the study. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study provides insights about the role of reproductive factors in relation to risk of pathway-based subgroups of ovarian cancer that with further confirmation may assist with the development of improved strategies for the prevention of these different tumor types. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research is funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute, the Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Merritt
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
623
|
Gordts S. New developments in reproductive surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 27:431-40. [PMID: 23291212 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2012] [Accepted: 11/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of in-vitro fertilisation within reproductive medicine has prompted questions to be asked about the relevance of reproductive surgery. Reproductive surgery is more than a competing discipline; it is complementary to the techniques of in-vitro fertilisation. As a complementary discipline, reproductive surgery covers the field of tubal and ovarian pathology and correction of uterine alterations. In recent decades, more attention has been paid to the importance of the uterus in the process of conception and implantation. The place of reproductive surgery and the existing controversies in the treatment of uterine congenital and acquired pathology, tubal, and ovarian surgery are discussed. Continuous training and accreditation programmes for reproductive technologies and surgery are more important than ever.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Gordts
- Leuven Institute for Fertility and Embryology, Tiensevest 168, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
624
|
Gadducci A, Guerrieri ME, Genazzani AR. Fertility drug use and risk of ovarian tumors: a debated clinical challenge. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013; 29:30-5. [PMID: 22946709 DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2012.705382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Infertility itself increases the incidence of ovarian carcinoma, while the potential additional risk associated with the use of fertility drugs is still debated. In 1992, the cumulative analysis of 12 US case-control studies revealed that women who received ovulation-inducing drugs had approximately three-fold higher incidence of invasive ovarian carcinoma. Other investigations reported a lower increase of the risk of invasive carcinoma or borderline tumor of the ovary in women treated with these agents. Conversely, several other case-control or cohort studies failed to detect a significant correlation between fertility drug use and ovarian tumor risk in either parous or nulliparous women compared with untreated infertile women. Moreover neither the number of treatment cycles nor the type of drug used was associated with an increased risk in most studies. Incessant ovulation and excessive gonadotropin secretion have been long considered to play a major role in the development of ovarian carcinoma, and therefore fertility drugs, which raise the serum levels of gonadotropins and increase the chances of multiple ovulations, have been retained as a risk factor for this malignancy, However, the large majority of literature data as well as the new hypotheses on ovarian carcinogenesis appear to exclude a relevant impact of fertility drug use on the risk of ovarian tumors, and especially of high-grade invasive epithelial ovarian cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angiolo Gadducci
- Department of Procreative Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
625
|
Abstract
Endometriosis-related ovarian neoplasms (ERONs) are a unique group of tumors as they are associated with endometriosis, especially endometriosis presenting as an ovarian endometriotic cyst (endometrioma). ERONs include clear cell carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, and seromucinous borderline tumor. A growing body of evidence from both clinicopathologic and molecular studies suggests that most, if not all, ERONs develop from endometriotic cyst epithelium through different stages of tumor progression. The endometriotic cyst contains abundant iron-induced reactive oxygen species that are thought to be mutagenic, and chronic exposure of cystic epithelium to this microenvironment facilitates the accumulation of somatic mutations that ultimately result in tumor development. Molecular analyses of ERONs, including genome-wide screens, have identified several molecular genetic alterations that lead to aberrant activation or inactivation of pathways involving ARID1A, PI3K, Wnt, and PP2A. Among all molecular genetic changes identified to date, inactivating mutations of the ARID1A tumor suppressor gene are the most common in ERON. Understanding the molecular changes and pathogenesis involved in the development of ERON is fundamental for future translational studies aimed at designing new diagnostic tests for early detection and identifying critical molecular features for targeted therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichi Maeda
- Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
626
|
Shen H, Fridley BL, Song H, Lawrenson K, Cunningham JM, Ramus SJ, Cicek MS, Tyrer J, Stram D, Larson MC, Köbel M, Ziogas A, Zheng W, Yang HP, Wu AH, Wozniak EL, Ling Woo Y, Winterhoff B, Wik E, Whittemore AS, Wentzensen N, Palmieri Weber R, Vitonis AF, Vincent D, Vierkant RA, Vergote I, Van Den Berg D, Van Altena AM, Tworoger SS, Thompson PJ, Tessier DC, Terry KL, Teo SH, Templeman C, Stram DO, Southey MC, Sieh W, Siddiqui N, Shvetsov YB, Shu XO, Shridhar V, Wang-Gohrke S, Severi G, Schwaab I, Salvesen HB, Rzepecka IK, Runnebaum IB, Anne Rossing M, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Risch HA, Renner SP, Poole EM, Pike MC, Phelan CM, Pelttari LM, Pejovic T, Paul J, Orlow I, Zawiah Omar S, Olson SH, Odunsi K, Nickels S, Nevanlinna H, Ness RB, Narod SA, Nakanishi T, Moysich KB, Monteiro AN, Moes-Sosnowska J, Modugno F, Menon U, McLaughlin JR, McGuire V, Matsuo K, Mat Adenan NA, Massuger LF, Lurie G, Lundvall L, Lubiński J, Lissowska J, Levine DA, Leminen A, Lee AW, Le ND, Lambrechts S, Lambrechts D, Kupryjanczyk J, Krakstad C, Konecny GE, Krüger Kjaer S, Kiemeney LA, Kelemen LE, Keeney GL, Karlan BY, Karevan R, Kalli KR, Kajiyama H, Ji BT, Jensen A, Jakubowska A, Iversen E, Hosono S, Høgdall CK, Høgdall E, Hoatlin M, Hillemanns P, Heitz F, Hein R, Harter P, Halle MK, Hall P, Gronwald J, Gore M, Goodman MT, Giles GG, Gentry-Maharaj A, Garcia-Closas M, Flanagan JM, Fasching PA, Ekici AB, Edwards R, Eccles D, Easton DF, Dürst M, du Bois A, Dörk T, Doherty JA, Despierre E, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Cybulski C, Cramer DW, Cook LS, Chen X, Charbonneau B, Chang-Claude J, Campbell I, Butzow R, Bunker CH, Brueggmann D, Brown R, Brooks-Wilson A, Brinton LA, Bogdanova N, Block MS, Benjamin E, Beesley J, Beckmann MW, Bandera EV, Baglietto L, Bacot F, Armasu SM, Antonenkova N, Anton-Culver H, Aben KK, Liang D, Wu X, Lu K, Hildebrandt MA, Schildkraut JM, Sellers TA, Huntsman D, Berchuck A, Chenevix-Trench G, Gayther SA, Pharoah PD, Laird PW, Goode EL, Leigh Pearce C. Epigenetic analysis leads to identification of HNF1B as a subtype-specific susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer. Nat Commun 2013; 4:1628. [PMID: 23535649 PMCID: PMC3848248 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2012] [Accepted: 02/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
HNF1B is overexpressed in clear cell epithelial ovarian cancer, and we observed epigenetic silencing in serous epithelial ovarian cancer, leading us to hypothesize that variation in this gene differentially associates with epithelial ovarian cancer risk according to histological subtype. Here we comprehensively map variation in HNF1B with respect to epithelial ovarian cancer risk and analyse DNA methylation and expression profiles across histological subtypes. Different single-nucleotide polymorphisms associate with invasive serous (rs7405776 odds ratio (OR)=1.13, P=3.1 × 10(-10)) and clear cell (rs11651755 OR=0.77, P=1.6 × 10(-8)) epithelial ovarian cancer. Risk alleles for the serous subtype associate with higher HNF1B-promoter methylation in these tumours. Unmethylated, expressed HNF1B, primarily present in clear cell tumours, coincides with a CpG island methylator phenotype affecting numerous other promoters throughout the genome. Different variants in HNF1B associate with risk of serous and clear cell epithelial ovarian cancer; DNA methylation and expression patterns are also notably distinct between these subtypes. These findings underscore distinct mechanisms driving different epithelial ovarian cancer histological subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Shen
- USC Epigenome Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Brooke L. Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, 66160 Kansas USA
| | - Honglin Song
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN UK
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Julie M. Cunningham
- Division of Experimental Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Susan J. Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Mine S. Cicek
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Jonathan Tyrer
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN UK
| | - Douglas Stram
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Melissa C. Larson
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Martin Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 2T9 Alberta Canada
| | | | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Cancer Genetics Research and Prevention, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, 92697 California USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 37232 Tennessee USA
| | - Hannah P. Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 20892 Maryland USA
| | - Anna H. Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Eva L. Wozniak
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - Yin Ling Woo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Affiliated to UM Cancer Research Institute, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 59100 Malaysia
| | - Boris Winterhoff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Elisabeth Wik
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, HB 5006 Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, HB 5006 Norway
| | - Alice S. Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, 94305 California USA
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 20892 Maryland USA
| | - Rachel Palmieri Weber
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, 27708 North Carolina USA
| | - Allison F. Vitonis
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
| | | | - Robert A. Vierkant
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
| | - David Van Den Berg
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Anne M. Van Altena
- Department of Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, HB 6500 The Netherlands
| | - Shelley S. Tworoger
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
| | - Pamela J. Thompson
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Hawaii, 96813 USA
| | | | - Kathryn L. Terry
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Initiatives Foundation, Sime Darby Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, 47500 Malaysia
- University Malaya Cancer Research Institute, University Malaya Medical Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 59100 Malaysia
| | - Claire Templeman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Daniel O. Stram
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Department of Pathology, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3053 Victoria Australia
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, 94305 California USA
| | - Nadeem Siddiqui
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G4 0SF UK
| | - Yurii B. Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Hawaii, 96813 USA
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Cancer Genetics Research and Prevention, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, 92697 California USA
| | - Viji Shridhar
- Division of Experimental Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Shan Wang-Gohrke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, 89091 Germany
| | - Gianluca Severi
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3053 Victoria Australia
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytical Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Victoria Australia
| | - Ira Schwaab
- Institut für Humangenetik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 65187 Germany
| | - Helga B. Salvesen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, HB 5006 Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, HB 5006 Norway
| | - Iwona K. Rzepecka
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, 02-781 Poland
| | - Ingo B. Runnebaum
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, 07743 Germany
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Program in Epidemiology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, 98109 Washington USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, 98109 Washington USA
| | - Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, 08901 New Jersey USA
| | - Harvey A. Risch
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, 06520 Connecticut USA
| | - Stefan P. Renner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen, 91054 Germany
| | - Elizabeth M. Poole
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065 New York USA
| | - Catherine M. Phelan
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, 33612 Florida USA
| | - Liisa M. Pelttari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00530 Finland
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, 97239 Oregon USA
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, 97239 Oregon USA
| | - James Paul
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - Irene Orlow
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065 New York USA
| | - Siti Zawiah Omar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Affiliated to UM Cancer Research Institute, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 59100 Malaysia
| | - Sara H. Olson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10065 New York USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, 14263 New York USA
| | - Stefan Nickels
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00530 Finland
| | - Roberta B. Ness
- School of Public Health, University of Texas, Houston, 77030 Texas USA
| | - Steven A. Narod
- Women’s College Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G IN8 Ontario Canada
| | - Toru Nakanishi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Central Hospital, Nagoya, 464-8681 Japan
| | - Kirsten B. Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, 14263 New York USA
| | - Alvaro N.A. Monteiro
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, 33612 Florida USA
| | - Joanna Moes-Sosnowska
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, 02-781 Poland
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15213 Pennsylvania USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15213 Pennsylvania USA
- Women’s Cancer Research Program, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, 15213 Pennsylvania USA
| | - Usha Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, London, NW1 2BU UK
| | - John R. McLaughlin
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5T 3M7 Ontario Canada
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, M5G IX5 Ontario Canada
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, 94305 California USA
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, 464-8681 Japan
| | - Noor Azmi Mat Adenan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Affiliated to UM Cancer Research Institute, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 59100 Malaysia
| | - Leon F.A.G Massuger
- Department of Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, HB 6500 The Netherlands
| | - Galina Lurie
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Hawaii, 96813 USA
| | - Lene Lundvall
- Gynecologic Clinic, The Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, DK-2100 Denmark
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, 70-115 Poland
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, 02-781 Poland
| | - Douglas A. Levine
- Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, 10021 New York USA
| | - Arto Leminen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00530 Finland
| | - Alice W. Lee
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Nhu D. Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, G12 0YN British Columbia Canada
| | - Sandrina Lambrechts
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
| | - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, 02-781 Poland
| | - Camilla Krakstad
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, HB 5006 Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, HB 5006 Norway
| | - Gottfried E. Konecny
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 90095 California USA
| | - Susanne Krüger Kjaer
- Gynecologic Clinic, The Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, DK-2100 Denmark
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, DK-2100 Denmark
| | - Lambertus A. Kiemeney
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, HB 6500 Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, HB 6500 The Netherlands
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, 1066CX The Netherlands
| | - Linda E. Kelemen
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, Calgary, T2N 2T9 Alberta Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics and Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 2T9 Alberta Canada
| | - Gary L. Keeney
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- Women’s Cancer Program, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, 90048 California USA
| | - Rod Karevan
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Kimberly R. Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Hiroaki Kajiyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, 464-8601 Japan
| | - Bu-Tian Ji
- Division of Cancer Etiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 20892 Maryland USA
| | - Allan Jensen
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, DK-2100 Denmark
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, 70-115 Poland
| | - Edwin Iversen
- Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, 27708 North Carolina USA
| | - Satoyo Hosono
- Division of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, 464-8681 Japan
| | - Claus K. Høgdall
- Gynecologic Clinic, The Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, DK-2100 Denmark
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, DK-2100 Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Unit, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2730 Denmark
| | - Maureen Hoatlin
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, 97239 Oregon USA
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625 Germany
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, 45136 Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, 65199 Germany
| | - Rebecca Hein
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, PMV Research Group, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50923 Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, 45136 Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, 65199 Germany
| | - Mari K. Halle
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, HB 5006 Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, HB 5006 Norway
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, 171-77 Sweden
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, 70-115 Poland
| | - Martin Gore
- Gynecological Oncology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, SW3 6JJ UK
| | - Marc T. Goodman
- Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center Institute, Los Angeles, 90048 California USA
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3053 Victoria Australia
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytical Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Victoria Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3806 Victoria Australia
| | | | - Montserrat Garcia-Closas
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP UK
| | - James M. Flanagan
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen, 91054 Germany
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, 90095 California USA
| | - Arif B. Ekici
- Institute of Human Genetics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, 91054 Germany
| | - Robert Edwards
- Maggee Women’s Hospital, Pittsburg, 15213 Pennsylvania USA
| | - Diana Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, S017 1BJ UK
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN UK
| | - Matthias Dürst
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, 07743 Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, 45136 Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, 65199 Germany
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625 Germany
| | - Jennifer A. Doherty
- Section of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, 03755 New Hampshire USA
| | - Evelyn Despierre
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory for Translational Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, 3000 Belgium
| | - Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, 02-781 Poland
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, International Hereditary Cancer Center, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, 70-115 Poland
| | - Daniel W. Cramer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 02115 Massachusetts USA
| | - Linda S. Cook
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 87131 New Mexico USA
| | - Xiaoqing Chen
- Department of Genetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD 4006 Queensland Australia
| | - Bridget Charbonneau
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 87131 New Mexico USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, 69120 Germany
| | - Ian Campbell
- Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Melbourne, VIC 3002 Victoria Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3053 Victoria Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3002 Victoria Australia
| | - Ralf Butzow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00530 Finland
- Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, 00530 Finland
| | - Clareann H. Bunker
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15213 Pennsylvania USA
| | - Doerthe Brueggmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Robert Brown
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK
| | - Angela Brooks-Wilson
- Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, V52 1L3 British Columbia Canada
| | - Louise A. Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, 20892 Maryland USA
| | - Natalia Bogdanova
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, 30625 Germany
| | - Matthew S. Block
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Elizabeth Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6JJ UK
| | - Jonathan Beesley
- Department of Genetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD 4006 Queensland Australia
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Erlangen, 91054 Germany
| | - Elisa V. Bandera
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, 08901 New Jersey USA
| | - Laura Baglietto
- Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3053 Victoria Australia
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytical Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Victoria Australia
| | | | - Sebastian M. Armasu
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Natalia Antonenkova
- Belarusian Institute for Oncology and Medical Radiology Aleksandrov N.N., Minsk, 223040 Belarus
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Cancer Genetics Research and Prevention, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, 92697 California USA
| | - Katja K. Aben
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, HB 6500 Netherlands
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, 1066CX The Netherlands
| | - Dong Liang
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, 77044 Texas USA
| | - Xifeng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030 Texas USA
| | - Karen Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030 Texas USA
| | | | | | - Australian Cancer Study
- Department of Genetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD 4006 Queensland Australia
| | - Joellen M. Schildkraut
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, 27708 North Carolina USA
- Cancer Prevention, Detection and Control Research Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, 27708 North Carolina USA
| | - Thomas A. Sellers
- Division of Population Sciences, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, 33612 Florida USA
| | - David Huntsman
- Department of Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, V5Z 4E6 British Columbia Canada
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Gynecologic Cancer Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, 27708 North Carolina USA
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, QLD 4006 Queensland Australia
| | - Simon A. Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN UK
| | - Peter W. Laird
- USC Epigenome Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| | - Ellen L. Goode
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905 Minnesota USA
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, 90033 California USA
| |
Collapse
|
627
|
Are oestrogens and genetic predisposition etiologic factors in the development of clear cell carcinoma of the peritoneum? Med Hypotheses 2012; 80:167-71. [PMID: 23265355 DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2012.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2012] [Revised: 11/10/2012] [Accepted: 11/15/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
A literature search was carried out for clinical observations that could explain the possible aetiology of primary peritoneal clear cell carcinoma (CCC) including diagnostic dilemmas, various theories of origin, oestrogen dependence and genetic association. It was found to be an extremely rare tumour (CCC) arising in the peritoneum and is often misdiagnosed as mesothelioma or serous carcinoma or metastatic adenocarcinoma due to overlapping morphological features. The awareness of such dilemmas is important even before making a diagnosis. Clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical studies like WT1, CK20 and calretinin are usually helpful in differentiating CCC from serous carcinoma, metastatic carcinoma from bowel and mesothelioma. (CK7 is common to all epithelial tumours, CEA can be expressed in clear cell carcinoma, WT1 is normally expressed in serous carcinoma, calretinin is expressed in mesothelioma and CK20 in colon carcinoma). The distinction between the above tumours is important as correct diagnosis is required in initiating appropriate treatment. Less than ten cases have been reported in the English language medical literature. Mullerian metaplasia and malignant transformation in endometriosis are two theories proposed for its existence. Peritoneal CCC can be oestrogen dependent in view of association with oestrogen dependent conditions which include endometriosis, adenomyosis and endometrial carcinoma. A genetic ascertain is difficult to be associated and needs further evaluation in a research setting in the familial cancer genetic clinics.
Collapse
|
628
|
Modugno F, Laskey R, Smith AL, Andersen CL, Haluska P, Oesterreich S. Hormone response in ovarian cancer: time to reconsider as a clinical target? Endocr Relat Cancer 2012; 19:R255-79. [PMID: 23045324 PMCID: PMC3696394 DOI: 10.1530/erc-12-0175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide among women in developed countries and the most lethal of all gynecologic malignancies. There is a critical need for the introduction of targeted therapies to improve outcome. Epidemiological evidence suggests a critical role for steroid hormones in ovarian tumorigenesis. There is also increasing evidence from in vitro studies that estrogen, progestin, and androgen regulate proliferation and invasion of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Limited clinical trials have shown modest response rates; however, they have consistently identified a small subset of patients that respond very well to endocrine therapy with few side effects. We propose that it is timely to perform additional well-designed trials that should include biomarkers of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesmary Modugno
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
629
|
Storeng R, Vangen S, Omland AK, Oldereid NB. Infertility treatment and the risk of cancer. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2012; 132:2494-9. [PMID: 23338030 DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A possible correlation between hormonal stimulation during treatment of infertility and the risk of cancer of the breast, the ovaries, the cervix or the uterus has been investigated in a number of epidemiological studies. The purpose of this article is to review the relevant literature and summarise the findings. KNOWLEDGE BASE: This review article is based on literature searches in the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE. RESULTS No studies showed a specific general correlation between hormonal ovulatory stimulation used as pre-treatment to assisted fertilisation and an increased risk of cancer of the breast, the ovaries, the cervix or the uterus. Most studies detected no increased risk. Some studies, however, showed an increased risk of cancer among certain sub-groups, such as women who have received repeated treatment with clomiphene citrate. INTERPRETATION On the basis of the studies reviewed, the conclusions are ambiguous. It is therefore necessary to monitor the long-term effects of infertility treatment on women's health. Further good-quality large-scale population studies are necessary, with longer follow-up periods and better adjustment for confounding factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritsa Storeng
- Norwegian Resource Centre for Women's Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Women and Children's Division, Norway.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
630
|
Spowart JE, Townsend KN, Huwait H, Eshragh S, West NR, Ries JN, Kalloger S, Anglesio M, Gorski SM, Watson PH, Gilks CB, Huntsman DG, Lum JJ. The autophagy protein LC3A correlates with hypoxia and is a prognostic marker of patient survival in clear cell ovarian cancer. J Pathol 2012; 228:437-47. [DOI: 10.1002/path.4090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2012] [Revised: 07/15/2012] [Accepted: 07/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeline E Spowart
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency; Victoria BC Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology; University of Victoria; BC Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team in Investigating Autophagy Proteins as Molecular Targets for Cancer Treatments; Simon Fraser University; BC Canada
| | - Katelin N Townsend
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency; Victoria BC Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology; University of Victoria; BC Canada
| | - Hassan Huwait
- Anatomical Pathology; Vancouver General Hospital; BC Canada
| | - Sima Eshragh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of British Columbia; BC Canada
| | - Nathan R West
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency; Victoria BC Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology; University of Victoria; BC Canada
| | - Jenna N Ries
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency; Victoria BC Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology; University of Victoria; BC Canada
| | - Steve Kalloger
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of British Columbia; BC Canada
| | - Michael Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of British Columbia; BC Canada
| | - Sharon M Gorski
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team in Investigating Autophagy Proteins as Molecular Targets for Cancer Treatments; Simon Fraser University; BC Canada
- Genome Sciences Centre; BC Cancer Agency; Vancouver BC Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry; Simon Fraser University; BC Canada
| | - Peter H Watson
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency; Victoria BC Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology; University of Victoria; BC Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of British Columbia; BC Canada
| | - C Blake Gilks
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of British Columbia; BC Canada
| | - David G Huntsman
- Centre for Translational and Applied Genomics, BC Cancer Agency; Vancouver BC Canada
| | - Julian J Lum
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer Agency; Victoria BC Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology; University of Victoria; BC Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Team in Investigating Autophagy Proteins as Molecular Targets for Cancer Treatments; Simon Fraser University; BC Canada
| |
Collapse
|
631
|
CYP1B1 and hormone-induced cancer. Cancer Lett 2012; 324:13-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2012] [Revised: 04/21/2012] [Accepted: 04/24/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
632
|
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide among women in developed countries and the most lethal of all gynecologic malignancies. There is a critical need for the introduction of targeted therapies to improve outcome. Epidemiological evidence suggests a critical role for steroid hormones in ovarian tumorigenesis. There is also increasing evidence from in vitro studies that estrogen, progestin, and androgen regulate proliferation and invasion of epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Limited clinical trials have shown modest response rates; however, they have consistently identified a small subset of patients that respond very well to endocrine therapy with few side effects. We propose that it is timely to perform additional well-designed trials that should include biomarkers of response.
Collapse
|
633
|
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and ovarian cancer risk: findings from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study and systematic review. Cancer Causes Control 2012; 23:1839-52. [PMID: 22972000 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-0063-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 08/28/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic inflammation has been proposed as a risk factor for ovarian cancer. Some data suggest that anti-inflammatory medications may be protective against ovarian cancer; however, results have been inconsistent. METHODS We evaluated the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer with regular use of NSAIDs prospectively in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, using Cox proportional hazard models. We also examined the risk of common subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer (serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, and other epithelial) with regular use of NSAIDs. In addition, we performed meta-analyses summarizing the risk of ovarian cancer with "regular use" of NSAIDs in previously published studies. RESULTS We did not observe a significant association between regular use of NSAIDs with ovarian cancer risk in the AARP cohort (aspirin: RR 1.06, 95 % CI 0.87-1.29; non-aspirin NSAIDs: RR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.74-1.15); however, summary estimates from prospective cohort studies demonstrated that use of non-aspirin NSAIDs may reduce the risk of ovarian cancer (RR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.77-1.01). Although not significant, we found that mucinous tumors were inversely associated with non-aspirin NSAID use (RR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.23-2.10) in the AARP cohort, which was supported by the meta-analysis (RR 0.69, CI 0.50-0.94.) CONCLUSION Although results from the NIH-AARP cohort study were not statistically significant, our meta-analysis suggests that non-aspirin NSAIDs may be protective against ovarian cancer. Additional analyses, focusing on dose, duration, and frequency of NSAID use and accounting for ovarian cancer heterogeneity are necessary to further elucidate the association between NSAID use and ovarian cancer risk.
Collapse
|
634
|
Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012; 98:591-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 379] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2012] [Accepted: 05/22/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
635
|
Falconer H, Sundqvist J, Xu H, Vodolazkaia A, Fassbender A, Kyama C, Bokor A, D'Hooghe TM. Analysis of common variations in tumor-suppressor genes on chr1p36 among Caucasian women with endometriosis. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 127:398-402. [PMID: 22910690 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2012] [Revised: 08/05/2012] [Accepted: 08/11/2012] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Epidemiological data indicate that endometriosis increases the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but the mechanism of cancer transition is unknown. Results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and transcriptome sequencing have demonstrated that genes located in the 1p36 region are important in both endometriosis and endometriosis-associated cancer development. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that SNPs in two tumor-suppressor genes (CHD5 and ARID1A) in the 1p36 region are associated with endometriosis. METHODS Allele frequencies of SNPs were investigated in 1685 Caucasian women consisting of 947 women with endometriosis and 738 controls. Peripheral blood samples were retrieved, DNA extracted and allelic frequencies of SNPs in two tumor-suppressor genes (CHD5 and ARID1A) were analyzed using TaqMan Open Array technique. RESULTS Associations were observed for 3 SNPs in the CHD5 gene: rs1883603 (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.00-1.71), rs9434741 (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.71) and rs17436816 (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02-1.50). After correction for multiple comparisons, rs9434741 (CHD5) remained significantly associated with endometriosis (p<0.01). No associations were detected for ARID1A. CONCLUSIONS In this Caucasian population, endometriosis seems to be associated with the tumor-suppressor gene CHD5. Our findings support recent data, suggesting that the 1p36 region plays an important role in endometrios. To validate these data, replication in an independent population is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Falconer
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet/Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
636
|
|
637
|
Li S, Tong J, Rahman MM, Shepherd TG, McFadden G. Oncolytic virotherapy for ovarian cancer. Oncolytic Virother 2012; 1:1-21. [PMID: 25977900 DOI: 10.2147/ov.s31626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In the past two decades, more than 20 viruses with selective tropism for tumor cells have been developed as oncolytic viruses (OVs) for treatments of a variety of malignancies. Of these viruses, eleven have been tested in human ovarian cancer models in preclinical studies. So far, nine phase I or II clinical trials have been conducted or initiated using four different types of OVs in patients with recurrent ovarian cancers. In this article, we summarize the different OVs that are being assessed as therapeutics for ovarian cancer. We also present an overview of recent advances in identification of key genetic or immune-response pathways involved in tumorigenesis of ovarian cancer, which provides a better understanding of the tumor specificities and oncolytic properties of OVs. In addition, we discuss how next-generation OVs could be genetically modified or integrated into multimodality regimens to improve clinical outcomes based on recent advances in ovarian cancer biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoudong Li
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jessica Tong
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada ; Translational Ovarian Cancer Research Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Masmudur M Rahman
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Trevor G Shepherd
- Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada ; Translational Ovarian Cancer Research Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Grant McFadden
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
638
|
|
639
|
Kurta ML, Moysich KB, Weissfeld JL, Youk AO, Bunker CH, Edwards RP, Modugno F, Ness RB, Diergaarde B. Use of fertility drugs and risk of ovarian cancer: results from a U.S.-based case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 21:1282-92. [PMID: 22707710 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-0426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies examining associations between use of fertility drugs and ovarian cancer risk have provided conflicting results. We used data from a large case-control study to determine whether fertility drug use significantly impacts ovarian cancer risk when taking into account parity, gravidity, and cause of infertility. METHODS Data from the Hormones and Ovarian Cancer Prediction (HOPE) study were used (902 cases, 1,802 controls). Medical and reproductive histories were collected via in-person interviews. Logistic regression was used to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Models were adjusted for age, race, education, age at menarche, parity, oral contraceptive use, breastfeeding, talc use, tubal ligation, and family history of breast/ovarian cancer. RESULTS Ever use of fertility drugs was not significantly associated with ovarian cancer within the total HOPE population (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.35) or among women who reported seeking medical attention for infertility (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.54-1.40). We did observe a statistically significant increased risk of ovarian cancer for ever use of fertility drugs among women who, despite seeking medical attention for problems getting pregnant, remained nulligravid (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.01-9.67). CONCLUSIONS These results provide further evidence that fertility drug use does not significantly contribute to ovarian cancer risk among the majority of women; however, women who despite infertility evaluation and fertility drug use remain nulligravid, may have an elevated risk for ovarian cancer. IMPACT Our results suggest that fertility drug use does not significantly contribute to overall risk of ovarian cancer when adjusting for known confounding factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L Kurta
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
640
|
Guo SW, Zilberberg MD, Hummelshoj L. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13:e189-90; author reply e190. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70199-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
641
|
Pearce CL, Berchuck A. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer – Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70103-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
642
|
|
643
|
|
644
|
Epigenetic control of endocrine disrupting chemicals on gynecological disease: Focused on phthalates. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.5468/kjog.2012.55.9.619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
645
|
Brockman R. Medication and transference in psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy of the borderline patient. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1990; 28:1552-68. [PMID: 2352891 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 336] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The regressive potential of the borderline patient has been recognized ever since the term was first introduced by Adolph Stern in 1938. He believed these patients were "too ill for classical psychoanalysis," and indeed almost all who have written on this subject have supported Stern's view, recognizing the severe regressive potential of a borderline patient in unmodified psychoanalysis. Taking medication is not generally considered to be a particularly regressive experience. It should be remembered, however, that for many patients and especially for patients with borderline personality disorder, medication can be both an overvalued hope and a terrifying assault. Thus, although the pharmacologic action of the medication may help to integrate the patient's ego functioning, the very taking of the medication may at the same time initiate subtle and unanticipated regressive drives. Two forces are then set in motion with potentially different effects. In a treatment where the same physician is prescribing medication and doing psychotherapy, the common pathway of these forces is transference. Thus, pharmacologic action may modify transference. And more importantly, because it is less easily recognized, transference issues may affect the patient's subjective experience of the action of the medication. For this reason, it is particularly important that not only diagnostic issues but also transference issues be understood before medication is prescribed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Brockman
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|