Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults

Processes of care for community-acquired pneumonia

Clinical and economic outcomes in hospitalized patients with CAP directly are related to the way that certain processes of care are executed at the local-hospital level. For each process of care, a clear and evidence-based recommended course of action should be stated. Having an unambiguous action plan helps to develop process-of-care indicators and to educate healthcare workers. Improving processes of care is a secure way to improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with CAP.

Nonresponses and treatment failures with conventional empiric regimens in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Although most patients with suspected CAP respond to empiric therapy,a small number of patients do not respond in the expected fashion. Age and underlying comorbid conditions have a strong influence on the course of illness. Less common causes of treatment failures include overwhelming infection, antimicrobial resistance, and misdiagnosis. It is a common practice for empiric antimicrobial treatment of CAP to be initiated without microbiologic studies. Clinicians carefully should observe these patients for unusual or slow responses and should be ready to pursue a more extensive search for the cause of treatment failure.

Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: new developments concerning microbiology and pathophysiology--impact on approaches to risk stratification and therapy

Exacerbations are a characteristic feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and contribute significantly to associated morbidity and mortality. Renewed interest in this common clinical problem and research using new investigative tools has enhanced substantially the understanding of the pathogenesis of exacerbations. Results of recent clinical trials and observational studies have allowed refinements in treatment of exacerbations that should im-prove patient outcomes. This article discusses a rational, stratified approach to the use of antibiotics for this condition based on these recent studies.

Antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common disorder that is potentially life-threatening, especially in older adults and patients with comorbid disease. Despite substantial progress in therapeutic options, CAP remains a primary cause of death from infectious disease in the United States. The mainstay of treatment for most patients is appropriate antimicrobial therapy This article reviews the principles for initial antimicrobial therapy, highlights some of the differences in approaches to antimicrobial drug selection in selected guidelines, and includes new recommendations for empiric and pathogen-directed therapy of CAP.

Diagnostic test for etiologic agents of community-acquired pneumonia

Diagnostic tests for the detection of the etiologic agent of pneumonia are neither recommended nor done for most outpatients with CAP (Table 4).Most of these patients have no clear diagnosis but seem to do well with empiric antibiotic treatment, which often costs less than the diagnostic tests. For hospitalized patients, a pre-treatment blood culture and an expectorated sputum gram stain and culture should be done. Testing for Legionella spp is appropriate in hospitalized patients, especially those who are seriously ill. New tests that merit use in selected patients are the urinary antigen assay for S pneumoniae and the PCR test for L pneumophila. Anticipated developments in the near future are PCR tests for detection of C pneumoniae and M pneumoniae.

Re-evaluation of the therapy of severe pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae

Pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most deadly form of community-acquired pneumonia. The death rate of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia has remained constant over the past 50 years. Several retrospective reviews of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia suggest that dual therapy with a beta-lactam and a macrolide antimicrobial agent is associated with a lower case fatality rate than therapy with a beta-lactam alone. These studies are reviewed, potential mechanisms are suggested, and future studies are discussed.

Antimicrobial selection for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections in the 21st century: a review of gemifloxacin

Community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are more prevalent in the elderly than in children and younger adults and form a significant proportion of all consultations and hospital admissions in this older age group. Furthermore, in a world of increasing life expectancy the trend seems unlikely to be reversed. Antimicrobial treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) must cover Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, and in many circumstances should also cover the intracellular (atypical) pathogens. In contrast, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) are mainly associated with H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae and not with atypical bacteria: in severe cases, other Gram-negative bacteria may be involved. Frequently in LRTIs, the aetiology of the infection cannot be identified from the laboratory specimens and treatment has to be empirical. In such situations it is important to not only to use an antibiotic that covers all likely organisms, but also one that has good activity against these organisms given the local resistance patterns. Gemifloxacin is a new quinolone antibiotic that targets pneumococcal DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV and is highly active against S. pneumoniae including penicillin-, macrolide- and many ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, as well as H. influenzae and the atypical pathogens. In clinical trials in CAP and AECB, gemifloxacin has been shown to be as effective a range of comparators and demonstrated an adverse event profile that was in line with the comparator agents. In one long-term study in AECB significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin than clarithromycin remained free of recurrence after 26 weeks. The improved potency, broad spectrum of activity and proven clinical and bacteriological efficacy and safety profile should make it a useful agent in the 21st century battle against community-acquired LRTIs.

Moxifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections

Moxifloxacin (Avelox) is a fluoroquinolone antibacterial with a methoxy group in the C-8 position and a bulky C-7 side chain. Moxifloxacin is approved for use in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute bacterial sinusitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (approved indications may differ between countries). Moxifloxacin has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity, including activity against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. It achieves good tissue penetration and has a convenient once-daily administration schedule, as well as being available in both intravenous and oral formulations in some markets. Moxifloxacin has good efficacy in the treatment of patients with AECB, CAP, acute bacterial sinusitis and uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, and is generally well tolerated. Thus, moxifloxacin is an important option in the treatment of bacterial infections.

[Community-acquired pneumonia]

Diagnostic tools are essential for the physician to reach a correct diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, to determine the pathogen, and to estimate the prognosis of individual patients. X-ray of the chest remains the "gold standard" for identification of pneumonia. Modern inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein and in the future procalcitonin are essential for the differential diagnosis and follow-up. The microbiology tests include, besides classic bacterial cultures, urinary antigen tests for Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila. A simple prognostic score has been developed to help the physician to decide if the patient needs hospitalization.

Impact of positive legionella urinary antigen test on patient management and improvement of antibiotic use

AIM

To assess the incidence of legionella infection over a 27 month period at a large university hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with legionellosis, defined as those presenting a positive urinary antigen for legionella together with a medical history, clinical findings, and radiological findings consistent with pneumonia. These patients were evaluated to determine the relation between their test results and changes in treatment modalities. A control group of patients with pneumonia but a negative urinary antigen test for legionella were also analysed.

RESULTS

Twenty seven of 792 assessed patients tested positive for legionella. In 22 of these patients, legionella active antibiotics were administered empirically. In seven patients, the test results prompted a legionella specific treatment, whereas in 12 cases, non-specific antibiotics were stopped within 24 hours. Overall, treatment was altered in more than half of the patients as a result of the test results.

CONCLUSIONS

The urinary antigen may have a direct impact on clinical management of pulmonary legionellosis. However, patient comorbidities and individual clinical judgment are still important for determining the best treatment to be given in each individual case.

Antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for antimicrobial therapy for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee.

METHODS

The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591.

CONCLUSION

Since the prompt institution of therapy that is active against the causative pathogen is one of the most important predictors of outcome, clinicians must establish a system for rapid administration of a rationally chosen drug or combination of drugs when sepsis or septic shock is suspected. The expanding number of antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral agents available provides opportunities for effective empiric and specific therapy. However, to minimize the promotion of antimicrobial resistance and cost and to maximize efficacy, detailed knowledge of the likely pathogens and the properties of the available drugs is necessary for the intensivist.

Relationship between increased levofloxacin use and decreased susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States

Increasing reports of fluoroquinolone-non-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae are of clinical concern. We examined the relationship between outpatient fluoroquinolone use and susceptibility of community-acquired S. pneumoniae isolates. Using multivariable general linear modeling, US SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program and Intercontinental Medical Statistics data (1997-2002) were analyzed to determine the influence of selected patient-, institution-, and geographic region-specific factors, including local fluoroquinolone usage, on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of levofloxacin against S. pneumoniae. Levofloxacin MIC50, MIC90, and MIC range (n = 384 from 26 hospitals) were 1, 1, and < or =0.5 to >4 microg/mL, respectively. Variables associated with changes in geometric mean MIC included geographical region (P < 0.0001), medical service (P = 0.0002), study year (P = 0.0006), primary diagnosis group (P = 0.02), and 2 interactions (duration of hospital stay before isolate collection by bed capacity, P = 0.06, and levofloxacin use by geographical region, P = 0.08; P < 0.001 when study year was removed from the model). MIC increased with levofloxacin use across all geographical regions, with increases of 54% and 126% in the southwest and west, respectively. In contrast to other fluoroquinolones, increased levofloxacin use, along with other variables, was associated with decreased pneumococcal susceptibility. Given the US environment of increasing pneumococcal resistance, these data may be useful in better understanding factors related to emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance.

Guide to selection of fluoroquinolones in patients with lower respiratory tract infections

Newer fluoroquinolones such as levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and gemifloxacin have several attributes that make them excellent choices for the therapy of lower respiratory tract infections. In particular, they have excellent intrinsic activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens. Fluoroquinolones may be used as monotherapy to treat high-risk patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and for patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalisation, but not admission to intensive care. Overall, the newer fluoroquinolones often achieve clinical cure rates in > or =90% of these patients. However, rates may be lower in hospital-acquired pneumonia, and this infection should be treated on the basis of anticipated organisms and evaluation of risk factors for specific pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In this setting, an antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone may be used in combination with an antipseudomonalbeta-lactam. Concerns are now being raised about the widespread use, and possibly misuse, of fluoroquinolones and the emergence of resistance among S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. A number of pharmacokinetic parameters such as the peak concentration of the antibacterial after a dose (C(max)), and the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24) and their relationship to pharmacodynamic parameters such as the minimum inhibitory and the mutant prevention concentrations (MIC and MPC, respectively) have been proposed to predict the effect of fluoroquinolones on bacterial killing and the emergence of resistance. Higher C(max)/MIC or AUC24/MIC and C(max)/MPC or AUC24/MPC ratios, either as a result of dose administration or the susceptibility of the organism, may lead to a better clinical outcome and decrease the emergence of resistance, respectively. Pharmacokinetic profiles that are optimised to target low-level resistant minor subpopulations of bacteria that often exist in infections may help preserve fluoroquinolones as a class. To this end, optimising the AUC24/MPC or C(max)/MPC ratios is important, particularly against S. pneumoniae, in the setting of lower respiratory tract infections. Agents such as moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin with high ratios against this organism are preferred, and agents such as ciprofloxacin with low ratios should be avoided. For agents such as levofloxacin and gatifloxacin, with intermediate ratios against S. pneumoniae, it may be worthwhile considering alternative dose administration strategies, such as using higher dosages, to eradicate low-level resistant variants. This must, of course, be balanced against the potential of toxicity. Innovative approaches to the use of fluoroquinolones are worth testing in further in vitro experiments as well as in clinical trials.

Value of short-course antimicrobial therapy in community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Non-compliance with therapy may be associated with deterioration in the patient's condition, treatment failure, and increased use and cost of healthcare resources such as the requirement for additional drugs and hospital admission. Adherence to the prescribed regimen is affected by a number of variables including dosing interval, treatment duration, adverse effects, and palatability in pediatric patients. Accumulating evidence suggests that short-course antimicrobial therapy may be at least as effective as, and in some cases may be more effective than, traditional longer therapies (7-14 days) even in hospital-acquired pneumonia. Given the unique pharmacokinetic properties of azithromycin, attempts have been made to condense the traditional total dose over a 3-5-day period into single-dose therapy with the aim of improving treatment compliance. The results of two phase III CAP trials indicate that a single 2.0 g dose of azithromycin microspheres is a suitable alternative to 7 days of either clarithromycin XL or levofloxacin.

Blood Culture and Susceptibility Results and Allergy History Do Not Influence Fluoroquinolone Use in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of blood culture and susceptibility results and antimicrobial allergy history on fluoroquinolone use in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of medical records.

SETTING

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Seattle, Washington.

PATIENTS

A total of 10,275 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with the diagnosis of pneumonia received antimicrobial treatment within 24 hours of admission. Of these patients, 288 had blood cultures positive for pneumococcus and were matched one-to-one with patients with negative blood and sputum cultures.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Antimicrobial use at the beginning and end of hospitalization, culture and susceptibility results, and patient allergies were recorded retrospectively and compared between two matched groups: patients with blood cultures positive for Streptococcus pneumoniae and those whose blood and sputum cultures were negative. Neither culture and susceptibility results nor allergy history affected the rate of fluoroquinolone use. Despite infection due to penicillin-susceptible pneumococci and no penicillin allergy, patients received therapy with fluoroquinolones (26.7%) as frequently as those with culture-negative pneumonia (34.9%; p=0.401).

CONCLUSION

Fluoroquinolones are prescribed despite microbiologic confirmation of penicillin-susceptible pneumococcal pneumonia in the absence of penicillin allergy. These prescribing patterns may contribute to selection pressure associated with fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.

Anti-inflammatory effects of macrolides—an underappreciated benefit in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections and chronic inflammatory pulmonary conditions?

BACKGROUND

It has been recognized for more than 20 years that the macrolides have immunomodulatory effects that are beneficial for those suffering from chronic pulmonary inflammatory syndromes, such as diffuse panbronchiolitis, cystic fibrosis, asthma and bronchiectasis. The macrolides have consistently been associated with decreased length of stay and mortality when used alone or in combination with beta-lactam antibiotics. This effect can be demonstrated against combinations consisting of beta-lactams and other antibiotics active against 'atypical chest pathogens' when treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in hospitalized patients. As such, it appears that the macrolides' effects in CAP patients are more than just antibacterial in nature. AIMS OF THIS REVIEW: This review aims: to give the reader information on the background areas described, as well as related areas; to review the CAP benefits with macrolides and how they may be related to the immunomodulatory properties they demonstrate, albeit in a shorter period of time than previously demonstrated with chronic pulmonary disorders; to use ex vivo data to support these extrapolations.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search using Medline was conducted from 1966 onwards, searching for articles with relevant key words such as macrolide, diffuse panbronchiolitis, community-acquired pneumonia, biofilm, immunomodulation, cystic fibrosis, erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin and azithromycin, bronchiectasis and asthma. When appropriate, additional references were found from the bibliographies of identified papers of interest. Any relevant scientific conference proceedings or medical texts were checked when necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Research into macrolide immunomodulation for chronic pulmonary disorders demonstrates consistent positive effects, although of types other than seen with diffuse panbronchiolitis. These effects, together with their inhibitory activity on biofilms, have the potential to make them a useful option. (2) The benefits for CAP are consistent, and higher when a macrolide is given with another atypical agent than if the other atypical agent is given alone, suggesting a non-antibacterial benefit. (3) Recent research of the immunomodulatory properties of azithromycin imply that azithromycin may have a previously unknown short-term biphasic effect on inflammation modulation: enhancement of host defence mechanisms shortly after initial administration followed by curtailment of local infection/inflammation in the following period. (4) Additional in vivo research is needed prior to developing any firm conclusions.

Macrolides and ketolides: azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin

The advanced macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolide telithromycin are structural analogues of erythromycin. They have several distinct advantages when compared with erythromycin including enhanced spectrum of activity, more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, once daily administration, and improved tolerability. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics, antimicrobial activity, clinical use, and adverse effects of these antimicrobial agents.

Pathogens resistant to antimicrobial agents: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and clinical management

Resistance to antimicrobial drugs is increasing at an alarming rate among both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Traditionally, bacteria resistant to multiple antimicrobial agents have been restricted to the nosocomial environment. A disturbing trend has been the recent emergence and spread of resistant pathogens and resistance traits in nursing homes, the community, as well as in hospitals. This article reviews the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms of resistance, and treatment options for pathogens resistant to antimicrobial drugs.

Ciprofloxacin treatment failure in a patient with resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae infection following prior ciprofloxacin therapy

Reported here is the case of a patient with underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in whom ciprofloxacin treatment of a lower respiratory tract infection failed subsequent to ciprofloxacin treatment of an exacerbation of COPD several weeks earlier. During the second course of ciprofloxacin therapy, the patient's condition continued to deteriorate, and she was admitted to the intensive care unit. Bilateral pneumonia was diagnosed. Streptococcus pneumoniae, serotype 11A, resistant to ciprofloxacin was isolated from the sputum. Sequencing revealed a S79F mutation in parC and there was evidence of an efflux pump. The patient improved rapidly after administration of azithromycin and ampicillin/sulbactam. This report of treatment failure due to ciprofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae shows that fluoroquinolones should be avoided when treating patients who have recently received this class of antibiotics.

Is it possible to distinguish between atypical pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia?: evaluation of the guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia in Japan

The Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) published the guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in 2000. The guidelines set up nine parameters and criteria for the differential diagnosis of atypical pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia based on clinical symptoms, physical signs and laboratory data. To evaluate the performance of these guideline criteria, 91 cases of Chlamydia pneumoniae (53 cases were pure-C. pneumoniae and 38 cases were mixed-C. pneumoniae pneumonia), 103 cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (86 cases were pure-M. pneumoniae and 17 cases were mixed-M. pneumoniae pneumonia) and 144 cases of bacterial (Streptococcus pneumoniae and/or Haemophilus influenzae) pneumonia were analyzed. The accordance rate for a suspected atypical pneumonia with the guideline criteria was 84.8% for pure-M. pneumoniae pneumonia and 60.3% for pure-C. pneumoniae pneumonia, but only 9.0% for bacterial pneumonia, 12.1% for mixed-C. pneumoniae pneumonia and 16.6% for mixed-M. pneumoniae pneumonia. Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of the criteria in the JRS guidelines were 75.5% and 90.9%, respectively. Our results indicated that the differentiation of pneumonia in the JRS guidelines is useful for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae pneumonia, but difficult to apply to the diagnosis of C. pneumoniae pneumonia.

Patterns of health care resource utilization after macrolide treatment failure: Results from a large, population-based cohort with acute sinusitis, acute bronchitis, and community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Macrolide antibiotics are used as first-line therapy for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. The recent emergence of macrolide-resistant pathogens is a major concern.

OBJECTIVE

This study quantifies the frequency of macrolide treatment failure in respiratory infections and examines its impact on health care use.

METHODS

Patients with respiratory infections treated with macrolides in outpatient clinics from January to December 2002 were identified from a health insurance claims database. Macrolide treatment failure was defined as the receipt of a second antibiotic, different from the first, within 4 weeks after the initial macrolide. The end points were numbers of hospitalizations and emergency department and office visits within 1 month after the initial macrolide. We examined diagnostic codes on claim forms for posttreatment hospitalizations and visits to identify those most likely to be related to treatment failure as opposed to other causes. Utilization data were analyzed by Poisson regression to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

The patients were divided into acute sinusitis (n = 111,135), acute bronchitis (n = 157,360), and community-acquired pneumonia (n = 36,212). Of these respective groups, 11,285 (10.2%), 15,498 (9.9%), and 4144 (11.4%) received a second antibiotic within 4 weeks. This subgroup with macrolide treatment failure was older, included more women, and had used more medical care before the index visit compared with patients with treatment success. After adjustment for age, sex, and previous health care use, patients experiencing treatment failure were more likely to be admitted to the hospital or to use emergency department or outpatient care after the index visit. This association was strongest for admissions and visits pertaining to the care of respiratory infections.

CONCLUSIONS

By our definition, about 10% of patients with respiratory infections who were treated with macrolide antibiotics experienced treatment failure within 4 weeks. Macrolide treatment failure was associated with increased health care utilization.

Antibiotic resistance: a view from the prescriber

Antibiotic resistance is increasingly affecting the management of infectious diseases. The prescribing clinician is not only important to the development of the problem but also central to its solution. This article addresses the current weaknesses in the information systems and the evidence base that support prescribing. Remedies necessary for improvements in prudent prescribing include better guidance in managing specific diseases where resistance is of prognostic significance and also increasing diagnostic precision.

Local guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia: development, implementation, and outcome studies

Published outcome studies mostly report a positive effect of successfully implemented pneumonia guidelines. Confirmatory studies are needed that use randomized, parallel groups with precisely defined treatments, however. Further research also is needed to develop methodology for more easily providing guideline logic to clinicians at the point of care.

Community-acquired pneumonia: new management strategies for evolving pathogens and antimicrobial susceptibilities

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is still one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity. The most common bacterial cause of CAP is Streptococcus pneumoniae. The increase in antimicrobial resistance has raised concerns about the efficacy of available therapies, and a call for the reassessment of both existing and newer therapeutic agents. Although microbiological breakpoints are useful for monitoring the emergence of resistance, the current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines make no distinction between clinical and microbiological breakpoints. Recent changes in NCCLS breakpoints for extended spectrum cephalosporins have provided a more meaningful approach to susceptibility testing and to consideration of the site of infection. Further controversy surrounds the clinical guidelines relating to CAP in terms of which antimicrobial agents should be given empirically to which types of patients. Within this review, the role of monotherapy versus the need for combination antimicrobial therapy, which often includes a macrolide and an extended spectrum cephalosporin such as ceftriaxone, is discussed. This review also discusses the various aspects of antimicrobial susceptibilities of S. pneumoniae, the drivers and influences of increasing resistance, the clinical relevance of this resistance and possible therapeutic options in the face of changing susceptibilities and mixed bacterial aetiologies. New guidelines from the IDSA attempt to embrace these changes.

Update on Resistance among Respiratory Tract Pathogens: Results of the Antimicrobial Resistance Management Program

Purpose

This update from the Antimicrobial Resistance Management (ARM) Program reports surveillance data for Streptrococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae isolates from 1994 to 2002.

Methods

Antibiograms and sensitivity reports submitted to the ARM program database were reviewed for resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics

Results

Nationally S. pneumoniae resistance to penicillin was 37.4% (n = 37,688); to erythromycin, 29.6% (n = 18,774); and to clindamycin, 9.9% (n = 5510). Resistance to cefotaxime was 25.5% (n = 10,527) and 16.8% to ceftriaxone (26,594). For H. influenzae, resistance to cefotaxime was 4.3% (n = 4,927) and to ceftriaxone 1% (n = 10,353), a difference seen largely in the Northeast.

Conclusions

Resistance to penicillin appears to have reached a plateau above 40%; however, sparing of beta-lactam antibiotics may occur at the expense of other agents (ie, macrolides). Clindamycin remains active against penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP), but use of agents with antianaerobic properties is discouraged. The ARM program suggests important differences between cefotaxime and ceftriaxone.

In vitro activity of ertapenem against selected respiratory pathogens

OBJECTIVES

The in vitro activity of ertapenem was evaluated in comparison to 21 selected agents against a large collection of recently isolated respiratory tract pathogens including: 180 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 100 Streptococcus pyogenes, 70 Haemophilus influenzae, 70 Moraxella catarrhalis, 100 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and 30 Klebsiella pneumoniae. Additional in vitro tests (time-kill curves with ertapenem alone and in combination with four other agents) for S. pneumoniae were carried out.

METHODS

MIC determinations and time-kill curves were carried out following the procedures suggested by the NCCLS.

RESULTS

According to NCCLS susceptibility breakpoints, ertapenem was comparable to the most potent compounds tested for all pathogens studied. Ertapenem was 100% active against penicillin-susceptible and -intermediate S. pneumoniae and against 60% of penicillin-resistant strains. Time-kill tests at 4x MIC confirmed a pronounced bactericidal potency of ertapenem against these organisms. Interactions of ertapenem with several other agents against pneumococci resulted in clear synergic interactions (98.4%). Indifference was extremely rare and antagonism was not observed. All S. pyogenes strains tested were inhibited by ertapenem, irrespective of their macrolide resistance phenotypes. Ertapenem was also fully active against H. influenzae (100% susceptible) and M. catarrhalis (MIC90 0.015-0.03 mg/L) even when capable of synthesizing beta-lactamases. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and K. pneumoniae, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing strains, were 100% susceptible to ertapenem.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that ertapenem has a suitable spectrum of activity against organisms encountered in community-acquired bacterial respiratory tract infections.

Double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety of oral pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxicillin-clavulanate (2,000/125 milligrams) versus those of amoxicillin-clavulanate (875/125 milligrams), both given twice daily for 7 days, in treatment of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in adults

This randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial was designed to demonstrate that pharmacokinetically enhanced amoxicillin-clavulanate (2,000/125 mg) was at least as effective clinically as amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg, both given twice daily for 7 days, in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. In total, 633 clinically and radiologically confirmed community-acquired pneumonia patients (intent-to-treat population) were randomized to receive either oral amoxicillin-clavulanate 2,000/125 mg (n = 322) or oral amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg (n = 311). At screening, 160 of 633 (25.3%) patients had at least one typical pathogen isolated from expectorated or invasive sputum samples or blood culture (bacteriology intent-to-treat population). Streptococcus pneumoniae (58 of 160, 36.3%), methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (34 of 160, 21.3%), and Haemophilus influenzae (33 of 160, 20.6%) were the most common typical causative pathogens isolated in both groups in the bacteriology intent-to-treat population. Clinical success in the clinical per protocol population at test of cure (days 16 to 37), the primary efficacy endpoint, was 90.3% (223 of 247) for amoxicillin-clavulanate 2,000/125 mg and 87.6% (198 of 226) for amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg (treatment difference, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, -3.0, 8.3). Bacteriological success at test of cure in the bacteriology per protocol population was 86.6% (58 of 67) for amoxicillin-clavulanate 2,000/125 mg and 78.4% (40 of 51) for amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg (treatment difference, 8.1%; 95% confidence interval, -5.8, 22.1). Both therapies were well tolerated. Amoxicillin-clavulanate 2,000/125 mg twice daily was shown to be as clinically effective as amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg twice daily for 7 days in the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia, without a noted increase in the reported rate of adverse events.

Levofloxacin-resistant invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States: evidence for clonal spread and the impact of conjugate pneumococcal vaccine

The emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in sterile-site isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae is documented in this study characterizing all invasive levofloxacin-resistant (MIC, > or = 8 mg/liter) S. pneumoniae isolates (n = 50) obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Active Bacterial Core Surveillance from 1998 to 2002. Resistance among all isolates increased from 0.1% in 1998 to 0.6% in 2001 (P = 0.008) but decreased to 0.4% in 2002, while resistance among vaccine serotypes continued to increase from 0.3% in 1998 to 1.0% in 2002, suggesting that fluoroquinolones continue to exert selective pressure on these vaccine serotypes. Only 22% of resistant isolates were not covered by the conjugate vaccine serogroups. Multilocus sequence typing revealed that 58% of resistant strains were related to five international clones identified by the Pneumococcal Molecular Epidemiology Network, with the Spain(23F)-1 clone being most frequent (16% of all isolates). Thirty-six percent of the isolates were coresistant to penicillin, 44% were coresistant to macrolides, and 28% were multiresistant to penicillin, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. Fifty percent of the isolates were resistant to any three drug classes. Ninety-four percent of the isolates had multiple mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions of the gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes. In 16% of the isolates, there was evidence of an active efflux mechanism. An unusual isolate was found that showed only a single parE mutation and for which the ciprofloxacin MIC was lower (2 mg/liter) than that of levofloxacin (8 mg/liter). Our results suggest that invasive pneumococcal isolates resistant to levofloxacin in the United States show considerable evidence of multiple resistance and of clonal spread.

Legionella maceachernii pneumonia in a patient with HIV infection

We report a case of fatal Legionella maceachernii pneumonia in a 49 year-old man with HIV infection and review the 3 previous reported cases, all of which occurred in individuals with underlying immune defects. Infection with L. maceachernii was attributable to the deaths of all cases. Issues related to the clinical aspects, laboratory identification of this unusual species, and detection of Legionnaires' diseases are discussed.

Severe community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Community-acquired pneumonia remains a prevalent and potentially life-threatening infection. In general, the disease is considered severe when inpatient care including ICU admission is required, and this often suggests a poorer prognosis. Severe community-acquired pneumonia continues to be an important subject of research from different perspectives, including assessment of illness severity, etiology, diagnostic tests, and treatment options. The aim of this descriptive review is to comment on the results of the relevant original articles in this area published since April 1, 2003.

RECENT FINDINGS

The main themes in the literature covered by the review include the time course of serum concentrations of different markers of the inflammatory response, validation of severity scores to optimize hospital and ICU admission, outcome improvement (duration of therapy and optimal dosing, time to antibiotic administration, adequate initial treatment, and the impact of positive microbiological diagnosis on management and prognosis), and the efficacy of new antimicrobials.

SUMMARY

The usefulness of inflammatory markers to assess the outcome of the disease is unclear. Data on severity scores are conclusive and different validated and simple predictive rules are available for the classification of patients into risk classes. Therapeutic strategies that have been investigated confirm the impact of adequate empiric antibiotic treatment on clinical outcome and the equivalence between short and long courses in the duration of therapy. A definitive beneficial effect of early administration of antimicrobials or the knowledge of the etiology of pneumonia on the clinical course of the disease has not been demonstrated.

Comparison of two urinary antigen tests for establishment of pneumococcal etiology of adult community-acquired pneumonia

The Binax NOW immunochromatographic test (ICT) detecting the pneumococcal C polysaccharide and a serotype-specific latex agglutination (LA) test detecting 23 pneumococcal capsular antigens were evaluated for establishing pneumococcal etiology in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) by use of nonconcentrated urine. ICT was considered to be strongly positive for result lines at least as intense as the control line and weakly positive for less intense result lines. When 215 adult CAP patients were tested, strong ICT, weak ICT, and LA positivity were found in 28, 24, and 16 patients, respectively; of these patients, 13 (46%), 6 (25%), and 13 (81%), respectively, had pneumococcal bacteremia and 27 (96%), 17 (71%), and 15 (94%), respectively, had Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from blood, sputum, and/or nasopharynx. Among 108 controls tested, 2 (1.9%) were weakly ICT positive. When weak positivity was considered negative, the sensitivity of ICT decreased from 79% (19 of 24) to 54% (13 of 24), while the specificity increased from 83% (158 of 191) to 92% (176 of 191); no controls were false positive. The sensitivity and specificity of LA were 54% (13 of 24) and 98% (188 of 191), respectively. Eight of nine LA serotypes corresponded to culture serotypes. In conclusion, using nonconcentrated urine and dividing ICT-positive results into strongly and weakly positive results is a suitable way of performing ICT. While weak ICT positivity should be interpreted with caution, strong ICT positivity and LA positivity should be considered supportive of pneumococcal etiology in adult CAP. As such, these assays might have implications for antibiotic use in CAP. LA has promising potential for pneumococcal serotyping, although further evaluation is required.

Efficacy and safety of sequential moxifloxacin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia associated with atypical pathogens

In two prospective, randomized studies intravenous (IV)/oral (PO) moxifloxacin (400 mg q.i.d.) was compared to IV/PO antimicrobial comparator agents for the treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Reported here are the pooled data for the sub-population with atypical pathogens. Of 101 intent-to-treat patients with atypical pathogens, a total of 39 moxifloxacin-treated and 47 comparator-treated subjects were microbiologically valid and included in the analysis. Clinical and bacteriological success rates were 95% for the moxifloxacin-treated and 94% for the comparator-treated subjects at the test-of-cure visit. The results indicate IV/PO moxifloxacin (400 mg q.i.d.) is an effective monotherapy for patients with CAP due to atypical pathogens.

Antibiotic agents in the elderly

Diagnosis and treatment of infections in the elderly is challenging and complicated because of age-related physiologic changes and lack of classical clinical symptoms. Elderly patients are more vulnerable to infections because of their underlying diseases. This article reviews the pharmacologic issues in treating the elderly with antibiotics, the most frequently encountered infections in this patient population, and the suggested antibiotic regimens. The discussion also includes the special challenges of treating these most frequently encountered infections in the elderly who reside in long-term care facilities.

Community-acquired pneumonia: updates in assessment and management

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a significant health condition. Knowledge of the clinical presentation and treatment of CAP are important for critical care nurses as up to 20% of patients with CAP require hospitalization and in-patient management. Patients with severe CAP requiring intensive care unit (ICU) treatment often require aggressive management including mechanical ventilation and multisystem organ support. This article presents an overview of CAP, including the presentation of typical and atypical CAP, clinical findings, and the essentials of management. Treatment differences between CAP and healthcare-acquired pneumonia and nursing implications are also highlighted.

Antimicrobial prescribing patterns for respiratory diseases including tuberculosis in Russia: a possible role in drug resistance?

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing exposes patients to the risk of side effects and encourages the development of drug resistance across antimicrobial groups used for respiratory infections including tuberculosis (TB).

AIM

Determine among Russian general practitioners and specialists: (1) sources of antimicrobial prescribing information; (2) patterns of antimicrobial prescribing for common respiratory diseases and differences between primary and specialist physicians; (3) whether drug resistance in TB might be linked to over-prescribing of anti-TB drugs for respiratory conditions.

METHODS

Point-prevalence cross-sectional survey involving all 28 primary care, general medicine and TB treatment institutions in Samara City, Russian Federation. In this two-stage study, a questionnaire was used to examine doctors' antimicrobial (including TB drugs) prescribing habits, sources of prescribing information, management of respiratory infections and a case scenario ('common cold'). This was followed by a case note review of actual prescribing for consecutive patients with respiratory diseases at three institutions.

RESULTS

Initial questionnaires were completed by 81.3% (425/523) of physicians with 78.4% working in primary care. Most doctors used standard textbooks to guide their antimicrobial practice but 80% made extensive use of pharmaceutical company information. A minority of 1.7% would have inappropriately prescribed antibiotics for the case and 0.8-1.8% of respondents would have definitely prescribed TB drugs for non-TB conditions. Of the 495 respiratory cases, 25% of doctors prescribed an antibiotic for a simple upper respiratory tract infection and of 8 patients with a clinical diagnosis of TB, 4 received rifampicin monotherapy alone. Ciprofloxacin was widely but inappropriately used.

CONCLUSION

Doctors rely on information provided by pharmaceutical companies; there was inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

Activity of telithromycin and comparators against bacterial pathogens isolated from 1,336 patients with clinically diagnosed acute sinusitis

Background

Increasing antimicrobial resistance among the key pathogens responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections has the potential to limit the effectiveness of antibiotics available to treat these infections. Since there are regional differences in the susceptibility patterns observed and treatment is frequently empirical, the selection of antibiotic therapy may be challenging. PROTEKT, a global, longitudinal multicentre surveillance study, tracks the activity of telithromycin and comparator antibacterial agents against key respiratory tract pathogens.

Methods

In this analysis, we examine the prevalence of antibacterial resistance in 1,336 bacterial pathogens, isolated from adult and paediatric patients clinically diagnosed with acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS).

Results and discussion

In total, 58.0%, 66.1%, and 55.8% of S. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to penicillin, cefuroxime, and clarithromycin respectively. Combined macrolide resistance and reduced susceptibility to penicillin was present in 200/640 (31.3 %) of S. pneumoniae isolates (128 isolates were resistant to penicillin [MIC >= 2 mg/L], 72 intermediate [MIC 0.12–1 mg/L]) while 99.5% and 95.5% of isolates were susceptible to telithromycin and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. In total, 88.2%, 87.5%, 99.4%, 100%, and 100% of H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to ampicillin, clarithromycin, cefuroxime, telithromycin, and amoxicillin-clavulanate, respectively. In vitro, telithromycin demonstrated the highest activity against M. catarrhalis (MIC₅₀ = 0.06 mg/L, MIC₉₀ = 0.12 mg/L).

Conclusion

The high in vitro activity of against pathogens commonly isolated in ABS, together with a once daily dosing regimen and clinical efficacy with 5-day course of therapy, suggest that telithromycin may play a role in the empiric treatment of ABS.

Review of treatment guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a costly disease that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The growing prevalence of this disease has resulted in various advances in diagnosis and treatment. The most common pathogens of CAP include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and atypical pathogens; however, the underlying pathogen often is unknown. Treatment of CAP has evolved because of changing etiologic patterns and increasing antimicrobial resistance among common respiratory pathogens. Among the groups that have established treatment guidelines for CAP are the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). These guidelines establish risk factors associated with drug resistance or infection with specific pathogens. In addition, each guideline provides unique recommendations that are similar in some ways, yet different in others. By understanding the various risk factors for drug resistance and the treatment options endorsed by these guidelines, physicians can treat patients with the most appropriate antimicrobial available.

Streptococcus pneumoniae and community-acquired pneumonia: a cause for concern

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the sixth most common cause of death in the United States and the leading cause of death from infectious diseases. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and poses a major economic burden to the healthcare system. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of CAP. Other common bacterial causes include Haemophilus influenzae as well as atypical bacteria (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Legionella species). Increasing resistance to a variety of antimicrobial agents has been documented in S. pneumoniae and is common in H. influenzae as well. Successful empiric therapy is paramount to the management of CAP to avoid treatment failure and subsequent associated costs. Given that resistance is increasing among respiratory pathogens, and S. pneumoniae is the most common etiologic agent identified in CAP, strategies for antimicrobial therapy should be based on the likely causative pathogen, the presence of risk factors for infection with resistant bacteria, and local resistance patterns.

Overview of newer antimicrobial formulations for overcoming pneumococcal resistance

The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of an antimicrobial agent provides important information that can be used to maximize bacteriologic and clinical efficacy, minimize selective pressure for the development of antimicrobial resistance, and determine an optimal dosing regimen. Judicious selection of an antimicrobial based on local susceptibility data and PK and PD parameters is imperative in this era of increasing resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae, a leading cause of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. The beta-lactam antimicrobials display time-dependent bacterial killing with minimal to no persistent effects. Ketolides and fluoroquinolones display concentration-dependent bacterial killing, and tetracyclines and macrolides display time-dependent killing. All have prolonged persistent effects (e.g., postantibiotic effect) that retard or prevent bacterial regrowth when free drug levels fall below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). New high-dose and/or extended-release formulations of traditional antimicrobials have been added to the current armamentarium for treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. These formulations include amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium powder for oral suspension 90/6.4 mg/kg per day divided every 12 hours (Augmentin ES-600; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC), amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium extended-release tablets 2 x 1,000 mg/62.5 mg every 12 hours (Augmentin XR; GlaxoSmithKline), clarithromycin extended-release tablets 2 x 500 mg once daily (Biaxin XL; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL), and cefaclor extended-release tablets 375 mg or 500 mg every 12 hours (Ceclor CD; Eli Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Indianapolis, IN). Of these agents, only amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium powder for oral suspension and amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium extended-release tablets were designed to treat infections caused by penicillin-resistant pneumococci (penicillin MIC < or =2 microg/mL). Extended-release clarithromycin does not provide higher daily doses than its immediate-release counterpart; rather, it allows for once-daily dosing of this agent because of its slower absorption following oral administration. Extended-release cefaclor is considered clinically equivalent to 250 mg of immediate-release cefaclor pulvules administered 3 times daily; it cannot be used interchangeably with 500 mg 3-times-daily dosages of other cefaclor formulations. Thus, despite providing a similar or higher total daily dose than its immediate-release counterpart, extended-release cefaclor is indicated only for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate infections caused by susceptible strains of certain organisms.

Mechanisms of resistance among respiratory tract pathogens

Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory tract pathogens represents a significant health care threat. Identifying the antimicrobial agents that remain effective in the presence of resistance, and knowing why, requires a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of action of the various agents as well as the mechanisms of resistance demonstrated among respiratory tract pathogens. The primary goal of antimicrobial therapy is to eradicate the pathogen, via killing or inhibiting bacteria, from the site of infection; the defenses of the body are required for killing any remaining bacteria. Targeting a cellular process or function specific to bacteria and not to the host limits the toxicity to patients. Currently, there are four general cellular targets to which antimicrobials are targeted: cell wall formation and maintenance, protein synthesis, DNA replication, and folic acid metabolism. Resistance mechanisms among respiratory tract pathogens have been demonstrated for all four targets. In general, the mechanisms of resistance used by these pathogens fall into one of three categories: enzymatic inactivation of the antimicrobial, prevention of intracellular accumulation, and modification of the target site to which agents bind to exert an antimicrobial effect. Resistance to some agents can be overcome by modifying the dosage regimens (e.g., using high-dose therapy) or inhibiting the resistance mechanism (e.g., b-lactamase inhibitors), whereas other mechanisms of resistance can only be overcome by using an agent from a different class. Understanding the mechanisms of action of the various agents and the mechanisms of resistance used by respiratory tract pathogens can help clinicians identify the agents that will increase the likelihood of achieving optimal outcomes.

Hospitalization rates among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with telithromycin vs clarithromycin: results from two randomized, double-blind, clinical trials

AIMS

To compare hospitalization rates among patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treated with oral telithromycin and clarithromycin, based on pooled data from two randomized, double-blind, multinational clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients with CAP eligible for oral therapy (Study 1, n = 448; Study 2, n = 575) received telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 10 (Study 1, 2-arms), 5 or 7 (Study 2, 3-arms) days, or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days. Frequency of CAP-related hospitalizations, physician visits/tests/procedures, and additional respiratory tract infection-related antibacterial use, as well as CAP-related length of hospital stay and hospitalization costs, were compared by treatment group (intent to treat populations) up until the late post-therapy visit (Days 31-36). Study investigators blinded to treatment regimen assessed whether hospital admissions were CAP related.

RESULTS

Despite equivalent clinical efficacy for telithromycin vs clarithromycin in the clinically evaluable per-protocol populations (n = 784) (88.8% [428/482] vs 90.1% [272/302]--difference: -1.3%; 95% CI: -6.0, 3.4), telithromycin treatment for 5, 7, or 10 days was associated with significantly fewer CAP-related hospitalizations (p = 0.023) and CAP-related hospital days (p = 0.025) vs clarithromycin (reduction of 2.3 hospitalizations and 23.4 hospital days per 100 patients). Accordingly, estimated CAP-related hospitalization costs were significantly lower (p = 0.025) for telithromycin recipients (30,231 US dollars less per 100 patients). CAP-related hospitalizations, duration of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs for 7- to 10-day telithromycin--the approved dosing regimen for CAP--were significantly lower (p = 0.023, 0.025, and 0.025, respectively) than for clarithromycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this study indicate that telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5, 7, or 10 days provides an effective therapy for patients with CAP, and may be associated with fewer CAP-related hospitalizations and hospital days than clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days. Treatment with telithromycin could, therefore, potentially translate into cost savings in the management of CAP.