FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High Solid Tumors

Distinct tumor immune microenvironments in primary and metastatic lesions in gastric cancer patients

This study compared the tumor immune microenvironments (TIMEs) of primary gastric cancer (PGC) and paired metastatic gastric cancer (MGC). CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cell density and PD-L1 expression were evaluated by multiplex immunohistochemistry, DNA mismatch repair (MMR) by immunohistochemistry, and immune-related genes by RNA sequencing. Twenty-three patients who underwent surgical treatment for PGC and MGC were enrolled in this study. CD8⁺ T-cell, PD-L1⁺ cell, and PD-L1⁺CK⁺ cell densities were significantly lower in MGC than PGC. PD-L1 positivity using a combined positive score (≥ 1%) and deficient MMR were observed in 52.2% and 8.7% of PGC samples, respectively, whereas both occurred in only 4.3% of MGC samples. The most frequent TIME types were inflamed (34.8%) and adaptive immune resistance (34.8%) in PGC, and immune desert (65.2%) and immunological ignorance (73.9%) in MGC. In transcriptome analysis, the expression of the T-cell inflamed gene set and co-stimulatory gene module was down-regulated in MGC compared to PGC. The total CD8⁺ T-cell density was an independent prognostic marker in both PGC and MGC (univariate P = 0.002, multivariate P = 0.006). Our result suggest that the TIME of metastatic tumors was less immunologically active compared to that of primary tumors in gastric cancer patients.

Therapy of Primary Liver Cancer

Primary liver cancer (PLC) is a fatal disease that affects millions of lives worldwide. PLC is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the incidence rate is predicted to rise in the coming decades. PLC can be categorized into three major histological subtypes: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and combined HCC-ICC. These subtypes are distinct with respect to epidemiology, clinicopathological features, genetic alterations, and clinical managements, which are thoroughly summarized in this review. The state of treatment strategies for each subtype, including the currently approved drugs and the potential novel therapies, are also discussed.

The Gut Microbiome Is Associated with Clinical Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy in Gastrointestinal Cancer

We report on a comprehensive analysis of the gut microbiomes of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. The human gut microbiota has been associated with clinical responses to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to investigate this association in GI cancers. We also identified bacterial taxa with patient stratification potential. We recruited 74 patients with advanced-stage GI cancer receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment and collected their fecal samples prior to and during immunotherapy, along with clinical evaluations. Our 16S rRNA taxonomy survey on the fecal samples revealed an elevation of the Prevotella/Bacteroides ratio in patients, with a preferred response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment, and a particular subgroup of responders harboring a significantly higher abundance of Prevotella, Ruminococcaceae, and Lachnospiraceae The shotgun metagenomes of the same samples showed that patients exhibiting different responses had differential abundance of pathways related to nucleoside and nucleotide biosynthesis, lipid biosynthesis, sugar metabolism, and fermentation to short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). Gut bacteria that were capable of SCFA production, including Eubacterium, Lactobacillus, and Streptococcus, were positively associated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 response across different GI cancer types. We further demonstrated that the identified bacterial taxa were predictive of patient stratification in both our cohort and melanoma patients from two previously published studies. Our results thus highlight the impact of gut microbiomes on anti-PD-1/PD-L1 outcomes, at least in a subset of patients with GI cancer, and suggest the potential of the microbiome as a marker for immune-checkpoint blockade responses.See articles by Tomita et al., p. 1236, and Hakozaki et al., p. 1243.

Resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade cancer immunotherapy: mechanisms, predictive factors, and future perspectives

PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy is a promising cancer treatment strategy, which has revolutionized the treatment landscape of malignancies. Over the last decade, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy has been trialed in a broad range of malignancies and achieved clinical success. Despite the potentially cure-like survival benefit, only a minority of patients are estimated to experience a positive response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, and the primary or acquired resistance might eventually lead to cancer progression in patients with clinical responses. Accordingly, the resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade remains a significant challenge hindering its further application. To overcome the limitation in therapy resistance, substantial effort has been made to improve or develop novel anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based immunotherapy strategies with better clinical response and reduced immune-mediated toxicity. In this review, we provide an overview on the resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and briefly introduce the mechanisms underlying therapy resistance. Moreover, we summarize potential predictive factors for the resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Furthermore, we give an insight into the possible solutions to improve efficacy and clinical response. In the following research, combined efforts of basic researchers and clinicians are required to address the limitation of therapy resistance.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated biliary tract cancer (ROAR): a phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicentre basket trial

BACKGROUND

Effective treatments for patients with cholangiocarcinoma after progression on gemcitabine-based chemotherapy are urgently needed. Mutations in the BRAF gene have been found in 5% of biliary tract tumours. The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib has shown activity in several BRAF^V600E-mutated cancers. We aimed to assess the activity and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy in patients with BRAF^V600E-mutated biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

This study is part of an ongoing, phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicentre, Rare Oncology Agnostic Research (ROAR) basket trial in patients with BRAF^V600E-mutated rare cancers. Patients were eligible for the biliary tract cancer cohort if they were aged 18 years or older, had BRAF^V600E-mutated, unresectable, metastatic, locally advanced, or recurrent biliary tract cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had received previous systemic treatment. All patients were treated with oral dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily and oral trametinib 2 mg once daily until disease progression or intolerance of treatment. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate, which was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 in the intention-to-treat evaluable population, which comprised all enrolled patients regardless of receiving treatment who were evaluable (ie, had progression, began a new anticancer treatment, withdrew consent, died, had stable disease for 6 weeks or longer, or had two or more post-baseline assessments). The ROAR trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02034110. These results are based on an interim analysis; the study is active but not recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between March 12, 2014, and July 18, 2018, 43 patients with BRAF^V600E-mutated biliary tract cancer were enrolled to the study and were evaluable. Median follow-up was 10 months (IQR 6-15). An investigator-assessed overall response was achieved by 22 (51%, 95% CI 36-67) of 43 patients. An independent reviewer-assessed overall response was achieved by 20 (47%, 95% CI 31-62) of 43 patients. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse event was increased γ-glutamyltransferase in five (12%) patients. 17 (40%) patients had serious adverse events and nine (21%) had treatment-related serious adverse events, the most frequent of which was pyrexia (eight [19%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Dabrafenib plus trametinib combination treatment showed promising activity in patients with BRAF^V600E-mutated biliary tract cancer, with a manageable safety profile. Routine testing for BRAF^V600E mutations should be considered in patients with biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis.

Pembrolizumab in Combination with Axitinib as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): Evidence to Date

Over the last 18 months, 3 immunotherapy combination regimens (ipilimumab + nivolumab, pembrolizumab + axitinib, and axitinib + avelumab) were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), making selection of the optimal first-line treatment regimen very challenging. As of April 2020, preferred first-line treatment options for mRCC are pembrolizumab + axitinib and ipilimumab + nivolumab, based on the improvement in overall survival and progression-free survival compared to sunitinib, as observed in pivotal phase III clinical trials. Because the combination of 2 drugs is typically more toxic than a monotherapy, careful attention must be given to overlapping toxicities. The pembrolizumab + axitinib combination led to grade ≥3 adverse events in 75.8% of patients (vs 70.6% in the sunitinib group), while grade ≥3 adverse events were less frequent in the nivolumab + ipilimumab group compared to the sunitinib group. Discontinuation rates due to toxicity were 10.7% for pembrolizumab + axitinib (both drugs), 22% for ipilimumab + nivolumab and were comparable with sunitinib in both studies (13.9% and 12%, respectively). The combination of pembrolizumab + axitinib may have immune-modulating functions that may provide clinical benefit without the additional toxicity observed with ipilimumab + nivolumab. In addition, this tyrosine kinase inhibitor + immune checkpoint combination should have faster treatment response in patients with larger disease burden or in more symptomatic patients, which makes this combination an excellent choice for the first-line treatment regimen for mRCC. These combinations have proven to be tolerable, though long-term results are still lacking. As treatment options for mRCC are rapidly expanding, immunotherapy combinations could potentially change the treatment paradigm, with the ultimate goal of prolonging life and eventually curing mRCC.

Preclinical Antitumor Activity and Biodistribution of a Novel Anti-GCC Antibody-Drug Conjugate in Patient-derived Xenografts

Guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) is a unique therapeutic target with expression restricted to the apical side of epithelial cell tight junctions thought to be only accessible by intravenously administered agents on malignant tissues where GCC expression is aberrant. In this study, we sought to evaluate the therapeutic potential of a second-generation investigational antibody-dug conjugate (ADC), TAK-164, comprised of a human anti-GCC mAb conjugated via a peptide linker to the highly cytotoxic DNA alkylator, DGN549. The in vitro binding, payload release, and in vitro activity of TAK-164 was characterized motivating in vivo evaluation. The efficacy of TAK-164 and the relationship to exposure, pharmacodynamic marker activation, and biodistribution was evaluated in xenograft models and primary human tumor xenograft (PHTX) models. We demonstrate TAK-164 selectively binds to, is internalized by, and has potent cytotoxic effects against GCC-expressing cells in vitro A single intravenous administration of TAK-164 (0.76 mg/kg) resulted in significant growth rate inhibition in PHTX models of metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, imaging studies characterized TAK-164 uptake and activity and showed positive relationships between GCC expression and tumor uptake which correlated with antitumor activity. Collectively, our data suggest that TAK-164 is highly active in multiple GCC-positive tumors including those refractory to TAK-264, a GCC-targeted auristatin ADC. A strong relationship between uptake of ⁸⁹Zr-labeled TAK-164, levels of GCC expression and, most notably, response to TAK-164 therapy in GCC-expressing xenografts and PHTX models. These data supported the clinical development of TAK-164 as part of a first-in-human clinical trial (NCT03449030).

Current Status and Future Perspectives of Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

The clinical spectrum of prostate cancer (PCa) varies from castration-naive to metastatic castration-resistant disease. Despite the administration of androgen synthesis inhibitors and chemotherapy regimens for castration-resistant prostate cancer, the treatment options for this entity are limited. The utilization of the immune system against cancer cells shows potential as a therapeutic modality for various solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. With technological advances over the last decade, immunotherapy has become an integral treatment modality for advanced solid tumors. The feasibility of immunotherapy has shown promise for patients with PCa, and with advances in molecular diagnostic platforms and our understanding of immune mechanisms, immunotherapy is reemerging as a potential treatment modality for PCa. Various combinations of individualized immunotherapy and immune checkpoint blockers with androgen receptor-targeted therapies and conventional cytotoxic agents show promise. This article will review the current status of immunotherapy, including new discoveries and precision approaches to PCa, and discuss future directions in the continuously evolving landscape of immunotherapy.

Biostatistical and Logistical Considerations in the Development of Basket and Umbrella Clinical Trials

Oncology clinical trials are undergoing transformation to evaluate targeted therapies addressing a wider variety of biologically defined cancer subgroups. Multiarm basket and umbrella trials conducted under master protocols have become more prominent mechanisms for the clinical evaluation of promising new biologically driven anticancer therapies that are integral to precision oncology medicine. These new trial designs permit efficient clinical evaluation of multiple therapies in a variety of histologically and biologically defined cancers. These complex trials require extensive planning and attention to many factors, including choice of biomarker assay platform, mechanism for processing clinicopathologic and biomarker data to assign patients to substudies, and statistical design, monitoring, and analysis of substudies. Trial teams have expanded to include expertise in the interface between biology, clinical oncology, bioinformatics, and statistics. Strategies for the design, conduct, and analysis of these complex trials will continue to evolve to meet new challenges and opportunities in precision oncology medicine.

Basket Trials and the MD Anderson Precision Medicine Clinical Trials Platform

Precision medicine incorporates information regarding tumor biology involved in patients' carcinogenesis and individualized treatment of patients using drugs that inhibit the molecular basis of their disease. Implementation of precision medicine accelerated the drug approval process, translating discoveries in basic science and biotechnology into patient care. Clinical trials with innovative or adaptive design including "basket" and "umbrella" trials explore personalized therapies against in selected tumor types and/or across tumor types. In 2007, we started the Initiative for Molecular Profiling and Advanced Cancer Therapy, the first precision medicine program across tumor types. We demonstrated that therapy matched to patients' tumor molecular profiling is associated with improved rates of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with nonmatched targeted therapy. We have now entered a new era of precision medicine that includes comprehensive tumor testing and multiple innovative modalities hoping to overcome the complexity of tumor biology to improve patient outcomes.

High PD-L1 expression is associated with therapeutic response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer

Pembrolizumab appears promising for patients with programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive solid tumors. However, data on immunotherapy for biliary tract cancers (BTC) are limited. We aimed to investigate the predictive value of PD-L1 expression as an immunotherapeutic biomarker in BTC. Patients with advanced BTC (n = 175) were screened for PD-L1 expression using PharmDx assay and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Of the total of 175 patients, 125 (71%) showed tumoral PD-L1 positivity (≥ 1%) while only two (2/142, 1.4%) showed MSI-High. Among 175 patients, 26 patients were treated with pembrolizumab as a second-line therapy, and tumor response was evaluated. Separating these patients into two groups by PD-L1 expression (high [≥ 50%] vs. low [< 50%]), overall response rate was 23% (56% [5/9] in high PD-L1 group vs. 6% [1/17] in low PD-L1 group, P = 0.004). Disease control rate was also higher in high PD-L1 group (78% vs. 35%, P = 0.019). The six responders showed median progression-free survival of 5.8 months after starting pembrolizumab, and none of them was MSI-High. High PD-L1 expression was associated with a better response to pembrolizumab. PD-L1 expression can potentially serve as an alternative predictive biomarker for pembrolizumab therapy in advanced BTC.

Resistance Mechanisms of Anti-PD1/PDL1 Therapy in Solid Tumors

In cancer-immunity cycle, the immune checkpoint PD1 and its ligand PDL1 act as accomplices to help tumors resist to immunity-induced apoptosis and promote tumor progression. Immunotherapy targeting PD1/PDL1 axis can effectively block its pro-tumor activity. Anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy has achieved great success in the past decade. However, only a subset of patients showed clinical responses. Most of the patients can not benefit from anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy. Furthermore, a large group of responders would develop acquired resistance after initial responses. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of resistance is necessary for improving anti-PD1/PDL1 efficacy. Currently, researchers have identified primary resistance mechanisms which include insufficient tumor immunogenicity, disfunction of MHCs, irreversible T cell exhaustion, primary resistance to IFN-γ signaling, and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Some oncogenic signaling pathways also contribute to the primary resistance. Under the pressure applied by anti-PD1/PDL1 therapy, tumors experience immunoediting and preserve beneficial mutations, upregulate the compensatory inhibitory signaling and induce re-exhaustion of T cells, all of which may attenuate the durability of the therapy. Here we explore the underlying mechanisms in detail, review biomarkers that help identifying responders among patients and discuss the strategies that may relieve the anti-PD1/PDL1 resistance.

A Genetic Vaccine Encoding Shared Cancer Neoantigens to Treat Tumors with Microsatellite Instability

Tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) are caused by a defective DNA mismatch repair system that leads to the accumulation of mutations within microsatellite regions. Indels in microsatellites of coding genes can result in the synthesis of frameshift peptides (FSP). FSPs are tumor-specific neoantigens shared across patients with MSI. In this study, we developed a neoantigen-based vaccine for the treatment of MSI tumors. Genetic sequences from 320 MSI tumor biopsies and matched healthy tissues in The Cancer Genome Atlas database were analyzed to select shared FSPs. Two hundred nine FSPs were selected and cloned into nonhuman Great Ape Adenoviral and Modified Vaccinia Ankara vectors to generate a viral-vectored vaccine, referred to as Nous-209. Sequencing tumor biopsies of 20 independent patients with MSI colorectal cancer revealed that a median number of 31 FSPs out of the 209 encoded by the vaccine was detected both in DNA and mRNA extracted from each tumor biopsy. A relevant number of peptides encoded by the vaccine were predicted to bind patient HLA haplotypes. Vaccine immunogenicity was demonstrated in mice with potent and broad induction of FSP-specific CD8 and CD4 T-cell responses. Moreover, a vaccine-encoded FSP was processed in vitro by human antigen-presenting cells and was subsequently able to activate human CD8 T cells. Nous-209 is an "off-the-shelf" cancer vaccine encoding many neoantigens shared across sporadic and hereditary MSI tumors. These results indicate that Nous-209 can induce the optimal breadth of immune responses that might achieve clinical benefit to treat and prevent MSI tumors. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of an "off-the-shelf" vaccine for treatment and prevention of tumors harboring frameshift mutations and neoantigenic peptides as a result of microsatellite instability.

Somatic mutations in genes associated with mismatch repair predict survival in patients with metastatic cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as one of the most promising therapeutic options for patients with advanced cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of somatic mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes in metastatic cancers after ICI treatment, as well as their association with tumor mutational burden (TMB). Information regarding gene mutations in mismatch repair and the survival time of patients with advanced cancer following ICI treatment was collected from the cBioPortal database. The prognostic value of somatic mutations in MMR genes and the association between the mutation status and TMB score were analyzed among multiple types of cancer. Somatic mutation frequency in the MMR genes was identified to be 7% among all patients, which varied across different types of cancer. Somatic mutations in the MMR genes were associated with improved overall survival time in all tested patients (P=0.004). Following stratification by type of ICI treatment, a significant association was observed between somatic mutations in the MMR genes and overall survival time in patients treated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors (P=0.01). In addition, marked but non-significant association between somatic mutations in the MMR genes and overall survival time was revealed in patients administered with programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand-1 inhibitors (P=0.09). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that somatic mutations in MMR genes were significantly associated with overall survival time (hazard ratio, 0.683; 95% confidence interval, 0.497-0.938; P=0.01). Patients with somatic mutations in the MMR genes demonstrated higher TMB compared with those not harboring mutations (P<0.01). The results of the present study suggested that somatic mutations in the MMR genes may be used as a prognostic marker of a positive outcome in patients with metastatic cancer receiving ICI treatment, since somatic mutations in the MMR genes may be one of the main factors affecting the tumor mutation load.

Developing Drugs for Tissue-Agnostic Indications: A Paradigm Shift in Leveraging Cancer Biology for Precision Medicine

Targeted therapies have reshaped the landscape of the development of cancer therapeutics. Recent biomarker‐driven, tissue‐agnostic clinical trials represent a significant paradigm shift in precision cancer medicine. Despite their growth in preclinical and clinical studies, to date only a few biomarker‐driven, tissue‐agnostic indications have seen approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These approvals include pembrolizumab in microsatellite instability‐high or mismatch repair deficient solid tumors, as well as both larotrectinib and entrectinib in NTRK fusion‐positive tumors. Complex cancer biology, clinical trial design, and identification of resistance mechanisms represent some of the challenges that future tissue‐agnostic therapies have to overcome. In this Review, we present a brief history of the development of tissue‐agnostic therapies, comparing the similarities in the approval of pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, and entrectinib for tissue‐agnostic indications. We also explore the future of tissue‐agnostic cancer therapeutics while identifying important challenges for the future that drugs targeting tissue‐agnostic indications will face.

Immunotherapies and Combination Strategies for Immuno-Oncology

The advent of novel immunotherapies in the treatment of cancers has dramatically changed the landscape of the oncology field. Recent developments in checkpoint inhibition therapies, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapies, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, and cancer vaccines have shown immense promise for significant advancements in cancer treatments. Immunotherapies act on distinct steps of immune response to augment the body's natural ability to recognize, target, and destroy cancerous cells. Combination treatments with immunotherapies and other modalities intend to activate immune response, decrease immunosuppression, and target signaling and resistance pathways to offer a more durable, long-lasting treatment compared to traditional therapies and immunotherapies as monotherapies for cancers. This review aims to briefly describe the rationale, mechanisms of action, and clinical efficacy of common immunotherapies and highlight promising combination strategies currently approved or under clinical development. Additionally, we will discuss the benefits and limitations of these immunotherapy approaches as monotherapies as well as in combination with other treatments.

Rapid onset type 1 diabetes with anti-PD-1 directed therapy

Type 1 diabetes is a rare immune-related adverse event (irAE) caused by checkpoint inhibitors with serious risk for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Using our electronic medical record, we identified 1327 adult patients who received PD-(L)1 or CTLA-4 inhibitors from 2013 to 2018. Of the patients who received immunotherapy, 5 (0.38%) patients were found to have type 1 diabetes, all of whom presented with DKA requiring insulin at 20 to 972 days from their first anti-PD-(L)1 dose. All patients were treated with anti-PD-1 therapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab). Four patients had new onset diabetes with mean HbA1c of 9.1% on DKA presentation and persistent elevations over time. Two patients who tested positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies presented with DKA at 20 and 106 days from first anti-PD-1 administration whereas patients who were autoantibody negative had DKA more than a year later. Type 1 diabetes occurs within a wide time frame after anti-PD-1 initiation and commences with an abrupt course. Our case series suggests that monitoring glycemia in patients on PD-1 inhibitors is not predictive for diabetes occurrence. GAD autoantibodies could portend earlier onset for diabetes, although further prospective studies are needed to elucidate their diagnostic utility and contribution in therapeutic interception.

Study protocol for an open-label, single-arm, phase Ib/II study of combination of toripalimab, nab-paclitaxel, and gemcitabine as the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a fatal disease with a dismal response to single-use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs combined with systemic therapy has shown efficacy and safety in various solid tumors. Nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (AG), as the standard first-line treatment for advanced PDAC, has been widely used in recent years. The combination of ICIs and AG chemotherapy appears to be a promising option in the treatment of PDAC.

Methods

This is an open-label, single-arm, and single-center phase Ib/II trial. The enrolled subjects are the unresectable (locally advanced or metastatic) PDAC patients without previous systemic treatments. All subjects receive an intravenous injection of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m² on day 1 and day 8, along with toripalimab 240 mg at day 1 every 3 weeks. The subjects may discontinue the treatment because of progression disease (PD), intolerable toxicities, requirements of patients or researchers. For local advanced patients who are evaluated as partial response (PR), surgeons need to assess the surgical possibility. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and overall survival (OS) of this combination therapy; and the secondary objective is related to the assessment of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and the rate of resection or R0 resection after receiving toripalimab plus AG treatment. Besides, we expect to identify the predictive biomarkers (such as MMR protein and PD-L1 expression, the number of TILs, the small RNA of EBV and so on) and explore the correlation between these biomarkers and tumor response to this combined regimen.

Discussion

This trial is the first attempt to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of toripalimab plus AG chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable PDAC patients. The results of this phase Ib/II study will provide preliminary evidence for further assessment of this combined therapeutic regimen for unresectable PDAC patients.

Trial registration

Trial registration: ChiCTR (ChiCTR2000032293). Registered 25 April 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Gut bacteria affect the tumoral immune milieu: distorting the efficacy of immunotherapy or not？

Immunotherapy using immune-checkpoint inhibitors is revolutionizing oncotherapy. However, the application of immunotherapy may be restricted because of the lack of proper biomarkers in a portion of cancer patients. Recently, emerging evidence has revealed that gut commensal bacteria can impact the therapeutic efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in several cancer models. In addition, testing the composition of gut bacteria provides context for prediction of the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the impacts of gut commensal bacteria on the tumoral immune milieu, highlighting some typical bacteria and their associations with immunotherapy.

Recent Advances and Challenges in the Treatment of Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma, the most common soft tissue sarcoma noted in childhood, requires multimodality treatment, including chemotherapy, surgical resection, and/or radiation therapy. The majority of the patients with localized rhabdomyosarcoma can be cured; however, the long-term outcomes in patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma remain poor. The standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma is the combination of vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide. In recent clinical trials, modifications of the standard chemotherapy protocol have shown improvements in the outcomes in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. In various type of malignancies, new treatments, such as molecular targeted drugs and immunotherapies, have shown superior clinical outcomes compared to those of standard treatments. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the benefits of these treatments in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. Moreover, recent basic and clinical studies on rhabdomyosarcoma have reported promising therapeutic targets and novel therapeutic approaches. This article reviews the recent challenges and advances in the management of rhabdomyosarcoma.

JSCO-ESMO-ASCO-JSMO-TOS: international expert consensus recommendations for tumour-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumours with microsatellite instability or NTRK fusions

A Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO)-hosted expert meeting was held in Japan on 27 October 2019, which comprised experts from the JSCO, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The purpose of the meeting was to focus on what we have learnt from both microsatellite instability (MSI)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy, and the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions in predicting the efficacy of inhibitors of the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) proteins across a range of solid tumour types. The recent regulatory approvals of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab and the TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib, based on specific tumour biomarkers rather than specific tumour type, have heralded a paradigm shift in cancer treatment approaches. The purpose of the meeting was to develop international expert consensus recommendations on the use of such tumour-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumours. The aim was to generate a reference document for clinical practice, for pharmaceutical companies in the design of clinical trials, for ethics committees in the approval of clinical trial protocols and for regulatory authorities in relation to drug approvals, with a particular emphasis on diagnostic testing and patient selection.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy-Based Systemic Treatment in MMR-Deficient or MSI-High Rectal Cancer: Case Series

Treatment options for locally advanced rectal cancer have continued to consist largely of chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and/or surgical resection. For patients who are unable to undergo these therapeutic modalities or who do not to experience a response to them, treatment options are limited. We report 3 cases of mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum that showed significant response with neoadjuvant immunotherapy-based systemic treatment. The first patient was not eligible for standard therapy because of a history of radiotherapy to the prostate with concurrent comorbidities and therefore received single-agent pembrolizumab. The second patient did not respond to total neoadjuvant chemoradiation and subsequently received combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. The third patient had a known family history of Lynch syndrome and presented with locally advanced rectal cancer and a baseline carcinoembryonic antigen level of 1,566 ng/mL. She was treated using neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin). In this small series, we suggest that single-agent and combined-modality neoadjuvant immunotherapy/chemotherapy appear to be safe and effective treatment options for patients with (dMMR) locally advanced rectal cancer. Our findings encourage further studies to investigate the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a viable treatment strategy in this population.

Incorporating traditional and emerging biomarkers in the clinical management of metastatic colorectal cancer: an update

INTRODUCTION

Molecular profiling has led to significantly longer survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Clinical guidelines recommend testing for KRAS/NRAS, BRAF and MSI status, and new biomarkers such as HER2 amplification and NTRK fusions have emerged more recently in refractory CRC, supported by overwhelming clinical relevance. These biomarkers can guide treatment management to improve clinical outcomes in these patients.

AREAS COVERED

Preclinical and clinical data over the last decade were reviewed for known and novel biomarkers with clinical implications in refractory CRC. Molecular alterations are described for classic and novel biomarkers, and data for completed and ongoing studies with targeted and immunotherapies are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Use of targeted therapies based on biomarker testing in CRC has enabled impressive improvements in clinical outcomes in refractory patients. BRAF, MSI, NRAS and KRAS should be tested upfront in all patients given their indisputable therapeutic implications. Other molecular alterations such as HER2 and NTRK are emerging. Testing for these alterations may further improve outcomes for refractory CRC patients. Nonetheless, many key aspects remain to be defined including the optimal timing and technique for testing, the most adequate panel, and whether all patients should be tested for all alterations.

Establishment of a novel gene panel as a biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitor response

Objective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care in various cancers, although the predictive tool is still unknown.

Methods

This study aimed to develop a novel gene panel by selecting DNA damage response (DDR) genes from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) databank and validating them in previously reported cohorts. This association between DDR gene mutations and tumor mutation burden or microsatellite status was analysed from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databank. Furthermore, we made the gene panel clinically accessible and predicted the response in clinical patients receiving ICIs by using cell‐free DNA.

Results

The top 20 mutated DDR genes in various cancers (total 37 genes) were taken from the COSMIC databank, and the DDR genes found to individually predict a response rate > 50% in Van Allen's cohort were selected (Science, 350, 2015 and 207). Eighteen DDR genes were selected as the gene panel. The prevalence and predicted response rate were validated in the other three reported cohorts. Tumor mutational burden‐high was positively associated with mutations of the 18 DDR genes for most cancers. We used cell‐free DNA to test the DDR gene panel and validated by our patients receiving ICIs. This DDR gene panel accounted for approximately 30% of various cancers, achieving a predicted response rate of approximately 60% in patients with a mutated gene panel receiving ICIs.

Conclusion

This gene panel is a novel and reliable tool for predicting the response to ICIs in cancer patients and guides the appropriate administration of ICIs in clinical practice.

Scientifically based combination therapies with immuno-oncology checkpoint inhibitors

The discovery of immune checkpoints and their role in modulating immune response have revolutionised cancer treatment in recent years. The immune checkpoints, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand, programmed cell death-ligand 1, have been extensively studied. Currently 7 monoclonal antibodies targeting these immune checkpoints are approved for treatment of various cancers. Inhibiting immune checkpoints has shown some success in clinic, however, a proportion of patients do not benefit from this treatment. Several other inhibitory molecules, in addition to lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed cell death protein 1, are known to be involved in regulating immune response. To further improve patient outcomes, studies have examined targeting these inhibitory molecules through combination therapies. This review discusses the current landscape of combination therapies of checkpoint inhibitors.

The utility of immunohistochemical testing for mismatch repair proteins in fine needle aspiration specimens of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is recommended for all colonic and endometrial carcinomas to screen for Lynch syndrome. The role of MSI testing in pancreatic adenocarcinoma has not been well-established. Screening can be done via immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). We report our experience and the clinical utility of MMR IHC on pancreatic adenocarcinomas in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to identify all patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma by FNA at our institution between December 2017 and September 2019. For cases with sufficient tumor cells for testing, the MMR results and morphology were summarized, as well as corresponding clinical information, including age, clinical stage, treatment, and concurrent other cancers.

RESULTS

From December 2017 to September 2019, there were a total of 184 pancreatic FNAs with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Of these 184 FNAs, 65 (35%) contained sufficient material in the cell block to perform IHC for MMR. The cell block material was collected in either RPMI or CytoLyt. Poor technical quality precluded interpretation of PMS2 in 4 cases and MSH6 in 2 cases. All other cases showed intact expression of all four proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

IHC for MMR proteins can be done on specimens collected in RPMI or CytoLyt, but RPMI appears to be more reliable. None of the pancreatic adenocarcinomas in this study showed loss of MMR protein expression. Routine testing of MMR loss may not be indicated in pancreatic adenocarcinomas in the general patient population.

[Updated guidelines for predictive biomarker testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology]

In 2011, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) initiated a joint project to establish guidelines for biomarker testing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer based on the information available at the time. As this field is constantly evolving, these guidelines were updated in 2012 and 2015 and now in 2019. Current evidence suggests it should be mandatory to test all patients with this kind of advanced lung cancer for EGFR and BRAF mutations, ALK and ROS1 rearrangements and PD-L1 expression. The growing need to study other emerging biomarkers has promoted the routine use of massive sequencing (next-generation sequencing, NGS). However, the coordination of every professional involved and the prioritisation of the most suitable tests and technologies for each case remain a challenge.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Microsatellite instability (MSI) status may affect the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. In this study, the clinical characteristics of MSI-high (MSI-H) gastric cancer and the predictive value of MSI-H for adjuvant chemotherapy in large cohorts of gastric cancer patients were evaluated.

Material and Methods

This study consisted of two cohorts. Cohort 1 included gastric cancer patients who received curative resection with pathologic stage IB-IIIC. Cohort 2 included patients with MSI-H gastric cancer who received curative resection with pathologic stage II/III. MSI was examined using two mononucleotide markers and three dinucleotide markers.

RESULTS

Of 359 patients (cohort 1), 41 patients (11.4%) had MSI-H. MSI-H tumors were more frequently identified in older patients (p < 0.001), other histology than poorly cohesive, signet ring cell type (p=0.005), intestinal type (p=0.028), lower third tumor location (p=0.005), and absent perineural invasion (p=0.027). MSI-H status has a tendency of better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in multivariable analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; p=0.059 and HR, 0.4; p=0.063, respectively). In the analysis of 162 MSI-H patients (cohort 2), adjuvant chemotherapy showed a significant benefit with respect to longer DFS and OS (p=0.047 and p=0.043, respectively). In multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy improved DFS (HR, 0.4; p=0.040).

CONCLUSION

MSI-H gastric cancer had distinct clinicopathologic findings. Even in MSI-H gastric cancer of retrospective cohort, adjuvant chemotherapy could show a survival benefit, which was in contrast to previous prospective studies and should be investigated in a further prospective trial.

Advances in immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: a review

Immunotherapy is a new and exciting modality of cancer treatments. Its role in gastrointestinal malignancies has been promising, especially in advanced disease. Although various therapies are available for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer, survival rates for these patients remain very poor. The application of immunotherapy in colorectal cancer has shown remarkable results for a subset of patients with mismatch-repair-deficient mutations or microsatellite instability in their tumors. This literature review evaluates the current role of immunotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer, potential challenges clinicians face with immunotherapy-based regimens, and the possible future approach of combined modality immunotherapy.

Review of precision cancer medicine: Evolution of the treatment paradigm

In recent years, biotechnological breakthroughs have led to identification of complex and unique biologic features associated with carcinogenesis. Tumor and cell-free DNA profiling, immune markers, and proteomic and RNA analyses are used to identify these characteristics for optimization of anticancer therapy in individual patients. Consequently, clinical trials have evolved, shifting from tumor type-centered to gene-directed, histology-agnostic, with innovative adaptive design tailored to biomarker profiling with the goal to improve treatment outcomes. A plethora of precision medicine trials have been conducted. The majority of these trials demonstrated that matched therapy is associated with superior outcomes compared to non-matched therapy across tumor types and in specific cancers. To improve the implementation of precision medicine, this approach should be used early in the course of the disease, and patients should have complete tumor profiling and access to effective matched therapy. To overcome the complexity of tumor biology, clinical trials with combinations of gene-targeted therapy with immune-targeted approaches (e.g., checkpoint blockade, personalized vaccines and/or chimeric antigen receptor T-cells), hormonal therapy, chemotherapy and/or novel agents should be considered. These studies should target dynamic changes in tumor biologic abnormalities, eliminating minimal residual disease, and eradicating significant subclones that confer resistance to treatment. Mining and expansion of real-world data, facilitated by the use of advanced computer data processing capabilities, may contribute to validation of information to predict new applications for medicines. In this review, we summarize the clinical trials and discuss challenges and opportunities to accelerate the implementation of precision oncology.

Frequency of mismatch repair deficiency in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has an ominous prognosis and there are only few treatment options. It is therefore crucial to investigate possible predictive markers that may improve the treatment of this disease. Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (d-MMR), meaning MMR protein loss (l-MMR) and/or microsatellite instability (MSI), is predictive of response to immunotherapy, but its frequency has to our knowledge not been elucidated in Scandinavian PDACs. Our aims were to examine the frequency of d-MMR in a Danish cohort of PDACs. We constructed multi-punch tissue microarrays (TMAs) using primary tumor tissue. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the DNA MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 was performed, and their expression was evaluated using a scoring system from 0 to 4. If the overall score was between 0-2 or if IHC was inconclusive for technical reasons, IHC on whole-tissue sections and MSI using PCR was performed. A final score of 0, 1-2 or 3-4 defined the tumor as l-MMR, MMR reduced (r-MMR) or MMR proficient. In total, 4/164 (2.4 %), 2/164 (1.2 %) and 3/164 (1.8 %) were l-MMR, r-MMR, or inconclusive based on IHC. MSI testing of these specimens showed that two of the four l-MMR tumors were MSI-high, while the remaining cases were microsatellite stable (MSS). In conclusion, in this study of Danish PDACss, d-MMR was found in a small proportion of the tumors. For these patients, individualized treatment using immunotherapy could be considered.

Multi-layered control of PD-L1 expression in Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. In approximately 10% of GC cases, cancer cells show ubiquitous and monoclonal Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. A significant feature of EBV-associated GC (EBVaGC) is high lymphocytic infiltration and high expression of immune checkpoint proteins, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). This highlights EBVaGC as a strong candidate for immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Indeed, several recent studies have shown that EBV positivity in GC correlates with positive response to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 blockade therapy. Understanding the mechanisms that control PD-L1 expression in EBVaGC can indicate new predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy, as well as therapeutic targets for combination therapy. Various mechanisms have been implicated in PD-L1 expression regulation, including structural variations, post-transcriptional control, oncogenic activation of intrinsic signaling pathways, and increased sensitivity to extrinsic signals. This review provides the most recent updates on the multilayered control of PD-L1 expression in EBVaGC.

Beyond the Variants: Mutational Patterns in Next-Generation Sequencing Data for Cancer Precision Medicine

Massively parallel sequencing, also referred to as “next-generation sequencing” (NGS) provides not only information about simple, single nucleotide alterations, but it can also provide information on complex variations, such as insertions and deletions, copy number alterations, and structural variants. In addition to identifying individual alterations, genome-wide biomarkers can be discerned from somatic cancer NGS data, broadly termed mutational patterns and signatures. This review will focus on several of the most common genome-wide biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, homologous recombination deficiency, and mutational signatures.

Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Gastroesophageal Cancers

Immune checkpoint inhibition has transformed cancer treatment. For gastroesophageal cancer, this class of drugs have demonstrated durable responses and survival benefit in a subgroup of patients, resulting in regulatory approval. However, several recent randomized phase III studies in gastroesophageal cancer have reported negative results, blunting initial enthusiasm. Identification and validation of predictive biomarkers with appropriate patient selection for benefit from immunotherapy is an area of intense research with novel concepts rapidly emerging. In this review we describe the latest immune checkpoint inhibitor trials which have been reported in gastroesophageal cancers with a focus on predictive biomarkers. We also explore novel biomarkers being developed to improve precision oncology for immunotherapy in gastroesophageal cancers.

The Role of Palliative Surgery for Malignant Bowel Obstruction and Perforation in Advanced Microsatellite Instability-High Colorectal Carcinoma in the Era of Immunotherapy: Case Report

The role of palliative surgery in the management of acute complications in patients with disseminated malignancy remains controversial given the complexity of assessing acute surgical risk and long-term oncologic outcome. With the emergence of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy, there appears to be an increasing role for historically palliative procedures as a bridge to systemic immunotherapy. This is especially evident in advanced microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer where malignant obstruction and fistula formation are more common and where immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade (anti-PD-1/PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4) has a high response rate with potential for favorable oncologic outcomes. We present a series of three patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer complicated by malignant bowel obstruction and fistula formation, who having progressed on standard chemotherapy, underwent palliative intervention as a bridge to immune checkpoint blockade with durable and clinically meaningful anti-cancer responses. These cases highlight the need to re-evaluate the role of historically palliative operations in the setting of disease progression for immunotherapy-responsive tumors.

CCNE1 Amplification as a Predictive Biomarker of Chemotherapy Resistance in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most-deadly gynecologic malignancy, with greater than 14,000 women expected to succumb to the disease this year in the United States alone. In the front-line setting, patients are treated with a platinum and taxane doublet. Although 40–60% of patients achieve complete clinical response to first-line chemotherapy, 25% are inherently platinum-resistant or refractory with a median overall survival of about one year. More than 80% of women afflicted with ovarian cancer will recur. Many attempts have been made to understand the mechanism of platinum and taxane based chemotherapy resistance. However, despite decades of research, few predictive markers of chemotherapy resistance have been identified. Here, we review the current understanding of one of the most common genetic alterations in epithelial ovarian cancer, CCNE1 (cyclin E1) amplification, and its role as a potential predictive marker of cytotoxic chemotherapy resistance. CCNE1 amplification has been identified as a primary oncogenic driver in a subset of high grade serous ovarian cancer that have an unmet clinical need. Understanding the interplay between cyclin E1 amplification and other common ovarian cancer genetic alterations provides the basis for chemotherapeutic resistance in CCNE1 amplified disease. Exploration of the effect of cyclin E1 amplification on the cellular machinery that causes dysregulated proliferation in cancer cells has allowed investigators to explore promising targeted therapies that provide the basis for emerging clinical trials.

Trying for a BRAF Slam Dunk

The first basket clinical trial testing the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib resulted in evidence of activity in 13 unique cancer types with BRAF V600 mutations, but the response rates were variable. Therefore, different cancer histologies with the same driver oncogene display different degrees of oncogenic pathway addiction.See related article by Subbiah et al., p. 657.

Next-generation therapies for adrenocortical carcinoma

Almost one decade ago, etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin and mitotane (EDP-M) has been established as first-line systemic therapy of metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Although heterogeneous, the prognosis of advanced stage ACC is still poor and novel treatments are urgently needed. This article provides a short summary of current systemic ACC treatment and provides a comprehensive overview of new therapeutic approaches that have been investigated in the past years, including drugs targeting the IGF pathway, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, radionuclide treatment, and immunotherapy. The results of most of these trials were disappointing and we will discuss possible reasons why these drugs failed (e.g. drug interactions with mitotane, disease heterogeneity with exceptional responses in very few patients, and resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy). We then will present potential new drug targets that have emerged from many molecular studies (e.g. wnt/β-catenin, cyclin-dependent kinases, PARP1) that may be the foundation of next-generation therapies of ACC.

Pan-Cancer Efficacy of Vemurafenib in BRAF V600-Mutant Non-Melanoma Cancers

BRAF V600 mutations occur in a wide range of tumor types, and RAF inhibition has become standard in several of these cancers. Despite this progress, BRAF V600 mutations have historically been considered a clear demonstration of tumor lineage context-dependent oncogene addiction, based predominantly on the insensitivity to RAF inhibition in colorectal cancer. However, the true broader activity of RAF inhibition pan-cancer remains incompletely understood. To address this, we conducted a multicohort "basket" study of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in non-melanoma BRAF V600 mutation-positive solid tumors. In total, 172 patients with 26 unique cancer types were treated, achieving an overall response rate of 33% and median duration of response of 13 months. Responses were observed in 13 unique cancer types, including historically treatment-refractory tumor types such as cholangiocarcinoma, sarcoma, glioma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and salivary gland carcinomas. Collectively, these data demonstrate that single-agent BRAF inhibition has broader clinical activity than previously recognized. SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that BRAF V600 mutations lead to oncogene addiction and are clinically actionable in a broad range of non-melanoma cancers, including tumor types in which RAF inhibition is not currently considered standard of care.See related commentary by Ribas and Lo, p. 640.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 627.

Therapeutic targeting of the DNA damage response in prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present article highlights the most common DNA repair gene mutations, using specific examples of individual genes or gene classes, and reviews the epidemiology and treatment implications for each one [with particular emphasis on poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition and PD-1 blockade].

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic and genomic testing have an increasingly important role in the oncology clinic. For patients with prostate cancer, germline genetic testing is now recommended for all men with high-risk and metastatic disease, and somatic multigene tumor testing is recommended for men with metastatic castration-resistant disease. The most common mutations that are present in men with advanced prostate cancer are in genes coordinating DNA repair and the DNA damage response.

SUMMARY

Although much of what is discussed currently remains investigational, it is clear that genomically-targeted treatments will become increasingly important for patients with prostate cancer in the near future and beyond.

Cancer Immunotherapy with CDK7 Inhibitors

Recent findings demonstrate that pharmacological cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) inhibitors can evoke anticancer immunity upon genomic destabilization of neoplastic cells. Besides adding CDK7 to the expanding list of cell cycle proteins that impinge on immune regulation, these results support the value of aggravating genomic instability in cancer cells to enable immunological disease control.

Therapeutic Development of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has been proven to be an effective strategy for enhancing the effector activity of anti-tumor T cells, and checkpoint blockers targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 have displayed strong and durable clinical responses in certain cancer patients. The new hope brought by ICB therapy has led to the boost in therapeutic development of ICBs in recent years. Nonetheless, the therapeutic efficacy of ICBs varies substantially among cancer types and patients, and only a proportion of cancer patients could benefit from ICBs. The emerging targets and molecules for enhancing anticancer immunity may bring additional therapeutic opportunities for cancer patients. The current challenges in the ICB therapy have been discussed, aimed to provide further strategies for maximizing the efficacy of ICB therapy.

Liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases: What do we need to know?

Adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer mortality, driven by stage IV disease (Rahib et al., 2014) [1]. While surgical resection of liver metastases has demonstrated a survival advantage, a minority of patients are candidates for resection due to anatomic involvement of disease. Recent advances in liver surgery, chemotherapy, and decision making guided by stratification at the time of presentation has better equipped us to perform aggressive metastasectomies, with resulting improved survival (Fong et al., 1999; Abdalla et al., 2001; Cremolini et al., 2017) [2-4]. As a result, there is a resurgent interest in the concept of total hepatectomy and liver transplantation (LT) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). As of this writing, eight prospective clinical trials in six countries are assessing the viability of split or whole LT for CRLM. However, LT for CRLM remains controversial. Recent prospective trials have illustrated the importance of patient selection, and a disciplined respect for tumor biology. Here we present the current status of LT for CRLM, and suggest clinical decision criteria aimed at matching survival benefit comparable to other indications for LT.

Biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies that target ctla-4, PD-1, or the PD-1 ligand PD-L1 have received approval in Canada and many parts of the world for the treatment of melanoma, renal cell cancer, urothelial cancer, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. However only a small proportion of patients derive long-term clinical benefit. Here, we describe the biomarkers associated with the complex relationship between tumour-related immune stimulus, T cell-mediated immune response, and immune modulation of the microenvironment that can help to predict improved patient outcomes.

Computational methods in tumor immunology

The remarkable success of cancer immunotherapies, especially the checkpoint blocking antibodies, in a subset of patients has reinvigorated the study of tumor-immune crosstalk and its role in heterogeneity of response. High-throughput sequencing and imaging technologies can help recapitulate various aspects of the tumor ecosystem. Computational approaches provide an arsenal of tools to efficiently analyze, quantify and integrate multiple parameters of tumor immunity mined from these diverse but complementary high-throughput datasets. This chapter describes numerous such computational approaches in tumor immunology that leverage high-throughput data from diverse sources (genomic, transcriptomics, epigenomics and digitized histopathology images) to systematically interrogate tumor immunity in context of its microenvironment, and to identify mechanisms that confer resistance or sensitivity to cancer therapies, in particular immunotherapy.

An overview of precision oncology basket and umbrella trials for clinicians

With advancements in biomarkers and momentum in precision medicine, biomarker-guided trials such as basket trials and umbrella trials have been developed under the master protocol framework. A master protocol refers to a single, overarching design developed to evaluate multiple hypotheses with the general goal of improving the efficiency of trial evaluation. One type of master protocol is the basket trial, in which a targeted therapy is evaluated for multiple diseases that share common molecular alterations or risk factors that may help predict whether the patients will respond to the given therapy. Another variant of a master protocol is the umbrella trial, in which multiple targeted therapies are evaluated for a single disease that is stratified into multiple subgroups based on different molecular or other predictive risk factors. Both designs follow the core principle of precision medicine-to tailor intervention strategies based on the patient's risk factor(s) that can help predict whether they will respond to a specific treatment. There have been increasing numbers of basket and umbrella trials, but they are still poorly understood. This article reviews common characteristics of basket and umbrella trials, key trials and recent US Food and Drug Administration approvals for precision oncology, and important considerations for clinical readers when critically evaluating future publications on basket trials and umbrella trials and for researchers when designing these clinical trials.

Genomic Alteration in Metastatic Breast Cancer and Its Treatment

Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains responsible for the majority of breast cancer deaths. Whereas clinical outcomes have improved with the development of novel therapies, resistance almost inevitably develops, indicating the need for novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of mBC. Recent investigations into mBC genomic alterations have revealed novel and potential therapeutic targets. Most notably, therapies against PIK3CA mutation and germline BRCA1/2 mutations have solidified the role of targeted therapy in mBC, with treatments against these alterations now approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the basis of clinical benefit for patients with mBC. Familiarity with relevant genomic alterations in mBC, technologies for mutation detection, methods of interpreting genomic alterations, and an understanding of their clinical impact will aid practicing clinicians in the treatment of mBC as the field of breast oncology moves toward the era of precision medicine.