Overall survival and central nervous system activity of crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged lung cancer-final results of the EUCROSS trial

BACKGROUND

In 2019, we reported the first efficacy and safety analysis of EUCROSS, a phase II trial investigating crizotinib in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer. At that time, overall survival (OS) was immature and the effect of crizotinib on intracranial disease control remained unclear. Here, we present the final analysis of OS, systemic and intracranial activity, and the impact of co-occurring aberrations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

EUCROSS was a prospective, single-arm, phase II trial. The primary endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST 1.1. Secondary and exploratory endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and efficacy in pre-defined subgroups.

RESULTS

Median OS of the intention-to-treat population (N = 34) was 54.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.3 months-not reached (NR); median follow-up 81.4 months] and median all-cause PFS of the response-evaluable population (N = 30) was 19.4 months (95% CI 10.1-32.2 months). Time on treatment was significantly correlated with OS (R = 0.82; P < 0.0001). Patients with co-occurring TP53 aberrations (28%) had a significantly shorter OS [hazard ratio (HR) 11; 95% CI 2.0-56.0; P = 0.006] and all-cause PFS (HR 4.2; 95% CI 1.2-15; P = 0.025). Patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement at baseline (N = 6; 20%) had a numerically shorter median OS and all-cause PFS. Median intracranial PFS was 32.2 months (95% CI 23.7 months-NR) and the rate of isolated CNS progression was 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our final analysis proves the efficacy of crizotinib in ROS1-positive lung cancer, but also highlights the devastating impact of TP53 mutations on survival and treatment efficacy. Additionally, our data show that CNS disease control is durable and the risk of CNS progression while on crizotinib treatment is low.

KEAP1/NFE2L2 Pathway Signature Outperforms KEAP1/NFE2L2 Mutation Status and Reveals Alternative Pathway-Activating Mutations in NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Activation of the antioxidant KEAP1/NFE2L2 (NRF2) pathway leads to increased glutamine dependence and an aggressive phenotype in NSCLC. Because this pathway has been explored as a clinical target, we developed a transcriptomic signature for identifying KEAP1/NFE2L2-activated tumors.

METHODS

A total of 971 NSCLC samples were used to train an expression signature (K1N2-score) to predict KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations. There were 348 in-house NSCLCs that were analyzed using a NanoString expression panel for validation.

RESULTS

The 46-gene K1N2 score robustly predicted KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations in the validation set irrespective of histology and mutation (area under the curve: 89.5, sensitivity: 90.2%), suggesting that approximately 90% of KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations are pathway-activating. The K1N2-score outperformed KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutational status when predicting patient survival (score p = 0.047; mutation p = 0.215). In K1N2 score-positive but KEAP1/NFE2L2 wild-type samples, enrichment testing identified SMARCA4/BRG1 and CUL3 mutations as mimics of KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The K1N2-score identified KEAP1/NFE2L2-activated NSCLC by robustly detecting KEAP1/NFE2L2mut cases and discovering alternative genomic activators. It is a potential means for selecting patients with a constitutively active KEAP1/NFE2L2 pathway.

Outcomes of Patients Treated with Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Re-irradiation (re-RT) for recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) after prior HNC radiation therapy (RT) is clinically challenging given prior radiation of nearby organs at risk (OARs). We describe clinical outcomes and toxicity of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT) for recurrent HNC.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of recurrent HNC patients treated at a single institution with PBS-PT. Baseline demographic, disease and treatment characteristics were recorded. Local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), progression free survival (PFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. UVA was completed using logistic regression, and MVA was performed using a backward elimination model. We also report acute and late grade 3+ toxicity outcomes, graded per CTCAE v5.0.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients treated with PBS-PT for recurrent HNC between 2016 and 2022 were included. Primary sites included oropharynx (30.0%), oral cavity (22.5%), sinonasal cavity (15.7%), larynx (12.4%) and nasopharynx (6.7%). The most common tumor histology was SCC (73.0%). Median time to re-RT was 47 months. Median dose of PBS-PT was 60 Gy (range: 40-72) with 50.6% receiving BID treatment. Median GTV volume was 30cc (range 4.8-1083cc). 24% of patients received concurrent systemic therapy (46% cytotoxic, 4.5% immunotherapy). Median follow-up after PBS-PT was 8 months (range: 0-71), and median OS was 13 months (95% CI: 9.3-16.7). The median PFS and DMFS were 7 months (95% CI 5.0-9.0) and 9 months (95% CI 5.3-12.7) respectively. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 80.8% (95% CI: 70.8-90.8) and 66.2% (95% CI: 50.7-81.7). The 1- and 2-year DMFS were 41.0% (95% CI: 30.0-52.0) and 26.3% (95% CI: 15.7-36.9). On UVA and MVA, smaller GTV volume was associated with improved OS (HR 1.002, p = .004), DMFS (HR 1.002, p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 1.002, p = 0.014). In addition, shorter time to re-RT was associated with worse LRC (HR 1.003, p = 0.002), and higher KPS was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.57, p = 0.04). There were 31 acute grade 3 toxicity events (21 patients), the most common being odynophagia (9.0%) followed mucositis (5.6%), dehydration and dermatitis (both 4.5%). One patient had grade 4 toxicity, laryngeal edema requiring intubation 40 days after completion of re-RT. One patient had acute grade 5 toxicity, an oropharyngeal bleed 74 days after completion of re-RT. There were 35 late toxicity events (n = 27), the most common being dysphagia (n = 7, 7.9%). One patient suffered late grade 5 osteoradionecrosis, which resulted in sepsis.

CONCLUSION

PBS-PT for recurrent HNC results in effective disease control and favorable toxicity. Patients with smaller GTV volume appear to have improved OS, PFS and DMFS, and may be better candidates. Those with shorter time to re-RT also have worse LRC. However, distant failure (DF) comprises a major failure pattern, and biomarkers to identify patients at risk for DF may improve clinical decision making.

Comutations and KRASG12C Inhibitor Efficacy in Advanced NSCLC

Molecular modifiers of KRASG12C inhibitor (KRASG12Ci) efficacy in advanced KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC are poorly defined. In a large unbiased clinicogenomic analysis of 424 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we identified and validated coalterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4, and CDKN2A as major independent determinants of inferior clinical outcomes with KRASG12Ci monotherapy. Collectively, comutations in these three tumor suppressor genes segregated patients into distinct prognostic subgroups and captured ∼50% of those with early disease progression (progression-free survival ≤3 months) with KRASG12Ci. Pathway-level integration of less prevalent coalterations in functionally related genes nominated PI3K/AKT/MTOR pathway and additional baseline RAS gene alterations, including amplifications, as candidate drivers of inferior outcomes with KRASG12Ci, and revealed a possible association between defective DNA damage response/repair and improved KRASG12Ci efficacy. Our findings propose a framework for patient stratification and clinical outcome prediction in KRASG12C-mutant NSCLC that can inform rational selection and appropriate tailoring of emerging combination therapies.

SIGNIFICANCE

In this work, we identify co-occurring genomic alterations in KEAP1, SMARCA4, and CDKN2A as independent determinants of poor clinical outcomes with KRASG12Ci monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, and we propose a framework for patient stratification and treatment personalization based on the comutational status of individual tumors. See related commentary by Heng et al., p. 1513. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1501.

Characterization data of reference materials used for phase II of the priority program DFG SPP 2005 "Opus Fluidum Futurum - Rheology of reactive, multiscale, multiphase construction materials"

A thorough characterization of base materials is the prerequisite for further research. In this paper, the characterization data of the reference materials (CEM I 42.5 R, limestone powder, calcined clay and a mixture of these three components) used in the second funding phase of the priority program 2005 of the German Research Foundation (DFG SPP 2005) are presented under the aspects of chemical and mineralogical composition as well as physical and chemical properties. The data were collected based on tests performed by up to eleven research groups involved in this cooperative program.

External validation of a low fidelity dry-lab platform to enhance loupes surgical skills techniques for hypospadias repair

INTRODUCTION

Hypospadias repair is an index pediatric urology procedure that requires trainee familiarity with surgical loupes. A previous low-fidelity, 6-step curriculum was proposed that deconstructed the most important steps of loupe surgery. We expanded on this curriculum with an intermediate-fidelity silicone hypospadias model and designed an abbreviated version of the 6-step curriculum to precede the hypospadias repair simulation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity of our prior, low-fidelity conceptual model using the metric of improved performance on the intermediate-fidelity silicone hypospadias model.

STUDY DESIGN

A silicone model was first prototyped with the design software Solidworks™, and then fabricated using a cast made of a mixture of silicone rubbers designed to function like skin and soft tissue (Mold Star 20T, Dragon skin FX-pro and Slacker). Casts were used to create the penile shaft model and the dorsal hooded foreskin model. The urethral plate was cast separately on a flat surface. The model was then assembled by hand. The model used for simulation included the penile shaft and urethral plate, while the dorsal-hooded foreskin was prepared to simulate the penile anatomy separately. Trainees were then divided into two groups. Group 1 practiced the low-fidelity curriculum (3 tasks) and then performed dissection of the urethral plate and suturing using the intermediate-fidelity hypospadias model. Group 2 practiced hypospadias repair prior to the low-fidelity curriculum. Both groups' models were scored by 3 blinded urologists. Trainees were then asked to complete a post simulation satisfaction survey. Data analysis was performed in IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh (Version 28.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

RESULTS

Twenty-two candidates across Wisconsin, USA, and Dublin, Ireland participated in the study. This included 7 s-year residents, 9 third-year residents, 2 fourth-year residents, and 3 fifth-year residents. Both Groups 1 and 2 had a similar distribution of trainees (p = 0.60). Group 1 outperformed group 2 in all tasks (p < 0.05, Table 1). Trainees reported that the platform was very useful (91%).

DISCUSSION

Our curriculum showed improvement in trainee ability and comfort to perform hypospadias repair. Advantages of such a simulated curriculum include improving current resident training in microsurgery, improving surgical ergonomics for trainees prior to real-time experience, and decreasing the learning curve for trainees pursuing pediatric urology.

CONCLUSION

An intermediate-fidelity hypospadias platform externally validates the conceptual model implemented in the low-fidelity loupes curriculum. This appears to lead to improvement in loupe surgical skills regardless of trainee level.

HepCCATT: a multilevel intervention for hepatitis C among vulnerable populations in Chicago

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C infection could be eliminated. Underdiagnosis and lack of treatment are the barriers to cure, especially for vulnerable populations (i.e. unable to pay for health care).

METHODS

A multilevel intervention from September 2014 to September 2019 focused on the providers and organizations in 'the safety net' (providing health care to populations unable to pay), including: (i) public education, (ii) training for primary care providers (PCPs) and case managers, (iii) case management for high-risk populations, (iv) policy advice and (v) a registry (Registry) for 13 health centers contributing data. The project tracked the number of PCPs trained and, among Registry sites, the number of people screened, engaged in care (i.e. clinical follow-up after diagnosis), treated and/or cured.

RESULTS

In Chicago, 215 prescribing PCPs and 56 other health professionals, 86% of whom work in the safety net, were trained to manage hepatitis C. Among Registry sites, there was a 137% increase in antibody screening and a 32% increase in current hepatitis C diagnoses. Engagement in care rose by 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis C Community Alliance to Test and Treat (HepCCATT) successfully targeted safety net providers and organizations with a comprehensive care approach. While there were challenges, HepCCATT observed increased hepatitis C screening, diagnosis and engagement in care in the Chicago community.

Nazartinib for treatment-naive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase 2, single-arm, open-label study

INTRODUCTION

Nazartinib, a novel third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, previously demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≤ 3 prior lines of systemic therapy. Herein, we report phase 2 efficacy and safety of first-line nazartinib.

METHODS

This single-arm, open-label, global study enrolled treatment-naive adult patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations (eg, L858R and/or ex19del). Patients with neurologically stable and controlled brain metastases were also eligible. Patients received oral nazartinib 150 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients received ≥ 1 dose of nazartinib. The median follow-up time from enrollment to data cutoff (November 1, 2019) was 30 months (range: 25-34). The BIRC-assessed ORR was 69% (95% CI, 53-82). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months (95% CI, 15-not estimable [NE]). The median overall survival was NE. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n = 18), the ORR and median PFS (95% CIs) were 67% (41-87) and 17 months (11-21). Seventeen of 18 patients had brain metastases as non-target lesions; the CNS lesions were absent/normalized in 9 of 17 (53%). Only 2 of 27 patients without baseline brain metastases developed new brain metastases postbaseline. Most frequent adverse events (≥ 25%, any grade, all-causality) were diarrhea (47%), maculopapular rash (38%), pyrexia (29%), cough, and stomatitis (27% each).

CONCLUSIONS

First-line nazartinib demonstrated promising efficacy, including clinically meaningful antitumor activity in the brain, and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02108964.

New Constraint on the Local Relic Neutrino Background Overdensity with the First KATRIN Data Runs

We report on the direct search for cosmic relic neutrinos using data acquired during the first two science campaigns of the KATRIN experiment in 2019. Beta-decay electrons from a high-purity molecular tritium gas source are analyzed by a high-resolution MAC-E filter around the end point at 18.57 keV. The analysis is sensitive to a local relic neutrino overdensity ratio of η<9.7×10^{10}/α (1.1×10^{11}/α) at a 90% (95%) confidence level with α=1 (0.5) for Majorana (Dirac) neutrinos. A fit of the integrated electron spectrum over a narrow interval around the end point accounting for relic neutrino captures in the tritium source reveals no significant overdensity. This work improves the results obtained by the previous neutrino mass experiments at Los Alamos and Troitsk. We furthermore update the projected final sensitivity of the KATRIN experiment to η<1×10^{10}/α at 90% confidence level, by relying on updated operational conditions.

A global ensemble of ocean wave climate statistics from contemporary wave reanalysis and hindcasts

There are numerous global ocean wave reanalysis and hindcast products currently being distributed and used across different scientific fields. However, there is not a consistent dataset that can sample across all existing products based on a standardized framework. Here, we present and describe the first coordinated multi-product ensemble of present-day global wave fields available to date. This dataset, produced through the Coordinated Ocean Wave Climate Project (COWCLIP) phase 2, includes general and extreme statistics of significant wave height (H_s), mean wave period (T_m) and mean wave direction (θ_m) computed across 1980–2014, at different frequency resolutions (monthly, seasonally, and annually). This coordinated global ensemble has been derived from fourteen state-of-the-science global wave products obtained from different atmospheric reanalysis forcing and downscaling methods. This data set has been processed, under a specific framework for consistency and quality, following standard Data Reference Syntax, Directory Structures and Metadata specifications. This new comprehensive dataset provides support to future broad-scale analysis of historical wave climatology and variability as well as coastal risk and vulnerability assessments across offshore and coastal engineering applications.

Measurement(s)	Significant wave height • Mean wave period • Mean wave direction
Technology Type(s)	Global wave reanalysis and hindcasts
Sample Characteristic - Environment	Wind-waves
Sample Characteristic - Location	Global

Abstract CT558: Capmatinib vs docetaxel as second- or third-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC: The GeoMETry-III trial

Background: MET dysregulation is a poor prognostic factor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) mutations occur in ~3% of patients with NSCLC. There is limited evidence of the efficacy of standard therapies, such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy, in patients with METex14-mutated advanced NSCLC. Capmatinib, a MET inhibitor (METi), is approved for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC, based on the results of the phase 2 GEOMETRY mono-1 study. Results (data cutoff: September 18, 2020) of this study in patients with METex14-mutated NSCLC treated with capmatinib showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 66.7% in first line (N=60), 51.6% in second line (N=31) and 40.6% in second- or third-line (2/3L; N=69). GeoMETry-III (NCT04427072) is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled, global, phase 3 trial that is further evaluating the efficacy and safety of capmatinib vs docetaxel in the 2/3L setting in patients with METex14-mutated NSCLC.

Methods: This study began enrollment in September 2020 and is currently recruiting adult patients with EGFR wild-type, ALK-negative, stage IIIB/IIIC/IV METex14-mutated NSCLC, who have progressed on 1 or 2 prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced/metastatic disease and are candidates for single-agent docetaxel. Other eligibility criteria include ≥1 measurable lesion per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤1 and no prior treatment with any METi or hepatocyte growth factor-targeting therapies. Patients with neurologically unstable, symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases or those requiring increasing doses of steroids ≤2 weeks prior to study entry to manage CNS symptoms are excluded. Around 90 patients will be randomized 2:1 to receive either oral capmatinib 400 mg twice daily or intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 21 days. Randomization is stratified by number of prior lines (1 or 2) of systemic therapy. Patients meeting protocol-specified eligibility criteria can cross over from the docetaxel to the capmatinib arm after blinded independent review committee (BIRC)-confirmed progressive disease as per RECIST 1.1.The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) by BIRC per RECIST 1.1. The key secondary endpoint is ORR by BIRC per RECIST 1.1. Other secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed ORR and PFS; duration of response, time to response and disease control rate (DCR) by BIRC and investigator; overall survival; safety; pharmacokinetics; patient-reported outcomes; overall intracranial response rate, intracranial DCR, duration of- and time to- intracranial response by BIRC per the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria in patients with baseline CNS lesions.

Citation Format: Pierre Jean Souquet, Sang-We Kim, Johan F. Vansteenkiste, Anna Robeva, Aline Jary, Sabine Glaser, Alejandro Yovine, Juergen Wolf. Capmatinib vs docetaxel as second- or third-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-mutated NSCLC: The GeoMETry-III trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT558.

Tumor agnostic efficacy of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion+ solid tumors: A global, multicenter, registrational trial update (LIBRETTO-001)

3094

Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective and potent RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for the treatment of lung and thyroid cancer with RET fusions and medullary thyroid cancer with RET mutations. We provide an efficacy and safety update with more patients (pts) and longer follow-up (data cut-off: 24Sep2021) in RET fusion+ solid tumors with histologies other than lung/thyroid. Methods: The phase 1/2 LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128) enrolled pts with locally advanced/metastatic RET fusion+ solid tumors. Following dose escalation, pts received the recommended dose of 160 mg orally twice daily. The efficacy analysis set consisted of pts enrolled ≥6 months (mo) prior to the cut-off date. If a pt achieved response, an additional ≥6 mo follow-up from the initial response was required. There was no additional follow-up required for non-responders. Response was assessed per RECIST 1.1. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included ORR by investigator (INV), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), and safety. Results: Forty-five pts with 14 unique RET fusion+ tumor types received ≥1 dose of selpercatinib: 12 pancreatic, 10 colon, 4 salivary, 3 unknown primary, 3 sarcoma, 2 each of breast, carcinoma of the skin, xanthogranuloma, and cholangiocarcinoma, and 1 each of lung carcinoid, rectal neuroendocrine, small intestine, ovarian, and pulmonary carcinosarcoma. Median age was 53 years (range 21-85). Forty-one pts received prior systemic therapy (median prior lines: 2, range 0-9); 31% received ≥3 lines. In 41 efficacy-evaluable pts, confirmed ORR by IRC was 44% (18/41, 95% CI: 29-60). Clinical benefit was observed in 63% (26/41) of pts: 2 complete responses (breast, small intestine), 16 partial responses, and stable disease ≥16 weeks in 8 pts by IRC. Responses were observed across a variety of fusion partners. Median TTR was 1.9 mo by IRC. Median DoR was 24.5 mo (95% CI: 9.2-NE) with 50% (9/18) of responses ongoing at a median follow-up of 14.9 mo by IRC. Median PFS by IRC was 13.2 mo (95% CI: 7.4-26.2), with 34.1% alive and progression-free at a median follow-up of 16.4 mo. No new safety signals were identified in this cohort compared to broader safety database. Three grade 5 AEs were observed (unrelated to treatment by INV), and 4 pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (1 deemed related to treatment by INV). Conclusions: Selpercatinib continued to demonstrate durable antitumor activity in pts with RET fusion+ cancers across multiple tumor types. No new safety signals were identified. These results emphasize the importance of comprehensive genomic profiling to identify actionable oncogenic drivers, including RET fusions. The LIBRETTO-001 study continues to enroll pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.

A first-in-human phase 1 study of the next-generation RET inhibitor, LOXO-260, in RET inhibitor refractory patients with RET-altered cancers (trial in progress)

TPS8595

Background: RET fusions are found in 1-2% of lung adenocarcinomas and 10-20% of papillary thyroid carcinomas. Activating RET mutations occur in 50-60% of medullary thyroid cancers (MTCs). Selpercatinib was the first selective RET inhibitor approved by the FDA and is indicated for patients (pts) with RET fusion-positive NSCLC and thyroid cancer, and RET mutant MTC. Despite marked and durable activity, acquired resistance can eventually develop through a variety of mechanisms. These include acquisition of RET G810X mutations at the solvent front of the ATP pocket. LOXO-260 is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of RET designed to have activity against both solvent front and gatekeeper mutations, expressed alone or together, while maintaining potency against RET fusions or mutations (Kolakowski GR. et al. 2021 Cancer Research 81 (13 Suppl) 1464). Methods: LOXO-NGR-21001 is a global, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study of LOXO-260 in pts with RET fusion-positive advanced solid tumors and RET mutant MTC who received a prior selective RET inhibitor. Phase 1a dose escalation will utilize a modified i3+3 design, allowing for pt backfill to previously cleared dose levels. Phase 1b dose expansion will evaluate LOXO-260 in specific expansion cohorts: RET fusion-positive NSCLC or thyroid cancers and RET mutant MTC. The primary objectives in dose escalation are to determine the MTD/RP2D and safety of LOXO-260. Key secondary objectives include characterization of PK and preliminary antitumor activity of LOXO-260 per RECIST v1.1. The primary objective of dose expansion is to assess the antitumor activity of LOXO-260 based on investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Key secondary objectives are to characterize the PK and antitumor activity of LOXO-260 based on progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), and duration of response (DOR). Eligible pts must have received a prior selective RET inhibitor, have a documented RET fusion or RET mutation and a diagnosis of locally advanced, unresectable and/or metastatic cancer per disease-specific criteria, and must have progressed or be intolerant to standard therapies or must have refused such a therapy. Pts must be ≥18 years old and have an ECOG PS of 0-2. Key exclusion criteria include presence of serious cardiac conditions, interstitial lung disease, symptomatic CNS metastases, or carcinomatous meningitis. Clinical trial information: NCT05241834.

Efficacy and safety of capmatinib plus pembrolizumab in treatment (tx)-naïve patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high tumor PD-L1 expression: Results of a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study

9118

Background: Capmatinib is a selective MET inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation. Pembrolizumab (pembro) is a programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor approved as monotherapy for pts with advanced NSCLC expressing PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Preclinical studies have shown that capmatinib enhances T cell mediated antitumor response in mice treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Combining capmatinib with pembro may be beneficial in pts with advanced NSCLC expressing high tumor PD-L1. Methods: Herein we evaluated the efficacy and safety of capmatinib plus pembro (combo) versus pembro alone in tx-naïve pts with advanced MET-unselected NSCLC expressing PD-L1 with tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%, and no ALK or EGFR tumor aberrations. Pts received pembro 200 mg IV q3w in the pembro alone arm or with capmatinib 400 mg orally BID in the combo arm. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) using RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), pharmacokinetics and safety. Results: As of the data cut off (DCO) of 28 Feb 2021, 76 pts were randomized 2:1 to the combo arm (n = 51) or pembro alone arm (n = 25). Baseline demographics and disease status were mostly comparable across study arms. At this interim analysis, PFS data were not mature. Median PFS (95% CI) was 6.3 (3.2, not evaluable [NE]) months in the combo arm and 4.3 (2.3, NE) months in the pembro alone arm. The ORR (95% CI) was 15.7% (7.0%, 28.6%) and 28.0% (12.1%, 49.4%) in the combo and pembro alone arms, respectively. The DCR (95% CI) was comparable across study arms; combo: 56.9% (42.2%, 70.7%) and pembro alone: 56.0% (34.9%, 75.6%). In the combo arm, capmatinib exposure (Cmax: 3580 ng/mL [n = 7] and AUCtau: 19700 hr*ng/mL [n = 2]) was consistent with data from previous studies. Tx-related grade (GR) ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more common in the combo (37.3%) vs pembro alone arm (16%). Tx-related AEs occurring in ≥10% of pts are shown in the Table. Tx discontinuation and dose adjustment/interruptions were more common in the combo (27.5% and 52.9%) vs pembro alone arm (16% and 16%). Capmatinib was stopped prematurely in the combo arm, and at DCO, 32 (62.7%) pts in the combo arm and 18 (72%) pts in the pembro alone arm were receiving pembro monotherapy. Conclusions: Combination tx with capmatinib and pembro was not well tolerated and did not improve antitumor activity in tx-naïve pts with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. Clinical trial information: NCT04139317. [Table: see text]

Largest evaluation of acquired resistance to sotorasib in KRAS p.G12C-mutated non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC): Plasma biomarker analysis of CodeBreaK100

102

Background: Sotorasib, a specific, irreversible KRASG12C inhibitor, has been approved in multiple countries for adults with KRAS p.G12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received prior systemic therapy based on the global phase 1/2 CodeBreaK100 trial. Here we describe putative mechanisms of acquired resistance to sotorasib from the largest single dataset evaluated to-date. Methods: Patients with advanced KRAS p.G12C-mutated NSCLC or CRC from the CodeBreaK100 Ph1/2 trial who received sotorasib monotherapy at 960 mg once daily were analyzed for efficacy. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by central review. To investigate biomarkers of resistance to sotorasib, an exploratory endpoint was defined to examine acquired genomic alterations at disease progression. Plasma samples collected at baseline and progression were analyzed for genomic alterations with the 23-gene Resolution Bioscience ctDx Lung test for NSCLC and the 74-gene Guardant 360 ctDNA test for CRC. Acquired genomic alterations were defined by their absence at baseline and presence at progression. Results: In 174 pts with NSCLC and 91 pts with CRC-treated with sotorasib, the ORR were 41% and 12% respectively. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.3 months (mos) and 12.5 mos for NSCLC pts and 4.2 mos and 13.4 mos for CRC pts (median follow-up: 22.5 mos NSCLC; 12.5 mos CRC). A total of 67 NSCLC pts and 45 CRC pts had a plasma sample sequenced both at baseline and at progression. At least one new acquired genomic alteration at progression was detected in 19 (28%) NSCLC pts and in 33 (73%) CRC pts (Table). The acquired genomic alterations were heterogeneous in both NSCLC and CRC, with variants detected across multiple genes and pathways. The most prevalent putative pathway of resistance in both NSCLC and CRC was the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) pathway. Secondary RAS alterations occurred more frequently in CRC versus NSCLC pts (16% vs. 3%). Conclusions: Based on the largest descriptive dataset to-date, diverse mechanisms of acquired resistance occur in KRAS p.G12C-mutated NSCLC and CRC pts treated with sotorasib. New RTK pathway alterations frequently emerged at progression, highlighting the potential role for combining sotorasib with upstream inhibitors of RTK, such as SHP2 or EGFR inhibitors. Serial plasma DNA analysis revealed acquired resistance patterns that support the development of KRASG12C inhibitor combination therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT03600883. [Table: see text]

Metastatic patterns plus clinical and molecular characteristics of ROS1 aberrations in non-small cell lung cancer patients without rearrangements

e21117

Background: Fusions in the ROS1 proto-oncogene are among the best treatable genetic aberrations in Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Besides the occurrence of solvent-front mutations (SFM) in acquired resistance to targeted therapy, little is known about ROS1 aberrations other than fusions. We analyzed molecular and clinical characteristics and metastatic patterns of ROS1 mutations in NSCLC patients without activating ROS1 fusions or SFMs. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on tissue samples from NSCLC patients within the National Network Genomic Medicine (nNGM). Patients with activating ROS1 fusions detected by fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) were excluded. Staging and restaging procedures were performed following local standards from each partner. We analyzed the mutations’ characteristics, co-occurring mutations and metastatic patterns. Results: Of 8072 patients analyzed by NGS between 2018 and 2021, 118 (1.5%) patients harbored ROS1 mutations. Most patients were male (76.3%) and had adenocarcinoma histology (57.6%). The median age at diagnosis amounted to 68 years. Nearly all of the patients (96.5%) had a smoking history, amassing 40 pack-years on average. Besides TP53 mutations (61.0%), KRAS (25.4%), EGFR (7.6%), PIK3CA and FGFR1-4 mutations (5.9% each) co-occurred most frequently. In 12 (10.2%) patients, ROS1 mutation was the only detected aberration. The majority (59.3%) of patients had UICC stage IV whereby 27.2% of patients featured Stage III; about 7% fall upon stage I and II. The metastatic pattern of all stage IV patients shows that 22.9% of metastasis is allotted to cerebral, 12.5% to lung, 16.7% to subdiaphragmatic, 14.9% to bone and 6.3% to skin metastasis. Thereby, the patients’ subgroup with mutually exclusive ROS1 mutations (10.2%) resembles this trend: about a half of these patients had UICC stage IV, too, and the metastasis distribution featured similar characteristics. Conclusions: The cohort contrasts the clinical characteristics of patients with ROS1 fusion regarding sex, age, and histology. This evidence implies a basic clinical impact exerted by this molecular subtype. We warrant further research on the detected mutations to characterize the biological impact and the potential to act as a drug target.

Screening of FGFR patients for FGFR directed clinical trials in Network Genomic Medicine (NGM): Real-world data

e21013

Background: The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 genes show a heterogenic landscape of alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whereas only a small amount is yet considered to have oncogenic potential. The frequency of activating FGFR alterations is low, counting for approximately 2% of NSCLC. We have screened NSCLC patients (pts) for FGFR translocations/mutations within NGM and analysed them on FGFR alteration frequency, patient characteristics and outcome. Methods: From 04/2019 to 01/2020 we screened 472 squamous NSCLC for FGFR gene alterations and from 02/2020 to 12/2021 an additional 5286 patients including all NSCLC cases. Of these 5286 pts, 1097 pts were analysed for FGFR fusions. We used DNA-NGS for FGFR-mutations and RNA-NGS for FGFR–translocations. Activating mutations were defined according to the publicly available molecular data bases and published data. Results: Within the cohort of 5758 NSCLC patients, we found 316 (5.5%) patients with FGFR alterations. Sixty-six (20.9% of FGFR, 1.1% of NSCLC) patients had alterations classified as activating, of whom 39 had FGFR point mutations and 27 FGFR translocations. Concerning the patients with activating alterations, they had UICC stage III or IV at time of diagnosis; 22 were females; 58 patients had squamous cell carcinoma, 6 patients had adenocarcinoma and 2 had large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Fifty-three patients (80.3%) with activating FGFR alteration had a co-mutation: TP53 (inactivating) co-mutation was seen in 41 cases (62.1%) and 19 cases had either PTEN (7 pts), KRAS (4), EGFR (3), PIK3CA (2), ROS1 (1), ALK (1) or BRAF (1) mutations. Ten patients were included in a FGFR-targeted trial. Sixty patients were available for follow-up. The median overall survival (mOS) was 21.4 month (95%CI: 16.8–25.9) for all patients with activating FGFR alteration, whereas mOS was 18.5 month (95%CI: 13.2-23.9) for FGFR mutation and 25.3 months (95%CI: 17.8-32.9) for FGFR fusions. Conclusions: FGFR 1-4 gene alterations are rare. Large molecular and clinical networks are necessary to identify these pts. Prognostic factors of FGFR patients are currently not defined. Further assessments on molecular and clinical features in FGFR altered NSCLC are needed to identify sensitivity to FGFR inhibition. Clinical trials with specific FGFR inhibitors are ongoing.

Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged lung cancer (EUCROSS): Updated overall survival

9078

Background: ROS1 rearrangements are found in approximately 1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Prospective clinical trials showed high efficacy of crizotinib in this molecular subset. Lately, we reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 70% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 19.4 months for patients treated within the EUCROSS trial (Michels et al. Clin Oncol, 37(15_suppl):9066-9066, 2019). Here we present an updated analysis of the overall survival. Methods: EUCROSS is a European multi-centre, single arm phase 2 trial (Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT02183870). Key eligibility criteria were ≥18 years of age, advanced/metastatic lung cancer, centrally confirmed ROS1-rearranged (fluorescence-in situ hybridisation) and no or stable brain metastases at baseline. Crizotinib was given at a dose of 250 mg twice daily. Primary endpoint of the trial was investigator-assessed ORR in the response-evaluable population (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1), with secondary endpoints of PFS and overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 34 patients who received at least one dose of crizotinib (intention-to-treat population, ITT), 30 were included the primary efficacy analysis set (PAS). After a median follow-up of 55.9 months, 13 (43%) patients in the PAS and 15 (44%) in the ITT had died. Median OS was not reached in either group (95% CI, 17.1-NR and 20.3-NR, respectively). OS was negatively correlated with the presence of brain metastases (Log-rank p = 0.1805) and TP53 mutations (Log-rank p = 0.015). Detailed listings of the survival rates are depicted in Table. No new safety signals were observed. Owing to the approval of crizotinib by the European Medicines Agency, all patients who were still on treatment by January 24th 2018 (n=8), were prescribed crizotinib outside the trial. Conclusions: Updated OS highlights the efficacy of crizotinib in patients with ROS1-rearranged lung cancer. Patients with co-occurring TP53 mutations or brain metastases had worse outcomes and represent challenging populations. Clinical trial information: NCT02183870. [Table: see text]

ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer in 2021. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 34 leading experts in the management of lung cancer. The aim of the consensus was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where the available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were: (i) tissue and biomarkers analyses; (ii) early and locally advanced disease; (iii) metastatic disease and (iv) clinical trial design, patient's perspective and miscellaneous. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the recommendations developed, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation.

Treatment outcome of atypical EGFR mutations in the German National Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer (nNGM)

BACKGROUND

Atypical EGFR mutations occur in 10-30% of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and their sensitivity to classical EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is highly heterogeneous. Patients harboring one group of uncommon, recurrent EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, L861Q) respond to EGFR-TKI. Exon 20 insertions are mostly insensitive to EGFR-TKI but display sensitivity to exon 20 inhibitors. Clinical outcome data of patients with very rare point and compound mutations upon systemic treatments are still sparse to date.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, multi-center study of the national Network Genomic Medicine (nNGM) in Germany, 856 NSCLC cases with atypical EGFR mutations including co-occuring mutations were reported from 12 centers. Clinical follow-up data after treatment with different EGFR-TKI, chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors were available from 260 patients. Response to treatment was analyzed in three major groups: (1) uncommon mutations (G719X, S7681, L861Q and combinations), (2) exon 20 insertions and (3) very rare EGFR mutations (very rare single point mutations, compound mutations, exon 18 deletions, exon 19 insertions).

RESULTS

Our study comprises the largest thus far reported real-world cohort of very rare EGFR single point and compound mutations treated with different systemic treatments. We validated higher efficacy of EGFR-TKI in comparison to chemotherapy in group 1 (uncommon), while most exon 20 insertions (group 2) were not EGFR-TKI responsive. In addition, we found TKI sensitivity of very rare point mutations (group 3) and of complex EGFR mutations containing exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations independent of the combination partner. Notably, treatment responses in group 3 (very rare) were highly heterogeneous. Co-occurring TP53 mutations exerted a non-significant trend for a detrimental effect on outcome in EGFR-TKI treated patients in groups 2 and 3 but not in group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings we propose a novel nNGM classification of uncommon EGFR mutations.

Abstract LB056: Accurate detection of MET exon 14 skipping using a liquid biopsy assay in NSCLC patients in the GEOMETRY mono-1 study

IntroductionCapmatinib, a highly selective and potent MET inhibitor, was approved for patients with advanced METex14 NSCLC in the US and Japan in 2020, with the FoundationOne® CDx (F1CDx; a next-generation sequencing assay using DNA isolated from FFPE tumor tissue), based on results of the ongoing phase 2 GEOMETRY mono-1 study (NCT02414139). Previously, the F1CDx demonstrated 99% concordance with the METex14 RT-PCR clinical trial assay (CTA) used in the GEOMETRY mono-1 study. Here, we report findings of METex14 detection using the an NGS-based liquid biopsy assay (LDx), which detects MET single nucleotide variants and indels that lead to METex14 in circulating tumor (ct)DNA. MethodsDuring the GEOMETRY mono-1 study, patients were screened for METex14 status using a METex14 RT-PCR CTA on FFPE tissue. Clinical validation of the LDx was performed using plasma samples from patients enrolled in the GEOMETRY mono-1 study, which include METex14-positive samples from Cohort (C)4 (pretreated) and C5b (treatment-naïve), in addition to METex14-negative samples from C1b, C2, and C3, and samples from commercial sources. Concordance of the CTA and LDx were evaluated by positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA). Clinical utility of the LDx in identifying METex14 positive patients for treatment with capmatinib was evaluated by comparing overall response rate (ORR) by BIRC in METex14 positive patients by the CTA and LDx. ResultsOf the 97 patients with METex14 NSCLC in C4 (n=69) and C5b (n=28), 88 patients had plasma volume ≥2.5 mL and cell free DNA ≥20 ng (minimum input). Of the 88 CTA METex14 positive patients, 57 were LDx positive, 26 were LDx negative; 5 had invalid sequencing results. Review of the 26 CTA discordant (METex14-negative) cases on LDx identified 3 with an alternate MET alteration, while the vast majority had evidence of low ctDNA levels. Of the 97 CTA METex14-negative patients who met minimum input requirements, 88 were LDx negative and 9 had invalid sequencing results; the LDx identified no CTA METex14-negative patient as positive. The PPA and NPA for these were 68.7% (95% CI: 57.6%, 78.4%) and 100% (95% CI: 95.9%, 100%), respectively. A post-hoc analysis comparing LDx with F1CDx in patients with METex14 showed similar results. For patients identified as METex14-positive by the LDx, the ORR (95% CI) by BIRC was determined as 48.8% (32.9–64.9%; n=20/41) for C4, and 81.3% (54.4–96.0%; n=13/16) for C5b; corresponding ORRs for patients identified as METex14-positive by the CTA were 40.6% (28.9-53.1%; n=28/69) for C4 and 67.9% (47.6-84.1%; n=19/28) for C5b.ConclusionsCurrent findings from the GEOMETRY mono-1 study support the feasibility and clinical utility of identifying advanced NSCLC patients with METex14 in ctDNA using LDx. For patients identified as METex14-negative by LDx, further testing should be performed on tissue samples, as a negative liquid biopsy result does not preclude a positive result by tissue biopsy.

Citation Format: Rebecca S. Heist, Edward B. Garon, Daniel S. Tan, Harry J. Groen, Takashi Seto, Egbert F. Smit, Mike Zou, Yiqun Yang, Ying Li, Andrea Chassot Agostinho, Juergen Wolf. Accurate detection of MET exon 14 skipping using a liquid biopsy assay in NSCLC patients in the GEOMETRY mono-1 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB056.

Recent CO2 levels promote increased production of the toxin parthenin in an invasive Parthenium hysterophorus biotype

Recent carbon dioxide (CO₂) concentrations promoted higher parthenin concentrations in an invasive Parthenium hysterophorus biotype. Mean concentrations of parthenin, an allelopathic and defensive sesquiterpene lactone, were 49% higher at recent (~400 ppm) than at mid-twentieth-century (~300 ppm) CO₂ concentrations, but did not vary in a non-invasive biotype, suggesting that recent increases in atmospheric CO₂ may have already altered the chemistry of this destructive weed, potentially contributing to its invasive success.

Patient-reported outcomes from STARTRK-2: a global phase II basket study of entrectinib for ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer and NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly relevant endpoints in clinical trials, contributing to our understanding of risk-benefit profiles, in addition to efficacy and safety data. We investigated the impact of entrectinib on patient-reported symptoms, functioning, and health-related quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

STARTRK-2 is a phase II basket study in patients with locally advanced/metastatic neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1/2/3 (NTRK1/2/3) and ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) fusion-positive solid tumours. PROs (prespecified secondary endpoint) were evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), lung cancer module (QLQ-LC13), and colorectal cancer module (QLQ-CR29), and the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level instruments, completed before cycle 1 day 1 and each subsequent 4-week cycle of entrectinib dosing, and the end of treatment. Adverse events and treatment-related symptoms were assessed in the safety analysis (SA)-PRO population. Tumour-related symptoms, functioning, and global health status were assessed in the efficacy analysis (EA)-PRO population. Data cut-offs: 31 October 2018 NTRK cohort; 01 May 2019 ROS1 cohort.

RESULTS

SA-PRO populations comprised patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours (N = 88) or ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (N = 180) who received one or more doses of entrectinib, completed PRO questionnaires on cycle 1 day 1 and answered one or more questions on-study. EA-PRO populations (N = 71) and (N = 145), respectively, comprised SA-PRO patients with measurable baseline disease. Moderate-to-high baseline global health status scores were maintained in EA-PRO populations during treatment. Role and physical functioning scores were moderate-to-high at baseline, with trends towards clinical improvement during treatment. Both cohorts reported low-to-moderate symptom burden at baseline, which was maintained or trended towards clinically meaningful improvement. Symptoms commonly associated with cancer treatment (e.g. nausea, fatigue) remained stable or improved during treatment. All SA-PRO patients experienced one or more adverse events, most frequently constipation or diarrhoea.

CONCLUSIONS

PRO findings were consistent with the favourable safety profile of entrectinib, and further reinforce the positive benefit-risk profile of this treatment, indicating minimal overall treatment burden.

Patient-reported outcomes in capmatinib-treated patients with METex14-mutated advanced NSCLC: Results from the phase II GEOMETRY mono-1 study

9056

Background: Capmatinib, a potent, selective MET inhibitor, showed substantial antitumor activity and manageable tolerability in patients with METex14-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in the GEOMETRY mono-1 trial (NCT02414139). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from this study are reported here. Methods: GEOMETRY mono-1 enrolled patients ≥18 years with METex14-mutated or MET-amplified, ALK-negative and EGFR wild-type, treatment-naïve (1L) or pre-treated (2L+) aNSCLC, to receive capmatinib orally 400 mg bid during 21-day treatment cycles. Here we report results for patients with METex14 mutations. PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-LC13 and EQ-5D-5L) were collected at baseline (BL) and every 6 weeks (Wks) until end of treatment. Key PROs (in patients with BL and ≥1 post-BL value) included change from BL in QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS), QLQ-LC13 symptoms (cough, chest pain and dyspnea), and EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS), with a ≥10-point change from BL considered clinically meaningful. Time to definitive deterioration (TTDD) in QLQ-LC13 symptoms (time from treatment initiation to first date of ≥10% symptom change from BL with no later reduction) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier. QLQ-LC13 symptoms over time were explored by BIRC-assessed clinical response to capmatinib. Results: By Jan 6, 2020 cut-off, median capmatinib exposure was 48.2 (4.0 117.4) Wks and 22.1 (0.4 136.0) Wks for 1L and 2L+ patients, respectively. A total of 27/28 1L patients and 65/69 2L+ patients completed PROs at BL, and completion rate remained high (mostly > 70%) through treatment cycles. Mean [SD] BL PRO scores were moderate-to-high in 1L and 2L+ patients (GHS: 64.7 [21.6] and 58.8 [21.0.]; cough: 35.9 [32.6] and 28.7 [28.2]; chest pain: 12.8 [23.2] and 17.2 [22.7]; dyspnea: 23.5 [23.4] and 22.2 [20.8]; VAS: 67.7 [20.8] and 61.9 [18.8], respectively). Overall change from BL in PROs was maintained over time. Cough improved early, with meaningful improvements observed through cycles, notably in 1L patients (mean change from BL [SD] at Wk 7: 1L -13.0 [39.9], 2L+ -8.2 [28.4]; Wk 25: 1L -15.6 [33.0], 2L+ -6.0 [31.5]; Wk 43: 1L -28.2 [26.7], 2L+ -10.5 [27.3]). Median TTDD in GHS was 16.6 months (95% CI: 9.7, NE [not estimated]) and 12.4 months (95% CI: 4.2, 19.4) in 1L and 2L+ patients, respectively. Median TTDD for cough and chest pain was NE in both 1L and 2L+ patients, and for dyspnea was 19.4 months (95% CI: 12.4, NE) and 22.1 months (95% CI: 9.9, NE), respectively. QLQ-LC13 symptoms improved at all cycles in patients achieving clinical complete response or partial response, while symptom worsening was seen in those with no clinical response. Conclusions: Capmatinib was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in cough, delayed time to lung symptom deterioration, and preserved QoL, supporting its use as a treatment option in patients with METex14-mutated aNSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT02414139.

Capmatinib efficacy in patients with NSCLC identified as METex14 using an NGS-based liquid biopsy assay: Results from the GEOMETRY mono-1 study

9111

Background: Capmatinib, a highly selective and potent MET inhibitor, was approved for patients (pts) with advanced MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14) NSCLC in the US and Japan, with the FoundationOne CDx (tissue NGS assay), based on results of the ongoing GEOMETRY mono-1 study (NCT02414139). Here, we report efficacy findings in pts from GEOMETRY mono-1, who were identified as METex14 using a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based liquid biopsy test (LDx), which detects METex14 in circulating tumor (ct)DNA. Methods: During the GEOMETRY mono-1 study, pts were screened for METex14 status using a METex14 RT-PCR clinical trial assay (CTA) on FFPE tissue. Clinical validation of the LDx was performed using plasma samples from pts enrolled in the GEOMETRY mono-1 study, which include METex14-positive samples from Cohort (C)4 (pretreated) and C5b (treatment-naïve), in addition to METex14-negative samples from C1b, C2, and C3, and 21 tissue-matched NSCLC plasma samples from commercial sources to supplement the total number of METex14 deletion negative patients. Concordance of the CTA and LDx were evaluated by positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA). This retrospective analysis reports overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS), all by BIRC, and overall survival (OS) in pts identified as METex14 by the LDx (data cutoff: Sep 18, 2020). Results: Of the 97 pts with METex14 NSCLC in C4 (n = 69) and C5b (n = 28), 88 pts had plasma volume ≥2.5 mL and cell free DNA ≥20 ng (minimum input); of these 57 were LDx positive (C4, n = 41; C5b, n = 16), 26 were negative; 5 had invalid sequencing results. Of the 97 CTA METex14-negative patients who met minimum input requirements, 88 were LDx negative and 9 had invalid sequencing results; none of the CTA METex14-negative pts (N = 97) were reported as positive by the LDx. The PPA and NPA for these were 68.7% (95% CI: 57.6%, 78.4%) and 100% (95% CI: 95.9%, 100%), respectively, when excluding LDx invalid results. In pts identified as METex14 positive by LDx, the ORR (95% CI) was 81.3% (54.4‒96.0; n = 16) in C5b and 48.8% (32.9‒64.9; n = 41) in C4; median DOR (95% CI) was 20.3 (4.2, NE; n = 13) months in C5b and 9.8 (4.2‒19.5; n = 20) months in C4; median PFS (95% CI) was 12.4 (4.5‒NE; n = 16) months in C5b and 5.4 (4.0‒6.6; n = 41) months in C4; median OS was 17.9 (9.8‒NE; n = 16) months in C5b and 13.6 (6.6‒23.3; n = 41) months in C4. Clinical findings in those identified as METex14 positive by LDx were comparable with those identified by the CTA. Conclusions: Current findings from the GEOMETRY mono-1 study support the activity of capmatinib in advanced NSCLC pts with METex14 identified using LDx. For pts identified as METex14-negative by the LDx, further testing should be performed on tissue samples, as a negative LDx result does not preclude a positive result by tissue biopsy. Clinical trial information: NCT02414139.

Response to selpercatinib versus prior systemic therapy in patients (pts) with RET fusion+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9032

Background: Selpercatinib, a first-in-class highly selective, potent, CNS-active RET kinase inhibitor, is approved in multiple countries for treatment of RET fusion+ lung or thyroid cancers. Selpercatinib demonstrated durable antitumor activity in previously treated pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC in an ongoing Phase 1/2 trial, LIBRETTO-001 (Besse et al., ASCO 2021). Methods: Pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC enrolled in the global, multicenter, LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128; 16 countries, 89 sites). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, and safety. This post-hoc intrapatient analysis was based on a 30 March 2020 data cutoff date. Historical physician-reported best overall response (BOR) from last systemic therapy received prior to enrollment was compared with selpercatinib BOR by independent review committee per RECIST v1.1, with each patient serving as his/her own control. Results: In efficacy-evaluable pts (N = 218) who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo), median pt age was 61 years, the majority with ECOG of 0/1 (37%/61%), with a median of 2 (range: 1-15) prior systemic therapies. Overall, 57% of patients responded to selpercatinib while 16% responded to the immediate prior therapy. ORR improvements with selpercatinib were observed regardless of prior therapy: chemotherapy + immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (57% vs 14%), single-agent ICI (48% vs 3%), or chemotherapy (58% vs 15%). A total of 108 patients (49%) did not respond to immediate prior therapy but responded to selpercatinib. Fewer patients had progressive disease as their BOR with selpercatinib (2%) compared to the immediate prior therapy (28%). The median duration of therapy for selpercatinib was notably extended compared with that of the immediate prior therapy (11.8 vs. 3.4 months, respectively). Conclusions: In pts with RET fusion+ NSCLC treated on LIBRETTO-001, systemic therapies administered prior to enrollment achieved less meaningful clinical benefit than selpercatinib. Selpercatinib demonstrated consistent efficacy regardless of the type of prior therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128.

Treatment outcome and functional characterization of uncommon EGFR mutations in the German National Network Genomic Medicine Lung Cancer (nNGM)

9036

Background: The nNGM centralizes molecular diagnostics, treatment recommendations and follow-up reporting in NSCLC in Germany. Uncommon EGFR mutations pose a clinical challenge because they comprise a heterogenous group and analyses of treatment outcome are still scarce. Here, we analyzed follow-up data of patients with rare EGFR mutations and performed functional characterization of recurrent mutations with unknown function. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective analysis of uncommon EGFR mutations (excluding L858R-, T790M mutations and exon 19 deletions) includes stage IV patients with NSCLC from 12 nNGM centers. We categorized EGFR-mutations into 3 groups: uncommon EGFR mutations with known driver function, for instance E709X, G719X, S768I and L861Q (group 1), exon 20 insertions (group 2) and all other very rare mutations (group 3). Functional characterization of unknown mutations was performed by insertion mutagenesis in Ba/F3 cells and monitoring of growth factor-independent proliferation. Results: In total, 834 cases with uncommon EGFR mutations were reported. Follow-up data after EGFR-TKI (Erlotinib, Gefitinib, Afatinib and Osimertinib), chemotherapy and/or mono-PD(L)1 blockade was available for 252 patients. Mean progression free survival (mPFS) on EGFR-TKIs vs. chemotherapy was 6.6 months vs. 5.0 months (HR 0.54, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.81, P =.003) in group 1 (n = 84), and 6.7 months vs. 3.4 months (HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.92, P =.015) in group 3 (n = 104). Mono-anti-PD(L1) blockade was not superior to chemotherapy (group 1, mPFS 3.0 months, HR 1.32, 95% 0.55 – 3.15, P =.535 and group3, mPFS 4.3 months, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.64 – 1.62, P = 0.951). Exon 20 insertions (group 2, n = 63) did not benefit from EGFR-TKIs or anti-PD(L1) blockade vs. chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) analysis (n = 218) following chemotherapy (56%) or EGFR-TKI treatment (44%) showed median OS (mOS) of 18.0 months vs. 13.9 months in patients treated with EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy, respectively in group 1 (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.75, P =.929). In group 3 patients treated with EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy had a mOS of 35.4 months vs. 12.0 months, respectively (HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.35 to 1.01, P =.056). In the Ba/F3 system we could identify 8 recurrent driver and 12 non-driver mutations with a clinically applicable assay turnaround time of 4 weeks to inform clinical decision-making in the future. Conclusions: This real-world dataset confirms that patients with group 1(uncommon) EGFR mutations benefit from EGFR-TKIs and indicates that mono-anti PD(L)1 blockade is not superior to chemotherapy. Furthermore, patients with very rare EGFR mutations (group 3) also experienced a PFS benefit from EGFR-TKI compared to chemotherapy while immune therapy was not beneficial.