Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis

Combination of Biological Agents in Moderate to Severe Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Treatment with biological agents such as anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNFs) has become standard of care in moderate to severe pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a significant proportion of patients experience loss of response to anti-TNFs, need treatment escalation, or develop side effects. There is no data in the literature regarding combination of biological agents in pediatric IBD.

METHODS

At our hospital, which is a tertiary referral center, we have combined the anti-TNF infliximab with either vedolizumab or ustekinumab in patients with severe pediatric IBD. The indications for dual biological therapy were insufficient efficacy of infliximab or vedolizumab monotherapy, or side effects such as psoriasis due to anti-TNFs.

RESULTS

Eight patients (four boys) aged 14-17.5 years received a combination of infliximab and vedolizumab due to only a partial response to infliximab, four with Crohn's disease (CD) and four with ulcerative colitis (UC). Clinical remission was achieved in four patients (3 UC) and four had a colectomy (3 CD, 1 UC). Five CD patients (3 girls) aged 11-17 years, on maintenance therapy with infliximab, developed psoriasis resistant to topical treatment. A combination of infliximab and ustekinumab resulted in clinical remission of CD without skin symptoms. No serious adverse events occurred in any of the patients on combination therapy. Thirteen publications report on combining biologicals, all in adult IBD.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric IBD, combining biological agents seems to be safe and beneficial in selected patients. The safety should be addressed in long-term follow-up studies.

Long-term direct and indirect costs of ulcerative colitis in a privately-insured United States population

Objective: Prior evaluations of ulcerative colitis (UC)-related costs are dated or encompassed limited follow-up. This study assessed the incremental direct and indirect work loss-related costs of privately-insured patients with UC in the United States, overall and in specific subgroups.Methods: In this retrospective matched cohort study, the OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc (formerly Optum Health Reporting and Insights employer) database (01 January 1999-31 March 2017) was used to identify adult patients with ≥2 claims for UC, who were matched 1:5 to patients with no claims for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). UC subgroups were identified based on indicators during the observation period (i.e. use of biologics, opioids, or corticosteroids; UC-related surgery; moderate-to-severe disease; UC-related comorbidities). Healthcare resource utilization (HRU), work loss days, and direct and work loss-related costs were compared between matched cohorts. Descriptive analyses of direct and work loss-related costs were conducted within each UC subgroup.Results: Compared to the non-IBD cohort (n = 46,765), the UC cohort (n = 9353) incurred higher HRU, including 128% more inpatients visits, resulting in $11,029 higher direct costs per patient per year (PPPY; $7170 vs. $18,198; p < .001). Patients in the UC cohort also incurred more work loss days, resulting in $2142 higher work loss-related costs PPPY ($3165 vs. $5307; p < .001). Direct and work loss-related costs were particularly high in the UC subgroups, with patients undergoing UC-related surgery incurring the highest costs.Conclusions: Over ∼5 years follow-up, patients with UC had significantly higher all-cause direct healthcare and indirect work loss-related costs compared to matched patients without IBD.

Janus Kinase inhibitors in the New Treatment Paradigms of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

This review provides guidance in the decision-making process regarding when to choose a janus kinase [JAK] inhibitor as medical treatment strategy. The focus will be on ulcerative colitis, because the only yet available JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, has approval for use in ulcerative colitis. The guidance path will include consideration of disease activity, previous treatment, comorbidities, family planning, patient preferences, pharmacology as well as concurrent chronic inflammatory diseases or extraintestinal manifestations. The suggested guidance path illustrates our daily difficulties in the decision-making process regarding best choice for the individual patient. However if predictive biomarkers are lacking, the named criteria can be applied to any other strategy and hence provide support in daily practice.

IFN-γ promoted exosomes from mesenchymal stem cells to attenuate colitis via miR-125a and miR-125b

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have demonstrated therapeutic effects for colitis through immunomodulation and anti-inflammation. However, whether MSC-derived exosomes possessed the similar function remains unclear. In present study, exosomes were isolated from control and IFN-γ-primed MSCs and was verified by transmission electron microscope (TEM) and immunofluorescence staining. Administration of exosomes to mice significantly improved the disease activity index and histological score of colitis, and decreased the ratio of Th17 cells with elevated Treg cells ratio in mice colitis model. Exosomes from IFN-γ-primed MSCs showed superior therapeutic effects to colitis. Exosomes treatment inhibited Th17 differentiation in vitro, and exosomes from IFN-γ-primed MSCs showed higher inhibition efficacy. Mechanistically, exosomes treatment significantly decreased the expression of Stat3 and p-Stat3 to inhibit Th17 cells differentiation. IFN-γ pretreatment increased the level of miR-125a and miR-125b of exosomes, which directly targeted on Stat3, to repress Th17 cell differentiation. Moreover, combination of miR-125a and miR-125b agmior infusion also showed therapeutic effects for colitis, accompanied by decreased Th17 cell ratio. Collectively, this study demonstrates that IFN-γ treatment promoted exosomes from MSCs to attenuate colitis through increasing the level of miR-125a and miR-125b, which binding on 3′-UTR of Stat3 to repress Th17 cell differentiation. This study provides a new approach of exocytosis on the treatment of colitis.

Ustekinumab for treating ulcerative colitis: an expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Biologic agents have revolutionized the therapeutic management of ulcerative colitis. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents were the first biologic drugs used to induce and maintain remission in this inflammatory bowel disease. Recently, another biologic option, ustekinumab, has become available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, the authors review the literature on the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in the context of current biologic agents used for the management of this disease. The potential role of ustekinumab in the treatment paradigm of the disease is also discussed. Expert opinion: The UNIFI trial has demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in induction and maintenance phases of treatment for ulcerative colitis. Ustekinumab may provide clinical benefit in a range of settings in patients with ulcerative colitis, even for those with multiple treatment failures, which are relatively common in daily clinical practice. Future clinical trials should compare the efficacy of ustekinumab with existing biologic agents in the management of ulcerative colitis.

Cytomegalovirus and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) with a Special Focus on the Link with Ulcerative Colitis (UC)

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects approximately 40% of adults in France and persists lifelong as a latent agent in different organs, including gut. A close relationship is observed between inflammation that favors viral expression and viral replication that exacerbates inflammation. In this context, CMV colitis may impact the prognosis of patients suffering from inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), and notably those with ulcerative colitis (UC). In UC, the mucosal inflammation and T helper cell (T_H) 2 cytokines, together with immunomodulatory drugs used for controlling flare-ups, favor viral reactivation within the gut, which, in turn, increases mucosal inflammation, impairs corticoid and immunosuppressor efficacy (the probability of steroid resistance is multiplied by more than 20 in the case of CMV colitis), and enhances the risk for colectomy. This review emphasizes the virological tools that are recommended for exploring CMV colitis during inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and underlines the interest of using ganciclovir for treating flare-ups associated to CMV colitis in UC patients.

Genetic Analysis of Ulcerative Colitis in Japanese Individuals Using Population-specific SNP Array

BACKGROUND

To clarify the genetic background of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the Japanese population, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using a population-specific single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array.

METHODS

We performed a GWAS and replication study including 1676 UC patients and 2381 healthy controls. The probability of colectomy was compared between genotypes of rs117506082, the top hit SNP at HLA loci, by the Kaplan-Meier method. We studied serum expression of miR-622, a newly identified candidate gene, from 32 UC patients and 8 healthy controls by quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

In the GWAS, only the HLA loci showed genome-wide significant associations with UC (rs117506082, P = 6.69E-28). Seven nominally significant regions included 2 known loci, IL23R (rs76418789, P = 6.29E-7) and IRF8 (rs16940202, P = 1.03E-6), and 5 novel loci: MIR622 (rs9560575, P = 8.23E-7), 14q31 (rs117618617, P = 1.53E-6), KAT6B (rs12260609, P = 1.81E-6), PAX3-CCDC140-SGPP2 (rs7589797, P = 2.87E-6), and KCNA2 (rs118020656, P = 4.01E-6). Combined analysis revealed that IL23R p.G149R (rs76418789, P = 9.03E-11; odds ratio [OR], 0.51) had genome-wide significant association with UC. Patients with GG genotype of rs117506082 had a significantly lower probability of total colectomy than those with the GA+AA genotype (P = 1.72E-2). Serum expression of miR-622 in patients with inactive UC tended to be higher than in healthy controls and patients with active UC (inactive UC vs healthy controls, P = 3.03E-02; inactive UC vs active UC, P = 6.44E-02).

CONCLUSIONS

IL23R p.G149R is a susceptibility locus for UC in Japanese individuals. The GG genotype of rs117506082 at HLA loci may predict a better clinical course.

Biologics and surgical outcomes in Crohn's disease: is there a direct relationship?

Despite significant advances in medical therapy in the management of Crohn's disease (CD), surgery is still required in a significant proportion of patients and constitutes an important tool in treatment algorithms. Recently, more options of biological agents have been made available, and most patients with CD undergoing surgical procedures have been previously exposed to this class of drugs. There is controversy in the literature as to whether anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, anti-integrins, or anti-interleukins (ILs) have a direct relationship with increased postoperative complications. In this narrative review, the authors summarize the most important data regarding the effect of biologics on postoperative outcomes in CD. Most studies (with different designs) are based on the experience with anti-TNF agents, mostly with infliximab. Some studies outlined the relationship between vedolizumab and postoperative complications, and there is a lack of data with ustekinumab in this scenario. Most studies are retrospective, but few prospective data are available. A cause-effect (proof of concept) direct relationship between biologics and an increase in postoperative morbidity has not been demonstrated to date. Several confounding factors such as previous use of steroids, malnutrition, and unfavorable abdominal conditions have a definitely effect on postoperative complications in CD. Biologics seem safe to be used in the perioperative period, but available data are still controversial. Multidisciplinary individualized decisions should be made on a case-to-case basis, adapting the surgical strategy according to risk factors involved.

The voltage-gated potassium channel KV1.3 as a therapeutic target for venom-derived peptides

The voltage-gated potassium channel K_V1.3 is a well-established therapeutic target for a range of autoimmune diseases, in addition to being the site of action of many venom-derived peptides. Numerous studies have documented the efficacy of venom peptides that target K_V1.3, in particular from sea anemones and scorpions, in animal models of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and multiple sclerosis. Moreover, an analogue of the sea anemone peptide ShK (known as dalazatide) has successfully completed Phase 1 clinical trials in mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis. In this article we consider other potential therapeutic applications of inhibitors of K_V1.3, including in inflammatory bowel disease and neuroinflammatory conditions such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, as well as fibrotic diseases. We also summarise strategies for facilitating the entry of peptides to the central nervous system, given that this will be a pre-requisite for the treatment of most neuroinflammatory diseases. Venom-derived peptides that have been reported recently to target K_V1.3 are also described. The increasing number of autoimmune and other conditions in which K_V1.3 is upregulated and is therefore a potential therapeutic target, combined with the fact that many venom-derived peptides are potent inhibitors of K_V1.3, suggests that venoms are likely to continue to serve as a rich source of new pharmacological tools and therapeutic leads targeting this channel.

IBD considerations in spondyloarthritis

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) may be regarded a family of auto-inflammatory conditions with inflammation focused on the joints. These form part of a wider family of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, which include inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). These conditions share common elements of pathophysiology and it is perhaps unsurprising, therefore, that individuals with SpA frequently manifest gastrointestinal inflammation, to which the physician managing the patient with SpA must be alert. In this article, we review the shared epidemiology and pathophysiology of these conditions, before discussing approaches to diagnosis and management of inflammatory gastrointestinal pathology in patients seen in rheumatology clinics. In particular, we discuss the difference between non-specific gastrointestinal inflammation commonly described in this patient group and the more specific diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. We describe the appropriate diagnostic workup for patients suspected of having IBD. In addition, we discuss how a diagnosis of IBD can inform treatment selection, highlighting important differences in treatment choice, drug dosing, monitoring and drug safety for this particular comorbid patient population.

Long-term outcomes of patients with ulcerative proctitis: Analysis from a large referral centre cohort

INTRODUCTION

Long-term outcomes of patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP) have been poorly investigated, since these patients are excluded from participation in randomized controlled clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic and therapeutic long-term outcomes of patients with UP.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with UP followed at our referral centre between 1 January 1998 and 1 January 2019 was performed. Treatment success was defined as clinical response (significant improvement in UP-related symptoms) and endoscopic response (mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1) if available at last follow-up.

RESULTS

From a total of 1561 patients with ulcerative colitis, 118 patients with UP were identified. A total of 36 (31%) patients were refractory to rectal and oral therapy with 5-ASA and corticosteroids, necessitating azathioprine as monotherapy in 19 (16%) patients and/or biological therapies in 33 (28%) patients. After a median follow-up of 71 months (interquartile range 29-149 months), treatment success was observed in 103/118 (87%) UP patients and in 25/36 (69%) patients with refractory UP. Clinical response rates were significantly higher for refractory UP patients treated with biologicals (23/33; 70%) compared to ones treated with azathioprine (2/19; 11%; p  =  0.001).

CONCLUSION

Good clinical outcomes were recorded in UP, with treatment success in 87% of patients. Nevertheless, 28% needed escalation to biologicals. Long-term outcome in patients on biologicals was superior to azathioprine.

Etrolizumab for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: An Overview of the Phase 3 Clinical Program

Introduction

Etrolizumab is a next-generation anti-integrin with dual action that targets two pathways of inflammation in the gut. A robust phase 3 clinical program in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease is ongoing and will evaluate the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab in well-defined patient populations in rigorous trials that include direct head-to-head comparisons against approved anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents (anti-TNF). The etrolizumab phase 3 clinical program consists of six randomized controlled trials (RCTs; UC: HIBISCUS I and II, GARDENIA, LAUREL, HICKORY; Crohn’s disease: BERGAMOT) and two open-label extension trials (OLEs; UC: COTTONWOOD; Crohn’s disease: JUNIPER) evaluating patients with moderately to severely active UC or Crohn’s disease.

Methods

In the UC RCTs, patients are randomly assigned according to each protocol to receive etrolizumab, adalimumab, infliximab, or placebo. In BERGAMOT, patients are randomly assigned to receive etrolizumab 105 mg, etrolizumab 210 mg, or placebo. The primary outcomes for the UC RCTs are Mayo Clinic score-based clinical response, remission, and clinical remission; for BERGAMOT, the co-primary outcomes are clinical remission (based on abdominal pain and stool frequency) and endoscopic improvement (based on the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s disease). The OLEs will primarily assess long-term efficacy and safety. Secondary and exploratory endpoints include endoscopy, histology, quality of life, and biomarkers at various timepoints.

Discussion

The etrolizumab phase 3 clinical program is the largest and most comprehensive in inflammatory bowel disease, enrolling more than 3000 patients. The program explores both induction and maintenance regimens. HIBISCUS I and II and GARDENIA are among the first head-to-head trials in UC against an anti-TNF and are the first registrational trials making that comparison. This program will also help address unanswered clinical questions on evaluation of treatment effects and treatment selection across a range of patients with varying treatment histories using an extensive repository of patient samples and data.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: HIBISCUS I (NCT02163759), HIBISCUS II (NCT02171429), GARDENIA (NCT02136069), LAUREL (NCT02165215), HICKORY (NCT02100696), COTTONWOOD (NCT02118584), BERGAMOT (NCT02394028), JUNIPER (NCT02403323).

The treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease in 2020

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple new medications with novel mechanisms of action are now available to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Identifying the appropriate patients in whom to use these therapies is critical in maximizing benefit and reducing unnecessary risks. Once the appropriate therapy is selected, using a treat-to-target algorithm including symptomatic, biochemical, and endoscopic monitoring can improve clinical outcomes. If symptoms recur, these same principles, coupled with therapeutic drug monitoring, should be considered to confirm inflammation and determine next therapeutic steps.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple network meta-analyses can assist clinicians in determining the ideal biologic or small molecule therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe IBD. Once selected, several clinical trials have demonstrated that follow-up in 3 to 4 months, coupled with fecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein monitoring, can improve clinical remission and mucosal healing rates. Structural assessment should be performed via colonoscopy, enterography, or capsule endoscopy, dependent on disease location, at 9--12 months to confirm healing.

SUMMARY

Appropriate disease stratification, coupled with biologic or small molecule medication selection and treat-to-target follow-up, can greatly assist clinicians who are managing patients with IBD in achieving the greatest potential benefits of medical therapy.

Effectiveness of ustekinumab dose escalation in Crohn's disease patients with insufficient response to standard-dose subcutaneous maintenance therapy

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients will not respond or lose response to ustekinumab. The current evidence to support the effectiveness of dose-optimisation for ustekinumab nonresponse is limited.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of dose escalation of ustekinumab.

METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. We included active Crohn's disease patients who received a standard-dose intravenous induction and at least one subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg dose. All enrolled patients received dose escalation by either shortening the interval between the doses to every 4 or 6 weeks, intravenous reinduction or a combination of strategies. The primary outcome of the study was clinical response at week 16 after dose escalation.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients (22 centres/14 countries) were included. The patients were dose-escalated after a median treatment duration of 30 weeks. At week 16 from escalation, 73/142 (51.4%) responded to treatment, including 55/142 (38.7%) in clinical remission. Corticosteroid-free remission was achieved in 6/34 (17.6%) patients on corticosteroids at the time of escalation; 118/142 (83%) continued treatment beyond week 16. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 74/118 (62.7%) patients. On the last follow-up, 51/98 (52%) patients with available data responded to treatment, including 41/98 (42%) in clinical remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensification of ustekinumab maintenance dosage was effective in over 50% of the patients. This strategy should be considered in patients who are nonresponsive to every 8 weeks ustekinumab maintenance dosing.

Clinical relevance of innovative immunoassays for serum ustekinumab and anti-ustekinumab antibody levels in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody to the p40 subunit of human IL-12/IL-23. The purpose of this report is to verify the newly developed immunoassays for serum ustekinumab and anti-ustekinumab antibody (AUA) concentrations and assess their clinical utility.

METHODS

Serum ustekinumab trough levels and AUA levels were measured using new immunoassays in 38 patients with Crohn's disease under ustekinumab maintenance injection.

RESULTS

Mean ustekinumab trough levels were 2.54 ± 2.1 μg/mL, and 3 of 38 patients (7.9%) were positive for AUAs. There was no association between ustekinumab trough levels and AUA levels. The optimal trough level of ustekinumab to maintain negative C-reactive protein levels (≤ 0.3 mg/dL) was 1.67 μg/mL determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Ustekinumab trough level negatively but significantly correlated with C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and Crohn's disease activity index and positively and significantly correlated with serum albumin levels. Ustekinumab trough levels were significantly higher in biologics-naïve patients than in biologics-experienced patients, although there was no difference in AUA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed new assays for serum ustekinumab trough and AUA levels. These assays might provide new insights into therapeutic drug monitoring-based management of Crohn's disease patients under ustekinumab therapy.

Immediate Infusion Reaction to Intravenous Ustekinumab in Three Crohn's Disease Patients: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Recently, ustekinumab has been approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Treatment is started with an intravenous induction dose, followed by a subcutaneous dosage. We present details of three patients with therapy-refractory Crohn's disease who experienced an immediate infusion reaction to intravenous administration of ustekinumab. In two of these patients a subsequent reaction to subcutaneous injections occurred. Clinical features and pathophysiology are discussed.

Targeting T cells in inflammatory bowel disease

T cells play a pivotal role in the immune response underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis. On this basis, over the past 25 years several drugs have assessed to target T cells in IBD patients. Amongst anti-CD3 antibodies, visilizumab and foralumab did not show clinical efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) patients, respectively, whereas otelixizumab has been tested in vitro only. The anti-CD4 BF-5 and cM-T412, and the anti-CD25 basiliximab and daclizumab were not effective in CD and UC patients, respectively. The anti-NKG2D antibody NNC0142-0002 showed clinical benefit in CD patients, in particular in biologic naïve ones, in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. The anti-CD40L M90 and the GSK1349571A blocking calcium release-activated calcium (CRAC) channels, which are involved in the T cell activation and proliferation, were tested only in ex vivo/in vitro experiments. Apart from ustekinumab, all the other drugs targeting T cell-derived cytokines failed. The reinduction of lamina propria T cell apoptosis is a mechanism to modulate T cell survival exploited by cyclosporin A, azathioprine and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents, such as infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab. In this article, we review the drugs targeting T cells via surface receptors, via T cell-derived cytokines, via CRAC channels or by inducing apoptosis.

Soluble Siglec-9 alleviates intestinal inflammation through inhibition of the NF-κB pathway

BACKGROUND

Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglecs) are a superfamily of immunoreceptors recognizing sialic acid. Siglec-9 has been shown to mediate inhibitory immune responses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a soluble form of Siglec-9 (sSiglec-9) on inflamed intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), murine macrophages, and experimental murine colitis models.

METHODS

COLO 205 human IECs and RAW 264.7 murine macrophages were pretreated with sSiglec-9 and then stimulated with TNF-α or lipopolysaccharides, respectively. The expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-8 and TNF-α was measured using real-time RT-PCR and ELISA. To demonstrate the inhibitory effects of sSiglec-9 on the NF-κB pathway, IκBα phosphorylation/degradation was determined using western blotting and the DNA binding activity of NF-κB was evaluated using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Further, mouse models with dextran sulfate sodium-induced acute colitis and piroxicam-induced IL-10^-/- chronic colitis were generated. Intraperitoneal injections of sSiglec-9 were performed, and body weight, colon length, and histopathologic findings were examined.

RESULTS

sSiglec-9 suppressed IL-8 and TNF-α gene expression in stimulated COLO 205 and RAW 264.7 cells. sSiglec-9 inhibited IκBα phosphorylation/degradation and the DNA binding activity of NF-κB. sSiglec-9 injections significantly ameliorated weight loss, colon shortening, and the severity of intestinal inflammation in acute and chronic colitis mouse models.

CONCLUSION

sSiglec-9 may inhibit NF-κB activation in IECs and macrophages and alleviate experimental colitis in mice, suggesting that sSiglec-9 is a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

The Treatment of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Biologic Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biologics for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been transformative to the therapeutic goals in the pediatric population. We review the biologics used to treat IBD, highlighting the importance of patient selection, dosing considerations, and therapeutic drug monitoring in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Infliximab is well-established as a safe and efficacious therapy for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Both dose escalation strategies and therapeutic drug monitoring increase the likelihood of response to anti-TNFα therapies. Early real-world experience of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in pediatric IBD shows promising results, including clinical response rates comparable to what is seen in adults, but there are limited data using them as first-line therapies. Biologic therapies have improved outcomes in pediatric IBD, including achieving mucosal healing as well as improved growth and pubertal development. Therapeutic drug monitoring improves likelihood of response to anti-TNFα therapies, but further studies for vedolizumab and ustekinumab are necessary.

Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab induction therapy for 103 patients with ulcerative colitis: a GETAID multicentre real-world cohort study

BACKGROUND

Phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), but few real-world data are currently available.

AIM

To assess short-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with UC.

METHODS

From January to September 2019, all patients with UC treated with ustekinumab in 20 French GETAID centres were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo Clinic score ≤2) at weeks 12-16 without a rectal bleeding subscore >1.

RESULTS

Among the 103 patients included, 70% had been previously exposed to ≥2 anti-TNF agents and 85% to vedolizumab. At weeks 12-16, steroid-free clinical remission and clinical remission rates were 35.0% and 39.8% respectively; the absence of rectal bleeding with normal stool frequency was noted in 19.4% of patients. Two patients discontinued ustekinumab before the week 12-16 visit and underwent surgery. In multivariable analysis, a partial Mayo Clinic score >6 at inclusion (18.6% vs 46.7%, P = 0.003) and a history of both exposure to anti-TNF and vedolizumab therapies (27.3% vs 80.0%, P = 0.001) were negatively associated with steroid-free clinical remission at weeks 12-16. Adverse events occurred in 7.8% of patients and serious adverse events in 3.9% of patients.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of highly refractory patients with UC with multiple prior drug failures, ustekinumab provided steroid-free clinical remission in one-third of cases at weeks 12-16. Clinical severity and previous use of anti-TNF and vedolizumab therapies were associated with ustekinumab failure at weeks 12-16.

IL23 Promotes Antimicrobial Pathways in Human Macrophages, Which Are Reduced With the IBD-Protective IL23R R381Q Variant

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Interleukin (IL)23 is a major contributor to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis and is being pursued as a therapeutic target, both through targeting IL23 alone or in combination with IL12. Unexpected trial outcomes highlight the importance of understanding the cell types through which IL23 regulates immune responses, and how IL23 and IL12 compare in these responses. Macrophages are key players in IBD, and IL23 recently was found to promote inflammatory outcomes in human macrophages. This raises the possibility that IL23 may be required for additional essential macrophage functions, in particular microbial clearance, such that either blocking the IL23 pathway or the IL23R-R381Q IBD-protective variant may reduce macrophage-mediated microbial clearance.

METHODS

We analyzed protein expression, signaling, bacterial uptake, and intracellular bacterial clearance in human monocyte-derived macrophages through Western blot, flow cytometry, and gentamicin protection.

RESULTS

Autocrine/paracrine IL23 was critical for optimal levels of pattern-recognition-receptor (PRR)-induced intracellular bacterial clearance in human macrophages. Mechanisms regulated by IL23 included induction of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1-dependent bacterial uptake, and up-regulation of reactive oxygen species through nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase members, nitric oxide synthase 2, and autophagy through ATG5 and ATG16L1. Complementing these pathways in IL23R-deficient macrophages restored PRR-induced bacterial uptake and clearance. Janus kinase 2, TYK2, and STAT3 were required for IL23-induced mechanisms. IL23 and IL12 induced antimicrobial pathways to similar levels in human macrophages. Relative to IL23R-R381, transfected IL23R-Q381, or monocyte-derived macrophages from IL23R-Q381 carriers showed reduced bacterial uptake and clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

We identify that autocrine/paracrine IL23 is required for optimal PRR-enhanced macrophage bacterial uptake and intracellular bacterial clearance, define mechanisms regulating IL23R-induced bacterial clearance, and determine how the IBD-protective IL23R-R381Q variant modulates these processes.

Facilitating Longitudinal Exposure-Response Modeling of a Composite Endpoint Using the Joint Modeling of Sparsely and Frequently Collected Subcomponents

Longitudinal exposure-response modeling plays an important role in optimizing dose and dosing regimens in clinical drug development. Certain clinical trials contain induction and maintenance phases where the maintenance treatment depends on the subjects' achieving the main endpoint outcome in the induction phase. Due to logistic difficulties and cost considerations, the main endpoint is usually collected more sparsely than a subcomponent (or other related endpoints). The sparse collection of the main endpoint hampers its longitudinal modeling. In principle, the frequent collection of a subcomponent allows its longitudinal modeling. However, the model evaluation via the visual predictive check (VPC) in the maintenance phase is difficult due to the requirement of the main-endpoint model to identify the treatment subgroups. This manuscript proposes a solution to this dilemma via the joint modeling of the main endpoint and the subcomponent. The challenges are illustrated by analyzing the data collected up to 60 weeks from a phase III trial of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The main endpoint Mayo score, a commonly used composite endpoint to measure the severity of UC, was collected only at baseline, the end of the induction phase, and the end of the maintenance phase. The partial Mayo score, which is a major subset of the Mayo score, was collected at nearly every 4 weeks. A longitudinal joint exposure-response model, developed under a latent-variable Indirect Response modeling framework, described the Mayo score time course and facilitated the VPC model evaluation under a response-adaptive trial design.

Microbiome characterization and re-design by biologic agents for inflammatory bowel disease insights

The therapeutic effect of inflammatory bowel disease has improved in the past decades, but most of patients cannot tolerate, do not respond to drugs, or relapse after treating with conventional therapy. Therefore, new and more effective treatment methods are still needed in treatment of IBD. In this review, we will discuss the relevant mechanisms and the latest research progress of biologics (anti-TNF treatments, interleukin inhibitors, integrin inhibitors, antisense oligonucleotide, and JAK inhibitors) for IBD, focus on the efficacy and safety of drugs for moderate-to-severe IBD, and summarize the clinical status and future development direction of biologics in IBD.

Update on therapeutic management of spondyloarthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease

Management of spondyloarthritis (SpA) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains a challenging task that requires multidisciplinary collaboration. Separate guidelines for each disease are well-established. However, the management of SpA co-occurring with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) has hardly been studied. There are few specific reports that focus on this therapeutic area. The main issue is that some therapeutic options used to treat one disease can negatively influence the other disease course. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic alternatives that would allow for the appropriate management of patients with both SpA and IBD. Key Points • Collaboration between gastroenterologists and rheumatologists is recommended to improve the management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). • When treating SpA occurring simultaneously with IBD, it would be appropriate to give priority to the active disease. • Considering its well-proven efficacy in both conditions, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy remains the corner stone in the treatment of these patients. • Other therapeutic options such as Janus kinases (JAK) inhibitors, interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-12 inhibitors, and vedolizumab are still under investigation.

What's new in IBD therapy: An "omics network" approach

The industrial revolution that began in the late 1800s has resulted in dramatic changes in the environment, human lifestyle, dietary habits, social structure, and so on. Almost certainly because this rapid evolution has outpaced the ability of the body to adapt to a number of environmental and behavioral changes, there has been a parallel emergence of several chronic inflammatory diseases, among which are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), primarily ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The ability to treat these conditions has progressively improved in the last 50 years, particularly in the last couple of decades with the introduction of biological therapy targeting primarily soluble mediators produced by inflammatory cells. A large number of biologics are now available, but all of them induce similarly unsatisfactory (<50%) rates of clinical response and remission, and most of them lose efficacy over time, requiring dose escalation or switching from one biologic to another. So, treatment of IBD still needs improvement that will occur only if different approaches are taken. A reason why even the most recent forms of IBD therapy are unsatisfactory is because they target only selected components of an exceedingly complex pathophysiological process, a reality that must be honestly considered if better IBD therapies are to be achieved. Brand new approaches must integrate all relevant factors in their totality - the "omes" - and identify the key controllers of biological responses. This can be accomplished by using systems biology-based approaches and advanced bioinformatics tools, which together represent the essence of network medicine. This review looks at the past and the present of IBD pathogenesis and therapy, and discusses how to develop new therapies based on a network medicine approach.

Cytokines in inflammatory bowel diseases - Update 2020

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD), namely Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis, cause a significant disease burden in modern civilization. Ever since the introduction of anti-TNF-directed therapies 20 years ago, cytokines have attracted a lot of research attention and several cytokine-directed therapies have been implemented in the clinical treatment of these diseases. The research progress in these past years has underlined the importance of both myeloid and lymphoid elements of the immune system in the pathogenesis of IBD and their cytokine-mediated interplay. The conceptual framework of the mucosal cytokine network has shifted during these years from a T helper (Th) dichotomy (Th1/Th2) to the effector/regulatory T cell balance, while nowadays, the importance of myeloid cell instruction of lymphocytes, namely by IL-12 and IL-23, is increasingly recognized. Anti-IL-12p40 agents, like ustekinumab, groundbreakingly changed patient care, and anti-IL23p19-directed approaches are on the verge of grand success. In this review we present a modular approach to understand the cytokine network and put it into the context of the pathogenesis of IBD with a special focus on publications since 2014.

Novel Therapeutic Options for People with Ulcerative Colitis: An Update on Recent Developments with Janus Kinase (JAK) Inhibitors

Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), the main forms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in human beings, are chronic relapsing-remitting disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, which usually require lifelong therapies. For many years, IBD have been managed with corticosteroids, aminosalicylates and immunosuppressants (ie, thiopurines). The advent of biologic therapies (anti-TNF-α agents) has significantly improved the outcome of IBD patients in terms of prolonged clinical remission, corticosteroid sparing, achievement of mucosal healing and prevention of disease-related complications. Nevertheless, primary failure or loss of response to biologics occur in about 50% of patients treated with these drugs. Therefore, the need for new effective treatments for such patients has critically emerged as an urgent priority. With this regard, several small-molecule drugs (SMDs) targeting lymphocyte trafficking (ie, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators) and the JAK/STAT pathway (eg, tofacitinib) have been recently developed and tested in IBD. In particular, JAK inhibitors are oral compounds characterized by short half-life, low antigenicity and the ability to dampen several pro-inflammatory pathways simultaneously. Tofacitinib, a pan-JAK inhibitor, has shown good efficacy and safety in UC clinical trials and has been recently approved for the treatment of UC patients. In this review, we analyze the main evidence supporting the use of JAK inhibitors in UC and explore the unanswered questions about the use of this class of drug in UC.

Positioning Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic, idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that affects the large intestine. Several therapeutic drug classes are available for the treatment of UC: salicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, calcineurin inhibitors, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents, anti-adhesion molecules, and, more recently, small molecules directed against the Janus kinase (JAK) pathways, and ustekinumab (anti IL12/23). Other drugs are currently in development, and they will be probably available for UC patients in the near future. Several therapeutic algorithms have been proposed for the treatment of UC patients, yet these are predominantly based on expert opinions rather than high-quality evidence, mainly due to the lack of head-to-head trials, especially for monoclonal antibody and small molecule therapies. The optimal position of therapies in these algorithms remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this review of the literature to provide an up-to-date overview of the available evidence on this topic.

Comparative efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in ulcerative colitis after failure of a first subcutaneous anti-TNF agent: a multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Few data exist to help select a second biologic agent in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC).

AIM

To compare the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in UC patients who failed a first subcutaneous anti-tumor necrosing factor (TNF) agent.

METHODS

Consecutive UC patients from 12 French centres starting IFX or VDZ after at least one injection of adalimumab or golimumab have been included in a retrospective study. Outcomes were clinical remission at week 14, survival without treatment discontinuation and survival without UC-related event.

RESULTS

Among the 225 patients included, clinical remission at week 14 was achieved in 40/154 (26%) patients treated with IFX and in 35/71 (49%) treated with VDZ (P = 0.001). After a propensity score matching analysis, this difference remained significant (odds ratio: 1.67; 95% confidence interval: 1.08-2.56; P = 0.02). With a median follow-up of 117 weeks, survival rates without treatment discontinuation at years 1 and 3 were 50% and 29% with IFX, and 80% and 55% with VDZ, respectively (P < 0.001). Regarding survival without UC-related event, they were 49% and 27% with IFX, and 74% and 52% with VDZ (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

After failure of a first subcutaneous anti-TNF agent, UC patients were more likely to achieve clinical remission with VDZ than those treated with IFX. Although due to prescription habits patients in the IFX group had a significantly more severe disease, these differences remained after adjustments and subgroup analyses. Such results have to be confirmed prospectively and warrant dedicated head-to-head trials.

Ulcerative colitis: Recent advances in the understanding of disease pathogenesis

Inflammatory bowel diseases are common, complex, immune-mediated conditions with a sharply rising global prevalence. While major advances since 2000 have provided strong mechanistic clues implicating a de-regulation in the normal interaction among host genetics, immunity, microbiome, and the environment, more recent progress has generated entirely new hypotheses and also further refined older disease concepts. In this review, we focus specifically on these novel developments in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis.

Steroid use and misuse: a key performance indicator in the management of IBD

Corticosteroids remain an important tool for inducing remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but they have no role in maintenance of remission. The significant adverse side effect profile of these drugs means their use should be avoided where possible or measures taken to reduce their risk. Despite an expanding array of alternative therapies, corticosteroid dependency and excess remain common. Appropriate steroid use is now regarded a key performance indicator in the management of IBD. This article aims to outline indications for corticosteroid use in IBD, their risks and strategies to reduce their use and misuse.

Real-World Experience With Acute Infusion Reactions to Ustekinumab at 2 Large Tertiary Care Centers

Background

Ustekinumab is approved for Crohn's disease and Ulcerative colitis with acute infusion reactions reported at a rate of 0.9%-4.5%.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients experiencing an acute infusion reaction to ustekinumab at 2 large institutions.

Results

Acute ustekinumab infusion reactions occurred in 16 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC), at a rate of 0.8%-3%. Patients were all naïve to ustekinumab, receiving their initial IV induction. Ninety-three percent subsequently tolerated the injection without issues.

Conclusions

In this large, real-world study of acute infusion reactions to ustekinumab, the rate was similar to that seen in clinical trials-0.8%-3%.

Efficacy of ustekinumab vs. advanced therapies for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective: To compare the relative efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) vs. other therapies for 1-year response and remission rates in patients with moderate-severe UC.Methods: Randomized controlled trials reporting induction and maintenance efficacy of anti-TNFs (infliximab [IFX], adalimumab [ADA], golimumab [GOL]), vedolizumab (VDZ), tofacitinib (TOF) or UST were identified through a systematic literature review (SLR). Analyses were conducted for clinical response, clinical remission and endoscopic-mucosal healing for populations with and without failure of prior biologics (non-biologic failure [NBF]; biologic failure [BF]). Maintenance data from trials with re-randomized response designs were re-calculated to correspond to treat-through arms. Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMA) were conducted to obtain posterior distribution probabilities for UST to perform better than comparators.Results: Six trials included NBF patients and four included BF patients. In NBF patients, UST as a 1-year regimen showed higher probabilities of clinical response, remission and endoscopic-mucosal healing vs. all treatments: Bayesian probabilities of UST being better than active therapies ranged from 91% (VDZ) to 100% (ADA) for response; 82% (VDZ) to 99% (ADA) for remission and 82% (IFX) to 100% (ADA and GOL) for endoscopic-mucosal healing. In BF patients, UST was the most effective treatment (Q8W dose); however, effect sizes were smaller than in the NBF population.Conclusions: Results indicate a higher likelihood of response, remission and endoscopic-mucosal healing at 1 year with UST vs. comparators in the NBF population. In BF patients, a higher likelihood of response to UST vs. the most comparators was also observed, although results were more uncertain.

Maintenance of Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab Through One Year in a Phase II Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial of Patients With Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab through 1 year in a phase II trial in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Eligible patients were diagnosed as having clinically active SLE (based on Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria), despite standard background therapy. Active disease was defined by an SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of ≥6 as well as having ≥1 British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A organ domain score and/or ≥2 BILAG B organ domain scores present at screening. Patients (n = 102) were randomized (3:2) to receive either ustekinumab (~6 mg/kg of single intravenous infusion at week 0, then 90-mg subcutaneous injections every 8 weeks beginning at week 8) or a matching placebo added to standard therapy. At week 24, the placebo group crossed over to receive a subcutaneous 90-mg dose of ustekinumab every 8 weeks, and the original ustekinumab group continued to receive therapy through week 40. Maintenance of efficacy was assessed using the SLEDAI-2K, the SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4), physician global assessment, and mucocutaneous and joint disease measures in a modified intent-to-treat population.

RESULTS

SRI-4 response rates were significantly greater in the ustekinumab group (62%) versus the placebo group (33%) in the week 24 primary end point analysis (P = 0.006) and were maintained at week 48 (63.3%) in the ustekinumab group. In the ustekinumab group, response rates across other disease measures were also maintained through week 48. Among patients in the placebo group who crossed over to ustekinumab treatment (n = 33), increased response rates across efficacy measures were noted. Among all ustekinumab-treated patients, 81.7% had ≥1 adverse event (AE), and 15.1% had ≥1 serious AE through week 56. No deaths, malignancies, opportunistic infections, or tuberculosis cases were observed.

CONCLUSION

Ustekinumab provided sustained clinical benefit in patients with SLE through 1 year, with a safety profile consistent with other indications.

AGA Technical Review on the Management of Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

A subset of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) present with, or progress to, moderate to severe disease activity. These patients are at high risk for colectomy, hospitalization, corticosteroid dependence, and serious infections. The risk of life-threatening complications and emergency colectomy is particularly high among those patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Optimal management of outpatients or inpatients with moderate to severe UC often requires the use of immunomodulator and/or biologic therapies, including thiopurines, methotrexate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, TNF-α antagonists, vedolizumab, tofacitnib, or ustekinumab, either as monotherapy or in combination (with immunomodulators), to mitigate these risks. Decisions about optimal drug therapy in moderate to severe UC are complex, with limited guidance on comparative efficacy and safety of different treatments, leading to considerable practice variability. Therefore, the American Gastroenterological Association prioritized development of clinical guidelines on this topic. To inform the clinical guidelines, this technical review was completed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Focused questions in adult outpatients with moderate to severe UC included: (1) overall and comparative efficacy of different medications for induction and maintenance of remission in patients with or without prior exposure to TNF-α antagonists, (2) comparative efficacy and safety of biologic monotherapy vs combination therapy with immunomodulators, (3) comparative efficacy of top-down (upfront use of biologics and/or immunomodulator therapy) vs step-up therapy (acceleration to biologic and/or immunomodulator therapy only after failure of 5-aminosalicylates, and (4) role of continuing vs stopping 5-aminosalicylates in patients being treated with immunomodulator and/or biologic therapy for moderate to severe UC. Focused questions in adults hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis included: (5) overall and comparative efficacy of pharmacologic interventions for inpatients refractory to corticosteroids, in reducing risk of colectomy, (6) optimal dosing regimens for intravenous corticosteroids and infliximab in these patients, and (7) role of adjunctive antibiotics in the absence of confirmed infections.

New insights into the IL-12 and IL-23: From a molecular basis to clinical application in immune-mediated inflammation and cancers

The cytokines interleukin-12 (IL-12) and IL-23 share a common IL-12/IL-23p40 subunit in structure and play a central role in T cell-mediated responses in inflammation. Over-activated IL-12 and IL-23 signaling drives aberrant T helper (Th) 1 and Th17 immune responses and contributes to immune-mediated diseases. Evidence from genome-wide association studies has shown that genetic alterations in the IL-12/IL-23 signaling pathways have significant links with chronic inflammation. In addition, accumulating evidence from animal models and clinical trials has provided insights into the effectiveness of blocking the IL-12/IL-23 pathways in immune regulation, broadening the clinical indications of IL-12/IL-23 pathway effectors in immune-mediated diseases. More recently, it has been addressed that the balance between IL and 12 and IL-23 is also critical in carcinogenesis. IL-12- and IL-23-driven T cell cytokines are especially important in controlling tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis, and thus, the IL-12/IL-23 pathway may be a promising target for immunotherapy. This review focuses on IL-12/IL-23 signal transduction and biological functionality in autoimmunity and oncoimmunology. We discuss the therapeutic rationale for targeting these cytokines to treat immune-mediated diseases and issues regarding their inadvertent consequences in the balance of host defense and tumor surveillance and summarize their recent clinical applications in immune-mediated diseases.

Small molecule oral targeted therapies in ulcerative colitis

The incidence and prevalence of ulcerative colitis are increasing globally. Although the exact cause and pathogenesis of this disease is unclear, research has led to a better understanding of the condition and to identification of new targets for therapy, which in turn has encouraged the development of new therapies. As well as biologic therapies, which have changed the way inflammatory bowel disease is managed, small molecules have been developed for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. These small molecule treatments are orally administered and are likely to bring a substantial shift in the way this chronic disease is treated. Oral therapies offer many advantages over infusion therapies, such as ease of use, increased acceptability by patients, and reduction of cost. This Review focuses not only on oral therapies that have been approved for use in ulcerative colitis, but also on those that are in development, providing a comprehensive overview for clinicians of available oral therapies and drugs that are likely to become available. We have also reviewed drugs that have shown promise in preclinical studies and could be effective future therapies.

The Complex Interplay Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Malignancy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Both the chronic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and its treatment, can increase the risk of malignancy. There is also an increasing number of patients with current and prior cancer who require IBD treatment. Thus, there is a complex interplay between immunosuppressive treatment and monitoring for new and recurrent cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vedolizumab and ustekinumab have not been shown to increase the risk of malignancy. Transplant data shows a potential risk with tofacitinib although rheumatoid arthritis data does not. IBD patients have been shown to tolerate chemotherapy, specifically with cytotoxic compared with hormonal chemotherapy. Patients with prior cancer are at increased risk of new or recurrent cancers; however, immunosuppression appears to be safe. Emerging treatments for IBD have demonstrated acceptable safety profiles for malignancy risk, and immunosuppression appears to be safe for use in patients with current and prior malignancy. More data is still needed to assess long-term risk of malignancy in these patients, especially with newer treatments.

Positioning ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: new kid on the block

Introduction: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing disorder of the colonic tract. Dysregulated innate and adaptive immune pathways contribute to intestinal inflammation in IBD, and cytokines, including IL-12 and IL-23, play a key role. The blockade of both IL-12 and IL-23 may have an impact on different pathways of inflammation and could be effective for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.Ustekinumab is a fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody which binds to the shared p40 protein subunit of IL-12 and -23. It is currently approved for several immune-mediated diseases such as moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and Crohn's disease, and has shown promising results in UC.Areas covered: A review of the literature was performed to understand several aspects including the role of IL-12 and -23 in UC, the potential therapeutic role of ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease, and the positioning of ustekinumab in the therapeutic algorithm of UC, based on extrapolated data from available randomized clinical trials.Expert opinion: Ustekinumab is effective and safe in UC, and shows potential advantages compared to other drugs in moderate-to-severe UC.

Emerging treatments for inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic inflammation, a relapsing and remitting clinical course, requirement for lifelong medication and often, significant morbidity. While multiple effective therapeutic options exist for the treatment of IBD, a proportion of patients will either fail to respond or lose response to therapy. Advances in therapeutics, such as the gut-specific anti-integrins, now offer patients an alternative option to systemic immunosuppression. Anti-interleukin 12 (anti-IL-12)/IL-23 agents offer new and effective treatment options for CD, while the oral small molecules now offer an oral alternative for the treatment of moderate-to-severe disease, previously requiring subcutaneous injection or intravenous infusion. Alternatives to pharmacological treatment such as stem-cell transplant and faecal microbiota transplant are also showing some promise in the treatment of both CD and UC.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Modeling Analyses of Ustekinumab in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response (E-R) relationship of ustekinumab, an anti-interleukin-12/interleukin-23 (IL-12/IL-23) human monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), population PK and E-R modeling analyses were conducted based on the data from the pivotal phase 3 induction and maintenance studies in UC patients. The observed serum concentration-time data of ustekinumab were adequately described by a 2-compartment linear PK model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination. Body weight, baseline serum albumin, sex, and antibodies to ustekinumab were the covariates to influence ustekinumab PK, but the magnitudes of the effects of these covariates were not considered clinically relevant, and dose adjustment was not warranted. Positive E-R relationships were demonstrated between ustekinumab exposure metrics and clinical endpoints (including clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic healing based on Mayo score) at induction week 8 and maintenance week 44, consistent with the effectiveness of ustekinumab in the induction and maintenance treatment of patients with UC. E-R modeling results suggest that ustekinumab ∼6 mg/kg intravenous induction and 90-mg subcutaneous every-8-week maintenance dose would produce greater efficacy than the 130 mg intravenous induction and the 90-mg subcutaneous every-12-week maintenance regimen, respectively. Our work provides a comprehensive evaluation of ustekinumab PK and E-R in a modeling framework to support ustekinumab dose recommendations in patients with UC.

First-Line Biologics or Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Practical Guide for the Clinician

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treating moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease has become increasingly complex as the array of available biologics increases. Moreover, tofacitinib, the first small molecule approved for IBD, is available for use in ulcerative colitis. Choosing the right biologic, for the right patient, at the right time, can be a confusing and daunting task for clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we summarize the evidence for first-line use of the available biologics by disease state. Special circumstances for consideration including rapidity of action, safety, comparative effectiveness, postoperative Crohn's disease, fertility and pregnancy, and extraintestinal manifestations are discussed. In the moderate-to-severe UC patient, vedolizumab and infliximab are preferred first-line options. In the moderate-to-severe CD patient with a penetrating phenotype or with multiple EIMs, infliximab or adalimumab are the preferred first-line agents. In the moderate-to-severe CD patient with an inflammatory phenotype, anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab are all reasonable options.

Histological healing: should it be considered as a new outcome for ulcerative colitis?

Introduction: Currently, mucosal healing is considered as a composite treatment end-point in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) since it has been demonstrated to improve disease-related outcomes. The definition of mucosal healing has evolved and current evidence suggests that in addition to endoscopic healing the achievement of histological remission (HR) represents a potential novel target in the management of IBD in relation to better long-term disease outcomes.Areas covered: We aimed to review the current literature on HR in ulcerative colitis and discuss its limitations and advantages when adopting this potential new target as an ultimate treatment outcome in clinical trials and routine clinical practice.Expert opinion: HR is achievable in UC with different rates in conventional therapies, biological and novel drugs. Targeting HR in UC lowers the risk of hospitalizations, colectomy, and colorectal cancer. HR occurs later than endoscopic remission, longer treatment courses are associated with higher HR assessment. This might imply modifying monitoring time schedules and algorithms. Prospective data are needed to support histological healing as a new treatment target in UC.

Dissecting the Heterogeneity in T-Cell Mediated Inflammation in IBD

Infiltration of the lamina propria by inflammatory CD4+ T-cell populations is a key characteristic of chronic intestinal inflammation. Memory-phenotype CD4+ T-cell frequencies are increased in inflamed intestinal tissue of IBD patients compared to tissue of healthy controls and are associated with disease flares and a more complicated disease course. Therefore, a tightly controlled balance between regulatory and inflammatory CD4+ T-cell populations is crucial to prevent uncontrolled CD4+ T-cell responses and subsequent intestinal tissue damage. While at steady state, T-cells display mainly a regulatory phenotype, increased in Th1, Th2, Th9, Th17, and Th17.1 responses, and reduced Treg and Tr1 responses have all been suggested to play a role in IBD pathophysiology. However, it is highly unlikely that all these responses are altered in each individual patient. With the rapidly expanding plethora of therapeutic options to inhibit inflammatory T-cell responses and stimulate regulatory T-cell responses, a crucial need is emerging for a robust set of immunological assays to predict and monitor therapeutic success at an individual level. Consequently, it is crucial to differentiate dominant inflammatory and regulatory CD4+ T helper responses in patients and relate these to disease course and therapy response. In this review, we provide an overview of how intestinal CD4+ T-cell responses arise, discuss the main phenotypes of CD4+ T helper responses, and review how they are implicated in IBD.