Clinical pharmacology of tramadol

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of O-alkyl derivatives of tramadol

Tramadol is a centrally acting opioid analgesic structurally related to codeine and morphine. O-Alkyl, N-desmethyl, and non-phenol containing derivatives of tramadol were synthesized to probe their effect on metabolic stability and both in vitro and in vivo potency.

Use of a sparse sampling study design to assess transfer of tramadol and its O-desmethyl metabolite into transitional breast milk

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

There are presently no published data on tramadol transfer into breast milk or on its effects in the breastfed infant.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

We have provided quantitative data on the absolute and relative infant doses of rac-tramadol and it rac-O-desmethyl metabolite for the breastfed infant. We have also demonstrated a novel sparse sampling data collection method for investigating infant exposure via milk.

AIMS

To investigate the transfer of rac-tramadol and its rac-O-desmethyl metabolite into transitional milk, and assess unwanted effects in the breastfed infant.

METHODS

Tramadol HCl (100 mg six hourly) was administered to 75 breastfeeding mothers for postoperative analgesia on days 2-4 after Caesarian section. Milk and plasma samples were collected after administration of four or more doses. Rac-tramadol and rac-O-desmethyltramadol were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Milk : plasma ratio (M : P) and infant doses were calculated by standard methods. The behavioural characteristics of the exposed breastfed infants and a matched control group of infants not exposed to tramadol were also studied. RESULTS At steady-state, mean (95% CI) M : P was 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) for rac-tramadol and 2.8 (2.5, 3.1) for rac-O-desmethyltramadol. The estimated absolute and relative infant doses were 112 (102, 122) microg kg(-1) day(-1) and 30 (28, 32) microg kg(-1) day(-1), and 2.24% (2.04, 2.44)% and 0.64% (0.59, 0.69)% for rac-tramadol and rac-O-desmethyltramadol, respectively. The exposed infants and control breastfed infants had similar characteristics, including Apgar scores at birth and Neurologic and Adaptive Capacity Scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined relative infant dose of 2.88% at steady-state was low. The similarity of NACS in exposed infants and controls suggests that there were no significant behavioural adverse effects. We conclude that short-term maternal use of tramadol during establishment of lactation is compatible with breastfeeding.

Going beyond efficacy: strategies for cancer pain management

Despite great advances in the fields of pain management and palliative care, pain directly or indirectly associated with a cancer diagnosis remains significantly undertreated. The present paper reviews the current standard for cancer pain management and highlights new treatments and targeted interventional techniques.

Cholestasis and endogenous opioids: liver disease and exogenous opioid pharmacokinetics

A class of endogenous opioids is upregulated in liver disease particular to cholestasis, which contributes to symptoms in liver disease such as pruritus, hypotension and encephalopathy. Symptoms associated with cholestasis are reversed or at least ameliorated by mu opioid receptor antagonists. Palliation of symptoms related to cholestatic liver disease also involves bile acid binding agents. Opioid receptor antagonists, unlike bile acid binding agents, have been reported to relieve multiple symptoms, except for pruritus, and improve liver function as demonstrated in experimental cholestasis. Exogenous opioid pharmacology is altered by liver disease. Dose reduction or prolongation of dose intervals is necessary depending on the severity of liver disease.

Fatal unintentional intoxications with tramadol during 1995–2005

Tramadol is an extensively used centrally acting analgesic and is considered a safe drug devoid of many serious adverse effects of traditional opioids. However, recently, toxicity and an abuse potential of tramadol have been reported. This study examined fatal unintentional tramadol intoxications among Swedish forensic autopsy cases between 1995 and 2005. All fatal intoxications were selected, in which toxic concentrations of tramadol (>1 microg/g femoral blood) had been detected, and where the forensic pathologist considered the intoxication unintentional and the fatal outcome at least partly explained by tramadol. Toxicology analyses, police reports, autopsy protocols and medical records were scrutinized. A total of 17 cases (eleven men and six women) of fatal unintentional tramadol intoxications were identified. For these cases the median age was 44 years (range 18-78 years) and the median tramadol concentration was 2.0 microg/g (range 1.1-12.0 microg/g). Other pharmaceutical substances, illicit drugs or ethanol were detected in addition to tramadol in all of these cases. In fact, intoxication with multiple drugs was considered the cause of death in 10 (59%) cases. However, in seven cases tramadol was the only substance present in toxic concentrations. A history of substance abuse was identified in 14 (82%) subjects and a present tramadol abuse in 8 (47%). These results suggest that fatal intoxications with tramadol may occur unintentionally and that subjects with a history of substance abuse may be at certain risk. Precaution is therefore warranted when prescribing tramadol in such patients.

Synergistic interaction between dexamethasone and tramadol in a murine model of acute visceral pain

Tramadol is effective in the management of mild to moderate postoperative pain, but its administration is associated with nausea and vomiting. Patients treated with tramadol, often receive dexamethasone as antiemetic. The aim of our investigation was to assess if the two drugs interact in a murine model of acute visceral pain. Using the acetic acid writhing test in mice, we assessed the antinociceptive effects of tramadol and dexamethasone (a glucocorticoid with antiemetic effect) administrated individually and in a 1 : 1 fixed ratio combination. Tramadol and dexamethasone induced a dose-dependent inhibition of the writhing response when administered individually, with ED(50) values of 2.9 [2.09-4.31, 95% confidence limit (CL)] mg/kg, and 0.13 (0.05-0.29, 95% CL) mg/kg, respectively. The ED(50) of the combination was 0.13 (0.01-0.29, 95% CL) mg/kg; the isobolographic and interaction index analysis revealed a synergistic interaction. The results suggest that the combination of tramadol and dexamethasone could be beneficial in the management of postoperative pain in humans.

Regular tramadol use does not affect the propofol dose requirement for induction of anaesthesia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

An increased risk of awareness during general anaesthesia in patients receiving tramadol has been reported. We studied whether tramadol affects the amount of propofol required for induction of anaesthesia.

METHODS

In this prospective controlled study, we evaluated 46 patients, half of whom used tramadol regularly. Entropy indices, state entropy and response entropy, were used to assess the level of hypnosis. Patients were anaesthetized with a propofol infusion (1 mg kg(-1) min(-1)) until they first became unconscious, and further until they developed a burst suppression pattern in the electroencephalogram. The doses of propofol needed to reach these end-points were recorded.

RESULTS

The amount (median, (range)) of propofol required for loss of consciousness was 2.0 (1.0-5.5) mg kg(-1) and 2.4 (0.9-8.3) mg kg(-1) (P=0.95) in the tramadol users and controls, respectively. The amount of propofol required for burst suppression was 5.8 (3.9-12.7) mg kg(-1) and 6.4 (2.9-15.1) mg kg(-1) (P=0.89) in the tramadol users and controls. There was no difference between the groups in state entropy and response entropy during different stages of induction of anaesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Tramadol did not affect the dose of propofol required to achieve loss of consciousness or burst suppression pattern in electroencephalogram during induction of general anaesthesia. However, there was a ninefold inter-individual variation in propofol dose requirement for loss of consciousness and a fivefold variation for reaching burst suppression. Due to extensive inter-individual variability, monitoring the level of hypnosis during general anaesthesia using propofol may enhance the correct dosage.

Quantification of Drugs in Plasma Without Primary Reference Standards by Liquid Chromatography-Chemiluminescence Nitrogen Detection: Application to Tramadol Metabolite Ratios

Lack of availability of reference standards for drug metabolites, newly released drugs, and illicit drugs hinders the analysis of these substances in biologic samples. To counter this problem, an approach is presented here for quantitative drug analysis in plasma without primary reference standards by liquid chromatography-chemiluminescence nitrogen detection (LC-CLND). To demonstrate the feasibility of the method, metabolic ratios of the opioid drug tramadol were determined in the setting of a pharmacogenetic study. Four volunteers were given a single 100-mg oral dose of tramadol, and a blood sample was collected from each subject 1 hour later. Tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, and nortramadol were determined in plasma by LC-CLND without reference standards and by a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry reference method. In contrast to previous CLND studies lacking an extraction step, a liquid-liquid extraction system was created for 5-mL plasma samples using n-butyl chloride-isopropyl alcohol (98 + 2) at pH 10. Extraction recovery estimation was based on model compounds chosen according to their similar physicochemical characteristics (retention time, pKa, logD). Instrument calibration was performed with a single secondary standard (caffeine) using the equimolar response of the detector to nitrogen. The mean differences between the results of the LC-CLND and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry methods for tramadol, O-desmethyltramadol, and nortramadol were 8%, 32%, and 19%, respectively. The sensitivity of LC-CLND was sufficient for therapeutic concentrations of tramadol and metabolites. A good correlation was obtained between genotype, expressed by the number of functional genes, and the plasma metabolite ratios. This experiment suggests that a recovery-corrected LC-CLND analysis produces sufficiently accurate results to be useful in a clinical context, particularly in instances in which reference standards are not readily accessible.

Single-Dose Intravenous Tramadol for Acute Migraine Pain in Adults: A Single-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Tramadol, an atypical opioid, is a narcotic analgesic used for pain management. A search of the current literature found no studies examining the efficacy of intravenous tramadol on migraine pain.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a single dose of intravenous tramadol hydrogen chloride 100 mg in comparison with placebo in patients presenting with migraine.

METHODS

Adult migraineurs admitted consecutively to the emergency department of the Kocaeli University Hospital were enrolled in this single-blind (patients), prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients were randomized to receive a 30-minute infusion of either intravenous tramadol (n = 17; 100 mg in 100-mL saline) or placebo (n = 17; 100-mL saline). Pain response was defined as a decrease of visual analogue scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) score to <50% of the pretreatment (baseline) value and a decrease of 4-point verbal scale (FPVS) score (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) to mild or none. Pain-free response was defined as a decrease of both VAS and FPVS scores to 0. Pain was assessed at baseline and at 30 minutes and 1 hour after treatment completion. Migraine symptoms (eg, photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, vomiting) and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at the same time. A follow-up was also conducted by phone 24 hours after treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-four migraineurs were screened and 34 (28 women and 6 men; mean [SD] age, 39.5 [10.4] years; all were white) were enrolled in the study. Each group contained 11 patients with severe pain and 6 patients with moderate pain at baseline FPVS. At the end of 1 hour, pain response was reported by significantly more patients in the tramadol group than in the placebo group (12 [70.6%] vs 6 [35.3%]; P = 0.040). Pain-free response was reported by 5 (29.4%) patients in the tramadol group and 2 (11.8%) patients in the placebo group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Symptoms associated with migraine were also relieved in all patients reporting pain response. No AEs were observed. However, at the 24-hour follow-up, 1 patient in the tramadol group reported transient blurred vision and dizziness within the day of infusion. Headache recurrence was reported by 2 (16.7%) of the 12 patients with pain response in the tramadol group and 1 (16.7%) of 6 patients with pain response in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous tramadol appeared to be more effective than placebo in pain response rate at the end of the first hour. The slow infusion of tramadol 100 mg in 100-mL saline solution was well tolerated in this group of adult migraineurs.

Single- and multiple-dose bioequivalence of two once-daily tramadol formulations using stereospecific analysis of tramadol and its demethylated (M1 and M5) metabolites

OBJECTIVE

To assess bioequivalence of two once-daily formulations of tramadol (T) as well as delineate pharmacokinetics of its enantiomers and those of its main metabolites after single- and multiple-dose administration.

METHODS

Single- and multiple-dose studies were conducted separately each in 48 healthy volunteers using an open-label, randomized, crossover design. Subjects received the 200 mg test (Tramadolor) and reference (Ultram ER) formulations in a randomized manner separated by a 7-day washout period once (single-dose study) or once daily for 7 days (multiple-dose study). Blood was sampled on days 1-2 (single-dose) or days 4-7 (multiple-dose), and plasma samples were analyzed using a stereospecific assay for quantitation of individual enantiomers of T and its active O-demethylated (M1) and N,O-demethylated (M5) metabolites. Bioequivalence was assessed using log-transformation and 90% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

All analytes showed stereoselectivity after single and multiple doses of both products, with average concentrations of (+)-T, (-)-M1, and (-)-M5 exceeding those of their respective antipode. However, a decrease in steady-state oral clearance of T relative to single dose was not stereoselective. In both studies, the formulations were bioequivalent with regard to AUG and Cmax for both enantiomers of all analytes. The Tmax for the reference (10-12 h) was significantly (p < 0.05) longer than that for the test (5-6 h). Degree of fluctuation of T enantiomers after the test was greater than the reference. Both formulations were tolerated relatively well.

CONCLUSIONS

Tramadolor and Ultram ER were bioequivalent for both enantiomers of T, M1 and M5. It is unlikely there would be any significant clinical differences between the two formulations.

Pharmacological strategies for the management of cancer pain in developing countries

Pain associated with cancer is often under treated especially in the developing countries where there are problems of poor economy, poor purchasing power of the citizens, absence of effective national health insurance schemes, poor manpower, fake adulterated and expired drugs, poor drug storage conditions; adverse temperature conditions combined with poor power supply which may affect drug efficacy. There is also poor understanding of the physiopharmacology of cancer pain management by health care providers. Assessment of the severity of the pain by location, oncological type, as well as psychosocial, emotional and environmental factors are necessary. The pain often occurs from malignancy, from procedures done to diagnose, stage and treat the malignancy, and from the toxicities of therapy used in treating the cancer. The first priority of treatment is to control pain rapidly and completely, as judged by the patient. The second priority is to prevent recurrence of pain. Analgesic drugs are given 'by the ladder,' 'by the clock' and 'by the appropriate route' using the analgesic ladder guideline proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). The pharmacological aspects of various drugs used in the management of cancer pain are discussed.

[Pharmacokinetics of tramadol in children]

The recent studies focusing on the pharmacokinetics of tramadol in children contributed to the increase popularity of tramadol as an analgesic alternative in clinical practice. Tramadol is a racemic mixture of 2 enantiomers that have comparable pharmacokinetic profile and this lack of difference is also observed with their main active metabolite, O-demethyl tramadol (M1). The serum concentrations of this metabolite depend largely on the activity of the cytochrome P450 and particularly of the enzyme CYP2D6 which reaches its maturity in the newborn. Nevertheless, the interindividual variability observed in the pharmacokinetics of tramadol and consequently in the pharmacodynamic profile is mainly due to the genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450.

New guideline for tramadol usage following adverse drug reactions reported to the Iranian Pharmacovigilance Center

BACKGROUND

Tramadol was introduced as injection and oral form to Iranian Pharmaceutical Market in 2002. Shortly after, the injection form of the drug was observed at the top of suspected drug list of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) received monthly by Iranian Pharmacovigilance Center (IPC).

OBJECTIVES

To detect, assess and report total number of Tramadol-induced ADRs received by IPC. To assess the frequency of reported Tramadol-induced ADRs before and after interventions. To design a guideline for prevention of probable ADRs due to Tramadol injection.

METHODS

A descriptive study was conducted on spontaneous reporting received by IPC from April 2002 to February 2005. All ADRs suspected to be induced by Tramadol registered in the database during mentioned period were analysed. To assess the effect of different interventions based on Spontaneous Reporting System, the trend of reporting frequency of Tramadol-induced ADRs was evaluated before and after interventions.

RESULTS

There were 337 cases of Tramadol-induced ADRs describing 939 reactions, reported to IPC during the study period. Although causal relationship had not been established, three cases of deaths appeared among the reports. The severity of reactions led to implementation of limitations on injectable Tramadol distribution to community pharmacies and the restriction of its use to hospitals only. Since most adverse reactions were dose-dependent, the drug potency of injectable Tramadol available in the country changed from 100 mg to 50 mg. The assessment of ADR reports received by IPC showed that the frequency of adverse reactions registered in the centre was reduced considerably following these interventions.

CONCLUSION

Designing a detailed programme by Pharmacovigilance Centres and closely monitoring of newly marketed pharmaceutical products is highly recommended.

The enantiomers of tramadol and its major metabolite inhibit peristalsis in the guinea pig small intestine via differential mechanisms

Background

Inhibition of intestinal peristalsis is a major side effect of opioid analgesics. Although tramadol is an opioid-like analgesic, its effect on gut motility is little known. Therefore, the effect of (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol and the major metabolite O-desmethyltramadol on intestinal peristalsis in vitro and their mechanisms of action were examined. Distension-induced peristalsis was recorded in fluid-perfused segments of the guinea pig small intestine. The intraluminal peristaltic pressure threshold (PPT) was used to quantify the motor effects of extraserosally administered drugs.

Results

Racemic tramadol, its (+)- and (-)-enantiomers and the major metabolite O-desmethyltramadol (0.1 – 100 μM) concentration-dependently increased PPT until peristalsis was transiently or persistently abolished. The rank order of potency was (-)-tramadol < (+)-tramadol <O-desmethyltramadol. The peristaltic motor inhibition caused by (+)- and (-)-tramadol was markedly and that of O-desmethyltramadol nearly completely prevented by naloxone, but left unaltered by the 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists methysergide plus tropisetron. The adrenoceptor antagonists prazosin plus yohimbine reduced the effect of (+)- and (-)-tramadol but not that of O-desmethyltramadol.

Conclusion

The results show that the metabolite O-desmethyltramadol is more potent in inhibiting peristalsis than its parent compound. The action of all tramadol forms depends on opioid receptors, and that of (+)- and (-)-tramadol also involves adrenoceptors.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of tramadol IR and SR in elderly patients: a prospective, age-group-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Tramadol is widely prescribed, even to the eldest patients. Although age-related differences in pharmacologic responsiveness are to be expected, the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tramadol have not been systematically compared between patients of various ages.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness, PK properties, and safety profile of 2 galenic tramadol formulations in 3 similarly sized age groups with malignant and nonmalignant pain of moderate to severe intensity.

METHODS

This prospective, age-group-controlled study was conducted at the ambulatory pain clinic of the Landeskrankenhaus Kärnten, Klagenfurt, Austria. Male and female adults with malignant and nonmalignant pain of moderate to severe intensity were eligible. Patients were stratified into similarly sized age groups, as follows: >or=75, 65-<75, and <65 years. Patients first received the immediate-release galenic formulation of tramadol (tramadol IR) until steady state was achieved, followed by the sustained-release formulation (tramadol SR) until steady state. Serum concentrations of tramadol and its active metabolite (O-desmethyl-tramadol [M1]) were measured using gas chromatography to estimate the age-related PK handling of the analgesic drug. Three validated scales were used to measure pain intensity during the study: a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), an 11-point numeric analog scale (NAS), and a 4-point verbal rating scale (VRS). Tolerability was assessed by evaluating daily answers about the potential occurrence of adverse events (and respective details such as type and severity) from baseline until the end of the observation period.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled (58 women, 42 men; mean [SD] age, 65.2 [15.0] years; >or=75, 30 patients; 65-<75, 31 patients; and <65 years, 39 patients). Predominant causes of pain were neoplasms (27.4% of causes) and injury and other external causes (20.8%), and diseases of the musculoskeletal and connective-tissues systems (19.8%). Fifty-five patients completed the study and provided all data as planned. Mean (SEM) steady-state tramadol IR doses were 250 (20.2), 277 (39.8), and 325 (33.1) mg/d in patients aged >or=75, 65-<75, and 65 years, respectively (P = NS); tramadol SR, 278 (27.5), 306 (39.7), and 340 (35.1) mg/d (P = NS). Serum concentrations of tramadol and M1 were statistically similar across all 3 age groups. Overall, mean pain intensity scores, as measured using the VAS and NAS, were decreased from baseline (62.4 [2.0] mm and 6.22 [0.22] points, respectively) to steady state with tramadol IR (23.6 [2.9] mm and 2.65 [0.30] points) and tramadol SR (16.9 [2.5] mm and 1.91 [0.26] points) (all, P < 0.001). Pain intensity before and improvements during both treatment phases were similar across all 3 age groups.

RESULTS

for pain intensity on the VRS also did not find age-related differences. The predominant adverse effects were nausea (27.0% of patients), dizziness and giddiness (18.0%), and malaise and fatigue (15.0%); no significant differences in adverse events were found between age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The fate of tramadol and its active metabolite, and their clinical effects, have been examined here for the first time in a prospective cohort study, which compared patients aged <65 years, 65-<75 years, and >or=75 years. In contrast to expectations, it was concluded that tramadol IR and tramadol SR were both generally well tolerated and effective in the treatment of moderate to severe pain in any of the 3 age groups in these patients. Although the eldest group of patients consumed, on average, 20% less tramadol (P = NS) than the youngest group, the PK properties of both drugs were not changed when given to elderly patients.

The addition of tramadol to morphine via patient-controlled analgesia does not lead to better post-operative pain relief after total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Tramadol is used as an analgesic in post-operative pain treatment. Intravenous tramadol is often combined with morphine to achieve better pain relief and less side-effects after orthopaedic surgery. However, the available evidence is insufficient to support this combination. For this reason, we conducted the present non-commercial, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

METHOD

Sixty-three patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, selected for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), were randomized to receive saline or tramadol 100 mg/ml intravenously every 6 h during the first post-operative day (total, 400 mg/24 h). All patients had access to morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump.

RESULTS

Neither during the 6 h after the first dose nor during the first post-operative day could we detect any statistically significant difference with regard to pain intensity, sedation and nausea between patients treated with tramadol and the placebo group. However, the withdrawal rate caused by insufficient pain relief was greater in the tramadol group (7/31) than in the saline group (2/32). This difference did not reach statistical significance. In the group of patients who remained in the study for 24 h ('per protocol'), those randomized to receive tramadol had a significantly (P < 0.05) lower morphine consumption (20 mg or 31%) than the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Our study does not support the combination of tramadol and morphine via PCA for post-operative pain relief after primary TKA. In addition, our study indicates that morphine via PCA as the sole means of post-operative analgesia does not provide sufficient pain relief after TKA. Thus, other means of post-operative analgesia should be used following TKA.

Pharmacokinetics and interactions of headache medications, part I: introduction, pharmacokinetics, metabolism and acute treatments

Recent progress in the treatment of primary headaches has made available specific, effective and safe medications for these disorders, which are widely spread among the general population. One of the negative consequences of this undoubtedly positive progress is the risk of drug-drug interactions. This review is the first in a two-part series on pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of headache medications. Part I addresses acute treatments. Part II focuses on prophylactic treatments. The overall aim of this series is to increase the awareness of physicians, either primary care providers or specialists, regarding this topic. Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions of major severity involving acute medications are a minority among those reported in literature. The main drug combinations to avoid are: i) NSAIDs plus drugs with a narrow therapeutic range (i.e., digoxin, methotrexate, etc.); ii) sumatriptan, rizatriptan or zolmitriptan plus monoamine oxidase inhibitors; iii) substrates and inhibitors of CYP2D6 (i.e., chlorpromazine, metoclopramide, etc.) and -3A4 (i.e., ergot derivatives, eletriptan, etc.), as well as other substrates or inhibitors of the same CYP isoenzymes. The risk of having clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions seems to be limited in patients with low frequency headaches, but could be higher in chronic headache sufferers with medication overuse.

Catatonia Associated with Coadministration of Tramadol and Meperidine

Tramadol and meperidine are frequently prescribed medications in the management of oncologic patients. The pharmacologic interaction of these two drugs may induce mental disturbance. This was demonstrated by our case of a 39-year-old woman with gastric mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (MALToma), stage III after chemotherapy. She was admitted to our medical ward with the complaint of abdominal pain. Pantoprazole 40 mg and tramadol 150 mg daily were prescribed with intravenous route after hospitalization. Two days later, the patient developed transient visual hallucinations and disorientation after additional injection of meperidine (25 mg). Six hours later, catatonic features appeared. The duty doctor stopped all the medications. Two days later, the catatonic features disappeared. From the clinical course, we suggest that the catatonia was caused by drug interactions between tramadol and meperidine. The pharmacodynamic mechanism might be related to the dopamine and serotonin systems.

Slow release tramadol in the initial treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain: Open, multicentric clinical trial

Introduction The analgesic efficacy of slow release tramadol in the titration phase of treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate this treatment strategy in routine daily practice. Method This was a prospective, non-randomized, open, multicentric, phase IV two-week study. Each patient received 100 mg slow release tramadol orally, twice a day. Patients were allowed to take 20 drops (50 mg) of tramadol as needed for breakthrough pain. The pain intensity and tramadol tolerability were recorded every day for the previous 24 hours, in the first week and at the end of the study. Pain relief and the impact of pain on sleep were evaluated on the 8th and 15th day. Results The study included 46 patients with metastatic malignant disease. The total of 46 patients completed the first week of treatment, and 33 patients completed the whole study. At the end of study, the intensity of pain was significantly reduced from 6.75 to 3.03 on numerical scale (NS 0-10) (p<0.001). At the end of study, 60.6% of patients graded the severity of pain as maximally mild on a verbal scale. The pain relief significantly improved from 25.75 to 71.81 on a numerical scale (NS 0-100) (p<0.001). The impact of pain on sleep was significantly reduced from 51.51% to 10.61% on a numerical scale (NS 0-100) (p<0.001). There were no differences in the drowsiness/confusion, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, loss of appetite and constipation, from the beginning to the end of treatment. Conclusion Tramadol slow release was effective in the titration phase of treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain with good tolerability.

Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of three Tramadol Contramid® OAD tablet strengths

A three-way crossover study in 27 human volunteers was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics and to assess the dose proportionality of 100 mg, 200 mg and 300 mg strengths of a novel once-a-day tramadol controlled-release tablet (Tramadol Contramid OAD) following single-dose administration. Serial blood samples were collected at predefined timepoints over a 48 h period and racemic tramadol and O-desmethyltramadol concentrations in plasma were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived using noncompartmental methods. Following dose normalization and logarithmic transformation of concentration-dependent parameters, the results were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The residual variability thereby obtained was used to construct 90% classical confidence intervals. The two one-sided tests procedure was used for all pairwise comparisons. Dose proportionality was concluded since the 90% CI for the ratio of geometric means was included in the acceptance range of 0.80-1.25 for all comparisons.

Route-dependent stereoselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol and its activeO-demethylated metabolite in rats

The effects of route of administration on the stereoselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol (T) and its active metabolite (M1) were studied in rats. A single 20 mg/kg dose of racemic T was administered through intravenous, intraperitoneal, or oral route to different groups of rats, and blood and urine samples were collected. Samples were analyzed using chiral chromatography, and pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) were estimated by noncompartmental methods. Following intravenous injection, there was no stereoselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of T. Both enantiomers showed clearance values (62.5 +/- 27.2 and 64.4 +/- 39.0 ml/min/kg for (+)- and (-)-T, respectively) that were equal or higher than the reported liver blood flow in rats. Similar to T, the area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) of M1 did not exhibit stereoselectivity after intravenous administration of the parent drug. However, the systemic availability of (+)-T was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of its antipode following intraperitoneal (0.527 +/- 0.240 vs. 0.373 +/- 0.189) and oral (0.307 +/- 0.136 vs. 0.159 +/- 0.115) administrations. The AUC of the M1 enantiomers, on the other hand, remained mostly nonstereoselective regardless of the route of administration. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that the stereoselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of oral T is due to stereoselective first pass metabolism in the liver and, possibly, in the gastrointestinal tract. The direction and extent of stereoselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of T and M1 in rats were in agreement with those previously reported in humans, suggesting that the rat may be a suitable model for enantioselective studies of T pharmacokinetics.

What is new in neuropathic pain?

INTRODUCTION

Neuropathic pain occurs in 1% of the population and is difficult to manage. Responses to single drugs are limited in benefit. Thirty percent will fail to respond altogether. This is a review of newer drugs and treatment paradigms.

METHODS

A literature review was performed pertinent to new drugs and treatment algorithms in the management of neuropathic pain.

RESULTS

New information on opioids (tramadol and buprenorphine) suggests benefits in the management of neuropathic pain and has increased interest in their use earlier in the course of illness. Newer antidepressants, selective noradrenaline, and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have evidence for benefit and reduced toxicity without an economic disadvantage compared to tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). Pregabalin and gabapentin are effective in diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia. Treatment paradigms are shifting from sequential single drug trials to multiple drug therapies. Evidence is needed to justify this change in treatment approach.

CONCLUSION

Drug choices are now based not only on efficacy but also toxicity and drug interactions. For this reason, SNRIs and gabapentin/pregabalin have become popular though efficacy is not better than TCAs. Multiple drug therapies becoming an emergent treatment paradigm research in multiple drug therapy are needed.

The effects of paracetamol and parecoxib on kidney function in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery

The common adverse effects of traditional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on renal function include reductions in renal blood flow, glomerular filtration rate, and sodium and potassium excretion, mainly via inhibition of renal cyclooxygenase. We designed the present study to determine the effects of IV paracetamol or parecoxib on renal function in elderly patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Seventy-five patients (76 +/- 8 yr, mean +/- sd) undergoing hip replacement or surgery of the femoral shaft completed this randomized and placebo-controlled study. After their arrival in the postanesthesia care unit, patients received an initial dose of the study medication, paracetamol 1000 mg IV (n = 25), parecoxib 40 mg IV (n = 25), or saline IV (n = 25); subsequent doses were administered for the next 3 days. Opioids were provided as rescue medication. Blood and urine samples were collected before and after surgery, and markers of renal function were determined. During the first 2 h after the initial dose of parecoxib, creatinine clearance was slightly diminished (125 +/- 83 to 86 +/- 45 mL/min, P < 0.05), whereas no significant decrease of creatinine clearance was observed in the placebo and paracetamol groups. After all treatments, sodium and potassium excretion as well as urine albumin and alpha-1-microglobulin were transiently increased (group differences: not signicifant). In conclusion, glomerular and tubular functions were transiently affected in all patients after orthopedic surgery; however, the differences between the treatment groups were small and not clinically relevant. Further studies are warranted to determine adverse renal effects of longer-lasting therapy with these drugs, especially in patients with renal impairment or concomitant diseases.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Medical Therapy of Urolithiasis

Nephrolithiasis treatment has become easier and less invasive with the development of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and endourologic techniques. However, medical therapy represents a well-established and complementary approach that can improve the efficacy of SWL and endourology. During recent decades, pharmacologic intervention has become more effective in stone disease: drugs can control the pain of renal colic, interfere at various levels in lithogenesis, and contribute to the expulsion of stones. It is well known that lithogenesis is a multifactorial process influenced by environmental-nutritional factors (low urinary volume, diet rich in animal protein, etc) and metabolic alterations; i.e., hypercalciuria, hyperuricosuria, and deficiency of stone-inhibiting factors (citrate, magnesium, glycosaminoglycans [GAGs]). Specific drugs such as citrate, allopurinol, and thiazide represent highly effective treatments for the promoting factors. Furthermore, recent findings suggest an interesting role for a phytotherapeutic agent, Phillantus niruri, and its inhibitory action on calcium oxalate crystallization related to the higher incorporation of GAGs into the calculi. Another step forward in medical management of stone disease is expulsive therapy. Many studies have proven the efficacy of medical expulsive therapy with nifedipine and alpha-blockers: their specific action on ureteral smooth muscle in association with anti-edema drugs accounts for their efficacy in expelling ureteral stones. In this paper, we provide an update on the medical treatment of stone disease, focusing our attention on what is known and what is new in renal colic and litholithic and expulsive medical therapy.

Safety and efficacy of tramadol in the treatment of idiopathic detrusor overactivity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tramadol in patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity (IDO).

METHODS

A total of 76 patients 18 years or older with IDO were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg tramadol sustained release (group 1, n = 38) or placebo (group 2, n = 38) every 12 h for 12 weeks. Clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and every 2 weeks during treatment. All patients underwent urodynamics and ice water test at baseline and 12-week treatment. Main outcome measures were number of voids per 24 h, urine volume per void and episodes of urge incontinence per 24 h on a frequency volume chart and detailed recording of adverse effect.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks of treatment mean number of voids per 24 h +/- SD decreased from 9.3 +/- 3.2 to 5.1 +/- 2.1 (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.1--0.4]. At that time mean urine volume per void increased from 158 +/- 32 to 198 +/- 76 ml (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) (95% CI 8-22), while mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 h decreased from 3.2 +/- 3.3 to 1.6 +/- 2.8 (P < 0.001 vs. placebo) (95% CI -2-0.3). Tramadol induced significant improvements in urodynamic parameters. More adverse effects were associated with tramadol treatment than with placebo (P < 0.05). The main adverse event with tramadol was nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with non-neurogenic IDO tramadol provided beneficial clinical and urodynamic results. Further studies are required to draw final conclusions on the efficacy of this drug in IDO.

Effect of the CYP2D6*10 C188T polymorphism on postoperative tramadol analgesia in a Chinese population

OBJECTIVE

The CYP2D6*10 allele is the most common allele with a frequency ranging from 51.3 to 70% and correlated with a significantly reduced metabolic activity in a Chinese population. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the CYP2D6*10 allele has an impact on the postoperative analgesia effect of tramadol in Chinese patients recovering from major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A prospective study design was used and 70 gastric cancer patients recovering from gastrectomy were enrolled. After receiving a loading dose i.v., patients could self-administer doses of the drug combination (10 mg/ml tramadol plus 0.3 mg/ml metoclopramide) via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Blood samples were collected after induction of anesthesia. The CYP2D6*10 C188T polymorphism was analyzed by means of polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Demographic data among groups with different genotypes were analyzed using analysis of variance. The total consumption of tramadol between the three genotype groups for 48 h was compared.

RESULTS

The allele frequency of CYP2D6*10 is 52.4%; patients were categorized into three groups according to the CYP2D6 genotype: patients without CYP2D6*10 (group I, n=17), patients heterozygous for CYP2D6*10 (group II, n=26), and patients homozygous for CYP2D6*10 (group III, n=20). The demographic data among the three groups were comparable. The total consumption of tramadol for 48 h in group III was significantly higher than that in groups I and II, while it did not differ between groups I and II.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the CYP2D6*10 allele has significant impact on analgesia with tramadol in a Chinese population. Pharmacogenetics may explain some of the varying responses to pain medication in postoperative patients.

Once-daily tramadol in rheumatological pain

New once-daily formulations of tramadol have been recently marketed in various countries. This review focuses on the matrix systems used in sustained-release formulations to control drug delivery, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic profile and the available clinical trials on once-daily tramadol. Four controlled clinical studies with a limited number of patients have shown that once-daily tramadol is safe and effective for up to 12 weeks in rheumatological pain treatment, with a favourable side effects profile. Once-daily tramadol has established efficacy superior to that of placebo for pain management and functional improvement in patients with osteoarthritis. Two randomised clinical trials demonstrated similar rates of efficacy between immediate-release and once-daily sustained-release formulation, without significant differences in the use of escape medications and the number of nights woken. Once-daily tramadol offers the advantage of a reduced dosing regimen that improves patient compliance.

Enantioselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol in CYP2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers

OBJECTIVE

To describe in detail the intravenous, single oral and multiple oral dose enantioselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol in CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers (EMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs).

METHODS

Eight EMs and eight PMs conducted three phases as an open-label cross-over trial with different formulations; 150 mg single oral tramadol hydrochloride, 50 mg single oral tramadol hydrochloride every 8 h for 48 h (steady state), 100 mg intravenous tramadol hydrochloride. Urine and plasma concentrations of (+/-)-tramadol and (+/-)-M1 were determined for 48 h after administration.

RESULTS

In all three phases, there were significant differences between EMs and PMs in AUC and t(1/2) of (+)-tramadol (P< or =0.0015), (-)-tramadol (P< or =0.0062), (+)-M1 (P< or =0.0198) and (-)-M1 (P< or =0.0370), and significant differences in C(max) of (+)-M1 (P<0.0001) and (-)-M1 (P< or =0.0010). In Phase A and C, significant differences in t(max) were seen for (+)-M1 (P< or =0.0200). There were no statistical differences between the absolute bioavailability of tramadol in EMs and PMs. The urinary recoveries of (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol, (+)-M1 and (-)-M1 were statistically significantly different in EMs and PMs (P<0.05). Median antimodes of the urinary metabolic ratios of (+)-tramadol / (+)-M1 and (-)-M1 were 5.0 and 1.5, respectively, hereby clearly separating EMs and PMs in all three phases.

CONCLUSION

The impact of CYP2D6 phenotype on tramadol pharmacokinetics was similar after single oral, multiple oral and intravenous administration displaying significant pharmacokinetic differences between EMs and PMs of (+)-tramadol, (-)-tramadol, -(+)-M1 and (-)-M1. The O-demethylation of tramadol was catalysed stereospecific by CYP2D6 in the way that very little (+)-M1 was produced in PMs.

Pain management today—what have we learned?

Pain is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide, with published data showing its prevalence as high as 50% for chronic pain in the European population. This prevalence is likely to continue to rise, particularly in elderly people with comorbid conditions and complex aetiologies of pain. There is thus a rapidly growing demand for safe and effective pain management. Management of mild-to-moderate pain has traditionally been based upon the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the synthetic non-opioid analgesic paracetamol (acetaminophen), the latter of which acts centrally, inhibiting brain cyclo-oxygenase (COX) and nitric oxide synthase. Both the NSAIDs and paracetamol are effective for mild-to-moderate pain and are widely recommended and used. However, NSAIDs may not be tolerated due to gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and can result in potentially fatal peptic ulceration and bleeding. Selective COX-2 inhibitors were developed to reduce the GI side effects and complications, but large-scale studies have highlighted another serious potential effect of anti-inflammatory drugs: cardiovascular events. Both the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) in the US have issued advice to apply cautions and restrictions when prescribing COX-2 inhibitors, particularly for patients at increased cardiovascular risk and for long-term use. The FDA also applied cardiovascular warnings with regard to nonselective NSAIDs. Both the EMEA and the FDA have recommended using the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration. These concerns and warnings have left physicians seeking safe alternatives to anti-inflammatory drugs for both short- and long-term uses in many patients. These developments have generated a climate of uncertainty in the absence of official guidance on the selection of alternative analgesic regimens. Amongst the possible strategies, combinations of drugs that provide analgesic efficacy at reduced individual doses may confer the optimal risk-benefit ratio for pain management in the long term or in patients at increased cardiovascular risk. Weak opioids devoid of serious organ-damaging effects combined with paracetamol may well be safer for long-term therapy. Fixed-dose combinations of paracetamol with weak opioids, such as codeine, dextropropoxyphene or tramadol are currently available. Paracetamol plus tramadol is an effective and safe multimodal analgesic regimen for the management of both acute and chronic moderate-to-severe pain. Re-evaluating the role of weak opioids, such as tramadol, and combinations in pain management may prove a valuable option for prescribers seeking alternatives to anti-inflammatory drugs.

Combination analgesia in 2005 - a rational approach: focus on paracetamol-tramadol

A multimodal (or balanced) approach to anaesthesia is a familiar concept that offers important benefits in the management of both acute and chronic pain. Rational combinations of analgesic agents with different mechanisms of action can achieve improved efficacy and/or tolerability and safety compared with equianalgesic doses of the individual drugs. Combining different agents also enhances efficacy in complex pain states that involve multiple causes. Combinations of paracetamol plus a weak opioid agent are widely used. One such combination, paracetamol plus tramadol, exploits the well-established complementary pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of action of these two drugs. This combination has demonstrated genuine synergy in animal studies and also combines paracetamol's rapid onset of efficacy with tramadol's prolonged analgesic effect. Numerous studies have confirmed the efficacy and tolerability of paracetamol plus tramadol in both acute and chronic pain. As a single-dose treatment for acute post-operative pain, this combination delivers rapid and sustained pain relief that is greater than either agent alone. There is also extensive evidence for efficacy in the long-term management of chronic pain conditions, including osteoarthritis, low back pain and fibromyalgia. In the setting of chronic pain, paracetamol plus tramadol has shown sustained efficacy, safety and tolerability for up to 2 years without the development of tolerance. The efficacy of this combination has been demonstrated as well in respect to reduction of pain intensity and, more importantly, with regard to improvement of function and quality of life and the reduction of disability. Comparative trials have shown that paracetamol plus tramadol has comparable efficacy to paracetamol plus codeine, but with reduced somnolence and constipation compared with the codeine combination. The paracetamol plus tramadol combination is also free of organ toxicity associated with selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Hence, paracetamol plus tramadol offers an effective and well-tolerated alternative to anti-inflammatory drugs or other paracetamol plus weak opioid combinations.

Pharmacological aspects of successful long-term analgesia

Persistent pain represents a major quality-of-life burden for patients and a challenge for their physician. Chronic pain often arises from multiple tissue sources and involves multiple chemical mediators and pain transmission pathways. Successful long-term pain management requires analgesic regimens that can treat pains of multiple origin and type. Safety and tolerability are also a high priority when prescribing chronic therapy. Recent publications and regulatory developments affecting anti-inflammatory drugs have limited the options available for the management of chronic pain. Major concerns in long-term use of anti-inflammatory drugs include renal toxicity, gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding and cardiovascular events, which can be of particular concern for elderly patients. Opioid agents avoid the end-organ toxicity seen with anti-inflammatory drugs, but their use may be limited, especially in the long term, by side effects such as constipation or sedation and by concerns about the potential for physical or psychological dependence. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) has a favourable safety and tolerability profile, although exceeding the recommended dose (up to 4 g/day) carries a risk of liver damage. It exerts simultaneous anti-nociception at both spinal and supra-spinal sites, and has shown self-synergy between these two routes of activity. Tramadol, an atypical weak opioid with a multi-modal mechanism of action, inhibits re-uptake of multiple neurotransmitters and has an improved safety and tolerability profile compared with traditional opioids. Rational combinations of analgesic drugs offer a viable approach to managing persistent pain that involves multiple sites or pathways. The combination of paracetamol plus tramadol brings together two well-known analgesics that have different but complementary mechanisms of analgesic action. Laboratory studies have demonstrated that these agents interact to produce synergistic analgesia with a desirable safety/efficacy profile.

Opioids in pain management of blood-related malignancies

Opioids are basic analgesics used in the treatment of moderate to severe pain in patients affected by blood-related malignancies. They should be sequentially administered according to the World Health Organisation scale for cancer pain. Initial treatment and titration with opioids should be based on immediate-release preparations, to be administered at appropriate intervals in order to relieve pain and to satisfy the individual opioid requirement. Once a relatively good pain control has been achieved, a slow release formulation at equivalent doses can be given. Most patients can be adequately managed using oral formulation opioids. However, a small group, such as those presenting severe mucositis or requiring a rapid pain relief, should be managed by intravenous continuous infusion and/or by a patient-controlled analgesia system; while for patients in the community, there are distinct advantages to using the subcutaneous route. Other available routes of administration for opioids, can be used in selected circumstances, including rectal, transdermal, epidural, intrathecal and intramuscular. The invasive neuraxial route has a very limited role in patients with haematological malignancies, given the high risk of infection and bleeding. Through a close observation and a careful management, opioid-related side effects can be effectively prevented and treated. This article reviews the principles of opioid therapy and how opioids can be adapted for patients with pain due to haematological malignancies.

Use of hydrophilic natural gums in formulation of sustained-release matrix tablets of tramadol hydrochloride

The objective of this work was to develop matrix sustained-release tablets of highly water-soluble tramadol HCl using natural gums (xanthan [X gum] and guar [G gum]) as cost-effective, nontoxic, easily available, and suitable hydrophilic matrix systems compared with the extensively investigated hydrophilic matrices (ie, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose [HPMC]/carboxymethyl cellulose [CMC] with respect to in vitro drug release rate) and hydration rate of the polymers. Matrix tablets of tramadol (dose 100 mg) were produced by direct compression method. Different ratios, of 100∶0, 80∶20, 60∶40, 20∶80, 0∶100 of G gum (or X):HPMC, X gum:G gum, and triple mixture of these polymers (G gum, X gum, HPMC) were applied. After evaluation of physical characteristics of tablets, the dissolution test was, performed in the phosphate buffer media (pH 7.4) up to 8 hours. Tablets with only X had the highest mean dissolution time (MDT), the least dissolution efficiency (DE8%), and released the drug following a zero-order model via swelling, diffusion, and erosion mechanisms. Guar gum alone could not efficiently control the drug release, while X and all combinations of natural gums with HPMC could retard tramadol HCl release. However, according to the similarity factor (f 2), pure HPMC and H8G2 were the most similar formulations to Topalgic-LP as the reference standard.

Safety and efficacy of tramadol in the treatment of premature ejaculation: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, randomized study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new serotonergic centrally acting drug tramadol in delaying ejaculation in patients with premature ejaculation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-four potent men with premature ejaculation were randomly assigned to receive 50 mg tramadol (group 1, n = 32) or placebo (group 2, n = 32) approximately 2 hours before planned sexual activity, for 8 weeks. Pretreatment evaluation included history and physical examination, intravaginal ejaculatory latency time, International Index of Erectile Function, and Meares-Stamey test. The efficacy of 2 treatments was assessed using responses to International Index of Erectile Function, intravaginal ejaculatory latency time evaluation, and several general assessment questions.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven (89%) completed the whole treatment schedule. The mean intravaginal ejaculatory latency time after tramadol and placebo increased from 19 and 21 seconds to approximately 243 and 34 seconds, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean weekly intercourse episodes increased from pretreatment values of 1.07 and 1.1 to 2.3 and 1.3, for tramadol and placebo, respectively (P < 0.05). Baseline mean intercourse satisfaction domain values of International Index of Erectile Function 10 and 11 reached to 14 and 10 at 8-week treatment in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no withdrawal caused by adverse effects with tramadol or placebo, but more adverse events were associated with tramadol treatment (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Tramadol seems to provide significantly better results in terms of intravaginal ejaculatory latency time and intercourse satisfaction versus placebo. Further studies are required to draw final conclusions on the efficacy of this drug in premature ejaculation.

The use of opioids in the treatment of osteoarthritis: when, why, and how?

As life expectancy increases every decade, the incidence and prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) also will increase. Despite progress in our knowledge of the pathophysiology of OA, the management of OA-mediated pain continues to challenge physicians. Concern regarding the cardiovascular effects of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and the gastrointestinal and renal side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in general has limited the use of these medications in the management of chronic non-cancer pain. Appropriately dosed and monitored use of opioids for OA pain, when more conservative methods have failed, has potentially fewer life-threatening complications associated with it than the more commonly and often less successfully employed pharmacotherapeutic approaches to care. When used as part of a multimodal approach to pain control, opioids are a safe and effective treatment for joint pain, including that of OA. Patients for whom NSAIDs are contraindicated, or for whom combined acetaminophen, tramadol, and NSAID therapy is ineffective, may be started on low-dose opioids and titrated as needed and tolerated. Patient education and informed consent, exercise, complementary medicine, and the use of a controlled substance agreement increases the likelihood of patient compliance with treatment guidelines, improving functional capacity and quality of life.

In vitro and in vivo vasodilator activity of racemic tramadol and its enantiomers in Wistar rats

Tramadol ((+/-)-tramadol) is an analgesic agent formulated as a racemic mixture (1:1) of (-)- and (+)-tramadol, which differ in their potency to bind to mu-opioid receptors and to inhibit monoamine-reuptake. We investigated the stereoselectivity of in vitro tramadol-induced vasodilatation of aortic rings and its effect on the arterial blood pressure measured in conscious Wistar rats. (+)-Tramadol, but not (-)-tramadol, produced a concentration-dependent relaxation of aorta precontracted with phenylephrine. The concentration-response curve was significantly altered by the removal of endothelium. Vascular relaxation was also inhibited by pre-incubation of endothelium-intact aorta with naloxone, suggesting the involvement of opioid receptors. The vasodilatation produced by tramadol was stereoselective, and the (+)-tramadol-induced vasodilatation was mediated by mu-opioid receptors and partially dependent on endothelium integrity. The hypotensive response induced by (+)-tramadol was also observed after bolus injection of 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg. The results indicate that only high doses of tramadol cause cardiac depression and hypotension, indicating that it can be used safely.

O-demethylation of tramadol in the first months of life

OBJECTIVE

Assess in vivo O-demethylation activity in the first months of life.

METHODS

Time-concentration profiles of tramadol (M) and O-demethyl tramadol (M1) in plasma and urine were simultaneously collected in the first 24 h of continuous intravenous tramadol administration in neonates and young infants. M and M1 were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Correlations between perinatal characteristics [postnatal age (PNA), postmenstrual age (PMA)] and the contribution of metabolites (M, M1) to overall tramadol elimination and to the plasma and urine log M/M1 were calculated.

RESULTS

Plasma samples were available in 20/29 and complete 24-h urine collections were available in 25/29 neonates (25-53 weeks PMA). Mean plasma log M/M1 value (>4 h, n=86) was 0.8 (SD 0.4). A significant correlation between plasma log M/M1 and PMA (r=-0.73, P<0.0001) and PNA (r=-0.58, P<0.005) was observed. In a multiple regression model, only PMA remained an independent variable. Mean urine log M/M1 was 0.94 (SD 0.7). Significant correlations of the urine log M/M1 ratio with PMA (r=-0.73, P<0.0001) and PNA (r=-0.56, P=0.0035) were observed. In a multiple regression model with the urine log M/M1 ratio as dependent variable, only PMA remained an independent variable. The maturational half-life of the log M/M1 ratio in early neonatal life in the age range evaluated is about 12-16 weeks without plateau.

CONCLUSIONS

O-demethylation activity was already observed in early neonatal life. A significant correlation with PMA was documented, but PMA can only partially explain the observed variability in O-demethylation activity. Polymorphism therefore likely already contributes to the interindividual variability observed in neonates.

Profiling the subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects of tramadol in recreational drug users

Tramadol is a mu opioid agonist that also inhibits the reuptake of norepinephrine and serotonin. Because non-medical use of prescription opioids, including tramadol, has increased in the U.S. over the last several years, we sought to profile its subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects in recreational drug users. Twenty-two subjects received placebo, 50 or 100 mg tramadol, morphine, or 2 mg lorazepam in a randomized, crossover, double-blind design. The last 12 subjects in the study received 25 mg morphine, a dose that is putatively equianalgesic to 100 mg tramadol. In these subjects, morphine induced miosis and several other mu agonist subjective effects; 100 mg tramadol increased "feel drug effect" and drug liking ratings, and decreased pupil size, but the miotic effect was not statistically significant. Lorazepam, but neither tramadol nor morphine, impaired psychomotor performance. When the placebo, tramadol, and lorazepam data from all 22 subjects were analyzed, 100 mg tramadol induced miosis, and several subjective effects were increased significantly, including ratings of drug liking and "want to take again." The present results indicating that a clinically-prescribed dose of oral tramadol has abuse liability-related effects in recreational drug users suggest the need for further abuse liability testing of the oral formulation in opioid abusers.

Tramadol-induced hyponatraemia following unicompartmental knee replacement surgery

We report a case of postoperative hyponatraemia following routine knee surgery, followed by a subsequent, less severe, episode after identical surgery on the contralateral knee. On each occasion the patient had been given the weak opioid tramadol for postoperative pain relief. Through its effects on serotonergic neurotransmission in the central nervous system, we hypothesise that tramadol may have been directly involved in this patient's biochemical disorder.