Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial

Long term efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: ARMADA 4 year extended study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) given for up to 4 years in patients with active, longstanding rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

Patients responding inadequately to MTX were entered into a 24 week, controlled study (ARMADA) with adalimumab plus MTX or placebo plus MTX, and some were enrolled in a subsequent open label extension. The efficacy and safety of treatment were evaluated. Additional analyses were made for those patients whose corticosteroid and/or MTX dosages were adjusted during the extension.

RESULTS

Of 271 patients in the original ARMADA trial, 262 received at least one dose of adalimumab and were evaluated. At the time of analysis, 162/262 (62%) patients had remained in the study and received treatment for a mean of 3.4 years. Withdrawals were for lack of efficacy (8%), adverse events (12%), and other reasons (18%). In 147 patients who completed 4 years' treatment, efficacy achieved at 6 months was maintained. At 4 years, 78%, 57%, and 31% had achieved ACR20/50/70; 43% achieved clinical remission (DAS28 <2.6); and 22% had no physical function abnormalities (HAQ = 0). Results were similar for 196 patients who received treatment for 2-4 years. Efficacy was maintained in many patients when dosages were decreased (corticosteroids (51/81 (63%) patients), MTX (92/217 (42%)), or both (25/217 (12%))). Serious adverse events were comparable during open label treatment and the controlled phase. Serious infections occurring during open label treatment and the blinded period were similar (2.03 v 2.30 events per 100 patient-years, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab plus MTX sustained clinical response and remission in patients with RA during 4 years. The safety profile during the first 6 months was similar to that after 4 years' follow up. Reduction of corticosteroid and/or MTX dosages did not adversely affect long term efficacy.

Systematic review of studies of productivity loss due to rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, debilitating disease with a significant impact on workplace productivity.

AIM

To perform a systematic review of studies of the relationship between RA and reduced workplace productivity.

METHODS

Screening of 307 titles identified in bibliographic database searches resulted in 38 articles subject to systematic review. Productivity loss was expressed by three different measures: work disability, work loss (synonymous with absenteeism or short-term sick leave) and work limitation (reduction in productivity while present at work).

RESULTS

A median of 66% (range 36-84%) of employed RA subjects experienced work loss due to RA in the previous 12 months, for a median duration of 39 days (range 7-84 days). The times from RA diagnosis until a 50% probability of being work disabled varied from 4.5 to 22 years. In inception cohort studies, the baseline variables consistently predictive of subsequent work disability were a physically demanding work type, more severe RA and older age.

CONCLUSIONS

RA-related work-disability rates were similar in the USA and European countries. An apparent decrease in the prevalence of RA-related work disability since the 1970s may be related to a decrease in physically demanding work rather than to epidemiologic changes in RA. The majority of the literature addresses permanent disability and temporary work loss; none of the studies reviewed reported the effect of RA on presenteeism, i.e. work limitation from the employer perspective, and there are few published studies of the effectiveness of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in reducing work-related productivity loss.

The Evidence for Early Intervention

It is believed that rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common, potentially treatable cause of disability in the Western world. A commonsense approach to the management of a persistent, progressive, damaging condition such as RA would seem to be intervention before the onset of damage, at a stage when disease still may be reversible. Such a phase of disease has been described as a "window of opportunity" for intervention. This article discusses the evidence for early intervention in RA.

Biologics in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is started immediately after diagnosis, resulting in more effective suppression of disease activity and substantial reduction of joint damage. The development of biologic agents has enabled remission as a realistic therapeutic goal in a greater proportion of patients. The tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab, have been studied in numerous randomized clinical trials. These agents can suppress disease activity directly, slow or stop progression of radiologic damage, and prevent further loss of quality of life. Patients treated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors show few adverse events, which together with the high clinical effectiveness is favorable for treatment compliance. The exact role of these agents in the treatment of early-stage RA is unknown.

[Modern antirheumatic pharmacotherapy. Low molecular weight substances vs. biologicals]

Rheumatoid arthritis potentially causes joint destruction, organ failures, and accompanying disorders. Therefore initiating therapeutic measures as early as possible is crucial, whereby symptomatic treatment only is definitely insufficient. Among the traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) Methotrexate is regarded the gold standard. Increasing knowledge of cell-interactions, particularly of the cytokine-cascade, resulted in new therapeutic options. Direct impact via "biologicals" on key inflammatory mediators, primarily TNF-alpha, offers the possibility of effectively modulating or even arresting disease progression. Nowadays, those substances are applied in non-responders to traditional DMARD. Despite their benefits, cons like an increased risk for infections, for exacerbating latent tuberculosis and possibly for malignancies must be considered. Thus, a thorough patient check-up before initiating these therapies is mandatory. Pharmacoeconomic aspects influence the discussion about these "new therapies". The high costs of biologicals, however, should be related to the possible reduction of the diseases psychological, social and economic burdens.

Infliximab improves health related quality of life and physical function in patients with psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of infliximab on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and physical function in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the IMPACT 2 trial.

METHODS

200 patients with PsA unresponsive to conventional treatment were randomised to intravenous infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22; patients with inadequate response entered early escape at week 16. HRQoL was assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) at weeks 0, 14, and 24. Functional disability was assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at every visit through week 24. Associations between changes in quality of life (SF-36) and articular (American College of Rheumatology (ACR)) and dermatological (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)) responses were examined.

RESULTS

Mean percentage improvement from baseline in HAQ was 48.6% in the infliximab group compared with worsening of 18.4% in the placebo group at week 14 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 58.6% and 19.4% of infliximab and placebo treated patients, respectively, achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ (that is, > or = 0.3 unit decrease) at week 14 (p < 0.001). Increases in physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores and all eight scales of the SF-36 in the infliximab group were greater than those in the placebo group at week 14 (p < or = 0.001). These benefits were sustained through week 24. Patients achieving ACR20 and PASI75 responses had the greatest improvements in PCS and MCS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PsA, infliximab 5 mg/kg significantly improved HRQoL and physical function compared with placebo through 24 weeks.

Low-dose methotrexate: a mainstay in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Methotrexate administered weekly in low doses is a mainstay in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. Although originally developed as a folate antagonist for the treatment of cancer, its mechanism of action in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis remains less clear. Several mechanisms have been proposed including inhibition of T cell proliferation via its effects on purine and pyrimidine metabolism, inhibition of transmethylation reactions required for the prevention of T cell cytotoxicity, interference with glutathione metabolism leading to alterations in recruitment of monocytes and other cells to the inflamed joint, and promotion of the release of the endogenous anti-inflammatory mediator adenosine. These mechanisms of action and the role of methotrexate in the suppression of rheumatoid arthritis are reviewed.

Gene Profiling in Atherosclerosis Reveals a Key Role for Small Inducible Cytokines

Background— Pathological aspects of atherosclerosis are well described, but gene profiles during atherosclerotic plaque progression are largely unidentified.

Methods and Results— Microarray analysis was performed on mRNA of aortic arches of ApoE −/− mice fed normal chow (NC group) or Western-type diet (WD group) for 3, 4.5, and 6 months. Of 10 176 reporters, 387 were differentially (>2×) expressed in at least 1 group compared with a common reference (ApoE −/− , 3- month NC group). The number of differentially expressed genes increased during plaque progression. Time-related expression clustering and functional grouping of differentially expressed genes suggested important functions for genes involved in inflammation (especially the small inducible cytokines monocyte chemoattractant protein [MCP]-1, MCP-5, macrophage inflammatory protein [MIP]-1α, MIP-1β, MIP-2, and fractalkine) and matrix degradation (cathepsin-S, matrix metalloproteinase-2/12). Validation experiments focused on the gene cluster of small inducible cytokines. Real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed a plaque progression–dependent increase in mRNA levels of MCP-1, MCP-5, MIP-1α, and MIP-1β. ELISA for MCP-1 and MCP-5 showed similar results. Immunohistochemistry for MCP-1, MCP-5, and MIP-1α located their expression to plaque macrophages. An inhibiting antibody for MCP-1 and MCP-5 (11K2) was designed and administered to ApoE −/− mice for 12 weeks starting at the age of 5 or 17 weeks. 11K2 treatment reduced plaque area and macrophage and CD45 + cell content and increased collagen content, thereby inducing a stable plaque phenotype.

Conclusions— Gene profiling of atherosclerotic plaque progression in ApoE −/− mice revealed upregulation of the gene cluster of small inducible cytokines. Further expression and in vivo validation studies showed that this gene cluster mediates plaque progression and stability.

Duration of rheumatoid arthritis influences the degree of functional improvement in clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Functional capacity is an important outcome in rheumatoid arthritis and is generally measured using the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ). Functional limitation incorporates both activity and damage. Because irreversible damage increases over time, the HAQ may be less likely to show improvement in late than in early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relation between sensitivity to change of the HAQ and duration of rheumatoid arthritis in reports of clinical trials.

METHODS

Data were pooled from clinical trials that measured responses of HAQ scores at three or six months. The effect size of the HAQ was calculated and linear regression used to predict the effect size by duration of rheumatoid arthritis at group level. Treatment effect was adjusted for by including the effect sizes of pain scores and of tender joint counts as additional independent variables in separate models. Subgroup analysis employed contemporary regimens (methotrexate, leflunomide, combination therapies, and TNF inhibitors) only.

RESULTS

36 studies with 64 active treatment arms and 7628 patients (disease duration 2.5 months to 12.2 years) were included. The effect sizes of the HAQ decreased by 0.02 for each additional year of mean disease duration using all trials, and by 0.04/year in the subgroup analysis (p<or=0.01 for both analyses, except for pain adjusted models at three months).

CONCLUSIONS

In individual trials, less improvement in the HAQ might be expected in late than in early rheumatoid arthritis. Comparison of changes in HAQ among rheumatoid arthritis trials should take into consideration the disease stage of the treated groups.

Role of biological agents in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases

A new era in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disorders has begun with the clinical availability of anticytokine therapy. Biological agents that are currently available include 3 agents that decrease the activity of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept) and an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra), with many more in development. Those extraordinarily effective medications are an important addition to our therapeutic armamentarium, and, although originally developed for rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn disease, have been found to be efficacious in the treatment of seronegative spondyloarthropathies (psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis) and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Their role is currently being defined in other autoimmune disorders such as uveitis, sarcoidosis, interstitial lung disease, vasculitis, inflammatory myopathies, graft-versus-host disease, and Sjögren syndrome.

Unmet needs in rheumatoid arthritis

Until the pathophysiology/etiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is better understood, treatment strategies must focus on disease management. Early diagnosis and treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are necessary to reduce early joint damage, functional loss, and mortality. Several clinical trials have now clearly shown that administering appropriate DMARDs early yields better therapeutic outcomes. However, RA is a heterogeneous disease in which responses to treatment vary considerably for any given patient. Thus, choosing which patients receive combination DMARDs, and which combinations, remains one of our major challenges in treating RA patients. In many well controlled clinical trials methotrexate and other DMARDs, including the tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors, have shown considerable efficacy in controlling the inflammatory process, but many patients continue to have active disease. Optimizing clinical response requires the use of a full spectrum of clinical agents with different therapeutic targets. Newer therapies, such as rituximab, that specifically target B cells have emerged as viable treatment options for patients with RA.

How should we manage early rheumatoid arthritis? From imaging to intervention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic systemic and progressive inflammatory disorder of the synovium characterised by destruction of bone and cartilage. It is associated with significant morbidity and economic costs. Recent advances have shown that early diagnosis and timely, intensive therapy of rheumatoid arthritis can modify disease outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current investigations into the role of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis suggest these modalities will provide information to assist in the early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, identify poor prognostic factors, and aid in the monitoring of response to therapy. New developments in pharmacologic therapy, particularly the development of biologic agents, allow better disease control than was previously achievable, and the early application of these drugs in combination with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs seems to produce the best outcomes.

SUMMARY

The application of novel imaging techniques will aid the target application of biologic therapy within the window of opportunity and aid in the monitoring of response to therapy. This is likely to significantly decrease the rate of structural damage and offers hope of a future when the normal outcome for rheumatoid arthritis will be remission.

Combination treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis

Combinations of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are increasingly being used in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) when long term results with sequential DMARD monotherapy are disappointing. Combination DMARD therapy may be more effective than monotherapy, and has no additional short term adverse events. The evidence for using combination DMARD therapy is still weak, however, and further trials are needed.

Remission and active disease in rheumatoid arthritis: Defining criteria for disease activity states

OBJECTIVE

Several composite scores are available to assess the activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Criteria for remission and active RA based on these continuous scores are important for use in clinical practice and clinical trials. We aimed to reevaluate or to define such criteria for the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI).

METHODS

We sampled patient profiles from an observational RA database that included clinical and laboratory variables. Thirty-five rheumatology experts classified these profiles into 1 of 4 categories: remission, low, moderate, or high disease activity. Cutoff values were estimated by mapping scores on the DAS28 and SDAI to these ratings, and analyses of agreement (kappa statistics) and a diagnostic testing approach (receiver operating characteristic curves) were used to validate the estimates. The final criteria were validated using 2 observational cohorts (a routine cohort of 767 patients and an inception cohort of 91 patients).

RESULTS

Results from the 3 analyses were very similar and were integrated. The criteria for separating remission, low, moderate, and high disease activity based on the SDAI were scores of 3.3, 11, and 26, respectively; those based on the DAS28 were scores of 2.4, 3.6, 5.5, respectively. In the routine cohort, these cutoff values showed substantial agreement (weighed kappa = 0.70) and discriminated between groups of patients with clearly different functional capacities (P < 0.001). In the inception cohort, these cutoff scores differentiated responders (those with a 20% response on the American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria) from nonresponders (P < 0.01), as well as patients with and without radiologic progression (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

New criteria for levels of RA disease activity were determined and internally validated. These criteria, which are based on current and explicit expert judgment, are valuable in this era of rapidly advancing therapeutic approaches.

Pattern of infliximab utilization in rheumatoid arthritis patients at an academic medical center

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the pattern of use of infliximab with an emphasis on treatment escalation and the durability of infliximab use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in an academic setting.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of pharmacy and medical records of 183 patients with RA who received at least 1 infliximab infusion at the infusion centers of the Brigham and Women's Hospital. Treatment escalation was defined as an increase in the dosage of infliximab to >3 mg/kg and/or a decrease in the dosing interval to <7 weeks between infusions.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients with RA received infliximab infusions for a mean +/- SD duration of 58.2 +/- 56.6 weeks. Infliximab was discontinued in 48% of the patients during the first year of therapy and in 67% of the patients overall. A total of 126 patients had a treatment escalation, including 25 patients with a dose increase, 35 patients with a decrease in the interval, and 66 patients with both. Infliximab treatment was associated with a decrease in corticosteroid and methotrexate doses. Patients who had a treatment escalation were more likely to continue infliximab infusions compared with patients without a treatment escalation (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.0-4.1).

CONCLUSION

The use of infliximab may be an effective treatment for RA; however, a substantial number of patients will discontinue its use. Treatment escalation is commonly used in the management of RA with infliximab and is associated with longer duration of infliximab use.

The updated BSR guidelines for anti-TNF in adults with RA: what has changed and why?

In 2001 the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) published guidelines for prescribing TNF-alphablockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In an unusual move, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) accepted the BSR guidelines and published them unchanged and included them in their own Technology Appraisal (National Institute of Clinical Excellence, 2002). The field of anti-TNF in RA is rapidly changing, and the BSR Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group decided in 2004 to update the guidelines. These were published in February 2005 (Ledingham and Deighton, 2005). This article summarizes the key changes, and attempts to justify them, using further data that has emerged since the updated guidelines were produced, and audit data from the Derby Rheumatology department.

The PREMIER study: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy or adalimumab monotherapy in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX treatment.

METHODS

This was a 2-year, multicenter, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study of 799 RA patients with active disease of < 3 years' duration who had never been treated with MTX. Treatments included adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week plus oral MTX, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week, or weekly oral MTX. Co-primary end points at year 1 were American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement (ACR50) and mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score.

RESULTS

Combination therapy was superior to both MTX and adalimumab monotherapy in all outcomes measured. At year 1, more patients receiving combination therapy exhibited an ACR50 response (62%) than did patients who received MTX or adalimumab monotherapy (46% and 41%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Similar superiority of combination therapy was seen in ACR20, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at 1 and 2 years. There was significantly less radiographic progression (P < or = 0.002) among patients in the combination treatment arm at both year 1 and year 2 (1.3 and 1.9 Sharp units, respectively) than in patients in the MTX arm (5.7 and 10.4 Sharp units) or the adalimumab arm (3.0 and 5.5 Sharp units). After 2 years of treatment, 49% of patients receiving combination therapy exhibited disease remission (28-joint Disease Activity Score <2.6), and 49% exhibited a major clinical response (ACR70 response for at least 6 continuous months), rates approximately twice those found among patients receiving either monotherapy. The adverse event profiles were comparable in all 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

In this population of patients with early, aggressive RA, combination therapy with adalimumab plus MTX was significantly superior to either MTX alone or adalimumab alone in improving signs and symptoms of disease, inhibiting radiographic progression, and effecting clinical remission.

Infliximab

Infliximab (Remicade) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha that has shown efficacy in Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis with a disease-modifying activity and rapid onset of action. It is administered intravenously, generally in a schedule with initial infusions at 0, 2 and 6 weeks, followed by administration once every 8 weeks. Infliximab is effective in the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease with an inadequate response to other treatment options or those with fistulising disease. In combination with methotrexate, infliximab reduced signs and symptoms and delayed disease progression in patients with active, methotrexate-refractory rheumatoid arthritis and in those with early disease. The drug was generally well tolerated. Recrudescence of tuberculosis infection and worsening of heart failure and demyelinating disease are among some of the concerns with anti-TNFalpha therapy, requiring cautious use of these agents in high-risk patients. Current data suggest that infliximab may be cost effective, especially when long-term clinical outcomes and burden of the diseases are taken into account. More robust, prospective pharmaco-economic studies are required to better ascertain the cost effectiveness of infliximab. Direct head-to-head comparative trials of infliximab with other biological agents are not yet available and would be helpful in determining with greater certainty the place of infliximab in the management of these diseases. Nonetheless, infliximab, like other biological agents, is a valuable treatment option in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (including fistulising disease) or rheumatoid arthritis (including early disease).

Immunological therapies for rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis of the synovial joints that causes loss of function and a shortened life expectancy. In the last 10 years there have been major advances in the treatment of RA, including more aggressive use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and the development of immune therapies targeted to molecules and cells important in the immunopathogenesis of RA. Molecular messengers that travel between cells (cytokines) have been found to be of major importance. Blocking the cytokine tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) produces significant improvement in RA, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn's disease. The use of cytokine blockers has shown the extent to which immune and inflammatory pathways are shared in a number of inflammatory diseases. There has also been an important proof of principle that blocking single cytokines can produce profound effects in inflammatory diseases.