Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is currently the fifth most common solid tumor worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Eighty percent of new cases occur in developing countries, but the incidence is rising in economically developed regions including Japan, Western Europe, and the United States. More than 80% of patients present with advanced or unresectable disease, and for those patients who do undergo resection, the recurrence rates can be as high as 50% at 2 years. Thus, a large number of patients will seek systemic therapy. Systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy is largely ineffective and can have significant toxicity in patients with underlying liver dysfunction. Newer biologic agents that target molecular abnormalities common to HCC may improve the clinical outcome in patients with HCC.

Combining nanoliposomal ceramide with sorafenib synergistically inhibits melanoma and breast cancer cell survival to decrease tumor development

PURPOSE

Deregulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt and Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathways occurs in melanoma and breast cancer, deregulating normal cellular apoptosis and proliferation. Therapeutic cocktails simultaneously targeting these pathways could promote synergistically acting tumor inhibition. However, agents with manageable toxicity and mechanistic basis for synergy need identification. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preclinical therapeutic efficacy and associated toxicity of combining sorafenib with nanoliposomal ceramide.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Effects of sorafenib and nanoliposomal ceramide as single and combinatorial agents were examined on cultured cells using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium salt assays and CalcuSyn software used to assess synergistic or additive inhibition. Western blotting measured cooperative effects on signaling pathways. Rates of proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis were measured in size- and time-matched tumors to identify mechanistic basis for inhibition. Toxicity was evaluated measuring animal weight, blood toxicity parameters, and changes in liver histology.

RESULTS

Sorafenib and nanoliposomal ceramide synergistically inhibited cultured cells by cooperatively targeting mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling. A 1- to 2-fold increase in cellular apoptosis and 3- to 4-fold decrease in cellular proliferation were observed following combination treatment compared with single agents, which caused synergistically acting inhibition. In vivo, an approximately 30% increase in tumor inhibition compared with sorafenib treatment alone and an approximately 58% reduction in tumor size compared with nanoliposomal ceramide monotherapy occurred by doubling apoptosis rates with negligible systemic toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that nanoliposomal ceramide enhances effectiveness of sorafenib causing synergistic inhibition. Thus, a foundation is established for clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of combining sorafenib with nanoliposomal ceramide for treatment of cancers.

A phase II study of oxaliplatin in combination with doxorubicin as first-line systemic chemotherapy in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

We designed a phase II trial of the combination with oxaliplatin and doxorubicin for patients with unresectable HCC to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) and the toxicity.

METHODS

Forty patients with inoperable, systemic chemotherapy naive HCC were enrolled. Finally, 32 patients received oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) and doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Eighty-two treatment cycles were administered (median 2 cycles, range 1-6). There was no treatment-related mortality. The ORR was 15.6% (95% CI, 3.3-28.7) with five partial responses. The median overall survival and median overall progression free survival were 31 weeks (95% CI, 22-40 weeks) and 12 weeks (95% CI, 5-19 weeks). Nausea and peripheral neuropathy were most frequent non-hematologic toxicities (nausea, n = 15; peripheral neuropathy, n = 10). The most frequent grade 3-4 hematologic adverse event was neutropenia (14 of 82 cycles) including three cases of febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oxaliplatin and doxorubicin showed modest activity and a tolerable toxicity profile in advanced HCC patients.

Predictive factors of outcome and tumor response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Systemic chemotherapy is an important treatment modality for metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the predictive factors of outcome and tumor response have not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to identify factors that could be used to predict outcome and tumor response to systemic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic HCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 82 consecutive patients with metastatic HCC undergoing systemic chemotherapy to investigate factors associated with outcome and tumor response. The patients underwent 5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone and cisplatin (FMP) therapy.

RESULTS

The overall objective response rate was 22% (95% confidence interval, 14-32), and the median survival time and 1-year survival for all patients were 11.2 months and 43.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the absence of radiologically active intrahepatic disease (P = 0.02) and ascites (P = 0.002) was independent favorable prognostic factors. Although multivariate analysis revealed no significant predictive factors of tumor response, the response rates in patients without radiologically active intrahepatic disease (response rate, 46%) tended to be higher than those in patients with active intrahepatic disease (response rate, 17%) (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with metastatic HCC, who had sufficient hepatic function and no radiologically active intrahepatic disease, might be good candidates for systemic chemotherapy.

Blinded independent central review of progression-free survival in phase III clinical trials: important design element or unnecessary expense?

Progression-free survival is an important end point in advanced disease settings. Blinded independent central review (BICR) of progression in randomized clinical trials has been advocated to control bias that might result from errors in progression assessments. However, although BICR lessens some potential biases, it does not remove all biases from evaluations of treatment effectiveness. In fact, as typically conducted, BICRs may introduce bias because of informative censoring, which results from having to censor unconfirmed locally determined progressions. In this article, we discuss the rationale for BICR and different ways of implementing independent review. We discuss the limitations of these approaches and review published trials that report implementing BICR. We demonstrate the existence of informative censoring using data from a randomized phase II trial. We conclude that double-blinded trials with consistent application of measurement criteria are the best means of ensuring unbiased trial results. When such designs are not practical, BICR is not recommended as a general strategy for reducing bias. However, BICR may be useful as an auditing tool to assess the reliability of marginally positive results.

Expression of c-kit protooncogen in hepatitis B virus-induced chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: has it a diagnostic role?

AIM

There are more than 350 million people worldwide chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), who are at high risk for the development of hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the conflicting results about c-kit expression in HCC and the key role played by c-kit in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) and other solid tumours, the aim of this study was to determine c-kit expression in the course of hepatitis B infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Paraffin-embedded tissues in Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine Department of Pathology between January 2002 and February 2006 were searched restrospectively to investigate this issue. We performed immunohistochemistry on biopsies of 125 patients with HBV infection, grouped as: mild, moderate and severe hepatitis, cirrhosis and HCC, 25 patients in each of them, using anti c-kit monoclonal antibody. The severity of parenchymal inflammation and of interface hepatitis was semiquantitatively graded on a haematoxylin and eosin stained paraffin sections. Additionally, 50 more HCC, formed on HBV basis, were studied to determine the prevalence of c-kit overexpression.

RESULTS

In cirrhotic liver, lower intensity of staining and rarely c-kit positivity were present. The greatest number of the c-kit positivity and higher intensity of staining was found in the livers of patients with severe hepatitis and HCC. In chronic hepatitis B infection, the staining intensity was parallel with the grade and stage of the disease. In the areas where fibrosis was seen, c-kit positivity was rare or absent. In the HCC specimens, c-kit positivity appeared both inside and around the cancerous nodes. C-kit expression was observed in 62 of 75 HCC tissue specimens (82%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

C-kit positivity was observed in the mitotic, proliferating and also dysplastic hepatic cells. These results suggest that c-kit expression may be used as an early diagnostic indicator for HBV induced HCC.

What is the risk of intracranial bleeding during anti-VEGF therapy?

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key mediator of physiological and pathological angiogenesis. All solid tumors are dependent on pathological angiogenesis, and anti-VEGF therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit in breast, colorectal, non-small-cell lung, and renal carcinomas. Central nervous system metastases are common in many of these tumor types. An increased risk of bleeding has been reported with anti-VEGF therapy, but the risk of intracranial bleeding is unknown with this type of therapy. We reviewed the available data to investigate the risk of intracranial bleeding with anti-VEGF therapy in the presence and absence of CNS metastases. The PubMed and Medline databases and the Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meetings were searched for articles, abstracts, and presentations of clinical trials. We identified 57 trials examining the safety and efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy in a total of 10,598 patients. Four trials examined the use of anti-VEGF therapy in treating patients with brain metastases. The presence of CNS metastases was a stated exclusion criterion in 76% of trials. The rate of intracranial bleeding was negligible. We conclude that there is no trial evidence that anti-VEGF therapy confers an increased risk of intracranial bleeding, even in the presence of CNS metastases. Future trials of anti-VEGF therapy should not exclude patients with controlled CNS metastases at enrollment.

Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

No effective systemic therapy exists for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. A preliminary study suggested that sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Raf may be effective in hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

In this multicenter, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 602 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had not received previous systemic treatment to receive either sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Primary outcomes were overall survival and the time to symptomatic progression. Secondary outcomes included the time to radiologic progression and safety.

RESULTS

At the second planned interim analysis, 321 deaths had occurred, and the study was stopped. Median overall survival was 10.7 months in the sorafenib group and 7.9 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the sorafenib group, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 0.87; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the median time to symptomatic progression (4.1 months vs. 4.9 months, respectively, P=0.77). The median time to radiologic progression was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the sorafenib group (2%) and two patients in the placebo group (1%) had a partial response; no patients had a complete response. Diarrhea, weight loss, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia were more frequent in the sorafenib group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, median survival and the time to radiologic progression were nearly 3 months longer for patients treated with sorafenib than for those given placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00105443.)

Impact of different anticancer regimens on biomarkers of angiogenesis in patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer

OBJECTIVE

Advanced hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is a highly vascularised tumor with limited treatment options. We wanted to evaluate the impact of different treatments on systemic biomarkers linked to angiogenesis.

METHODS

Two subsequent prospective, randomised, phase-I/II trials in patients with advanced HCC were performed. A total of 38 patients was randomised to a total of 4 regimens consisting of 3 cycles of 4 weeks each: Trial 1 included group 1 receiving octreotide 30 mg im on day 1, and group 2 octreotide 30 mg on day 1 plus Imatinib 400 mg po daily; Trial 2 included group 3 with oxaliplatin on day 1 (60 mg-90 mg/m(2)), and group 4 with oxaliplatin on day 1, 8, 15 (20 mg-30 mg/m(2)) in combination with octreotide 30 mg on day 1 plus imatinib 400 mg po daily. Primary outcome measure was the relative changes in plasma biomarkers over time.

RESULTS

Time-to-progression and overall survival was not different between the the two study trials. Within group 1-4, the mean relative increase from baseline to week 12 of treatment was 17, 18, 37, and 2% for s-E-selectin; -1, 90, 10, and -9% for VEGF-A; 18, 84, 141, and 74% for PDGF-BB, and 111, 142, 30, and 7% for serum AFP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase of plasma levels for s-E-selectin and PDGF-BB seen in patients receiving chemotherapy alone may reflect activation of angiogenesis. In contrast, low-dose metronomic chemotherapy in combination with anti-angiogenic drugs seems to correlate with the least increase in biomarkers. Imatinib-octreotide temporarily leads to a decrease in PDGF-BB, whereas octreotide alone had no effect on PDGF-BB plasma levels.

Linking molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma and personalized medicine: preliminary steps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of high-throughput technologies able to simultaneously investigate thousands of genes (e.g. single nucleotide polymorphism-array, gene expression microarray, etc.) has opened a new era in translational research. Obtaining a molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma, however, remains a striking challenge. This review summarizes the molecular classifications of hepatocellular carcinoma reported so far, analyzes the status of targeted therapies tested in clinical trials, and evaluates feasibility of personalized medicine approaches in hepatocellular carcinoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different investigators attempted to classify patients according to their liver cancer molecular background, a feature that will path the way for trial enrichment and personalized medicine. Currently, hepatocellular carcinoma can be classified in molecular classes according to Wnt-beta-catenin pathway activation, proliferation signature activation (associated with chromosomal instability), and other subgroups. In parallel, the first-time-ever positive results of a phase III trial in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib have encouraged this approach.

SUMMARY

Selection of patient candidates according to their tumor molecular background is a reality in human malignancies. Thus, a molecular classification is essential to allow the development of new targets, and to customize therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Upper gastrointestinal tumors: current status and future perspectives

Recent therapeutic developments that have provided new promising and successful approaches to the treatment of solid tumors are in large part due to the increasing understanding of their molecular biology. Despite this progress, these new therapies have provided minimal benefit in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Hence, the overall survival of patients with upper GI tumors remains dismal. These disappointing results are largely due to the lack of early detection strategies, inadequate medical treatments and the poor understanding of upper GI tumor biology. Clinically, the treatment paradigm has been evolving for these malignancies. Esophageal cancer is now commonly treated with preoperative chemoradiation in the USA, in both academic and community cancer centers, due to its theoretical advantages. Adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation are also frequently used in patients with pancreatic cancer. Exciting prospects remain in the medical and surgical treatment of these malignancies with the inclusion of biologic agents in many protocols, newer chemotherapeutic agents (such as S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer), and the use of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of premalignant and, possibly, early malignant lesions of the esophagus and stomach. This review focuses on the current practice in the management of upper GI tumors and summarizes the recent advances in the field.

Advances in experimental and translational research in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the fifth-leading cause of cancer and the third-leading cause of cancer related deaths world-wide. Current treatment options are limited, as HCC has been shown to be a highly resistant type of cancer to most current treatment modalities. Novel approaches are being explored in the fields of gene therapy, viral oncolytics, radioembolization, and several new biologic therapies. This article summarizes these recent clinical findings and discusses what role they will have in the future treatment of HCC.

Bevacizumab and rapamycin induce growth suppression in mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a leading cause of global cancer mortality, with standard chemotherapy being minimally effective in prolonging survival. We investigated if combined targeting of vascular endothelial growth factor protein and expression might affect hepatocellular carcinoma growth and angiogenesis.

METHODS

We treated patient-derived hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts with (i) bevacizumab; (ii) rapamycin; and (iii) bevacizumab plus rapamycin. Western blotting was employed to determine changes in the proteins. Apoptosis, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, microvessel density, and cell proliferation were analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Hepatocellular carcinoma growth was inhibited by bevacizumab plus rapamycin treatment to a significantly greater degree than bevacizumab or rapamycin monotherapy. Reductions in tumor growth by bevacizumab plus rapamycin were associated with inhibition of downstream targets of the mammalian target-of-rapamycin pathway, reductions in vascular endothelial growth factor expression, and tumor microvessel density. Potentially additive effects of bevacizumab plus rapamycin included reductions in vascular endothelial growth factor expression, cyclin D1, and cyclin B1. In an intra-peritoneal model of hepatocellular carcinoma, bevacizumab plus rapamycin potently inhibited both intra-liver and intra-abdominal tumor growth, reduced ascites levels, and significantly prolonged mouse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab and rapamycin, which are both clinically approved drugs, may represent a novel molecularly-targeted combination treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Novel advancements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in 2008

New advancements have emerged in the field of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent years. There has been a switch in the type of presentation of HCC in developed countries, with a clear increase of tumors <2 cm in diameter as a result of the wide implementation of surveillance programs. Non-invasive radiological techniques have been developed and validated for the diagnosis of small and tiny HCCs. Simultaneously, diagnostic criteria based on molecular profiling of early tumors have been proposed. The current clinical classification of HCC divides patients into 5 stages with a specific treatment-oriented schedule. There is no established molecular classification of HCC, although preliminary proposals have already been published. Advancements in the treatment arena have come from well designed trials. Radiofrequency ablation is currently consolidated as providing better local control of the disease compared with percutaneous ethanol injection. New devices are available to improve the anti-tumoral efficacy of conventional chemoembolization. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has shown survival benefits in patients at advanced stages of the disease. This advancement represents a breakthrough in the management of this complex disease, and proves that molecular targeted therapies can be effective in this otherwise chemo-resistant tumor. Consequently, sorafenib will become the standard of care in advanced cases, and the control arm for future trials. Now, the research effort faces other areas of unmet need, such as the adjuvant setting of resection/local ablation and combination therapies.

MiR-221 controls CDKN1C/p57 and CDKN1B/p27 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma

The identification of target mRNAs is a key step for assessing the role of aberrantly expressed microRNAs in human cancer. MiR-221 is upregulated in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as well as in other malignancies. One proven target of miR-221 is CDKN1B/p27, whose downregulation affects HCC prognosis. Here, we proved that the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKI) CDKN1C/p57 is also a direct target of miR-221. Indeed, downregulation of both CDKN1B/p27 and CDKN1C/p57 occurs in response to miR-221 transfection into HCC-derived cells and a significant upregulation of both CDKN1B/p27 and CDKN1C/p57 occurs in response to antimiR-221 transfection. A direct interaction of miR-221 with a target site on the 3' UTR of CDKN1C/p57 mRNA was also demonstrated. By controlling these two CDKIs, upregulation of miR-221 can promote growth of HCC cells by increasing the number of cells in S-phase. To assess the relevance of these studies in primary tumors, matched HCC and cirrhosis samples were assayed for miR-221, for CDKN1B/p27 and CDKN1C/p57 expression. MiR-221 was upregulated in 71% of HCCs, whereas CDKN1B/p27 and CDKN1C/p57 proteins were downregulated in 77% of cases. A significant inverse correlation between miR-221 and both CDKN1B/p27 and CDKN1C/p57 was found in HCCs. In conclusion, we suggest that miR-221 has an oncogenic function in hepatocarcinogenesis by targeting CDKN1B/p27 and CDKN1C/p57, hence promoting proliferation by controlling cell-cycle inhibitors. These findings establish a basis toward the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at blocking miR-221 in HCC.

Risk of hand-foot skin reaction with sorafenib: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a dose-limiting toxicity associated with sorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor with clinical activity against solid tumors. This study was conducted to determine the risk of developing HFSR among patients receiving sorafenib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Databases from Pubmed, Web of Science, and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings from 2004 through July, 2007 were searched to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies were prospective clinical trials using single agent sorafenib. The summary incidence rate and the relative risk (RR) were calculated using random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 4 883 patients in 11 trials with metastatic tumors were included for analysis. Among patients receiving sorafenib, the summary incidence of all-grade HFSR was 33.8% (95% CI: 24.5-44.7%) with significant difference between patients with RCC and non-RCC malignancy (RR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.32-1.75%, p<0.001). The incidence of high-grade HFSR was 8.9% (95% CI: 7.3-10.7%). In addition, sorafenib was associated with a significant increased risk of HFSR with RR of 6.6 (95% CI: 3.7 to 11.7, p<0.001) in comparison with controls.

CONCLUSION

There is a significant risk of HFSR associated with sorafenib. Proper management and further study are recommended to reduce the risk.

A phase I/II trial of TAC-101, an oral synthetic retinoid, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Preclinical models showed TAC-101 (4-[3,5-bis(trimethylsilyl) benzamide] benzoic acid), an oral synthetic retinoid, has anti-tumor activity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A phase I/II study was performed in advanced HCC patients (pts).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled. During Phase I, pts received 40 mg daily for 14 days q3 weeks; 2 of 5 patients developed DLT so dose was reduced to 20 mg/day. Twenty-eight patients received 20 mg/day.

RESULTS

No pt had a CR or PR, but 12 of 21 (57%) had SD. Two pts (9.5%) had late PR after discontinuing TAC-101. Median survival (MS) for all 28 pts treated with 20 mg/day was 12.7 months (95% CI 8.8-22.7); MS for 21 evaluable pts was 19.2 months (95% CI 10.4-27.6).

CONCLUSIONS

20 mg of TAC- was well tolerated. Significant disease stabilization (12/21 pts, 57%), 2 late PRs, and prolonged MS (19.2 months) suggest that TAC-101 provides meaningful patient benefit.

Sorafenib: in hepatocellular carcinoma

Sorafenib is an orally active multikinase inhibitor with anti-tumour activity. It was recently approved in the US and the EU for the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily significantly improved survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the randomized, double-blind, multicentre, phase III SHARP trial (n = 602); the median duration of survival was 10.7 months with sorafenib and 7.9 months with placebo. In addition, the median time to progression was significantly longer in patients receiving sorafenib than in those receiving placebo (5.5 vs 2.8 months). Combination therapy with oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and intravenous doxorubicin has potential in the treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, according to the results of a randomized, double-blind, phase II study (n = 96). Although the addition of sorafenib to doxorubicin did not significantly delay the time to progression, the median durations of overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly longer with sorafenib plus doxorubicin than with doxorubicin alone. Monotherapy with oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, with a manageable adverse event profile.

RAD001 (everolimus) inhibits tumour growth in xenograft models of human hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and highly resistant to available chemotherapies. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions to regulate protein translation, angiogenesis and cell cycle progression in many cancers including HCC. In the present study, subcutaneous patient-derived HCC xenografts were used to study the effects of an mTOR inhibitor, RAD001 (everolimus), on tumour growth, apoptosis and angiogenesis. We report that oral administration of RAD001 to mice bearing patient-derived HCC xenografts resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of tumour growth. RAD001-induced growth suppression was associated with inactivation of downstream targets of mTOR, reduction in VEGF expression and microvessel density, inhibition of cell proliferation, up-regulation of p27(Kip1) and down-regulation of p21(Cip1/Waf1), Cdk-6, Cdk-2, Cdk-4, cdc-25C, cyclin B1 and c-Myc. Our data indicate that the mTOR pathway plays an important role in angiogenesis, cell cycle progression and proliferation of liver cancer cells. Our study provides a strong rationale for clinical investigation of mTOR inhibitor RAD001 in patients with HCC.

Blocking transforming growth factor-beta up-regulates E-cadherin and reduces migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment is challenging because the mechanisms underlying tumor progression are still largely unknown. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 is considered a crucial molecule in HCC tumorigenesis because increased levels of patients' serum and urine are associated with disease progression. The aim of the present study was to investigate the inhibition of TGF-beta signaling and its impact on HCC progression. Human HCC cell lines were treated with a TGF-beta receptor kinase inhibitor (LY2109761) whose selectivity was determined in a kinase assay. Exogenous TGF-beta1 phosphorylates the TGF-beta receptor, consequently activating Smad-2, whereas the drug selectively blocks this effect and dephosphorylates autocrine p-Smad-2 at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 0.1 microM. A cytotoxic effect documented by 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), trypan blue, and propidium iodide staining assays was observed at 10microM, whereas the drug inhibits (P < 0.001) the migration of HCC cells on fibronectin, laminin-5, and vitronectin and invasion through Matrigel (P < 0.001) at concentrations up to 0.1 microM. LY2109761 up-regulates (P < 0.001) E-cadherin mRNA and protein levels. This increase was localized at the cellular membrane where E-cadherin mediates anchorage that is cell-cell dependent. Consistently, a functional monoclonal antibody that inhibits E-cadherin-dependent cell-cell contact restores the migratory and invasive activity. Finally, nonmetastatic HCC tissues from 7 patients were cultured with TGF-beta1 in the presence or absence of LY2109761. E-cadherin expression was reduced by TGF-beta1 and was significantly (P < 0.0001) increased by LY2109761 treatment, measured by quantitative real-time PCR on microdissected tissues and by immunohistochemistry on serial sections. In 72 patients, E-cadherin tissue expression was more weakly expressed in metastatic than in nonmetastatic HCC (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

LY2109761 blocks migration and invasion of HCC cells by up-regulating E-cadherin, suggesting that there could be a mechanistic use for this molecule in clinical trials.

Intramuscular recurrence in a hepatocellular carcinoma patient with indolent disease course

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide and treatment options are depended on the stage of the tumour. In general, the prognosis of HCC patients with extra-hepatic metastasis is poor. The most common sites of extra-hepatic metastasis are the lung, abdominal lymph nodes and bone.

Case presentation

Here, we reported a 54-year-old man with an indolent clinical course of HCC. He had multiple extra-hepatic recurrences after initial hepatectomy for HCC and was benefited from repeated resections with prolonged survival. Eventually, he developed intramuscular recurrence in the thigh, which was initially mistaken as deep vein thrombosis.

Conclusion

Selected patients with indolent disease course of HCC may benefit from repeated resections of extra-hepatic metastases with prolonged survival.

Growth factors as therapeutic targets in HCC

Despite various effective local treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), some patients do not meet the treatment criteria because of extrahepatic metastases or macroscopic vascular invasion at the time of their diagnosis. Furthermore, many patients treated with successful local treatments develop recurrences after treatment. Although these patients receive systemic treatment including chemotherapy, HCC is generally recognized as a chemo-resistant tumor. Recently, new molecular targets have been confirmed and various targeted agents are now being investigated for the treatment of HCC. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently expressed in human hepatoma cells, and EGF may be one of the mitogens that are needed for the growth of hepatoma cells. HCC is generally hypervascular, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes HCC development and metastasis. Various inhibitors targeting EGFR and/or VEGF, VEGF receptor (VEGFR) have been developed as treatments of HCC. In phase-II studies of these growth factor inhibitors, the response rates are relatively low; however, high rates of disease control, enabling a good time to progression, have been achieved. Recently, a randomized phase III trial of sorafenib versus placebo conducted in patients with advanced HCC demonstrated the beneficial effects of this drug on the time-to-progression and overall survival of the patients, and the drug could become established as the standard chemotherapeutic agent for advanced HCC. Further clinical trials using biologic agents are warranted to prolong the survival in HCC patients.

Targeting vessels to treat hepatocellular carcinoma

The process of blood vessel proliferation, known as angiogenesis, is essential during embryonic development and organogenesis. In adult life, it participates in normal tissue repair, wound healing, and cyclical growth of the corpus luteum and the endometrium. Crucial as it is, angiogenesis can become pathological, and abnormal angiogenesis contributes to the pathogenesis of inflammatory and neoplasic diseases. The present review highlights the evidence for the role of angiogenesis in HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) and discusses the increasing importance of inhibitors of angiogenesis in HCC therapy.

Sulfatase 2 up-regulates glypican 3, promotes fibroblast growth factor signaling, and decreases survival in hepatocellular carcinoma

It has been shown that the heparin-degrading endosulfatase, sulfatase 1 (SULF1), functions as a liver tumor suppressor, but the role of the related sulfatase, sulfatase 2 (SULF2), in liver carcinogenesis remains to be elucidated. We investigated the effect of SULF2 on liver tumorigenesis. Expression of SULF2 was increased in 79 (57%) of 139 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and 8 (73%) of 11 HCC cell lines. Forced expression of SULF2 increased HCC cell growth and migration, whereas knockdown of SULF2 using short hairpin RNA targeting SULF2 abrogated HCC cell proliferation and migration in vitro. Because SULF1 and SULF2 desulfate heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) and the HSPG glypican 3 (GPC3) is up-regulated in HCC, we investigated the effects of SULF2 on GPC3 expression and the association of SULF2 with GPC3. SULF2-mediated cell growth was associated with increased binding of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and AKT, and expression of GPC3. Knockdown of GPC3 attenuated FGF2 binding in SULF2-expressing HCC cells. The effects of SULF2 on up-regulation of GPC3 and tumor growth were confirmed in nude mouse xenografts. Moreover, HCC patients with increased SULF2 expression in resected HCC tissues had a worse prognosis and a higher rate of recurrence after surgery.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to the tumor suppressor effect of SULF1, SULF2 has an oncogenic effect in HCC mediated in part through up-regulation of FGF signaling and GPC3 expression.

Potential prognostic benefits of radiotherapy as an initial treatment for patients with unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with invasion to intrahepatic large vessels

OBJECTIVES

To examine the efficacy and prognostic benefits of radiotherapy (RT) in patients who have unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with invasion to intrahepatic large vessels (IHLVs).

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients who had advanced HCC with invasion to IHLVs were studied. Thirty-two consecutive patients initially received 3-dimensional conformal RT for HCC invasion to IHLVs. Tumor response, prognostic factors, and survival were studied in the patients given RT. Prognostic factors and survival were assessed in the study group as a whole. Data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, univariate analysis, and a Cox model.

RESULTS

The rate of objective response to RT was 48%. Predictors of survival in the patients who received RT were a hepatic function of Child-Pugh class A (p = 0.0263) and a response to RT (p = 0.0121). In the study group as a whole, independent predictors of survival in a Cox model were multinodular HCC (p = 0.007), inferior vena caval invasion (p = 0.001), a serum alpha-fetoprotein level of >1,000 ng/ml (p = 0.032), and the performance of RT (p < 0.001). Notably, the median survival of the nonresponders to RT (n = 15) was significantly longer than that of the patients who received no treatment for HCC (n = 21; 7.0 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.0014).

CONCLUSION

RT is considered an effective initial treatment for HCC invasion to IHLVs, and may offer survival benefits, even in nonresponders, because of the induction of stable disease.

FTY720 induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through activation of protein kinase C delta signaling

This study was aimed at elucidating the mechanism by which FTY720, a synthetic sphingosine immunosuppressant, mediated antitumor effects in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. The three HCC cell lines examined, Hep3B, Huh7, and PLC5, exhibited differential susceptibility to FTY720-mediated suppression of cell viability, with IC(50) values of 4.5, 6.3, and 11 mumol/L, respectively. Although FTY720 altered the phosphorylation state of protein kinase B and p38, our data refuted the role of these two signaling kinases in FTY720-mediated apoptosis. Evidence indicates that the antitumor effect of FTY720 was attributable to its ability to stimulate reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which culminated in protein kinase C (PKC)delta activation and subsequent caspase-3-dependent apoptosis. We showed that FTY720 activated PKC delta through two distinct mechanisms: phosphorylation and caspase-3-dependent cleavage. Cotreatment with the caspase-3 inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK abrogated the effect of FTY720 on facilitating PKC delta proteolysis. Equally important, pharmacologic inhibition or shRNA-mediated knockdown of PKC delta protected FTY720-treated Huh7 cells from caspase-3 activation. Moreover, FTY720 induced ROS production to different extents among the three cell lines, in the order of Hep3B > Huh7 >> PLC5, which inversely correlated with the respective glutathione S-transferase pi expression levels. The low level of ROS generation might underlie the resistant phenotype of PLC5 cells to the apoptotic effects of FTY720. Blockade of ROS production by an NADPH oxidase inhibitor protected Huh7 cells from FTY720-induced PKC delta activation and caspase-3-dependent apoptosis. Together, this study provides a rationale to use FTY720 as a scaffold to develop potent PKC delta-activating agents for HCC therapy.

Conformal radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Technical advancements in radiation therapy (RT) have facilitated the safe delivery of conformal, dose-escalated radiation to a wide spectrum of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. A variety of doses and RT fractionation schemes have been used, and RT has been used in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Compared to untreated historical controls or those treated with TACE alone, outcomes following RT alone or TACE and RT are better. Despite advances in RT delivery, liver toxicity following RT remains a dose-limiting factor, and investigations to better understand the pathophysiology of RT-induced liver toxicity are warranted. For most tumors, RT can provide sustained local control. However, HCC tends to recur within the liver away from the irradiated volume, providing rationale for combining RT with systemic or regional therapies. There is a particular interest in combining RT with anti-VEGF-targeted agents for their independent activity in HCC as well as their radiation sensitization properties. Randomized trials of RT are warranted.

The evolving role of radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Technical advancements in imaging, in radiation therapy (RT) planning and RT delivery, have facilitated the safe delivery of conformal radiation therapy to patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although experience in liver cancer RT is limited, the RT technologies and tools to deliver RT safely are being disseminated rapidly. A variety of doses and RT fractionations have been used to treat HCC, and RT has been used in combination with other therapies including transarterial hepatic chemoembolization (TACE). Outcomes following RT alone or RT and TACE appear better than outcomes following similar historical controls of TACE alone, however, randomized trials of RT are needed. The first site of recurrence following RT is most often within the liver, away from the high dose volume, providing rationale for combining RT with regional or systemic therapies. Given the vascular properties of HCC, the combination of RT with anti-VEGF targeted agents may improve outcomes further.

Genetic diversity of hepatocellular carcinomas and its potential impact on targeted therapies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent solid tumors worldwide and represents the third cause of mortality among deaths from cancer. It has been extensively studied in terms of genetic alteration in the last 10 years and our knowledge has dramatically increased in this field, leading to the definition of different altered pathways in hepatocarcinogenesis. Recently, a comprehensive study of genetic and transcriptomic alterations in a large series of HCC tumors enabled the identification of a six-group molecular-based classification of HCC, defined by a simple 16-gene signature. This classification is closely related to specific alteration of WNT and AKT oncogenic pathways. Together with the analysis of defined oncogenic proteins, such global classifications could be useful in the prediction of future-targeted therapy efficiency.

Development of sorafenib and other molecularly targeted agents in hepatocellular carcinoma

It is well appreciated that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents one of the most challenging malignancies of worldwide importance. In fact, HCC is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death globally. The incidence rates for HCC in the U.S. and Western Europe have been rising. Unresectable or metastatic HCC carries a poor prognosis, and systemic therapy with cytotoxic agents provides marginal benefit. Because of the poor track record of systemic therapy in HCC, there has been a sense of nihilism for this disease in the oncology community for decades. However, with the arrival of newly developed, molecularly targeted agents and the success of some of these agents in other traditionally challenging cancers, such as renal cell carcinoma, there has been renewed interest in developing novel systemic therapy in HCC. At the recent Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, results of a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial were presented in which sorafenib demonstrated improved survival in patients with advanced HCC. This landmark study represents the first agent that has demonstrated an improved overall survival benefit in this disease and sets the new standard for first-line treatment of advanced HCC. For this review, the author concisely summarized the current status of molecularly targeted agents that are under clinical development in advanced HCC.

Cutaneous reactions related to systemic immunomodulators and targeted therapeutics

The arrival of targeted therapeutics into the oncology clinic, while enthusiastically anticipated, introduced the oncologist to dermatologic events that can pose challenging management issues. The dermatologic effects of these targeted agents appear to be more frequent than those with cytotoxic therapy and are not uniform; that is, different agents have distinct dermatologic toxicities. Interestingly, dermatologic toxicity may correlate with antitumor activity with some of these targeted agents. The correlation of rash with response and survival in particular mandates the development of effective and appropriate management strategies. The nature and challenges of the dermatologic events observed to date with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, multikinase inhibitors, proteosome inhibitors, BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immunomodulatory drugs will be addressed in this review.

High Frequency of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor

OBJECTIVES

To report the high incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between October 2005 and December 2006, 67 patients with metastatic RCC were treated with sorafenib or sunitinib at the Montpellier Cancer Center in compassionate access programs. The medical records of five (7%) patients who died of ICH during therapy were reviewed retrospectively. Four of them had known brain metastases. Previous radiation therapy had been indicated in two patients. Two patients had a history of hypertension. Death from ICH occurred in the first 2 wk following the onset of treatment. Three other patients with brain metastases who received sorafenib or sunitinib during the same period did not experience ICH.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of fatal ICH in RCC patients with brain metastases treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the VEGFR seems high. Prospective clinical trials will be necessary for assessing the true incidence and predictive factors related to this toxicity.

Treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is frequently diagnosed at advanced stages and has a high mortality rate. With improved survival of patients with cirrhotic liver disease and increased prevalence of chronic hepatitis C viral infections, a rise in the number of HCC cases is being reported worldwide. Early diagnosis and treatment can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with HCC. Although surgical resection is an important potentially curative therapy for liver tumors, in appropriately selected patients, liver transplantation has been shown to achieve excellent survival rates for a solid tumor. Locally ablative and locoregional therapies in the form of percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and transcatheter arterial radioembolization (TheraSphere) are viable options in patients with unresectable HCC. Unfortunately, the role of systemic therapy has been very limited in the treatment of these patients. Novel treatment options based on an improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of HCC are being explored. These targeted molecular therapies are aimed at growth factors and their receptors, intracellular signal transduction and cell cycle control. A substantial improvement in outcomes of intermediate and advanced stage HCC is expected with the advent of these targeted therapies, used in combination with surgical or locoregional therapies. Recent positive results from a large Phase III study of the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, hold great promise in the treatment of HCC.

Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy has not provided clinical benefit or prolonged survival for patients with advanced HCC. This review summarizes the results of prospective clinical trials of several categories of systemic therapy, with emphasis on the more promising results from recent trials of biologically targeted therapeutic agents in HCC.