Cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (COSMIC-312): final results of a randomised phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the COSMIC-312 trial was to evaluate cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib in patients with previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. In the initial analysis, cabozantinib plus atezolizumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus sorafenib. Here, we report the pre-planned final overall survival analysis and updated safety and efficacy results following longer follow-up.

METHODS

COSMIC-312 was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study done across 178 centres in 32 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were eligible. Patients must have had measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), and adequate marrow and organ function, including Child-Pugh class A liver function; those with fibrolamellar carcinoma, sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, or combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma were ineligible. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1:1) using a web-based interactive response system to a combination of oral cabozantinib 40 mg once daily plus intravenous atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks, oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, or oral single-agent cabozantinib 60 mg once daily. Randomisation was stratified by disease aetiology, geographical region, and presence of extrahepatic disease or macrovascular invasion. Dual primary endpoints were for cabozantinib plus atezolizumab versus sorafenib: progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1, as assessed by a blinded independent radiology committee, in the first 372 randomly assigned patients (previously reported) and overall survival in all patients randomly assigned to cabozantinib plus atezolizumab or sorafenib. The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival in all patients randomly assigned to cabozantinib versus sorafenib. Outcomes in all randomly assigned patients, including final overall survival, are presented. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03755791.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 7, 2018, and Aug 27, 2020, 432 patients were randomly assigned to combination treatment, 217 to sorafenib, and 188 to single-agent cabozantinib, and included in all efficacy analyses. 704 (84%) patients were male and 133 (16%) were female. 824 of these patients received at least one dose of study treatment and were included in the safety population. Median follow-up was 22·1 months (IQR 19·3-24·8). Median overall survival was 16·5 months (96% CI 14·5-18·7) for the combination treatment group and 15·5 months (12·2-20·0) for the sorafenib group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·98 [0·78-1·24]; stratified log-rank p=0·87). Median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (99% CI 5·7-8·2) for the combination treatment group, 4·3 months (2·9-6·1) for the sorafenib group, and 5·8 months (99% CI 5·4-8·2) for the single-agent cabozantinib group (HR 0·74 [0·56-0·97] for combination treatment vs sorafenib; HR 0·78 [99% CI 0·56-1·09], p=0·05, for single-agent cabozantinib vs sorafenib). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 281 (66%) of 429 patients in the combination treatment group, 100 (48%) of 207 patients in the sorafenib group, and 108 (57%) of 188 patients in the single-agent cabozantinib group; the most common were hypertension (37 [9%] vs 17 [8%] vs 23 [12%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (36 [8%] vs 18 [9%] vs 16 [9%]), aspartate aminotransferase increased (42 [10%] vs eight [4%] vs 17 [9%]), and alanine aminotransferase increased (40 [9%] vs six [3%] vs 13 [7%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 223 (52%) patients in the combination treatment group, 84 (41%) patients in the sorafenib group, and 87 (46%) patients in the single agent cabozantinib group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in six (1%) patients in the combination treatment group (encephalopathy, hepatic failure, drug-induced liver injury, oesophageal varices haemorrhage, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and tumour lysis syndrome), one (<1%) in the sorafenib group (general physical health deterioration), and four (2%) in the single-agent cabozantinib group (asthenia, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, sepsis, and gastric perforation).

INTERPRETATION

First-line cabozantinib plus atezolizumab did not improve overall survival versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The progression-free survival benefit of the combination versus sorafenib was maintained, with no new safety signals.

FUNDING

Exelixis and Ipsen.

Biomarker and pharmacodynamic activity of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) inhibitor SAR439459 as monotherapy and in combination with cemiplimab in a phase I clinical study in patients with advanced solid tumors

SAR439459, a 'second-generation' human anti-transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) monoclonal antibody, inhibits all TGFβ isoforms and improves the antitumor activity of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 therapeutics. This study reports the pharmacodynamics (PD) and biomarker results from phase I/Ib first-in-human study of SAR439459 ± cemiplimab in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT03192345). In dose-escalation phase (Part 1), SAR439459 was administered intravenously at increasing doses either every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 3 weeks (Q3W) with cemiplimab IV at 3 mg/kg Q2W or 350 mg Q3W, respectively, in patients with advanced solid tumors. In dose-expansion phase (Part 2), patients with melanoma received SAR439459 IV Q3W at preliminary recommended phase II dose (pRP2D) of 22.5/7.5 mg/kg or at 22.5 mg/kg with cemiplimab 350 mg IV Q3W. Tumor biopsy and peripheral blood samples were collected for exploratory biomarker analyses to assess target engagement and PD, and results were correlated with patients' clinical parameters. SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed decreased plasma and tissue TGFβ, downregulation of TGFβ-pathway activation signature, modulation of peripheral natural killer (NK) and T cell expansion, proliferation, and increased secretion of CXCL10. Conversion of tumor tissue samples from 'immune-excluded' to 'immune-infiltrated' phenotype in a representative patient with melanoma SAR439459 22.5 mg/kg with cemiplimab was observed. In paired tumor and plasma, active and total TGFβ1 was more consistently elevated followed by TGFβ2, whereas TGFβ3 was only measurable (lower limit of quantitation ≥2.68 pg/mg) in tumors. SAR439459 ± cemiplimab showed expected peripheral PD effects and TGFβ alteration. However, further studies are needed to identify biomarkers of response.

Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of benign insulinomas

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) has emerged as an alternative nonsurgical treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term follow-up of patients treated with EUS-RFA for a sporadic insulinoma in our centre in terms of efficacy, safety and risk of recurrence.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

We retrospectively analysed the data of 11 patients with an insulinoma treated by EUS-RFA in our tertiary centre between June 2018 and April 2022. Clinical and biological, as well as imaging, follow-up was planned at 3, 6, 12 months and then annually.

RESULTS

In our series, there were nine women and two men with a median age of 65 years. All tumours were sporadic, with a mean size of 11 mm. The procedure allowed an immediate and complete symptomatic and biological remission in all patients without notable complications. Complete radiological resolution of the tumour after ablation was observed in seven patients, and persistence of an asymptomatic tumour residue was observed in four patients. During the mean follow-up period of 26 months, two patients presented a significant but asymptomatic increase of the tumour residue; a second EUS-RFA session was performed in one patient and the other patient is being closely monitored.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-RFA treatment of benign insulinomas provides a long-term complete clinical resolution of hypoglycaemia. A long-term follow-up is essential if residual tumour persists after initial EUS-RFA treatment.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Surgical Resection for Treatment of Pancreatic Insulinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is emerging as a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We aimed to compare EUS-RFA and surgical resection for the treatment of pancreatic insulinoma (PI).

METHODS

Patients with sporadic PI who underwent EUS-RFA at 23 centers or surgical resection at 8 high-volume pancreatic surgery institutions between 2014 and 2022 were retrospectively identified and outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis. Primary outcome was safety. Secondary outcomes were clinical efficacy, hospital stay, and recurrence rate after EUS-RFA.

RESULTS

Using propensity score matching, 89 patients were allocated in each group (1:1), and were evenly distributed in terms of age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, distance between lesion and main pancreatic duct, lesion site, size, and grade. Adverse event (AE) rate was 18.0% and 61.8% after EUS-RFA and surgery, respectively (P < .001). No severe AEs were observed in the EUS-RFA group compared with 15.7% after surgery (P < .0001). Clinical efficacy was 100% after surgery and 95.5% after EUS-RFA (P = .160). However, the mean duration of follow-up time was shorter in the EUS-RFA group (median, 23 months; interquartile range, 14-31 months vs 37 months; interquartile range, 17.5-67 months in the surgical group; P < .0001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the surgical group (11.1 ± 9.7 vs 3.0 ± 2.5 days in the EUS-RFA group; P < .0001). Fifteen lesions (16.9%) recurred after EUS-RFA and underwent a successful repeat EUS-RFA (11 patients) or surgical resection (4 patients).

CONCLUSION

EUS-RFA is safer than surgery and highly effective for the treatment of PI. If confirmed in a randomized study, EUS-RFA treatment can become first-line therapy for sporadic PI.

Preoperative treatment with mFOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel +/- isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body Radiation Therapy (iHD-SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (the STEREOPAC trial): study protocol for a randomised comparative multicenter phase II trial

BACKGROUND

For patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment. Surgery is generally followed by postoperative chemotherapy associated with improved survival, yet neoadjuvant therapy is a rapidly emerging concept requiring to be explored and validated in terms of treatment options and oncological outcomes. In this context, stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) appears feasible and can be safely integrated into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX) with promising benefits in terms of R0 resection, local control and survival. However, the optimal therapeutic sequence is still not known, especially for borderline resectable PDAC, and the role of adding SBRT to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting needs to be evaluated in randomised controlled trials. The aim of the STEREOPAC trial is to assess the impact and efficacy of adding isotoxic high-dose SBRT (iHD-SBRT) to neoadjuvant mFFX or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (Gem/Nab-P) in patients with borderline resectable PDAC.

METHODS

This is a randomised comparative multicentre phase II trial, planning to enrol patients (n = 256) diagnosed with a borderline resectable biopsy-confirmed PDAC. Patients will receive 4 cycles of mFFX (or 6 doses of Gem/Nab-P). After full disease restaging, non-progressive patients will be randomised for receiving either 4 additional mFFX cycles (or 6 doses of Gem/Nab-P) (Arm A), or 2 mFFX cycles (or 3 doses of Gem/Nab-P) + iHD-SBRT (35 to 55 Gy in 5 fractions) + 2 mFFX cycles (or 3 doses of Gem/Nab-P) (Arm B). Then curative surgery will be performed followed by adjuvant chemotherapy according to patient's condition. The co-primary endpoints are R0 resection and disease-free survival after the complete sequence strategy. The secondary endpoints include resection rate, overall survival, locoregional failure / distant metastasis free interval, pathologic complete response, toxicity, postoperative complications and quality of life assessment.

DISCUSSION

This trial will help define the best neoadjuvant treatment sequence for borderline resectable PDAC and aims to evaluate if a total neoadjuvant treatment integrating iHD-SBRT improves the patients' oncological outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at ClinicalTrails.gov (NCT05083247) on October 19th, 2021, and in the Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) EU CT database (2022-501181-22-01) on July 2022.

A real-world analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in Belgium

Background

Currently, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5-FU/LV) is the only approved second-line treatment for patients suffering from metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). However, also other chemotherapeutic regimens are used in this setting and due to the lack of clear real-world data on the efficacy of the different regimens, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment sequence for mPDAC patients.

Objectives

To provide information on the safe and efficacious use of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice in Belgium, which is needed for healthcare professionals to estimate the risk-benefit ratio of the intervention.

Methods

Medical data of adult patients with mPDAC who were treated with nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in one of the participating Belgian hospitals were retrospectively collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to obtain survival curves to estimate the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). All other results were presented descriptively.

Results

A total of 56 patients [median age at diagnosis: 69 years (range 43 years), 57.1% male] were included. Patients received a median of 5 (range 49 cycles) nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV cycles, extended over 10 weeks (range 130.8 weeks). The median start dose for nal-IRI was 70 mg/m² (range 49.24 mg/m²) and chemotherapy dose reduction and delay occurred in, respectively, 42.8% and 37.5% of the patients. The median OS was 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.6-8.4 months) with a 6-month survival rate of 57.4% and a 1-year survival rate of 27.8% in the overall study population. The median OS for patients treated with nal-IRI as second-line therapy or as later-line treatment was, respectively, 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.9-7.0 months) and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.2-no upper limit). In the overall study population, a median PFS of 3.1 months (95% CI: 2.4-4.6 months) and a disease control rate of 48.3%, comprising 30.4% stable disease, 16.1% partial and 1.8% complete response, was observed. The median PFS for patients treated with nal-IRI as second-line therapy was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.8-4.8 months) while this was 2.4 months (95% CI: 1.9-9.1 months) for those that received nal-IRI in a later-line treatment. In terms of safety, gastrointestinal problems occurred most (64.3% of the patients) and from all reported treatment emergent adverse events, 39.2% were grade 3 or 4.

Conclusion

Nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is a valuable, effective, and safe sequential treatment option following gemcitabine-based therapy in patients with mPDAC.

Trial details

Retrospective study on the efficacy and tolerability of liposomal irinotecan (NALIRI); ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0509506 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05095064?term=naliri&draw=2&rank=2).

Proposal of early CT morphological criteria for response of liver metastases to systemic treatments in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Alternatives to RECIST

RECIST 1.1 criteria are commonly used with computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the efficacy of systemic treatments in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and liver metastases (LMs), but their relevance is questioned in this setting. We aimed to explore alternative criteria using different numbers of measured LMs and thresholds of size and density variation. We retrospectively studied patients with advanced pancreatic or small intestine NETs with LMs, treated with systemic treatment in the first-and/or second-line, without early progression, in 14 European expert centers. We compared time to treatment failure (TTF) between responders and non-responders according to various criteria defined by 0%, 10%, 20% or 30% decrease in the sum of LM size, and/or by 10%, 15% or 20% decrease in LM density, measured on two, three or five LMs, on baseline (≤1 month before treatment initiation) and first revaluation (≤6 months) contrast-enhanced CT scans. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were performed to adjust the association between response criteria and TTF on prognostic factors. We included 129 systemic treatments (long-acting somatostatin analogs 41.9%, chemotherapy 26.4%, targeted therapies 31.8%), administered as first-line (53.5%) or second-line therapies (46.5%) in 91 patients. A decrease ≥10% in the size of three LMs was the response criterion that best predicted prolonged TTF, with significance at multivariable analysis (HR 1.90; 95% CI: 1.06-3.40; p = .03). Conversely, response defined by RECIST 1.1 did not predict prolonged TTF (p = .91), and neither did criteria based on changes in LM density. A ≥10% decrease in size of three LMs could be a more clinically relevant criterion than the current 30% threshold utilized by RECIST 1.1 for the evaluation of treatment efficacy in patients with advanced NETs. Its implementation in clinical trials is mandatory for prospective validation. Criteria based on changes in LM density were not predictive of treatment efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at CNIL-CERB, Assistance publique hopitaux de Paris as "E-NETNET-L-E-CT" July 2018. No number was assigned. Approved by the Medical Ethics Review Board of University Medical Center Groningen.

Belgian guidelines for pathology reporting of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal tract

Since neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare tumors, registration of patient data in national and multinational registries is recommended. Indeed, this will facilitate multicenter studies on the epidemiology, efficacy and safety of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors as well as for neuroendocrine carcinomas. In Belgium, data on patient and tumor characteristics of all newly diagnosed malignancies have been collected in the Belgian Cancer Registry since 2004 including anonymized full pathological reports. The Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumor (DNET) registry collects information on classification, staging, diagnostic tools and treatment in a prospective national online database. However, the terminology, classification and staging systems of neuroendocrine neoplasms have changed repeatedly over the past 20 years as a result of a better understanding of these rare tumors, by joining forces internationally. These frequent changes make it very difficult to exchange data or perform retrospective analyses. For optimal decision making, for a clear understanding and to allow reclassification according to the latest staging system, several items need to be described in the pathology report. This paper provides an overview of the essential items in reporting neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal tract.

Abstract A018: Mitazalimab (CD40 agonist) in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Safety data and recommended dose for phase 2 (RP2D) from OPTIMIZE-1, a phase 1b/2 study

Mitazalimab is a human CD40 agonistic IgG1antibody being developed as cancer immunotherapy. Targeting CD40 kickstarts the cancer immunity cycle by licensing DCs leading to tumor-specific T cell priming and activation. Furthermore, in PDAC, CD40 agonism activates myeloid cells and promotes the degradation of the desmoplastic tumor stroma, improving the influx of T cells and chemotherapeutic agents into the tumor. Mitazalimab has shown to be safe and well tolerated (at doses up to 1200 μg/kg) with signs of clinical activity in solid tumors in a Phase I study (NCT02829099). Most drug related adverse events (AE) were grade 1 or 2. OPTIMIZE-1 (NCT04888312) is a phase 1b/2, open-label, multicenter study designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in adults diagnosed with previously untreated mPDAC. The objective of the first (phase 1b) part of the study was to determine the RP2D of mitazalimab + mFOLFIRINOX. Mitazalimab was escalated from 450 µg/kg to 900 µg/kg following a Bayesian optimal interval design with at least 3 patients enrolled per dose level. In the first 21-day treatment cycle (Dose Limiting Toxicity assessment period), mitazalimab is administered intravenously on day 1 and 10 and mFOLFIRINOX starts on day 8. In the second and subsequent cycles, treatment follows a 14-day cycle schedule where mitazalimab is administered 2 days after mFOLFIRINOX. In part 2 of the study (phase 2), mitazalimab at the RP2D will be administered in combination with mFOLFIRINOX. Primary endpoint is RECIST-defined overall response rate. Progression-free survival and overall survival will be assessed as secondary endpoints. We report data from phase 1b (dose escalation) part of this study. As of March 9, 2022, 11 patients were treated with mitazalimab: 5 at 450 µg/kg and 6 at 900 µg/kg mitazalimab doses. One patient in the 900 µg/kg dose cohort withdrew from the trial for administrative reasons after the first mitazalimab infusion, prior to receiving mFOLFIRINOX and was not included in RP2D determination. Key baseline characteristics included: 7 female, 4 male; median age 63 (range 57-70); ECOG 0-1; median time since mPDAC diagnosis, 25 days. Mitazalimab related AEs were reported in 9/11 patients. Treatment related AEs occurring in &gt;1 patient were fever (60%), muscle pain (50%) and fatigue (20%). At the 450 µg/kg dose, all mitazalimab related AEs were grade 1-2. At the 900 µg/kg dose, 4 patients (67%) experienced grade 1-2 mitazalimab related AEs. One patient in the 900 µg/kg dose experienced mitazalimab related grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 headache that led to treatment discontinuation after the first cycle. There were no mitazalimab related grade 4 or 5 AEs. 1/10 patients required mFOLFIRINOX dose reduction and, at the cutoff date, the range of treatment length was 1-14 weeks. Mitazalimab combined with mFOLFIRINOX is safe and well tolerated. The 900 µg/kg dose of mitazalimab was selected as the RP2D. Phase 2 of the OPTIMIZE-1 trial is currently enrolling patients.

Citation Format: Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Ivan Borbath, Hans Prenen, Aurélien Lambert, Karen Geboes, Jean-Frédéric Blanc, Yago Pico de Coaña, Karin Enell-Smith, Lena Schultz, Karin Nordbladh, Peter Ellmark, Sumeet Ambarkhane, Malin Carlsson, Philippe Cassier. Mitazalimab (CD40 agonist) in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): Safety data and recommended dose for phase 2 (RP2D) from OPTIMIZE-1, a phase 1b/2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A018.

EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic/peripancreatic tumors and oligometastatic disease: an observational prospective multicenter study

Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) is an emerging and minimally invasive technique that seems promising for treatment of focal pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions. Our aim was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility, safety, and technical and clinical success of pancreatic and extra-pancreatic EUS-RFA. Patients and methods  We prospectively collected clinical and technical data for all patients who underwent EUS-RFA at two Belgian academic centers from June 2018 to February 2022. Feasibility, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up were also assessed. Results  Twenty-nine patients were included, accounting for 35 lesions: 10 non-functioning neuroendocrine tumors (29 %), 13 pancreatic insulinomas (37 %), one adenocarcinoma (3 %), and 11 intra-pancreatic and extra-pancreatic metastatic lesions (31 %). Technical success was achieved in 100 % of cases, with a median of three power applications per lesion (interquartile range 2). The majority of patients (59 %) presented no collateral effects, three (10.3 %) developed non-severe acute pancreatitis, and four (14 %) had mild abdominal pain. At 6 months follow-up (n = 25), 36 % of patients showed radiological complete response, 16 % presented a significant partial response and 48 % showed < 50 % decrease in diameter. At 12 months (n = 20), 30 % showed complete necrosis and 15 % > 50 % decrease in diameter. Hypoglycemia related to insulinoma was immediately corrected in all 13 cases, with no recurrence during follow-up. Conclusions  EUS-RFA is feasible, safe, and effective for treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic tumors. Larger and longer multicenter prospective studies are warranted to establish its role in management of focal pancreatic lesions and oligometastatic disease. Symptomatic insulinoma currently represent the best indication.

TCP post-radioembolization and TCP post-EBRT in HCC are similar and can be predicted using the in vitro radiosensitivity

Background

Tumor equivalent uniform dose (EUD) is proposed as a predictor of patient outcome after liver radioembolization (RE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and can be evaluated with ⁹⁰Y-TOF-PET. The aim is to evaluate the correlation between PET-based tumors EUD and the clinical response evaluated with dual molecular tracer (¹¹C-acetate and ¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT post-RE.

Methods

34 HCC tumors in 22 patients were prospectively evaluated. The metabolic response was characterized by the total lesion metabolism variation (ΔTLM) between baseline and follow-up. This response allowed to compute a tumor control probability (TCP) as a function of the tumor EUD.

Results

The absorbed dose response correlation was highly significant (R = 0.72, P < 0.001). With an absorbed dose threshold of 40 Gy, the metabolic response was strongly different in both groups (median response 35% versus 100%, P < 0.001). Post-RE TCP as a function of the EUD was very similar to that observed in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), with TCP values equal to 0.5 and 0.95 for a EUD of 51 Gy and 100 Gy, respectively. The TCP was perfectly predicted by the Poisson model assuming an inter tumor radiosensitivity variation of 30% around the HCC cell in vitro value.

Conclusions

EUD-based ⁹⁰Y TOF-PET/CT predicts the metabolic response post-RE in HCC assessed using dual molecular PET tracers and provides a similar TCP curve to that observed in EBRT. In vivo and in vitro HCC radiosensitivities are similar. Both TCPs show that a EUD of 100 Gy is needed to control HCC for the three devices (resin spheres, glass spheres, EBRT). Observed absorbed doses achieving this 100 Gy-EUD ranged from 190 to 1800 Gy!

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-022-00911-0.

Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Previously Untreated Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Data from the Open-Label, Phase II KEYNOTE-224 Trial

PURPOSE

KEYNOTE-224 cohort 1 demonstrated that pembrolizumab was efficacious and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with sorafenib. We report results from KEYNOTE-224 (NCT02702414) cohort 2, which enrolled patients with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

KEYNOTE-224 was an open-label, multicountry phase II trial. Eligible patients in cohort 2 had advanced HCC not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy and not previously treated with systemic therapy. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central imaging review per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability.

RESULTS

Between September 4, 2018, and February 20, 2019, 51 patients were allocated in cohort 2. The median time from the first dose to data cutoff (January 19, 2021) was 27 months (range, 23-29). ORR was 16% [95% confidence interval (CI), 7-29] and was similar across key subgroups. Median DOR was 16 months (range, 3-24+), and DCR was 57%. The median PFS was 4 months (95% CI, 2-8), and median TTP was 4 months (95% CI, 3-9). Median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 8-23). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced HCC with no prior systemic therapy, pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity, promising OS, and had a safety profile consistent with previous observations. These findings support further evaluation of pembrolizumab-based regimens for HCC.

Safety and efficacy results from the expansion phase of the first-in-human study evaluating TGFβ inhibitor SAR439459 alone and combined with cemiplimab in adults with advanced solid tumors

2524

Background: SAR439459 (SAR459) is a human anti-TGFβ monoclonal antibody that neutralizes all isoforms of TGFβ. In preclinical models, combining SAR459 with an anti-PD-1 showed improved anti-tumor activity compared to SAR459 single agent. In the dose escalation, acceptable tolerability was observed, the MTD was not reached and the preliminary RP2D was 22.5mg/kg Q3W when combined with cemiplimab (CEMI; S. Williamson et al. J Clin Oncol 39, 2021[suppl 15; #2510]). Reduction of plasma TGFβ was ≥90% at doses ≥0.25mg/kg Q2W, with a trend of a decrease in intra-tumoral TGFβ (D. Robbrecht et al. JITC 2021;9 [suppl 2; #250]). Here we report safety and efficacy results of the dose expansion. Methods: The expansion phase of this open-label, phase 1/1b study aimed to determine the optimal dose of SAR459 (7.5 mg/kg or 22.5 mg/kg Q3W) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) resistant to anti-PD(L)1 therapy (Part 2A); and the ORR (confirmed responses) in all treated pts with SAR459 22.5 mg/kg + CEMI 350 mg Q3W in pts with MEL, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), or Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), resistant to anti-PD(L)1; as well as in pts with mesenchymal Colorectal Cancer (CRC) or Urothelial Cancer (UC), anti-PD(L)1 naïve (Part 2B). Results: From October 2019 to September 2021, 109 pts with ECOG PS 0-1 enrolled in Part 2A (14) and Part 2B (95). Overall, the median age was 63 years and 83% of pts received up to 3 prior treatment lines for advanced disease (range 1-8). Based on preliminary data, the ORR in Part 2B was 8% (Table). No significant association between clinical response and plasma TGFb level at baseline or modulation upon treatment was observed. The correlation between tumor TGFb level and clinical benefit is inconclusive due to limited number of tumor biopsies. No response was observed in Part 2A. Overall, 100% of pts had at least one treatment emergent adverse event (AE), 67% were G≥3, 34% related G≥3, 17% G5, and 4% related G5. The limited number of patients treated with SAR459 alone at the RP2D did not allow to demonstrate added toxicity due to the combination. Overall, 51 pts (47%) reported hemorrhagic AE of any grade, 8 pts (7%) had G≥3 and 5 pts (5%) had fatal outcome. The rate of bleeding and severe hemorrhagic AE was higher in HCC pts compared to the other cohorts: 11/14 (79%) pts had a hemorrhagic AE, of which 3 (21%) G≥3 and fatal. An exploratory analysis showed a trend for higher frequency of any grade SAR459-related and fatal hemorrhagic AE in patients with higher exposure. Conclusions: The NCT03192345 study was discontinued due to a lack of efficacy, and a high bleeding risk particularly in pts with HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03192345. [Table: see text]

Pembrolizumab monotherapy for previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): 3-year follow-up of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 study

4109

Background: Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed durable antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with sorafenib-treated (cohort 1) and treatment-naive (cohort 2) aHCC in the open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 (NCT02702414) study. Longer term data from KEYNOTE-224 after ̃3 years of follow-up for patients with treatment-naive aHCC are reported. Methods: Eligible patients in cohort 2 had histologically, cytologically, or radiologically confirmed aHCC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C or B not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy and not amenable to curative treatment, Child-Pugh A liver function, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), and ECOG PS 0 or 1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles (̃2 years). Primary end point was ORR assessed per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. Secondary end points included DOR, DCR, TTP, and PFS, all assessed per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, OS, and safety/tolerability. Results: All 51 patients enrolled in cohort 2 received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab. Median follow-up, defined as the time from first dose to the data cutoff (October 1, 2021), was 35 months (range, 31-37). ORR was 16% (95% CI, 7-29). Median DOR was not reached (NR; range, 3 to 24+ months); 58% of responders were estimated to have a response duration ≥18 months. Best overall response was 8 (16%) PRs, 21 (41%) SDs, and 17 (33%) PDs; no CRs were observed and response was not evaluable for 2 patients (4%) and not assessed for 3 patients (6%). DCR was 57% (95% CI, 42-71). ORR was generally consistent among patients with a viral and nonviral etiology for HCC, although sample sizes were small. The median TTP was 4 months (95% CI, 3-9). Median PFS was 4 months (95% CI, 2-8). Estimated PFS rate at 24 months was 15%. Median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 8-23). Estimated OS rate at 24 months was 34%. No new or unexpected adverse events (AEs) occurred. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 28 patients (55%; grade 3-5, 8 [16%]). Conclusions: Updated results from cohort 2 of the KEYNOTE-224 study continued to demonstrate durable antitumor activity, promising OS, and manageable safety for pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with aHCC and no prior systemic therapy. These data, together with recent positive results from KEYNOTE-394, underscore the broad applicability of pembrolizumab in patients with aHCC both as monotherapy and in combination with other therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

Mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC): Safety data from part of the OPTIMIZE-1 study

e16237

Background: Mitazalimab is a human CD40 agonistic IgG1antibody being developed for cancer immunotherapy. Targeting CD40 kickstarts the cancer immunity cycle by licensing DCs leading to tumor-specific T cell priming and activation. Furthermore, in PDAC CD40 agonists on myeloid cells promote degradation of the desmoplastic tumor stroma, improving influx of T cells and chemotherapeutic agents into the tumor. Mitazalimab has shown to be safe and well tolerated (at doses up to 1200 μg/kg), with signs of clinical activity in solid tumors in a Phase I study (NCT02829099). Most drug related adverse events (AE) were grade 1 or 2. Methods: OPTIMIZE-1 (NCT04888312) is a Phase 1b/2, open-label, multicenter study designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX in adults diagnosed with previously untreated metastatic PDAC. In the first 21-day treatment cycle (Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) assessment period), mitazalimab is administered intravenously on day 1 and 10 and mFOLFIRINOX infusion starts on day 8. In the second and subsequent cycles, treatment follows a 14-day cycle schedule where mitazalimab is administered 2 days after mFOLFIRINOX. The primary objective of the first part of the study (Phase 1b) is to determine the recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of mitazalimab in combination with mFOLFIRINOX. Mitazalimab will be escalated from 450 µg/kg to 900 µg/kg following a Bayesian optimal interval design with at least 3 patients enrolled per dose level. A minimum of 6 patients will be evaluated at the RP2D. In Part 2 of the study, mitazalimab at the RP2D will be administered in combination with mFOLFIRINOX. The primary endpoint is RECIST-defined overall response rate. Progression-free survival and overall survival will be assessed as secondary endpoints. Here we report data from the Phase 1b (dose escalation) part of this study. Results: Five patients with histologically confirmed, previously untreated metastatic PDAC were treated at the 450 µg/kg dose level. Key baseline characteristics included: 2 female, 3 male; median age 65 (range 60-68); ECOG score of 0 or 1; median time since primary diagnosis 13 days (range 7-82). Treatment related AEs were only grade 1 or 2 (reported in 4 of 5 patients). Treatment related AEs occurring in > 1 patient were fever, muscle pain and nausea. No DLTs were reported. No patients required dose interruption/reduction with mitazalimab or mFOLFIRINOX. Two patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression and three remain on study. The study continues and patients are currently being enrolled at the 900 µg/kg mitazalimab dose in combination with mFOLFIRINOX. Conclusions: Mitazalimab at 450 µg/kg dose combined with mFOLFIRINOX is safe and well tolerated. Enrollment at the 900 µg/kg dose is ongoing for this Phase 1b/2 study. Updated data from part 1 of the study will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04888312.

PROOF 301: A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial of infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement

TPS4171

Background: First-line treatment options are limited for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Genetic alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR) gene play an important role in CCA. FGFR gene fusions/rearrangements are present in 10–16% of intrahepatic CCA and may predict tumor sensitivity to FGFR inhibitors. Infigratinib (BGJ398) is a potent, orally bioavailable, selective, ATP-competitive, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of FGFRs that showed promising clinical activity and a manageable adverse event profile in a phase 2 study in patients with previously treated, unresectable locally advanced/metastatic CCA with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement. The multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase 3 PROOF 301 trial is evaluating infigratinib vs standard-of-care gemcitabine + cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic or inoperable CCA with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement. Methods: Approximately 300 patients ≥18 years of age with histologically or cytologically confirmed, advanced/metastatic or inoperable CCA with an FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement (confirmed by central laboratory) are randomized 2:1 to oral infigratinib 125 mg once daily for the first 21 days of a 28-day treatment cycle vs intravenous standard gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) + cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Randomization will be stratified by unresectable locally advanced vs metastatic disease, geographic region, prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment vs none, and receipt of up to 1 cycle of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic disease prior to randomization vs none. Treatment will continue until confirmed progressive disease by blinded independent central review (BICR), intolerance, withdrawal of informed consent, or death. Patients on the gemcitabine + cisplatin arm who develop disease progression, confirmed by BICR, can cross-over to receive infigratinib. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS, RECIST v1.1), confirmed by BICR. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS (investigator determined), overall response rate, best overall response, disease control rate, duration of response (BICR and investigator determined), and the type, frequency, and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. PFS after subsequent therapy (PFS2), quality of life, pharmacokinetics and other exploratory genetic alterations/biomarkers will also be evaluated. Trial enrollment is ongoing in the US, EU, and APAC (including Australia). The Data Monitoring Committee last reviewed the trial in December 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT03773302.

Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

1: ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as the best tool to characterize subepithelial lesion (SEL) features (size, location, originating layer, echogenicity, shape), but EUS alone is not able to distinguish among all types of SEL.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE suggests providing tissue diagnosis for all SELs with features suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) if they are of size > 20 mm, or have high risk stigmata, or require surgical resection or oncological treatment.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) or mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) equally for tissue diagnosis of SELs ≥ 20 mm in size.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends against surveillance of asymptomatic gastrointestinal (GI) tract leiomyomas, lipomas, heterotopic pancreas, granular cell tumors, schwannomas, and glomus tumors, if the diagnosis is clear.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests surveillance of asymptomatic esophageal and gastric SELs without definite diagnosis, with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at 3-6 months, and then at 2-3-year intervals for lesions < 10 mm in size, and at 1-2-year intervals for lesions 10-20 mm in size. For asymptomatic SELs > 20 mm in size that are not resected, ESGE suggests surveillance with EGD plus EUS at 6 months and then at 6-12-month intervals.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends endoscopic resection for type 1 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) if they grow larger than 10 mm. The choice of resection technique should depend on size, depth of invasion, and location in the stomach.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7: ESGE suggests considering removal of histologically proven gastric GISTs smaller than 20 mm as an alternative to surveillance. The decision to resect should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting. The choice of technique should depend on size, location, and local expertise.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 8: ESGE suggests that, to avoid unnecessary follow-up, endoscopic resection is an option for gastric SELs smaller than 20 mm and of unknown histology after failure of attempts to obtain diagnosis.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 9: ESGE recommends basing the surveillance strategy on the type and completeness of resection. After curative resection of benign SELs no follow-up is advised, except for type 1 gastric NEN for which surveillance at 1-2 years is advised.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 10: For lower or upper GI NEN with a positive or indeterminate margin at resection, ESGE recommends repeating endoscopy at 3-6 months and another attempt at endoscopic resection in the case of residual disease.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

Joint Belgian recommendation on screening for DPD-deficiency in patients treated with 5-FU, capecitabine (and tegafur)

OBJECTIVES

Fluoropyrimidines such as 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), capecitabine and tegafur are drugs that are often used in the treatment of maliginancies. The enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the first and rate limiting enzyme of 5-FU catabolism. Genetic variations within the DPYD gene (encoding for DPD protein) can lead to reduced or absent DPD activity. Treatment of DPD deficient patients with fluoropyrimidines can result in severe and, rarely, fatal toxicity. Screening for DPD deficiency should be implemented in practice.

METHODS

The available methods in routine to screen for DPD deficiency were analyzed and discussed in several group meetings involving members of the oncological, genetic and toxicological societies in Belgium: targeted genotyping based on the detection of 4 DPYD variants and phenotyping, through the measurement of uracil and dihydrouracil/uracil ratio in plasma samples.

RESULTS

The main advantage of targeted genotyping is the existence of prospectively validated genotype-based dosing guidelines. The main limitations of this approach are the relatively low sensitivity to detect total and partial DPD deficiency and the fact that this approach has only been validated in Caucasians so far. Phenotyping has a better sensitivity to detect total and partial DPD deficiency when performed in the correct analytical conditions and is not dependent on the ethnic origin of the patient.

CONCLUSION

In Belgium, we recommend phenotype or targeted genotype testing for DPD deficiency before starting 5-FU, capecitabine or tegafur. We strongly suggest a stepwise approach using phenotype testing upfront because of the higher sensitivity and the lower cost to society.

Optimization of the Clinical Effectiveness of Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Dosimetry and Patient-Selection Criteria

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is part of the treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Strong clinical data demonstrated the effectiveness of this therapy in HCC with a significant improvement in patient outcomes. Recent studies demonstrated a strong correlation between the tumor response and the patient outcome when the tumor-absorbed dose was assessed by nuclear medicine imaging. Dosimetry plays a key role in predicting the clinical response and can be optimized using a personalized method of activity planning (multi-compartmental dosimetry). This paper reviews the main clinical results of SIRT in HCC and emphasizes the central role of dosimetry for improving it effectiveness. Moreover, some patient and tumor characteristics predict a worse outcome, and toxicity related to SIRT treatment of advanced HCC patient selection based on the performance status, liver function, tumor characteristics, and tumor targeting using technetium-99m macro-aggregated albumin scintigraphy can significantly improve the clinical performance of SIRT.

ENETS standardized (synoptic) reporting for endoscopy in neuroendocrine tumors

Despite efforts from various endoscopy societies, reporting in the field of endoscopy remains extremely heterogeneous. Harmonisation of clinical practice in endoscopy has been highlighted by application of many clinical practice guidelines and standards pertaining to the endoscopic procedures and reporting are underlined. The aim of the proposed "standardised reporting" is to (1) facilitate recognition of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) on initial endoscopy, (2) to enable interdisciplinary decision making for treatment by a multidisciplinary team, (3) to provide a basis for a standardised endoscopic follow-up which allows detection of recurrence or progression reliably, (4) to make endoscopic reports on NEN comparable between different units, and (5) to allow research collaboration between NEN centres in terms of consistency of their endoscopic data. The ultimate goal is to improve disease management, patient outcome and reduce the diagnostic burden on the side of the patient by ensuring the highest possible diagnostic accuracy and validity of endoscopic exams and possibly interventions.

520 Preliminary biomarker and pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of the TGFβ inhibitor SAR439459, alone or in combination with cemiplimab, in a phase 1 clinical study in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background

Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) is a bifunctional regulator of tumor growth playing a role in tumor immune evasion and resistance to checkpoint blockade. Increased activation of TGFβ pathway correlated with reduced overall survival in patients with PD-1 resistance/refractory tumors. Therefore, the combination of a TGFβ inhibitor with an anti-PD-1 agent may benefit patients who are resistant to checkpoint blockade. SAR439459 is a ”second generation” human anti-TGFβ IgG4 monoclonal antibody. Here we report the preliminary PD results and patient selection strategy (mesenchymal CRC) of SAR439459 ± anti-PD-1 cemiplimab in patients with advanced tumors from an on-going phase 1 study (NCT03192345).

Methods

Peripheral blood, serum and tumor biopsies from patients were collected for the assessment of both predictive and PD biomarkers. A consensus molecular subtyping 4 (CMS4) gene classifier was developed and used to identify mesenchymal CRC tumors based on an in-silico experiment followed by a validation using ~200 procured CRC tumor biopsy samples with customized NanoString assay. TGFβ level in plasma and tumor was measured by ELISA to assess target engagement of SAR439459. Well-known immune modulation events as the PD readout were measured: 1) immunophenotyping of circulating immune cells ; 2) cytokine/chemokine production by MSD assay; 3) PD-L1, CD8+ T cells and FoxP3+ Tregs in tumor micro-environment (TME) by immunohistochemistry; 4) TGFβ pathway activation gene signature in TME by RNAseq.

Results

SAR439459 ± cemiplimab, induced inhibition of plasma TGFβ level ≥ 90% at doses ≥ 0.25mg/kg Q2W, together with a clear trend of decrease in intra-tumoral TGFβ. RNAseq data from paired biopsies revealed concomitant down-regulation of TGFβ pathway. In periphery, SAR439459 ± cemiplimab increased proliferating T and NK cells. Concomitantly, enhanced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines confirmed peripheral immune activation. In TME, a trend of increased CD8+ T cell infiltration and conversion from ”immune-excluded” to ”immune-inflamed” phenotype was observed following the combination treatment in several cases. No significant modulation of PD-L1 or FoxP3 was observed from the available paired biopsies. Out of 137 pre-screened CRC patients, 58 (42%) were identified as carrying the CMS4 phenotype based on the gene classifier.

Conclusions

Clinical modulation of TGFβ level and the related pathway demonstrated SAR439459’s target engagement. Further analysis confirmed the peripheral immune activation in patients treated with SAR439459 ± cemiplimab. Coupled with CD8+ T cell modulation in TME, these findings suggest the identification of early PD biomarkers impacted by SAR439459 which is consistent with the mechanism of action and biological activity of TGFβ blockade therapy.

Trial Registration

NCT03192345

Ethics Approval

The study protocols were approved by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee of each participating institution. All patients provided written informed consent priorto enrollment.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this abstract and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Quality of pathology reporting and adherence to guidelines in rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a Belgian national study

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) in the rectum is rising since the introduction of colonoscopy screening programs. Guidelines, such as the European NeuroEndocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) algorithm, are mainly based on expert opinion. The goal of this nationwide study is to gain a better insight into the evolution in pathology reporting and adherence to the ENETS guidelines in Belgium. In Belgium, all NENs have to be reported to the Belgian Cancer Registry. We thoroughly reviewed all available pathology reports, coded as rectal NEN between 2004 and 2015, and reclassified according to World Health Organisation (WHO) classification 2019. To evaluate the adherence to the ENETS guidelines, population-based cancer registry data were linked with the medical procedures of the Belgian Health Insurance database. A total of 670 rectal NEN were retained and 16% of the cases needed reclassification. Annual incidence between 2004 and 2015 tripled from 0,20 to 0,61 per 100.000 inhabitants. Reporting of Ki67 proliferation index ameliorated most, while reporting of tumor size, lymphovascular and perineural invasion remained disappointing. Endoscopic ultrasound was performed in only 36.6% of the cases, while the mostly recommended mode of treatment (endoscopic/surgical/no resection) was followed in the majority of the cases. Incidence of rectal NEN in Belgium increased throughout the years and quality of pathology reporting improved especially after the WHO classification update in 2010. The growing awareness and knowledge among clinicians and pathologists in the community counters the need for centralization.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose lanreotide autogel in patients with progressive pancreatic or midgut neuroendocrine tumours: CLARINET FORTE phase 2 study results

INTRODUCTION

This prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of lanreotide autogel (LAN) administered at a reduced dosing interval in patients with progressive neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) after LAN standard regimen.

METHODS

Patients had metastatic or locally advanced, grade 1 or 2 midgut NETs or pancreatic NETs (panNETs) and centrally assessed disease progression on LAN 120 mg every 28 days. They were treated with LAN 120 mg every 14 days for up to 96 weeks (midgut cohort) or 48 weeks (panNET cohort). The primary end-point was centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS). PFS by Ki-67 categories was analysed post hoc. Secondary end-points included quality of life (QoL) and safety.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were enrolled (midgut, N = 51; panNET, N = 48). Median (95% CI) PFS was 8.3 (5.6-11.1) and 5.6 (5.5-8.3) months, respectively. In patients with Ki-67 ≤ 10%, median (95% CI) PFS was 8.6 (5.6-13.8) and 8.0 (5.6-8.3) months in the midgut and panNET cohorts, respectively. Patients' QoL did not deteriorate during the study. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events and only two withdrawals for treatment-related adverse events (both in the panNET cohort).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with progressive NETs following standard-regimen LAN, reducing the dosing interval to every 14 days provided encouraging PFS, particularly in patients with a Ki-67 ≤ 10% (post hoc); no safety concerns and no deterioration in QoL were observed. Increasing LAN dosing frequency could therefore be considered before escalation to less well-tolerated therapies.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy With or Without Rapid On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The benefit of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has never been evaluated in a randomized study. This trial aimed to test the hypothesis that in solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs), diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB without ROSE was not inferior to that of EUS-FNB with ROSE.

METHODS

A noninferiority study (noninferiority margin, 5%) was conducted at 14 centers in 8 countries. Patients with SPLs requiring tissue sampling were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo EUS-FNB with or without ROSE using new-generation FNB needles. The touch-imprint cytology technique was used to perform ROSE. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy, and secondary endpoints were safety, tissue core procurement, specimen quality, and sampling procedural time.

RESULTS

Eight hundred patients were randomized over an 18-month period, and 771 were analyzed (385 with ROSE and 386 without). Comparable diagnostic accuracies were obtained in both arms (96.4% with ROSE and 97.4% without ROSE, P = .396). Noninferiority of EUS-FNB without ROSE was confirmed with an absolute risk difference of 1.0% (1-sided 90% confidence interval, -1.1% to 3.1%; noninferiority P < .001). Safety and sample quality of histologic specimens were similar in both groups. A significantly higher tissue core rate was obtained by EUS-FNB without ROSE (70.7% vs. 78.0%, P = .021), with a significantly shorter mean sampling procedural time (17.9 ± 8.8 vs 11.7 ± 6.0 minutes, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNB demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in evaluating SPLs independently on execution of ROSE. When new-generation FNB needles are used, ROSE should not be routinely recommended. (ClinicalTrial.gov number NCT03322592.).

Infigratinib (BGJ398) in previously treated patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: mature results from a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Treatment options are sparse for patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma after progression on first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements occur in 10-16% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Infigratinib is a selective, ATP-competitive inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors. We aimed to evaluate the antitumour activity of infigratinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, FGFR2 alterations, and previous gemcitabine-based treatment.

METHODS

This multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study recruited patients from 18 academic centres and hospitals in the USA, Belgium, Spain, Germany, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, had histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma and FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements, and were previously treated with at least one gemcitabine-containing regimen. Patients received 125 mg of oral infigratinib once daily for 21 days of 28-day cycles until disease progression, intolerance, withdrawal of consent, or death. Radiological tumour evaluation was done at baseline and every 8 weeks until disease progression via CT or MRI of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. The primary endpoint was objective response rate, defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response of a confirmed complete or partial response, as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. The primary outcome and safety were analysed in the full analysis set, which comprised all patients who received at least one dose of infigratinib. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02150967, and is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between June 23, 2014, and March 31, 2020, 122 patients were enrolled into our study, of whom 108 with FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements received at least one dose of infigratinib and comprised the full analysis set. After a median follow-up of 10·6 months (IQR 6·2-15·6), the BICR-assessed objective response rate was 23·1% (95% CI 15·6-32·2; 25 of 108 patients), with one confirmed complete response in a patient who only had non-target lesions identified at baseline and 24 partial responses. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were hyperphosphataemia (n=83), stomatitis (n=59), fatigue (n=43), and alopecia (n=41). The most common ocular toxicity was dry eyes (n=37). Central serous retinopathy-like and retinal pigment epithelial detachment-like events occurred in 18 (17%) patients, of which ten (9%) were grade 1, seven (6%) were grade 2, and one (1%) was grade 3. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Infigratinib has promising clinical activity and a manageable adverse event profile in previously treated patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma harbouring FGFR2 gene fusions or rearrangements, and so represents a potential new therapeutic option in this setting.

FUNDING

QED Therapeutics and Novartis.

Pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy for previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 study

4074

Background: Results from cohort 1 of KEYNOTE-224, an open-label, single-arm, multi-country phase 2 trial, demonstrated that pembro monotherapy was efficacious and tolerable in patients (pts) with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. Here, we report results from KEYNOTE-224 cohort 2, which enrolled pts with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible pts in cohort 2 had radiologically, histologically, or cytologically confirmed, incurable HCC not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy, Child Pugh A liver disease, measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), ECOG PS 0-1, and BCLC stage C or B. Pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for ̃2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or investigator decision. Primary endpoint was ORR (RECIST 1.1 by BICR). Secondary endpoints included DOR, DCR, TTP, PFS, OS, and safety/tolerability. Response was assessed every 9 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed in pts who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. DOR was assessed in responders. The estimate and 95% CI of the ORR and DCR were based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, PFS, and DOR. A sample size of ̃50 pts was chosen to provide acceptable precision for the assessment of ORR. Results: Cohort 2 enrolled 51 pts. The median time from the first dose to data cutoff (July 31, 2020) was 21 (range, 17-23) mo. The median age of pts was 68 (range, 41-91) years, one pt was HBV+, 80% had alcohol use, 8% were HCV+, 18% had vascular invasion, 35% had extrahepatic disease, 33% had BCLC Stage B disease, and 67% had BCLC Stage C HCC. ORR was 16% (95% CI, 7-29) and was similar across most subgroups. Median DOR was not reached (range, 3-20+ mo); 70% were estimated to have response duration ≥12 mo. Best overall responses were 0 CR, 8 (16%) PRs, 21 (41%) SDs, and 17 (33%) PDs; response was not evaluable or not assessed for 5 (10%) pts. DCR was 57%. The median TTP was 4 (95% CI, 3-8) mo. The median PFS was 4 (95% CI, 2-6) mo, and median OS was 17 (95% CI, 8-NA) mo. PFS rate at 18 mo was 16%, and OS rate at 18 mo was 46%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 27 (53%) pts; the most common TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, hypothyroidism, and myalgia. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 7 (14%) pts. TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 6% of pts. Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 11 (22%) pts. One treatment-related death occurred due to myocarditis, with associated immune-related hepatitis. Conclusions: In pts with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy, pembro monotherapy provided durable anti-tumor activity, promising overall survival, and demonstrated a safety profile consistent with that previously observed for pembro in advanced HCC. These findings support further evaluation of pembro-based regimens for the treatment of HCC in the frontline setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

Safety of systemic anti-cancer treatment in oncology patients with non-severe COVID-19: a cohort study

Background

The viral pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted cancer patient management around the world. Most reported data relate to incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe COVID-19. The safety of systemic anti-cancer therapy in oncology patients with non-severe COVID-19 is an important matter in daily practice.

Methods

ONCOSARS-1 was a single-center, academic observational study. Adult patients with solid tumors treated in the oncology day unit with systemic anti-cancer therapy during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium were prospectively included. All patients (n = 363) underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological testing after the first peak of the pandemic in Belgium. Additionally, 141 of these patients also had a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test during the pandemic. The main objective was to retrospectively determine the safety of systemic cancer treatment, measured by the rate of adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative patients.

Results

Twenty-two (6%) of the 363 eligible patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and/or serology. Of these, three required transient oxygen supplementation, but none required admission to the intensive care unit. Hematotoxicity was the only adverse event more frequently observed in SARS-CoV-2 -positive patients than in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients: 73% vs 35% (P < 0.001). This association remained significant (odds ratio (OR) 4.1, P = 0.009) even after adjusting for performance status and type of systemic treatment. Hematological adverse events led to more treatment delays for the SARS-CoV-2-positive group: 55% vs 20% (P < 0.001). Median duration of treatment interruption was similar between the two groups: 14 and 11 days, respectively. Febrile neutropenia, infections unrelated to COVID-19, and bleeding events occurred at a low rate in the SARS-CoV-2-positive patients.

Conclusion

Systemic anti-cancer therapy appeared safe in ambulatory oncology patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. There were, however, more treatment delays in the SARS-CoV-2-positive population, mainly due to a higher rate of hematological adverse events.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08349-8.

A phase II study of infigratinib in previously treated advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR gene fusions/alterations

TPS356

Background: The FGFR family plays an important role in cholangiocarcinoma, with FGFR2 gene fusions detected in about 15% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Infigratinib is an FGFR1–3-selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor under evaluation in multiple indications including front-line and pre-treated cholangiocarcinoma. CBGJ398X2204 is an ongoing phase II study evaluating the efficacy of single-agent infigratinib in patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR genetic alterations who have received prior gemcitabine. Methods: Study CBGJ398X2204 consists of 3 cohorts and patients in all cohorts receive oral infigratinib once daily for 21 days of a 28-day treatment cycle. Treatment will continue until progressive disease, intolerance, withdrawal of consent, or death. Cohort 1 includes patients with FGFR2 gene fusions or translocations. Cohort 2 includes patients with FGFR genetic alterations other than FGFR2 gene fusions (patients in both Cohorts 1 and 2 must not have received any prior FGFR inhibitors). Cohort 3 includes patients with FGFR2 gene fusions who have received prior treatment with a selective FGFR inhibitor other than infigratinib. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR, RECIST v1.1 per central review). Secondary endpoints include overall survival and overall response rate (per investigator). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory genetic alterations/biomarkers will also be measured. The study was initiated in 2014 and has a planned enrollment of up to 160 patients across all 3 cohorts (120 in Cohort 1, 20 in Cohort 2, and 20 in Cohort 3). Cohort 1 has completed enrollment and findings from this Cohort are the focus of a separate abstract submitted to the meeting. Results are not currently available from Cohorts 2 and 3 (trial in progress). Clinical trial information: NCT02150967.

Pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy for previously untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase II KEYNOTE-224 study

297

Background: Results from cohort 1 of KEYNOTE-224, an open-label, single-arm, multi-country phase II trial, demonstrated that pembro monotherapy was efficacious and tolerable in patients (pts) with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. Here, we report results from KEYNOTE-224 cohort 2, which enrolled pts with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible pts in cohort 2 had radiologically, histologically, or cytologically confirmed, incurable HCC not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy, Child Pugh A liver disease, measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), ECOG PS 0-1, and BCLC stage C or B. Pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for ~2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or investigator decision. Primary endpoint was ORR (RECIST 1.1 by BICR). Secondary endpoints included DOR, DCR, TTP, PFS, OS, and safety/tolerability. Response was assessed every 9 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed in pts who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. DOR was assessed in responders. The estimate and 95% CI of the ORR and DCR were based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, PFS, and DOR. A sample size of ~50 pts was chosen to provide acceptable precision for the assessment of ORR. Results: Cohort 2 enrolled 51 pts. The median time from the first dose to data cutoff (July 31, 2020) was 21 (range, 17-23) mo. The median age of pts was 68 (range, 41-91) years, one pt was HBV+, 80% had alcohol use, 8% were HCV+, 18% had vascular invasion, 35% had extrahepatic disease, 33% had BCLC Stage B disease, and 67% had BCLC Stage C HCC. ORR was 16% (95% CI, 7-29) and was similar across most subgroups. Median DOR was not reached (range, 3-20+ mo); 70% were estimated to have response duration ≥12 mo. Best overall responses were 0 CR, 8 (16%) PRs, 21 (41%) SDs, and 17 (33%) PDs; response was not evaluable or not assessed for 5 (10%) pts. DCR was 57%. The median TTP was 4 (95% CI, 3-8) mo. The median PFS was 4 (95% CI, 2-6) mo, and median OS was 17 (95% CI, 8-NA) mo. PFS rate at 18 mo was 16%, and OS rate at 18 mo was 46%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 27 (53%) pts; the most common TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, hypothyroidism, and myalgia. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 7 (14%) pts. TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 6% of pts. Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 11 (22%) pts. One treatment-related death occurred due to myocarditis, with associated immune-related hepatitis. Conclusions: In pts with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy, pembro monotherapy provided durable anti-tumor activity, promising overall survival, and demonstrated a safety profile consistent with that previously observed for pembro in advanced HCC. These findings support further evaluation of pembro-based regimens for the treatment of HCC in the frontline setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

Final results from a phase II study of infigratinib (BGJ398), an FGFR-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with previously treated advanced cholangiocarcinoma harboring an FGFR2 gene fusion or rearrangement

265

Background: Treatment options for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) after progression on first-line gemcitabine-based therapy are limited. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ( FGFR2) gene fusions occur in 13–17% of intrahepatic CCA. A single-arm, phase II study (NCT02150967) evaluated infigratinib, an ATP-competitive FGFR1–3-selective oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in previously-treated advanced CCA with FGFR fusions/rearrangements. Methods: Adult patients with advanced/metastatic CCA with progression on ≥1 line of systemic therapy received infigratinib 125 mg orally for 21 days of each 28-day cycle until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. All patients received prophylaxis with the oral phosphate binder sevelamer. Primary endpoint: objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review per RECIST v1.1, with duration of response (DOR). Secondary endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate, overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics. Approximately 160 patients are planned (120/20/20 patients in Cohorts 1/2/3). This analysis focuses on Cohort 1 (patients with FGFR2 gene fusions or rearrangements without receiving a prior FGFR inhibitor). Results: As of 31 March 2020, 108 patients, including 83 (77%) with FGFR2 fusions, received infigratinib: median age 53 years (range 23–81 years); 54% had received ≥2 prior treatment lines. Median follow-up was 10.6 months (range 1.1–55.9 months). 96 patients (88.9%) discontinued treatment (12 ongoing). Centrally reviewed ORR was 23.1% (95% CI 15.6–32.2) including 1 CR and 24 PRs; median DOR was 5.0 months (range 0.9–19.1 months). Among responders, 8 (32.0%) patients had a DOR of ≥6 months. Median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI 5.6–7.6 months). Prespecified subgroup analysis: ORR was 34% (17/50) in the second-line setting and 13.8% (8/58) in the third-/later-line setting (3–8 prior treatments). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs, any grade) were hyperphosphatemia (76.9%), eye disorders (67.6%, excluding central serous retinopathy/retinal pigment epithelium detachment [CSR/RPED]), stomatitis (54.6%), and fatigue (39.8%). CSR/RPED occurred in 16.7% of patients (including 1 G3 event; 0 G4). Other common grade 3/4 TEAEs were stomatitis (14.8%; all G3), hyponatremia (13.0%; all G3), and hypophosphatemia (13.0%; 13 G3, 1 G4). Conclusions: Infigratinib is associated with promising anticancer activity and a manageable AE profile in patients with advanced, refractory CCA with an FGFR2 gene fusion or rearrangement. A phase III study of infigratinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin is ongoing in the front-line setting (NCT03773302). Clinical trial information: NCT02150967.

Current practice in approaching controversial diagnostic and therapeutic topics in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm management. Belgian multidisciplinary expert discussion based on a modified Delphi method

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are relatively rare, with marked clinical and biological heterogeneity. Consequently, many controversial areas remain in diagnosis and optimal treatment stratification for NEN patients. We wanted to describe current clinical practice regarding controversial NEN topics and stimulate critical thinking and mutual learning among a Belgian multidisciplinary expert panel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 3-round, Delphi method based project, coordinated by a steering committee (SC), was applied to a predefined multidisciplinary NEN expert panel studying the following controversial topics : factors guiding therapeutic decision making, the use of somatostatin analogues (SSA) in adjuvant setting, the interference between non-radioactive and radioactive SSAs, challenging small intestine neuroendocrine tumor (NET) cases, the approach of the carcinoid syndrome, the role of chemotherapy in well differentiated NET, the relevance of NET G3 and neuroendocrine carcinoma subclassification and the role of imaging techniques in NEN management.

RESULTS

A high level of consensus exists regarding the necessary diagnostic work-up, use of imaging techniques and interference between non-radioactive and radioactive SSAs. However, the prognostic impact of tumor functionality might be overrated and adequate diarrhea differential diagnostic work-up in these patients is underused. Significant differences are seen between individual experts and centers regarding treatment preferences both on the treatment modality level, as well as the choice of specific drugs (e.g. chemotherapy regimen).

CONCLUSIONS

A Delphi-like multi-round expert discussion proves useful to boost critical thinking and discussion among experts of different background, as well as to describe current clinical practice and stimulate mutual learning in the absence of high-level scientific guidance.

Infigratinib in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF 301 trial

Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with poor overall survival. Approximately 15% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas contain FGFR alterations. Infigratinib is an oral FGFR 1-3 kinase inhibitor. Favorable results from a Phase II trial of infigratinib in advanced/metastatic FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinomas has led to its further investigation in the front-line setting. In this article we describe the design, objectives and rationale for PROOF 301, a Phase III multicenter, open label, randomized trial of infigratinib in comparison to standard of care gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 translocations. The results of this study have the potential to define a new role for a chemotherapy-free, targeted therapy option in the front-line setting for these patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03773302 (ClincalTrials.gov).

Regorafenib after failure of gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced/metastatic biliary tumors: REACHIN, a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

There is a high unmet clinical need for treatments of advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancers after progression on first-line chemotherapy. Regorafenib has demonstrated efficacy in some gastrointestinal tumors that progress on standard therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

REACHIN was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of regorafenib in patients with nonresectable/metastatic biliary tract cancer that progressed after gemcitabine/platinum chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to best supportive care plus either regorafenib 160 mg once daily 3 weeks on/1 week off or placebo until progression or unacceptable toxicity. No crossover was allowed. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives were response rate, overall survival, and translational analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients with intrahepatic (n = 42), perihilar (n = 6), or extrahepatic (n = 9) cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder carcinoma (n = 9) were randomized, 33 to each treatment group (33 per group). At a median follow-up of 24 months, all patients had progressed and six patients were alive. Median treatment duration was 11.0 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.0-15.9] in the regorafenib group and 6.3 weeks (95% CI: 3.9-7.0) in the placebo group (P = 0.002). Fourteen of 33 patients (42%) in the regorafenib group had a dose reduction. Stable disease rates were 74% (95% CI: 59-90) in the regorafenib group and 34% with placebo (95% CI: 18-51; P = 0.002). Median PFS in the regorafenib group was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.9) and 1.5 months (95% CI: 1.2-2.0) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29-0.81; P = 0.004) and median overall survival was 5.3 months (95% CI: 2.7-10.5) and 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.0-6.4), respectively (P = 0.28). There were no unexpected/new safety signals.

CONCLUSION

Regorafenib significantly improved PFS and tumor control in patients with previously treated metastatic/unresectable biliary tract cancer in the second- or third-line setting.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered in the European Clinical Trials Register database (EudraCT 2012-005626-30) and at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02162914).

A retrospective analysis of post second-line chemotherapy treatment outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma and FGFR2 fusions

4591

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the most common biliary tract malignancy with an estimated incidence of 8,000–10,000 patients/year in the US. Chemotherapy is the most common second-line treatment with reported outcomes in patients with CCA. Response rates of < 10% and median progression-free survival (PFS) times of ~3–4 months have been reported with second-line chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX in the ABC-06 trial. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 ( FGFR2) fusions occur in 13–17% of CCA and multiple targeted agents are in development for patients with FGFR2 fusions. To date, the outcome of patients with CCA and FGFR2 fusions receiving standard second-line chemotherapy is unknown. Methods: Patients with advanced CCA and FGFR2 fusions after prior treatment with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were enrolled in a single-arm phase 2 study (NCT02150967) and received the FGFR1–3 selective TKI infigratinib (previously BGJ398) 125 mg orally qd on d1–21, cycles repeated q28 days until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, investigator discretion, or withdrawal of consent. A retrospective analysis of a subset of patients who received infigratinib as third- or later-line treatment was performed. Investigator-assessed PFS and best overall response (BOR, per RECIST 1.1) following second-line chemotherapy (pre-infigratinib) and third-line or later-line infigratinib were calculated. Results: Of the 71 patients (44 women; median age 53 years) with FGFR2 fusions enrolled at the time of analysis (datacut 8 August 2018), 37 (52%) were included in this retrospective analysis. Median PFS with standard second-line chemotherapy was 4.63 months (95% CI 2.69–7.16) compared with 6.77 months (95% CI 3.94–7.79) for third- and later-line infigratinib. BOR for second-line chemotherapy was 5.4% (95% CI 0.7–18.2) compared with 21.6% for third- and later-line infigratinib (95% CI 9.8–38.2). Conclusions: Outcomes from second-line chemotherapy in patients with CCA and FGFR2 fusions were similar to those reported in the literature for all patients with CCA regardless of genomic status and remain dismal. Infigratinib administered as third- and later-line treatment resulted in a meaningful PFS and ORR benefit in patients with CCA and FGFR2 fusions. Clinical trial information: NCT02150967 .

Kras and Lkb1 mutations synergistically induce intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm derived from pancreatic duct cells

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer can arise from precursor lesions called intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), which are characterised by cysts containing papillae and mucus-producing cells. The high frequency of KRAS mutations in IPMN and histological analyses suggest that oncogenic KRAS drives IPMN development from pancreatic duct cells. However, induction of Kras mutation in ductal cells is not sufficient to generate IPMN, and formal proof of a ductal origin of IPMN is still missing. Here we explore whether combining oncogenic Kras^G12D mutation with an additional gene mutation known to occur in human IPMN can induce IPMN from pancreatic duct cells.

DESIGN

We created and phenotyped mouse models in which mutations in Kras and in the tumour suppressor gene liver kinase B1 (Lkb1/Stk11) are conditionally induced in pancreatic ducts using Cre-mediated gene recombination. We also tested the effect of β-catenin inhibition during formation of the lesions.

RESULTS

Activating Kras^G12D mutation and Lkb1 inactivation synergised to induce IPMN, mainly of gastric type and with malignant potential. The mouse lesions shared several features with human IPMN. Time course analysis suggested that IPMN developed from intraductal papillae and glandular neoplasms, which both derived from the epithelium lining large pancreatic ducts. β-catenin was required for the development of glandular neoplasms and subsequent development of the mucinous cells in IPMN. Instead, the lack of β-catenin did not impede formation of intraductal papillae and their progression to papillary lesions in IPMN.

CONCLUSION

Our work demonstrates that IPMN can result from synergy between Kras^G12D mutation and inactivation of a tumour suppressor gene. The ductal epithelium can give rise to glandular neoplasms and papillary lesions, which probably both contribute to IPMN formation.

Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) and tissue next-generation sequencing analysis in a phase II study of infigratinib (BGJ398) for cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions

579

Background: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) alterations occur in 11% of cholangiocarcinomas, 85% of which are fusions. A multicenter, open-label, phase II study is currently evaluating the efficacy of infigratinib, a selective FGFR1–3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with previously treated advanced cholangiocarcinoma containing FGFR2 fusions. We report detailed biomarker analyses from this study. Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma containing FGFR2 fusions whose disease had progressed following cisplatin- or gemcitabine-based therapy were eligible. Patients received oral infigratinib 125 mg once daily on days 1–21 every 28 days. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed on tumor tissue and cfDNA collected prior to the start of therapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) [RECIST version 1.1]. Data cut-off (prespecified): August 8, 2018. Trial registration: NCT02150967. Results: At data cut-off, 71 patients with FGFR2 fusions were included (62% women; median age 53 years; 55% received ≥2 prior lines of therapy). Median duration of treatment was 5.5 months. ORR (confirmed and unconfirmed) was 31.0% (95% CI 20.5–43.1%) and confirmed ORR was 26.9% (95% CI 16.8–39.1%). 33 unique FGFR2 fusion genes were identified in 71 enrolled patients. The most common fusion gene partner was BICC1 (32%; 23/71). Pathogenic variants in 9 other druggable genes were identified in 32% of patients (13/37) who underwent CGP. FGFR2 fusions were concordant in 67% (8/12) of patients with tumor tissue and cfDNA at screening. Conclusions: The large assortment of FGFR2 fusion genes identified in this study underscores the diversity of FGFR2 rearrangements that may drive cholangiocarcinoma. Although cfDNA analysis was performed in a minority, these preliminary data suggest that cfDNA analysis may be valuable for the identification of FGFR2 fusions and to study intratumoral heterogeneity. Clinical trial information: NCT02150967.