EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Anti-androgen monotherapy versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in men with advanced, non-metastatic prostate cancer: a register-based, observational study

BACKGROUND

In randomised controlled trials, men with advanced, non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with anti-androgen monotherapy (AA) had similar all-cause mortality as men treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. Using real-world evidence (i.e., observational data), we aimed to further assess the difference in mortality between these two drug categories.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We emulated a trial using data from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden 3.0. We specifically focused on men diagnosed in 2006-2012 with high-risk PCa who had no distant metastasis. They either received primary hormonal therapy with AA (n = 2078) or GnRH agonists (n = 4878) who were followed for a median time of 5 years. Risk of death from PCa and other causes was assessed using competing risk analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, including propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The cumulative 5-year PCa mortality was lower for men treated with AA (16% [95% confidence interval, CI, 15-18%]) than men treated with GnRH agonists (22% [95% CI 21-24%]). The 5-year other cause mortality was also lower for men on AA (17% [95% CI 15-19%] compared to men on GnRH agonists (27% [95% CI 25-28%]). In regression analyses, the risk of PCa death was similar, GnRH agonists versus AA (reference), hazard ratio (HR) 1.08 (95% CI 0.95-1.23), but the risk of death from all causes was higher for men on GnRH agonists, HR 1.23 (95% CI 1.13-1.34). Consistent results were seen in the propensity score-matched cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the use of AA as primary hormonal therapy in men with high-risk non-metastatic PCa does not increase PCa-specific mortality compared to GnRH. Using AA instead of GnRH agonists may result in shorter time on/exposure to GnRH-treatment, which may reduce the risk of adverse events associated with this treatment.

Abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: clinical evidence and experience

More than a million men worldwide are diagnosed with prostate cancer every year. After androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), chemotherapy has been the only subsequent intervention to improve survival in the metastatic setting but has limitations for patients who may not tolerate its toxicity profile or are not candidates on the basis of comorbidities. Novel anti-androgens such as abiraterone acetate have shown promise for such patients. This review draws on clinical evidence and experience to identify abiraterone as a well-tolerated, effective alternative to docetaxel. In the castration-resistant setting, studies demonstrated a survival benefit over placebo, prompting further trials in the hormone-naïve population. More recently the STAMPEDE and LATITUDE studies suggest abiraterone has comparable survival outcomes to docetaxel in the castration-sensitive setting, with evidence in favour of its quality of life profile. Available comparisons with docetaxel are limited, but those available suggest they have comparable efficacy. However, the significant cost compared with docetaxel is a major barrier in resource-rationed healthcare settings. Overall, abiraterone is an effective alternative to chemotherapy for men with castration-sensitive prostate cancer, but this should be balanced with the significantly greater cost.

Prospective evaluation of the performance of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) for lymph node staging in patients undergoing superextended salvage lymph node dissection after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of [⁶⁸Ga]-PSMA-11 PET/CT or [⁶⁸Ga]-PSMA-11 PET/MRI (PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI)) for lymph node (LN) staging using salvage LN dissection (SLND) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective study, 65 consecutive patients who developed BCR after RP underwent SLND after PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) between 2014 and 2018. Extended SLND up to the inferior mesenteric artery was performed in all patients. Regional and template-based correlations between the presence of LN metastases on histopathology and whole-body PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) results were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) was also evaluated in relation to PSA level at the time of SLND.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients at the time of SLND was 65 years (IQR 63-69 years) and the median PSA level was 1.4 ng/ml (IQR 0.8-2.9 ng/ml). Before SLND, 50 patients (77%) had additional therapy after RP (26.2% androgen-deprivation therapy and 50.8% radiotherapy). The median number of LNs removed on SLND was 40 (IQR 33-48) and the median number of positive nodes was 4 (IQR 2-6). LN metastases were seen in 13.8% of resected LNs (317 of 2,292). LNs positive on PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) had a median diameter of 7.2 mm (IQR 5.3-9 mm). Metastatic LNs in regions negative on PSMA-11 PET had a median diameter of 3.4 mm (IQR 2.1-5.4 mm). In a regional analysis, the sensitivity of PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) ranged from 72% to 100%, and the specificity from 96% to 100%. Region-specific positive and negative predictive values ranged from 95% to 100% and 93% to 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) has a very good performance for the identification of LN metastases in patients with BCR after RP. The high diagnostic accuracy in the regional and subregional analyses demonstrates the potential of this approach to enable a region-directed instead of a complete bilateral therapeutic intervention. The performance of PSMA-11 PET/CT(MRI) is dependent on the PSA level and the size of the metastatic deposit.

Initial experience of Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in evaluation of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients

Gallium-68 labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (Ga-68 PSMA) ligand (HBED-CC) is a novel tracer used for prostate cancer imaging. The aim of the study was to investigate the performance of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after definitive treatment. Scans of 96 consecutive patients were analyzed. Sixty-two patients received external beam radiotherapy, 34 underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), and 20 patients were on androgen deprivation therapy. Patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≥>0.2 ng/mL following RP and PSA rise by 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir PSA following RT (Phoenix criteria) was considered as BCR, respectively. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced PET/CT after injection of 67–111 MBq Ga-68 PSMA ligand. Detection rates were correlated with serum PSA level. Detection rate for nodal metastases was compared with CT. Results of the scan were validated by using either biopsy or follow-up imaging or clinical follow-up. Seventy-four (77%) patients showed abnormal finding in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT. The median serum PSA level of the population was 5.5 ng/ml (range 0.2–123 ng/ml). The median PSA of the positive scans was higher than that of the negative scans (6 vs. 1.7 ng/ml) and was statistically significant (P = 0.001 by Mann–Whitney U-test). In post-RP group, the detection rates were 23%, 50%, and 82% for PSA <1, 1–2, and >2 ng/ml, respectively. For post-RT, the detection was 86%, 85%, and 95% for PSA 2–5, 5.1–10, and >10 ng/ml, respectively. PSMA PET/CT revealed nodal metastases in 52 (54%) patients while CT showed pathological nodes only in 27 (28%) patients. Overall PSMA PET/CT revealed more number of nodes than CT (111 vs. 48 nodal station). PSMA PET/CT showed relapse in prostate/prostatic bed in 26 (27%) patients, nodal metastases in 50 (52%), skeletal metastases in 20 (21%), and other sites in 4 (4%) patients. Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT has high detection rate for localizing the site of recurrence in patients with biochemical failure and is superior to CT scan in the detection of nodal disease.

Health Care Delivery for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Across the Globe

Prostate cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Concurrently, the incidence of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) at diagnosis has significantly risen as a result, in part, of recent advances in imaging. Given the increased utilization of prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted positron emission tomography imaging and other modalities with improved accuracy in the detection of cancer, combined with changes in screening and other secular trends, more men get diagnosed at an oligometastatic stage in which timely treatment may improve survival. However, the optimal timing of initiation and the specific sequence of systemic agents are not yet clearly defined. Worldwide, both urologists and oncologists may primarily direct the medical management of mHSPC. This collaboration potentially invites differing treatment recommendations dependent upon the treating physician's medical specialty. Ideally, a shared decision-making approach incorporating multidisciplinary tumor board discussions and personalized analysis will provide personalized treatment recommendations to optimize the benefit for mHSPC patients. Here, we conducted a concise review and evaluation of existing literature, and provide one perspective on health care delivery for mHSPC worldwide. PATIENT SUMMARY: Given the improvement in imaging techniques and changes in screening practices, the incidence of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer will likely continue to rise. An early, multimodal treatment approach involving a multidisciplinary team is critical to delivering the best care to this patient population.

Discovery and validation of a serum microRNA signature to characterize oligo- and polymetastatic prostate cancer: not ready for prime time

PURPOSE

Patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PC) may benefit from metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), delaying disease progression and the start of palliative systemic treatment. However, a significant proportion of oligometastatic PC patients progress to polymetastatic PC within a year following MDT, suggesting an underestimation of the metastatic load by current staging modalities. Molecular markers could help to identify true oligometastatic patients eligible for MDT.

METHODS

Patients with asymptomatic biochemical recurrence following primary PC treatment were classified as oligo- or polymetastatic based on 18^F-choline PET/CT imaging. Oligometastatic patients had up to three metastases at baseline and did not progress to more than three lesions following MDT or surveillance within 1 year of diagnosis of metastases. Polymetastatic patients had > 3 metastases at baseline or developed > 3 metastases within 1 year following imaging. A model aiming to prospectively distinguish oligo- and polymetastatic PC patients was trained using clinicopathological parameters and serum-derived microRNA expression profiles from a discovery cohort of 20 oligometastatic and 20 polymetastatic PC patients. To confirm the models predictive performance, it was applied on biomarker data obtained from an independent validation cohort of 44 patients with oligometastatic and 39 patients with polymetastatic disease.

RESULTS

Oligometastatic PC patients had a more favorable prognosis compared to polymetastatic ones, as defined by a significantly longer median CRPC-free survival (not reached versus 38 months; 95% confidence interval 31-45 months with P < 0.001). Despite the good performance of a predictive model trained on the discovery cohort, with an AUC of 0.833 (0.693-0.973; 95% CI) and a sensitivity of 0.894 (0.714-1.000; 95% CI) for oligometastatic disease, none of the miRNA targets were found to be differentially expressed between oligo- and polymetastatic PC patients in the signature validation cohort. The multivariate model had an AUC of 0.393 (0.534 after cross-validation) and therefore, no predictive ability.

CONCLUSIONS

Although PC patients with oligometastatic disease had a more favorable prognosis, no serum-derived biomarkers allowing for prospective discrimination of oligo- and polymetastatic prostate cancer patients could be identified.

Urine-based liquid biopsy: non-invasive and sensitive AR-V7 detection in urinary EVs from patients with prostate cancer

Androgen-receptor splice variant 7 (AR-V7) is associated with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and resistance to anti-androgen therapy. Despite its clinical importance, the lack of efficient methods for AR-V7 analysis remains a challenge for broader use of this biomarker in routine clinical practice. Herein, we suggest a practical and non-invasive liquid biopsy method for analysis of AR-V7 in the RNA of urine-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) without the need for blood withdrawal. Urine-derived EVs were isolated by a lab-on-a-disc integrated with six independent nanofiltration units (Exo-Hexa) allowing simultaneous processing of six individual samples. Rapid enrichment of EVs (<30 min) from each 4 mL urine sample was followed by mRNA extraction, and AR-V7 and androgen receptor full-length (AR-FL) mRNA levels in the urinary EVs were quantified by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) as absolute concentrations (copies per mL). Higher AR-V7 and lower AR-FL expressions were detected in urine-derived EVs from 14 patients with CRPC than in those from 22 patients with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Additionally, we found that AR-V7 transcript levels and the AR-V7/AR-FL ratio in urinary EVs were higher in patients with advanced prostate cancer. This study is the first to report that RNA of urine-derived EVs is a reliable source for AR-V7 expression analysis. The proposed method for quantifying AR-V7 in urinary EVs prepared by a lab-on-a-disc is therefore a simple and promising approach to liquid biopsy with great potential for therapeutic impact on prostate cancer.

Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on serum urate levels in patients with prostate cancer: A retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVES

Although estrogenic modulation of serum urate levels is well-known, the androgenic effect on urate homeostasis remains controversial. We investigated the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on serum urate levels.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled a total of 489 prostate cancer patients with available serum urate levels at baseline and 3 and 6 months after ADT (n = 150) or prostate surgery (n = 339). We extracted the demographic, clinical, and laboratory data from a data warehouse and compared the changes in urate levels between the two treatment groups and between the different ADT regimens (with versus without luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists) using generalized estimating equation (GEE).

RESULTS

The baseline urate levels and the proportion of hyperuricemic subjects were comparable between the two groups. After 6 months, the urate levels were significantly decreased (by -0.66 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.81 to -0.51]) in the ADT group, whereas they did not significantly change in the surgery group in the univariate GEE analysis. The ADT group (4.7% from 18.0% at baseline) had a significantly lower proportion of hyperuricemic patients than surgery group (16.5% from 15.9% at baseline) at 6-month (p < 0.001). Regardless of whether LHRH agonists were used, the serial urate levels were lowered by the ADT. Temporal changes in the urate levels were significantly associated with the treatment group, baseline hyperuricemia, and poor functional or advanced cancer status. The ADT-related serum urate level reduction also remained significant in the multivariate GEE analysis (regression coefficient = -0.43 [-0.67 to -0.19] after 3 months and -0.37 [-0.64 to -0.10] after 6 months). Moreover, propensity-score-matched analyses yielded the same results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that longitudinal serum urate levels were significantly reduced in men receiving ADT. This finding suggests that androgen could have an independent role in urate homeostasis.

Adding multiparametric MRI to the MSKCC and Partin nomograms for primary prostate cancer: Improving local tumor staging?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

As a single diagnostic modality, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has imperfect accuracy to detect locally advanced prostate cancer (T-stages 3-4). In this study we evaluate if combining mpMRI with preoperative nomograms (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [MSKCC] and Partin) improves the prediction of locally advanced tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative mpMRI results of 430 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients were analyzed. MSKCC and Partin nomogram scores predicting extraprostatic growth were calculated. Logistic regression analysis was performed, combining the nomogram prediction scores with mpMRI results. The diagnostic value of the combined models was evaluated by creating receiver operator characteristics curves and comparing the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

mpMRI was a significant predictor of locally advanced disease in addition to both the MSKCC and Partin nomogram, despite its low sensitivity (45.3%). However, overall predictive accuracy increased by only 1% when mpMRI was added to the MSKCC nomogram (AUC MSKCC 0.73 vs MSKCC + mpMRI 0.74). Predictive accuracy for the Partin Tables increased 4% (AUC Partin 0.62 vs Partin + mpMRI 0.66).

CONCLUSION

The addition of mpMRI to the preoperative MSKCC and Partin nomograms did not increase diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the Radiotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer in Comparison to CT: A Retrospective Analysis

⁶⁸Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT) offers unprecedented accuracy for staging of primary, persistent, or recurrent prostate cancer. Thus, we hypothesized that ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radiotherapy significantly affects the radiotherapeutic approach in comparison to the current standard, a CT-based approach. Methods: Between February 2014 and December 2017, 172 patients underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radiotherapy and were included in this retrospective analysis. Twenty-two (13%) patients were referred for primary definitive radiotherapy, 51% (88/172) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence, and 36% (62/172) for PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. An experienced radiation oncologist, masked to the CT and PET/CT results, decided on the radiation treatment management of all patients on the basis of the clinical and pathologic variables. The potential increase in diagnostic accuracy, and the subsequent change in radiotherapeutic approach, were documented separately for PET/CT versus CT. Results: The overall detection rate was 70% (120/172) for ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Patients with a pre-PET/CT PSA level of more than 0.5 ng/mL (98/111; 88%) had PET-positive results significantly more often. Overall, PSMA PET/CT revealed 171 lesions, PET alone 156, and CT alone 85. For all patients, a continuous diagnostic increase in positive findings was observed for primary tumor/local recurrence (CT, 18%, vs. PET/CT, 37%), pelvic lymph nodes (CT, 21%, vs. PET/CT, 44%), and distant metastases (CT, 7%, vs. PET/CT, 19%) when comparing CT with PET/CT. Compared with CT, the combination of PET/CT information resulted in a change in treatment in 107 of 172 (62%) patients, that is, 8 of 22 (36%) patients before any treatment, 31 of 62 (50%) with PSA recurrence, and 68 of 88 (77%) with PSA persistence. Comparing the different radiotherapy indications with one another, there was a higher rate of change in management for postoperative patients than for patients before any treatment. Conclusion: Compared with conventional CT, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT had a remarkable impact on radiotherapeutic approach, especially in postoperative patients. Thus, considering the growing amount of data on the impact of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT on postoperative patients, ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT has recently been endorsed by a few cancer guidelines as an imaging modality in patients with PSA persistence or recurrence (e.g., the German S3 guideline and the European Association of Urology guideline).

Benefits of Elective Para-Aortic Radiotherapy for pN1 Prostate Cancer Using Arc Therapy (Intensity-Modulated or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy): Protocol for a Nonrandomized Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with histopathologically proven pelvic lymph node (LN) metastasis (pN1) after extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), multimodality treatment consisting of treatment of the primary tumor and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) offers promising results, leading to better cause-specific survival rates compared with ADT alone. However, in case more than one pelvic LN is invaded by the tumor, approximately 40% of the patients relapse biochemically and clinically. Clinical relapse is present in the para-aortic LNs (M1a disease) in up to 77% of the relapsing cases.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesize that, based on the evidence that positive LNs represent the door to hematogenous dissemination, elective para-aortic irradiation will reduce the development of both retroperitoneal nodal (M1a) and distant metastasis (M1b or M1c disease), postpone the need for palliative ADT, and prolong the time to castration-refractory disease.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, we will conduct a prospective, nonrandomized phase II trial to study the efficacy of additional elective para-aortic radiotherapy (PART) in pN1 patients compared with those who were historically treated with adjuvant WPRT alone. We aim to include 137 patients with PCa and presence of pN1 disease after ePLND. With this number of patients, an improvement of 15% in the 5-year clinical relapse-free survival can be detected with a power of 80%.

RESULTS

Recruitment of patients for this trial started in 2017 and will be completed approximately by March 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first phase II trial to investigate the benefits of an elective PART in patients with PCa. The results of this trial will potentially serve as a sound base for a later randomized phase III trial. All participants are given a PART information sheet and required to give written informed consent. Results are expected to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03079323; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03079323 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73ELimv1d).

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/11256.

Salvage CyberKnife-Based Reirradiation of Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer: The Single-Center Experience

The aim of this study was to evaluate CyberKnife-based radioablation as a salvage treatment for prostate cancer postirradiation relapses based on a group of patients disqualified from available conventional methods of salvage treatment. Thirty-eight patients were treated with a fraction dose varying from 5.5 to 10 Gy (median 7.35) to a total dose of 18 to 36.25 Gy (median 36.25). In all, 55.3% of patients had androgen deprivation therapy during this time. Nine patients had oligometastases in the salvage time. The follow-up varied from 1.6 to 46.4 months (mean 19.7, median 14.4). In all, 92.6% to 97.4% of patients had no gastrointestinal acute adverse effects; no effects higher than G1 were noted. There were particular (up to 4.8%) G2 late gastrointestinal effects. The percentage without genitourinary acute effects varied from 59.1% to 78.9%; 3.7% had G3 toxicity. G3 late genitourinary toxicity appeared 3 times, the maximal percentage being 12.5% (24 months after salvage treatment). The nadir of prostate-specific antigen median was 0.24 ng/mL (9 months after treatment). Twelve (31.6%) patients failed in the timeline of 6 to 42 months after salvage treatment (mean 18.7, median 16.5)—5 due to dissemination. In 2 cases, progression in existing metastases was identified. Five (13.2%) patients had biochemical failure without additional metastases (local relapses); hence, local control was 86.8%. The failure risk is strongly influenced by initial disease stage and presalvage prostate-specific antigen concentration. The obtained results permit us to conclude that such a treatment could be an effective and safe option for prostate cancer postirradiation relapse salvage treatment.

Current Imaging Techniques for Lymph Node Staging in Prostate Cancer: A Review

Introduction: Lymph node metastases (LNM) represent a proven prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, metastatic free survival and overall survival in prostate cancer (PCa). Although pelvic node dissection remains the gold standard for the detection of LNM, novel imaging techniques are entering clinical practice, in the effort to improve LNM detection and spare unnecessary surgeries. Aim of the current review is to describe such imaging techniques and explore their advantages and limitations.

Evidence Acquisition: The National Library of Medicine Database was searched for relevant articles published between January 2013 and August 2018. A wide search was performed including the combination of following words: “Prostate” and “Cancer” and “staging” and “Lymph Node” and “imaging” and (“MRI” or “PET”). The initial list of selected papers was enriched by individual suggestions of the authors of the present review.

Evidence Synthesis: DWI-MRI in detection of lymph node invasion has a sensitivity and specificity of 41 and 94%, respectively. For SPIO MRI using ferumoxtran-10, the sensitivity for detection of LNM with short axis diameter of 5–10 mm is reported at 96.4%, compared to 28.5% with MRI alone. PSMA PET/CT is growing exponentially, both in the initial detection of LNM and for BCR evaluation. Fluciclovine PET could improve detection of subcentimetric pathologic lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node techniques remain experimental and not validated in the field of PCa.

Conclusions: Molecular imaging, particularly PSMA ligand PET imaging, present interesting diagnostic accuracy in LN diagnosis even in subcentimetric LN. DWI-MRI yields good results in LN involvement evaluation and the use of contrast agent such SPIO may improve the detection rate. The SLN technique is limited to experimental protocols and for intermediate or high-risk PCa. Prospective trials are awaited to evaluate the true clinical impact of these imaging techniques on PCa oncologic outcomes.

Effect of positive carbon-11-choline PET/CT results in the therapeutic management of prostate cancer biochemical relapse

OBJECTIVE

Carbon-11-(C)-choline PET/computed tomography (CT) has shown good results in re-staging of prostate cancer (PCa) with raised serum levels of prostate-specific antigen. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of positive C-choline PET/CT results in the therapeutic management of patients with PCa with biochemical relapse (BR) after curative intention treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 112 patients with PCa BR and positive C-choline PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. PET/CT was acquired 20 min after intravenous administration of 555-740 MBq of C-choline. The therapeutic management after C-choline PET/CT was obtained from the clinical records. The minimum follow-up time was 18 months.

RESULTS

In 80 (71.4%) of 112 patients, C-choline PET/CT showed local recurrence of PCa; in 17 (15.2%) patients, distant recurrence; and in 15 (13.4%) patients, local plus distant recurrence. A second malignancy was detected in five (4.5%) patients. The planned therapeutic management was changed as per positive C-choline PET/CT result in 74 (66.1%) patients and were treated as follows: 31 (27.7%) patients with HT, combined with other treatments in eight (7.1%), 17 (15.2%) with BT, 13 (11.6%) with external beam radiotherapy, one (0.9%) with RP, and four (3.6%) with chemotherapy. Treatment approach was not modified in 37 (33%) patients. No data was available from one (0.9%) patient.

CONCLUSION

Positive C-choline PET/CT result had an important effect in the therapeutic management of patients with PCa and BR, leading to a change in the planned approach in two (66.1%) out of three patients. In addition, in 4.5% of the patients, the C-choline PET/CT allowed the detection of a second malignancy.

Cost-effectiveness analyses and cost analyses in castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review

Background

Treatment of metastatic prostate cancer is associated with high personal and economic burden. Recently, new treatment options for castration-resistant prostate cancer became available with promising survival advantages. However, cost-effectiveness of those new treatment options is sometimes ambiguous or given only under certain circumstances. The aim of this study was to systematically review studies on the cost-effectiveness of treatments and costs of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastasizing castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) on their methodological quality and the risk of bias.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed in the databases PubMed, CINAHL Complete, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection for costs-effectiveness analyses, model-based economic evaluations, cost-of-illness analyses and budget impact analyses. Reported costs were inflated to 2015 US$ purchasing power parities. Quality assessment and risk of bias assessment was performed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist and the Bias in Economic Evaluations checklist, respectively.

Results

In total, 38 articles were identified by the systematic literature search. The methodological quality of the included studies varied widely, and there was considerable risk of bias. The cost-effectiveness treatments for CRPC and mCRPC was assessed with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from dominance for mitoxantrone to $562,328 per quality-adjusted life year gained for sipuleucel-T compared with prednisone alone. Annual costs for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer ranged from $3,067 to $77,725.

Conclusion

The cost-effectiveness of treatments of CRPC strongly depended on the willingness to pay per quality-adjusted life year gained/life-year saved throughout all included costs-effectiveness analyses and model-based economic evaluations. High-quality cost-effectiveness analyses based on randomized controlled trials are needed in order to make informed decisions on the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer and the resulting financial impact on the healthcare system.

Focal Salvage Treatment of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Current Strategies and Future Perspectives

Over the last decades, primary prostate cancer radiotherapy saw improving developments, such as more conformal dose administration and hypofractionated treatment regimens. Still, prostate cancer recurrences after whole-gland radiotherapy remain common, especially in patients with intermediate- to high-risk disease. The vast majority of these patients are treated palliatively with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which exposes them to harmful side-effects and is only effective for a limited amount of time. For patients with a localized recurrent tumor and no signs of metastatic disease, local treatment with curative intent seems more rational. However, whole-gland salvage treatments such as salvage radiotherapy or salvage prostatectomy are associated with significant toxicity and are, therefore, uncommonly performed. Treatments that are solely aimed at the recurrent tumor itself, thereby better sparing the surrounding organs at risk, potentially provide a safer salvage treatment option in terms of toxicity. To achieve such tumor-targeted treatment, imaging developments have made it possible to better exclude metastatic disease and accurately discriminate the tumor. Currently, focal salvage treatment is being performed with different modalities, including brachytherapy, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Oncologic outcomes seem comparable to whole-gland salvage series, but with much lower toxicity rates. In terms of oncologic control, these results will improve further with better understanding of patient selection. Other developments, such as high-field diagnostic MRI and live adaptive MRI-guided radiotherapy, will further improve precision of the treatment.

Quality of life in men with metastatic prostate cancer in their final years before death - a retrospective analysis of prospective data

Background

Quality of Life (QoL) is the most important outcome for patients in palliative care along with symptom alleviation. Metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) is a life-threatening illness, and hence, a palliative care approach may be beneficial to this group. Over time, new life-prolonging treatments have been developed for men with mPC, but the possibility to prolong life should also be balanced against the men’s QoL, particularly because there are side effects involved with these treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate QoL, functioning and symptoms in men with mPC during their final years before death.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of data from a long-term prospective study of men (n = 3885) with prostate cancer from two regions in Sweden. Validated questionnaires asking about participants’ QoL, functioning and symptoms were used to collect data. From the overall study, 190 men with mPC were identified. They were stratified into three groups, depending on the amount of time that had passed between the last questionnaire and their death; < 6 months, 6–18 months and > 18 months before death.

Results

Men with mPC generally rated their QoL poorly compared to established clinically significant threshold values. The group of men that were < 6 months before death rated their QoL, functioning and several symptoms significantly worse than the two other groups. Men that died after the year 2006 reported lower QoL and functioning and more pain and fatigue than those who died before 2006.

Conclusion

The results in this study indicate that men with mPC have unmet needs with regards to QoL and symptoms. A palliative care approach, alongside possible life-prolonging treatments, that focuses on QoL and symptom relief, may serve as an important frame to give the best support to these men in their final years of life.

Dendritic cells pulsed with prostate-specific membrane antigen in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dendritic cells (DCs) are used in many malignancies as vaccines to induce immunity against specific cancer antigens. The role of DCs in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is not determined. In this study, the proportion of mCRPC patients with clinically significant response to targeted therapy by DCs pulsed with prostate-specific membrane antigen was evaluated, and the possible adverse effects of this modality were investigated.

METHODS

Major databases were searched up to Feb 2017, to identify studies in which the antitumor efficacy of DCs pulsed with the extracellular portion of PSMA was studied for the treatment of mCRPC. Data were collected by two reviewers and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software, version 2.0.

FINDINGS

Our study consisted of 6 nonrandomized prospective (cohort) trials, overall reporting on 153 mCRPC patients. The event rate that is the representative of fraction of patients showing antitumor response was 0.43 (95% confidence interval = 0.355-0.512; P = 0.097). No significant between-study heterogeneity or inconsistency was detected (I2 = 5.47; Q = 5; P = 0.382). Our study failed to demonstrate a significant therapeutic efficacy for DCs in mCRPC. However, no significant adverse effects were seen.

Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for patients under active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review with diagnostic meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the setting of patients under active surveillance (AS) is promising. In this systematic-review we aimed to analyse the role of mpMRI in patients under AS.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature research for English-language original and review articles, recently published, was carried out using Medline, Scopus and Web of sciences databases until 30 October 2017. The following MeSH terms were used: 'active surveillance', 'prostate cancer', 'multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging'. A diagnostic meta-analysis was performed for 3.0 T mpMRI in predicting disease re-classification.

RESULTS

In total, 226 studies were selected after research and after removal of duplicates. After analysis on inclusion criteria, 43 studies were identified as eligible for this systematic review with a total of 6,605 patients. The timing of MRI during follow-up of AS differed from all studies like criteria for inclusion in the AS protocol. Overall, there was a low risk of bias across all studies. The diagnostic meta-analysis for 1.5 tesla showed a sensitivity of 0.60, negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.75 and a hierarchical summary receiving operating curve (HSROC) of 0.74 while for 3.0 tesla mpMRI a sensitivity of 0.81, a NPV of 0.78 and a HSROC of 0.83.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the available evidence suggests that both 1.5 or 3.0 Tesla mpMRI are a valid tool to monitor progression during AS follow-up, showing good accuracy capabilities in detecting PCa re-classification. However, the modality to better define what means 'disease progression' on mpMRI must be further evaluated.

Effect of early salvage radiotherapy at PSA < 0.5 ng/ml and impact of post-SRT PSA nadir in post-prostatectomy recurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

For patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP), salvage radiotherapy (SRT) offers a second chance of cure. European guidelines (EAU) recommend SRT at a PSA < 0.5 ng/ml. We analyze the efficacy of SRT given according to this recommendation and investigate the predictive power of the post-SRT PSA nadir.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2013, 301 patients of two university hospitals received SRT at a PSA < 0.5 ng/ml (median 0.192 ng/ml, IQR 0.110-0.300). Patients, who previously received androgen deprivation therapy, were excluded. All patients had 3D-conformal RT or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT, n = 59) (median 66.6 Gy). The median follow-up was 5.9 years. Progression and overall survival were the endpoints.

RESULTS

After SRT, 252 patients re-achieved an undetectable PSA. In univariate analysis, pre-RP PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml, pT3-4, Gleason score (GS) 7-10 or 8-10, negative surgical margins, post-RP PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/ml, pre-SRT PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml and post-SRT PSA nadir ≥ 0.1 ng/ml correlated unfavorably with post-SRT progression. In a multivariable Cox model, pT3-4, GS 7-10, negative margins and a pre-SRT PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml were significant risk factors. If the post-SRT PSA was added to the analysis, it dominated the outcome (HR = 9.00). Of the patients with a pre-SRT PSA < 0.2 ng/ml, only 9% failed re-achieving an undetectable PSA. Overall survival in these patients was 98% after 5.9 years compared to 91% in patients with higher pre-SRT PSA (Logrank p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

SRT at a PSA < 0.2 ng/ml correlates significantly with achieving a post-SRT undetectable PSA (<0.1 ng/ml) and subsequently with improved freedom from progression. Given these overall favorable outcomes, whether additional androgen deprivation therapy is required for these men requires further study.

Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Prostate Cancer Initiating GnRH Agonists/Antagonists Therapy Using a German Claims Database: Epidemiological and Patient Outcomes

Objective: The objective of this study was to obtain real-world information on gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist (GnRHa) therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa).

Materials and methods: Anonymized, routine healthcare claims data from approx. 75 German statutory health insurance funds from 2010–2015 (n = 4,205,227) were analyzed. Patients had an enrolment of 1 year before GnRHa, 1 index quarter of initial GnRHa prescription and ≥2 years of follow-up.

Results: In total, 2,382 patients with PCa were eligible. The most frequent index therapy was leuprolide in 56.6%. The rank order of PCa comorbidity prevalence was consistent over time (% at index and 3-years of follow-up): hypertension (71.5; 85.0), hyperlipidemia (45.2; 60.8), cardiovascular disease (CVD) (35.7; 54.1), and diabetes (28.3; 36.2). Comparing pooled therapy classes (agonists, hybrids, and antagonist), no significant differences in the incidence of CVD or diabetes were observed. For hypertension, there was a significant increase for agonists (16.4%) compared to antagonists (6.9%, p = 0.022) and leuprolide hybrid group (11.6%, p = 0.006). During the follow-up period 23.9% of all PCa patients died. There were no significant differences concerning mortality rate and discontinuation rates between the cohorts. In total, 11.2% of all patients discontinued GnRHa after first prescription; the mean time to first switch to another GnRHa therapy was 100 days earlier for hybrids than for agonists (p = 0.016).

Conclusion: This comparative retrospective analysis provides real-world information about healthcare characteristics and treatment patterns, highlighting the impact of different GnRHa on clinical outcomes for patients with advanced PCa in Germany.

Patient Selection for Radium-223 Therapy in Patients With Bone Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: New Recommendations and Future Perspectives

Radium-223 therapy was registered in 2013 as a new life-prolonging therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after the phase 3 ALSYMPCA study. Postregistration reports on the use of radium-223 in real-world populations demonstrate that appropriate selection of patients for radium-223 therapy is challenging. While primarily retrospective and post hoc studies identified prognostic variables associated with overall survival, validated predictive biomarkers are still lacking. Important pretherapeutic prognostic variables include the number of prior therapies, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, baseline extent of bone metastatic disease, and baseline alkaline phosphatase, prostate-specific antigen, and lactate dehydrogenase levels. We reviewed the currently available literature to provide recommendations on patient selection for radium-223 therapy in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. In addition, the recent evidence from the report of the European Medicines Agency's Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee regarding the restricted use of radium-223 after interim data analysis of the ERA-223 trial has been incorporated into our recommendations. Future perspectives are also discussed, including radium-223 re-treatment, the use of concomitant therapies, and the implementation of pretherapeutic molecular analysis for treatment stratification.

Remarkable response to abiraterone acetate in castration-resistant prostate cancer patient with aggressive liver metastasis

Introduction

The number of treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has increased in recent years. Abiraterone, which selectively inhibits CYP17 in the androgen synthesis pathway, is widely used. Liver metastasis is one of the worst prognostic factors in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Only a few case reports have shown abiraterone successfully treated the liver metastasis of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old man with prostate-specific antigen of 16.69 ng/mL was diagnosed with Gleason 8 (3 + 5) poorly differentiated prostate adenocarcinoma. Androgen deprivation therapy and sequential anti-androgen replacement were performed; however, the disease advanced to castration-resistant prostate cancer with liver metastasis. Prior to docetaxel, abiraterone achieved marked improvements in liver metastasis and prostate-specific antigen.

Conclusion

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with visceral metastasis were excluded from COU-AA-302, which is phase III trial on abiraterone prior to docetaxel. Although docetaxel is the recommended treatment for the visceral metastasis of castration-resistant prostate cancer according to the European Association of Urology guidelines, abiraterone also has potential as a treatment option.

Molecular underpinnings of enzalutamide resistance

Prostate cancer (PCa) is among the most common adult malignancies, and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. As PCa is hormone dependent, blockade of the androgen receptor (AR) signaling is an effective therapeutic strategy for men with advanced metastatic disease. The discovery of enzalutamide, a compound that effectively blocks the AR axis and its clinical application has led to a significant improvement in survival time. However, the effect of enzalutamide is not permanent, and resistance to treatment ultimately leads to development of lethal disease, for which there currently is no cure. This review will focus on the molecular underpinnings of enzalutamide resistance, bridging the gap between the preclinical and clinical research on novel therapeutic strategies for combating this lethal stage of prostate cancer.

18F-NaF/223RaCl2 theranostics in metastatic prostate cancer: treatment response assessment and prediction of outcome

Theranostics refers to companion agents with identical or similar structure targeted to a specific biological entity for imaging and treatment. Although the concept has a long history with radioiodine in thyroidology, but it has experienced remarkable recent renaissance in management of neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. Bone scintigraphy based on osteoblastic reaction and targeted radionuclide therapy with the alpha-particle calcium-mimetic agent, 223RaCl2, also form a theranostic model for imaging and treatment of osseous metastatic disease. Since the regulatory approval of 223RaCl2 in 2013, there has been accumulating evidence on the potential use of 18F-NaF PET scintigraphy in the assessment of response and prediction of outcome in males with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer who undergo 223RaCl2 therapy. We review the 18F-NaF/223RaCl2 as theranostic companion in the management of prostate cancer with emphasis on the utility of 18F-NaF and other relevant PET radiotracers in the therapy response and prognosis assessments.

Prior switching to a second-line nonsteroidal antiandrogen does not impact the therapeutic efficacy of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Even in the era of novel targeted agents, switching to a second-line nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) is still widely used in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), especially in undeveloped countries. However, whether prior treatment with a second-line NSAA would impact the efficacy of abiraterone acetate (Abi) remains uncertain. In the current study, 87 mCRPC patients treated with Abi were analyzed. Among them, 21 were treated with a second-line NSAA (from bicalutamide to flutamide) before receiving abiraterone, while the remaining 66 received Abi directly. Therapeutic efficacy of Abi was compared between those with and without prior second-line NSAA using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression models. The therapeutic efficacy of Abi was similar between those with or without the prior switching treatment of flutamide, in terms of either prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS, 5.5 vs 5.6 months, P = 0.967), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS, 12.8 vs 13.4 months, P = 0.508), overall survival (OS, not reached vs 30.6 months, P = 0.606), or PSA-response rate (71.4% [15/21] vs 60.6% [40/66], P = 0.370). This is the first time that the impact of prior switching of treatment to a second-line NSAA on the efficacy of Abi in mCRPC patients has been addressed. Our data support that, use of prior sequential bicalutamide and flutamide does not seem to preclude response to abiraterone, although larger cohort studies and, ideally, a randomized controlled trial are needed. These findings will facilitate doctors' decision-making in the treatment of mCRPC patients, especially for those with previous experience of switching NSAA second-line treatments in the clinic.

Impact of sodium 18F-fluoride PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI on the management of patients with prostate cancer suspicious for metastasis: a prospective multicentre study

PURPOSE

To compare the impact of 18F-sodium-fluoride (NaF) PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT and diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI (DW-MRI) on the management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) suspicious for distant metastasis.

METHODS

Prostate cancer patients were prospectively included between December 2011 and August 2014 and benefited from these three whole-body imaging (WBI) modalities within 1 month in addition to the standard PCa workup. Management was prospectively decided by clinicians during two multidisciplinary meetings, before and after the whole-body imaging workup. Rates of induced changes of whole-body imaging modalities were compared by Cochran's Q test.

RESULTS

One-hundred-one patients (27 at staging, 59 at first biochemical recurrence (BCR) and 15 at first episode of rising serum level of prostate-specific antigen during androgen-deprivation therapy) were included. The overall rate of management changes was 52%: 29% as a consequence of WBI, higher for FCH-PET/CT than for NaF-PET/CT or DW-MRI (p < 0.0001) and highest (41%) for FCH-PET/CT at BCR. Actual management was adequate in all patients but two.

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-body imaging induced a change in management in approximately a third of PCa patients suspicious for metastasis. The impact rate was determined to be greatest at first BCR using FCH-PET/CT. NaF-PET/CT and DW-MRI seemed less useful in this context.

Current therapeutic options in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The tumors of many patients with prostate cancer eventually become refractory to androgen deprivation therapy with progression to metastatic castration-resistant disease. Significant advances in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have been made in recent years, and new treatment strategies have recently been made available. The aim of this report was to schematically review all the approved pharmacologic treatment options for patients with mCRPC through 2018, analyzing the efficacy and possible side effects of each therapy to assist clinicians in reaching an appropriate treatment decision. New biomarkers potentially of aid in the choice of treatment in this setting are also briefly reviewed.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of clinical trials of new drugs and treatments for patients diagnosed with mCRPC published through 2018.

RESULTS

Two new hormonal drugs, abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide have been approved by FDA in 2011 and 2012, respectively for the treatment of patients with mCRPC and have undergone extensive testing. While these treatments have shown a benefit in progression-free and overall survival, the appropriate sequencing must still be determined so that treatment decisions can be made based on their specific clinical profile. Cabazitaxel has been shown to be an efficient therapeutic option in a postdocetaxel setting, while its role in chemotherapy-naïve patients must still be determined. Sipuleucel-T and radium-223 have been studied in patients without visceral metastases and have achieved overall survival benefits with good safety profiles. The feasibility and efficacy of combinations of new treatments with other known therapies such as chemotherapy are currently under investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug development efforts continue to attempt to prolong survival and improve quality of life in the mCRPC setting, with several therapeutic options available. Ongoing and future trials are needed to further assess the efficacy and safety of these new drugs and their interactions, along with the most appropriate sequencing.

A Territory-wide, Multicenter, Age- and Prostate-specific Antigen-matched Study Comparing Chemohormonal Therapy and Hormonal Therapy Alone in Chinese Men With Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of real-world data regarding the treatment outcomes of chemohormonal therapy versus hormonal therapy alone in Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a territory-wide, multicenter, age- and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-matched cohort study comparing chemohormonal therapy and hormonal therapy alone in Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Patient and disease characteristics were reviewed. The primary outcome was PSA progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included clinical progression-free survival and castration resistance-free survival. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

From January 2015 to July 2016, 32 Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were treated with chemohormonal therapy, and they were matched to 32 Chinese men who were treated with hormonal therapy alone. Patient and disease characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The chemohormonal therapy group had a significantly better PSA progression-free survival (P = .001) and castration resistance-free survival (P = .002) than the hormonal therapy group. There was no significant difference in the clinical progression-free survival between the 2 groups. Upon multivariate Cox regression analyses, the use of chemohormonal therapy was significantly associated with a longer time to PSA progression (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.73; P = .008) and a longer time to castration resistance (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.83; P = .015), but was not associated with clinical progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of chemohormonal therapy could prevent PSA progression and the development of castration resistance when compared with hormonal therapy alone in Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostatic cancer.

LXRs, SHP, and FXR in Prostate Cancer: Enemies or Ménage à Quatre With AR?

Androgens and androgen receptor (AR, NR3C4) clearly play a crucial role in prostate cancer progression. Besides, the link between metabolic disorders and the risk of developing a prostate cancer has been emerging these last years. Interestingly, “lipid” nuclear receptors such as LXRα/NR1H3 and LXRβ/NR1H2 (as well as FXRα/NR1H4 and SHP/NR0B2) have been described to decrease the lipid metabolism, while AR increases it. Moreover, these former orphan nuclear receptors can regulate androgen levels and modulate AR activity. Thus, it is not surprising to find such receptors involved in the physiology of prostate. This review is focused on the roles of liver X receptors (LXRs), farnesoid X receptor (FXR), and small heterodimeric partner (SHP) in prostate physiology and their capabilities to interfere with the androgen-regulated pathways by modulating the levels of active androgen within the prostate. By the use of prostate cancer cell lines, mice deficient for these nuclear receptors and human tissue libraries, several authors have pointed out the putative possibility to pharmacologically target these receptors. These data open a new field of research for the development of new drugs that could overcome the castration resistance in prostate cancer, a usual phenomenon in patients.

Taxane-based chemohormonal therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

There has been considerable development in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer over the last decade. A number of agents, including docetaxel, cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide and sipuleucel-T, have been reported to improve outcomes in men with castration-resistant disease and their use is being explored in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of early taxane-based chemohormonal therapy for newly diagnosed, metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 10 August 2018. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials in which participants were administered taxane-based chemotherapy with systemic androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) within 120 days of beginning ADT versus ADT alone at the time of diagnosis of metastatic disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently classified studies and abstracted data from the included studies. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the quality of evidence according to the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

The search identified three studies in which 2,261 participants were randomized to receive either ADT alone, or taxane-based chemotherapy at a dose of 75mg per square meter of body surface area at three-weekly intervals for six or nine cycles in addition to ADT.Primary outcomesEarly treatment with taxane-based chemotherapy in addition to ADT probably reduces death from any cause compared to ADT alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.87; moderate-certainty evidence); this would result in 94 fewer deaths per 1,000 men (95% CI 51 to 137 fewer deaths). We downgraded the certainty of evidence due to study limitations related to potential performance bias. Based on the results of one study with 375 participants, the addition of taxane-based chemotherapy to ADT may increase the incidence of Grade III to V adverse events compared to ADT alone (risk ratio (RR) 2.98, 95% CI 2.19 to 4.04; low-certainty evidence); this would result in 405 more Grade III to V adverse events per 1,000 men (95% CI 243 to 621 more events). We downgraded the certainty of evidence due to study limitations and imprecision.Secondary outcomesEarly taxane-based chemotherapy in addition to ADT probably reduces the risk of prostate cancer-specific death (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89; moderate-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence due to study limitations related to potential performance and detection bias. The addition of taxane-based chemotherapy also probably reduces disease progression compared to ADT alone (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.71; moderate-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence because of study limitations related to potential performance bias. The addition of taxane-based chemotherapy to ADT may result in a large increase in the risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 79.41, 95% CI 4.92 to 1282.78; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence due to study limitations and imprecision. This estimate is derived from a single study with no events in the control arm but a discontinuation rate of 20% in the intervention arm. Taxane-based chemotherapy may increase the incidence of adverse events of any grade (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.17; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded our assessment of the certainty of evidence due to very serious study limitations. There may be a small improvement, which may not be clinically important, in quality of life at 12 months with combination treatment (mean difference (MD) 2.85 on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate scale, 95% CI 0.13 higher to 5.57 higher; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for study limitations related to potential performance, detection and attrition bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to ADT alone, the early (within 120 days of beginning ADT) addition of taxane-based chemotherapy to ADT for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer probably prolongs both overall and disease-specific survival and delays disease progression. There may be an increase in toxicity with taxane-based chemotherapy in combination with ADT. There may also be a small, clinically unimportant improvement in quality of life at 12 months with taxane-based chemotherapy and ADT treatment.

Single-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Lymph Node Relapse in Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) emerged as a treatment option in oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) patients experiencing lymph node relapse from treated prostate cancer. No recommendations are available concerning dose schedule, and available studies report the use of multiple-fraction regimens due to theoretical lower toxicity and higher cumulative dose delivered to the target. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a dose-intensive, single-fraction SBRT regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective data on outcome and toxicity from 27 treatments on 23 consecutive patients were collected. Statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 22 months (range 6-63, interquartile range 15-28). Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 65%, 40%, and 26%, respectively. In 2 cases acute toxicity of grade 1 were observed.

CONCLUSION

Single-fraction SBRT for lymph node relapse of oligometastatic prostate cancer resulted in promising biochemical control with minimal toxicity.

Consensus on management of castration-resistant prostate cancer on behalf of the Urological Tumours Working Group (URONCOR) of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology

BACKGROUND

The knowledge in the field of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is developing rapidly, with emerging new therapies and advances in imaging. Nonetheless, in multiple areas there is still a lack of or very limited evidence, and clear guidance from clinicians regarding optimal strategy is required.

METHODS

A modified Delphi method, with 116 relevant questions divided into 7 different CRPC management topics, was used to develop a consensus statement by the URONCOR group.

RESULTS

A strong consensus or unanimity was reached on 93% of the proposed questions. The seven topics addressed were: CRPC definition, symptomatic patients, diagnosis of metastasis, CRPC progression, M0 management, M1 management and sequencing therapy, and treatment monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations based on the radiation oncology experts' opinions are intended to provide cancer specialists with expert guidance and to standardise CRPC patient management in Spain, facilitating decision-making in different clinically relevant issues regarding CRPC patients.

Identifying the Optimal Candidate for Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Results from a Large, Multi-institutional Analysis

BACKGROUND

Salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) represents a possible treatment option for prostate cancer patients affected by nodal recurrence after local treatment. However, SLND may be associated with intra- and postoperative complications, and the oncological benefit may be limited to specific groups of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the optimal candidates for SLND based on preoperative characteristics.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The study included 654 patients who experienced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) rise and nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and underwent SLND at nine tertiary referral centers. Lymph node recurrence was documented by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan using either ¹¹C-choline or ⁶⁸Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand.

INTERVENTION

SLND.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The study outcome was early clinical recurrence (eCR) developed within 1 yr after SLND. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to develop a predictive model. Multivariable-derived coefficients were used to develop a novel risk calculator. Decision-curve analysis was used to evaluate the net benefit of the predictive model.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median follow-up was 30 (interquartile range, 16-50) mo among patients without clinical recurrence (CR), and 334 patients developed CR after SLND. In particular, eCR at 1 yr after SLND was observed in 150 patients, with a Kaplan-Meier probability of eCR equal to 25%. The development of eCR was significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality at 3 yr, being 20% versus 1.4% in patients with and without eCR, respectively (p<0.0001). At multivariable analysis, Gleason grade group 5 (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.04; p<0.0001), time from RP to PSA rising (HR: 0.99; p=0.025), hormonal therapy administration at PSA rising after RP (HR: 1.47; p=0.0005), retroperitoneal uptake at PET/CT scan (HR: 1.24; p=0.038), three or more positive spots at PET/CT scan (HR: 1.26; p=0.019), and PSA level at SLND (HR: 1.05; p<0.0001) were significant predictors of CR after SLND. The coefficients of the predictive model were used to develop a risk calculator for eCR at 1 yr after SLND. The discrimination of the model (Harrel'sC index) was 0.75. At decision-curve analysis, the net benefit of the model was higher than the "treat-all" option at all the threshold probabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

We reported the largest available series of patients treated with SLND. Roughly 25% of men developed eCR after surgery. We developed the first risk stratification tool to identify the optimal candidate to SLND based on routinely available preoperative characteristics. This tool can be useful to avoid use of SLND in men more likely to progress despite any imaging-guided approach.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The risk of early recurrence after salvage lymph node dissection (SLND) was approximately 25%. In this study, we developed a novel tool to predict the risk of early failure after SLND. This tool will be useful to identify patients who would benefit the most from SLND from other patients who should be spared from surgery.

Metastases-yield and Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics Following Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer: A Comparison Between Conventional Surgical Approach and Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-radioguided Surgery

The first results on ^99mTechnetium prostate-specific membrane antigen-radioguided surgery (^99mTc-PSMA- RGS) showed promising outcome. Here, we sought to evaluate if this targeted molecular surgical approach might be more effective than conventional salvage lymph node dissection (sLND). We prospectively analysed 42 consecutive patients who underwent sLND based on preoperative ⁶⁸Gallium (⁶⁸Ga)-PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging between 2015 and 2018. In 29 patients, the dissection field was based solely ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET imaging (conventional surgical approach [CSA]), whereas 13 patients underwent ^99mTc-PSMA-RGS. Preoperative characteristics of both groups were similar. Final pathology revealed no metastases in nine CSA patients (31%), whereas all visible lesions on preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-PET were removed in patients who underwent RGS. A PSA decline in general, >50% and >90% within 6 wk was seen in 50%, 29%, and 7% versus 100%, 92%, and 53% in CSA versus RGS groups, respectively (all p<0.01). This is the first comparison of conventional and PSMA-radioguided approach with regards to short-term efficacy of sLND. Although long-term outcome needs to be awaited, RGS offers promising results. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared two surgical approaches for lymph node dissection in lymph node only recurrent prostate cancer patients. The radioguided approach was superior in removing the affected lymph nodes, resulting in a more pronounced prostate-specific antigen decline.

Combining anticancer drugs with osteoprotective agents in prostate cancer-A contemporary update

Recently, a plethora of life-prolonging cytotoxic, next-generation hormonal, immunotherapeutical as well as radionuclide therapies has emerged as a standard care for metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer. Being strikingly effective in cancer control, these novel therapies might in fact exert a beneficial impact on skeletal events. Therefore, combining anticancer drugs with osteoprotective agents might lead to additional clinical advantage but must be weighed against simultaneously exposing patients to serious toxicities. In addition, further survival prolongation by changing treatment paradigm in both metastasized hormone-sensitive and nonmetastatic castration-resistant disease might potentially increase the risk for bone density reduction complications due to a growing efficacy of androgen ablation leading to prolonged exposure. To address both possible indications of combined treatment and to draw practical conclusions, we performed a comprehensive review of the currently available evidence.

Effect on Survival of Androgen Deprivation Therapy Alone Compared to Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Concurrent Radiation Therapy to the Prostate in Patients with Primary Bone Metastatic Prostate Cancer in a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial: Data from the HORRAD Trial

BACKGROUND

The cornerstone of standard treatment for patients with primary bone metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Retrospective studies suggest a survival benefit for treatment of the primary prostatic tumour in mPCa, but to date, no randomised-controlled-trials (RCTs) have been published addressing this issue.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether overall survival is prolonged by adding local treatment of the primary prostatic tumour with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to ADT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The HORRAD trial is a multicentre RCT recruiting 432 patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20ng/ml and primary bone mPCa on bone scan between 2004 and 2014.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised to either ADT with EBRT (radiotherapy group) or ADT alone (control group).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoint was time to PSA progression. Crude and adjusted analyses were applied to evaluate treatment effect.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Median PSA level was 142ng/ml and 67% of patients had more than five osseous metastases. Median follow up was 47 mo. Median overall survival was 45 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.4-49.6) in the radiotherapy group and 43 mo (95% CI: 32.6-53.4) in the control group (p=0.4). No significant difference was found in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.70-1.14; p=0.4). Median time to PSA progression in the radiotherapy group was 15 mo (95% CI: 11.8-18.2), compared with 12 mo (95% CI: 10.6-13.4) in the control group. The crude HR (0.78; 95% CI: 0.63-0.97) was statistically significant (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The current RCT comparing ADT to ADT with EBRT to the prostate in patients with primary bone mPCa did not show a significant difference in overall survival, although the CI cannot exclude a substantial survival benefit. Further research is needed to confirm our findings.

PATIENT SUMMARY

This study investigated the effect of adding radiation therapy to the prostate to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer patients with metastasis to the bone at diagnosis. In our patient group, additional radiotherapy did not improve overall survival. Further research is needed to confirm our findings.

TWITTER SUMMARY

Adding radiotherapy to the prostate in patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer does not improve overall survival.